Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A major focus is Elina Kupce, the former deputy chief of staff in Morales’ office who reportedly was not a U.S. citizen. Rob says the issue is especially serious because the Secretary of State oversees elections, businesses, and sensitive information tied to millions of Hoosiers. He notes that Morales finally addressed the controversy in a letter to delegates, but did not appear to deny that Kupce was a noncitizen, while Treasurer Daniel Elliott has gone further by claiming she was illegally in the country.

Rob also criticizes Elliott, Todd Rokita, Jim Banks, Mike Braun, Micah Beckwith, and other Republicans for acting concerned now after years of silence. He says if they truly believe Morales has done something serious enough to resign, they should be calling for criminal and ethics investigations, not just trying to push him off the ballot. Rob argues the party does not want the full truth exposed because it could implicate the broader Republican network that funded, protected, and benefited from Morales.

The show also steps back into a broader discussion about what the Republican Party has become. Rob reflects on once seeing the GOP as a place for free thought, low taxes, accountability, and policing its own, but says that has been replaced by Trump loyalty as the main standard. He points to Morales using his loyalty to Trump as a defense and argues the party now often excuses bad behavior as long as someone is aligned with the right political faction.

The episode closes with Rob discussing Ken Paxton winning the Republican Senate runoff in Texas, despite years of serious ethical and legal controversies. Rob compares the reaction to Paxton with the Morales situation, saying Republicans are increasingly willing to celebrate deeply flawed candidates if they have Trump’s support. He warns that while Trump’s endorsement can still dominate Republican primaries, candidates like Paxton may become major liabilities in general elections when voters outside the party base start paying attention.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Rob also criticizes Governor Mike Braun for refusing to take a position on Morales, despite the mounting scandals and recent reporting about former deputy chief of staff Elena Copsey. He argues Braun is treating the race like a normal convention fight, when the issue is really about whether a statewide officeholder who oversees elections and business records has abused public trust. Rob says Braun’s silence is about political self-preservation, shared donors, and avoiding anything that could implicate the broader Republican power structure.

A major part of the show breaks down the sudden push behind Max Engling as the Republican alternative to Morales. Rob argues the move is less about finding the most qualified person and more about Jim Banks and Todd Rokita trying to increase their control inside the Indiana Republican Party. He questions why party leaders did not rally behind David Shelton, who actually has election experience, and instead moved toward someone closely tied to Banks after years of standing by Morales.

The show also turns to Indiana’s suspended gas taxes, with Rob arguing the pause proves taxes make everyday life more expensive. While he credits Braun for suspending the sales and excise taxes on gas, Rob says the move only happened because voters are furious about high gas prices and because those prices are hurting Trump politically. He warns that if state leaders truly believed the gas taxes were wrong, they would work to eliminate them permanently instead of temporarily suspending them when people are paying attention.

The episode closes with a sharp critique of Trump’s handling of the Iran conflict and the confusion around a possible deal. Rob says Trump created unnecessary chaos by suggesting a deal was close without clearly explaining what was in it, leading even supporters like Lindsey Graham, Ted Cruz, and Roger Wicker to raise concerns. He argues the administration needs a clear outcome that stops Iran’s nuclear ambitions and support for terrorism, and says Trump’s public messaging has made an already difficult foreign policy situation even more unstable.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Rob spends much of the show calling out what he sees as gaslighting from Republican officials who previously ignored, defended, or endorsed Morales. He points to questions surrounding the India trip, no-bid contracts, the $90,000 vehicle, use of state resources, and the recent reporting about former deputy chief of staff Elena Copsey. Rob argues that if party leaders were serious about accountability, they would be demanding investigations and answers, not simply pushing Morales aside before the convention.

The show also digs into Jim Banks’ role in backing Max Engling as the new Republican alternative for Secretary of State. Rob questions Banks’ explanation that the Copsey story was the final straw, arguing that Engling’s name had already been circulating before that reporting became public. He suggests powerful Republicans may have known about the issue earlier and held it back until Morales became too big of a political liability.

Another major topic is whether Copsey, who reportedly rose to deputy chief of staff in Morales’ office, was not only a noncitizen but possibly in the country illegally. Rob highlights comments from Treasurer Daniel Elliott that appear to suggest that possibility and says reporters should press Banks, Rokita, Elliott, and Morales for clear answers. He argues the distinction matters because Republican leaders built their politics around “America First” messaging while apparently ignoring major questions inside one of Indiana’s most sensitive statewide offices.

The episode closes with Rob arguing that Morales should stay in the race rather than allow party leaders to quietly push him out and bury the story. He says the situation could expose how the Republican power structure really works, especially if Morales starts talking about the people who enabled him. Rob also highlights Greg Ballard’s reaction, saying the chaos helps prove Ballard’s argument that more competition is needed in Indiana politics because the current system protects insiders instead of voters.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A major part of the show centers on Max Engling entering the Republican Secretary of State race and the role Rob believes Jim Banks is playing behind the scenes. Rob questions why party leaders suddenly describe Engling as the “viable” alternative when David Shelton, a county clerk with actual election experience, has already been running. He argues the move is less about qualifications and more about power, control, and preventing Morales from dragging the party down in November.

Rob also reacts to Jim Banks and Todd Rokita withdrawing their endorsements of Morales. He criticizes both for backing Morales despite years of controversies, then only changing course when it looked like Republicans could lose the office. Rob says the real issue is that they still are not publicly demanding answers about Morales’ India trip, no-bid contracts, use of state resources, the $90,000 car, or the recent questions surrounding former deputy chief of staff Elena Copsey.

The show also looks at how Republican officials and state lawmakers are responding to Rob’s criticism. Rob says politicians are trying to dismiss him as irrelevant or bitter while avoiding the underlying issue: they failed to deal with Morales when they had the chance. He argues the audience continues to support the show because it says plainly what many people in Indiana politics already know but refuse to say publicly.

The episode closes with Rob urging people not to let the Morales story disappear just because party leaders may try to replace him. He says the public still deserves answers about what happened inside the Secretary of State’s office and why so many powerful Republicans protected Morales for so long. Rob also highlights his latest IndyStar column on school referendums, arguing that Indiana lawmakers should eliminate a system he says is rigged in favor of local governments and school districts seeking more taxpayer money.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Kendall expands that into a broader warning about where the Republican Party is headed. He argues the party is increasingly demanding total obedience to Trump, even from lawmakers like Lauren Boebert who have been loyal but still supported Massie. Kendall says the real test will come in November, when Trump-backed primary winners have to face the larger general electorate, which polling shows is far less enthusiastic about Trump’s policies than Republican primary voters are.

The show also revisits new reporting from Indy Politics about Secretary of State Diego Morales and a former high-ranking employee in his office. Kendall highlights questions about whether Elena Copsey, who reportedly served as deputy chief of staff, was a noncitizen and how someone with limited government experience rose to such a senior role. He argues Morales needs to answer basic questions about her status, what she did in the office, why she left, and whether she had access to sensitive information tied to elections and Indiana businesses.

Another major topic is the sudden entrance of Max Engling into the Republican Secretary of State race. Kendall explains how the state convention process works and says Engling’s candidacy likely reflects growing concern among delegates that Diego Morales could be a disaster in the general election. While Kendall says David Shelton remains the most qualified candidate, he argues both Shelton and Engling need to directly confront Morales’ record if they want to beat him at convention.

The episode closes with a broader look at Republican primary voters versus the general electorate. Kendall argues that while Trump endorsements remain powerful inside GOP primaries, national polling suggests the wider public is increasingly unhappy with inflation, gas prices, spending, and the direction of the country. His warning is that Republicans may keep winning internal party fights while setting themselves up for major losses in the fall if they ignore what voters outside the Trump base are saying.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Kendall focuses heavily on the implications of a high-ranking official in the Secretary of State’s office potentially being a non-citizen, especially in an office that oversees elections, businesses, and sensitive information tied to millions of Hoosiers. He questions how someone with no listed prior government experience rose so quickly to a senior role and why the position was not publicly posted. He also says Morales should immediately answer the questions raised by the reporting instead of falling back on his usual strategy of attacking the media and waiting for the story to fade.

The show also covers Paula Copenhaver officially requesting a recount in her extremely close Senate primary race against Spencer Deery. Kendall says a recount is fair given the margin, but criticizes Copenhaver’s legal strategy of trying to subpoena 14 voters and question whether they were eligible to vote in the Republican primary based on alleged crossover voting. He argues that if voters are legally registered and cast legal ballots, attempting to invalidate them over presumed political intent is dangerous and could set a terrible precedent.

That discussion leads into a broader critique of Indiana Republicans pushing to close primaries after the Deery race. Kendall points out that Republicans have benefited from open primaries in the past, including Mike Braun’s own explanation years ago that he voted in Democratic primaries because those races determined local offices where he lived. Kendall argues that if taxpayers fund party primaries, voters should be allowed to choose which ballot they want, especially in heavily gerrymandered areas where the primary is often the only election that matters.

The episode closes with a look at the Chicago Bears stadium situation and whether Indiana is still being used as leverage against Illinois. Kendall says he originally believed the Bears were mostly using Indiana to force a better deal in Illinois, but now thinks Indiana’s offer may be so generous that the team could seriously consider leaving. He argues the Bears are ultimately a business chasing the best financial deal, and warns that Indiana taxpayers could end up subsidizing a multibillion-dollar franchise if Illinois fails to get its act together.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Kendall then shifts into a larger question about what the Republican Party is becoming, using Congressman Thomas Massie’s primary fight as the central example. He argues Massie represents many of the principles Republicans claim to support, including lower spending, smaller government, transparency, and skepticism of foreign wars. Despite that, Massie is being targeted by Trump and outside groups because he has been willing to challenge the president.

