A few days ago we released the video version of my conversation with CJ Hopkins, a playwright and political satirist living in Germany. The podcast versions are here:

Spotify / Apple

Hopkins shares his experiences with the German authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic. He discusses the draconian measures implemented in Germany, the suspension of constitutional rights, and the censorship of dissenting voices and much more. The conversation emphasizes the importance of raising awareness about the crackdown on dissent and fighting for a free society.

The Illusion of Consensus is a listener-supported podcast. To receive exclusive segments and support our work, consider becoming a paid subscriber:

0:00 Introduction to playwright CJ Hopkins

2:50 Covid and Draconian law in Germany

6:38 Punishment of critics of Covid protocol

11:00 CJ's story: the new normal 13.10 Censorship on Twitter 16.30 Censorship on Amazon

18:05 Authoritarianism of the German government

22:05 The swastika in political satire

14:40 The Infection Protection Act

30:19 Persecution and free speech

35:10 Elon Musk and social media censorship

38:00 One big global capitalist system

44:20 Demonization of the unvaccinated

46:45 The new "untouchables"

49:00 The RKI files, hidden scientific findings

01:00:00 The crackdown on dissent

We’re excited to release the full audio version of the podcast now - you can listen here or in the Spotify and Apple links available below.

We apologize, there was another production delay as a key member on our team had to leave to his home country to address a personal emergency.

The full, official video premiere will be tomorrow.

For those patiently waiting, we didn’t want to disappoint you so we decided to provide the audio today at the very least.

Take a listen now before the full video experience in high-definition quality with all our new graphics comes out tomorrow.

Spotify link / Apple link

The Illusion of Consensus is a listener-supported podcast. Become a paid member now to receive exclusive Q+As and member-only podcast segments:

Hi everyone,

Here’s a sneak peak preview of our conversation with Russell Brand dropping tomorrow!

Members can access this early access clip now and hear one of Russell’s signature soliloquies (does anyone do it better?)!

We hope you enjoy it.

Tune in tomorrow for the podcast premiere!

Consider supporting our work by becoming a paid member (we need your help…

I’m happy to bring you the first episode — in a series of conversations — on sleep health with Dr. Nerina Ramlakhan, a physiologist and sleep therapist, about the importance of sleep and how to improve sleep quality. We discuss various topics including the current sleep discourse, the difference between ‘martini sleepers’ and ‘sensitive sleepers,’ the role of inner safety in sleep, and the challenges of sleeping on airplanes. Dr. Ramlakan emphasizes the need for an inside-out approach to sleep, focusing on emotional and mental well-being in addition to external factors like light and exercise. She also highlights the importance of individualized approaches to sleep and the role of somatic work in achieving better sleep.

In this final part of the conversation, Nerina discusses the importance of going to bed earlier before midnight and the impact it has on mental health. She highlights the trend of young people going to the gym at night instead of getting enough sleep and the potential long-term health consequences. She also explains the connection between the circadian rhythm and the rhythms of nature, emphasizing the importance of going to bed as the light levels start to drop.

Housekeeping:

Become a paid member now to receive early access and member-only segments of SEASON 2 of The Illusion of Consensus.

First episode launching May 15th with Russell Brand!

Listen To Sleep Podcast Now:

Apple podcasts / Spotify

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

09:19 The Current Sleep Discourse

14:16 Andrew Huberman and Sleep Protocols

22:37 The Importance of Inner Safety

26:31 Somatic Work for Better Sleep

32:22 Preparing the Nervous System for Better Sleep on an Airplane

47:52 The Importance of Deep Sleep for Growth Hormone and Organ Regeneration

01:06 Going to Bed Earlier Before Midnight

01:13 Practical Tips for Improving Sleep

01:32 Dealing with Waking Up at Night

Takeaways

* Sleep is a complex issue that is influenced by both external factors (such as light and exercise) and internal factors (such as emotional and mental well-being).

* Building inner safety and addressing emotional and mental well-being are crucial for improving sleep quality.

* Somatic work, such as yoga nidra and progressive muscle relaxation, can help individuals get out of their heads and into their bodies, promoting better sleep.

* Napping can be a valuable tool for rest and rejuvenation, especially in situations where it is difficult to get a full night's sleep, such as during travel.

* An individualized approach to sleep is important, as different people have different sleep needs and preferences. Train your nervous system to rest and relax in waking hours to improve sleep on an airplane.

* Power napping can help improve energy levels and overall sleep quality.

* Specific organ systems are replenished during different phases of deep sleep.

* While scientific research on these correlations is limited, observations from clinical experience support their significance. Going to bed earlier before midnight is important for mental health and overall well-being.

* Practical tips for improving sleep include eating breakfast within 45 minutes of waking up, avoiding caffeine as a substitute for food, staying hydrated, going to bed earlier, and cultivating a healthier relationship with technology.

The Illusion of Consensus is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a paid subscriber:

In this episode, professor Bryce Nickels and I discuss the debate over the origin of COVID-19, specifically whether it was a lab leak or a natural spillover. We highlight the challenges faced by scientists who question the lab leak theory and the suppression of dissenting voices. We also discuss the risks and ethics of gain-of-function research and the need for transparency and public accountability in the scientific community. The conversation in this part focuses on the deliberate suppression of Jeremy Farrar's involvement in the Nature Medicine paper, the importance of getting the paper retracted to expose the manipulation by top funders, and the hearing on Peter Daszak's role in gain-of-function research. The discussion also touches on the challenges of having different perspectives during the pandemic and the need for a healthier culture of scientific debate and discussion.

The Illusion of Consensus is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a paid subscriber:

Takeaways

* The scientific journals have played a role in suppressing the lab leak theory and promoting the natural spillover theory.

* There is a need to reevaluate the justification for certain types of research, such as studying exotic viruses in labs, and consider the potential risks and ethical implications. There was a deliberate suppression of Jeremy Farrar's involvement in the Nature Medicine paper, which is an ethical violation that needs to be addressed.

* Getting the paper retracted is important to expose the manipulation by top funders and inform the public and scientific community about the deliberate shaping of the message on the origins of the virus.

* The hearing on Peter Daszak's role in gain-of-function research was a historic event that may change the future direction of the origins issue and the regulation of risky virology research.

Listen Now:

Apple podcasts / Spotify

Sound Bites

* "The debate over COVID has become something where you have to take sides and stay with everyone that's on your side on every issue."

* "Biosafety Now's mission is to reduce the risks of lab-generated pandemics and push for public transparency and accountability."

* "The consensus in the mainstream press and among scientists like Tony Fauci was that there was no debate about the lab leak theory."

* "Nature medicine. They tried to get into nature and it went into nature medicine."

* "The paper states that the work was funded by the Wellcome Trust, which is, he was the head of it. So that is a clear, I mean, that's simply just an ethical violation that's as clear as day and nobody can dispute it."

* "The acknowledgement of malfeasance or misfeasance and misconduct is the most critical thing. And that paper is the one that needs to go first."

A note from our podcast sponsor:

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration. Alcami contains 9 high-quality adaptogens that can help regulate your nervous system and optimize energy and focus. Adaptogens are herbs and mushrooms that help build the body’s resilience to stress.

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion” here:

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

In this interview I talk to Debbie Lerman, an investigative journalist, about the key players and decision-making processes behind the pandemic response in the United States. She reveals that the National Security Council (NSC) took over as the lead policy group, with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) becoming the lead federal agencies. This shift in power sidelined the CDC and HHS, which were traditionally responsible for managing infectious disease outbreaks. Debbie also explores the appointment of Deborah Birx as the head of the White House Task Force and questions the involvement of Matt Pottinger, a China expert, in the decision-making process. The conversation explores the role of the government and public health officials in the COVID-19 response.

The Illusion of Consensus is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a paid subscriber:

Takeaways:

* The National Security Council (NSC) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) took over as the lead policy and federal agencies, respectively, in the pandemic response.

* Deborah Birx was appointed as the head of the White House Task Force, but the involvement of Matt Pottinger in the decision-making process is questionable.

* The decision-making process behind the lockdowns and the development of vaccines was influenced by the defense industry and lacked democratic participation.

* There is a need to restructure pandemic response plans to ensure that the right people with reasonable training and the right temperament are in charge.

* Revoking emergency declarations and promoting democratic participation are essential to maintain trust in public health and prevent a bioterrorism-like response in the future.

Watch:

Apple / Spotify

Chapters:

00:00 Introduction: Debbie Lerman's Investigative Journalism on the Pandemic

04:48 The Key Players: National Security Council and Department of Homeland Security

10:02 Sidelining the CDC and HHS in the Decision-Making Process

26:10 Deborah Birx's Controversial Appointment

29:34 Questioning the Involvement of Matt Pottinger

31:27 Deborah Birx and the Non-Traditional Approach to Public Health

34:50 The Decision-Making Process Behind the Lockdowns

41:04 The Development of Vaccines and Operation Warp Speed

47:47 The Ineffectiveness of Contact Tracing

52:23 Treating COVID-19 as a Bioterrorism Crisis

59:33 Restructuring Pandemic Response Plans and Promoting Democratic Participation

A note from our podcast sponsor:

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration. Alcami contains 9 high-quality adaptogens that can help regulate your nervous system and optimize energy and focus. Adaptogens are herbs and mushrooms that help build the body’s resilience to stress.

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion” here:

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

In this conversation, I interview psychologist Dr. Matt Johnson about the current state of mainstream pharmaceutical solutions for mental health issues such as ADHD, depression, and anxiety. A bit about Matt: he has lead groundbreaking research in psychedelic therapy at Johns Hopkins University over the past two decades. We aimed to discuss that but ended up spending the whole podcast discussing the staggering limits of current pharmaceutical interventions. As an expert in the intersecting field of psychopharmacology — studying the psychological effects of various drugs — he was the perfect person to discuss this with.

As Matt humbly admitted, psychopharmacology faces challenges in finding effective treatments for complex psychological problems. Medications like SSRIs and benzodiazepines have limitations in terms of long-term efficacy and side effects. Meanwhile, the use of psychedelics and related compounds, such as ketamine, have shown promise in providing relief for depression and anxiety. However, the field of psychopharmacology still lacks major breakthroughs and relies on medications that may not fully address the complexity of psychological issues. The new development of non-psychedelic compounds that mimic the effects of psychedelics without the visionary experience may not be as effective. The conversation highlights the need for innovative approaches to mental health treatment.

