<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.megaphone.fm/THRH2699724562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <title>On The Case</title>
    <link>https://play.acast.com/s/onthecase</link>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright></copyright>
    <description>The First Amendment. Gun litigation. President Donald Trump's impact on the judiciary. The hurricane of daily legal news seems to never let up. A new podcast series from Reuters columnist Alison Frankel takes you into the eye of the storm, talking about law and precedent with experts who know their stuff inside and out.
See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.</description>
    
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>The First Amendment. Gun litigation. President Donald Trump&amp;apos;s impact on the judiciary. The hurricane of daily legal news seems to never let up. A new podcast series from Reuters columnist Alison Frankel takes you into the eye of the storm, talking...</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Reuters</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>The First Amendment. Gun litigation. President Donald Trump's impact on the judiciary. The hurricane of daily legal news seems to never let up. A new podcast series from Reuters columnist Alison Frankel takes you into the eye of the storm, talking about law and precedent with experts who know their stuff inside and out.
See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.</itunes:summary>
    <content:encoded>
      <![CDATA[<p>The First Amendment. Gun litigation. President Donald Trump's impact on the judiciary. The hurricane of daily legal news seems to never let up. A new podcast series from Reuters columnist Alison Frankel takes you into the eye of the storm, talking about law and precedent with experts who know their stuff inside and out.</p><p>See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for privacy and opt-out information.</p>]]>
    </content:encoded>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name></itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>info+72ee673d-ced8-445e-9f1c-732f42ef0eac@mg.pippa.io</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c66f2fb6-af5a-11ec-a15e-af41df3e5a45/image/show-cover.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
    <itunes:category text="News">
    </itunes:category>
    <item>
      <title>The trillion-dollar question: Can private lawyers hold drug companies accountable for the opioid epidemic?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/onthecase/episodes/thetrillion-dollarquestion-canprivatelawyersholddrugcompaniesaccountablefortheopioidepidemic-</link>
      <description>Cities, states and counties across the country have hired private lawyers to sue the pharmaceutical companies that they blame for the addiction crisis that has cost tens of thousands of lives – and billions of dollars. One of the leaders of the private litigation, Paul Hanly, discusses why he thinks it’s okay for lawyers with a profit motive to step in when governments can’t otherwise afford to hold defendants accountable. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 21:00:32 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The trillion-dollar question: Can private lawyers hold drug companies accountable for the opioid epidemic?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Reuters</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Cities, states and counties across the country have hired private lawyers to sue the pharmaceutical companies that they blame for the addiction&amp;nbsp;crisis that has cost tens of thousands of lives – and billions of dollars. One of the leaders of th...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Cities, states and counties across the country have hired private lawyers to sue the pharmaceutical companies that they blame for the addiction crisis that has cost tens of thousands of lives – and billions of dollars. One of the leaders of the private litigation, Paul Hanly, discusses why he thinks it’s okay for lawyers with a profit motive to step in when governments can’t otherwise afford to hold defendants accountable. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Cities, states and counties across the country have hired private lawyers to sue the pharmaceutical companies that they blame for the addiction<strong> </strong>crisis that has cost tens of thousands of lives – and billions of dollars. One of the leaders of the private litigation, Paul Hanly, discusses why he thinks it’s okay for lawyers with a profit motive to step in when governments can’t otherwise afford to hold defendants accountable.<br><p> See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for privacy and opt-out information.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2393</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[abe56ced-f1c1-4cb0-9f17-23bedd552d86]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/THRH1628187851.mp3?updated=1648556801" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Free speech v. government regulation on the Internet</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/onthecase/episodes/freespeechv.governmentregulationontheinternet</link>
      <description>Congress and the White House are talking about regulating Google, Twitter, Facebook and other Internet content companies. First Amendment guru Eugene Volokh – who predicted the Babel of voices on the Internet more than 20 years ago – explains why search engine and social media companies are (mostly) protected from government interference. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:13:14 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Free speech v. government regulation on the Internet</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Reuters</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Congress and the White House are talking about regulating Google, Twitter, Facebook and other Internet content companies. First Amendment guru Eugene Volokh – who predicted the Babel of voices on the Internet more than 20 years ago – explains why searc...