The show also examines how loyalty to Trump has become the dominant force in Republican primaries. Kendall points to polling showing a Trump endorsement remains the most powerful factor among Republican voters, but questions whether that power helps the party in general elections when Trump’s broader economic numbers are weak. He warns that a party built around obedience to one person rather than policy principles may struggle once voters begin judging results outside of the primary electorate.

Another major topic is the influence of issues like AI, tech companies, and data centers on voters. Kendall highlights polling showing both Trump and Harris voters are increasingly concerned about regulating AI and large tech companies, calling it a major warning sign for local officials dealing with data center fights in Indiana. He argues candidates who take a strong but reasonable position on data centers could find real support across party lines.

The episode closes with Kendall reflecting on what Massie’s race could reveal about the future of the Republican Party. If Massie wins, Kendall says it may show there is still room for independent thought and policy-driven conservatism. If he loses, he argues it will signal that the party has moved even further toward personality-driven politics, where disagreement with Trump is treated as disloyalty no matter how conservative a person’s record may be.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The show then shifts to Brownsburg, where the school system reached an agreement with local government entities to avoid pursuing a school referendum. Kendall explains how the deal came together and frames it as an example of what can happen when officials actually look for creative ways to protect taxpayers. While he remains critical of school spending overall, he gives Brownsburg credit for choosing a smaller, negotiated solution instead of asking voters for a tax increase that would fall outside the property tax caps.

Kendall also uses the Brownsburg example to warn other communities about the wave of school referendums expected across Indiana this fall. He argues many school districts will use referendums as an easy way to raise taxes rather than making difficult budget decisions. Kendall lays out a strategy for opposing them, including organizing a group, forming a political action committee, raising money, identifying the strongest arguments against the proposal, and making sure voters understand how much their taxes could increase.

Another major topic is the renewed Republican push to close Indiana’s primary elections after concerns that Democrats may have crossed over in the Spencer Deery and Paula Copenhaver race. Kendall argues that if taxpayers are funding party primaries, voters should be allowed to choose which ballot they want. He points out that heavily gerrymandered districts often make the primary the only meaningful election, meaning independents and minority-party voters may have no real voice unless they participate in the dominant party’s primary.

The episode closes with a broader critique of political control inside Indiana’s Republican Party. Kendall argues the push for closed primaries is less about principle and more about preventing dissent, limiting voter choice, and protecting insiders from challenges they do not like. He says Republicans who want closed primaries should also support nonpartisan map-drawing, arguing that they should not be allowed to rig districts and then complain when voters use the only election that matters to have a say.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Kendall also reacts to news that lawmakers will study the property assessment process during the summer, but he is skeptical anything meaningful will come from it. He compares the study committee to a delaying tactic, saying lawmakers already know the system is broken but are trying to buy time after homeowners opened new assessment notices and saw their bills rise. He criticizes state leaders for claiming they are still “having conversations” about property taxes after years of warnings and failed reform efforts.

The show also covers the future of Indiana’s suspended gas taxes, as Governor Braun’s temporary pause is set to expire unless the General Assembly acts. Kendall questions why Braun is willing to call special sessions for issues like redistricting but appears hesitant when it comes to extending tax relief for drivers. He argues the pattern shows Braun is more willing to fight for Trump’s priorities than for policies that directly save Hoosiers money.

Another major topic is the razor-thin Senate race between Spencer Deery and Paula Copenhaver, where Deery’s lead has grown to three votes with only two provisional ballots left to count. Kendall explains how provisional ballots and recount timelines work, using the race as a clear example of why individual votes matter. He also raises concerns about Secretary of State Diego Morales potentially overseeing a recount after aligning himself with Turning Point USA, which backed Copenhaver.

The episode closes with a broader discussion about the role of the Secretary of State’s office and why Kendall believes it should be a boring, administrative position rather than a political machine. He points to Greg Ballard’s pledge not to endorse candidates in races his office would oversee as an example of why neutrality matters. Kendall argues the office has become increasingly politicized, especially under Diego Morales, and says that creates real problems when close elections and recounts require public trust.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A major theme throughout the show is frustration with Indiana Republicans taking conservative voters for granted. Kendall argues the party has spent years governing poorly because it rarely faces serious electoral consequences, allowing politicians to focus more on donors, lobbyists, and internal power struggles than actual policy outcomes. He says the possibility of a viable third party could finally pressure Republicans into governing differently by creating real competition outside the normal two-party structure.

The show also breaks down a complicated legal fight involving Attorney General Todd Rokita, Hamilton County GOP chairman Mario Massillamany, and a nonprofit organization called Third Phase Inc. Kendall walks listeners through allegations that the nonprofit failed to follow basic operating requirements while attempting to sell valuable property to Massillamany at what Rokita’s office claims was far below market value. He describes the dispute as a potentially major story because it involves some of the most powerful Republican figures in Indiana openly accusing each other of misconduct and political retaliation.

Another segment focuses on Republican hypocrisy surrounding suspending the federal gas tax. Kendall points out that several Republican senators who now support suspending the tax under President Trump strongly opposed the exact same idea when President Biden proposed it just a few years ago. While Kendall supports lowering taxes, he argues politicians continue using temporary tax cuts without reducing government spending, which ultimately leads to more debt, inflation, and higher long-term costs for taxpayers.

The episode closes with criticism of comments Trump made regarding Iran and the economy. Kendall argues Trump sounded tone deaf when dismissing concerns about rising costs and inflation while insisting the focus should remain entirely on preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. He says many middle-class voters supported Trump specifically because they wanted relief from rising prices, and warns that continuing economic pain tied to gas prices, electricity costs, and inflation could weaken the coalition that helped return Trump to office.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A major part of the show centers on how Indiana Republicans continue prioritizing internal political fights and party control over issues affecting everyday Hoosiers. Kendall criticizes lawmakers for focusing on things like closing primary elections while problems like gas taxes, utility costs, and corruption at the IEDC continue unresolved. He argues modern politics has become more about optics, social media, and loyalty than producing actual results that improve people’s lives.

The conversation also revisits the razor-thin Senate primary race between incumbent Spencer Deery and challenger Paula Copenhaver. Kendall explains how provisional ballots work and walks listeners through the remaining vote-counting process as Deery holds a two-vote lead. He uses the race as an example of how every vote truly matters, while also arguing the contest reflected broader political grudges tied to figures like Mitch Daniels, Rod Bray, and Todd Young rather than simply policy disagreements.

Another segment examines growing distrust in government following polling showing a surprisingly high percentage of Americans believe the assassination attempts against Donald Trump may have been staged. Kendall argues the numbers reflect years of dishonesty and manipulation from political leaders and institutions, which has left many people skeptical of almost everything they hear from government or the media. While acknowledging widespread distrust is understandable, he also says some conspiracy theories surrounding the attacks go far beyond reasonable skepticism.

The show closes with a broader discussion about money and revenge politics inside the Republican Party, highlighted by massive spending against Congressman Thomas Massie in Kentucky. Kendall argues Republicans increasingly punish lawmakers who consistently stick to conservative principles on spending and government size, while rewarding loyalty and political obedience instead. He frames the situation as another example of how both parties are drifting further away from policy-focused governance and deeper into personality-driven politics fueled by money and outside influence.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

He also pushes back against criticism he received during Indiana’s own redistricting debate, arguing many Republicans openly admitted they cared more about partisan advantage than drawing districts that actually reflected communities. Kendall says the Virginia case highlights a larger national problem where political parties increasingly prioritize maintaining power over representing voters fairly. He argues elections should be won through ideas and governance rather than engineered maps designed to protect incumbents or party control.

Another major segment focuses on money in politics and growing frustration over the influence of donors, PACs, and special interests. Kendall discusses new polling showing overwhelming bipartisan concern about the role money plays in elections and admits his own views on campaign finance have shifted over time. While he once strongly believed political donations were simply free speech, he now argues the current system overwhelmingly benefits wealthy interests while making it nearly impossible for ordinary people to compete for higher office.

The show also examines how special interests shape policy decisions in Indiana, particularly around utilities, data centers, and lobbying efforts at the Statehouse. Kendall argues many of the policies hurting taxpayers can be traced directly back to industries spending huge amounts of money on politicians and lobbying campaigns. He says the average voter increasingly understands that major donors and connected interests often have far more influence over government than everyday residents.

The episode wraps with a longer reflection on risk-taking, using the Indiana Pacers’ controversial trade for center Ivica Zubac as a jumping-off point. Kendall argues that while the trade could ultimately fail, successful organizations and individuals often have to take calculated risks rather than playing everything safe. He ties that idea back into his own career decisions and the move into independent media, emphasizing that even uncertain opportunities are worth pursuing if there’s a chance to build something bigger long term.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A major part of the show centers on Trump endorsements during the primaries and Kendall’s belief that many voters treated them as unquestionable instructions rather than evaluating candidates individually. He argues several politicians who received Trump’s backing, including longtime lawmakers with records unpopular among conservatives, used the endorsements strategically despite not actually supporting the broader movement behind them. Kendall specifically points to comments from Senator Ron Alting after his reelection as proof that redistricting was more political theater than a genuine policy fight.