The Illusion of Consensus is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a paid subscriber:

Takeaways

* Mainstream pharmaceutical solutions for mental health issues like ADHD, depression, and anxiety have limitations and potential harms.

* Overuse of ADHD stimulant medications is a concern, and the narrative of depression being caused by low serotonin levels is overly simplistic.

* Psychotherapy, such as cognitive behavioral therapy, can be highly effective in treating anxiety disorders and depression.

* Benzodiazepines are commonly prescribed for anxiety but can have negative long-term effects and should be used with caution. Psychopharmacology struggles to find effective treatments for complex psychological problems.

* Medications like SSRIs and benzodiazepines have limitations in terms of long-term efficacy and side effects.

Sound Bites

* "There are major issues with some traditional medications"

* "The narrative of depression being caused by low serotonin is overly simplistic"

* "Psychedelic therapy offers the potential for long-term benefits"

* "Psychopharmacology medications for the mind don't seem to work the same way as other classes of medicine."

* "There's a real danger associated with being on benzodiazepines chronically."‘

Watch now:

Apple link / Spotify

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

09:20 Mainstream Pharmaceutical Solutions for Mental Health

32:00 Exploring the Root Causes of Mental Health Disorders

46:30 The Limitations of Psychopharmacology

57:43 The Complexity of Mental Health and Treatment

01:08 Debunking the Serotonin Model of Depression

01:29 The Limitations of Medications for Anxiety

01:58 Closing Remarks and Future Directions

Our exciting first podcast sponsor:

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration. Alcami contains 9 high-quality adaptogens that can help regulate your nervous system and optimize energy and focus. Adaptogens are herbs and mushrooms that help build the body’s resilience to stress.

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion” here:

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

The Illusion of Consensus is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a paid subscriber:

In this bonus, member-only podcast episode, I interview our resident cardiologist Dr. Anish Koka about two recent major studies on cardiac risks associated with the mRNAs: Pfizer’s long-awaited subclinical myocarditis analysis and the CDC’s sudden cardiac death study. We start the conversation with a heartbreaking update (yikes, that adjective had to come to my mind first) on the case of a 38-year-old law enforcement member who developed vaccine myocarditis over two years ago. I interviewed him in a Substack piece at the time and just checked back in. Bad news. So much for “mild” and “transient” myocarditis assured by CDC and FDA talking-heads.

As promised to our loyal paid members, you will have access to bonus conversations every month. This is one of them. There is a free preview accessible to everyone for the first 10 minutes.

Takeaways

* Dr. Anish Koka has been vocal about the vaccine myocarditis issue and has provided critical analysis of the data throughout the pandemic.

* The case of a 38-year-old law enforcement member who developed vaccine myocarditis highlights the ongoing symptoms and complications that can arise from this condition.

* The subclinical myocarditis study by Pfizer and the CDC study on post-vaccine sudden cardiac death in adolescents are important in shaping the discourse around the risks and benefits of the COVID vaccine.

* There is a need for comprehensive data on the rate of sudden cardiac deaths after vaccination, especially in different age groups and with long-term follow-up.

* Alternative treatments, such as stem cell therapy, are being explored for vaccine injuries. Further investigation is needed to understand the potential harm caused by mRNA vaccines on the heart, particularly in young individuals.

Sound Bites:

* "mRNA vaccines are harming the heart, that there's some kind of mechanism that we need to understand better and investigate better."

* "I think we should hold everyone to the same level of rigor."

* "Given the numbers we're talking about here, some people are gonna have actual, you know more significant stuff than than what you're seeing here."

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

05:46 The Severity of Vaccine Myocarditis

11:14 Recommendations for Treatment

16:06 Concerns and Questions about Long-Term Effects

30:17 The Importance of Rigorous Research

38:34 Introduction and Background

41:10 The Delayed Recognition of Vaccine-Related Myocarditis

43:12 Study Design and Limitations

55:05 Conflicts of Interest and Interpretation of Results

01:01:20 The CDC Study on Post-Vaccine Sudden Cardiac Death

01:05:52 Conclusion and Considerations

01:06:11 Pfizer's Study on the Vaccine-Myocarditis Link

The Illusion of Consensus is a citizen-funded podcast. To receive exclusive podcasts and support our work, consider becoming a paid subscriber:

Our exciting first podcast sponsor:

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration. Alcami contains 9 high-quality adaptogens that can help regulate your nervous system and optimize energy and focus. Adaptogens are herbs and mushrooms that help build the body’s resilience to stress.

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion” here:

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

In this episode I interview Laura Powell, a lawyer who fought against a law in California that restricted doctors from discussing their opinions with patients. The law, known as AB 2098, aimed to silence doctors who were expressing views that went against the mainstream narrative. Laura discusses the unconstitutional nature of the law and the chilling effect it had on doctors' free speech rights. She also discusses the role of various organizations, such as the California Medical Association and the No License for Disinformation group, in pushing for the law. Despite facing personal blowback, she is proud of the work she has done and the friendships she has formed.

The Illusion of Consensus is a reader-supported podcast. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a paid subscriber:

Takeaways

* AB 2098 was a law in California that restricted doctors from discussing their opinions with patients, particularly on topics that went against the mainstream narrative.

* The erosion of trust in public health institutions has contributed to the skepticism towards mainstream narratives and the importance of allowing doctors to prioritize their patients' interests over public health agendas.

* The victory in the Hoeg v. Newsom case highlighted the importance of protecting doctors' free speech rights and ensuring that laws are narrowly tailored and not overly vague. Laura Powell started Californians for Good Governance before the case because she saw a lack of opposition to the California law that would have restricted doctors' free speech rights.

* She testified in front of the California legislature and received a positive response from the judge, who granted a preliminary injunction against the law.

Listen Now:

Spotify / Apple podcasts

Sound Bites

* "It's just frustrating because we actually weren't paid and people were telling lies in order to as an ad hominem attack against us to say we're only doing this because we're getting money."

* "It's a great free speech victory.

* "Nobody else was doing this."

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

03:23 AB 2098: The Unconstitutional Law

10:47 The Role of the California Medical Association

35:06 The Fight for Free Speech Rights for Doctors

44:43 The Erosion of Trust in Public Health Institutions

53:57 The Hoag v. Newsom Case: A Victory for Free Speech

01:00:56 Challenging Unconstitutional Laws

01:06:33 The Need to Stand Up for Free Speech

I’m pleased to release this interview I recorded on Monday with vice presidential candidate Nicole Shanahan. We discuss her background in law and her investments in science, particularly in reproductive longevity. We delve into the need to restore free speech in science and the detrimental effects of suppressing dissenting voices. We highlight the inefficiency and high cost of the American healthcare system, particularly in addressing chronic diseases. Shanahan suggests investing in public health systems, rethinking agriculture practices, and ensuring access to clean water as preventive measures for chronic diseases.

The conversation highlights the need for preventative healthcare and a shift away from relying solely on drugs to manage symptoms. We also discuss the influence of capitalism on healthcare and the importance of addressing conflicts of interest in the industry. The failures of regulatory bodies like the FDA and CDC are examined, with a focus on the need for screening for conflicts of interest and community-based input.

We hope you enjoy this conversation.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

10:03 Free Speech in Science

25:40 Addressing the Root Causes of Chronic Disease

29:31 Restoring Free Speech and Scientific Debate

30:22 Shifting Towards Preventative Healthcare

33:43 Corporate Capture in the Healthcare Industry

36:48 Failures of the FDA, NIH, and CDC

56:02 The Impact of the Pandemic on Education

57:58 Prioritizing the Well-being and Development of Children

Sound Bites

* "Investing in science for the sake of information and not for the sake of a commercial outcome."

* "A vast effort by the federal government to suppress the speech of scientists who disagreed with government scientists."

* "Scientists do not feel comfortable publishing the paper they actually want to publish."

* "We need preventative healthcare... healthcare professionals who aren't playing whack-a-mole with symptoms and their only tool being prescribing new drugs to patients."

* "If sick people are being viewed as business opportunities, there's no incentive to reduce the numbers of needy people."

* "The CDC, the FDA, the NIH, all have failed in pretty fundamental ways."

This episode was scheduled for public release in a week, but I got too many messages and emails asking when this will be released to everyone. Here it is! In this episode, I interview Dr. Adeel Khan, a leading innovator and clinician in the regenerative medicine space. He runs Eterna Health where he’s treated people like Tony Robbins, Jordan Peterson, and Israel Adesanya.

While the focus of the conversation was initially about the fundamentals of regenerative medicine, we had to discuss vaccine injuries since before we started rolling, Dr. Khan told me how he’s successfully treated hundreds of vaccine-injured patients.

Dr. Adeel Khan explains that stem cell therapy can help regulate and restore the immune system by reprogramming white blood cells to send the right signals. This is particularly beneficial for individuals with chronic inflammation, such as those with myocarditis. Stem cells can interact with the heart muscle and help reduce inflammation. Dr. Khan acknowledges that the stem cell industry is full of shady clinics, but his clinic is focused on research and pushing the field forward. He is confident in his protocols and believes he can successfully treat most vaccine injuries and psychosomatic long COVID cases. He emphasizes the importance of informed consent and the need for more awareness and options for patients.

(NOTE: I am not endorsing any particular treatment or product here. I only gave Dr. Khan a platform to delineate the remarkable success he’s seen at his clinic. I was skeptical in the conversation and pushed him on what seems to be “too good to be true” but Dr. Khan stood his ground and presented a compelling rationale for his clinical protocols. I encourage everyone to go in with an open mind and consider this as a *potentially* highly effective alternative to the current failures in the medical system to treat vaccine-injured patients.)

The Illusion of Consensus is a citizen-supported podcast. To receive exclusive posts and support our work, consider becoming a paid subscriber:

Takeaways

* Dr. Khan emphasizes the importance of a nuanced approach to vaccination and the need to explore alternative treatments for COVID, such as peptides and lifestyle interventions.

* He highlights the potential risks and benefits of mRNA vaccines, including the use of lipid nanoparticle vectors and the potential for offsite targets and immunogenicity.

* Stem cell therapy can regulate and restore the immune system by reprogramming white blood cells to send the right signals.

* Stem cells can interact with the heart muscle and help reduce inflammation in individuals with myocarditis.