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Congress and the White House are talking about regulating Google, Twitter, Facebook and other Internet content companies. First Amendment guru Eugene Volokh – who predicted the Babel of voices on the Internet more than 20 years ago – explains why search engine and social media companies are (mostly) protected from government interference. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Congress and the White House are talking about regulating Google, Twitter, Facebook and other Internet content companies. First Amendment guru Eugene Volokh – who predicted the Babel of voices on the Internet more than 20 years ago – explains why search engine and social media companies are (mostly) protected from government interference.<br><p> See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for privacy and opt-out information.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2151</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[43759cc5-3ed2-4830-b369-b779df4907e6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/THRH4011195293.mp3?updated=1648556801" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Meanwhile, back at 1 First Street</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/onthecase/episodes/meanwhile-backat1firststreet</link>
      <description>With the Kavanaugh crisis resolved, the U.S. Supreme Court returns to business as usual. We get the inside skinny from Supreme Court lawyer (and former Antonin Scalia clerk) Kannon Shanmugam about appearing before the highest court in the land. Spoiler alert: You need a lucky tie! See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 21:45:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Meanwhile, back at 1 First Street</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Reuters</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>With the Kavanaugh crisis resolved, the U.S. Supreme Court returns to business as usual.&amp;nbsp;We get the inside skinny from Supreme Court lawyer (and former Antonin Scalia clerk) Kannon Shanmugam about appearing before the highest court in the land...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With the Kavanaugh crisis resolved, the U.S. Supreme Court returns to business as usual. We get the inside skinny from Supreme Court lawyer (and former Antonin Scalia clerk) Kannon Shanmugam about appearing before the highest court in the land. Spoiler alert: You need a lucky tie! See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[With the Kavanaugh crisis resolved, the U.S. Supreme Court returns to business as usual. We get the inside skinny from Supreme Court lawyer (and former Antonin Scalia clerk) Kannon Shanmugam about appearing before the highest court in the land. Spoiler alert: You need a lucky tie!<br><p> See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for privacy and opt-out information.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2382</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e1b507ed-5cc8-46d2-a1fb-0aff051d4a98]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/THRH7000223225.mp3?updated=1648556801" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can the president control the Justice Department?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/onthecase/episodes/canthepresidentcontrolthejusticedepartment-</link>
      <description>Donald Trump is challenging the independence of the Justice Department in unprecedented ways – and neither the U.S. Constitution nor Congress has set explicit limits on presidential authority over federal prosecutors. But law professor and historian Rebecca Roiphe contends the rule of law ultimately prevail. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:43:30 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Can the president control the Justice Department?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Reuters</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Donald Trump is challenging the independence of the Justice Department in unprecedented ways – and neither the U.S. Constitution nor Congress has set explicit limits on presidential authority over federal prosecutors. But law professor and historian Re...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Donald Trump is challenging the independence of the Justice Department in unprecedented ways – and neither the U.S. Constitution nor Congress has set explicit limits on presidential authority over federal prosecutors. But law professor and historian Rebecca Roiphe contends the rule of law ultimately prevail. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Donald Trump is challenging the independence of the Justice Department in unprecedented ways – and neither the U.S. Constitution nor Congress has set explicit limits on presidential authority over federal prosecutors. But law professor and historian Rebecca Roiphe contends the rule of law ultimately prevail.<br><p> See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for privacy and opt-out information.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2855</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[bbbe90db-2020-46d1-98b8-f25aad09d791]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/THRH3165079961.mp3?updated=1648556802" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Courting Change: Trump’s impact on the federal appellate courts</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/onthecase/episodes/courtingchange-trump-simpactonthefederalappellatecourts</link>
      <description>While all eyes are on the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court, this is far from the full story of Trump’s impact on the federal judiciary. In less than two years, Trump has appointed 26 judges to the 13 Courts of Appeals – a record pace. Reuters legal columnist Alison Frankel talks to Arthur Hellman, a law professor and expert on the federal courts, about Trump’s picks to the appellate bench and how his appointments could impact the balance of power of Democratic and Republican-appointed judges. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:26:36 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Courting Change: Trump’s impact on the federal appellate courts</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Reuters</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>While all eyes are on the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court, this is far from the full story of Trump’s impact on the federal judiciary.&amp;nbsp;In less than two years,&amp;nbsp;Trump&amp;nbsp;has appointed 26 judges to the&amp;n...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>While all eyes are on the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court, this is far from the full story of Trump’s impact on the federal judiciary. In less than two years, Trump has appointed 26 judges to the 13 Courts of Appeals – a record pace. Reuters legal columnist Alison Frankel talks to Arthur Hellman, a law professor and expert on the federal courts, about Trump’s picks to the appellate bench and how his appointments could impact the balance of power of Democratic and Republican-appointed judges. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[While all eyes are on the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court, this is far from the full story of Trump’s impact on the federal judiciary. In less than two years, Trump has appointed 26 judges to the 13 Courts of Appeals – a record pace. Reuters legal columnist Alison Frankel talks to Arthur Hellman, a law professor and expert on the federal courts, about Trump’s picks to the appellate bench and how his appointments could impact the balance of power of Democratic and Republican-appointed judges.<br><p> See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for privacy and opt-out information.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2066</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b50519bb-f7f8-4b15-8a09-d175f5c18139]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/THRH1813119933.mp3?updated=1648556802" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Guns and lawsuits: Is America actually safer because you can’t sue gunmakers over mass shootings?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/onthecase/episodes/gunsandlawsuits-isamericaactuallysaferbecauseyoucan-tsuegunmakersovermassshootings-</link>
      <description>State and federal laws make it almost impossible to hold gunmakers accountable when killers go on murderous sprees. Shooting victims’ families are fighting an uphill battle to get around those rules. But, in this episode, a top lawyer for the firearms industry makes the case that it hasn’t received any special protection – and that crime is actually down since gun immunity laws were passed. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 17:53:15 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Guns and lawsuits: Is America actually safer because you can’t sue gunmakers over mass shootings?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Reuters</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>State and federal laws make it almost impossible to hold&amp;nbsp;gunmakers&amp;nbsp;accountable when killers go on murderous sprees. Shooting victims’ families are fighting an uphill battle to get around those&amp;nbsp;rules.&amp;nbsp;But, in this epi...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>State and federal laws make it almost impossible to hold gunmakers accountable when killers go on murderous sprees. Shooting victims’ families are fighting an uphill battle to get around those rules. But, in this episode, a top lawyer for the firearms industry makes the case that it hasn’t received any special protection – and that crime is actually down since gun immunity laws were passed. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[State and federal laws make it almost impossible to hold gunmakers accountable when killers go on murderous sprees. Shooting victims’ families are fighting an uphill battle to get around those rules. But, in this episode, a top lawyer for the firearms industry makes the case that it hasn’t received any special protection – and that crime is actually down since gun immunity laws were passed.<br><p> See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for privacy and opt-out information.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2086</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9690f93e-fb67-40e9-bd8d-2fd9ec85b7cc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/THRH2592040463.mp3?updated=1648556802" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NFL protesters, Omarosa and John Brennan: When the president wants you to just shut up</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/onthecase/episodes/nflprotestors-omarosaandjohnbrennan-whenthepresidentwantsyoutojustshutup</link>
      <description>What do NFL protesters, Omarosa and John Brennan have in common? President Donald Trump wants them all to shut up. Trump’s efforts to control what other people say stir up some really complicated questions about the 1st amendment, employment law and national security. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 16:02:38 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>NFL protesters, Omarosa and John Brennan: When the president wants you to just shut up</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Reuters</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>What do NFL protesters, Omarosa and John Brennan have in common? President Donald Trump wants them all to shut up. Trump’s efforts to control what other people say stir up some really complicated questions about the 1st amendment, employment law and na...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What do NFL protesters, Omarosa and John Brennan have in common? President Donald Trump wants them all to shut up. Trump’s efforts to control what other people say stir up some really complicated questions about the 1st amendment, employment law and national security. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What do NFL protesters, Omarosa and John Brennan have in common? President Donald Trump wants them all to shut up. Trump’s efforts to control what other people say stir up some really complicated questions about the 1st amendment, employment law and national security.<br><p> See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for privacy and opt-out information.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1674</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[aba34bff-8dab-4167-8613-b420555d64d4]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/THRH9375686022.mp3?updated=1648556803" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