The conversation also shifts to former Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard’s effort to create a new “Lincoln Party” in Indiana. Kendall explains how Ballard is attempting to collect enough signatures to secure ballot access for a third party and argues that more political competition would ultimately benefit voters. While stopping short of endorsing Ballard or the party itself, Kendall says giving Hoosiers additional choices outside the Republican and Democrat structures could help challenge the current system and open the door for more independent-minded candidates.

Another major topic involves Attorney General Todd Rokita and controversy surrounding an investigation into a Monroe County man who posted “86” on elected officials’ Facebook pages. Kendall criticizes the move by Rokita’s office to send an investigator to the man’s home and threaten possible charges, arguing it crosses the line into government intimidation over protected speech. At the same time, he also points out what he sees as hypocrisy from Rokita, comparing the aggressive response in this case to the attorney general’s refusal to investigate questions surrounding Secretary of State Diego Morales and his trip to India.

The episode closes with a broader reflection on political culture both in Indiana and nationally. Kendall argues both parties increasingly punish dissent and discourage independent thought, while political influencers and elected officials focus more on loyalty and attention than policy results. He emphasizes that his criticism comes from frustration with rising costs, government expansion, and a lack of accountability, insisting that voters should demand concrete solutions instead of simply rallying behind personalities or party factions.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

What else went into a bad night for the establishment? What's next for the Indiana Senate? Rob Kendall, Abdul-Hakim Shabazz, and Jim Merritt tackle these questions and more on Statehouse Happenings.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Kendall also questions the timing and reasoning behind Braun’s decision, especially after earlier claims that suspending certain taxes supposedly wasn’t legally possible. He argues the issue isn’t simply high gas prices, but the fact that government leaders continue taking more money because they can. The broader frustration centers on what he sees as a lack of accountability in state government, with taxes and fees constantly increasing while everyday costs continue climbing for Indiana residents.

Another major segment reflects on the death of media mogul Ted Turner and the enormous impact he had on American television and pop culture. Kendall walks through Turner’s legacy building TBS, CNN, TNT, and World Championship Wrestling, while also sharing memories of growing up watching Cubs and Braves games during the height of cable television. He frames Turner as one of the most influential and fascinating media figures of the last century, someone whose reach extended across sports, entertainment, news, and broadcasting.

The show then returns to the fallout from Indiana’s Senate primaries and the criticism Kendall received over his election coverage. He reiterates that he never supported the incumbents who lost, but argues many challengers also failed to offer specific policy ideas or real solutions for issues like property taxes, utility bills, or government corruption. Kendall pushes back on attacks from national conservative influencers and Turning Point USA figures, saying too much of the political movement is driven by loyalty to personalities rather than concrete plans to improve life for Hoosiers.

The episode closes with a broader reflection on the current state of Republican politics both nationally and in Indiana. Kendall argues voters are being asked to choose between establishment politicians and social media-driven political movements, while many of the core problems affecting taxpayers remain unresolved. He emphasizes that his focus remains on government accountability and policy outcomes rather than party loyalty, insisting that simply changing personalities in office means very little without meaningful reform behind it.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A major theme throughout the show is the role redistricting played in the primaries and how much influence President Trump and outside political groups had on the races. Kendall argues the push to remove Senate leader Rod Bray was driven more by loyalty to Trump than by any genuine effort to improve governance in Indiana. While he remains highly critical of Bray and longtime establishment Republicans, he also questions whether replacing them with candidates tied to Turning Point USA or Trump-backed movements will actually produce better results for taxpayers.

The show also breaks down several of the biggest Senate race results, including the defeats of longtime lawmakers Travis Holdman, Jim Buck, and Greg Walker. Kendall argues those incumbents lost largely because of voter frustration over property taxes, utility costs, and years in office rather than because of redistricting itself. At the same time, he questions whether many of the challengers offer any meaningful policy changes, pointing out that several are already part of the same political system they campaigned against.

Another major topic is Secretary of State Diego Morales losing his delegate race ahead of the Republican convention. Kendall describes the result as a sign of how unpopular Morales has become outside of party leadership circles and revisits several controversies surrounding him, including questions about ethics, spending, and political favoritism. He argues Morales continues to survive politically because of connections and money within the party structure, despite widespread frustration from Republican voters.

The episode closes with a broader critique of both Indiana and national Republican leadership, focusing on inflation, gas prices, property taxes, and government spending. Kendall questions what voters have actually gained despite Republicans controlling major offices, arguing that many of the issues people care most about have continued to worsen. The overall message is that political victories and campaign theater mean very little unless they result in real policy changes that improve daily life for taxpayers.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

He traces his long-standing frustration with the system back to the 2007 property tax protests and says little has changed since then. Kendall points out that assessments continue to rise even when homeowners have no intention of selling, meaning they’re effectively penalized for staying in their homes. He also calls out the lack of organized pushback from assessors themselves, arguing that while many will privately admit the system is flawed, there has been no unified effort to challenge it publicly or demand reform.

The discussion then shifts to public education spending, where Kendall examines new data comparing how much states spend per student versus actual outcomes. He breaks down Indiana’s funding levels, noting that when combining state, local, and federal dollars, the total reaches tens of billions annually. Despite that, he argues there’s no clear correlation between higher spending and better performance, pointing to states that spend far more but don’t rank highly in reading or math scores.

Kendall challenges the common argument that schools simply need more money, asking what the actual target number would be and suggesting there isn’t one. He frames it as a system where funding is always deemed insufficient regardless of results, while data shows outcomes don’t consistently improve with increased spending. The broader takeaway is that how money is used matters more than how much is allocated, a point he says often gets overlooked in policy debates.

The show wraps with a look at new polling on President Donald Trump and the economy, highlighting declining approval ratings and growing concerns over inflation and the cost of living. Kendall walks through the numbers, noting that a majority of Americans disapprove of how economic issues are being handled, and argues that affordability remains the central issue for voters. He also discusses how policies like tariffs and ongoing conflicts are contributing to rising costs, reinforcing the idea that immediate economic pressures are shaping public opinion.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

He then revisits Senate Bill 1 and argues that what was sold as relief ultimately failed to address the core issue. Kendall breaks down how the math plays out, showing how even small increases in assessed value can quickly erase any short-term savings. He ties those outcomes directly to decisions made by lawmakers, saying the structure of the law ensures taxes will continue to rise. The discussion builds into a broader criticism of state leadership and questions about why more wasn’t done to prevent what he says was an obvious outcome.

The conversation expands to what’s coming next, including the likelihood of more school referendums and additional tax pressure in the near future. Kendall argues that many homeowners will see any remaining savings disappear entirely, leaving them paying more than they were just a few years ago. He also raises concerns about how assessments are determined and the limited accountability around them, describing a system where taxpayers have little control once values are set.

Another major segment looks at Indiana’s marijuana laws, using new reporting on the size of the cannabis market tied to Hoosiers. Kendall argues that prohibition isn’t stopping usage, with many residents already accessing it either out of state or informally, while the state misses out on significant tax revenue. He frames the issue as both a financial and policy question, especially as surrounding states continue to allow legal access.

The show also touches on a potential change from the IHSAA regarding whether high school athletes can profit from their name, image, and likeness. Kendall lays out both sides, noting the traditional concerns while also pointing to court decisions that suggest some form of NIL is likely inevitable. He explains the proposed restrictions and questions how much impact the change would realistically have for most athletes, framing it as an attempt to manage something that’s already reshaping amateur sports.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The conversation also digs into the lack of clear messaging around what Americans are getting in return for those higher costs. With oil prices climbing and uncertainty continuing, the focus turns to how expectations were set versus what people are experiencing now, and why frustration is building as costs continue to rise without a clear explanation of long-term benefits.

From there, the show shifts to Indianapolis politics, focusing on Joe Hogsett and the possibility of a fourth term as mayor. After years of signaling he might step away, new comments suggest he could stay in the race, and the segment looks at how his tenure is being viewed, particularly around major events like the 2020 riots and ongoing concerns about crime, development, and population shifts in the city.

The discussion expands into the broader political landscape in Marion County, including the lack of competition in many local races and what that means for voters. It also touches on how political parties are functioning at the local level and how that impacts who runs, who wins, and what choices voters actually have when they go to the ballot box.

The final segment moves to the national level with a major Supreme Court decision on redistricting and the Voting Rights Act. The ruling centers on how claims of discrimination must now be proven, narrowing the standards for legal challenges and changing how states approach drawing congressional maps. The discussion looks at what the decision means going forward and how it could reshape election law and representation across the country.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

From there, the conversation expands into the broader implications of that situation, including questions about how taxpayer money is used, how public officials are held accountable, and what standards should apply to people overseeing massive state budgets. It also looks at the lack of response from many elected officials and the contrast between how government decisions are explained to the public versus how they actually play out behind the scenes.

The show then shifts to Indiana’s state Senate primaries, focusing on a new report about the increasingly negative and misleading campaign ads dominating those races. The discussion breaks down the difference between legitimate scrutiny of a candidate’s record and messaging that crosses into distortion, and how that environment discourages qualified people from running for office in the first place. It also touches on low voter engagement and turnout, despite the intensity of messaging in these campaigns.