* He is confident in his protocols and believes he can successfully treat most vaccine injuries and long COVID cases.

* There is not comprehensive, robust RCT evidence on stem cell therapies but they have shown incredible efficacy in various clinical settings. Dr. Khan believes they should be presented as viable alternative or option on the table rather than a magic bullet which can cure all diseases.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to Dr. Adeel Khan and Regenerative Medicine

02:27 Shift in Focus to COVID Vaccines and Vaccine Injuries

14:47 Vaccine Mandates and the Lack of Nuanced Approach

23:57 The mRNA Platform and its Issues

39:55 Connecting the Issues with mRNA Vaccines to Vaccine Injuries

41:31 Lack of Transparency and Downplaying by Regulatory Bodies

44:33 The Limitations and Risks of Psychiatric Drugs

53:40 Treating Vaccine Injuries: A Holistic Approach

01:01:16 Restoring Immune and Heart Function with Stem Cells

01:08:57 Addressing the Underlying Causes of Health Issues

01:18:16 Regulating the Immune System and Controlling Inflammation

01:19:06 Retraining the Immune System with Stem Cell Therapy

01:19:55 Treating Myocarditis and Restoring Heart Function

01:21:15 Investing in Research and Legitimizing Stem Cell Therapy

01:22:22 The Importance of Large Clinical Trials and Safety

01:32:46 Restoring Immune Dysregulation with Stem Cell Therapy

01:34:39 Impressive Safety Profile of Stem Cell Therapy

Listen now:

Apple podcasts / Spotify

Sound Bites

* "There's a lot of undocumented adverse effects that people will never know the true incidence and prevalence of these injuries because they're just not all going to be reported." - Dr. Adeel Khan

* "I just never understood why we weren't looking or why weren't we promoting healthy lifestyle? Why weren't we promoting peptides like in Russia where they use thymus and alpha-1 and thymulin to literally treat severe COVID?" - Dr. Adeel Khan

* "Lack of straight answers from Health Canada on COVID vaccines is concerning" - Dr. Adeel Khan

* "So much of what you do... seems too good to be true." - Rav Arora

Chapters:

00:00 Introduction and Background

01:02 The Catastrophic Impact of Lockdowns in the Global South

06:33 The Cruelty of Lockdown Policies in India

08:57 The Global South's Experience of Lockdowns

11:36 The Violation of the Implicit Promise of Globalization

21:51 The Impact of Propaganda and Fear of Death

26:13 Opposition to the WHO Treaty and Neo-Colonial Imposition

31:07 Impact on the Sovereignty of the Global South

34:05 Ethical Issues with Vaccine Policies

39:35 Xenophobia and Movement Restrictions

46:23 Imposition of Western Medicine and Knowledge

51:05 Critique of Neoliberalism and Colonialism

51:58 Maintaining Integrity in the Face of Pandemic

53:23 Closing Remarks

Our sponsor Alcami Elements:

Our new blend uses high-quality, organic Peruvian cacao, enhancing the delicious flavour of our original mix. True raw cacao is high in antioxidants and minerals such as magnesium which also can have calming effects.

Illusion of Consensus readers can get 10% off their first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusionconsensus” here:

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

Hi everyone,

Suffice it to say I had my mind blown yesterday when I had on Dr. Adeel Khan — founder of the cutting-edge regenerative medicine clinic Eterna Health — to discuss stem cell therapy, peptides, vagus nerve re-set shots for restoring chronic back, knee, and other musculoskeletal, as well as mental health, issues.

I saw him on Jordan Peterson’s p…

Sound Bites:

* "The government had essentially set up what he called an Orwellian ministry of truth."

* "This is the worst free speech violation in United States history."

* "Throttle everything that's positive about Great Barrington Declaration."

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Personal Experiences with Censorship

06:15 The Scope and Impact of Censorship

10:27 The July 4th Ruling and Constitutional Violations

13:17The Circuit Court's Ruling and Third-Party Censorship

16:46The Appeals Court and Preliminary Injunction

17:26Media Coverage and Economic Interests

20:03The Supreme Court Case and Expectations

24:55 The Twitter Files and Reporting

26:52 The Role of Legacy Media and Censorship

28:59 The ACLU and Professional Medical Societies

32:33 The Supreme Court Experience and Observations

36:21 Reading the Tea Leaves: Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson

39:16 Concerning Justices and Compelling State Interest

41:46 The Purpose of the First Amendment

46:00 Government's Spread of Misinformation

46:47 Illusion of Consensus

47:29 Government's Right to Free Speech

48:56 Censorship vs. Speech

49:26 Government's Misinformation

53:24 Section 230 and Liability Protection

58:27 Potential Supreme Court Ruling

01:00:48 Impact of Winning or Losing

01:07:31 Importance of Free Speech

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

01:16 Early COVID Essays

06:37 Censorship on Medium

08:03 Formation of Rational Ground

22:30 Motivation to Speak Out

25:49 Transition to Zoom School

31:32 Impact on Children with Special Needs

34:16 Lack of In-Person Help for Children with Special Needs

39:51 The Effect on College Students

45:36 The Purpose of Life and the Importance of Relationships

52:55 The Great Barrington Declaration and Consent

58:29The Critique of the Great Barrington Declaration

01:00:54 The Inhumane Treatment in Nursing Home

Takeaways

* AJ K. faced censorship and deplatforming for challenging the mainstream narrative on COVID-19.

* The Rational Ground group was formed as a response to the censorship and aimed to provide a platform for independent writers and researchers.

* School closures had a significant impact on children with special needs, depriving them of essential services and support.

* The isolation and disrupted routines caused by the pandemic had detrimental effects on the mental health and well-being of children. Early intervention and support are crucial for the development of children with special needs.

* The period of neuroplasticity in early childhood is finite, and the lack of in-person help during the pandemic may have long-term consequences for children's outcomes.

* College closures and isolation measures have had negative effects on young adults' socialization and well-being.

* The trade-off between safety and the loss of important relationships and experiences raises questions about the purpose of protection.

I’m excited to bring you this conversation with clinical psychologist Dr. Roger McFillin. His content on X and Substack is incredibly thought-provoking and challenges the popular medical consensus on mental health.

McFillin challenges the efficacy of antidepressants and stimulants, pointing out that the placebo effect plays a significant role in their perceived effectiveness. He also emphasizes the lack of scientific evidence supporting the chemical imbalance theory of depression and the potential negative consequences of long-term use of psychiatric drugs.

We also discuss the potential harm caused by antidepressants, including an increased risk of suicide, self-injury, and permanent sexual dysfunction. The third theme is the influence of pharmaceutical companies on medical guidelines and research, leading to biased and distorted information.

He explains how major medical organizations in the United States are funded by biotech and pharmaceutical companies, as well as nonprofits that are pushed by pharma. He highlights the focus on drugs as healthcare in the allopathic medical model and the lack of emphasis on diet interventions and addressing root causes of poor health. Dr. McFillin also criticizes the overdiagnosis of psychiatric conditions like ADHD and the role of schools in promoting the use of medication.

The Illusion of Consensus is a reader-supported podcast. To receive exclusive posts and support our work, consider becoming a paid subscriber:

Takeaways

* The pharmaceutical industry has a significant influence on the mental health field, leading to overprescription and misrepresentation of scientific data.

* There is a lack of evidence for the efficacy and safety of psychiatric drugs, and the long-term consequences are often not fully understood.

* The concept of a chemical imbalance as the cause of mental illness is not supported by scientific evidence. Pharmaceutical companies often have a significant influence on research, including ghostwriting and biased reporting.

* Medical organizations, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Psychiatric Association, receive funding from pharmaceutical companies, leading to conflicts of interest.

* The FDA's analysis of studies and approval of drugs may not always consider the risks and adverse effects.

* The overprescription of ADHD medications is influenced by the mass indoctrination in education and the desire for obedience in classrooms. ADHD is a spectrum of attentional challenges, rather than a disorder.

Watch Now:

Apple podcasts

Time-stamps:

00:00 Introduction and Background

03:19Awakening to the Flaws in Mainstream Mental Health Approaches

05:09 Influence of Pharmaceutical Industry on Mental Health Field

08:57 Lack of Efficacy and Safety of Psychiatric Drugs

12:16 Prevalence and Problems with SSRIs and Stimulants

28:30 Meta-Analysis on SSRIs and Suicide Risk

40:21 Conflict of Interest in Research

43:13 Ghostwriting and Pharmaceutical Influence

45:21 Corruption in Medical Organizations

48:55 Lack of Proper Analysis by FDA

56:06 Overprescription of ADHD Medications

01:01:48 Mass Indoctrination in Education

01:10:38 The Rise of ADHD Diagnoses

01:21:25 The Power of Behavioral Interventions

01:26:28 The Influence of Pharmaceutical Industry and Labeling

01:32:19 Understanding ADHD as a Spectrum

01:43:00 The Value of Unique Skills and Abilities

01:50:13 The Normalization of Attentional Challenges

01:59:18 Cultivating Inner Reality and Expectations

01:56:24 Depathologizing Mental Health

01:59:44 The Challenges of Achievement and More

02:01:06 The Value and Limitations of Labels

02:03:15 Understanding ADHD on a Spectrum

02:04:23The Spectrum of Trauma and PTSD

02:08:10 The Mismatch Between Evolution and Modern Society

02:19:19The Value and Danger of Labels

02:28:39 Cultural Factors and Changing the Culture

02:29:12 Future Discussions: Trauma and Treatments

Our exciting first podcast sponsor:

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration. Alcami contains 9 high-quality adaptogens that can help regulate your nervous system and optimize energy and focus. Adaptogens are herbs and mushrooms that help build the body’s resilience to stress.

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion” here:

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

Subscribe to Dr. McFillin’s Substack:

In this new episode of The Illusion of Consensus podcast, I interview Charles Rixey, a member of the group DRASTIC, which has been investigating the origins of the COVID-19 virus. They discuss the efforts by scientific leaders, such as Tony Fauci, to suppress the lab leak theory and create an illusion of consensus around the natural origin theory. DRASTIC, a group of citizen scientists, uncovered evidence that challenged the natural origin narrative, including deleted sequences from the Wuhan lab's viral database. The conversation emphasizes the importance of uncovering the truth and restoring trust in science and medicine.