That leads into a deeper look at why many of these races are failing to capture public interest, with an emphasis on how candidates present themselves and whether they’re giving voters a reason to engage. The conversation highlights how endorsements, funding, and political alignment don’t necessarily translate into voter enthusiasm, and why connecting with voters on a personal and practical level is often missing in these campaigns.

Finally, the show examines Greg Ballard’s recent comments on Indiana’s primary election system and the role of taxpayer funding in party-run elections. The segment explains how the current system operates, why it limits participation for many voters, and the argument that political parties shouldn’t rely on public funds while maintaining restrictive access to their nomination process. It also looks at how those dynamics shape who can realistically run for office and how elections are structured overall.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The conversation then moves into how those tax decisions are framed, particularly the idea that any reduction in taxes could impact infrastructure like roads and bridges. That leads into a broader look at state spending priorities, including recent examples involving large amounts of public money, and how those decisions compare to the relatively small savings taxpayers might see at the pump. The segment ties these ideas together by questioning how funding tradeoffs are presented to the public.

In the second major segment, the focus shifts to Indiana Republican politics, using a recent Indy Star column about Diego Morales as a starting point. The discussion looks at how party support works, why certain candidates continue to receive backing from top officials, and what that says about leadership and accountability within the party. It also examines the role of party loyalty versus performance and how that affects decision-making at higher levels.

That conversation expands into a broader reflection on political culture, including how both major parties elevate certain voices over others and how that impacts voters’ perception of candidates. There’s also a focus on how expectations of elected officials—particularly around competence, transparency, and behavior—play into how they are evaluated by both party insiders and the public.

The final segment moves to the national stage, analyzing a New York Times focus group of Trump voters and what it reveals about current political sentiment. The discussion highlights how voters view issues like cost of living, immigration, and foreign policy, and how those views connect to approval ratings. It also emphasizes how expectations set during campaigns—especially around affordability—can shape how voters respond once those expectations aren’t fully met.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The conversation then shifts to the Fourth Congressional District race, where Jim Baird, Craig Haggard, and John Piper are competing in the primary. The focus centers on Haggard’s past controversies and a new dispute involving a data center–connected super PAC. Allegations include undisclosed campaign expenditures, ties between the PAC and a data center company, and questions about legislation and business dealings that could benefit those same interests.

From there, the discussion zooms out to a broader look at elections in Indiana, with early voting trends and turnout issues across the state. While Marion County is seeing increased participation, much of the state continues to struggle with low engagement, prompting a deeper look at why voters are tuning out.

A key theme is the lack of distinction between candidates, especially in primary races. Many challengers are criticized for running on limited issues without clearly defining how they differ from incumbents, leaving voters with little reason to feel invested or motivated. Examples from state Senate races highlight how candidates often take similar positions, even while attacking each other in campaign materials.

The show ultimately raises a consistent question across all these topics: whether it’s unanswered investigations, campaign controversies, or uninspiring candidates, how much accountability are voters actually getting from the people seeking to represent them.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

From there, the conversation shifts to property taxes and the broader role of local government. Using real examples from a Brownsburg meeting, the discussion highlights how decisions are delayed, avoided, or buried in process when officials are asked to think outside the usual framework. It paints a picture of systems driven more by playbooks and bureaucracy than by problem-solving or accountability to taxpayers.

A major focus is the frustration over how governments talk about “lost revenue,” especially after years of rising property tax collections. The show examines how taxpayers are seeing only modest relief while local entities react as if funds they never owned were taken from them, raising questions about where previous increases actually went and why budgets still fall short.

The episode also revisits the state’s property tax reform efforts, including claims about how many people actually saw decreases versus increases. It breaks down concerns that any short-term relief may disappear due to unchanged assessments, combined with the likelihood of future referendums and other tax pressures returning.

Finally, there’s an update on the Adam Krupp situation, focusing on his disappearance from DCS, his return in a newly created role with no defined responsibilities, and the lack of transparency from state leadership. The segment raises broader questions about accountability, hiring practices, and how high-level positions are handled when issues arise behind the scenes.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

We then dig into why redistricting failed to gain traction in Indiana in the first place. Public polling showed voters were largely apathetic—or outright opposed—and that says something deeper about how Republicans are governing. When voters feel stuck choosing the “less bad” option, they’re not exactly eager to hand more power to the same people, especially when key issues and accountability continue to fall short.

From there, we move into a major example of that frustration: state spending and transparency. After being told Indiana was “broke” and needed to raise taxes by $1 billion, new developments raise serious questions about where the money is actually going. We look at the controversy surrounding the Department of Child Services, including the disappearance of its former head, a six-figure salary shuffle, and a newly created taxpayer-funded role with unclear responsibilities.

Next, we take a closer look at Todd Rokita and how political incentives can change people over time. Once seen as a reform-minded leader—especially on voter ID and even nonpartisan redistricting—Rokita is now at the center of a legal fight that directly contradicts policies he previously championed. It’s a case study in how political ambition and “Trump orbit” influence can reshape priorities and messaging.

Finally, we break down a growing scandal out of Clinton County involving alleged fraud, nepotism, and lack of oversight at the sheriff’s office. From disability payments to jail commissary funds, the story raises serious concerns about how local governments monitor spending—and how problems can go unchecked for years. It’s another example of what happens when accountability takes a back seat.

All of this ties back to a central theme: the issue isn’t whether there’s money or power—it’s how both are being used. And more importantly, why voters are increasingly skeptical of the people in charge.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

But crowds across the state for the conservative activist were small. As Election Day is inside of two weeks, how are the challengers, running mostly on outside money and revenge for Donald Trump over redistricting doing? Rob Kendall and Abdul-Hakim Shabazz discuss on Statehouse Happenings.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Rob walks through the full background, from the State Board of Accounts investigation to the involvement of state police and veteran investigator Jeff Herrin. The case appeared to be heading toward serious consequences, only to abruptly stall. Now, with Marion County Prosecutor Ryan Mears stepping in and filing limited charges, the story has resurfaced — and the pressure is building. The key question remains: why did such a detailed case seemingly disappear, and who made that decision?

The show also breaks down the explosive developments from the Law Enforcement Training Board, which rejected a proposed agreement that would have allowed Kleinhelter to quietly retain his credentials. That decision forced Governor Braun to act, but his response — a brief, vague statement removing Kleinhelter from the board — has only raised more eyebrows. Rob analyzes Braun’s comments from Hammer and Nigel, where the focus shifted away from the allegations and toward criticism of former superintendent Doug Carter, prompting even more scrutiny.

Beyond the politics, Rob reflects on the role of media and accountability, explaining why stories like this matter and why persistence is necessary. He shares his perspective on using his platform to push for transparency, challenge power, and keep stories alive that might otherwise fade. It’s a candid look at what drives the show and why certain issues continue to get attention long after others move on.

The episode then shifts to your wallet, breaking down Indiana’s confusing gas tax situation. Braun’s temporary suspension of the gas sales tax saved drivers about 17 cents per gallon — but that relief may be short-lived. If the suspension isn’t extended, prices could jump by over 23 cents per gallon due to how the tax is calculated. Meanwhile, calls are growing to suspend both the sales tax and the excise tax, which could significantly increase savings for Hoosiers at the pump.

Rob puts those numbers into context, comparing short-term tax relief to broader spending decisions and questioning whether the priorities match what taxpayers actually need. As always, the show blends detailed breakdowns with sharp commentary, tying together politics, policy, and everyday impact in a way that keeps the focus on accountability and transparency.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The conversation then shifts into the broader influence of Bob and Tom, and how their dominance in radio shaped not just Indianapolis, but the entire state. There’s a deeper reflection on how media has changed, why that kind of connection is harder to replicate today, and what it means when figures who defined entire eras begin to pass on. It’s not just nostalgia, it’s a reminder of how powerful a voice can be when it truly resonates with people.

From there, the focus turns to Indiana politics and the looming local elections. The argument is straightforward: local races should be about local issues, but many candidates are missing the mark. Instead of focusing on things like property taxes, utility costs, and everyday affordability, campaigns have been built around national narratives that don’t resonate with voters on the ground. The result is a disconnect that could cost challengers any real shot at winning.

There’s also a sharp critique of outside political influence, particularly the role of national figures and organizations shaping local campaigns. The idea that big-name endorsements or appearances can carry a race is put to the test, with real-world examples showing low turnout and limited impact. The takeaway is clear: voters care about what affects their daily lives, not political theater driven from outside the state.

Finally, the show zooms out to the national level, taking aim at Republicans in Washington for failing to deliver on core promises around inflation and cost of living. The frustration centers on what’s described as a simple economic reality: spending drives inflation, and inflation is crushing everyday Americans. Instead of addressing that, the focus appears to be shifting toward political strategy, including the possibility of leveraging Supreme Court vacancies to energize voters ahead of midterms.

It’s a mix of reflection, frustration, and blunt analysis, from honoring a broadcasting icon to breaking down why voters are increasingly fed up at every level of government. If there’s a through line, it’s this: people want results, not excuses, and they’re starting to respond accordingly.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

That leads into a broader discussion about accountability. Should candidates be judged based on what their spouse does, especially when there’s no illegal behavior involved? And if a legal business suddenly becomes disqualifying, what does that say about the state that allows it in the first place? The contrast becomes even sharper when you compare this line of attack to the very real concerns surrounding those currently holding office.

From there, the show shifts into a firsthand look at how local government actually operates—and where it breaks down. A redevelopment commission meeting in Brownsburg becomes a case study in confusion, lack of preparation, and a complete absence of leadership. What should have been a straightforward decision about using excess funds to help schools avoid raising taxes turned into an hour-and-a-half display of uncertainty.

Listeners get a clear breakdown of how tax increment financing (TIF) is supposed to work, why it was created, and how it can be used effectively to reduce taxpayer burden. But what happens when the people in charge don’t fully understand the system they oversee? The result is paralysis, missed opportunities, and decisions getting kicked down the road instead of resolved.

At its core, this episode highlights a larger issue that goes far beyond one town or one race. There’s a growing pattern of well-meaning people in positions of authority who lack the knowledge, direction, or willingness to make decisive choices. Add in leadership that won’t lead and staff with their own agendas, and you end up with a system that stalls out—leaving taxpayers to deal with the consequences.

If you’ve ever wondered why property taxes don’t seem to go down, or why government feels stuck in place, this episode connects the dots. What’s happening in one Indiana community is likely happening in many others—and understanding it is the first step to holding it accountable.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The show walks through key parts of the recent tax changes, including the child tax credit, overtime and tip deductions, and senior tax breaks. While these policies were heavily promoted, the reality appears far more limited, with caps, phase-outs, and restrictions that leave many taxpayers with little to no meaningful difference. The gap between political messaging and real-world impact becomes a central theme.

From there, the focus turns to Indiana Secretary of State Diego Morales, as longtime political figure Connie Lawson publicly breaks her silence and endorses David Shelton. Lawson’s criticism, paired with support from election official Valerie Walker, signals a major shift and raises serious questions about leadership, management, and trust in one of the state’s most important offices.

The discussion outlines ongoing concerns tied to Morales’ tenure, including controversies involving spending, hiring practices, and overall administration of the office. Shelton is presented as a qualified alternative with direct election experience, while the broader conversation highlights growing frustration within political circles about accountability and direction.

The episode also covers a major breaking development: the resignation of the top two officials in the Indiana Election Division. With Brad King and Valerie Walker stepping down at the same time, the move is seen as a significant warning sign about internal operations and leadership challenges within the Secretary of State’s office.

Altogether, the show paints a picture of rising tension in Indiana politics, from tax policy concerns to internal conflict within election leadership. It’s a detailed look at how decisions made at the top level are playing out in real time, and why more people are starting to question what’s really going on behind the scenes.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The show also breaks down how these toll increases function in practice. What was once capped at 2% annually can now rise at a higher rate, with additional flexibility tied to inflation. While the state receives a large upfront payment from the private operator, the long-term impact falls on drivers who rely on the road. At the same time, only minimal reinvestment is required for maintenance, raising questions about where the money is going and who ultimately benefits.

Another major topic centers on accountability and recent developments involving Tom Kleinhelter. Increased media attention appears to have played a role in pushing the situation forward, with actions taken that could lead to meaningful consequences. The episode highlights the importance of individuals like Doug Carter and Jeff Herron, who chose to act despite potential personal and professional risks. Their decisions are framed as examples of what can happen when people prioritize accountability over convenience.

The conversation then shifts to a broader critique of government policy, particularly around taxation and spending priorities. The show examines what it describes as a contradiction in how redistribution is discussed versus how it is implemented. Property taxes and other mechanisms are compared to policies often criticized at the national level, raising questions about consistency in messaging versus action.

Finally, the episode takes a closer look at Indiana’s childcare funding decisions. After previously citing limited resources and raising taxes to balance the budget, the state is now allocating hundreds of millions of dollars toward childcare assistance. This raises questions about economic priorities, eligibility thresholds, and whether such programs primarily support families or indirectly benefit employers by offsetting workforce costs.

Overall, the episode ties these topics together around a central theme: how public money is collected, where it is directed, and who ultimately benefits. From toll road increases to childcare funding and questions of accountability, the discussion focuses on the broader implications for taxpayers across the state.

Note: We apologize for the slight technical issues in the beginning and ending portions of the show, it has been cleaned up as much as possible for the podcast.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

From there, the show shifts into the broader issue of property taxes and affordability, questioning whether state leaders are addressing the root causes of rising costs or making the problem worse. With concerns about shrinking local revenue, increased population density, and more referendums on the horizon, the conversation highlights growing frustration from residents who feel their communities—and their voices—are being sidelined.

The episode also takes a closer look at one of the most high-profile primary races in Indiana, involving longtime State Senator Travis Holdman. As a powerful figure controlling tax and fiscal policy, Holdman’s tenure and performance are put under scrutiny. But the focus isn’t just on the incumbent—it’s also on the difficulty voters face when challengers fail to present a compelling alternative, leaving many feeling stuck between two underwhelming choices.

That frustration leads into a broader conversation about the state of political leadership, the role of endorsements, and whether candidates are running to serve constituents or to align with national political figures. The show explores the growing disconnect between voters’ concerns and the motivations of those seeking office, raising questions about accountability and genuine representation.

Finally, the episode breaks down a fascinating lawsuit involving Indiana State Treasurer Daniel Elliott. The case centers on a long-running dispute over a property in Martinsville, where Elliott and his wife claim they invested $250,000 based on an agreement that would eventually grant them ownership. However, no formal contract has been produced, and the property was ultimately transferred to other entities, setting up a complex legal battle.

The situation raises serious questions about contracts, accountability, and decision-making—especially given Elliott’s role overseeing state finances. Whether this was a misunderstanding, a lack of documentation, or something more, it’s a story that blends personal business dealings with public responsibility, making it one of the most intriguing developments in Indiana politics right now.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The show breaks down how this controversy developed, including the background of the race, Greg Good’s role after being appointed mid-term, and the effort by national political groups to recruit a challenger. It also explores how Alexandra Wilson entered the race, why her candidacy drew immediate backlash, and the broader implications of multiple officials reaching out to a candidate during a critical filing period.

There’s also a deeper look at the tactics involved, including references to past legal issues, the suggestion of political appointments, and the involvement of multiple layers of government leadership. With early voting already underway and legal challenges ongoing, the discussion focuses on what this means for the integrity of the election process and how political influence is being exercised at the state level.

In the second half of the show, the focus shifts to a significant moment in Indiana history, marking the anniversary of Ryan White’s funeral. The episode reflects on his life, the adversity he faced after contracting AIDS as a teenager, and the national impact of his advocacy. His story is revisited not just as a historical note, but as a reminder of how one individual helped reshape public understanding of a major health crisis.

The discussion highlights the fear and misinformation that surrounded HIV/AIDS in the 1980s, the resistance Ryan White encountered in his own community, and how he ultimately became a national voice for education and compassion. His legacy is tied to the progress made in awareness, research, and treatment, and the show reflects on why his story still matters decades later.

Taken together, today’s episode covers both a current political controversy and a lasting historical legacy, connecting themes of power, influence, resilience, and public impact. It’s a look at how individuals and institutions shape outcomes, whether in politics today or in moments that defined public understanding in the past.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The show then returns to a developing political controversy involving Dubois County Sheriff Tom Kleinhelter and Governor Mike Braun. After an 80-page probable cause affidavit and a lengthy investigation, the case appeared to stall—only for Marion County Prosecutor Ryan Mears to step in and file charges in a different jurisdiction. The timeline, the connections, and the sudden halt of the original case raise serious questions about accountability, transparency, and what may have happened behind the scenes.

There’s also a closer look at the Indiana Economic Development Corporation and a controversial ethics case involving a former high-ranking official. The situation centers on an attempt to move directly from a powerful state role into a private-sector job tied to contracts he previously oversaw. The ethics commission ultimately blocked the move, but the case highlights ongoing concerns about conflicts of interest, decision-making power, and whether common-sense standards are being ignored in favor of technical loopholes.

In the media world, the show breaks down the fallout from the acquisition of RTV6 by DuJuan McCoy and Circle City Broadcasting. Layoffs, restructuring, and promises about maintaining local content are all under scrutiny. While the cuts are framed as typical corporate consolidation, questions remain about whether the level of local journalism can truly be preserved or expanded moving forward.

The episode also explores the broader implications of these stories, from how long major investigations can take to how decisions at the highest levels of government and business impact everyday Hoosiers. Whether it’s public trust, media consolidation, or economic development, each topic ties back to the same core issue—who is accountable, and who is looking out for the public.

Later in the show, attention turns back to the Shelbyville data center fight, with insight from concerned citizens on the front lines. Even if you don’t live in Shelbyville, this is a conversation that could affect your community next. Understanding what’s happening now is key to being prepared for what may come.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

We also dig into the politics surrounding the gas tax suspension. Many lawmakers who were silent for weeks are now celebrating the move, raising questions about why the relief wasn’t pushed sooner. The discussion examines the broader affordability claims coming from state leadership and whether rising costs—from property taxes to utilities—tell a different story. If the state can function without this tax for a month, it raises an important question about whether it should return at all once the suspension ends.

Another major topic today focuses on the rapid expansion of data centers and how developers are changing their strategy. Companies are increasingly targeting land already zoned for heavy industrial use, allowing them to bypass many of the political hurdles and public hearings that typically come with rezoning requests. A proposed $2 billion data center project in Indianapolis highlights this shift, bringing with it only a few dozen permanent jobs while raising broader questions about land use, economic benefits, and the balance between development and community oversight.