Our exciting first podcast sponsor:

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration. Alcami contains 9 high-quality adaptogens that can help regulate your nervous system and optimize energy and focus. Adaptogens are herbs and mushrooms that help build the body’s resilience to stress.

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion” here:

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

03:12 Unscrupulous Scientific Leaders and Motives

11:02 The Importance of Furin Cleavage Site

12:30 The Significance of ACE2 Receptor and Furin Cleavage Site

15:50 Debate Among Molecular Geneticists

25:57 Formation and Work of DRASTIC

29:46 Access to Wuhan Lab Sequences

40:53 The Michael Warby Paper and Flaws

43:52 Questioning the Accuracy of Chinese Data

48:44 The Lancet Commission and Jeffrey Sachs

55:31 Evidence of a Lab Leak: The Diffuse Proposal

01:02:12 History of Gain-of-Function Research

01:15:10 The Implications for Future Pandemic Preparedness

01:20:15 The Collapse of Trust in Science

Consider helping us fund our podcast expansion as we seek to hire a producer and video editor:

https://donorbox.org/help-fund-independent-journalism-2

Myocarditis happens to be the most common severe adverse event associated with the mRNA vaccines — concentrated in young, healthy men — and instead of honestly discussing the risks and benefits, the CDC and FDA gaslit the public and harmed untold numbers of young people who no conceivable reason to benefit.

In this wide-ranging conversation, Dr. Anish Koka and I discuss how he came to regret vaccinating young, healthy people at his clinic and his comprehensive analysis of the relevant vaccine myocarditis data.

We need more clinicians and scientists like Dr. Koka. This podcast may offer a glimmer of hope.

Our exciting first podcast sponsor:

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration. Alcami contains 9 high-quality adaptogens that can help regulate your nervous system and optimize energy and focus. Adaptogens are herbs and mushrooms that help build the body’s resilience to stress.

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion” here:

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

Quotes from the podcast:

“Me running around saying it's ‘safe and effective,’ and giving it to 17-year-olds, given that most of the patients that were in the vaccine studies weren't 17-years-old — I wasn't technically correct.”

“This is a very cardioactive vaccine”

“I would not give it to low risk people again…That was a mistake on my part.”

Takeaways

* The data suggests that COVID-19-related myocarditis is different from vaccine-related myocarditis, with the latter showing higher troponin levels and a higher likelihood of scar formation.

* Myocarditis should not be characterized as a mild condition, as it can have significant consequences and requires hospital care and follow-up.

* Higher troponin levels indicate more severe heart muscle damage and a higher risk of long-term impacts. Higher cardiac biomarkers indicate more heart muscle damage and a higher chance of long-term impacts

* The smallpox vaccine had side effects, leading to its discontinuation despite its effectiveness against smallpox.

* The mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 have shown a higher risk of myocarditis in young men. Myocarditis is more commonly seen with the Moderna vaccine compared to the Pfizer vaccine, likely due to the higher mRNA dose in the Moderna vaccine.

* The initial vaccine trials had limitations, and the effectiveness of vaccines against new variants is uncertain. Interpreting studies and data related to COVID-19 requires epistemic humility and careful consideration of the baseline risk of viral infections.

* A study from Korea found severe cases of vaccine myocarditis, highlighting the importance of understanding the severity of adverse events.

Time-stamps:

02:21 Evolution of the COVID Vaccine Conversation

08:09 Myocarditis and Previous Vaccines

26:39 Discussion on Vaccine Efficacy

35:22 Uncertainty about Vaccine Benefit

40:25 Limitations of Vaccine Recommendations

43:54 Risk of COVID-19 in Healthy Children

48:10 Granularity and Humility in Public Health

57:31 Differences Between COVID-19 Myocarditis and Vaccine Myocarditis

01:03 Misconceptions about COVID-19 Myocarditis

01:08 Misleading Comparisons of Myocarditis Rates

01:21:36Troponin Levels in Myocarditis Cases

(Note: our podcast editing software was not able to generate full time-stamps for the whole 3 hour show. We apologize for this and aim to contact tech support to ameliorate this)

If you would like to help us fund our podcast expansion to Rumble and YouTube (we would like to hire a producer and purchase professional theme music and graphics when we are financially able!), you may donate to us here. Your support is greatly appreciated:

https://donorbox.org/help-fund-independent-journalism-2

I have just recorded my first thoughts on the Murthy v. Missouri case, which involves the foundational First Amendment rights of Americans. I delve into the history of the case and the concerns about the Biden administration’s censorship regime. Also, I go into some detail about the preliminary injunction and Judge Terry Doughty's ruling, as well as the appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

This is the first part of our exclusive Murthy v. Missouri coverage. Rav and I will be recording a podcast next to discuss the implications further. Moreover, we will be recording episodes with my co-plaintiff Aaron Kheriaty and Jenin Younes (an attorney on the case).

The Illusion of Consensus is a citizen-funded podcast. Please consider supporting us by becoming a paid member:

Takeaways:

* The Murthy v. Biden case involves the First Amendment rights of Americans and concerns about censorship by the Biden administration.

* There is a pattern of social media censorship, with the government directing social media companies to censor speech on various topics.

* The preliminary injunction in the case ruled that the Biden administration was violating First Amendment rights, but the case is still ongoing.

* The Supreme Court's decision in this case will have significant implications for the protection of free speech and the role of the government in censorship.

Listen now:

Apple:

Spotify:

Chapters:

00:00 Introduction to the Murthy v. Missouri Case

01:00 Concerns about Censorship by the Biden Administration

04:00 Role of the Government in Censorship

06:03 Preliminary Injunction and Judge Terry Doughty's Ruling

08:13 Appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

09:39 Limitations of the Preliminary Injunction

10:34 Stanford University's Involvement

12:02 Government as the Source of Misinformation

16:20 Supreme Court Hearing: Standing and Traceability

21:45 Traceability and Coercion by the Government

24:35 First Amendment and its Application

26:33 Government's Argument for Censorship

28:30 Analogies and Differences with Traditional Media

31:27 Coercion vs. Persuasion by the Government

35:12 Restrictions on Social Media Companies

39:05 Hypotheticals and the First Amendment

43:19 Stakes and Importance of the Supreme Court Decision

If you would like to help us fund our podcast expansion to Rumble and YouTube, you may donate to us here. Your support is greatly appreciated:

https://donorbox.org/help-fund-independent-journalism-2

Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill, a specialist physician in Ontario, faced tremendous backlash for advocating against lockdowns and speaking out about the broader health impacts of COVID-19 policies. She was labeled as an anti-vaxxer and faced multiple complaints to her professional regulator. Despite her strong scientific background and advocacy for evidence-based medicine, she was targeted by powerful entities in the Canadian media and medical communities.

Dr. Gill filed a defamation lawsuit to clear her name. The court procedural/motion decision and the cost order were both appealed, ultimately leading to a costs order of nearly $300K ordered in late February 2024 with just weeks to pay. She is now facing financial hardship and may have to declare bankruptcy.

In our 35 minute special podcast episode, we discuss all of this.

Please donate to Kulvinder’s legal fund to help support her:

https://www.givesendgo.com/kulvinder

Follow her on X:

https://twitter.com/dockaurG

Takeaways

* Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill faced backlash and persecution for advocating against lockdowns and speaking out about the broader health impacts of COVID-19 policies.

* She was labeled as an anti-vaxxer and faced multiple complaints to her professional regulator, despite her strong scientific background and advocacy for evidence-based medicine.

* Powerful entities in the Canadian media and medical communities targeted Dr. Gill, leading to a defamation lawsuit. However, the court ruled against her and ordered her to pay $1.2 million in costs.

* Dr. Gill is now facing financial hardship and may have to declare bankruptcy.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

02:17Advocacy for Health and Concerns for Marginalized Communities

03:14 Backlash and Labeling as an Anti-Vaxxer

06:32 Advocacy Against Lockdowns and Focus on Immunity

11:42 Persecution and Attacks on Reputation

28:49 Court Ruling and Financial Burden

32:01 Implications and Give Send Go Campaign

34:22 Recognition and Gratitude

In this critical conversation we discuss a number of hot topics, most crucially Martin’s firing from Harvard for his opposition to vaccine mandates. He has broken the silence on this tragic issue and we are happy to host his first public conversation on the matter.

We also discuss Martin’s firing from the CDC over the J&J vaccine and Harvard’s generally unscientific response to the pandemic. The conversation concludes with a discussion on decentralizing and reforming the scientific community.

- Jay Bhattacharya

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

14:12 Early Thoughts on the Pandemic

30:36 Meeting at the White House

48:46 The Great Barrington Declaration

52:40 Challenges and Attacks

58:25 Assessing the Vaccine Trials

01:01:48 The CDC's Pause on the J&J Vaccine

01:04:39 The Need for Exemptions and Accommodations

01:09:49 Harvard's Vaccine Mandate and Firing

01:14:47 Martin's Experience with COVID-19

01:18:24 Harvard's Treatment of Martin

01:27:06 Assessing Harvard's Response to the Pandemic

01:31:17 The Need for Reform in the Scientific Community

01:35:46 Bright Spots and Moving Forward

If you would like to help us fund our podcast expansion to Rumble and YouTube (we intend on hiring a producer when we are financially able!), you may donate to us here. Your support is greatly appreciated:

https://donorbox.org/help-fund-independent-journalism-2

Our exciting first podcast sponsor:

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration. Alcami contains 9 high-quality adaptogens that can help regulate your nervous system and optimize energy and focus. Adaptogens are herbs and mushrooms that help build the body’s resilience to stress.

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion” here:

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

Chapters:

00:00 Introduction: Evidence Hierarchy and Conflicting Views on Masks

00:30 Cochrane Collaborative's Reviews on Masks

06:23 The Limitations of Medicine and Public Health

10:36 The Psychological Impact of Masks

19:22 The Corrupted Scientific Agency

23:21 Lack of Trust in the CDC

24:48 Conflicts of Interest in Mask Research

26:53 Political Motivations

36:08 Lack of RCTs on Masks

42:39 Protecting Reputations

49:46 Teaching People Masks Work

Our exciting first podcast sponsor:

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration. Alcami contains 9 high-quality adaptogens that can help regulate your nervous system and optimize energy and focus. Adaptogens are herbs and mushrooms that help build the body’s resilience to stress.

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion” here:

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

Chapters

00:00 Different Policies in Denmark and the United States

03:41 Empirical Data on School Closures

07:57 Study on School Reopening in Wisconsin

11:19 CDC Guidelines and Masking in Schools

15:21 Study on Mask Effectiveness

23:09 Debate on Masking in Schools

25:23 Study on Mask Mandates in North Dakota

34:39 Myocarditis as a Side Effect of Vaccines

35:10 Concerns about Myocarditis

38:16 Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)

40:12 Comparing Myocarditis Rates

43:22 Ethics of Vaccine Mandates

53:27 Personal Costs of Research

59:33 Loss of Job at UC Davis

01:07:15 Negative Reaction to Urgency of Normal

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration. Alcami contains 9 high-quality adaptogens that can help regulate your nervous system and optimize energy and focus. Adaptogens are herbs and mushrooms that help build the body’s resilience to stress.

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion” here:

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

---

Hi everyone,

I’m very excited to release this eye-opening episode. While only an hour, this felt like three or four because my special guest Dr. Pamela Kryskow — a psychedelic researcher and medical doctor — presents a powerful model for collective healing of psychological issues such as depression and PTSD.

As someone interested in new solutions for mental health crises, I was quite moved by her community-oriented model where healing is not individual but communal — and uses the incredible power of psychedelic medicines. Dr. Kryskow shares her experience working with end-of-life patients and the positive results she has seen. She emphasizes the importance of doing the necessary work alongside psychedelic therapy and the need for ethical therapists. She also highlights the time and effort required for healing and the importance of creating a safe, ceremonial space for psychedelic sessions. She emphasizes the value of progressing at one's own pace and the benefits of having a community that holds individuals accountable to their healing.

Dr. Kryskow also explores the potential for healing in relationships and the generational impact of psychedelic therapy. She explains the process of accessing psychedelic therapy through referrals and Health Canada approvals. The effectiveness of ketamine for PTSD is discussed, along with the role of psychedelics in trauma healing. The importance of timing and safety in psychedelic experiences is highlighted, as well as the need for a solid therapeutic team. Dr. Kryskow distinguishes between challenging experiences and bad trips, emphasizing the importance of proper preparation and support.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

03:01 The Role of Psychedelics in Palliative Care

07:31 Results of Psychedelic Therapy for End-of-Life Patients

14:59 The Role of Psychedelics in Holistic Healing

16:10 Understanding the Limitations of Psychedelic Therapy

23:38 The Importance of Ethical Therapists

26:18 The Time and Effort Required for Healing

32:17 The Roots to Thrive Program and Protocols

36:31 The Importance of a Solid Ceremonial Space

36:51 Integration and Community Support

39:02 Healing in Relationships

41:03 Accessing Psychedelic Therapy

43:11 Effectiveness of Ketamine for PTSD

44:09 Psychedelics and Trauma Healing

47:46 Choosing the Right Medicine for Healing

49:50 Timing and Safety of Psychedelic Experiences

55:26 Building Safety and Readiness for Psychedelic Therapy

59:11 Challenging Experiences vs. Bad Trips

Hi everyone,

In this conversation, Professor Jay Bhattacharya and Mattias Desmet discuss the psychology of totalitarianism and the Illusion of Consensus. They explore the corruption of science, the modern mechanistic worldview, and the alienation of people from each other. They also delve into the role of measurement and measurability, the impact of digital connections, and the phenomenon of scapegoating. The conversation highlights the role of leaders in mass formation and the emergence of totalitarian states. Together, they provide insights into the psychological factors that contribute to the manipulation of public opinion and the erosion of individual freedoms. The conversation explores the themes of mass formation, totalitarianism, awakening, sincere speech, and rejecting the mechanistic worldview. It highlights the impact of lonely masses and the potential for a technocratic totalitarianism. The power of sincere speech is discussed as a means to inhibit mass formation and create genuine connections. The conversation concludes with a discussion on the importance of remaining open-minded and avoiding fanaticism in ideologies.

The Illusion of Consensus is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a paid subscriber:

Takeaways

* The replication crisis in science has revealed the corruption and lack of truthfulness in academic research.

* The mechanistic worldview and the reliance on rational thinking have led to the alienation of individuals and the deterioration of social bonds.

* Digital connections and technological communication have replaced meaningful in-person interactions, leading to increased loneliness and disconnection.

* Mass formation is a psychological phenomenon that arises when individuals connect to a collective ideal, leading to the manipulation of public opinion and the emergence of totalitarian states. Lonely masses can be used as a psychological basis for totalitarian states.

* Awakening from mass formation can occur when the power of the narrative weakens.

* Sincere speech inhibits mass formation and creates genuine connections.

* Rejecting the mechanistic worldview is essential to address mass formation.

* Remaining open-minded and avoiding fanaticism is crucial in preventing mass formation.

Our exciting first podcast sponsor:

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration. Alcami contains 9 high-quality adaptogens that can help regulate your nervous system and optimize energy and focus. Adaptogens are herbs and mushrooms that help build the body’s resilience to stress.

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion” here:

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

Spotify link:

Apple link:

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

02:13 The Corruption of Science

05:12 The Mechanistic Worldview and Alienation

08:25 The Alienation of People from Each Other

11:58 The Paradox of Science

14:28 The Role of Measurement and Measurability

19:50 The Role of Digital Connections

22:41 The Phenomenon of Scapegoating

26:35 The Role of Leaders in Mass Formation

32:26 Totalitarianism and Mass Formation

38:59 Leaders and the Population in the COVID Crisis

49:34 Lonely Masses and Totalitarianism

52:20 Awakening from Mass Formation

56:06 The Power of Sincere Speech

01:03:36 Rejecting the Mechanistic Worldview

01:08:44 Guarding Against Mass Formation

The Illusion of Consensus is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a paid subscriber:

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration.

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion."

---

Hi everyone,

This episode of the podcast features investigative journalist Lee Fang discussing various topics related to the Illusion of Consensus in science, public health, and public policy. The conversation covers Twitter's covert campaign to influence messaging, the role of AI firm Logically AI in censoring activists and journalists, the suppression of research on pesticides, and Moderna's surveillance and censorship efforts. The discussion also includes Jay Bhattacharya's personal experience and perspective on these issues. The conversation explores the censorship and suppression of vaccine information, the lack of media coverage on critical topics, the conflict of interest in public health, the lack of transparency in financial relationships, astroturfing and marketing tactics, the blurring of the line between corporate PR and public health, trolls and online attacks, the mobilization of healthcare professionals, the lack of disclosure and transparency, the corruption of trust in healthcare institutions, and the crisis of trust.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

07:46 Twitter's Covert Campaign

18:16 Logically AI and Election Influence

26:13 Pesticides and Suppression of Research

39:35 Moderna's Surveillance and Censorship

46:16 Jay Bhattacharya's Experience and Perspective

47:57 Censorship and Suppression of Vaccine Information

49:09 Lack of Media Coverage

50:46 Conflict of Interest in Public Health

51:20 Lack of Transparency in Financial Relationships

52:41 Astroturfing and Marketing Tactics

53:31 Blurring the Line Between Corporate PR and Public Health

55:24 Trolls and Online Attacks

56:15 Mobilization of Healthcare Professionals

57:40 Lack of Disclosure and Transparency

58:05 Corruption of Trust in Healthcare Institutions

59:00 Crisis of Trust

Hi everyone,

I’ll keep the introduction short here. Steve and Kevin spent over 3 hours intensively discussing vaccine deaths on this podcast. The conversation was civil, friendly, and more equal-paced compared to the last. Both parties contributed more or less equally without one dominating the other. I will let you — our loyal audience — decide the outc…

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration.

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion."

----

In this exciting new podcast episode, I interview science journalist Gary Taubes about his new book on diabetes, titled 'Rethinking Diabetes.' We discuss the history of diabetes treatment, the role of journalists in critiquing scientific paradigms, and the misconceptions surrounding type 2 diabetes. Taubes highlights the illusion of consensus in the medical community and the harm that can result from it. He also challenges the prevailing belief that diabetes is a pancreatic deficiency disorder and explores alternative approaches to treatment. The conversation explores the flaws in medical thinking, particularly in the treatment of diabetes and obesity. We discusses the historical use of starvation diets and high-fat diets, as well as the misguided approach of calorie restriction. The conversation also highlights the influence of medical organizations, such as the American Diabetic Association, in promoting high-carb diets.

Unlike other episodes, this conversation may have a direct and immediate impact on the health choices one may make. We endeavour to bring you more such episodes exploring the illusion of consensus surrounding diet, fitness, supplementation, mental health, psychotherapy, and more!

----

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

04:06 The Role of Journalists in Critiquing Scientific Paradigms

18:32 Understanding Diabetes: Types and Consequences

29:09 The Historical Treatment of Diabetes: Diet and Insulin Therapy

39:03 The Impact of Insulin Therapy and the Rise of Type 2 Diabetes

49:36 The Misconception of Type 2 Diabetes as a Pancreatic Deficiency Disorder

50:01 The Quarter Century Victory Models and the Limitations of Insulin Therapy

50:38 The Flaws in Medical Thinking

55:13 Starvation Diets and Insulin Therapy

56:11 The Paradox of High-Fat Diets

59:03 The Ineffectiveness of Calorie Restriction

01:00:06 The Starvation Study by Ancel Keys

01:05:18 The American Diabetic Association's Embrace of High-Carb Diets

01:07:49 The Influence of Medical Organizations

01:14:29 Systematic Changes to Improve Science

01:15:00 Pragmatic Approach for Patients

01:24:06 Fixing the Flaws in Science

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration.

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion."

Hi everyone,

The 3-hour vaccine death debate between Denis and Tracy has now been released! Anyone can access it now here in the Substack app/website or in the Spotify/Apple links below. I hope it helps shape your perspective on this contentious topic.

Takeaways:

* Tracy criticizes Denis' paper on the number of deaths caused by COVID vaccines, arguing that the estimate of 17 million deaths is implausible.

* Denis defends his paper, explaining the methodology and selection of countries in the study.

* The debate becomes heated as they discuss the accusation of cherry-picking countries.

* Technical difficulties interrupt the discussion briefly. There are inconsistencies in estimates of excess mortality and the causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and deaths.

* Methodology plays a crucial role in determining the accuracy of these estimates.

* Accurate information and fact-finding are essential in understanding the impact of COVID-19 vaccines on mortality.

* Further discussion and analysis are needed to address the discrepancies between different studies and estimates. There is a temporal association between booster rollouts and excess mortality.

* The causes of excess mortality are complex and can vary between countries and age groups.

* The peak in mortality after the pandemic announcement is a significant phenomenon that requires further investigation.

* Analyzing mortality data in countries without age stratification requires additional considerations.

* The consistent association of excess mortality with booster rollouts suggests a potential link.

* Quantifying excess mortality and the vaccine dose fatality rate can provide insights into the risk of death. The correlation between vaccine rollout and excess mortality is a topic of debate, with different interpretations and perspectives.

* Communication plays a crucial role in conveying scientific findings, and the choice of words and statements can impact public perception.

* Traditional methods may not always capture vaccine mortality, and there is a need for more comprehensive data and analysis.

* The case of Sweden's excess mortality highlights the complexities of interpreting data and the importance of considering different factors.

* Improving data collection and reporting is essential for a better understanding of the impact of vaccines and other interventions. Clear communication and agreement on recording and distribution processes are important in collaborative conversations.

Our exciting first podcast sponsor:

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration. Alcami contains 9 high-quality adaptogens that can help regulate your nervous system and optimize energy and focus. Adaptogens are herbs and mushrooms that help build the body’s resilience to stress.

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion” here:

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

Spotify link:

Apple Podcast Link:

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

07:19 Tracy's Criticisms of Denis' Paper

12:20 Denis' Response to Tracy's Criticisms

27:17 Discussion on the Selection of Countries

34:00 Technical Difficulties

38:36 Addressing the Accusation of Cherry Picking

40:18 Excess Mortality and Vaccine Rollout

45:20 Cherry Picking and Projection

49:48 Analyzing Denmark's Data

52:30 Causality and Correlation

58:03 Excess Mortality by Age Group

01:03:36 Temporal Relationship between Vaccination and Mortality

01:10:20 Discussion on Causality and Uncertainties

01:16:01 Clarifying Statements and Limitations

01:19:25 Introduction and Setting the Stage

01:21:15 Inconsistencies in Estimates and Causal Link

01:23:14 Discussion on Methodology and Excess Mortality

01:36:19 Desire for Accurate Information and Fact-Finding

01:45:45 Proposal to Show Additional Graphs and Discuss Discrepancies

01:51:26 Graphs Showing Excess Mortality in Peru

01:54:10 Graphs Showing Excess Mortality by Age Group

01:55:01 Association between booster rollouts and excess mortality

01:59:05 Exploring the causes of excess mortality

02:00:09 Examining the New Zealand data

02:01:10 Consistent association of excess mortality with booster rollouts

02:02:35 Analyzing mortality data in countries without age stratification

02:03:08 Understanding the peak in mortality in Ecuador

02:04:36 Exploring the peak in mortality after the pandemic announcement

02:07:40 Considering the initial vaccine rollout and booster rollout

02:09:53 Comparing excess mortality in different periods

02:11:45 Quantifying excess mortality and vaccine dose fatality rate

02:19:14 Addressing the inconsistency in excess mortality patterns

02:25:36 Examining excess mortality in Sweden

02:35:29 Discussion on Vaccine Rollout and Excess Mortality

02:40:17 Clarifying the Claims and Interpretations

02:46:35 Debate on Communication and Provocative Statements

02:53:07 Why Traditional Methods Don't Pick Up Vaccine Mortality

02:59:59 Sweden's Excess Mortality and Interpretation

03:04:55 The Need for Better Data and Reporting

03:08:26 Debrief and Final Thoughts

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration.

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion."

---

In this conversation, Jay Bhattacharya and Matthew Crawford discuss the corruption of science and the challenges it faces in the modern era. They explore the transformation of science from a small-scale, individual pursuit to a large-scale, corporate enterprise. They highlight the politicization of science and the influence of external entities on scientific research. The conversation also delves into the replication crisis in science and the need for reform. They propose alternative models, such as a review culture, to encourage independent thinking and foster a healthier scientific community. Jay Bhattacharya discusses the productivity of science, the centralization of science and politics, and the potential for decentralization as a solution. He highlights the challenge of attention and pre-selection in scientific research and the markers of quality in science. Bhattacharya also explores the advantages and disadvantages of centralized and decentralized models in science.

---

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

07:46 The Transformation of Science

11:45 The Authority of Science

14:41 Science as an Authority-Giving Power

18:11 The Corruption of Science

23:46 The Intimidation Factor in Science

26:27 Research Cartels and the Control of Resources

29:57 The Replication Crisis and the Need for Reform

36:38 Alternative Models: A Review Culture

42:38 Analogizing Science to the Movie Industry

46:03 The Role of Replication in Science

50:33 The Social Nature of Science

52:14 The Productivity of Science

55:19 Centralization of Science and Politics

56:22 Decentralization as a Solution

57:32 The Challenge of Attention and Pre-Selection

58:55 Markers of Quality in Science

59:51 Centralized vs Decentralized Models

01:00:16 Conclusion and Gratitude

Subscribe to Matthew’s Substack:

Alcami Elements - a premium herbal supplement for energy, focus, and concentration.

https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage

Get 10% off your first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusion."

---

Hi listeners,

We’re incredibly excited to release this bombshell new episode of The Illusion of Consensus podcast. In light of the new FOIA documents (yesterday), biologist Alex Washburne has been essentially vindicated in his lab leak paper — which generated tremendous controversy last year.

In this episode, Professor Jay Bhattacharya and Alex Washburne discuss Alex's work with dangerous pathogens, his switch to studying COVID-19, and the discrepancy between public and private discussions on the origins of the pandemic.

Notably, Alex and Jay discuss the evidence of a reverse genetic system in SARS-CoV-2 and the implications of this finding. They explore the methodology of DNA cloning and the use of molecular scissors in the lab. They also address the pushback on the research and the need for public involvement in scientific discussions. The conversation concludes with a discussion on preventing future pandemics and the restructuring of the scientific enterprise.

— The Illusion of Consensus team

Note to subscribers: this podcast is currently behind a paywall (free 10 minute preview) till X allows us to upload full episodes with monetization on their platform. Then it will be accessible to everyone.

This is a bombshell new story essentially confirming the lab leak theory and we are the first platform to publish an extended feature on this. Please consider becoming a paid member to support the hard work we are doing and to gain access to high-profile podcasts such as this one:

https://www.illusionconsensus.com/subscribe?

I’m delighted to have on molecular biologist and fellow freedom fighter on the podcast today. In this conversation, we discuss a new Nature paper that highlights the potential problems with the modified mRNA used in the COVID-19 vaccines. Dr. Rose explain the process of mRNA and protein translation, as well as the role of codon optimization. The conversation delves into the implications of N1-methyl pseudouridine and frame shifting, which can lead to the production of unintended proteins. We also discuss the unpredictability of dosing and the need for further research to understand the potential risks associated with the modified mRNA vaccines.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

07:05 Discussion on COVID Work

08:34 Introduction to the Nature Paper

09:01 mRNA and Protein Translation

13:25 Modified mRNA and Protein Production

29:24 N1-methyl Pseudouridine and Frame Shifting

36:05 Discussion on the Nature Paper

45:37 Implications and Unknowns

52:04 Predictability and Dosing

53:01 Codon Optimization and Slippery Sequences

54:56 Codon Optimization and Protein Production

55:54 Implications of Increasing GC Content

56:49 Ribosomal Pausing and Frame Shifting

59:08 Co-Translational Folding

01:00:06 The Potential of the mRNA Platform

01:01:31 The Complexity of the Human Body

01:03:17 Safety and Regulatory Considerations

01:05:40 Challenges of Coding Different Proteins

01:07:01 The Need for Regulatory Processes

01:09:21 Takeaways and Implications

Viral clip of Wilkinson and Collins discussed in the podcast”

https://x.com/anish_koka/status/1740212697348870241?s=20

Takeaways

* Open and honest conversation is essential for bridging political divides and finding common ground.

* Lockdown policies during the COVID-19 pandemic had significant collateral harms, including economic, social, and mental health impacts.

* The Great Barrington Declaration, which argued against lockdowns and for focused protection, was based on evidence and should have been part of a broader scientific debate.

* There is a need for reform in public health decision-making, including checks and balances and public input.

* Building trust and depolarizing society requires individuals to engage in meaningful conversations and work towards common goals. Balancing perspectives is important in conversations about the pandemic.

* Open and honest discussion is crucial during times of crisis.

* Acknowledging mistakes and learning from them is essential for progress.

* Rebuilding trust requires dialogue and understanding.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

03:16 The Conversation with Francis Collins

16:21 Regrets and Apologies

20:20 The Illusion of Consensus

28:42 The Swedish and Florida Responses

32:43 The Need for Reform

38:40 The Importance of Conversation

46:42 Working Towards Change

47:39 Continued Conversations with Francis Collins

48:17 The Arizona Alliance Event

52:28 Answering Audience Questions

53:24 Reconciliation between Supporters and Skeptics

56:27 Importance of Free Speech, Dialogue, and Debate

59:41 Hindsight and Recommendations for Change

01:04:19 President Biden's Mistakes and Recommendations

01:07:43 Rebuilding Trust through Dialogue and Acknowledging Errors

Today we are releasing a very important episode featuring Dr. Kevin McKernan, a molecular biologist, who discusses the DNA contamination of mRNA vaccines. The conversation delves into the manufacturing process of the vaccine and the discovery of DNA contamination in the vials. The issue of endotoxin contamination and its potential risks is also discussed. The findings are replicated by other independent groups, confirming the presence of DNA contamination. The conversation concludes with a discussion on the SV40 promoter and its potential implications. We also explore the integration potential of DNA in the context of COVID-19 vaccines. It discusses the risks associated with plasmid chopping and the potential for DNA fragments to integrate into the genome. The concern of spike protein integration and its impact on gene expression is also examined. The conversation highlights the need for large-scale studies to investigate the correlation between DNA concentration and adverse events. It raises questions about the regulatory response to Pfizer and Moderna, including the redaction of important information and the use of different measurement tools.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

01:38 Dr. Kevin McKernan's Background

06:03 Sequencing the Marijuana Genome

08:44 Critique of the Drosten PCR Test

12:08 Discovering DNA Contamination in the Vaccine

19:24 Manufacturing Process of the Vaccine

22:57 Cleaning the Vaccine and Endotoxin Concerns

29:27 Replication of the Findings

35:15 SV40 Contamination in the Vaccine

39:07 Integration Potential of DNA

40:22 Plasmid Chopping and Integration Risks

42:09 Concerns about Spike Protein Integration

43:15 Epidemiological Signal of Increased Cancer Rates

44:36 Correlation between DNA Concentration and Adverse Events

45:23 Need for Large-Scale Studies

49:04 Regulatory Response to Pfizer and Moderna

51:53 Thresholds and Guidelines for DNA Contamination

56:21 Regulatory Capture and User Fees

01:08 Importance of Informed Consent

01:11 Transparency and Public Trust

01:16 Censorship and Attacks on Dissenting Voices

01:20 Final Questions and Future of Vaccines

01:21 Low Uptake and Public Trust

01:22 Closing Remarks

https://www.illusionconsensus.com/

The conversation with Molly and Ben Kingsley focuses on the government's mishandling of the pandemic and its impact on children. They discuss the government's failure to prioritize children's needs in policy-making, the systematic attacks on advocacy groups, and the unethical treatment of children during school closures. The role of local districts and central government in school closure decisions is examined, as well as the influence of unions and the media blackout on dissenting voices. The conversation also delves into the role of Pharma funding and the spread of smears and misinformation. The chapter concludes with a discussion on the rollout of child vaccines and the ethical issues surrounding it. The conversation explores the themes of regulatory capture, ethics, and media suppression in the context of pandemic policies.

Buy Molly Kingsley, Arabella Skinner and Ben Kingsley’s new book:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Accountability-Deficit-ministers-officials-accountability-ebook/dp/B0CNPWS79P

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

01:52 Government Malfeasance and Attacks on Advocacy Groups

04:05 School Closures and the Treatment of Children

07:48 Role of Local Districts and Central Government in School Closure Decisions

13:00 Role of Unions and Smearing Campaigns

17:27 Government's Role in Censorship and Media Blackout

22:12 Pharma Funding and Influence on Media

28:57 Smears and Attacks on Advocates

39:46 Rollout of Child Vaccines in the UK

50:44 Ethical Issues and Treatment of Children

52:53 Regulatory Capture

58:17 Ethics and Advisory Group

01:06:07 Suppression of Ethical Advice

01:09:46 Media Suppression

https://www.illusionconsensus.com/

Hi everyone,

Welcome to a new episode of The Illusion of Consensus podcast. Today we have on OBGYN Dr. Adam Urato who discusses the impact of prenatal antidepressant exposure on the developing fetal brain. He highlights a study that shows a significant difference in brain volumes, particularly in cerebral grey matter, in children exposed to SSRIs during pregnancy. Dr. Urato emphasizes that this is not the first study to show such effects and that there is a growing body of research on the topic. He addresses the argument of confounding by indication and explains why it is not a valid critique of the literature.

Follow Dr. Urato on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/AdamUrato1

Takeaways

* Prenatal exposure to SSRIs has been shown to have significant effects on the developing fetal brain, including alterations in brain volumes and connectivity.

* There is a growing body of research, including animal studies, that supports the negative impact of SSRIs on the developing brain.

* Confounding by indication is often used as a critique of the literature, but it does not negate the chemical effects of SSRIs on the fetal brain.

* Immediate effects of prenatal SSRI exposure include poor neonatal adaptation and behavioral changes in newborns.

* Long-term consequences of prenatal SSRI exposure are still being studied, but there is evidence of potential impacts on motor skills, language acquisition, emotional regulation, and a potential link to autism and ADHD. SSRIs have been linked to adverse effects on fetal development, including an increased risk of preterm births.

* There is mixed evidence regarding the connection between SSRIs and miscarriages.

* Counseling for pregnant women considering SSRIs should provide accurate information about the risks, benefits, and alternatives.

* The information ecosystem is corrupted by pharmaceutical industry influence, leading to a lack of transparency and misinformation.

* There is a need for caution when using herbal supplements during pregnancy due to limited research and potential risks. There are many unanswered questions and mysteries surrounding the effects of different foods and diets during pregnancy.

* The CDC and FDA's recommendations on COVID vaccines for pregnant women have raised concerns about the influence of the pharmaceutical industry.

* Pregnant women have been portrayed as victims of misinformation when expressing concerns about vaccine safety.

* We should be skeptical and informed about the risks and benefits of medications, especially during pregnancy. Synthetic chemical compounds can have consequences on fetal development and should be approached with caution.

* Vitamin deficiencies, particularly vitamin D deficiency, can negatively impact obstetrical outcomes in pregnancy.

* Pregnant women should focus on maintaining a healthy diet and consider taking a basic prenatal vitamin.

Hi everyone,

I just recorded a bombshell 2-hour interview with Joseph Fraiman on his experiences conducting MDMA research in mice (several years ago) and being forced to present a very specific narrative on its risks and dangers, while doing the exact opposite in a study on the pharmaceutical drug citalopram (SSRI). His story captures so much of what wen…

Today’s podcast guest is Ethan Strauss from The House of Strauss Substack. Ethan and I met at a dinner in San Francisco in August and I was fascinated by his experiences in the sports industry world, having closely covered the Golden State Warriors NBA team during their winning streak. We had a great conversation on the podcast discussing the NBA, Ethan’s time following the GSW, leaving The Athletic due to various pressures and constraints, joining Substack, creating an independent model, and building a relationship with his readers.

I hope you enjoy this more left-field, alternative conversation deviating from our focal topics. Stay tuned for Dr. Jay’s upcoming conversation with Mattias Desmet and our joint podcast with Vivek Ramaswamy on public health, FDA reform, and the pharmaceutical industry.

— Rav Arora

Subscribe to our Substack: https://www.illusionconsensus.com/

I'm here today with Dr. Reid Sheftall. Reid and I have got to know each other through the pandemic, mainly through a series of podcasts that Reid hosted. I think we recorded something like 20 to 24 hours of podcast together, where we discussed every aspect exhaustively about the science of the pandemic, how fast the disease spread, how deadly the disease was, the vaccines, etc.

The striking thing about that was we had a really friendly agreement on many things and friendly disagreements on many other things. It was actually kind of like a scientific discussion or debate in many, many cases. I greatly enjoyed that. I've been looking forward to introduce him to The Illusion of Consensus audience.

— Jay Bhattacharya

We are really excited today to have on Jeff Childers — a very successful attorney based in Florida, who's been on the front lines in court fighting cases on vaccine and mask mandates. He's done tremendous work throughout the pandemic, fighting for our personal rights and civil liberties.

Jay and him have collaborated on previous legal cases, so we're excited to get into some of that. Jeff is also the author of the fantastic Coffee and COVID newsletter, which I read every week, and I highly encourage everyone else to check it out if you haven't already. It's a great read. Jeff does an excellent job there, just as he does in his legal work. So we're excited to talk about all of it.

If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe to our Substack newsletter:

https://www.illusionconsensus.com/

This is professor Jay Bhattacharya hosting this episode. I'm here with Natalya Murakhver. She is the co-founder of Restore Childhood, an organization founded originally in New York City, but now expanded all over the United States. There have been people that have been advocating for open schools, for normal childhood for children, and Natalya is one of those people. I'm absolutely delighted to have her here. She is a longtime resident of New York City and also an advocate for children long before the pandemic.

I hope you enjoy this conversation as much as I did.

— Dr. Jay Bhattacharya

The Illusion of Consensus is a reader-supported publication. Support us by becoming a paid member:

https://www.illusionconsensus.com/

I'm Professor Jay Bhattacharya. I am delighted to be here with Kevin Bardosh. Kevin is the research director and the director of Collateral Global, which is a charity in the UK. Just full disclosure, I'm a trustee of this charity. The goal of the charity is to document the harms that the lockdowns globally from 2020 and onward. And again, with an emphasis on documenting these harms in a scholarly way with data and with rigorous analysis.

I hope you take away something new from this wide-ranging conversation on the multitude of negative societal shifts causes by lockdowns.

Note to readers: the full podcast transcript is available thanks to Substack’s new functionality. You can access it by clicking on the podcast tab above.

— Jay Bhattacharya

If you appreciate the work we are doing here, please consider supporting us by becoming a paid subscriber:

Spotify link:

Apple podcast:

Note: For some strange reason, Jay’s audio has an intense echo for the first 10 minutes before it goes away. Apologies in advance.

Support Kevin’s organization Collateral Global:

https://collateralglobal.org/article/uk-covid-inquiry-turns-its-focus-to-great-barrington-declaration/

Podcast Transcript Highlights:

Kevin on his background:

I've worked for 15 years in public health, global public health programs, mostly in the global south, so in over 20 countries in Africa, Asia, and that's on infectious disease programs. So I was involved tangentially in the Ebola response. And during the Zika pandemic, I actually led quite a large mosquito control program in Haiti. So that's dealing with community engagement, messaging, mosquito control, and the whole sort of range of scientific questions also about, well, where are microcephaly cases happening, et cetera.

I've also worked a lot on parasitic diseases, neglected tropical diseases, et cetera.And all of that work in the global public health community in general, we have these sort of ethical frameworks around not doing harm, around equity, or, you know, community empowerment, et cetera. And we saw a lot of those sort of guiding principles thrown out the window during the COVID response. And I think a lot of people felt like, or a lot of academics who work in this space, didn't feel like they had a voice, or at least were very confused about where the consensus was going. And so... my sort of work for the last two years has been to try to somewhat speak to that issue, which is obviously a very political issue.

Consider supporting us:

Kevin’s detailed survey on the literature on lockdowns and their effects on poor countries:

The report is called, How Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Response Harm Society? A Global Evaluation and State of Knowledge Review, covering 2020 and 2021. And I think what motivated me on, well, there's a lot of things that did, but on the one hand, the public discourse and public conversation, that there is this sort of scientific consensus. And I've actually called this and I'm covering the UK COVID inquiry for an online newspaper called Unherd. And I've called this the lockdown doctrine. which is the notion that during a respiratory pandemic, you need to lock down society faster and harder as a precondition to get a vaccine and then you reopen, right? And that's a very particular model, a political model, and it comes with some very detailed assumptions about reality and also about scientific evidence that I think is very flawed.

What I saw essentially is you have thousands of papers on all these different topics about the harms of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID. And yet we don't have a good sense of, well, how do you put those together? How do you weigh, let's say the control of COVID, which has these very neat statistics, right? Like cases, deaths, you can sort of talk. It has this sort of simplicity and elegance to it that compels people to act and think a certain way. But then when you put together all of the different harms, it's like, it's, it's almost too complicated for people to get their head around. And so when we challenge, let's say this lockdown doctrine by saying, Well, actually, when you think about trade-offs, there's a lot more harm to locking down society than there is benefit.

People will say, well, how do you weigh that? And so this framework was an attempt to, in as much detail as possible, come to terms with, well, what are those harms? What's the full range of it? And what does the academic community, or the academic knowledge, tell us about these harms? So on the one hand, type, right, type of harm, but then also the magnitude. And in that regard, I would say that the report has these sort of two elements to it. On the one hand, it's a story about the actual harms that took place in the real world, but it's filtered through the academic research that is available. And in some areas, we have very concrete statistics that are easy to appreciate, but in a lot of areas, we don't.

Kevin on the pandemic’s negative impact on obesity and lifestyle:

I would say one of the more worrying ones — this is from a meta-analysis on obesity rates — estimating a 1% increase in children and a 2% increase in adults in global obesity rates. So that's a pretty significant increase when you think about the consequences of obesity. People became much more addicted to screens. Screen use increased by 50% among children. And those screen addiction habits have continued, right? We're living in this sort of era where if you watch kids, they're all staring at their phones and COVID encouraged them to stare at their phones longer. And I think that that's, that is going to have astronomical cultural and psychological impacts going forward. It was something that we're already struggling with as a society, but we said, okay, everyone's, you know, don't go meet your friends at the park, which was already decreasing because how many people actually go to the park and know their neighbors. And if you go to the park, you watch the parents sitting on their phones while their kids are playing.

Anyhow, I could rant about that for a long time. I actually don't own a cell phone. No, because of these effects. Yeah, I kind of just got rid of it a while ago. So sleep problems, all sorts of interesting studies, actually even about dream interruption. There's actually a whole sort of niche area of COVID and dreams, which is quite interesting. Obviously, exercise decreased, and exercise has all sorts of beneficial effects for health.

The Illusion of Consensus is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a paid subscriber:

Welcome to episode 16 of The Illusion of Consensus podcast. I'm professor Jay Bhattacharya. I'm here with Dr. Azadeh Khatibi. She is a doctor who has distinguished herself during the pandemic by engaging in this lawsuit against a law in California called AB 2098.

The law passed by the California legislature last year essentially put doctors at risk of losing their license if they contradicted public health advice. In effect, they basically made it so that the doctors had to look over their shoulder and see the CDC in the room with their patients, and they had to decide if they had the patient's interest in mind or the CDC's interest in mind.

I hope you enjoy this rich and engaging conversation with Dr. Khatibi. The Spotify and Apple links are available below as well as the highlighted podcast transcript. The full video podcast is also accessible to paid members here:

Spotify link:

Apple podcast link:

Transcript Highlights:

Dr. Khatibi on challenging consensus throughout her career:

In my own personal life and in my professional life, I have gone against formal consensus and informal consensus. Many times. I also feel like it's because I'm using my centred mind to make these decisions. I did it for my own health. I went against informal consensus opinion when I faced death and had to make some decisions about my own healthcare. I went against the informal consensus within my hospital care system. I've done it for my family members, I've gone against formal consensus for my family members, a matter for some health issues unrelated to COVID. And it turned out fantastic because we got data and information that we would have not otherwise gotten. And understanding that those consensus opinions were people taking into account the evidence as well as fiscal considerations. And for me, I was just looking at what's the smartest thing to do for these family members slash patients.

Dr. Khatibi talks about California’s bill AB 2098:

So in the declaration, I wrote from the perspective of both a physician and as a patient, because AB 2098, the law says that any doctor can be found to have unprofessional conduct if they engage in disinformation or misinformation. So disinformation, their definition was, knowing something is incorrect, but telling it to the patient anyway, right? Giving them false information that you know is false. I don't disagree with that. I think it's wrong and unethical for a doctor to give false information knowingly to a patient. But their other definition was also misinformation.

And so then they had the definition of misinformation in the bill. And their definition of misinformation was false information that's contradicted by contemporary consensus or something. And so I read that, I was like, this is terrible. This is horrible, right? Because all along I had been thinking differently from consensus and if I say something, they're gonna come after me. Like this is frightening and I already knew so many of my friends had been chilling their speech, playing small, being afraid, didn't wanna get fired.

Dr. Bhattacharya on how the leading scientific consensus has often been false:

Let's assess the track record of this consensus. Like how well did the CDC and the World Health Organization and the California Medical Association do in assessing sort of the nature of COVID, you know, the age gradient in mortality risk, the infection fatality rate, the immunity after COVID recovery, how well did it do in assessing whether the vaccine stops you from getting and spreading COVID? How well did we do in some of the most important questions about side effects of the vaccine for young men, especially with myocarditis. It seemed to me like the consensus was wrong on important topic after important topic after important topic.

Dr. Khatibi on how California’s censorship bill violated the 14th Amendment:

The law is so vague. And that's where the 14th Amendment right violation comes in. The law is supposed to be clear to a person of average intelligence. But we argued that this law is so mumble jumble. You can even hear that I kind of like, I'm like, well, what was the wording of the law again? It's so unclear and vague that it, and the grammar of it was also really bad. And the judge even said when he granted us the preliminary injunction, this law doesn't, the grammar of it doesn't even make sense. So that was the 14th Amendment rights violation, the right to due process, understanding that the law and making sure that it's clear that it was failed on, and that was the grounds actually upon which we won the preliminary injunction. The judge said this law is vague, it's not clear.

Azadeh shares her remarkably impressive success in filmmaking and production:

I got involved in a film called Window Horses with Sandra that was shortlisted for Academy Award nomination for best animated feature in 2018. That was one of 27 films that was shortlisted in that category. And I also helped produce that film and I played two voices. I was doing voiceover two characters in that film. And that was about creating intercultural, intergenerational bonds. It was about Iran. It was about love. It was about coming together, processing the past wounds. And then as I progressed in my filmmaking, I, we started a production company called Genius at Large. And so our projects are really looking at more of a human, humanity, human rights focus at this point. And so our film Sinjar was a co-production with Spain and looked at the Yazidi genocide of 2014. So ISIS came into Iraq and they invaded the city of the area of Sinjar and they killed the adults. the adult males and the older boys, and they enslaved the women and children, and they stole them and they sold them. So ISIS is very organized. They have actual slave markets.

If you appreciate the work we’re doing, consider supporting our work by becoming a paid member:

Today’s podcast episode features independent author Gabrielle Bauer, who wrote the excellent new book Blindsight is 2020 (Amazon link here). Jay and Gabrielle spend the hour discussing fear in the pandemic, religious communities’ response to Covid, and faux scientific consensus.

Follow her on Twitter: https://twitter.com/GabrielleJBauer

Today we are excited to bring you a conversation on The Illusion of Consensus podcast between Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and ER physician Dr. Joseph Fraiman. Dr. Fraiman lead the re-analysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s safety data and discovered a 1 in 800 serious adverse event rate — far higher than any other vaccine on the market. In this podcast episode, Jay and Joe discuss his study and the implications for scientific authority and public trust — as well as Dr. Fraiman’s early experiences with Covid in the ICUs and how he changed his position over time.

If you appreciate the work we are doing at The Illusion of Consensus, consider supporting our publication and podcast by becoming a paid subscriber:

https://www.illusionconsensus.com/

— The Illusion of Consensus Team

We are pleased to share with you episode 13 of The Illusion of Consensus podcast with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and Rav Arora. We are happy to have received excellent feedback on our previous episodes with Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, Alex Berenson, and others.

Today’s guest is Dr. Aaron Khariety, a psychiatrist and director of the Program in Bioethics and American Democracy at the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C.

Jay and Aaron discuss how core bioethical principles were violated during the pandemic,

Note to readers: we are offering an exclusive 10% off discount on all paid subscriptions for our month-end-sale. Please consider supporting us to receive exclusive Q+A podcasts with Dr. Jay, in-depth articles, and upcoming pieces on mental health solutions outside of Big Pharma:

https://www.illusionconsensus.com/p/the-dangerous-illusion-of-scientific

— The Illusion of Consensus team

Today, we are happy to bring you the second part of Rav and Dr. Jay’s podcast conversation with Dr. Robert Malone.

Subscribe now to receive exclusive Q+A podcasts with Dr. Jay and Rav Arora’s upcoming investigation on a leading cardiologist’s regrets in vaccinating young people at his clinic:

https://www.illusionconsensus.com/

Today’s special edition podcast episode features a must-listen, long-form exchange with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and Dr. Robert Malone — two scientists who have maintained great courage, bravery, and resilience throughout the pandemic. This is part one of a larger 2+ hour conversation the two doctor-heretics engage in.

To receive the exclusive second part of their conversation in video format, please consider subscribing to The Illusion of Consensus newsletter and podcast:

https://www.illusionconsensus.com

I am delighted to host Kelly Kroner, who has come to prominence during the pandemic as basically a citizen scientist, a leader in holding the CDC and other scientists accountable for basic errors in math and counting. It's been striking to watch professionals publish pieces — scare-mongering about the deadliness of COVID to children — and to watch Kelly take apart these claims, using data from the CDC, analyzing the basic standard sources.

I've been admiring her advocacy for some time now on Twitter. In fact, I think I wrote a tweet saying that you're a national treasure, and I honestly believe that. It's been wonderful to watch. Enjoy my hour-long conversation with her.

— Jay Bhattacharya

Subscribe to our Substack:

https://www.illusionconsensus.com/

On today’s podcast episode, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya hosts Dr. Kat Lindley, president of the Global Health Project, for a one-on-one interview. They discuss her background living in a communist country,

— The Illusion of Consensus podcast

Please consider becoming a subscriber to The Illusion of Consensus Substack to receive the exclusive second part of Rav’s conversation with Dr. Ladapo which focuses on his views of mind-body health, holistic medicine, overcoming trauma, psychotherapy, and living a good life.

Subscribe:

https://www.illusionconsensus.com