The show also explains how zoning rules normally protect communities and why the rezoning process is designed to be difficult. When land is already classified as industrial, however, much of that process can be avoided. That means fewer opportunities for residents to weigh in on projects that could dramatically change their communities. It’s a look at how developers are learning to navigate the system and what that could mean for future projects across Indiana.

Finally, we cover a major legal development involving Dubois County Sheriff Tom Kleinfelter. The sheriff has been charged with false informing and official misconduct related to statements made during a theft and fraud investigation tied to jail commissary funds. The case has drawn attention because of its long and unusual history, including an extensive investigation, an 80-page probable cause affidavit, and months of unanswered questions about why charges were not initially filed. Now, prosecutors have stepped in and the case is moving forward.

We also examine the broader story behind the investigation itself—how the allegations surfaced, the role of the Indiana State Police investigation, and the scrutiny that followed when the case appeared to stall. With charges now filed, the legal process begins in earnest, and the situation is likely to remain a major story in Indiana politics and law enforcement accountability in the weeks ahead.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Rob also takes a closer look at the idea that redistricting was supposed to help Republicans win more seats in Congress, especially in Indiana’s First Congressional District. Instead of investing in competitive races, Rob argues political groups are spending huge sums on internal political revenge campaigns. He questions whether the focus is really about better governance or simply about consolidating power within the party.

Later in the show, Rob discusses a newly announced tax amnesty program that will allow individuals and businesses with overdue Indiana taxes to pay them off without penalties. While the state expects the program could bring in hundreds of millions of dollars, Rob raises a bigger question: is this good fiscal policy, or simply a sign that lawmakers mismanaged the state’s finances and are now scrambling for revenue?

Rob also examines where that potential revenue will go. Because the money will be placed in the state’s general fund, lawmakers could spend it on anything they choose. Rob questions why the funds wouldn’t be used to offset future tax hikes or infrastructure costs instead of potentially funding new projects or government programs.

In the second half of the show, Rob digs into the growing debate over housing in Indiana. Drawing on reporting from Stateline and the Indiana Capital Chronicle, he explores how government policies—including low interest rates, massive stimulus spending, and immigration policy—have contributed to the current housing shortage. Rob also looks at new state laws that limit the ability of local communities to block high-density housing developments and what that could mean for neighborhoods across the state.

Plus, Rob previews a major segment coming up later in the program examining newly released body camera footage connected to the raid on Nathan Peternel’s home, a case tied to the arrest and conviction of Jonathan Peternel for crimes against children. The footage, Rob says, sheds new light on a disturbing situation that affected many people.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The show also examines Governor Mike Braun’s recent ceremonial signing of legislation tied to utility billing in Indiana. While the administration frames the measure as a step toward affordability, the discussion explores whether the law will actually lower costs for Hoosiers or simply delay meaningful changes. The episode looks at the role of investor-owned utilities, the influence of political donations, and how regulatory decisions shape what residents ultimately pay on their monthly bills.

Another major topic is the growing controversy surrounding large-scale data center developments across Indiana. A recent proposal in Shelbyville, Indiana has sparked backlash after the city council approved annexation and zoning for hundreds of acres despite a negative recommendation from the local planning commission. The episode breaks down how these decisions are made, why residents are concerned about land use and transparency, and what the rise of artificial intelligence and digital infrastructure means for communities being asked to host these massive facilities.

The program also explores the broader policy vacuum surrounding data centers in Indiana. With communities making decisions case by case, the lack of statewide guidelines has created what some describe as a “Wild West” environment for development. The show examines how incentives, secrecy surrounding economic development deals, and the involvement of government agencies are fueling public frustration and skepticism about how projects are approved.

Finally, the episode features a major interview with Lebanon Mayor Matt Gentry. The conversation covers the controversial LEAP District, water infrastructure plans connected to large developments, and the role of the Indiana Economic Development Corporation. The discussion also touches on broader political dynamics within Indiana’s Republican Party, including debates about party leadership and upcoming convention decisions.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

From there, the conversation turns to property taxes and the lack of concrete proposals from many candidates promising reform. Rob argues that lowering property taxes requires difficult choices about spending and government priorities, and he challenges candidates to be honest about what programs or systems would need to change. He also highlights the role of local government structures, including fire territories, and argues that vague campaign messaging deprives voters of meaningful choices at the ballot box.

The show also tackles a controversial social media post from former President Donald Trump about Iran. Rob questions the tone and timing of the message, arguing that presidential rhetoric should maintain a level of professionalism and unity. He also raises broader concerns about the administration’s lack of explanation regarding the ongoing conflict with Iran and whether Americans have been given a clear case for how the situation benefits or protects the United States.

Rob then shifts to a growing concern in Indiana: the collapse of local media coverage. Reflecting on his time at WIBC, he explains how the elimination of Statehouse reporters and newsroom cuts have reduced oversight of government. According to Rob, politicians have noticed the shrinking press corps, and the lack of scrutiny has real consequences for accountability at both the state and local levels.

Finally, the show explores the broader media shakeup happening in Indianapolis following the purchase of RTV6 and the layoffs that followed. With another potential television merger looming, Rob argues that the traditional media model is disappearing and that journalists must rethink how they operate. Independent journalism, digital platforms, and direct audience support may be the future, and Rob explains why he believes new media models can better serve the public than corporate-owned newsrooms.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Later in the hour, Rob is joined by Jacob Stewart, deputy opinion editor at The Indianapolis Star, for a spirited debate about two major local stories. First, they discuss the possibility of the Chicago Bears relocating to Hammond, Indiana, and whether bringing an NFL team closer to the region would benefit the state. They also tackle the mass firings at WRTV and debate whether viewers should feel sympathy for the employees affected, as well as the broader question of local ownership in media and what it means for local programming.

Rob also reacts to a new report from Politico’s Adam Wren that Governor Mike Braun’s Hope super PAC plans to spend $500,000 supporting challengers against incumbent state senators who opposed redistricting. Rob argues most incumbents are still likely to win because of the power of incumbency and questions whether the move will create long-term political fallout within the Indiana Senate.

The discussion also touches on the role of national politics in the fight over redistricting, including the influence of Donald Trump’s endorsement and how much weight it still carries in local races. Rob examines how candidates relying solely on Trump’s backing without addressing local issues may struggle with voters who care more about legislative performance than national political branding.

Finally, Rob explains why he originally endorsed Braun for governor and why he now feels frustrated with how property tax reform played out in Indiana. He argues that promises were made about using political action committee funds to pressure lawmakers on property taxes but that those efforts never materialized, while significant money is now being spent on redistricting battles.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of The Rob Kendall Show, Rob breaks down the so-called 10% property tax “credit” and shows why it was designed to give short-term relief while long-term costs continue to rise. By walking through the math step by step, he demonstrates how increasing assessments quickly eat away at that credit, meaning many taxpayers are already seeing smaller savings than advertised—and in just a few years, that relief could disappear entirely.

Rob also explains how the system itself operates, from assessors determining home values to how those values are tied to neighboring property sales. He shares personal experiences challenging his own assessment and encourages homeowners to do the same, pointing out how errors and inconsistencies can directly impact what you pay.

Looking ahead, Rob outlines what could be coming next, including new local income taxes beginning in 2029 and the likelihood of school referendums that could further increase costs. He argues that the current system isn’t about lowering taxes, but about shifting how and when you pay them while giving the appearance of relief.

Throughout the episode, Rob challenges elected officials to defend the policy and invites them to explain the long-term impact on taxpayers, maintaining that everything he predicted is now visible in the numbers.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Adding another layer of intrigue, Trump has said he plans to attend the oral arguments in person. According to reporting cited on the show, there is no official record of a sitting president ever attending Supreme Court oral arguments in person during the nation’s roughly 250-year history. That makes this hearing not only legally significant, but potentially historic as well.

We also break down the constitutional roots of the debate, focusing on the language of the 14th Amendment and how courts have interpreted it over time. The precedent most often cited comes from the 1898 Supreme Court case United States v. Wong Kim Ark, which held that a child born in the United States to Chinese parents could be considered a citizen under the amendment. The show examines how that ruling shaped modern interpretations of birthright citizenship and why the current Court’s decision could have major national and state-level implications.

Back in Indiana, we dive into a striking report from the Indiana Capital Chronicle about the massive amount of unpaid caregiving happening across the state. According to research cited from AARP, roughly 1.1 million Hoosiers are currently acting as caregivers for parents, spouses, or other adults who require constant assistance. That work adds up to approximately 860 million hours of care every year.

When economists assign a market value to that labor using typical caregiving wages, the total comes to an estimated $16.1 billion annually in unpaid care provided by Indiana families. The numbers have grown significantly in recent years as the population ages and more people require long-term assistance. Many families are stepping in to provide that care themselves, often dedicating dozens of hours each week to helping loved ones.

The program also explores the policy challenges tied to those numbers, including the financial strain on Indiana’s Medicaid program and the reduction of payments to family caregivers. As government budgets tighten, many families caring for elderly relatives or individuals with severe disabilities face difficult choices about how to continue providing care while meeting everyday financial needs.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

We also discuss a controversy in Carmel over a proposed ICE administrative office. Despite the facility being described as overflow office space for administrative personnel, a public meeting drew roughly 200 people and sparked calls for protests and boycotts of local businesses. The debate highlights the broader political divide around immigration and border policy, an issue where polling has consistently shown strong public concern even while other national issues dominate headlines.

The conversation then shifts to Indiana’s Fourth Congressional District, where a closely watched Republican primary is shaping up. Incumbent Congressman Jim Baird, who has held the seat since 2018, is facing a challenge from State Representative Craig Haggard, with a third candidate, John Piper, also in the race. The contest is drawing attention because it pits a long-time officeholder against a challenger attempting to position himself as a fresh alternative.

We take a closer look at the records and controversies surrounding the candidates. Baird’s critics argue he has accomplished little in Congress and relies heavily on incumbency advantages, while Haggard has faced scrutiny over past political positions and his response to allegations involving AI-generated images connected to people in Micah Beckwith’s office. The discussion raises larger questions about political consistency, credibility, and what voters should expect from candidates seeking higher office.

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita has now entered the race with a high-profile endorsement of Haggard, adding another layer to the primary battle. Meanwhile, Baird has highlighted his endorsement from Donald Trump, underscoring how influential national political backing can be in local races. The show examines whether endorsements actually translate into better policy outcomes or simply reinforce the political status quo.

Altogether, today’s show looks at the bigger picture of Indiana politics: voter dissatisfaction with current leadership, the challenges Democrats face in presenting a credible alternative, and the internal battles shaping the Republican Party ahead of the next election cycle.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Rob also revisits comments made by Indiana Governor Mike Braun earlier this month, when Braun said he would strongly consider suspending the gas tax if prices didn’t improve within two to three weeks and if conditions surrounding global oil supply didn’t stabilize. With prices still significantly higher than when that statement was made, Rob asks why the governor has not acted and why more media outlets and political figures aren’t pressing for answers.

Later in the show, Terre Haute Mayor Brandon Sakbun joins Rob to discuss Braun’s proposal to toll Interstate 70. Sakbun explains the potential consequences for communities across Indiana that rely on I-70 traffic for commerce and travel. If drivers begin avoiding the highway to skip tolls, it could have serious economic impacts for cities and towns along the corridor.

Rob also reacts to the “No Kings” protest held in Indianapolis over the weekend, which reportedly drew thousands of participants. After reviewing footage and statements from organizers and attendees, Rob raises questions about what the movement is trying to accomplish and whether the message resonates beyond the people already attending the rallies.

The conversation expands into a broader discussion about political activism, executive authority, and how protests influence public opinion. Rob compares the goals of different political demonstrations and argues that movements are most effective when their message is clear and grounded in persuading people who may not already agree with them.

All of that and more on today’s episode of The Rob Kendall Show, including a look at Indiana politics, public policy, and the issues impacting everyday Hoosiers.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Rob also responds to Indiana Governor Mike Braun’s criticism of the proposal. Braun framed the issue as government interference in business, but Rob challenges that argument, questioning whether it’s really “free market” behavior when teams leverage billions in public subsidies while threatening to relocate. The discussion highlights the ongoing battle between states competing to hand out taxpayer-funded incentives to multibillion-dollar sports franchises.

The show also revisits Braun’s comments about potentially suspending Indiana’s gas tax if prices continued to rise during the conflict affecting global oil supply. With gas prices now over $4 per gallon in many places, Rob asks why the governor hasn’t followed through. Local South Bend officials are now asking the same question, urging Braun to temporarily suspend the gas tax to provide relief for Hoosier drivers.

Rob breaks down how Indiana’s gas taxes work, explaining the combination of the gasoline excise tax and the state sales tax applied to fuel. As gas prices rise, the state collects even more tax revenue, which Rob argues makes the system fundamentally regressive for working families who rely on driving to get to work, school, and daily responsibilities.

Later in the show, Rob reflects on the role of media in holding government accountable. He argues that the decline of local journalism, combined with media personalities seeking access and approval from politicians, has led to fewer tough questions and less accountability. According to Rob, real accountability only happens when media outlets are willing to challenge elected officials—even when it’s uncomfortable.

Throughout the episode, Rob emphasizes the idea that the audience—not politicians—is the real opportunity for media. He explains why he believes platforms should prioritize serving their listeners and viewers rather than building relationships with those in power, and why accountability in government depends on a media environment willing to ask hard questions.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Next, Rob takes aim at the upcoming “No Kings” protests planned across Indiana and the country. Organizers are holding more than 40 rallies statewide while running a nationwide ad campaign urging people to march against what they describe as abuses of power. Rob questions what the slogan actually means and argues that outrage about presidential authority often depends on which party holds the White House. He also reflects on his own experience during COVID workplace mandates and asks why similar protests weren’t happening during earlier administrations if the concern is truly about executive power.

The show also features a conversation with viewers after news out of Fishers where police arrested a driver going nearly 60 miles over the speed limit. Rob asks the YouTube audience to share their own stories about speeding tickets and the fastest they’ve ever driven, comparing minor speeding violations with extreme cases that lead to reckless driving charges.

Rob then turns to the massive LEAP District development in Lebanon, Indiana, where companies like Meta are building enormous data center campuses. Residents living near the project say their lives are being disrupted by nonstop noise, construction activity, and massive lighting installations that run around the clock. Rob highlights the tension between economic development and the quality of life for longtime residents whose rural communities are rapidly changing.

The discussion also dives into the public incentives being offered to attract these projects. Rob outlines the various tax exemptions, property tax abatements, infrastructure spending, and other incentives that state and local governments have reportedly provided to companies like Meta. He questions whether taxpayers are getting a fair return on investment when large corporations receive major subsidies while residents deal with the consequences of rapid development.

Throughout the show, Rob connects these topics to a larger theme: accountability in government. Whether it’s dark money ads, political loyalty tests, presidential power, or taxpayer-funded corporate incentives, Rob argues that voters should be willing to question everyone in power—not just the people on the other side of the aisle.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Rob also dives into the growing outrage over skyrocketing utility bills across Indiana. With the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission holding hearings with the state’s largest power companies, Rob lays out why many Hoosiers feel trapped in a broken system. Investor-owned utilities operating under government-granted monopolies are reporting rising profits while customers face major increases in their monthly bills. Rob walks through how electric bills are actually calculated and why the current system leaves consumers with little choice or recourse.

Another major topic today is the growing pressure on Governor Mike Braun as gas prices surge past the $4 mark in central Indiana. Rob revisits comments Braun made earlier in March about the possibility of using tools available to the state to mitigate rising prices, including suspending the gas tax. With prices now significantly higher and the timeline Braun referenced having passed, Rob asks whether the governor will follow through on that idea or if it will remain another unfulfilled political promise.

Rob also discusses how Indiana drivers are paying not only a state gas tax but also a sales tax that increases as the price of gasoline rises. That means when prices spike, the government collects even more revenue. Rob argues this creates a system where the state benefits financially from higher fuel prices while Hoosiers feel the squeeze at the pump.

Later in the show, Rob previews an upcoming conversation with Indiana Capital Chronicle reporter Nicki Kelly about the growing debate over local income taxes at the city, town, and county level. As communities across Indiana consider raising or restructuring local taxes, Rob examines how these decisions could affect taxpayers and local government budgets moving forward.

From political endorsements and statehouse battles to utility monopolies and rising gas prices, today’s episode tackles the biggest economic and political pressures facing Indiana residents right now.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The show also examines the growing backlash around the proposed Mid-States Corridor project in southwest Indiana. Rob analyzes a new op-ed written by former Lieutenant Governor Sue Ellspermann defending the multi-billion-dollar highway plan. He questions why Governor Mike Braun has largely avoided publicly defending the project himself and argues that the proposal has faced strong opposition from local residents who believe the benefits are limited and the costs are high.

A major part of the discussion focuses on property rights and eminent domain, as families in the proposed path of the Mid-States Corridor could lose farmland and homes that have been in their families for generations. Rob discusses the justification often used for large infrastructure projects and contrasts it with the strong opposition from people living in the affected areas. The segment raises broader questions about how governments balance economic development goals with the rights of property owners.

The program then shifts to rising utility costs in Indiana and the role of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC). Rob explains how the commission, whose members are appointed by the governor, is responsible for approving or rejecting utility rate increases. The IURC has announced a statewide “affordability listening tour” encouraging residents to bring copies of their utility bills and discuss rising costs.

Rob breaks down how utilities operate as monopolies in many parts of the state, meaning residents cannot choose a different provider. Because of that structure, the IURC becomes the primary safeguard for ratepayers. The show questions whether regulators have done enough over the past decade to push back against rate increases and whether the new listening tour will lead to meaningful change.

Throughout the episode, Rob also highlights the growth of the Rob Kendall Show itself, thanking listeners for helping the program approach major subscriber milestones and encouraging viewers to support the show by sharing the feed and subscribing. The goal, he says, is to continue covering Indiana politics, government, and public policy in a way that focuses on how decisions affect everyday taxpayers.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Rob also discusses the latest developments in the effort to bring the Chicago Bears to Indiana. A key agenda item related to stadium financing was quietly pulled from a meeting of the Indiana Finance Authority, raising questions about whether lawmakers have the votes needed to move forward. The conversation highlights the financial risks taxpayers often face with publicly funded stadiums and why there may be more resistance to the proposal than originally expected.

The show also explores why the Bears may ultimately remain in the Chicago area despite discussions about Indiana. Rob explains how deeply sports franchises are tied to their cities and fan bases, and why relocating a team away from the core of that community could be risky. He argues the team may be leveraging Indiana as part of negotiations with Illinois rather than seriously planning a move across state lines.

Later in the program, Rob previews an interview with Spike Cohen, the 2020 Libertarian vice presidential nominee and founder of the organization You Are The Power. The group works with citizens around the country to challenge government actions and raise awareness about controversial policies. Their work has recently focused on Indiana’s Mid-States Corridor project, helping organize opposition and bring national attention to the issue.

Rob also dives into one of the most dramatic political races in Indiana right now: the battle for Senate District 38. The contest between incumbent Greg Goode and Trump-endorsed challenger Brenda Wilson has become increasingly complicated, including legal challenges surrounding a third candidate, Alexandra Wilson. The dispute has already gone through the Indiana Election Commission and multiple court rulings regarding whether her name can appear on the ballot.

Adding even more intrigue to the race, Greg Goode recently received a public endorsement from the family of the late Fred Wilson — who was previously married to Brenda Wilson. The surprising endorsement has intensified an already heated campaign and turned the Senate District 38 race into one of the most closely watched political contests in the state.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Next, Rob examines the lawsuit involving Braun’s former campaign and its ex-treasurer after the Federal Election Commission fined the campaign $159,000 over reporting issues tied to millions of dollars in loans and financial disclosures. Rob questions the lack of oversight and accountability inside major political campaigns.

Rob also looks at a troubling economic trend in Indiana: the state now has one of the highest foreclosure rates in the country. He discusses new reporting showing that rising property taxes, insurance costs, and escrow payments are pushing more Hoosiers toward losing their homes—even when they can still afford the base mortgage payment.

Later in the show, Rob reacts to national news about the possibility of U.S. ground troops being deployed in the Middle East amid tensions with Iran, and he questions how the situation could escalate and what it means for Americans already dealing with rising costs.

Today's guest is IndyStar columnist Jacob Stewart, who talks about the state stepping in to block rental caps in cities like Fishers and Carmel, and the growing costs schools face educating students who do not speak English.

Producer Jason also shares the best YouTube chat posts of the day.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Rob starts with a meeting in Brownsburg where local school officials explained why Indiana’s property tax “fix” may not actually lower taxes long term. The discussion highlights how rising home assessments continue to drive property taxes higher even with credits like the $300 rebate.

The show also looks at the real winners of Senate Bill 1, with businesses receiving major tax breaks through personal property tax changes while homeowners see little relief.

Next, Rob digs into the controversy surrounding the Indiana Economic Development Corporation. After spending $800,000 on an audit that found serious problems, the state is now considering another $1 billion in spending through the same agency. Meanwhile, the connected IEDC Foundation has spent millions on travel, meals, and events for government officials, raising ongoing transparency concerns.

Rob's guest today was Kenny Britt, find him on Facebook at Britt's Picks. He covers some possible upsets and cinderella's in the NCAA Tourney starting this week.

The show also covers the growing political chaos in the Terre Haute state Senate primary, where a legal challenge over whether a candidate has a past felony conviction has now halted absentee ballots just weeks before the election.

Rob then shifts to a major development in Indianapolis with the approval of a 900,000-square-foot data center in Marion County, raising questions about zoning, water usage, and how Indiana should regulate the rapidly expanding data center industry.

Producer Jason also makes his daily appearance highlighting the best YouTube chat comments of the day.

The show also touches on the possibility of adding a third hour to the program, the latest episode of Statehouse Happenings, and what diesel fuel reaching $5 per gallon in central Indiana could mean for the local economy.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The show opens with a discussion about the growing push for data centers across Indiana and what that means for local communities. Rob breaks down a column analyzing the similarities between today’s data center boom and the expansion of big-box retail years ago, raising questions about tax incentives, land use, and long-term impact.

While data centers play an important role in cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and digital infrastructure, Rob questions whether communities are giving away too much in tax breaks while getting very little in return—especially when these facilities create minimal long-term jobs and place increasing strain on electricity and water resources.

The conversation then shifts to the global stage and how the conflict with Iran is already hitting home in Indiana. Rob explains how rising oil prices and supply chain disruptions are driving up costs for farmers, particularly fertilizer, at a critical time heading into planting season. He walks through the broader strategy behind the conflict, the risks tied to the Strait of Hormuz, and why many Americans are beginning to feel the economic consequences in real time.

Joining the show is Bill Herrick of Midwest Energy Partners, who provides insight into how the Iran conflict is impacting oil and gas prices and what that could mean moving forward. The discussion focuses on rising fuel costs, market instability, and how global energy disruptions translate into higher everyday expenses for consumers and businesses alike.

Finally, Rob examines a new policy debate in Indiana involving rental caps in communities like Fishers and Carmel. After local governments attempted to limit the number of investor-owned rental properties in neighborhoods, the state stepped in and banned those restrictions. Rob discusses how large corporations have increasingly bought up single-family homes, driving up housing prices and changing the character of neighborhoods, while also tying the issue back to property taxes and how long-term homeowners are often penalized as values rise.

From data centers and energy policy to housing and global conflict, this episode connects national decisions to their real-world impact on Indiana residents and their daily lives.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Rob also looks at the growing number of Republican primary challengers running for the Indiana State Senate and raises questions about what these candidates actually stand for. He discusses how several of the challengers were recruited following the redistricting fight and argues that many are campaigning on loyalty to national political figures rather than presenting specific policy ideas that would affect the daily lives of Hoosiers. The conversation focuses on the importance of candidates explaining what they would actually vote for on issues like property taxes, energy costs, and government spending.

The show then turns to the rising cost of utilities and the role of government-granted monopolies. Rob breaks down new data showing that investor-owned utilities across the country have generated massive profits in recent years, keeping roughly fifteen cents of every dollar paid by customers. Because consumers cannot choose their electric, gas, water, or sewer providers, Rob argues that these companies operate as legal monopolies and that meaningful legislative reform may be needed to address rising costs for households.

Rob also discusses the late Jim Irsay and the nearly $100 million raised from the sale of memorabilia from his estate. While the auction included historic sports and music artifacts, the conversation centers on the role taxpayers played in building the stadiums that helped create the Colts franchise’s enormous value. Rob raises questions about the long-term public investment in facilities like the Hoosier Dome and Lucas Oil Stadium and whether taxpayers have received a fair return for the billions spent on professional sports infrastructure.

Another topic in today’s show is the Federal Communications Commission and concerns about government threats toward television stations over coverage of the conflict with Iran. Rob explains how broadcast licensing works, the limited authority the FCC is supposed to have over content, and why the idea of revoking licenses because of political coverage raises serious First Amendment concerns.

Finally, Rob examines new concerns among Republicans about the upcoming midterm elections as economic pressures continue to affect voters. Rising gas prices, inflation, and the broader cost of living are shaping political sentiment, and Rob discusses how voters often make decisions based on the immediate impact on their daily finances rather than long-term policy outcomes.

From state taxes and energy costs to national politics and media regulation, today’s episode covers the key issues driving political debate in Indiana and across the country.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Rob discusses the partnership between Secretary of State Diego Morales and Turning Point USA, the political standing of Governor Mike Braun, and the proposed $6.5 billion tolling plan for I-70.

Niki Kelly, Indiana Capital Chronicle, discusses I-70 tolls, Braun, Ballard and upcoming elections.

The show also covers the LEAP district water controversy, national debates over the SAVE Act, concerns about rising gas prices and foreign policy, and possible airport delays tied to the Homeland Security funding dispute.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The second major topic shifts to national politics, focusing on Donald Trump’s demand that Congress pass the SAVE Act before he signs additional legislation. The show explains what the SAVE Act would do, including voter ID and proof-of-citizenship requirements, why it has stalled in the Senate, and how the filibuster stands in the way. There’s also a broader strategic discussion about whether Republicans are trying to do too much at once, with comparisons to DOGE-style reform efforts and an argument that incremental changes such as voter ID rules and tighter mail-in ballot safeguards may be more politically achievable than the full bill as proposed.

From there, the episode turns to the state of America’s primary system and asks why taxpayers are funding party primaries that most eligible voters do not even participate in. The script argues that the current system rewards extremism, sidelines the median voter, and pushes candidates to appeal to the most ideological voters in primaries before pivoting in the general election. Indiana’s ballot access rules, the Libertarian Party’s convention-based nominating process, and the potential impact of a Greg Ballard run for secretary of state are all part of this discussion.

The show closes with a look at rising gas and diesel prices and what that could mean for household budgets, inflation, and the broader economy. The host connects fuel price increases to transportation costs, consumer affordability, and political pressure on President Trump, while also arguing that the White House has done a poor job explaining its economic decisions to the public. The segment frames energy prices as both an economic issue and a political vulnerability.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Rob argues that Cornyn represents the classic Washington establishment figure, but also notes that Trump has backed similar figures before, pointing to Lindsey Graham as an example. The discussion centers on what Rob sees as a troubling shift within the GOP: the expectation that Republican officials must show total allegiance to Trump rather than represent their constituents independently.

The episode also covers Paxton’s proposal to drop out of the Senate race if lawmakers agree to end the filibuster and vote on a national voter ID bill, along with Paxton’s public statement emphasizing his loyalty to Trump. Rob questions the political strategy behind tying policy demands to personal loyalty and explores what it says about the current direction of Republican politics.

Rob's guest today is IndyStar Columnist James Briggs discussing why Mike Braun's approval rating in Indiana is so low. And why Republicans are lashing out at former Republican Mayor Greg Ballard.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices