<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.megaphone.fm/LTN4656899563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <title>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</title>
    <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/</link>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Legal Talk Network</copyright>
    <description>Lawyer 2 Lawyer is an award-winning podcast covering relevant, contemporary news from a legal perspective. Host J. Craig Williams invites industry professionals to examine current events and recent rulings in discussions that raise contemplative questions for those involved in the legal industry. Launched in 2005, Lawyer 2 Lawyer is one of the longest-running podcasts on the Internet.</description>
    
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>Law News and Legal Topics for Lawyers and Legal Professionals</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Lawyer 2 Lawyer is an award-winning podcast covering relevant, contemporary news from a legal perspective. Host J. Craig Williams invites industry professionals to examine current events and recent rulings in discussions that raise contemplative questions for those involved in the legal industry. Launched in 2005, Lawyer 2 Lawyer is one of the longest-running podcasts on the Internet.</itunes:summary>
    <content:encoded>
      <![CDATA[<p>Lawyer 2 Lawyer is an award-winning podcast covering relevant, contemporary news from a legal perspective. Host J. Craig Williams invites industry professionals to examine current events and recent rulings in discussions that raise contemplative questions for those involved in the legal industry. Launched in 2005, Lawyer 2 Lawyer is one of the longest-running podcasts on the Internet.</p>]]>
    </content:encoded>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Legal Talk Network</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>distro@legaltalknetwork.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/bd9077b0-cfa9-11eb-861f-73be7264b364/image/56e7f1b2d19174e79a78c127e13708b5.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
    <itunes:category text="News">
      <itunes:category text="Politics"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Education">
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Government">
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.megaphone.fm/LTN4656899563</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <item>
      <title>Law School Accreditation: Shaping the Future of the Profession</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2026/04/law-school-accreditation-shaping-the-future-of-the-profession</link>
      <description>Law school accreditation is an essential component in shaping the future of our  legal profession. The Council of the American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar, which operates independently of the ABA, is the only national accreditor of law schools. where they set the standards for curriculum, faculty, and facilities to ensure quality legal education.

Craig welcomes Daniel R. Thies, Chair of the Council of the American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar. Craig &amp; Daniel discuss law school accreditation, misconceptions, accreditation at the state and federal levels right now,  the value of a single national accreditor, and the impact on the legal profession. 

 

Mentioned in this Episode:

Council of the the American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>685</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1bc57876-3486-11f1-840d-db0c7bafa7ed/image/1d925c41c0ee14abc2f2f86ff52ea774.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Law school accreditation is an essential component in shaping the future of our  legal profession. The Council of the American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar, which operates independently of the ABA, is the only national accreditor of law schools. where they set the standards for curriculum, faculty, and facilities to ensure quality legal education.

Craig welcomes Daniel R. Thies, Chair of the Council of the American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar. Craig &amp; Daniel discuss law school accreditation, misconceptions, accreditation at the state and federal levels right now,  the value of a single national accreditor, and the impact on the legal profession. 

 

Mentioned in this Episode:

Council of the the American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Law school accreditation is an essential component in shaping the future of our  legal profession. The Council of the American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar, which operates independently of the ABA, is the only national accreditor of law schools. where they set the standards for curriculum, faculty, and facilities to ensure quality legal education.</p>
<p>Craig welcomes Daniel R. Thies, Chair of the Council of the American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar. Craig &amp; Daniel discuss law school accreditation, misconceptions, accreditation at the state and federal levels right now,  the value of a single national accreditor, and the impact on the legal profession. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://www.americanbar.org/groups/legal_education/"><em><strong>Council of the the American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar</strong></em></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2615</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1bc57876-3486-11f1-840d-db0c7bafa7ed]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2569091837.mp3?updated=1775830741" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Citizens United: A Strategy to Take Dark Money Out of Politics</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2026/03/citizens-united-a-strategy-to-take-dark-money-out-of-politics</link>
      <description>Back in 2010, in the campaign finance case, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, SCOTUS ruled in favor of Citizens United stating that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent political expenditures by corporations and unions. This then opened the door to unlimited political spending by corporations and outside groups, ultimately reshaping our elections. 

Craig welcomes Tom Moore, Senior Fellow for Democracy Policy at the Center for American Progress, to discuss the 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision. Craig &amp; Tom take a look at the impact of this SCOTUS ruling over 16 years, and in an election year, how a state's authority over corporations can take out dark money in politics.

 

Mentioned in this Episode:

Transparent Election Initiative

The Montana Plan</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>681</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/530e68d0-297b-11f1-97ef-5fe8d3953102/image/d85f5b44331a19fc9084136c1c5753ea.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Back in 2010, in the campaign finance case, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, SCOTUS ruled in favor of Citizens United stating that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent political expenditures by corporations and unions. This then opened the door to unlimited political spending by corporations and outside groups, ultimately reshaping our elections. 

Craig welcomes Tom Moore, Senior Fellow for Democracy Policy at the Center for American Progress, to discuss the 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision. Craig &amp; Tom take a look at the impact of this SCOTUS ruling over 16 years, and in an election year, how a state's authority over corporations can take out dark money in politics.

 

Mentioned in this Episode:

Transparent Election Initiative

The Montana Plan</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Back in 2010, in the campaign finance case, <em>Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission</em>, SCOTUS ruled in favor of Citizens United stating that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent political expenditures by corporations and unions. This then opened the door to unlimited political spending by corporations and outside groups, ultimately reshaping our elections. </p>
<p>Craig welcomes Tom Moore, Senior Fellow for Democracy Policy at the Center for American Progress, to discuss the 2010 <em>Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission</em> decision. Craig &amp; Tom take a look at the impact of this SCOTUS ruling over 16 years, and in an election year, how a state's authority over corporations can take out dark money in politics.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://transparentelection.org/"><em><strong>Transparent Election Initiative</strong></em></a></p>
<p><a href="https://montanaplan.org/"><em><strong>The Montana Plan</strong></em></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2198</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[530e68d0-297b-11f1-97ef-5fe8d3953102]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2059274968.mp3?updated=1774575330" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Celebrating Women’s History Month: Trailblazers Who Paved the Way for the Women of Today</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2026/03/celebrating-womens-history-month-trailblazers-who-paved-the-way-for-the-women-of-today</link>
      <description>March is Women’s History Month where we pay tribute to all of the women who have made a difference and shaped our political and legal landscape. Pioneers like Susan B. Anthony, Sojourner Truth, Eliza Harriot, Belva Lockwood, Alice Paul, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg are a number of women who have made a difference and continue to inspire the women of today. 

Craig welcomes Mary Sarah Bilder, historian and the Founders Professor of Law at Boston College Law School, to celebrate Women's History Month. Craig &amp; Mary discuss trailblazing women throughout history, like Eliza Harriot, the barriers they faced, and the impact these women pioneers had on the founding era. 

 

Mentioned in this Episode:

Female Genius: Eliza Harriot and George Washington at the Dawn of the Constitution by Mary Sarah Bilder</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 14:15:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>683</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/7583079c-1ee3-11f1-9ba2-6bd06fd1a713/image/27b0ddb7a2083a5f490bcc99ed93a75d.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>March is Women’s History Month where we pay tribute to all of the women who have made a difference and shaped our political and legal landscape. Pioneers like Susan B. Anthony, Sojourner Truth, Eliza Harriot, Belva Lockwood, Alice Paul, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg are a number of women who have made a difference and continue to inspire the women of today. 

Craig welcomes Mary Sarah Bilder, historian and the Founders Professor of Law at Boston College Law School, to celebrate Women's History Month. Craig &amp; Mary discuss trailblazing women throughout history, like Eliza Harriot, the barriers they faced, and the impact these women pioneers had on the founding era. 

 

Mentioned in this Episode:

Female Genius: Eliza Harriot and George Washington at the Dawn of the Constitution by Mary Sarah Bilder</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>March is Women’s History Month where we pay tribute to all of the women who have made a difference and shaped our political and legal landscape. Pioneers like Susan B. Anthony, Sojourner Truth, Eliza Harriot, Belva Lockwood, Alice Paul, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg are a number of women who have made a difference and continue to inspire the women of today. </p>
<p>Craig welcomes Mary Sarah Bilder, historian and the Founders Professor of Law at Boston College Law School, to celebrate Women's History Month. Craig &amp; Mary discuss trailblazing women throughout history, like Eliza Harriot, the barriers they faced, and the impact these women pioneers had on the founding era. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Female-Genius-Harriot-Washington-Constitution/dp/0813947197"><em>Female Genius: Eliza Harriot and George Washington at the Dawn of the Constitution by Mary Sarah Bilder</em></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2268</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7583079c-1ee3-11f1-9ba2-6bd06fd1a713]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4745584534.mp3?updated=1773410430" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The SAVE America Act: Mission, Constitutionality, &amp; Potential Impact</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2026/02/the-save-america-act-mission-constitutionality-potential-impact</link>
      <description>The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility, better known as the SAVE America Act, is a 2026 bill designed to tighten federal election integrity by requiring proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration, and photo proof when voting in federal elections. Recently passed by the House, this bill has created quite the stir, igniting debates in the Senate with bipartisan opposition to registering and voting through documentation requirements.

So if passed, will the SAVE America Act change elections going forward? And how will this impact who votes in future elections? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins  John J. Martin, Assistant Professor of Law at Quinnipiac University School of Law, as they explore the SAVE America Act and voter ID requirements.  Craig &amp; John discuss the origin, constitutionality, and potential impact on the people of the United States.

 

Mentioned in this Episode:

Citizenship Voting Requirement in SAVE America Act Has No Basis in the Constitution – and Ignores Precedent that Only States Decide Who Gets to Vote by John J. Martin</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>682</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/a2fc36d6-138e-11f1-9709-0b9e7b816d7a/image/ebe56eaf73592772384e23b74c7b2730.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility, better known as the SAVE America Act, is a 2026 bill designed to tighten federal election integrity by requiring proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration, and photo proof when voting in federal elections. Recently passed by the House, this bill has created quite the stir, igniting debates in the Senate with bipartisan opposition to registering and voting through documentation requirements.

So if passed, will the SAVE America Act change elections going forward? And how will this impact who votes in future elections? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins  John J. Martin, Assistant Professor of Law at Quinnipiac University School of Law, as they explore the SAVE America Act and voter ID requirements.  Craig &amp; John discuss the origin, constitutionality, and potential impact on the people of the United States.

 

Mentioned in this Episode:

Citizenship Voting Requirement in SAVE America Act Has No Basis in the Constitution – and Ignores Precedent that Only States Decide Who Gets to Vote by John J. Martin</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility, better known as the SAVE America Act, is a 2026 bill designed to tighten federal election integrity by requiring proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration, and photo proof when voting in federal elections. Recently passed by the House, this bill has created quite the stir, igniting debates in the Senate with bipartisan opposition to registering and voting through documentation requirements.</p>
<p>So if passed, will the SAVE America Act change elections going forward? And how will this impact who votes in future elections? On this episode of<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, Craig joins  John J. Martin, Assistant Professor of Law at Quinnipiac University School of Law, as they explore the SAVE America Act and voter ID requirements.  Craig &amp; John discuss the origin, constitutionality, and potential impact on the people of the United States.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://theconversation.com/citizenship-voting-requirement-in-save-america-act-has-no-basis-in-the-constitution-and-ignores-precedent-that-only-states-decide-who-gets-to-vote-275658"><em><strong>Citizenship Voting Requirement in SAVE America Act Has No Basis in the Constitution – and Ignores Precedent that Only States Decide Who Gets to Vote by John J. Martin</strong></em></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2280</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a2fc36d6-138e-11f1-9709-0b9e7b816d7a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6790413188.mp3?updated=1772164506" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mental Health &amp; the Legal Profession</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2026/02/mental-health-the-legal-profession</link>
      <description>The legal profession can be a stressful one. Whether its workload, the demands of clients, financial pressure or long days and nights, it can be overwhelming to many. 

So what kind of toll is this stress having on lawyers?  And where can you get help?

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins Attorney Jason Ward, public speaker on mental wellness and addiction, as they discuss mental health &amp; the legal profession. Craig &amp; Jason talk about the stressors that come with the profession, the impact, how to alleviate the day-to-day stress of the occupation, and where to get help. 

 

Mentioned in this Episode:

Litigation Radio: The Toll It Takes: Litigation, Substance Abuse, And (Maybe) You

ABA’s Well Being Toolkit</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 14:40:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>681</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/78c81f1c-08e7-11f1-ab3e-931acd27ca1c/image/05dbe9f877f1661369786ea5564d0632.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The legal profession can be a stressful one. Whether its workload, the demands of clients, financial pressure or long days and nights, it can be overwhelming to many. 

So what kind of toll is this stress having on lawyers?  And where can you get help?

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins Attorney Jason Ward, public speaker on mental wellness and addiction, as they discuss mental health &amp; the legal profession. Craig &amp; Jason talk about the stressors that come with the profession, the impact, how to alleviate the day-to-day stress of the occupation, and where to get help. 

 

Mentioned in this Episode:

Litigation Radio: The Toll It Takes: Litigation, Substance Abuse, And (Maybe) You

ABA’s Well Being Toolkit</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The legal profession can be a stressful one. Whether its workload, the demands of clients, financial pressure or long days and nights, it can be overwhelming to many. </p>
<p>So what kind of toll is this stress having on lawyers?  And where can you get help?</p>
<p>On this episode of<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, Craig joins Attorney Jason Ward, public speaker on mental wellness and addiction, as they discuss mental health &amp; the legal profession. Craig &amp; Jason talk about the stressors that come with the profession, the impact, how to alleviate the day-to-day stress of the occupation, and where to get help. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/litigation-radio/2023/08/the-toll-it-takes-litigation-substance-abuse-and-maybe-you/"><em><strong>Litigation Radio: The Toll It Takes: Litigation, Substance Abuse, And (Maybe) Yo</strong></em><strong>u</strong></a></p>
<p><a href="https://lawyerwellbeing.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Toolkit-Full_Final_July-30-2018.pdf"><strong>ABA’s Well Being Toolkit</strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2540</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[78c81f1c-08e7-11f1-ab3e-931acd27ca1c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4008997650.mp3?updated=1770993290" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legalities Behind ICE, The Constitution, Minnesota, &amp; the Impact on the Rule of Law</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2026/01/the-legalities-behind-ice-the-constitution-minnesota-the-impact-on-the-rule-of-law</link>
      <description>The recent fatal shootings of Renee Good &amp; Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, Minnesota shook the nation and the world. In recent months, the tactics and actions of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, better known as ICE,  have reached a boiling point in communities and have come under scrutiny for the treatment of civilians. In response, many  have taken to the streets to protest.

With the Trump administration's mission to deport dangerous criminals, a recent internal ICE policy specifically allowed agents to go door to door without a judicial warrant, in direct contradiction to the Fourth Amendment (unreasonable searches and seizures by the government). As protestors lined the streets, an individual’s First Amendment rights—freedom of speech and assembly in particular—were also under attack. 

Are we currently witnessing the shredding of the U.S Constitution and the rule of law?  Will there be investigations into the actions of ICE? Will the legislative branch step in? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins David Cole, Professor in Law and Public Policy at Georgetown Law and former National Legal Director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Craig &amp; David discuss the legalities behind the actions of ICE, the constitutional rights of individuals who encounter ICE agents, the recent tragedies in Minnesota surrounding ICE agents and civilians, and the overall impact these actions are having on the rule of law and the U.S. Constitution.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 16:25:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>680</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/de0c25a2-fdf3-11f0-9b58-bb803ef34a7b/image/e4c8cef8a8eee3496aeb3381682af7d0.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The recent fatal shootings of Renee Good &amp; Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, Minnesota shook the nation and the world. In recent months, the tactics and actions of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, better known as ICE,  have reached a boiling point in communities and have come under scrutiny for the treatment of civilians. In response, many  have taken to the streets to protest.

With the Trump administration's mission to deport dangerous criminals, a recent internal ICE policy specifically allowed agents to go door to door without a judicial warrant, in direct contradiction to the Fourth Amendment (unreasonable searches and seizures by the government). As protestors lined the streets, an individual’s First Amendment rights—freedom of speech and assembly in particular—were also under attack. 

Are we currently witnessing the shredding of the U.S Constitution and the rule of law?  Will there be investigations into the actions of ICE? Will the legislative branch step in? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins David Cole, Professor in Law and Public Policy at Georgetown Law and former National Legal Director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Craig &amp; David discuss the legalities behind the actions of ICE, the constitutional rights of individuals who encounter ICE agents, the recent tragedies in Minnesota surrounding ICE agents and civilians, and the overall impact these actions are having on the rule of law and the U.S. Constitution.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The recent fatal shootings of Renee Good &amp; Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, Minnesota shook the nation and the world. In recent months, the tactics and actions of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, better known as ICE,  have reached a boiling point in communities and have come under scrutiny for the treatment of civilians. In response, many  have taken to the streets to protest.</p>
<p>With the Trump administration's mission to deport dangerous criminals, a recent internal ICE policy specifically allowed agents to go door to door without a judicial warrant, in direct contradiction to the Fourth Amendment (unreasonable searches and seizures by the government). As protestors lined the streets, an individual’s First Amendment rights—freedom of speech and assembly in particular—were also under attack. </p>
<p>Are we currently witnessing the shredding of the U.S Constitution and the rule of law?  Will there be investigations into the actions of ICE? Will the legislative branch step in? On this episode of<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, Craig joins David Cole, Professor in Law and Public Policy at Georgetown Law and former National Legal Director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Craig &amp; David discuss the legalities behind the actions of ICE, the constitutional rights of individuals who encounter ICE agents, the recent tragedies in Minnesota surrounding ICE agents and civilians, and the overall impact these actions are having on the rule of law and the U.S. Constitution.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2438</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[de0c25a2-fdf3-11f0-9b58-bb803ef34a7b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2010229141.mp3?updated=1769789265" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Venezuela Invasion, the Monroe Doctrine, International Law, and Trump Takeovers</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2026/01/the-venezuela-invasion-the-monroe-doctrine-international-law-and-trump-takeovers</link>
      <description>On January 3, 2026, the U.S. military captured Venezuela’s president Nicolas Maduro and his wife and brought them back  to the United States where they faced criminal charges related to drug trafficking. Many questioned the legality of the invasion and a policy from the 1800s called the Monroe Doctrine was being alluded to by the current administration.  Trump’s reinterpretation of the Monroe Doctrine nicknamed 

“The Donroe Doctrine” by Trump himself, was originally a policy created back in 1823 by then-President James Monroe to oppose European interference in the Western Hemisphere. Trump reinvoked Monroe in his decision to take over Venezuela and publicly made threats to take over other countries.

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins Claire Finkelstein, Professor of National Security Law and faculty director of the Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law (CERL) at University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School. Craig &amp; Claire discuss international law, the Monroe Doctrine, the legality  of the Venezuela invasion, and the threats from the Trump administration of possible takeovers of other countries.

 

Mentioned in this Episode:

The Monroe Doctrine

In Dispute: Why John Adams Defended the British Soldiers During the Boston Massacre Trials</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>679</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/6a612674-f26e-11f0-a87f-6f7d56b90e4f/image/6adf2b9c72f25c041af8ebab5bcdb93c.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On January 3, 2026, the U.S. military captured Venezuela’s president Nicolas Maduro and his wife and brought them back  to the United States where they faced criminal charges related to drug trafficking. Many questioned the legality of the invasion and a policy from the 1800s called the Monroe Doctrine was being alluded to by the current administration.  Trump’s reinterpretation of the Monroe Doctrine nicknamed 

“The Donroe Doctrine” by Trump himself, was originally a policy created back in 1823 by then-President James Monroe to oppose European interference in the Western Hemisphere. Trump reinvoked Monroe in his decision to take over Venezuela and publicly made threats to take over other countries.

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins Claire Finkelstein, Professor of National Security Law and faculty director of the Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law (CERL) at University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School. Craig &amp; Claire discuss international law, the Monroe Doctrine, the legality  of the Venezuela invasion, and the threats from the Trump administration of possible takeovers of other countries.

 

Mentioned in this Episode:

The Monroe Doctrine

In Dispute: Why John Adams Defended the British Soldiers During the Boston Massacre Trials</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On January 3, 2026, the U.S. military captured Venezuela’s president Nicolas Maduro and his wife and brought them back  to the United States where they faced criminal charges related to drug trafficking. Many questioned the legality of the invasion and a policy from the 1800s called the Monroe Doctrine was being alluded to by the current administration.  Trump’s reinterpretation of the Monroe Doctrine nicknamed </p>
<p><em>“The Donroe Doctrine”</em> by Trump himself, was originally a policy created back in 1823 by then-President James Monroe to oppose European interference in the Western Hemisphere. Trump reinvoked Monroe in his decision to take over Venezuela and publicly made threats to take over other countries.</p>
<p>On this episode of<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, Craig joins Claire Finkelstein, Professor of National Security Law and faculty director of the Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law (CERL) at University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School. Craig &amp; Claire discuss international law, the Monroe Doctrine, the legality  of the Venezuela invasion, and the threats from the Trump administration of possible takeovers of other countries.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/monroe-doctrine"><em><strong>The Monroe Doctrine</strong></em></a></p>
<p><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/in-dispute/2024/07/why-john-adams-defended-the-british-soldiers-during-the-boston-massacre-trials/"><em><strong>In Dispute: Why John Adams Defended the British Soldiers During the Boston Massacre Trials</strong></em></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3057</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6a612674-f26e-11f0-a87f-6f7d56b90e4f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2409911853.mp3?updated=1768522607" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment: SCOTUS &amp; Copyright Law</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/12/cox-communications-inc-v-sony-music-entertainment-scotus-copyright-law</link>
      <description>On December 1, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in the landmark copyright case, Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment. 

This case centers on whether Cox, an internet service provider, can be held legally liable for copyright infringement committed by its subscribers when those users downloaded and shared thousands of copyrighted songs without permission. 

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins Professor Christopher Jon Sprigman, Co-Director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law and Policy at NYU Law, 

as they spotlight Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment.

Craig &amp; Chris discuss this SCOTUS case, oral arguments, the friend-of-the-court brief, copyright law, and the potential impact of a future ruling.

 

Mentioned in this Episode:

Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment Brief of Amici Curiae ACLU et al. in Support of Petitioners</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>678</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f57d0b42-dc84-11f0-ae8d-03ef3f785ebb/image/9c62240e4f4320e2f0b877d4400a62fc.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On December 1, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in the landmark copyright case, Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment. 

This case centers on whether Cox, an internet service provider, can be held legally liable for copyright infringement committed by its subscribers when those users downloaded and shared thousands of copyrighted songs without permission. 

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins Professor Christopher Jon Sprigman, Co-Director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law and Policy at NYU Law, 

as they spotlight Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment.

Craig &amp; Chris discuss this SCOTUS case, oral arguments, the friend-of-the-court brief, copyright law, and the potential impact of a future ruling.

 

Mentioned in this Episode:

Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment Brief of Amici Curiae ACLU et al. in Support of Petitioners</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On December 1, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in the landmark copyright case, Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment. </p>
<p>This case centers on whether Cox, an internet service provider, can be held legally liable for copyright infringement committed by its subscribers when those users downloaded and shared thousands of copyrighted songs without permission. </p>
<p>On this episode of<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, Craig joins Professor Christopher Jon Sprigman, Co-Director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law and Policy at NYU Law, </p>
<p>as they spotlight<em> Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment.</em></p>
<p>Craig &amp; Chris discuss this SCOTUS case, oral arguments, the friend-of-the-court brief, copyright law, and the potential impact of a future ruling.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aclu.org/cases/cox-v-sony?document=Cox-Communications-Inc-v-Sony-Music-Entertainment-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-ACLU-et-al-in-Support-of-Petitioners#legal-documents"><em><strong>Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment Brief of Amici Curiae ACLU et al. in Support of Petitioners</strong></em></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2699</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f57d0b42-dc84-11f0-ae8d-03ef3f785ebb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9495772096.mp3?updated=1766113142" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Illegal Orders, Military Law, and Investigations</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/12/illegal-orders-military-law-and-investigations</link>
      <description>Last month, six Democrat lawmakers, all with military or intelligence backgrounds, released a controversial video urging service members to refuse illegal orders set forth by the current administration. In response, the Defense Department said it would investigate these lawmakers, while President Donald Trump chimed in accusing them of  “seditious behavior,” a charge “punishable by death.

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins Professor Victor M. Hansen as they spotlight the controversy over the "illegal orders"video.  Craig &amp; Victor discuss what constitutes illegal orders in the military, the FBI/DOD investigation into those involved in the video, and military code and law.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>677</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/6d7bfdb2-d189-11f0-b114-0f2e56cf99af/image/cd3370781660168c3372d7e9f670394a.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Last month, six Democrat lawmakers, all with military or intelligence backgrounds, released a controversial video urging service members to refuse illegal orders set forth by the current administration. In response, the Defense Department said it would investigate these lawmakers, while President Donald Trump chimed in accusing them of  “seditious behavior,” a charge “punishable by death.

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins Professor Victor M. Hansen as they spotlight the controversy over the "illegal orders"video.  Craig &amp; Victor discuss what constitutes illegal orders in the military, the FBI/DOD investigation into those involved in the video, and military code and law.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Last month, six Democrat lawmakers, all with military or intelligence backgrounds, released a controversial video urging service members to refuse illegal orders set forth by the current administration. In response, the Defense Department said it would investigate these lawmakers, while President Donald Trump chimed in accusing them of  “seditious behavior,” a charge “punishable by death.</p>
<p>On this episode of<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, Craig joins Professor Victor M. Hansen as they spotlight the controversy over the "illegal orders"video.  Craig &amp; Victor discuss what constitutes illegal orders in the military, the FBI/DOD investigation into those involved in the video, and military code and law.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2770</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6d7bfdb2-d189-11f0-b114-0f2e56cf99af]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6774393576.mp3?updated=1764905495" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alienation of Affection: Litigation and the Treatment of Intimate Deception</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/11/alienation-of-affection-litigation-and-the-treatment-of-intimate-deception</link>
      <description>Recently, in the state of North Carolina, a judge ordered a Tik Tok influencer to pay 1.75 million for destroying her manager’s marriage citing a common law tort called  alienation of affection. Alienation of affection lawsuits are still legal in a few states, including Hawaii, Illinois, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah.

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins Professor Jill Hasday from the University of Minnesota Law School, as they spotlight the tort of alienation of affection.  Craig &amp; Jill discuss litigation, states that recognize alienation of affection, and the law's treatment of intimate deception.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>676</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/6d967890-c68f-11f0-974a-8324a5238e6f/image/4e06ba451764c60eaeaec9ce23124bf4.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Recently, in the state of North Carolina, a judge ordered a Tik Tok influencer to pay 1.75 million for destroying her manager’s marriage citing a common law tort called  alienation of affection. Alienation of affection lawsuits are still legal in a few states, including Hawaii, Illinois, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah.

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins Professor Jill Hasday from the University of Minnesota Law School, as they spotlight the tort of alienation of affection.  Craig &amp; Jill discuss litigation, states that recognize alienation of affection, and the law's treatment of intimate deception.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Recently, in the state of North Carolina, a judge ordered a Tik Tok influencer to pay 1.75 million for destroying her manager’s marriage citing a common law tort called  alienation of affection. Alienation of affection lawsuits are still legal in a few states, including Hawaii, Illinois, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah.</p>
<p>On this episode of<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, Craig joins Professor Jill Hasday from the University of Minnesota Law School, as they spotlight the tort of alienation of affection.  Craig &amp; Jill discuss litigation, states that recognize alienation of affection, and the law's treatment of intimate deception.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2058</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6d967890-c68f-11f0-974a-8324a5238e6f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4827223793.mp3?updated=1763698706" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside ICE: Immigration Law, Constitutionality, and the Impact on Our Communities</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/11/inside-ice-immigration-lawconstitutionality-and-the-impact-on-our-communities</link>
      <description>The actions of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, better known as ICE, have divided the country. Many believe that the Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration and violent crime is making the country safer. On the other side, there has been a resistance across the United States with communities standing up to ICE’s intimidating tactics, which include anything from unmarked vehicles, masks concealing ICE agents' identities, to arrests outside courtrooms, and a lack of due process. This has led to controversy and legal challenges. 

So do ICE’s actions go too far? Or is ICE making our country a safer place to live? And are these ICE raids protected and legal? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins Professor Daniel Kanstroom, founder of the Boston College Immigration and Asylum Clinic, as they spotlight immigration law and ICE. Craig &amp; Dan take a look at the legalities behind the actions of ICE, the constitutionality of ICE raids, the lack of due process, and the impact ICE is having on citizens and non-citizens of the United States.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>675</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1225bd6a-bb84-11f0-9bc0-ff9e8801ce76/image/f47aa961c906a77c4e5fef7fc05b001c.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The actions of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, better known as ICE, have divided the country. Many believe that the Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration and violent crime is making the country safer. On the other side, there has been a resistance across the United States with communities standing up to ICE’s intimidating tactics, which include anything from unmarked vehicles, masks concealing ICE agents' identities, to arrests outside courtrooms, and a lack of due process. This has led to controversy and legal challenges. 

So do ICE’s actions go too far? Or is ICE making our country a safer place to live? And are these ICE raids protected and legal? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins Professor Daniel Kanstroom, founder of the Boston College Immigration and Asylum Clinic, as they spotlight immigration law and ICE. Craig &amp; Dan take a look at the legalities behind the actions of ICE, the constitutionality of ICE raids, the lack of due process, and the impact ICE is having on citizens and non-citizens of the United States.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The actions of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, better known as ICE, have divided the country. Many believe that the Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration and violent crime is making the country safer. On the other side, there has been a resistance across the United States with communities standing up to ICE’s intimidating tactics, which include anything from unmarked vehicles, masks concealing ICE agents' identities, to arrests outside courtrooms, and a lack of due process. This has led to controversy and legal challenges. </p>
<p>So do ICE’s actions go too far? Or is ICE making our country a safer place to live? And are these ICE raids protected and legal? On this episode of<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, Craig joins Professor Daniel Kanstroom, founder of the Boston College Immigration and Asylum Clinic, as they spotlight immigration law and ICE. Craig &amp; Dan take a look at the legalities behind the actions of ICE, the constitutionality of ICE raids, the lack of due process, and the impact ICE is having on citizens and non-citizens of the United States.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2268</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1225bd6a-bb84-11f0-9bc0-ff9e8801ce76]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1422563332.mp3?updated=1762484378" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Salem Witch Trials | An In Dispute Halloween Special</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/10/the-salem-witch-trials-an-in-dispute-halloween-special</link>
      <description>This Halloween, Lawyer 2 Lawyer is stepping back into the courtroom of 1692 with a special episode of In Dispute, Craig’s miniseries on landmark trials throughout history. In this haunting installment, Craig revisits the Salem witch trials, where hysteria ruled and justice vanished in the shadows.

-----

In 1692, claims of satanic rituals, ghosts, and seemingly “afflicted” children stirred puritanical imaginations, deepened by petty rifts between powerful families and rival congregations in Salem Village (now known as Danvers, Massachusetts). In response to the growing number of citizen complaints and imprisonments, Massachusetts Bay Colony Governor William Phips appointed a man with no legal training to preside over the trials. More than a dozen poor decisions and questionable verdicts later, townspeople became all too familiar with death sentences by hanging. Hear the full story unravel with voiceover reenactments, historical context and present-day reflection from Attorney J. Craig Williams.  LINKS:


  Listen to all episodes of In Dispute: 10 Famous Trials That Changed History


  Purchase the e-book. 

  Purchase the hardcover.


 SPECIAL THANKS TO OUR VOICE ACTORS:

Troy Starr as John Hathorne

Doreen Wiley as Sarah Good

Kevin McGrath as Cotton Mather

Dave Scriven-Young as Stephen Sewell

Evan Dicharry as Judge

Georgia Well as Bridgett Bishop</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 15:10:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>bonus</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/912c5a12-b669-11f0-8298-63b57db75146/image/9bd16a4cc3651bad04e42613eeb48a7d.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This Halloween, Lawyer 2 Lawyer is stepping back into the courtroom of 1692 with a special episode of In Dispute, Craig’s miniseries on landmark trials throughout history. In this haunting installment, Craig revisits the Salem witch trials, where hysteria ruled and justice vanished in the shadows.

-----

In 1692, claims of satanic rituals, ghosts, and seemingly “afflicted” children stirred puritanical imaginations, deepened by petty rifts between powerful families and rival congregations in Salem Village (now known as Danvers, Massachusetts). In response to the growing number of citizen complaints and imprisonments, Massachusetts Bay Colony Governor William Phips appointed a man with no legal training to preside over the trials. More than a dozen poor decisions and questionable verdicts later, townspeople became all too familiar with death sentences by hanging. Hear the full story unravel with voiceover reenactments, historical context and present-day reflection from Attorney J. Craig Williams.  LINKS:


  Listen to all episodes of In Dispute: 10 Famous Trials That Changed History


  Purchase the e-book. 

  Purchase the hardcover.


 SPECIAL THANKS TO OUR VOICE ACTORS:

Troy Starr as John Hathorne

Doreen Wiley as Sarah Good

Kevin McGrath as Cotton Mather

Dave Scriven-Young as Stephen Sewell

Evan Dicharry as Judge

Georgia Well as Bridgett Bishop</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This Halloween, <em>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em> is stepping back into the courtroom of 1692 with a special episode of <a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/in-dispute/"><em>In Dispute</em></a>, Craig’s miniseries on landmark trials throughout history. In this haunting installment, Craig revisits the Salem witch trials, where hysteria ruled and justice vanished in the shadows.</p>
<p>-----</p>
<p>In 1692, claims of satanic rituals, ghosts, and seemingly “afflicted” children stirred puritanical imaginations, deepened by petty rifts between powerful families and rival congregations in Salem Village (now known as Danvers, Massachusetts). In response to the growing number of citizen complaints and imprisonments, Massachusetts Bay Colony Governor William Phips appointed a man with no legal training to preside over the trials. More than a dozen poor decisions and questionable verdicts later, townspeople became all too familiar with death sentences by hanging. Hear the full story unravel with voiceover reenactments, historical context and present-day reflection from Attorney J. Craig Williams.  <strong>LINKS:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li>Listen to all episodes of<a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/in-dispute/"> In Dispute: 10 Famous Trials That Changed History</a>
</li>
  <li>Purchase the <a href="https://us.amazon.com/dp/B0D5JYN55D?binding=kindle_edition&amp;ref=dbs_dp_sirpi">e-book</a>. </li>
  <li>Purchase the <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1681607794?ref_=cm_sw_r_mwn_dp_KEVBXNTM8ZF82195C6PQ&amp;language=en_US">hardcover</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p> <strong>SPECIAL THANKS TO OUR VOICE ACTORS:</strong></p>
<p><em>Troy Starr as John Hathorne</em></p>
<p><em>Doreen Wiley as Sarah Good</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.facebook.com/kevin.mcgrath.775/"><em>Kevin McGrath</em></a><em> as Cotton Mather</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.backstage.com/dave-scriven-young/"><em>Dave Scriven-Young</em></a><em> as Stephen Sewell</em></p>
<p><em>Evan Dicharry as Judge</em></p>
<p><em>Georgia Well as Bridgett Bishop</em></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2236</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[912c5a12-b669-11f0-8298-63b57db75146]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5866009891.mp3?updated=1761923056" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Traffic Stops, Terry Stops, Policing, the Fourth Amendment, and Your Rights</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/10/traffic-stops-terry-stops-policing-the-fourth-amendment-and-your-rights</link>
      <description>In a landmark ruling  back in 1968, the Supreme Court ruled in Terry v. Ohio,  that it is constitutional for police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime. Over the years this ruling has been criticized, with many saying that this decision leads to an abuse of power by police and racial profiling. 

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins Aliza Hochman Bloom, assistant professor of law at Northeastern University School of Law, as they spotlight traffic criminal law. Craig &amp; Aliza take a look at traffic stops, Terry stops (Terry v. Ohio), the constitutionality of policing, the 4th Amendment, and what rights an individual has when pulled over by law enforcement.

Mentioned in this Episode:

Terry V. Ohio</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>674</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/33235f8c-b052-11f0-9dcd-6f0f2d05eb7a/image/16dbbe60a116aead3c91e4f6daec6dd6.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In a landmark ruling  back in 1968, the Supreme Court ruled in Terry v. Ohio,  that it is constitutional for police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime. Over the years this ruling has been criticized, with many saying that this decision leads to an abuse of power by police and racial profiling. 

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins Aliza Hochman Bloom, assistant professor of law at Northeastern University School of Law, as they spotlight traffic criminal law. Craig &amp; Aliza take a look at traffic stops, Terry stops (Terry v. Ohio), the constitutionality of policing, the 4th Amendment, and what rights an individual has when pulled over by law enforcement.

Mentioned in this Episode:

Terry V. Ohio</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In a landmark ruling  back in 1968, the Supreme Court ruled in <em>Terry v. Ohio, </em> that it is constitutional for police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime. Over the years this ruling has been criticized, with many saying that this decision leads to an abuse of power by police and racial profiling. </p>
<p>On this episode of<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, Craig joins Aliza Hochman Bloom, assistant professor of law at Northeastern University School of Law, as they spotlight traffic criminal law. Craig &amp; Aliza take a look at traffic stops, Terry stops (<em>Terry v. Ohio</em>), the constitutionality of policing, the 4th Amendment, and what rights an individual has when pulled over by law enforcement.</p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/1967/67"><em><strong>Terry V. Ohio</strong></em></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2367</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[33235f8c-b052-11f0-9dcd-6f0f2d05eb7a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9404500108.mp3?updated=1761253385" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trump’s Tariffs: SCOTUS, and the Impact on International Trade Law &amp; the American People</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/10/trumps-tariffs-scotus-and-the-impact-on-international-trade-law-the-american-people</link>
      <description>At the start of his 2nd term, President Trump imposed a series of tariffs affecting nearly all goods imported into the country, causing controversy.  These tariffs on goods from countries all over the world, include steel, aluminum, cars, auto parts, furniture, pharmaceuticals and more. Since Trump’s announcement, there have been many legal challenges regarding these tariffs.

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins attorney, author, and professor, Raj Bhala, a University Distinguished Professor at the University of Kansas School of Law. Craig &amp; Raj discuss tariffs, President Trump's use of tariffs, SCOTUS, and their potential impact on international trade law, and the American people.

Mentioned in this Episode:

KU Professor Says Trump’s Tariffs are Xenophobic, Unlawful and Harmful to U.S. By Tim Carpenter Kansas Reflector/The Lawrence Times</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>673</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c6b14c64-a55d-11f0-b573-c7e7ba904ddd/image/fcf71db4a27775dd1511663f8a14c471.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>At the start of his 2nd term, President Trump imposed a series of tariffs affecting nearly all goods imported into the country, causing controversy.  These tariffs on goods from countries all over the world, include steel, aluminum, cars, auto parts, furniture, pharmaceuticals and more. Since Trump’s announcement, there have been many legal challenges regarding these tariffs.

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins attorney, author, and professor, Raj Bhala, a University Distinguished Professor at the University of Kansas School of Law. Craig &amp; Raj discuss tariffs, President Trump's use of tariffs, SCOTUS, and their potential impact on international trade law, and the American people.

Mentioned in this Episode:

KU Professor Says Trump’s Tariffs are Xenophobic, Unlawful and Harmful to U.S. By Tim Carpenter Kansas Reflector/The Lawrence Times</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>At the start of his 2nd term, President Trump imposed a series of tariffs affecting nearly all goods imported into the country, causing controversy.  These tariffs on goods from countries all over the world, include steel, aluminum, cars, auto parts, furniture, pharmaceuticals and more. Since Trump’s announcement, there have been many legal challenges regarding these tariffs.</p>
<p>On this episode of<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, Craig joins attorney, author, and professor, Raj Bhala, a University Distinguished Professor at the University of Kansas School of Law. Craig &amp; Raj discuss tariffs, President Trump's use of tariffs, SCOTUS, and their potential impact on international trade law, and the American people.</p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://lawrencekstimes.com/2025/09/16/ku-prof-trump-tariffs/"><em><strong>KU Professor Says Trump’s Tariffs are Xenophobic, Unlawful and Harmful to U.S. By Tim Carpenter Kansas Reflector/The Lawrence Times</strong></em></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2871</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c6b14c64-a55d-11f0-b573-c7e7ba904ddd]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4314063264.mp3?updated=1760048914" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyer 2 Lawyer Celebrates 20 Years of Podcasting</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/09/lawyer-2-lawyer-celebrates-20-years-of-podcasting</link>
      <description>In this very special episode, Lawyer 2 Lawyer celebrates 20 years of podcasting on the Legal Talk Network.

Host J.  Craig Williams  joins former Lawyer 2 Lawyer co-host and host of LawNext, Bob Ambrogi, and producer of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Kate Kenney Nutting, to chat about some of the exciting discussions we’ve had over the past 20 years. Take a walk with us down memory lane!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>672</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/badaef1e-9a52-11f0-89cd-cf7d1aa16d28/image/e3d2ce05d3dfd3260691fd29c603e2ff.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this very special episode, Lawyer 2 Lawyer celebrates 20 years of podcasting on the Legal Talk Network.

Host J.  Craig Williams  joins former Lawyer 2 Lawyer co-host and host of LawNext, Bob Ambrogi, and producer of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Kate Kenney Nutting, to chat about some of the exciting discussions we’ve had over the past 20 years. Take a walk with us down memory lane!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this very special episode, Lawyer 2 Lawyer celebrates 20 years of podcasting on the Legal Talk Network.</p>
<p>Host<a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/hosts/j-craig-williams/"><strong> J.  Craig Williams </strong></a> joins former Lawyer 2 Lawyer co-host and host of<a href="https://www.lawnext.com/"> <strong>LawNext</strong>,</a> <a href="https://www.lawnext.com/about"><strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong></a><strong>,</strong> and producer of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, <a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/hosts/kate-nutting/"><strong>Kate Kenney </strong></a><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/hosts/kate-nutting/"><strong>Nutting,</strong></a> to chat about some of the exciting discussions we’ve had over the past 20 years. Take a walk with us down memory lane!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1739</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[badaef1e-9a52-11f0-89cd-cf7d1aa16d28]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4421131099.mp3?updated=1758834632" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The U.S. Strike on a Venezuelan Boat:  International Law, Human Rights, &amp;  Legal Authority</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/09/the-u-s-strike-on-a-venezuelan-boat-international-law-human-rights-legal-authority</link>
      <description>On September 2nd, 2025, the U.S. Navy killed 11 civilians on a boat in the Caribbean Sea that President Trump claimed was operated by the Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua, who were allegedly carrying drugs bound for the United States. 

The response was swift. Legal experts weighed in on  whether this attack was a violation of international law and if it was considered a criminal act against civilians. So is this attack on civilians considered a war crime? And how will Venezuela respond to this attack? 

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins guest Dr. Anthony C. Arend, Professor of Government and Foreign Service and Chair of the Department of Government at Georgetown University. Craig &amp; Tony discuss the recent U.S. Navy attack on a Venezuelan boat in the Caribbean Sea. We will talk about the specifics and legal issues behind the strike, and whether this was a violation of international law, and a criminal act against civilians.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>671</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/258d6140-8f66-11f0-9816-0f627c07ee76/image/cf3f0d5efee2ded47922703c0e2bbd24.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On September 2nd, 2025, the U.S. Navy killed 11 civilians on a boat in the Caribbean Sea that President Trump claimed was operated by the Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua, who were allegedly carrying drugs bound for the United States. 

The response was swift. Legal experts weighed in on  whether this attack was a violation of international law and if it was considered a criminal act against civilians. So is this attack on civilians considered a war crime? And how will Venezuela respond to this attack? 

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins guest Dr. Anthony C. Arend, Professor of Government and Foreign Service and Chair of the Department of Government at Georgetown University. Craig &amp; Tony discuss the recent U.S. Navy attack on a Venezuelan boat in the Caribbean Sea. We will talk about the specifics and legal issues behind the strike, and whether this was a violation of international law, and a criminal act against civilians.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On September 2nd, 2025, the U.S. Navy killed 11 civilians on a boat in the Caribbean Sea that President Trump claimed was operated by the Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua, who were allegedly carrying drugs bound for the United States. </p>
<p>The response was swift. Legal experts weighed in on  whether this attack was a violation of international law and if it was considered a criminal act against civilians. So is this attack on civilians considered a war crime? And how will Venezuela respond to this attack? </p>
<p>On this episode of<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, Craig joins guest Dr. Anthony C. Arend, Professor of Government and Foreign Service and Chair of the Department of Government at Georgetown University. Craig &amp; Tony discuss the recent U.S. Navy attack on a Venezuelan boat in the Caribbean Sea. We will talk about the specifics and legal issues behind the strike, and whether this was a violation of international law, and a criminal act against civilians.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2453</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[258d6140-8f66-11f0-9816-0f627c07ee76]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1721527060.mp3?updated=1757636129" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Redistricting, Gerrymandering, and the Impact on the 2026 Mid-Term Elections</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/08/redistricting-gerrymandering-and-the-impact-on-the-2026-mid-term-elections</link>
      <description>Discover how redistricting battles could shape the future of American democracy and the 2026 midterm elections. Professor Ned Foley of The Ohio State University, Moritz College of Law, breaks down the Texas redistricting controversy, the mechanics of gerrymandering, and the legal and political standoff between Democrats and Republicans—revealing the high-stakes implications for voters, representation, and the balance of power.

As the November 2026 mid-term elections inch closer and closer, the redistricting of states are at the forefront of controversy. President Trump created a political firestorm when he asked Governor Abbott &amp; Texas Republicans to redraw voting maps that would add  five more congressional seats for the GOP. This new map targeted Democratic U.S. House members in the Austin, Dallas, and Houston metro areas and in South Texas.

In protest, Texas Democrat state representatives fled Texas, hopped a plane to a few Blue states, and refused to vote on the proposed map.  On August 18th, the Democrats returned to the Capitol, after Governor Abbott took legal action against them, but not without making their mark and putting a spotlight on redistricting.

In response to the political chaos in Texas, Governor of California, Gavin Newson, had his own strategy in mind, by proposing California congressional maps, which would add five Democratic seats, offsetting Texas gains.

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins returning guest Professor Ned Foley,  Ebersold Chair in Constitutional Law &amp; Director of Election Law at The Ohio State University, Moritz College of Law . Craig &amp; Ned discuss the recent Texas redistricting controversy, gerrymanderying, the current standoff between Democrats and Republicans, legalities, and how all of this could impact the 2026 midterm elections.

 

Mentioned in this Episode:

Common Ground Democracy</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>670</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ed442e52-8454-11f0-834b-5f2875f5903b/image/cdb9980591387bb1adfdaa19674261ca.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Discover how redistricting battles could shape the future of American democracy and the 2026 midterm elections. Professor Ned Foley of The Ohio State University, Moritz College of Law, breaks down the Texas redistricting controversy, the mechanics of gerrymandering, and the legal and political standoff between Democrats and Republicans—revealing the high-stakes implications for voters, representation, and the balance of power.

As the November 2026 mid-term elections inch closer and closer, the redistricting of states are at the forefront of controversy. President Trump created a political firestorm when he asked Governor Abbott &amp; Texas Republicans to redraw voting maps that would add  five more congressional seats for the GOP. This new map targeted Democratic U.S. House members in the Austin, Dallas, and Houston metro areas and in South Texas.

In protest, Texas Democrat state representatives fled Texas, hopped a plane to a few Blue states, and refused to vote on the proposed map.  On August 18th, the Democrats returned to the Capitol, after Governor Abbott took legal action against them, but not without making their mark and putting a spotlight on redistricting.

In response to the political chaos in Texas, Governor of California, Gavin Newson, had his own strategy in mind, by proposing California congressional maps, which would add five Democratic seats, offsetting Texas gains.

On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins returning guest Professor Ned Foley,  Ebersold Chair in Constitutional Law &amp; Director of Election Law at The Ohio State University, Moritz College of Law . Craig &amp; Ned discuss the recent Texas redistricting controversy, gerrymanderying, the current standoff between Democrats and Republicans, legalities, and how all of this could impact the 2026 midterm elections.

 

Mentioned in this Episode:

Common Ground Democracy</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Discover how redistricting battles could shape the future of American democracy and the 2026 midterm elections. Professor Ned Foley of The Ohio State University, Moritz College of Law, breaks down the Texas redistricting controversy, the mechanics of gerrymandering, and the legal and political standoff between Democrats and Republicans—revealing the high-stakes implications for voters, representation, and the balance of power.</p>
<p>As the November 2026 mid-term elections inch closer and closer, the redistricting of states are at the forefront of controversy. President Trump created a political firestorm when he asked Governor Abbott &amp; Texas Republicans to redraw voting maps that would add  five more congressional seats for the GOP. This new map targeted Democratic U.S. House members in the Austin, Dallas, and Houston metro areas and in South Texas.</p>
<p>In protest, Texas Democrat state representatives fled Texas, hopped a plane to a few Blue states, and refused to vote on the proposed map.  On August 18th, the Democrats returned to the Capitol, after Governor Abbott took legal action against them, but not without making their mark and putting a spotlight on redistricting.</p>
<p>In response to the political chaos in Texas, Governor of California, Gavin Newson, had his own strategy in mind, by proposing California congressional maps, which would add five Democratic seats, offsetting Texas gains.</p>
<p>On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Craig joins returning guest Professor Ned Foley,  Ebersold Chair in Constitutional Law &amp; Director of Election Law at The Ohio State University, Moritz College of Law . Craig &amp; Ned discuss the recent Texas redistricting controversy, gerrymanderying, the current standoff between Democrats and Republicans, legalities, and how all of this could impact the 2026 midterm elections.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://edwardbfoley.substack.com/"><em><strong>Common Ground Democracy</strong></em></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2500</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ed442e52-8454-11f0-834b-5f2875f5903b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9101838625.mp3?updated=1756417159" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyer 2 Lawyer’s 20th Anniversary &amp; Constitutional Law Then &amp; Now</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/08/lawyer-2-lawyers-20th-anniversary-constitutional-law-then-now</link>
      <description>Gain expert legal insights and historical perspective as Berkeley Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky joins Lawyer 2 Lawyer’s 20th Anniversary episode. He examines the evolution of constitutional law, landmark SCOTUS rulings, civil rights cases, and the future of the U.S. Supreme Court — delivering analysis you won’t want to miss.

Way back in August of 2005 we started a little podcast called Coast to Coast with attorney Bob Ambrogi, led by our original Legal Talk Network founders, Lu Ann Reeb &amp; Scott Hess. After issues with our original show name, we changed our name to Lawyer 2 Lawyer, and our podcasting adventure began! 

In the middle of our podcasting adventure, Adam Camras, CEO of Lawgical and now Legal Talk Network, took the reins and Lawyer 2 Lawyer continued to soar. Fast forward to today, after a multitude of amazing guests, controversial legal topics &amp; SCOTUS decisions, and a number of presidents, this month we celebrate our 20th Anniversary of Lawyer 2 Lawyer!

To make this celebration even sweeter, we have invited our very first guest, Erwin Chemerinsky,  Dean of Berkeley Law, to join us. We will celebrate this milestone with Erwin, and you the audience, as we take a look at constitutional law then &amp; now, landmark SCOTUS decisions over the years, and what the future holds.

Mentioned in this Episode:

Lawyer 2 Lawyer’s  Inaugural Show with Erwin Chemerinsky &amp; Michael Greco</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>669</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/65a88942-7938-11f0-a7a1-07f98c583036/image/4f63f6a86bb1f0c3758ab92854e56022.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Gain expert legal insights and historical perspective as Berkeley Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky joins Lawyer 2 Lawyer’s 20th Anniversary episode. He examines the evolution of constitutional law, landmark SCOTUS rulings, civil rights cases, and the future of the U.S. Supreme Court — delivering analysis you won’t want to miss.

Way back in August of 2005 we started a little podcast called Coast to Coast with attorney Bob Ambrogi, led by our original Legal Talk Network founders, Lu Ann Reeb &amp; Scott Hess. After issues with our original show name, we changed our name to Lawyer 2 Lawyer, and our podcasting adventure began! 

In the middle of our podcasting adventure, Adam Camras, CEO of Lawgical and now Legal Talk Network, took the reins and Lawyer 2 Lawyer continued to soar. Fast forward to today, after a multitude of amazing guests, controversial legal topics &amp; SCOTUS decisions, and a number of presidents, this month we celebrate our 20th Anniversary of Lawyer 2 Lawyer!

To make this celebration even sweeter, we have invited our very first guest, Erwin Chemerinsky,  Dean of Berkeley Law, to join us. We will celebrate this milestone with Erwin, and you the audience, as we take a look at constitutional law then &amp; now, landmark SCOTUS decisions over the years, and what the future holds.

Mentioned in this Episode:

Lawyer 2 Lawyer’s  Inaugural Show with Erwin Chemerinsky &amp; Michael Greco</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Gain expert legal insights and historical perspective as Berkeley Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky joins Lawyer 2 Lawyer’s 20th Anniversary episode. He examines the evolution of constitutional law, landmark SCOTUS rulings, civil rights cases, and the future of the U.S. Supreme Court — delivering analysis you won’t want to miss.</p>
<p>Way back in August of 2005 we started a little podcast called <em>Coast to Coast</em> with attorney Bob Ambrogi, led by our original Legal Talk Network founders, Lu Ann Reeb &amp; Scott Hess. After issues with our original show name, we changed our name to Lawyer 2 Lawyer, and our podcasting adventure began! </p>
<p>In the middle of our podcasting adventure, Adam Camras, CEO of Lawgical and now Legal Talk Network, took the reins and Lawyer 2 Lawyer continued to soar. Fast forward to today, after a multitude of amazing guests, controversial legal topics &amp; SCOTUS decisions, and a number of presidents, this month we celebrate our 20th Anniversary of Lawyer 2 Lawyer!</p>
<p>To make this celebration even sweeter, we have invited our very first guest, Erwin Chemerinsky,  Dean of Berkeley Law, to join us. We will celebrate this milestone with Erwin, and you the audience, as we take a look at constitutional law then &amp; now, landmark SCOTUS decisions over the years, and what the future holds.</p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/08/inaugural-show-two-great-guests-83105/"><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer’s  Inaugural Show with Erwin Chemerinsky &amp; Michael Greco</strong></a><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2286</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65a88942-7938-11f0-a7a1-07f98c583036]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2305486766.mp3?updated=1755195080" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scams: What to Look Out For, Recovery, AI, and How to Protect Yourself</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/08/scams-what-to-look-out-for-recovery-ai-and-how-to-protect-yourself</link>
      <description>From VA Imposter Scams to “Free Piano” Scams, scammers will stop at nothing to lure you in and take your money. With the introduction of AI into our everyday lives, scammers have used this as a tool to deceive individuals, leaving victims penniless or even stealing their identity. So how do you identify a scammer? And is there anything legally you can do to stop them?

In this episode, Craig welcomes Steve Weisman, a nationally recognized expert in scams, identity theft, and cybersecurity as well as a lawyer, college professor, and prolific author. Together, Craig and Steve discuss scams, what to look out for, how to navigate through a scam, recovery, AI &amp; scams, and how to protect yourself from these various scams.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>668</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/40fb76ae-6d71-11f0-b6a4-d7d8f378b15b/image/7e417c24f0bdc9fa24e5f28852df9a49.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>From VA Imposter Scams to “Free Piano” Scams, scammers will stop at nothing to lure you in and take your money. With the introduction of AI into our everyday lives, scammers have used this as a tool to deceive individuals, leaving victims penniless or even stealing their identity. So how do you identify a scammer? And is there anything legally you can do to stop them?

In this episode, Craig welcomes Steve Weisman, a nationally recognized expert in scams, identity theft, and cybersecurity as well as a lawyer, college professor, and prolific author. Together, Craig and Steve discuss scams, what to look out for, how to navigate through a scam, recovery, AI &amp; scams, and how to protect yourself from these various scams.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>From VA Imposter Scams to “Free Piano” Scams, scammers will stop at nothing to lure you in and take your money. With the introduction of AI into our everyday lives, scammers have used this as a tool to deceive individuals, leaving victims penniless or even stealing their identity. So how do you identify a scammer? And is there anything legally you can do to stop them?</p>
<p>In this episode, Craig welcomes Steve Weisman, a nationally recognized expert in scams, identity theft, and cybersecurity as well as a lawyer, college professor, and prolific author. Together, Craig and Steve discuss scams, what to look out for, how to navigate through a scam, recovery, AI &amp; scams, and how to protect yourself from these various scams.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2074</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[40fb76ae-6d71-11f0-b6a4-d7d8f378b15b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7191999281.mp3?updated=1753923124" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Texas Floods: Warnings, Staffing Cuts, Climate Change, &amp; How to Protect Ourselves from Extreme Weather</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/07/the-texas-floods-warnings-staffing-cuts-climate-change-how-to-protect-ourselves-from-extreme-weather</link>
      <description>On the 4th of July, extreme rainfall ripped through Central Texas, causing catastrophic flash flooding, leaving 119 dead and over 160 missing, with numbers climbing. The National Weather Service (NWS), which has recently experienced staffing cuts under DOGE &amp; the Trump Administration, came under fire from local Texas officials who criticized the insufficient warnings ahead of the extreme weather.

In this episode, Craig welcomes Professor Jim Blackburn, environmental lawyer and co-director of the Severe Storm Prevention, Education and Evacuation from Disaster (SSPEED) Center at Rice University. Together, Craig and Jim discuss warnings, impact of staffing cuts, climate change, policy, and how we can protect ourselves from extreme weather.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>664</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/80004b08-6359-11f0-b119-03e4c7ed1895/image/2807a999c725a64c63b65be4fdb1e6e6.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On the 4th of July, extreme rainfall ripped through Central Texas, causing catastrophic flash flooding, leaving 119 dead and over 160 missing, with numbers climbing. The National Weather Service (NWS), which has recently experienced staffing cuts under DOGE &amp; the Trump Administration, came under fire from local Texas officials who criticized the insufficient warnings ahead of the extreme weather.

In this episode, Craig welcomes Professor Jim Blackburn, environmental lawyer and co-director of the Severe Storm Prevention, Education and Evacuation from Disaster (SSPEED) Center at Rice University. Together, Craig and Jim discuss warnings, impact of staffing cuts, climate change, policy, and how we can protect ourselves from extreme weather.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On the 4th of July, extreme rainfall ripped through Central Texas, causing catastrophic flash flooding, leaving 119 dead and over 160 missing, with numbers climbing. The National Weather Service (NWS), which has recently experienced staffing cuts under DOGE &amp; the Trump Administration, came under fire from local Texas officials who criticized the insufficient warnings ahead of the extreme weather.</p>
<p>In this episode, Craig welcomes Professor Jim Blackburn, environmental lawyer and co-director of the Severe Storm Prevention, Education and Evacuation from Disaster (SSPEED) Center at Rice University. Together, Craig and Jim discuss warnings, impact of staffing cuts, climate change, policy, and how we can protect ourselves from extreme weather.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2480</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[80004b08-6359-11f0-b119-03e4c7ed1895]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7763417388.mp3?updated=1753931988" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Law of War</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/07/the-law-of-war</link>
      <description>The law of war is a component of international law that regulates the conditions for initiating war. With the Israel-Iran conflict raging on, and in a significant escalation, on June 21st, the United States retaliated against Iran by striking three of their nuclear sites. In response, Iran launched a strike against a U.S. air base in Qatar. After the strikes, President Trump promoted peace and announced a ceasefire, only to be met with more strikes and a continuance of the Israel-Iran conflict. So what is the law of war? And how does it apply to the current conflict between Iran, Israel, and now the United States? 

In this episode, Craig  welcomes back Rachel E. VanLandingham, Lt Col. (ret.), Co-Associate Dean of Research &amp; Irwin R. Buchalter Professor of Law at Southwestern Law School. Together, Craig and Rachel discuss the law of war and the potential impact on our military, our country, and our relations with other countries. </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2025 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>666</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e04dcb3c-5857-11f0-ae6a-3b6d0412449f/image/55cdbea5ec289301787f2edf3b0e6d17.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The law of war is a component of international law that regulates the conditions for initiating war. With the Israel-Iran conflict raging on, and in a significant escalation, on June 21st, the United States retaliated against Iran by striking three of their nuclear sites. In response, Iran launched a strike against a U.S. air base in Qatar. After the strikes, President Trump promoted peace and announced a ceasefire, only to be met with more strikes and a continuance of the Israel-Iran conflict. So what is the law of war? And how does it apply to the current conflict between Iran, Israel, and now the United States? 

In this episode, Craig  welcomes back Rachel E. VanLandingham, Lt Col. (ret.), Co-Associate Dean of Research &amp; Irwin R. Buchalter Professor of Law at Southwestern Law School. Together, Craig and Rachel discuss the law of war and the potential impact on our military, our country, and our relations with other countries. </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The law of war is a component of international law that regulates the conditions for initiating war. With the Israel-Iran conflict raging on, and in a significant escalation, on June 21st, the United States retaliated against Iran by striking three of their nuclear sites. In response, Iran launched a strike against a U.S. air base in Qatar. After the strikes, President Trump promoted peace and announced a ceasefire, only to be met with more strikes and a continuance of the Israel-Iran conflict. So what is the law of war? And how does it apply to the current conflict between Iran, Israel, and now the United States<strong>? </strong></p>
<p>In this episode, Craig  welcomes back Rachel E. VanLandingham, Lt Col. (ret.), Co-Associate Dean of Research &amp; Irwin R. Buchalter Professor of Law at Southwestern Law School. Together, Craig and Rachel discuss the law of war and the potential impact on our military, our country, and our relations with other countries. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2640</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e04dcb3c-5857-11f0-ae6a-3b6d0412449f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4369144169.mp3?updated=1751580212" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why John Adams Defended the British Soldiers During the Boston Massacre Trials | An In Dispute Re-Broadcast</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/07/why-john-adams-defended-the-british-soldiers-during-the-boston-massacre-trials-an-in-dispute-re-broadcast</link>
      <description>This Fourth of July, we're spotlighting one of the most iconic trials in American history. While the next regular Lawyer 2 Lawyer episode will drop on Monday, today we're revisiting one of America’s earliest and most pivotal legal battles: the Boston Massacre trial. This episode comes from Craig’s recent miniseries In Dispute, exclusively on Legal Talk Network.

----

When an unruly crowd of angry colonists attacked a small platoon of British soldiers in 1770, five Bostonians were killed and several others wounded. John Adams, a then-34-year-old lawyer who would eventually become the second president of the United States, took on a bold and unpopular defense of the soldiers and orchestrated their trials in a way that defied conventional thinking. To better understand the historical context of the Boston Massacre, what actually went down, the aftermath of the tragedy, and the surprising takeaway trial lawyers should have after hearing John Adams’ closing arguments, Attorney J. Craig Williams invites you to bundle up and relive the astounding altercation that’s still talked about to this day. 

LINKS:


  Listen to all episodes of In Dispute: 10 Famous Trials That Changed History


  Purchase the e-book. 

  Purchase the hardcover.


SPECIAL THANKS TO OUR VOICE ACTORS:

Scott Well as John Adams

Alan Chudnow as Samuel Quincy

Skyler C. as Josiah Quincy

Alan Parsons as Captain Thomas Preston

Robert Mattson as Samuel Adams

Dan Ring as Daniel Calef

Patrick Correia as Richard Palmes

Kate Kenney Nutting as the female witness

Neil Harvey as the British Soldier

Brian Driesen as Benjamin Lee

Andrew Clark as Thomas Handaside Peck

Robert “Terry” Terelak as Ebenerzer Bridgham

Jud Pierce as Dr. John Jeffries

Christopher Rogers as John Hogdson</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>bonus</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/266b89d4-5857-11f0-a207-db14c3fd73e3/image/29c2452b55f693620e9e2ffaa0df72bb.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This Fourth of July, we're spotlighting one of the most iconic trials in American history. While the next regular Lawyer 2 Lawyer episode will drop on Monday, today we're revisiting one of America’s earliest and most pivotal legal battles: the Boston Massacre trial. This episode comes from Craig’s recent miniseries In Dispute, exclusively on Legal Talk Network.

----

When an unruly crowd of angry colonists attacked a small platoon of British soldiers in 1770, five Bostonians were killed and several others wounded. John Adams, a then-34-year-old lawyer who would eventually become the second president of the United States, took on a bold and unpopular defense of the soldiers and orchestrated their trials in a way that defied conventional thinking. To better understand the historical context of the Boston Massacre, what actually went down, the aftermath of the tragedy, and the surprising takeaway trial lawyers should have after hearing John Adams’ closing arguments, Attorney J. Craig Williams invites you to bundle up and relive the astounding altercation that’s still talked about to this day. 

LINKS:


  Listen to all episodes of In Dispute: 10 Famous Trials That Changed History


  Purchase the e-book. 

  Purchase the hardcover.


SPECIAL THANKS TO OUR VOICE ACTORS:

Scott Well as John Adams

Alan Chudnow as Samuel Quincy

Skyler C. as Josiah Quincy

Alan Parsons as Captain Thomas Preston

Robert Mattson as Samuel Adams

Dan Ring as Daniel Calef

Patrick Correia as Richard Palmes

Kate Kenney Nutting as the female witness

Neil Harvey as the British Soldier

Brian Driesen as Benjamin Lee

Andrew Clark as Thomas Handaside Peck

Robert “Terry” Terelak as Ebenerzer Bridgham

Jud Pierce as Dr. John Jeffries

Christopher Rogers as John Hogdson</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This Fourth of July, we're spotlighting one of the most iconic trials in American history. While the next regular Lawyer 2 Lawyer episode will drop on Monday, today we're revisiting one of America’s earliest and most pivotal legal battles: the Boston Massacre trial. This episode comes from Craig’s recent miniseries <a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/in-dispute/">In Dispute</a>, exclusively on Legal Talk Network.</p>
<p>----</p>
<p>When an unruly crowd of angry colonists attacked a small platoon of British soldiers in 1770, five Bostonians were killed and several others wounded. John Adams, a then-34-year-old lawyer who would eventually become the second president of the United States, took on a bold and unpopular defense of the soldiers and orchestrated their trials in a way that defied conventional thinking. To better understand the historical context of the Boston Massacre, what actually went down, the aftermath of the tragedy, and the surprising takeaway trial lawyers should have after hearing John Adams’ closing arguments, Attorney J. Craig Williams invites you to bundle up and relive the astounding altercation that’s still talked about to this day. </p>
<p><strong>LINKS:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li>Listen to all episodes of<a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/in-dispute/"> In Dispute: 10 Famous Trials That Changed History</a>
</li>
  <li>Purchase the <a href="https://us.amazon.com/dp/B0D5JYN55D?binding=kindle_edition&amp;ref=dbs_dp_sirpi">e-book</a>. </li>
  <li>Purchase the <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1681607794?ref_=cm_sw_r_mwn_dp_KEVBXNTM8ZF82195C6PQ&amp;language=en_US">hardcover</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>SPECIAL THANKS TO OUR VOICE ACTORS:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://craicinthestone.com/">Scott Well </a>as John Adams</p>
<p><a href="https://www.alanchudnowtherapy.com/">Alan Chudnow</a> as Samuel Quincy</p>
<p>Skyler C. as Josiah Quincy</p>
<p>Alan Parsons as Captain Thomas Preston</p>
<p><a href="http://www.audibletalent.com/">Robert Mattson</a> as Samuel Adams</p>
<p>Dan Ring as Daniel Calef</p>
<p>Patrick Correia as Richard Palmes</p>
<p>Kate Kenney Nutting as the female witness</p>
<p>Neil Harvey as the British Soldier</p>
<p>Brian Driesen as Benjamin Lee</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@AndrewClarkSaxophone">Andrew Clark</a> as Thomas Handaside Peck</p>
<p>Robert “Terry” Terelak as Ebenerzer Bridgham</p>
<p><a href="http://ppnlaw.com/">Jud Pierce </a>as Dr. John Jeffries</p>
<p>Christopher Rogers as John Hogdson</p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2375</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[266b89d4-5857-11f0-a207-db14c3fd73e3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9657348717.mp3?updated=1751580349" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Protests, the Military, Newsom v. Trump, the Insurrection Act, &amp; Martial Law</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/06/protests-the-military-newsom-v-trump-the-insurrection-act-martial-law</link>
      <description> In response to the recent protests in Los Angeles, sparked by ICE raids, President Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to L.A, and now 700 active duty Marines have joined, bypassing the authority of Governor Gavin Newsom and estimated to cost taxpayers an estimated $134 million. This stirred discussions over whether the President could use the Insurrection Act of 1807 &amp; declare Martial law and whether these actions can be enforced. 

In this episode, Craig is joined by Rachel E. VanLandingham, Lt Col. (ret.), Co-Associate Dean of Research &amp; Irwin R. Buchalter Professor of Law at Southwestern Law School.

Together, Craig and Rachel discuss the use of martial law &amp; the Insurrection Act in response to protests, the military’s role, Newsom v. Trump,  and whether the deployment of  troops to Los Angeles constitutes martial law.

Mentioned in this Episode:

Newsom v. Trump</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>665</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f957f0ba-4864-11f0-87d8-037a16dc6525/image/8f139af7cce806dc7d58c2216478b377.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary> In response to the recent protests in Los Angeles, sparked by ICE raids, President Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to L.A, and now 700 active duty Marines have joined, bypassing the authority of Governor Gavin Newsom and estimated to cost taxpayers an estimated $134 million. This stirred discussions over whether the President could use the Insurrection Act of 1807 &amp; declare Martial law and whether these actions can be enforced. 

In this episode, Craig is joined by Rachel E. VanLandingham, Lt Col. (ret.), Co-Associate Dean of Research &amp; Irwin R. Buchalter Professor of Law at Southwestern Law School.

Together, Craig and Rachel discuss the use of martial law &amp; the Insurrection Act in response to protests, the military’s role, Newsom v. Trump,  and whether the deployment of  troops to Los Angeles constitutes martial law.

Mentioned in this Episode:

Newsom v. Trump</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p> In response to the recent protests in Los Angeles, sparked by ICE raids, President Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to L.A, and now 700 active duty Marines have joined, bypassing the authority of Governor Gavin Newsom and estimated to cost taxpayers an estimated $134 million. This stirred discussions over whether the President could use the Insurrection Act of 1807 &amp; declare Martial law and whether these actions can be enforced. </p>
<p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Rachel E. VanLandingham, Lt Col. (ret.), Co-Associate Dean of Research &amp; Irwin R. Buchalter Professor of Law at Southwestern Law School.</p>
<p>Together, Craig and Rachel discuss the use of martial law &amp; the Insurrection Act in response to protests, the military’s role, Newsom v. Trump,  and whether the deployment of  troops to Los Angeles constitutes martial law.</p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.450934/gov.uscourts.cand.450934.64.0.pdf?fbclid=IwY2xjawK49t5leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETF6V3ZCRDQ3OFNkY3ZybTFjAR6TKiQiDPLmyYiGV7FOy-Y66D6o_z-eZdPtA5lV-aEJBb6doHMv25g3My1GGw_aem_lh53tq6OEXCpTzPM4ZRFdg"><em><strong>Newsom v. Trump</strong></em></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2257</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f957f0ba-4864-11f0-87d8-037a16dc6525]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5225368780.mp3?updated=1749826538" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Birthright Citizenship, Trump’s Executive Order,  &amp; a SCOTUS Showdown</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/06/birthright-citizenship-trumps-executive-order-a-scotus-showdown</link>
      <description>On January 20th, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order (EO) 14160, limiting birthright citizenship. This was met with backlash, as the constitutionality of the order was questioned. On May 15, 2025 SCOTUS heard oral arguments regarding a challenge to the order and a decision is expected to be released by late June or early July 2025. The courts have temporarily blocked the implementation of the Executive Order while constitutional challenges proceed.

In this episode, Craig is joined by David C. Baluarte, Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and a Professor of Law at CUNY School of Law. Together, Craig and Dean Balaurte discuss Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship, recent oral arguments before SCOTUS, the constitutional fight for birthright citizenship, and the potential impact of this upcoming decision.

Mentioned in this Episode:

United States v. Wong Kim Ark</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>664</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5cc3092e-424c-11f0-b004-47575fdf8615/image/980d816e4863a8d28a64b572d6f48115.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On January 20th, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order (EO) 14160, limiting birthright citizenship. This was met with backlash, as the constitutionality of the order was questioned. On May 15, 2025 SCOTUS heard oral arguments regarding a challenge to the order and a decision is expected to be released by late June or early July 2025. The courts have temporarily blocked the implementation of the Executive Order while constitutional challenges proceed.

In this episode, Craig is joined by David C. Baluarte, Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and a Professor of Law at CUNY School of Law. Together, Craig and Dean Balaurte discuss Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship, recent oral arguments before SCOTUS, the constitutional fight for birthright citizenship, and the potential impact of this upcoming decision.

Mentioned in this Episode:

United States v. Wong Kim Ark</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On January 20th, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order (EO) 14160, limiting birthright citizenship. This was met with backlash, as the constitutionality of the order was questioned. On May 15, 2025 SCOTUS heard oral arguments regarding a challenge to the order and a decision is expected to be released by late June or early July 2025. The courts have temporarily blocked the implementation of the Executive Order while constitutional challenges proceed.</p>
<p>In this episode, Craig is joined by David C. Baluarte, Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and a Professor of Law at CUNY School of Law. Together, Craig and Dean Balaurte discuss Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship, recent oral arguments before SCOTUS, the constitutional fight for birthright citizenship, and the potential impact of this upcoming decision.</p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=10d6edd35f94b437&amp;rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS866US866&amp;sxsrf=AE3TifPYc5Vel2A7xlxVIFVqeyyY1BuoHw%3A1748445210901&amp;q=United+States+v.+Wong+Kim+Ark&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=2ahUKEwi81NH9ucaNAxWXElkFHUdeD0kQxccNegQIHhAB&amp;mstk=AUtExfA7bbmU-TqRkxTxlkgTgqYFWMm6OPM2fePr6CQjklG7oDK8fwT5-8SS0tDuZXW_9pTU57MzbABiWbAnFy5zZc_ar3AuHHcRnuZZniYJcsxIgILZtKqtsHViwb6wcRUQwt8CqGmPf1aEXN1KjMJjakaEaL5gA_G4hD-V3NkFTFW6-qf692MYs0NFlampqH34TDzjwA0wd1Be2Kn1UuFMCK6X94ax8Ex1fIBCNf25pidmSrNyJ5D8994pK6fZ5x-AWlj5sCvUPUixuxW3hoTtJdC0&amp;csui=3"><em>United States v. Wong Kim Ark</em></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2448</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5cc3092e-424c-11f0-b004-47575fdf8615]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8308017454.mp3?updated=1749156586" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Fight Against Threats to Judicial Independence</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/05/the-fight-against-threats-to-judicial-independence</link>
      <description>Chief Justice John Roberts recently called out the Trump administration for their threats to impeach judges who have ruled against them.

In response to these threats to the judiciary, the Keep Our Republic’s Article III Coalition, composed of over twenty former federal district and circuit judges  appointed by Presidents Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Clinton, George W. Bush and Obama, defended the federal judiciary, as political impeachment attempts against judges increase and the federal courts system face heightened scrutiny.

In this episode, Craig is joined by Chief Judge Paul R. Michel, formerly of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and member of Keep Our Republic's Article III Coalition. Together, Craig and Judge Michel discuss the calls for impeachment of judges by the current administration, and how a coalition of judges is fighting back.

Mentioned in this Episode:

Keep Our Republic's Article III Coalition</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 14:20:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>662</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d97d0b90-37de-11f0-a118-a31155928a9b/image/eb825030755f1cd221de890d285cfdcd.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Chief Justice John Roberts recently called out the Trump administration for their threats to impeach judges who have ruled against them.

In response to these threats to the judiciary, the Keep Our Republic’s Article III Coalition, composed of over twenty former federal district and circuit judges  appointed by Presidents Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Clinton, George W. Bush and Obama, defended the federal judiciary, as political impeachment attempts against judges increase and the federal courts system face heightened scrutiny.

In this episode, Craig is joined by Chief Judge Paul R. Michel, formerly of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and member of Keep Our Republic's Article III Coalition. Together, Craig and Judge Michel discuss the calls for impeachment of judges by the current administration, and how a coalition of judges is fighting back.

Mentioned in this Episode:

Keep Our Republic's Article III Coalition</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Chief Justice John Roberts recently called out the Trump administration for their threats to impeach judges who have ruled against them.</p>
<p>In response to these threats to the judiciary, the Keep Our Republic’s Article III Coalition, composed of over twenty former federal district and circuit judges  appointed by Presidents Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Clinton, George W. Bush and Obama, defended the federal judiciary, as political impeachment attempts against judges increase and the federal courts system face heightened scrutiny.</p>
<p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Chief Judge Paul R. Michel, formerly of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and member of Keep Our Republic's Article III Coalition. Together, Craig and Judge Michel discuss the calls for impeachment of judges by the current administration, and how a coalition of judges is fighting back.</p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://keepourrepublic.org/article-iii-coalition/"><em><strong>Keep Our Republic's Article III Coalition</strong></em></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2198</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d97d0b90-37de-11f0-a118-a31155928a9b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1982881138.mp3?updated=1748009835" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOTUS &amp; the Separation of Church and State</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/05/scotus-the-separation-of-church-and-state</link>
      <description>The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution reads ‘Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.   In 1802, founding father Thomas Jefferson, wrote a letter to the Danbury, Connecticut Baptist Convention insisting that their legislature "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between church and state.

On April 30th, 2025, SCOTUS heard arguments in  the consolidated cases of St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School v. Drummond and Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond which could redefine the fine line between religion and government in public education. 

In this episode, Craig is joined by Frank Ravitch, professor of law &amp; religion at Michigan State University's College of Law.  Together, Craig and Professor Ravitch delve into the significant legal topic of SCOTUS and the separation of church and state. Their discussion encompasses the details of these cases, Chief Justice Roberts' prior involvement in similar matters, the complex question of whether faith-based schools should be part of the public charter system, the importance of safeguarding religious freedom, and the potential ramifications of this forthcoming landmark decision.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>662</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/504edcee-2c40-11f0-9c12-a3de69a8382f/image/7653aa9576b4083f3dff38c15b738547.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution reads ‘Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.   In 1802, founding father Thomas Jefferson, wrote a letter to the Danbury, Connecticut Baptist Convention insisting that their legislature "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between church and state.

On April 30th, 2025, SCOTUS heard arguments in  the consolidated cases of St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School v. Drummond and Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond which could redefine the fine line between religion and government in public education. 

In this episode, Craig is joined by Frank Ravitch, professor of law &amp; religion at Michigan State University's College of Law.  Together, Craig and Professor Ravitch delve into the significant legal topic of SCOTUS and the separation of church and state. Their discussion encompasses the details of these cases, Chief Justice Roberts' prior involvement in similar matters, the complex question of whether faith-based schools should be part of the public charter system, the importance of safeguarding religious freedom, and the potential ramifications of this forthcoming landmark decision.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution reads ‘Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.   In 1802, founding father Thomas Jefferson, wrote a letter to the Danbury, Connecticut Baptist Convention insisting that their legislature "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between church and state.</p>
<p>On April 30th, 2025, SCOTUS heard arguments in  the consolidated cases of <em>St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School v. Drummond and Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond </em>which could redefine the fine line between religion and government in public education. </p>
<p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Frank Ravitch, professor of law &amp; religion at Michigan State University's College of Law.  Together, Craig and Professor Ravitch delve into the significant legal topic of SCOTUS and the separation of church and state. Their discussion encompasses the details of these cases, Chief Justice Roberts' prior involvement in similar matters, the complex question of whether faith-based schools should be part of the public charter system, the importance of safeguarding religious freedom, and the potential ramifications of this forthcoming landmark decision.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2495</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[504edcee-2c40-11f0-9c12-a3de69a8382f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4957803794.mp3?updated=1746732112" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Constitutional Crisis, Due Process, &amp; the Rule of Law</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/04/a-constitutional-crisis-due-process-the-rule-of-law</link>
      <description>What is a constitutional crisis? For some, a constitutional crisis is when the president defies the Supreme Court, for others it is when a president simply defies a federal judge’s order. Under the reign of President Trump and his administration, the country has dealt with a number of incidents where judicial orders have been disregarded. Kilmar Abrego Garcia, Rümeysa Öztürk, Mahmoud Khalil are three individuals who have taken center stage in the battle between the courts and the Trump administration, and the quest for due process.
 
In this episode, Craig is joined by professor Kent Greenfield, the Dean’s Distinguished Scholar at Boston College Law School. Craig &amp; Kent discuss whether the country is currently in a constitutional crisis, the Trump administration's defiance of a Supreme Court order involving the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the United States,  the power of  judicial vs. executive branches, and the consequences for defying the rule of law.

Mentioned in this Episode:

Bipartisan Letter Coordinated by Kent Greenfield, Professor and Dean’s Distinguished Scholar at Boston College Law School, and the American Constitution Society</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 14:45:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>661</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fd4552aa-217f-11f0-bd77-5fcbb92c4d36/image/efae54fc16e3681e6cdb8d6ea9601349.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What is a constitutional crisis? For some, a constitutional crisis is when the president defies the Supreme Court, for others it is when a president simply defies a federal judge’s order. Under the reign of President Trump and his administration, the country has dealt with a number of incidents where judicial orders have been disregarded. Kilmar Abrego Garcia, Rümeysa Öztürk, Mahmoud Khalil are three individuals who have taken center stage in the battle between the courts and the Trump administration, and the quest for due process.
 
In this episode, Craig is joined by professor Kent Greenfield, the Dean’s Distinguished Scholar at Boston College Law School. Craig &amp; Kent discuss whether the country is currently in a constitutional crisis, the Trump administration's defiance of a Supreme Court order involving the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the United States,  the power of  judicial vs. executive branches, and the consequences for defying the rule of law.

Mentioned in this Episode:

Bipartisan Letter Coordinated by Kent Greenfield, Professor and Dean’s Distinguished Scholar at Boston College Law School, and the American Constitution Society</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>What is a constitutional crisis? For some, a constitutional crisis is when the president defies the Supreme Court, for others it is when a president simply defies a federal judge’s order. Under the reign of President Trump and his administration, the country has dealt with a number of incidents where judicial orders have been disregarded. Kilmar Abrego Garcia, Rümeysa Öztürk, Mahmoud Khalil are three individuals who have taken center stage in the battle between the courts and the Trump administration, and the quest for due process.</p><p> </p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by professor Kent Greenfield, the Dean’s Distinguished Scholar at Boston College Law School. Craig &amp; Kent discuss whether the country is currently in a constitutional crisis, the Trump administration's defiance of a Supreme Court order involving the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the United States,  the power of  judicial vs. executive branches, and the consequences for defying the rule of law.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://www.acslaw.org/inbrief/we-believe-we-are-in-a-constitutional-crisis-law-professors-and-law-teachers-stand-against-administrations-illegal-and-unconstitutional-actions/"><strong><em>Bipartisan Letter Coordinated by Kent Greenfield, Professor and Dean’s Distinguished Scholar at Boston College Law School, and the American Constitution Society</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2219</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[fd4552aa-217f-11f0-bd77-5fcbb92c4d36]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7689651456.mp3?updated=1746732017" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Rise of Deferred Contracts in Major League Baseball</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/04/the-rise-of-deferred-contracts-in-major-league-baseball</link>
      <description>Deferred contracts are becoming a powerful tool in Major League Baseball, allowing teams to stretch massive payouts over decades — but what does that mean for the sport?
 
In this episode, Craig is joined by Jeremy M. Evans, attorney and CEO of California Sports Lawyer, to discuss the rise of deferred contracts and how they’re reshaping financial strategy in baseball. Craig and Jeremy break down how teams like the Dodgers are leveraging media revenue, why private equity is entering the conversation, and what lessons MLB might take from other leagues.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:15:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>660</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/40a86030-16dd-11f0-a99b-2f62b20d7a41/image/188d4c1530c880b79869c3b6a25b8cbf.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Deferred contracts are becoming a powerful tool in Major League Baseball, allowing teams to stretch massive payouts over decades — but what does that mean for the sport?
 
In this episode, Craig is joined by Jeremy M. Evans, attorney and CEO of California Sports Lawyer, to discuss the rise of deferred contracts and how they’re reshaping financial strategy in baseball. Craig and Jeremy break down how teams like the Dodgers are leveraging media revenue, why private equity is entering the conversation, and what lessons MLB might take from other leagues.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Deferred contracts are becoming a powerful tool in Major League Baseball, allowing teams to stretch massive payouts over decades — but what does that mean for the sport?</p><p> </p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Jeremy M. Evans, attorney and CEO of California Sports Lawyer, to discuss the rise of deferred contracts and how they’re reshaping financial strategy in baseball. Craig and Jeremy break down how teams like the Dodgers are leveraging media revenue, why private equity is entering the conversation, and what lessons MLB might take from other leagues.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1913</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[40a86030-16dd-11f0-a99b-2f62b20d7a41]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4419432943.mp3?updated=1744380702" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Alien Enemies Act, Deportations, &amp; Defying the Judiciary</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/03/the-alien-enemies-act-deportations-defying-the-judiciary</link>
      <description>On March 15th, 2025, the Trump administration defied an oral order from U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg to stop the flights of Venezuelan migrants headed to a Salvadoran prison, after the administration used the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport more than 200 alleged members of the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang to El Salvador with no due process.

In this episode, Craig is joined by Virgil Wiebe, Professor of Law from the University of St. Thomas School of Law, as they discuss the recent deportation of Venezuelan migrants and federal Judge Boasberg's ruling, blocking the Trump administration from   deporting noncitizens. Craig &amp; Virgil talk about the Alien Enemies Act, defying the judiciary, and next steps for individuals who are deported without due process.

Related Episodes

Senators Weigh In on Immigration, The Constitution, and Obama’s Executive Order

Unaccompanied Minor Immigrants: Push and Pull Factors of Immigration

Inside Human Trafficking: Sex &amp; Labor Trafficking, and the Fight to Protect Victims</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 14:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>659</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/9555a340-0bde-11f0-9399-eb0f994d1fdb/image/7a3513e5b38840a5acad2f9a758fe2f0.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On March 15th, 2025, the Trump administration defied an oral order from U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg to stop the flights of Venezuelan migrants headed to a Salvadoran prison, after the administration used the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport more than 200 alleged members of the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang to El Salvador with no due process.

In this episode, Craig is joined by Virgil Wiebe, Professor of Law from the University of St. Thomas School of Law, as they discuss the recent deportation of Venezuelan migrants and federal Judge Boasberg's ruling, blocking the Trump administration from   deporting noncitizens. Craig &amp; Virgil talk about the Alien Enemies Act, defying the judiciary, and next steps for individuals who are deported without due process.

Related Episodes

Senators Weigh In on Immigration, The Constitution, and Obama’s Executive Order

Unaccompanied Minor Immigrants: Push and Pull Factors of Immigration

Inside Human Trafficking: Sex &amp; Labor Trafficking, and the Fight to Protect Victims</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On March 15th, 2025, the Trump administration defied an oral order from U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg to stop the flights of Venezuelan migrants headed to a Salvadoran prison, after the administration used the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport more than 200 alleged members of the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang to El Salvador with no due process.</p><p><br></p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Virgil Wiebe, Professor of Law from the University of St. Thomas School of Law, as they discuss the recent deportation of Venezuelan migrants and federal Judge Boasberg's ruling, blocking the Trump administration from   deporting noncitizens. Craig &amp; Virgil talk about the Alien Enemies Act, defying the judiciary, and next steps for individuals who are deported without due process.</p><p><br></p><p><strong><u>Related Episodes</u></strong></p><ul>
<li><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/12/senators-weigh-immigration-constitution-obamas-executive-order/">Senators Weigh In on Immigration, The Constitution, and Obama’s Executive Order</a></li>
<li><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/06/unaccompanied-minor-immigrants-push-pull-factors-immigration/">Unaccompanied Minor Immigrants: Push and Pull Factors of Immigration</a></li>
<li><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/03/inside-human-trafficking-sex-labor-trafficking-and-the-fight-to-protect-victims/">Inside Human Trafficking: Sex &amp; Labor Trafficking, and the Fight to Protect Victims</a></li>
</ul><p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2300</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9555a340-0bde-11f0-9399-eb0f994d1fdb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5235847946.mp3?updated=1743172100" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside Human Trafficking: Sex &amp; Labor Trafficking, and the Fight to Protect Victims</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/03/inside-human-trafficking-sex-labor-trafficking-and-the-fight-to-protect-victims</link>
      <description>Every year, millions of men, women, and children are trafficked worldwide – including right here in the United States. According to the Department of Homeland Security, human trafficking is defined as “the use of force, fraud, or coercion to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act.”
In this episode, Craig is joined by returning guest, Bridgette A. Carr, clinical professor of law and co-director of the Human Trafficking and Immigration Clinic at the University of Michigan Law School, as they spotlight human trafficking. Craig &amp; Bridgette discuss the different types of human trafficking, how it happens, how to recognize it, and what is being done to combat trafficking.
Mentioned in This Episode:
Archived Lawyer 2 Lawyer Episode: Legal Crackdown on Human Trafficking featuring Bridgette A. Carr</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>658</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/213f9874-0046-11f0-8d4b-9b2317a644b6/image/f99abdb726a18c0eeac1acbd19741fc2.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Every year, millions of men, women, and children are trafficked worldwide – including right here in the United States. According to the Department of Homeland Security, human trafficking is defined as “the use of force, fraud, or coercion to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act.”
In this episode, Craig is joined by returning guest, Bridgette A. Carr, clinical professor of law and co-director of the Human Trafficking and Immigration Clinic at the University of Michigan Law School, as they spotlight human trafficking. Craig &amp; Bridgette discuss the different types of human trafficking, how it happens, how to recognize it, and what is being done to combat trafficking.
Mentioned in This Episode:
Archived Lawyer 2 Lawyer Episode: Legal Crackdown on Human Trafficking featuring Bridgette A. Carr</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Every year, millions of men, women, and children are trafficked worldwide – including right here in the United States. According to the Department of Homeland Security, human trafficking is defined as “the use of force, fraud, or coercion to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act.”</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by returning guest, Bridgette A. Carr, clinical professor of law and co-director of the Human Trafficking and Immigration Clinic at the University of Michigan Law School, as they spotlight human trafficking. Craig &amp; Bridgette discuss the different types of human trafficking, how it happens, how to recognize it, and what is being done to combat trafficking.</p><p><strong><em>Mentioned in This Episode:</em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Archived Lawyer 2 Lawyer Episode: </em></strong><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/04/legal-crackdown-on-human-trafficking/"><strong><em>Legal Crackdown on Human Trafficking featuring Bridgette A. Carr</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2239</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[213f9874-0046-11f0-8d4b-9b2317a644b6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8593714524.mp3?updated=1741897014" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Case Against Incivility: Restoring Respect in Law</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/02/the-case-against-incivility-restoring-respect-in-law</link>
      <description>Civility within the legal profession can be defined as the courteous and respectful behavior exhibited by legal professionals throughout their practice. Personal attacks, not agreeing to reasonable requests, writing inflammatory emails, briefs, or motions, are just a few examples of incivility within the profession. These actions have prompted calls for a return to civility. Where some states have adopted codes of civility, a fight for mandatory civility continues. 
In this episode, Craig is joined by David A. Grenardo, a professor of law and associate director of the Holloran Center for Ethical Leadership in the Professions at St. Thomas School of Law. Craig &amp; David spotlight civility in the legal profession, and take a look at mandatory civility and teaching the importance of civility to our law students and to those within the legal profession.
Mentioned in This Episode:
Civility Rules: Debunking the Major Myths Surrounding Mandatory Civility for Lawyers and Five Mandatory Civility Rules That Will Work
﻿Hear more from David on State Bar of Texas Podcast </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>657</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ae2af3c4-f582-11ef-9a36-63df3be0e18c/image/67026395f5b827c7f20a2c23718adb3f.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Civility within the legal profession can be defined as the courteous and respectful behavior exhibited by legal professionals throughout their practice. Personal attacks, not agreeing to reasonable requests, writing inflammatory emails, briefs, or motions, are just a few examples of incivility within the profession. These actions have prompted calls for a return to civility. Where some states have adopted codes of civility, a fight for mandatory civility continues. 
In this episode, Craig is joined by David A. Grenardo, a professor of law and associate director of the Holloran Center for Ethical Leadership in the Professions at St. Thomas School of Law. Craig &amp; David spotlight civility in the legal profession, and take a look at mandatory civility and teaching the importance of civility to our law students and to those within the legal profession.
Mentioned in This Episode:
Civility Rules: Debunking the Major Myths Surrounding Mandatory Civility for Lawyers and Five Mandatory Civility Rules That Will Work
﻿Hear more from David on State Bar of Texas Podcast </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Civility within the legal profession can be defined as the courteous and respectful behavior exhibited by legal professionals throughout their practice. Personal attacks, not agreeing to reasonable requests, writing inflammatory emails, briefs, or motions, are just a few examples of incivility within the profession. These actions have prompted calls for a return to civility. Where some states have adopted codes of civility, a fight for mandatory civility continues. </p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by David A. Grenardo, a professor of law and associate director of the Holloran Center for Ethical Leadership in the Professions at St. Thomas School of Law. Craig &amp; David spotlight civility in the legal profession, and take a look at mandatory civility and teaching the importance of civility to our law students and to those within the legal profession.</p><p><strong><em>Mentioned in This Episode:</em></strong></p><p><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4557403"><em>Civility Rules: Debunking the Major Myths Surrounding Mandatory Civility for Lawyers and Five Mandatory Civility Rules That Will Work</em></a></p><p><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/state-bar-texas/2024/07/keynote-speaker-david-grenardo-state-bar-of-texas-annual-meeting-2024/"><em>﻿Hear more from David on State Bar of Texas Podcast </em></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2137</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ae2af3c4-f582-11ef-9a36-63df3be0e18c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8989787957.mp3?updated=1741040599" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>California Wildfires and the Insurance Crisis: What's Next for Palisades, Altadena and the L.A. Area</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/02/california-wildfires-and-the-insurance-crisis-whats-next-for-palisades-altadena-and-the-l-a-area</link>
      <description>In January, communities in Los Angeles were devastated by wildfires, permanently displacing thousands and destroying property and lives. Prior to the fires, thousands of L.A. residents in fire-prone areas were dropped from their insurance, leaving them with no protection or safety net. After losing their homes, their businesses, and their schools, they were left with the harsh reality of picking up the pieces.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Hannah Perls, Senior Staff Attorney with the Harvard Environmental &amp; Energy Law Program (EELP), as they take a look at the aftermath of the L.A. fires. Craig and Hannah discuss disaster preparedness and response, insurance recovery after big disasters like the fires, and next steps for those impacted by the fires.
Listen to our previous episodes about other California wildfires:
2018 Episode with Dan Wade, Tiela Chalmers and Michael Hart
2007 Episode with Mark C. Zebrowski, Katherine L. Parker and Dan Hull

Mentioned in This Episode:
﻿It’s Always Fire Season Now -Harvard Law Today
Neighborhood Legal Services of L.A. County (NLSLA)
Is California Becoming Uninsurable?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 15:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>656</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0f113bc8-eae6-11ef-a5cd-6b994fd87aca/image/ca5938c9068b44929f9e1bb1e6abb6b0.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In January, communities in Los Angeles were devastated by wildfires, permanently displacing thousands and destroying property and lives. Prior to the fires, thousands of L.A. residents in fire-prone areas were dropped from their insurance, leaving them with no protection or safety net. After losing their homes, their businesses, and their schools, they were left with the harsh reality of picking up the pieces.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Hannah Perls, Senior Staff Attorney with the Harvard Environmental &amp; Energy Law Program (EELP), as they take a look at the aftermath of the L.A. fires. Craig and Hannah discuss disaster preparedness and response, insurance recovery after big disasters like the fires, and next steps for those impacted by the fires.
Listen to our previous episodes about other California wildfires:
2018 Episode with Dan Wade, Tiela Chalmers and Michael Hart
2007 Episode with Mark C. Zebrowski, Katherine L. Parker and Dan Hull

Mentioned in This Episode:
﻿It’s Always Fire Season Now -Harvard Law Today
Neighborhood Legal Services of L.A. County (NLSLA)
Is California Becoming Uninsurable?</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In January, communities in Los Angeles were devastated by wildfires, permanently displacing thousands and destroying property and lives. Prior to the fires, thousands of L.A. residents in fire-prone areas were dropped from their insurance, leaving them with no protection or safety net. After losing their homes, their businesses, and their schools, they were left with the harsh reality of picking up the pieces.</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Hannah Perls, Senior Staff Attorney with the Harvard Environmental &amp; Energy Law Program (EELP), as they take a look at the aftermath of the L.A. fires. Craig and Hannah discuss disaster preparedness and response, insurance recovery after big disasters like the fires, and next steps for those impacted by the fires.</p><p>Listen to our previous episodes about other California wildfires:</p><p><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/12/the-california-fires-dealing-with-natural-disasters/">2018 Episode with Dan Wade, Tiela Chalmers and Michael Hart</a></p><p><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/10/the-southern-california-fires/">2007 Episode with Mark C. Zebrowski, Katherine L. Parker and Dan Hull</a></p><p><br></p><p><strong><em>Mentioned in This Episode:</em></strong></p><p><a href="https://hls.harvard.edu/today/its-always-fire-season-now/?utm_medium=social&amp;utm_source=hltFacebook&amp;fbclid=IwY2xjawITC69leHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHXu7QoUNuDnurCbTvVedf-KlbqT_K2SVCHX83pqQgKgP4-CKwIRLqUYhiQ_aem_GahVMAHBxeKrCaQM2QWWtQ"><strong><em>﻿It’s Always Fire Season Now -Harvard Law Today</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://nlsla.org/services/disaster-assistance/"><strong><em>Neighborhood Legal Services of L.A. County (NLSLA)</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://www.insuranceforgood.org/blog/is-california-becoming-uninsurable"><strong><em>Is California Becoming Uninsurable?</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2269</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0f113bc8-eae6-11ef-a5cd-6b994fd87aca]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6767691653.mp3?updated=1739546485" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trump's Executive Orders, Legality, Litigation, and Impact</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/01/trumps-executive-orders-legality-litigation-and-impact</link>
      <description>With a stroke of a pen, President Trump signed a record number of executive orders attempting to change the fabric of our nation, attempting to undo years of legislation, and challenge the Constitution of the United States. From birthright citizenship to the elimination of DEI programs, to a freeze on federal aid, these orders stand to impact millions.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Qasim Rashid, human rights lawyer, author, and a former Congressional candidate, as they spotlight Trump's recent executive orders including: birthright citizenship, the elimination of DEI programs, and the freeze on federal aid. Craig &amp; Qasim discuss reaction, the legality of these orders, the executive branch v. Congress, litigation, and the potential impact these orders could have on the people of our nation.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:15:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>655</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/57e706b2-df5a-11ef-980c-7b94c524928b/image/5a64a4276e5f8a3ea76350e4f8e9b90e.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With a stroke of a pen, President Trump signed a record number of executive orders attempting to change the fabric of our nation, attempting to undo years of legislation, and challenge the Constitution of the United States. From birthright citizenship to the elimination of DEI programs, to a freeze on federal aid, these orders stand to impact millions.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Qasim Rashid, human rights lawyer, author, and a former Congressional candidate, as they spotlight Trump's recent executive orders including: birthright citizenship, the elimination of DEI programs, and the freeze on federal aid. Craig &amp; Qasim discuss reaction, the legality of these orders, the executive branch v. Congress, litigation, and the potential impact these orders could have on the people of our nation.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>With a stroke of a pen, President Trump signed a record number of executive orders attempting to change the fabric of our nation, attempting to undo years of legislation, and challenge the Constitution of the United States. From birthright citizenship to the elimination of DEI programs, to a freeze on federal aid, these orders stand to impact millions.</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Qasim Rashid, human rights lawyer, author, and a former Congressional candidate, as they spotlight Trump's recent executive orders including: birthright citizenship, the elimination of DEI programs, and the freeze on federal aid. Craig &amp; Qasim discuss reaction, the legality of these orders, the executive branch v. Congress, litigation, and the potential impact these orders could have on the people of our nation.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2137</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[57e706b2-df5a-11ef-980c-7b94c524928b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8915843823.mp3?updated=1738336747" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will Trump Pardon January 6 Rioters? Here’s How the Pardon System Works.</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2025/01/will-trump-pardon-january-6-rioters-heres-how-the-pardon-system-works</link>
      <description>Four years ago, on January 6th, 2021, our U.S. Capitol was under siege by supporters of Donald Trump who tried to stop a joint session of Congress from certifying the electoral votes of the 2020 presidential election. Fast forward to 2025, Donald J. Trump is about to take office as President and the fate of those convicted of January 6th crimes lies in his hands.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Kimberly Wehle, professor of law at the University of Baltimore School of Law and author of the book, Pardon Power: How the Pardon System Works—and Why. Craig &amp; Kim take a look back at January 6th, the possibility of Trump pardoning those convicted of federal crimes stemming from January 6th, and the implications this could have on our society and our legal system.
Mentioned in This Episode:
Los Angeles Times: Hundreds of Capitol Riot Prosecutions in Limbo as D.C. Court Awaits Trump’s White House Return By Alanna Durkin Richer and Michael Kunzelman 
 Pardon Power: How the Pardon System Works—and Why by Kimberly Wehle</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>654</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3e48252c-d458-11ef-9ea2-6f66e06d3f4e/image/75cec3d8fd20f5d60a2024f5a9c5b8c2.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Four years ago, on January 6th, 2021, our U.S. Capitol was under siege by supporters of Donald Trump who tried to stop a joint session of Congress from certifying the electoral votes of the 2020 presidential election. Fast forward to 2025, Donald J. Trump is about to take office as President and the fate of those convicted of January 6th crimes lies in his hands.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Kimberly Wehle, professor of law at the University of Baltimore School of Law and author of the book, Pardon Power: How the Pardon System Works—and Why. Craig &amp; Kim take a look back at January 6th, the possibility of Trump pardoning those convicted of federal crimes stemming from January 6th, and the implications this could have on our society and our legal system.
Mentioned in This Episode:
Los Angeles Times: Hundreds of Capitol Riot Prosecutions in Limbo as D.C. Court Awaits Trump’s White House Return By Alanna Durkin Richer and Michael Kunzelman 
 Pardon Power: How the Pardon System Works—and Why by Kimberly Wehle</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Four years ago, on January 6th, 2021, our U.S. Capitol was under siege by supporters of Donald Trump who tried to stop a joint session of Congress from certifying the electoral votes of the 2020 presidential election. Fast forward to 2025, Donald J. Trump is about to take office as President and the fate of those convicted of January 6th crimes lies in his hands.</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Kimberly Wehle, professor of law at the University of Baltimore School of Law and author of the book, <em>Pardon Power: How the Pardon System Works—and Why. </em>Craig &amp; Kim take a look back at January 6th, the possibility of Trump pardoning those convicted of federal crimes stemming from January 6th, and the implications this could have on our society and our legal system.</p><p><strong><em>Mentioned in This Episode:</em></strong></p><p><a href="https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2025-01-06/hundreds-of-capitol-riot-prosecutions-are-in-limbo-as-a-dc-court-awaits-trumps-white-house-return"><strong><em>Los Angeles Times: Hundreds of Capitol Riot Prosecutions in Limbo as D.C. Court Awaits Trump’s White House Return By Alanna Durkin Richer and Michael Kunzelman </em></strong></a></p><p> <a href="https://kimberlywehle.com/how-the-pardon-system-works-and-why/"><strong><em>Pardon Power: How the Pardon System Works—and Why by Kimberly Wehle</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2142</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3e48252c-d458-11ef-9ea2-6f66e06d3f4e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8627598361.mp3?updated=1737066725" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Went Wrong–and Right–with 10 Famous Trials │ A Modern Law Library Re-Broadcast</title>
      <description>Whether you’re a legal history buff, a bookwork, or someone who just loves a great courtroom story, you’ll want to listen to this special episode, originally recorded for ABA Journal’s Modern Law Library with Lee Rawles. In this episode, What Went Wrong–and Right–with 10 Famous Trials, Lee sat down with Craig to discuss his book, How Would You Decide? 10 Famous Trials That Changed History, Book One. In this discussion, Craig talks about his research, what went into the selection of historic cases and trials for the book, and looks ahead to Book Two. 

Craig will be back soon with all new episodes of Lawyer 2 Lawyer. As we await his return, you can also get caught up on  In Dispute. Enjoy! 

ABA Journal’s Modern Law Library invites top legal authors to discuss legal theories and historic events twice a month here on Legal Talk Network.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>bonus</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>653</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f43af3ea-c91e-11ef-a773-cf4125c94326/image/2608de37c3bb5626f11b7d1111b652ae.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Whether you’re a legal history buff, a bookwork, or someone who just loves a great courtroom story, you’ll want to listen to this special episode, originally recorded for ABA Journal’s Modern Law Library with Lee Rawles. In this episode, What Went Wrong–and Right–with 10 Famous Trials, Lee sat down with Craig to discuss his book, How Would You Decide? 10 Famous Trials That Changed History, Book One. In this discussion, Craig talks about his research, what went into the selection of historic cases and trials for the book, and looks ahead to Book Two. 

Craig will be back soon with all new episodes of Lawyer 2 Lawyer. As we await his return, you can also get caught up on  In Dispute. Enjoy! 

ABA Journal’s Modern Law Library invites top legal authors to discuss legal theories and historic events twice a month here on Legal Talk Network.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Whether you’re a legal history buff, a bookwork, or someone who just loves a great courtroom story, you’ll want to listen to this special episode, originally recorded for ABA Journal’s Modern Law Library with Lee Rawles. In this episode, <a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/aba-journal-modern-law-library/2024/11/what-went-wrong-and-right-with-10-famous-trials/"><em>What Went Wrong–and Right–with 10 Famous Trials</em></a>, Lee sat down with Craig to discuss his book, <em>How Would You Decide? 10 Famous Trials That Changed History, Book One.</em> In this discussion, Craig talks about his research, what went into the selection of historic cases and trials for the book, and looks ahead to Book Two. </p><p><br></p><p>Craig will be back soon with all new episodes of <em>Lawyer 2 Lawyer.</em> As we await his return, you can also get caught up on <a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/in-dispute/"> <strong><em>In Dispute</em></strong></a>. Enjoy! </p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/aba-journal-modern-law-library/">ABA Journal’s Modern Law Library</a> invites top legal authors to discuss legal theories and historic events twice a month here on Legal Talk Network.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2718</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f43af3ea-c91e-11ef-a773-cf4125c94326]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7346001389.mp3?updated=1735834122" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Banning of TCE &amp; PCE, and the Future of the EPA</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/12/the-banning-of-tce-pce-and-the-future-of-the-epa</link>
      <description>On December 9th, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced the banning of two chemicals found in products used primarily in the automobile, dry-cleaning, and manufacturing industries, but also found in some household products like cleaning wipes, paint removers, glues, and wig adhesives. The two solvents, Trichloroethylene, also known as TCE, and Perchloroethylene, also known as PCE or Perc, have been linked to cancer and other severe health issues.
With the banning of TCE &amp; PCE, the future of the EPA will be under Trump rule come January 20th, 2025. So what will be the impact of the TCE &amp; PCE ban? And will there be a major overhaul of the EPA and an undoing of Biden’s regulations under Trump? In this episode, Craig is joined by Professor Wendy Wagner from The University of Texas at Austin School of Law. Craig &amp; Wendy discuss the recent banning of TCE &amp; PCE by the EPA, and the future of the EPA under a second Trump presidency.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>652</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/00e3e326-be5d-11ef-ac3e-eb75be7a503f/image/36287008c460043d974e181f608cbd74.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On December 9th, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced the banning of two chemicals found in products used primarily in the automobile, dry-cleaning, and manufacturing industries, but also found in some household products like cleaning wipes, paint removers, glues, and wig adhesives. The two solvents, Trichloroethylene, also known as TCE, and Perchloroethylene, also known as PCE or Perc, have been linked to cancer and other severe health issues.
With the banning of TCE &amp; PCE, the future of the EPA will be under Trump rule come January 20th, 2025. So what will be the impact of the TCE &amp; PCE ban? And will there be a major overhaul of the EPA and an undoing of Biden’s regulations under Trump? In this episode, Craig is joined by Professor Wendy Wagner from The University of Texas at Austin School of Law. Craig &amp; Wendy discuss the recent banning of TCE &amp; PCE by the EPA, and the future of the EPA under a second Trump presidency.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On December 9th, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced the banning of two chemicals found in products used primarily in the automobile, dry-cleaning, and manufacturing industries, but also found in some household products like cleaning wipes, paint removers, glues, and wig adhesives. The two solvents, Trichloroethylene, also known as TCE, and Perchloroethylene, also known as PCE or Perc, have been linked to cancer and other severe health issues.</p><p>With the banning of TCE &amp; PCE, the future of the EPA will be under Trump rule come January 20th, 2025. So what will be the impact of the TCE &amp; PCE ban? And will there be a major overhaul of the EPA and an undoing of Biden’s regulations under Trump? In this episode, Craig is joined by Professor Wendy Wagner from The University of Texas at Austin School of Law. Craig &amp; Wendy discuss the recent banning of TCE &amp; PCE by the EPA, and the future of the EPA under a second Trump presidency.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2058</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[00e3e326-be5d-11ef-ac3e-eb75be7a503f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3314019451.mp3?updated=1734649792" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Abortion Rights &amp; Challenges Ahead</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/12/abortion-rights-challenges-ahead</link>
      <description>Back in 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned 50 years of precedent, overruling Roe v. Wade. Leading up to the presidential election, abortion was a hot button issue and appeared on ballots across the states. 
Since the election, former President Trump has publicly denied that he would support a national abortion ban, and has said that he believes abortion should be left to the states. So what happens now? In this episode, Craig is joined by Kimberly Mutcherson, Professor of Law and former Co-Dean at Rutgers Law School and currently the Phyllis W. Beck Chair in Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law. Craig &amp; Kim reflect on what has transpired after the Roe v. Wade decision, and discuss abortion rights and the challenges ahead.
Mentioned in This Episode:
﻿SB 8, Its Impact, and the Future of Roe v. Wade</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>651</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/b3f5ec40-b348-11ef-98e0-4f489c92d106/image/ffc7830e8228fbcca516022250f8034a.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Back in 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned 50 years of precedent, overruling Roe v. Wade. Leading up to the presidential election, abortion was a hot button issue and appeared on ballots across the states. 
Since the election, former President Trump has publicly denied that he would support a national abortion ban, and has said that he believes abortion should be left to the states. So what happens now? In this episode, Craig is joined by Kimberly Mutcherson, Professor of Law and former Co-Dean at Rutgers Law School and currently the Phyllis W. Beck Chair in Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law. Craig &amp; Kim reflect on what has transpired after the Roe v. Wade decision, and discuss abortion rights and the challenges ahead.
Mentioned in This Episode:
﻿SB 8, Its Impact, and the Future of Roe v. Wade</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Back in 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned 50 years of precedent, overruling <em>Roe v. Wade.</em> Leading up to the presidential election, abortion was a hot button issue and appeared on ballots across the states. </p><p>Since the election, former President Trump has publicly denied that he would support a national abortion ban, and has said that he believes abortion should be left to the states. So what happens now? In this episode, Craig is joined by Kimberly Mutcherson, Professor of Law and former Co-Dean at Rutgers Law School and currently the Phyllis W. Beck Chair in Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law. Craig &amp; Kim reflect on what has transpired after the <em>Roe v. Wade</em> decision, and discuss abortion rights and the challenges ahead.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in This Episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/09/sb-8-its-impact-and-the-future-of-roe-v-wade/"><strong>﻿<em>SB 8, Its Impact, and the Future of Roe v. Wade</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2409</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b3f5ec40-b348-11ef-98e0-4f489c92d106]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6196763143.mp3?updated=1733431656" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mass Deportations Under a Second Trump Presidency</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/11/mass-deportations-under-a-second-trump-presidency</link>
      <description>With former President Trump slated to take office on January 20th, 2025, he has not wasted any time in his quest to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. Trump recently appointed Former Acting U.S. ICE Director Tom Homan, as "border czar,” and confirmed his plan to declare a national emergency once in office, using the military for mass deportations.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Professor Ediberto Román, Director of Immigration and Citizenship Initiatives at the Florida International University College of Law. Craig &amp; Ediberto discuss mass deportations under a second Trump presidency, the legal issues, and the potential impact on immigrants, industries, and our nation.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>650</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/6f522fb0-a85b-11ef-848d-d74c7d1ad8f0/image/3620ac251748494071d4422a94bd6351.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With former President Trump slated to take office on January 20th, 2025, he has not wasted any time in his quest to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. Trump recently appointed Former Acting U.S. ICE Director Tom Homan, as "border czar,” and confirmed his plan to declare a national emergency once in office, using the military for mass deportations.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Professor Ediberto Román, Director of Immigration and Citizenship Initiatives at the Florida International University College of Law. Craig &amp; Ediberto discuss mass deportations under a second Trump presidency, the legal issues, and the potential impact on immigrants, industries, and our nation.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>With former President Trump slated to take office on January 20th, 2025, he has not wasted any time in his quest to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. Trump recently appointed Former Acting U.S. ICE Director Tom Homan, as "border czar,” and confirmed his plan to declare a national emergency once in office, using the military for mass deportations.</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Professor Ediberto Román, Director of Immigration and Citizenship Initiatives at the Florida International University College of Law. Craig &amp; Ediberto discuss mass deportations under a second Trump presidency, the legal issues, and the potential impact on immigrants, industries, and our nation.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2150</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6f522fb0-a85b-11ef-848d-d74c7d1ad8f0]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5030424305.mp3?updated=1732230211" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legalities of Baseball: Fan Interference, Ball Ownership, &amp; the Constitution</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/11/the-legalities-of-baseball-fan-interference-ball-ownership-the-constitution</link>
      <description>Baseball. America’s favorite pastime. A wonderful game, with its share of controversy. On October 30th, 2024, the World Series wrapped with the LA Dodgers beating the NY Yankees 4-1 in the series. In the third game of the series, at Yankee Stadium, there was a controversial play involving LA Dodgers right fielder Mookie Betts and two New York Yankees fans, who tried to rip the ball out of the glove of Betts during a play- a prime example of fan interference. According to the Yankees, the fans were ejected from the game due to their “egregious and unacceptable physical contact."
In this episode, Craig is joined by Dr. Paul Finkelman, a Distinguished Visiting Professor at the University of Cincinnati College of Law to spotlight baseball, the law, and regulation. Craig &amp; Paul take a look at everything from fan interference to who owns a ball. We will also discuss baseball and how it all relates to the Constitution, and the American legal system.
Mentioned in this episode: 
Baseball and the American Legal Mind by by Spencer W. Waller, Neil B. Cohen, and Paul Finkelman
In Dispute on Legal Talk Network-The Chicago Black Sox Trial: How 8 Players Went From the Dugout to the Courtroom</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>649</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1f7d853e-9d70-11ef-834e-e7739ff638b0/image/5d5e944146d93408372632bcbc368598.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Baseball. America’s favorite pastime. A wonderful game, with its share of controversy. On October 30th, 2024, the World Series wrapped with the LA Dodgers beating the NY Yankees 4-1 in the series. In the third game of the series, at Yankee Stadium, there was a controversial play involving LA Dodgers right fielder Mookie Betts and two New York Yankees fans, who tried to rip the ball out of the glove of Betts during a play- a prime example of fan interference. According to the Yankees, the fans were ejected from the game due to their “egregious and unacceptable physical contact."
In this episode, Craig is joined by Dr. Paul Finkelman, a Distinguished Visiting Professor at the University of Cincinnati College of Law to spotlight baseball, the law, and regulation. Craig &amp; Paul take a look at everything from fan interference to who owns a ball. We will also discuss baseball and how it all relates to the Constitution, and the American legal system.
Mentioned in this episode: 
Baseball and the American Legal Mind by by Spencer W. Waller, Neil B. Cohen, and Paul Finkelman
In Dispute on Legal Talk Network-The Chicago Black Sox Trial: How 8 Players Went From the Dugout to the Courtroom</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Baseball. America’s favorite pastime. A wonderful game, with its share of controversy. On October 30th, 2024, the World Series wrapped with the LA Dodgers beating the NY Yankees 4-1 in the series. In the third game of the series, at Yankee Stadium, there was a controversial play involving LA Dodgers right fielder Mookie Betts and two New York Yankees fans, who tried to rip the ball out of the glove of Betts during a play- a prime example of fan interference. According to the Yankees, the fans were ejected from the game due to their “egregious and unacceptable physical contact."</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Dr. Paul Finkelman, a Distinguished Visiting Professor at the University of Cincinnati College of Law to spotlight baseball, the law, and regulation. Craig &amp; Paul take a look at everything from fan interference to who owns a ball. We will also discuss baseball and how it all relates to the Constitution, and the American legal system.</p><p><strong><em>Mentioned in this episode:</em> </strong></p><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Baseball-American-Legal-Spencer-Waller/dp/0815320574"><strong><em>Baseball and the American Legal Mind by by Spencer W. Waller, Neil B. Cohen, and Paul Finkelman</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/in-dispute/2024/10/the-chicago-black-sox-trial-how-8-players-went-from-the-dugout-to-the-courtroom/"><strong><em>In Dispute on Legal Talk Network-The Chicago Black Sox Trial: How 8 Players Went From the Dugout to the Courtroom</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2285</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1f7d853e-9d70-11ef-834e-e7739ff638b0]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1749181264.mp3?updated=1731029891" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What San Juan's Coal Power Plant Closure Means for The Future of Energy &amp; The Navajo Nation</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/10/what-san-juans-coal-power-plant-closure-means-for-the-future-of-energy-the-navajo-nation</link>
      <description>For almost fifty years, coal dominated the Navajo economy. In April of 2017, the Public Service Company of New Mexico announced they planned to close the San Juan Generating Station, a coal-fired power plant in New Mexico, and replace it with other energy sources, including wind and solar. In 2022, the San Juan Generating Station in New Mexico closed, and on August 24, 2024, the station was demolished with a cleanup expected in 2025.
The demolition of the station received mixed reviews from the Navajo Nation. While some supported the demolition, others were tied to the history of the industry and how it provided for their families.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Dr. Andrew Curley, Assistant Professor at the School of Geography, Development &amp; Environment at the University of Arizona. Craig and Andrew discuss coal, its history and use, the impact it has had on the Navajo Nation, the labor force, and the environment, and what the future holds.
Mentioned in This Episode:
Carbon Sovereignty: Coal, Development, and Energy Transition in the Navajo Nation</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>648</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f987a9b6-926d-11ef-9733-13bc241a9cc2/image/1a8f265f2424b87f60b38d3fc4d0812a.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For almost fifty years, coal dominated the Navajo economy. In April of 2017, the Public Service Company of New Mexico announced they planned to close the San Juan Generating Station, a coal-fired power plant in New Mexico, and replace it with other energy sources, including wind and solar. In 2022, the San Juan Generating Station in New Mexico closed, and on August 24, 2024, the station was demolished with a cleanup expected in 2025.
The demolition of the station received mixed reviews from the Navajo Nation. While some supported the demolition, others were tied to the history of the industry and how it provided for their families.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Dr. Andrew Curley, Assistant Professor at the School of Geography, Development &amp; Environment at the University of Arizona. Craig and Andrew discuss coal, its history and use, the impact it has had on the Navajo Nation, the labor force, and the environment, and what the future holds.
Mentioned in This Episode:
Carbon Sovereignty: Coal, Development, and Energy Transition in the Navajo Nation</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For almost fifty years, coal dominated the Navajo economy. In April of 2017, the Public Service Company of New Mexico announced they planned to close the San Juan Generating Station, a coal-fired power plant in New Mexico, and replace it with other energy sources, including wind and solar. In 2022, the San Juan Generating Station in New Mexico closed, and on August 24, 2024, the station was demolished with a cleanup expected in 2025.</p><p>The demolition of the station received mixed reviews from the Navajo Nation. While some supported the demolition, others were tied to the history of the industry and how it provided for their families.</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Dr. Andrew Curley, Assistant Professor at the School of Geography, Development &amp; Environment at the University of Arizona. Craig and Andrew discuss coal, its history and use, the impact it has had on the Navajo Nation, the labor force, and the environment, and what the future holds.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in This Episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://uapress.arizona.edu/book/carbon-sovereignty"><strong><em>Carbon Sovereignty: Coal, Development, and Energy Transition in the Navajo Nation</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2048</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f987a9b6-926d-11ef-9733-13bc241a9cc2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2406794735.mp3?updated=1729863767" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Much Power Vice Presidents Really Have &amp; Why JD Vance’s Comments Are Alarming Lawyers</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/10/how-much-power-vice-presidents-really-have-why-jd-vances-comments-are-alarming-lawyers</link>
      <description>The role of the Vice President of the United States is an important one, but what actual power does it hold? Recently, vice president candidate JD Vance spoke publicly about the power of the vice presidency, the role of presiding over the electoral count as President of the Senate, and what he would have done if he was in former Vice President Mike Pence’s shoes on January 6th 2021.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Matthew Seligman, a fellow at the Stanford Constitutional Law Center, as they discuss the power of the vice presidency, the presiding role over the electoral count, and clarify the role of the vice presidency.
Mentioned in This Episode:
﻿How to Steal a Presidential Election (co-authored with Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Lessig), Yale University Press (2024)
"How JD Vance Disqualified Himself” by Matthew Seligman (The New York Times)
The Ramifications of NSA Monitoring on Attorney-Client Privilege and the Bill of Rights featuring John Eastman &amp; Erwin Chemerinsky (2014)</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>647</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0ee14466-8756-11ef-8243-1b1a547bea3f/image/9c9bcd0540e581a6b9a6c53887e6a44c.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The role of the Vice President of the United States is an important one, but what actual power does it hold? Recently, vice president candidate JD Vance spoke publicly about the power of the vice presidency, the role of presiding over the electoral count as President of the Senate, and what he would have done if he was in former Vice President Mike Pence’s shoes on January 6th 2021.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Matthew Seligman, a fellow at the Stanford Constitutional Law Center, as they discuss the power of the vice presidency, the presiding role over the electoral count, and clarify the role of the vice presidency.
Mentioned in This Episode:
﻿How to Steal a Presidential Election (co-authored with Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Lessig), Yale University Press (2024)
"How JD Vance Disqualified Himself” by Matthew Seligman (The New York Times)
The Ramifications of NSA Monitoring on Attorney-Client Privilege and the Bill of Rights featuring John Eastman &amp; Erwin Chemerinsky (2014)</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The role of the Vice President of the United States is an important one, but what actual power does it hold? Recently, vice president candidate JD Vance spoke publicly about the power of the vice presidency, the role of presiding over the electoral count as President of the Senate, and what he would have done if he was in former Vice President Mike Pence’s shoes on January 6th 2021.</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Matthew Seligman, a fellow at the Stanford Constitutional Law Center, as they discuss the power of the vice presidency, the presiding role over the electoral count, and clarify the role of the vice presidency.</p><p><strong><em>Mentioned in This Episode:</em></strong></p><p><a href="https://amzn.to/4h32bP1"><strong><em>﻿How to Steal a Presidential Election (co-authored with Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Lessig), Yale University Press (2024)</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/01/opinion/jd-vance-vice-president.html"><strong><em>"How JD Vance Disqualified Himself” by Matthew Seligman (The New York Times)</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/03/ramifications-nsa-monitoring-attorney-client-privilege-bill-rights/"><strong><em>The Ramifications of NSA Monitoring on Attorney-Client Privilege and the Bill of Rights featuring John Eastman &amp; Erwin Chemerinsky (2014)</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2103</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0ee14466-8756-11ef-8243-1b1a547bea3f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2037972112.mp3?updated=1728690466" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Revisiting Space Law </title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/09/revisiting-space-law</link>
      <description>While Craig is on vacation, we’re re-airing one of our favorite episodes from the Lawyer 2 Lawyer library so you can re-listen or be introduced for the first time if you’re a new subscriber. As many of you know, NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams are currently stranded in space due to a problem with the Boeing Starliner and will now be rescued in February of 2025! This brings up many questions pertaining to the legal arena of space law. 
In this archived episode, originally recorded in September of 2019, titled, Space Law, Craig spoke with Attorneys Michelle Hanlon and Mark Sundahl as they discussed pertinent space case law, and other related legal issues in the space law arena.
Craig will be back soon with all new episodes of Lawyer 2 Lawyer. As we await his return, you can also get caught up on In Dispute, Craig’s new podcast, about 10 famous trials that changed history. Enjoy! </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 14:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>646</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/de15865a-7cd6-11ef-8daa-a7c0d1662323/image/b4cfa840623be9d78b14fbc4ae4c9da3.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>While Craig is on vacation, we’re re-airing one of our favorite episodes from the Lawyer 2 Lawyer library so you can re-listen or be introduced for the first time if you’re a new subscriber. As many of you know, NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams are currently stranded in space due to a problem with the Boeing Starliner and will now be rescued in February of 2025! This brings up many questions pertaining to the legal arena of space law. 
In this archived episode, originally recorded in September of 2019, titled, Space Law, Craig spoke with Attorneys Michelle Hanlon and Mark Sundahl as they discussed pertinent space case law, and other related legal issues in the space law arena.
Craig will be back soon with all new episodes of Lawyer 2 Lawyer. As we await his return, you can also get caught up on In Dispute, Craig’s new podcast, about 10 famous trials that changed history. Enjoy! </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>While Craig is on vacation, we’re re-airing one of our favorite episodes from the <em>Lawyer 2 Lawyer </em>library so you can re-listen or be introduced for the first time if you’re a new subscriber. As many of you know, NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams are currently stranded in space due to a problem with the Boeing Starliner and will now be rescued in February of 2025! This brings up many questions pertaining to the legal arena of space law. </p><p>In this archived episode, originally recorded in September of 2019, titled, <a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/09/space-law/"><strong>Space Law,</strong></a> Craig spoke with Attorneys Michelle Hanlon and Mark Sundahl as they discussed pertinent space case law, and other related legal issues in the space law arena.</p><p>Craig will be back soon with all new episodes of <em>Lawyer 2 Lawyer.</em> As we await his return, you can also get caught up on<a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/in-dispute/"> <strong><em>In Dispute</em></strong></a>, Craig’s new podcast, about 10 famous trials that changed history. Enjoy! </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1957</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[de15865a-7cd6-11ef-8daa-a7c0d1662323]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2941496618.mp3?updated=1727445712" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using Music in Political Campaigns: Misuse, Copyright Infringement, &amp; Litigation</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/09/using-music-in-political-campaigns-misuse-copyright-infringement-litigation</link>
      <description>Over the years, the power of music has been an integral piece in energizing a crowd, whether through a specific song used at a political rally or in a campaign video on social media. However, there are legalities when it comes to the use of songs, especially when the musician doesn't want to be tied to a specific political candidate or a candidate uses a song without the musician’s permission.
Back on August 29, 2024, deputy director of communications for the Trump campaign, Margo McAtee Martin, posted a short clip on X of Donald Trump boarding a plane, set to the opening riff of the widely popular song, “Seven Nation Army” by the band The White Stripes. In response to the post, guitarist and lead singer of the rock duo, Jack White, wrote on his Instagram page, “Oh….Don’t even think about using my music you fascists…“Lawsuit coming from my lawyers about this (to add to your five thousand others..)” On September 9th, Jack &amp; his bandmate, Meg White, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Trump &amp; company for the “flagrant misappropriation” of their song. 
In this episode, Craig is joined by Joseph Fishman, Professor of Law at Vanderbilt University School of Law and Professor at the Blair School of Music, as they discuss The White Stripes' recent lawsuit against Donald Trump for the unauthorized use of their song "Seven Nation Army". Craig &amp; Joe will talk about copyright infringement, and the legalities behind the use of songs in campaigns.
Mentioned in This Episode:
Donald Trump Infringed ‘Electric Avenue’ By Using Song In Campaign Video, Judge Rules</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:45:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>645</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1502a370-720d-11ef-9558-9fe8cbf3e6a6/image/43009b5b94bb107da38754b36aba9d79.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Over the years, the power of music has been an integral piece in energizing a crowd, whether through a specific song used at a political rally or in a campaign video on social media. However, there are legalities when it comes to the use of songs, especially when the musician doesn't want to be tied to a specific political candidate or a candidate uses a song without the musician’s permission.
Back on August 29, 2024, deputy director of communications for the Trump campaign, Margo McAtee Martin, posted a short clip on X of Donald Trump boarding a plane, set to the opening riff of the widely popular song, “Seven Nation Army” by the band The White Stripes. In response to the post, guitarist and lead singer of the rock duo, Jack White, wrote on his Instagram page, “Oh….Don’t even think about using my music you fascists…“Lawsuit coming from my lawyers about this (to add to your five thousand others..)” On September 9th, Jack &amp; his bandmate, Meg White, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Trump &amp; company for the “flagrant misappropriation” of their song. 
In this episode, Craig is joined by Joseph Fishman, Professor of Law at Vanderbilt University School of Law and Professor at the Blair School of Music, as they discuss The White Stripes' recent lawsuit against Donald Trump for the unauthorized use of their song "Seven Nation Army". Craig &amp; Joe will talk about copyright infringement, and the legalities behind the use of songs in campaigns.
Mentioned in This Episode:
Donald Trump Infringed ‘Electric Avenue’ By Using Song In Campaign Video, Judge Rules</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Over the years, the power of music has been an integral piece in energizing a crowd, whether through a specific song used at a political rally or in a campaign video on social media. However, there are legalities when it comes to the use of songs, especially when the musician doesn't want to be tied to a specific political candidate or a candidate uses a song without the musician’s permission.</p><p>Back on August 29, 2024, deputy director of communications for the Trump campaign, Margo McAtee Martin, posted a short clip on X of Donald Trump boarding a plane, set to the opening riff of the widely popular song,<em> “Seven Nation Army”</em> by the band The White Stripes. In response to the post, guitarist and lead singer of the rock duo, Jack White, wrote on his Instagram page, “<em>Oh….Don’t even think about using my music you fascists…“Lawsuit coming from my lawyers about this (to add to your five thousand others..)” </em>On September 9th, Jack &amp; his bandmate, Meg White, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Trump &amp; company for the “flagrant misappropriation” of their song. </p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Joseph Fishman, Professor of Law at Vanderbilt University School of Law and Professor at the Blair School of Music, as they discuss The White Stripes' recent lawsuit against Donald Trump for the unauthorized use of their song<em> "Seven Nation Army". </em>Craig &amp; Joe will talk about copyright infringement, and the legalities behind the use of songs in campaigns.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in This Episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.billboard.com/pro/donald-trump-infringed-electric-avenue-campaign-video-judge-rules/">Donald Trump Infringed ‘Electric Avenue’ By Using Song In Campaign Video, Judge Rules</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2189</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1502a370-720d-11ef-9558-9fe8cbf3e6a6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1487018961.mp3?updated=1726259871" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE FTC, Noncompete Ban, and the Recent Ruling</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/08/the-ftc-noncompete-ban-and-the-recent-ruling</link>
      <description>On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission issued a final rule to “ promote competition by banning noncompete agreements nationwide, protecting the fundamental freedom of workers to change jobs, increasing innovation, and fostering new business formation.” Noncompetes are agreements that prohibit workers from leaving their employers to join a competitor or start a rival business for a specific period of time.
However, the ban has been met with opposition. On August 14th, a federal judge in Florida ruled against the FTC’s proposed ban on most noncompete agreements. Back in July, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas temporarily blocked the FTC’s new rule. On August 20, 2024, U.S. District Judge Ada Brown found that the FTC lacked the statutory authority to issue the rule, set to go into effect on September 4th, 2024, blocking the rule nationwide.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Sandeep Vaheesan, the legal director at the Open Markets Institute, as they discuss the Federal Trade Commission's ban of noncompete agreements. Craig &amp; Sandeep look at the recent court rulings to block the FTC's ban, the impact of the ban, and what this new ruling by Judge Brown means.
Mentioned in This Episode:
﻿Democracy in Power: A History of Electrification in the United States</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>644</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission issued a final rule to “ promote competition by banning noncompete agreements nationwide, protecting the fundamental freedom of workers to change jobs, increasing innovation, and fostering new business formation.” Noncompetes are agreements that prohibit workers from leaving their employers to join a competitor or start a rival business for a specific period of time.
However, the ban has been met with opposition. On August 14th, a federal judge in Florida ruled against the FTC’s proposed ban on most noncompete agreements. Back in July, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas temporarily blocked the FTC’s new rule. On August 20, 2024, U.S. District Judge Ada Brown found that the FTC lacked the statutory authority to issue the rule, set to go into effect on September 4th, 2024, blocking the rule nationwide.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Sandeep Vaheesan, the legal director at the Open Markets Institute, as they discuss the Federal Trade Commission's ban of noncompete agreements. Craig &amp; Sandeep look at the recent court rulings to block the FTC's ban, the impact of the ban, and what this new ruling by Judge Brown means.
Mentioned in This Episode:
﻿Democracy in Power: A History of Electrification in the United States</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission issued a final rule to “ promote competition by banning noncompete agreements nationwide, protecting the fundamental freedom of workers to change jobs, increasing innovation, and fostering new business formation.” Noncompetes are agreements that prohibit workers from leaving their employers to join a competitor or start a rival business for a specific period of time.</p><p>However, the ban has been met with opposition. On August 14th, a federal judge in Florida ruled against the FTC’s proposed ban on most noncompete agreements. Back in July, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas temporarily blocked the FTC’s new rule. On August 20, 2024, U.S. District Judge Ada Brown found that the FTC lacked the statutory authority to issue the rule, set to go into effect on September 4th, 2024, blocking the rule nationwide.</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Sandeep Vaheesan, the legal director at the Open Markets Institute, as they discuss the Federal Trade Commission's ban of noncompete agreements. Craig &amp; Sandeep look at the recent court rulings to block the FTC's ban, the impact of the ban, and what this new ruling by Judge Brown means.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in This Episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/D/bo238463843.html"><strong>﻿<em>Democracy in Power: A History of Electrification in the United States</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2055</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ed3ac956-6651-11ef-a7d7-ef9ae6f16abe]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3016125946.mp3?updated=1724969859" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 2024 Presidential Election: Policy, Party, or Personality</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/08/the-2024-presidential-election-policy-party-or-personality</link>
      <description>Last month, President Biden announced that he would be dropping out of the 2024 presidential race, and endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for the presidential nomination. The momentum shifted, creating an entirely new battlefield in the race for the presidency against former President Trump and his Vice President candidate, JD Vance. 
Inflation. The economy. Women’s reproductive rights. Immigration. Education. These are just some of the policy &amp; legal issues that we have covered over the years here on Lawyer 2Lawyer and will surely be on the minds of voters as they cast their ballot for president on November 5th, 2024.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Dr. Casey Burgat, an assistant professor and the director of the Legislative Affairs program at George Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management, as they discuss the upcoming presidential election, the candidates, policy issues important to voters, and what we can expect on Election Day and beyond.
Mentioned in this episode: 
We Hold These “Truths” Book
Mastering the Room Podcast</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>643</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Last month, President Biden announced that he would be dropping out of the 2024 presidential race, and endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for the presidential nomination. The momentum shifted, creating an entirely new battlefield in the race for the presidency against former President Trump and his Vice President candidate, JD Vance. 
Inflation. The economy. Women’s reproductive rights. Immigration. Education. These are just some of the policy &amp; legal issues that we have covered over the years here on Lawyer 2Lawyer and will surely be on the minds of voters as they cast their ballot for president on November 5th, 2024.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Dr. Casey Burgat, an assistant professor and the director of the Legislative Affairs program at George Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management, as they discuss the upcoming presidential election, the candidates, policy issues important to voters, and what we can expect on Election Day and beyond.
Mentioned in this episode: 
We Hold These “Truths” Book
Mastering the Room Podcast</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Last month, President Biden announced that he would be dropping out of the 2024 presidential race, and endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for the presidential nomination. The momentum shifted, creating an entirely new battlefield in the race for the presidency against former President Trump and his Vice President candidate, JD Vance. </p><p>Inflation. The economy. Women’s reproductive rights. Immigration. Education. These are just some of the policy &amp; legal issues that we have covered over the years here on Lawyer 2Lawyer and will surely be on the minds of voters as they cast their ballot for president on November 5th, 2024.</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Dr. Casey Burgat, an assistant professor and the director of the Legislative Affairs program at George Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management, as they discuss the upcoming presidential election, the candidates, policy issues important to voters, and what we can expect on Election Day and beyond.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in this episode: </strong></p><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/We-Hold-These-Truths-Holding/dp/B0D5WLLLBD/ref=sr_1_1?crid=TZZG1BSDR9KT&amp;dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.pPsyKO1YC4UZPb4FDsLBGd1JvkO1YjwZjMkSo7gymO_sVf4JNO_BJZD6FATmX7zkrVpL6ea4-z-8U-5U72UxkEZzmw77bOcLGhrMG-Ryq5JncRB_RapsaxQmWSfzESZ9t-jrUblzPpVx7x0ANVJEhg.Dc6BsuXn5B2RkC3cOjmo7LSem5qHIz7KIF3YjnGAjTs&amp;dib_tag=se&amp;keywords=we+hold+these+truths+casey&amp;qid=1723735439&amp;sprefix=we+hold+these+truths+casey+%2Caps%2C116&amp;sr=8-1"><strong><em>We Hold These “Truths” Book</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://gspm.gwu.edu/mastering-room-podcast"><strong><em>Mastering the Room Podcast</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2149</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b6f78b62-5b67-11ef-bd99-1b5bd4ab426d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7294600657.mp3?updated=1723769707" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Governor Newsom’s Executive Order &amp; the Impact on the Homeless</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/08/governor-newsoms-executive-order-the-impact-on-the-homeless</link>
      <description>On July 25, 2024, California Governor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order directing state officials to start removing homeless encampments across the state. This follows last month’s SCOTUS ruling in City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, where the high court ruled that they will allow cities to enforce bans on sleeping outside in public spaces. According to a 2023 homelessness assessment report to Congress from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, California has the largest homeless population in the nation with more than 180,000 people out on the streets. 
In this episode, Craig is joined by returning guest Gary Blasi, Professor of Law Emeritus at the UCLA School of Law, as they discuss Governor Newsom's executive order for removal of homeless encampments in California. Craig &amp; Gary discuss the order, the recent SCOTUS decision in City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, and the potential impact this could have on the homeless community.
Mentioned in this episode:
Governor Newsom’s Executive Order on Encampments  
City of Grants Pass v. Johnson Scotus Ruling 
The Legal Issues Surrounding Homelessness with Gary Blasi &amp; Breanne Schuster on Lawyer2Lawyer</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>642</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On July 25, 2024, California Governor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order directing state officials to start removing homeless encampments across the state. This follows last month’s SCOTUS ruling in City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, where the high court ruled that they will allow cities to enforce bans on sleeping outside in public spaces. According to a 2023 homelessness assessment report to Congress from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, California has the largest homeless population in the nation with more than 180,000 people out on the streets. 
In this episode, Craig is joined by returning guest Gary Blasi, Professor of Law Emeritus at the UCLA School of Law, as they discuss Governor Newsom's executive order for removal of homeless encampments in California. Craig &amp; Gary discuss the order, the recent SCOTUS decision in City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, and the potential impact this could have on the homeless community.
Mentioned in this episode:
Governor Newsom’s Executive Order on Encampments  
City of Grants Pass v. Johnson Scotus Ruling 
The Legal Issues Surrounding Homelessness with Gary Blasi &amp; Breanne Schuster on Lawyer2Lawyer</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On July 25, 2024, California Governor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order directing state officials to start removing homeless encampments across the state. This follows last month’s SCOTUS ruling in <em>City of Grants Pass v. Johnson</em>, where the high court ruled that they will allow cities to enforce bans on sleeping outside in public spaces. According to a 2023 homelessness assessment report to Congress from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, California has the largest homeless population in the nation with more than 180,000 people out on the streets. </p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by <a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/07/the-legal-issues-surrounding-homelessness/">returning guest Gary Blasi</a>, Professor of Law Emeritus at the UCLA School of Law, as they discuss Governor Newsom's executive order for removal of homeless encampments in California. Craig &amp; Gary discuss the order, the recent SCOTUS decision in <em>City of Grants Pass v. Johnson</em>, and the potential impact this could have on the homeless community.</p><p><strong><em>Mentioned in this episode:</em></strong></p><p><a href="http://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024-Encampments-EO-7-24.pdf"><strong><em>Governor Newsom’s Executive Order on Encampments  </em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-175_19m2.pdf"><strong><em>City of Grants Pass v. Johnson Scotus Ruling </em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/07/the-legal-issues-surrounding-homelessness/"><strong><em>The Legal Issues Surrounding Homelessness with Gary Blasi &amp; Breanne Schuster on Lawyer2Lawyer</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1940</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[edd73abe-5041-11ef-98ab-5b48b232d6bb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7681061493.mp3?updated=1722544103" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Ten Commandments, Classrooms, &amp; the Constitution</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/07/the-ten-commandments-classrooms-the-constitution</link>
      <description>The separation of church and state has always been a contentious topic in political circles. Now more than ever, we are seeing religion &amp; our government collide in our classrooms and before our Supreme Court. On June 19, 2024, Louisiana governor Jeff Landry signed into law legislation requiring a poster-sized display of the Ten Commandments in “large, easily readable font” in all public classrooms, from kindergarten to state-funded universities.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Rebecca S. Markert, Vice President and Legal Director at Americans United for Separation of Church and State, as they discuss Louisiana's Ten Commandments classroom law, the separation of church and state, and what this could mean for classrooms across the country.
Mentioned in this episode: 
We Dissent Podcast
Justice Department Press Release on DOJ v. Live Nation-Ticketmaster Lawsuit</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2024 15:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>641</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The separation of church and state has always been a contentious topic in political circles. Now more than ever, we are seeing religion &amp; our government collide in our classrooms and before our Supreme Court. On June 19, 2024, Louisiana governor Jeff Landry signed into law legislation requiring a poster-sized display of the Ten Commandments in “large, easily readable font” in all public classrooms, from kindergarten to state-funded universities.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Rebecca S. Markert, Vice President and Legal Director at Americans United for Separation of Church and State, as they discuss Louisiana's Ten Commandments classroom law, the separation of church and state, and what this could mean for classrooms across the country.
Mentioned in this episode: 
We Dissent Podcast
Justice Department Press Release on DOJ v. Live Nation-Ticketmaster Lawsuit</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The separation of church and state has always been a contentious topic in political circles. Now more than ever, we are seeing religion &amp; our government collide in our classrooms and before our Supreme Court. On June 19, 2024, Louisiana governor Jeff Landry signed into law legislation requiring a poster-sized display of the Ten Commandments in “large, easily readable font” in all public classrooms, from kindergarten to state-funded universities.</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Rebecca S. Markert, Vice President and Legal Director at Americans United for Separation of Church and State, as they discuss Louisiana's Ten Commandments classroom law, the separation of church and state, and what this could mean for classrooms across the country.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in this episode: </strong></p><p><a href="https://we-dissent.org/"><strong><em>We Dissent Podcast</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-live-nation-ticketmaster-monopolizing-markets-across-live-concert"><strong><em>Justice Department Press Release on DOJ v. Live Nation-Ticketmaster Lawsuit</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1890</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c73ae8c2-45da-11ef-ad47-0b00bcac5d25]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3276873477.mp3?updated=1721400037" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Revisiting Wrongfully Convicted: William Dillon and His Life in Prison</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/07/revisiting-wrongfully-convicted-william-dillon-and-his-life-in-prison</link>
      <description>While Craig is on vacation, we thought we’d bring back one of our favorite episodes from the Lawyer2Lawyer library so you can re-listen or be introduced for the first time if you’re a new subscriber. In this episode, Craig talks with William Dillon, a man who served 28 years of a life sentence for a murder he did not commit. William actually sings the music in one of our other shows on the Legal Talk Network called For the Innocent, where we talk to exonerees about their wrongful convictions. 
Craig will be back soon with all new episodes of Lawyer2Lawyer. As we await his return, you can also get caught up on In Dispute, Craig’s new podcast, about 10 famous trials that changed history.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2024 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>640</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>While Craig is on vacation, we thought we’d bring back one of our favorite episodes from the Lawyer2Lawyer library so you can re-listen or be introduced for the first time if you’re a new subscriber. In this episode, Craig talks with William Dillon, a man who served 28 years of a life sentence for a murder he did not commit. William actually sings the music in one of our other shows on the Legal Talk Network called For the Innocent, where we talk to exonerees about their wrongful convictions. 
Craig will be back soon with all new episodes of Lawyer2Lawyer. As we await his return, you can also get caught up on In Dispute, Craig’s new podcast, about 10 famous trials that changed history.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>While Craig is on vacation, we thought we’d bring back one of our favorite episodes from the <em>Lawyer2Lawyer </em>library so you can re-listen or be introduced for the first time if you’re a new subscriber. In this episode, Craig talks with William Dillon, a man who served 28 years of a life sentence for a murder he did not commit. William actually sings the music in one of our other shows on the Legal Talk Network called <a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/for-the-innocent/"><strong><em>For the Innocent,</em></strong></a> where we talk to exonerees about their wrongful convictions. </p><p>Craig will be back soon with all new episodes of <em>Lawyer2Lawyer.</em> As we await his return, you can also get caught up on<a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/in-dispute/"> <strong><em>In Dispute</em></strong></a>, Craig’s new podcast, about 10 famous trials that changed history.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2158</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b1af8264-3fc8-11ef-8786-87110231af45]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7625684457.mp3?updated=1720733986" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DOJ v. Live Nation-Ticketmaster</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/06/doj-v-live-nation-ticketmaster/</link>
      <description>According to a May 23rd U.S. Department of Justice press release, “the Justice Department, along with 30 state and district attorneys general, filed a civil antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation Entertainment Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Ticketmaster LLC (also known as Live Nation-Ticketmaster) for monopolization and other unlawful conduct that thwarts competition in markets across the live entertainment industry.” A high demand for tickets to Taylor Swift’s “Eras Tour” and a rise in ticket prices for a 2022 Bruce Springsteen concert, are just a few examples of how Live Nation-Ticketmaster’s actions angered consumers, and ultimately led the DOJ to step into action.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Lee Hepner, a California-based antitrust lawyer and Senior Legal Counsel for the American Economic Liberties Project, as they spotlight the Justice Department’s lawsuit against Live Nation-Ticketmaster. Craig &amp; Lee will talk about the lawsuit, monopolies, antitrust law, and the potential impact this could have on the ticket sales giant and future ticket sales.
Mentioned in this episode: 
Justice Department Press Release on DOJ v. Live Nation-Ticketmaster Lawsuit</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>639</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>According to a May 23rd U.S. Department of Justice press release, “the Justice Department, along with 30 state and district attorneys general, filed a civil antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation Entertainment Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Ticketmaster LLC (also known as Live Nation-Ticketmaster) for monopolization and other unlawful conduct that thwarts competition in markets across the live entertainment industry.” A high demand for tickets to Taylor Swift’s “Eras Tour” and a rise in ticket prices for a 2022 Bruce Springsteen concert, are just a few examples of how Live Nation-Ticketmaster’s actions angered consumers, and ultimately led the DOJ to step into action.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Lee Hepner, a California-based antitrust lawyer and Senior Legal Counsel for the American Economic Liberties Project, as they spotlight the Justice Department’s lawsuit against Live Nation-Ticketmaster. Craig &amp; Lee will talk about the lawsuit, monopolies, antitrust law, and the potential impact this could have on the ticket sales giant and future ticket sales.
Mentioned in this episode: 
Justice Department Press Release on DOJ v. Live Nation-Ticketmaster Lawsuit</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>According to a May 23rd U.S. Department of Justice press release, “the Justice Department, along with 30 state and district attorneys general, filed a civil antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation Entertainment Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Ticketmaster LLC (also known as Live Nation-Ticketmaster) for monopolization and other unlawful conduct that thwarts competition in markets across the live entertainment industry.” A high demand for tickets to Taylor Swift’s “Eras Tour” and a rise in ticket prices for a 2022 Bruce Springsteen concert, are just a few examples of how Live Nation-Ticketmaster’s actions angered consumers, and ultimately led the DOJ to step into action.</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Lee Hepner, a California-based antitrust lawyer and Senior Legal Counsel for the American Economic Liberties Project, as they spotlight the Justice Department’s lawsuit against Live Nation-Ticketmaster. Craig &amp; Lee will talk about the lawsuit, monopolies, antitrust law, and the potential impact this could have on the ticket sales giant and future ticket sales.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in this episode: </strong></p><p><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-live-nation-ticketmaster-monopolizing-markets-across-live-concert"><strong><em>Justice Department Press Release on DOJ v. Live Nation-Ticketmaster Lawsuit</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1889</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[46d531da-34b7-11ef-824c-b30d7c84af2e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6513875427.mp3?updated=1719515639" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Introducing: In Dispute: 10 Famous Trials That Changed History</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/06/introducing-in-dispute-10-famous-trials-that-changed-history</link>
      <description>J. Craig Williams has a brand new show 'In Dispute: 10 Famous Trials That Changed History' right here on Legal Talk Network! Join us as we take a journey through time to discover the most interesting and impactful court cases in world history. Go beyond the basic historical accounts recapped in law school textbooks and soak in every aspect of the trials with fascinating reenactments of actual conversations preserved through trial transcripts and court reporters. Then, receive an exclusive courtroom backstage pass to hear legal analysis and modern-day reflections from Seasoned Attorney J. Craig Williams. Get ready to dive into the trials of the Salem witches, Chicago Black Sox, OJ Simpson, McMartin preschool childcare providers, and more! The first episode 'Salem Witch Trials: How The Hysteria Went Terribly Awry' is available to listen to now.
LINKS:

Subscribe on Apple Podcasts


Subscribe on Spotify


Sign up for our newsletter so that you’re the first to know when new episodes drop!

Tell us what you’re looking forward to the most for this show on LinkedIn, Facebook, X or Instagram! 

Purchase the e-book


Purchase the hardcover



SPECIAL THANKS TO OUR VOICE ACTORS:
Meghan Steenburgh as News Reporter
Daniel Rover Singer as William Jennings Bryan
Scott Well as Clarence Darrow</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>bonus</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>J. Craig Williams has a brand new show 'In Dispute: 10 Famous Trials That Changed History' right here on Legal Talk Network! Join us as we take a journey through time to discover the most interesting and impactful court cases in world history. Go beyond the basic historical accounts recapped in law school textbooks and soak in every aspect of the trials with fascinating reenactments of actual conversations preserved through trial transcripts and court reporters. Then, receive an exclusive courtroom backstage pass to hear legal analysis and modern-day reflections from Seasoned Attorney J. Craig Williams. Get ready to dive into the trials of the Salem witches, Chicago Black Sox, OJ Simpson, McMartin preschool childcare providers, and more! The first episode 'Salem Witch Trials: How The Hysteria Went Terribly Awry' is available to listen to now.
LINKS:

Subscribe on Apple Podcasts


Subscribe on Spotify


Sign up for our newsletter so that you’re the first to know when new episodes drop!

Tell us what you’re looking forward to the most for this show on LinkedIn, Facebook, X or Instagram! 

Purchase the e-book


Purchase the hardcover



SPECIAL THANKS TO OUR VOICE ACTORS:
Meghan Steenburgh as News Reporter
Daniel Rover Singer as William Jennings Bryan
Scott Well as Clarence Darrow</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>J. Craig Williams has a brand new show '<a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/in-dispute?utm_source=l2l&amp;utm_medium=shownotes">In Dispute: 10 Famous Trials That Changed History</a>' right here on Legal Talk Network! Join us as we take a journey through time to discover the most interesting and impactful court cases in world history. Go beyond the basic historical accounts recapped in law school textbooks and soak in every aspect of the trials with fascinating reenactments of actual conversations preserved through trial transcripts and court reporters. Then, receive an exclusive courtroom backstage pass to hear legal analysis and modern-day reflections from Seasoned Attorney J. Craig Williams. Get ready to dive into the trials of the Salem witches, Chicago Black Sox, OJ Simpson, McMartin preschool childcare providers, and more! The first episode '<a href="https://link.chtbl.com/ID_SalemWitch?sid=l2l">Salem Witch Trials: How The Hysteria Went Terribly Awry</a>' is available to listen to now.</p><p><strong>LINKS:</strong></p><ul>
<li>Subscribe on <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/in-dispute-10-famous-trials-that-changed-history/id1751526223">Apple Podcasts</a>
</li>
<li>Subscribe on <a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/2dEiHDxr6fmbvxGf7MRwC0?si=e8901c5dff134976">Spotify</a>
</li>
<li>Sign up for <a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/in-dispute?utm_source=in-dispute&amp;utm_medium=show-notes">our newsletter</a> so that you’re the first to know when new episodes drop!</li>
<li>Tell us what you’re looking forward to the most for this show on <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/legal-talk-network">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/legaltalknetwork/">Facebook</a>, <a href="https://x.com/LegalTalkNet">X</a> or <a href="https://www.instagram.com/legaltalknet/">Instagram</a>! </li>
<li>Purchase the <a href="https://us.amazon.com/dp/B0D5JYN55D?binding=kindle_edition&amp;ref=dbs_dp_sirpi">e-book</a>
</li>
<li>Purchase the <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1681607794?ref_=cm_sw_r_mwn_dp_KEVBXNTM8ZF82195C6PQ&amp;language=en_US">hardcover</a>
</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p><strong>SPECIAL THANKS TO OUR VOICE ACTORS:</strong></p><p><em>Meghan Steenburgh as News Reporter</em></p><p><em>Daniel Rover Singer as William Jennings Bryan</em></p><p><em>Scott Well as Clarence Darrow</em></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>460</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c8e36194-29c5-11ef-8504-6f79e86129a0]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9138095031.mp3?updated=1718985500" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Hush Money Conviction &amp; Sentencing Trump</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/06/the-hush-money-conviction-sentencing-trump</link>
      <description>On May 31, 2024, a New York jury found former president Donald J. Trump guilty on all 34 counts in his highly watched hush money trial. He will be sentenced on July 11th by Judge Juan Merchan. Since the verdict, the former president has lashed out at the verdict and even turned to the Supreme of the Court of the United States, asking them to throw out his conviction. This is the first-ever criminal trial of a former U.S. president, and the first criminal conviction of a former president.
So will former President Trump see jail time? And how will this verdict influence voters as they place their ballot for president of the United States come November? In this episode, Craig is joined by Bennett L. Gershman, professor of law from Pace University’s Elisabeth Haub School of Law, as they discuss former President Trump's hush money conviction, sentencing, and how a felony conviction of a former president may impact the presidency.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 14:15:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>638</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On May 31, 2024, a New York jury found former president Donald J. Trump guilty on all 34 counts in his highly watched hush money trial. He will be sentenced on July 11th by Judge Juan Merchan. Since the verdict, the former president has lashed out at the verdict and even turned to the Supreme of the Court of the United States, asking them to throw out his conviction. This is the first-ever criminal trial of a former U.S. president, and the first criminal conviction of a former president.
So will former President Trump see jail time? And how will this verdict influence voters as they place their ballot for president of the United States come November? In this episode, Craig is joined by Bennett L. Gershman, professor of law from Pace University’s Elisabeth Haub School of Law, as they discuss former President Trump's hush money conviction, sentencing, and how a felony conviction of a former president may impact the presidency.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On May 31, 2024, a New York jury found former president Donald J. Trump guilty on all 34 counts in his highly watched hush money trial. He will be sentenced on July 11th by Judge Juan Merchan. Since the verdict, the former president has lashed out at the verdict and even turned to the Supreme of the Court of the United States, asking them to throw out his conviction. This is the first-ever criminal trial of a former U.S. president, and the first criminal conviction of a former president.</p><p>So will former President Trump see jail time? And how will this verdict influence voters as they place their ballot for president of the United States come November? In this episode, Craig is joined by Bennett L. Gershman, professor of law from Pace University’s Elisabeth Haub School of Law, as they discuss former President Trump's hush money conviction, sentencing, and how a felony conviction of a former president may impact the presidency.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2116</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c38a2aec-24d5-11ef-809d-278584d74d7d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2717711205.mp3?updated=1717769175" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Civil Forfeiture in Culley v. Marshall</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/05/civil-forfeiture-in-culley-v-marshall</link>
      <description>Under the 14th Amendment, "No state shall...deprive any person of...property, without due process of law." This principle was at the heart of the matter of the 2023 Supreme Court case of Culley v. Marshall, in which two women had respectively loaned their cars to others only to have the cars seized under an Alabama civil forfeiture law following each lendee's arrest for drug offenses. The petitioners claimed that, absent a preliminary hearing, their 14th Amendment rights had been violated. Justice Kavanagh wrote for the majority stating that “In civil forfeiture cases, the Due Process Clause requires a timely forfeiture hearing, but does not require a separate preliminary hearing.”
In this episode, Craig is joined by Attorney Kirby Thomas West from the Institute for Justice to discuss the recent SCOTUS decision in Culley v. Marshall. Craig &amp; Kirby spotlight civil forfeiture and the potential impact of this ruling. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>637</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Under the 14th Amendment, "No state shall...deprive any person of...property, without due process of law." This principle was at the heart of the matter of the 2023 Supreme Court case of Culley v. Marshall, in which two women had respectively loaned their cars to others only to have the cars seized under an Alabama civil forfeiture law following each lendee's arrest for drug offenses. The petitioners claimed that, absent a preliminary hearing, their 14th Amendment rights had been violated. Justice Kavanagh wrote for the majority stating that “In civil forfeiture cases, the Due Process Clause requires a timely forfeiture hearing, but does not require a separate preliminary hearing.”
In this episode, Craig is joined by Attorney Kirby Thomas West from the Institute for Justice to discuss the recent SCOTUS decision in Culley v. Marshall. Craig &amp; Kirby spotlight civil forfeiture and the potential impact of this ruling. </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Under the 14th Amendment, "No state shall...deprive any person of...property, without due process of law." This principle was at the heart of the matter of the 2023 Supreme Court case of <em>Culley v. Marshall</em>, in which two women had respectively loaned their cars to others only to have the cars seized under an Alabama civil forfeiture law following each lendee's arrest for drug offenses. The petitioners claimed that, absent a preliminary hearing, their 14th Amendment rights had been violated. Justice Kavanagh wrote for the majority stating that “In civil forfeiture cases, the Due Process Clause requires a timely forfeiture hearing, but does not require a separate preliminary hearing.”</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Attorney Kirby Thomas West from the Institute for Justice to discuss the recent SCOTUS decision in <em>Culley v. Marshall. </em>Craig &amp; Kirby spotlight civil forfeiture and the potential impact of this ruling. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1908</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ad1a71c2-1945-11ef-8509-0bd36b30902a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6225877162.mp3?updated=1716498088" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Reclassification of Marijuana</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/05/the-reclassification-of-marijuana</link>
      <description>In April of 2024, the United States Drug Enforcement Agency recently announced that they are proceeding with reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug. The Justice Department proposal would move marijuana from the “Schedule I” group which includes heroin, LSD, quaaludes and ecstasy to “Schedule III” which includes ketamine and some anabolic steroids.
In this episode, Craig is joined by professor Robert Mikos from Vanderbilt University Law School to discuss the proposed reclassification of marijuana. Craig &amp; Rob take a look at the history of the war on drugs, cannabis law, and what constitutional right an individual has when it comes to drug use.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>636</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In April of 2024, the United States Drug Enforcement Agency recently announced that they are proceeding with reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug. The Justice Department proposal would move marijuana from the “Schedule I” group which includes heroin, LSD, quaaludes and ecstasy to “Schedule III” which includes ketamine and some anabolic steroids.
In this episode, Craig is joined by professor Robert Mikos from Vanderbilt University Law School to discuss the proposed reclassification of marijuana. Craig &amp; Rob take a look at the history of the war on drugs, cannabis law, and what constitutional right an individual has when it comes to drug use.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In April of 2024, the United States Drug Enforcement Agency recently announced that they are proceeding with reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug. The Justice Department proposal would move marijuana from the “Schedule I” group which includes heroin, LSD, quaaludes and ecstasy to “Schedule III” which includes ketamine and some anabolic steroids.</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by professor Robert Mikos from Vanderbilt University Law School to discuss the proposed reclassification of marijuana. Craig &amp; Rob take a look at the history of the war on drugs, cannabis law, and what constitutional right an individual has when it comes to drug use.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2028</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c87cfe7a-0e47-11ef-b7a2-7392b5808c80]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1946450647.mp3?updated=1715289781" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Importance of Jury Selection in Trump’s Criminal Cases</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/04/the-importance-of-jury-selection-in-trumps-criminal-cases</link>
      <description>One of former President Trump’s criminal cases, the hush money trial, is currently underway in a New York City courtroom. Jury selection for this case was a lengthy and controversial process which included Trump’s lawyers scrutinizing potential jurors’ social media, Judge Merchan giving Trump a warning for reacting to a potential juror in court, and the dismissal of one seated juror due to their concerns over the intense media coverage of the trial.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Betty L. Dunkum, Esq., Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Victory Trial Consulting, as they spotlight jury selection. Craig &amp; Betty discuss the process, strategy, and what attorneys should look for in a juror.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:35:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>635</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>One of former President Trump’s criminal cases, the hush money trial, is currently underway in a New York City courtroom. Jury selection for this case was a lengthy and controversial process which included Trump’s lawyers scrutinizing potential jurors’ social media, Judge Merchan giving Trump a warning for reacting to a potential juror in court, and the dismissal of one seated juror due to their concerns over the intense media coverage of the trial.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Betty L. Dunkum, Esq., Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Victory Trial Consulting, as they spotlight jury selection. Craig &amp; Betty discuss the process, strategy, and what attorneys should look for in a juror.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>One of former President Trump’s criminal cases, the hush money trial, is currently underway in a New York City courtroom. Jury selection for this case was a lengthy and controversial process which included Trump’s lawyers scrutinizing potential jurors’ social media, Judge Merchan giving Trump a warning for reacting to a potential juror in court, and the dismissal of one seated juror due to their concerns over the intense media coverage of the trial.</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Betty L. Dunkum, Esq., Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Victory Trial Consulting, as they spotlight jury selection. Craig &amp; Betty discuss the process, strategy, and what attorneys should look for in a juror.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2064</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ca7f0ce0-03cf-11ef-9f38-d30cdbd502b3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4677444276.mp3?updated=1714138256" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Baltimore Bridge Collapse: Admiralty Law, Liability, &amp; Litigation</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/04/the-baltimore-bridge-collapse-admiralty-law-liability-litigation</link>
      <description>In the early morning hours of March 26, 2024, Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge collapsed after a Singapore-based cargo ship named the Dali, lost power and hit the bridge's pillar. According to officials, eight people were on the bridge that morning when it fell: two were rescued, two bodies were recovered, and four are presumed dead. Crew members on the Dali were all safe.
In this episode, Craig is joined by LSU law professor and LSU President Emeritus, Tom Galligan, as they spotlight the Baltimore bridge collapse. Craig &amp; Tom explore the incident through the lens of admiralty law, liability, litigation, impact, and how to prevent future disasters involving vessels.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>634</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the early morning hours of March 26, 2024, Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge collapsed after a Singapore-based cargo ship named the Dali, lost power and hit the bridge's pillar. According to officials, eight people were on the bridge that morning when it fell: two were rescued, two bodies were recovered, and four are presumed dead. Crew members on the Dali were all safe.
In this episode, Craig is joined by LSU law professor and LSU President Emeritus, Tom Galligan, as they spotlight the Baltimore bridge collapse. Craig &amp; Tom explore the incident through the lens of admiralty law, liability, litigation, impact, and how to prevent future disasters involving vessels.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the early morning hours of March 26, 2024, Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge collapsed after a Singapore-based cargo ship named the Dali, lost power and hit the bridge's pillar. According to officials, eight people were on the bridge that morning when it fell: two were rescued, two bodies were recovered, and four are presumed dead. Crew members on the Dali were all safe.</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by LSU law professor and LSU President Emeritus, Tom Galligan, as they spotlight the Baltimore bridge collapse. Craig &amp; Tom explore the incident through the lens of admiralty law, liability, litigation, impact, and how to prevent future disasters involving vessels.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2127</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9e0b0902-f844-11ee-8fb3-676fd949a801]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6406305303.mp3?updated=1712869078" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trump &amp; His Appeal Bond</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/03/trump-his-appeal-bond</link>
      <description>In a ruling on Monday, March 25th, 2024,the New York appeals court gave Trump a major victory, cutting the bond needed in his civil fraud case from $464 million to $175 million, and also affording him an extra 10 days to find the money.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Will Thomas, Assistant Professor of Business Law at the Stephen M. Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan, as they discuss former president Trump's current legal and financial issues. Craig &amp; Will take a look at this recent ruling on the $464 million judgment, specifics on the inability to secure a bond, and what next steps will be taken to retrieve payment from Trump.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>633</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In a ruling on Monday, March 25th, 2024,the New York appeals court gave Trump a major victory, cutting the bond needed in his civil fraud case from $464 million to $175 million, and also affording him an extra 10 days to find the money.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Will Thomas, Assistant Professor of Business Law at the Stephen M. Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan, as they discuss former president Trump's current legal and financial issues. Craig &amp; Will take a look at this recent ruling on the $464 million judgment, specifics on the inability to secure a bond, and what next steps will be taken to retrieve payment from Trump.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In a ruling on Monday, March 25th, 2024,the New York appeals court gave Trump a major victory, cutting the bond needed in his civil fraud case from $464 million to $175 million, and also affording him an extra 10 days to find the money.</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Will Thomas, Assistant Professor of Business Law at the Stephen M. Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan, as they discuss former president Trump's current legal and financial issues. Craig &amp; Will take a look at this recent ruling on the $464 million judgment, specifics on the inability to secure a bond, and what next steps will be taken to retrieve payment from Trump.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2190</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[bc4e9c64-ed48-11ee-8aa4-835ef3b604bb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5564964433.mp3?updated=1711661396" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Women’s History Month, Policy Issues, and Fighting for Gender Justice</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/03/womens-history-month-policy-issues-and-fighting-for-gender-justice</link>
      <description>March is Women’s History Month where we celebrate the contributions women have made to the United States throughout American history in a variety of fields. Charlotte E. Ray. Belva Lockwood. Sandra Day O’Connor. Ruth Bader Ginsberg. These are just some of the standout women who have shaped our legal history and fought for women and girls across the nation.
Unfortunately, in recent years women’s rights have come under attack. With SCOTUS’ overturning of Roe v. Wade, and many other policy issues like equal pay, Title IX, childcare, taxes, and equity in education, women continue to fight for their individual rights.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Amy Royce, Senior Counsel for Income Security for the National Women’s Law Center, as they will spotlight Women's History Month by discussing the current policy issues involving women, highlighting the intersection of gender justice and tax policy. We will also take a look back at women throughout history who have paved the way, and what women across the nation can do to rise up against legislation and fight for their rights.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>632</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>March is Women’s History Month where we celebrate the contributions women have made to the United States throughout American history in a variety of fields. Charlotte E. Ray. Belva Lockwood. Sandra Day O’Connor. Ruth Bader Ginsberg. These are just some of the standout women who have shaped our legal history and fought for women and girls across the nation.
Unfortunately, in recent years women’s rights have come under attack. With SCOTUS’ overturning of Roe v. Wade, and many other policy issues like equal pay, Title IX, childcare, taxes, and equity in education, women continue to fight for their individual rights.
In this episode, Craig is joined by Amy Royce, Senior Counsel for Income Security for the National Women’s Law Center, as they will spotlight Women's History Month by discussing the current policy issues involving women, highlighting the intersection of gender justice and tax policy. We will also take a look back at women throughout history who have paved the way, and what women across the nation can do to rise up against legislation and fight for their rights.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>March is Women’s History Month where we celebrate the contributions women have made to the United States throughout American history in a variety of fields. Charlotte E. Ray. Belva Lockwood. Sandra Day O’Connor. Ruth Bader Ginsberg. These are just some of the standout women who have shaped our legal history and fought for women and girls across the nation.</p><p>Unfortunately, in recent years women’s rights have come under attack. With SCOTUS’ overturning of <em>Roe v. Wade, </em>and many other policy issues like equal pay, Title IX, childcare, taxes, and equity in education, women continue to fight for their individual rights.</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by Amy Royce, Senior Counsel for Income Security for the National Women’s Law Center, as they will spotlight Women's History Month by discussing the current policy issues involving women, highlighting the intersection of gender justice and tax policy. We will also take a look back at women throughout history who have paved the way, and what women across the nation can do to rise up against legislation and fight for their rights.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1967</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[92cb9f92-e251-11ee-becb-57b6564bd698]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2953907601.mp3?updated=1710455606" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Presidential Election &amp; Saving our Democracy</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/03/the-presidential-election-saving-our-democracy</link>
      <description>On November 5th, 2024, people across the nation will head to the polls and cast their vote for president of the United States. It is looking more and more like another battle between President Joe Biden &amp; former President Donald Trump with policy and rhetoric indicating an even more divided nation than in the prior election. With policy issues like immigration, abortion, IVF, guns, employment, and the economy taking center stage in this race, this election could once again be a controversial one. 
So, with a nation divided, can our democracy be saved? In this episode, Craig is joined by attorney David Pepper, as they discuss the upcoming presidential election, the state of democracy in the U.S., the current policy issues that could impact the election, and how we can save our democracy. 
Mentioned in this episode: 
Saving Democracy: A User’s Manual
Laboratories of Autocracy: A Wake-Up Call from Behind the Lines</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>631</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On November 5th, 2024, people across the nation will head to the polls and cast their vote for president of the United States. It is looking more and more like another battle between President Joe Biden &amp; former President Donald Trump with policy and rhetoric indicating an even more divided nation than in the prior election. With policy issues like immigration, abortion, IVF, guns, employment, and the economy taking center stage in this race, this election could once again be a controversial one. 
So, with a nation divided, can our democracy be saved? In this episode, Craig is joined by attorney David Pepper, as they discuss the upcoming presidential election, the state of democracy in the U.S., the current policy issues that could impact the election, and how we can save our democracy. 
Mentioned in this episode: 
Saving Democracy: A User’s Manual
Laboratories of Autocracy: A Wake-Up Call from Behind the Lines</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On November 5th, 2024, people across the nation will head to the polls and cast their vote for president of the United States. It is looking more and more like another battle between President Joe Biden &amp; former President Donald Trump with policy and rhetoric indicating an even more divided nation than in the prior election. With policy issues like immigration, abortion, IVF, guns, employment, and the economy taking center stage in this race, this election could once again be a controversial one. </p><p>So, with a nation divided, can our democracy be saved? In this episode, Craig is joined by attorney David Pepper, as they discuss the upcoming presidential election, the state of democracy in the U.S., the current policy issues that could impact the election, and how we can save our democracy. </p><p><strong>Mentioned in this episode: </strong></p><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/stores/David-Pepper/author/B01IJCZT92?ref=ap_rdr&amp;isDramIntegrated=true&amp;shoppingPortalEnabled=true"><strong><em>Saving Democracy: A User’s Manual</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://laboratoriesofautocracy.com/"><strong><em>Laboratories of Autocracy: A Wake-Up Call from Behind the Lines</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2350</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6aa53308-d751-11ee-bb9f-eb32c98042d6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1074918817.mp3?updated=1709246098" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside Trump’s Criminal Cases</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/02/inside-trumps-criminal-cases</link>
      <description>For the past two episodes of Lawyer2Lawyer, we have covered SCOTUS cases that have included ballot access and immunity with former President Trump at the forefront of these cases. Trump has also been charged in four criminal cases.
In this episode, Craig is joined by professor Tamara R. Lave, from the University of Miami, as they spotlight these upcoming criminal cases of Trump, whether these cases will go to trial before the presidential election, and possible punishment.
 
Mentioned in this episode:
Tracking the Trump Criminal Cases (Politico)</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 15:15:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>630</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the past two episodes of Lawyer2Lawyer, we have covered SCOTUS cases that have included ballot access and immunity with former President Trump at the forefront of these cases. Trump has also been charged in four criminal cases.
In this episode, Craig is joined by professor Tamara R. Lave, from the University of Miami, as they spotlight these upcoming criminal cases of Trump, whether these cases will go to trial before the presidential election, and possible punishment.
 
Mentioned in this episode:
Tracking the Trump Criminal Cases (Politico)</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the past two episodes of <em>Lawyer2Lawyer</em>, we have covered SCOTUS cases that have included ballot access and immunity with former President Trump at the forefront of these cases. Trump has also been charged in four criminal cases.</p><p>In this episode, Craig is joined by professor Tamara R. Lave, from the University of Miami, as they spotlight these upcoming criminal cases of Trump, whether these cases will go to trial before the presidential election, and possible punishment.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Mentioned in this episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.politico.com/interactives/2023/trump-criminal-investigations-cases-tracker-list/"><strong><em>Tracking the Trump Criminal Cases (Politico)</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2426</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3c2ebd92-ccdd-11ee-886d-732523a70183]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3344086332.mp3?updated=1708096678" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOTUS 2024: Conflict at the Texas Border, Bump Stocks, the NRA &amp; Free Speech</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/02/scotus-2024-conflict-at-the-texas-border-bump-stocks-the-nra-free-speech</link>
      <description>In our last episode, we discussed administrative law, abortion, guns, presidential immunity &amp; ballot access— just some of the upcoming cases that will come before the High Court in 2024. 
In this episode, we continue our conversation with Professor Steven D. Schwinn and spotlight some of the remaining standout SCOTUS cases on the docket. Additionally, we discuss a developing conflict at the Texas border with Mexico, where the State is openly defying a recent SCOTUS ruling.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>629</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In our last episode, we discussed administrative law, abortion, guns, presidential immunity &amp; ballot access— just some of the upcoming cases that will come before the High Court in 2024. 
In this episode, we continue our conversation with Professor Steven D. Schwinn and spotlight some of the remaining standout SCOTUS cases on the docket. Additionally, we discuss a developing conflict at the Texas border with Mexico, where the State is openly defying a recent SCOTUS ruling.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In our last episode, we discussed administrative law, abortion, guns, presidential immunity &amp; ballot access— just some of the upcoming cases that will come before the High Court in 2024. </p><p>In this episode, we continue our conversation with Professor Steven D. Schwinn and spotlight some of the remaining standout SCOTUS cases on the docket. Additionally, we discuss a developing conflict at the Texas border with Mexico, where the State is openly defying a recent SCOTUS ruling.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2327</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[18dce590-c151-11ee-b88a-b747501b3f84]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6196179858.mp3?updated=1706827034" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOTUS 2024: Administrative Law, Abortion, Guns, Presidential Immunity, &amp; Ballot Access</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/01/scotus-2024-administrative-law-abortion-guns-presidential-immunity-ballot-access</link>
      <description>Administrative law, abortion, guns, presidential immunity, &amp; ballot access. These are just some of the upcoming cases that will come before the High Court in 2024. How will the justices rule? And how could their rulings change the course of our legal system for years to come?
In this episode, host Craig Williams joins returning guest Steven D. Schwinn from the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law, as they spotlight the standout SCOTUS cases of 2024 and the potential impact.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>628</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Administrative law, abortion, guns, presidential immunity, &amp; ballot access. These are just some of the upcoming cases that will come before the High Court in 2024. How will the justices rule? And how could their rulings change the course of our legal system for years to come?
In this episode, host Craig Williams joins returning guest Steven D. Schwinn from the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law, as they spotlight the standout SCOTUS cases of 2024 and the potential impact.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Administrative law, abortion, guns, presidential immunity, &amp; ballot access. These are just some of the upcoming cases that will come before the High Court in 2024. How will the justices rule? And how could their rulings change the course of our legal system for years to come?</p><p>In this episode, host Craig Williams joins returning guest Steven D. Schwinn from the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law, as they spotlight the standout SCOTUS cases of 2024 and the potential impact.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2185</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4e6fa16a-b635-11ee-8c5a-f391d27a3ff9]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7009879617.mp3?updated=1705605843" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyer2Lawyer Spotlight: The NextGen Bar Exam</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2024/01/lawyer2lawyer-spotlight-the-nextgen-bar-exam</link>
      <description>The first bar examination in the United States was administered in oral form in the Delaware Colony in 1783, and in 1885, Massachusetts became the first state to employ a written version of the bar exam. Over time, the bar examination process has become more standardized, but there's no one test. One example of a standardized test is the Uniform Bar Examination (UBE), created back in 2011, and first administered that year by Missouri and North Dakota.
So what is NEXT in standardized tests? According to the National Conference of Bar Examiners’ website, the NextGen Bar Exam, set to debut in July 0f 2026, will “test a broad range of foundational lawyering skills, utilizing a focused set of clearly identified fundamental legal concepts and principles needed in today’s practice of law.”
Will the transition from a standardized test like UBE to NextGen be an easy one? And what can law students &amp; faculty expect? In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Dennis C. Prieto, an Associate Professor and Reference Librarian at ­Rutgers Law School, who served on the National Conference of Bar Examiners’ NextGen Content Scope Committee and is a member of the NextGen Tasks and Rubrics Advisory Committee. Craig &amp; Dennis explore the specifics of the exam, how law students and faculty can transition to preparing for the new exam, and what students can expect from the exam in 2026.
Mentioned in this episode: 
NextGen Bar Exam
From My Perspective: Essays on the NextGen Bar Exam and Legal Education By Dennis C. Prieto, Susan Landrum, Timothy J. McFarlin, and Wanda M. Temm

﻿Correction: In the podcast, Professor Prieto mentioned 'NCBE member Beth Kennedy,' but the correct name is Beth Donohue. We apologize for any confusion and appreciate your understanding.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>627</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The first bar examination in the United States was administered in oral form in the Delaware Colony in 1783, and in 1885, Massachusetts became the first state to employ a written version of the bar exam. Over time, the bar examination process has become more standardized, but there's no one test. One example of a standardized test is the Uniform Bar Examination (UBE), created back in 2011, and first administered that year by Missouri and North Dakota.
So what is NEXT in standardized tests? According to the National Conference of Bar Examiners’ website, the NextGen Bar Exam, set to debut in July 0f 2026, will “test a broad range of foundational lawyering skills, utilizing a focused set of clearly identified fundamental legal concepts and principles needed in today’s practice of law.”
Will the transition from a standardized test like UBE to NextGen be an easy one? And what can law students &amp; faculty expect? In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Dennis C. Prieto, an Associate Professor and Reference Librarian at ­Rutgers Law School, who served on the National Conference of Bar Examiners’ NextGen Content Scope Committee and is a member of the NextGen Tasks and Rubrics Advisory Committee. Craig &amp; Dennis explore the specifics of the exam, how law students and faculty can transition to preparing for the new exam, and what students can expect from the exam in 2026.
Mentioned in this episode: 
NextGen Bar Exam
From My Perspective: Essays on the NextGen Bar Exam and Legal Education By Dennis C. Prieto, Susan Landrum, Timothy J. McFarlin, and Wanda M. Temm

﻿Correction: In the podcast, Professor Prieto mentioned 'NCBE member Beth Kennedy,' but the correct name is Beth Donohue. We apologize for any confusion and appreciate your understanding.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The first bar examination in the United States was administered in oral form in the Delaware Colony in 1783, and in 1885, Massachusetts became the first state to employ a written version of the bar exam. Over time, the bar examination process has become more standardized, but there's no one test. One example of a standardized test is the Uniform Bar Examination (UBE), created back in 2011, and first administered that year by Missouri and North Dakota.</p><p>So what is NEXT in standardized tests? According to the National Conference of Bar Examiners’ website, the NextGen Bar Exam, set to debut in July 0f 2026, will “test a broad range of foundational lawyering skills, utilizing a focused set of clearly identified fundamental legal concepts and principles needed in today’s practice of law.”</p><p>Will the transition from a standardized test like UBE to NextGen be an easy one? And what can law students &amp; faculty expect? In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Dennis C. Prieto, an Associate Professor and Reference Librarian at ­Rutgers Law School, who served on the National Conference of Bar Examiners’ NextGen Content Scope Committee and is a member of the NextGen Tasks and Rubrics Advisory Committee. Craig &amp; Dennis explore the specifics of the exam, how law students and faculty can transition to preparing for the new exam, and what students can expect from the exam in 2026.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in this episode: </strong></p><p><a href="https://nextgenbarexam.ncbex.org/"><strong><em>NextGen Bar Exam</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://thebarexaminer.ncbex.org/article/summer-2023/my-perspective-summer-2023/"><strong><em>From My Perspective: Essays on the NextGen Bar Exam and Legal Education By Dennis C. Prieto, Susan Landrum, Timothy J. McFarlin, and Wanda M. Temm</em></strong></a></p><p><br></p><p><em>﻿Correction: In the podcast, Professor Prieto mentioned 'NCBE member Beth Kennedy,' but the correct name is Beth Donohue. We apologize for any confusion and appreciate your understanding.</em></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2215</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7a79b54c-ab50-11ee-9cb0-b319f04ef9fb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6831672639.mp3?updated=1704474700" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rhetoric, Hate Speech, Free Speech, Section 3 of the 14th, &amp; an Insurrection</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/12/rhetoric-hate-speech-free-speech-section-3-of-the-14th-an-insurrection</link>
      <description>Did former President Trump’s rhetoric lead to an insurrection on January 6th, 2021? A court in Colorado has said it did. So, what constitutes rhetoric? And how powerful are words?
In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Dr. Pete Simi, Professor of Sociology at Chapman University, to discuss the impact of rhetoric. Craig &amp; Pete take a look at former President Trump's history of violent rhetoric, free speech and hate speech, and how extreme rhetoric can lead to political violence.
Mentioned in this Episode:
﻿Out of Hiding (Routledge Studies in Extremism and Democracy) 1st Edition
Former President Trump 14th Amendment Hearing in Colorado</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2023 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>626</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Did former President Trump’s rhetoric lead to an insurrection on January 6th, 2021? A court in Colorado has said it did. So, what constitutes rhetoric? And how powerful are words?
In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Dr. Pete Simi, Professor of Sociology at Chapman University, to discuss the impact of rhetoric. Craig &amp; Pete take a look at former President Trump's history of violent rhetoric, free speech and hate speech, and how extreme rhetoric can lead to political violence.
Mentioned in this Episode:
﻿Out of Hiding (Routledge Studies in Extremism and Democracy) 1st Edition
Former President Trump 14th Amendment Hearing in Colorado</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Did former President Trump’s rhetoric lead to an insurrection on January 6th, 2021? A court in Colorado has said it did. So, what constitutes rhetoric? And how powerful are words?</p><p>In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Dr. Pete Simi, Professor of Sociology at Chapman University, to discuss the impact of rhetoric. Craig &amp; Pete take a look at former President Trump's history of violent rhetoric, free speech and hate speech, and how extreme rhetoric can lead to political violence.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Out-Hiding-Extremist-Supremacy-Routledge/dp/1032333898/ref=sr_1_1?qid=1702590389&amp;refinements=p_27%3APete+Simi&amp;s=books&amp;sr=1-1"><strong>﻿<em>Out of Hiding (Routledge Studies in Extremism and Democracy) 1st Edition</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://www.c-span.org/video/?531511-102/president-trump-14th-amendment-hearing-colorado-day-2-part-3"><strong><em>Former President Trump 14th Amendment Hearing in Colorado</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2143</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[97d4a952-a052-11ee-9b2b-1f23ae3e5038]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9228560471.mp3?updated=1703199336" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Political, Environmental, and Social Impact on U.S. Life Expectancy</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/12/the-political-environmental-and-social-impact-on-u-s-life-expectancy</link>
      <description>Last month, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), released a report on U.S. life expectancy. Keren Landman, senior reporter from Vox, wrote an excellent piece on this report, detailing the takeaways including the impact of COVID 19, the rise of infant mortality, and how the States compared to other countries on life expectancy. 
In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Michael Ulrich, Assistant Professor of Health Law, Ethics, &amp; Human Rights at Boston University’s School of Public Health and School of Law, to discuss the recent CDC Report on U.S. life expectancy. Craig &amp; Michael explore the possible legal implications of this report, and the political, environmental, and social influence on U.S. life expectancy.
Mentioned in this Episode:
﻿Provisional Life Expectancy Estimates for 2022
US Life Expectancy No Longer Catastrophic, Now Merely Bad By Keren Landman</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2023 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>625</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Last month, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), released a report on U.S. life expectancy. Keren Landman, senior reporter from Vox, wrote an excellent piece on this report, detailing the takeaways including the impact of COVID 19, the rise of infant mortality, and how the States compared to other countries on life expectancy. 
In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Michael Ulrich, Assistant Professor of Health Law, Ethics, &amp; Human Rights at Boston University’s School of Public Health and School of Law, to discuss the recent CDC Report on U.S. life expectancy. Craig &amp; Michael explore the possible legal implications of this report, and the political, environmental, and social influence on U.S. life expectancy.
Mentioned in this Episode:
﻿Provisional Life Expectancy Estimates for 2022
US Life Expectancy No Longer Catastrophic, Now Merely Bad By Keren Landman</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Last month, the<a href="https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsrr/vsrr031.pdf"> Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), released a report on U.S. life expectancy.</a> Keren Landman, senior reporter from Vox, wrote an <a href="https://www.vox.com/health/2023/11/29/23981047/us-life-expectancy-number-76-77-years-bad-why-covid-cdc">excellent piece on this report,</a> detailing the takeaways including the impact of COVID 19, the rise of infant mortality, and how the States compared to other countries on life expectancy. </p><p>In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Michael Ulrich, Assistant Professor of Health Law, Ethics, &amp; Human Rights at Boston University’s School of Public Health and School of Law, to discuss the recent CDC Report on U.S. life expectancy. Craig &amp; Michael explore the possible legal implications of this report, and the political, environmental, and social influence on U.S. life expectancy.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsrr/vsrr031.pdf"><strong>﻿<em>Provisional Life Expectancy Estimates for 2022</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://www.vox.com/health/2023/11/29/23981047/us-life-expectancy-number-76-77-years-bad-why-covid-cdc"><strong><em>US Life Expectancy No Longer Catastrophic, Now Merely Bad By Keren Landman</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2069</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d9ad5606-953c-11ee-9564-ef850e3ae92e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9464729210.mp3?updated=1701980522" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Environmental Law Series: The Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act &amp; our Oceans</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/11/environmental-law-series-the-marine-protection-research-and-sanctuaries-act-our-oceans</link>
      <description>As we near the end of our environmental law series, we turn to our beloved oceans. The Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 also known as MPRSA, is one of several key environmental laws passed by the US Congress in 1972. The Act regulates the disposition of any material into ocean waters, unless expressly excluded under the MPRSA. 
In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is joined by Professor Robin Craig, the Robert C. Packard Trustee Chair in Law from USC Gould School of Law, as they discuss MPRSA, its origin &amp; history, purpose, and impact.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2023 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>624</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As we near the end of our environmental law series, we turn to our beloved oceans. The Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 also known as MPRSA, is one of several key environmental laws passed by the US Congress in 1972. The Act regulates the disposition of any material into ocean waters, unless expressly excluded under the MPRSA. 
In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is joined by Professor Robin Craig, the Robert C. Packard Trustee Chair in Law from USC Gould School of Law, as they discuss MPRSA, its origin &amp; history, purpose, and impact.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>As we near the end of our environmental law series, we turn to our beloved oceans. The Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 also known as MPRSA, is one of several key environmental laws passed by the US Congress in 1972. The Act regulates the disposition of any material into ocean waters, unless expressly excluded under the MPRSA. </p><p>In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is joined by Professor Robin Craig, the Robert C. Packard Trustee Chair in Law from USC Gould School of Law, as they discuss MPRSA, its origin &amp; history, purpose, and impact.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2231</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[cec4feb4-8967-11ee-bbfe-f7f011302a9b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9958547862.mp3?updated=1700679482" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside Art Law: Art Restitution, Stolen Art, &amp; AI</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/11/inside-art-law-art-restitution-stolen-art-ai</link>
      <description>According to the Georgetown Law Library, Art Law can be defined as “the body of law, involving numerous disciplines, that protects, regulates and facilitates the creation, use and marketing of art. Those involved in the practice of art law look to a variety of disciplines, such as intellectual property, contract, constitutional, tort, tax, commercial and international law to protect the interests of their clients.”
In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guests, attorneys Gabrielle C. Wilson &amp; Yaél M. Weitz from Kaye Spiegler, as they spotlight art law. They will discuss the emerging trend of colonial art restitution, stolen and misappropriated art, and how AI has impacted art and copyright law.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>623</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>According to the Georgetown Law Library, Art Law can be defined as “the body of law, involving numerous disciplines, that protects, regulates and facilitates the creation, use and marketing of art. Those involved in the practice of art law look to a variety of disciplines, such as intellectual property, contract, constitutional, tort, tax, commercial and international law to protect the interests of their clients.”
In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guests, attorneys Gabrielle C. Wilson &amp; Yaél M. Weitz from Kaye Spiegler, as they spotlight art law. They will discuss the emerging trend of colonial art restitution, stolen and misappropriated art, and how AI has impacted art and copyright law.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>According to the Georgetown Law Library, Art Law can be defined as “the body of law, involving numerous disciplines, that protects, regulates and facilitates the creation, use and marketing of art. Those involved in the practice of art law look to a variety of disciplines, such as intellectual property, contract, constitutional, tort, tax, commercial and international law to protect the interests of their clients.”</p><p>In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guests, attorneys Gabrielle C. Wilson &amp; Yaél M. Weitz from Kaye Spiegler, as they spotlight art law. They will discuss the emerging trend of colonial art restitution, stolen and misappropriated art, and how AI has impacted art and copyright law.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1718</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[627f9ad4-7f49-11ee-9c9e-3f448d85a0d4]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8118711215.mp3?updated=1699567004" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Environmental Law Series: Sackett v. EPA, Water, &amp; Wetlands</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/10/environmental-law-series-sackett-v-epa-water-wetlands</link>
      <description>In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is joined by Professor Jody Freeman, the Archibald Cox Professor at Harvard Law School and a leading expert on administrative law and environmental law. Jody &amp; Craig spotlight SCOTUS' Sackett v. EPA ruling, and its impact on the EPA's powers, Clean Water Act protections, and the regulation of wetlands.
Mentioned in this Episode:
CleanLaw Podcast</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>622</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is joined by Professor Jody Freeman, the Archibald Cox Professor at Harvard Law School and a leading expert on administrative law and environmental law. Jody &amp; Craig spotlight SCOTUS' Sackett v. EPA ruling, and its impact on the EPA's powers, Clean Water Act protections, and the regulation of wetlands.
Mentioned in this Episode:
CleanLaw Podcast</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is joined by Professor Jody Freeman, the Archibald Cox Professor at Harvard Law School and a leading expert on administrative law and environmental law. Jody &amp; Craig spotlight SCOTUS'<em> Sackett v. EPA </em>ruling, and its impact on the EPA's powers, Clean Water Act protections, and the regulation of wetlands.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://eelp.law.harvard.edu/cleanlaw-our-podcast/"><strong><em>CleanLaw Podcast</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2038</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7c6cb4d6-7445-11ee-ba28-cfa09f09636f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3567597388.mp3?updated=1698355946" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sexual Exploitation Laws &amp; Child Victims</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/10/sexual-exploitation-laws-child-victims</link>
      <description>In a recent incident in Columbus, Ohio, an 11 year old girl was manipulated into sending explicit photos to an adult. After law enforcement was called by the girl’s father, a police officer told the father his daughter could face child porn charges for her actions.
So how do we protect our children who are victims of these kinds of crimes? And what needs to change within our laws? In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest attorney Riya Saha Shah, Senior Managing Director of Juvenile Law Center, to explore the misuse of sexual exploitation laws against child victims, advocating for children's rights, and what needs to change within our legal system and inside our police departments.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>621</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In a recent incident in Columbus, Ohio, an 11 year old girl was manipulated into sending explicit photos to an adult. After law enforcement was called by the girl’s father, a police officer told the father his daughter could face child porn charges for her actions.
So how do we protect our children who are victims of these kinds of crimes? And what needs to change within our laws? In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest attorney Riya Saha Shah, Senior Managing Director of Juvenile Law Center, to explore the misuse of sexual exploitation laws against child victims, advocating for children's rights, and what needs to change within our legal system and inside our police departments.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In a recent incident in Columbus, Ohio, an 11 year old girl was manipulated into sending explicit photos to an adult. After law enforcement was called by the girl’s father, a police officer told the father his daughter could face child porn charges for her actions.</p><p>So how do we protect our children who are victims of these kinds of crimes? And what needs to change within our laws? In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest attorney Riya Saha Shah, Senior Managing Director of Juvenile Law Center, to explore the misuse of sexual exploitation laws against child victims, advocating for children's rights, and what needs to change within our legal system and inside our police departments.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1772</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[07e4cb92-693e-11ee-8fdc-a335ddda9591]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7895856319.mp3?updated=1697143107" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Environmental Law Series: Part Two: NEPA &amp; CEQA: Courts, City Councils, Environmental Consequences, &amp; Filing Lawsuits</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/09/environmental-law-series-part-two-nepa-ceqa-courts-city-councils-environmental-consequences-filing-lawsuits</link>
      <description>In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is once again joined by Alisha M. Winterswyk, an attorney from Best Best &amp; Krieger, LLP, as they continue their discussion on NEPA &amp; CEQA. The conversation moves into the specifics of how courts deal with decisions by city councils that dealing with environmental consequences, and on the other side, how citizens deal with this whole process by filing lawsuits.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2023 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>620</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is once again joined by Alisha M. Winterswyk, an attorney from Best Best &amp; Krieger, LLP, as they continue their discussion on NEPA &amp; CEQA. The conversation moves into the specifics of how courts deal with decisions by city councils that dealing with environmental consequences, and on the other side, how citizens deal with this whole process by filing lawsuits.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is once again joined by Alisha M. Winterswyk, an attorney from Best Best &amp; Krieger, LLP, as they continue their discussion on NEPA &amp; CEQA. The conversation moves into the specifics of how courts deal with decisions by city councils that dealing with environmental consequences, and on the other side, how citizens deal with this whole process by filing lawsuits.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2107</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[703c42b8-5e2d-11ee-b8a8-07c53735fb8f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3089548677.mp3?updated=1695926657" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trump vs. the Constitution: Exploring Section 3 of the 14th Amendment</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/09/section-3-of-the-14th-amendment</link>
      <description>With primaries set to start in spring of 2024, an upcoming presidential election, and a number of federal &amp; state indictments against former President Trump, including the January 6th indictment, section 3 of the 14th amendment has taken center stage. It reads "no person who has taken an oath as an officer of the United States can hold office if they “have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof”. So, will Section 3 of the 14th Amendment actually impact the presidential election and eliminate Donald Trump from the running?  
In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Ron Fein, the Legal Director for Free Speech For People. as they spotlight Section 3 and what this could mean for the upcoming presidential election.
Mentioned in this Episode:
﻿The Sweep and Force of Section 3 by William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen
The Constitution Prohibits Trump From Ever Being President Again by J. Michael Luttig and Laurence H. Tribe 
Conservative Case Emerges to Disqualify Trump for Role on Jan. 6 by Adam Liptak
The 14Point3 Campaign
Trump is Disqualified</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>619</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With primaries set to start in spring of 2024, an upcoming presidential election, and a number of federal &amp; state indictments against former President Trump, including the January 6th indictment, section 3 of the 14th amendment has taken center stage. It reads "no person who has taken an oath as an officer of the United States can hold office if they “have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof”. So, will Section 3 of the 14th Amendment actually impact the presidential election and eliminate Donald Trump from the running?  
In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Ron Fein, the Legal Director for Free Speech For People. as they spotlight Section 3 and what this could mean for the upcoming presidential election.
Mentioned in this Episode:
﻿The Sweep and Force of Section 3 by William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen
The Constitution Prohibits Trump From Ever Being President Again by J. Michael Luttig and Laurence H. Tribe 
Conservative Case Emerges to Disqualify Trump for Role on Jan. 6 by Adam Liptak
The 14Point3 Campaign
Trump is Disqualified</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>With primaries set to start in spring of 2024, an upcoming presidential election, and a number of federal &amp; state indictments against former President Trump, including the January 6th indictment, section 3 of the 14th amendment has taken center stage. It reads "no person who has taken an oath as an officer of the United States can hold office if they “have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof”. So, will Section 3 of the 14th Amendment actually impact the presidential election and eliminate Donald Trump from the running?  </p><p>In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Ron Fein, the Legal Director for Free Speech For People. as they spotlight Section 3 and what this could mean for the upcoming presidential election.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4532751"><strong>﻿<em>The Sweep and Force of Section 3 by William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/08/donald-trump-constitutionally-prohibited-presidency/675048/"><strong><em>The Constitution Prohibits Trump From Ever Being President Again by J. Michael Luttig and Laurence H. Tribe</em></strong></a><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/10/us/trump-jan-6-insurrection-conservatives.html"><strong><em>Conservative Case Emerges to Disqualify Trump for Role on Jan. 6 by Adam Liptak</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://freespeechforpeople.org/the-14point3-campaign/"><strong><em>The 14Point3 Campaign</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://trumpisdisqualified.org/"><strong><em>Trump is Disqualified</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2021</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d437fd18-4832-11ee-883d-93ace4ed4da0]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6143695642.mp3?updated=1693621679" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Defending Against Domestic Violent Extremism: A Discussion with Brian Michael Jenkins</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/08/defending-against-domestic-violent-extremism-a-discussion-with-brian-michael-jenkins-2</link>
      <description>While Craig is away on a well-deserved vacation, we wanted to do things a little bit differently, and share with you one of our favorite episodes from the Chicago Bar Association’s @the Bar podcast. This episode is Defending Against Domestic Violent Extremism: A Discussion with Brian Michael Jenkins. We hope you enjoy it!
-----
In this episode, host Jonathan Amarilio speaks with one of the world’s leading authorities on terrorism and the man famously known for predicting 9/11, Brian Michael Jenkins of the RAND Corporation. They discuss Mr. Jenkins’ historical work as an advisor to many U.S. Presidents and governments on terrorism, as well as the current state of domestic political violence and terrorism in America. In this riveting discussion, Mr. Jenkins shares his advice for how we can develop a pragmatic strategy to combat the rising tide of violence in today’s tumultuous world.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2023 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>618</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>While Craig is away on a well-deserved vacation, we wanted to do things a little bit differently, and share with you one of our favorite episodes from the Chicago Bar Association’s @the Bar podcast. This episode is Defending Against Domestic Violent Extremism: A Discussion with Brian Michael Jenkins. We hope you enjoy it!
-----
In this episode, host Jonathan Amarilio speaks with one of the world’s leading authorities on terrorism and the man famously known for predicting 9/11, Brian Michael Jenkins of the RAND Corporation. They discuss Mr. Jenkins’ historical work as an advisor to many U.S. Presidents and governments on terrorism, as well as the current state of domestic political violence and terrorism in America. In this riveting discussion, Mr. Jenkins shares his advice for how we can develop a pragmatic strategy to combat the rising tide of violence in today’s tumultuous world.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>While Craig is away on a well-deserved vacation, we wanted to do things a little bit differently, and share with you one of our favorite episodes from the <a href="https://listen.legaltalknetwork.com/CBAL2L0823">Chicago Bar Association’s @the Bar podcast.</a> This episode is <a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/chicago-bar/2023/05/defending-against-domestic-violent-extremism-a-discussion-with-brian-michael-jenkins/"><em>Defending Against Domestic Violent Extremism: A Discussion with Brian Michael Jenkins.</em></a> We hope you enjoy it!</p><p>-----</p><p>In this episode, host Jonathan Amarilio speaks with one of the world’s leading authorities on terrorism and the man famously known for predicting 9/11, Brian Michael Jenkins of the RAND Corporation. They discuss Mr. Jenkins’ historical work as an advisor to many U.S. Presidents and governments on terrorism, as well as the current state of domestic political violence and terrorism in America. In this riveting discussion, Mr. Jenkins shares his advice for how we can develop a pragmatic strategy to combat the rising tide of violence in today’s tumultuous world.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3110</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[dddc0630-3d28-11ee-8841-cfa9f25c762d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3169530049.mp3?updated=1692296159" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Environmental Law Series: The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/08/environmental-law-series-the-national-environmental-policy-act-nepa-and-the-california-environmental-quality-act-ceqa</link>
      <description>In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is joined by Alisha M. Winterswyk, an attorney from Best Best &amp; Krieger, LLP, as they spotlight NEPA and CEQA, their impact, and purpose.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 14:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>617</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is joined by Alisha M. Winterswyk, an attorney from Best Best &amp; Krieger, LLP, as they spotlight NEPA and CEQA, their impact, and purpose.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is joined by Alisha M. Winterswyk, an attorney from Best Best &amp; Krieger, LLP, as they spotlight NEPA and CEQA, their impact, and purpose.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2153</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[191eb038-32d1-11ee-bc79-a7198a39c188]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1669715598.mp3?updated=1691158869" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2023 End-of-Term SCOTUS Rulings &amp; Long-Term Impact</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/07/2023-end-of-term-scotus-rulings-long-term-impact</link>
      <description>As SCOTUS wrapped in leadup to its annual summer recess, three controversial rulings, all with a 6-3 vote, created quite the stir: Biden v. Nebraska, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President &amp; Fellows of Harvard College, and 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis.
So what sort of impact will these rulings have on society? In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Professor Steven D. Schwinn from the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law, as they spotlight the recent SCOTUS rulings regarding loan relief, affirmative action, &amp; the website designer/first amendment ruling. Craig and Steve discuss SCOTUS, these rulings, and long-term impact of these decisions.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>616</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As SCOTUS wrapped in leadup to its annual summer recess, three controversial rulings, all with a 6-3 vote, created quite the stir: Biden v. Nebraska, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President &amp; Fellows of Harvard College, and 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis.
So what sort of impact will these rulings have on society? In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Professor Steven D. Schwinn from the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law, as they spotlight the recent SCOTUS rulings regarding loan relief, affirmative action, &amp; the website designer/first amendment ruling. Craig and Steve discuss SCOTUS, these rulings, and long-term impact of these decisions.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>As SCOTUS wrapped in leadup to its annual summer recess, three controversial rulings, all with a 6-3 vote, created quite the stir: <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-506_nmip.pdf"><strong><em>Biden v. Nebraska</em></strong></a>, <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/20-1199_hgdj.pdf"><strong><em>Students for</em></strong> <strong><em>Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President &amp; Fellows of Harvard College,</em></strong></a> <strong>and </strong><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf"><strong><em>303 Creative LLC v. Elenis</em></strong></a><strong><em>.</em></strong></p><p>So what sort of impact will these rulings have on society? In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Professor Steven D. Schwinn from the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law, as they spotlight the recent SCOTUS rulings regarding loan relief, affirmative action, &amp; the website designer/first amendment ruling. Craig and Steve discuss SCOTUS, these rulings, and long-term impact of these decisions.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2045</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[17a57458-2773-11ee-955a-1b41ef59872e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7271906820.mp3?updated=1689909041" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Environmental Law Series: The Clean Air Act</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/07/environmental-law-series-the-clean-air-act</link>
      <description>The Clean Air Act also known as (CAA) is a comprehensive Federal law that regulates all sources of air emissions. The 1970 CAA authorized the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to protect public health and the environment.
In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is joined by Trish McCubbin, a retired Professor of Environmental Law at the Southern Illinois University School of Law, as they spotlight CAA, its impact, progress, and how we as a society can reduce air pollution.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>615</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Clean Air Act also known as (CAA) is a comprehensive Federal law that regulates all sources of air emissions. The 1970 CAA authorized the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to protect public health and the environment.
In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is joined by Trish McCubbin, a retired Professor of Environmental Law at the Southern Illinois University School of Law, as they spotlight CAA, its impact, progress, and how we as a society can reduce air pollution.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The Clean Air Act also known as (CAA) is a comprehensive Federal law that regulates all sources of air emissions. The 1970 CAA authorized the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to protect public health and the environment.</p><p>In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is joined by Trish McCubbin, a retired Professor of Environmental Law at the Southern Illinois University School of Law, as they spotlight CAA, its impact, progress, and how we as a society can reduce air pollution.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1936</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e8a2749e-1b74-11ee-b1d8-b76ed41f5ddd]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3508736801.mp3?updated=1688590398" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Police Decertification &amp; SB 2</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/06/police-decertification-sb-2</link>
      <description>On September 30, 2021, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 2 (SB 2), also known as the Kenneth Ross, Jr. Police Decertification Act of 2021, establishing a statewide system to decertify or suspend officers who have committed serious misconduct.
So what constitutes police misconduct? And how is SB 2 shaping police departments? In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Marshal Arnwine, Jr., an Advocate for the Criminal Justice Program at the ACLU of Northern California. Craig and Marshal discuss SB 2, decertification due to police misconduct, transparency in police departments, and the impact on states' decertification/revocation laws.
Mentioned in this Episode:
Police Decertification in California: How Does it Work?
Protect SB 2 Press Conference (Bradford, 2021)
Coalition Opposition to SB 2 TBL: Contact Information</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>614</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On September 30, 2021, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 2 (SB 2), also known as the Kenneth Ross, Jr. Police Decertification Act of 2021, establishing a statewide system to decertify or suspend officers who have committed serious misconduct.
So what constitutes police misconduct? And how is SB 2 shaping police departments? In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Marshal Arnwine, Jr., an Advocate for the Criminal Justice Program at the ACLU of Northern California. Craig and Marshal discuss SB 2, decertification due to police misconduct, transparency in police departments, and the impact on states' decertification/revocation laws.
Mentioned in this Episode:
Police Decertification in California: How Does it Work?
Protect SB 2 Press Conference (Bradford, 2021)
Coalition Opposition to SB 2 TBL: Contact Information</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On September 30, 2021, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 2 (SB 2), also known as the Kenneth Ross, Jr. Police Decertification Act of 2021, establishing a statewide system to decertify or suspend officers who have committed serious misconduct.</p><p>So what constitutes police misconduct? And how is SB 2 shaping police departments? In this episode, host Craig Williams is joined by guest Marshal Arnwine, Jr., an Advocate for the Criminal Justice Program at the ACLU of Northern California. Craig and Marshal discuss SB 2, decertification due to police misconduct, transparency in police departments, and the impact on states' decertification/revocation laws.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.aclunc.org/campaign/police-decertification-california-how-it-works"><strong><em>Police Decertification in California: How Does it Work?</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CmdfrmhDXs"><strong><em>Protect SB 2 Press Conference (Bradford, 2021)</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EqEzlKOc_IGB71Y-Vm8ER-2pIkCI81D0kS1Eg0TiKhQ/edit"><strong><em>Coalition Opposition to SB 2 TBL: Contact Information</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2009</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[098c0aea-1142-11ee-afb8-7fc221edb447]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4489769715.mp3?updated=1687788216" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Environmental Law Series: The Endangered Species Act (ESA)</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/06/environmental-law-series-the-endangered-species-act-esa</link>
      <description>The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) provided a framework to conserve and protect endangered and threatened species and their habitats both domestically and abroad. According to the Center for Progressive Reform, at an April 2023 hearing of the Water, Wildlife and Fisheries Subcommittee of the House Natural Resources Committee, the conservative majority pushed no less than three Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolutions aimed at blocking ESA protections.
In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is joined by professor of environmental law, Robert L. Fischman from the Indiana University Maurer School of Law, as they spotlight ESA, its impact, and ESA reform.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>613</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) provided a framework to conserve and protect endangered and threatened species and their habitats both domestically and abroad. According to the Center for Progressive Reform, at an April 2023 hearing of the Water, Wildlife and Fisheries Subcommittee of the House Natural Resources Committee, the conservative majority pushed no less than three Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolutions aimed at blocking ESA protections.
In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is joined by professor of environmental law, Robert L. Fischman from the Indiana University Maurer School of Law, as they spotlight ESA, its impact, and ESA reform.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) provided a framework to conserve and protect endangered and threatened species and their habitats both domestically and abroad. According to the Center for Progressive Reform, at an April 2023 hearing of the Water, Wildlife and Fisheries Subcommittee of the House Natural Resources Committee, the conservative majority pushed no less than three Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolutions aimed at blocking ESA protections.</p><p>In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is joined by professor of environmental law, Robert L. Fischman from the Indiana University Maurer School of Law, as they spotlight ESA, its impact, and ESA reform.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2182</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e0ca158e-061f-11ee-9f84-635f6ac47d5e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4977130574.mp3?updated=1686244955" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Voting Rights &amp; Gerrymandering</title>
      <description>According to the League of Women Voters, “Voting is a fundamental principle, and all Americans deserve the equal opportunity to make their voices heard in our democracy.” Yet over the years, various states have suppressed voters from reaching the ballot box through various methods like strict ID laws, purging voter rolls, and cutting early voting. 
Gerrymandering, defined as “to manipulate the boundaries of (an electoral constituency) so as to favor one party or class” has taken center stage when it comes to voting in elections. Just recently, SCOTUS decided to take up a South Carolina racial gerrymandering case, a lower court decision that struck down a congressional district in South Carolina as an illegal racial gerrymander. This case will be heard by SCOTUS next term.
In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest, professor Ruth Greenwood, Director of the Election Law Clinic at Harvard Law School. Craig and Ruth discuss election law, voting rights, gerrymandering, and SCOTUS and the South Carolina racial gerrymandering case.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>612</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>According to the League of Women Voters, “Voting is a fundamental principle, and all Americans deserve the equal opportunity to make their voices heard in our democracy.” Yet over the years, various states have suppressed voters from reaching the ballot box through various methods like strict ID laws, purging voter rolls, and cutting early voting. 
Gerrymandering, defined as “to manipulate the boundaries of (an electoral constituency) so as to favor one party or class” has taken center stage when it comes to voting in elections. Just recently, SCOTUS decided to take up a South Carolina racial gerrymandering case, a lower court decision that struck down a congressional district in South Carolina as an illegal racial gerrymander. This case will be heard by SCOTUS next term.
In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest, professor Ruth Greenwood, Director of the Election Law Clinic at Harvard Law School. Craig and Ruth discuss election law, voting rights, gerrymandering, and SCOTUS and the South Carolina racial gerrymandering case.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>According to the League of Women Voters, “<em>Voting is a fundamental principle, and all Americans deserve the equal opportunity to make their voices heard in our democracy.</em>” Yet over the years, various states have suppressed voters from reaching the ballot box through various methods like strict ID laws, purging voter rolls, and cutting early voting. </p><p>Gerrymandering, defined as “to manipulate the boundaries of (an electoral constituency) so as to favor one party or class” has taken center stage when it comes to voting in elections. Just recently, SCOTUS decided to take up a South Carolina racial gerrymandering case, a lower court decision that struck down a congressional district in South Carolina as an illegal racial gerrymander. This case will be heard by SCOTUS next term.</p><p>In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest, professor Ruth Greenwood, Director of the Election Law Clinic at Harvard Law School. Craig and Ruth discuss election law, voting rights, gerrymandering, and SCOTUS and the South Carolina racial gerrymandering case.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1954</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3243cdf4-fb50-11ed-8e77-9f87dbfa7d6f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6911863418.mp3?updated=1685056359" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Environmental Law Series: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/05/environmental-law-series-the-comprehensive-environmental-response-compensation-and-liability-act-cercla</link>
      <description>According to the EPA, “The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 -- otherwise known as CERCLA or Superfund -- provides a Federal "Superfund" to clean up uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous-waste sites as well as accidents, spills, and other emergency releases of pollutants and contaminants into the environment. Through CERCLA, the EPA was given power to seek out those parties responsible for any release and assure their cooperation in the cleanup.”
In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig william joins Professor of environmental law at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University, Katrina F. Kuh, as they spotlight CERCLA and discuss the origin and history, purpose, and impact.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>611</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>According to the EPA, “The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 -- otherwise known as CERCLA or Superfund -- provides a Federal "Superfund" to clean up uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous-waste sites as well as accidents, spills, and other emergency releases of pollutants and contaminants into the environment. Through CERCLA, the EPA was given power to seek out those parties responsible for any release and assure their cooperation in the cleanup.”
In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig william joins Professor of environmental law at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University, Katrina F. Kuh, as they spotlight CERCLA and discuss the origin and history, purpose, and impact.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>According to the EPA, “The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 -- otherwise known as CERCLA or Superfund -- provides a Federal "Superfund" to clean up uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous-waste sites as well as accidents, spills, and other emergency releases of pollutants and contaminants into the environment. Through CERCLA, the EPA was given power to seek out those parties responsible for any release and assure their cooperation in the cleanup.”</p><p>In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig william joins Professor of environmental law at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University, Katrina F. Kuh, as they spotlight CERCLA and discuss the origin and history, purpose, and impact.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1785</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d378f94e-f040-11ed-9967-b33294b729d2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6989238439.mp3?updated=1683924080" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Justice Clarence Thomas, Judicial Ethics, &amp; Calls for Reform</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/04/justice-clarence-thomas-judicial-ethics-calls-for-reform</link>
      <description>On April 6th, 2023, ProPublica released a report titled, Clarence Thomas and the Billionaire, detailing Justice Clarence Thomas’ failure to report years of lavish trips paid for by Republican billionaire Harlan Crow. Justice Thomas’ actions led U.S. Senate Majority Whip and Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Dick Durbin and other Senate Judiciary Committee Democratic members to send a letter to Chief Justice Roberts inviting him to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify at a public hearing regarding Supreme Court ethics reform. Chief Justice Roberts declined the invitation to appear. 
 
So are we looking at major judicial ethics violations here at the hands of a Supreme Court Justice? Or was Justice Thomas simply complying with established norms?In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest Dean James J. Alfini, professor of law from South Texas College of Law Houston, to spotlight Justice Clarence Thomas, his recent ethics scandal, judicial ethics, the potential investigation into his actions, and calls for new ethics rules for SCOTUS.

Mentioned in this episode:
﻿Clarence Thomas and the Billionaire by ProPublica
Judicial Ethics, Misconduct, and Reform</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 14:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>610</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On April 6th, 2023, ProPublica released a report titled, Clarence Thomas and the Billionaire, detailing Justice Clarence Thomas’ failure to report years of lavish trips paid for by Republican billionaire Harlan Crow. Justice Thomas’ actions led U.S. Senate Majority Whip and Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Dick Durbin and other Senate Judiciary Committee Democratic members to send a letter to Chief Justice Roberts inviting him to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify at a public hearing regarding Supreme Court ethics reform. Chief Justice Roberts declined the invitation to appear. 
 
So are we looking at major judicial ethics violations here at the hands of a Supreme Court Justice? Or was Justice Thomas simply complying with established norms?In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest Dean James J. Alfini, professor of law from South Texas College of Law Houston, to spotlight Justice Clarence Thomas, his recent ethics scandal, judicial ethics, the potential investigation into his actions, and calls for new ethics rules for SCOTUS.

Mentioned in this episode:
﻿Clarence Thomas and the Billionaire by ProPublica
Judicial Ethics, Misconduct, and Reform</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On April 6th, 2023, ProPublica released a report titled, <em>Clarence Thomas and the Billionaire, </em>detailing Justice Clarence Thomas’ failure to report years of lavish trips paid for by Republican billionaire Harlan Crow. Justice Thomas’ actions led U.S. Senate Majority Whip and Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Dick Durbin and other Senate Judiciary Committee Democratic members to send a letter to Chief Justice Roberts inviting him to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify at a public hearing regarding Supreme Court ethics reform. Chief Justice Roberts declined the invitation to appear. </p><p> </p><p>So are we looking at major judicial ethics violations here at the hands of a Supreme Court Justice? Or was Justice Thomas simply complying with established norms?In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest Dean James J. Alfini, professor of law from South Texas College of Law Houston, to spotlight Justice Clarence Thomas, his recent ethics scandal, judicial ethics, the potential investigation into his actions, and calls for new ethics rules for SCOTUS.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Mentioned in this episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.propublica.org/article/clarence-thomas-scotus-undisclosed-luxury-travel-gifts-crow"><strong>﻿<em>Clarence Thomas and the Billionaire by ProPublica</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/12/judicial-ethics-misconduct-and-reform/"><strong><em>Judicial Ethics, Misconduct, and Reform</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2147</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6c11c982-e5ca-11ed-9aeb-3fdf19a50efc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2230415645.mp3?updated=1682689889" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Environmental Law Series: The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/04/environmental-law-series-the-resource-conservation-and-recovery-act-rcra</link>
      <description>Back on Oct. 21, 1976, President Gerald Ford signed the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) into law, highlighting that this law “provides sound state and local programs to deal with ever increasing amounts of municipal solid wastes generated in this country.” In this episode of our Environmental Law series, we spotlight the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act better known as RCRA. We discuss regulations, goals, importance, impact, and how far we have come.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>609</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Back on Oct. 21, 1976, President Gerald Ford signed the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) into law, highlighting that this law “provides sound state and local programs to deal with ever increasing amounts of municipal solid wastes generated in this country.” In this episode of our Environmental Law series, we spotlight the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act better known as RCRA. We discuss regulations, goals, importance, impact, and how far we have come.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Back on Oct. 21, 1976, President Gerald Ford signed the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) into law, highlighting that this law “provides sound state and local programs to deal with ever increasing amounts of municipal solid wastes generated in this country.” In this episode of our Environmental Law series, we spotlight the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act better known as RCRA. We discuss regulations, goals, importance, impact, and how far we have come.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1952</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6b4a0a4a-dad1-11ed-b545-ab669d00436a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9087962585.mp3?updated=1681483915" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI &amp; the Law</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/03/ai-the-law/</link>
      <description>Artificial Intelligence has become one of the most discussed topics of our day. With the introduction of sophisticated chatbots like OpenAIs ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4, many have predicted that we're on the verge of a revolution in terms of how many industries operate, including the legal industry.
So what do firms and attorneys need to do to stay ahead of the incoming AI wave? In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest John Villasenor, professor of electrical engineering, law, public policy, and management at UCLA, to discuss AI and the law, the impact, and what the future holds for the profession under this new AI revolution.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>608</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Artificial Intelligence has become one of the most discussed topics of our day. With the introduction of sophisticated chatbots like OpenAIs ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4, many have predicted that we're on the verge of a revolution in terms of how many industries operate, including the legal industry.
So what do firms and attorneys need to do to stay ahead of the incoming AI wave? In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest John Villasenor, professor of electrical engineering, law, public policy, and management at UCLA, to discuss AI and the law, the impact, and what the future holds for the profession under this new AI revolution.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Artificial Intelligence has become one of the most discussed topics of our day. With the introduction of sophisticated chatbots like OpenAIs ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4, many have predicted that we're on the verge of a revolution in terms of how many industries operate, including the legal industry.</p><p>So what do firms and attorneys need to do to stay ahead of the incoming AI wave? In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest John Villasenor, professor of electrical engineering, law, public policy, and management at UCLA, to discuss AI and the law, the impact, and what the future holds for the profession under this new AI revolution.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2082</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[97023f14-cf18-11ed-8666-7f691d830199]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3962970700.mp3?updated=1680194531" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Environmental Law Series: NEPA, Wetlands Protection, &amp; Habitat Conservation Plans</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/03/environmental-law-series-nepa-wetlands-protection-habitat-conservation-plans</link>
      <description>This year, we have created a new Environmental Law series on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, where wewill cover cradle to grave treatment of chemicals and our laws on environmental biology.
In this episode, host Craig Williams joins Mark Squillace from the University of Colorado Law School, to discuss the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), wetlands protection, and habitat conservation plans.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>607</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This year, we have created a new Environmental Law series on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, where wewill cover cradle to grave treatment of chemicals and our laws on environmental biology.
In this episode, host Craig Williams joins Mark Squillace from the University of Colorado Law School, to discuss the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), wetlands protection, and habitat conservation plans.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This year, we have created a new Environmental Law series on<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer, </em>where wewill cover cradle to grave treatment of chemicals and our laws on environmental biology.</p><p>In this episode, host Craig Williams joins Mark Squillace from the University of Colorado Law School, to discuss the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), wetlands protection, and habitat conservation plans.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2144</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3cf93fbc-c43d-11ed-b55f-1774c2846413]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3048013939.mp3?updated=1679001002" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The East Palestine, Ohio Train Derailment: Transporting Chemicals &amp; the Environment</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/03/the-east-palestine-ohio-train-derailment-transporting-chemicals-the-environment</link>
      <description>On February 3, 2023, a Norfolk Southern freight train carrying hazardous materials derailed in East Palestine, Ohio starting a fire which spewed toxic fumes into the air, driving surrounding residents out of their homes. Since then, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued a legally binding notice ordering Norfolk Southern to handle and pay for all necessary cleanup after this freight train derailment led to an intentional release of vinyl chloride.
So what could be the long-term impact on residents? What about the air, soil, and water? And what needs to change in our laws to prevent another environmental disaster like this from happening again on our railroads? In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest David Raack to discuss the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio and the potential environmental legal issues that could stem from this disaster.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>606</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On February 3, 2023, a Norfolk Southern freight train carrying hazardous materials derailed in East Palestine, Ohio starting a fire which spewed toxic fumes into the air, driving surrounding residents out of their homes. Since then, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued a legally binding notice ordering Norfolk Southern to handle and pay for all necessary cleanup after this freight train derailment led to an intentional release of vinyl chloride.
So what could be the long-term impact on residents? What about the air, soil, and water? And what needs to change in our laws to prevent another environmental disaster like this from happening again on our railroads? In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest David Raack to discuss the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio and the potential environmental legal issues that could stem from this disaster.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On February 3, 2023, a Norfolk Southern freight train carrying hazardous materials derailed in East Palestine, Ohio starting a fire which spewed toxic fumes into the air, driving surrounding residents out of their homes. Since then, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued a legally binding notice ordering Norfolk Southern to handle and pay for all necessary cleanup after this freight train derailment led to an intentional release of vinyl chloride.</p><p>So what could be the long-term impact on residents? What about the air, soil, and water? And what needs to change in our laws to prevent another environmental disaster like this from happening again on our railroads? In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest David Raack to discuss the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio and the potential environmental legal issues that could stem from this disaster.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1924</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a6a63ae0-b944-11ed-b0d4-ff6469afac93]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6537584768.mp3?updated=1677794576" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Environmental Law Series: Pollution, Clean Water &amp; Clean Air</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/02/environmental-law-series-pollution-clean-water-clean-air</link>
      <description>This year, we have created a new Environmental Law series on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, where we will cover cradle to grave treatment of chemicals and our laws on environmental biology.
In this episode, host Craig Williams joins LeRoy (Lee) C. Paddock, former associate dean for environmental law studies at George Washington University Law School, as they discuss the Pollution Prevention Act, the Clean Water Act, &amp; the Clean Air Act, their intended impact on our environment, and a look ahead to future legislation.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 15:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>605</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This year, we have created a new Environmental Law series on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, where we will cover cradle to grave treatment of chemicals and our laws on environmental biology.
In this episode, host Craig Williams joins LeRoy (Lee) C. Paddock, former associate dean for environmental law studies at George Washington University Law School, as they discuss the Pollution Prevention Act, the Clean Water Act, &amp; the Clean Air Act, their intended impact on our environment, and a look ahead to future legislation.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This year, we have created a new Environmental Law series on<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer, </em>where we will cover cradle to grave treatment of chemicals and our laws on environmental biology.</p><p>In this episode, host Craig Williams joins LeRoy (Lee) C. Paddock, former associate dean for environmental law studies at George Washington University Law School, as they discuss the Pollution Prevention Act, the Clean Water Act, &amp; the Clean Air Act, their intended impact on our environment, and a look ahead to future legislation.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1725</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d3ca29c0-aed4-11ed-ab60-03a7bdf4f2c6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4990010215.mp3?updated=1676646893" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Attorney Misconduct &amp; Discipline</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/02/attorney-misconduct-discipline/</link>
      <description>Rule 8.4 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, dealing with Misconduct, is subtitled with the phrase “Maintaining the Integrity of the Profession”. When attorneys engage in unethical behavior, it is believed that their actions harm the industry. As such, disciplinary procedures are a key feature to maintaining the legitimacy of not only the profession, but the legal system as a whole. Usually, attorney disciplinary matters don’t enter the broader public discourse, but, in the wake of the 2020 presidential election, we have seen an increase in high-profile attorney disciplinary matters.
Attorneys like Rudy Giuliani and John Charles Eastman, and the disciplinary charges brought against them in DC and California respectively, have been featured prominently in the news of late, and so it’s time we turn our attention to the issue of attorney misconduct and discipline.
In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest Leslie C. Levin, professor of law at University of Connecticut School of Law to take an overall look at prominent attorneys who have come under fire for their violation of the rule of law, measures taken to regulate attorney's actions, and the consequences that could stem from their actions.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 16:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>604</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Rule 8.4 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, dealing with Misconduct, is subtitled with the phrase “Maintaining the Integrity of the Profession”. When attorneys engage in unethical behavior, it is believed that their actions harm the industry. As such, disciplinary procedures are a key feature to maintaining the legitimacy of not only the profession, but the legal system as a whole. Usually, attorney disciplinary matters don’t enter the broader public discourse, but, in the wake of the 2020 presidential election, we have seen an increase in high-profile attorney disciplinary matters.
Attorneys like Rudy Giuliani and John Charles Eastman, and the disciplinary charges brought against them in DC and California respectively, have been featured prominently in the news of late, and so it’s time we turn our attention to the issue of attorney misconduct and discipline.
In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest Leslie C. Levin, professor of law at University of Connecticut School of Law to take an overall look at prominent attorneys who have come under fire for their violation of the rule of law, measures taken to regulate attorney's actions, and the consequences that could stem from their actions.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Rule 8.4 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, dealing with Misconduct, is subtitled with the phrase “Maintaining the Integrity of the Profession”. When attorneys engage in unethical behavior, it is believed that their actions harm the industry. As such, disciplinary procedures are a key feature to maintaining the legitimacy of not only the profession, but the legal system as a whole. Usually, attorney disciplinary matters don’t enter the broader public discourse, but, in the wake of the 2020 presidential election, we have seen an increase in high-profile attorney disciplinary matters.</p><p>Attorneys like Rudy Giuliani and John Charles Eastman, and the disciplinary charges brought against them in DC and California respectively, have been featured prominently in the news of late, and so it’s time we turn our attention to the issue of attorney misconduct and discipline.</p><p>In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest Leslie C. Levin, professor of law at University of Connecticut School of Law to take an overall look at prominent attorneys who have come under fire for their violation of the rule of law, measures taken to regulate attorney's actions, and the consequences that could stem from their actions.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2010</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[40edce16-a7c9-11ed-91c0-8be809274c29]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7217310911.mp3?updated=1675872321" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Environmental Law Series: Inside The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/01/environmental-law-series-inside-the-toxic-substances-control-act-tsca</link>
      <description>This year, we have created a new Environmental Law series on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, where we will cover cradle to grave treatment of chemicals and our laws on environmental biology.
 In our first episode, we will spotlight the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) which addresses the manufacturing, processing, distribution, use, and disposal of commercial and industrial chemicals.
Host Craig Williams is joined by Managing Partner of Bergeson &amp; Campbell, P.C, Lynn L. Bergeson who will give us an overview of the Toxic Substances Control Act, its history, impact, and the forecast for U.S. federal and international chemical regulatory policy.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>603</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This year, we have created a new Environmental Law series on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, where we will cover cradle to grave treatment of chemicals and our laws on environmental biology.
 In our first episode, we will spotlight the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) which addresses the manufacturing, processing, distribution, use, and disposal of commercial and industrial chemicals.
Host Craig Williams is joined by Managing Partner of Bergeson &amp; Campbell, P.C, Lynn L. Bergeson who will give us an overview of the Toxic Substances Control Act, its history, impact, and the forecast for U.S. federal and international chemical regulatory policy.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This year, we have created a new Environmental Law series on<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer, </em>where we will cover cradle to grave treatment of chemicals and our laws on environmental biology.</p><p> In our first episode, we will spotlight the <strong>Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA</strong>) which addresses the manufacturing, processing, distribution, use, and disposal of commercial and industrial chemicals.</p><p>Host Craig Williams is joined by Managing Partner of Bergeson &amp; Campbell, P.C, Lynn L. Bergeson who will give us an overview of the Toxic Substances Control Act, its history, impact, and the forecast for U.S. federal and international chemical regulatory policy.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2058</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[02e3c9bc-9839-11ed-9f94-8ff27b791352]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5074262464.mp3?updated=1674161399" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ethics, Congress, SCOTUS, &amp; the Executive Branch</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2023/01/ethics-congress-scotus-the-executive-branch</link>
      <description>As part of his bid to secure the position of Speaker of the House, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy has made a series of proposals in an effort to garner party support. One notable proposal calls for the gutting of the Office of Congressional Ethics, an independent, non-partisan entity created in 2008 and tasked with reviewing allegations of misconduct against members, officers, and staff of the US House of Representatives.
In light of recent pressure to investigate some House Republicans in regards to January 6th, as well as recent high-profile allegations against incoming congressman George Santos, ethics has taken center stage. In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest Richard W. Painter, former Chief White House ethics lawyer and the S. Walter Richey Professor of Corporate Law at University of Minnesota Law School, as they spotlight ethics and its role within Congress, SCOTUS, and the Executive branch.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 18:20:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>602</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As part of his bid to secure the position of Speaker of the House, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy has made a series of proposals in an effort to garner party support. One notable proposal calls for the gutting of the Office of Congressional Ethics, an independent, non-partisan entity created in 2008 and tasked with reviewing allegations of misconduct against members, officers, and staff of the US House of Representatives.
In light of recent pressure to investigate some House Republicans in regards to January 6th, as well as recent high-profile allegations against incoming congressman George Santos, ethics has taken center stage. In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest Richard W. Painter, former Chief White House ethics lawyer and the S. Walter Richey Professor of Corporate Law at University of Minnesota Law School, as they spotlight ethics and its role within Congress, SCOTUS, and the Executive branch.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>As part of his bid to secure the position of Speaker of the House, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy has made a series of proposals in an effort to garner party support. One notable proposal calls for the gutting of the Office of Congressional Ethics, an independent, non-partisan entity created in 2008 and tasked with reviewing allegations of misconduct against members, officers, and staff of the US House of Representatives.</p><p>In light of recent pressure to investigate some House Republicans in regards to January 6th, as well as recent high-profile allegations against incoming congressman George Santos, ethics has taken center stage. In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest Richard W. Painter, former Chief White House ethics lawyer and the S. Walter Richey Professor of Corporate Law at University of Minnesota Law School, as they spotlight ethics and its role within Congress, SCOTUS, and the Executive branch.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2040</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a73573fa-8de2-11ed-bdcd-5799feede87d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3839432932.mp3?updated=1673029098" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOTUS &amp; Originalism</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/12/scotus-originalism/</link>
      <description>Originalism is a type of judicial interpretation of a constitution (especially the U.S. Constitution) that aims to follow how it would have been understood or was intended to be understood at the time it was written. With the addition of Justice Amy Coney Barrett to the High Court, there are now 4 avowed originalists on the Supreme Court including: Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh.
Originalism has been cited in recent landmark decisions including Dobbs &amp; Bruen, but are these justices abiding by the true definition of the word? Are they truly originalists? Or are they picking and choosing their history based on their ideology?
In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest David H. Gans, Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights &amp; Citizenship Program at the Constitutional Accountability Center to discuss SCOTUS' move toward originalism, the impact, and the conflict between Justice Thomas' and Justice Jackson's views.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>601</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Originalism is a type of judicial interpretation of a constitution (especially the U.S. Constitution) that aims to follow how it would have been understood or was intended to be understood at the time it was written. With the addition of Justice Amy Coney Barrett to the High Court, there are now 4 avowed originalists on the Supreme Court including: Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh.
Originalism has been cited in recent landmark decisions including Dobbs &amp; Bruen, but are these justices abiding by the true definition of the word? Are they truly originalists? Or are they picking and choosing their history based on their ideology?
In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest David H. Gans, Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights &amp; Citizenship Program at the Constitutional Accountability Center to discuss SCOTUS' move toward originalism, the impact, and the conflict between Justice Thomas' and Justice Jackson's views.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Originalism is a type of judicial interpretation of a constitution (especially the U.S. Constitution) that aims to follow how it would have been understood or was intended to be understood at the time it was written. With the addition of Justice Amy Coney Barrett to the High Court, there are now 4 avowed originalists on the Supreme Court including: Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh.</p><p>Originalism has been cited in recent landmark decisions including Dobbs &amp; Bruen, but are these justices abiding by the true definition of the word? Are they truly originalists? Or are they picking and choosing their history based on their ideology?</p><p>In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest David H. Gans, Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights &amp; Citizenship Program at the Constitutional Accountability Center to discuss SCOTUS' move toward originalism, the impact, and the conflict between Justice Thomas' and Justice Jackson's views.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2057</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3be34704-8210-11ed-8261-bf31b68a6df1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9521998100.mp3?updated=1671724738" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish: The Aging Lawyer &amp; Exiting Gracefully</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/12/the-life-of-a-lawyer-start-to-finish-the-aging-lawyer-exiting-gracefully</link>
      <description>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed Retirement with Ida Abbott. In this episode, we move on to the final rung of the ladder: The Aging Lawyer: Exiting Gracefully.  
Host Craig Williams is joined by Tish Vincent, LMSW, Esq., Chair of the ABA Commission on Lawyers Assistance Programs, as they spotlight the aging lawyer. Craig &amp; Tish discuss senior lawyers, possible warning signs of cognitive decline to look out for if a co-worker is suffering, how to approach, and where to go for help if you or a colleague are experiencing warning signs.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 18:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>600</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed Retirement with Ida Abbott. In this episode, we move on to the final rung of the ladder: The Aging Lawyer: Exiting Gracefully.  
Host Craig Williams is joined by Tish Vincent, LMSW, Esq., Chair of the ABA Commission on Lawyers Assistance Programs, as they spotlight the aging lawyer. Craig &amp; Tish discuss senior lawyers, possible warning signs of cognitive decline to look out for if a co-worker is suffering, how to approach, and where to go for help if you or a colleague are experiencing warning signs.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On the last episode of our <strong><em>The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish</em></strong> series, we discussed <strong><em>Retirement with Ida Abbott. </em></strong>In this episode, we move on to the final rung of the ladder:<strong><em> The Aging Lawyer: Exiting Gracefully.  </em></strong></p><p>Host Craig Williams is joined by Tish Vincent, LMSW, Esq., Chair of the ABA Commission on Lawyers Assistance Programs, as they spotlight the aging lawyer. Craig &amp; Tish discuss senior lawyers, possible warning signs of cognitive decline to look out for if a co-worker is suffering, how to approach, and where to go for help if you or a colleague are experiencing warning signs.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1996</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7b6b9a80-77e7-11ed-987e-8b72b8edac73]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5208171694.mp3?updated=1670607842" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish: Retirement</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/11/the-life-of-a-lawyer-start-to-finish-retirement</link>
      <description>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed Money Management for Lawyers with L.J. Jones. In this episode, we move on to the next rung of the ladder: Retirement. 
Host Craig Williams is joined byIda O. Abbot, founder of Ida Abbott Consulting, as they tackle retirement. Ida &amp; Craig take a look at when to start thinking about retiring as a lawyer, steps attorneys can take to prepare for retirement, and ultimately life post-retirement.

Mentioned in This Episode:
﻿Retirement by Design: A Guided Workbook for Creating a Happy and Purposeful Future by Ida Abbott</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>599</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed Money Management for Lawyers with L.J. Jones. In this episode, we move on to the next rung of the ladder: Retirement. 
Host Craig Williams is joined byIda O. Abbot, founder of Ida Abbott Consulting, as they tackle retirement. Ida &amp; Craig take a look at when to start thinking about retiring as a lawyer, steps attorneys can take to prepare for retirement, and ultimately life post-retirement.

Mentioned in This Episode:
﻿Retirement by Design: A Guided Workbook for Creating a Happy and Purposeful Future by Ida Abbott</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On the last episode of our <strong><em>The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish</em></strong> series, we discussed <a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/10/the-life-of-a-lawyer-start-to-finish-money-management-for-lawyers/"><strong><em>Money Management for Lawyers with L.J. Jones</em></strong></a>. In this episode, we move on to the next rung of the ladder:<strong><em> Retirement. </em></strong></p><p>Host Craig Williams is joined byIda O. Abbot, founder of Ida Abbott Consulting, as they tackle retirement. Ida &amp; Craig take a look at when to start thinking about retiring as a lawyer, steps attorneys can take to prepare for retirement, and ultimately life post-retirement.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Mentioned in This Episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Retirement-Design-Workbook-Creating-Purposeful/dp/164604021X/ref=asc_df_164604021X/?tag=hyprod-20&amp;linkCode=df0&amp;hvadid=507975958237&amp;hvpos=&amp;hvnetw=g&amp;hvrand=1372338089291471554&amp;hvpone=&amp;hvptwo=&amp;hvqmt=&amp;hvdev=c&amp;hvdvcmdl=&amp;hvlocint=&amp;hvlocphy=9001965&amp;hvtargid=pla-891957445886&amp;psc=1"><strong>﻿<em>Retirement by Design: A Guided Workbook for Creating a Happy and Purposeful Future by Ida Abbott</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2270</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9f01ee02-679a-11ed-96f8-73c5d2e87684]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8271987510.mp3?updated=1668815392" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Water Law: Droughts, Climate Change, &amp; Policy</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/11/water-law-droughts-climate-change-policy</link>
      <description>Water is our most precious resource, but water, statewide and worldwide, is becoming scarce. According to the World Health Organization, an estimated 55 million people globally are affected by droughts every year, and water shortages are the most serious hazard to livestock and crops in nearly every part of the world. By 2025, two-thirds of the world’s population may face water shortages, and by 2030, as many as 700 million people are expected to be at-risk of being displaced.
In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest Rhett Larson, the Richard Morrison Professor of Water Law at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, as we spotlight water law. We discuss droughts, erratic climate events, and what is being done to eradicate these water centric issues through laws and policy.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>598</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Water is our most precious resource, but water, statewide and worldwide, is becoming scarce. According to the World Health Organization, an estimated 55 million people globally are affected by droughts every year, and water shortages are the most serious hazard to livestock and crops in nearly every part of the world. By 2025, two-thirds of the world’s population may face water shortages, and by 2030, as many as 700 million people are expected to be at-risk of being displaced.
In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest Rhett Larson, the Richard Morrison Professor of Water Law at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, as we spotlight water law. We discuss droughts, erratic climate events, and what is being done to eradicate these water centric issues through laws and policy.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Water is our most precious resource, but water, statewide and worldwide, is becoming scarce. According to the World Health Organization, an estimated 55 million people globally are affected by droughts every year, and water shortages are the most serious hazard to livestock and crops in nearly every part of the world. By 2025, two-thirds of the world’s population may face water shortages, and by 2030, as many as 700 million people are expected to be at-risk of being displaced.</p><p>In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest Rhett Larson, the Richard Morrison Professor of Water Law at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, as we spotlight water law. We discuss droughts, erratic climate events, and what is being done to eradicate these water centric issues through laws and policy.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2559</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[feef5cfa-614b-11ed-a41b-af7651227f4d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2911617105.mp3?updated=1668122197" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish: Money Management for Lawyers</title>
      <description>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed Lifelong Learning with attorney Kelli Proia. In this episode, we move on to the next rung of the ladder: Money Management.
Host Craig Williams is joined by L.J. Jones, CPA, founder of Developing Financial to discuss money management for lawyers. Craig &amp; L.J. explore common money management problems, and how lawyers can take steps to manage their money inside and outside of the law firm.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>597</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed Lifelong Learning with attorney Kelli Proia. In this episode, we move on to the next rung of the ladder: Money Management.
Host Craig Williams is joined by L.J. Jones, CPA, founder of Developing Financial to discuss money management for lawyers. Craig &amp; L.J. explore common money management problems, and how lawyers can take steps to manage their money inside and outside of the law firm.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On the last episode of our <strong><em>The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish</em></strong> series, we discussed <a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/09/the-life-of-a-lawyer-start-to-finish-lifelong-learning/"><em>Lifelong Learning</em> with attorney Kelli Proia</a>. In this episode, we move on to the next rung of the ladder:<strong><em> Money Management.</em></strong></p><p>Host Craig Williams is joined by L.J. Jones, CPA, founder of Developing Financial to discuss money management for lawyers. Craig &amp; L.J. explore common money management problems, and how lawyers can take steps to manage their money inside and outside of the law firm.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2055</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1225b340-56c6-11ed-aa4d-b38743e65a4c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1066977773.mp3?updated=1667321315" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legitimacy of SCOTUS</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/10/the-legitimacy-of-scotus/</link>
      <description>Last month at a judicial conference in Colorado Springs, two judges from the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals interviewed Chief Justice John Roberts on all things SCOTUS, in which he decried attacks on the court’s legitimacy following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health ruling. Roberts said "If the court doesn't retain its legitimate function of interpreting the constitution, I'm not sure who would take up that mantle. You don't want the political branches telling you what the law is, and you don't want public opinion to be the guide about what the appropriate decision is…”
In a later response to Roberts comments, Justice Elena Kagan declared “Judges create legitimacy problems for themselves when they don’t act like courts” and “when they instead stray into places that look like politics.”
So does the Supreme Court of the United States have a legitimacy problem? In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest Douglas Keith, counsel in the Brennan Center’s Democracy Program, as they spotlight the legitimacy of the Supreme Court. Craig and Doug take a look at the public's reaction to recent SCOTUS decisions, the justices reaction to a legitimacy problem in the High Court, and what the new term will bring.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>596</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Last month at a judicial conference in Colorado Springs, two judges from the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals interviewed Chief Justice John Roberts on all things SCOTUS, in which he decried attacks on the court’s legitimacy following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health ruling. Roberts said "If the court doesn't retain its legitimate function of interpreting the constitution, I'm not sure who would take up that mantle. You don't want the political branches telling you what the law is, and you don't want public opinion to be the guide about what the appropriate decision is…”
In a later response to Roberts comments, Justice Elena Kagan declared “Judges create legitimacy problems for themselves when they don’t act like courts” and “when they instead stray into places that look like politics.”
So does the Supreme Court of the United States have a legitimacy problem? In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest Douglas Keith, counsel in the Brennan Center’s Democracy Program, as they spotlight the legitimacy of the Supreme Court. Craig and Doug take a look at the public's reaction to recent SCOTUS decisions, the justices reaction to a legitimacy problem in the High Court, and what the new term will bring.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Last month at a judicial conference in Colorado Springs, two judges from the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals interviewed Chief Justice John Roberts on all things SCOTUS, in which he decried attacks on the court’s legitimacy following the<strong><em> Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health</em></strong> ruling. Roberts said <em>"If the court doesn't retain its legitimate function of interpreting the constitution, I'm not sure who would take up that mantle. You don't want the political branches telling you what the law is, and you don't want public opinion to be the guide about what the appropriate decision is…</em>”</p><p>In a later response to Roberts comments, Justice Elena Kagan declared “<em>Judges create legitimacy problems for themselves when they don’t act like courts”</em> and “<em>when they instead stray into places that look like politics.”</em></p><p>So does the Supreme Court of the United States have a legitimacy problem? In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest Douglas Keith, counsel in the Brennan Center’s Democracy Program, as they spotlight the legitimacy of the Supreme Court. Craig and Doug take a look at the public's reaction to recent SCOTUS decisions, the justices reaction to a legitimacy problem in the High Court, and what the new term will bring.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2069</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5e22fcea-4b21-11ed-9f1a-6f0f6704360a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2699389303.mp3?updated=1667321264" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish: Lifelong Learning</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/09/the-life-of-a-lawyer-start-to-finish-lifelong-learning</link>
      <description>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed Hobbies &amp; Travel with attorney Steven Lefkoff. In this episode, we move on to the next rung of the ladder: Lifelong Learning.
Host Craig Williams is joined by attorney, entrepreneur, and teacher Kelli J. Proia, founder of Lawducate. Craig and Kelli explore lifelong learning, discuss the importance of a continuous learning plan through education and training, the impact on career and personal growth, and the perks of being a lifelong learner.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>595</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed Hobbies &amp; Travel with attorney Steven Lefkoff. In this episode, we move on to the next rung of the ladder: Lifelong Learning.
Host Craig Williams is joined by attorney, entrepreneur, and teacher Kelli J. Proia, founder of Lawducate. Craig and Kelli explore lifelong learning, discuss the importance of a continuous learning plan through education and training, the impact on career and personal growth, and the perks of being a lifelong learner.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On the last episode of our <strong><em>The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish</em></strong> series, we discussed <a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/09/the-life-of-a-lawyer-start-to-finish-hobbies-travel/">Hobbies &amp; Travel with attorney Steven Lefkoff</a>. In this episode, we move on to the next rung of the ladder: <strong><em>Lifelong Learning.</em></strong></p><p>Host Craig Williams is joined by attorney, entrepreneur, and teacher Kelli J. Proia, founder of Lawducate. Craig and Kelli explore lifelong learning, discuss the importance of a continuous learning plan through education and training, the impact on career and personal growth, and the perks of being a lifelong learner.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2272</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5aafdbde-402a-11ed-990b-136e0750d58e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7963023822.mp3?updated=1667321241" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The DOJ Investigation &amp; the Special Master Ruling</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/09/the-doj-investigation-the-special-master-ruling</link>
      <description>On September 5th, 2022, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointed judge, granted Trump’s request for a special master to review records seized by the FBI during its search of former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate, thus delaying the DOJ’s investigation into the alleged actions of the former president and blocking their review of seized documents. In response, on September 8th, the DOJ appealed Judge Cannon’s order, citing the delay of review could be a threat to our national security. On September 15th, Judge Cannon declined to lift any part of the order, and a special master was appointed to review documents from the Mar-a-Lago search.
So what is a special master? Is a special master appropriate in this situation? In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest, Stanford Law professor David Alan Sklansky, faculty co-director at Stanford Criminal Justice Center, as they discuss this ruling, its potential impact, and the role of a special master.

Mentioned in This Episode:
Judge Cannon’s Ruling
A Pattern of Violence: How the Law Classifies Crimes and What It Means for Justice</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>594</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On September 5th, 2022, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointed judge, granted Trump’s request for a special master to review records seized by the FBI during its search of former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate, thus delaying the DOJ’s investigation into the alleged actions of the former president and blocking their review of seized documents. In response, on September 8th, the DOJ appealed Judge Cannon’s order, citing the delay of review could be a threat to our national security. On September 15th, Judge Cannon declined to lift any part of the order, and a special master was appointed to review documents from the Mar-a-Lago search.
So what is a special master? Is a special master appropriate in this situation? In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest, Stanford Law professor David Alan Sklansky, faculty co-director at Stanford Criminal Justice Center, as they discuss this ruling, its potential impact, and the role of a special master.

Mentioned in This Episode:
Judge Cannon’s Ruling
A Pattern of Violence: How the Law Classifies Crimes and What It Means for Justice</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On September 5th, 2022, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointed judge, granted Trump’s request for a special master to review records seized by the FBI during its search of former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate, thus delaying the DOJ’s investigation into the alleged actions of the former president and blocking their review of seized documents. In response, on September 8th, the DOJ appealed Judge Cannon’s order, citing the delay of review could be a threat to our national security. On September 15th, Judge Cannon declined to lift any part of the order, and a special master was appointed to review documents from the Mar-a-Lago search.</p><p>So what is a special master? Is a special master appropriate in this situation? In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest, Stanford Law professor David Alan Sklansky, faculty co-director at Stanford Criminal Justice Center, as they discuss this ruling, its potential impact, and the role of a special master.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Mentioned in This Episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22275119-cannon-order-to-appoint-a-special-master?responsive=1&amp;title=1"><strong><em>Judge Cannon’s Ruling</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674248908"><strong><em>A Pattern of Violence: How the Law Classifies Crimes and What It Means for Justice</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2444</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[115d7c22-35dd-11ed-aefa-6328e7b76684]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1407511572.mp3?updated=1667321192" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish: Hobbies &amp; Travel</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/09/the-life-of-a-lawyer-start-to-finish-hobbies-travel</link>
      <description>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed work-life balance with Molly Ranns. In this episode, we move on to the next rung of the ladder: Hobbies &amp; Travel.
Host Craig Williams is joined by Steven Lefkoff, a business litigation and general practice attorney and host of the popular podcast, Lawyers with Lives. Craig and Steven dig deeper into hobbies and traveling, and how these activities can materially improve your practice, client relationships, and peace of mind.

Mentioned in This Episode:
﻿Lawyers with Lives Podcast</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>593</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed work-life balance with Molly Ranns. In this episode, we move on to the next rung of the ladder: Hobbies &amp; Travel.
Host Craig Williams is joined by Steven Lefkoff, a business litigation and general practice attorney and host of the popular podcast, Lawyers with Lives. Craig and Steven dig deeper into hobbies and traveling, and how these activities can materially improve your practice, client relationships, and peace of mind.

Mentioned in This Episode:
﻿Lawyers with Lives Podcast</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On the last episode of our <strong><em>The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish</em></strong> series, we discussed work-life balance with Molly Ranns. In this episode, we move on to the next rung of the ladder:<strong><em> Hobbies &amp; Travel.</em></strong></p><p>Host Craig Williams is joined by Steven Lefkoff, a business litigation and general practice attorney and host of the popular podcast, <strong><em>Lawyers with Lives.</em></strong> Craig and Steven dig deeper into hobbies and traveling, and how these activities can materially improve your practice, client relationships, and peace of mind.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Mentioned in This Episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/lawyers-with-lives/id1491943741"><strong>﻿<em>Lawyers with Lives Podcast</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2099</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6d676c78-2a50-11ed-8c30-53847c58124f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4694662727.mp3?updated=1667321216" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Classified Documents &amp; the FBI Search of Mar-a-Lago</title>
      <description>On August 8th 2022, FBI agents entered the Mar-a-Lago residence of former President Trump in search of classified documents, allegedly taken from the White House. According to the search warrant, the FBI removed 11 sets of classified documents, including some documents that were marked as top secret and meant to be only available in special government facilities. So what does this mean for the former President?

On this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest, Jason R. Baron, Professor of the Practice at the University of Maryland's College of Information Studies, to discuss the FBI’s recent search for classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Craig and Jason take a look at the Presidential Records Act, the role of the National Archives and Records Administration, and the penalty for the mishandling of these White House records.

Mentioned in this episode:
Search and Seizure Warrant</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2022 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>592</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/b9479392-1f70-11ed-91bb-bf389da4e55f/image/L2L-4-1024x1024.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On August 8th 2022, FBI agents entered the Mar-a-Lago residence of former President Trump in search of classified documents, allegedly taken from the White House. According to the search warrant, the FBI removed 11 sets of classified documents, including some documents that were marked as top secret and meant to be only available in special government facilities. So what does this mean for the former President?

On this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest, Jason R. Baron, Professor of the Practice at the University of Maryland's College of Information Studies, to discuss the FBI’s recent search for classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Craig and Jason take a look at the Presidential Records Act, the role of the National Archives and Records Administration, and the penalty for the mishandling of these White House records.

Mentioned in this episode:
Search and Seizure Warrant</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On August 8th 2022, FBI agents entered the Mar-a-Lago residence of former President Trump in search of classified documents, allegedly taken from the White House. According to the search warrant, the FBI removed 11 sets of classified documents, including some documents that were marked as top secret and meant to be only available in special government facilities. So what does this mean for the former President?</p><p><br></p><p>On this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest, Jason R. Baron, Professor of the Practice at the University of Maryland's College of Information Studies, to discuss the FBI’s recent search for classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Craig and Jason take a look at the Presidential Records Act, the role of the National Archives and Records Administration, and the penalty for the mishandling of these White House records.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Mentioned in this episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/search-warrant-1100-S-Ocean-Blvd-08-12-2022.pdf">Search and Seizure Warrant</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1992</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b9479392-1f70-11ed-91bb-bf389da4e55f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9840747766.mp3?updated=1667321157" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish: Work-Life Balance</title>
      <description>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed The Business of Law with Attorney Christopher T. Anderson. In this episode, we move on to the next rung of the ladder: Work-Life Balance. 
Host Craig Williams is joined by program director for the Lawyers and Judges Assistance Program at the State Bar of Michigan, and co-host of the State Bar of Michigan: On Balance Podcast, Molly Ranns.
Craig and Molly discuss the well-being of an attorney, addressing a lawyer’s workload, the stress of the profession, and how a lawyer can balance their personal and professional life.

Mentioned in this episode: 
The State Bar of Michigan: On Balance Podcast

Special thanks to our sponsors Embroker and Posh.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 16:05:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>591</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5857a496-14d5-11ed-b2ab-0734645ede0d/image/L2L-4-1024x1024.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The well-being of an attorney, addressing a lawyer’s workload, the stress of the profession, and how a lawyer can balance their personal and professional life</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed The Business of Law with Attorney Christopher T. Anderson. In this episode, we move on to the next rung of the ladder: Work-Life Balance. 
Host Craig Williams is joined by program director for the Lawyers and Judges Assistance Program at the State Bar of Michigan, and co-host of the State Bar of Michigan: On Balance Podcast, Molly Ranns.
Craig and Molly discuss the well-being of an attorney, addressing a lawyer’s workload, the stress of the profession, and how a lawyer can balance their personal and professional life.

Mentioned in this episode: 
The State Bar of Michigan: On Balance Podcast

Special thanks to our sponsors Embroker and Posh.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On the last episode of our <strong><em>The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish</em></strong> series, we discussed <strong><em>The Business of Law</em></strong> with Attorney Christopher T. Anderson. In this episode, we move on to the next rung of the ladder:<strong><em> Work-Life Balance</em></strong><em>. </em></p><p>Host Craig Williams is joined by program director for the Lawyers and Judges Assistance Program at the State Bar of Michigan, and co-host of the <strong><em>State Bar of Michigan: On Balance Podcast</em></strong><em>,</em> Molly Ranns.</p><p>Craig and Molly discuss the well-being of an attorney, addressing a lawyer’s workload, the stress of the profession, and how a lawyer can balance their personal and professional life.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Mentioned in this episode: </strong></p><p><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/state-bar-michigan-on-balance/">The State Bar of Michigan: On Balance Podcast</a></p><p><br></p><p>Special thanks to our sponsors <a href="https://www.embroker.com/law/">Embroker</a> and <a href="https://www.posh.com/?utm_source=LTN&amp;utm_campaign=2022&amp;utm_medium=Podcast&amp;utm_content=Legal">Posh</a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1993</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5857a496-14d5-11ed-b2ab-0734645ede0d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5757315872.mp3?updated=1667321136" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOTUS, Dobbs, &amp; the Fate of the 4th</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/07/scotus-dobbs-the-fate-of-the-4th/</link>
      <description>With a ruling as momentous as we’ve seen in the recent Dobbs decision, one episode is just not enough to cover the extent of its significance. On our last episode with Cary Franklin, we discussed the ramifications of Dobbs in the context of abortion.
On this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest, criminal defense attorney Jon May, to discuss his recent article, Justice Alito’s Opinion on Abortion: Not Just the End of Reproductive Rights, But the Downfall of Fundamental Civil Liberties Guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to All Americans. Jon and Craig look beyond the matter of abortion, and explore the possible wider impacts of Dobbs, specifically as to the civil liberties guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment.

Mentioned in This Episode:
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health OrganizationRuling 
SCOTUS &amp; the Overturning of Roe v. Wade
Justice Alito’s Opinion on Abortion: Not Just the End of Reproductive Rights, But the Downfall of Fundamental Civil Liberties Guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to All Americans</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 11:01:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>590</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With a ruling as momentous as we’ve seen in the recent Dobbs decision, one episode is just not enough to cover the extent of its significance. On our last episode with Cary Franklin, we discussed the ramifications of Dobbs in the context of abortion.
On this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest, criminal defense attorney Jon May, to discuss his recent article, Justice Alito’s Opinion on Abortion: Not Just the End of Reproductive Rights, But the Downfall of Fundamental Civil Liberties Guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to All Americans. Jon and Craig look beyond the matter of abortion, and explore the possible wider impacts of Dobbs, specifically as to the civil liberties guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment.

Mentioned in This Episode:
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health OrganizationRuling 
SCOTUS &amp; the Overturning of Roe v. Wade
Justice Alito’s Opinion on Abortion: Not Just the End of Reproductive Rights, But the Downfall of Fundamental Civil Liberties Guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to All Americans</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>With a ruling as momentous as we’ve seen in the recent Dobbs decision, one episode is just not enough to cover the extent of its significance. On our last episode with Cary Franklin, we discussed the ramifications of Dobbs in the context of abortion.</p><p>On this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest, criminal defense attorney Jon May, to discuss his recent article,<strong><em> Justice Alito’s Opinion on Abortion: Not Just the End of Reproductive Rights, But the Downfall of Fundamental Civil Liberties Guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to All Americans.</em></strong> Jon and Craig look beyond the matter of abortion, and explore the possible wider impacts of Dobbs, specifically as to the civil liberties guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Mentioned in This Episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf"><strong><em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health OrganizationRuling </em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/07/scotus-the-overturning-of-roe-v-wade/"><strong>SCOTUS &amp; the Overturning of Roe v. Wade</strong></a></p><p><a href="https://verdict.justia.com/2022/06/27/justice-alitos-opinion-on-abortion-not-just-the-end-of-reproductive-rights-but-the-downfall-of-fundamental-civil-liberties-guaranteed-by-the-fourth-amendment-to-all-americans"><strong><em>Justice Alito’s Opinion on Abortion: Not Just the End of Reproductive Rights, But the Downfall of Fundamental Civil Liberties Guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to All Americans</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1900</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8e35b65e-0d35-11ed-acc6-e3edd2dd86ad]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2172004372.mp3?updated=1667321114" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOTUS &amp; the Overturning of Roe v. Wade</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/07/scotus-the-overturning-of-roe-v-wade</link>
      <description>On May 13th, 2022, we released an episode entitledSCOTUS &amp; the Future of Roe v. Wade. At that time, a leaked draft opinion in the matter of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization indicated that the Court was preparing to overturn Roe. Our guest on that episode, Cary Franklin, spoke about the impact of the leak, the constitutional right to abortion, the role of stare decisis, and the anticipated impacts of overruling Roe v. Wade.
On Friday, June 24th, 2022, that leaked opinion became a reality. The U.S. Supreme Court officially reversed the half-century old precedent of Roe v. Wade, declaring that abortion is no longer a right guaranteed by the Constitution. Host Craig Williams joins returning guest,  Cary Franklin, Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law, to discuss SCOTUS’ recent ruling on abortion and the potential impact this could have on the nation, as well as the ramifications for our highest court; specifically, its politics, its approval rating, and its trajectory.
Mentioned in This Episode:
SCOTUS &amp; the Future of Roe v. Wade
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Ruling</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>589</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On May 13th, 2022, we released an episode entitledSCOTUS &amp; the Future of Roe v. Wade. At that time, a leaked draft opinion in the matter of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization indicated that the Court was preparing to overturn Roe. Our guest on that episode, Cary Franklin, spoke about the impact of the leak, the constitutional right to abortion, the role of stare decisis, and the anticipated impacts of overruling Roe v. Wade.
On Friday, June 24th, 2022, that leaked opinion became a reality. The U.S. Supreme Court officially reversed the half-century old precedent of Roe v. Wade, declaring that abortion is no longer a right guaranteed by the Constitution. Host Craig Williams joins returning guest,  Cary Franklin, Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law, to discuss SCOTUS’ recent ruling on abortion and the potential impact this could have on the nation, as well as the ramifications for our highest court; specifically, its politics, its approval rating, and its trajectory.
Mentioned in This Episode:
SCOTUS &amp; the Future of Roe v. Wade
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Ruling</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On May 13th, 2022, we released an episode entitled<strong><em>SCOTUS &amp; the Future of Roe v. Wade</em>.</strong> At that time, a leaked draft opinion in the matter of <strong><em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization</em></strong> indicated that the Court was preparing to overturn Roe. Our guest on that episode, Cary Franklin, spoke about the impact of the leak, the constitutional right to abortion, the role of stare decisis, and the anticipated impacts of overruling <strong><em>Roe v. Wade</em></strong>.</p><p>On Friday, June 24th, 2022, that leaked opinion became a reality. The U.S. Supreme Court officially reversed the half-century old precedent of <strong><em>Roe v. Wade</em></strong>, declaring that abortion is no longer a right guaranteed by the Constitution. Host Craig Williams joins returning guest, <strong> Cary Franklin, </strong>Professor of Law at <strong>UCLA School of Law</strong>, to discuss SCOTUS’ recent ruling on abortion and the potential impact this could have on the nation, as well as the ramifications for our highest court; specifically, its politics, its approval rating, and its trajectory.</p><p><strong><u>Mentioned in This Episode:</u></strong></p><p><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/05/scotus-the-future-of-roe-v-wade/"><strong><em>SCOTUS &amp; the Future of Roe v. Wade</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf"><strong><em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Ruling</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2217</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[76c9be70-fe3a-11ec-814b-5bd70eace88e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6465865146.mp3?updated=1667321094" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside the January 6th Hearings</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/06/inside-the-january-6th-hearings/</link>
      <description>The January 6th hearings, a series of five scheduled hearings investigating the January 6th insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, by the United States House Select Committee, is currently underway. So, what will these hearings uncover?
Host Craig Williams is joined by William C. Banks, law professor and an expert in constitutional law, national security law, and counterterrorism law, to discuss the January 6th hearings. Craig and Bill take a look at the purpose, goals of the January 6th Select Committee, potential criminal referrals to the DOJ by the committee, and whether there could be possible criminal prosecution due to the information revealed in these hearings.
Mentioned in this Episode:
﻿National Security Law Today Podcast 
January 6th Hearings </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>588</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The January 6th hearings, a series of five scheduled hearings investigating the January 6th insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, by the United States House Select Committee, is currently underway. So, what will these hearings uncover?
Host Craig Williams is joined by William C. Banks, law professor and an expert in constitutional law, national security law, and counterterrorism law, to discuss the January 6th hearings. Craig and Bill take a look at the purpose, goals of the January 6th Select Committee, potential criminal referrals to the DOJ by the committee, and whether there could be possible criminal prosecution due to the information revealed in these hearings.
Mentioned in this Episode:
﻿National Security Law Today Podcast 
January 6th Hearings </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The January 6th hearings, a series of five scheduled hearings investigating the January 6th insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, by the United States House Select Committee, is currently underway. So, what will these hearings uncover?</p><p>Host Craig Williams is joined by William C. Banks, law professor and an expert in constitutional law, national security law, and counterterrorism law, to discuss the January 6th hearings. Craig and Bill take a look at the purpose, goals of the January 6th Select Committee, potential criminal referrals to the DOJ by the committee, and whether there could be possible criminal prosecution due to the information revealed in these hearings.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.americanbar.org/groups/law_national_security/nslt/"><strong>﻿<em>National Security Law Today Podcast </em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://january6th.house.gov/"><strong><em>January 6th Hearings </em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2275</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f3483864-f32c-11ec-bcd0-8f2084383665]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1439445343.mp3?updated=1667321073" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish: The Business of Law</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/06/the-life-of-a-lawyer-start-to-finish-the-business-of-law</link>
      <description>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed Reprogramming a Lawyer’s Brain. In this episode, we move on to the next logical step: The Business of Law. 
Host Craig Williams is joined by attorney and law firm management consultant, and host of The Un-Billable Hour, Christopher T. Anderson from AndersonDodson, P.C..
Craig and Christopher discuss what goes into setting up a law firm, building a client base and positioning yourself to become a partner with a successful book of business, and ultimately how to become successful in the practice of law or however you’ve chosen to use your law degree.
Mentioned in this Episode:
The Un-Billable Hour 
Join the Un-Billable Hour's Community Round Table with Christopher
Profit First: Transform Your Business from a Cash-Eating Monster to a Money-Making Machine By Mike Michalowicz
Who: The A Method for Hiring by Geoff Smart &amp; Randy Street
 </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>587</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed Reprogramming a Lawyer’s Brain. In this episode, we move on to the next logical step: The Business of Law. 
Host Craig Williams is joined by attorney and law firm management consultant, and host of The Un-Billable Hour, Christopher T. Anderson from AndersonDodson, P.C..
Craig and Christopher discuss what goes into setting up a law firm, building a client base and positioning yourself to become a partner with a successful book of business, and ultimately how to become successful in the practice of law or however you’ve chosen to use your law degree.
Mentioned in this Episode:
The Un-Billable Hour 
Join the Un-Billable Hour's Community Round Table with Christopher
Profit First: Transform Your Business from a Cash-Eating Monster to a Money-Making Machine By Mike Michalowicz
Who: The A Method for Hiring by Geoff Smart &amp; Randy Street
 </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On the last episode of our <strong><em>The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish</em></strong> series, we discussed <strong><em>Reprogramming a Lawyer’s Brain</em></strong>. In this episode, we move on to the next logical step: <strong><em>The Business of Law. </em></strong></p><p>Host Craig Williams is joined by attorney and law firm management consultant, and host of <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-un-billable-hour/id335971413"><em>The Un-Billable Hour</em></a><em>, </em>Christopher T. Anderson from AndersonDodson, P.C..</p><p>Craig and Christopher discuss what goes into setting up a law firm, building a client base and positioning yourself to become a partner with a successful book of business, and ultimately how to become successful in the practice of law or however you’ve chosen to use your law degree.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/un-billable-hour/"><strong><em>The Un-Billable Hour </em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://www.eventbrite.com/e/un-billable-hour-community-round-table-ask-me-anything-tickets-362687567277?aff=ebdssbonlinesearch"><strong><em>Join the Un-Billable Hour's Community Round Table with Christopher</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Profit-First-Transform-Cash-Eating-Money-Making/dp/073521414X/ref=asc_df_073521414X/?tag=hyprod-20&amp;linkCode=df0&amp;hvadid=312006100296&amp;hvpos=&amp;hvnetw=g&amp;hvrand=13724359379302532008&amp;hvpone=&amp;hvptwo=&amp;hvqmt=&amp;hvdev=c&amp;hvdvcmdl=&amp;hvlocint=&amp;hvlocphy=9002019&amp;hvtargid=pla-298926601855&amp;psc=1"><strong><em>Profit First: Transform Your Business from a Cash-Eating Monster to a Money-Making Machine By Mike Michalowicz</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Who-Method-Hiring-Geoff-Smart-ebook/dp/B001EL6RWY/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1J4DJ3KHFITFO&amp;keywords=who+randy+street&amp;qid=1654788722&amp;s=digital-text&amp;sprefix=who+randy+street%2Cdigital-text%2C64&amp;sr=1-1"><strong><em>Who: The A Method for Hiring by Geoff Smart &amp; Randy Street</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/un-billable-hour/"><strong><em> </em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2083</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6b8430e8-e82a-11ec-8ea8-a72cd4b00bb8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6120126285.mp3?updated=1667321043" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Revisiting Roberts’ Rocky Road</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/05/revisiting-roberts-rocky-road/</link>
      <description>In light of recent developments at the U.S. Supreme Court, we’ve decided to offer a revisit to a classic episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer— in fact, the very first episode of this show. Nearly 17 years ago, when this show began, many things were different. For one, this show wasn’t even called Lawyer 2 Lawyer; it was Coast to Coast.
Our first episode, entitled Roberts’ Rocky Road, discussed the nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court of John Roberts, then a DC Circuit Appeals Court Judge, now Chief Justice. Even then as now, a great deal of attention was focused on the possible overturning of Roe v. Wade. But as we approach that likely reality with the Dobbs case, and as we see more and more attention focused on both the legitimacy of the Supreme Court and the role of its Chief Justice, we here at Lawyer 2 Lawyer want to re-share this conversation from our archives to provide you a glimpse into the talking points surrounding his nomination in 2005. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2022 11:01:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>586</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In light of recent developments at the U.S. Supreme Court, we’ve decided to offer a revisit to a classic episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer— in fact, the very first episode of this show. Nearly 17 years ago, when this show began, many things were different. For one, this show wasn’t even called Lawyer 2 Lawyer; it was Coast to Coast.
Our first episode, entitled Roberts’ Rocky Road, discussed the nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court of John Roberts, then a DC Circuit Appeals Court Judge, now Chief Justice. Even then as now, a great deal of attention was focused on the possible overturning of Roe v. Wade. But as we approach that likely reality with the Dobbs case, and as we see more and more attention focused on both the legitimacy of the Supreme Court and the role of its Chief Justice, we here at Lawyer 2 Lawyer want to re-share this conversation from our archives to provide you a glimpse into the talking points surrounding his nomination in 2005. </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In light of recent developments at the U.S. Supreme Court, we’ve decided to offer a revisit to a classic episode of <em>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>— in fact, the very first episode of this show. Nearly 17 years ago, when this show began, many things were different. For one, this show wasn’t even called <em>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em><strong>;</strong> it was <em>Coast to Coast.</em></p><p>Our first episode, entitled <em>Roberts’ Rocky Road</em>, discussed the nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court of John Roberts, then a DC Circuit Appeals Court Judge, now Chief Justice. Even then as now, a great deal of attention was focused on the possible overturning of <em>Roe v. Wade</em>. But as we approach that likely reality with the <em>Dobbs</em> case, and as we see more and more attention focused on both the legitimacy of the Supreme Court and the role of its Chief Justice, we here at<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em> want to re-share this conversation from our archives to provide you a glimpse into the talking points surrounding his nomination in 2005. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1760</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6ce7cea0-dd1b-11ec-8ff7-7f28599e1fd7]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6591378656.mp3?updated=1654727761" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOTUS &amp; the Future of Roe v. Wade</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/05/scotus-the-future-of-roe-v-wade/</link>
      <description>It has been nearly fifty years since the US Supreme Court's ruling in Roe v. Wade established that the Constitution protects a woman's liberty to choose to have an abortion. But in the last two weeks, the issue has once again become the center of nationwide controversy as a leaked draft opinion in the matter of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization indicates the Court is prepared to overturn Roe.
While questions remain as to how closely the final ruling will track the draft opinion, the public has wasted no time in expressing its anger, with those advocating for abortion staging protests and demonstrations, and those advocating against taking issue with the leak itself.
On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by professor Cary Franklin, Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law, to discuss this recent leak of a draft Supreme Court opinion that would overturn abortion rights, the constitutional right to abortion, the role of stare decisis, and the impact this will have if Roe v. Wade is overruled.

Special thanks to our sponsors, Posh Virtual Receptionists and Embroker.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 16:25:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>585</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It has been nearly fifty years since the US Supreme Court's ruling in Roe v. Wade established that the Constitution protects a woman's liberty to choose to have an abortion. But in the last two weeks, the issue has once again become the center of nationwide controversy as a leaked draft opinion in the matter of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization indicates the Court is prepared to overturn Roe.
While questions remain as to how closely the final ruling will track the draft opinion, the public has wasted no time in expressing its anger, with those advocating for abortion staging protests and demonstrations, and those advocating against taking issue with the leak itself.
On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by professor Cary Franklin, Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law, to discuss this recent leak of a draft Supreme Court opinion that would overturn abortion rights, the constitutional right to abortion, the role of stare decisis, and the impact this will have if Roe v. Wade is overruled.

Special thanks to our sponsors, Posh Virtual Receptionists and Embroker.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>It has been nearly fifty years since the US Supreme Court's ruling in <em>Roe v. Wade </em>established that the Constitution protects a woman's liberty to choose to have an abortion. But in the last two weeks, the issue has once again become the center of nationwide controversy as a leaked draft opinion in the matter of<em> Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization </em>indicates the Court is prepared to overturn Roe.</p><p>While questions remain as to how closely the final ruling will track the draft opinion, the public has wasted no time in expressing its anger, with those advocating for abortion staging protests and demonstrations, and those advocating against taking issue with the leak itself.</p><p>On this episode of <em>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, host Craig Williams is joined by professor Cary Franklin, Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law, to discuss this recent leak of a draft Supreme Court opinion that would overturn abortion rights, the constitutional right to abortion, the role of stare decisis, and the impact this will have if <em>Roe v. Wade</em> is overruled.</p><p><br></p><p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <a href="https://posh.com/?utm_source=LTN&amp;utm_campaign=2022&amp;utm_medium=Podcast&amp;utm_content=Legal">Posh Virtual Receptionists</a> and <a href="https://www.embroker.com/law/">Embroker</a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2193</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[300c427e-d2d8-11ec-ab8d-7b18d4af7468]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8183367319.mp3?updated=1654727635" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish: Reprogramming a Lawyer's Brain</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/04/the-life-of-a-lawyer-start-to-finish-reprogramming-a-lawyers-brain</link>
      <description>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed How to Find a Job After Law School. In this episode, we move on to the next logical step: Reprogramming a Lawyer's Brain.
Host Craig Williams is joined by Debra S. Austin, JD, PhD, Professor of the Practice of Law at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law. Craig and Debra discuss the impact law school and a heavy law practice have on a lawyer, how to manage the everyday stresses of the legal profession, and how to ultimately improve overall well-being. 
Special thanks to our sponsors, Posh Virtual Receptionists and Embroker.
 </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>584</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dr. Debra Austin discusses the impact law school and a heavy law practice have on a lawyer, how to manage the everyday stresses of the legal profession, and how to ultimately improve overall well-being.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed How to Find a Job After Law School. In this episode, we move on to the next logical step: Reprogramming a Lawyer's Brain.
Host Craig Williams is joined by Debra S. Austin, JD, PhD, Professor of the Practice of Law at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law. Craig and Debra discuss the impact law school and a heavy law practice have on a lawyer, how to manage the everyday stresses of the legal profession, and how to ultimately improve overall well-being. 
Special thanks to our sponsors, Posh Virtual Receptionists and Embroker.
 </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On the last episode of our <strong><em>The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish</em></strong> series, we discussed <strong><em>How to Find a Job After Law School</em></strong>. In this episode, we move on to the next logical step: <strong><em>Reprogramming a Lawyer's Brain.</em></strong></p><p>Host Craig Williams is joined by Debra S. Austin, JD, PhD, Professor of the Practice of Law at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law. Craig and Debra discuss the impact law school and a heavy law practice have on a lawyer, how to manage the everyday stresses of the legal profession, and how to ultimately improve overall well-being. </p><p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <a href="https://posh.com/?utm_source=LTN&amp;utm_campaign=2022&amp;utm_medium=Podcast&amp;utm_content=Legal">Posh Virtual Receptionists</a> and <a href="https://www.embroker.com/law/">Embroker</a>.</p><p> </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2169</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ca8b6106-c737-11ec-b497-3b1aeb4d64c2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1120252081.mp3?updated=1654727578" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>War Crimes</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/04/war-crimes/</link>
      <description>A war crime is defined as a violation of the laws or customs of war as established by international customary law and treaties. 
On February 24, 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine, pushing for control in the east and south of Ukraine. Days later, on February 28th, Karim Khan,the International Criminal Court's chief prosecutor, said he had opened a war crimes investigation following this invasion. And on April 4th, President Biden called for “ the prosecution of Russian President Vladimir Putin for war crimes over the discovery in Bucha, Ukraine, of mass graves and bodies of bound civilians shot at close range.” 
On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by professor Jonathan Hafetz from Seton Hall Law, to discuss the Russia/Ukraine war, what constitutes a war crime, and the potential war crime charges against Putin and his associates.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Posh Virtual Receptionists.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:40:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>583</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Jonathan Hafetz discusses the Russia/Ukraine war,  what constitutes a war crime, and the potential war crime charges against Putin and his associates.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A war crime is defined as a violation of the laws or customs of war as established by international customary law and treaties. 
On February 24, 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine, pushing for control in the east and south of Ukraine. Days later, on February 28th, Karim Khan,the International Criminal Court's chief prosecutor, said he had opened a war crimes investigation following this invasion. And on April 4th, President Biden called for “ the prosecution of Russian President Vladimir Putin for war crimes over the discovery in Bucha, Ukraine, of mass graves and bodies of bound civilians shot at close range.” 
On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by professor Jonathan Hafetz from Seton Hall Law, to discuss the Russia/Ukraine war, what constitutes a war crime, and the potential war crime charges against Putin and his associates.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Posh Virtual Receptionists.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A war crime is defined as a violation of the laws or customs of war as established by international customary law and treaties. </p><p>On February 24, 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine, pushing for control in the east and south of Ukraine. Days later, on February 28th, Karim Khan,the International Criminal Court's chief prosecutor, said he had opened a war crimes investigation following this invasion. And on April 4th, President Biden called for “ the prosecution of Russian President Vladimir Putin for war crimes over the discovery in Bucha, Ukraine, of mass graves and bodies of bound civilians shot at close range.” </p><p>On this episode of <em>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, host Craig Williams is joined by professor Jonathan Hafetz from Seton Hall Law, to discuss the Russia/Ukraine war, what constitutes a war crime, and the potential war crime charges against Putin and his associates.</p><p><br></p><p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <a href="https://posh.com/?utm_source=LTN&amp;utm_campaign=2022&amp;utm_medium=Podcast&amp;utm_content=Legal">Posh Virtual Receptionists</a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2042</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0104abec-bcda-11ec-8a1a-531f92c5b892]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1440374430.mp3?updated=1654727543" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish: How to Find a Job After Law School</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/04/the-life-of-a-lawyer-start-to-finish-how-to-find-a-job-after-law-school</link>
      <description>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed How to Succeed in Law School. In this episode, we move on to the next logical step: How to Find a Job After Law School.
We’re pleased to be joined by someone who wrote the playbook on how to do just that! Host Craig Williams is joined by trial attorney Rachel Gezerseh, author of The Law Career Playbook: The Guerrilla Guide to Getting a Legal Job You Actually Like, which is the leading networking guide for law students and new lawyers.
Special thanks to our sponsor, Posh Virtual Receptionists.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>582</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Attorney Rachel Gezerseh discusses her book, the strategy for finding a job, how to stand out from the rest, and ensuring the path you pick is the right path for you.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On the last episode of our The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish series, we discussed How to Succeed in Law School. In this episode, we move on to the next logical step: How to Find a Job After Law School.
We’re pleased to be joined by someone who wrote the playbook on how to do just that! Host Craig Williams is joined by trial attorney Rachel Gezerseh, author of The Law Career Playbook: The Guerrilla Guide to Getting a Legal Job You Actually Like, which is the leading networking guide for law students and new lawyers.
Special thanks to our sponsor, Posh Virtual Receptionists.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On the last episode of our <strong><em>The Life of a Lawyer Start to Finish</em></strong> series, we discussed <em>How to Succeed in Law School</em>. In this episode, we move on to the next logical step: <strong><em>How to Find a Job After Law School.</em></strong></p><p>We’re pleased to be joined by someone who wrote the playbook on how to do just that! Host Craig Williams is joined by trial attorney Rachel Gezerseh, author of <strong><em>The Law Career Playbook: The Guerrilla Guide to Getting a Legal Job You Actually Like,</em></strong> which is the leading networking guide for law students and new lawyers.</p><p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <a href="https://posh.com/?utm_source=LTN&amp;utm_campaign=2022&amp;utm_medium=Podcast&amp;utm_content=Legal">Posh Virtual Receptionists</a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2078</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7b080310-b160-11ec-b17f-136f4bbd942c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4222187111.mp3?updated=1654727452" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The CIA and the Life of a Covert Warrior</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/03/the-cia-and-the-life-of-a-covert-warrior</link>
      <description>The Central Intelligence Agency, better known as the CIA, is the principal foreign intelligence and counterintelligence agency of the U.S. government. The CIA's primary job is collecting and analyzing foreign intelligence and conducting covert action, and U.S. policymakers, including the President of the United States, make policy decisions based on the information provided by the CIA.
On this very special episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Ric Prado, a decorated hero and CIA shadow warrior, who spent years fighting to protect the nation and home that welcomed him as a child from a communist repression. Craig and Ric discuss Ric’s book, BLACK Ops: The Life of a CIA Shadow Warrior, what the CIA does, how our laws as a country apply, and how they apply in foreign situations.
Special thanks to our sponsor, Posh Virtual Receptionists.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>581</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Ric Prado discusses the role of the CIA, his work as covert warrior, how our laws as a country apply, and how they apply in foreign situations.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Central Intelligence Agency, better known as the CIA, is the principal foreign intelligence and counterintelligence agency of the U.S. government. The CIA's primary job is collecting and analyzing foreign intelligence and conducting covert action, and U.S. policymakers, including the President of the United States, make policy decisions based on the information provided by the CIA.
On this very special episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Ric Prado, a decorated hero and CIA shadow warrior, who spent years fighting to protect the nation and home that welcomed him as a child from a communist repression. Craig and Ric discuss Ric’s book, BLACK Ops: The Life of a CIA Shadow Warrior, what the CIA does, how our laws as a country apply, and how they apply in foreign situations.
Special thanks to our sponsor, Posh Virtual Receptionists.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The Central Intelligence Agency, better known as the CIA, is the principal foreign intelligence and counterintelligence agency of the U.S. government. The CIA's primary job is collecting and analyzing foreign intelligence and conducting covert action, and U.S. policymakers, including the President of the United States, make policy decisions based on the information provided by the CIA.</p><p>On this very special episode of <em>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, host Craig Williams is joined by Ric Prado, a decorated hero and CIA shadow warrior, who spent years fighting to protect the nation and home that welcomed him as a child from a communist repression. Craig and Ric discuss Ric’s book, <em>BLACK Ops: The Life of a CIA Shadow Warrior</em>, what the CIA does, how our laws as a country apply, and how they apply in foreign situations.</p><p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <a href="https://posh.com/?utm_source=LTN&amp;utm_campaign=2022&amp;utm_medium=Podcast&amp;utm_content=Legal">Posh Virtual Receptionists</a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2134</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[63c9569c-a65f-11ec-a889-47bea43cb452]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2566346356.mp3?updated=1654727427" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish: How to Succeed in Law School</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/03/the-life-of-a-lawyer-start-to-finish-how-to-succeed-in-law-school</link>
      <description>As you may recall, we’re running a new series we call The Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish, where we explore the experience of becoming and being an attorney, from applying to law schools through retirement and everything in between. On our last episode in this series, we discussed How to Get Into Law School with the Deans of Admissions from both Harvard &amp; Yale Law.
In this episode, we move on to the next step and discuss “How to Succeed in Law School”, and we’re pleased to be joined by someone who wrote the book on how to do just that! Host Craig Williams is joined by attorney Isaac Mamaysky, author of Letter to a One L Friend: A Little Guide to Seeing the Big Picture and Succeeding in Law School, which helps students navigate the challenges of law school.
 
Special thanks to our sponsor, Posh Virtual Receptionists.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 20:50:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>580</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Attorney Issac Mamaysky discusses his book, how to navigate the challenges of law school, and what it takes to rise above.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As you may recall, we’re running a new series we call The Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish, where we explore the experience of becoming and being an attorney, from applying to law schools through retirement and everything in between. On our last episode in this series, we discussed How to Get Into Law School with the Deans of Admissions from both Harvard &amp; Yale Law.
In this episode, we move on to the next step and discuss “How to Succeed in Law School”, and we’re pleased to be joined by someone who wrote the book on how to do just that! Host Craig Williams is joined by attorney Isaac Mamaysky, author of Letter to a One L Friend: A Little Guide to Seeing the Big Picture and Succeeding in Law School, which helps students navigate the challenges of law school.
 
Special thanks to our sponsor, Posh Virtual Receptionists.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>As you may recall, we’re running a new series we call <strong><em>The Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish</em></strong>, where we explore the experience of becoming and being an attorney, from applying to law schools through retirement and everything in between. On our last episode in this series, we discussed <a href="https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/02/the-life-of-a-lawyer-start-to-finish-how-to-get-into-law-school/"><em>How to Get Into Law School</em></a> with the Deans of Admissions from both Harvard &amp; Yale Law.</p><p>In this episode, we move on to the next step and discuss “<strong><em>How to Succeed in Law School”</em></strong>, and we’re pleased to be joined by someone who wrote the book on how to do just that! Host Craig Williams is joined by attorney Isaac Mamaysky, author of <strong><em>Letter to a One L Friend: A Little Guide to Seeing the Big Picture and Succeeding in Law School</em></strong>, which helps students navigate the challenges of law school.</p><p> </p><p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <a href="https://posh.com/?utm_source=LTN&amp;utm_campaign=2022&amp;utm_medium=Podcast&amp;utm_content=Legal">Posh Virtual Receptionists</a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2440</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f74c6666-9bec-11ec-bff1-571ede871676]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3471551735.mp3?updated=1654727397" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Affirmative Action in Higher Education</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/02/affirmative-action-in-higher-education</link>
      <description>Affirmative action has found its way to the Supreme Court. Last month, SCOTUS agreed to hear two cases brought by the Students for Fair Admissions: Students for Fair Admissions v. President &amp; Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina. These cases were reviewed by SCOTUS and because of their similarities, consolidated.
So what could these cases mean for the future of affirmative action? Host Craig Williams is joined by Rachel F. Moran, a Distinguished Professor of Law at UCI Law, to spotlight affirmative action in higher education. Craig and Rachel discuss the history and origins, the two cases set to go before SCOTUS, and the impact these SCOTUS' decisions could have on college admissions and affirmative action.
Special thanks to our sponsor, Posh Virtual Receptionists.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>579</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Professor Rachel F. Moran discusses affirmative action in higher education, the two cases set to go before SCOTUS, and the impact these decisions could have on college admissions and affirmative action.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Affirmative action has found its way to the Supreme Court. Last month, SCOTUS agreed to hear two cases brought by the Students for Fair Admissions: Students for Fair Admissions v. President &amp; Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina. These cases were reviewed by SCOTUS and because of their similarities, consolidated.
So what could these cases mean for the future of affirmative action? Host Craig Williams is joined by Rachel F. Moran, a Distinguished Professor of Law at UCI Law, to spotlight affirmative action in higher education. Craig and Rachel discuss the history and origins, the two cases set to go before SCOTUS, and the impact these SCOTUS' decisions could have on college admissions and affirmative action.
Special thanks to our sponsor, Posh Virtual Receptionists.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Affirmative action has found its way to the Supreme Court. Last month, SCOTUS agreed to hear two cases brought by the Students for Fair Admissions: <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-1199.html">Students for Fair Admissions v. President &amp; Fellows of Harvard College</a> and <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-university-of-north-carolina/">Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina</a>. These cases were reviewed by SCOTUS and because of their similarities, consolidated.</p><p>So what could these cases mean for the future of affirmative action? Host Craig Williams is joined by Rachel F. Moran, a Distinguished Professor of Law at UCI Law, to spotlight affirmative action in higher education. Craig and Rachel discuss the history and origins, the two cases set to go before SCOTUS, and the impact these SCOTUS' decisions could have on college admissions and affirmative action.</p><p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <a href="https://posh.com/?utm_source=LTN&amp;utm_campaign=2022&amp;utm_medium=Podcast&amp;utm_content=Legal">Posh Virtual Receptionists</a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1962</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[35f2c346-9063-11ec-9474-879000776b5d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8456357209.mp3?updated=1654727330" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish: How to Get into Law School</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/02/the-life-of-a-lawyer-start-to-finish-how-to-get-into-law-school</link>
      <description>As part of a new feature on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we are releasing something a little different. While we will be maintaining our regular practice of providing you high-quality commentary on the biggest subjects in the law today, every other episode for the next few months, we’ll be running a series we call “The Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish”. This series will explore the experience of becoming and being an attorney, from applying to law schools through retirement and everything in between. We’re excited to use this series to offer some great advice for lawyers at all stages of their careers.
In our first episode, we will start, logically enough, with “How to Get into Law School.”  Host Craig Williams is joined by Miriam Ingber, Associate Dean of Admissions &amp; Financial Aid at Yale Law School, and Kristi Jobson, Assistant Dean for Admissions and Chief Admissions Officer at Harvard Law School, to cover their popular podcast for future law students, Navigating Law School Admissions, the admissions process, standing out in the crowd, and preparing for your first year.
Special thanks to our sponsor, Posh Virtual Receptionists.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>578</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Miriam Ingber and Kristi Jobson discuss their widely popular podcast for future law students, the admissions process, standing out in the crowd, and preparing for your first year.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As part of a new feature on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we are releasing something a little different. While we will be maintaining our regular practice of providing you high-quality commentary on the biggest subjects in the law today, every other episode for the next few months, we’ll be running a series we call “The Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish”. This series will explore the experience of becoming and being an attorney, from applying to law schools through retirement and everything in between. We’re excited to use this series to offer some great advice for lawyers at all stages of their careers.
In our first episode, we will start, logically enough, with “How to Get into Law School.”  Host Craig Williams is joined by Miriam Ingber, Associate Dean of Admissions &amp; Financial Aid at Yale Law School, and Kristi Jobson, Assistant Dean for Admissions and Chief Admissions Officer at Harvard Law School, to cover their popular podcast for future law students, Navigating Law School Admissions, the admissions process, standing out in the crowd, and preparing for your first year.
Special thanks to our sponsor, Posh Virtual Receptionists.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>As part of a new feature on<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, we are releasing something a little different. While we will be maintaining our regular practice of providing you high-quality commentary on the biggest subjects in the law today, every other episode for the next few months, we’ll be running a series we call <em>“The Life of a Lawyer, Start to Finish”.</em> This series will explore the experience of becoming and being an attorney, from applying to law schools through retirement and everything in between. We’re excited to use this series to offer some great advice for lawyers at all stages of their careers.</p><p>In our first episode, we will start, logically enough, with<em> “How to Get into Law School.” </em> Host Craig Williams is joined by Miriam Ingber, Associate Dean of Admissions &amp; Financial Aid at Yale Law School, and Kristi Jobson, Assistant Dean for Admissions and Chief Admissions Officer at Harvard Law School, to cover their popular podcast for future law students, <em>Navigating Law School Admissions,</em> the admissions process, standing out in the crowd, and preparing for your first year.</p><p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <a href="https://posh.com/?utm_source=LTN&amp;utm_campaign=2022&amp;utm_medium=Podcast&amp;utm_content=Legal">Posh Virtual Receptionists</a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2437</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[32e8e24a-8544-11ec-ac74-fb86843101ac]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5202637961.mp3?updated=1654727292" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Filibuster: MLK, Voting Rights, and Constitutionality</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/01/the-filibuster-mlk-voting-rights-and-constitutionality</link>
      <description>It’s no coincidence that this week, as we honored the legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr., the Democrats had hoped to make progress on passing the Freedom to Vote Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. However, the Democrats’ efforts have been stymied by a Republican filibuster, resulting in a strategic shift from voting rights legislation to filibuster rule reform. Yet, with the rule change on the table, the Democrats failed to even secure sufficient party support, let alone the additional Republican support necessary to pass the change.
So why is there so much controversy over the filibuster? How is it impacting legislation? And is reform the answer? On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by professor Michael J. Gerhardt, from UNC School of Law, as we spotlight the past, present, and possible future of the filibuster, and its impact on voting rights legislation.
 </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2022 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>577</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Michael Gerhardt discusses the past, present, and possible future of the filibuster, and its impact on voting rights legislation.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It’s no coincidence that this week, as we honored the legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr., the Democrats had hoped to make progress on passing the Freedom to Vote Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. However, the Democrats’ efforts have been stymied by a Republican filibuster, resulting in a strategic shift from voting rights legislation to filibuster rule reform. Yet, with the rule change on the table, the Democrats failed to even secure sufficient party support, let alone the additional Republican support necessary to pass the change.
So why is there so much controversy over the filibuster? How is it impacting legislation? And is reform the answer? On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by professor Michael J. Gerhardt, from UNC School of Law, as we spotlight the past, present, and possible future of the filibuster, and its impact on voting rights legislation.
 </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>It’s no coincidence that this week, as we honored the legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr., the Democrats had hoped to make progress on passing the Freedom to Vote Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. However, the Democrats’ efforts have been stymied by a Republican filibuster, resulting in a strategic shift from voting rights legislation to filibuster rule reform. Yet, with the rule change on the table, the Democrats failed to even secure sufficient party support, let alone the additional Republican support necessary to pass the change.</p><p>So why is there so much controversy over the filibuster? How is it impacting legislation? And is reform the answer? On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by professor Michael J. Gerhardt, from UNC School of Law, as we spotlight the past, present, and possible future of the filibuster, and its impact on voting rights legislation.</p><p> </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1564</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f09622bc-7a27-11ec-9d43-5fdd127b5069]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4283198349.mp3?updated=1642707550" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>January 6th: One Year Later</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2022/01/january-6th-one-year-later/</link>
      <description>A year has passed since Pro-Trump protestors attacked the U.S. Capitol on January 6th, 2o21. So, one year later, what has resulted from that dark day in 2021? And what progress have we made? 
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Gregory P. Magarian, professor of law at Washington University School of Law in St. Louis, to reflect on the January 6th Capitol insurrection. Craig and Greg will take a look at the investigation by the January 6th committee, the impact of the insurrection, the people involved, and where we go from here.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 16:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>576</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Greg Magarian takes a look back at the January 6th Capitol insurrection, First Amendment issues surrounding that day, and the investigation by the January 6th committee.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A year has passed since Pro-Trump protestors attacked the U.S. Capitol on January 6th, 2o21. So, one year later, what has resulted from that dark day in 2021? And what progress have we made? 
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Gregory P. Magarian, professor of law at Washington University School of Law in St. Louis, to reflect on the January 6th Capitol insurrection. Craig and Greg will take a look at the investigation by the January 6th committee, the impact of the insurrection, the people involved, and where we go from here.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A year has passed since Pro-Trump protestors attacked the U.S. Capitol on January 6th, 2o21. So, one year later, what has resulted from that dark day in 2021? And what progress have we made? </p><p>On<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, host Craig Williams is joined by Gregory P. Magarian, professor of law at Washington University School of Law in St. Louis, to reflect on the January 6th Capitol insurrection. Craig and Greg will take a look at the investigation by the January 6th committee, the impact of the insurrection, the people involved, and where we go from here.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1971</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2d86785e-6fd6-11ec-8d84-27a085c77dcb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8673176967.mp3?updated=1641572922" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Divorce &amp; the Holidays</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/12/divorce-the-holidays/</link>
      <description>The holidays can be tough for so many, and after a divorce or separation, it can be very hard on children. So how can divorcing or divorced couples better manage the holiday season? 
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by attorney Kelly Chang Rickert to discuss divorce and the holidays. They take a look at co-parenting, putting children first, and how to make your child’s holiday the best one yet.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2021 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>575</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Kelly Chang Rickert talks about divorce and the holidays, co-parenting, putting children first, and how to make your child’s holiday the best one yet.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The holidays can be tough for so many, and after a divorce or separation, it can be very hard on children. So how can divorcing or divorced couples better manage the holiday season? 
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by attorney Kelly Chang Rickert to discuss divorce and the holidays. They take a look at co-parenting, putting children first, and how to make your child’s holiday the best one yet.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The holidays can be tough for so many, and after a divorce or separation, it can be very hard on children. So how can divorcing or divorced couples better manage the holiday season? </p><p>On<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, host Craig Williams is joined by attorney Kelly Chang Rickert to discuss divorce and the holidays. They take a look at co-parenting, putting children first, and how to make your child’s holiday the best one yet.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1610</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6210277e-5f4a-11ec-922f-9348bb32c5d1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8660910837.mp3?updated=1639753662" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Judicial Ethics, Misconduct, and Reform</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/12/judicial-ethics-misconduct-and-reform</link>
      <description>In many recent high profile cases, the courtroom conduct of judges has been in the spotlight. In 2020, Reuters journalists Michael Berens and John Shiffman did an investigative series on judicial misconduct titled The Teflon Robe. In this series, Berens and Shiffman reviewed 1,509 cases from 2008 through 2019 in which judges resigned, retired or were publicly disciplined following accusations of misconduct.
In Tennessee, juvenile court Judge Donna Scott Davenport has come under fire after a ProPublica and Nashville Public Radio investigation revealed that she allegedly oversaw a juvenile justice system which disproportionately and illegally jailed Black children for the crime of “criminal responsibility,” a crime that doesn't exist. Judge Donna Scott Davenport remains on the bench. 
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Dean James J. Alfini, professor of law from South Texas College of Law Houston to discuss the ethical guidelines judges need to abide by, what should happen to these judges if these guidelines are violated, and whether there should be some type of reform to prevent future misconduct. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>574</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dean James J. Alfini talks about the ethical guidelines judges need to abide by, judicial misconduct, and whether past incidents of misconduct necessitate reform.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In many recent high profile cases, the courtroom conduct of judges has been in the spotlight. In 2020, Reuters journalists Michael Berens and John Shiffman did an investigative series on judicial misconduct titled The Teflon Robe. In this series, Berens and Shiffman reviewed 1,509 cases from 2008 through 2019 in which judges resigned, retired or were publicly disciplined following accusations of misconduct.
In Tennessee, juvenile court Judge Donna Scott Davenport has come under fire after a ProPublica and Nashville Public Radio investigation revealed that she allegedly oversaw a juvenile justice system which disproportionately and illegally jailed Black children for the crime of “criminal responsibility,” a crime that doesn't exist. Judge Donna Scott Davenport remains on the bench. 
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Dean James J. Alfini, professor of law from South Texas College of Law Houston to discuss the ethical guidelines judges need to abide by, what should happen to these judges if these guidelines are violated, and whether there should be some type of reform to prevent future misconduct. </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In many recent high profile cases, the courtroom conduct of judges has been in the spotlight. In 2020, Reuters journalists Michael Berens and John Shiffman did an investigative series on judicial misconduct titled <strong><em>The Teflon Robe</em></strong>. In this series, Berens and Shiffman reviewed 1,509 cases from 2008 through 2019 in which judges resigned, retired or were publicly disciplined following accusations of misconduct.</p><p>In Tennessee, juvenile court Judge Donna Scott Davenport has come under fire after a ProPublica and Nashville Public Radio investigation revealed that she allegedly oversaw a juvenile justice system which disproportionately and illegally jailed Black children for the crime of “criminal responsibility,” a crime that doesn't exist. Judge Donna Scott Davenport remains on the bench. </p><p>On<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, host Craig Williams is joined by Dean James J. Alfini, professor of law from South Texas College of Law Houston to discuss the ethical guidelines judges need to abide by, what should happen to these judges if these guidelines are violated, and whether there should be some type of reform to prevent future misconduct. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2032</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9f07726a-5935-11ec-b776-c7f7371e458c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1862270908.mp3?updated=1639085038" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanksgiving: Vaccines, Family, &amp; Conflict Resolution</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/11/thanksgiving-vaccines-family-conflict-resolution</link>
      <description>Has the topic of vaccines become the new “no talk of politics, sex, or religion at the dinner table?” As we approach the Thanksgiving holiday, the topic of who is or is not vaccinated is sure to come up ahead of the big day. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 58.5% of the United States is currently fully vaccinated against Covid-19. So, if you’re faced with a conflict with your family and friends this holiday season, how do you avoid a squabble of epic proportions?
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by psychologist and therapist Dr. Roseann Capanna-Hodge to discuss hosting Thanksgiving and how to peacefully broach the controversial topic of vaccines with your family members. Craig and Dr. Roseann take a look at the reality of COVID during the holidays, public health, conflict resolution, negotiation, and the best approach to ensure safety at your home.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>573</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dr. Roseann Capanna-Hodge talks about Thanksgiving and how to peacefully broach the controversial topic of vaccines with your family members.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Has the topic of vaccines become the new “no talk of politics, sex, or religion at the dinner table?” As we approach the Thanksgiving holiday, the topic of who is or is not vaccinated is sure to come up ahead of the big day. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 58.5% of the United States is currently fully vaccinated against Covid-19. So, if you’re faced with a conflict with your family and friends this holiday season, how do you avoid a squabble of epic proportions?
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by psychologist and therapist Dr. Roseann Capanna-Hodge to discuss hosting Thanksgiving and how to peacefully broach the controversial topic of vaccines with your family members. Craig and Dr. Roseann take a look at the reality of COVID during the holidays, public health, conflict resolution, negotiation, and the best approach to ensure safety at your home.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Has the topic of vaccines become the new “no talk of politics, sex, or religion at the dinner table?” As we approach the Thanksgiving holiday, the topic of who is or is not vaccinated is sure to come up ahead of the big day. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 58.5% of the United States is currently fully vaccinated against Covid-19. So, if you’re faced with a conflict with your family and friends this holiday season, how do you avoid a squabble of epic proportions?</p><p>On<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, host Craig Williams is joined by psychologist and therapist Dr. Roseann Capanna-Hodge to discuss hosting Thanksgiving and how to peacefully broach the controversial topic of vaccines with your family members. Craig and Dr. Roseann take a look at the reality of COVID during the holidays, public health, conflict resolution, negotiation, and the best approach to ensure safety at your home.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1870</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[80d14ea2-4ce1-11ec-9bd4-9f9bbfd3a6d2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7140118034.mp3?updated=1637729496" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Trial in the Killing of Ahmaud Arbery</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/11/the-trial-in-the-killing-of-ahmaud-arbery</link>
      <description>In Glynn County, Georgia, the trial of three white men charged in the death of Ahmaud Arbery has selected a jury, however the makeup of that jury has raised some controversy. With eleven White members and only one Black member, the prosecution has accused the defense of eliminating qualified Black jurors from serving.
In response to a motion filed by the State, presiding Judge Timothy Walmsley said, “This court has found that there appears to be intentional discrimination.” However, after hearing arguments by the defense, the judge ultimately denied the state’s motion, and gave the greenlight to move forward, ruling that there were in fact valid reasons that went beyond race for why the jurors were dismissed. 
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Christopher Slobogin, director of the Criminal Justice Program at Vanderbilt Law School, as they spotlight the trial in the killing of Ahmaud Arbery. Craig and Chris discuss the racial breakdown of the jury, the "intentional discrimination" in jury selection, the citizen's arrest law, and the potential impact all of this this could have on the case.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 11:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>572</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Professor Christopher Slobogin talks about the trial in the killing of Ahmaud Arbery, the "intentional discrimination" in jury selection, the citizen's arrest law, and the potential impact all of this this could have on the case.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In Glynn County, Georgia, the trial of three white men charged in the death of Ahmaud Arbery has selected a jury, however the makeup of that jury has raised some controversy. With eleven White members and only one Black member, the prosecution has accused the defense of eliminating qualified Black jurors from serving.
In response to a motion filed by the State, presiding Judge Timothy Walmsley said, “This court has found that there appears to be intentional discrimination.” However, after hearing arguments by the defense, the judge ultimately denied the state’s motion, and gave the greenlight to move forward, ruling that there were in fact valid reasons that went beyond race for why the jurors were dismissed. 
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Christopher Slobogin, director of the Criminal Justice Program at Vanderbilt Law School, as they spotlight the trial in the killing of Ahmaud Arbery. Craig and Chris discuss the racial breakdown of the jury, the "intentional discrimination" in jury selection, the citizen's arrest law, and the potential impact all of this this could have on the case.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In Glynn County, Georgia, the trial of three white men charged in the death of Ahmaud Arbery has selected a jury, however the makeup of that jury has raised some controversy. With eleven White members and only one Black member, the prosecution has accused the defense of eliminating qualified Black jurors from serving.</p><p>In response to a motion filed by the State, presiding Judge Timothy Walmsley said, “<em>This court has found that there appears to be intentional discrimination</em>.” However, after hearing arguments by the defense, the judge ultimately denied the state’s motion, and gave the greenlight to move forward, ruling that there were in fact valid reasons that went beyond race for why the jurors were dismissed. </p><p>On<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, host Craig Williams is joined by Christopher Slobogin, director of the Criminal Justice Program at Vanderbilt Law School, as they spotlight the trial in the killing of Ahmaud Arbery. Craig and Chris discuss the racial breakdown of the jury, the "intentional discrimination" in jury selection, the citizen's arrest law, and the potential impact all of this this could have on the case.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1936</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3414075e-4376-11ec-ad3b-6fd5e1ae8b5c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7690415530.mp3?updated=1636693850" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Special Bonus Episode: “Fascinating Stuff, This Pricing” (Can We Talk About It?)</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lunch-hour-legal-marketing/2021/10/fascinating-stuff-this-pricing-can-we-talk-about-it/</link>
      <description>In honor of Conrad Saam's recent appearance on this program, we're sharing an episode of his show Lunch Hour Legal Marketing for you to hear. If you like what you hear, be sure to subscribe for more Conrad and Gyi Tsakalakis.
-----------
Conrad and Gyi take on the elephant in the courtroom. Clio’s Legal Trend Report shows us potential clients are interested in both pricing and payment plans, but as lawyers, we’re reluctant to go there. Why? 
Explore options on how you can better position yourself. Are you less expensive than the competition? More efficient? A better value? Dig into the marketing opportunities that make you special based, in part, on your pricing model. Hey, the other guy is doing it. If it’s something you’ve never considered, it’s probably time you did. 
And in the news (maybe related, just a bit!) we’re seeing a spike in inflation, even if the Fed wants to call it transitory. Look around, everything seems to be going up … except legal fees? Plus, Facebook (and its global apps) go down. In legal tech, what’s up with Smokeball legal matter management? Changes in Google marketing? Let’s talk. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2021 16:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>bonus</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lunch Hour Legal Marketing - Price and payment options are important to potential clients. So why don’t lawyers address this in their marketing?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In honor of Conrad Saam's recent appearance on this program, we're sharing an episode of his show Lunch Hour Legal Marketing for you to hear. If you like what you hear, be sure to subscribe for more Conrad and Gyi Tsakalakis.
-----------
Conrad and Gyi take on the elephant in the courtroom. Clio’s Legal Trend Report shows us potential clients are interested in both pricing and payment plans, but as lawyers, we’re reluctant to go there. Why? 
Explore options on how you can better position yourself. Are you less expensive than the competition? More efficient? A better value? Dig into the marketing opportunities that make you special based, in part, on your pricing model. Hey, the other guy is doing it. If it’s something you’ve never considered, it’s probably time you did. 
And in the news (maybe related, just a bit!) we’re seeing a spike in inflation, even if the Fed wants to call it transitory. Look around, everything seems to be going up … except legal fees? Plus, Facebook (and its global apps) go down. In legal tech, what’s up with Smokeball legal matter management? Changes in Google marketing? Let’s talk. </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In honor of Conrad Saam's recent appearance on this program, we're sharing an episode of his show Lunch Hour Legal Marketing for you to hear. If you like what you hear, be sure to <a href="https://link.chtbl.com/Kg68ryO0?sid=L2L_cr">subscribe</a> for more Conrad and Gyi Tsakalakis.</p><p>-----------</p><p>Conrad and Gyi take on the elephant in the courtroom. Clio’s Legal Trend Report shows us potential clients are interested in both pricing and payment plans, but as lawyers, we’re reluctant to go there. Why? </p><p>Explore options on how you can better position yourself. Are you less expensive than the competition? More efficient? A better value? Dig into the marketing opportunities that make you special based, in part, on your pricing model. Hey, the other guy is doing it. If it’s something you’ve never considered, it’s probably time you did. </p><p>And in the news (maybe related, just a bit!) we’re seeing a spike in inflation, even if the Fed wants to call it transitory. Look around, everything seems to be going up … except legal fees? Plus, Facebook (and its global apps) go down. In legal tech, what’s up with Smokeball legal matter management? Changes in Google marketing? Let’s talk. </p><p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1930</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4df1eb50-3e4e-11ec-8cc4-eb9c5883135a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4677549449.mp3?updated=1636126958" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Award Industry and the Constraints for Legal Marketing</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/10/the-award-industry-and-the-constraints-for-legal-marketing</link>
      <description>Many attorneys have received an offer of an award recognizing them as a distinguished lawyer in your city or state. Perhaps the message, coming as an email or a message on Facebook, offers a custom plaque, an inscribed crystal, and/or an appearance in a publication, and all for the low, low price of the membership fees to the awarding organization. Who would ever pass up such a rare opportunity?
So are we looking at a pay-to-play here? A scam? What is the application process? And should lawyers beware?! On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Conrad Saam, founder of Mockingbird Marketing, to talk about the award industry, the constraints for legal marketing, and what lawyers should do if they receive a solicitation promising an award for a price.
Watch this channel next week for a special bonus Lunch Hour Legal Marketing episode. But there’s no need to wait! Click here to find all the great content from Lunch Hour Legal Marketing.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>571</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Conrad Saam talks about the award industry, the constraints for legal marketing, and the infamous (and apparently distinguished) Zippy the Chicken.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Many attorneys have received an offer of an award recognizing them as a distinguished lawyer in your city or state. Perhaps the message, coming as an email or a message on Facebook, offers a custom plaque, an inscribed crystal, and/or an appearance in a publication, and all for the low, low price of the membership fees to the awarding organization. Who would ever pass up such a rare opportunity?
So are we looking at a pay-to-play here? A scam? What is the application process? And should lawyers beware?! On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Conrad Saam, founder of Mockingbird Marketing, to talk about the award industry, the constraints for legal marketing, and what lawyers should do if they receive a solicitation promising an award for a price.
Watch this channel next week for a special bonus Lunch Hour Legal Marketing episode. But there’s no need to wait! Click here to find all the great content from Lunch Hour Legal Marketing.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Many attorneys have received an offer of an award recognizing them as a distinguished lawyer in your city or state. Perhaps the message, coming as an email or a message on Facebook, offers a custom plaque, an inscribed crystal, and/or an appearance in a publication, and all for the low, low price of the membership fees to the awarding organization. Who would ever pass up such a rare opportunity?</p><p>So are we looking at a pay-to-play here? A scam? What is the application process? And should lawyers beware?! On<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, host Craig Williams is joined by Conrad Saam, founder of Mockingbird Marketing, to talk about the award industry, the constraints for legal marketing, and what lawyers should do if they receive a solicitation promising an award for a price.</p><p>Watch this channel next week for a special bonus Lunch Hour Legal Marketing episode. But there’s no need to wait! Click <a href="https://link.chtbl.com/Kg68ryO0?sid=l2ldesc">here</a> to find all the great content from Lunch Hour Legal Marketing.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1834</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[88178dde-385f-11ec-884c-4f8fc966f164]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2203514216.mp3?updated=1635474650" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Non-Disclosure Agreements: Trump, the Stormy Daniels NDA, and the Future of NDAs</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/10/non-disclosure-agreements-litigation-constitutionality-the-future-of-ndas</link>
      <description>A New York arbitrator recently ruled against former President Trump and his campaign in favor of former White House adviser Omarosa Manigault Newman in a matter regarding the enforceability of an NDA and Omarosa’s tell-all book, Unhinged. According to an article in the Daily Beast, the arbitrator found that the NDA went too far when Omarosa was forced “to never say anything remotely critical of Mr. Trump, his family or his or his family members’ businesses for the rest of her life.”
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Mark Fenster, the Stephen C. O’Connell Chair at the Levin College of Law, to talk about non-disclosure agreements. We will take a look at former President Trump's use of NDAs, this recent ruling, the constitutionality of NDAs, and the future of these types of agreements.
Mentioned in this Episode:
Trump’s Sprawling Use of NDAs Now Threatens to Humiliate Him
Trump NDAs can’t silence ex-White House officials: legal experts
Trump Organization Standard Non-Disclosure Agreement</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:40:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>570</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Professor Mark Fenster talks about non-disclosure agreements. We will take a look at former President Trump's use of NDAs, and the future of these types of agreements.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A New York arbitrator recently ruled against former President Trump and his campaign in favor of former White House adviser Omarosa Manigault Newman in a matter regarding the enforceability of an NDA and Omarosa’s tell-all book, Unhinged. According to an article in the Daily Beast, the arbitrator found that the NDA went too far when Omarosa was forced “to never say anything remotely critical of Mr. Trump, his family or his or his family members’ businesses for the rest of her life.”
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Mark Fenster, the Stephen C. O’Connell Chair at the Levin College of Law, to talk about non-disclosure agreements. We will take a look at former President Trump's use of NDAs, this recent ruling, the constitutionality of NDAs, and the future of these types of agreements.
Mentioned in this Episode:
Trump’s Sprawling Use of NDAs Now Threatens to Humiliate Him
Trump NDAs can’t silence ex-White House officials: legal experts
Trump Organization Standard Non-Disclosure Agreement</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A New York arbitrator recently ruled against former President Trump and his campaign in favor of former White House adviser Omarosa Manigault Newman in a matter regarding the enforceability of an NDA and Omarosa’s tell-all book, <strong><em>Unhinged. </em></strong>According to an article in the<em> Daily Beas</em>t, the arbitrator found that the NDA went too far when Omarosa was forced “to never say anything remotely critical of Mr. Trump, his family or his or his family members’ businesses for the rest of her life.”</p><p>On<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, host Craig Williams is joined by <strong>Mark Fenster</strong>, the Stephen C. O’Connell Chair at the <strong>Levin College of Law, </strong>to talk about non-disclosure agreements. We will take a look at former President Trump's use of NDAs, this recent ruling, the constitutionality of NDAs, and the future of these types of agreements.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in this Episode:</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-trumps-sprawling-use-of-ndas-now-threatens-to-humiliate-him-non-disclosure-agreement-omarosa?source=politics&amp;via=rss"><strong><em>Trump’s Sprawling Use of NDAs Now Threatens to Humiliate Him</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-otc-nda/trump-ndas-cant-silence-ex-white-house-officials-legal-experts-idUSKBN1GV2UT"><strong><em>Trump NDAs can’t silence ex-White House officials: legal experts</em></strong></a></p><p><a href="https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2685&amp;context=historical"><strong><em>Trump Organization Standard Non-Disclosure Agreement</em></strong></a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1822</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e2b60cc2-2dcc-11ec-b260-e708c05044e6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7198194776.mp3?updated=1634322748" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Explosion of Mediation: An Alternative to Trials</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/10/the-explosion-of-mediation-an-alternative-to-trials</link>
      <description>At the beginning of the pandemic, the eruption of COVID cases forced courts across the nation to close their doors. In its place, attorneys, judges and clients opted, where possible, to participate in virtual proceedings through phone calls and video platforms. Over a year later, with a backlog of cases clogging courts, and limited in-person proceedings, attorneys have increasingly turned to the alternate dispute resolution of mediation to resolve their cases.
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by David A. Hoffman, the founding member of Boston Law Collaborative, LLC, as they take a look at the explosion of mediation during the pandemic. Craig and David discuss the push for mediation as an alternative to trials, and what the future holds for jury trials.

Feel audio isn't enough? Check out a video of the conversation here.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 15:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>569</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Mediator David A. Hoffman talks about the explosion of mediation during the pandemic,  the push for mediation as an alternative to trials, and what the future holds for jury trials.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>At the beginning of the pandemic, the eruption of COVID cases forced courts across the nation to close their doors. In its place, attorneys, judges and clients opted, where possible, to participate in virtual proceedings through phone calls and video platforms. Over a year later, with a backlog of cases clogging courts, and limited in-person proceedings, attorneys have increasingly turned to the alternate dispute resolution of mediation to resolve their cases.
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by David A. Hoffman, the founding member of Boston Law Collaborative, LLC, as they take a look at the explosion of mediation during the pandemic. Craig and David discuss the push for mediation as an alternative to trials, and what the future holds for jury trials.

Feel audio isn't enough? Check out a video of the conversation here.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>At the beginning of the pandemic, the eruption of COVID cases forced courts across the nation to close their doors. In its place, attorneys, judges and clients opted, where possible, to participate in virtual proceedings through phone calls and video platforms. Over a year later, with a backlog of cases clogging courts, and limited in-person proceedings, attorneys have increasingly turned to the alternate dispute resolution of mediation to resolve their cases.</p><p>On<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, host Craig Williams is joined by David A. Hoffman, the founding member of Boston Law Collaborative, LLC, as they take a look at the explosion of mediation during the pandemic. Craig and David discuss the push for mediation as an alternative to trials, and what the future holds for jury trials.</p><p><br></p><p>Feel audio isn't enough? Check out a video of the conversation <a href="https://youtu.be/bVKMWFsH6uE">here</a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2015</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ec4f9302-2250-11ec-a058-afd18c18f15f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9353864431.mp3?updated=1633100500" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SB 8, Its Impact, and the Future of Roe v. Wade</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/09/sb-8-its-impact-and-the-future-of-roe-v-wade</link>
      <description>Back in May of this year, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed into law Texas Senate Bill 8, better known as SB 8, one of the most restrictive abortion bills in the nation. SB 8 went into effect on September 1st, 2021, after the US Supreme Court refused to strike it down. Since then, the constitutionality of SB 8 has come into question, and the potential threat to the constitutional rights of women and other persons has taken center stage. 
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Dean Kimberly Mutcherson from Rutgers Law School as they take a look at Texas' abortion law, SB 8. Craig &amp; Dean Mutcherson discuss the impact of the law, the legal, ethical, and bioethical concerns stemming from SB 8, its constitutionality, and what it means for the future of Roe v. Wade.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 17:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>568</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dean Kimberly Mutcherson talks about Texas' abortion law, SB 8, its constitutionality, and what it means for the future of Roe v. Wade.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Back in May of this year, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed into law Texas Senate Bill 8, better known as SB 8, one of the most restrictive abortion bills in the nation. SB 8 went into effect on September 1st, 2021, after the US Supreme Court refused to strike it down. Since then, the constitutionality of SB 8 has come into question, and the potential threat to the constitutional rights of women and other persons has taken center stage. 
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Dean Kimberly Mutcherson from Rutgers Law School as they take a look at Texas' abortion law, SB 8. Craig &amp; Dean Mutcherson discuss the impact of the law, the legal, ethical, and bioethical concerns stemming from SB 8, its constitutionality, and what it means for the future of Roe v. Wade.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Back in May of this year, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed into law Texas Senate Bill 8, better known as SB 8, one of the most restrictive abortion bills in the nation. SB 8 went into effect on September 1st, 2021, after the US Supreme Court refused to strike it down. Since then, the constitutionality of SB 8 has come into question, and the potential threat to the constitutional rights of women and other persons has taken center stage. </p><p>On<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, host Craig Williams is joined by Dean Kimberly Mutcherson from Rutgers Law School as they take a look at Texas' abortion law, SB 8. Craig &amp; Dean Mutcherson discuss the impact of the law, the legal, ethical, and bioethical concerns stemming from SB 8, its constitutionality, and what it means for the future of Roe v. Wade.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2002</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0d85495a-17d8-11ec-9234-87e7248c4781]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5288426124.mp3?updated=1631898025" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Masks in our Schools: Controversy, Litigation &amp; Politics</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/09/masks-in-our-schools-controversy-litigation-politics</link>
      <description>As students across the country return to classrooms, the controversy surrounding masks has reached a fever pitch. In at least 14 states, lawsuits have been filed either for or against masks in schools. This has led to protests, litigation, and even violence. Just this week, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights launched investigations into five states that have banned mask mandates in schools, alleging that the governors are violating the civil rights of students with disabilities.
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by professor Ellen Wright Clayton, JD, MD. Together, they take a look at the mask controversy in schools and communities across the United States. The conversation focuses on mask mandates, public health law, parental freedom, and litigation surrounding these issues.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 10:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>567</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Ellen Wright Clayton talks about the mask controversy in schools and communities across the United States, mask mandates, and litigation surrounding these issues.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As students across the country return to classrooms, the controversy surrounding masks has reached a fever pitch. In at least 14 states, lawsuits have been filed either for or against masks in schools. This has led to protests, litigation, and even violence. Just this week, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights launched investigations into five states that have banned mask mandates in schools, alleging that the governors are violating the civil rights of students with disabilities.
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by professor Ellen Wright Clayton, JD, MD. Together, they take a look at the mask controversy in schools and communities across the United States. The conversation focuses on mask mandates, public health law, parental freedom, and litigation surrounding these issues.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>As students across the country return to classrooms, the controversy surrounding masks has reached a fever pitch. In at least 14 states, lawsuits have been filed either for or against masks in schools. This has led to protests, litigation, and even violence. Just this week, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights launched investigations into five states that have banned mask mandates in schools, alleging that the governors are violating the civil rights of students with disabilities.</p><p>On<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, host Craig Williams is joined by professor Ellen Wright Clayton, JD, MD. Together, they take a look at the mask controversy in schools and communities across the United States. The conversation focuses on mask mandates, public health law, parental freedom, and litigation surrounding these issues.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1646</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3f345c70-0c39-11ec-aeb8-f38421b4bfa6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9614716126.mp3?updated=1630620355" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sexual Harassment &amp; Politics</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/08/sexual-harassment-politics/</link>
      <description>Sexual harassment and inappropriate conduct has become all too familiar of a story in modern day politics. High profile allegations of sexual misconduct have straddled political lines. Just in recent memory, high profile accusations have been leveled at Al Franken, Brett Kavanaugh, Donald Trump, Roy Moore, Joe Biden, and Matt Gaetz. And, most recently, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has announced he will step down effective August 24th after multiple women came forward alleging sexual misconduct and inappropriate behavior by the governor. He has denied all allegations.
So why do these misconduct allegations against high power political figures impact some but not others? And what can we do as a society to eliminate this behavior? On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by professor Rebecca Ortiz, PhD, as they take a look at sexual harassment and the resignation of Governor Cuomo. Craig and Rebecca will discuss sexual harassment in politics, holding perpetrators accountable over these claims, and what is being done to combat sexual misconduct.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 16:55:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>566</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Rebecca Ortiz PhD talks about the sexual harassment in politics and holding perpetrators accountable over these claims.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Sexual harassment and inappropriate conduct has become all too familiar of a story in modern day politics. High profile allegations of sexual misconduct have straddled political lines. Just in recent memory, high profile accusations have been leveled at Al Franken, Brett Kavanaugh, Donald Trump, Roy Moore, Joe Biden, and Matt Gaetz. And, most recently, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has announced he will step down effective August 24th after multiple women came forward alleging sexual misconduct and inappropriate behavior by the governor. He has denied all allegations.
So why do these misconduct allegations against high power political figures impact some but not others? And what can we do as a society to eliminate this behavior? On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by professor Rebecca Ortiz, PhD, as they take a look at sexual harassment and the resignation of Governor Cuomo. Craig and Rebecca will discuss sexual harassment in politics, holding perpetrators accountable over these claims, and what is being done to combat sexual misconduct.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Sexual harassment and inappropriate conduct has become all too familiar of a story in modern day politics. High profile allegations of sexual misconduct have straddled political lines. Just in recent memory, high profile accusations have been leveled at Al Franken, Brett Kavanaugh, Donald Trump, Roy Moore, Joe Biden, and Matt Gaetz. And, most recently, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has announced he will step down effective August 24th after multiple women came forward alleging sexual misconduct and inappropriate behavior by the governor. He has denied all allegations.</p><p>So why do these misconduct allegations against high power political figures impact some but not others? And what can we do as a society to eliminate this behavior? On<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, host Craig Williams is joined by professor Rebecca Ortiz, PhD, as they take a look at sexual harassment and the resignation of Governor Cuomo. Craig and Rebecca will discuss sexual harassment in politics, holding perpetrators accountable over these claims, and what is being done to combat sexual misconduct.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1907</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e5d4f370-01d3-11ec-ad2f-b354ca09523f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1149661690.mp3?updated=1629477315" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The January 6th Select Committee, the Hearings, and Subpoenas</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/08/the-january-6th-select-committee-the-hearings-and-subpoenas</link>
      <description>After failing to form a bipartisan committee to investigate the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol Complex, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi instead formed a select committee. However, accusations of partisanship have been leveled at the committee, particularly after Pelosi eliminated House Minority Leader McCarthy's offered committee members - representatives Jim Banks of Indiana and Jim Jordan of Ohio.
Last week, police officers from the U.S. Capitol Police and Washington, D.C.'s Metropolitan Police Department appeared before the committee, giving their accounts of what happened that day. Since the hearings have started, the subject of subpoenas has come up, particularly for those who spoke with former President Trump that day. Representative Adam Kinzinger, one of the Republican committee members, indicated that this committee would use its subpoena power stating “I would expect to see a significant amount of subpoenas.”
So will this select committee use their subpoena power? And how difficult will it be to get members of Congress, and maybe even the former president to testify before the panel? On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by professor David A. Super from Georgetown Law, as they take a look at the creation of the House select committee and the investigation of January 6th. Craig and David discuss the hearings, the possibility of using subpoenas, and where this is all headed.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 10:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>565</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Host Craig Willliams and guest David A. Super talk about the creation of the House select committee, the investigation of January 6th, hearings, subpoenas, and where this is all headed.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>After failing to form a bipartisan committee to investigate the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol Complex, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi instead formed a select committee. However, accusations of partisanship have been leveled at the committee, particularly after Pelosi eliminated House Minority Leader McCarthy's offered committee members - representatives Jim Banks of Indiana and Jim Jordan of Ohio.
Last week, police officers from the U.S. Capitol Police and Washington, D.C.'s Metropolitan Police Department appeared before the committee, giving their accounts of what happened that day. Since the hearings have started, the subject of subpoenas has come up, particularly for those who spoke with former President Trump that day. Representative Adam Kinzinger, one of the Republican committee members, indicated that this committee would use its subpoena power stating “I would expect to see a significant amount of subpoenas.”
So will this select committee use their subpoena power? And how difficult will it be to get members of Congress, and maybe even the former president to testify before the panel? On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by professor David A. Super from Georgetown Law, as they take a look at the creation of the House select committee and the investigation of January 6th. Craig and David discuss the hearings, the possibility of using subpoenas, and where this is all headed.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>After failing to form a bipartisan committee to investigate the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol Complex, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi instead formed a select committee. However, accusations of partisanship have been leveled at the committee, particularly after Pelosi eliminated House Minority Leader McCarthy's offered committee members - representatives Jim Banks of Indiana and Jim Jordan of Ohio.</p><p>Last week, police officers from the U.S. Capitol Police and Washington, D.C.'s Metropolitan Police Department appeared before the committee, giving their accounts of what happened that day. Since the hearings have started, the subject of subpoenas has come up, particularly for those who spoke with former President Trump that day. Representative Adam Kinzinger, one of the Republican committee members, indicated that this committee would use its subpoena power stating <em>“I would expect to see a significant amount of subpoenas.”</em></p><p>So will this select committee use their subpoena power? And how difficult will it be to get members of Congress, and maybe even the former president to testify before the panel? On<em> Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, host Craig Williams is joined by professor David A. Super from Georgetown Law, as they take a look at the creation of the House select committee and the investigation of January 6th. Craig and David discuss the hearings, the possibility of using subpoenas, and where this is all headed.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1815</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6ca9f4de-f637-11eb-9326-ab713e48fff8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3085954010.mp3?updated=1628200647" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Issues Surrounding Homelessness</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/07/the-legal-issues-surrounding-homelessness</link>
      <description>Host Craig Willliams and guests Gary Blasi and Breanne Schuster talk about the legal issues surrounding homelessness, separation of powers, current legislation, and what is being done to combat this nationwide problem.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 10:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Issues Surrounding Homelessness</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>564</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/aa3bf492-eba5-11eb-83d0-6fa58b36c57f/image/L2L-4-384x384.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In cities across our nation, homelessness is an ongoing problem. According to the 2020 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) to Congress, completed by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development prior to COVID, roughly 580,000 people were...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Willliams and guests Gary Blasi and Breanne Schuster talk about the legal issues surrounding homelessness, separation of powers, current legislation, and what is being done to combat this nationwide problem.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Host Craig Willliams and guests Gary Blasi and Breanne Schuster talk about the legal issues surrounding homelessness, separation of powers, current legislation, and what is being done to combat this nationwide problem.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1999</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[33f838e2-e129-43f5-91af-6cd3eb2b9aca]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5566858351.mp3?updated=1627333340" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rights of Nature &amp; the Law</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/07/rights-of-nature-the-law/</link>
      <description>Host Craig Willliams and guest Lindsey Schromen-Wawrin talk about the Rights of Nature doctrine, representing ecosystems, and whether nature has its own legal rights.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 10:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Rights of Nature &amp; the Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>563</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0ef952dc-e9a6-11eb-8cd2-5fd294892fdf/image/L2L-4-384x384.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Declaration of Independence famously states "that all men…are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights”. But do those or similar unalienable rights extend beyond people? According to groups like the Global Alliance for the...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Willliams and guest Lindsey Schromen-Wawrin talk about the Rights of Nature doctrine, representing ecosystems, and whether nature has its own legal rights.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Willliams and guest Lindsey Schromen-Wawrin talk about the Rights of Nature doctrine, representing ecosystems, and whether nature has its own legal rights.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1868</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7475831f-e518-4d29-9e24-a84675a5a548]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7663992262.mp3?updated=1626818934" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOTUS &amp; Religious Freedom</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/06/scotus-religious-freedom/</link>
      <description>Host Craig Williams and guest Jim Oleske talk about the recent rulings on religious freedom cases that have come before SCOTUS and the impact these rulings will have on future cases.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>SCOTUS &amp; Religious Freedom</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>562</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/a6250842-d5a4-11eb-a11e-87929a24ab6f/image/L2L-4-384x384.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Supreme Court has seen a number of religious freedom cases so far in 2021. In a 5-4 ruling in Tandon v. Newsom, the high court struck down COVID-related restrictions on group religious activities in private homes. Also, in Fulton v. Philadelphia,...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Williams and guest Jim Oleske talk about the recent rulings on religious freedom cases that have come before SCOTUS and the impact these rulings will have on future cases.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Williams and guest Jim Oleske talk about the recent rulings on religious freedom cases that have come before SCOTUS and the impact these rulings will have on future cases.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1889</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[56291037-ffcd-441e-be27-3738823333da]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3046186377.mp3?updated=1624619259" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ransomware Attacks &amp; Cybersecurity</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/06/ransomware-attacks-cybersecurity/</link>
      <description>Host Craig Willliams and guest Tom Holt take a look at the recent ransomware attacks, and what to do if you, your firm, or your company become a target.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Ransomware Attacks &amp; Cybersecurity</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>560</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5211e6be-d52f-11eb-8704-7f97f873e85e/image/L2L-4-384x384.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>We have all seen a wave of ransomware attacks in the news as of late. For those who are unfamiliar, ransomware is a type of malware that threatens to publish, destroy, or block access to the victim's personal data unless a ransom is paid. The ransom...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Willliams and guest Tom Holt take a look at the recent ransomware attacks, and what to do if you, your firm, or your company become a target.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Willliams and guest Tom Holt take a look at the recent ransomware attacks, and what to do if you, your firm, or your company become a target.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1416</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0a28e71a-1a4f-4f2f-b9ba-b46c9fec5864]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1128709968.mp3?updated=1626818934" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>States Regulating Protests</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/06/states-regulating-protests/</link>
      <description>Host Craig Willliams and guest Jeff Lewis take a look at states regulating protests through legislation, the First Amendment, and the impact on those who protest.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2021 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>States Regulating Protests</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>560</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/bedd43f0-cfa9-11eb-92b9-77a0bdc26cdb/image/L2L-4-384x384.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>According to The Hill, Republican lawmakers in 34 states have introduced more than 80 anti-protest bills thus far in the 2021 legislative session.  In Florida, Governor Ron Desantis recently signed an ‘anti-riot’ bill into law that states, in...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Willliams and guest Jeff Lewis take a look at states regulating protests through legislation, the First Amendment, and the impact on those who protest.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Willliams and guest Jeff Lewis take a look at states regulating protests through legislation, the First Amendment, and the impact on those who protest.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1623</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[92b4fff8-6d36-40d9-87e4-85cf376e3e37]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9478556778.mp3?updated=1623961812" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Packing the Court</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/05/packing-the-court/</link>
      <description>Host Craig Willliams and guest Tonja Jacobi take a look at packing the Supreme Court, potential reform, and next steps under the Biden administration.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Packing the Court</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>559</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/beffcdbc-cfa9-11eb-92b9-fb1dc025fd78/image/L2L-4-384x384.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Court packing is defined as “the act or practice of packing a court and especially the United States Supreme Court by increasing the number of judges or justices in an attempt to change the ideological makeup of the court.” Last month,...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Willliams and guest Tonja Jacobi take a look at packing the Supreme Court, potential reform, and next steps under the Biden administration.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Willliams and guest Tonja Jacobi take a look at packing the Supreme Court, potential reform, and next steps under the Biden administration. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2060</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[00b5e41e-ae18-4315-8ff9-50bf0350c983]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2813885961.mp3?updated=1623961812" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Journalists, Protests, Law Enforcement, and Freedom of the Press</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/04/journalists-protests-law-enforcement-and-freedom-of-the-press</link>
      <description>Host Craig Willliams and guests, Shannon Jankowski and David Bralow take a look at the treatment of journalists during recent protests, freedom of the press, and the filming and photographing of the police by citizens.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Journalists, Protests, Law Enforcement, and Freedom of the Press</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>558</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/bf23c3ca-cfa9-11eb-92b9-2757cb233e34/image/L2L-4-384x384.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Social justice issues have been at the forefront of protests across our nation.  In order to report on these protests, journalists have been on the front lines of the action. Yet, due to a lack of public trust, journalists are often targeted by...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Willliams and guests, Shannon Jankowski and David Bralow take a look at the treatment of journalists during recent protests, freedom of the press, and the filming and photographing of the police by citizens.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Willliams and guests, Shannon Jankowski and David Bralow take a look at the treatment of journalists during recent protests, freedom of the press, and the filming and photographing of the police by citizens.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1877</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[bda67655-0728-4c5b-a53f-1f3628c6557f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8727933030.mp3?updated=1623961812" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cyberwarfare, U.S./Russia Relations, and Ukraine</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/04/cyberwarfare-u-s-russia-relations-and-ukraine</link>
      <description>Host Craig Willliams and professors Claire Finkelstein &amp; General Charles J. Dunlap Jr., discuss the potential threat of cyber warfare, U.S./Russia relations, and Ukraine.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:39:01 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Cyberwarfare, U.S./Russia Relations, and Ukraine</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>557</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/bf4ff22e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-f7f6e7fb65bf/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a Daily Beast article published on April 13, 2021, Julia Davis writes that, “the head of the Kremlin-funded RT and Sputnik news agencies believes Russia will invade Ukraine, sparking a conflict with the U.S. that will force entire cities into...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Willliams and professors Claire Finkelstein &amp; General Charles J. Dunlap Jr., discuss the potential threat of cyber warfare, U.S./Russia relations, and Ukraine.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Willliams and professors Claire Finkelstein &amp; General Charles J. Dunlap Jr., discuss the potential threat of cyber warfare, U.S./Russia relations, and Ukraine.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2129</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9435d19a-691f-4410-98e2-5d950d5365ca]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7253533898.mp3?updated=1623961812" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Open Carry Laws, Public Safety, and Young v. Hawaii</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/04/open-carry-laws-public-safety-and-young-v-hawaii</link>
      <description>Host Craig Willliams and professor Eric Ruben discuss the debate surrounding open carry laws, Young v. Hawaii, and open carry vs. public safety.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 16:31:58 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Open Carry Laws, Public Safety, and Young v. Hawaii</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>556</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/bf801eae-cfa9-11eb-92b9-47b7d479f1d7/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On March 24th, 2021, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals reversed an earlier ruling and upheld the effective ban on the open carry of firearms in the state of Hawaii. Coming in the wake of multiple high-profile mass shootings around the country, the...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Willliams and professor Eric Ruben discuss the debate surrounding open carry laws, Young v. Hawaii, and open carry vs. public safety.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Willliams and professor Eric Ruben discuss the debate surrounding open carry laws, Young v. Hawaii, and open carry vs. public safety.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1664</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8e39149f-bbc7-42db-b299-539f246cee77]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7027305256.mp3?updated=1623961812" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Charging the Capitol Rioters, Attorney General Merrick Garland, and the Future of the Justice Department</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/03/charging-the-capitol-rioters-attorney-general-merrick-garland-and-the-future-of-the-justice-department</link>
      <description>Host Craig Willliams and former U.S. attorney Joyce White Vance discuss charging the Capitol rioters, newly appointed Attorney General Merrick Garland, and future charges against all involved.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Charging the Capitol Rioters, Attorney General Merrick Garland, and the Future of the Justice Department</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>555</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/bfb9fbd8-cfa9-11eb-92b9-d78aeb30cb80/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>More than two months after the event, federal prosecutors continue to file charges against individuals involved in the January 6th U.S Capital riot. In his confirmation hearings, now confirmed U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland stated that charging...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Willliams and former U.S. attorney Joyce White Vance discuss charging the Capitol rioters, newly appointed Attorney General Merrick Garland, and future charges against all involved.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Willliams and former U.S. attorney Joyce White Vance discuss charging the Capitol rioters, newly appointed Attorney General Merrick Garland, and future charges against all involved. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2154</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2951bd95-3978-41f9-8049-df4ec21586b0]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7421105975.mp3?updated=1623961813" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Liability and Litigation Stemming from the Texas Weather Crisis</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/03/liability-and-litigation-stemming-from-the-texas-weather-crisis</link>
      <description>Host Craig Willliams and professor Heather Payne discuss litigation, liability, and ERCOT’s role in Texas’ recent weather crisis.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 18:12:27 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Liability and Litigation Stemming from the Texas Weather Crisis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>554</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/bfe0df5a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-d3f5c1152a78/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In February, two severe winter storms swept across the United States, ultimately hitting the state of Texas hard. These storms caused major power outages, water and food shortages, and dangerous weather conditions, leaving Texans across the state...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Willliams and professor Heather Payne discuss litigation, liability, and ERCOT’s role in Texas’ recent weather crisis.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Willliams and professor Heather Payne discuss litigation, liability, and ERCOT’s role in Texas’ recent weather crisis.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1616</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e383d64a-165f-411d-881b-b8bd303b8c6d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1177753993.mp3?updated=1623961813" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Search of Electronic Devices at the U.S. Border</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/02/the-search-of-electronic-devices-at-the-u-s-border</link>
      <description>Host Craig Willliams and professor Laura K. Donohue discuss the recent circuit court ruling on electronic device searches at the U.S. border.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 18:36:58 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Search of Electronic Devices at the U.S. Border</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>553</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c00b7e86-cfa9-11eb-92b9-7302b76065ea/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On February 9th, 2021, reversing what had been seen as a landmark legal victory for civil liberties groups, First Circuit Judge Sandra Lynch ruled in the matter of Alasaad v. McAleenan, finding that both basic and “advanced” searches fall within...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Willliams and professor Laura K. Donohue discuss the recent circuit court ruling on electronic device searches at the U.S. border.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Willliams and professor Laura K. Donohue discuss the recent circuit court ruling on electronic device searches at the U.S. border. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1847</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[67e76df6-7641-4917-8b94-1d85fcc518a0]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7333543126.mp3?updated=1623961814" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Executive Orders of President Biden</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/02/the-executive-orders-of-president-biden</link>
      <description>Host Craig Willliams and professors Michael W. McConnell and Dr. Kevin G. Vance  take a look at President Biden's executive orders.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 16:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Executive Orders of President Biden</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>552</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c043cd7c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-17333d8b9b9e/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>With a stack of executive orders piled on his desk, President Biden wasted no time. According to Newsweek, “President Biden signed more executive orders in the first 12 days of his presidency than the combined number issued by Donald Trump and...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Willliams and professors Michael W. McConnell and Dr. Kevin G. Vance  take a look at President Biden's executive orders.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Willliams and professors Michael W. McConnell and Dr. Kevin G. Vance  take a look at President Biden's executive orders.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1786</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[51ce2e88-2ba7-449d-9b25-194d926cfb4e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3427506315.mp3?updated=1623961814" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Liability Stemming from the Capitol Riot</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/01/legal-liability-stemming-from-the-capitol-riot</link>
      <description>Host Craig Willliams and attorneys Alan Gassman and Michael McAuliffe take a look at legal liability stemming from the U.S. Capitol riot, federal felony charges, and what lies ahead for all involved.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 17:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Liability Stemming from the Capitol Riot</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>551</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c0d2aa2e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-23993828a5cb/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>As the nation celebrated the 59th Presidential Inauguration, the White House, U.S. Capitol and other federal buildings were surrounded by checkpoints, a seven-foot-high fence, thousands of National Guard Troops, and military vehicles patrolling the...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Willliams and attorneys Alan Gassman and Michael McAuliffe take a look at legal liability stemming from the U.S. Capitol riot, federal felony charges, and what lies ahead for all involved.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Willliams and attorneys Alan Gassman and Michael McAuliffe take a look at legal liability stemming from the U.S. Capitol riot, federal felony charges, and what lies ahead for all involved.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1730</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[fd715271-f590-497c-8cfe-08a875552eaa]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6754215791.mp3?updated=1624285465" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Defining Sedition under the Trump Presidency</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2021/01/defining-sedition-under-the-trump-presidency</link>
      <description>Host Craig Willliams and constitutional law professor Carlton Larson take a look at the legal line between sedition and free speech, and define what is and isn't sedition under the current president.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2021 18:41:13 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Defining Sedition under the Trump Presidency</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>550</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c144de8c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-37d5f1db5aaa/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sedition is defined as “conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.” Throughout the Trump presidency, the word “sedition” has been used by both parties to describe various actions alleged to have...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Willliams and constitutional law professor Carlton Larson take a look at the legal line between sedition and free speech, and define what is and isn't sedition under the current president.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Willliams and constitutional law professor Carlton Larson take a look at the legal line between sedition and free speech, and define what is and isn't sedition under the current president.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1630</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a2bcb897-fc77-4e65-8432-6c3b46c2c216]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2891970805.mp3?updated=1623961814" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Taking a Different Path-Leaving the Law and Finding your Passion</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/12/taking-a-different-path-leaving-the-law-and-finding-your-passion</link>
      <description>Host Craig Willliams and former lawyer turned world traveler Jodi Ettenberg discuss her departure from the law and the importance of following your passion.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2020 15:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Taking a Different Path-Leaving the Law and Finding your Passion</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>549</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c1802258-cfa9-11eb-92b9-939048990597/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Have you ever considered leaving the law and going on the adventure of a lifetime? On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams spotlights word traveler, writer, photographer, and public speaker Jodi Ettenberg, a former lawyer who left the law and took a...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Willliams and former lawyer turned world traveler Jodi Ettenberg discuss her departure from the law and the importance of following your passion.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Willliams and former lawyer turned world traveler Jodi Ettenberg discuss her departure from the law and the importance of following your passion. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1634</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3bd8b393-c212-46ec-b0e3-c687691c38dd]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7893767268.mp3?updated=1623961815" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>COVID &amp; the Courts</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/12/covid-the-courts/</link>
      <description>Attorney John S. Stiff and the National Center for State Courts’ Danielle Hirsch discuss getting justice during a pandemic and the impact all of this is having on judges, clerks, jurors, attorneys, and their clients.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>COVID &amp; the Courts</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>548</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c1a46c30-cfa9-11eb-92b9-9b611dd05eff/image/L2L-4-384x384.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>With the pandemic still raging, litigation looks very different. Courtrooms across our country have had to adapt to the pandemic through new safety measures and the use of technology to keep up. But while these changes have allowed courts to operate,...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Attorney John S. Stiff and the National Center for State Courts’ Danielle Hirsch discuss getting justice during a pandemic and the impact all of this is having on judges, clerks, jurors, attorneys, and their clients.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Attorney John S. Stiff and the National Center for State Courts’ Danielle Hirsch discuss getting justice during a pandemic and the impact all of this is having on judges, clerks, jurors, attorneys, and their clients.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1677</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2d0fde35-c980-40d8-a246-760d1387e641]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2049352448.mp3?updated=1623961815" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Transition of Power</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/11/transition-of-power</link>
      <description>Law professors William C. Banks and Leslie Gielow Jacobs talk about the practical impact of a delayed transfer of power from an uncooperative incumbent administration, both for the incoming administration and the American people.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Transition of Power</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>547</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c1dba43e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-2b17d7980fcd/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The transition of presidential power is the process during which the president-elect of the United States prepares to take over the administration of the federal government of the United States from the incumbent president. The peaceful transition of...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Law professors William C. Banks and Leslie Gielow Jacobs talk about the practical impact of a delayed transfer of power from an uncooperative incumbent administration, both for the incoming administration and the American people.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Law professors William C. Banks and Leslie Gielow Jacobs talk about the practical impact of a delayed transfer of power from an uncooperative incumbent administration, both for the incoming administration and the American people.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1866</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a1723329-5a7f-4995-8dda-cac53336fc8b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5751863382.mp3?updated=1623961815" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Presidential Immunity</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/11/presidential-immunity</link>
      <description>Attorney David S. Weinstein talks about the loss of presidential immunity after Donald Trump leaves office and what legal challenges he may face.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:49:15 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Presidential Immunity</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>546</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c217237e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-47b1d9c6eff9/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On Saturday, November 7th, 2020, after nearly a week of waiting for the results of the 2020 election, former Vice President Joe Biden was declared the winner of the 2020 presidential election. As of the publication of this episode, President Trump has...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Attorney David S. Weinstein talks about the loss of presidential immunity after Donald Trump leaves office and what legal challenges he may face.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Attorney David S. Weinstein talks about the loss of presidential immunity after Donald Trump leaves office and what legal challenges he may face.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1878</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c04c9780-f961-4033-8e98-e3e42ab4f672]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2569084050.mp3?updated=1623961816" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 2020 Election: Voter Suppression, Mail-in Ballots, and a Potential Legal Fight</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/10/the-2020-election-voter-suppression-mail-in-ballots-and-a-potential-legal-fight</link>
      <description>Professor Joshua A. Douglas talks about legal issues leading up to the election including voter suppression, the controversy over mail-in ballots, and the impact of the Supreme Court.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The 2020 Election: Voter Suppression, Mail-in Ballots, and a Potential Legal Fight</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>545</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c246adce-cfa9-11eb-92b9-3b0d69daab25/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>As we approach Election Day on November 3rd, 2020, it seems the list of issues grows by the day. Controversy over ballot drop boxes. Intimidating emails to voters from Iran and Russia. A call for an "army of poll watchers" from the president. And so...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Professor Joshua A. Douglas talks about legal issues leading up to the election including voter suppression, the controversy over mail-in ballots, and the impact of the Supreme Court.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Professor Joshua A. Douglas talks about legal issues leading up to the election including voter suppression, the controversy over mail-in ballots, and the impact of the Supreme Court.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1844</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[25c86fca-7eef-4e8c-94de-1d795e0e3154]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6756286060.mp3?updated=1623961816" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The President, COVID-19, and Impact on the American Public</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/10/the-president-covid-19-and-impact-on-the-american-public</link>
      <description>Harry Nelson, founder and managing partner of Nelson Hardiman, discusses the current health of the president, whether it is a national security issue to not know his condition, and the impact of the president’s words regarding the virus on the American public.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The President, COVID-19, and Impact on the American Public</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>545</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c27a34c8-cfa9-11eb-92b9-b7d27f57c91f/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On October 2nd, 2020 President Trump announced that he and his wife, Melania Trump tested positive for the coronavirus. After disclosing his positive test, President Trump was taken to Walter Reed hospital, and questions and rumors circulated about...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Harry Nelson, founder and managing partner of Nelson Hardiman, discusses the current health of the president, whether it is a national security issue to not know his condition, and the impact of the president’s words regarding the virus on the American public.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Harry Nelson, founder and managing partner of Nelson Hardiman, discusses the current health of the president, whether it is a national security issue to not know his condition, and the impact of the president’s words regarding the virus on the American public.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1644</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[60060eca-39fc-48a8-9295-da7c4d4412a5]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8225258595.mp3?updated=1623961816" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RBG, Judge Amy Coney Barrett &amp; the Impact on SCOTUS</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/10/rbg-judge-amy-coney-barrett-the-impact-on-scotus</link>
      <description>Co-director of the Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy at Cardozo School of Law, professor Deborah Pearlstein discusses the latest on SCOTUS, the passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, President Trump's nomination of Amy Coney Barrett in an election year, and the potential impact on the High Court.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2020 17:28:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>RBG, Judge Amy Coney Barrett &amp; the Impact on SCOTUS</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>543</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c2ab998c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-0f6a96640fb2/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On September 18th, 2020, we lost a powerhouse on the Supreme Court. An advocate, a fighter for women’s rights, and a trailblazer, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed away leaving behind a huge legacy, in addition to an empty seat on the Supreme...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Co-director of the Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy at Cardozo School of Law, professor Deborah Pearlstein discusses the latest on SCOTUS, the passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, President Trump's nomination of Amy Coney Barrett in an election year, and the potential impact on the High Court.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Co-director of the Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy at Cardozo School of Law, professor Deborah Pearlstein discusses the latest on SCOTUS, the passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, President Trump's nomination of Amy Coney Barrett in an election year, and the potential impact on the High Court.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1806</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[fe3be527-8500-410c-859d-7bdf2c44c295]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9146660973.mp3?updated=1623961817" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bob Woodward, the “Trump Tapes,” and the Parallels to Watergate</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/09/bob-woodward-the-trump-tapes-and-the-parallels-to-watergate</link>
      <description>Attorney Jim Robenalt and John W. Dean, former White House counsel for President Richard Nixon, discuss the parallels to the Watergate scandal through the recently released "Trump Tapes,” and how these revelations could impact the president before the election.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 14:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Bob Woodward, the “Trump Tapes,” and the Parallels to Watergate</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>542</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c2da36e8-cfa9-11eb-92b9-cf3f342877b7/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>This month, a series of excerpts from 18 recorded interviews between investigative journalist Bob Woodward and President Trump for Woodward’s book, Rage, were released. As many of you know, Bob Woodward, who was a young reporter with The Washington...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Attorney Jim Robenalt and John W. Dean, former White House counsel for President Richard Nixon, discuss the parallels to the Watergate scandal through the recently released "Trump Tapes,” and how these revelations could impact the president before the election.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Attorney Jim Robenalt and John W. Dean, former White House counsel for President Richard Nixon, discuss the parallels to the Watergate scandal through the recently released "Trump Tapes,” and how these revelations could impact the president before the election.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1792</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ce982b0c-c424-49af-9887-88e8f22f1b86]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8514187332.mp3?updated=1623961817" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The President, the Press, and the Dossier</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/09/the-president-the-press-and-the-dossier</link>
      <description>Professor Stephen Gillers and attorney Charles Glasser discuss an alleged dossier against Washington Post reporter David Fahrenthold and the current and historic relationships between the White House and journalists.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The President, the Press, and the Dossier</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>541</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c30cf312-cfa9-11eb-92b9-cff4d7530d12/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In response to an article published on August 27th by Washington Post’s reporter David Fahrenthold on how the U.S. Secret Service has spent more than $900,000 at Trump properties during Trump’s presidency, White House spokesperson Judd Deere said:...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Professor Stephen Gillers and attorney Charles Glasser discuss an alleged dossier against Washington Post reporter David Fahrenthold and the current and historic relationships between the White House and journalists.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Professor Stephen Gillers and attorney Charles Glasser discuss an alleged dossier against Washington Post reporter David Fahrenthold and the current and historic relationships between the White House and journalists.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1623</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c4e81b44-e135-45b0-9ad5-533a1287c9d1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6922067946.mp3?updated=1623961817" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Constitutionality of the President’s Recent Executive Orders</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/08/the-constitutionality-of-the-presidents-recent-executive-orders</link>
      <description>Professors Kim Wehle and Michael McConnell discuss the constitutionality of President Trump's recent use of executive orders.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2020 16:58:33 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Constitutionality of the President’s Recent Executive Orders</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>540</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c342db08-cfa9-11eb-92b9-2b6db890cc53/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since 2017, President Trump has issued 181 executive orders. Recently, the president has come under fire for issuing executive orders to provide economic relief to Americans during the pandemic, bypassing congress and its traditional "power of the...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Professors Kim Wehle and Michael McConnell discuss the constitutionality of President Trump's recent use of executive orders.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Professors Kim Wehle and Michael McConnell discuss the constitutionality of President Trump's recent use of executive orders.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1895</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6220429d-7898-463e-995c-7d6f84bd1c5c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7422609815.mp3?updated=1623961818" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Look at Voting in the Upcoming Election</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/08/a-look-at-voting-in-the-upcoming-election</link>
      <description>Jim Gardner, a specialist in election law out of the University at Buffalo School of Law, discusses voting in the upcoming election, mail-in voting, foreign interference in elections, and what we will see on election day.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 22:12:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>A Look at Voting in the Upcoming Election</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>539</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c379dc2a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5f29d23a9f26/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On July 30th, 2020, President Trump tweeted the following: "With Universal Mail-In Voting (not Absentee Voting, which is good), 2020 will be the most INACCURATE &amp; FRAUDULENT Election in history. It will be a great embarrassment to the USA. Delay...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Jim Gardner, a specialist in election law out of the University at Buffalo School of Law, discusses voting in the upcoming election, mail-in voting, foreign interference in elections, and what we will see on election day.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Jim Gardner, a specialist in election law out of the University at Buffalo School of Law, discusses voting in the upcoming election, mail-in voting, foreign interference in elections, and what we will see on election day.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1800</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[46a9c128-fd7f-4cc9-b135-2d9d43c03821]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1580273847.mp3?updated=1623961819" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Standout SCOTUS Rulings, the Justices, and Impact</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/07/standout-scotus-rulings-the-justices-and-impact</link>
      <description>Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, discusses SCOTUS, some of SCOTUS’ more notable recent decisions, the justices, and the impacts of these rulings.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Standout SCOTUS Rulings, the Justices, and Impact</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>539</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c3ac6578-cfa9-11eb-92b9-ffe73b0ca047/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>From LGBTQ rights, to abortion, to the Dreamers, to Trump’s taxes, major rulings coming out of the Supreme Court in 2020, have been anything but ordinary. Through these decisions, we have witnessed the unpredictability of some of the justices-in...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, discusses SCOTUS, some of SCOTUS’ more notable recent decisions, the justices, and the impacts of these rulings.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, discusses SCOTUS, some of SCOTUS’ more notable recent decisions, the justices, and the impacts of these rulings.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2127</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d9b4ea56-d743-4bdd-a0ba-cc545818e496]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6970204377.mp3?updated=1624285514" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Celebrating the Upcoming 100th Anniversary of the 19th Amendment</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/07/celebrating-the-upcoming-100th-anniversary-of-the-19th-amendment</link>
      <description>Historian Ellen Carol DuBois and law professor Paula Monopoli discuss the upcoming 100th Anniversary of the official adoption of the 19th Amendment and take a look at the history of women fighting for voting rights.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Celebrating the Upcoming 100th Anniversary of the 19th Amendment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>537</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c3f9587e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-17766f0a8c03/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On August 26, 1920, nearly two years after President Woodrow Wilson gave a speech before Congress in support of guaranteeing women the right to vote, Secretary of State Bainbridge Colby certified that the 19th Amendment had become a part of the...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Historian Ellen Carol DuBois and law professor Paula Monopoli discuss the upcoming 100th Anniversary of the official adoption of the 19th Amendment and take a look at the history of women fighting for voting rights.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Historian Ellen Carol DuBois and law professor Paula Monopoli discuss the upcoming 100th Anniversary of the official adoption of the 19th Amendment and take a look at the history of women fighting for voting rights.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1796</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e595583a-d1d0-428c-952e-b0afa7582d76]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9949650189.mp3?updated=1623961819" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside Girls High School Football and a Title IX Lawsuit</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/06/inside-girls-high-school-football-and-a-title-ix-lawsuit</link>
      <description>Attorney Brent Gordon and his daughter, Sam Gordon, discuss girls high school football, their pending Title IX lawsuit, and the importance of fighting for change for girls in sports.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2020 18:16:18 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside Girls High School Football and a Title IX Lawsuit</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>536</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c4357318-cfa9-11eb-92b9-c70961d830a9/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In June 2017, a Title IX lawsuit was filed against three school districts and the Utah High School Activities Association seeking to add girls football teams to the lineup of sports offered to students. On today’s Lawyer 2 Lawyer, guest host Jared...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Attorney Brent Gordon and his daughter, Sam Gordon, discuss girls high school football, their pending Title IX lawsuit, and the importance of fighting for change for girls in sports.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Attorney Brent Gordon and his daughter, Sam Gordon, discuss girls high school football, their pending Title IX lawsuit, and the importance of fighting for change for girls in sports.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1859</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[af1ddaa7-e010-4d1b-a64e-7316b8d1b5c0]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9924039415.mp3?updated=1623961819" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Quick Announcement</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/06/a-quick-announcement</link>
      <description>Host Craig Williams is on vacation. In the meantime, producer Kate Nutting has a special announcement about next week's episode and shares some suggested relevant episodes you should check out during this extraordinary time.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 21:45:03 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>A Quick Announcement</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>bonus</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c4b45282-cfa9-11eb-92b9-d3834f92f340/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Host Craig Williams is on vacation. In the meantime, producer Kate Nutting has a special announcement about next week's episode and shares some suggested relevant episodes you should check out during this extraordinary time.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Williams is on vacation. In the meantime, producer Kate Nutting has a special announcement about next week's episode and shares some suggested relevant episodes you should check out during this extraordinary time.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Host Craig Williams is on vacation. In the meantime, producer Kate Nutting has a special announcement about next week's episode and shares some suggested relevant episodes you should check out during this extraordinary time.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>68</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f7a54c2f-1be5-4abd-98eb-50c984ef2dd9]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6169113464.mp3?updated=1623961819" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Current State of Civility in the Legal Profession</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/05/the-current-state-of-civility-in-the-legal-profession</link>
      <description>Attorneys Dick Semerdjian and Jayne Reardon discuss the use of overly aggressive litigation tactics and the current state of civility in the legal profession.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 16:40:04 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Current State of Civility in the Legal Profession</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>535</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c4f413d6-cfa9-11eb-92b9-4338fc8ccc26/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On May 14, 2020, clients of the litigation firm Boies Schiller Flexner filed a malpractice lawsuit against the law firm alleging that the attorneys in their dispute gave them bad advice and drove up costs through overly aggressive litigation tactics....</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Attorneys Dick Semerdjian and Jayne Reardon discuss the use of overly aggressive litigation tactics and the current state of civility in the legal profession.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Attorneys Dick Semerdjian and Jayne Reardon discuss the use of overly aggressive litigation tactics and the current state of civility in the legal profession.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1851</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[983ea9c2-0209-4a6e-bbcd-e10deca9fdbc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2213139873.mp3?updated=1623961820" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Killing of Ahmaud Arbery</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/05/the-killing-of-ahmaud-arbery</link>
      <description>Attorney Chris Bruce discusses the killing of Ahmaud Arbery, the laws of Georgia, the handling of this case by prosecutors, and where this matter stands today.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 16:15:38 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Killing of Ahmaud Arbery</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>534</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c529f91a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-1fb25f27a9d9/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On February 23rd, 2020, Ahmaud Arbery, a 25-year old African American man, was gunned down while jogging through his Brunswick, Georgia neighborhood, just steps from his home. Two armed white men, Gregory McMichael, a former officer with the Glynn...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Attorney Chris Bruce discusses the killing of Ahmaud Arbery, the laws of Georgia, the handling of this case by prosecutors, and where this matter stands today.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Attorney Chris Bruce discusses the killing of Ahmaud Arbery, the laws of Georgia, the handling of this case by prosecutors, and where this matter stands today.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1507</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[203f08b8-40c6-4927-ac81-69672196c69a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1918169619.mp3?updated=1623961820" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Potential Legal Issues Stemming from the Reopening of Businesses</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/05/potential-legal-issues-stemming-from-the-reopening-of-businesses</link>
      <description>Attorney Meg Kurlinski discusses states’ reopening of businesses and the potential legal issues employers could face as employees return to work.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2020 17:06:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Potential Legal Issues Stemming from the Reopening of Businesses</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>533</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c559c6d6-cfa9-11eb-92b9-8396d2b7340b/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>With certain states reopening across the nation, employers could soon face a host of legal issues when their employees return to work. For instance, per the decision of their governors, retail stores in South Carolina AND salons, barbershops and...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Attorney Meg Kurlinski discusses states’ reopening of businesses and the potential legal issues employers could face as employees return to work.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Attorney Meg Kurlinski discusses states’ reopening of businesses and the potential legal issues employers could face as employees return to work. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1757</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2c6deaa9-03ff-43a9-bab9-243d74c4c121]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1282648899.mp3?updated=1623961820" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Voting During a Pandemic</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/04/voting-during-a-pandemic</link>
      <description>Professors Ned Foley and Charles Stewart III discuss voting during a pandemic and the impact the pandemic may have on the upcoming election.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:02:08 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Voting During a Pandemic</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>532</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c587a7d6-cfa9-11eb-92b9-a7418faf8765/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On April 6th, 2020, on the eve of the Wisconsin primary, the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Republican National Committee and Wisconsin Republicans, thus refusing to extend the deadline for absentee ballots in Wisconsin in the middle of a...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Professors Ned Foley and Charles Stewart III discuss voting during a pandemic and the impact the pandemic may have on the upcoming election.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Professors Ned Foley and Charles Stewart III discuss voting during a pandemic and the impact the pandemic may have on the upcoming election.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1735</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e39f5794-86d1-4151-8f86-1ab885e205a2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5650798215.mp3?updated=1623961821" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federalism and the Coronavirus</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/04/federalism-and-the-coronavirus</link>
      <description>Professors Robert Tsai and Glenn Cohen discuss the concepts of federalism and states’ rights in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 crisis.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 18:03:34 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Federalism and the Coronavirus</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>531</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c5b972b6-cfa9-11eb-92b9-0f98bcbe7c3d/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>As our nation battles the COVID-19 pandemic, our president’s response and leadership is being tested. Ventilators are in short supply, hospitals across the states are in desperate need of masks, supplies, tests, and beds, and governors across the...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Professors Robert Tsai and Glenn Cohen discuss the concepts of federalism and states’ rights in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 crisis.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Professors Robert Tsai and Glenn Cohen discuss the concepts of federalism and states’ rights in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 crisis.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1692</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c7b3efa6-512d-4f17-831d-857928f3101c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5864723434.mp3?updated=1623961821" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Funding and Sanctuary Cities</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/03/federal-funding-and-sanctuary-cities</link>
      <description>Professors Ilya Somin and Philip L. Torrey discuss President Trump's intent to withhold federal funding to sanctuary cities and the impact this could have on state/local rights and immigration.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:13:25 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Federal Funding and Sanctuary Cities</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>530</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c5ec3c8c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-275098538eda/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On February 26, 2020 the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan ruled that the Department of Justice could withhold funding from “sanctuary cities”, the common term for cities and states that refuse to cooperate with the Trump administration's...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Professors Ilya Somin and Philip L. Torrey discuss President Trump's intent to withhold federal funding to sanctuary cities and the impact this could have on state/local rights and immigration.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Professors Ilya Somin and Philip L. Torrey discuss President Trump's intent to withhold federal funding to sanctuary cities and the impact this could have on state/local rights and immigration.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1788</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6edff3a0-aea7-4259-b89a-a8f5798b9cf8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4574015600.mp3?updated=1624285469" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The SCOTUS Ruling in Hernandez v. Mesa</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/03/the-scotus-ruling-in-hernandez-v-mesa</link>
      <description>Guest professor James Pfander explores the recent SCOTUS ruling in Hernandez v. Mesa.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 16:56:08 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The SCOTUS Ruling in Hernandez v. Mesa</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>529</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c69f2c8e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-2bb859249456/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On February 25, 2020, in a 5-4 ruling in the case of Hernandez v. Mesa, the Supreme Court ruled that the parents of Sergio Adrián Hernández Güereca, a 15-year-old Mexican national who was fatally shot by Border Patrol Agent Jesus Mesa, Jr., cannot...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Guest professor James Pfander explores the recent SCOTUS ruling in Hernandez v. Mesa.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Guest professor James Pfander explores the recent SCOTUS ruling in Hernandez v. Mesa.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1906</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[97b716d9-2409-4d8e-b644-d1b7d2328e4f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9441541606.mp3?updated=1623961821" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside the Coronavirus Outbreak</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/02/inside-the-coronavirus-outbreak</link>
      <description>Guest attorney Grace Yang explores this new coronavirus outbreak, the overall impact on travel, and business, and China's new rules for dealing with the coronavirus.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:40:54 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside the Coronavirus Outbreak</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>528</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c6fe2842-cfa9-11eb-92b9-cf796a8b897e/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>First identified in early December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus, informally named Wuhan Coronavirus (now formally named COVID-19 by World Health Organization) after the area it was first found, has attracted the attention of the world. As of...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Guest attorney Grace Yang explores this new coronavirus outbreak, the overall impact on travel, and business, and China's new rules for dealing with the coronavirus.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Guest attorney Grace Yang explores this new coronavirus outbreak, the overall impact on travel, and business, and China's new rules for dealing with the coronavirus.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1699</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[15813505-c921-41cf-b323-a99e98d275b8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2583481304.mp3?updated=1623961822" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Impeachment Trial of President Trump</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/02/the-impeachment-trial-of-president-trump</link>
      <description>Guests Tom Jipping and Alan Barron discuss the impeachment trial, specifically the issues of witnesses, new evidence, and its constitutionality.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 17:46:04 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Impeachment Trial of President Trump</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>527</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c737e9b0-cfa9-11eb-92b9-a7e20ab37c84/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The impeachment trial of President Donald J. Trump is underway and, as expected, it has come with its share of controversy. On December 18, 2019, President Trump was impeached by the House of Representatives for abuse of power and obstruction of...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Guests Tom Jipping and Alan Barron discuss the impeachment trial, specifically the issues of witnesses, new evidence, and its constitutionality.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Guests Tom Jipping and Alan Barron discuss the impeachment trial, specifically the issues of witnesses, new evidence, and its constitutionality.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1957</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[cd80e0f5-df7e-4bc7-a888-cb77d6ceabc4]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2469982589.mp3?updated=1623961822" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Ethics and the Profession</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/01/legal-ethics-and-the-profession</link>
      <description>Guests Deborah L. Rhode and Scott Cummings explore legal ethics in today's world and what lawyers can do to maintain the reputation of the profession.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 15:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Ethics and the Profession</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>526</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c76f3082-cfa9-11eb-92b9-3bb77946229d/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Upon their admittance to practice, new attorneys agree to abide by their jurisdiction's ethical rules. For most states, this means upholding some version of the ABA's Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which prescribes standards of legal ethics and...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Guests Deborah L. Rhode and Scott Cummings explore legal ethics in today's world and what lawyers can do to maintain the reputation of the profession.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Guests Deborah L. Rhode and Scott Cummings explore legal ethics in today's world and what lawyers can do to maintain the reputation of the profession.
]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1906</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[82c3152d-c150-4762-afcf-364d6b7afd79]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6185343759.mp3?updated=1623961822" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legalities Surrounding the U.S. Airstrike</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2020/01/the-legalities-surrounding-the-u-s-airstrike</link>
      <description>Guests Bradley P. Moss and Rebecca Ingber discuss the legal issues surrounding the airstrike, its causes, and it’s potential ramifications.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:00:44 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legalities Surrounding the U.S. Airstrike</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>525</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c79e6988-cfa9-11eb-92b9-47743feb4881/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>At the top of the New Year, President Trump ordered an airstrike killing Iranian Commander Qassem Soleimani, the head of Iran's elite Quds military force. President Trump justified the action by citing Soleimani's decades long tension with the U.S.,...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Guests Bradley P. Moss and Rebecca Ingber discuss the legal issues surrounding the airstrike, its causes, and it’s potential ramifications.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Guests Bradley P. Moss and Rebecca Ingber discuss the legal issues surrounding the airstrike, its causes, and it’s potential ramifications.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1766</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f3232e3a-788a-4366-bc17-a2331cd2ba94]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3018213562.mp3?updated=1623961822" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Divorce Mediation Movement</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/12/the-divorce-mediation-movement</link>
      <description>Attorney Kelly Chang Rickert discuss the pros and cons of mediation over litigation in divorce proceedings, and the impact on the couple going forward.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 18:49:59 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Divorce Mediation Movement</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>524</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c7f31e4c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-3f5645c6ac91/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Divorce can be a grueling process for couples. The days of standing in front of a judge are becoming less common. Instead mediation has become one of the most frequently used methods of negotiating a divorce settlement. On today’s Lawyer 2 Lawyer,...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Attorney Kelly Chang Rickert discuss the pros and cons of mediation over litigation in divorce proceedings, and the impact on the couple going forward.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Attorney Kelly Chang Rickert discuss the pros and cons of mediation over litigation in divorce proceedings, and the impact on the couple going forward. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1855</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[020bc1b5-095b-480d-8704-edce078ea0ea]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3435357230.mp3?updated=1623961823" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Study into Women Leaving the Law</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/12/a-study-into-women-leaving-the-law</link>
      <description>ABA President Judy Perry Martinez and attorneys and study authors Stephanie Scharf and Roberta Liebenberg discuss the recently released research on why women are leaving the law and how it is impacting firms.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 18:46:14 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>A Study into Women Leaving the Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>523</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c8272638-cfa9-11eb-92b9-8f68356305f0/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>There is a big problem in the realm of private practice: women are leaving the practice of law at the height of their careers. Whether due to caretaking commitments, billable hours, or stress, women are leaving in droves. To get to the bottom of this...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>ABA President Judy Perry Martinez and attorneys and study authors Stephanie Scharf and Roberta Liebenberg discuss the recently released research on why women are leaving the law and how it is impacting firms.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[ABA President Judy Perry Martinez and attorneys and study authors Stephanie Scharf and Roberta Liebenberg discuss the recently released research on why women are leaving the law and how it is impacting firms. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2273</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4ee56544-1053-438d-94a4-5c88a34855f3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6975163072.mp3?updated=1623961823" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The U.S. Supreme Court Ruling on Sandy Hook Families' Lawsuit against Remington Arms</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/11/the-u-s-supreme-court-ruling-on-sandy-hook-families-lawsuit-against-remington-arms</link>
      <description>Professor Timothy D. Lytton and attorney Stephen P. Halbrook discuss the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the Sandy Hook families' lawsuit against gunmaker Remington Arms.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:31:46 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The U.S. Supreme Court Ruling on Sandy Hook Families' Lawsuit against Remington Arms</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>522</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c854a75c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-db4c3e8f4254/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On November 12th, 2019 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the families of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting victims can proceed with a lawsuit against Remington Arms Co., maker of the Bushmaster firearm used in the Newtown shootings. Remington...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Professor Timothy D. Lytton and attorney Stephen P. Halbrook discuss the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the Sandy Hook families' lawsuit against gunmaker Remington Arms.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Professor Timothy D. Lytton and attorney Stephen P. Halbrook discuss the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the Sandy Hook families' lawsuit against gunmaker Remington Arms.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2028</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[994af887-e1d2-442b-a5f8-ed59d058ad47]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7665797439.mp3?updated=1623961823" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside the Liability of Selfies</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/11/inside-the-liability-of-selfies</link>
      <description>Attorney Mitch Jackson discusses the dangers and risk people put themselves in to meet society’s obsession with capturing the perfect moment, and what may need to change.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 21:05:51 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside the Liability of Selfies</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>521</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c88cacd8-cfa9-11eb-92b9-775273601f09/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Social media and the ubiquity of technology have created a culture in which people feel compelled to capture a moment and immediately share it with their friends, family, and followers. Oftentimes this takes the form of a "selfie". A “selfie” is...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Attorney Mitch Jackson discusses the dangers and risk people put themselves in to meet society’s obsession with capturing the perfect moment, and what may need to change.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Attorney Mitch Jackson discusses the dangers and risk people put themselves in to meet society’s obsession with capturing the perfect moment, and what may need to change. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1914</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a323bb3f-578d-4fb3-b461-c0ee8021e2c1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5837317151.mp3?updated=1623961824" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside Impeachment</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/10/inside-impeachment</link>
      <description>Attorneys Bowman and Healy discuss the impeachment inquiry, the process, the players, and what this means for the presidency.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside Impeachment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>520</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c8b8a608-cfa9-11eb-92b9-eb70d040e05b/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On September 24, 2019, House speaker Nancy Pelosi initiated an impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. Unsurprisingly, the White House and its allies have been vocally opposed to the inquiry, and in many cases have sought to impede the...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Attorneys Bowman and Healy discuss the impeachment inquiry, the process, the players, and what this means for the presidency.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Attorneys Bowman and Healy discuss the impeachment inquiry, the process, the players, and what this means for the presidency.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1793</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a856133cb038407ab4dd3cd45c29d35c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9079382081.mp3?updated=1623961824" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Whistleblower Complaint</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/10/the-whistleblower-complaint</link>
      <description>On August 12, 2019, an unnamed whistleblower filed a complaint about information they received from other officials regarding a July 25th call with President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky. This complaint has led to the instigation of an impeachment inquiry into President Trump by the House of Representatives.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 18:59:23 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Whistleblower Complaint</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>519</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c8e44510-cfa9-11eb-92b9-af11cb389a3c/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On August 12, 2019, an unnamed whistleblower filed a complaint about information they received from other officials regarding a July 25th call with President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky. This complaint has led to the instigation of an...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On August 12, 2019, an unnamed whistleblower filed a complaint about information they received from other officials regarding a July 25th call with President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky. This complaint has led to the instigation of an impeachment inquiry into President Trump by the House of Representatives.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On August 12, 2019, an unnamed whistleblower filed a complaint about information they received from other officials regarding a July 25th call with President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky. This complaint has led to the instigation of an impeachment inquiry into President Trump by the House of Representatives.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2155</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f09d64217825451b9ccc36f649db308c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7391726639.mp3?updated=1623961824" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>California's AB5 Gig Work Bill</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/09/californias-ab5-gig-work-bill</link>
      <description>This month, California State Senators passed California Assembly Bill 5 better known as AB5, California’s Gig Economy Worker Bill. AB5 requires workers previously classified as independent contractors to be classified as employees. AB5 now heads to Governor Gavin Newsom’s office.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:05:26 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>California's AB5 Gig Work Bill</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>518</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c913a1f2-cfa9-11eb-92b9-63fb4ef71a23/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>This month, California State Senators passed California Assembly Bill 5 better known as AB5, California’s Gig Economy Worker Bill. AB5 requires workers previously classified as independent contractors to be classified as employees. AB5 now heads to...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This month, California State Senators passed California Assembly Bill 5 better known as AB5, California’s Gig Economy Worker Bill. AB5 requires workers previously classified as independent contractors to be classified as employees. AB5 now heads to Governor Gavin Newsom’s office.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[This month, California State Senators passed California Assembly Bill 5 better known as AB5, California’s Gig Economy Worker Bill. AB5 requires workers previously classified as independent contractors to be classified as employees. AB5 now heads to Governor Gavin Newsom’s office.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2122</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3d88c9db0af545f085f08e1941e53fdf]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4505141155.mp3?updated=1623961825" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Space Law</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/09/space-law</link>
      <description>Space law is defined as the body of law governing space-related activities, encompassing both international and domestic agreements, rules, and principles. Recently, NASA astronaut Anne McClain was accused of illegally accessing her wife’s bank account during her stay on the International Space Station, bringing up a variety of legal issues and questions as to how to litigate a crime committed in space. NASA is currently investigating the matter.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 18:22:25 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Space Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>517</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c9460778-cfa9-11eb-92b9-9ba6388f6e1f/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Space law is defined as the body of law governing space-related activities, encompassing both international and domestic agreements, rules, and principles. Recently, NASA astronaut Anne McClain was accused of illegally accessing her wife’s bank...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Space law is defined as the body of law governing space-related activities, encompassing both international and domestic agreements, rules, and principles. Recently, NASA astronaut Anne McClain was accused of illegally accessing her wife’s bank account during her stay on the International Space Station, bringing up a variety of legal issues and questions as to how to litigate a crime committed in space. NASA is currently investigating the matter.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Space law is defined as the body of law governing space-related activities, encompassing both international and domestic agreements, rules, and principles. Recently, NASA astronaut Anne McClain was accused of illegally accessing her wife’s bank account during her stay on the International Space Station, bringing up a variety of legal issues and questions as to how to litigate a crime committed in space. NASA is currently investigating the matter.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1810</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[cf4b7312f2544532b831f47aba083114]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2132417790.mp3?updated=1623961825" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside New York’s Child Victims Act</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/08/inside-new-yorks-child-victims-act</link>
      <description>As of August 14, 2019, New York’s Child Victims Act has opened a one year window allowing child abuse survivors, who would otherwise be barred from filing claims due to the statute of limitations, to file civil suits against their abuser, as well as against individuals and organizations that failed to protect them.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside New York’s Child Victims Act</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>516</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c97a1ffe-cfa9-11eb-92b9-73b1a40b2e7d/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>As of August 14, 2019, New York’s Child Victims Act has opened a one year window allowing child abuse survivors, who would otherwise be barred from filing claims due to the statute of limitations, to file civil suits against their abuser, as well as...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As of August 14, 2019, New York’s Child Victims Act has opened a one year window allowing child abuse survivors, who would otherwise be barred from filing claims due to the statute of limitations, to file civil suits against their abuser, as well as against individuals and organizations that failed to protect them.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[As of August 14, 2019, New York’s Child Victims Act has opened a one year window allowing child abuse survivors, who would otherwise be barred from filing claims due to the statute of limitations, to file civil suits against their abuser, as well as against individuals and organizations that failed to protect them.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1985</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[bd27d58539c24a7d88b1de509c283f01]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8777145266.mp3?updated=1623961825" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Website Accessibility and the ADA</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/08/website-accessibility-and-the-ada</link>
      <description>Attorneys Eve Hill and Minh Vu discuss website accessibility litigation and how the ADA impacts such cases.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 14:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Website Accessibility and the ADA</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>515</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c9bbb8c4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-272020edac6d/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a highly watched case, Robles, v. Domino Pizza LLC, Guillermo Robles, who is blind, filed a lawsuit against Domino’s back in 2016 after he was unable to order a custom pizza from the company’s website and mobile app. His attorneys argued that...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Attorneys Eve Hill and Minh Vu discuss website accessibility litigation and how the ADA impacts such cases.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Attorneys Eve Hill and Minh Vu discuss website accessibility litigation and how the ADA impacts such cases.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1903</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6483fd3f47cf41d9871425437d0d33fe]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5080197165.mp3?updated=1623961825" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Natural Disasters and Dealing with the Aftermath</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/07/natural-disasters-and-dealing-with-the-aftermath</link>
      <description>Natural disasters like hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, and earthquakes are awe inspiring forces that can cause extreme levels of destruction and devastation to the communities they impact. In recent months, Hurricane Barry caused flooding and disruption of vital services in New Orleans and the surrounding areas; and two powerful earthquakes rattled southern California. And nearly two years later. Puerto Rico is still reeling and recovering from the tragic effects of Hurricane Maria.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 14:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Natural Disasters and Dealing with the Aftermath</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>514</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c9ec273e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-53e8b2a39016/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Natural disasters like hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, and earthquakes are awe inspiring forces that can cause extreme levels of destruction and devastation to the communities they impact. In recent months, Hurricane Barry caused flooding and...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Natural disasters like hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, and earthquakes are awe inspiring forces that can cause extreme levels of destruction and devastation to the communities they impact. In recent months, Hurricane Barry caused flooding and disruption of vital services in New Orleans and the surrounding areas; and two powerful earthquakes rattled southern California. And nearly two years later. Puerto Rico is still reeling and recovering from the tragic effects of Hurricane Maria.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Natural disasters like hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, and earthquakes are awe inspiring forces that can cause extreme levels of destruction and devastation to the communities they impact. In recent months, Hurricane Barry caused flooding and disruption of vital services in New Orleans and the surrounding areas; and two powerful earthquakes rattled southern California. And nearly two years later. Puerto Rico is still reeling and recovering from the tragic effects of Hurricane Maria.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1943</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7952a7b122d147eaa6122a678c09af82]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8490814846.mp3?updated=1623961825" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 2020 Census Citizenship Question and Gerrymandering</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/07/the-2020-census-citizenship-question-and-gerrymandering</link>
      <description>Nicholas Stephanopoulos and Dale Ho take an in-depth look at two controversial SCOTUS rulings on gerrymandering and the 2020 census citizenship question.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 19:14:35 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The 2020 Census Citizenship Question and Gerrymandering</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>513</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ca19f86c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-83c37a7c0f0f/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Last month, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in two highly-watched cases. In Rucho v. Common Cause/ Lamone v. Benisek, the high court ruled federal courts do not have a role in deciding partisan gerrymandering claims. In Department of...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Nicholas Stephanopoulos and Dale Ho take an in-depth look at two controversial SCOTUS rulings on gerrymandering and the 2020 census citizenship question.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Nicholas Stephanopoulos and Dale Ho take an in-depth look at two controversial SCOTUS rulings on gerrymandering and the 2020 census citizenship question.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1935</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[80f75301f78c4365b04f939b187b4300]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5967558190.mp3?updated=1623961826" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Golden State Killer, Genealogical Sites &amp; Privacy (Rebroadcast)</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/06/the-golden-state-killer-genealogical-sites-privacy-2</link>
      <description>Disclaimer: This episode was originally aired on May 17, 2018.
After decades of searching, Joseph James DeAngelo, whom authorities suspect is the so-called Golden State Killer or East Area Rapist, was arrested and suspected of committing a dozen murders and 50 rapes from 1976 to 1984. Prosecutors and law enforcement praised new DNA techniques used to catch the suspect, while defense attorneys and DNA experts voiced concern over the privacy and ethical concerns over customer data.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 17:54:56 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Golden State Killer, Genealogical Sites &amp; Privacy (Rebroadcast)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>512</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ca4fe1f2-cfa9-11eb-92b9-4fea717f675d/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Disclaimer: This episode was originally aired on May 17, 2018. After decades of searching, Joseph James DeAngelo, whom authorities suspect is the so-called Golden State Killer or East Area Rapist, was arrested and suspected of committing a dozen...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Disclaimer: This episode was originally aired on May 17, 2018.
After decades of searching, Joseph James DeAngelo, whom authorities suspect is the so-called Golden State Killer or East Area Rapist, was arrested and suspected of committing a dozen murders and 50 rapes from 1976 to 1984. Prosecutors and law enforcement praised new DNA techniques used to catch the suspect, while defense attorneys and DNA experts voiced concern over the privacy and ethical concerns over customer data.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Disclaimer: This episode was originally aired on May 17, 2018.
After decades of searching, Joseph James DeAngelo, whom authorities suspect is the so-called Golden State Killer or East Area Rapist, was arrested and suspected of committing a dozen murders and 50 rapes from 1976 to 1984. Prosecutors and law enforcement praised new DNA techniques used to catch the suspect, while defense attorneys and DNA experts voiced concern over the privacy and ethical concerns over customer data.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2114</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c18ea46a0f1a4da295f91335da530bbc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4290531214.mp3?updated=1623961826" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Abortion Legislation and the Diverging States</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/06/abortion-legislation-and-the-diverging-states</link>
      <description>In recent months, there has been a rise in abortion legislation within the United States. Notably, Alabama and Georgia have passed pro-life laws like the “hearbeat bill”, while conversly, New York and Vermont have passed pro-choice legislation like the The Reproductive Health Act.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 20:12:01 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Abortion Legislation and the Diverging States</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>511</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ca83d1f6-cfa9-11eb-92b9-d722058cac65/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In recent months, there has been a rise in abortion legislation within the United States. Notably, Alabama and Georgia have passed pro-life laws like the “hearbeat bill”, while conversly, New York and Vermont have passed pro-choice legislation...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In recent months, there has been a rise in abortion legislation within the United States. Notably, Alabama and Georgia have passed pro-life laws like the “hearbeat bill”, while conversly, New York and Vermont have passed pro-choice legislation like the The Reproductive Health Act.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In recent months, there has been a rise in abortion legislation within the United States. Notably, Alabama and Georgia have passed pro-life laws like the “hearbeat bill”, while conversly, New York and Vermont have passed pro-choice legislation like the The Reproductive Health Act.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2934</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[98836f3b99754fd58137cc9bda87db47]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4001039093.mp3?updated=1623961826" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Congressional Subpoena Power &amp; Executive Privilege</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/05/congressional-subpoena-power-executive-privilege</link>
      <description>In recent months, with the release of the redacted Mueller Report, Congress has used its power to subpoena individuals and companies connected to the Trump Administration, the Trump Organization, and the Mueller report, as they seek additional evidence. Some subpoenas have been ignored, where others have been blocked or put on hold through litigation.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 04:07:16 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Congressional Subpoena Power &amp; Executive Privilege</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>510</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cab381e4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-b7335f3daefb/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>A subpoena is a writ issued by a government agency, most often a court, to compel testimony by a witness or production of evidence under a penalty for failure to comply. In recent months, with the release of the redacted Mueller Report, Congress has...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In recent months, with the release of the redacted Mueller Report, Congress has used its power to subpoena individuals and companies connected to the Trump Administration, the Trump Organization, and the Mueller report, as they seek additional evidence. Some subpoenas have been ignored, where others have been blocked or put on hold through litigation.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In recent months, with the release of the redacted Mueller Report, Congress has used its power to subpoena individuals and companies connected to the Trump Administration, the Trump Organization, and the Mueller report, as they seek additional evidence. Some subpoenas have been ignored, where others have been blocked or put on hold through litigation.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1922</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[95528529052f45a1a769dd2d3579fc79]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3761965437.mp3?updated=1623961826" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Confederate Statues’ Ruling</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/05/the-confederate-statues-ruling</link>
      <description>On April 25, 2019, Circuit Judge Richard Moore ruled that the statues of prominent Confederate figures Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson are considered war memorials protected by state law. Back in 2017, Charlottesville was the site of a rally where white nationalists protested the removal of the statue of Robert E. Lee. A clash between protesters and counter-protesters turned violent, resulting in the death of Heather Heyer, which sparked a national debate over these controversial statues.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 17:49:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Confederate Statues’ Ruling</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>509</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cae79c86-cfa9-11eb-92b9-4f1a0ea0e48d/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On April 25, 2019, in Charlottesville, Virginia, Circuit Judge Richard Moore ruled that the statues of prominent Confederate figures Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson are considered war memorials protected by state law. Back in 2017, Charlottesville...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On April 25, 2019, Circuit Judge Richard Moore ruled that the statues of prominent Confederate figures Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson are considered war memorials protected by state law. Back in 2017, Charlottesville was the site of a rally where white nationalists protested the removal of the statue of Robert E. Lee. A clash between protesters and counter-protesters turned violent, resulting in the death of Heather Heyer, which sparked a national debate over these controversial statues.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On April 25, 2019, Circuit Judge Richard Moore ruled that the statues of prominent Confederate figures Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson are considered war memorials protected by state law. Back in 2017, Charlottesville was the site of a rally where white nationalists protested the removal of the statue of Robert E. Lee. A clash between protesters and counter-protesters turned violent, resulting in the death of Heather Heyer, which sparked a national debate over these controversial statues.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1722</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[43d5100bfe7549de8f6bc3bcd6090c91]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4565559057.mp3?updated=1623961827" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside the Mueller Report</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/04/inside-the-mueller-report</link>
      <description>On April 18, 2019, a redacted version of the eagerly anticipated Mueller Report was finally released to the public. After reading the report, some agree with the President, that he is free and clear of any collusion with Russia or obstruction of justice. Others disagree, and point to actions by the President and his staff, that does anything but exonerate him.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:40:04 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside the Mueller Report</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>508</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cb1bd94c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-97d31a2812f4/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On April 18, 2019, a redacted version of the eagerly anticipated Mueller Report was finally released to the public. After reading the report, some agree that the President is free and clear of any collusion with Russia or obstruction of justice....</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On April 18, 2019, a redacted version of the eagerly anticipated Mueller Report was finally released to the public. After reading the report, some agree with the President, that he is free and clear of any collusion with Russia or obstruction of justice. Others disagree, and point to actions by the President and his staff, that does anything but exonerate him.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On April 18, 2019, a redacted version of the eagerly anticipated Mueller Report was finally released to the public. After reading the report, some agree with the President, that he is free and clear of any collusion with Russia or obstruction of justice. Others disagree, and point to actions by the President and his staff, that does anything but exonerate him. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1970</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[72ec28f3bee54ffba37b6393b660d50b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9445779855.mp3?updated=1623961827" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gender Discrimination in Biglaw</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/04/gender-discrimination-in-biglaw</link>
      <description>Over the years, the quest to obtain gender diversity within big law firms has been a difficult one. Just recently, on April 3rd, 2019, a $200 million lawsuit was filed against Jones Day law firm by six former female associates alleging that they were discriminated against based on gender, pregnancy and maternity. In response to the litigation, Jones Day has dismissed these claims, citing firm statistics highlighting their support of women employees.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:27:21 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Gender Discrimination in Biglaw</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>507</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cb4deebe-cfa9-11eb-92b9-6f7387488beb/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the years, the quest to obtain gender diversity within big law firms has been a difficult one. Just recently, on April 3rd, 2019, a $200 million lawsuit was filed against Jones Day law firm by six former female associates alleging that they were...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Over the years, the quest to obtain gender diversity within big law firms has been a difficult one. Just recently, on April 3rd, 2019, a $200 million lawsuit was filed against Jones Day law firm by six former female associates alleging that they were discriminated against based on gender, pregnancy and maternity. In response to the litigation, Jones Day has dismissed these claims, citing firm statistics highlighting their support of women employees.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Over the years, the quest to obtain gender diversity within big law firms has been a difficult one. Just recently, on April 3rd, 2019, a $200 million lawsuit was filed against Jones Day law firm by six former female associates alleging that they were discriminated against based on gender, pregnancy and maternity. In response to the litigation, Jones Day has dismissed these claims, citing firm statistics highlighting their support of women employees.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1875</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[505a5937ed344113ad08dc2403bcbc06]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5502833394.mp3?updated=1623961827" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Timbs v. Indiana</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/03/the-supreme-courts-ruling-in-timbs-v-indiana</link>
      <description>Back in 2013, Tyson Timbs’ $40,000 Land Rover was seized by police after he was arrested and charged with selling $400 worth of heroin. After Timbs and his attorney filed suit, his case went from Indiana state court all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 17:13:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Timbs v. Indiana</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>506</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cb8575c8-cfa9-11eb-92b9-0f48a7fea01a/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Back in 2013, Tyson Timbs’ $40,000 Land Rover was seized by police after he was arrested and charged with selling $400 worth of heroin. After Timbs and his attorney filed suit, his case went from Indiana state court all the way to the Supreme Court...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Back in 2013, Tyson Timbs’ $40,000 Land Rover was seized by police after he was arrested and charged with selling $400 worth of heroin. After Timbs and his attorney filed suit, his case went from Indiana state court all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Back in 2013, Tyson Timbs’ $40,000 Land Rover was seized by police after he was arrested and charged with selling $400 worth of heroin. After Timbs and his attorney filed suit, his case went from Indiana state court all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1657</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8da89b0dd5524ebaa57c73b9c765c98c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3652147214.mp3?updated=1623961827" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The College Admissions Scandal</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/03/the-college-admissions-scandal</link>
      <description>In what can be classified as the nation's largest-ever college admissions bribery scandal, on March 12, 2019, U.S federal prosecutors out of Boston, Massachusetts charged 50 individuals with allegedly being part of a scheme to influence admissions decisions at colleges and universities across the States.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 16:45:58 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The College Admissions Scandal</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>505</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cbb63f96-cfa9-11eb-92b9-cf19d4b7fb82/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In what can be classified as the nation's largest-ever college admissions bribery scandal, on March 12, 2019, U.S federal prosecutors out of Boston, Massachusetts charged 50 individuals with allegedly being part of a scheme to influence admissions...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In what can be classified as the nation's largest-ever college admissions bribery scandal, on March 12, 2019, U.S federal prosecutors out of Boston, Massachusetts charged 50 individuals with allegedly being part of a scheme to influence admissions decisions at colleges and universities across the States.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In what can be classified as the nation's largest-ever college admissions bribery scandal, on March 12, 2019, U.S federal prosecutors out of Boston, Massachusetts charged 50 individuals with allegedly being part of a scheme to influence admissions decisions at colleges and universities across the States.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1940</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a6c791962b504a6592fa346a66c41c93]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3572638599.mp3?updated=1624285478" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Framework of the Anti-Vaccination Movement</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/02/the-legal-framework-of-the-anti-vaccination-movement</link>
      <description>According to “The History of Vaccines”-an educational resource by the College of Physicians of Philadelphia, the development and growing use of smallpox vaccine in the early 1800’s triggered the establishment of vaccination mandates, especially for children. Over the years, there has been a great debate over whether to vaccinate children or not.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 19:49:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Framework of the Anti-Vaccination Movement</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>504</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cbf03138-cfa9-11eb-92b9-975e88ca3a34/image/L2L-4_copy.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>According to “The History of Vaccines”-an educational resource by the College of Physicians of Philadelphia, the development and growing use of smallpox vaccine in the early 1800’s triggered the establishment of vaccination mandates, especially...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>According to “The History of Vaccines”-an educational resource by the College of Physicians of Philadelphia, the development and growing use of smallpox vaccine in the early 1800’s triggered the establishment of vaccination mandates, especially for children. Over the years, there has been a great debate over whether to vaccinate children or not.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[According to “The History of Vaccines”-an educational resource by the College of Physicians of Philadelphia, the development and growing use of smallpox vaccine in the early 1800’s triggered the establishment of vaccination mandates, especially for children. Over the years, there has been a great debate over whether to vaccinate children or not.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1974</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3f66c92991a54b63a26eec94d67a6404]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6658084603.mp3?updated=1623961828" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside the Opioid Epidemic and Big Pharma</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/02/inside-the-opioid-epidemic-and-big-pharma</link>
      <description>Host Craig Williams is joined by Attorney Jonathan Novak from the Fears Nachawati law firm and Joanne Peterson, founder and executive director of Learn to Cope (LTC) as they take a look at the opioid epidemic and discuss the impact, litigation against big pharma, what is being done to assist victims of opioid addiction and their families, and where those impacted can get help legally and personally.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 18:11:32 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside the Opioid Epidemic and Big Pharma</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>503</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cc1da9a6-cfa9-11eb-92b9-97a582677f96/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>According to the Center for Disease Control, on average, 130 Americans die every day from an opioid overdose. Right now, inside a Massachusetts federal courtroom, Massachusetts attorney general Maura Healey is up against pharmaceutical giant Purdue...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Williams is joined by Attorney Jonathan Novak from the Fears Nachawati law firm and Joanne Peterson, founder and executive director of Learn to Cope (LTC) as they take a look at the opioid epidemic and discuss the impact, litigation against big pharma, what is being done to assist victims of opioid addiction and their families, and where those impacted can get help legally and personally.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Williams is joined by Attorney Jonathan Novak from the Fears Nachawati law firm and Joanne Peterson, founder and executive director of Learn to Cope (LTC) as they take a look at the opioid epidemic and discuss the impact, litigation against big pharma, what is being done to assist victims of opioid addiction and their families, and where those impacted can get help legally and personally.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2058</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[edd0815dc70540b4b798be171ef8344a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5715205296.mp3?updated=1623961828" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/01/the-legacy-of-dr-martin-luther-king-jr</link>
      <description>This week we celebrated Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., a leader and icon in the civil rights movement. Dr. King combatted racial inequality through non-violent resistance up until his assassination in 1968, but his words, his teachings, and his fight for equality continue to inspire and impact people all over the world.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 21:06:54 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>502</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cc4f94ca-cfa9-11eb-92b9-1716e66738da/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On January 21, 2019, we celebrated Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., a leader and icon in the civil rights movement. Dr. King combatted racial inequality through non-violent resistance up until his assassination in 1968, but his words, his teachings, and...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week we celebrated Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., a leader and icon in the civil rights movement. Dr. King combatted racial inequality through non-violent resistance up until his assassination in 1968, but his words, his teachings, and his fight for equality continue to inspire and impact people all over the world.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[This week we celebrated Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., a leader and icon in the civil rights movement. Dr. King combatted racial inequality through non-violent resistance up until his assassination in 1968, but his words, his teachings, and his fight for equality continue to inspire and impact people all over the world.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2390</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7d0532959df04a3394005c19a354ef10]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3469853405.mp3?updated=1623961829" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Predictions on the Mueller Report</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2019/01/predictions-on-the-mueller-report</link>
      <description>Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation initially was to look at the 2016 election and the Russian government's efforts to interfere but the investigation has since ballooned. Currently at 19 months, the Mueller investigation could be close to wrapping up and Mueller could potentially be releasing his final report soon.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:30:42 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Predictions on the Mueller Report</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>501</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cc9f00d2-cfa9-11eb-92b9-63a308217fbc/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation initially was to look at the 2016 election and the Russian government's efforts to interfere but the investigation has since ballooned. Currently at 19 months, the Mueller investigation could be close...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation initially was to look at the 2016 election and the Russian government's efforts to interfere but the investigation has since ballooned. Currently at 19 months, the Mueller investigation could be close to wrapping up and Mueller could potentially be releasing his final report soon.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation initially was to look at the 2016 election and the Russian government's efforts to interfere but the investigation has since ballooned. Currently at 19 months, the Mueller investigation could be close to wrapping up and Mueller could potentially be releasing his final report soon.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1912</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2406e101b42749e1925df7730823c2ed]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7262634667.mp3?updated=1623961829" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside Campaign Finance Law</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/12/inside-campaign-finance-law</link>
      <description>Campaign finance law in the United States can be very complicated. In the news and under our current administration, we have heard the terms “campaign finance violations”, “hush-money payments”, and “private versus campaign payouts”. Since the 2010 Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC and the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in SpeechNow.org v. FEC, campaign finance law has changed drastically.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 21:46:08 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside Campaign Finance Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>500</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ccd2b2c4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-7b73775d7aa4/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Campaign finance law in the United States can be very complicated. In the news and under our current administration, we have heard the terms “campaign finance violations”, “hush-money payments”, and “private versus campaign payouts”. Since...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Campaign finance law in the United States can be very complicated. In the news and under our current administration, we have heard the terms “campaign finance violations”, “hush-money payments”, and “private versus campaign payouts”. Since the 2010 Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC and the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in SpeechNow.org v. FEC, campaign finance law has changed drastically.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Campaign finance law in the United States can be very complicated. In the news and under our current administration, we have heard the terms “campaign finance violations”, “hush-money payments”, and “private versus campaign payouts”. Since the 2010 Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC and the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in SpeechNow.org v. FEC, campaign finance law has changed drastically.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2048</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d4c9cde46f4042ec92d9dd3d4235b2c8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8414925422.mp3?updated=1623961829" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The California Fires &amp; Dealing with Natural Disasters</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/12/the-california-fires-dealing-with-natural-disasters</link>
      <description>In November 2018, destructive fires erupted across the state of California, including the devastating “Woolsey Fire” and “Camp Fire”. The “Camp Fire” killed at least 85 people, destroyed 14,000 residences and 296 people are still unaccounted for, becoming both California's deadliest and most destructive wildfire on record. Host Craig Williams is joined by Dan Wade, Tiela Chalmers, and Michael Hart to discuss the recent California fires and how attorneys can get involved with assisting disaster s</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 20:35:27 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The California Fires &amp; Dealing with Natural Disasters</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>499</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cd0d1bd0-cfa9-11eb-92b9-bf869b937ceb/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In November 2018, destructive fires erupted across the state of California, including the devastating “Woolsey Fire” and “Camp Fire”. The “Camp Fire” killed at least 85 people, destroyed 14,000 residences and 296 people are still...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In November 2018, destructive fires erupted across the state of California, including the devastating “Woolsey Fire” and “Camp Fire”. The “Camp Fire” killed at least 85 people, destroyed 14,000 residences and 296 people are still unaccounted for, becoming both California's deadliest and most destructive wildfire on record. Host Craig Williams is joined by Dan Wade, Tiela Chalmers, and Michael Hart to discuss the recent California fires and how attorneys can get involved with assisting disaster s</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In November 2018, destructive fires erupted across the state of California, including the devastating “Woolsey Fire” and “Camp Fire”. The “Camp Fire” killed at least 85 people, destroyed 14,000 residences and 296 people are still unaccounted for, becoming both California's deadliest and most destructive wildfire on record. Host Craig Williams is joined by Dan Wade, Tiela Chalmers, and Michael Hart to discuss the recent California fires and how attorneys can get involved with assisting disaster s]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1799</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b6e47bd26b0545ff95995fd7902089c8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8979009119.mp3?updated=1623961830" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trump vs. Acosta and the Press</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/11/trump-vs-acosta-and-the-press</link>
      <description>So is there a lack of respect for the Office and the press? And how will this latest incident impact relations? Host Craig Williams is joined by Charles J. Glasser, Jr., a professor of Media Law and Ethics at New York University, and Thomas A. Clare, partner with the firm Clare Locke LLP, as they discuss President Trump's relationship with the press, the recent removal of Jim Acosta's press pass at the White house, and CNN's lawsuit.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 23:36:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Trump vs. Acosta and the Press</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>498</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cd3fba0e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-4b50ac371692/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>After a tense back and forth between President Trump and CNN reporter, Jim Acosta at a White House pressing, and a struggle over a microphone between Acosta and a White house intern, Jim Acosta’s press pass was ultimately revoked. Just this week,...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>So is there a lack of respect for the Office and the press? And how will this latest incident impact relations? Host Craig Williams is joined by Charles J. Glasser, Jr., a professor of Media Law and Ethics at New York University, and Thomas A. Clare, partner with the firm Clare Locke LLP, as they discuss President Trump's relationship with the press, the recent removal of Jim Acosta's press pass at the White house, and CNN's lawsuit.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[So is there a lack of respect for the Office and the press? And how will this latest incident impact relations? Host Craig Williams is joined by Charles J. Glasser, Jr., a professor of Media Law and Ethics at New York University, and Thomas A. Clare, partner with the firm Clare Locke LLP, as they discuss President Trump's relationship with the press, the recent removal of Jim Acosta's press pass at the White house, and CNN's lawsuit.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2055</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5760914b06f34d52b10fa177096ffdc8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7609011663.mp3?updated=1623961830" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Birthright Citizenship and the 14th Amendment</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/11/birthright-citizenship-and-the-14th-amendment</link>
      <description>Host Craig Williams is joined by Dr. John C. Eastman, the Henry Salvatori professor of law and community service, and former dean, at Chapman University’s Fowler School of Law and attorney Margaret Stock from the Cascadia Cross Border Law Group LLC out of Anchorage Alaska, and a former law professor at the United States Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., to discuss the origin and application of birthright citizenship, whether or not it can be restricted, and much more.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 18:56:51 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Birthright Citizenship and the 14th Amendment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>497</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cd76a6e0-cfa9-11eb-92b9-0fcaecc5ad3d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Section 1 of the 14th amendment reads “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” Birthright citizenship stems from the...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Williams is joined by Dr. John C. Eastman, the Henry Salvatori professor of law and community service, and former dean, at Chapman University’s Fowler School of Law and attorney Margaret Stock from the Cascadia Cross Border Law Group LLC out of Anchorage Alaska, and a former law professor at the United States Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., to discuss the origin and application of birthright citizenship, whether or not it can be restricted, and much more.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Williams is joined by Dr. John C. Eastman, the Henry Salvatori professor of law and community service, and former dean, at Chapman University’s Fowler School of Law and attorney Margaret Stock from the Cascadia Cross Border Law Group LLC out of Anchorage Alaska, and a former law professor at the United States Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., to discuss the origin and application of birthright citizenship, whether or not it can be restricted, and much more.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1925</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0d8b9dd2fc3a416e90d04650c378e723]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4728534703.mp3?updated=1623961830" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Justice Kavanaugh’s Confirmation</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/10/justice-kavanaughs-confirmation</link>
      <description>On October 6, 2018 Brett Michael Kavanaugh was sworn in as the 114th Justice of the Supreme Court. Allegations of sexual misconduct from years past, days of dramatic Senate Judiciary Committee public hearings, a combative Senate split by party, an FBI investigation into Kavanaugh, and finally a controversial vote, led to a new justice on the high court.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 20:03:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Justice Kavanaugh’s Confirmation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>496</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cda51eb2-cfa9-11eb-92b9-a7e11d0a6bd7/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On October 6, 2018 Brett Michael Kavanaugh was sworn in as the 114th Justice of the Supreme Court. Allegations of sexual misconduct from years past, days of dramatic Senate Judiciary Committee public hearings, a combative Senate split by party, an FBI...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On October 6, 2018 Brett Michael Kavanaugh was sworn in as the 114th Justice of the Supreme Court. Allegations of sexual misconduct from years past, days of dramatic Senate Judiciary Committee public hearings, a combative Senate split by party, an FBI investigation into Kavanaugh, and finally a controversial vote, led to a new justice on the high court.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On October 6, 2018 Brett Michael Kavanaugh was sworn in as the 114th Justice of the Supreme Court. Allegations of sexual misconduct from years past, days of dramatic Senate Judiciary Committee public hearings, a combative Senate split by party, an FBI investigation into Kavanaugh, and finally a controversial vote, led to a new justice on the high court.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2318</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[dff6c8525ef24fe7a62f83b5da58fe20]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1916069537.mp3?updated=1623961831" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Combating Cyberbullying</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/10/combating-cyberbullying</link>
      <description>But within the legal profession, there are efforts to put laws in place and combat cyberbullying through a variety of ways. Host Craig Williams joins attorney Maria Z. Vathis, the 91st president of the Federal Bar Association, and returning guest and internet attorney Andrew Rossow to discuss cyberbullying, the impact on victims, and the efforts by the legal profession to prevent cyberbullying.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 19:42:53 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Combating Cyberbullying</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>495</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ce064cfa-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5f90316e7320/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>With the rise of social media over the years, cyberbullying has been a huge problem. Cyberbullying is the use of electronic communication to bully a person, typically by sending messages of an intimidating or threatening nature. Bullying tweets and...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>But within the legal profession, there are efforts to put laws in place and combat cyberbullying through a variety of ways. Host Craig Williams joins attorney Maria Z. Vathis, the 91st president of the Federal Bar Association, and returning guest and internet attorney Andrew Rossow to discuss cyberbullying, the impact on victims, and the efforts by the legal profession to prevent cyberbullying.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[But within the legal profession, there are efforts to put laws in place and combat cyberbullying through a variety of ways. Host Craig Williams joins attorney Maria Z. Vathis, the 91st president of the Federal Bar Association, and returning guest and internet attorney Andrew Rossow to discuss cyberbullying, the impact on victims, and the efforts by the legal profession to prevent cyberbullying.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1840</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0d908af6d3de4e0c98fb98a4277e3206]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8265644165.mp3?updated=1623961831" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bail Reform &amp; Controversy &amp; SB10</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/09/bail-reform-controversy-sb10</link>
      <description>Host Craig Williams joins attorney Jeff Clayton, the executive director of the American Bail Coalition and attorney Shima Baradaran Baughman, a professor at the University of Utah's S.J. Quinney College of Law, for a discussion about bail reform, the recently signed California Money Bail Reform Act (SB10), and the future impact.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:03:18 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Bail Reform &amp; Controversy &amp; SB10</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>494</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ce445608-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5b068c7e524d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Eighth Amendment to the Constitution states: “Excessive bail will not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishment inflicted.” On August 28th, 2018, Governor Jerry Brown of California signed into law the...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Williams joins attorney Jeff Clayton, the executive director of the American Bail Coalition and attorney Shima Baradaran Baughman, a professor at the University of Utah's S.J. Quinney College of Law, for a discussion about bail reform, the recently signed California Money Bail Reform Act (SB10), and the future impact.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Williams joins attorney Jeff Clayton, the executive director of the American Bail Coalition and attorney Shima Baradaran Baughman, a professor at the University of Utah's S.J. Quinney College of Law, for a discussion about bail reform, the recently signed California Money Bail Reform Act (SB10), and the future impact.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1531</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8263113d6f3342db9eb1dcae59438d35]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2226380257.mp3?updated=1623961831" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Woodward Book, the NY Times Op-Ed &amp; Freedom of the Press</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/09/the-woodward-book-the-ny-times-op-ed-freedom-of-the-press</link>
      <description>Host Craig Williams joins attorney George Freeman, executive director of the Media Law Resource Center (MLRC), and Robert Corn-Revere, partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, as they discuss Bob Woodward’s book, the recent anonymous NY Times article on President Trump from a senior official, freedom of the press, the President/press relationship, and the political impact this could have on the presidency.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 18:03:08 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Woodward Book, the NY Times Op-Ed &amp; Freedom of the Press</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>493</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ce7478e2-cfa9-11eb-92b9-135d05a2878b/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On September 11, 2018, the highly anticipated book, “Fear: Trump in the White House” by Bob Woodward was released. Woodward is an author and associate editor at the Washington Post who has covered eight presidencies from Nixon to Obama.Prior to...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Williams joins attorney George Freeman, executive director of the Media Law Resource Center (MLRC), and Robert Corn-Revere, partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, as they discuss Bob Woodward’s book, the recent anonymous NY Times article on President Trump from a senior official, freedom of the press, the President/press relationship, and the political impact this could have on the presidency.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Williams joins attorney George Freeman, executive director of the Media Law Resource Center (MLRC), and Robert Corn-Revere, partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, as they discuss Bob Woodward’s book, the recent anonymous NY Times article on President Trump from a senior official, freedom of the press, the President/press relationship, and the political impact this could have on the presidency.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1997</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[cce06c7cec8f41f98fe842029c06d553]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4849470493.mp3?updated=1623961832" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyer 2 Lawyer Says Farewell to Bob Ambrogi</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/08/lawyer-2-lawyer-says-farewell-to-bob-ambrogi</link>
      <description>Hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams discuss what they have learned about podcasting after 13 Years, where they began, and the art of podcasting. They take a look at how far podcasting has come and bid farewell to host Bob Ambrogi with a walk down memory lane.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:43:43 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyer 2 Lawyer Says Farewell to Bob Ambrogi</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>492</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cea2816a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-9f3debbd029c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Back in 2005, podcasting could have been seen as a flash in the pan or the latest craze, but in 2018, podcasts are everywhere and an outlet for many. According to Edison Research‘s 2018 podcast statistics, in 2018 six million more Americans listen...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams discuss what they have learned about podcasting after 13 Years, where they began, and the art of podcasting. They take a look at how far podcasting has come and bid farewell to host Bob Ambrogi with a walk down memory lane.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams discuss what they have learned about podcasting after 13 Years, where they began, and the art of podcasting. They take a look at how far podcasting has come and bid farewell to host Bob Ambrogi with a walk down memory lane.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2407</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c009afc2803b4f1daa96e652a6476a37]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7320744595.mp3?updated=1623961832" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Cohen Tapes</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/08/the-cohen-tapes</link>
      <description>In 2016, before the Presidential election, attorney Michael Cohen secretly recorded a conversation with Donald Trump, discussing the payment to a former Playboy model, Karen McDougal, who alleged had an affair with Trump. Hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join attorney and professor Rebecca Roiphe and Bennett Gershman to discuss the Michael Cohen tapes, legal ethics, attorney-client privilege, campaign finance law, the impact of these tapes, and what lies ahead for attorney Cohen and the President.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 18:51:27 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Cohen Tapes</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>491</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cecc2b28-cfa9-11eb-92b9-83ce590e0f90/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Back in 2016, months before the Presidential election, attorney Michael Cohen secretly recorded a conversation with his client, Donald Trump, discussing the payment to a former Playboy model, Karen McDougal, who alleged she had an affair with Trump....</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In 2016, before the Presidential election, attorney Michael Cohen secretly recorded a conversation with Donald Trump, discussing the payment to a former Playboy model, Karen McDougal, who alleged had an affair with Trump. Hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join attorney and professor Rebecca Roiphe and Bennett Gershman to discuss the Michael Cohen tapes, legal ethics, attorney-client privilege, campaign finance law, the impact of these tapes, and what lies ahead for attorney Cohen and the President.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In 2016, before the Presidential election, attorney Michael Cohen secretly recorded a conversation with Donald Trump, discussing the payment to a former Playboy model, Karen McDougal, who alleged had an affair with Trump. Hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join attorney and professor Rebecca Roiphe and Bennett Gershman to discuss the Michael Cohen tapes, legal ethics, attorney-client privilege, campaign finance law, the impact of these tapes, and what lies ahead for attorney Cohen and the President.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1825</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d0a930bd4c324b2eb8e5561b23488e6f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5025843072.mp3?updated=1623961833" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Infamous Skyjacker D.B. Cooper</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/07/the-infamous-skyjacker-d-b-cooper</link>
      <description>The actual identity of D.B. Cooper has mystified the public for decades. To this day his remains have never been found. So who is D. B. Cooper? Host Laurence Colletti, guest co-host Jared Correia, and special guest, attorney Mark Zaid, founding partner of Mark S. Zaid, PC., discuss the mystery behind D.B. Cooper. Mark speaks about representing the team of private investigators looking to unlock the mystery, and talk about how the notorious D.B. Cooper continues to be an intriguing figure to so many.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 17:15:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Infamous Skyjacker D.B. Cooper</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>490</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ceff8e46-cfa9-11eb-92b9-973df84d95cb/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On November 24th, 1971, an unidentified man hijacked a commercial airliner heading out of Portland International Airport in Portland, Oregon. According to reports, the man had checked in as "Dan Cooper" later referred to, by the press, as D.B. Cooper,...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The actual identity of D.B. Cooper has mystified the public for decades. To this day his remains have never been found. So who is D. B. Cooper? Host Laurence Colletti, guest co-host Jared Correia, and special guest, attorney Mark Zaid, founding partner of Mark S. Zaid, PC., discuss the mystery behind D.B. Cooper. Mark speaks about representing the team of private investigators looking to unlock the mystery, and talk about how the notorious D.B. Cooper continues to be an intriguing figure to so many.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The actual identity of D.B. Cooper has mystified the public for decades. To this day his remains have never been found. So who is D. B. Cooper? Host Laurence Colletti, guest co-host Jared Correia, and special guest, attorney Mark Zaid, founding partner of Mark S. Zaid, PC., discuss the mystery behind D.B. Cooper. Mark speaks about representing the team of private investigators looking to unlock the mystery, and talk about how the notorious D.B. Cooper continues to be an intriguing figure to so many.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2698</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b42c7873cd1c4cc196f1aa1f911e2fc2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2443785712.mp3?updated=1623961833" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Justice Anthony Kennedy Retires -- Judge Brett Kavanaugh Nominated for SCOTUS</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/07/justice-anthony-kennedy-retires-judge-brett-kavanaugh-nominated-for-scotus</link>
      <description>Guest host Laurence Colletti, Elizabeth Slattery, a legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, and David Lat, editor at large and founding editor of Above the Law, discuss Justice Kennedy's retirement and Judge Kavanaugh's nomination.

The "Marshall's Cry" provided by Oyez, a free law project by Justia and the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 16:36:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Justice Anthony Kennedy Retires -- Judge Brett Kavanaugh Nominated for SCOTUS</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>489</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cf2bb5a2-cfa9-11eb-92b9-fb619dbc5f52/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>At the end of last month, Justice Anthony Kennedy, announced he would be retiring and stepping down effective July 31st, 2018. On the evening of July 9th, President Trump announced his top pick to fill Justice Kennedy’s vacant seat: Judge Brett...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Guest host Laurence Colletti, Elizabeth Slattery, a legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, and David Lat, editor at large and founding editor of Above the Law, discuss Justice Kennedy's retirement and Judge Kavanaugh's nomination.

The "Marshall's Cry" provided by Oyez, a free law project by Justia and the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Guest host Laurence Colletti, Elizabeth Slattery, a legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, and David Lat, editor at large and founding editor of Above the Law, discuss Justice Kennedy's retirement and Judge Kavanaugh's nomination.

The "Marshall's Cry" provided by Oyez, a free law project by Justia and the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1724</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[002fa4f126c1414c810e011fae2b19a1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5560380947.mp3?updated=1623961833" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside the Trump-Kim Summit</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/06/inside-the-trump-kim-summit/</link>
      <description>On June 12, 2018, President Donald Trump met with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in Singapore in the first summit meeting between the leaders of the two countries. Host Craig Williams joins Ambassador Chas W. Freeman, Jr., senior fellow at Brown University's Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, and Morse Tan, professor of law at Northern Illinois University College of Law, as they discuss the Trump-Kim summit.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 17:18:43 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside the Trump-Kim Summit</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>488</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cf4d9c76-cfa9-11eb-92b9-739a2f95fde2/image/L2L-4-384x384.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On June 12, 2018, President Donald Trump met with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in Singapore in the first summit meeting between the leaders of the two countries. Although the United States and North Korea have a tense history, the two were able to...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On June 12, 2018, President Donald Trump met with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in Singapore in the first summit meeting between the leaders of the two countries. Host Craig Williams joins Ambassador Chas W. Freeman, Jr., senior fellow at Brown University's Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, and Morse Tan, professor of law at Northern Illinois University College of Law, as they discuss the Trump-Kim summit.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On June 12, 2018, President Donald Trump met with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in Singapore in the first summit meeting between the leaders of the two countries. Host Craig Williams joins Ambassador Chas W. Freeman, Jr., senior fellow at Brown University's Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, and Morse Tan, professor of law at Northern Illinois University College of Law, as they discuss the Trump-Kim summit. ]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1832</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[263678f4e57747e998c63abe2793afac]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9917918872.mp3?updated=1623961834" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Illinois Disciplinary Agency's Report on Client-Lawyer Matching</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/06/illinois-disciplinary-agencys-report-on-client-lawyer-matching</link>
      <description>Last week, the Illinois ARDC published its report on client-lawyer matching services and attorneys’ participation in for-profit referral services. Host Bob Ambrogi joins Jerome (Jerry) Larkin, administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) and author of the recently-published report, as they take a look at the ARDC's recent report on client-lawyer matching services, lawyer participation in these services, and regulation of for-profit referral services.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 16:06:14 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Illinois Disciplinary Agency's Report on Client-Lawyer Matching</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>487</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cf6ea470-cfa9-11eb-92b9-63917e0b8c5d/image/L2L-4-384x384.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Last week, the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, better known as ARDC, published its report on client-lawyer matching services and attorneys’ participation in for-profit referral services. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Last week, the Illinois ARDC published its report on client-lawyer matching services and attorneys’ participation in for-profit referral services. Host Bob Ambrogi joins Jerome (Jerry) Larkin, administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) and author of the recently-published report, as they take a look at the ARDC's recent report on client-lawyer matching services, lawyer participation in these services, and regulation of for-profit referral services.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Last week, the Illinois ARDC published its report on client-lawyer matching services and attorneys’ participation in for-profit referral services. Host Bob Ambrogi joins Jerome (Jerry) Larkin, administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) and author of the recently-published report, as they take a look at the ARDC's recent report on client-lawyer matching services, lawyer participation in these services, and regulation of for-profit referral services.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1917</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4ee22e0847ce48fcbe1c7beb16be5af1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1615459024.mp3?updated=1623961834" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analyzing Eric Schneiderman: A New York Attorney General's Abuse Allegations</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/05/analyzing-eric-schneiderman-a-new-york-attorney-generals-abuse-allegations</link>
      <description>Host Craig Williams joins Karla Fischer, Joan Meier and Julie Owens, a survivor of domestic violence and domestic violence expert witness, to discuss the abuse allegations against New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. They take a look inside domestic violence and sexual misconduct cases and the psychology behind the obvious conflict between Schneiderman’s support of the #MeToo movement and women’s issues on the outside and his private behavior as an alleged abuser.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 20:45:48 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Analyzing Eric Schneiderman: A New York Attorney General's Abuse Allegations</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>486</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cf92373c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-cbeb771c3aca/image/L2L-4-384x384.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On May 7th 2018, The New Yorker published a piece written by Jane Mayer and Ronan Farrow about physical abuse allegations by 4 women against New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. Shortly after publication, Schneiderman denied the allegations,...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Host Craig Williams joins Karla Fischer, Joan Meier and Julie Owens, a survivor of domestic violence and domestic violence expert witness, to discuss the abuse allegations against New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. They take a look inside domestic violence and sexual misconduct cases and the psychology behind the obvious conflict between Schneiderman’s support of the #MeToo movement and women’s issues on the outside and his private behavior as an alleged abuser.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Host Craig Williams joins Karla Fischer, Joan Meier and Julie Owens, a survivor of domestic violence and domestic violence expert witness, to discuss the abuse allegations against New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. They take a look inside domestic violence and sexual misconduct cases and the psychology behind the obvious conflict between Schneiderman’s support of the #MeToo movement and women’s issues on the outside and his private behavior as an alleged abuser.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2129</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[68679fccf0d8414db42201b090436ae3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4005250329.mp3?updated=1623961834" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Golden State Killer, Genealogical Sites &amp; Privacy</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/05/the-golden-state-killer-genealogical-sites-privacy</link>
      <description>Hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join attorney Bicka Barlow from the Law Office of Bicka Barlow, and Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O’Malley, as they take a look at the Golden State Killer. They discuss the latest DNA techniques used in cases, the controversy over tracking down alleged perpetrators through genealogy websites, law enforcement's vantage point, the investigation process, and privacy and ethical concerns over data.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 21:43:57 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Golden State Killer, Genealogical Sites &amp; Privacy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>485</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cfb2158e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-7fbf3282abde/image/L2L-4-384x384.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>After decades of searching, Joseph James DeAngelo, whom authorities suspect is the so-called Golden State Killer or East Area Rapist, was arrested and suspected of committing a dozen murders and 50 rapes from 1976 to 1984. Prosecutors and law...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join attorney Bicka Barlow from the Law Office of Bicka Barlow, and Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O’Malley, as they take a look at the Golden State Killer. They discuss the latest DNA techniques used in cases, the controversy over tracking down alleged perpetrators through genealogy websites, law enforcement's vantage point, the investigation process, and privacy and ethical concerns over data.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join attorney Bicka Barlow from the Law Office of Bicka Barlow, and Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O’Malley, as they take a look at the Golden State Killer. They discuss the latest DNA techniques used in cases, the controversy over tracking down alleged perpetrators through genealogy websites, law enforcement's vantage point, the investigation process, and privacy and ethical concerns over data.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2095</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[22ec9ff7103345e5b7d94d21e9fdf6a1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6995288519.mp3?updated=1623961834" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 2018 Am Law 100</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/04/the-2018-am-law-100</link>
      <description>According to the press release, The American Lawyer has released the 2018 Am Law 100 data, providing a detailed look at the financial health of an industry that exhibited its highest growth in key financial metrics since the fiscal year 2010! Hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams joins Gina Passarella and Nicholas Bruch, as they take a look at the 2018 Am Law 100, analysis of data, the process, what this means for law firms, and comparisons to prior years.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:26:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The 2018 Am Law 100</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>484</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/cfd33282-cfa9-11eb-92b9-334c92265f9c/image/L2L-4-384x384.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The American Lawyer’s Am Law 100 has been recognized as the definitive public ranking of financial performance for the nation’s largest law firms since its introduction in 1987. According to the press release, The American Lawyer has released the...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>According to the press release, The American Lawyer has released the 2018 Am Law 100 data, providing a detailed look at the financial health of an industry that exhibited its highest growth in key financial metrics since the fiscal year 2010! Hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams joins Gina Passarella and Nicholas Bruch, as they take a look at the 2018 Am Law 100, analysis of data, the process, what this means for law firms, and comparisons to prior years.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[According to the press release, The American Lawyer has released the 2018 Am Law 100 data, providing a detailed look at the financial health of an industry that exhibited its highest growth in key financial metrics since the fiscal year 2010! Hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams joins Gina Passarella and Nicholas Bruch, as they take a look at the 2018 Am Law 100, analysis of data, the process, what this means for law firms, and comparisons to prior years.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2030</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[382f82e8ca5bc84d95f6c88d43c057a1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8675989783.mp3?updated=1623961835" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sexual Assault Awareness Month</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/04/sexual-assault-awareness-month</link>
      <description>Sexual Assault Awareness Month (SAAM) is an annual campaign to raise public awareness about sexual assault and educate communities and individuals on how to prevent sexual violence. On April 1, 2001 the U.S. first observed Sexual Assault Awareness Month (SAAM) nationally, and in 2009, President Obama was the first United States president to proclaim April as Sexual Assault Awareness Month.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 19:29:48 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Sexual Assault Awareness Month</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>486</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d00a02f8-cfa9-11eb-92b9-07ef197352f6/image/L2L-4-384x384.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sexual Assault Awareness Month (SAAM) is an annual campaign to raise public awareness about sexual assault and educate communities and individuals on how to prevent sexual violence. On April 1, 2001 the U.S. first observed Sexual Assault Awareness...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Sexual Assault Awareness Month (SAAM) is an annual campaign to raise public awareness about sexual assault and educate communities and individuals on how to prevent sexual violence. On April 1, 2001 the U.S. first observed Sexual Assault Awareness Month (SAAM) nationally, and in 2009, President Obama was the first United States president to proclaim April as Sexual Assault Awareness Month.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sexual Assault Awareness Month (SAAM) is an annual campaign to raise public awareness about sexual assault and educate communities and individuals on how to prevent sexual violence. On April 1, 2001 the U.S. first observed Sexual Assault Awareness Month (SAAM) nationally, and in 2009, President Obama was the first United States president to proclaim April as Sexual Assault Awareness Month.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1950</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e5085f2b906deec7216e6b991015aa65]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1445154946.mp3?updated=1623961835" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Should We Regulate Video Game Violence?</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/03/should-we-regulate-video-game-violence</link>
      <description>In a world of iPhones, social media, video games, and the latest technology, teenagers and children are captivated by the allure of media and technology. After the recent school shooting in Florida, the topic of video game violence and its impact on children and teenagers was addressed at a listening session at the White House. In searching for answers behind the shooting, President Trump suggested that violent video games be regulated.
 In the 2011 Supreme Court ruling of Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, it was decided that California law restricting sales of violent video games to minors violated the right to free speech. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Cheryl Olson, internationally-known researcher on video game violence, and Professor Kevin W. Saunders, author of the book Violence as Obscenity: Limiting the Media's First Amendment Protection, to discuss regulation of video game violence, the Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association 2011 ruling, the Supreme Court, and the impact of video games on children and teenagers.
 Cheryl K. Olson is an internationally known expert on using media to change behavior (promoting mental and physical health) and effects of electronic media on children. Cheryl co-founded the Center for Mental Health and Media at Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School.
 Professor Kevin W. Saunders is the Charles Clarke Chair in Constitutional Law at Michigan State University College of Law. Professor Saunders is the author of two books, “Violence as Obscenity: Limiting the Media's First Amendment Protection and “Saving Our Children from the First Amendment.”</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2018 18:09:56 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Should We Regulate Video Game Violence?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>485</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d0332be2-cfa9-11eb-92b9-337b574ef814/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a world of iPhones, social media, video games, and the latest technology, teenagers and children are captivated by the allure of media and technology. After the recent school shooting in Florida, the topic of video game violence and its impact on...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In a world of iPhones, social media, video games, and the latest technology, teenagers and children are captivated by the allure of media and technology. After the recent school shooting in Florida, the topic of video game violence and its impact on children and teenagers was addressed at a listening session at the White House. In searching for answers behind the shooting, President Trump suggested that violent video games be regulated.
 In the 2011 Supreme Court ruling of Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, it was decided that California law restricting sales of violent video games to minors violated the right to free speech. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Cheryl Olson, internationally-known researcher on video game violence, and Professor Kevin W. Saunders, author of the book Violence as Obscenity: Limiting the Media's First Amendment Protection, to discuss regulation of video game violence, the Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association 2011 ruling, the Supreme Court, and the impact of video games on children and teenagers.
 Cheryl K. Olson is an internationally known expert on using media to change behavior (promoting mental and physical health) and effects of electronic media on children. Cheryl co-founded the Center for Mental Health and Media at Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School.
 Professor Kevin W. Saunders is the Charles Clarke Chair in Constitutional Law at Michigan State University College of Law. Professor Saunders is the author of two books, “Violence as Obscenity: Limiting the Media's First Amendment Protection and “Saving Our Children from the First Amendment.”</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In a world of iPhones, social media, video games, and the latest technology, teenagers and children are captivated by the allure of media and technology. After the recent school shooting in Florida, the topic of video game violence and its impact on children and teenagers was addressed at a listening session at the White House. In searching for answers behind the shooting, President Trump suggested that violent video games be regulated.</p> <p>In the 2011 Supreme Court ruling of Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, it was decided that California law restricting sales of violent video games to minors violated the right to free speech. On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, host <strong>Craig Williams</strong> and <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> join Cheryl Olson, internationally-known researcher on video game violence, and Professor Kevin W. Saunders, author of the book Violence as Obscenity: Limiting the Media's First Amendment Protection, to discuss regulation of video game violence, the Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association 2011 ruling, the Supreme Court, and the impact of video games on children and teenagers.</p> <p><strong>Cheryl K. Olson</strong> is an internationally known expert on using media to change behavior (promoting mental and physical health) and effects of electronic media on children. Cheryl co-founded the Center for Mental Health and Media at Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School.</p> <p>Professor <strong>Kevin W. Saunders</strong> is the Charles Clarke Chair in Constitutional Law at Michigan State University College of Law. Professor Saunders is the author of two books, “Violence as Obscenity: Limiting the Media's First Amendment Protection and “Saving Our Children from the First Amendment.”</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1857</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b3634b22a1541800ccf1b71c24bcbde4]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8603955441.mp3?updated=1623961835" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jared Kushner's Security Clearance Downgrade</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/03/jared-kushners-security-clearance-downgrade</link>
      <description>Last month, Jared Kushner, senior adviser and son in law to President Trump, had his security clearance downgraded. What led to Kushner’s security clearance downgrade and is it a threat to our national security to have Kushner remain a senior adviser to the President?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 00:16:52 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Jared Kushner's Security Clearance Downgrade</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>484</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d071f052-cfa9-11eb-92b9-8389300a996d/image/Lawyer2Lawyer.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Last month, Jared Kushner, senior adviser and son in law to President Trump, had his security clearance downgraded. So the questions remain -- what led to Kushner’s security clearance downgrade and is it a threat to our national security to have...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Last month, Jared Kushner, senior adviser and son in law to President Trump, had his security clearance downgraded. What led to Kushner’s security clearance downgrade and is it a threat to our national security to have Kushner remain a senior adviser to the President?</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Last month, Jared Kushner, senior adviser and son in law to President Trump, had his security clearance downgraded. What led to Kushner’s security clearance downgrade and is it a threat to our national security to have Kushner remain a senior adviser to the President?]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2320</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a1ae7ef63664972ba3fd970b7d3f159b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4830527852.mp3?updated=1623961836" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Florida School Shooting: Gun Legislation, Mental Health, and Prevention</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/02/florida-school-shooting-gun-legislation-mental-health-and-prevention</link>
      <description>On February 14, 2018, a shooter opened fire at Marjory Stoneman Douglas high school in Parkland, Florida, killing 17 and wounding many. We have covered mass shootings over the years here on Lawyer 2 Lawyer. From Sandy Hook to Orlando, and most recently Las Vegas, Mass shootings seem to be becoming the new normal. Gun advocates voice their concerns over a growing problem of individuals with mental health issues, where the anti-gun movement calls for stricter regulations and legislation when it comes to the purchasing of guns.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join attorney Stephen P. Halbrook, senior fellow at the Independent Institute, and professor John J. Donohue III from Stanford Law School, as they discuss this recent tragedy, mental health, gun legislation and gun control, and what can be done to prevent future mass shootings.
 Attorney Stephen P. Halbrook is senior fellow at the Independent Institute and author of the forthcoming book, Gun Control in Nazi-Occupied France.
 Professor John J. Donohue III is from Stanford Law School and has been one of the leading empirical researchers in the legal academy over the past 25 years.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:38:41 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Florida School Shooting: Gun Legislation, Mental Health, and Prevention</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>483</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d09cc9e4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5fc9ab21cd65/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On February 14, 2018, a shooter opened fire at Marjory Stoneman Douglas high school in Parkland, Florida, killing 17 and wounding many. We have covered mass shootings over the years here on Lawyer 2 Lawyer. From Sandy Hook to Orlando, and most...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On February 14, 2018, a shooter opened fire at Marjory Stoneman Douglas high school in Parkland, Florida, killing 17 and wounding many. We have covered mass shootings over the years here on Lawyer 2 Lawyer. From Sandy Hook to Orlando, and most recently Las Vegas, Mass shootings seem to be becoming the new normal. Gun advocates voice their concerns over a growing problem of individuals with mental health issues, where the anti-gun movement calls for stricter regulations and legislation when it comes to the purchasing of guns.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join attorney Stephen P. Halbrook, senior fellow at the Independent Institute, and professor John J. Donohue III from Stanford Law School, as they discuss this recent tragedy, mental health, gun legislation and gun control, and what can be done to prevent future mass shootings.
 Attorney Stephen P. Halbrook is senior fellow at the Independent Institute and author of the forthcoming book, Gun Control in Nazi-Occupied France.
 Professor John J. Donohue III is from Stanford Law School and has been one of the leading empirical researchers in the legal academy over the past 25 years.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On February 14, 2018, a shooter opened fire at Marjory Stoneman Douglas high school in Parkland, Florida, killing 17 and wounding many. We have covered mass shootings over the years here on Lawyer 2 Lawyer. From Sandy Hook to Orlando, and most recently Las Vegas, Mass shootings seem to be becoming the new normal. Gun advocates voice their concerns over a growing problem of individuals with mental health issues, where the anti-gun movement calls for stricter regulations and legislation when it comes to the purchasing of guns.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> and <strong>Craig Williams</strong> join attorney Stephen P. Halbrook, senior fellow at the Independent Institute, and professor John J. Donohue III from Stanford Law School, as they discuss this recent tragedy, mental health, gun legislation and gun control, and what can be done to prevent future mass shootings.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>Stephen P. Halbrook</strong> is senior fellow at the Independent Institute and author of the forthcoming book, Gun Control in Nazi-Occupied France.</p> <p>Professor <strong>John J. Donohue III</strong> is from Stanford Law School and has been one of the leading empirical researchers in the legal academy over the past 25 years.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017">Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2094</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8faa7bd0b49f0f9eaf4d055f80d7d8fa]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8430072117.mp3?updated=1623961836" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FISA and the Nunes Memo</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/02/fisa-and-the-nunes-memo</link>
      <description>Last week, a controversial 4 page memo created by Republican staffers and House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes alleging abuse of surveillance authority by the Justice Department and FBI was released after being declassified by President Trump. In a nutshell, the Nunes memo alleges that the FBI may have relied on “politically motivated or questionable sources" to obtain a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant in the early phases of the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Robert E. Anderson, Jr., managing director of Navigant and a former national security executive with the FBI, and John Malcolm, vice president of the Institute for Constitutional Government for the Heritage Foundation and former deputy assistant attorney general in the Department of Justice Criminal Division, as they discuss the release of the Nunes memo, impact, the Democrat’s response to the memo, FISA, and the legalities surrounding this release.
 Robert E. Anderson, Jr. is managing director of Navigant. After serving with the FBI for over 20 years, Anderson is a recognized expert in cybersecurity, incident response, cyber hacking, counterintelligence, and economic espionage.
 John Malcolm is vice president of the Institute for Constitutional Government for the Heritage Foundation, director of the Meese Center for Legal &amp; Judicial Studies, and Senior Legal Fellow.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 20:32:16 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>FISA and the Nunes Memo</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>482</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d0c88b88-cfa9-11eb-92b9-67bef3ba9137/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Last week, a controversial 4 page memo created by Republican staffers and House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes alleging abuse of surveillance authority by the Justice Department and FBI was released after being declassified by President Trump. In a...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Last week, a controversial 4 page memo created by Republican staffers and House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes alleging abuse of surveillance authority by the Justice Department and FBI was released after being declassified by President Trump. In a nutshell, the Nunes memo alleges that the FBI may have relied on “politically motivated or questionable sources" to obtain a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant in the early phases of the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Robert E. Anderson, Jr., managing director of Navigant and a former national security executive with the FBI, and John Malcolm, vice president of the Institute for Constitutional Government for the Heritage Foundation and former deputy assistant attorney general in the Department of Justice Criminal Division, as they discuss the release of the Nunes memo, impact, the Democrat’s response to the memo, FISA, and the legalities surrounding this release.
 Robert E. Anderson, Jr. is managing director of Navigant. After serving with the FBI for over 20 years, Anderson is a recognized expert in cybersecurity, incident response, cyber hacking, counterintelligence, and economic espionage.
 John Malcolm is vice president of the Institute for Constitutional Government for the Heritage Foundation, director of the Meese Center for Legal &amp; Judicial Studies, and Senior Legal Fellow.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Last week, a controversial 4 page memo created by Republican staffers and House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes alleging abuse of surveillance authority by the Justice Department and FBI was released after being declassified by President Trump. In a nutshell, the Nunes memo alleges that the FBI may have relied on “politically motivated or questionable sources" to obtain a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant in the early phases of the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> and <strong>Craig Williams</strong> join Robert E. Anderson, Jr., managing director of Navigant and a former national security executive with the FBI, and John Malcolm, vice president of the Institute for Constitutional Government for the Heritage Foundation and former deputy assistant attorney general in the Department of Justice Criminal Division, as they discuss the release of the Nunes memo, impact, the Democrat’s response to the memo, FISA, and the legalities surrounding this release.</p> <p><strong>Robert E. Anderson</strong>, Jr. is managing director of Navigant. After serving with the FBI for over 20 years, Anderson is a recognized expert in cybersecurity, incident response, cyber hacking, counterintelligence, and economic espionage.</p> <p><strong>John Malcolm</strong> is vice president of the Institute for Constitutional Government for the Heritage Foundation, director of the Meese Center for Legal &amp; Judicial Studies, and Senior Legal Fellow.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017">Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1892</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d6e5d8cf6c16d0668f9a8d6c1cf08e6d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6113477421.mp3?updated=1623961836" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gerrymandering and Impact of Redistricting Litigation</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/01/gerrymandering-and-impact-of-redistricting-litigation</link>
      <description>Gerrymandering is the dividing of a state, county, etc. into election districts so as to give one political party a majority in many districts while concentrating the voting strength of the other party into as few districts as possible. This strategy has been deployed by both political parties throughout history. In gerrymandering, “cracking” and “packing” are tactics of drawing peculiarly shaped districts to capture the desired results. Currently redistricting litigation remains pending in eight states and just this week, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down the state’s congressional map, saying it illegally benefits the GOP, violating the state constitution.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams joins professor Edward B. Foley, director of Election Law at Moritz College of Law, and Thomas Wolf, counsel with the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, to discuss the history of gerrymandering, redistricting litigation across the nation, and the impact of gerrymandering on elections.
 Professor Edward B. Foley (Ned) is director of Election Law at Moritz College of Law/Ohio State’s law school, where he also holds the Ebersold Chair in Constitutional Law.
 Thomas (Tom) Wolf is counsel with the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, focusing on redistricting issues.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2018 21:12:53 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Gerrymandering and Impact of Redistricting Litigation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>481</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d0ed1552-cfa9-11eb-92b9-1b04d837aa2d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Gerrymandering is the dividing of a state, county, etc. into election districts so as to give one political party a majority in many districts while concentrating the voting strength of the other party into as few districts as possible. This strategy...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Gerrymandering is the dividing of a state, county, etc. into election districts so as to give one political party a majority in many districts while concentrating the voting strength of the other party into as few districts as possible. This strategy has been deployed by both political parties throughout history. In gerrymandering, “cracking” and “packing” are tactics of drawing peculiarly shaped districts to capture the desired results. Currently redistricting litigation remains pending in eight states and just this week, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down the state’s congressional map, saying it illegally benefits the GOP, violating the state constitution.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams joins professor Edward B. Foley, director of Election Law at Moritz College of Law, and Thomas Wolf, counsel with the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, to discuss the history of gerrymandering, redistricting litigation across the nation, and the impact of gerrymandering on elections.
 Professor Edward B. Foley (Ned) is director of Election Law at Moritz College of Law/Ohio State’s law school, where he also holds the Ebersold Chair in Constitutional Law.
 Thomas (Tom) Wolf is counsel with the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, focusing on redistricting issues.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Gerrymandering is the dividing of a state, county, etc. into election districts so as to give one political party a majority in many districts while concentrating the voting strength of the other party into as few districts as possible. This strategy has been deployed by both political parties throughout history. In gerrymandering, “cracking” and “packing” are tactics of drawing peculiarly shaped districts to capture the desired results. Currently redistricting litigation remains pending in eight states and just this week, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down the state’s congressional map, saying it illegally benefits the GOP, violating the state constitution.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, host <strong>Craig Williams</strong> joins professor Edward B. Foley, director of Election Law at Moritz College of Law, and Thomas Wolf, counsel with the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, to discuss the history of gerrymandering, redistricting litigation across the nation, and the impact of gerrymandering on elections.</p> <p>Professor <strong>Edward B. Foley</strong> (Ned) is director of Election Law at Moritz College of Law/Ohio State’s law school, where he also holds the Ebersold Chair in Constitutional Law.</p> <p><strong>Thomas (Tom) Wolf</strong> is counsel with the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, focusing on redistricting issues.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017">Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2232</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e3b5465efca54671c9ea90d53b00d9b1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8537139298.mp3?updated=1623961836" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Sessions’ Rescission</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2018/01/the-sessions-rescission</link>
      <description>On January 4th, 2018, Attorney General Jeff Sessions rescinded Obama-era policy instructing federal prosecutors not to prioritize prosecutions against violators of federal drug laws in states that had decriminalized marijuana at the state level. This announcement came days after new legalization measures took effect in California. While many states have legalized at the state level, the drug is still illegal everywhere in the United States under federal law.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host, Craig Williams joins Paul Armentano, deputy director of NORML and Paul Larkin, senior legal research fellow for the Heritage Foundation's Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, to discuss Attorney General Jeff Sessions' efforts to rescind the Obama-era policies on marijuana, the impact on state’s marijuana legislation, and how this announcement will impact marijuana litigation and the marijuana business.
 Paul Armentano is deputy director of NORML, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.
 Paul Larkin is senior legal research fellow for the Heritage Foundation's Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 23:24:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Sessions’ Rescission</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>480</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d10cc4e2-cfa9-11eb-92b9-9f17d0eabf87/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On January 4th, 2018, Attorney General Jeff Sessions rescinded Obama-era policy instructing federal prosecutors not to prioritize prosecutions against violators of federal drug laws in states that had decriminalized marijuana at the state level. This...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On January 4th, 2018, Attorney General Jeff Sessions rescinded Obama-era policy instructing federal prosecutors not to prioritize prosecutions against violators of federal drug laws in states that had decriminalized marijuana at the state level. This announcement came days after new legalization measures took effect in California. While many states have legalized at the state level, the drug is still illegal everywhere in the United States under federal law.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host, Craig Williams joins Paul Armentano, deputy director of NORML and Paul Larkin, senior legal research fellow for the Heritage Foundation's Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, to discuss Attorney General Jeff Sessions' efforts to rescind the Obama-era policies on marijuana, the impact on state’s marijuana legislation, and how this announcement will impact marijuana litigation and the marijuana business.
 Paul Armentano is deputy director of NORML, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.
 Paul Larkin is senior legal research fellow for the Heritage Foundation's Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On January 4th, 2018, Attorney General Jeff Sessions rescinded Obama-era policy instructing federal prosecutors not to prioritize prosecutions against violators of federal drug laws in states that had decriminalized marijuana at the state level. This announcement came days after new legalization measures took effect in California. While many states have legalized at the state level, the drug is still illegal everywhere in the United States under federal law.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, host, <strong>Craig Williams</strong> joins Paul Armentano, deputy director of NORML and Paul Larkin, senior legal research fellow for the Heritage Foundation's Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, to discuss Attorney General Jeff Sessions' efforts to rescind the Obama-era policies on marijuana, the impact on state’s marijuana legislation, and how this announcement will impact marijuana litigation and the marijuana business.</p> <p><strong>Paul Armentano</strong> is deputy director of NORML, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.</p> <p><strong>Paul Larkin</strong> is senior legal research fellow for the Heritage Foundation's Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1839</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[cea8a2d159abd8798a2d72854be6a472]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6127877547.mp3?updated=1623961837" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2017 in Review: The Mailbag Episode</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/12/2017-in-review-the-mailbag-episode</link>
      <description>Lawyer 2 Lawyer has covered the Mueller investigation, sexual misconduct allegations, the Take a Knee movement, DACA, censorship and hate speech, the Equifax breach, the devastation of Hurricane Irma and Maria, and many legal stories surrounding President Trump. This past year in the law has been anything but boring.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join longtime producer, Kate Nutting, to take a look at the year in review. Bob and Craig answer audience questions from the mailbag and talk about the show, the law, and even themselves!
 Kate Nutting is a longtime producer for Lawyer 2 Lawyer on the Legal Talk Network. She also produces Ringler Radio and works closely with hosts and staff to schedule all of Legal Talk Network’s podcasts.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 21:40:02 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>2017 in Review: The Mailbag Episode</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>479</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d12c1e96-cfa9-11eb-92b9-67539b37a010/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyer 2 Lawyer has covered the Mueller investigation, sexual misconduct allegations, the Take a Knee movement, DACA, censorship and hate speech, the Equifax breach, the devastation of Hurricane Irma and Maria, and many legal stories surrounding...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Lawyer 2 Lawyer has covered the Mueller investigation, sexual misconduct allegations, the Take a Knee movement, DACA, censorship and hate speech, the Equifax breach, the devastation of Hurricane Irma and Maria, and many legal stories surrounding President Trump. This past year in the law has been anything but boring.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join longtime producer, Kate Nutting, to take a look at the year in review. Bob and Craig answer audience questions from the mailbag and talk about the show, the law, and even themselves!
 Kate Nutting is a longtime producer for Lawyer 2 Lawyer on the Legal Talk Network. She also produces Ringler Radio and works closely with hosts and staff to schedule all of Legal Talk Network’s podcasts.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Lawyer 2 Lawyer has covered the Mueller investigation, sexual misconduct allegations, the Take a Knee movement, DACA, censorship and hate speech, the Equifax breach, the devastation of Hurricane Irma and Maria, and many legal stories surrounding President Trump. This past year in the law has been anything but boring.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> and <strong>Craig Williams</strong> join longtime producer, Kate Nutting, to take a look at the year in review. Bob and Craig answer audience questions from the mailbag and talk about the show, the law, and even themselves!</p> <p><strong>Kate Nutting</strong> is a longtime producer for Lawyer 2 Lawyer on the Legal Talk Network. She also produces Ringler Radio and works closely with hosts and staff to schedule all of Legal Talk Network’s podcasts.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017">Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2175</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c2e077e15ba9a281f8ecad0655b63804]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9968305132.mp3?updated=1623961837" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyers Giving Back</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/12/lawyers-giving-back</link>
      <description>As we approach the holidays, giving is the true meaning of the season. Former U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno once said, “Being a lawyer is not merely a vocation. It is a public trust, and each of us has an obligation to give back to our communities.” And the legal community continues to make strides in assisting clients and mentoring individuals who are in need of assistance.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins attorney Jessie Kornberg, president and CEO of Bet Tzedek, attorney Shamika T. Askew-Storay, owner and managing attorney of the Storay Advocacy Group, P.A., and attorney Ricky Patel, partner with the firm Farrell Patel Jomarron &amp; Lopez, as we spotlight three attorneys who are giving back to their community, not only during the holiday season, but year round.
 Attorney Jessie Kornberg is the president and CEO of Bet Tzedek, a respected public-interest law firm out of Los Angeles, California.
 Attorney Shamika T. Askew-Storay is the owner and managing attorney of the Storay Advocacy Group, P.A. (SAG) located in Brandon, Florida.
 Attorney Ricky Patel is partner with the firm, Farrell Patel Jomarron &amp; Lopez.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:18:07 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyers Giving Back</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>478</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d14dbe34-cfa9-11eb-92b9-671c18568691/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>As we approach the holidays, giving is the true meaning of the season. Former U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno once said, “Being a lawyer is not merely a vocation. It is a public trust, and each of us has an obligation to give back to our...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As we approach the holidays, giving is the true meaning of the season. Former U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno once said, “Being a lawyer is not merely a vocation. It is a public trust, and each of us has an obligation to give back to our communities.” And the legal community continues to make strides in assisting clients and mentoring individuals who are in need of assistance.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins attorney Jessie Kornberg, president and CEO of Bet Tzedek, attorney Shamika T. Askew-Storay, owner and managing attorney of the Storay Advocacy Group, P.A., and attorney Ricky Patel, partner with the firm Farrell Patel Jomarron &amp; Lopez, as we spotlight three attorneys who are giving back to their community, not only during the holiday season, but year round.
 Attorney Jessie Kornberg is the president and CEO of Bet Tzedek, a respected public-interest law firm out of Los Angeles, California.
 Attorney Shamika T. Askew-Storay is the owner and managing attorney of the Storay Advocacy Group, P.A. (SAG) located in Brandon, Florida.
 Attorney Ricky Patel is partner with the firm, Farrell Patel Jomarron &amp; Lopez.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>As we approach the holidays, giving is the true meaning of the season. Former U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno once said, “Being a lawyer is not merely a vocation. It is a public trust, and each of us has an obligation to give back to our communities.” And the legal community continues to make strides in assisting clients and mentoring individuals who are in need of assistance.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, host <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> joins attorney Jessie Kornberg, president and CEO of Bet Tzedek, attorney Shamika T. Askew-Storay, owner and managing attorney of the Storay Advocacy Group, P.A., and attorney Ricky Patel, partner with the firm Farrell Patel Jomarron &amp; Lopez, as we spotlight three attorneys who are giving back to their community, not only during the holiday season, but year round.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>Jessie Kornberg</strong> is the president and CEO of Bet Tzedek, a respected public-interest law firm out of Los Angeles, California.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>Shamika T. Askew-Storay</strong> is the owner and managing attorney of the Storay Advocacy Group, P.A. (SAG) located in Brandon, Florida.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>Ricky Patel</strong> is partner with the firm, Farrell Patel Jomarron &amp; Lopez.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017">Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2350</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ae76a0180529713bdafbfd990d786350]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3928903299.mp3?updated=1623961837" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sexual Harassment in the Legal Profession</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/12/sexual-harassment-in-the-legal-profession</link>
      <description>Matt Lauer, Senator Al Franken, Roy Moore, Harvey Weinstein, President Trump. From movie moguls and politicians to top media personalities, sexual misconduct and harassment allegations have flooded the news cycle. But the problem of sexual harassment not only lies in Hollywood,  Capitol Hill, and newsrooms, allegations exist in the workplace, most notably in law firms. The legal website, Above the Law, hosts a series titled “The Pink Ghetto”, which spotlights real life stories from victims of sexual harassment in law firms.
 In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join attorney and professor Joanna L. Grossman, the inaugural Ellen K. Solender Endowed Chair in Women and the Law at SMU Dedman School of Law, and attorney Kathryn Rubino, editor for “Above the Law” and columnist for “Corporette,” to discuss sexual harassment at law firms. We will take a look at how the recent widespread allegations of sexual misconduct allegations in the news have impacted policy at law firms, the prevalence of sexual harassment in the legal profession, and what needs to change in workplace policy.
 Attorney and professor Joanna L. Grossman is the inaugural Ellen K. Solender Endowed Chair in Women and the Law at SMU Dedman School of Law.
 Attorney Kathryn Rubino is editor for Above the Law and columnist for Corporette.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 22:43:01 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Sexual Harassment in the Legal Profession</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>477</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d17020e6-cfa9-11eb-92b9-0fb843b9eb87/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Matt Lauer, Senator Al Franken, Roy Moore, Harvey Weinstein, President Trump. From movie moguls and politicians to top media personalities, sexual misconduct and harassment allegations have flooded the news cycle. But the problem of sexual harassment...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Matt Lauer, Senator Al Franken, Roy Moore, Harvey Weinstein, President Trump. From movie moguls and politicians to top media personalities, sexual misconduct and harassment allegations have flooded the news cycle. But the problem of sexual harassment not only lies in Hollywood,  Capitol Hill, and newsrooms, allegations exist in the workplace, most notably in law firms. The legal website, Above the Law, hosts a series titled “The Pink Ghetto”, which spotlights real life stories from victims of sexual harassment in law firms.
 In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join attorney and professor Joanna L. Grossman, the inaugural Ellen K. Solender Endowed Chair in Women and the Law at SMU Dedman School of Law, and attorney Kathryn Rubino, editor for “Above the Law” and columnist for “Corporette,” to discuss sexual harassment at law firms. We will take a look at how the recent widespread allegations of sexual misconduct allegations in the news have impacted policy at law firms, the prevalence of sexual harassment in the legal profession, and what needs to change in workplace policy.
 Attorney and professor Joanna L. Grossman is the inaugural Ellen K. Solender Endowed Chair in Women and the Law at SMU Dedman School of Law.
 Attorney Kathryn Rubino is editor for Above the Law and columnist for Corporette.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Matt Lauer, Senator Al Franken, Roy Moore, Harvey Weinstein, President Trump. From movie moguls and politicians to top media personalities, sexual misconduct and harassment allegations have flooded the news cycle. But the problem of sexual harassment not only lies in Hollywood,  Capitol Hill, and newsrooms, allegations exist in the workplace, most notably in law firms. The legal website, Above the Law, hosts a series titled “The Pink Ghetto”, which spotlights real life stories from victims of sexual harassment in law firms.</p> <p>In this episode of <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts, <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> and <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> join attorney and professor Joanna L. Grossman, the inaugural Ellen K. Solender Endowed Chair in Women and the Law at SMU Dedman School of Law, and attorney Kathryn Rubino, editor for “Above the Law” and columnist for “Corporette,” to discuss sexual harassment at law firms. We will take a look at how the recent widespread allegations of sexual misconduct allegations in the news have impacted policy at law firms, the prevalence of sexual harassment in the legal profession, and what needs to change in workplace policy.</p> <p>Attorney and professor <strong>Joanna L. Grossman</strong> is the inaugural Ellen K. Solender Endowed Chair in Women and the Law at SMU Dedman School of Law.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>Kathryn Rubino</strong> is editor for <em>Above the Law</em> and columnist for <em>Corporette.</em></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1673</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[985a373b36f0123a642bbdcdc8d9614b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6333260728.mp3?updated=1623961837" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside the Mueller Investigation</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/11/inside-the-mueller-investigation</link>
      <description>On October 30, 2017, federal charges were filed against President Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, and former Trump campaign official Rick Gates. Charges were filed in connection to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible collusion between the 2016 Presidential campaign and the Russian government. On October 5, 2017, President Trump’s foreign policy adviser, George Papadopoulos, plead guilty for giving false statements to the FBI.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, guest host Laurence Colletti joins attorney Mark Zaid, a Washington, D.C. based attorney specializing in national security, and attorney Douglas W. Kmiec, professor of constitutional law and Caruso Family Chair in constitutional law at Pepperdine Law and Ambassador of the United States (Ret.,) to discuss the recent charges in Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian involvement in the 2016 Presidential campaign. They will take a look at the charges, the players involved, who will be the next to be charged, potential pardons, and whether President Trump will be charged by Mueller.
 Attorney Mark S. Zaid is a Washington, D.C. attorney who specializes in crisis management and complex administrative and litigation matters relating to national security, international law, and the Freedom of Information/Privacy Act.
 Attorney Douglas W. Kmiec is a professor of constitutional law and Caruso Family Chair in constitutional law at Pepperdine University and Ambassador of the United States (Ret.).
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:14:46 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside the Mueller Investigation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>476</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d1902210-cfa9-11eb-92b9-37dffa63ce7f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On October 30, 2017, federal charges were filed against President Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, and former Trump campaign official Rick Gates. Charges were filed in connection to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On October 30, 2017, federal charges were filed against President Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, and former Trump campaign official Rick Gates. Charges were filed in connection to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible collusion between the 2016 Presidential campaign and the Russian government. On October 5, 2017, President Trump’s foreign policy adviser, George Papadopoulos, plead guilty for giving false statements to the FBI.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, guest host Laurence Colletti joins attorney Mark Zaid, a Washington, D.C. based attorney specializing in national security, and attorney Douglas W. Kmiec, professor of constitutional law and Caruso Family Chair in constitutional law at Pepperdine Law and Ambassador of the United States (Ret.,) to discuss the recent charges in Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian involvement in the 2016 Presidential campaign. They will take a look at the charges, the players involved, who will be the next to be charged, potential pardons, and whether President Trump will be charged by Mueller.
 Attorney Mark S. Zaid is a Washington, D.C. attorney who specializes in crisis management and complex administrative and litigation matters relating to national security, international law, and the Freedom of Information/Privacy Act.
 Attorney Douglas W. Kmiec is a professor of constitutional law and Caruso Family Chair in constitutional law at Pepperdine University and Ambassador of the United States (Ret.).
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On October 30, 2017, federal charges were filed against President Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, and former Trump campaign official Rick Gates. Charges were filed in connection to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible collusion between the 2016 Presidential campaign and the Russian government. On October 5, 2017, President Trump’s foreign policy adviser, George Papadopoulos, plead guilty for giving false statements to the FBI.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, guest host <strong>Laurence Colletti</strong> joins attorney Mark Zaid, a Washington, D.C. based attorney specializing in national security, and attorney Douglas W. Kmiec, professor of constitutional law and Caruso Family Chair in constitutional law at Pepperdine Law and Ambassador of the United States (Ret.,) to discuss the recent charges in Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian involvement in the 2016 Presidential campaign. They will take a look at the charges, the players involved, who will be the next to be charged, potential pardons, and whether President Trump will be charged by Mueller.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>Mark S. Zaid</strong> is a Washington, D.C. attorney who specializes in crisis management and complex administrative and litigation matters relating to national security, international law, and the Freedom of Information/Privacy Act.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>Douglas W. Kmiec</strong> is a professor of constitutional law and Caruso Family Chair in constitutional law at Pepperdine University and Ambassador of the United States (Ret.).</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017">Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3536</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[170d24b60439e4143d489fcf1fa609e2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3130899882.mp3?updated=1623961838" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Take a Knee Movement, the NFL, and the First Amendment</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/10/take-a-knee-movement-the-nfl-and-the-first-amendment</link>
      <description>Last football season, the NFL’s San Francisco 49ers quarterback, Colin Kaepernick, famously took a knee during the National Anthem as a silent protest against police violence against people of color. Many were outraged by Kaepernick’s stance and saw it as a sign of disrespect for the country,  flag, military, and police, where others applauded the movement, including fellow NFL players who supported Kaepernick's gesture of racial equality by also taking a knee in solidarity during the National Anthem.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams joins attorney Alan Milstein from Sherman, Silverstein, Kohl, Rose &amp; Podolsky, P.A and attorney Marc Randazza, the managing partner of Randazza Legal Group, as they discuss the controversy over #takeaknee, players’ rights, the First Amendment, President Trump reaction, and the NFL’s role in this controversy, as well as the potential impact on the NFL and other sports.
 Alan Milstein is an adjunct faculty member at the University of New Hampshire School of Law and Temple University as well as a shareholder and chairman of the litigation department at Sherman, Silverstein, Kohl, Rose &amp; Podolsky, P.A. in Moorestown, New Jersey.
 Attorney Marc Randazza is the managing partner of Randazza Legal Group and is a nationally-known First Amendment and intellectual property attorney.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 21:04:57 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Take a Knee Movement, the NFL, and the First Amendment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>475</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d1b4d6a0-cfa9-11eb-92b9-3748c5f177d9/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Last football season, the NFL’s San Francisco 49ers quarterback, Colin Kaepernick, famously took a knee during the National Anthem as a silent protest against police violence against people of color. Many were outraged by Kaepernick’s stance and...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Last football season, the NFL’s San Francisco 49ers quarterback, Colin Kaepernick, famously took a knee during the National Anthem as a silent protest against police violence against people of color. Many were outraged by Kaepernick’s stance and saw it as a sign of disrespect for the country,  flag, military, and police, where others applauded the movement, including fellow NFL players who supported Kaepernick's gesture of racial equality by also taking a knee in solidarity during the National Anthem.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams joins attorney Alan Milstein from Sherman, Silverstein, Kohl, Rose &amp; Podolsky, P.A and attorney Marc Randazza, the managing partner of Randazza Legal Group, as they discuss the controversy over #takeaknee, players’ rights, the First Amendment, President Trump reaction, and the NFL’s role in this controversy, as well as the potential impact on the NFL and other sports.
 Alan Milstein is an adjunct faculty member at the University of New Hampshire School of Law and Temple University as well as a shareholder and chairman of the litigation department at Sherman, Silverstein, Kohl, Rose &amp; Podolsky, P.A. in Moorestown, New Jersey.
 Attorney Marc Randazza is the managing partner of Randazza Legal Group and is a nationally-known First Amendment and intellectual property attorney.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Last football season, the NFL’s San Francisco 49ers quarterback, Colin Kaepernick, famously took a knee during the National Anthem as a silent protest against police violence against people of color. Many were outraged by Kaepernick’s stance and saw it as a sign of disrespect for the country,  flag, military, and police, where others applauded the movement, including fellow NFL players who supported Kaepernick's gesture of racial equality by also taking a knee in solidarity during the National Anthem.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, host <strong>Craig Williams</strong> joins attorney Alan Milstein from Sherman, Silverstein, Kohl, Rose &amp; Podolsky, P.A and attorney Marc Randazza, the managing partner of Randazza Legal Group, as they discuss the controversy over #takeaknee, players’ rights, the First Amendment, President Trump reaction, and the NFL’s role in this controversy, as well as the potential impact on the NFL and other sports.</p> <p><strong>Alan Milstein</strong> is an adjunct faculty member at the University of New Hampshire School of Law and Temple University as well as a shareholder and chairman of the litigation department at Sherman, Silverstein, Kohl, Rose &amp; Podolsky, P.A. in Moorestown, New Jersey.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>Marc Randazza</strong> is the managing partner of Randazza Legal Group and is a nationally-known First Amendment and intellectual property attorney.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1701</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0c8e6eaf6dcad546834a7e84723de2c3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5358860987.mp3?updated=1623961838" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Issues Stemming from the Las Vegas Tragedy</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/10/the-legal-issues-stemming-from-the-las-vegas-tragedy</link>
      <description>On the night of October 1, 2017, a shooter opened fire from the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay casino onto a crowd attending the Route 91 Harvest music festival in Las Vegas, Nevada. This tragedy left 58 people dead and more than 500 wounded. With terrible tragedies like this one, victims and their families are left to pick up the pieces and face a host of very real legal issues, anywhere from probate and wills to benefits and insurance claims.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins attorney Tennille Pereira from the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada and attorney Kristin Tyler, founding partner with the law firm of Garman Turner Gordon LLP in Las Vegas, Nevada, to discuss the legal issues stemming from the Las Vegas tragedy. Together they discuss how the surrounding legal community is assisting the victims and their families and the next steps lawyers are taking.
 Tennille Pereira is a staff attorney from the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada.
 Kristin M. Tyler is a founding partner with the law firm of Garman Turner Gordon LLP in Las Vegas, Nevada.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2017 22:44:13 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Issues Stemming from the Las Vegas Tragedy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>474</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d1dc016c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-0b176b7acc4d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On the night of October 1, 2017, a shooter opened fire from the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay casino onto a crowd attending the Route 91 Harvest music festival in Las Vegas, Nevada. This tragedy left 58 people dead and more than 500 wounded. With...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On the night of October 1, 2017, a shooter opened fire from the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay casino onto a crowd attending the Route 91 Harvest music festival in Las Vegas, Nevada. This tragedy left 58 people dead and more than 500 wounded. With terrible tragedies like this one, victims and their families are left to pick up the pieces and face a host of very real legal issues, anywhere from probate and wills to benefits and insurance claims.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins attorney Tennille Pereira from the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada and attorney Kristin Tyler, founding partner with the law firm of Garman Turner Gordon LLP in Las Vegas, Nevada, to discuss the legal issues stemming from the Las Vegas tragedy. Together they discuss how the surrounding legal community is assisting the victims and their families and the next steps lawyers are taking.
 Tennille Pereira is a staff attorney from the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada.
 Kristin M. Tyler is a founding partner with the law firm of Garman Turner Gordon LLP in Las Vegas, Nevada.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On the night of October 1, 2017, a shooter opened fire from the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay casino onto a crowd attending the Route 91 Harvest music festival in Las Vegas, Nevada. This tragedy left 58 people dead and more than 500 wounded. With terrible tragedies like this one, victims and their families are left to pick up the pieces and face a host of very real legal issues, anywhere from probate and wills to benefits and insurance claims.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, host <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> joins attorney Tennille Pereira from the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada and attorney Kristin Tyler, founding partner with the law firm of Garman Turner Gordon LLP in Las Vegas, Nevada, to discuss the legal issues stemming from the Las Vegas tragedy. Together they discuss how the surrounding legal community is assisting the victims and their families and the next steps lawyers are taking.</p> <p><strong>Tennille Pereira</strong> is a staff attorney from the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada.</p> <p><strong>Kristin M. Tyler</strong> is a founding partner with the law firm of Garman Turner Gordon LLP in Las Vegas, Nevada.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017">Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1962</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3a06566c3cde810ba1686a6194053bbe]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3537643342.mp3?updated=1623961838" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Implications of the Equifax Data Breach</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/09/legal-implications-of-the-equifax-data-breach</link>
      <description>The credit-reporting agency Equifax experienced a massive data breach, exposing the personal and financial data of 143 million U.S. consumers, including names, birthdates, addresses, and even social security numbers and license numbers.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Attorney Drew Rossow, from the firm Gregory M. Gantt Co. LPA,  and attorney Ben Meiselas, from Geragos &amp; Geragos, APC, to discuss the Equifax data breach, what went wrong, litigation, the potential impact, and what customers need to do if they discover that they are victims of this breach.
 Andrew Rossow is an associate attorney at Gregory M. Gantt Co. LPA where, in addition to their general practice, Drew’s passion lies in the areas of cyberspace law and technology law.
 Attorney Ben Meiselas is an associate at Geragos &amp; Geragos, APC. His practice includes personal injury law, civil rights, class actions, and complex business disputes.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:21:35 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>473</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d1fe66da-cfa9-11eb-92b9-837cafe55afb/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The credit-reporting agency Equifax experienced a massive data breach, exposing the personal and financial data of 143 million U.S. consumers, including names, birthdates, addresses, and even social security numbers and license numbers. On Lawyer 2...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The credit-reporting agency Equifax experienced a massive data breach, exposing the personal and financial data of 143 million U.S. consumers, including names, birthdates, addresses, and even social security numbers and license numbers.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Attorney Drew Rossow, from the firm Gregory M. Gantt Co. LPA,  and attorney Ben Meiselas, from Geragos &amp; Geragos, APC, to discuss the Equifax data breach, what went wrong, litigation, the potential impact, and what customers need to do if they discover that they are victims of this breach.
 Andrew Rossow is an associate attorney at Gregory M. Gantt Co. LPA where, in addition to their general practice, Drew’s passion lies in the areas of cyberspace law and technology law.
 Attorney Ben Meiselas is an associate at Geragos &amp; Geragos, APC. His practice includes personal injury law, civil rights, class actions, and complex business disputes.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The credit-reporting agency Equifax experienced a massive data breach, exposing the personal and financial data of 143 million U.S. consumers, including names, birthdates, addresses, and even social security numbers and license numbers.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> and <strong>Craig Williams</strong> join Attorney Drew Rossow, from the firm Gregory M. Gantt Co. LPA,  and attorney Ben Meiselas, from Geragos &amp; Geragos, APC, to discuss the Equifax data breach, what went wrong, litigation, the potential impact, and what customers need to do if they discover that they are victims of this breach.</p> <p><strong>Andrew Rossow</strong> is an associate attorney at Gregory M. Gantt Co. LPA where, in addition to their general practice, Drew’s passion lies in the areas of cyberspace law and technology law.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>Ben Meiselas</strong> is an associate at Geragos &amp; Geragos, APC. His practice includes personal injury law, civil rights, class actions, and complex business disputes.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017">Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2101</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9c28888bb521aaf4aa36f470e5aebb11]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2164919882.mp3?updated=1623961838" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DACA, DREAMers, and the Threat of Deportation</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/09/daca-dreamers-and-the-threat-of-deportation</link>
      <description>After the recording of this podcast, President Trump mentioned that he would work with Democrats on DACA and immigration policy. As of today, a potential "DACA deal" with Democrats remains unclear. 
 Due to the developing nature of this issue, the information in this podcast may be incorrect or outdated though still relevant. Please keep this in mind upon listening.
 On September 5th of 2017, President Trump's administration said they would rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. Back in June of 2012, DACA was put in place by the Obama Administration to protect immigrants without legal status who came to the United States as children. President Trump’s call to end DACA now heads to Congress to find a solution for the population that was previously eligible under the policy. Just this week, the state of California filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for its decision to rescind DACA.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Hans von Spakovsky, senior legal fellow in the Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and immigration attorney Erin J. Lee, from the Law Offices of Erin J. Lee, as they take a look at DACA and the DREAM Act, the role of Congress, the reality of deportation and potential impact, future litigation, and what the future holds for DREAMers and their families.
 Hans von Spakovsky is a senior legal fellow in the Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies.
 Erin J. Lee, from the Law Offices of Erin J. Lee is an immigration attorney out of San Diego, California.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 19:45:05 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>DACA, DREAMers, and the Threat of Deportation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>472</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d22015c8-cfa9-11eb-92b9-dbc98d80ec01/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>After the recording of this podcast, President Trump mentioned that he would work with Democrats on DACA and immigration policy. As of today, a potential "DACA deal" with Democrats remains unclear.  Due to the developing nature of this issue, the...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>After the recording of this podcast, President Trump mentioned that he would work with Democrats on DACA and immigration policy. As of today, a potential "DACA deal" with Democrats remains unclear. 
 Due to the developing nature of this issue, the information in this podcast may be incorrect or outdated though still relevant. Please keep this in mind upon listening.
 On September 5th of 2017, President Trump's administration said they would rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. Back in June of 2012, DACA was put in place by the Obama Administration to protect immigrants without legal status who came to the United States as children. President Trump’s call to end DACA now heads to Congress to find a solution for the population that was previously eligible under the policy. Just this week, the state of California filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for its decision to rescind DACA.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Hans von Spakovsky, senior legal fellow in the Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and immigration attorney Erin J. Lee, from the Law Offices of Erin J. Lee, as they take a look at DACA and the DREAM Act, the role of Congress, the reality of deportation and potential impact, future litigation, and what the future holds for DREAMers and their families.
 Hans von Spakovsky is a senior legal fellow in the Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies.
 Erin J. Lee, from the Law Offices of Erin J. Lee is an immigration attorney out of San Diego, California.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>After the recording of this podcast, President Trump mentioned that he would work with Democrats on DACA and immigration policy. As of today, a potential "DACA deal" with Democrats remains unclear. </em></p> <p><em>Due to the developing nature of this issue, the information in this podcast may be incorrect or outdated though still relevant. Please keep this in mind upon listening.</em></p> <p>On September 5th of 2017, President Trump's administration said they would rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. Back in June of 2012, DACA was put in place by the Obama Administration to protect immigrants without legal status who came to the United States as children. President Trump’s call to end DACA now heads to Congress to find a solution for the population that was previously eligible under the policy. Just this week, the state of California filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for its decision to rescind DACA.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> and <strong>Craig Williams</strong> join Hans von Spakovsky, senior legal fellow in the Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and immigration attorney Erin J. Lee, from the Law Offices of Erin J. Lee, as they take a look at DACA and the DREAM Act, the role of Congress, the reality of deportation and potential impact, future litigation, and what the future holds for DREAMers and their families.</p> <p><strong>Hans von Spakovsky</strong> is a senior legal fellow in the Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies.</p> <p><strong>Erin J. Lee</strong>, from the Law Offices of Erin J. Lee is an immigration attorney out of San Diego, California.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017">Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1950</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5b39a8150dc4175cf44218bac34f7cb9]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8637605481.mp3?updated=1623961838" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>First Amendment’s Clash with Censorship and Hate Speech</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/09/first-amendments-clash-with-censorship-and-hate-speech</link>
      <description>For the past year, the First Amendment, censorship, and hate speech have been at the forefront of the news cycle. From President Trump blocking users on Twitter, to violence at rallies or on college campuses, protections of our First Amendment have been tested. Also, with the rise in popularity of social media, it has become complicated when deciphering what is actually a First Amendment right and what is not.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join First Amendment attorney Robert Bertsche, partner with the firm Prince Lobel Tye, LLP, and Eugene Volokh, founder and co-author of the popular blog, The Volokh Conspiracy, as they define First Amendment, and how it relates to censorship and hate speech. Together, they differentiate and clarify government censorship versus public/private censorship, explore censorship policies on social media platforms, and discuss recent news items related to this topic.
 Attorney Robert A. Bertsche is partner with the firm, Prince Lobel Tye, LLP. Rob is devoted to protecting and strengthening his clients’ ability to communicate their content on a wide variety of platforms, including digital, interactive, print, electronic, and social media.
 Professor Eugene Volokh teaches free speech law, tort law, religious freedom law, church-state relations law, and a First Amendment amicus brief clinic at UCLA School of Law, where he has also often taught copyright law, criminal law, and a seminar on firearms regulation policy. He is also founder and co-author of the popular blog, The Volokh Conspiracy.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 20:55:22 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>First Amendment’s Clash with Censorship and Hate Speech</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>471</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d23fa46a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-8f87ec4fcefd/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>For the past year, the First Amendment, censorship, and hate speech have been at the forefront of the news cycle. From President Trump blocking users on Twitter, to violence at rallies or on college campuses, protections of our First Amendment have...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the past year, the First Amendment, censorship, and hate speech have been at the forefront of the news cycle. From President Trump blocking users on Twitter, to violence at rallies or on college campuses, protections of our First Amendment have been tested. Also, with the rise in popularity of social media, it has become complicated when deciphering what is actually a First Amendment right and what is not.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join First Amendment attorney Robert Bertsche, partner with the firm Prince Lobel Tye, LLP, and Eugene Volokh, founder and co-author of the popular blog, The Volokh Conspiracy, as they define First Amendment, and how it relates to censorship and hate speech. Together, they differentiate and clarify government censorship versus public/private censorship, explore censorship policies on social media platforms, and discuss recent news items related to this topic.
 Attorney Robert A. Bertsche is partner with the firm, Prince Lobel Tye, LLP. Rob is devoted to protecting and strengthening his clients’ ability to communicate their content on a wide variety of platforms, including digital, interactive, print, electronic, and social media.
 Professor Eugene Volokh teaches free speech law, tort law, religious freedom law, church-state relations law, and a First Amendment amicus brief clinic at UCLA School of Law, where he has also often taught copyright law, criminal law, and a seminar on firearms regulation policy. He is also founder and co-author of the popular blog, The Volokh Conspiracy.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the past year, the First Amendment, censorship, and hate speech have been at the forefront of the news cycle. From President Trump blocking users on Twitter, to violence at rallies or on college campuses, protections of our First Amendment have been tested. Also, with the rise in popularity of social media, it has become complicated when deciphering what is actually a First Amendment right and what is not.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> and <strong>Craig Williams</strong> join First Amendment attorney Robert Bertsche, partner with the firm Prince Lobel Tye, LLP, and Eugene Volokh, founder and co-author of the popular blog, The Volokh Conspiracy, as they define First Amendment, and how it relates to censorship and hate speech. Together, they differentiate and clarify government censorship versus public/private censorship, explore censorship policies on social media platforms, and discuss recent news items related to this topic.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>Robert A. Bertsche</strong> is partner with the firm, Prince Lobel Tye, LLP. Rob is devoted to protecting and strengthening his clients’ ability to communicate their content on a wide variety of platforms, including digital, interactive, print, electronic, and social media.</p> <p>Professor <strong>Eugene Volokh</strong> teaches free speech law, tort law, religious freedom law, church-state relations law, and a First Amendment amicus brief clinic at UCLA School of Law, where he has also often taught copyright law, criminal law, and a seminar on firearms regulation policy. He is also founder and co-author of the popular blog, The Volokh Conspiracy.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017">Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2147</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b8b68cd692d0bc265bedfe316f13f5b6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1523594392.mp3?updated=1623961839" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Presidential Pardon Power</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/08/presidential-pardon-power</link>
      <description>According to Article II, Section 2, of the United States Constitution, the president "shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.” With the recent investigation into President Trump’s possible collusion with Russia by special counsel Robert Mueller, talk of presidential pardon power has surfaced. So the question remains: if President Trump were to be ever found guilty of a federal crime, could he pardon himself?
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins guests Brian C. Kalt, professor of law and the Harold Norris Faculty Scholar at Michigan State University College of Law, and Robert L. Deitz, professor of Public Policy at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University, as they take an inside look at presidential pardon power. They discuss limits, take a look back at history, look ahead to see how this all will unfold, and get a deeper look into a possible presidential self-pardon and repercussions.
 Brian C. Kalt is professor of law and the Harold Norris Faculty Scholar at Michigan State University College of Law.
 Robert L. Deitz is professor of Public Policy at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 20:12:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Presidential Pardon Power</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>470</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d25fbe6c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-e7c635b80b44/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>According to Article II, Section 2, of the United States Constitution, the president "shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.” With the recent investigation into...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>According to Article II, Section 2, of the United States Constitution, the president "shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.” With the recent investigation into President Trump’s possible collusion with Russia by special counsel Robert Mueller, talk of presidential pardon power has surfaced. So the question remains: if President Trump were to be ever found guilty of a federal crime, could he pardon himself?
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins guests Brian C. Kalt, professor of law and the Harold Norris Faculty Scholar at Michigan State University College of Law, and Robert L. Deitz, professor of Public Policy at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University, as they take an inside look at presidential pardon power. They discuss limits, take a look back at history, look ahead to see how this all will unfold, and get a deeper look into a possible presidential self-pardon and repercussions.
 Brian C. Kalt is professor of law and the Harold Norris Faculty Scholar at Michigan State University College of Law.
 Robert L. Deitz is professor of Public Policy at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>According to Article II, Section 2, of the United States Constitution, the president "shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.” With the recent investigation into President Trump’s possible collusion with Russia by special counsel Robert Mueller, talk of presidential pardon power has surfaced. So the question remains: if President Trump were to be ever found guilty of a federal crime, could he pardon himself?</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, host <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> joins guests Brian C. Kalt, professor of law and the Harold Norris Faculty Scholar at Michigan State University College of Law, and Robert L. Deitz, professor of Public Policy at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University, as they take an inside look at presidential pardon power. They discuss limits, take a look back at history, look ahead to see how this all will unfold, and get a deeper look into a possible presidential self-pardon and repercussions.</p> <p><strong>Brian C. Kalt</strong> is professor of law and the Harold Norris Faculty Scholar at Michigan State University College of Law.</p> <p><strong>Robert L. Deitz</strong> is professor of Public Policy at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017">Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2214</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c039cc293a952bbf4c0e5061390c9d9a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9583973837.mp3?updated=1623961839" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BONUS CONTENT: President Trump’s Proposed Ban on Transgender Service Members</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/08/president-trumps-proposed-ban-on-transgender-service-members</link>
      <description>After recording the most recent episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer about President Trump’s proposed ban of transgender people in the military, Bob Ambrogi, Craig Williams, Kris Poppe, and Brynn Tannehill continued their discussion on the topic. We recorded their candid conversation and wanted to share it with our listeners. If you were a fan of last week’s episode, check out this bonus content from the show.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:09:38 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>BONUS CONTENT: President Trump’s Proposed Ban on Transgender Service Members</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>bonus</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>469</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d27fd06c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-4fda649c90de/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>After recording the most recent episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer about President Trump’s proposed ban of transgender people in the military, Bob Ambrogi, Craig Williams, Kris Poppe, and Brynn Tannehill continued their discussion on the topic. We recorded...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>After recording the most recent episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer about President Trump’s proposed ban of transgender people in the military, Bob Ambrogi, Craig Williams, Kris Poppe, and Brynn Tannehill continued their discussion on the topic. We recorded their candid conversation and wanted to share it with our listeners. If you were a fan of last week’s episode, check out this bonus content from the show.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>After recording the most recent episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer about President Trump’s proposed ban of transgender people in the military, Bob Ambrogi, Craig Williams, Kris Poppe, and Brynn Tannehill continued their discussion on the topic. We recorded their candid conversation and wanted to share it with our listeners. If you were a fan of last week’s episode, check out this bonus content from the show.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>747</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[daba0f9eb32be216afd216a0553cb2e3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3223700178.mp3?updated=1623961839" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>President Trump’s Proposed Ban on Transgender Service Members</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/08/president-trumps-proposed-ban-on-transgender-service-members</link>
      <description>In a series of tweets on July 26th, 2017, President Trump announced that “after consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military.” Transgender service members have been allowed to openly serve since 2016 when former Defense Secretary Ash Carter ended the ban. According to a Rand Corporation study, it is estimated that there are between 1,320 and 6,630 transgender personnel serving in the active component and between 830 and 4,160 in the Selected Reserve.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join attorney Kris Poppe from the Richardson law firm and Brynn Tannehill, director of Advocacy and founding member of the LGBT military organization SPART*A, as they discuss President’s Trump announcement, reaction by the military and transgender community, legislation, and potential litigation.
 Attorney Kris Poppe is from the Richardson law firm. He joined the Richardson Firm in 2016 after nearly 35 years of military service, including over 20 years as an Army Judge Advocate. Kris served as an NCO in the U.S. Marine Corps and as an Army infantry officer before becoming an attorney.
 Brynn Tannehill is director of Advocacy and founding member of the LGBT military organization SPART*A.  Over the past 20 years she has held positions of leadership over diverse teams of people as a Lieutenant Commander (LCDR) in the United States Navy, and as a senior research scientist and project manager at the RAND Corporation and others in private industry.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 20:34:38 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>President Trump’s Proposed Ban on Transgender Service Members</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>468</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d2a5cd3a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5bb9a5fdf60d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a series of tweets on July 26th, 2017, President Trump announced that “after consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In a series of tweets on July 26th, 2017, President Trump announced that “after consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military.” Transgender service members have been allowed to openly serve since 2016 when former Defense Secretary Ash Carter ended the ban. According to a Rand Corporation study, it is estimated that there are between 1,320 and 6,630 transgender personnel serving in the active component and between 830 and 4,160 in the Selected Reserve.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join attorney Kris Poppe from the Richardson law firm and Brynn Tannehill, director of Advocacy and founding member of the LGBT military organization SPART*A, as they discuss President’s Trump announcement, reaction by the military and transgender community, legislation, and potential litigation.
 Attorney Kris Poppe is from the Richardson law firm. He joined the Richardson Firm in 2016 after nearly 35 years of military service, including over 20 years as an Army Judge Advocate. Kris served as an NCO in the U.S. Marine Corps and as an Army infantry officer before becoming an attorney.
 Brynn Tannehill is director of Advocacy and founding member of the LGBT military organization SPART*A.  Over the past 20 years she has held positions of leadership over diverse teams of people as a Lieutenant Commander (LCDR) in the United States Navy, and as a senior research scientist and project manager at the RAND Corporation and others in private industry.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In a series of tweets on July 26th, 2017, President Trump announced that “after consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military.” Transgender service members have been allowed to openly serve since 2016 when former Defense Secretary Ash Carter ended the ban. According to a Rand Corporation study, it is estimated that there are between 1,320 and 6,630 transgender personnel serving in the active component and between 830 and 4,160 in the Selected Reserve.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> and <strong>Craig Williams</strong> join attorney Kris Poppe from the Richardson law firm and Brynn Tannehill, director of Advocacy and founding member of the LGBT military organization SPART*A, as they discuss President’s Trump announcement, reaction by the military and transgender community, legislation, and potential litigation.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>Kris Poppe</strong> is from the Richardson law firm. He joined the Richardson Firm in 2016 after nearly 35 years of military service, including over 20 years as an Army Judge Advocate. Kris served as an NCO in the U.S. Marine Corps and as an Army infantry officer before becoming an attorney.</p> <p><strong>Brynn Tannehill</strong> is director of Advocacy and founding member of the LGBT military organization SPART*A.  Over the past 20 years she has held positions of leadership over diverse teams of people as a Lieutenant Commander (LCDR) in the United States Navy, and as a senior research scientist and project manager at the RAND Corporation and others in private industry.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017">Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1981</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ed857c4fc380d6842a25fe753272d703]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6202934702.mp3?updated=1623961840" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Supreme Court’s End of Term</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/07/the-supreme-courts-end-of-term</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ended its term on Monday, June 27, 2017. Decisions were handed down in a variety of cases including cases involving big corporations, church and state, voting rights, and most notably, the controversial travel ban, put forth by President Trump.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins attorney and constitutional scholar, David J. Shestokas, author of the book, Creating the Declaration of Independence and Carolyn Shapiro, associate professor of law and co-director of the Institute on the Supreme Court of the United States at Chicago-Kent College of Law, as they discuss the Supreme Court’s end of term, landmark cases and decisions, the addition of Gorsuch to the high court, and look ahead to upcoming cases on the docket.
 Attorney and constitutional scholar David J. Shestokas is author of the new book, Creating the Declaration of Independence, which takes you through the thoughts of the men and the political climate of the day as they forged the bold and barrier breaking document embracing the ‘law of nature and nature’s god’, as a foundation for self-government.
 Carolyn Shapiro is an associate professor of law and co-director of the Institute on the Supreme Court of the United States at Chicago-Kent College of Law. From 2014 through mid-2016, Professor Shapiro took a leave of absence from Chicago-Kent to serve as Illinois solicitor general.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 23:20:26 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Supreme Court’s End of Term</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>467</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d2c8a5da-cfa9-11eb-92b9-0f7a3f828e19/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Supreme Court ended its term on Monday, June 27, 2017. Decisions were handed down in a variety of cases including cases involving big corporations, church and state, voting rights, and most notably, the controversial travel ban, put forth by...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Supreme Court ended its term on Monday, June 27, 2017. Decisions were handed down in a variety of cases including cases involving big corporations, church and state, voting rights, and most notably, the controversial travel ban, put forth by President Trump.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins attorney and constitutional scholar, David J. Shestokas, author of the book, Creating the Declaration of Independence and Carolyn Shapiro, associate professor of law and co-director of the Institute on the Supreme Court of the United States at Chicago-Kent College of Law, as they discuss the Supreme Court’s end of term, landmark cases and decisions, the addition of Gorsuch to the high court, and look ahead to upcoming cases on the docket.
 Attorney and constitutional scholar David J. Shestokas is author of the new book, Creating the Declaration of Independence, which takes you through the thoughts of the men and the political climate of the day as they forged the bold and barrier breaking document embracing the ‘law of nature and nature’s god’, as a foundation for self-government.
 Carolyn Shapiro is an associate professor of law and co-director of the Institute on the Supreme Court of the United States at Chicago-Kent College of Law. From 2014 through mid-2016, Professor Shapiro took a leave of absence from Chicago-Kent to serve as Illinois solicitor general.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court ended its term on Monday, June 27, 2017. Decisions were handed down in a variety of cases including cases involving big corporations, church and state, voting rights, and most notably, the controversial travel ban, put forth by President Trump.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, host <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> joins attorney and constitutional scholar, David J. Shestokas, author of the book, Creating the Declaration of Independence and Carolyn Shapiro, associate professor of law and co-director of the Institute on the Supreme Court of the United States at Chicago-Kent College of Law, as they discuss the Supreme Court’s end of term, landmark cases and decisions, the addition of Gorsuch to the high court, and look ahead to upcoming cases on the docket.</p> <p>Attorney and constitutional scholar <strong>David J. Shestokas</strong> is author of the new book, Creating the Declaration of Independence, which takes you through the thoughts of the men and the political climate of the day as they forged the bold and barrier breaking document embracing the ‘law of nature and nature’s god’, as a foundation for self-government.</p> <p><strong>Carolyn Shapiro</strong> is an associate professor of law and co-director of the Institute on the Supreme Court of the United States at Chicago-Kent College of Law. From 2014 through mid-2016, Professor Shapiro took a leave of absence from Chicago-Kent to serve as Illinois solicitor general.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017">Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2221</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[15150f99c03db0e480fe4b2099961bdf]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9977899358.mp3?updated=1623961840" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Rights of Animals</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/07/the-legal-rights-of-animals</link>
      <description>There is a great fight over the release of two chimpanzees, Tommy the chimpanzee, caged in a warehouse in Gloversville, New York, and Kiko, caged in a storefront at the Primary Sanctuary in Niagara Falls, New York. In a recent legal ruling by a New York appeals court, the court struck down the habeas appeal by the Nonhuman Rights Project. According to a Nonhuman Rights project press release, “the court held that the NhRP did not have the right to seek second writs of habeas corpus on behalf of Tommy and Kiko then gave certain non-binding opinions about granting legal personhood to nonhuman animals. The NhRP intends to seek appeal of this decision to New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals.”
 The Nonhuman Rights Project vows to continue to argue that the chimps’ capabilities require that they have the same fundamental rights as humans. Others have disagreed that this is not a “personhood issue” but rather a human responsibility issue.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join guests, Steven M. Wise, president of the Nonhuman Rights Project, and Richard L. Cupp, J.D., the John W. Wade professor of law at Pepperdine University, as they discuss the recent legal ruling involving captive chimpanzees, the debate over animals as "legal persons,” animal rights, animal law, and next steps.
 Steven M. Wise is president of the Nonhuman Rights Project, the only civil rights organization in the United States working for the legal rights of nonhuman animals.
 Richard L. Cupp, J.D. is the John W. Wade professor of law at Pepperdine University, where he teaches torts, products liability, remedies, and animal law.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 16:47:54 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Rights of Animals</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>466</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d2ea776e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-b338138a82ea/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>There is a great fight over the release of two chimpanzees, Tommy the chimpanzee, caged in a warehouse in Gloversville, New York, and Kiko, caged in a storefront at the Primary Sanctuary in Niagara Falls, New York. In a recent legal ruling by a New...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>There is a great fight over the release of two chimpanzees, Tommy the chimpanzee, caged in a warehouse in Gloversville, New York, and Kiko, caged in a storefront at the Primary Sanctuary in Niagara Falls, New York. In a recent legal ruling by a New York appeals court, the court struck down the habeas appeal by the Nonhuman Rights Project. According to a Nonhuman Rights project press release, “the court held that the NhRP did not have the right to seek second writs of habeas corpus on behalf of Tommy and Kiko then gave certain non-binding opinions about granting legal personhood to nonhuman animals. The NhRP intends to seek appeal of this decision to New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals.”
 The Nonhuman Rights Project vows to continue to argue that the chimps’ capabilities require that they have the same fundamental rights as humans. Others have disagreed that this is not a “personhood issue” but rather a human responsibility issue.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join guests, Steven M. Wise, president of the Nonhuman Rights Project, and Richard L. Cupp, J.D., the John W. Wade professor of law at Pepperdine University, as they discuss the recent legal ruling involving captive chimpanzees, the debate over animals as "legal persons,” animal rights, animal law, and next steps.
 Steven M. Wise is president of the Nonhuman Rights Project, the only civil rights organization in the United States working for the legal rights of nonhuman animals.
 Richard L. Cupp, J.D. is the John W. Wade professor of law at Pepperdine University, where he teaches torts, products liability, remedies, and animal law.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>There is a great fight over the release of two chimpanzees, Tommy the chimpanzee, caged in a warehouse in Gloversville, New York, and Kiko, caged in a storefront at the Primary Sanctuary in Niagara Falls, New York. In a recent legal ruling by a New York appeals court, the court struck down the habeas appeal by the Nonhuman Rights Project. According to a Nonhuman Rights project press release, “the court held that the NhRP did not have the right to seek second writs of habeas corpus on behalf of Tommy and Kiko then gave certain non-binding opinions about granting legal personhood to nonhuman animals. The NhRP intends to seek appeal of this decision to New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals.”</p> <p>The Nonhuman Rights Project vows to continue to argue that the chimps’ capabilities require that they have the same fundamental rights as humans. Others have disagreed that this is not a “personhood issue” but rather a human responsibility issue.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> and <strong>Craig Williams</strong> join guests, Steven M. Wise, president of the Nonhuman Rights Project, and Richard L. Cupp, J.D., the John W. Wade professor of law at Pepperdine University, as they discuss the recent legal ruling involving captive chimpanzees, the debate over animals as "legal persons,” animal rights, animal law, and next steps.</p> <p><strong>Steven M. Wise</strong> is president of the Nonhuman Rights Project, the only civil rights organization in the United States working for the legal rights of nonhuman animals.</p> <p><strong>Richard L. Cupp, J.D.</strong> is the John W. Wade professor of law at Pepperdine University, where he teaches torts, products liability, remedies, and animal law.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017">Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2885</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e30ad5cacd29c64069cee974bd6d8232]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6591477135.mp3?updated=1623961841" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bill Cosby Mistrial</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/06/bill-cosby-mistrial</link>
      <description>Comedian, actor, and America’s TV dad  Bill Cosby has been on trial for the sexual assault of Andrea Constand. Ms. Constand accused Cosby of sexually assaulting her and drugging her in 2004 at Cosby’s Philadelphia mansion. After a six day trial and the jury being “hopelessly deadlocked” after 52 hours of deliberating, the judge finally declared a mistrial on June 17th.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi joins attorney Letitia Quinones from the firm Quinones &amp; Associates and attorney and professor Barbara Lynn Ashcroft from the Beasley School of Law at Temple University to discuss this case, the allegations, the prosecution strategy, the defense strategy, what lead to the mistrial, and what happens next.
 Attorney Letitia Quinones is from the firm Quinones &amp; Associates out of Houston, Texas.  Attorney Quinones brings over 18 years of criminal law experience to her clients in Houston, throughout the state of Texas and across the nation.
 Attorney and professor Barbara Lynn Ashcroft is from the Beasley School of Law at Temple University. A former Montgomery County assistant district attorney, Ms. Ashcroft spent seven years prosecuting more than 1,500 criminal cases comprising fraud, burglary, domestic violence, sexual assault, felony drug crime, and homicide.
 Special thanks to our sponsors,  Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 21:29:36 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Bill Cosby Mistrial</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>465</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d30c968c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-f3e48f7e0d0f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Comedian, actor, and America’s TV dad  Bill Cosby has been on trial for the sexual assault of Andrea Constand. Ms. Constand accused Cosby of sexually assaulting her and drugging her in 2004 at Cosby’s Philadelphia mansion. After a six day...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Comedian, actor, and America’s TV dad  Bill Cosby has been on trial for the sexual assault of Andrea Constand. Ms. Constand accused Cosby of sexually assaulting her and drugging her in 2004 at Cosby’s Philadelphia mansion. After a six day trial and the jury being “hopelessly deadlocked” after 52 hours of deliberating, the judge finally declared a mistrial on June 17th.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi joins attorney Letitia Quinones from the firm Quinones &amp; Associates and attorney and professor Barbara Lynn Ashcroft from the Beasley School of Law at Temple University to discuss this case, the allegations, the prosecution strategy, the defense strategy, what lead to the mistrial, and what happens next.
 Attorney Letitia Quinones is from the firm Quinones &amp; Associates out of Houston, Texas.  Attorney Quinones brings over 18 years of criminal law experience to her clients in Houston, throughout the state of Texas and across the nation.
 Attorney and professor Barbara Lynn Ashcroft is from the Beasley School of Law at Temple University. A former Montgomery County assistant district attorney, Ms. Ashcroft spent seven years prosecuting more than 1,500 criminal cases comprising fraud, burglary, domestic violence, sexual assault, felony drug crime, and homicide.
 Special thanks to our sponsors,  Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Comedian, actor, and America’s TV dad  Bill Cosby has been on trial for the sexual assault of Andrea Constand. Ms. Constand accused Cosby of sexually assaulting her and drugging her in 2004 at Cosby’s Philadelphia mansion. After a six day trial and the jury being “hopelessly deadlocked” after 52 hours of deliberating, the judge finally declared a mistrial on June 17th.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> joins attorney Letitia Quinones from the firm Quinones &amp; Associates and attorney and professor Barbara Lynn Ashcroft from the Beasley School of Law at Temple University to discuss this case, the allegations, the prosecution strategy, the defense strategy, what lead to the mistrial, and what happens next.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>Letitia Quinones</strong> is from the firm Quinones &amp; Associates out of Houston, Texas.  Attorney Quinones brings over 18 years of criminal law experience to her clients in Houston, throughout the state of Texas and across the nation.</p> <p>Attorney and professor <strong>Barbara Lynn Ashcroft</strong> is from the Beasley School of Law at Temple University. A former Montgomery County assistant district attorney, Ms. Ashcroft spent seven years prosecuting more than 1,500 criminal cases comprising fraud, burglary, domestic violence, sexual assault, felony drug crime, and homicide.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017"> Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2350</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4aba89bfe667f6ae7f16f646241d1c24]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8115022582.mp3?updated=1623961841" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Paris Agreement on Climate Change</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/06/the-paris-agreement-on-climate-change</link>
      <description>On June 1st 2017, President Trump announced that the United States will withdraw from the Paris climate agreement. This accord was negotiated in 2015 to limit and reduce global warming.  Environmental organizations voiced their outrage over the decision citing a denial of climate change and a threat to our environment, whereas supporters of the withdrawal praised President Trump’s decision claiming it would create domestic energy production and jobs stateside.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins environmental attorney Jeffrey B. Gracer from the firm Sive, Paget &amp; Riesel and Nicolas Loris, an economist from The Heritage Foundation, as they take a look at the Paris Agreement on climate change, President Trump’s withdrawal from the accord, climate change, the impact on international law and relations, and the long-term implications for the economy and the environment.
 Attorney Jeffrey B. Gracer is from the firm Sive, Paget &amp; Riesel. Jeff has a vibrant domestic and international environmental law practice.
 Nicolas (Nick) Loris is an economist who focuses on energy, environmental, and regulatory issues as the Herbert and Joyce Morgan fellow at The Heritage Foundation.
 Special thanks to our sponsors,  Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 16:42:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Paris Agreement on Climate Change</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>464</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d3304096-cfa9-11eb-92b9-dbe347754245/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On June 1st 2017, President Trump announced that the United States will withdraw from the Paris climate agreement. This accord was negotiated in 2015 to limit and reduce global warming.  Environmental organizations voiced their outrage over the...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On June 1st 2017, President Trump announced that the United States will withdraw from the Paris climate agreement. This accord was negotiated in 2015 to limit and reduce global warming.  Environmental organizations voiced their outrage over the decision citing a denial of climate change and a threat to our environment, whereas supporters of the withdrawal praised President Trump’s decision claiming it would create domestic energy production and jobs stateside.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins environmental attorney Jeffrey B. Gracer from the firm Sive, Paget &amp; Riesel and Nicolas Loris, an economist from The Heritage Foundation, as they take a look at the Paris Agreement on climate change, President Trump’s withdrawal from the accord, climate change, the impact on international law and relations, and the long-term implications for the economy and the environment.
 Attorney Jeffrey B. Gracer is from the firm Sive, Paget &amp; Riesel. Jeff has a vibrant domestic and international environmental law practice.
 Nicolas (Nick) Loris is an economist who focuses on energy, environmental, and regulatory issues as the Herbert and Joyce Morgan fellow at The Heritage Foundation.
 Special thanks to our sponsors,  Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On June 1st 2017, President Trump announced that the United States will withdraw from the Paris climate agreement. This accord was negotiated in 2015 to limit and reduce global warming.  Environmental organizations voiced their outrage over the decision citing a denial of climate change and a threat to our environment, whereas supporters of the withdrawal praised President Trump’s decision claiming it would create domestic energy production and jobs stateside.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, host <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> joins environmental attorney Jeffrey B. Gracer from the firm Sive, Paget &amp; Riesel and Nicolas Loris, an economist from The Heritage Foundation, as they take a look at the Paris Agreement on climate change, President Trump’s withdrawal from the accord, climate change, the impact on international law and relations, and the long-term implications for the economy and the environment.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>Jeffrey B. Gracer</strong> is from the firm Sive, Paget &amp; Riesel. Jeff has a vibrant domestic and international environmental law practice.</p> <p><strong>Nicolas (Nick) Loris</strong> is an economist who focuses on energy, environmental, and regulatory issues as the Herbert and Joyce Morgan fellow at The Heritage Foundation.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017"> Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2127</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ee9444bd7de7607bfe89e6d4617d57f1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4359480402.mp3?updated=1623961841" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside the FBI, Comey Firing, and the Russia Connection</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/05/inside-the-fbi-comey-firing-and-the-russia-connection</link>
      <description>On May 9th, 2017, President Trump fired James Comey, the seventh Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Although the accounts are in dispute, it was reported that days before his dismissal, Comey had requested more resources for an FBI probe into the alleged meddling of Russia in the presidential election. The Justice Department has since denied those allegations.  Many were stunned by the dismissal of Comey and are questioning the reasons behind it.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams joins Ronald Kessler, author of “The FBI: Inside the World's Most Powerful Law Enforcement Agency”, and Asha Rangappa, associate dean at Yale Law School and former special agent for the FBI, as they take an inside look at the FBI, the dismissal of Comey, the legalities triggered by dismissals, and the Russia connection.
 Ronald Kessler is the New York Times bestselling author of 20 non-fiction books. For Kessler's eighth book, “The FBI: Inside the World's Most Powerful Law Enforcement Agency”, the FBI gave Kessler unprecedented access to the bureau.
 Asha Rangappa is associate dean at Yale Law School. Prior to her current position, Asha served as a special agent in the New York office of the FBI, specializing in counterintelligence investigations.
 Special thanks to our sponsors,  Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 18:58:31 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside the FBI, Comey Firing, and the Russia Connection</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>463</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d352cbfc-cfa9-11eb-92b9-87cab56e96a9/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On May 9th, 2017, President Trump fired James Comey, the seventh Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Although the accounts are in dispute, it was reported that days before his dismissal, Comey had requested more resources for an FBI probe...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On May 9th, 2017, President Trump fired James Comey, the seventh Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Although the accounts are in dispute, it was reported that days before his dismissal, Comey had requested more resources for an FBI probe into the alleged meddling of Russia in the presidential election. The Justice Department has since denied those allegations.  Many were stunned by the dismissal of Comey and are questioning the reasons behind it.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams joins Ronald Kessler, author of “The FBI: Inside the World's Most Powerful Law Enforcement Agency”, and Asha Rangappa, associate dean at Yale Law School and former special agent for the FBI, as they take an inside look at the FBI, the dismissal of Comey, the legalities triggered by dismissals, and the Russia connection.
 Ronald Kessler is the New York Times bestselling author of 20 non-fiction books. For Kessler's eighth book, “The FBI: Inside the World's Most Powerful Law Enforcement Agency”, the FBI gave Kessler unprecedented access to the bureau.
 Asha Rangappa is associate dean at Yale Law School. Prior to her current position, Asha served as a special agent in the New York office of the FBI, specializing in counterintelligence investigations.
 Special thanks to our sponsors,  Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On May 9th, 2017, President Trump fired James Comey, the seventh Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Although the accounts are in dispute, it was reported that days before his dismissal, Comey had requested more resources for an FBI probe into the alleged meddling of Russia in the presidential election. The Justice Department has since denied those allegations.  Many were stunned by the dismissal of Comey and are questioning the reasons behind it.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, host <strong>Craig Williams</strong> joins Ronald Kessler, author of “The FBI: Inside the World's Most Powerful Law Enforcement Agency”, and Asha Rangappa, associate dean at Yale Law School and former special agent for the FBI, as they take an inside look at the FBI, the dismissal of Comey, the legalities triggered by dismissals, and the Russia connection.</p> <p><strong>Ronald Kessler</strong> is the New York Times bestselling author of 20 non-fiction books. For Kessler's eighth book, “The FBI: Inside the World's Most Powerful Law Enforcement Agency”, the FBI gave Kessler unprecedented access to the bureau.</p> <p><strong>Asha Rangappa</strong> is associate dean at Yale Law School. Prior to her current position, Asha served as a special agent in the New York office of the FBI, specializing in counterintelligence investigations.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017"> Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1801</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b942495c63af62a8541c609810733ee8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7582684975.mp3?updated=1623961842" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Assessment Drives Learning: The Solicitors Qualifying Exam Eliminates U.K. Law School Requirement</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/05/assessment-drives-learning-the-solicitors-qualifying-exam-eliminates-u-k-law-school-requirement</link>
      <description>The regulatory body that oversees the legal profession in England and Wales, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), has enacted a major overhaul of legal training and solicitor licensure. This will take effect in 2020.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join attorney Mark A. Cohen, CEO of Legal Mosaic and Julie Brannan, Director of Education and Training for the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), as they discuss how the U.K. is eliminating the requirement of attending law school in favor of a skills exam. They talk about that exam, its potential impact on law students and the legal community, and whether or not the United States will adopt a similar practice.
 Mark Cohen, the CEO of Legal Mosaic, is a Distinguished Lecturer in Law at Georgetown Law School and writes a weekly column on the global legal marketplace for Forbes. Mark recently wrote a piece for Forbes titled, “A British Reboot of Legal Education-- Law School Optional.”
 Julie Brannan is the director of education and training for the Solicitors Regulation Authority better known as the SRA out of the U.K. She joined the SRA in October 2013, and since then has been leading the Training for Tomorrow review of legal education and training.
 Special thanks to our sponsors,  Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 16:18:03 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Assessment Drives Learning: The Solicitors Qualifying Exam Eliminates U.K. Law School Requirement</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>462</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d374e4c6-cfa9-11eb-92b9-c3b19b9c7078/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The regulatory body that oversees the legal profession in England and Wales, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), has enacted a major overhaul of legal training and solicitor licensure. This will take effect in 2020. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The regulatory body that oversees the legal profession in England and Wales, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), has enacted a major overhaul of legal training and solicitor licensure. This will take effect in 2020.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join attorney Mark A. Cohen, CEO of Legal Mosaic and Julie Brannan, Director of Education and Training for the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), as they discuss how the U.K. is eliminating the requirement of attending law school in favor of a skills exam. They talk about that exam, its potential impact on law students and the legal community, and whether or not the United States will adopt a similar practice.
 Mark Cohen, the CEO of Legal Mosaic, is a Distinguished Lecturer in Law at Georgetown Law School and writes a weekly column on the global legal marketplace for Forbes. Mark recently wrote a piece for Forbes titled, “A British Reboot of Legal Education-- Law School Optional.”
 Julie Brannan is the director of education and training for the Solicitors Regulation Authority better known as the SRA out of the U.K. She joined the SRA in October 2013, and since then has been leading the Training for Tomorrow review of legal education and training.
 Special thanks to our sponsors,  Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The regulatory body that oversees the legal profession in England and Wales, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), has enacted a major overhaul of legal training and solicitor licensure. This will take effect in 2020.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em><em>,</em> hosts <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> and <strong>Craig Williams</strong> join attorney Mark A. Cohen, CEO of Legal Mosaic and Julie Brannan, Director of Education and Training for the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), as they discuss how the U.K. is eliminating the requirement of attending law school in favor of a skills exam. They talk about that exam, its potential impact on law students and the legal community, and whether or not the United States will adopt a similar practice.</p> <p><strong>Mark Cohen</strong>, the CEO of Legal Mosaic, is a Distinguished Lecturer in Law at Georgetown Law School and writes a weekly column on the global legal marketplace for Forbes. Mark recently wrote a piece for Forbes titled, “A British Reboot of Legal Education-- Law School Optional.”</p> <p><strong>Julie Brannan</strong> is the director of education and training for the Solicitors Regulation Authority better known as the SRA out of the U.K. She joined the SRA in October 2013, and since then has been leading the Training for Tomorrow review of legal education and training.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017"> Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2092</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ed92adad5a0bda6def3951c82bac924c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6656044462.mp3?updated=1623961842" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Aftermath of the Massachusetts Drug Lab Scandal and the Dismissal of 21,000 Cases</title>
      <link>https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/04/aftermath-massachusetts-drug-lab-scandal-dismissal-21000-cases/</link>
      <description>On April 18th 2017, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court dismissed more than 21,000 low-level drug cases connected to the drug lab scandal that involved Annie Dookhan, a former chemist of a Massachusetts crime lab who admitted to falsifying evidence. After an investigation into Annie Dookhan and her work at the Hinton State Laboratory Institute, Dookhan admitted to altering and faking test results over a period of 8 years.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Carl Williams, staff attorney for the ACLU of Massachusetts, and Sandra Guerra Thompson, the director of the Criminal Justice Institute at the University of Houston Law Center, to take a look at this drug lab scandal in Massachusetts and its impact on drug cases, attorneys, defendants, as well as take an inside look at what goes on inside a crime lab.
 Carl Williams is a staff attorney for the ACLU of Massachusetts. Carl was previously a criminal defense attorney with the Roxbury Defenders Unit of the Committee for Public Counsel Services.
 Sandra Guerra Thompson is the director of the Criminal Justice Institute at the University of Houston Law Center. In 2015, Sandra wrote a book entitled “Cops in Lab Coats: Curbing Wrongful Convictions with Independent Forensic Laboratories."</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 21:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Aftermath of the Massachusetts Drug Lab Scandal and the Dismissal of 21,000 Cases</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>461</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d3b60f00-cfa9-11eb-92b9-8f029782159f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On April 18th 2017, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court dismissed more than 21,000 low-level drug cases connected to the drug lab scandal that involved Annie Dookhan, a former chemist of a Massachusetts crime lab who admitted to falsifying...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On April 18th 2017, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court dismissed more than 21,000 low-level drug cases connected to the drug lab scandal that involved Annie Dookhan, a former chemist of a Massachusetts crime lab who admitted to falsifying evidence. After an investigation into Annie Dookhan and her work at the Hinton State Laboratory Institute, Dookhan admitted to altering and faking test results over a period of 8 years.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Carl Williams, staff attorney for the ACLU of Massachusetts, and Sandra Guerra Thompson, the director of the Criminal Justice Institute at the University of Houston Law Center, to take a look at this drug lab scandal in Massachusetts and its impact on drug cases, attorneys, defendants, as well as take an inside look at what goes on inside a crime lab.
 Carl Williams is a staff attorney for the ACLU of Massachusetts. Carl was previously a criminal defense attorney with the Roxbury Defenders Unit of the Committee for Public Counsel Services.
 Sandra Guerra Thompson is the director of the Criminal Justice Institute at the University of Houston Law Center. In 2015, Sandra wrote a book entitled “Cops in Lab Coats: Curbing Wrongful Convictions with Independent Forensic Laboratories."</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On April 18th 2017, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court dismissed more than 21,000 low-level drug cases connected to the drug lab scandal that involved Annie Dookhan, a former chemist of a Massachusetts crime lab who admitted to falsifying evidence. After an investigation into Annie Dookhan and her work at the Hinton State Laboratory Institute, Dookhan admitted to altering and faking test results over a period of 8 years.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em><em>,</em> hosts <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> and <strong>Craig Williams</strong> join Carl Williams, staff attorney for the ACLU of Massachusetts, and Sandra Guerra Thompson, the director of the Criminal Justice Institute at the University of Houston Law Center, to take a look at this drug lab scandal in Massachusetts and its impact on drug cases, attorneys, defendants, as well as take an inside look at what goes on inside a crime lab.</p> <p><strong>Carl Williams</strong> is a staff attorney for the ACLU of Massachusetts. Carl was previously a criminal defense attorney with the Roxbury Defenders Unit of the Committee for Public Counsel Services.</p> <p><strong>Sandra Guerra Thompson</strong> is the director of the Criminal Justice Institute at the University of Houston Law Center. In 2015, Sandra wrote a book entitled “Cops in Lab Coats: Curbing Wrongful Convictions with Independent Forensic Laboratories."</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1718</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a83903cb560d4bffdac286af73b6e19c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8583626074.mp3?updated=1623961843" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Your Browser History: How Recent ISP Legislation Affects Privacy</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/04/browser-history-recent-isp-legislation-affects-privacy</link>
      <description>On April 3rd, 2017, President Trump signed into law a controversial measure repealing online privacy protections, which were established by the Federal Communications Commission under the Obama Administration and would go into effect at the end of 2017.  This legislation allows internet providers or ISPs to sell customer data without consent. Supporters of this legislation believe that keeping browsing information private would stop innovation, where opponents voice their concerns over the privacy protections of customers.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Ernesto Falcon, legislative counsel at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Alden F. Abbott, deputy director of the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation, as they take a look at the passing of this legislation involving internet service providers and web-surfing data. They discuss this controversial legislation, the privacy issues, and the potential impact on customers.
 Ernesto Falcon is legislative counsel at the Electronic Frontier Foundation with a primary focus on intellectual property and open Internet issues. Prior to joining EFF, Ernesto worked as a legislative staffer for two Members of Congress (2004-2010).
 Alden F. Abbott is the Rumpel senior legal fellow and deputy director of the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation. Alden previously served as director of patent and antitrust strategy for BlackBerry, and in a variety of senior government positions.
 Special thanks to our sponsors,  Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 17:14:54 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Your Browser History: How Recent ISP Legislation Affects Privacy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>460</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d4065744-cfa9-11eb-92b9-2b961835cda3/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On April 3rd, 2017, President Trump signed into law a controversial measure repealing online privacy protections, which were established by the Federal Communications Commission under the Obama Administration and would go into effect at the end of...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On April 3rd, 2017, President Trump signed into law a controversial measure repealing online privacy protections, which were established by the Federal Communications Commission under the Obama Administration and would go into effect at the end of 2017.  This legislation allows internet providers or ISPs to sell customer data without consent. Supporters of this legislation believe that keeping browsing information private would stop innovation, where opponents voice their concerns over the privacy protections of customers.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Ernesto Falcon, legislative counsel at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Alden F. Abbott, deputy director of the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation, as they take a look at the passing of this legislation involving internet service providers and web-surfing data. They discuss this controversial legislation, the privacy issues, and the potential impact on customers.
 Ernesto Falcon is legislative counsel at the Electronic Frontier Foundation with a primary focus on intellectual property and open Internet issues. Prior to joining EFF, Ernesto worked as a legislative staffer for two Members of Congress (2004-2010).
 Alden F. Abbott is the Rumpel senior legal fellow and deputy director of the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation. Alden previously served as director of patent and antitrust strategy for BlackBerry, and in a variety of senior government positions.
 Special thanks to our sponsors,  Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On April 3rd, 2017, President Trump signed into law a controversial measure repealing online privacy protections, which were established by the Federal Communications Commission under the Obama Administration and would go into effect at the end of 2017.  This legislation allows internet providers or ISPs to sell customer data without consent. Supporters of this legislation believe that keeping browsing information private would stop innovation, where opponents voice their concerns over the privacy protections of customers.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> and <strong>Craig Williams</strong> join Ernesto Falcon, legislative counsel at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Alden F. Abbott, deputy director of the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation, as they take a look at the passing of this legislation involving internet service providers and web-surfing data. They discuss this controversial legislation, the privacy issues, and the potential impact on customers.</p> <p><strong>Ernesto Falcon</strong> is legislative counsel at the Electronic Frontier Foundation with a primary focus on intellectual property and open Internet issues. Prior to joining EFF, Ernesto worked as a legislative staffer for two Members of Congress (2004-2010).</p> <p><strong>Alden F. Abbott</strong> is the Rumpel senior legal fellow and deputy director of the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation. Alden previously served as director of patent and antitrust strategy for BlackBerry, and in a variety of senior government positions.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017"> Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1853</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a0b1c601aef29ec82fc9467fa806232d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3258580966.mp3?updated=1623961843" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will Budget Cuts to the Legal Services Corporation Diminish Access To Justice?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/03/will-budget-cuts-legal-services-corporation-diminish-access-justice</link>
      <description>On March 16, 2017, President Trump unveiled his proposed federal budget. With this proposed budget came many federal budget cuts to federal agencies and programs like the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, “Meals on Wheels,” and the Office of Violence Against Women.  Included in these cuts, was the Legal Services Corporation, an independent nonprofit established by Congress in 1974 to provide financial support for civil legal aid to low-income Americans. If President Trump’s current budget proposal is approved by Congress, this elimination of funding would directly impact those who seek legal representation.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins attorney Jim Sandman, president of the Legal Services Corporation, and attorney Linda Klein, president of the American Bar Association, to discuss President Trump’s budget proposal to zero out funding for the Legal Services Corporation. This discussion includes the state of legal services funding today and what cuts or elimination would mean for lower income Americans.
 Attorney James J. Sandman has been president of the Legal Services Corporation since 2011. Jim practiced law with Arnold &amp; Porter LLP for 30 years and served as the firm’s managing partner for a decade.
 Attorney Linda Klein is president of the American Bar Association and the senior managing shareholder at Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell &amp; Berkowitz.
 Special thanks to our sponsors,  Clio and Litera.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:59:05 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Will Budget Cuts to the Legal Services Corporation Diminish Access To Justice?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>459</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d430a238-cfa9-11eb-92b9-77ab98282c08/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On March 16, 2017, President Trump unveiled his proposed federal budget. With this proposed budget came many federal budget cuts to federal agencies and programs like the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, “Meals on Wheels,” and the Office of...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On March 16, 2017, President Trump unveiled his proposed federal budget. With this proposed budget came many federal budget cuts to federal agencies and programs like the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, “Meals on Wheels,” and the Office of Violence Against Women.  Included in these cuts, was the Legal Services Corporation, an independent nonprofit established by Congress in 1974 to provide financial support for civil legal aid to low-income Americans. If President Trump’s current budget proposal is approved by Congress, this elimination of funding would directly impact those who seek legal representation.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins attorney Jim Sandman, president of the Legal Services Corporation, and attorney Linda Klein, president of the American Bar Association, to discuss President Trump’s budget proposal to zero out funding for the Legal Services Corporation. This discussion includes the state of legal services funding today and what cuts or elimination would mean for lower income Americans.
 Attorney James J. Sandman has been president of the Legal Services Corporation since 2011. Jim practiced law with Arnold &amp; Porter LLP for 30 years and served as the firm’s managing partner for a decade.
 Attorney Linda Klein is president of the American Bar Association and the senior managing shareholder at Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell &amp; Berkowitz.
 Special thanks to our sponsors,  Clio and Litera.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On March 16, 2017, President Trump unveiled his proposed federal budget. With this proposed budget came many federal budget cuts to federal agencies and programs like the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, “Meals on Wheels,” and the Office of Violence Against Women.  Included in these cuts, was the Legal Services Corporation, an independent nonprofit established by Congress in 1974 to provide financial support for civil legal aid to low-income Americans. If President Trump’s current budget proposal is approved by Congress, this elimination of funding would directly impact those who seek legal representation.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, host <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> joins attorney Jim Sandman, president of the Legal Services Corporation, and attorney Linda Klein, president of the American Bar Association, to discuss President Trump’s budget proposal to zero out funding for the Legal Services Corporation. This discussion includes the state of legal services funding today and what cuts or elimination would mean for lower income Americans.</p> <p>Attorney James J. Sandman has been president of the Legal Services Corporation since 2011. Jim practiced law with Arnold &amp; Porter LLP for 30 years and served as the firm’s managing partner for a decade.</p> <p>Attorney Linda Klein is president of the American Bar Association and the senior managing shareholder at Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell &amp; Berkowitz.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.clio.com/?utm_campaign=Clio_Podcast&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_source=legaltalknetwork&amp;utm_content=lawyer_2_lawyer&amp;utm_term=mar_22_2017"> Clio</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litera</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1972</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b07cee1fa6cfc5ed1ef4445711ab04b4]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7463277429.mp3?updated=1623961843" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>President Trump vs. the Press</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/03/president-trump-vs-press</link>
      <description>In recent months, President Trump has been very vocal about his disdain for the press and labeling certain news outlets “fake news.”  In retaliation for contentious press relations, the White House blocked a number of news organizations including CNN, the New York Times, Politico, and the Los Angeles Times from attending an off-camera press briefing with Press Secretary, Sean Spicer on February 24th. So the question remains, how far will President Trump go with curtailing press participation and is that considered an infringement on the freedom of the press?
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join attorney David A. Schulz, co-director of the Media Freedom and Information Access (MFIA) Clinic and attorney Howard Cooper, a founding partner of Todd &amp; Weld LLP, as they take a look at the First Amendment, discuss the Trump/press relationship, what constitutes “fake news,” the freedom of the press, and potential future litigation involving the press.
 Attorney David A. Schulz is a senior research scholar in law and Floyd Abrams clinical lecturer in Law at Yale Law School and co-director of the Media Freedom and Information Access (MFIA) Clinic.
 Attorney Howard Cooper is a founding partner of Todd &amp; Weld LLP. Howard regularly handles significant civil rights and First Amendment matters, which are often of public significance.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litéra.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 22:46:21 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>President Trump vs. the Press</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>458</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d45c86a0-cfa9-11eb-92b9-b3e828ac0617/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In recent months, President Trump has been very vocal about his disdain for the press and labeling certain news outlets “fake news.”  In retaliation for contentious press relations, the White House blocked a number of news organizations...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In recent months, President Trump has been very vocal about his disdain for the press and labeling certain news outlets “fake news.”  In retaliation for contentious press relations, the White House blocked a number of news organizations including CNN, the New York Times, Politico, and the Los Angeles Times from attending an off-camera press briefing with Press Secretary, Sean Spicer on February 24th. So the question remains, how far will President Trump go with curtailing press participation and is that considered an infringement on the freedom of the press?
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join attorney David A. Schulz, co-director of the Media Freedom and Information Access (MFIA) Clinic and attorney Howard Cooper, a founding partner of Todd &amp; Weld LLP, as they take a look at the First Amendment, discuss the Trump/press relationship, what constitutes “fake news,” the freedom of the press, and potential future litigation involving the press.
 Attorney David A. Schulz is a senior research scholar in law and Floyd Abrams clinical lecturer in Law at Yale Law School and co-director of the Media Freedom and Information Access (MFIA) Clinic.
 Attorney Howard Cooper is a founding partner of Todd &amp; Weld LLP. Howard regularly handles significant civil rights and First Amendment matters, which are often of public significance.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litéra.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In recent months, President Trump has been very vocal about his disdain for the press and labeling certain news outlets “fake news.”  In retaliation for contentious press relations, the White House blocked a number of news organizations including CNN, the New York Times, Politico, and the Los Angeles Times from attending an off-camera press briefing with Press Secretary, Sean Spicer on February 24th. So the question remains, how far will President Trump go with curtailing press participation and is that considered an infringement on the freedom of the press?</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> and <strong>Craig Williams</strong> join attorney David A. Schulz, co-director of the Media Freedom and Information Access (MFIA) Clinic and attorney Howard Cooper, a founding partner of Todd &amp; Weld LLP, as they take a look at the First Amendment, discuss the Trump/press relationship, what constitutes “fake news,” the freedom of the press, and potential future litigation involving the press.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>David A. Schulz</strong> is a senior research scholar in law and Floyd Abrams clinical lecturer in Law at Yale Law School and co-director of the Media Freedom and Information Access (MFIA) Clinic.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>Howard Cooper</strong> is a founding partner of Todd &amp; Weld LLP. Howard regularly handles significant civil rights and First Amendment matters, which are often of public significance.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong> and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litéra</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1929</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12957b301b31c46edb84a2a8cf455aea]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9997721274.mp3?updated=1623961844" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Trump Administration and U.S. Labor Laws</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/03/trump-administration-u-s-labor-laws</link>
      <description>The Taft-Hartley Act, written in 1947, is one of the key laws governing labor relations in the United States today. Laws governing the workforce and employers have changed little, while the working world has changed dramatically. So are U.S. labor laws due for a major overhaul?  Also, in recent months, President Trump has nominated Alexander Acosta to fill the Secretary of Labor spot after his first pick, Andrew Puzder, withdrew his nomination.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join attorney Howard Wexler, an associate in the Labor and Employment group at Seyfarth Shaw LLP, and Kate Bronfenbrenner, director of labor education research and a senior lecturer at Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations, as they take a look at U.S. Federal Labor laws, reform, current legislation, and the impact a new Secretary of Labor under a Trump presidency will have on the U.S. workforce and employers.
 Attorney Howard Wexler is an associate in the Labor and Employment group in Seyfarth Shaw’s New York office. In this role, Mr. Wexler has extensive experience defending both single and multi-plaintiff discrimination/harassment cases, class and/or collective actions, as well as lawsuits initiated by the EEOC.
 Kate Bronfenbrenner is director of labor education research and a senior lecturer at Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations where she teaches and does research on union and employer strategies in organizing and bargaining in the global economy.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litéra.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 17:57:41 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Trump Administration and U.S. Labor Laws</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>457</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d48c1bae-cfa9-11eb-92b9-a7cbfebf0080/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Taft-Hartley Act, written in 1947, is one of the key laws governing labor relations in the United States today. Laws governing the workforce and employers have changed little, while the working world has changed dramatically. So are U.S. labor...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Taft-Hartley Act, written in 1947, is one of the key laws governing labor relations in the United States today. Laws governing the workforce and employers have changed little, while the working world has changed dramatically. So are U.S. labor laws due for a major overhaul?  Also, in recent months, President Trump has nominated Alexander Acosta to fill the Secretary of Labor spot after his first pick, Andrew Puzder, withdrew his nomination.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join attorney Howard Wexler, an associate in the Labor and Employment group at Seyfarth Shaw LLP, and Kate Bronfenbrenner, director of labor education research and a senior lecturer at Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations, as they take a look at U.S. Federal Labor laws, reform, current legislation, and the impact a new Secretary of Labor under a Trump presidency will have on the U.S. workforce and employers.
 Attorney Howard Wexler is an associate in the Labor and Employment group in Seyfarth Shaw’s New York office. In this role, Mr. Wexler has extensive experience defending both single and multi-plaintiff discrimination/harassment cases, class and/or collective actions, as well as lawsuits initiated by the EEOC.
 Kate Bronfenbrenner is director of labor education research and a senior lecturer at Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations where she teaches and does research on union and employer strategies in organizing and bargaining in the global economy.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litéra.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The Taft-Hartley Act, written in 1947, is one of the key laws governing labor relations in the United States today. Laws governing the workforce and employers have changed little, while the working world has changed dramatically. So are U.S. labor laws due for a major overhaul?  Also, in recent months, President Trump has nominated Alexander Acosta to fill the Secretary of Labor spot after his first pick, Andrew Puzder, withdrew his nomination.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em><em>,</em> hosts <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> and <strong>Craig Williams</strong> join attorney Howard Wexler, an associate in the Labor and Employment group at Seyfarth Shaw LLP, and Kate Bronfenbrenner, director of labor education research and a senior lecturer at Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations, as they take a look at U.S. Federal Labor laws, reform, current legislation, and the impact a new Secretary of Labor under a Trump presidency will have on the U.S. workforce and employers.</p> <p><strong>Attorney Howard Wexler</strong> is an associate in the Labor and Employment group in Seyfarth Shaw’s New York office. In this role, Mr. Wexler has extensive experience defending both single and multi-plaintiff discrimination/harassment cases, class and/or collective actions, as well as lawsuits initiated by the EEOC.</p> <p><strong>Kate Bronfenbrenner</strong> is director of labor education research and a senior lecturer at Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations where she teaches and does research on union and employer strategies in organizing and bargaining in the global economy.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong> and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litéra</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1873</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8c652b64296387b7528630248c3d1d47]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8931154836.mp3?updated=1623961844" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Nomination of Judge Gorsuch to the Supreme Court</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/02/nomination-judge-gorsuch-supreme-court/</link>
      <description>On January 31, 2017, President Trump announced that he had selected federal appeals court Judge Neil Gorsuch as his nomination for the U.S. Supreme Court to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Many praised Trump on his nomination, citing parallels to Justice Scalia, while others saw Judge Gorsuch’s documented conservatism as a possible threat to future Supreme Court rulings.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Carrie Severino, chief counsel and policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network and Michele Jawando, vice president for Legal Progress at American Progress, as they take a look at the nomination of Judge Gorsuch, his record on rulings, and his potential impact on the Supreme Court if confirmed.
 Carrie Severino is chief counsel and policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network. In that capacity, Carrie has testified before Congress on assorted constitutional issues and briefed Senators on judicial nominations.
 Attorney Michele Jawando is vice president for Legal Progress at American Progress. Previously, Michele served as general counsel and senior advisor to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), where she was responsible for a wide-ranging portfolio of policy issues pertaining to the federal judiciary and nominations.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litéra.
  </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:37:18 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Nomination of Judge Gorsuch to the Supreme Court</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>456</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d4ad89a6-cfa9-11eb-92b9-dbd356c69eb1/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On January 31, 2017, President Trump announced that he had selected federal appeals court Judge Neil Gorsuch as his nomination for the U.S. Supreme Court to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Many praised Trump on his nomination, citing...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On January 31, 2017, President Trump announced that he had selected federal appeals court Judge Neil Gorsuch as his nomination for the U.S. Supreme Court to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Many praised Trump on his nomination, citing parallels to Justice Scalia, while others saw Judge Gorsuch’s documented conservatism as a possible threat to future Supreme Court rulings.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Carrie Severino, chief counsel and policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network and Michele Jawando, vice president for Legal Progress at American Progress, as they take a look at the nomination of Judge Gorsuch, his record on rulings, and his potential impact on the Supreme Court if confirmed.
 Carrie Severino is chief counsel and policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network. In that capacity, Carrie has testified before Congress on assorted constitutional issues and briefed Senators on judicial nominations.
 Attorney Michele Jawando is vice president for Legal Progress at American Progress. Previously, Michele served as general counsel and senior advisor to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), where she was responsible for a wide-ranging portfolio of policy issues pertaining to the federal judiciary and nominations.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litéra.
  </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On January 31, 2017, President Trump announced that he had selected federal appeals court Judge Neil Gorsuch as his nomination for the U.S. Supreme Court to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Many praised Trump on his nomination, citing parallels to Justice Scalia, while others saw Judge Gorsuch’s documented conservatism as a possible threat to future Supreme Court rulings.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> and <strong>Craig Williams</strong> join Carrie Severino, chief counsel and policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network and Michele Jawando, vice president for Legal Progress at American Progress, as they take a look at the nomination of Judge Gorsuch, his record on rulings, and his potential impact on the Supreme Court if confirmed.</p> <p><strong>Carrie Severino</strong> is chief counsel and policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network. In that capacity, Carrie has testified before Congress on assorted constitutional issues and briefed Senators on judicial nominations.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>Michele Jawando</strong> is vice president for Legal Progress at American Progress. Previously, Michele served as general counsel and senior advisor to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), where she was responsible for a wide-ranging portfolio of policy issues pertaining to the federal judiciary and nominations.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong> and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litéra</strong></a>.</p> <p> </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1893</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b4835be819672aa954a8f0a60cff4eb6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8242169434.mp3?updated=1623961844" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Debate over Sanctuary Cities</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/02/great-debate-sanctuary-cities/</link>
      <description>The term “sanctuary city” has been widely used in the great debate over immigration policy and protections. Opponents of sanctuary cities claim that policy protects undocumented immigrants from criminal prosecution, where supporters believe these policies are needed to protect the rights of both citizens and undocumented immigrants.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins Matthew J. O’Brien, the director of research at the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), and Jonathan Blazer, the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) advocacy and policy counsel, to discuss policy, current legislation, immigration reform, and the status of sanctuary cities under a Trump presidency.
 Matthew J. O’Brien is the director of research at the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).  Matt joined FAIR in 2016 and is responsible for managing FAIR’s research activities.
 Jonathan Blazer is the American Civil Liberty Union’s advocacy and policy counsel. As the ACLU’s advocacy and policy counsel, Jon tracks developments in state and local measures concerning immigrants as well as police practices and supports the legislative advocacy efforts of ACLU staff across the country.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litéra.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 16:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Debate over Sanctuary Cities</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>455</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d4d792d2-cfa9-11eb-92b9-0b575519413a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The term “sanctuary city” has been widely used in the great debate over immigration policy and protections. Opponents of sanctuary cities claim that policy protects undocumented immigrants from criminal prosecution, where supporters believe these...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The term “sanctuary city” has been widely used in the great debate over immigration policy and protections. Opponents of sanctuary cities claim that policy protects undocumented immigrants from criminal prosecution, where supporters believe these policies are needed to protect the rights of both citizens and undocumented immigrants.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins Matthew J. O’Brien, the director of research at the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), and Jonathan Blazer, the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) advocacy and policy counsel, to discuss policy, current legislation, immigration reform, and the status of sanctuary cities under a Trump presidency.
 Matthew J. O’Brien is the director of research at the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).  Matt joined FAIR in 2016 and is responsible for managing FAIR’s research activities.
 Jonathan Blazer is the American Civil Liberty Union’s advocacy and policy counsel. As the ACLU’s advocacy and policy counsel, Jon tracks developments in state and local measures concerning immigrants as well as police practices and supports the legislative advocacy efforts of ACLU staff across the country.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litéra.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The term “sanctuary city” has been widely used in the great debate over immigration policy and protections. Opponents of sanctuary cities claim that policy protects undocumented immigrants from criminal prosecution, where supporters believe these policies are needed to protect the rights of both citizens and undocumented immigrants.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em><em>,</em> host <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> joins Matthew J. O’Brien, the director of research at the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), and Jonathan Blazer<strong>,</strong> the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) advocacy and policy counsel, to discuss policy, current legislation, immigration reform, and the status of sanctuary cities under a Trump presidency.</p> <p><strong>Matthew J. O’Brien</strong> is the director of research at the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).  Matt joined FAIR in 2016 and is responsible for managing FAIR’s research activities.</p> <p><strong>Jonathan Blazer</strong> is the American Civil Liberty Union’s advocacy and policy counsel. As the ACLU’s advocacy and policy counsel, Jon tracks developments in state and local measures concerning immigrants as well as police practices and supports the legislative advocacy efforts of ACLU staff across the country.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong> and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litéra</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2876</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f3d43c129fd635a979a2d9e7cdb6ea9c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5519162092.mp3?updated=1623961845" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legalities of Amazon’s Echo</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/01/legalities-amazons-echo/</link>
      <description>Recently, prosecutors involved in a 2015 Arkansas murder case have included Amazon’s Echo as technology-based evidence.The Echo is a hands-free speaker you control with your voice, connecting to the Alexa Voice Service to play music, provide information, news, sports scores, weather, and more. In this investigation, law enforcement discovered that the Amazon Echo could host important recordings and clues that are relevant to the murder case.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Andrew Rossow, cyberspace and technology attorney, and Craig Ball, a trial attorney and expert in digital forensics, as they take a look at the legalities surrounding Amazon’s Echo, technology-based evidence, and the impact on future cases.
 Drew Rossow is a cyberspace and technology attorney in Dayton, Ohio. He recently wrote an article titled, “Amazon Echo May Be Sending Its Sound Waves into the Court Room as our First ‘Smart Witness.’”
 Craig Ball is a board certified trial attorney in Texas and an adjunct professor at the University of Texas School of Law teaching electronic evidence and digital discovery. For nine years, he wrote the award winning column on computer forensics and e-discovery for American Lawyer Media called "Ball in your Court," and still pens a popular blog of the same name at ballinyourcourt.com.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litéra.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 17:50:43 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legalities of Amazon’s Echo</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>454</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d4f47d20-cfa9-11eb-92b9-6bf9fa5fd7e6/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Recently, prosecutors involved in a 2015 Arkansas murder case have included Amazon’s Echo as technology-based evidence.The Echo is a hands-free speaker you control with your voice, connecting to the Alexa Voice Service to play music, provide...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Recently, prosecutors involved in a 2015 Arkansas murder case have included Amazon’s Echo as technology-based evidence.The Echo is a hands-free speaker you control with your voice, connecting to the Alexa Voice Service to play music, provide information, news, sports scores, weather, and more. In this investigation, law enforcement discovered that the Amazon Echo could host important recordings and clues that are relevant to the murder case.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Andrew Rossow, cyberspace and technology attorney, and Craig Ball, a trial attorney and expert in digital forensics, as they take a look at the legalities surrounding Amazon’s Echo, technology-based evidence, and the impact on future cases.
 Drew Rossow is a cyberspace and technology attorney in Dayton, Ohio. He recently wrote an article titled, “Amazon Echo May Be Sending Its Sound Waves into the Court Room as our First ‘Smart Witness.’”
 Craig Ball is a board certified trial attorney in Texas and an adjunct professor at the University of Texas School of Law teaching electronic evidence and digital discovery. For nine years, he wrote the award winning column on computer forensics and e-discovery for American Lawyer Media called "Ball in your Court," and still pens a popular blog of the same name at ballinyourcourt.com.
 Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litéra.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Recently, prosecutors involved in a 2015 Arkansas murder case have included Amazon’s Echo as technology-based evidence.The Echo is a hands-free speaker you control with your voice, connecting to the Alexa Voice Service to play music, provide information, news, sports scores, weather, and more. In this investigation, law enforcement discovered that the Amazon Echo could host important recordings and clues that are relevant to the murder case.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> and <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> join Andrew Rossow, cyberspace and technology attorney, and Craig Ball, a trial attorney and expert in digital forensics, as they take a look at the legalities surrounding Amazon’s Echo, technology-based evidence, and the impact on future cases.</p> <p><strong>Drew Rossow</strong> is a cyberspace and technology attorney in Dayton, Ohio. He recently wrote an article titled, “Amazon Echo May Be Sending Its Sound Waves into the Court Room as our First ‘Smart Witness.’”</p> <p><strong>Craig Ball</strong> is a board certified trial attorney in Texas and an adjunct professor at the University of Texas School of Law teaching electronic evidence and digital discovery. For nine years, he wrote the award winning column on computer forensics and e-discovery for American Lawyer Media called "Ball in your Court," and still pens a popular blog of the same name at ballinyourcourt.com.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsors, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong> and <a href="http://www.litera.com/"><strong>Litéra</strong></a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2165</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[cf1636aa5c4db0125a74a2307a506e4f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3779449879.mp3?updated=1623961845" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside Trump’s EPA Pick and Possible Implications</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2017/01/inside-trumps-epa-pick-possible-implications</link>
      <description>On December 7, 2016, President-elect Trump chose Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt as his nominee to head the Environment Protection Agency, better known as the EPA. Some have said that Pruitt is a climate change denier and an advocate against the EPA’s activist agenda, while Trump himself has said, “Scott Pruitt will be a powerful advocate for that mission while promoting jobs, safety, and opportunity.”
 In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins Jody Freeman, the Archibald Cox Professor of Law and the founding director of the Harvard Law School Environmental Law and Policy Program, and Representative Bob Inglis, executive director of republicEn, as they take a look at the future of the EPA under President-elect Trump's pick, Scott Pruitt, and how Pruitt will impact regulation and the mission of the EPA.
 Jody Freeman is the Archibald Cox Professor of Law and the founding director of the Harvard Law School Environmental Law and Policy Program. Professor Freeman served in the White House as Counselor for Energy and Climate Change in 2009-10, where she was the architect of the president’s historic agreement with the auto industry to double fuel efficiency standards, launching the administration’s greenhouse gas program under the Clean Air Act.
 Representative Bob Inglis is executive director of republicEn, an organization educating the country about free-enterprise solutions to climate change.  Bob was also the U.S. Representative for South Carolina's 4th Congressional District from 1993 to 1999 and again from 2005 to 2011.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 18:15:20 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside Trump’s EPA Pick and Possible Implications</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>453</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d51366b8-cfa9-11eb-92b9-a333135fa8cd/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On December 7, 2016, President-elect Trump chose Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt as his nominee to head the Environment Protection Agency, better known as the EPA. Some have said that Pruitt is a climate change denier and an advocate against...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On December 7, 2016, President-elect Trump chose Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt as his nominee to head the Environment Protection Agency, better known as the EPA. Some have said that Pruitt is a climate change denier and an advocate against the EPA’s activist agenda, while Trump himself has said, “Scott Pruitt will be a powerful advocate for that mission while promoting jobs, safety, and opportunity.”
 In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins Jody Freeman, the Archibald Cox Professor of Law and the founding director of the Harvard Law School Environmental Law and Policy Program, and Representative Bob Inglis, executive director of republicEn, as they take a look at the future of the EPA under President-elect Trump's pick, Scott Pruitt, and how Pruitt will impact regulation and the mission of the EPA.
 Jody Freeman is the Archibald Cox Professor of Law and the founding director of the Harvard Law School Environmental Law and Policy Program. Professor Freeman served in the White House as Counselor for Energy and Climate Change in 2009-10, where she was the architect of the president’s historic agreement with the auto industry to double fuel efficiency standards, launching the administration’s greenhouse gas program under the Clean Air Act.
 Representative Bob Inglis is executive director of republicEn, an organization educating the country about free-enterprise solutions to climate change.  Bob was also the U.S. Representative for South Carolina's 4th Congressional District from 1993 to 1999 and again from 2005 to 2011.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On December 7, 2016, President-elect Trump chose Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt as his nominee to head the Environment Protection Agency, better known as the EPA. Some have said that Pruitt is a climate change denier and an advocate against the EPA’s activist agenda, while Trump himself has said, “Scott Pruitt will be a powerful advocate for that mission while promoting jobs, safety, and opportunity.”</p> <p>In this episode of <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, host <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> joins Jody Freeman, the Archibald Cox Professor of Law and the founding director of the Harvard Law School Environmental Law and Policy Program, and Representative Bob Inglis, executive director of republicEn, as they take a look at the future of the EPA under President-elect Trump's pick, Scott Pruitt, and how Pruitt will impact regulation and the mission of the EPA.</p> <p><strong>Jody Freeman</strong> is the Archibald Cox Professor of Law and the founding director of the Harvard Law School Environmental Law and Policy Program. Professor Freeman served in the White House as Counselor for Energy and Climate Change in 2009-10, where she was the architect of the president’s historic agreement with the auto industry to double fuel efficiency standards, launching the administration’s greenhouse gas program under the Clean Air Act.</p> <p>Representative <strong>Bob Inglis</strong> is executive director of republicEn, an organization educating the country about free-enterprise solutions to climate change.  Bob was also the U.S. Representative for South Carolina's 4th Congressional District from 1993 to 1999 and again from 2005 to 2011.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2435</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0b246f8b3cdbfb97b3a73c003703ed11]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7435382898.mp3?updated=1623961845" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Supreme Court Under President Trump</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/12/supreme-court-president-trump/</link>
      <description>After a fight to the finish, Donald J. Trump has been elected President of the United States. With his presidency comes the role of appointing Justices to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has had its share of controversy. So who will Trump choose? Will he seek to appoint a conservative justice to the bench? Or will he play it safe and choose a middle of the road judge? Or better yet, surprise us all and fill Justice Scalia’s seat with a liberal judge?
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Carrie Severino, chief counsel and policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network and Nan Aron, president of the Alliance for Justice, as they take a look at a Supreme Court under the newly-elected Donald Trump. They will discuss his choice of Justices, the fate of specific cases, and the impact his choices will have on the law of the land.
 Carrie Severino is chief counsel and policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network. In that capacity, Carrie has testified before Congress on assorted constitutional issues and briefed Senators on judicial nominations. She has written and spoken on a wide range of judicial issues, particularly the constitutional limits on government, the federal nomination process, and state judicial selection.
 Nan Aron is president of the Alliance for Justice. Nan is nationally recognized for her vast expertise in public interest law, the federal judiciary and citizen participation in public policy. Prior to founding Alliance for Justice, Nan was a staff attorney for the ACLU’s National Prison Project, where she challenged conditions in state prison systems through lawsuits in federal and state courts.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:41:52 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Supreme Court Under President Trump</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>452</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d532c29c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-ef15083656e1/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>After a fight to the finish, Donald J. Trump has been elected President of the United States. With his presidency comes the role of appointing Justices to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has had its share of controversy. So who will Trump choose?...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>After a fight to the finish, Donald J. Trump has been elected President of the United States. With his presidency comes the role of appointing Justices to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has had its share of controversy. So who will Trump choose? Will he seek to appoint a conservative justice to the bench? Or will he play it safe and choose a middle of the road judge? Or better yet, surprise us all and fill Justice Scalia’s seat with a liberal judge?
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Carrie Severino, chief counsel and policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network and Nan Aron, president of the Alliance for Justice, as they take a look at a Supreme Court under the newly-elected Donald Trump. They will discuss his choice of Justices, the fate of specific cases, and the impact his choices will have on the law of the land.
 Carrie Severino is chief counsel and policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network. In that capacity, Carrie has testified before Congress on assorted constitutional issues and briefed Senators on judicial nominations. She has written and spoken on a wide range of judicial issues, particularly the constitutional limits on government, the federal nomination process, and state judicial selection.
 Nan Aron is president of the Alliance for Justice. Nan is nationally recognized for her vast expertise in public interest law, the federal judiciary and citizen participation in public policy. Prior to founding Alliance for Justice, Nan was a staff attorney for the ACLU’s National Prison Project, where she challenged conditions in state prison systems through lawsuits in federal and state courts.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>After a fight to the finish, Donald J. Trump has been elected President of the United States. With his presidency comes the role of appointing Justices to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has had its share of controversy. So who will Trump choose? Will he seek to appoint a conservative justice to the bench? Or will he play it safe and choose a middle of the road judge? Or better yet, surprise us all and fill Justice Scalia’s seat with a liberal judge?</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em><em>,</em> hosts <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> and <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> join Carrie Severino, chief counsel and policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network and Nan Aron, president of the Alliance for Justice, as they take a look at a Supreme Court under the newly-elected Donald Trump. They will discuss his choice of Justices, the fate of specific cases, and the impact his choices will have on the law of the land.</p> <p><strong>Carrie Severino</strong> is chief counsel and policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network. In that capacity, Carrie has testified before Congress on assorted constitutional issues and briefed Senators on judicial nominations. She has written and spoken on a wide range of judicial issues, particularly the constitutional limits on government, the federal nomination process, and state judicial selection.</p> <p><strong>Nan Aron</strong> is president of the Alliance for Justice. Nan is nationally recognized for her vast expertise in public interest law, the federal judiciary and citizen participation in public policy. Prior to founding Alliance for Justice, Nan was a staff attorney for the ACLU’s National Prison Project, where she challenged conditions in state prison systems through lawsuits in federal and state courts.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1882</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2cf68248ed1dcc1013681ef9aa353c53]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5599758081.mp3?updated=1624285490" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside the Dakota Access Pipeline Protest at Standing Rock</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/12/inside-dakota-access-pipeline-protest-standing-rock</link>
      <description>Since April, the Standing Rock Sioux tribe, alongside other Native American tribes, have been protesting the construction of Energy Transfer Partners’ Dakota Access Pipeline. The tribe claims that this pipeline, which will stretch from North Dakota to Illinois by way of their land, will be a threat to their drinking water, sacred land and the future of their children. They also claim that they were not consulted before the approval of the project.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Monte Mills, co-director of the Margery Hunter Brown Indian Law Clinic at the Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana and attorney Jeffrey Haas, who is presently working with the Water Protector Legal Collective representing the water protectors at Standing Rock. They will take a look at the protesting of the Dakota Access Pipeline at Standing Rock and discuss the legal issues, history of land and people, the protest, the history and impact of the pipeline, the recent re-routing news, and what the future holds.  
 Monte Mills is co-director of the Margery Hunter Brown Indian Law Clinic at the Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana. He teaches a variety of Indian law courses and works with clinical students on a range of legal matters in the Indian Law Clinic. Prior to joining the faculty at the Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana, Monte was the Director of the Legal Department for the Southern Ute Indian Tribe in Colorado.
 Jeffrey Haas is founding partner of the People's Law Office in Chicago and defended Mora County, New Mexico, which was sued by a subsidiary of Shell Oil for passing an ordinance banning fracking. Jeffrey recently wrote a piece for Truthout titled “Lawyer's View: Recent Days at Standing Rock.” He is presently member of the Camp's legal team, presently working with the Water Protector Legal Collective representing the water protectors at Standing Rock.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 17:33:58 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside the Dakota Access Pipeline Protest at Standing Rock</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>451</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d54fe674-cfa9-11eb-92b9-87294aba0d9f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since April, the Standing Rock Sioux tribe, alongside other Native American tribes, have been protesting the construction of Energy Transfer Partners’ Dakota Access Pipeline. The tribe claims that this pipeline, which will stretch from North Dakota...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Since April, the Standing Rock Sioux tribe, alongside other Native American tribes, have been protesting the construction of Energy Transfer Partners’ Dakota Access Pipeline. The tribe claims that this pipeline, which will stretch from North Dakota to Illinois by way of their land, will be a threat to their drinking water, sacred land and the future of their children. They also claim that they were not consulted before the approval of the project.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Monte Mills, co-director of the Margery Hunter Brown Indian Law Clinic at the Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana and attorney Jeffrey Haas, who is presently working with the Water Protector Legal Collective representing the water protectors at Standing Rock. They will take a look at the protesting of the Dakota Access Pipeline at Standing Rock and discuss the legal issues, history of land and people, the protest, the history and impact of the pipeline, the recent re-routing news, and what the future holds.  
 Monte Mills is co-director of the Margery Hunter Brown Indian Law Clinic at the Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana. He teaches a variety of Indian law courses and works with clinical students on a range of legal matters in the Indian Law Clinic. Prior to joining the faculty at the Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana, Monte was the Director of the Legal Department for the Southern Ute Indian Tribe in Colorado.
 Jeffrey Haas is founding partner of the People's Law Office in Chicago and defended Mora County, New Mexico, which was sued by a subsidiary of Shell Oil for passing an ordinance banning fracking. Jeffrey recently wrote a piece for Truthout titled “Lawyer's View: Recent Days at Standing Rock.” He is presently member of the Camp's legal team, presently working with the Water Protector Legal Collective representing the water protectors at Standing Rock.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Since April, the Standing Rock Sioux tribe, alongside other Native American tribes, have been protesting the construction of Energy Transfer Partners’ Dakota Access Pipeline. The tribe claims that this pipeline, which will stretch from North Dakota to Illinois by way of their land, will be a threat to their drinking water, sacred land and the future of their children. They also claim that they were not consulted before the approval of the project.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em><em>,</em> hosts <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> and <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> join Monte Mills, co-director of the Margery Hunter Brown Indian Law Clinic at the Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana and attorney Jeffrey Haas, who is presently working with the Water Protector Legal Collective representing the water protectors at Standing Rock. They will take a look at the protesting of the Dakota Access Pipeline at Standing Rock and discuss the legal issues, history of land and people, the protest, the history and impact of the pipeline, the recent re-routing news, and what the future holds.  </p> <p><strong>Monte Mills</strong> is co-director of the Margery Hunter Brown Indian Law Clinic at the Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana. He teaches a variety of Indian law courses and works with clinical students on a range of legal matters in the Indian Law Clinic. Prior to joining the faculty at the Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana, Monte was the Director of the Legal Department for the Southern Ute Indian Tribe in Colorado.</p> <p><strong>Jeffrey Haas</strong> is founding partner of the People's Law Office in Chicago and defended Mora County, New Mexico, which was sued by a subsidiary of Shell Oil for passing an ordinance banning fracking. Jeffrey recently wrote a piece for Truthout titled “Lawyer's View: Recent Days at Standing Rock.” He is presently member of the Camp's legal team, presently working with the Water Protector Legal Collective representing the water protectors at Standing Rock.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2347</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8ee1161a5cff02b356055eff3b537e0e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2029654794.mp3?updated=1623961846" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Issues in Doing Business with Cuba</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/11/legal-issues-business-cuba/</link>
      <description>On December 17, 2014, President Obama announced that he was rejecting “the failed, Cold War-era policy era of the past to chart a new course in Cuba.”  Since then, we have made great strides in rebuilding our relationship with Cuba by re-establishing diplomatic relations, empowering the Cuban people through regulation, and finally, facilitating travel to Cuba. For attorneys, some see this as a great opportunity to expand their business or even create strong, lasting relationships with Cuba.
 In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join legal affairs writer Victor Li and Aliette DelPozo Rodz, partner in the Miami office of Shutts &amp; Bowen LLP, to discuss the legal issues in doing business with Cuba and the opportunities for law firms to expand into Cuba.
 Victor Li is a legal affairs writer who joined the ABA Journal staff in 2013. He is a former reporter for Law Technology News, the American Lawyer magazine and Litigation Daily (NYC). A former prosecutor in the Bronx, Victor recently wrote a piece for the ABA Journal titled, “A New Dawn for Cuba as it Opens for Business.”
 Aliette DelPozo Rodz is a partner in the Miami office of Shutts &amp; Bowen LLP, where she is a member of the Business Litigation Group and Chair of the Cuba Task Force and the firm’s Diversity Committee. She is also co-chair of the firm’s Focus on Women Group.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 16:58:57 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Issues in Doing Business with Cuba</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>450</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d574ea0a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-6baa0e6d8600/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On December 17, 2014, President Obama announced that he was rejecting “the failed, Cold War-era policy era of the past to chart a new course in Cuba.”  Since then, we have made great strides in rebuilding our relationship with Cuba by...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On December 17, 2014, President Obama announced that he was rejecting “the failed, Cold War-era policy era of the past to chart a new course in Cuba.”  Since then, we have made great strides in rebuilding our relationship with Cuba by re-establishing diplomatic relations, empowering the Cuban people through regulation, and finally, facilitating travel to Cuba. For attorneys, some see this as a great opportunity to expand their business or even create strong, lasting relationships with Cuba.
 In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join legal affairs writer Victor Li and Aliette DelPozo Rodz, partner in the Miami office of Shutts &amp; Bowen LLP, to discuss the legal issues in doing business with Cuba and the opportunities for law firms to expand into Cuba.
 Victor Li is a legal affairs writer who joined the ABA Journal staff in 2013. He is a former reporter for Law Technology News, the American Lawyer magazine and Litigation Daily (NYC). A former prosecutor in the Bronx, Victor recently wrote a piece for the ABA Journal titled, “A New Dawn for Cuba as it Opens for Business.”
 Aliette DelPozo Rodz is a partner in the Miami office of Shutts &amp; Bowen LLP, where she is a member of the Business Litigation Group and Chair of the Cuba Task Force and the firm’s Diversity Committee. She is also co-chair of the firm’s Focus on Women Group.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On December 17, 2014, President Obama announced that he was rejecting “the failed, Cold War-era policy era of the past to chart a new course in Cuba.”  Since then, we have made great strides in rebuilding our relationship with Cuba by re-establishing diplomatic relations, empowering the Cuban people through regulation, and finally, facilitating travel to Cuba. For attorneys, some see this as a great opportunity to expand their business or even create strong, lasting relationships with Cuba.</p> <p>In this episode of <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> and <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> join legal affairs writer Victor Li and Aliette DelPozo Rodz, partner in the Miami office of Shutts &amp; Bowen LLP, to discuss the legal issues in doing business with Cuba and the opportunities for law firms to expand into Cuba.</p> <p><strong>Victor Li</strong> is a legal affairs writer who joined the ABA Journal staff in 2013. He is a former reporter for Law Technology News, the American Lawyer magazine and Litigation Daily (NYC). A former prosecutor in the Bronx, Victor recently wrote a piece for the ABA Journal titled, “A New Dawn for Cuba as it Opens for Business.”</p> <p><strong>Aliette DelPozo Rodz</strong> is a partner in the Miami office of Shutts &amp; Bowen LLP, where she is a member of the Business Litigation Group and Chair of the Cuba Task Force and the firm’s Diversity Committee. She is also co-chair of the firm’s Focus on Women Group.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1806</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0f0c50c5735132d287fe25d3bb232948]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7075318570.mp3?updated=1623961847" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Use of Body Cameras by Law Enforcement</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/11/use-body-cameras-law-enforcement/</link>
      <description>With a string of recent incidents involving shootings of civilians by police, the question remains as to whether our police officers should be equipped with body cameras to capture police pursuits. Some believe body cameras will improve police and civilian behavior, while others believe that body cameras will hinder a police officer’s privacy, health, and safety.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Professor Eugene O’Donnell from the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and Dr. Tod Burke, professor in the Department of Criminal Justice at Radford University, as they talk about the pros and cons of body cameras in law enforcement. We will take a look at recent events, transparency and accountability, and the impact body cameras will have on policing.
 Eugene O’Donnell is a professor from the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and is a nationally recognized expert on policing issues, including the use of force, and has been quoted in hundreds of media stories.
 Dr. Tod Burke is a professor in the Department of Criminal Justice at Radford University. Dr. Burke is also the co-author of an introductory criminal justice text titled, Foundations of Criminal Justice (second edition).
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 17:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Use of Body Cameras by Law Enforcement</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>449</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d59a5236-cfa9-11eb-92b9-ff67e358cc0e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>With a string of recent incidents involving shootings of civilians by police, the question remains as to whether our police officers should be equipped with body cameras to capture police pursuits. Some believe body cameras will improve police and...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With a string of recent incidents involving shootings of civilians by police, the question remains as to whether our police officers should be equipped with body cameras to capture police pursuits. Some believe body cameras will improve police and civilian behavior, while others believe that body cameras will hinder a police officer’s privacy, health, and safety.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Professor Eugene O’Donnell from the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and Dr. Tod Burke, professor in the Department of Criminal Justice at Radford University, as they talk about the pros and cons of body cameras in law enforcement. We will take a look at recent events, transparency and accountability, and the impact body cameras will have on policing.
 Eugene O’Donnell is a professor from the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and is a nationally recognized expert on policing issues, including the use of force, and has been quoted in hundreds of media stories.
 Dr. Tod Burke is a professor in the Department of Criminal Justice at Radford University. Dr. Burke is also the co-author of an introductory criminal justice text titled, Foundations of Criminal Justice (second edition).
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>With a string of recent incidents involving shootings of civilians by police, the question remains as to whether our police officers should be equipped with body cameras to capture police pursuits. Some believe body cameras will improve police and civilian behavior, while others believe that body cameras will hinder a police officer’s privacy, health, and safety.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Professor Eugene O’Donnell from the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and Dr. Tod Burke, professor in the Department of Criminal Justice at Radford University, as they talk about the pros and cons of body cameras in law enforcement. We will take a look at recent events, transparency and accountability, and the impact body cameras will have on policing.</p> <p><strong>Eugene O’Donnell</strong> is a professor from the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and is a nationally recognized expert on policing issues, including the use of force, and has been quoted in hundreds of media stories.</p> <p><strong>Dr. Tod Burke</strong> is a professor in the Department of Criminal Justice at Radford University. Dr. Burke is also the co-author of an introductory criminal justice text titled, Foundations of Criminal Justice (second edition).</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1925</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0cd3443fc3c1ee2c4d25cb6f3fef57fc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6620231838.mp3?updated=1623961847" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Electoral College, National Popular Vote, and the Presidential Election</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/10/electoral-college-national-popular-vote-presidential-election</link>
      <description>The Electoral College has become somewhat of a controversial talking point when it comes to deciding the presidency. Some have praised the Electoral College citing its creation by our Founding Fathers, while others have produced legislation to abolish the Electoral College in its entirety, favoring electing our president though a national popular vote. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams joins Trent England, director of the Save Our States project and Dr. John R. Koza, originator of the National Popular Vote legislation, as they discuss history of the Electoral College, Electoral College vs. national popular vote, and the great debate over the Electoral College, especially during this presidential election.
 Trent England is vice president for strategic initiatives at the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs, where he also is the David and Ann Brown Distinguished Fellow for the Advancement of Liberty and directs the Save Our States project.
 Dr. John R. Koza is lead author of the book Every Vote Equal: A State-Based Plan for Electing the President by National Popular Vote and originator of the National Popular Vote legislation.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 21:08:53 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Electoral College, National Popular Vote, and the Presidential Election</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>448</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d5c05f94-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5b485c385817/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Electoral College has become somewhat of a controversial talking point when it comes to deciding the presidency. Some have praised the Electoral College citing its creation by our Founding Fathers, while others have produced legislation to abolish...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Electoral College has become somewhat of a controversial talking point when it comes to deciding the presidency. Some have praised the Electoral College citing its creation by our Founding Fathers, while others have produced legislation to abolish the Electoral College in its entirety, favoring electing our president though a national popular vote. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams joins Trent England, director of the Save Our States project and Dr. John R. Koza, originator of the National Popular Vote legislation, as they discuss history of the Electoral College, Electoral College vs. national popular vote, and the great debate over the Electoral College, especially during this presidential election.
 Trent England is vice president for strategic initiatives at the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs, where he also is the David and Ann Brown Distinguished Fellow for the Advancement of Liberty and directs the Save Our States project.
 Dr. John R. Koza is lead author of the book Every Vote Equal: A State-Based Plan for Electing the President by National Popular Vote and originator of the National Popular Vote legislation.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The Electoral College has become somewhat of a controversial talking point when it comes to deciding the presidency. Some have praised the Electoral College citing its creation by our Founding Fathers, while others have produced legislation to abolish the Electoral College in its entirety, favoring electing our president though a national popular vote. On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong>,</em> host <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> joins Trent England, director of the Save Our States project and Dr. John R. Koza<strong>,</strong> originator of the National Popular Vote legislation, as they discuss history of the Electoral College, Electoral College vs. national popular vote, and the great debate over the Electoral College, especially during this presidential election.</p> <p><strong>Trent England</strong> is vice president for strategic initiatives at the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs, where he also is the David and Ann Brown Distinguished Fellow for the Advancement of Liberty and directs the Save Our States project.</p> <p><strong>Dr. John R. Koza</strong> is lead author of the book <em>Every Vote Equal: A State-Based Plan for Electing the President by National Popular Vote</em> and originator of the National Popular Vote legislation.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1969</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[971461670c9b79296440205a00ba969e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1366213560.mp3?updated=1623961847" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gender Discrimination in the Workplace</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/10/gender-discrimination-workplace</link>
      <description>Across the country, women have been filing class action lawsuits over a male-dominated culture and alleged gender discrimination within the walls of their law firms.
 In this episode of  Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join David Sanford, chairman and co-founder of Sanford Heisler, LLP, attorney Kerrie Campbell, a partner in Chadbourne &amp; Parke’s Litigation Department and Caroline Fredrickson, president of the American Constitution Society (ACS), to discuss litigation, the difficulty of proving gender discrimination, legislation, and what the future looks like for equality for women in the workplace.
 Attorney David Sanford is chairman and co-founder of Sanford Heisler, LLP.  David was lead counsel representing approximately 7,000 female employees in Velez v. Novartis. After a seven-week trial, Mr. Sanford secured the largest employment verdict in United States history. David is currently representing attorney Kerrie Campbell in her gender discrimination class action lawsuit.
 Attorney Kerrie Campbell is a partner in Chadbourne &amp; Parke’s Litigation Department in its Washington, DC office. Over 27 years, Ms. Campbell has built a practice focused on all aspects of consumer product safety, risk management, regulatory compliance and related litigation, and on reputation protection, defamation, libel, product disparagement and First Amendment issues and litigation.  Attorney Campbell is currently involved in litigation against her law firm alleging gender discrimination.
 Attorney Caroline Fredrickson is president of the American Constitution Society (ACS). Before joining ACS, Caroline served as the director of the ACLU’s Washington legislative office and as general counsel and legal director of NARAL Pro-Choice America. During the Clinton administration, she served as special assistant to the president for legislative affairs. Caroline is author of “Under the Bus: How Working Women Are Being Run Over” (The New Press, 2015).
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 16:48:56 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Gender Discrimination in the Workplace</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>447</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d5e5fdf8-cfa9-11eb-92b9-97133782f704/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Across the country, women have been filing class action lawsuits over a male-dominated culture and alleged gender discrimination within the walls of their law firms. In this episode of  Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Across the country, women have been filing class action lawsuits over a male-dominated culture and alleged gender discrimination within the walls of their law firms.
 In this episode of  Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join David Sanford, chairman and co-founder of Sanford Heisler, LLP, attorney Kerrie Campbell, a partner in Chadbourne &amp; Parke’s Litigation Department and Caroline Fredrickson, president of the American Constitution Society (ACS), to discuss litigation, the difficulty of proving gender discrimination, legislation, and what the future looks like for equality for women in the workplace.
 Attorney David Sanford is chairman and co-founder of Sanford Heisler, LLP.  David was lead counsel representing approximately 7,000 female employees in Velez v. Novartis. After a seven-week trial, Mr. Sanford secured the largest employment verdict in United States history. David is currently representing attorney Kerrie Campbell in her gender discrimination class action lawsuit.
 Attorney Kerrie Campbell is a partner in Chadbourne &amp; Parke’s Litigation Department in its Washington, DC office. Over 27 years, Ms. Campbell has built a practice focused on all aspects of consumer product safety, risk management, regulatory compliance and related litigation, and on reputation protection, defamation, libel, product disparagement and First Amendment issues and litigation.  Attorney Campbell is currently involved in litigation against her law firm alleging gender discrimination.
 Attorney Caroline Fredrickson is president of the American Constitution Society (ACS). Before joining ACS, Caroline served as the director of the ACLU’s Washington legislative office and as general counsel and legal director of NARAL Pro-Choice America. During the Clinton administration, she served as special assistant to the president for legislative affairs. Caroline is author of “Under the Bus: How Working Women Are Being Run Over” (The New Press, 2015).
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Across the country, women have been filing class action lawsuits over a male-dominated culture and alleged gender discrimination within the walls of their law firms.</p> <p>In this episode of  <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> and <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> join David Sanford, chairman and co-founder of Sanford Heisler, LLP, attorney Kerrie Campbell, a partner in Chadbourne &amp; Parke’s Litigation Department and Caroline Fredrickson, president of the American Constitution Society (ACS), to discuss litigation, the difficulty of proving gender discrimination, legislation, and what the future looks like for equality for women in the workplace.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>David Sanford</strong> is chairman and co-founder of Sanford Heisler, LLP.  David was lead counsel representing approximately 7,000 female employees in <em>Velez v. Novartis.</em> After a seven-week trial, Mr. Sanford secured the largest employment verdict in United States history. David is currently representing attorney Kerrie Campbell in her gender discrimination class action lawsuit.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>Kerrie Campbell</strong> is a partner in Chadbourne &amp; Parke’s Litigation Department in its Washington, DC office. Over 27 years, Ms. Campbell has built a practice focused on all aspects of consumer product safety, risk management, regulatory compliance and related litigation, and on reputation protection, defamation, libel, product disparagement and First Amendment issues and litigation.  Attorney Campbell is currently involved in litigation against her law firm alleging gender discrimination.</p> <p>Attorney <strong>Caroline Fredrickson</strong> is president of the American Constitution Society (ACS). Before joining ACS, Caroline served as the director of the ACLU’s Washington legislative office and as general counsel and legal director of NARAL Pro-Choice America. During the Clinton administration, she served as special assistant to the president for legislative affairs. Caroline is author of “Under the Bus: How Working Women Are Being Run Over” (The New Press, 2015).</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2028</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[97d348545b9b8a2b04e3aaacd1cbaed5]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4279352621.mp3?updated=1623961847" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The DEA, Schedule 1, and Marijuana</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/09/dea-schedule-1-marijuana</link>
      <description>In a recent decision, the Drug Enforcement Administration ruled that marijuana will remain a Schedule 1 substance under the Controlled Substances Act. Substances in Schedule 1 are determined by the Food and Drug Administration to be drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.  
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams joins Paul Armentano, deputy director of NORML and Ben Cort, business development manager for the Center for Addiction Recovery and Rehabilitation (CeDAR), to discuss the recent decision by the DEA to keep marijuana on the Schedule 1 list. They will talk impact, the legalization of marijuana, manufacturing marijuana for scientific purposes, and what the future holds on this controversial topic.
 Paul Armentano is deputy director of NORML, and the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, and a senior policy advisor at Freedom Leaf, Inc: The Marijuana Legalization Company. He is the co-author of the book “Marijuana is Safer: So Why Are We Driving People to Drink?” Paul was also the principal investigator for defense counsel in U.S. v Schweder, the first federal evidentiary since 1973 hearing to challenge the constitutionality of cannabis as a schedule I controlled substance.
 Ben Cort is business development manager for the Center for Addiction Recovery and Rehabilitation (CeDAR), part of the University of Colorado Health system. Ben’s passion for recovery, prevention and harm reduction comes from his own struggle with substance abuse. Sober since 1996, Cort is also a junior fellow at the University of Florida’s Drug Policy Institute and serves on the boards of Project SAM (Smart Approaches to Marijuana) and the Stout Street Foundation.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The DEA, Schedule 1, and Marijuana</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>446</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d60cf99e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-bb89246224ed/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a recent decision, the Drug Enforcement Administration ruled that marijuana will remain a Schedule 1 substance under the Controlled Substances Act. Substances in Schedule 1 are determined by the Food and Drug Administration to be drugs with no...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In a recent decision, the Drug Enforcement Administration ruled that marijuana will remain a Schedule 1 substance under the Controlled Substances Act. Substances in Schedule 1 are determined by the Food and Drug Administration to be drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.  
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams joins Paul Armentano, deputy director of NORML and Ben Cort, business development manager for the Center for Addiction Recovery and Rehabilitation (CeDAR), to discuss the recent decision by the DEA to keep marijuana on the Schedule 1 list. They will talk impact, the legalization of marijuana, manufacturing marijuana for scientific purposes, and what the future holds on this controversial topic.
 Paul Armentano is deputy director of NORML, and the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, and a senior policy advisor at Freedom Leaf, Inc: The Marijuana Legalization Company. He is the co-author of the book “Marijuana is Safer: So Why Are We Driving People to Drink?” Paul was also the principal investigator for defense counsel in U.S. v Schweder, the first federal evidentiary since 1973 hearing to challenge the constitutionality of cannabis as a schedule I controlled substance.
 Ben Cort is business development manager for the Center for Addiction Recovery and Rehabilitation (CeDAR), part of the University of Colorado Health system. Ben’s passion for recovery, prevention and harm reduction comes from his own struggle with substance abuse. Sober since 1996, Cort is also a junior fellow at the University of Florida’s Drug Policy Institute and serves on the boards of Project SAM (Smart Approaches to Marijuana) and the Stout Street Foundation.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In a recent decision, the Drug Enforcement Administration ruled that marijuana will remain a Schedule 1 substance under the Controlled Substances Act. Substances in Schedule 1 are determined by the Food and Drug Administration to be drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.  </p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, host <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> joins Paul Armentano, deputy director of NORML and Ben Cort, business development manager for the Center for Addiction Recovery and Rehabilitation (CeDAR), to discuss the recent decision by the DEA to keep marijuana on the Schedule 1 list. They will talk impact, the legalization of marijuana, manufacturing marijuana for scientific purposes, and what the future holds on this controversial topic.</p> <p><strong>Paul Armentano</strong> is deputy director of NORML, and the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, and a senior policy advisor at Freedom Leaf, Inc: The Marijuana Legalization Company. He is the co-author of the book “Marijuana is Safer: So Why Are We Driving People to Drink?” Paul was also the principal investigator for defense counsel in <em>U.S. v Schweder</em>, the first federal evidentiary since 1973 hearing to challenge the constitutionality of cannabis as a schedule I controlled substance.</p> <p><strong>Ben Cort</strong> is business development manager for the Center for Addiction Recovery and Rehabilitation (CeDAR), part of the University of Colorado Health system. Ben’s passion for recovery, prevention and harm reduction comes from his own struggle with substance abuse. Sober since 1996, Cort is also a junior fellow at the University of Florida’s Drug Policy Institute and serves on the boards of Project SAM (Smart Approaches to Marijuana) and the Stout Street Foundation.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2030</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[67c733d213c0ecf1e23bf993f619fdf5]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7572440893.mp3?updated=1623961848" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Issues Facing Our Veterans</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/09/legal-issues-facing-veterans</link>
      <description>After our veterans return from combat or active duty, they can face a host of legal issues upon returning to the reality of home. From homelessness stemming from evictions and foreclosures to child custody disputes to problems with benefits, veterans can have various legal needs due to their lengthy separation from home and are in need of assistance. But there is help for these individuals and the legal community is making strides in assisting our veterans in these legal disputes.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join attorney Richard V. Spataro, director of training and publications for National Veterans Legal Services Program and Robert Liscord, veteran legal services outreach coordinator and paralegal for Pine Tree Legal Assistance, as they take a look at various legal issues facing our veterans. They will discuss legal needs and how attorneys and organizations are assisting veterans with their legal issues.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 19:18:27 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Issues Facing Our Veterans</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>445</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d63cefaa-cfa9-11eb-92b9-fb910d5c8536/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>After our veterans return from combat or active duty, they can face a host of legal issues upon returning to the reality of home. From homelessness stemming from evictions and foreclosures to child custody disputes to problems with benefits, veterans...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>After our veterans return from combat or active duty, they can face a host of legal issues upon returning to the reality of home. From homelessness stemming from evictions and foreclosures to child custody disputes to problems with benefits, veterans can have various legal needs due to their lengthy separation from home and are in need of assistance. But there is help for these individuals and the legal community is making strides in assisting our veterans in these legal disputes.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join attorney Richard V. Spataro, director of training and publications for National Veterans Legal Services Program and Robert Liscord, veteran legal services outreach coordinator and paralegal for Pine Tree Legal Assistance, as they take a look at various legal issues facing our veterans. They will discuss legal needs and how attorneys and organizations are assisting veterans with their legal issues.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>After our veterans return from combat or active duty, they can face a host of legal issues upon returning to the reality of home. From homelessness stemming from evictions and foreclosures to child custody disputes to problems with benefits, veterans can have various legal needs due to their lengthy separation from home and are in need of assistance. But there is help for these individuals and the legal community is making strides in assisting our veterans in these legal disputes.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> and <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> join attorney <strong>Richard V. Spataro</strong>, director of training and publications for National Veterans Legal Services Program and <strong>Robert Liscord</strong>, veteran legal services outreach coordinator and paralegal for Pine Tree Legal Assistance, as they take a look at various legal issues facing our veterans. They will discuss legal needs and how attorneys and organizations are assisting veterans with their legal issues.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1914</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2c0bfd8e593d2eee013aa765b11271c3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1249344866.mp3?updated=1623961848" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Law Enforcement and the Use of Robots</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/05/law-enforcement-use-robots/</link>
      <description>In July, a sniper, later identified as Micah Xavier Johnson, opened fire at a march against fatal police shootings, held in downtown Dallas, Texas, killing 5 police officers and wounding many others. After a 45 minute gun battle and hours of negotiation with the sniper, who was holed up in a parking garage, Dallas Police Chief David Brown gave an order to his SWAT team to come up with a plan to end the mayhem before more police officers were killed.  
 This led to the use of as robot, the Remotec Androx Mark V A-1, manufactured by Northrup Grumman and a pound of C-4 explosive, which was sent in eventually killing the sniper.
 Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi  join attorney Edward Obayashi, deputy sheriff and legal advisor for the Plumas County Sheriff's Office and Dr. Peter Asaro,  assistant professor and director of graduate programs for the School of Media Studies at the New School for Public Engagement, as they take a look at the recent tragedy in Dallas,  the use of robots by law enforcement, criticism, ethics, policy, and regulation when it comes to the use of robots.
 Attorney Edward Obayashi is deputy sheriff and legal advisor for the Plumas County sheriff's office and a licensed attorney in the State of California. Ed’s law office specializes in providing law enforcement legal services to California law enforcement agencies and he also serves as the legal advisor and a legal consultant for numerous law enforcement agencies in California. His duties include patrol, investigations, administration, training, and providing legal advice to department management and personnel.
 Dr. Peter Asaro is a philosopher of science, technology, and media. Dr. Asaro is assistant professor and director of graduate programs for the School of Media Studies at the New School for Public Engagement in New York City. He is the co-founder of the International Committee for Robot Arms Control and has written on lethal robotics from the perspective of just war theory and human rights. Dr. Asaro's research also examines agency and autonomy, liability and punishment, and privacy and surveillance as it applies to consumer robots, industrial automation, smart buildings, and autonomous vehicles.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 16:13:27 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Law Enforcement and the Use of Robots</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>444</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d65fc5d4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-2b53c0cd10aa/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In July, a sniper, later identified as Micah Xavier Johnson, opened fire at a march against fatal police shootings, held in downtown Dallas, Texas, killing 5 police officers and wounding many others. After a 45 minute gun battle and hours of...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In July, a sniper, later identified as Micah Xavier Johnson, opened fire at a march against fatal police shootings, held in downtown Dallas, Texas, killing 5 police officers and wounding many others. After a 45 minute gun battle and hours of negotiation with the sniper, who was holed up in a parking garage, Dallas Police Chief David Brown gave an order to his SWAT team to come up with a plan to end the mayhem before more police officers were killed.  
 This led to the use of as robot, the Remotec Androx Mark V A-1, manufactured by Northrup Grumman and a pound of C-4 explosive, which was sent in eventually killing the sniper.
 Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi  join attorney Edward Obayashi, deputy sheriff and legal advisor for the Plumas County Sheriff's Office and Dr. Peter Asaro,  assistant professor and director of graduate programs for the School of Media Studies at the New School for Public Engagement, as they take a look at the recent tragedy in Dallas,  the use of robots by law enforcement, criticism, ethics, policy, and regulation when it comes to the use of robots.
 Attorney Edward Obayashi is deputy sheriff and legal advisor for the Plumas County sheriff's office and a licensed attorney in the State of California. Ed’s law office specializes in providing law enforcement legal services to California law enforcement agencies and he also serves as the legal advisor and a legal consultant for numerous law enforcement agencies in California. His duties include patrol, investigations, administration, training, and providing legal advice to department management and personnel.
 Dr. Peter Asaro is a philosopher of science, technology, and media. Dr. Asaro is assistant professor and director of graduate programs for the School of Media Studies at the New School for Public Engagement in New York City. He is the co-founder of the International Committee for Robot Arms Control and has written on lethal robotics from the perspective of just war theory and human rights. Dr. Asaro's research also examines agency and autonomy, liability and punishment, and privacy and surveillance as it applies to consumer robots, industrial automation, smart buildings, and autonomous vehicles.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In July, a sniper, later identified as Micah Xavier Johnson, opened fire at a march against fatal police shootings, held in downtown Dallas, Texas, killing 5 police officers and wounding many others. After a 45 minute gun battle and hours of negotiation with the sniper, who was holed up in a parking garage, Dallas Police Chief David Brown gave an order to his SWAT team to come up with a plan to end the mayhem before more police officers were killed.  </p> <p>This led to the use of as robot, the Remotec Androx Mark V A-1, manufactured by Northrup Grumman and a pound of C-4 explosive, which was sent in eventually killing the sniper.</p> <p>Today on <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong>,</em> hosts <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> and <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> <strong> </strong>join attorney Edward Obayashi, deputy sheriff and legal advisor for the Plumas County Sheriff's Office and Dr. Peter Asaro,  assistant professor and director of graduate programs for the School of Media Studies at the New School for Public Engagement, as they take a look at the recent tragedy in Dallas,  the use of robots by law enforcement, criticism, ethics, policy, and regulation when it comes to the use of robots.</p> <p><strong>Attorney Edward Obayashi</strong> is deputy sheriff and legal advisor for the Plumas County sheriff's office and a licensed attorney in the State of California. Ed’s law office specializes in providing law enforcement legal services to California law enforcement agencies and he also serves as the legal advisor and a legal consultant for numerous law enforcement agencies in California. His duties include patrol, investigations, administration, training, and providing legal advice to department management and personnel.</p> <p><strong>Dr. Peter Asaro</strong> is a philosopher of science, technology, and media. Dr. Asaro is assistant professor and director of graduate programs for the School of Media Studies at the New School for Public Engagement in New York City. He is the co-founder of the International Committee for Robot Arms Control and has written on lethal robotics from the perspective of just war theory and human rights. Dr. Asaro's research also examines agency and autonomy, liability and punishment, and privacy and surveillance as it applies to consumer robots, industrial automation, smart buildings, and autonomous vehicles.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1864</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1f28918e0253fa4a54f3abf91f8e7975]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1615490694.mp3?updated=1623961849" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside “Making a Murderer” and the Steven Avery Trial</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/08/inside-making-murderer-steven-avery-trial</link>
      <description>Update: Brendan Dassey, nephew to Steven Avery, the primary defendant from the "Making a Murderer" series on Netflix had his conviction for murder, rape, and mutilation of a corpse overturned by U.S. Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin last Friday. This episode was recorded shortly before the development.
 Back on October 31st of 2005, a young photographer named Teresa Halbach went missing. Teresa’s last meeting had been with Steven Avery, on the grounds of Avery's Auto Salvage in Manitowoc County, Wisconsin. Teresa’s remains were later found on the grounds of Avery’s home and family business. Avery was well known to law enforcement and had previously served a lengthy prison sentence for rape and attempted murder from which he  was later exonerated on DNA evidence.
 What transpired inspired the extremely popular Netflix series “Making a Murderer,” directed by Laura Ricciardi and Moira Demos. The series spotlights Steven Avery and his quest for justice after claims that he was wrongfully accused in the murder of Teresa Halbach.
 In 2005, Steven Avery was arrested for the murder of Teresa Halbach, and was ultimately represented by Wisconsin attorneys, Dean Strang and Jerry Buting. Strang and Buting presented their case and their defense strategy, bringing to light alleged tampering and planting of evidence by police. After a whirlwind of a trial, the verdict came back guilty, sending Steven Avery to jail for life without the possibility of parole. As Steven Avery sits in jail, a new attorney has taken over his case and Steven hopes for a new trial and maybe one day his freedom.
 On this special episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins Dean Strang, former defense attorney for Steven Avery, and Peter Linton-Smith, a former television news reporter who covered the Avery trials, as they discuss the popular Netflix series, “Making a Murderer.” Dean and Peter  offer inside perspectives and get the latest on Steven Avery and his quest for a new trial and justice under a new attorney.
 Dean Strang is a lawyer in Madison, Wisconsin, at the firm Strang Bradley, LLC. He is best known for his work as one of Steven Avery's trial lawyers, as well as for his first book, "Worse Than the Devil: Anarchists Clarence Darrow, and Justice in a Time of Terror." Mr. Strang served five years as Wisconsin’s first federal defender and co-founded Strang Bradley, LLC. He is an adjunct professor at Marquette University Law School, the University of Wisconsin Law School, and University of Wisconsin's Division of Continuing Studies. Mr. Strang is a member of the American Law Institute and serves on several charity boards, including the Wisconsin Innocence Project. His second book will be published in early 2018.
 Peter Linton-Smith was a television news reporter for 24 years covering primarily courts (1988-2012). Peter has covered cases ranging from first degree murder, wrongful death, products liability, copyright dispute, employment and labor disputes. Peter has covered Steven Avery, both his civil and criminal case from 2003-2007. Peter is currently employed at Leventhal &amp; Puga in Denver, Colorado.
 If you want more on "Making a Murderer," check out the Defending Brendan Dassey of “Making a Murderer” Planet Lex episode, when Dassey's appeal attorneys discuss what it was like defending him.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:25:19 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside “Making a Murderer” and the Steven Avery Trial</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>443</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d67f3734-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5b7f4ab3302b/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Update: Brendan Dassey, nephew to Steven Avery, the primary defendant from the "Making a Murderer" series on Netflix had his conviction for murder, rape, and mutilation of a corpse overturned by U.S. Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin of the US...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Update: Brendan Dassey, nephew to Steven Avery, the primary defendant from the "Making a Murderer" series on Netflix had his conviction for murder, rape, and mutilation of a corpse overturned by U.S. Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin last Friday. This episode was recorded shortly before the development.
 Back on October 31st of 2005, a young photographer named Teresa Halbach went missing. Teresa’s last meeting had been with Steven Avery, on the grounds of Avery's Auto Salvage in Manitowoc County, Wisconsin. Teresa’s remains were later found on the grounds of Avery’s home and family business. Avery was well known to law enforcement and had previously served a lengthy prison sentence for rape and attempted murder from which he  was later exonerated on DNA evidence.
 What transpired inspired the extremely popular Netflix series “Making a Murderer,” directed by Laura Ricciardi and Moira Demos. The series spotlights Steven Avery and his quest for justice after claims that he was wrongfully accused in the murder of Teresa Halbach.
 In 2005, Steven Avery was arrested for the murder of Teresa Halbach, and was ultimately represented by Wisconsin attorneys, Dean Strang and Jerry Buting. Strang and Buting presented their case and their defense strategy, bringing to light alleged tampering and planting of evidence by police. After a whirlwind of a trial, the verdict came back guilty, sending Steven Avery to jail for life without the possibility of parole. As Steven Avery sits in jail, a new attorney has taken over his case and Steven hopes for a new trial and maybe one day his freedom.
 On this special episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins Dean Strang, former defense attorney for Steven Avery, and Peter Linton-Smith, a former television news reporter who covered the Avery trials, as they discuss the popular Netflix series, “Making a Murderer.” Dean and Peter  offer inside perspectives and get the latest on Steven Avery and his quest for a new trial and justice under a new attorney.
 Dean Strang is a lawyer in Madison, Wisconsin, at the firm Strang Bradley, LLC. He is best known for his work as one of Steven Avery's trial lawyers, as well as for his first book, "Worse Than the Devil: Anarchists Clarence Darrow, and Justice in a Time of Terror." Mr. Strang served five years as Wisconsin’s first federal defender and co-founded Strang Bradley, LLC. He is an adjunct professor at Marquette University Law School, the University of Wisconsin Law School, and University of Wisconsin's Division of Continuing Studies. Mr. Strang is a member of the American Law Institute and serves on several charity boards, including the Wisconsin Innocence Project. His second book will be published in early 2018.
 Peter Linton-Smith was a television news reporter for 24 years covering primarily courts (1988-2012). Peter has covered cases ranging from first degree murder, wrongful death, products liability, copyright dispute, employment and labor disputes. Peter has covered Steven Avery, both his civil and criminal case from 2003-2007. Peter is currently employed at Leventhal &amp; Puga in Denver, Colorado.
 If you want more on "Making a Murderer," check out the Defending Brendan Dassey of “Making a Murderer” Planet Lex episode, when Dassey's appeal attorneys discuss what it was like defending him.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Update:</strong> Brendan Dassey, nephew to Steven Avery, the primary defendant from the "Making a Murderer" series on Netflix had his conviction for murder, rape, and mutilation of a corpse overturned by U.S. Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin last Friday. This episode was recorded shortly before the development.</em></p> <p>Back on October 31st of 2005, a young photographer named Teresa Halbach went missing. Teresa’s last meeting had been with Steven Avery, on the grounds of Avery's Auto Salvage in Manitowoc County, Wisconsin. Teresa’s remains were later found on the grounds of Avery’s home and family business. Avery was well known to law enforcement and had previously served a lengthy prison sentence for rape and attempted murder from which he  was later exonerated on DNA evidence.</p> <p>What transpired inspired the extremely popular Netflix series “Making a Murderer,” directed by Laura Ricciardi and Moira Demos. The series spotlights Steven Avery and his quest for justice after claims that he was wrongfully accused in the murder of Teresa Halbach.</p> <p>In 2005, Steven Avery was arrested for the murder of Teresa Halbach, and was ultimately represented by Wisconsin attorneys, Dean Strang and Jerry Buting. Strang and Buting presented their case and their defense strategy, bringing to light alleged tampering and planting of evidence by police. After a whirlwind of a trial, the verdict came back guilty, sending Steven Avery to jail for life without the possibility of parole. As Steven Avery sits in jail, a new attorney has taken over his case and Steven hopes for a new trial and maybe one day his freedom.</p> <p>On this special episode of <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, host <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> joins Dean Strang, former defense attorney for Steven Avery, and Peter Linton-Smith, a former television news reporter who covered the Avery trials, as they discuss the popular Netflix series, “Making a Murderer.” Dean and Peter  offer inside perspectives and get the latest on Steven Avery and his quest for a new trial and justice under a new attorney.</p> <p><strong>Dean Strang</strong> is a lawyer in Madison, Wisconsin, at the firm Strang Bradley, LLC. He is best known for his work as one of Steven Avery's trial lawyers, as well as for his first book, "Worse Than the Devil: Anarchists Clarence Darrow, and Justice in a Time of Terror." Mr. Strang served five years as Wisconsin’s first federal defender and co-founded Strang Bradley, LLC. He is an adjunct professor at Marquette University Law School, the University of Wisconsin Law School, and University of Wisconsin's Division of Continuing Studies. Mr. Strang is a member of the American Law Institute and serves on several charity boards, including the Wisconsin Innocence Project. His second book will be published in early 2018.</p> <p><strong>Peter Linton-Smith</strong> was a television news reporter for 24 years covering primarily courts (1988-2012). Peter has covered cases ranging from first degree murder, wrongful death, products liability, copyright dispute, employment and labor disputes. Peter has covered Steven Avery, both his civil and criminal case from 2003-2007. Peter is currently employed at Leventhal &amp; Puga in Denver, Colorado.</p> <p><strong>If you want more on "Making a Murderer," check out the </strong><a href="http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/planet-lex-northwestern-pritzker-school-law-podcast/2016/07/defending-brendan-dassey-making-murderer/"><strong>Defending Brendan Dassey of “Making a Murderer”</strong></a> <strong>Planet Lex episode, when Dassey's appeal attorneys discuss what it was like defending him.</strong></p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2027</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[38047cafabf0bb4559009cae0372a1ca]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7794957438.mp3?updated=1623961849" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Issues Surrounding Pokémon Go</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/08/legal-issues-surrounding-pokemon-go</link>
      <description>The Pokémon Go App developed by Niantic is the latest craze sweeping the world. The location-based augmented reality mobile game/app produced 15 million downloads in just the first week. The game allows players to capture, battle, and train virtual creatures, called Pokémon, who appear on device screens as though in the real world.
 Unfortunately, this popular app has caused some trouble amongst gamers and has created a big threat to public safety. Trespassing on property, muggings, driving distracted, walking into traffic, and falling from cliffs are just some of the incidents stemming from the use of this app. In addition, businesses are attracting customers by adding fantasy characters to their stores, so the implications for liability have increased.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join professor Adam Thimmesch, an assistant professor of law at the University of Nebraska College of Law and attorney Brian Wassom from the firm Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP as they discuss the Pokémon Go App. They look at the very real legal implications surrounding this popular app, incorporating reality into a fantasy world, and whether Pokémon Go is here to stay or simply a passing fad.
 Professor Adam Thimmesch is an assistant professor of law at the University of Nebraska College of Law. Adam focuses his research on the impact of modern technology and markets on existing legal doctrines, with a particular emphasis on tax policy and the regulation of interstate commerce
 Attorney Brian Wassom is from the firm Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP. Brian is the leader of the firm’s social, mobile and emerging media industry group and is a litigator with 15 years of experience focusing his practice on intellectual property matters related to copyright, trademark, trade dress, and publicity rights. He also handles many other types of complex commercial litigation cases, including invasion of privacy, defamation, false and deceptive advertising, data security, and product liability issues.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 16:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Issues Surrounding Pokémon Go</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>442</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d6a3ab32-cfa9-11eb-92b9-ab6cc7dcf403/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Pokémon Go App developed by Niantic is the latest craze sweeping the world. The location-based augmented reality mobile game/app produced 15 million downloads in just the first week. The game allows players to capture, battle, and train virtual...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Pokémon Go App developed by Niantic is the latest craze sweeping the world. The location-based augmented reality mobile game/app produced 15 million downloads in just the first week. The game allows players to capture, battle, and train virtual creatures, called Pokémon, who appear on device screens as though in the real world.
 Unfortunately, this popular app has caused some trouble amongst gamers and has created a big threat to public safety. Trespassing on property, muggings, driving distracted, walking into traffic, and falling from cliffs are just some of the incidents stemming from the use of this app. In addition, businesses are attracting customers by adding fantasy characters to their stores, so the implications for liability have increased.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join professor Adam Thimmesch, an assistant professor of law at the University of Nebraska College of Law and attorney Brian Wassom from the firm Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP as they discuss the Pokémon Go App. They look at the very real legal implications surrounding this popular app, incorporating reality into a fantasy world, and whether Pokémon Go is here to stay or simply a passing fad.
 Professor Adam Thimmesch is an assistant professor of law at the University of Nebraska College of Law. Adam focuses his research on the impact of modern technology and markets on existing legal doctrines, with a particular emphasis on tax policy and the regulation of interstate commerce
 Attorney Brian Wassom is from the firm Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP. Brian is the leader of the firm’s social, mobile and emerging media industry group and is a litigator with 15 years of experience focusing his practice on intellectual property matters related to copyright, trademark, trade dress, and publicity rights. He also handles many other types of complex commercial litigation cases, including invasion of privacy, defamation, false and deceptive advertising, data security, and product liability issues.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The Pokémon Go App developed by Niantic is the latest craze sweeping the world. The location-based augmented reality mobile game/app produced 15 million downloads in just the first week. The game allows players to capture, battle, and train virtual creatures, called Pokémon, who appear on device screens as though in the real world.</p> <p>Unfortunately, this popular app has caused some trouble amongst gamers and has created a big threat to public safety. Trespassing on property, muggings, driving distracted, walking into traffic, and falling from cliffs are just some of the incidents stemming from the use of this app. In addition, businesses are attracting customers by adding fantasy characters to their stores, so the implications for liability have increased.</p> <p>On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join professor Adam Thimmesch, an assistant professor of law at the University of Nebraska College of Law and attorney Brian Wassom from the firm Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP as they discuss the Pokémon Go App. They look at the very real legal implications surrounding this popular app, incorporating reality into a fantasy world, and whether Pokémon Go is here to stay or simply a passing fad.</p> <p>Professor Adam Thimmesch is an assistant professor of law at the University of Nebraska College of Law. Adam focuses his research on the impact of modern technology and markets on existing legal doctrines, with a particular emphasis on tax policy and the regulation of interstate commerce</p> <p>Attorney Brian Wassom is from the firm Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP. Brian is the leader of the firm’s social, mobile and emerging media industry group and is a litigator with 15 years of experience focusing his practice on intellectual property matters related to copyright, trademark, trade dress, and publicity rights. He also handles many other types of complex commercial litigation cases, including invasion of privacy, defamation, false and deceptive advertising, data security, and product liability issues.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1702</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7a7654c2c4f45aa41e6732aaefd908be]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7488557182.mp3?updated=1623961850" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The American Bar Association: A Look Ahead Under New President, Linda Klein</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/07/american-bar-association-look-ahead-new-president-linda-klein</link>
      <description>The American Bar Association is one of the world’s largest voluntary professional organizations, with nearly 400,000 members and more than 3,500 entities. It is committed to doing what only a national association of attorneys can do: serve members, improve the legal profession, eliminate bias and enhance diversity, and advance the rule of law throughout the United States and around the world.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Linda Klein, president-elect of the American Bar Association, as she takes a look back at the past year as president-elect and looks ahead to her initiatives and mission under her presidency at the American Bar Association.
 Linda Klein is president-elect of the American Bar Association. Linda, senior managing shareholder at Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell &amp; Berkowitz, assumed the role of president-elect of the American Bar Association in August 2015 at the ABA Annual Meeting in Chicago. She is presently serving a one-year term as president-elect then will become ABA president in August 2016.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 17:21:56 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The American Bar Association: A Look Ahead Under New President, Linda Klein</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>441</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d6c64480-cfa9-11eb-92b9-838b09b86d9c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The American Bar Association is one of the world’s largest voluntary professional organizations, with nearly 400,000 members and more than 3,500 entities. It is committed to doing what only a national association of attorneys can do: serve members,...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The American Bar Association is one of the world’s largest voluntary professional organizations, with nearly 400,000 members and more than 3,500 entities. It is committed to doing what only a national association of attorneys can do: serve members, improve the legal profession, eliminate bias and enhance diversity, and advance the rule of law throughout the United States and around the world.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Linda Klein, president-elect of the American Bar Association, as she takes a look back at the past year as president-elect and looks ahead to her initiatives and mission under her presidency at the American Bar Association.
 Linda Klein is president-elect of the American Bar Association. Linda, senior managing shareholder at Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell &amp; Berkowitz, assumed the role of president-elect of the American Bar Association in August 2015 at the ABA Annual Meeting in Chicago. She is presently serving a one-year term as president-elect then will become ABA president in August 2016.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The American Bar Association is one of the world’s largest voluntary professional organizations, with nearly 400,000 members and more than 3,500 entities. It is committed to doing what only a national association of attorneys can do: serve members, improve the legal profession, eliminate bias and enhance diversity, and advance the rule of law throughout the United States and around the world.</p> <p>On <strong><em>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em></strong>, hosts <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> and <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> join Linda Klein, president-elect of the American Bar Association, as she takes a look back at the past year as president-elect and looks ahead to her initiatives and mission under her presidency at the American Bar Association.</p> <p><strong>Linda Klein</strong> is president-elect of the American Bar Association. Linda, senior managing shareholder at Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell &amp; Berkowitz, assumed the role of president-elect of the American Bar Association in August 2015 at the ABA Annual Meeting in Chicago. She is presently serving a one-year term as president-elect then will become ABA president in August 2016.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1603</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[90a6f33fa539492a9113e431a0d1a705]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1048776303.mp3?updated=1623961850" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Supreme Court End of Term Wrap-Up</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/07/supreme-court-end-term-wrap/</link>
      <description>On June 27th, the Supreme Court wrapped up its term with some standout cases. Immigration, affirmative action, abortion clinic restrictions, guns and domestic violence, and public corruption are only a few cases that have ended an eventful and, at some times, controversial Supreme Court term. These cases alongside a vacant seat on the Supreme Court have made this term an interesting one to say the least.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for the National Law Journal and Suzanna Sherry, the Herman O. Loewenstein professor of law at Vanderbilt University Law School, as they discuss the Supreme Court's end of term. They will take a look back at the standout cases, the last cases before the term ended, the impact of the loss of Justice Scalia and one less justice, and look forward to the start of next term in October.
 Tony Mauro is the Supreme Court correspondent for the National Law Journal. Tony has covered the Supreme Court for over 30 years. During his tenure, Tony has also written about the First Amendment and food, reviewing restaurants for various publications. He lives in Alexandria, Virginia, with his wife, Kathy Cullinan, and his daughter, Emily Mauro, lives nearby in Arlington.
 Suzanna Sherry is the Herman O. Loewenstein professor of law at Vanderbilt University Law School. Her writing focuses primarily on constitutional law and procedures and doctrines of the federal courts, including the Supreme Court. She is the author of seven books, including four textbooks, and more than 75 articles. She received her A.B. from Middlebury College and her J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 15:37:01 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Supreme Court End of Term Wrap-Up</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>440</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d6efdf70-cfa9-11eb-92b9-63446dd8072e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On June 27th, the Supreme Court wrapped up its term with some standout cases. Immigration, affirmative action, abortion clinic restrictions, guns and domestic violence, and public corruption are only a few cases that have ended an eventful and, at...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On June 27th, the Supreme Court wrapped up its term with some standout cases. Immigration, affirmative action, abortion clinic restrictions, guns and domestic violence, and public corruption are only a few cases that have ended an eventful and, at some times, controversial Supreme Court term. These cases alongside a vacant seat on the Supreme Court have made this term an interesting one to say the least.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for the National Law Journal and Suzanna Sherry, the Herman O. Loewenstein professor of law at Vanderbilt University Law School, as they discuss the Supreme Court's end of term. They will take a look back at the standout cases, the last cases before the term ended, the impact of the loss of Justice Scalia and one less justice, and look forward to the start of next term in October.
 Tony Mauro is the Supreme Court correspondent for the National Law Journal. Tony has covered the Supreme Court for over 30 years. During his tenure, Tony has also written about the First Amendment and food, reviewing restaurants for various publications. He lives in Alexandria, Virginia, with his wife, Kathy Cullinan, and his daughter, Emily Mauro, lives nearby in Arlington.
 Suzanna Sherry is the Herman O. Loewenstein professor of law at Vanderbilt University Law School. Her writing focuses primarily on constitutional law and procedures and doctrines of the federal courts, including the Supreme Court. She is the author of seven books, including four textbooks, and more than 75 articles. She received her A.B. from Middlebury College and her J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On June 27th, the Supreme Court wrapped up its term with some standout cases. Immigration, affirmative action, abortion clinic restrictions, guns and domestic violence, and public corruption are only a few cases that have ended an eventful and, at some times, controversial Supreme Court term. These cases alongside a vacant seat on the Supreme Court have made this term an interesting one to say the least.</p> <p>On <strong><em>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em></strong>, hosts <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> and <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> join Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for the National Law Journal and Suzanna Sherry, the Herman O. Loewenstein professor of law at Vanderbilt University Law School, as they discuss the Supreme Court's end of term. They will take a look back at the standout cases, the last cases before the term ended, the impact of the loss of Justice Scalia and one less justice, and look forward to the start of next term in October.</p> <p><strong>Tony Mauro</strong> is the Supreme Court correspondent for the National Law Journal. Tony has covered the Supreme Court for over 30 years. During his tenure, Tony has also written about the First Amendment and food, reviewing restaurants for various publications. He lives in Alexandria, Virginia, with his wife, Kathy Cullinan, and his daughter, Emily Mauro, lives nearby in Arlington.</p> <p><strong>Suzanna Sherry</strong> is the Herman O. Loewenstein professor of law at Vanderbilt University Law School. Her writing focuses primarily on constitutional law and procedures and doctrines of the federal courts, including the Supreme Court. She is the author of seven books, including four textbooks, and more than 75 articles. She received her A.B. from Middlebury College and her J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1769</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5a331af5f6758e7be618db0879446cfc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5524946009.mp3?updated=1623961851" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Orlando Shooting and Gun Laws</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/07/orlando-shooting-gun-laws</link>
      <description>On June 12, 2016, tragedy struck at Pulse, a popular nightclub within the LGBT community in Orlando, Florida, after a gunman, Omar Mateen fatally shot 49 people and injured 53. This tragedy is one of  the deadliest mass shootings in the United States and the nation's worst terror attack since 9/11. In a Father's Day address, President Obama said gun violence was "preventable" and too common. "It's unconscionable that we allow easy access to weapons of war in these places,"  he said.  And just yesterday, a divided Senate voted down 4 gun control measures.
 So what needs to change when it comes to gun laws, all while protecting the Second Amendment? And can bipartisan gun legislation curb gun violence and prevent future mass shootings?
 In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join attorney Steven W. Dulan, first vice chair of the Michigan Coalition of Responsible Gun Owners and Arkadi Gerney, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, as they take a look at gun laws and the tragedy in Orlando. They will talk reaction, the gun control debate, the Second Amendment, Florida gun laws and potential legislation. 
 Attorney Steven W. Dulan is first vice chair of the Michigan Coalition of Responsible Gun Owners. MCRGO is the largest state-based firearms advocacy organization in America and its mission is to promote safe use and ownership of firearms through education, litigation, and legislation. Steve has appeared on various media outlets to discuss gun ownership, including CNN (with Christiane Amanpour and Piers Morgan), FOX and Friends, NPR, and HuffPost Live.
 Attorney Arkadi Gerney is senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, where he focuses on crime and gun policy. Arkadi previously worked as special advisor and first deputy criminal justice coordinator to former New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, where he managed Mayors Against Illegal Guns, a national coalition that Mayor Bloomberg co-chairs. During four and a half years in the New York City mayor’s office, Gerney oversaw the coalition’s growth to more than 600 mayors, led successful campaigns to influence federal legislation, partnered with Walmart to develop a landmark gun seller code of conduct, and led New York City’s undercover investigation of out-of-state gun shows.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 19:25:29 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Orlando Shooting and Gun Laws</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>439</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d7188736-cfa9-11eb-92b9-6337c101f4a0/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On June 12, 2016, tragedy struck at Pulse, a popular nightclub within the LGBT community in Orlando, Florida, after a gunman, Omar Mateen fatally shot 49 people and injured 53. This tragedy is one of  the deadliest mass shootings in the United...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On June 12, 2016, tragedy struck at Pulse, a popular nightclub within the LGBT community in Orlando, Florida, after a gunman, Omar Mateen fatally shot 49 people and injured 53. This tragedy is one of  the deadliest mass shootings in the United States and the nation's worst terror attack since 9/11. In a Father's Day address, President Obama said gun violence was "preventable" and too common. "It's unconscionable that we allow easy access to weapons of war in these places,"  he said.  And just yesterday, a divided Senate voted down 4 gun control measures.
 So what needs to change when it comes to gun laws, all while protecting the Second Amendment? And can bipartisan gun legislation curb gun violence and prevent future mass shootings?
 In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join attorney Steven W. Dulan, first vice chair of the Michigan Coalition of Responsible Gun Owners and Arkadi Gerney, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, as they take a look at gun laws and the tragedy in Orlando. They will talk reaction, the gun control debate, the Second Amendment, Florida gun laws and potential legislation. 
 Attorney Steven W. Dulan is first vice chair of the Michigan Coalition of Responsible Gun Owners. MCRGO is the largest state-based firearms advocacy organization in America and its mission is to promote safe use and ownership of firearms through education, litigation, and legislation. Steve has appeared on various media outlets to discuss gun ownership, including CNN (with Christiane Amanpour and Piers Morgan), FOX and Friends, NPR, and HuffPost Live.
 Attorney Arkadi Gerney is senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, where he focuses on crime and gun policy. Arkadi previously worked as special advisor and first deputy criminal justice coordinator to former New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, where he managed Mayors Against Illegal Guns, a national coalition that Mayor Bloomberg co-chairs. During four and a half years in the New York City mayor’s office, Gerney oversaw the coalition’s growth to more than 600 mayors, led successful campaigns to influence federal legislation, partnered with Walmart to develop a landmark gun seller code of conduct, and led New York City’s undercover investigation of out-of-state gun shows.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On June 12, 2016, tragedy struck at Pulse, a popular nightclub within the LGBT community in Orlando, Florida, after a gunman, Omar Mateen fatally shot 49 people and injured 53. This tragedy is one of  the deadliest mass shootings in the United States and the nation's worst terror attack since 9/11. In a Father's Day address, President Obama said gun violence was "preventable" and too common. "It's unconscionable that we allow easy access to weapons of war in these places,"  he said.  And just yesterday, a divided Senate voted down 4 gun control measures.</p> <p>So what needs to change when it comes to gun laws, all while protecting the Second Amendment? And can bipartisan gun legislation curb gun violence and prevent future mass shootings?</p> <p>In this episode of <em>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, hosts <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> and <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> join attorney <strong>Steven W. Dulan</strong>, first vice chair of the Michigan Coalition of Responsible Gun Owners and <strong>Arkadi Gerney,</strong> senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, as they take a look at gun laws and the tragedy in Orlando. They will talk reaction, the gun control debate, the Second Amendment, Florida gun laws and potential legislation. </p> <p><strong>Attorney</strong> <strong>Steven W. Dulan</strong> is first vice chair of the Michigan Coalition of Responsible Gun Owners. MCRGO is the largest state-based firearms advocacy organization in America and its mission is to promote safe use and ownership of firearms through education, litigation, and legislation. Steve has appeared on various media outlets to discuss gun ownership, including CNN (with Christiane Amanpour and Piers Morgan), FOX and Friends, NPR, and HuffPost Live.</p> <p><strong>Attorney Arkadi Gerney</strong> is senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, where he focuses on crime and gun policy. Arkadi previously worked as special advisor and first deputy criminal justice coordinator to former New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, where he managed Mayors Against Illegal Guns, a national coalition that Mayor Bloomberg co-chairs. During four and a half years in the New York City mayor’s office, Gerney oversaw the coalition’s growth to more than 600 mayors, led successful campaigns to influence federal legislation, partnered with Walmart to develop a landmark gun seller code of conduct, and led New York City’s undercover investigation of out-of-state gun shows.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1838</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[25aa2b7001a3ab72d981b9698054716b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4284442488.mp3?updated=1623961851" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tribal Law, Indian Child Welfare Act, and Custody</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/06/tribal-law-indian-child-welfare-act-custody</link>
      <description>In a highly publicized custody case involving a 6-year-old girl, the use of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, a federal law that seeks to keep American Indian children with their American Indian families, has come into play.
 The child was recently removed from her foster home after a lower court judge ruled that Lexi’s Choctaw Indian bloodline requires her to live with relatives in Utah.  According to court records, Lexi was moved to foster care four years ago due to her birth mother’s substance abuse problems, her birth father’s criminal history, and custody issues involving both birth parents and other children. Lexi’s foster parents, have since filed an appeal to the California High Court
 In this episode of  Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join attorney Lori Alvino McGill, partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Wilkinson Walsh + Eskovitz and Chrissi Nimmo, assistant attorney general for Cherokee Nation, who has represented the nation in tribal, state, and federal courts since 2008, as they take an inside look at this case, tribal law, the Indian Child Welfare Act, and overall child custody cases.
 Attorney Lori Alvino McGill is partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Wilkinson Walsh + Eskovitz. Lori’s practice focuses on all aspects of appellate strategy, including issue preservation, briefing, argument, and obtaining (and opposing) Supreme Court review. She has handled high-profile civil and criminal appeals involving a wide range of constitutional and statutory issues in state and federal appellate courts, including the Supreme Court of the United States. Lori is presently representing the foster parents of Lexi and has appealed to the California’s highest court.
 Chrissi Nimmo is assistant attorney general for Cherokee Nation and has represented the nation in tribal, state, and federal courts since 2008. Chrissi primarily focuses on the Indian Child Welfare Act and in-house counsel duties for the nation. She represented Cherokee Nation in Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl before both the United States Supreme Court and the South Carolina Supreme Court and in Nielson v. Ketchum before the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Chrissi also serves as the Adam Walsh Act Sex Offender Registration and Notification Compliance Office for Cherokee Nation.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:25:22 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Tribal Law, Indian Child Welfare Act, and Custody</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>438</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d73cfb2a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-7b98f4277281/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a highly publicized custody case involving a 6-year-old girl, the use of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, a federal law that seeks to keep American Indian children with their American Indian families, has come into play. The child was recently...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In a highly publicized custody case involving a 6-year-old girl, the use of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, a federal law that seeks to keep American Indian children with their American Indian families, has come into play.
 The child was recently removed from her foster home after a lower court judge ruled that Lexi’s Choctaw Indian bloodline requires her to live with relatives in Utah.  According to court records, Lexi was moved to foster care four years ago due to her birth mother’s substance abuse problems, her birth father’s criminal history, and custody issues involving both birth parents and other children. Lexi’s foster parents, have since filed an appeal to the California High Court
 In this episode of  Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join attorney Lori Alvino McGill, partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Wilkinson Walsh + Eskovitz and Chrissi Nimmo, assistant attorney general for Cherokee Nation, who has represented the nation in tribal, state, and federal courts since 2008, as they take an inside look at this case, tribal law, the Indian Child Welfare Act, and overall child custody cases.
 Attorney Lori Alvino McGill is partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Wilkinson Walsh + Eskovitz. Lori’s practice focuses on all aspects of appellate strategy, including issue preservation, briefing, argument, and obtaining (and opposing) Supreme Court review. She has handled high-profile civil and criminal appeals involving a wide range of constitutional and statutory issues in state and federal appellate courts, including the Supreme Court of the United States. Lori is presently representing the foster parents of Lexi and has appealed to the California’s highest court.
 Chrissi Nimmo is assistant attorney general for Cherokee Nation and has represented the nation in tribal, state, and federal courts since 2008. Chrissi primarily focuses on the Indian Child Welfare Act and in-house counsel duties for the nation. She represented Cherokee Nation in Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl before both the United States Supreme Court and the South Carolina Supreme Court and in Nielson v. Ketchum before the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Chrissi also serves as the Adam Walsh Act Sex Offender Registration and Notification Compliance Office for Cherokee Nation.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In a highly publicized custody case involving a 6-year-old girl, the use of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, a federal law that seeks to keep American Indian children with their American Indian families, has come into play.</p> <p>The child was recently removed from her foster home after a lower court judge ruled that Lexi’s Choctaw Indian bloodline requires her to live with relatives in Utah.  According to court records, Lexi was moved to foster care four years ago due to her birth mother’s substance abuse problems, her birth father’s criminal history, and custody issues involving both birth parents and other children. Lexi’s foster parents, have since filed an appeal to the California High Court</p> <p>In this episode of  Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> and <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> join attorney <strong>Lori Alvino McGill</strong>, partner in the Washington, D.C. office of <strong>Wilkinson Walsh + Eskovitz</strong> and <strong>Chrissi Nimmo</strong>, assistant attorney general for <strong>Cherokee Nation</strong>, who has represented the nation in tribal, state, and federal courts since 2008, as they take an inside look at this case, tribal law, the Indian Child Welfare Act, and overall child custody cases.</p> <p><strong>Attorney Lori Alvino McGill</strong> is partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Wilkinson Walsh + Eskovitz. Lori’s practice focuses on all aspects of appellate strategy, including issue preservation, briefing, argument, and obtaining (and opposing) Supreme Court review. She has handled high-profile civil and criminal appeals involving a wide range of constitutional and statutory issues in state and federal appellate courts, including the Supreme Court of the United States. Lori is presently representing the foster parents of Lexi and has appealed to the California’s highest court.</p> <p><strong>Chrissi Nimmo</strong> is assistant attorney general for Cherokee Nation and has represented the nation in tribal, state, and federal courts since 2008. Chrissi primarily focuses on the Indian Child Welfare Act and in-house counsel duties for the nation. She represented Cherokee Nation in <em>Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl</em> before both the United States Supreme Court and the South Carolina Supreme Court and in <em>Nielson v. Ketchum</em> before the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Chrissi also serves as the Adam Walsh Act Sex Offender Registration and Notification Compliance Office for Cherokee Nation.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2161</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[88f3c536b92a2a4f853f5982c5939ae5]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2082141143.mp3?updated=1623961851" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Overtime Rule Changes: Impact and Reaction</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/06/overtime-rule-changes-impact-reaction/</link>
      <description>The Labor Department recently announced regulation changes pertaining to overtime pay for employees and their employers. Under these new rules, those who earn salaries of less than $47,476 a year will automatically qualify for overtime pay of time-and-a-half if they work more than 40 hours a week.
 Once the new rules go into effect on December 1, 2016, they will impact 4.2 million workers in the United States.  So what does this mean for business owners and their employees?
 In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Jane Lauer Barker, a partner at the New York labor and employment firm Pitta &amp; Giblin LLP and Thomas Wassel, a labor and employment partner with the New York firm Cullen and Dykman, as they take a look at these recent overtime rule changes and the impact, pros and cons, and reaction from business owners and the workforce.
 Jane Lauer Barker is a partner at the New York labor and employment firm Pitta &amp; Giblin LLP.  Jane concentrates in labor, employment, and employee benefits law and litigation and labor union representation.  Previously, Barker headed up New York State Attorney General's Labor Bureau where she oversaw civil and criminal enforcement of state labor laws and handled appellate litigation.
 Thomas Wassel is a labor and employment partner with the New York firm Cullen and Dykman. Tom has been advising employers on a wide range of labor and employment law matters since 1983.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 22:12:25 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Overtime Rule Changes: Impact and Reaction</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>437</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d75db414-cfa9-11eb-92b9-a3bfa0089f31/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Labor Department recently announced regulation changes pertaining to overtime pay for employees and their employers. Under these new rules, those who earn salaries of less than $47,476 a year will automatically qualify for overtime pay of...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Labor Department recently announced regulation changes pertaining to overtime pay for employees and their employers. Under these new rules, those who earn salaries of less than $47,476 a year will automatically qualify for overtime pay of time-and-a-half if they work more than 40 hours a week.
 Once the new rules go into effect on December 1, 2016, they will impact 4.2 million workers in the United States.  So what does this mean for business owners and their employees?
 In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Jane Lauer Barker, a partner at the New York labor and employment firm Pitta &amp; Giblin LLP and Thomas Wassel, a labor and employment partner with the New York firm Cullen and Dykman, as they take a look at these recent overtime rule changes and the impact, pros and cons, and reaction from business owners and the workforce.
 Jane Lauer Barker is a partner at the New York labor and employment firm Pitta &amp; Giblin LLP.  Jane concentrates in labor, employment, and employee benefits law and litigation and labor union representation.  Previously, Barker headed up New York State Attorney General's Labor Bureau where she oversaw civil and criminal enforcement of state labor laws and handled appellate litigation.
 Thomas Wassel is a labor and employment partner with the New York firm Cullen and Dykman. Tom has been advising employers on a wide range of labor and employment law matters since 1983.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The Labor Department recently announced regulation changes pertaining to overtime pay for employees and their employers. Under these new rules, those who earn salaries of less than $47,476 a year will automatically qualify for overtime pay of time-and-a-half if they work more than 40 hours a week.</p> <p>Once the new rules go into effect on December 1, 2016, they will impact 4.2 million workers in the United States.  So what does this mean for business owners and their employees?</p> <p>In this episode of <em>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em>, hosts <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> and <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> join <strong>Jane Lauer Barker</strong>, a partner at the New York labor and employment firm <strong>Pitta &amp; Giblin LLP</strong> and <strong>Thomas Wassel</strong>, a labor and employment partner with the New York firm <strong>Cullen and Dykman,</strong> as they take a look at these recent overtime rule changes and the impact, pros and cons, and reaction from business owners and the workforce.</p> <p><strong>Jane Lauer Barker</strong> is a partner at the New York labor and employment firm Pitta &amp; Giblin LLP.  Jane concentrates in labor, employment, and employee benefits law and litigation and labor union representation.  Previously, Barker headed up New York State Attorney General's Labor Bureau where she oversaw civil and criminal enforcement of state labor laws and handled appellate litigation.</p> <p><strong>Thomas Wassel</strong> is a labor and employment partner with the New York firm Cullen and Dykman. Tom has been advising employers on a wide range of labor and employment law matters since 1983.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2002</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7e5dbf019319aab886aa9b4cc0a15fad]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8297481323.mp3?updated=1623961852" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Panama Papers</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/05/panama-papers/</link>
      <description>An offshore investment scandal known as the Panama Papers has taken the world by storm. The controversy centers around the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca and its connections to high-ranking political figures, their relatives, celebrities, and business figures, including Iceland Prime Minister Sigmundur David Gunnlaugsson.
 Recently, a German newspaper announced that 11.5 million confidential documents between 1970 and 2015 had been leaked from the firm to journalists. These "Panama Papers" revealed how clients hid billions of dollars in offshore tax shelters.  There are many issues at hand here: establishing these offshore entities, evading taxes, fraud, laundering money, and overall corruption.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Jessica Tillipman, the assistant dean for field placement at George Washington Law School and Professor William Byrnes, a member of the law faculty and an associate dean with Texas A&amp;M University School of Law, as they take an inside look at the Panama Papers. They will discuss Mossack Fonseca’s role, shell companies and offshore bank accounts, the issue of data security, tax evasion, investigations into these clients, and future of Mossack Fonseca.
 Jessica Tillipman is the assistant dean for field placement at George Washington Law School and an expert in corruption, government ethics, and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. She is a senior editor of the FCPA Blog, which has been following the Panama Papers revelations.
 Professor William Byrnes is a member of the law faculty and an associate dean with Texas A&amp;M University School of Law. William held a senior position of international tax for a Big 6 firm and has been commissioned on fiscal policy by a number of governments. He is currently developing a tax and legal risk management online curriculum for professionals. Texas A&amp;M University is the fifth largest U.S. public research institution and one of only 62 institutions to be designated a member of the prestigious Association of American Universities.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 17:41:22 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Panama Papers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>436</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d77fb014-cfa9-11eb-92b9-c3984e1b1113/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>An offshore investment scandal known as the Panama Papers has taken the world by storm. The controversy centers around the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca and its connections to high-ranking political figures, their relatives, celebrities, and...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>An offshore investment scandal known as the Panama Papers has taken the world by storm. The controversy centers around the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca and its connections to high-ranking political figures, their relatives, celebrities, and business figures, including Iceland Prime Minister Sigmundur David Gunnlaugsson.
 Recently, a German newspaper announced that 11.5 million confidential documents between 1970 and 2015 had been leaked from the firm to journalists. These "Panama Papers" revealed how clients hid billions of dollars in offshore tax shelters.  There are many issues at hand here: establishing these offshore entities, evading taxes, fraud, laundering money, and overall corruption.
 On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Jessica Tillipman, the assistant dean for field placement at George Washington Law School and Professor William Byrnes, a member of the law faculty and an associate dean with Texas A&amp;M University School of Law, as they take an inside look at the Panama Papers. They will discuss Mossack Fonseca’s role, shell companies and offshore bank accounts, the issue of data security, tax evasion, investigations into these clients, and future of Mossack Fonseca.
 Jessica Tillipman is the assistant dean for field placement at George Washington Law School and an expert in corruption, government ethics, and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. She is a senior editor of the FCPA Blog, which has been following the Panama Papers revelations.
 Professor William Byrnes is a member of the law faculty and an associate dean with Texas A&amp;M University School of Law. William held a senior position of international tax for a Big 6 firm and has been commissioned on fiscal policy by a number of governments. He is currently developing a tax and legal risk management online curriculum for professionals. Texas A&amp;M University is the fifth largest U.S. public research institution and one of only 62 institutions to be designated a member of the prestigious Association of American Universities.
 Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>An offshore investment scandal known as the Panama Papers has taken the world by storm. The controversy centers around the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca and its connections to high-ranking political figures, their relatives, celebrities, and business figures, including Iceland Prime Minister Sigmundur David Gunnlaugsson.</p> <p>Recently, a German newspaper announced that 11.5 million confidential documents between 1970 and 2015 had been leaked from the firm to journalists. These "Panama Papers" revealed how clients hid billions of dollars in offshore tax shelters.  There are many issues at hand here: establishing these offshore entities, evading taxes, fraud, laundering money, and overall corruption.</p> <p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> and <strong>Craig Williams</strong> join Jessica Tillipman, the assistant dean for field placement at George Washington Law School and Professor William Byrnes, a member of the law faculty and an associate dean with Texas A&amp;M University School of Law, as they take an inside look at the Panama Papers. They will discuss Mossack Fonseca’s role, shell companies and offshore bank accounts, the issue of data security, tax evasion, investigations into these clients, and future of Mossack Fonseca.</p> <p><strong>Jessica Tillipman</strong> is the assistant dean for field placement at George Washington Law School and an expert in corruption, government ethics, and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. She is a senior editor of the FCPA Blog, which has been following the Panama Papers revelations.</p> <p><strong>Professor William Byrnes</strong> is a member of the law faculty and an associate dean with Texas A&amp;M University School of Law. William held a senior position of international tax for a Big 6 firm and has been commissioned on fiscal policy by a number of governments. He is currently developing a tax and legal risk management online curriculum for professionals. Texas A&amp;M University is the fifth largest U.S. public research institution and one of only 62 institutions to be designated a member of the prestigious Association of American Universities.</p> <p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2101</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3459aa578b694613a9fa4ab6e757532c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6481333291.mp3?updated=1623961852" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>North Carolina's HB2 Controversy, Transgender Legislation, and Litigation</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/04/north-carolinas-hb2-controversy-transgender-legislation-litigation</link>
      <description>North Carolina’s House Bill 2, better known as the “Bathroom
Law”, has taken center stage and has created a great debate. On
March 23, 2016, Gov. Pat McCrory signed the Public Facilities
Privacy and Security Act, also known as House Bill 2 or HB2. The
law bans people from using bathrooms that don't match the sex
indicated on their birth certificates, which opponents argue is
discriminatory toward the transgender community.

Supporters of the new law say it is a safety and privacy issue,
protecting women and children from men who use the law as a
pretense to deliberately enter the wrong restroom. Legislation
involving the transgender community is not only happening in the
state of North Carolina, but Mississippi and Tennessee have pushed
similar legislation as well.

On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J.
Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Ilona
Turner, legal director at the Transgender Law
Center, Andrew Beckwith, president of
the Massachusetts Family Institute and Professor Katie Eyer
from Rutgers Law School as they take a look at North Carolina's HB2
controversy, reaction, litigation surrounding HB2, anti-LGBT
discrimination bills and LGBT protections nationally, and the quest
for equal rights for the transgender community.

Ilona Turner was a staff attorney at the
National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR), where her work
frequently focused on issues affecting transgender clients. She
previously practiced law at Cohen, Weiss, &amp; Simon LLP in New
York City, representing unions, union-run health and retirement
plans, and employees. In the early 2000s she worked as the lobbyist
for Equality California, where she helped to shepherd
groundbreaking legislation that prohibited housing and employment
discrimination against transgender people and dramatically expanded
the rights of domestic partners in California.

Andrew Beckwith is a graduate of Gordon College
and the University of Minnesota Law School. Andrew is a judge
advocate in the United States Marine Corps Reserve where he holds
the rank of major. He has also served as an immigration trial
attorney for the Boston office of the Department of Homeland
Security.

Katie Eyer joined the Rutgers law faculty as an
assistant professor in June 2012. Katie also litigated civil rights
cases prior to entering academia full time, and secured a number of
precedents in the Third Circuit expanding the legal rights of LGBT
and disabled employees.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 18:03:17 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>North Carolina's HB2 Controversy, Transgender Legislation, and Litigation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>435</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d7a28256-cfa9-11eb-92b9-67df363fa2c1/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>North Carolina’s House Bill 2, better known as the “Bathroom
Law”, has taken center stage and has created a great debate. On
March 23, 2016, Gov. Pat McCrory signed the Public Facilities
Privacy and Security Act, also known as House Bill 2 or...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>North Carolina’s House Bill 2, better known as the “Bathroom
Law”, has taken center stage and has created a great debate. On
March 23, 2016, Gov. Pat McCrory signed the Public Facilities
Privacy and Security Act, also known as House Bill 2 or HB2. The
law bans people from using bathrooms that don't match the sex
indicated on their birth certificates, which opponents argue is
discriminatory toward the transgender community.

Supporters of the new law say it is a safety and privacy issue,
protecting women and children from men who use the law as a
pretense to deliberately enter the wrong restroom. Legislation
involving the transgender community is not only happening in the
state of North Carolina, but Mississippi and Tennessee have pushed
similar legislation as well.

On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J.
Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Ilona
Turner, legal director at the Transgender Law
Center, Andrew Beckwith, president of
the Massachusetts Family Institute and Professor Katie Eyer
from Rutgers Law School as they take a look at North Carolina's HB2
controversy, reaction, litigation surrounding HB2, anti-LGBT
discrimination bills and LGBT protections nationally, and the quest
for equal rights for the transgender community.

Ilona Turner was a staff attorney at the
National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR), where her work
frequently focused on issues affecting transgender clients. She
previously practiced law at Cohen, Weiss, &amp; Simon LLP in New
York City, representing unions, union-run health and retirement
plans, and employees. In the early 2000s she worked as the lobbyist
for Equality California, where she helped to shepherd
groundbreaking legislation that prohibited housing and employment
discrimination against transgender people and dramatically expanded
the rights of domestic partners in California.

Andrew Beckwith is a graduate of Gordon College
and the University of Minnesota Law School. Andrew is a judge
advocate in the United States Marine Corps Reserve where he holds
the rank of major. He has also served as an immigration trial
attorney for the Boston office of the Department of Homeland
Security.

Katie Eyer joined the Rutgers law faculty as an
assistant professor in June 2012. Katie also litigated civil rights
cases prior to entering academia full time, and secured a number of
precedents in the Third Circuit expanding the legal rights of LGBT
and disabled employees.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>North Carolina’s House Bill 2, better known as the “Bathroom
Law”, has taken center stage and has created a great debate. On
March 23, 2016, Gov. Pat McCrory signed the Public Facilities
Privacy and Security Act, also known as House Bill 2 or HB2. The
law bans people from using bathrooms that don't match the sex
indicated on their birth certificates, which opponents argue is
discriminatory toward the transgender community.</p>
<p>Supporters of the new law say it is a safety and privacy issue,
protecting women and children from men who use the law as a
pretense to deliberately enter the wrong restroom. Legislation
involving the transgender community is not only happening in the
state of North Carolina, but Mississippi and Tennessee have pushed
similar legislation as well.</p>
<p>On <strong><em>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</em></strong>, hosts <strong>J.
Craig Williams</strong> and <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> join Ilona
Turner<strong>, </strong>legal director at the Transgender Law
Center, Andrew Beckwith<strong>,</strong> president of
the Massachusetts Family Institute and Professor Katie Eyer
from Rutgers Law School as they take a look at North Carolina's HB2
controversy, reaction, litigation surrounding HB2, anti-LGBT
discrimination bills and LGBT protections nationally, and the quest
for equal rights for the transgender community.</p>
<p><strong>Ilona Turner</strong> was a staff attorney at the
National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR), where her work
frequently focused on issues affecting transgender clients. She
previously practiced law at Cohen, Weiss, &amp; Simon LLP in New
York City, representing unions, union-run health and retirement
plans, and employees. In the early 2000s she worked as the lobbyist
for Equality California, where she helped to shepherd
groundbreaking legislation that prohibited housing and employment
discrimination against transgender people and dramatically expanded
the rights of domestic partners in California.</p>
<p><strong>Andrew Beckwith</strong> is a graduate of Gordon College
and the University of Minnesota Law School. Andrew is a judge
advocate in the United States Marine Corps Reserve where he holds
the rank of major. He has also served as an immigration trial
attorney for the Boston office of the Department of Homeland
Security.</p>
<p><strong>Katie Eyer</strong> joined the Rutgers law faculty as an
assistant professor in June 2012. Katie also litigated civil rights
cases prior to entering academia full time, and secured a number of
precedents in the Third Circuit expanding the legal rights of LGBT
and disabled employees.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2217</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[cee24a085f54c0b30daa4952421fcf3a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3183237747.mp3?updated=1623961852" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Latest on the FBI/Apple Legal Battle</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/04/latest-fbi-apple-legal-battle</link>
      <description>The FBI and Apple, Inc. have been immersed in an ongoing legal battle over privacy and security. The legal battle reached a boiling point when the FBI and Apple engaged in a dispute over whether the federal court may compel Apple to create new software that would enable the FBI to unlock an iPhone 5C it recovered from one of the shooters in a terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California. So, is this a threat to our data security or will Apple’s assistance to the FBI provide key information needed to prevent future terrorist attacks?

On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join David O’Brien, a senior researcher at the Berkman Center and Robert E. Cattanach, a partner with the international law firm Dorsey &amp; Whitney LLP and a former justice department attorney, as they take a look at the latest on the FBI/Apple Legal Battle. They will discuss San Bernardino, encryption, privacy, national security and the future impact of this case.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.

 </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 19:11:19 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Latest on the FBI/Apple Legal Battle</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>434</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d7cb5a32-cfa9-11eb-92b9-bb900f184503/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The FBI and Apple, Inc. have been immersed in an ongoing legal battle over privacy and security. The legal battle reached a boiling point when the FBI and Apple engaged in a dispute over whether the federal court may compel Apple to create new...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The FBI and Apple, Inc. have been immersed in an ongoing legal battle over privacy and security. The legal battle reached a boiling point when the FBI and Apple engaged in a dispute over whether the federal court may compel Apple to create new software that would enable the FBI to unlock an iPhone 5C it recovered from one of the shooters in a terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California. So, is this a threat to our data security or will Apple’s assistance to the FBI provide key information needed to prevent future terrorist attacks?

On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join David O’Brien, a senior researcher at the Berkman Center and Robert E. Cattanach, a partner with the international law firm Dorsey &amp; Whitney LLP and a former justice department attorney, as they take a look at the latest on the FBI/Apple Legal Battle. They will discuss San Bernardino, encryption, privacy, national security and the future impact of this case.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.

 </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The FBI and Apple, Inc. have been immersed in an ongoing legal battle over privacy and security. The legal battle reached a boiling point when the FBI and Apple engaged in a dispute over whether the federal court may compel Apple to create new software that would enable the FBI to unlock an iPhone 5C it recovered from one of the shooters in a terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California. So, is this a threat to our data security or will Apple’s assistance to the FBI provide key information needed to prevent future terrorist attacks?</p>
<p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> and <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> join David O’Brien, a senior researcher at the Berkman Center and Robert E. Cattanach, a partner with the international law firm Dorsey &amp; Whitney LLP and a former justice department attorney, as they take a look at the latest on the FBI/Apple Legal Battle. They will discuss San Bernardino, encryption, privacy, national security and the future impact of this case.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>
<p> </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1998</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8a0b47b767d80cae2acfc4643f8c749d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3359621654.mp3?updated=1623961853" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Justice Antonin Scalia: His Legacy and the Impact of his Death</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/03/justice-antonin-scalia-legacy-impact-death</link>
      <description>Last month, Justice Antonin Scalia passed away unexpectedly sparking a huge reaction from the legal and political world. Justice Scalia was appointed to the Supreme Court by President Ronald Reagan in 1986 and is known for his conservative position in his rulings. Since his death, there has been great controversy over his replacement on the High Court and the nomination process under President Obama.

In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join Tony Mauro, the Supreme Court correspondent for the National Law Journal and Kevin P. Martin, an appellate and regulatory litigation partner and co-chair of Goodwin Procter’s Appellate Litigation Group and Justice Scalia’s former law clerk, as they discuss the passing of Justice Scalia, his legacy, the controversy over a replacement, and the impact his death will have on the future of the Supreme Court and the laws of the land.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:02:32 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Justice Antonin Scalia: His Legacy and the Impact of his Death</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>433</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d7ed439a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-1f7a92d28381/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Last month, Justice Antonin Scalia passed away unexpectedly sparking a huge reaction from the legal and political world. Justice Scalia was appointed to the Supreme Court by President Ronald Reagan in 1986 and is known for his conservative position in...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Last month, Justice Antonin Scalia passed away unexpectedly sparking a huge reaction from the legal and political world. Justice Scalia was appointed to the Supreme Court by President Ronald Reagan in 1986 and is known for his conservative position in his rulings. Since his death, there has been great controversy over his replacement on the High Court and the nomination process under President Obama.

In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join Tony Mauro, the Supreme Court correspondent for the National Law Journal and Kevin P. Martin, an appellate and regulatory litigation partner and co-chair of Goodwin Procter’s Appellate Litigation Group and Justice Scalia’s former law clerk, as they discuss the passing of Justice Scalia, his legacy, the controversy over a replacement, and the impact his death will have on the future of the Supreme Court and the laws of the land.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Last month, Justice Antonin Scalia passed away unexpectedly sparking a huge reaction from the legal and political world. Justice Scalia was appointed to the Supreme Court by President Ronald Reagan in 1986 and is known for his conservative position in his rulings. Since his death, there has been great controversy over his replacement on the High Court and the nomination process under President Obama.</p>
<p>In this episode of <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> and <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> join <strong>Tony Mauro</strong>, the Supreme Court correspondent for the National Law Journal and <strong>Kevin P. Martin</strong>, an appellate and regulatory litigation partner and co-chair of Goodwin Procter’s Appellate Litigation Group and Justice Scalia’s former law clerk, as they discuss the passing of Justice Scalia, his legacy, the controversy over a replacement, and the impact his death will have on the future of the Supreme Court and the laws of the land.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2048</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[fecb7ea2bd1835a7d3f59cb58839ac7c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6155923543.mp3?updated=1623961853" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Flint Water Crisis</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/03/flint-water-crisis/</link>
      <description>There is presently a public health crisis plaguing Flint, Michigan. Lead contamination in the water has led to a major public health danger. Back in 2014, Flint changed its water source from the treated Detroit Water and Sewerage Department water to the Flint River. Since then, Flint’s drinking water has had a host of problems.

This Flint River water then caused lead from aging pipes to seep into the water supply, causing extremely high levels of lead. Between 6,000 and 12,000 children have been exposed and they may experience a range of serious health problems. On January 21, 2016, the E.P.A. issued an emergency administrative order finding that “the city of Flint’s and the state of Michigan’s responses to the drinking water crisis in Flint have been inadequate to protect public health and that these failures continue.”

On Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join professor Peter Jacobson, professor of health management and policy at the School of Public Health at the University of Michigan and professor Peter J. Henning from Wayne State University, as they take a look at the Flint water crisis, the violation of public health laws, liability, the impact on the Flint community and their health, litigation and long-term effect.

 

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:47:21 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Flint Water Crisis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>432</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d8130030-cfa9-11eb-92b9-57e1336ee20f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>There is presently a public health crisis plaguing Flint, Michigan. Lead contamination in the water has led to a major public health danger. Back in 2014, Flint changed its water source from the treated Detroit Water and Sewerage Department water to...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>There is presently a public health crisis plaguing Flint, Michigan. Lead contamination in the water has led to a major public health danger. Back in 2014, Flint changed its water source from the treated Detroit Water and Sewerage Department water to the Flint River. Since then, Flint’s drinking water has had a host of problems.

This Flint River water then caused lead from aging pipes to seep into the water supply, causing extremely high levels of lead. Between 6,000 and 12,000 children have been exposed and they may experience a range of serious health problems. On January 21, 2016, the E.P.A. issued an emergency administrative order finding that “the city of Flint’s and the state of Michigan’s responses to the drinking water crisis in Flint have been inadequate to protect public health and that these failures continue.”

On Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join professor Peter Jacobson, professor of health management and policy at the School of Public Health at the University of Michigan and professor Peter J. Henning from Wayne State University, as they take a look at the Flint water crisis, the violation of public health laws, liability, the impact on the Flint community and their health, litigation and long-term effect.

 

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>There is presently a public health crisis plaguing Flint, Michigan. Lead contamination in the water has led to a major public health danger. Back in 2014, Flint changed its water source from the treated Detroit Water and Sewerage Department water to the Flint River. Since then, Flint’s drinking water has had a host of problems.</p>
<p>This Flint River water then caused lead from aging pipes to seep into the water supply, causing extremely high levels of lead. Between 6,000 and 12,000 children have been exposed and they may experience a range of serious health problems. On January 21, 2016, the E.P.A. issued an emergency administrative order finding that “the city of Flint’s and the state of Michigan’s responses to the drinking water crisis in Flint have been inadequate to protect public health and that these failures continue.”</p>
<p>On <em><strong>Lawyer2Lawyer</strong></em>, hosts <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> and <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> join professor Peter Jacobson, professor of health management and policy at the School of Public Health at the University of Michigan and professor Peter J. Henning from Wayne State University, as they take a look at the Flint water crisis, the violation of public health laws, liability, the impact on the Flint community and their health, litigation and long-term effect.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1651</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[dde320e76d5eb18c5f11838ebffe9069]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2343852817.mp3?updated=1623961853" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Rulings for Juvenile Life Sentences by the Supreme Court</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/02/new-rulings-juvenile-life-sentences-supreme-court/</link>
      <description>On January 25, 2016, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Kennedy, the Supreme Court ruled that those sentenced as juveniles to mandatory life imprisonment for murder, “should have a chance to be resentenced or argue for parole.”

This ruling plays off of the 2012 decision in Miller v. Alabama, which struck down mandatory life terms without parole for juveniles. This now must be applied retroactively and could affect at least 1,000 inmates in similar situations across the country.

In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins Emily C. Keller, a supervising attorney at Juvenile Law Center, and professor Christopher Slobogin from Vanderbilt Law School as they look at the recent Supreme Court decision, inside Montgomery v. Louisiana and Miller v. Alabama, the impact on past and future cases involving juveniles, the decision’s impact on the families of victims and juvenile justice reform.

Emily C. Keller engages in litigation and policy efforts to improve the child welfare and justice systems, including efforts to eliminate juvenile life without parole. Emily served as co-counsel for Henry Montgomery in Montgomery v. Louisiana before the U.S. Supreme Court and co-authored an amicus brief in Miller v. Alabama, the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2012 case banning mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles. Emily has also submitted amicus briefs in cases around the country challenging the imposition of life without parole and other extreme sentences on juvenile offenders.

Professor Christopher Slobogin occupies the Milton Underwood Chair at Vanderbilt Law School, where he directs the criminal justice program.  He has authored several books, including Juveniles at Risk: A Plea for Preventive Justice, published by Oxford University Press.

Links:

http://www.jlc.org/

http://www.jlc.org/about-us/who-we-are/staff/emily-keller

http://law.vanderbilt.edu/bio/christopher-slobogin</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:23:53 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>New Rulings for Juvenile Life Sentences by the Supreme Court</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>431</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d83a55e0-cfa9-11eb-92b9-1f3e640129e4/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On January 25, 2016, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Kennedy, the Supreme Court ruled that those sentenced as juveniles to mandatory life imprisonment for murder, “should have a chance to be resentenced or argue for parole.”
This...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On January 25, 2016, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Kennedy, the Supreme Court ruled that those sentenced as juveniles to mandatory life imprisonment for murder, “should have a chance to be resentenced or argue for parole.”

This ruling plays off of the 2012 decision in Miller v. Alabama, which struck down mandatory life terms without parole for juveniles. This now must be applied retroactively and could affect at least 1,000 inmates in similar situations across the country.

In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins Emily C. Keller, a supervising attorney at Juvenile Law Center, and professor Christopher Slobogin from Vanderbilt Law School as they look at the recent Supreme Court decision, inside Montgomery v. Louisiana and Miller v. Alabama, the impact on past and future cases involving juveniles, the decision’s impact on the families of victims and juvenile justice reform.

Emily C. Keller engages in litigation and policy efforts to improve the child welfare and justice systems, including efforts to eliminate juvenile life without parole. Emily served as co-counsel for Henry Montgomery in Montgomery v. Louisiana before the U.S. Supreme Court and co-authored an amicus brief in Miller v. Alabama, the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2012 case banning mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles. Emily has also submitted amicus briefs in cases around the country challenging the imposition of life without parole and other extreme sentences on juvenile offenders.

Professor Christopher Slobogin occupies the Milton Underwood Chair at Vanderbilt Law School, where he directs the criminal justice program.  He has authored several books, including Juveniles at Risk: A Plea for Preventive Justice, published by Oxford University Press.

Links:

http://www.jlc.org/

http://www.jlc.org/about-us/who-we-are/staff/emily-keller

http://law.vanderbilt.edu/bio/christopher-slobogin</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On January 25, 2016, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Kennedy, the Supreme Court ruled that those sentenced as juveniles to mandatory life imprisonment for murder, “should have a chance to be resentenced or argue for parole.”</p>
<p>This ruling plays off of the 2012 decision in Miller v. Alabama, which struck down mandatory life terms without parole for juveniles. This now must be applied retroactively and could affect at least 1,000 inmates in similar situations across the country.</p>
<p>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins Emily C. Keller, a supervising attorney at Juvenile Law Center, and professor Christopher Slobogin from Vanderbilt Law School as they look at the recent Supreme Court decision, inside Montgomery v. Louisiana and Miller v. Alabama, the impact on past and future cases involving juveniles, the decision’s impact on the families of victims and juvenile justice reform.</p>
<p><a>Emily C. Keller</a> engages in litigation and policy efforts to improve the child welfare and justice systems, including efforts to eliminate juvenile life without parole. Emily served as co-counsel for Henry Montgomery in Montgomery v. Louisiana before the U.S. Supreme Court and co-authored an amicus brief in Miller v. Alabama, the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2012 case banning mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles. Emily has also submitted amicus briefs in cases around the country challenging the imposition of life without parole and other extreme sentences on juvenile offenders.</p>
<p>Professor Christopher Slobogin occupies the Milton Underwood Chair at Vanderbilt Law School, where he directs the criminal justice program.  He has authored several books, including Juveniles at Risk: A Plea for Preventive Justice, published by Oxford University Press.</p>
<p><strong>Links:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.jlc.org/">http://www.jlc.org/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.jlc.org/about-us/who-we-are/staff/emily-keller">http://www.jlc.org/about-us/who-we-are/staff/emily-keller</a></p>
<p><a href="http://law.vanderbilt.edu/bio/christopher-slobogin">http://law.vanderbilt.edu/bio/christopher-slobogin</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2226</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d6b001589c09dbc27b9fe377f7351d27]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9507397596.mp3?updated=1623961854" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>President Obama’s Executive Order to Reduce Gun Violence</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/01/president-obamas-executive-order-reduce-gun-violence</link>
      <description>On January 5, 2016, President Obama announced he would be taking executive action to reduce gun violence. Surrounded by families of the Sandy Hook tragedy and other mass killings, he vowed to not allow guns to get in the wrong hands. In the past decade, more than 100,000 people have died as a result of gun violence. So, will the President’s recent action impact gun control or will all remain the same?

In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins David B. Kopel, adjunct professor of advanced constitutional law at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law and Laura Cutilletta, senior staff attorney at the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence as they take a look at this executive order on guns, “smart guns”, state laws, public reaction, and the impact this executive order could have on gun violence.

 

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 18:21:38 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>President Obama’s Executive Order to Reduce Gun Violence</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>430</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d86a28c4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-8377b31788ce/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On January 5, 2016, President Obama announced he would be taking executive action to reduce gun violence. Surrounded by families of the Sandy Hook tragedy and other mass killings, he vowed to not allow guns to get in the wrong hands. In the past...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On January 5, 2016, President Obama announced he would be taking executive action to reduce gun violence. Surrounded by families of the Sandy Hook tragedy and other mass killings, he vowed to not allow guns to get in the wrong hands. In the past decade, more than 100,000 people have died as a result of gun violence. So, will the President’s recent action impact gun control or will all remain the same?

In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins David B. Kopel, adjunct professor of advanced constitutional law at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law and Laura Cutilletta, senior staff attorney at the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence as they take a look at this executive order on guns, “smart guns”, state laws, public reaction, and the impact this executive order could have on gun violence.

 

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On January 5, 2016, President Obama announced he would be taking executive action to reduce gun violence. Surrounded by families of the Sandy Hook tragedy and other mass killings, he vowed to not allow guns to get in the wrong hands. In the past decade, more than 100,000 people have died as a result of gun violence. So, will the President’s recent action impact gun control or will all remain the same?</p>
<p>In this episode of <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, host <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> joins David B. Kopel, adjunct professor of advanced constitutional law at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law and Laura Cutilletta, senior staff attorney at the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence as they take a look at this executive order on guns, “smart guns”, state laws, public reaction, and the impact this executive order could have on gun violence.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2481</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a0ef3dc4ba2617fe5bf56b5b41c9bf8a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8148051910.mp3?updated=1623961853" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Prosecution and Defense of Bill Cosby</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2016/01/prosecution-defense-bill-cosby/</link>
      <description>When many of us think of actor and comedian Bill Cosby, we think of the jovial dad, Cliff Huxtable from the Cosby Show. Over the past year, at least 58 women have come forward alleging that Bill Cosby had drugged and sexually assaulted them at different times and in various locations.

Amidst a multitude of allegations from these women over the years, now, Bill Cosby faces criminal charges for allegedly drugging and sexual assaulting former Temple University staffer Andrea Constand back in 2004.

In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins attorney Scott Greenfield, criminal defense attorney out of New York, and attorney Murray Newman, a former prosecutor and criminal defense attorney out of Houston as they take a look at the legal issues surrounding Bill Cosby. We will discuss the allegations, prosecution vs. defense strategy, his arrest, the recent criminal charge of sexual assault, the statute of limitations on sexual assault, the impact on his public image, and what the future holds for Mr. Cosby.

For more than 30 years, Scott Greenfield has represented clients charged with crimes or the targets of investigations in state and federal courts across the United States. Scott also writes the Simple Justice blog, a criminal defense blog.

Since graduating from the University of Houston Law Center in 1999, Murray Newman has handled criminal cases ranging from driving while intoxicated to capital murder. He served as an assistant district attorney until 2008, leaving the Harris County District Attorney's Office as a felony chief prosecutor. In private practice since 2008, Murray continues to represent clients charged with criminal offenses in the State of Texas.  In addition, Murray works as a legal consultant for the TNT television show Cold Justice and author of the well-known blog, Life at the Harris County Criminal Justice Center​.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:25:20 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Prosecution and Defense of Bill Cosby</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>429</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d8900f80-cfa9-11eb-92b9-cf54400e1e4d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>When many of us think of actor and comedian Bill Cosby, we think of the jovial dad, Cliff Huxtable from the Cosby Show. Over the past year, at least 58 women have come forward alleging that Bill Cosby had drugged and sexually assaulted them at...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>When many of us think of actor and comedian Bill Cosby, we think of the jovial dad, Cliff Huxtable from the Cosby Show. Over the past year, at least 58 women have come forward alleging that Bill Cosby had drugged and sexually assaulted them at different times and in various locations.

Amidst a multitude of allegations from these women over the years, now, Bill Cosby faces criminal charges for allegedly drugging and sexual assaulting former Temple University staffer Andrea Constand back in 2004.

In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins attorney Scott Greenfield, criminal defense attorney out of New York, and attorney Murray Newman, a former prosecutor and criminal defense attorney out of Houston as they take a look at the legal issues surrounding Bill Cosby. We will discuss the allegations, prosecution vs. defense strategy, his arrest, the recent criminal charge of sexual assault, the statute of limitations on sexual assault, the impact on his public image, and what the future holds for Mr. Cosby.

For more than 30 years, Scott Greenfield has represented clients charged with crimes or the targets of investigations in state and federal courts across the United States. Scott also writes the Simple Justice blog, a criminal defense blog.

Since graduating from the University of Houston Law Center in 1999, Murray Newman has handled criminal cases ranging from driving while intoxicated to capital murder. He served as an assistant district attorney until 2008, leaving the Harris County District Attorney's Office as a felony chief prosecutor. In private practice since 2008, Murray continues to represent clients charged with criminal offenses in the State of Texas.  In addition, Murray works as a legal consultant for the TNT television show Cold Justice and author of the well-known blog, Life at the Harris County Criminal Justice Center​.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>When many of us think of actor and comedian Bill Cosby, we think of the jovial dad, Cliff Huxtable from the Cosby Show. Over the past year, at least 58 women have come forward alleging that Bill Cosby had drugged and sexually assaulted them at different times and in various locations.</p>
<p>Amidst a multitude of allegations from these women over the years, now, Bill Cosby faces criminal charges for allegedly drugging and sexual assaulting former Temple University staffer Andrea Constand back in 2004.</p>
<p>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins attorney Scott Greenfield, criminal defense attorney out of New York, and attorney Murray Newman, a former prosecutor and criminal defense attorney out of Houston as they take a look at the legal issues surrounding Bill Cosby. We will discuss the allegations, prosecution vs. defense strategy, his arrest, the recent criminal charge of sexual assault, the statute of limitations on sexual assault, the impact on his public image, and what the future holds for Mr. Cosby.</p>
<p>For more than 30 years, Scott Greenfield has represented clients charged with crimes or the targets of investigations in state and federal courts across the United States. Scott also writes the Simple Justice blog, a criminal defense blog.</p>
<p>Since graduating from the University of Houston Law Center in 1999, Murray Newman has handled criminal cases ranging from driving while intoxicated to capital murder. He served as an assistant district attorney until 2008, leaving the Harris County District Attorney's Office as a felony chief prosecutor. In private practice since 2008, Murray continues to represent clients charged with criminal offenses in the State of Texas.  In addition, Murray works as a legal consultant for the TNT television show Cold Justice and author of the well-known blog, Life at the Harris County Criminal Justice Center​.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2061</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4dcf76b40f6edcbee7164987adb48e77]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2001573079.mp3?updated=1623961854" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyer 2 Lawyer’s Holiday and 10th Anniversary Show</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/12/lawyer-2-lawyers-holiday-10th-anniversary-show</link>
      <description>Back in 2005, Legal Talk Network created a weekly show spotlighting current legal topics.  That show became Lawyer 2 Lawyer. The masters-that-be plucked two lawyers from obscurity, one from the east, one from the west, turning them into overnight sensations.

Back then, podcasting was just starting out and eventually took the world by storm. Fast forward to 2015, and Lawyer 2 Lawyer is still going strong, reaching listeners around the globe. From the debate over the death penalty, to Steve Jobs’ impact on the legal profession, to DOMA and Prop 8 rulings, we have covered a wide range of topics and have enjoyed ourselves in the process.

So, today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will visit with an old lawyer friend and musician and get in the holiday spirit, then we will take a look back at 10 years of podcasting with some special guests!

​Lawrence Savell is a New York lawyer, writer, musician, and songwriter. In 2012, after 30 years at Chadbourne &amp; Parke, Larry moved with a number of his colleagues to form the first U.S. office of the international law firm ​Herbert Smith Freehill​s. He continues to concentrate on litigation defense and counseling.

Larry’s musical take on the legal world started with performances at the University of Michigan Law School’s “Law Revue” (alleged) talent show in the early 1980s. It continued with solo and in-house band performances at summer and holiday functions at his former law firm, where his poking good-natured fun at lawyers and the legal profession was (thankfully) well received and encouraged. Over the years he recorded many of these songs, producing vinyl records, cassette tapes, and then ‘CDs’ which he gave each holiday season to family, friends, colleagues, clients, and people he met on airplanes. You can find out more about Larry and his music at lawrencesavell.com.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 18:21:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyer 2 Lawyer’s Holiday and 10th Anniversary Show</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>428</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d8b8d0aa-cfa9-11eb-92b9-37b1117ef1c3/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Back in 2005, Legal Talk Network created a weekly show spotlighting current legal topics.  That show became Lawyer 2 Lawyer. The masters-that-be plucked two lawyers from obscurity, one from the east, one from the west, turning them into overnight...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Back in 2005, Legal Talk Network created a weekly show spotlighting current legal topics.  That show became Lawyer 2 Lawyer. The masters-that-be plucked two lawyers from obscurity, one from the east, one from the west, turning them into overnight sensations.

Back then, podcasting was just starting out and eventually took the world by storm. Fast forward to 2015, and Lawyer 2 Lawyer is still going strong, reaching listeners around the globe. From the debate over the death penalty, to Steve Jobs’ impact on the legal profession, to DOMA and Prop 8 rulings, we have covered a wide range of topics and have enjoyed ourselves in the process.

So, today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will visit with an old lawyer friend and musician and get in the holiday spirit, then we will take a look back at 10 years of podcasting with some special guests!

​Lawrence Savell is a New York lawyer, writer, musician, and songwriter. In 2012, after 30 years at Chadbourne &amp; Parke, Larry moved with a number of his colleagues to form the first U.S. office of the international law firm ​Herbert Smith Freehill​s. He continues to concentrate on litigation defense and counseling.

Larry’s musical take on the legal world started with performances at the University of Michigan Law School’s “Law Revue” (alleged) talent show in the early 1980s. It continued with solo and in-house band performances at summer and holiday functions at his former law firm, where his poking good-natured fun at lawyers and the legal profession was (thankfully) well received and encouraged. Over the years he recorded many of these songs, producing vinyl records, cassette tapes, and then ‘CDs’ which he gave each holiday season to family, friends, colleagues, clients, and people he met on airplanes. You can find out more about Larry and his music at lawrencesavell.com.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Back in 2005, Legal Talk Network created a weekly show spotlighting current legal topics.  That show became Lawyer 2 Lawyer. The masters-that-be plucked two lawyers from obscurity, one from the east, one from the west, turning them into overnight sensations.</p>
<p>Back then, podcasting was just starting out and eventually took the world by storm. Fast forward to 2015, and Lawyer 2 Lawyer is still going strong, reaching listeners around the globe. From the debate over the death penalty, to Steve Jobs’ impact on the legal profession, to DOMA and Prop 8 rulings, we have covered a wide range of topics and have enjoyed ourselves in the process.</p>
<p>So, today on <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, we will visit with an old lawyer friend and musician and get in the holiday spirit, then we will take a look back at 10 years of podcasting with some special guests!</p>
<p>​Lawrence Savell is a New York lawyer, writer, musician, and songwriter. In 2012, after 30 years at Chadbourne &amp; Parke, Larry moved with a number of his colleagues to form the first U.S. office of the international law firm ​Herbert Smith Freehill​s. He continues to concentrate on litigation defense and counseling.</p>
<p>Larry’s musical take on the legal world started with performances at the University of Michigan Law School’s “Law Revue” (alleged) talent show in the early 1980s. It continued with solo and in-house band performances at summer and holiday functions at his former law firm, where his poking good-natured fun at lawyers and the legal profession was (thankfully) well received and encouraged. Over the years he recorded many of these songs, producing vinyl records, cassette tapes, and then ‘CDs’ which he gave each holiday season to family, friends, colleagues, clients, and people he met on airplanes. You can find out more about Larry and his music at lawrencesavell.com.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2446</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[63052083a4b3523276138a7d6c6d17ce]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7505077743.mp3?updated=1623961854" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Paris Attacks, Terrorism, and International Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/12/paris-attacks-terrorism-international-law</link>
      <description>On the evening of November 13, 2015, a series of coordinated terrorist attacks occurred in Paris, France, killing and maiming hundreds of people. Ultimately, the terror organization ISIS took responsibility for the attacks in retaliation of French airstrikes targeting ISIS on Syrian and Iraqi soil. These attacks rattled the world and put a spotlight on terrorism. So, with a complete and utter disregard for the rules of war by terror organizations, what needs to change?

In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join Dr. Lyal S. Sunga, head of the Rule of Law program at the Hague Institute for Global Justice in The Netherlands. They take a look at the recent Paris attacks, terrorism today vs. the terrorism of yesteryear, the Geneva Conventions and international law’s role, and what needs to be done legally to stay current in our fight against terrorism.

Dr. Lyal S. Sunga has conducted monitoring, investigation, reporting, technical cooperation, education and training in some 55 countries over the last 25 years in human rights, humanitarian law, and international criminal law. He is head of the Rule of Law program at the Hague Institute for Global Justice in The Netherlands and visiting professor at the Raoul Wallenberg Institute for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law in Lund, Sweden.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:45:17 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Paris Attacks, Terrorism, and International Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>427</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d8da5838-cfa9-11eb-92b9-57cbc2d2f979/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On the evening of November 13, 2015, a series of coordinated terrorist attacks occurred in Paris, France, killing and maiming hundreds of people. Ultimately, the terror organization ISIS took responsibility for the attacks in retaliation of French...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On the evening of November 13, 2015, a series of coordinated terrorist attacks occurred in Paris, France, killing and maiming hundreds of people. Ultimately, the terror organization ISIS took responsibility for the attacks in retaliation of French airstrikes targeting ISIS on Syrian and Iraqi soil. These attacks rattled the world and put a spotlight on terrorism. So, with a complete and utter disregard for the rules of war by terror organizations, what needs to change?

In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join Dr. Lyal S. Sunga, head of the Rule of Law program at the Hague Institute for Global Justice in The Netherlands. They take a look at the recent Paris attacks, terrorism today vs. the terrorism of yesteryear, the Geneva Conventions and international law’s role, and what needs to be done legally to stay current in our fight against terrorism.

Dr. Lyal S. Sunga has conducted monitoring, investigation, reporting, technical cooperation, education and training in some 55 countries over the last 25 years in human rights, humanitarian law, and international criminal law. He is head of the Rule of Law program at the Hague Institute for Global Justice in The Netherlands and visiting professor at the Raoul Wallenberg Institute for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law in Lund, Sweden.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On the evening of November 13, 2015, a series of coordinated terrorist attacks occurred in Paris, France, killing and maiming hundreds of people. Ultimately, the terror organization ISIS took responsibility for the attacks in retaliation of French airstrikes targeting ISIS on Syrian and Iraqi soil. These attacks rattled the world and put a spotlight on terrorism. So, with a complete and utter disregard for the rules of war by terror organizations, what needs to change?</p>
<p>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join Dr. Lyal S. Sunga, head of the Rule of Law program at the Hague Institute for Global Justice in The Netherlands. They take a look at the recent Paris attacks, terrorism today vs. the terrorism of yesteryear, the Geneva Conventions and international law’s role, and what needs to be done legally to stay current in our fight against terrorism.</p>
<p>Dr. Lyal S. Sunga has conducted monitoring, investigation, reporting, technical cooperation, education and training in some 55 countries over the last 25 years in human rights, humanitarian law, and international criminal law. He is head of the Rule of Law program at the Hague Institute for Global Justice in The Netherlands and visiting professor at the Raoul Wallenberg Institute for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law in Lund, Sweden.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1710</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[cb711bf8269fbedab4848fd65d05c68d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9661635509.mp3?updated=1623961854" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Revisiting the Death Penalty Debate</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/11/revisiting-death-penalty-debate</link>
      <description>Back in August of 2014, Lawyer 2 Lawyer hosted a show on the death penalty where we explored whether the death penalty was considered cruel and unusual with standout guests Judge Alex Kozinski from the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit, exonerated death row survivor Ronald Keine from Witness to Innocence, and M*A*S*H actor Mike Farrell from Death Penalty Focus.  That episode focused on the merits of firing squads vs. lethal injections and corruption in the judicial system. Presently, the death penalty is the law in in 31 states and the debate continues.

Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we revisit the death penalty debate. Host, J. Craig Williams joins attorney Robert Dunham, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center and Judge Alex Kozinski, who sits on the bench of the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit. Robert and Judge Kozinski take a look at the death penalty debate within our society and in our courts, exploring forensics, the fate of the death penalty, and whether we will see the constitutionality of death penalty argued before the Supreme Court.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:31:04 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Revisiting the Death Penalty Debate</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>426</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d9054e12-cfa9-11eb-92b9-7f563ed79ef9/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Back in August of 2014, Lawyer 2 Lawyer hosted a  where we explored whether the death penalty was considered cruel and unusual with standout guests Judge Alex Kozinski from the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit, exonerated...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Back in August of 2014, Lawyer 2 Lawyer hosted a show on the death penalty where we explored whether the death penalty was considered cruel and unusual with standout guests Judge Alex Kozinski from the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit, exonerated death row survivor Ronald Keine from Witness to Innocence, and M*A*S*H actor Mike Farrell from Death Penalty Focus.  That episode focused on the merits of firing squads vs. lethal injections and corruption in the judicial system. Presently, the death penalty is the law in in 31 states and the debate continues.

Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we revisit the death penalty debate. Host, J. Craig Williams joins attorney Robert Dunham, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center and Judge Alex Kozinski, who sits on the bench of the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit. Robert and Judge Kozinski take a look at the death penalty debate within our society and in our courts, exploring forensics, the fate of the death penalty, and whether we will see the constitutionality of death penalty argued before the Supreme Court.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Back in August of 2014, Lawyer 2 Lawyer hosted a <a href="http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/08/firing-squads-lethal-injections-todays-death-penalty-cruel-unusual/">show on the death penalty</a> where we explored whether the death penalty was considered cruel and unusual with standout guests Judge Alex Kozinski from the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit, exonerated death row survivor Ronald Keine from Witness to Innocence, and M*A*S*H actor Mike Farrell from Death Penalty Focus.  That episode focused on the merits of firing squads vs. lethal injections and corruption in the judicial system. Presently, the death penalty is the law in in 31 states and the debate continues.</p>
<p>Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we revisit the death penalty debate. Host, J. Craig Williams joins attorney Robert Dunham, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center and Judge Alex Kozinski, who sits on the bench of the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit. Robert and Judge Kozinski take a look at the death penalty debate within our society and in our courts, exploring forensics, the fate of the death penalty, and whether we will see the constitutionality of death penalty argued before the Supreme Court.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2040</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8551f616f3b5683937c2e0fa77080cfc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5087777260.mp3?updated=1623961855" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fair Use in Authors Guild v. Google, Inc.</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/11/fair-use-authors-guild-v-google-inc</link>
      <description>Ten years ago, the Authors Guild filed a lawsuit against Google, Inc. in an alleged copyright infringement case involving Google’s book scanning project. This project involved creating a searchable database that allows a user to search the content of all books that have been scanned into that database.

After many years in the courts, a federal appeals court recently ruled that the project is fully protected by fair use and does not infringe on the copyrights of authors.

In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins Attorney William H. Frankel from Brinks Gilson &amp; Lione, Attorney Kenneth D. Crews from Gipson Hoffman &amp; Pancion and Attorney Jeremy S. Goldman from Frankfurt Kurnit Klein + Selz, PC. Together, they discuss the ruling in Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., explore fair use, review the case, evaluate the Authors Guild’s potential appeal and analyze how this landmark ruling will impact the book industry and the general public of readers.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 18:32:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fair Use in Authors Guild v. Google, Inc.</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>425</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d92e1e50-cfa9-11eb-92b9-8f1273646e64/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Ten years ago, the Authors Guild filed a lawsuit against Google, Inc. in an alleged copyright infringement case involving Google’s book scanning project. This project involved creating a searchable database that allows a user to search the...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Ten years ago, the Authors Guild filed a lawsuit against Google, Inc. in an alleged copyright infringement case involving Google’s book scanning project. This project involved creating a searchable database that allows a user to search the content of all books that have been scanned into that database.

After many years in the courts, a federal appeals court recently ruled that the project is fully protected by fair use and does not infringe on the copyrights of authors.

In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins Attorney William H. Frankel from Brinks Gilson &amp; Lione, Attorney Kenneth D. Crews from Gipson Hoffman &amp; Pancion and Attorney Jeremy S. Goldman from Frankfurt Kurnit Klein + Selz, PC. Together, they discuss the ruling in Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., explore fair use, review the case, evaluate the Authors Guild’s potential appeal and analyze how this landmark ruling will impact the book industry and the general public of readers.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Ten years ago, the Authors Guild filed a lawsuit against Google, Inc. in an alleged copyright infringement case involving Google’s book scanning project. This project involved creating a searchable database that allows a user to search the content of all books that have been scanned into that database.</p>
<p>After many years in the courts, a federal appeals court recently ruled that the project is fully protected by fair use and does not infringe on the copyrights of authors.</p>
<p>In this episode of <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em>, host <strong>Bob Ambrogi</strong> joins Attorney William H. Frankel from Brinks Gilson &amp; Lione, Attorney Kenneth D. Crews from Gipson Hoffman &amp; Pancion and Attorney Jeremy S. Goldman from Frankfurt Kurnit Klein + Selz, PC. Together, they discuss the ruling in Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., explore fair use, review the case, evaluate the Authors Guild’s potential appeal and analyze how this landmark ruling will impact the book industry and the general public of readers.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2757</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[bd6bae433f7c5c551230a68d8d8b79ad]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2580215945.mp3?updated=1623961855" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legalities, Legislation, and Initiatives Surrounding Sexual Assault on College Campuses</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/10/legalities-legislation-initiatives-surrounding-sexual-assault-college-campuses</link>
      <description>Over the years, sexual assault on college campuses has been a huge problem and Washington has taken notice through various legislation and initiatives. Between the Clery Act, pending legislation of the Campus Accountability and Safety Act (CASA) and the Safe Campus Act, and Vice President Biden and President Obama’s “It’s On Us” Campaign, there has been a call to action implementing specific guidelines that colleges and universities need to adhere to when faced with allegations of sexual assault. But it is not all black and white—so, how are colleges handling allegations? Once accused, are those students receiving due process within administrative hearings? And are the alleged victims receiving the maximum protection from colleges?

On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Attorney Laura Dunn, executive director of SurvJustice and Attorney Brett A. Sokolow, the president and CEO of The NCHERM Group, as they take a look at the latest on sexual assault on college campuses, how colleges across the country are handling allegations, due process of accused students, victim protections and the importance of educating students and faculty on sexual assault.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:26:22 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legalities, Legislation, and Initiatives Surrounding Sexual Assault on College Campuses</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>424</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d94f6100-cfa9-11eb-92b9-e742fe21229e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the years, sexual assault on college campuses has been a huge problem and Washington has taken notice through various legislation and initiatives. Between the Clery Act, pending legislation of the Campus Accountability and Safety Act (CASA) and...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Over the years, sexual assault on college campuses has been a huge problem and Washington has taken notice through various legislation and initiatives. Between the Clery Act, pending legislation of the Campus Accountability and Safety Act (CASA) and the Safe Campus Act, and Vice President Biden and President Obama’s “It’s On Us” Campaign, there has been a call to action implementing specific guidelines that colleges and universities need to adhere to when faced with allegations of sexual assault. But it is not all black and white—so, how are colleges handling allegations? Once accused, are those students receiving due process within administrative hearings? And are the alleged victims receiving the maximum protection from colleges?

On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Attorney Laura Dunn, executive director of SurvJustice and Attorney Brett A. Sokolow, the president and CEO of The NCHERM Group, as they take a look at the latest on sexual assault on college campuses, how colleges across the country are handling allegations, due process of accused students, victim protections and the importance of educating students and faculty on sexual assault.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Over the years, sexual assault on college campuses has been a huge problem and Washington has taken notice through various legislation and initiatives. Between the Clery Act, pending legislation of the Campus Accountability and Safety Act (CASA) and the Safe Campus Act, and Vice President Biden and President Obama’s “It’s On Us” Campaign, there has been a call to action implementing specific guidelines that colleges and universities need to adhere to when faced with allegations of sexual assault. But it is not all black and white—so, how are colleges handling allegations? Once accused, are those students receiving due process within administrative hearings? And are the alleged victims receiving the maximum protection from colleges?</p>
<p>On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Attorney Laura Dunn, executive director of SurvJustice and Attorney Brett A. Sokolow, the president and CEO of The NCHERM Group, as they take a look at the latest on sexual assault on college campuses, how colleges across the country are handling allegations, due process of accused students, victim protections and the importance of educating students and faculty on sexual assault.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2292</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f1584802397e8dda9c6a3d7378090682]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2999328510.mp3?updated=1623961855" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside O'Bannon v. NCAA</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/10/inside-obannon-v-ncaa</link>
      <description>Back in 2009, former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon filed a lawsuit on behalf of the NCAA's Division I players. O’Bannon challenged the NCAA’s use of the images of its former student athletes for commercial purposes. Later, District Judge Claudia Wilken found for O'Bannon stating that the NCAA's rules violate antitrust laws.  However, on September 30, 2015, a three-judge panel upheld Judge Wilken's ruling, but threw out the proposal that the NCAA should pay athletes $5,000 per year in deferred compensation.

On Lawyer 2 Lawyer host, J. Craig Williams joins Attorney Swathi Bojedla from Hausfeld Law firm and Attorney Scott D. Schneider from Fisher &amp; Phillips LLP, as they take a look at O’Bannon v. NCAA, amateurism and anti-trust laws, the appeal and how this opinion will impact future cases.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:59:42 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside O'Bannon v. NCAA</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>423</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d974a258-cfa9-11eb-92b9-33d242f15e0d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Back in 2009, former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon filed a lawsuit on behalf of the NCAA's Division I players. O’Bannon challenged the NCAA’s use of the images of its former student athletes for commercial purposes. Later, District...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Back in 2009, former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon filed a lawsuit on behalf of the NCAA's Division I players. O’Bannon challenged the NCAA’s use of the images of its former student athletes for commercial purposes. Later, District Judge Claudia Wilken found for O'Bannon stating that the NCAA's rules violate antitrust laws.  However, on September 30, 2015, a three-judge panel upheld Judge Wilken's ruling, but threw out the proposal that the NCAA should pay athletes $5,000 per year in deferred compensation.

On Lawyer 2 Lawyer host, J. Craig Williams joins Attorney Swathi Bojedla from Hausfeld Law firm and Attorney Scott D. Schneider from Fisher &amp; Phillips LLP, as they take a look at O’Bannon v. NCAA, amateurism and anti-trust laws, the appeal and how this opinion will impact future cases.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Back in 2009, former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon filed a lawsuit on behalf of the NCAA's Division I players. O’Bannon challenged the NCAA’s use of the images of its former student athletes for commercial purposes. Later, District Judge Claudia Wilken found for O'Bannon stating that the NCAA's rules violate antitrust laws.  However, on September 30, 2015, a three-judge panel upheld Judge Wilken's ruling, but threw out the proposal that the NCAA should pay athletes $5,000 per year in deferred compensation.</p>
<p>On <em><strong>Lawyer 2 Lawyer</strong></em> host, <strong>J. Craig Williams</strong> joins Attorney Swathi Bojedla from Hausfeld Law firm and Attorney Scott D. Schneider from Fisher &amp; Phillips LLP, as they take a look at O’Bannon v. NCAA, amateurism and anti-trust laws, the appeal and how this opinion will impact future cases.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2037</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[195c8f4b3f548378a5bc6b7121cb6dd8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3924930939.mp3?updated=1623961855" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Writing that Moves Gavels</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/10/legal-writing-moves-gavels</link>
      <description>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Judge Alex Kozinski from the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit and Judge Richard Kopf from the U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska. Together, they discuss the essential elements that go into persuasive legal writing and how lawyers might be selling their clients short.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:43:08 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Writing that Moves Gavels</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>422</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d98eda60-cfa9-11eb-92b9-8f1bdb3f4fcc/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Judge Alex Kozinski from the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit and Judge Richard Kopf from the U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska. Together, they discuss the essential elements that...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Judge Alex Kozinski from the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit and Judge Richard Kopf from the U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska. Together, they discuss the essential elements that go into persuasive legal writing and how lawyers might be selling their clients short.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Judge Alex Kozinski from the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit and Judge Richard Kopf from the U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska. Together, they discuss the essential elements that go into persuasive legal writing and how lawyers might be selling their clients short.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2165</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[44e62006aa862f47f869dd5aa0ec2f01]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6994436096.mp3?updated=1623961856" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Robert Blagojevich’s Fight for Justice and Freedom</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/09/robert-blagojevichs-fight-justice-freedom</link>
      <description>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Robert Blagojevich. Together they discuss they his experiences with the FBI and U.S. Attorneys Office as well as his new book “Fundraiser A: My Fight for Justice and Freedom”. Tune in to hear about his million dollar legal fight to save his name and stay out of prison.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 17:32:31 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Robert Blagojevich’s Fight for Justice and Freedom</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>421</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d9b4aa24-cfa9-11eb-92b9-976999fc361e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Robert Blagojevich. Together they discuss they his experiences with the FBI and U.S. Attorneys Office as well as his new book “Fundraiser A: My Fight for Justice and Freedom”. Tune in to hear...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Robert Blagojevich. Together they discuss they his experiences with the FBI and U.S. Attorneys Office as well as his new book “Fundraiser A: My Fight for Justice and Freedom”. Tune in to hear about his million dollar legal fight to save his name and stay out of prison.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Robert Blagojevich. Together they discuss they his experiences with the FBI and U.S. Attorneys Office as well as his new book “Fundraiser A: My Fight for Justice and Freedom”. Tune in to hear about his million dollar legal fight to save his name and stay out of prison.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2083</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[df308da4cd82e8fc39813b13c70049e8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2776526486.mp3?updated=1623961856" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Justified Shooting or Police Misconduct? A Year In Review After Ferguson</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/09/justified-shooting-police-misconduct-year-review-ferguson</link>
      <description>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Dean Erwin Chemerinsky from University of California, Irvine School of Law and Sergeant John Rivera from the Dade County Police Benevolent Association. Together they discuss the merits of using Ferguson to analyze police procedures, culpability of elected officials, and growth of murder rates around the country. In addition, they talk about attacks on police as well as the use of military equipment. Tune in hear about body cams, protests by Black Lives Matter, and the benefits of community-based policing.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 17:40:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Justified Shooting or Police Misconduct? A Year In Review After Ferguson</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>420</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d9d0a468-cfa9-11eb-92b9-37284a35ec0e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Dean Erwin Chemerinsky from University of California, Irvine School of Law and Sergeant John Rivera from the Dade County Police Benevolent Association. Together they discuss the merits of using Ferguson to...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Dean Erwin Chemerinsky from University of California, Irvine School of Law and Sergeant John Rivera from the Dade County Police Benevolent Association. Together they discuss the merits of using Ferguson to analyze police procedures, culpability of elected officials, and growth of murder rates around the country. In addition, they talk about attacks on police as well as the use of military equipment. Tune in hear about body cams, protests by Black Lives Matter, and the benefits of community-based policing.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Dean Erwin Chemerinsky from University of California, Irvine School of Law and Sergeant John Rivera from the Dade County Police Benevolent Association. Together they discuss the merits of using Ferguson to analyze police procedures, culpability of elected officials, and growth of murder rates around the country. In addition, they talk about attacks on police as well as the use of military equipment. Tune in hear about body cams, protests by Black Lives Matter, and the benefits of community-based policing.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <strong><a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a></strong>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1738</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[16732f02dd30c0ec6b2521bf8505c9a3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1745816995.mp3?updated=1623961856" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyers, Weed, and Money: H.R. 2076 Found Some Fans</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/08/lawyers-weed-money-house-resolution-2076</link>
      <description>House Resolution 2076 would permit banking for marijuana businesses if they follow certain guidelines. But what does that mean for the banks and the existing federal laws? Wouldn’t they still be aiding and abetting criminal activity?

J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Tom Downey from Ireland Stapleton, Professor Sam Kamin from the University of Denver, and Leonard Frieling from NORML. Together they discuss existing federal restrictions, criminal penalties, and how H.R. 2076 might change the landscape. Tune in to hear about the Supremacy Clause, money laundering, and much more.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:36:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyers, Weed, and Money: H.R. 2076 Found Some Fans</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>419</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d9f38906-cfa9-11eb-92b9-f7bf0027b677/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>House Resolution 2076 would permit banking for marijuana businesses if they follow certain guidelines. But what does that mean for the banks and the existing federal laws? Wouldn’t they still be aiding and abetting criminal activity?
J. Craig...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>House Resolution 2076 would permit banking for marijuana businesses if they follow certain guidelines. But what does that mean for the banks and the existing federal laws? Wouldn’t they still be aiding and abetting criminal activity?

J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Tom Downey from Ireland Stapleton, Professor Sam Kamin from the University of Denver, and Leonard Frieling from NORML. Together they discuss existing federal restrictions, criminal penalties, and how H.R. 2076 might change the landscape. Tune in to hear about the Supremacy Clause, money laundering, and much more.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>House Resolution 2076 would permit banking for marijuana businesses if they follow certain guidelines. But what does that mean for the banks and the existing federal laws? Wouldn’t they still be aiding and abetting criminal activity?</p>
<p>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Tom Downey from Ireland Stapleton, Professor Sam Kamin from the University of Denver, and Leonard Frieling from NORML. Together they discuss existing federal restrictions, criminal penalties, and how H.R. 2076 might change the landscape. Tune in to hear about the Supremacy Clause, money laundering, and much more.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, <a href="https://www.goclio.com">Clio</a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1879</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2de4aa1b519135321e1d9c0fd1912693]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7067460672.mp3?updated=1623961856" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Uber vs. Taxi: The Sharing Economy’s Power over Workers and Liability</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/08/uber-vs-taxi-sharing-economys-power-workers-liability</link>
      <description>Despite its popularity, not everyone is so enamored with Uber. Recently, it has fallen under scrutiny for its utilization of independent contractors and been accused of violating local regulations for taxi services. Perhaps the most visible challengers to Uber’s ride sharing service are the taxicab companies and unions who are crying fowl in major metropolitan areas. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi discusses these issues and more with guests Jonathan Handel from University of Southern California and Matthew Feeney from the Cato Institute. Tune in to hear about categories for workers and liability for accidents in the new sharing economy.

Special thanks to our sponsor Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 18:53:23 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Uber vs. Taxi: The Sharing Economy’s Power over Workers and Liability</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>418</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/da1c25b4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-9b8c9fa34db2/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Despite its popularity, not everyone is so enamored with Uber. Recently, it has fallen under scrutiny for its utilization of independent contractors and been accused of violating local regulations for taxi services. Perhaps the most visible...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Despite its popularity, not everyone is so enamored with Uber. Recently, it has fallen under scrutiny for its utilization of independent contractors and been accused of violating local regulations for taxi services. Perhaps the most visible challengers to Uber’s ride sharing service are the taxicab companies and unions who are crying fowl in major metropolitan areas. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi discusses these issues and more with guests Jonathan Handel from University of Southern California and Matthew Feeney from the Cato Institute. Tune in to hear about categories for workers and liability for accidents in the new sharing economy.

Special thanks to our sponsor Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Despite its popularity, not everyone is so enamored with Uber. Recently, it has fallen under scrutiny for its utilization of independent contractors and been accused of violating local regulations for taxi services. Perhaps the most visible challengers to Uber’s ride sharing service are the taxicab companies and unions who are crying fowl in major metropolitan areas. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi discusses these issues and more with guests Jonathan Handel from University of Southern California and Matthew Feeney from the Cato Institute. Tune in to hear about categories for workers and liability for accidents in the new sharing economy.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor <a href="https://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2205</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7b4ed0b4e36923d8707be67fb19d7d20]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7849712764.mp3?updated=1623961857" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court of the United States: 2015 Session in Review</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/07/supreme-court-united-states-2015-session-review</link>
      <description>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi discuss the latest Supreme Court decisions with Tony Mauro from the National Law Journal and Tejinder Singh from SCOTUSBlog. Together they review the fundamental rights in Obergefell v. Hodges, interpretation of legislation under King v. Burwell, and free speech in Walker v. Sons of Confederate Veterans. Tune in to hear a detailed analysis of decisions as well as predictions for the future. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2015 00:55:56 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Supreme Court of the United States: 2015 Session in Review</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>417</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/da3f9a4e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-3b66954aacc1/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi discuss the latest Supreme Court decisions with Tony Mauro from the National Law Journal and Tejinder Singh from SCOTUSBlog. Together they review the fundamental rights in Obergefell v. Hodges, interpretation of...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi discuss the latest Supreme Court decisions with Tony Mauro from the National Law Journal and Tejinder Singh from SCOTUSBlog. Together they review the fundamental rights in Obergefell v. Hodges, interpretation of legislation under King v. Burwell, and free speech in Walker v. Sons of Confederate Veterans. Tune in to hear a detailed analysis of decisions as well as predictions for the future. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi discuss the latest Supreme Court decisions with Tony Mauro from the National Law Journal and Tejinder Singh from SCOTUSBlog. Together they review the fundamental rights in Obergefell v. Hodges, interpretation of legislation under King v. Burwell, and free speech in Walker v. Sons of Confederate Veterans. Tune in to hear a detailed analysis of decisions as well as predictions for the future. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1920</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[535fe7640bbe4390911152f83e81ce91]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8469805441.mp3?updated=1623961858" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Orange County’s Jailhouse Informant Program</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/07/orange-county-jailhouse-informant-program</link>
      <description>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, producer Laurence Colletti interviews Professor Alexandra Natapoff from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles and Rudolph Loewenstein, a recommendation directly from the Orange County Public Defenders Office. Together they discuss the constitutionality of Orange County’s Jailhouse Informant Program, why there’s such uproar in its use, and why Texas might be turning away from such practices in death penalty cases. Tune in to hear about the “papering” of Judge Thomas M. Goethals and likely punishments for alleged abuses of the system.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 19:31:32 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Orange County’s Jailhouse Informant Program</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>416</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/da5f64aa-cfa9-11eb-92b9-c387527e9385/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, producer Laurence Colletti interviews Professor Alexandra Natapoff from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles and Rudolph Loewenstein, a recommendation directly from the Orange County Public Defenders Office. Together they...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, producer Laurence Colletti interviews Professor Alexandra Natapoff from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles and Rudolph Loewenstein, a recommendation directly from the Orange County Public Defenders Office. Together they discuss the constitutionality of Orange County’s Jailhouse Informant Program, why there’s such uproar in its use, and why Texas might be turning away from such practices in death penalty cases. Tune in to hear about the “papering” of Judge Thomas M. Goethals and likely punishments for alleged abuses of the system.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, producer Laurence Colletti interviews Professor Alexandra Natapoff from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles and Rudolph Loewenstein, a recommendation directly from the Orange County Public Defenders Office. Together they discuss the constitutionality of Orange County’s Jailhouse Informant Program, why there’s such uproar in its use, and why Texas might be turning away from such practices in death penalty cases. Tune in to hear about the “papering” of Judge Thomas M. Goethals and likely punishments for alleged abuses of the system.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2357</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1236684142ef8c0ab2bd3b1af81fe190]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3505206355.mp3?updated=1623961859" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>‘FOSS+beer’ at Beryl’s Beer Co.</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/05/foss-beer-beryls-beer-co-denver</link>
      <description>During a recent trip, Lawyer 2 Lawyer host Bob Ambrogi visited Legal Talk Network headquarters in Denver, Colorado. While there, he interviewed hosts from another legal podcast called ‘FOSS+beer’. With their general focus on law, technology, and open source software, hosts Mark Donald, Jilayne Lovejoy, and the mysterious Boups the Beerman navigate potentially irreverent topics while sampling local libations on each episode. In an effort to respond in kind, we decided to adjourn from our comfy studio in favor of our neighbor’s craft brewery establishment, Beryl’s Beer Co.

Tune in to hear this spirited discussion about the indemnification, intellectual property, and ethical issues associated with open source software and the practice of law. In addition, listen to our very own Trent Carlyle, owner and chief technology officer of Legal Talk Network, and Chad Jolly, senior software developer, as they join the conversation and talk about the world of modern software development while Eric Nichols, head brewer from Beryl’s Beer Co., gives the rundown on the craft brewery industry sweeping the RiNo arts district in downtown Denver.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 18:47:06 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>‘FOSS+beer’ at Beryl’s Beer Co.</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>415</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/da7fe7a2-cfa9-11eb-92b9-d7b9fb77fec2/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>During a recent trip, Lawyer 2 Lawyer host Bob Ambrogi visited Legal Talk Network headquarters in Denver, Colorado. While there, he interviewed hosts from another legal podcast called ‘FOSS+beer’. With their general focus on law,...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>During a recent trip, Lawyer 2 Lawyer host Bob Ambrogi visited Legal Talk Network headquarters in Denver, Colorado. While there, he interviewed hosts from another legal podcast called ‘FOSS+beer’. With their general focus on law, technology, and open source software, hosts Mark Donald, Jilayne Lovejoy, and the mysterious Boups the Beerman navigate potentially irreverent topics while sampling local libations on each episode. In an effort to respond in kind, we decided to adjourn from our comfy studio in favor of our neighbor’s craft brewery establishment, Beryl’s Beer Co.

Tune in to hear this spirited discussion about the indemnification, intellectual property, and ethical issues associated with open source software and the practice of law. In addition, listen to our very own Trent Carlyle, owner and chief technology officer of Legal Talk Network, and Chad Jolly, senior software developer, as they join the conversation and talk about the world of modern software development while Eric Nichols, head brewer from Beryl’s Beer Co., gives the rundown on the craft brewery industry sweeping the RiNo arts district in downtown Denver.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>During a recent trip, Lawyer 2 Lawyer host Bob Ambrogi visited Legal Talk Network headquarters in Denver, Colorado. While there, he interviewed hosts from another legal podcast called ‘FOSS+beer’. With their general focus on law, technology, and open source software, hosts Mark Donald, Jilayne Lovejoy, and the mysterious Boups the Beerman navigate potentially irreverent topics while sampling local libations on each episode. In an effort to respond in kind, we decided to adjourn from our comfy studio in favor of our neighbor’s craft brewery establishment, Beryl’s Beer Co.</p>
<p>Tune in to hear this spirited discussion about the indemnification, intellectual property, and ethical issues associated with open source software and the practice of law. In addition, listen to our very own Trent Carlyle, owner and chief technology officer of Legal Talk Network, and Chad Jolly, senior software developer, as they join the conversation and talk about the world of modern software development while Eric Nichols, head brewer from Beryl’s Beer Co., gives the rundown on the craft brewery industry sweeping the RiNo arts district in downtown Denver.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3757</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2a12bc53f68c430ee3a6376dcb5d37cc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1184592600.mp3?updated=1623961859" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mandatory Vaccines vs. Individual Rights</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/05/mandatory-vaccines-vs-individual-rights</link>
      <description>Credited with saving millions of lives per year, few health programs can boast the success of vaccinations. Even for those who, for health reasons, can’t be inoculated, vaccines provide a type of community immunity by preventing dangerous outbreaks in densely populated areas. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention call vaccinations the greatest public health achievement in 100 years. But does that mean we should make vaccines mandatory? In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Drew Trimble, John Tocci, and Jeremy Byellin. Together they discuss federal authority and the police power of the states when it comes mandatory vaccinations and quarantine. Tune in to hear what exemptions exist for citizens opposed or unable to comply.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 18:54:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Mandatory Vaccines vs. Individual Rights</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>414</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/daace00e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-a30b1b07fe02/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Credited with saving millions of lives per year, few health programs can boast the success of vaccinations. Even for those who, for health reasons, can’t be inoculated, vaccines provide a type of community immunity by preventing dangerous...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Credited with saving millions of lives per year, few health programs can boast the success of vaccinations. Even for those who, for health reasons, can’t be inoculated, vaccines provide a type of community immunity by preventing dangerous outbreaks in densely populated areas. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention call vaccinations the greatest public health achievement in 100 years. But does that mean we should make vaccines mandatory? In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Drew Trimble, John Tocci, and Jeremy Byellin. Together they discuss federal authority and the police power of the states when it comes mandatory vaccinations and quarantine. Tune in to hear what exemptions exist for citizens opposed or unable to comply.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Credited with saving millions of lives per year, few health programs can boast the success of vaccinations. Even for those who, for health reasons, can’t be inoculated, vaccines provide a type of community immunity by preventing dangerous outbreaks in densely populated areas. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention call vaccinations the greatest public health achievement in 100 years. But does that mean we should make vaccines mandatory? In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Drew Trimble, John Tocci, and Jeremy Byellin. Together they discuss federal authority and the police power of the states when it comes mandatory vaccinations and quarantine. Tune in to hear what exemptions exist for citizens opposed or unable to comply.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2067</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[620d15b0ddbda105aaeeccc90ef13fae]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6934808373.mp3?updated=1623961860" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Ethics and Morality of 'Better Call Saul'</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/04/legal-ethics-morality-better-call-saul</link>
      <description>His name is James McGill, but most of us know him as Slipping Jimmy, or Saul Goodman, an ethically conflicted advocate for the unlawful. Making his debut in season two of 'Breaking Bad', actor Bob Odenkirk brought life to his loveably shady character, providing comedic relief in an otherwise dark show. Today, Saul Goodman returns to fans in a spin off show titled 'Better Call Saul' which is set in 2002, long before he meets Walter White and Jesse Pinkman. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Nicole Hyland author of The Legal Ethics of Better Call Saul blog. Together they discuss the ethical blunders of Saul Goodman, why he’s so likeable, and whether or not he’s a good person. Tune in to hear how Saul’s questionable antics stack up against real life rules of professional conduct and how what’s technically legal isn’t always what’s right. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 17:58:02 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Ethics and Morality of 'Better Call Saul'</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>413</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dac7fb32-cfa9-11eb-92b9-afe6160d5f42/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>His name is James McGill, but most of us know him as Slipping Jimmy, or Saul Goodman, an ethically conflicted advocate for the unlawful. Making his debut in season two of 'Breaking Bad', actor Bob Odenkirk brought life to his loveably shady character,...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>His name is James McGill, but most of us know him as Slipping Jimmy, or Saul Goodman, an ethically conflicted advocate for the unlawful. Making his debut in season two of 'Breaking Bad', actor Bob Odenkirk brought life to his loveably shady character, providing comedic relief in an otherwise dark show. Today, Saul Goodman returns to fans in a spin off show titled 'Better Call Saul' which is set in 2002, long before he meets Walter White and Jesse Pinkman. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Nicole Hyland author of The Legal Ethics of Better Call Saul blog. Together they discuss the ethical blunders of Saul Goodman, why he’s so likeable, and whether or not he’s a good person. Tune in to hear how Saul’s questionable antics stack up against real life rules of professional conduct and how what’s technically legal isn’t always what’s right. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>His name is James McGill, but most of us know him as Slipping Jimmy, or Saul Goodman, an ethically conflicted advocate for the unlawful. Making his debut in season two of 'Breaking Bad', actor Bob Odenkirk brought life to his loveably shady character, providing comedic relief in an otherwise dark show. Today, Saul Goodman returns to fans in a spin off show titled 'Better Call Saul' which is set in 2002, long before he meets Walter White and Jesse Pinkman. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Nicole Hyland author of The Legal Ethics of Better Call Saul blog. Together they discuss the ethical blunders of Saul Goodman, why he’s so likeable, and whether or not he’s a good person. Tune in to hear how Saul’s questionable antics stack up against real life rules of professional conduct and how what’s technically legal isn’t always what’s right. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2048</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f28d9934dc23ffc5086ee5434f7ff0bf]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7976071672.mp3?updated=1623961860" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ellen Pao v. Kleiner Perkins: A Discussion about Gender Equality in Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/04/ellen-pao-kleiner-perkins-discussion-about-gender-equality-in-law</link>
      <description>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Laurel Bellows, former president of the American Bar Association, Renwei Chung, featured columnist and contributor to Above the Law, and Professor Melissa Hart from the University of Colorado Law School. Together they discuss why they believe Ellen Pao (now interim CEO for reddit) was a victim of gender discrimination and how the legal industry is still affected by gender bias. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:35:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Ellen Pao v. Kleiner Perkins: A Discussion about Gender Equality in Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>412</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/daf66e9a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5b47afbf7f4c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Laurel Bellows, former president of the American Bar Association, Renwei Chung, featured columnist and contributor to Above the Law, and Professor Melissa Hart from...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Laurel Bellows, former president of the American Bar Association, Renwei Chung, featured columnist and contributor to Above the Law, and Professor Melissa Hart from the University of Colorado Law School. Together they discuss why they believe Ellen Pao (now interim CEO for reddit) was a victim of gender discrimination and how the legal industry is still affected by gender bias. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi interview Laurel Bellows, former president of the American Bar Association, Renwei Chung, featured columnist and contributor to Above the Law, and Professor Melissa Hart from the University of Colorado Law School. Together they discuss why they believe Ellen Pao (now interim CEO for reddit) was a victim of gender discrimination and how the legal industry is still affected by gender bias. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2054</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2778c50a41417db1a1225922e013d493]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8888176866.mp3?updated=1623961861" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Driving While Intoxicated: Prescription Drugs, Recliners, Wheels, and Hooves</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/03/driving-while-intoxicated-prescription-drugs-recliners-wheels-hooves</link>
      <description>We all know that drinking and driving is a serious and dangerous offense. But it may surprise you that drivers are being charged with DWI for taking prescription drugs while riding bicycles, horses, and yes Segways. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Douglas Kans and Robert Ambrose from the Kans Law Firm. Together they discuss the disparate treatment of controlled substances, your rights while being charged with an offense, and modes of transportation to stay away from while intoxicated. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 19:17:30 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Driving While Intoxicated: Prescription Drugs, Recliners, Wheels, and Hooves</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>411</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/db1d27c4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-6fc0c834d093/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>We all know that drinking and driving is a serious and dangerous offense. But it may surprise you that drivers are being charged with DWI for taking prescription drugs while riding bicycles, horses, and yes Segways. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer,...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>We all know that drinking and driving is a serious and dangerous offense. But it may surprise you that drivers are being charged with DWI for taking prescription drugs while riding bicycles, horses, and yes Segways. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Douglas Kans and Robert Ambrose from the Kans Law Firm. Together they discuss the disparate treatment of controlled substances, your rights while being charged with an offense, and modes of transportation to stay away from while intoxicated. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We all know that drinking and driving is a serious and dangerous offense. But it may surprise you that drivers are being charged with DWI for taking prescription drugs while riding bicycles, horses, and yes Segways. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Douglas Kans and Robert Ambrose from the Kans Law Firm. Together they discuss the disparate treatment of controlled substances, your rights while being charged with an offense, and modes of transportation to stay away from while intoxicated. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2235</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2f8c4847232d28a8bca8f6f4ad48d193]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5804291955.mp3?updated=1623961861" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Same Sex Marriage: Civil Right or State Right?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/03/sex-marriage-civil-right-state-right</link>
      <description>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Harry Mihet from Liberty Counsel, Elliot Mincberg from People For the American Way, and Professor Ronald Krotoszynski from the University of Alabama School of Law. Together they debate the duties of Alabama’s probate judges and the enforcement of existing same sex marriage licenses. Is same sex marriage a civil right? Who will win the tug-of-war between federal oversight and self governing states? Tune in to hear about this landmark issue and more. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2015 20:38:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Same Sex Marriage: Civil Right or State Right?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>410</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/db37a40a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-97a1d288d703/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Harry Mihet from Liberty Counsel, Elliot Mincberg from People For the American Way, and Professor Ronald Krotoszynski from the University of Alabama School of Law. Together they debate...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Harry Mihet from Liberty Counsel, Elliot Mincberg from People For the American Way, and Professor Ronald Krotoszynski from the University of Alabama School of Law. Together they debate the duties of Alabama’s probate judges and the enforcement of existing same sex marriage licenses. Is same sex marriage a civil right? Who will win the tug-of-war between federal oversight and self governing states? Tune in to hear about this landmark issue and more. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Harry Mihet from Liberty Counsel, Elliot Mincberg from People For the American Way, and Professor Ronald Krotoszynski from the University of Alabama School of Law. Together they debate the duties of Alabama’s probate judges and the enforcement of existing same sex marriage licenses. Is same sex marriage a civil right? Who will win the tug-of-war between federal oversight and self governing states? Tune in to hear about this landmark issue and more. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2037</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[bf1f94bf0a8ab70275f0dad02d63a455]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9298945344.mp3?updated=1623961862" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Driverless Cars: Who’s “Driving” and Who’s Responsible?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/02/driverless-cars-whos-driving-whos-responsible</link>
      <description>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews attorney and author of Robots Are People Too John Weaver, researcher and writer for Michigan Auto Law Todd Berg, and litigator and author of Motorista Anna Eby. Together they discuss liability for passengers, possible federal regulations, and risks associated with vehicle hacks. In addition, they debate when the government might pilot your driverless car, how medical emergencies in autonomous vehicles will be handled, and the possibility of the repo man summoning your automobile. Tune in to hear about existing driverless car laws and much much more!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 20:02:53 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Driverless Cars: Who’s “Driving” and Who’s Responsible?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>409</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/db63384a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-b3cffe72593a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews attorney and author of Robots Are People Too John Weaver, researcher and writer for Michigan Auto Law Todd Berg, and litigator and author of Motorista Anna Eby. Together they...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews attorney and author of Robots Are People Too John Weaver, researcher and writer for Michigan Auto Law Todd Berg, and litigator and author of Motorista Anna Eby. Together they discuss liability for passengers, possible federal regulations, and risks associated with vehicle hacks. In addition, they debate when the government might pilot your driverless car, how medical emergencies in autonomous vehicles will be handled, and the possibility of the repo man summoning your automobile. Tune in to hear about existing driverless car laws and much much more!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews attorney and author of Robots Are People Too John Weaver, researcher and writer for Michigan Auto Law Todd Berg, and litigator and author of Motorista Anna Eby. Together they discuss liability for passengers, possible federal regulations, and risks associated with vehicle hacks. In addition, they debate when the government might pilot your driverless car, how medical emergencies in autonomous vehicles will be handled, and the possibility of the repo man summoning your automobile. Tune in to hear about existing driverless car laws and much much more!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1886</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[385ba4f1317040adab012a65163478a1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2034109226.mp3?updated=1623961862" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Breaking Down The Serial Podcast: Attorneys Dissect Adnan Syed's Case</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/02/breaking-down-serial-podcast-attorneys-dissect-adnan-syeds-case</link>
      <description>On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams discuss Serial and the case it made famous with three attorneys: Director of Investigation for University of Virginia School of Law's Innocence Project Clinic Deirdre Enright, featured on episodes 7 and 12 of Serial and currently working on Adnan's appeal, Erica Zunkel from the Federal Criminal Justice Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School, and Markus Kypreos from the Fort Worth civil litigation firm Pennington Hill. Together, they analyze the case against Adnan from both sides, offering expert insight on criminal defense and prosecution, the testimony of Jay Wilds, and the portrayal of this case on Serial, all while tackling some of the tougher questions raised regarding DNA evidence, potential alibis, shaky timelines, and the overall defense strategy.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:15:08 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Breaking Down The Serial Podcast: Attorneys Dissect Adnan Syed's Case</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>408</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dba19fe0-cfa9-11eb-92b9-cb307673e842/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams discuss Serial and the case it made famous with three attorneys: Director of Investigation for University of Virginia School of Law's Innocence Project Clinic Deirdre Enright,...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams discuss Serial and the case it made famous with three attorneys: Director of Investigation for University of Virginia School of Law's Innocence Project Clinic Deirdre Enright, featured on episodes 7 and 12 of Serial and currently working on Adnan's appeal, Erica Zunkel from the Federal Criminal Justice Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School, and Markus Kypreos from the Fort Worth civil litigation firm Pennington Hill. Together, they analyze the case against Adnan from both sides, offering expert insight on criminal defense and prosecution, the testimony of Jay Wilds, and the portrayal of this case on Serial, all while tackling some of the tougher questions raised regarding DNA evidence, potential alibis, shaky timelines, and the overall defense strategy.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams discuss Serial and the case it made famous with three attorneys: Director of Investigation for University of Virginia School of Law's Innocence Project Clinic <strong>Deirdre Enright</strong>, featured on episodes 7 and 12 of Serial and currently working on Adnan's appeal, <strong>Erica Zunkel</strong> from the Federal Criminal Justice Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School, and <strong>Markus Kypreos</strong> from the Fort Worth civil litigation firm Pennington Hill. Together, they analyze the case against Adnan from both sides, offering expert insight on criminal defense and prosecution, the testimony of Jay Wilds, and the portrayal of this case on Serial, all while tackling some of the tougher questions raised regarding DNA evidence, potential alibis, shaky timelines, and the overall defense strategy.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2076</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7f895a5efde6e0d94690d95ec4005465]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4279991962.mp3?updated=1623961862" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Soto v. Bushmaster</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/01/soto-v-bushmaster/</link>
      <description>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Elliot Fineman from the National Gun Victims Action Council, Charles Heller from Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, and Professor Nicholas Johnson from Fordham University School of Law. Together they discuss the merits of this case, the Second Amendment, and the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. Tune in to hear outcome predictions as well as debates regarding self-defense and gun control. Where do you stand on the ownership of firearms and how responsible should companies be for the actions of others?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:45:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Soto v. Bushmaster</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>407</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dbd23916-cfa9-11eb-92b9-2b8d6da6d375/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Elliot Fineman from the National Gun Victims Action Council, Charles Heller from Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, and Professor Nicholas Johnson from Fordham University...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Elliot Fineman from the National Gun Victims Action Council, Charles Heller from Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, and Professor Nicholas Johnson from Fordham University School of Law. Together they discuss the merits of this case, the Second Amendment, and the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. Tune in to hear outcome predictions as well as debates regarding self-defense and gun control. Where do you stand on the ownership of firearms and how responsible should companies be for the actions of others?</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Elliot Fineman from the National Gun Victims Action Council, Charles Heller from Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, and Professor Nicholas Johnson from Fordham University School of Law. Together they discuss the merits of this case, the Second Amendment, and the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. Tune in to hear outcome predictions as well as debates regarding self-defense and gun control. Where do you stand on the ownership of firearms and how responsible should companies be for the actions of others?</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2649</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b9687d022308852a65713d0076e73874]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8411231236.mp3?updated=1623961863" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Senate Committee Study of the CIA’s Detention and Interrogation Program</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2015/01/senate-committee-study-cias-detention-interrogation-program</link>
      <description>In December 2014, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence released its study on the CIA's Detention and Interrogation Program. Among the many infractions alleged were unlawful torture, coverups, wrongful detention, and unauthorized dissemination of classified information. Since its release, there have been many critics of that report including the Senate Republican Minority, former Vice-President Dick Cheney, the CIA, and its former directors. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Guantanamo Bay (GTMO) attorney Professor Mark Denbeaux, Project 21 Chair Horace Cooper, and Cato Institute Policy Analyst Patrick Eddington. Together, they discuss the legalities of enhanced interrogation, whether or not it's effective, and the morality of its use in the theatre of war.

Professor Mark P. Denbeaux is the director of the Seton Hall Law School Center for Policy and Research, which is best known for its distribution of the internationally recognized series of reports on the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp. Professor Denbeaux's interest in the conditions of detainment arose during his representation of multiple detainees including Abu Zubaydah, who was held in a CIA dark site, as well as two Tunisian detainees from GTMO.

Horace Cooper is co-chairman for Project 21's National Advisory Board and adjunct fellow with the National Center for Public Policy Research. In addition to having taught constitutional law at George Mason University, Mr. Cooper was general counsel to U.S. House Majority Leader Dick Armey.

Patrick Eddington is a policy analyst in Homeland Security and Civil Liberties at the Cato Institute. A former senior policy advisor to U.S. Representative Rush Holt from New Jersey, Mr. Eddington's legislative portfolio includes security, intelligence, and detainee interrogation issues.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 20:03:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Senate Committee Study of the CIA’s Detention and Interrogation Program</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>406</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dbf95ee2-cfa9-11eb-92b9-477ea6b63b6a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In December 2014, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence released its study on the CIA's Detention and Interrogation Program. Among the many infractions alleged were unlawful torture, coverups, wrongful detention, and unauthorized dissemination...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In December 2014, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence released its study on the CIA's Detention and Interrogation Program. Among the many infractions alleged were unlawful torture, coverups, wrongful detention, and unauthorized dissemination of classified information. Since its release, there have been many critics of that report including the Senate Republican Minority, former Vice-President Dick Cheney, the CIA, and its former directors. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Guantanamo Bay (GTMO) attorney Professor Mark Denbeaux, Project 21 Chair Horace Cooper, and Cato Institute Policy Analyst Patrick Eddington. Together, they discuss the legalities of enhanced interrogation, whether or not it's effective, and the morality of its use in the theatre of war.

Professor Mark P. Denbeaux is the director of the Seton Hall Law School Center for Policy and Research, which is best known for its distribution of the internationally recognized series of reports on the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp. Professor Denbeaux's interest in the conditions of detainment arose during his representation of multiple detainees including Abu Zubaydah, who was held in a CIA dark site, as well as two Tunisian detainees from GTMO.

Horace Cooper is co-chairman for Project 21's National Advisory Board and adjunct fellow with the National Center for Public Policy Research. In addition to having taught constitutional law at George Mason University, Mr. Cooper was general counsel to U.S. House Majority Leader Dick Armey.

Patrick Eddington is a policy analyst in Homeland Security and Civil Liberties at the Cato Institute. A former senior policy advisor to U.S. Representative Rush Holt from New Jersey, Mr. Eddington's legislative portfolio includes security, intelligence, and detainee interrogation issues.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In December 2014, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence released its study on the CIA's Detention and Interrogation Program. Among the many infractions alleged were unlawful torture, coverups, wrongful detention, and unauthorized dissemination of classified information. Since its release, there have been many critics of that report including the Senate Republican Minority, former Vice-President Dick Cheney, the CIA, and its former directors. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Guantanamo Bay (GTMO) attorney Professor Mark Denbeaux, Project 21 Chair Horace Cooper, and Cato Institute Policy Analyst Patrick Eddington. Together, they discuss the legalities of enhanced interrogation, whether or not it's effective, and the morality of its use in the theatre of war.</p>
<p>Professor Mark P. Denbeaux is the director of the Seton Hall Law School Center for Policy and Research, which is best known for its distribution of the internationally recognized series of reports on the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp. Professor Denbeaux's interest in the conditions of detainment arose during his representation of multiple detainees including Abu Zubaydah, who was held in a CIA dark site, as well as two Tunisian detainees from GTMO.</p>
<p>Horace Cooper is co-chairman for Project 21's National Advisory Board and adjunct fellow with the National Center for Public Policy Research. In addition to having taught constitutional law at George Mason University, Mr. Cooper was general counsel to U.S. House Majority Leader Dick Armey.</p>
<p>Patrick Eddington is a policy analyst in Homeland Security and Civil Liberties at the Cato Institute. A former senior policy advisor to U.S. Representative Rush Holt from New Jersey, Mr. Eddington's legislative portfolio includes security, intelligence, and detainee interrogation issues.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2702</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a9ef4fd40beb34b5e7e3b62ab577d1c1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8445215060.mp3?updated=1623961863" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Animals’ Writ of Habeas Corpus: Autonomy, Self Determination, and Chimpanzees</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/12/animals-writ-habeas-corpus-autonomy-self-determination-chimpanzees</link>
      <description>On December 2, 2013, the first ever lawsuit on behalf of captive chimpanzees was filed in the New York Supreme Court. The objective of that lawsuit was to grant Tommy (a chimpanzee) bodily freedom through a common law writ of habeas corpus. Since then, two similar lawsuits have been filed. Leading the charge in all three actions is world-renowned animal rights lawyer Steven M. Wise from the Nonhuman Rights Project. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams welcomes back Mr. Wise to discuss the legal theories behind his cases as well as other animals that could potentially benefit. Tune in to hear why Steven is not deterred by the recent loss in Tommy's appeal and the difference between legal personhood and being human.

To hear more from Steven M. Wise on this topic, please listen to "Should a Chimpanzee Have Human Rights?" which was recorded before Tommy's case was filed.

Steven M. Wise is the president of the Nonhuman Rights Project and has been practicing animal protection law nationwide for 30 years. He currently teaches Animal Rights Jurisprudence at Lewis and Clark, University of Miami, and St. Thomas Law Schools and has previously taught Animal Rights Law at the Harvard and John Marshall Law Schools. Wise has published four books on animal rights, including Rattling the Cage - Toward Legal Rights for Animals, and is currently heading three simultaneous lawsuits in the State of New York to free Chimpanzees.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 18:45:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Animals’ Writ of Habeas Corpus: Autonomy, Self Determination, and Chimpanzees</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>405</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dc1ba61e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-038a6969572e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On December 2, 2013, the first ever lawsuit on behalf of captive chimpanzees was filed in the New York Supreme Court. The objective of that lawsuit was to grant Tommy (a chimpanzee) bodily freedom through a common law writ of habeas corpus. Since...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On December 2, 2013, the first ever lawsuit on behalf of captive chimpanzees was filed in the New York Supreme Court. The objective of that lawsuit was to grant Tommy (a chimpanzee) bodily freedom through a common law writ of habeas corpus. Since then, two similar lawsuits have been filed. Leading the charge in all three actions is world-renowned animal rights lawyer Steven M. Wise from the Nonhuman Rights Project. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams welcomes back Mr. Wise to discuss the legal theories behind his cases as well as other animals that could potentially benefit. Tune in to hear why Steven is not deterred by the recent loss in Tommy's appeal and the difference between legal personhood and being human.

To hear more from Steven M. Wise on this topic, please listen to "Should a Chimpanzee Have Human Rights?" which was recorded before Tommy's case was filed.

Steven M. Wise is the president of the Nonhuman Rights Project and has been practicing animal protection law nationwide for 30 years. He currently teaches Animal Rights Jurisprudence at Lewis and Clark, University of Miami, and St. Thomas Law Schools and has previously taught Animal Rights Law at the Harvard and John Marshall Law Schools. Wise has published four books on animal rights, including Rattling the Cage - Toward Legal Rights for Animals, and is currently heading three simultaneous lawsuits in the State of New York to free Chimpanzees.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On December 2, 2013, the first ever lawsuit on behalf of captive chimpanzees was filed in the New York Supreme Court. The objective of that lawsuit was to grant Tommy (a chimpanzee) bodily freedom through a common law writ of habeas corpus. Since then, two similar lawsuits have been filed. Leading the charge in all three actions is world-renowned animal rights lawyer Steven M. Wise from the Nonhuman Rights Project. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams welcomes back Mr. Wise to discuss the legal theories behind his cases as well as other animals that could potentially benefit. Tune in to hear why Steven is not deterred by the recent loss in Tommy's appeal and the difference between legal personhood and being human.</p>
<p>To hear more from Steven M. Wise on this topic, please listen to "Should a Chimpanzee Have Human Rights?" which was recorded before Tommy's case was filed.</p>
<p>Steven M. Wise is the president of the Nonhuman Rights Project and has been practicing animal protection law nationwide for 30 years. He currently teaches Animal Rights Jurisprudence at Lewis and Clark, University of Miami, and St. Thomas Law Schools and has previously taught Animal Rights Law at the Harvard and John Marshall Law Schools. Wise has published four books on animal rights, including Rattling the Cage - Toward Legal Rights for Animals, and is currently heading three simultaneous lawsuits in the State of New York to free Chimpanzees.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1885</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ce3c2a64bed1442eea590080463052fc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6510464039.mp3?updated=1623961864" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Senators Weigh In on Immigration, The Constitution, and Obama's Executive Order</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/12/senators-weigh-immigration-constitution-obamas-executive-order</link>
      <description>On November 20, President Obama announced his intention to execute an Executive Order potentially offering deferred deportation for nearly five million illegal immigrants. Since that time, opposing forces have challenged the constitutionality of such actions. Perhaps the most significant challenge is a federal lawsuit filed by nearly 20 states. In it, they allege violations of Article 2 Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution as well as the Administrative Procedure Act. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews former United States Senator Byron Dorgan and current New Mexico State Senator Steven Neville. Also participating by pre-recorded interview is current Texas State Senator Jose Rodriguez. Together, they discuss the constitutionality of President Obama's recent actions on immigration as well as the viability of the federal suit filed by the various states. Tune in to hear opposing views on the separation of families, burdens on the social welfare system, and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals.

If you find this topic interesting, you may also want to listen to an earlier show about unaccompanied minor immigrants titled "Unaccompanied Minor Immigrants: Push and Pull Factors of Immigration."

Former US Senator Byron L. Dorgan served as a Congressman and Senator for North Dakota for 30 years before retiring from the U.S. Senate in 2011. He served in the Senate Leadership for 16 years and was Chairman of Senate Committees and Subcommittees on the issues of Energy, Aviation, Appropriations, Water Policy, and Indian Affairs. Today, Senator Dorgan is a senior policy advisor at Arent Fox where he co-chairs the firm's government relations practice. In addition, he is a visiting professor at Georgetown University lecturing on energy and environmental issues as well as a Senior Fellow with the Bipartisan Policy Center, a think tank in Washington DC.

New Mexico State Senator Steven Neville is currently serving District 2 and has been in the New Mexico State Senate since 2004. Prior to that he served as County Commissioner in San Juan County from 1997 to 2004, the City Commission of the City of Aztec from 1995-1996, and County Chairman for the San Juan Republican Party from 1990-1991. Senator Neville has been self-employed with his own company, N-Vest, Inc., a real estate consulting and investment organization since 1985.

Texas State Senator Jose Rodriguez represents District 29 which includes the counties of El Paso, Hudspeth, Culberson, Jeff Davis, and Presidio. He represents both urban and rural constituencies, and more than 350 miles of the Texas-Mexico border. Senator Rodriguez currently serves as the Chairman of the Senate Hispanic Caucus, Vice Chairman of the Senate Jurisprudence Committee, and a member of the Senate Committees on Criminal Justice, Veteran Affairs and Military Installations, and Government Organization.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Senators Weigh In on Immigration, The Constitution, and Obama's Executive Order</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>404</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dc3b4064-cfa9-11eb-92b9-03861d61ce72/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On November 20, President Obama announced his intention to execute an Executive Order potentially offering deferred deportation for nearly five million illegal immigrants. Since that time, opposing forces have challenged the constitutionality of such...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On November 20, President Obama announced his intention to execute an Executive Order potentially offering deferred deportation for nearly five million illegal immigrants. Since that time, opposing forces have challenged the constitutionality of such actions. Perhaps the most significant challenge is a federal lawsuit filed by nearly 20 states. In it, they allege violations of Article 2 Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution as well as the Administrative Procedure Act. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews former United States Senator Byron Dorgan and current New Mexico State Senator Steven Neville. Also participating by pre-recorded interview is current Texas State Senator Jose Rodriguez. Together, they discuss the constitutionality of President Obama's recent actions on immigration as well as the viability of the federal suit filed by the various states. Tune in to hear opposing views on the separation of families, burdens on the social welfare system, and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals.

If you find this topic interesting, you may also want to listen to an earlier show about unaccompanied minor immigrants titled "Unaccompanied Minor Immigrants: Push and Pull Factors of Immigration."

Former US Senator Byron L. Dorgan served as a Congressman and Senator for North Dakota for 30 years before retiring from the U.S. Senate in 2011. He served in the Senate Leadership for 16 years and was Chairman of Senate Committees and Subcommittees on the issues of Energy, Aviation, Appropriations, Water Policy, and Indian Affairs. Today, Senator Dorgan is a senior policy advisor at Arent Fox where he co-chairs the firm's government relations practice. In addition, he is a visiting professor at Georgetown University lecturing on energy and environmental issues as well as a Senior Fellow with the Bipartisan Policy Center, a think tank in Washington DC.

New Mexico State Senator Steven Neville is currently serving District 2 and has been in the New Mexico State Senate since 2004. Prior to that he served as County Commissioner in San Juan County from 1997 to 2004, the City Commission of the City of Aztec from 1995-1996, and County Chairman for the San Juan Republican Party from 1990-1991. Senator Neville has been self-employed with his own company, N-Vest, Inc., a real estate consulting and investment organization since 1985.

Texas State Senator Jose Rodriguez represents District 29 which includes the counties of El Paso, Hudspeth, Culberson, Jeff Davis, and Presidio. He represents both urban and rural constituencies, and more than 350 miles of the Texas-Mexico border. Senator Rodriguez currently serves as the Chairman of the Senate Hispanic Caucus, Vice Chairman of the Senate Jurisprudence Committee, and a member of the Senate Committees on Criminal Justice, Veteran Affairs and Military Installations, and Government Organization.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On November 20, President Obama announced his intention to execute an Executive Order potentially offering deferred deportation for nearly five million illegal immigrants. Since that time, opposing forces have challenged the constitutionality of such actions. Perhaps the most significant challenge is a federal lawsuit filed by nearly 20 states. In it, they allege violations of Article 2 Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution as well as the Administrative Procedure Act. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews former United States Senator Byron Dorgan and current New Mexico State Senator Steven Neville. Also participating by pre-recorded interview is current Texas State Senator Jose Rodriguez. Together, they discuss the constitutionality of President Obama's recent actions on immigration as well as the viability of the federal suit filed by the various states. Tune in to hear opposing views on the separation of families, burdens on the social welfare system, and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals.</p>
<p>If you find this topic interesting, you may also want to listen to an earlier show about unaccompanied minor immigrants titled "Unaccompanied Minor Immigrants: Push and Pull Factors of Immigration."</p>
<p>Former US Senator Byron L. Dorgan served as a Congressman and Senator for North Dakota for 30 years before retiring from the U.S. Senate in 2011. He served in the Senate Leadership for 16 years and was Chairman of Senate Committees and Subcommittees on the issues of Energy, Aviation, Appropriations, Water Policy, and Indian Affairs. Today, Senator Dorgan is a senior policy advisor at Arent Fox where he co-chairs the firm's government relations practice. In addition, he is a visiting professor at Georgetown University lecturing on energy and environmental issues as well as a Senior Fellow with the Bipartisan Policy Center, a think tank in Washington DC.</p>
<p>New Mexico State Senator Steven Neville is currently serving District 2 and has been in the New Mexico State Senate since 2004. Prior to that he served as County Commissioner in San Juan County from 1997 to 2004, the City Commission of the City of Aztec from 1995-1996, and County Chairman for the San Juan Republican Party from 1990-1991. Senator Neville has been self-employed with his own company, N-Vest, Inc., a real estate consulting and investment organization since 1985.</p>
<p>Texas State Senator Jose Rodriguez represents District 29 which includes the counties of El Paso, Hudspeth, Culberson, Jeff Davis, and Presidio. He represents both urban and rural constituencies, and more than 350 miles of the Texas-Mexico border. Senator Rodriguez currently serves as the Chairman of the Senate Hispanic Caucus, Vice Chairman of the Senate Jurisprudence Committee, and a member of the Senate Committees on Criminal Justice, Veteran Affairs and Military Installations, and Government Organization.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1897</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ab7ed5fdadfe63adc7f6be6ce967f256]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1502370280.mp3?updated=1623961864" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Net Neutrality</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/11/net-neutrality</link>
      <description>On the coattails of presidential support and possible regulations from the Federal Communications Commission, Net Neutrality makes its way back into public debate. Proponents claim it will keep the internet a level playing field while opponents believe the opposite. One side worries about oppressive corporations while the other is concerned about oppressive government. Not surprisingly, opinions for or against tend to follow political party lines. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Chris Fedeli from Judicial Watch and Professor Jonathan Askin from Brooklyn Law School. Together they discuss the meaning of net neutrality, the pros and cons of regulating, and what it takes to keep the internet innovative. Tune in to hear about free market principles, consumer protection, and data packet discrimination.

Chris Fedeli is a senior attorney with Judicial Watch where he has litigated multiple cases in state and federal courts concerning election integrity, ballot initiatives and referendums, and government transparency. Prior to joining Judicial Watch, Fedeli was a senior associate at Davis Wright Tremaine in Washington D.C., where he represented clients in communications law litigation and regulatory proceedings. In 2009, the ABA's Communications Lawyer published Fedeli's article criticizing the FCC for its net neutrality regulations, which have since been overturned twice by the DC Circuit.

Professor Jonathan Askin is a professor at Brooklyn Law School where he teaches technology, telecommunications, and entrepreneurial law and policy. He is also the Founder of the Brooklyn Law Incubator and Policy Clinic, which represents internet, new media, communications and other tech entrepreneurs on business development, policy advocacy, and law reform. During the 2008 Presidential Election, Askin chaired the Internet Governance Working Group for the 2008 Obama Presidential Campaign.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Net Neutrality</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>403</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dc5ec548-cfa9-11eb-92b9-ff762f05b4f3/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On the coattails of presidential support and possible regulations from the Federal Communications Commission, Net Neutrality makes its way back into public debate. Proponents claim it will keep the internet a level playing field while opponents...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On the coattails of presidential support and possible regulations from the Federal Communications Commission, Net Neutrality makes its way back into public debate. Proponents claim it will keep the internet a level playing field while opponents believe the opposite. One side worries about oppressive corporations while the other is concerned about oppressive government. Not surprisingly, opinions for or against tend to follow political party lines. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Chris Fedeli from Judicial Watch and Professor Jonathan Askin from Brooklyn Law School. Together they discuss the meaning of net neutrality, the pros and cons of regulating, and what it takes to keep the internet innovative. Tune in to hear about free market principles, consumer protection, and data packet discrimination.

Chris Fedeli is a senior attorney with Judicial Watch where he has litigated multiple cases in state and federal courts concerning election integrity, ballot initiatives and referendums, and government transparency. Prior to joining Judicial Watch, Fedeli was a senior associate at Davis Wright Tremaine in Washington D.C., where he represented clients in communications law litigation and regulatory proceedings. In 2009, the ABA's Communications Lawyer published Fedeli's article criticizing the FCC for its net neutrality regulations, which have since been overturned twice by the DC Circuit.

Professor Jonathan Askin is a professor at Brooklyn Law School where he teaches technology, telecommunications, and entrepreneurial law and policy. He is also the Founder of the Brooklyn Law Incubator and Policy Clinic, which represents internet, new media, communications and other tech entrepreneurs on business development, policy advocacy, and law reform. During the 2008 Presidential Election, Askin chaired the Internet Governance Working Group for the 2008 Obama Presidential Campaign.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On the coattails of presidential support and possible regulations from the Federal Communications Commission, Net Neutrality makes its way back into public debate. Proponents claim it will keep the internet a level playing field while opponents believe the opposite. One side worries about oppressive corporations while the other is concerned about oppressive government. Not surprisingly, opinions for or against tend to follow political party lines. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Chris Fedeli from Judicial Watch and Professor Jonathan Askin from Brooklyn Law School. Together they discuss the meaning of net neutrality, the pros and cons of regulating, and what it takes to keep the internet innovative. Tune in to hear about free market principles, consumer protection, and data packet discrimination.</p>
<p>Chris Fedeli is a senior attorney with Judicial Watch where he has litigated multiple cases in state and federal courts concerning election integrity, ballot initiatives and referendums, and government transparency. Prior to joining Judicial Watch, Fedeli was a senior associate at Davis Wright Tremaine in Washington D.C., where he represented clients in communications law litigation and regulatory proceedings. In 2009, the ABA's Communications Lawyer published Fedeli's article criticizing the FCC for its net neutrality regulations, which have since been overturned twice by the DC Circuit.</p>
<p>Professor Jonathan Askin is a professor at Brooklyn Law School where he teaches technology, telecommunications, and entrepreneurial law and policy. He is also the Founder of the Brooklyn Law Incubator and Policy Clinic, which represents internet, new media, communications and other tech entrepreneurs on business development, policy advocacy, and law reform. During the 2008 Presidential Election, Askin chaired the Internet Governance Working Group for the 2008 Obama Presidential Campaign.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2254</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0b12dfd1b93349f98e1877b5befcc850]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5552996508.mp3?updated=1624285461" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quarantine and Isolation: How Federal and State Powers Fight Ebola</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/11/quarantine-isolation-federal-state-powers-fight-ebola</link>
      <description>Federal and State governing authorities have the power to quarantine an individual under the suspicion that person has Ebola and could possibly spread it to others. But what if the government is wrong? Is there redress for people held against their will? It might surprise you that your civil liberties can be subjugated for the common good. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Gary Phelan from Mitchell and Sheahan, P.C. and Professor John Thomas from Quinnipiac University School of Law. Together they discuss balancing tests that allow both Federal and State governments to quarantine individuals as well the possible criminal and tort liabilities for people who knowingly, recklessly, or through negligence infect others. Tune in to hear more about the power given to the Executive Branch, Governmental Immunity from suit, and International Health Regulations from the World Health Organization.

Gary Phelan is a shareholder at Mitchell and Sheahan, P.C. where he represents employees and employers in a wide range of matters, including disability and age discrimination, family responsibilities discrimination, wrongful termination, and severance negotiations. Mr. Phelan was recently the attorney for a Connecticut family whose little girl was not allowed to attend school for fear that she had been exposed to Ebola during her trip to a family wedding in Nigeria. The case received nationwide attention.

Professor John Thomas of Quinnipiac University School of Law teaches health law and intellectual property. He has been published over 170 times on topics such as gun violence, health policy, politics, autism, juvenile justice, and music. In addition, he has spoken on health law topics across the U.S. and internationally. Thomas is a freelance writer and guitar player with a recent literary work titled "Kalamazoo Gals: A Story of the Extraordinary Women and Gibson's "Banner" Guitars of WWII."

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:15:13 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Quarantine and Isolation: How Federal and State Powers Fight Ebola</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>402</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dc8019b4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-fb74b16eb928/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Federal and State governing authorities have the power to quarantine an individual under the suspicion that person has Ebola and could possibly spread it to others. But what if the government is wrong? Is there redress for people held against their...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Federal and State governing authorities have the power to quarantine an individual under the suspicion that person has Ebola and could possibly spread it to others. But what if the government is wrong? Is there redress for people held against their will? It might surprise you that your civil liberties can be subjugated for the common good. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Gary Phelan from Mitchell and Sheahan, P.C. and Professor John Thomas from Quinnipiac University School of Law. Together they discuss balancing tests that allow both Federal and State governments to quarantine individuals as well the possible criminal and tort liabilities for people who knowingly, recklessly, or through negligence infect others. Tune in to hear more about the power given to the Executive Branch, Governmental Immunity from suit, and International Health Regulations from the World Health Organization.

Gary Phelan is a shareholder at Mitchell and Sheahan, P.C. where he represents employees and employers in a wide range of matters, including disability and age discrimination, family responsibilities discrimination, wrongful termination, and severance negotiations. Mr. Phelan was recently the attorney for a Connecticut family whose little girl was not allowed to attend school for fear that she had been exposed to Ebola during her trip to a family wedding in Nigeria. The case received nationwide attention.

Professor John Thomas of Quinnipiac University School of Law teaches health law and intellectual property. He has been published over 170 times on topics such as gun violence, health policy, politics, autism, juvenile justice, and music. In addition, he has spoken on health law topics across the U.S. and internationally. Thomas is a freelance writer and guitar player with a recent literary work titled "Kalamazoo Gals: A Story of the Extraordinary Women and Gibson's "Banner" Guitars of WWII."

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Federal and State governing authorities have the power to quarantine an individual under the suspicion that person has Ebola and could possibly spread it to others. But what if the government is wrong? Is there redress for people held against their will? It might surprise you that your civil liberties can be subjugated for the common good. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Gary Phelan from Mitchell and Sheahan, P.C. and Professor John Thomas from Quinnipiac University School of Law. Together they discuss balancing tests that allow both Federal and State governments to quarantine individuals as well the possible criminal and tort liabilities for people who knowingly, recklessly, or through negligence infect others. Tune in to hear more about the power given to the Executive Branch, Governmental Immunity from suit, and International Health Regulations from the World Health Organization.</p>
<p>Gary Phelan is a shareholder at Mitchell and Sheahan, P.C. where he represents employees and employers in a wide range of matters, including disability and age discrimination, family responsibilities discrimination, wrongful termination, and severance negotiations. Mr. Phelan was recently the attorney for a Connecticut family whose little girl was not allowed to attend school for fear that she had been exposed to Ebola during her trip to a family wedding in Nigeria. The case received nationwide attention.</p>
<p>Professor John Thomas of Quinnipiac University School of Law teaches health law and intellectual property. He has been published over 170 times on topics such as gun violence, health policy, politics, autism, juvenile justice, and music. In addition, he has spoken on health law topics across the U.S. and internationally. Thomas is a freelance writer and guitar player with a recent literary work titled "Kalamazoo Gals: A Story of the Extraordinary Women and Gibson's "Banner" Guitars of WWII."</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1879</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6265574c6b2109d8ed4d8a0c0c9d1f8f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5237780482.mp3?updated=1623961864" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anniversary Show: Welcoming Our Tenth Year</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/10/anniversary-show-welcoming-tenth-year</link>
      <description>Having started their tenth year in podcasting, Lawyer 2 Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams take time to reflect upon on past shows, guests, and favorite moments. In an exchange of roles, Bob and Craig are interviewed by their very first guest, Michael S. Greco from K and L Gates LLP, who was the President of the American Bar Association and originally joined the show to talk about his initiatives. Tune in to hear about how our hosts got started in law, who wins "Name That Guest," favorite shows of 2014, as well as bloopers and theme songs. Thank you to all of our listeners over the years. We hope you enjoy this episode.

Michael S. Greco is currently Of-counsel at K and L Gates LLP an international law firm that's 2,000 attorneys strong and represents large business interests. He is a commercial litigator, arbitrator, mediator, and appellate lawyer with more than 40 years of experience in resolving complex business issues and other disputes throughout the United States and internationally. In addition, Mr. Greco is a former President of the American Bar Association.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 18:26:56 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Anniversary Show: Welcoming Our Tenth Year</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>401</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dca080dc-cfa9-11eb-92b9-877828c4c18c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Having started their tenth year in podcasting, Lawyer 2 Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams take time to reflect upon on past shows, guests, and favorite moments. In an exchange of roles, Bob and Craig are interviewed by their very first...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Having started their tenth year in podcasting, Lawyer 2 Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams take time to reflect upon on past shows, guests, and favorite moments. In an exchange of roles, Bob and Craig are interviewed by their very first guest, Michael S. Greco from K and L Gates LLP, who was the President of the American Bar Association and originally joined the show to talk about his initiatives. Tune in to hear about how our hosts got started in law, who wins "Name That Guest," favorite shows of 2014, as well as bloopers and theme songs. Thank you to all of our listeners over the years. We hope you enjoy this episode.

Michael S. Greco is currently Of-counsel at K and L Gates LLP an international law firm that's 2,000 attorneys strong and represents large business interests. He is a commercial litigator, arbitrator, mediator, and appellate lawyer with more than 40 years of experience in resolving complex business issues and other disputes throughout the United States and internationally. In addition, Mr. Greco is a former President of the American Bar Association.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Having started their tenth year in podcasting, Lawyer 2 Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams take time to reflect upon on past shows, guests, and favorite moments. In an exchange of roles, Bob and Craig are interviewed by their very first guest, Michael S. Greco from K and L Gates LLP, who was the President of the American Bar Association and originally joined the show to talk about his initiatives. Tune in to hear about how our hosts got started in law, who wins "Name That Guest," favorite shows of 2014, as well as bloopers and theme songs. Thank you to all of our listeners over the years. We hope you enjoy this episode.</p>
<p>Michael S. Greco is currently Of-counsel at K and L Gates LLP an international law firm that's 2,000 attorneys strong and represents large business interests. He is a commercial litigator, arbitrator, mediator, and appellate lawyer with more than 40 years of experience in resolving complex business issues and other disputes throughout the United States and internationally. In addition, Mr. Greco is a former President of the American Bar Association.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2136</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1e8085e1a9718c6421b4524369f762b2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2674193159.mp3?updated=1623961865" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wrongfully Convicted: William Dillon and His Life in Prison</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/10/wrongfully-convicted-william-dillon-life-prison</link>
      <description>Imagine being 20 years old and being investigated for a murder you didn't commit. Would you know what to say or do? Failure to react correctly could cost you a lifetime in prison. Sound far-fetched? It might surprise you to learn that it happens more often than we think, and for somewhat predictable reasons. In this special edition of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews William Michael Dillon, a man who spent nearly 30 years behind bars in one of the country's most dangerous prisons for a crime he did not commit, and Seth Miller, one of the attorneys who helped overturn his conviction. Tune in to hear how false confessions, eyewitness misidentification, and corrupt jail-house snitches are costing innocent people their freedom, and learn why William isn't angry today and how finding a voice through writing music helped him find hope.

William Dillon served 27 years and 8 months of a life sentence for a murder he did not commit. The State of Florida released him in 2008 when DNA testing proved he was not linked to a key piece of evidence used to convict him. He is a singer and songwriter whose work was inspired by his long incarceration in Florida State Prison. Today, he advocates for organizations, including the Innocence Project of Florida, that were instrumental in setting him free.

Seth Miller is one of the attorneys who helped exonerate William Dillon. He works for the Innocence Project of Florida where he has dedicated himself to exonerating the innocent since 2006. His organization receives nearly 2,000 requests to review convictions per year. Mr. Miller's focus is on post-conviction cases that have DNA in evidence.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 21:09:15 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Wrongfully Convicted: William Dillon and His Life in Prison</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>400</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dcc2381c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-fffa1d4e2357/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Imagine being 20 years old and being investigated for a murder you didn't commit. Would you know what to say or do? Failure to react correctly could cost you a lifetime in prison. Sound far-fetched? It might surprise you to learn that it happens more...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Imagine being 20 years old and being investigated for a murder you didn't commit. Would you know what to say or do? Failure to react correctly could cost you a lifetime in prison. Sound far-fetched? It might surprise you to learn that it happens more often than we think, and for somewhat predictable reasons. In this special edition of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews William Michael Dillon, a man who spent nearly 30 years behind bars in one of the country's most dangerous prisons for a crime he did not commit, and Seth Miller, one of the attorneys who helped overturn his conviction. Tune in to hear how false confessions, eyewitness misidentification, and corrupt jail-house snitches are costing innocent people their freedom, and learn why William isn't angry today and how finding a voice through writing music helped him find hope.

William Dillon served 27 years and 8 months of a life sentence for a murder he did not commit. The State of Florida released him in 2008 when DNA testing proved he was not linked to a key piece of evidence used to convict him. He is a singer and songwriter whose work was inspired by his long incarceration in Florida State Prison. Today, he advocates for organizations, including the Innocence Project of Florida, that were instrumental in setting him free.

Seth Miller is one of the attorneys who helped exonerate William Dillon. He works for the Innocence Project of Florida where he has dedicated himself to exonerating the innocent since 2006. His organization receives nearly 2,000 requests to review convictions per year. Mr. Miller's focus is on post-conviction cases that have DNA in evidence.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Imagine being 20 years old and being investigated for a murder you didn't commit. Would you know what to say or do? Failure to react correctly could cost you a lifetime in prison. Sound far-fetched? It might surprise you to learn that it happens more often than we think, and for somewhat predictable reasons. In this special edition of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews William Michael Dillon, a man who spent nearly 30 years behind bars in one of the country's most dangerous prisons for a crime he did not commit, and Seth Miller, one of the attorneys who helped overturn his conviction. Tune in to hear how false confessions, eyewitness misidentification, and corrupt jail-house snitches are costing innocent people their freedom, and learn why William isn't angry today and how finding a voice through writing music helped him find hope.</p>
<p>William Dillon served 27 years and 8 months of a life sentence for a murder he did not commit. The State of Florida released him in 2008 when DNA testing proved he was not linked to a key piece of evidence used to convict him. He is a singer and songwriter whose work was inspired by his long incarceration in Florida State Prison. Today, he advocates for organizations, including the Innocence Project of Florida, that were instrumental in setting him free.</p>
<p>Seth Miller is one of the attorneys who helped exonerate William Dillon. He works for the Innocence Project of Florida where he has dedicated himself to exonerating the innocent since 2006. His organization receives nearly 2,000 requests to review convictions per year. Mr. Miller's focus is on post-conviction cases that have DNA in evidence.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2053</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[113715ea8da5ab112dfbf975fb2f3879]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3167758200.mp3?updated=1623961865" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame: Rainmakers Who Ran the Gauntlet</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/10/trial-lawyer-hall-fame-rainmakers-ran-gauntlet</link>
      <description>Famed legal writer John Grisham calls them Rainmakers. We've celebrated their legendary victories in cinematic works such as "A Civil Action" and "Erin Brockovich." In Hollywood, these plaintiffs attorneys are often portrayed as Davids to their opposing Goliaths of corrupt industry. But who are they in real life? In this special edition of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview titans of the courtroom Mike Papantonio, Howard Nations, Thomas Girardi, and Fred Levin. In the first segment of this show, they reveal their most respected defense counsel, discuss the traits of successful trial attorneys, as well as evaluate the contingency fee model. In the second segment, Bob and Craig interview Fred Levin about his new biography which covers his very colorful life and career. Tune in to hear about his victories and his defeats.

Mike Papantonio was instrumental in the creation of The Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame. In addition to being a senior partner at Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Rafferty and Proctor, Mike co-hosts his nationally syndicated talk show (Ring of Fire) with esteemed co-hosts Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Sam Seder. Mr. Papantonio is also nationally known for his success in mass tort litigation, recipient of multiple prestigious awards (like Trial Lawyer of the Year and the Perry Nichols), and accomplished author of several motivational books for lawyers.

Howard Nations is an inductee at The Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame whose national practice is currently working on litigation for Actos bladder cancer, defective hip implants, transvaginal mesh, Pradaxa, and the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill. As a pioneer in courtroom technology, Howard was the first attorney to have computer-generated liability and medical animations admitted into evidence at trial. Among his many awards, he is the recipient of the W. McKinley Smiley, Jr., Lighthouse Award; the Belli Society's Mel Award; and MTMP's Clarence Darrow Award.

Thomas Girardi is an inductee at The Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame who's commonly known for his work in Anderson v. Pacific Gas and Electric (the case made famous by the Erin Brockovich film). Among his numerous headlines, Mr. Girardi secured a 4.85 billion dollar settlement from Merck for Vioxx, a 785 million dollar verdict from Lockheed for personal injuries, and a 1.7 billion dollar settlement from the State of California for manipulating natural gas prices.

Fred Levin is commonly referred to as the man who brought down Big Tobacco by helping to secure the largest settlement in US history. To date, he has won over 100 jury verdicts and settlements worth at least one million dollars. During his very colorful career he represented heavyweight boxing champion Roy Jones Jr., helped start the national firm of Johnnie Cochran, be-friended multiple Presidential candidates, and been investigated for murder twice. Today, Mr. Levin still practices as a senior partner at Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Rafferty and Proctor.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 23:28:30 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame: Rainmakers Who Ran the Gauntlet</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>399</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dce29986-cfa9-11eb-92b9-b7151987e672/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Famed legal writer John Grisham calls them Rainmakers. We've celebrated their legendary victories in cinematic works such as "A Civil Action" and "Erin Brockovich." In Hollywood, these plaintiffs attorneys are often portrayed as Davids to their...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Famed legal writer John Grisham calls them Rainmakers. We've celebrated their legendary victories in cinematic works such as "A Civil Action" and "Erin Brockovich." In Hollywood, these plaintiffs attorneys are often portrayed as Davids to their opposing Goliaths of corrupt industry. But who are they in real life? In this special edition of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview titans of the courtroom Mike Papantonio, Howard Nations, Thomas Girardi, and Fred Levin. In the first segment of this show, they reveal their most respected defense counsel, discuss the traits of successful trial attorneys, as well as evaluate the contingency fee model. In the second segment, Bob and Craig interview Fred Levin about his new biography which covers his very colorful life and career. Tune in to hear about his victories and his defeats.

Mike Papantonio was instrumental in the creation of The Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame. In addition to being a senior partner at Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Rafferty and Proctor, Mike co-hosts his nationally syndicated talk show (Ring of Fire) with esteemed co-hosts Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Sam Seder. Mr. Papantonio is also nationally known for his success in mass tort litigation, recipient of multiple prestigious awards (like Trial Lawyer of the Year and the Perry Nichols), and accomplished author of several motivational books for lawyers.

Howard Nations is an inductee at The Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame whose national practice is currently working on litigation for Actos bladder cancer, defective hip implants, transvaginal mesh, Pradaxa, and the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill. As a pioneer in courtroom technology, Howard was the first attorney to have computer-generated liability and medical animations admitted into evidence at trial. Among his many awards, he is the recipient of the W. McKinley Smiley, Jr., Lighthouse Award; the Belli Society's Mel Award; and MTMP's Clarence Darrow Award.

Thomas Girardi is an inductee at The Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame who's commonly known for his work in Anderson v. Pacific Gas and Electric (the case made famous by the Erin Brockovich film). Among his numerous headlines, Mr. Girardi secured a 4.85 billion dollar settlement from Merck for Vioxx, a 785 million dollar verdict from Lockheed for personal injuries, and a 1.7 billion dollar settlement from the State of California for manipulating natural gas prices.

Fred Levin is commonly referred to as the man who brought down Big Tobacco by helping to secure the largest settlement in US history. To date, he has won over 100 jury verdicts and settlements worth at least one million dollars. During his very colorful career he represented heavyweight boxing champion Roy Jones Jr., helped start the national firm of Johnnie Cochran, be-friended multiple Presidential candidates, and been investigated for murder twice. Today, Mr. Levin still practices as a senior partner at Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Rafferty and Proctor.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Famed legal writer John Grisham calls them Rainmakers. We've celebrated their legendary victories in cinematic works such as "A Civil Action" and "Erin Brockovich." In Hollywood, these plaintiffs attorneys are often portrayed as Davids to their opposing Goliaths of corrupt industry. But who are they in real life? In this special edition of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview titans of the courtroom Mike Papantonio, Howard Nations, Thomas Girardi, and Fred Levin. In the first segment of this show, they reveal their most respected defense counsel, discuss the traits of successful trial attorneys, as well as evaluate the contingency fee model. In the second segment, Bob and Craig interview Fred Levin about his new biography which covers his very colorful life and career. Tune in to hear about his victories and his defeats.</p>
<p>Mike Papantonio was instrumental in the creation of The Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame. In addition to being a senior partner at Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Rafferty and Proctor, Mike co-hosts his nationally syndicated talk show (Ring of Fire) with esteemed co-hosts Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Sam Seder. Mr. Papantonio is also nationally known for his success in mass tort litigation, recipient of multiple prestigious awards (like Trial Lawyer of the Year and the Perry Nichols), and accomplished author of several motivational books for lawyers.</p>
<p>Howard Nations is an inductee at The Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame whose national practice is currently working on litigation for Actos bladder cancer, defective hip implants, transvaginal mesh, Pradaxa, and the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill. As a pioneer in courtroom technology, Howard was the first attorney to have computer-generated liability and medical animations admitted into evidence at trial. Among his many awards, he is the recipient of the W. McKinley Smiley, Jr., Lighthouse Award; the Belli Society's Mel Award; and MTMP's Clarence Darrow Award.</p>
<p>Thomas Girardi is an inductee at The Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame who's commonly known for his work in Anderson v. Pacific Gas and Electric (the case made famous by the Erin Brockovich film). Among his numerous headlines, Mr. Girardi secured a 4.85 billion dollar settlement from Merck for Vioxx, a 785 million dollar verdict from Lockheed for personal injuries, and a 1.7 billion dollar settlement from the State of California for manipulating natural gas prices.</p>
<p>Fred Levin is commonly referred to as the man who brought down Big Tobacco by helping to secure the largest settlement in US history. To date, he has won over 100 jury verdicts and settlements worth at least one million dollars. During his very colorful career he represented heavyweight boxing champion Roy Jones Jr., helped start the national firm of Johnnie Cochran, be-friended multiple Presidential candidates, and been investigated for murder twice. Today, Mr. Levin still practices as a senior partner at Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Rafferty and Proctor.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3169</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7cf5ce3266df1d6e4a987e640fa77db1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3229224338.mp3?updated=1623961866" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fighting for Fifteen: Does Increasing the Minimum Wage Help the Economy?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/09/ighting-fifteen-increasing-minimum-wage-help-economy</link>
      <description>Worker groups around the country are demonstrating for the purpose of increasing the minimum wage while experts and policy makers debate the effect of such change. Proponents say a higher minimum wage helps low-skilled workers and boosts the economy. Opponents say increasing the minimum wage decreases employment and raises the cost of living. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Dr. Antony Davies from George Mason University and Dr. David Madland from American Progress. Together they discuss discuss economic and social principles associated with the minimum wage as well as who ultimately ends up paying for it. Tune in to learn more about the effects on fixed incomes, morale of workers, and quality of work.

Dr. Antony Davies is an associate professor of economics at Duquesne University and a Mercatus Affiliated Senior Scholar at George Mason University. His primary research interests include econometrics and public policy. Davies has authored over 100 op-eds in over thirty newspapers including the Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, New York Daily News, and Philadelphia Inquirer.

Dr. David Madland is the Director of the American Worker Project and the Managing Director of the Economic Policy team at American Progress. He has written extensively about the economy and American politics on a range of topics including retirement policy, labor unions, and the minimum wage. Madland has appeared on the the PBS News Hour and CNN's Crossfire. He has been cited in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post as well as been a guest on dozens of radio talk shows across the United States. David worked for Rep. George Miller (from California) and has testified before Congress and state legislatures.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:15:17 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fighting for Fifteen: Does Increasing the Minimum Wage Help the Economy?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>398</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dcfec1e2-cfa9-11eb-92b9-cfff1339a335/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Worker groups around the country are demonstrating for the purpose of increasing the minimum wage while experts and policy makers debate the effect of such change. Proponents say a higher minimum wage helps low-skilled workers and boosts the economy....</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Worker groups around the country are demonstrating for the purpose of increasing the minimum wage while experts and policy makers debate the effect of such change. Proponents say a higher minimum wage helps low-skilled workers and boosts the economy. Opponents say increasing the minimum wage decreases employment and raises the cost of living. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Dr. Antony Davies from George Mason University and Dr. David Madland from American Progress. Together they discuss discuss economic and social principles associated with the minimum wage as well as who ultimately ends up paying for it. Tune in to learn more about the effects on fixed incomes, morale of workers, and quality of work.

Dr. Antony Davies is an associate professor of economics at Duquesne University and a Mercatus Affiliated Senior Scholar at George Mason University. His primary research interests include econometrics and public policy. Davies has authored over 100 op-eds in over thirty newspapers including the Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, New York Daily News, and Philadelphia Inquirer.

Dr. David Madland is the Director of the American Worker Project and the Managing Director of the Economic Policy team at American Progress. He has written extensively about the economy and American politics on a range of topics including retirement policy, labor unions, and the minimum wage. Madland has appeared on the the PBS News Hour and CNN's Crossfire. He has been cited in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post as well as been a guest on dozens of radio talk shows across the United States. David worked for Rep. George Miller (from California) and has testified before Congress and state legislatures.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Worker groups around the country are demonstrating for the purpose of increasing the minimum wage while experts and policy makers debate the effect of such change. Proponents say a higher minimum wage helps low-skilled workers and boosts the economy. Opponents say increasing the minimum wage decreases employment and raises the cost of living. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Dr. Antony Davies from George Mason University and Dr. David Madland from American Progress. Together they discuss discuss economic and social principles associated with the minimum wage as well as who ultimately ends up paying for it. Tune in to learn more about the effects on fixed incomes, morale of workers, and quality of work.</p>
<p>Dr. Antony Davies is an associate professor of economics at Duquesne University and a Mercatus Affiliated Senior Scholar at George Mason University. His primary research interests include econometrics and public policy. Davies has authored over 100 op-eds in over thirty newspapers including the Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, New York Daily News, and Philadelphia Inquirer.</p>
<p>Dr. David Madland is the Director of the American Worker Project and the Managing Director of the Economic Policy team at American Progress. He has written extensively about the economy and American politics on a range of topics including retirement policy, labor unions, and the minimum wage. Madland has appeared on the the PBS News Hour and CNN's Crossfire. He has been cited in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post as well as been a guest on dozens of radio talk shows across the United States. David worked for Rep. George Miller (from California) and has testified before Congress and state legislatures.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2067</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5201e899739c9532c4eaac540001acab]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8805785607.mp3?updated=1623961866" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawful Arrest or Excessive Use of Force: Today’s Perceptions about Militarized Police</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/09/lawful-arrest-excessive-use-force-todays-perceptions-militarized-police</link>
      <description>In recent news, there have been several instances of demonstrations and riots resulting from allegations of police brutality. In cities like New York and Ferguson, there are many accounts and view points but there is still much to debate about the facts. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Amy Goodman from Democracy Now! and Sgt. Delroy Burton from DC Police Union. Together they discuss the perceptions and procedures of police as they use force to make arrests. Tune in to hear about why citizens shouldn't resist arrests as well as opinions about the use of military equipment for police work.

Amy Goodman is the host and executive producer of the award winning show Democracy Now! which airs on over 1,200 public television and radio stations worldwide. In addition, she has authored many best selling books including The Silenced Majority: Stories of Uprisings, Occupations, Resistance, and Hope. Ms. Goodman is the recipient of many prestigious awards such as the Right Livelihood Award, James Aronson Award for Social Justice Reporting, and many many more.

Sgt. Delroy Burton is the Chairman for DC Police Union and has been a police officer since August 1994. He worked many patrol assignments that required specialized training including alcohol enforcement, pulse Doppler radar, and police motorcycles. Sergeant Burton worked as a vice investigator prior to becoming detective and later became sergeant. He began working for DC Police Union in 2006 and was elected union chairman in 2013 with his term beginning in April of 2014.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:50:51 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawful Arrest or Excessive Use of Force: Today’s Perceptions about Militarized Police</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>397</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dd2a2684-cfa9-11eb-92b9-63b72709b345/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In recent news, there have been several instances of demonstrations and riots resulting from allegations of police brutality. In cities like New York and Ferguson, there are many accounts and view points but there is still much to debate about the...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In recent news, there have been several instances of demonstrations and riots resulting from allegations of police brutality. In cities like New York and Ferguson, there are many accounts and view points but there is still much to debate about the facts. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Amy Goodman from Democracy Now! and Sgt. Delroy Burton from DC Police Union. Together they discuss the perceptions and procedures of police as they use force to make arrests. Tune in to hear about why citizens shouldn't resist arrests as well as opinions about the use of military equipment for police work.

Amy Goodman is the host and executive producer of the award winning show Democracy Now! which airs on over 1,200 public television and radio stations worldwide. In addition, she has authored many best selling books including The Silenced Majority: Stories of Uprisings, Occupations, Resistance, and Hope. Ms. Goodman is the recipient of many prestigious awards such as the Right Livelihood Award, James Aronson Award for Social Justice Reporting, and many many more.

Sgt. Delroy Burton is the Chairman for DC Police Union and has been a police officer since August 1994. He worked many patrol assignments that required specialized training including alcohol enforcement, pulse Doppler radar, and police motorcycles. Sergeant Burton worked as a vice investigator prior to becoming detective and later became sergeant. He began working for DC Police Union in 2006 and was elected union chairman in 2013 with his term beginning in April of 2014.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In recent news, there have been several instances of demonstrations and riots resulting from allegations of police brutality. In cities like New York and Ferguson, there are many accounts and view points but there is still much to debate about the facts. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi interviews Amy Goodman from Democracy Now! and Sgt. Delroy Burton from DC Police Union. Together they discuss the perceptions and procedures of police as they use force to make arrests. Tune in to hear about why citizens shouldn't resist arrests as well as opinions about the use of military equipment for police work.</p>
<p>Amy Goodman is the host and executive producer of the award winning show Democracy Now! which airs on over 1,200 public television and radio stations worldwide. In addition, she has authored many best selling books including The Silenced Majority: Stories of Uprisings, Occupations, Resistance, and Hope. Ms. Goodman is the recipient of many prestigious awards such as the Right Livelihood Award, James Aronson Award for Social Justice Reporting, and many many more.</p>
<p>Sgt. Delroy Burton is the Chairman for DC Police Union and has been a police officer since August 1994. He worked many patrol assignments that required specialized training including alcohol enforcement, pulse Doppler radar, and police motorcycles. Sergeant Burton worked as a vice investigator prior to becoming detective and later became sergeant. He began working for DC Police Union in 2006 and was elected union chairman in 2013 with his term beginning in April of 2014.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2311</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[207861fdfe43a3d07d0d86e4cae57e87]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8995895193.mp3?updated=1623961866" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Firing Squads and Lethal Injections: Is Today’s Death Penalty Cruel and Unusual?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/08/firing-squads-lethal-injections-todays-death-penalty-cruel-unusual</link>
      <description>The Eighth Amendment protects people from cruel and unusual punishments in the United States but what does that mean? In the last 38 years, Americans used hangings, gas chambers, lethal injections, electrocutions, and firing squads to execute convicted murderers. Given the recent reports of botched lethal injections, some experts are calling for the return of the firing squad as the most humane form of capital punishment. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Judge Alex Kozinski from the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit, exonerated death row survivor Ronald Keine from Witness to Innocence, and M*A*S*H actor Mike Farrell from Death Penalty Focus. Together they discuss the merits of firing squads vs. lethal injections, corruption in the judicial system, and the morality of western society. Tune in to hear about the 144 exonerated death row survivors as well as Ronald Keine's near miss with the gas chamber.

Judge Alex Kozinski sits on the bench of the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit where he's served since his appointment on November 7th 1985. Prior to his appointment Judge Kozinski occupied other prestigious positions including Chief Judge of the US Claims Court and Office of Counsel to the President. He is married with three children plus three grandchildren.

Ronald Keine is an exonerated death row inmate who was just 9 days from his execution in the gas chamber when the actual murderer confessed to the crime. Today, he an Assistant Director of Membership and Training for Witness to Innocence an anti-death penalty organization whose leading voice is that of exonerated death row survivors.

Mike Farrell played Captain BJ Hunnicut for eight years on the hit television show M*A*S*H as well other roles like Jim Hansen in another series called Providence. In the 90s, he served for three years as a member of the State of California's Commission on Judicial Performance. Mr. Farrell is a life-long opponent of the death penalty and has been the President of Death Penalty Focus since 1994.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:32:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Firing Squads and Lethal Injections: Is Today’s Death Penalty Cruel and Unusual?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>396</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dd4a790c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-db187284c06e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Eighth Amendment protects people from cruel and unusual punishments in the United States but what does that mean? In the last 38 years, Americans used hangings, gas chambers, lethal injections, electrocutions, and firing squads to execute...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Eighth Amendment protects people from cruel and unusual punishments in the United States but what does that mean? In the last 38 years, Americans used hangings, gas chambers, lethal injections, electrocutions, and firing squads to execute convicted murderers. Given the recent reports of botched lethal injections, some experts are calling for the return of the firing squad as the most humane form of capital punishment. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Judge Alex Kozinski from the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit, exonerated death row survivor Ronald Keine from Witness to Innocence, and M*A*S*H actor Mike Farrell from Death Penalty Focus. Together they discuss the merits of firing squads vs. lethal injections, corruption in the judicial system, and the morality of western society. Tune in to hear about the 144 exonerated death row survivors as well as Ronald Keine's near miss with the gas chamber.

Judge Alex Kozinski sits on the bench of the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit where he's served since his appointment on November 7th 1985. Prior to his appointment Judge Kozinski occupied other prestigious positions including Chief Judge of the US Claims Court and Office of Counsel to the President. He is married with three children plus three grandchildren.

Ronald Keine is an exonerated death row inmate who was just 9 days from his execution in the gas chamber when the actual murderer confessed to the crime. Today, he an Assistant Director of Membership and Training for Witness to Innocence an anti-death penalty organization whose leading voice is that of exonerated death row survivors.

Mike Farrell played Captain BJ Hunnicut for eight years on the hit television show M*A*S*H as well other roles like Jim Hansen in another series called Providence. In the 90s, he served for three years as a member of the State of California's Commission on Judicial Performance. Mr. Farrell is a life-long opponent of the death penalty and has been the President of Death Penalty Focus since 1994.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The Eighth Amendment protects people from cruel and unusual punishments in the United States but what does that mean? In the last 38 years, Americans used hangings, gas chambers, lethal injections, electrocutions, and firing squads to execute convicted murderers. Given the recent reports of botched lethal injections, some experts are calling for the return of the firing squad as the most humane form of capital punishment. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Judge Alex Kozinski from the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit, exonerated death row survivor Ronald Keine from Witness to Innocence, and M*A*S*H actor Mike Farrell from Death Penalty Focus. Together they discuss the merits of firing squads vs. lethal injections, corruption in the judicial system, and the morality of western society. Tune in to hear about the 144 exonerated death row survivors as well as Ronald Keine's near miss with the gas chamber.</p>
<p>Judge Alex Kozinski sits on the bench of the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit where he's served since his appointment on November 7th 1985. Prior to his appointment Judge Kozinski occupied other prestigious positions including Chief Judge of the US Claims Court and Office of Counsel to the President. He is married with three children plus three grandchildren.</p>
<p>Ronald Keine is an exonerated death row inmate who was just 9 days from his execution in the gas chamber when the actual murderer confessed to the crime. Today, he an Assistant Director of Membership and Training for Witness to Innocence an anti-death penalty organization whose leading voice is that of exonerated death row survivors.</p>
<p>Mike Farrell played Captain BJ Hunnicut for eight years on the hit television show M*A*S*H as well other roles like Jim Hansen in another series called Providence. In the 90s, he served for three years as a member of the State of California's Commission on Judicial Performance. Mr. Farrell is a life-long opponent of the death penalty and has been the President of Death Penalty Focus since 1994.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2531</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[cfa4ee524454075fff189c9924d4d76a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6161291667.mp3?updated=1623961866" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Marijuana Use During Pregnancy and Child Abuse</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/08/marijuana-use-pregnancy-child-abuse</link>
      <description>Although still illegal everywhere in the United States under federal law, Colorado and Washington have decided not to prosecute marijuana use or production at the state level. Despite this lack of enforcement, women who use marijuana during their pregnancies are being charged with child abuse shortly after giving birth. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Sabrina Fendrick from the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws and Carla Lowe from Citizens Against Legalizing Marijuana. Together they discuss conflicting studies and beliefs regarding the benefits, harms, and prohibition of marijuana. Tune in to learn more about Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome as well as the differences between THC, tobacco, and alcohol for pregnant women.

Sabrina Fendrick currently serves as the Director of Strategic Partnerships for NORML the Washington DC-based National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. In 2010, she founded the NORML Women's Alliance and served as Director of Women's Outreach to develop multiple female-focused awareness campaigns to educate women, and empower them to speak out on behalf of progressive cannabis policies. Today Fendrick remains dedicated to increasing women's involvement throughout all aspects of the legalization movement, including parenting and child custody issues.

Carla Lowe is the founder of Citizens Against Legalizing Marijuana (CALM). She has been a volunteer anti-drug activist since 1977. Carla co-founded Californians for Drug-Free Youth and Californians for Drug-Free Schools. In addition, she chaired the Nancy Reagan Speakers' Bureau of the National Federation of Parents for Drug-Free Youth. Lowe is a mother of five grown children, grandmother of nine, and former high-school teacher.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 19:41:50 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Marijuana Use During Pregnancy and Child Abuse</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>395</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dd66de30-cfa9-11eb-92b9-33498fb3c4a2/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Although still illegal everywhere in the United States under federal law, Colorado and Washington have decided not to prosecute marijuana use or production at the state level. Despite this lack of enforcement, women who use marijuana during their...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Although still illegal everywhere in the United States under federal law, Colorado and Washington have decided not to prosecute marijuana use or production at the state level. Despite this lack of enforcement, women who use marijuana during their pregnancies are being charged with child abuse shortly after giving birth. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Sabrina Fendrick from the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws and Carla Lowe from Citizens Against Legalizing Marijuana. Together they discuss conflicting studies and beliefs regarding the benefits, harms, and prohibition of marijuana. Tune in to learn more about Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome as well as the differences between THC, tobacco, and alcohol for pregnant women.

Sabrina Fendrick currently serves as the Director of Strategic Partnerships for NORML the Washington DC-based National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. In 2010, she founded the NORML Women's Alliance and served as Director of Women's Outreach to develop multiple female-focused awareness campaigns to educate women, and empower them to speak out on behalf of progressive cannabis policies. Today Fendrick remains dedicated to increasing women's involvement throughout all aspects of the legalization movement, including parenting and child custody issues.

Carla Lowe is the founder of Citizens Against Legalizing Marijuana (CALM). She has been a volunteer anti-drug activist since 1977. Carla co-founded Californians for Drug-Free Youth and Californians for Drug-Free Schools. In addition, she chaired the Nancy Reagan Speakers' Bureau of the National Federation of Parents for Drug-Free Youth. Lowe is a mother of five grown children, grandmother of nine, and former high-school teacher.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Although still illegal everywhere in the United States under federal law, Colorado and Washington have decided not to prosecute marijuana use or production at the state level. Despite this lack of enforcement, women who use marijuana during their pregnancies are being charged with child abuse shortly after giving birth. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Sabrina Fendrick from the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws and Carla Lowe from Citizens Against Legalizing Marijuana. Together they discuss conflicting studies and beliefs regarding the benefits, harms, and prohibition of marijuana. Tune in to learn more about Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome as well as the differences between THC, tobacco, and alcohol for pregnant women.</p>
<p>Sabrina Fendrick currently serves as the Director of Strategic Partnerships for NORML the Washington DC-based National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. In 2010, she founded the NORML Women's Alliance and served as Director of Women's Outreach to develop multiple female-focused awareness campaigns to educate women, and empower them to speak out on behalf of progressive cannabis policies. Today Fendrick remains dedicated to increasing women's involvement throughout all aspects of the legalization movement, including parenting and child custody issues.</p>
<p>Carla Lowe is the founder of Citizens Against Legalizing Marijuana (CALM). She has been a volunteer anti-drug activist since 1977. Carla co-founded Californians for Drug-Free Youth and Californians for Drug-Free Schools. In addition, she chaired the Nancy Reagan Speakers' Bureau of the National Federation of Parents for Drug-Free Youth. Lowe is a mother of five grown children, grandmother of nine, and former high-school teacher.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2367</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5504c629e4b3cb00b7982095f708c175]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5371350779.mp3?updated=1623961866" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The New Pregnancy Drug Law in Tennessee</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/07/new-pregnancy-drug-law-tennessee</link>
      <description>On July 1st a new law took effect in Tennessee that allows prosecutors to pursue criminal assault charges if the mother uses illegal drugs during pregnancy. Although it had widespread bipartisan support and is designed to fight Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome, some believe it to be an unconstitutional infraction on privacy, equal protection, and due process. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Tennessee House Representative Mike Carter and Legal Director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee Thomas Castelli. Together they discuss maximum penalties, the law's effect on demographics, and treatment based defenses to punishment. Tune in to hear why the Tennessee General Assembly believes this law is their only option and the reasons the ACLU is fighting it.

Thomas H. Castelli is the Legal Director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee. Prior to joining the ACLU, he provided litigation counsel to businesses and law firms with Counsel on Call and was a founding partner with Castelli and Knox, LLP, a small general practice firm with an emphasis on employment discrimination and wrongful discharge. He also worked as an associate at Schulten, Ward and Turner, LLP as well as Sutherland, Asbill and Brennan, LLP, where he focused on employment, construction, bankruptcy and general business litigation. He is a native Tennessean who grew up in Murfreesboro.

The Honorable Mike Carter is a House Representative in the Tennessee General Assembly. He is a life-long resident of Ooltewah, Tennessee and practiced law for twenty years before being appointed as Judge, now retired, in 1997 by then Governor Don Sundquist. In 2009, Mr. Carter served as Special Assistant to then County Mayor Claude Ramsey. In 2012, he ran unopposed as a State Representative to serve the people of the newly created 29th District of Tennessee. Carter serves on the House Civil Justice Committee, House Finance Ways and Means Committee, and the House Ethics Committee. He also serves on TACIR (Tennessee Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations) and the House Judicial Oversight Panel.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 20:23:38 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The New Pregnancy Drug Law in Tennessee</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>394</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dd8d7388-cfa9-11eb-92b9-17818fb25a0e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On July 1st a new law took effect in Tennessee that allows prosecutors to pursue criminal assault charges if the mother uses illegal drugs during pregnancy. Although it had widespread bipartisan support and is designed to fight Neonatal Abstinence...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On July 1st a new law took effect in Tennessee that allows prosecutors to pursue criminal assault charges if the mother uses illegal drugs during pregnancy. Although it had widespread bipartisan support and is designed to fight Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome, some believe it to be an unconstitutional infraction on privacy, equal protection, and due process. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Tennessee House Representative Mike Carter and Legal Director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee Thomas Castelli. Together they discuss maximum penalties, the law's effect on demographics, and treatment based defenses to punishment. Tune in to hear why the Tennessee General Assembly believes this law is their only option and the reasons the ACLU is fighting it.

Thomas H. Castelli is the Legal Director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee. Prior to joining the ACLU, he provided litigation counsel to businesses and law firms with Counsel on Call and was a founding partner with Castelli and Knox, LLP, a small general practice firm with an emphasis on employment discrimination and wrongful discharge. He also worked as an associate at Schulten, Ward and Turner, LLP as well as Sutherland, Asbill and Brennan, LLP, where he focused on employment, construction, bankruptcy and general business litigation. He is a native Tennessean who grew up in Murfreesboro.

The Honorable Mike Carter is a House Representative in the Tennessee General Assembly. He is a life-long resident of Ooltewah, Tennessee and practiced law for twenty years before being appointed as Judge, now retired, in 1997 by then Governor Don Sundquist. In 2009, Mr. Carter served as Special Assistant to then County Mayor Claude Ramsey. In 2012, he ran unopposed as a State Representative to serve the people of the newly created 29th District of Tennessee. Carter serves on the House Civil Justice Committee, House Finance Ways and Means Committee, and the House Ethics Committee. He also serves on TACIR (Tennessee Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations) and the House Judicial Oversight Panel.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On July 1st a new law took effect in Tennessee that allows prosecutors to pursue criminal assault charges if the mother uses illegal drugs during pregnancy. Although it had widespread bipartisan support and is designed to fight Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome, some believe it to be an unconstitutional infraction on privacy, equal protection, and due process. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Tennessee House Representative Mike Carter and Legal Director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee Thomas Castelli. Together they discuss maximum penalties, the law's effect on demographics, and treatment based defenses to punishment. Tune in to hear why the Tennessee General Assembly believes this law is their only option and the reasons the ACLU is fighting it.</p>
<p>Thomas H. Castelli is the Legal Director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee. Prior to joining the ACLU, he provided litigation counsel to businesses and law firms with Counsel on Call and was a founding partner with Castelli and Knox, LLP, a small general practice firm with an emphasis on employment discrimination and wrongful discharge. He also worked as an associate at Schulten, Ward and Turner, LLP as well as Sutherland, Asbill and Brennan, LLP, where he focused on employment, construction, bankruptcy and general business litigation. He is a native Tennessean who grew up in Murfreesboro.</p>
<p>The Honorable Mike Carter is a House Representative in the Tennessee General Assembly. He is a life-long resident of Ooltewah, Tennessee and practiced law for twenty years before being appointed as Judge, now retired, in 1997 by then Governor Don Sundquist. In 2009, Mr. Carter served as Special Assistant to then County Mayor Claude Ramsey. In 2012, he ran unopposed as a State Representative to serve the people of the newly created 29th District of Tennessee. Carter serves on the House Civil Justice Committee, House Finance Ways and Means Committee, and the House Ethics Committee. He also serves on TACIR (Tennessee Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations) and the House Judicial Oversight Panel.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1977</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[bbe3350a17bb083bdb1e45197129fdf9]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8532262000.mp3?updated=1623961867" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: Religion, Contraception, and Regulation</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/07/burwell-v-hobby-lobby-religion-contraception-regulation</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court's recent decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby invokes passionate debates and fiery discourse. At the spearhead of exchange are questions about reproductive, First Amendment, and healthcare rights. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi brings light to these issues along with Emily Martin from the National Women's Law Center and Elizabeth Slattery from the Heritage Foundation. Together they discuss the application of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act vs. invoking a Constitutional argument centered around the First Amendment. Tune in to learn more about the 4 debated methods of contraception, Justice Ginsburg's dissent, and religious rights of corporations.

Emily Martin is the Vice President and General Counsel at the National Women's Law Center, where she undertakes cross-cutting projects addressing women's health, economic security, and education and employment opportunities. Prior to joining the Center, Ms. Martin served as Deputy Director of the Women's Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union and served as a law clerk for Senior Judge Wilfred Feinberg of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and Judge T.S. Ellis, III, of the Eastern District of Virginia. She has served as Vice President and President of the Fair Housing Justice Center, a non-profit organization in New York City.

Elizabeth Slattery is a senior legal policy analyst in The Heritage Foundation's Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies. She researches a variety of issues such as the rule of law, the First Amendment, civil rights and equal protection, and the scope of constitutional provisions. Ms. Slattery also studies and writes about cases before the Supreme Court, judicial nominations, and the proper role of the courts. She manages the Meese Center's appellate advocacy programs, including moot court sessions to prepare litigators for oral argument before the Supreme Court. Ms. Slattery's analysis and commentary have appeared in The Washington Times and The Washington Examiner, as well as outlets including National Review Online, The Daily Signal, The Daily Caller and U.S. News and World Report.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 19:33:39 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: Religion, Contraception, and Regulation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>393</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ddb8eb62-cfa9-11eb-92b9-ef4c4ff4f574/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Supreme Court's recent decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby invokes passionate debates and fiery discourse. At the spearhead of exchange are questions about reproductive, First Amendment, and healthcare rights. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer,...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Supreme Court's recent decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby invokes passionate debates and fiery discourse. At the spearhead of exchange are questions about reproductive, First Amendment, and healthcare rights. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi brings light to these issues along with Emily Martin from the National Women's Law Center and Elizabeth Slattery from the Heritage Foundation. Together they discuss the application of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act vs. invoking a Constitutional argument centered around the First Amendment. Tune in to learn more about the 4 debated methods of contraception, Justice Ginsburg's dissent, and religious rights of corporations.

Emily Martin is the Vice President and General Counsel at the National Women's Law Center, where she undertakes cross-cutting projects addressing women's health, economic security, and education and employment opportunities. Prior to joining the Center, Ms. Martin served as Deputy Director of the Women's Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union and served as a law clerk for Senior Judge Wilfred Feinberg of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and Judge T.S. Ellis, III, of the Eastern District of Virginia. She has served as Vice President and President of the Fair Housing Justice Center, a non-profit organization in New York City.

Elizabeth Slattery is a senior legal policy analyst in The Heritage Foundation's Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies. She researches a variety of issues such as the rule of law, the First Amendment, civil rights and equal protection, and the scope of constitutional provisions. Ms. Slattery also studies and writes about cases before the Supreme Court, judicial nominations, and the proper role of the courts. She manages the Meese Center's appellate advocacy programs, including moot court sessions to prepare litigators for oral argument before the Supreme Court. Ms. Slattery's analysis and commentary have appeared in The Washington Times and The Washington Examiner, as well as outlets including National Review Online, The Daily Signal, The Daily Caller and U.S. News and World Report.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court's recent decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby invokes passionate debates and fiery discourse. At the spearhead of exchange are questions about reproductive, First Amendment, and healthcare rights. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi brings light to these issues along with Emily Martin from the National Women's Law Center and Elizabeth Slattery from the Heritage Foundation. Together they discuss the application of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act vs. invoking a Constitutional argument centered around the First Amendment. Tune in to learn more about the 4 debated methods of contraception, Justice Ginsburg's dissent, and religious rights of corporations.</p>
<p>Emily Martin is the Vice President and General Counsel at the National Women's Law Center, where she undertakes cross-cutting projects addressing women's health, economic security, and education and employment opportunities. Prior to joining the Center, Ms. Martin served as Deputy Director of the Women's Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union and served as a law clerk for Senior Judge Wilfred Feinberg of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and Judge T.S. Ellis, III, of the Eastern District of Virginia. She has served as Vice President and President of the Fair Housing Justice Center, a non-profit organization in New York City.</p>
<p>Elizabeth Slattery is a senior legal policy analyst in The Heritage Foundation's Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies. She researches a variety of issues such as the rule of law, the First Amendment, civil rights and equal protection, and the scope of constitutional provisions. Ms. Slattery also studies and writes about cases before the Supreme Court, judicial nominations, and the proper role of the courts. She manages the Meese Center's appellate advocacy programs, including moot court sessions to prepare litigators for oral argument before the Supreme Court. Ms. Slattery's analysis and commentary have appeared in The Washington Times and The Washington Examiner, as well as outlets including National Review Online, The Daily Signal, The Daily Caller and U.S. News and World Report.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2167</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e7c17dc95d83545efa4b601451996fda]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8766743889.mp3?updated=1623961867" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unaccompanied Minor Immigrants: Push and Pull Factors of Immigration</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/06/unaccompanied-minor-immigrants-push-pull-factors-immigration</link>
      <description>Since 2009, the number of unaccompanied minors apprehended crossing the U.S. border has sharply increased. The journey for these children is long, expensive, and dangerous. What is the cause of this sudden influx of young immigrants? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Alex Nowrasteh from the Cato Institute and Elizabeth Dallam from Kids in Need of Defense (otherwise known as KIND). Together they discuss the immigration numbers, reasons for seeking asylum, and suggested policy changes. Tune in to learn how immigration is affected by Central American gangs and the War on Drugs.

Alex Nowrasteh is the immigration policy analyst at the Cato Institute's Center for Global Liberty and Prosperity. Previously he was the immigration policy analyst at the Competitive Enterprise Institute. Among many publications, his work has appeared in The Wall Street Journal, Houston Chronicle, and Boston Globe. He has appeared on Fox News and numerous television and radio stations across the United States. He received his B.A. in Economics from George Mason University and Masters in Economic History from the London School of Economics.

Elizabeth Dallam is the National Legal Services Director at Kids in Need of Defense (KIND) which is a program providing pro bono legal services to children who arrive "unaccompanied" or alone to the United States. Previously, she served as the Senior Protection Officer at the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Washington, DC. During her tenure at that organization, she acted as the agency's focal point on unaccompanied children and advocated for systemic reforms in law and policy to better protect children. Prior to that, Elizabeth was the Executive Director of the Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project in Arizona, where she started a children's representation project.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:37:56 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Unaccompanied Minor Immigrants: Push and Pull Factors of Immigration</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>392</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ddd762b8-cfa9-11eb-92b9-9ffab877fb8c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since 2009, the number of unaccompanied minors apprehended crossing the U.S. border has sharply increased. The journey for these children is long, expensive, and dangerous. What is the cause of this sudden influx of young immigrants? On this episode...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Since 2009, the number of unaccompanied minors apprehended crossing the U.S. border has sharply increased. The journey for these children is long, expensive, and dangerous. What is the cause of this sudden influx of young immigrants? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Alex Nowrasteh from the Cato Institute and Elizabeth Dallam from Kids in Need of Defense (otherwise known as KIND). Together they discuss the immigration numbers, reasons for seeking asylum, and suggested policy changes. Tune in to learn how immigration is affected by Central American gangs and the War on Drugs.

Alex Nowrasteh is the immigration policy analyst at the Cato Institute's Center for Global Liberty and Prosperity. Previously he was the immigration policy analyst at the Competitive Enterprise Institute. Among many publications, his work has appeared in The Wall Street Journal, Houston Chronicle, and Boston Globe. He has appeared on Fox News and numerous television and radio stations across the United States. He received his B.A. in Economics from George Mason University and Masters in Economic History from the London School of Economics.

Elizabeth Dallam is the National Legal Services Director at Kids in Need of Defense (KIND) which is a program providing pro bono legal services to children who arrive "unaccompanied" or alone to the United States. Previously, she served as the Senior Protection Officer at the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Washington, DC. During her tenure at that organization, she acted as the agency's focal point on unaccompanied children and advocated for systemic reforms in law and policy to better protect children. Prior to that, Elizabeth was the Executive Director of the Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project in Arizona, where she started a children's representation project.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Since 2009, the number of unaccompanied minors apprehended crossing the U.S. border has sharply increased. The journey for these children is long, expensive, and dangerous. What is the cause of this sudden influx of young immigrants? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Alex Nowrasteh from the Cato Institute and Elizabeth Dallam from Kids in Need of Defense (otherwise known as KIND). Together they discuss the immigration numbers, reasons for seeking asylum, and suggested policy changes. Tune in to learn how immigration is affected by Central American gangs and the War on Drugs.</p>
<p>Alex Nowrasteh is the immigration policy analyst at the Cato Institute's Center for Global Liberty and Prosperity. Previously he was the immigration policy analyst at the Competitive Enterprise Institute. Among many publications, his work has appeared in The Wall Street Journal, Houston Chronicle, and Boston Globe. He has appeared on Fox News and numerous television and radio stations across the United States. He received his B.A. in Economics from George Mason University and Masters in Economic History from the London School of Economics.</p>
<p>Elizabeth Dallam is the National Legal Services Director at Kids in Need of Defense (KIND) which is a program providing pro bono legal services to children who arrive "unaccompanied" or alone to the United States. Previously, she served as the Senior Protection Officer at the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Washington, DC. During her tenure at that organization, she acted as the agency's focal point on unaccompanied children and advocated for systemic reforms in law and policy to better protect children. Prior to that, Elizabeth was the Executive Director of the Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project in Arizona, where she started a children's representation project.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2055</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b63ff932c79352d5ecc35b3e853b9ac3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4639151296.mp3?updated=1624285467" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Facial Recognition Technology: Security vs. Privacy Concerns</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/06/facial-recognition-technology-security-vs-privacy-concerns</link>
      <description>Imagine a computer thousands of miles away recognizing you in a camera at an intersection. Furthermore, consider being tracked and monitored from your home to your place of work every day. Facial recognition technology makes this type of identification possible and it is being rapidly developed for country defense and law enforcement purposes. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Ed Tivol from EWA, Government Systems, Inc. and Jennifer Lynch from Electronic Frontier Foundation. Together, they discuss the paradox of security vs. privacy when it comes to biometric modes of identification. In addition, they deliberate on how this data is being collected, who is collecting it, and for what purpose. Tune in to hear about your evolving First and Fourth Amendment Rights in the face of national security, crime prevention, and the private sector.

Jennifer Lynch is a Senior Staff Attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation and works on open government, transparency, and privacy issues as part of EFF's Transparency Project. She is a writer and frequent speaker on government surveillance programs, domestic drones, intelligence community misconduct, and biometrics. Lynch has testified about facial recognition before Senate Subcommittees and prior to joining EFF, she was the Clinical Teaching Fellow with the Samuelson Law, Technology and Public Policy Clinic at UC Berkeley School of Law.

Ed Tivol is the Vice President of the Intelligence and Operations Division for EWA, Government Systems, Inc. a defense contractor actively developing facial recognition technology for the Federal Government. He is a 1964 graduate of The Citadel and served in the Army's Military Intelligence branch for 24 years. Tivol completed two tours in Vietnam and retired with the rank of Colonel in 1990. In the same year, he began his work with EWA and has been there ever since. Ed holds master's degrees from University of Maryland and the Army War College. Today Mr. Tivol and his wife raise racehorses and Angus cattle outside of Bowling Green, Kentucky.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 22:34:51 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Facial Recognition Technology: Security vs. Privacy Concerns</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>391</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ddf6e84a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-676867b62335/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Imagine a computer thousands of miles away recognizing you in a camera at an intersection. Furthermore, consider being tracked and monitored from your home to your place of work every day. Facial recognition technology makes this type of...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Imagine a computer thousands of miles away recognizing you in a camera at an intersection. Furthermore, consider being tracked and monitored from your home to your place of work every day. Facial recognition technology makes this type of identification possible and it is being rapidly developed for country defense and law enforcement purposes. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Ed Tivol from EWA, Government Systems, Inc. and Jennifer Lynch from Electronic Frontier Foundation. Together, they discuss the paradox of security vs. privacy when it comes to biometric modes of identification. In addition, they deliberate on how this data is being collected, who is collecting it, and for what purpose. Tune in to hear about your evolving First and Fourth Amendment Rights in the face of national security, crime prevention, and the private sector.

Jennifer Lynch is a Senior Staff Attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation and works on open government, transparency, and privacy issues as part of EFF's Transparency Project. She is a writer and frequent speaker on government surveillance programs, domestic drones, intelligence community misconduct, and biometrics. Lynch has testified about facial recognition before Senate Subcommittees and prior to joining EFF, she was the Clinical Teaching Fellow with the Samuelson Law, Technology and Public Policy Clinic at UC Berkeley School of Law.

Ed Tivol is the Vice President of the Intelligence and Operations Division for EWA, Government Systems, Inc. a defense contractor actively developing facial recognition technology for the Federal Government. He is a 1964 graduate of The Citadel and served in the Army's Military Intelligence branch for 24 years. Tivol completed two tours in Vietnam and retired with the rank of Colonel in 1990. In the same year, he began his work with EWA and has been there ever since. Ed holds master's degrees from University of Maryland and the Army War College. Today Mr. Tivol and his wife raise racehorses and Angus cattle outside of Bowling Green, Kentucky.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Imagine a computer thousands of miles away recognizing you in a camera at an intersection. Furthermore, consider being tracked and monitored from your home to your place of work every day. Facial recognition technology makes this type of identification possible and it is being rapidly developed for country defense and law enforcement purposes. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Ed Tivol from EWA, Government Systems, Inc. and Jennifer Lynch from Electronic Frontier Foundation. Together, they discuss the paradox of security vs. privacy when it comes to biometric modes of identification. In addition, they deliberate on how this data is being collected, who is collecting it, and for what purpose. Tune in to hear about your evolving First and Fourth Amendment Rights in the face of national security, crime prevention, and the private sector.</p>
<p>Jennifer Lynch is a Senior Staff Attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation and works on open government, transparency, and privacy issues as part of EFF's Transparency Project. She is a writer and frequent speaker on government surveillance programs, domestic drones, intelligence community misconduct, and biometrics. Lynch has testified about facial recognition before Senate Subcommittees and prior to joining EFF, she was the Clinical Teaching Fellow with the Samuelson Law, Technology and Public Policy Clinic at UC Berkeley School of Law.</p>
<p>Ed Tivol is the Vice President of the Intelligence and Operations Division for EWA, Government Systems, Inc. a defense contractor actively developing facial recognition technology for the Federal Government. He is a 1964 graduate of The Citadel and served in the Army's Military Intelligence branch for 24 years. Tivol completed two tours in Vietnam and retired with the rank of Colonel in 1990. In the same year, he began his work with EWA and has been there ever since. Ed holds master's degrees from University of Maryland and the Army War College. Today Mr. Tivol and his wife raise racehorses and Angus cattle outside of Bowling Green, Kentucky.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2256</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[56d32eb5d21a6767e8e810fbfa57cef9]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7911363737.mp3?updated=1624285466" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>60 Years After Brown v. Board of Education, Equal Educational Access Remains Elusive</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/06/60-years-brown-v-board-education-equal-educational-access-remains-elusive</link>
      <description>May 17th, 2014 marked the 60th Anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education, the landmark Supreme Court Decision that held state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students as unconstitutional because they violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Today, some six decades later, many parents and teachers are still worried that America's children are not receiving equal access to education envisioned in that case. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams shed light on this issue with guests Christian D'Andrea from the MacIver Institute and Kyle Serrette from The Center for Popular Democracy. Together they discuss private schools, charter schools, and homeschooling vs. the community school model. Tune in to learn more about funding concerns, oversight issues, and the proper role of teachers unions in the school choice debate.

Christian D'Andrea is an Education Policy Analyst with the John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy in Madison, WI. He earned his Master's of Public Policy degree at Vanderbilt University and has previously worked for the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice as a State Policy Director and Policy Analyst. He is the author of several studies that examine the fiscal and personal impacts of educational reform, and his work has been featured everywhere from the Huffington Post to EducationNext.

Kyle Serrette is the Director of Education Justice Campaigns at The Center for Popular Democracy and works with their partner organizations to strengthen their public education coalitions, develop strategy to help close the opportunity gaps, and coordinates national and regional campaigns that work to bolster our public education system. Prior to joining The Center for Popular Democracy, Kyle spent over 10 years working on corporate campaigns with groups such as Service Employees International Union, Change to Win, and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. He was awarded the 2010 Joe Hill Organizing Achievement Award by the LA Fed and the Los Angeles Orange County Organize Committee.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 17:44:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>60 Years After Brown v. Board of Education, Equal Educational Access Remains Elusive</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>390</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/de1647b2-cfa9-11eb-92b9-6fd17342f9e4/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>May 17th, 2014 marked the 60th Anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education, the landmark Supreme Court Decision that held state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students as unconstitutional because they violate the Equal...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>May 17th, 2014 marked the 60th Anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education, the landmark Supreme Court Decision that held state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students as unconstitutional because they violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Today, some six decades later, many parents and teachers are still worried that America's children are not receiving equal access to education envisioned in that case. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams shed light on this issue with guests Christian D'Andrea from the MacIver Institute and Kyle Serrette from The Center for Popular Democracy. Together they discuss private schools, charter schools, and homeschooling vs. the community school model. Tune in to learn more about funding concerns, oversight issues, and the proper role of teachers unions in the school choice debate.

Christian D'Andrea is an Education Policy Analyst with the John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy in Madison, WI. He earned his Master's of Public Policy degree at Vanderbilt University and has previously worked for the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice as a State Policy Director and Policy Analyst. He is the author of several studies that examine the fiscal and personal impacts of educational reform, and his work has been featured everywhere from the Huffington Post to EducationNext.

Kyle Serrette is the Director of Education Justice Campaigns at The Center for Popular Democracy and works with their partner organizations to strengthen their public education coalitions, develop strategy to help close the opportunity gaps, and coordinates national and regional campaigns that work to bolster our public education system. Prior to joining The Center for Popular Democracy, Kyle spent over 10 years working on corporate campaigns with groups such as Service Employees International Union, Change to Win, and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. He was awarded the 2010 Joe Hill Organizing Achievement Award by the LA Fed and the Los Angeles Orange County Organize Committee.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>May 17th, 2014 marked the 60th Anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education, the landmark Supreme Court Decision that held state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students as unconstitutional because they violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Today, some six decades later, many parents and teachers are still worried that America's children are not receiving equal access to education envisioned in that case. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams shed light on this issue with guests Christian D'Andrea from the MacIver Institute and Kyle Serrette from The Center for Popular Democracy. Together they discuss private schools, charter schools, and homeschooling vs. the community school model. Tune in to learn more about funding concerns, oversight issues, and the proper role of teachers unions in the school choice debate.</p>
<p>Christian D'Andrea is an Education Policy Analyst with the John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy in Madison, WI. He earned his Master's of Public Policy degree at Vanderbilt University and has previously worked for the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice as a State Policy Director and Policy Analyst. He is the author of several studies that examine the fiscal and personal impacts of educational reform, and his work has been featured everywhere from the Huffington Post to EducationNext.</p>
<p>Kyle Serrette is the Director of Education Justice Campaigns at The Center for Popular Democracy and works with their partner organizations to strengthen their public education coalitions, develop strategy to help close the opportunity gaps, and coordinates national and regional campaigns that work to bolster our public education system. Prior to joining The Center for Popular Democracy, Kyle spent over 10 years working on corporate campaigns with groups such as Service Employees International Union, Change to Win, and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. He was awarded the 2010 Joe Hill Organizing Achievement Award by the LA Fed and the Los Angeles Orange County Organize Committee.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2057</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1669c0997e1396f48ff16afe033b3186]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9897995232.mp3?updated=1624285467" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Greece v. Galloway: Prayer in Government Assemblies</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/05/greece-v-galloway-prayer-government-assemblies</link>
      <description>On May 5th 2014, the Supreme Court decided Greece v. Galloway, a landmark case about the right of prayer in government assemblies. Both sides of the argument invoked the First Amendment to make their case, but who is right and why? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi brings this issue to the forefront with opposing counsels Douglas Laycock, for the respondents, and David Cortman, for the petitioner. Together, they discuss the relative merits of their cases, the endorsement test, and the coercion test. Tune in to hear more about the future of legislative prayer and your First Amendment rights.

Professor Douglas Laycock is a Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law Professor of Religious Studies at University of Virginia School of Law and one of the nation's leading authorities on the law of religious liberty. In addition to teaching for over 30 years, Professor Laycock has testified frequently before Congress and has argued many cases in the courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. Professor Laycock is an accomplished author on the subject at hand and the 2nd Vice President of the American Law Institute. Especially pertinent to today's episode, Professor Laycock argued for Susan Galloway and Linda Stephens, the respondents, in the Supreme Court.

David Cortman serves as senior counsel and vice-president of Religious Liberty with Alliance Defending Freedom at its Atlanta Regional Service Center in Georgia. He also heads litigation efforts to defend and reclaim the First Amendment rights of public school students across the country. Among his many media appearances, Mr. Cortman has been on CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News. Especially pertinent to today's episode, he served as counsel for the Town of Greece, the petitioner, in the Supreme Court.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 16:42:02 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Greece v. Galloway: Prayer in Government Assemblies</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>389</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/de355eea-cfa9-11eb-92b9-37875c5b2258/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>On May 5th 2014, the Supreme Court decided Greece v. Galloway, a landmark case about the right of prayer in government assemblies. Both sides of the argument invoked the First Amendment to make their case, but who is right and why? On this episode of...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On May 5th 2014, the Supreme Court decided Greece v. Galloway, a landmark case about the right of prayer in government assemblies. Both sides of the argument invoked the First Amendment to make their case, but who is right and why? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi brings this issue to the forefront with opposing counsels Douglas Laycock, for the respondents, and David Cortman, for the petitioner. Together, they discuss the relative merits of their cases, the endorsement test, and the coercion test. Tune in to hear more about the future of legislative prayer and your First Amendment rights.

Professor Douglas Laycock is a Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law Professor of Religious Studies at University of Virginia School of Law and one of the nation's leading authorities on the law of religious liberty. In addition to teaching for over 30 years, Professor Laycock has testified frequently before Congress and has argued many cases in the courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. Professor Laycock is an accomplished author on the subject at hand and the 2nd Vice President of the American Law Institute. Especially pertinent to today's episode, Professor Laycock argued for Susan Galloway and Linda Stephens, the respondents, in the Supreme Court.

David Cortman serves as senior counsel and vice-president of Religious Liberty with Alliance Defending Freedom at its Atlanta Regional Service Center in Georgia. He also heads litigation efforts to defend and reclaim the First Amendment rights of public school students across the country. Among his many media appearances, Mr. Cortman has been on CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News. Especially pertinent to today's episode, he served as counsel for the Town of Greece, the petitioner, in the Supreme Court.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On May 5th 2014, the Supreme Court decided Greece v. Galloway, a landmark case about the right of prayer in government assemblies. Both sides of the argument invoked the First Amendment to make their case, but who is right and why? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi brings this issue to the forefront with opposing counsels Douglas Laycock, for the respondents, and David Cortman, for the petitioner. Together, they discuss the relative merits of their cases, the endorsement test, and the coercion test. Tune in to hear more about the future of legislative prayer and your First Amendment rights.</p>
<p>Professor Douglas Laycock is a Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law Professor of Religious Studies at University of Virginia School of Law and one of the nation's leading authorities on the law of religious liberty. In addition to teaching for over 30 years, Professor Laycock has testified frequently before Congress and has argued many cases in the courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. Professor Laycock is an accomplished author on the subject at hand and the 2nd Vice President of the American Law Institute. Especially pertinent to today's episode, Professor Laycock argued for Susan Galloway and Linda Stephens, the respondents, in the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>David Cortman serves as senior counsel and vice-president of Religious Liberty with Alliance Defending Freedom at its Atlanta Regional Service Center in Georgia. He also heads litigation efforts to defend and reclaim the First Amendment rights of public school students across the country. Among his many media appearances, Mr. Cortman has been on CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News. Especially pertinent to today's episode, he served as counsel for the Town of Greece, the petitioner, in the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1890</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a988036ea65432e3f29e7997928c6d2a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8377810751.mp3?updated=1623961869" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bryan Garner on the Latest Edition of Black’s Law Dictionary</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/05/bryan-garner-latest-edition-blacks-law-dictionary</link>
      <description>Due out this week is the 10th edition of Black's Law Dictionary. With 16,000 new definitions, 900 new maxims, and terms dated back to their first English usage, Black's Law Dictionary 10th Edition is touted to be the most comprehensive and relevant collection of legal terminology to date. But what goes into making this legal reference and how does it stay relevant in today's world? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Black's Law Dictionary's editor-in-chief Professor Bryan A. Garner. Together they discuss the army of 300 professionals and scholars who deciphered true meanings from historic documents, ancient language, and modern usage. Tune in to hear Garner describe what goes into updating Black's and why he believes attorneys will continue to use it for generations to come.

Bryan A. Garner is a U.S. lawyer, lexicographer, and teacher who has written several books about English usage and style, including Garner's Modern American Usage and Elements of Legal Style. He has served as editor-in-chief of Black's Law Dictionary since 1995, and coauthored two books with Justice Antonin Scalia: Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges, and Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts. Professor Garner is a prolific lecturer, having taught more than 2,500 writing workshops since the 1991 founding of his company, LawProse, Inc., and he is a distinguished Research Professor of Law at Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 21:04:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Bryan Garner on the Latest Edition of Black’s Law Dictionary</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>388</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/de5cc192-cfa9-11eb-92b9-d3ed84e59332/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Due out this week is the 10th edition of Black's Law Dictionary. With 16,000 new definitions, 900 new maxims, and terms dated back to their first English usage, Black's Law Dictionary 10th Edition is touted to be the most comprehensive and relevant...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Due out this week is the 10th edition of Black's Law Dictionary. With 16,000 new definitions, 900 new maxims, and terms dated back to their first English usage, Black's Law Dictionary 10th Edition is touted to be the most comprehensive and relevant collection of legal terminology to date. But what goes into making this legal reference and how does it stay relevant in today's world? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Black's Law Dictionary's editor-in-chief Professor Bryan A. Garner. Together they discuss the army of 300 professionals and scholars who deciphered true meanings from historic documents, ancient language, and modern usage. Tune in to hear Garner describe what goes into updating Black's and why he believes attorneys will continue to use it for generations to come.

Bryan A. Garner is a U.S. lawyer, lexicographer, and teacher who has written several books about English usage and style, including Garner's Modern American Usage and Elements of Legal Style. He has served as editor-in-chief of Black's Law Dictionary since 1995, and coauthored two books with Justice Antonin Scalia: Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges, and Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts. Professor Garner is a prolific lecturer, having taught more than 2,500 writing workshops since the 1991 founding of his company, LawProse, Inc., and he is a distinguished Research Professor of Law at Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Due out this week is the 10th edition of Black's Law Dictionary. With 16,000 new definitions, 900 new maxims, and terms dated back to their first English usage, Black's Law Dictionary 10th Edition is touted to be the most comprehensive and relevant collection of legal terminology to date. But what goes into making this legal reference and how does it stay relevant in today's world? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Black's Law Dictionary's editor-in-chief Professor Bryan A. Garner. Together they discuss the army of 300 professionals and scholars who deciphered true meanings from historic documents, ancient language, and modern usage. Tune in to hear Garner describe what goes into updating Black's and why he believes attorneys will continue to use it for generations to come.</p>
<p>Bryan A. Garner is a U.S. lawyer, lexicographer, and teacher who has written several books about English usage and style, including Garner's Modern American Usage and Elements of Legal Style. He has served as editor-in-chief of Black's Law Dictionary since 1995, and coauthored two books with Justice Antonin Scalia: Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges, and Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts. Professor Garner is a prolific lecturer, having taught more than 2,500 writing workshops since the 1991 founding of his company, LawProse, Inc., and he is a distinguished Research Professor of Law at Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2061</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3325fa2fb830cef61075017d8cd2da6e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8828278732.mp3?updated=1623961869" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gideon’s Promise: Do Low Pay and Heavy Workloads Undermine the Right to Counsel?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/04/gideons-promise-low-pay-heavy-workloads-undermine-right-counsel</link>
      <description>In its landmark 1963 decision Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court mandated the right to counsel in federal and state criminal proceedings. Fifty-one years after that unanimous decision, some question whether Gideon's promise has been fulfilled, as public defenders struggle against heavy caseloads, limited resources and low pay. On this episode of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Jonathan Rapping, founder of the Atlanta-based public defender training program Gideon's Promise, and Dawn Porter, director and producer of the documentary Gideon's Army. Together they discuss the daily rigors faced by public defenders in the south, their personal beliefs about unequal access to justice, and their ideas about how to better deliver on the promise of Gideon.

Jonathan Rapping is the president and founder of Gideon's Promise, a training and support group for public defenders in the south aimed at creating greater access to justice for indigent defendants. He is also the director of the Honors Program in Criminal Justice at Atlanta's John Marshall Law School, where he teaches criminal law and criminal procedure. Rapping is the former director of public defender training programs in the District of Columbia, Georgia, and Louisiana. He is the recipient of the Lincoln Leadership Award from Kentucky's Department of Public Advocacy, the Sentencing Project Award from the National Association of Sentencing Advocates and Mitigation Specialists, and the Gideon's Promise Award from the Southern Center for Human Rights.

Dawn Porter is a lawyer and the founder of Trilogy Films. She was the director and producer of the award-winning Gideon's Army, a documentary about public defenders associated with Gideon's Promise, which premiered at the 2013 Sundance Film Festival and aired on HBO Documentary Films. Prior to beginning her film and television career, Porter worked as an attorney at Baker and Hostetler and ABC Television Network. Among her many projects, she directed "Spies of Mississippi," a documentary on PBS about celebrity Chef Alexandra Guarnaschelli; produced "Serious Moonlight" starring Meg Ryan and Timothy Hutton; and produced "The Green," an independent feature starring Cheyenne Jackson (from 30 Rock) and Emmy-winning actress Julia Ormond.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:02:33 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Gideon’s Promise: Do Low Pay and Heavy Workloads Undermine the Right to Counsel?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>387</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/de7ac048-cfa9-11eb-92b9-239b0a1e13ff/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In its landmark 1963 decision Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court mandated the right to counsel in federal and state criminal proceedings. Fifty-one years after that unanimous decision, some question whether Gideon's promise has been fulfilled, as...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In its landmark 1963 decision Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court mandated the right to counsel in federal and state criminal proceedings. Fifty-one years after that unanimous decision, some question whether Gideon's promise has been fulfilled, as public defenders struggle against heavy caseloads, limited resources and low pay. On this episode of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Jonathan Rapping, founder of the Atlanta-based public defender training program Gideon's Promise, and Dawn Porter, director and producer of the documentary Gideon's Army. Together they discuss the daily rigors faced by public defenders in the south, their personal beliefs about unequal access to justice, and their ideas about how to better deliver on the promise of Gideon.

Jonathan Rapping is the president and founder of Gideon's Promise, a training and support group for public defenders in the south aimed at creating greater access to justice for indigent defendants. He is also the director of the Honors Program in Criminal Justice at Atlanta's John Marshall Law School, where he teaches criminal law and criminal procedure. Rapping is the former director of public defender training programs in the District of Columbia, Georgia, and Louisiana. He is the recipient of the Lincoln Leadership Award from Kentucky's Department of Public Advocacy, the Sentencing Project Award from the National Association of Sentencing Advocates and Mitigation Specialists, and the Gideon's Promise Award from the Southern Center for Human Rights.

Dawn Porter is a lawyer and the founder of Trilogy Films. She was the director and producer of the award-winning Gideon's Army, a documentary about public defenders associated with Gideon's Promise, which premiered at the 2013 Sundance Film Festival and aired on HBO Documentary Films. Prior to beginning her film and television career, Porter worked as an attorney at Baker and Hostetler and ABC Television Network. Among her many projects, she directed "Spies of Mississippi," a documentary on PBS about celebrity Chef Alexandra Guarnaschelli; produced "Serious Moonlight" starring Meg Ryan and Timothy Hutton; and produced "The Green," an independent feature starring Cheyenne Jackson (from 30 Rock) and Emmy-winning actress Julia Ormond.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In its landmark 1963 decision Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court mandated the right to counsel in federal and state criminal proceedings. Fifty-one years after that unanimous decision, some question whether Gideon's promise has been fulfilled, as public defenders struggle against heavy caseloads, limited resources and low pay. On this episode of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Jonathan Rapping, founder of the Atlanta-based public defender training program Gideon's Promise, and Dawn Porter, director and producer of the documentary Gideon's Army. Together they discuss the daily rigors faced by public defenders in the south, their personal beliefs about unequal access to justice, and their ideas about how to better deliver on the promise of Gideon.</p>
<p>Jonathan Rapping is the president and founder of Gideon's Promise, a training and support group for public defenders in the south aimed at creating greater access to justice for indigent defendants. He is also the director of the Honors Program in Criminal Justice at Atlanta's John Marshall Law School, where he teaches criminal law and criminal procedure. Rapping is the former director of public defender training programs in the District of Columbia, Georgia, and Louisiana. He is the recipient of the Lincoln Leadership Award from Kentucky's Department of Public Advocacy, the Sentencing Project Award from the National Association of Sentencing Advocates and Mitigation Specialists, and the Gideon's Promise Award from the Southern Center for Human Rights.</p>
<p>Dawn Porter is a lawyer and the founder of Trilogy Films. She was the director and producer of the award-winning Gideon's Army, a documentary about public defenders associated with Gideon's Promise, which premiered at the 2013 Sundance Film Festival and aired on HBO Documentary Films. Prior to beginning her film and television career, Porter worked as an attorney at Baker and Hostetler and ABC Television Network. Among her many projects, she directed "Spies of Mississippi," a documentary on PBS about celebrity Chef Alexandra Guarnaschelli; produced "Serious Moonlight" starring Meg Ryan and Timothy Hutton; and produced "The Green," an independent feature starring Cheyenne Jackson (from 30 Rock) and Emmy-winning actress Julia Ormond.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2164</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9ac3988c5b935f444dbc063341a20b4f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7245231986.mp3?updated=1624285460" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Revenge Porn: Criminal Legislation vs. Rights and Freedoms</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/04/revenge-porn-criminal-legislation-vs-rights-freedoms</link>
      <description>Six states have passed laws to address revenge porn, but critics say those laws may infringe upon First Amendment rights and subject people to needless criminal prosecution. Critics of anti-revenge porn laws believe the laws as drafted are overly broad, fail to exempt acceptable behavior, and create a chilling effect on otherwise legal expression. On this follow up episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Lee Rowland from the ACLU and Marc Randazza from the Randazza Legal Group. Together we discuss the potentially harmful components of non-consensual porn legislation and consider alternative avenues of redress for victims. Professor Mary Anne Franks of the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, a proponent of criminalizing revenge porn, joins us for the second half to debate criticisms of these laws. Tune in for a spirited debate about free speech, over-criminalization, and the proper way to address the troubling issue of revenge porn.

For part one of this two-part series, please listen to Revenge Porn: Societal Costs and Legislative Solutions.

Lee Rowland is a Staff Attorney with the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. Prior to joining the ACLU, she was a voting rights counsel with the Brennan Center for Justice, where she successfully represented the League of Women Voters of Florida and others in constitutional challenges to Florida's 2011 election law. Rowland previously ran the Reno office of the ACLU of Nevada, where she regularly argued before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Nevada Supreme Court.

Marc Randazza is a First Amendment lawyer for the Randazza Legal Group located in Las Vegas, Nevada. A graduate of Georgetown University Law Center, he found his passion for the First Amendment while attending the University of Massachusetts at Amherst Journalism Program. Randazza has law offices in five states and represents both adult entertainment companies and private individuals. He is a regular contributor to news sources such as CNN and Fox News, and is a frequent commentator on legal issues to the international media.

Professor Mary Anne Franks is the Vice President of Cyber Civil Rights Initiative and an Associate Professor of Law at the University of Miami School of Law. She holds a Juris Doctor degree from Harvard Law School and prior to her teaching career, obtained both her Masters and Ph.D. in Modern Languages and Literature as a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford University. As part of her continuing efforts with the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, she works with state legislatures to draft legislation against non-consensual pornography.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 21:15:59 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Revenge Porn: Criminal Legislation vs. Rights and Freedoms</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>386</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/de9ebc82-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5f2a436b513b/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Six states have passed laws to address revenge porn, but critics say those laws may infringe upon First Amendment rights and subject people to needless criminal prosecution. Critics of anti-revenge porn laws believe the laws as drafted are overly...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Six states have passed laws to address revenge porn, but critics say those laws may infringe upon First Amendment rights and subject people to needless criminal prosecution. Critics of anti-revenge porn laws believe the laws as drafted are overly broad, fail to exempt acceptable behavior, and create a chilling effect on otherwise legal expression. On this follow up episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Lee Rowland from the ACLU and Marc Randazza from the Randazza Legal Group. Together we discuss the potentially harmful components of non-consensual porn legislation and consider alternative avenues of redress for victims. Professor Mary Anne Franks of the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, a proponent of criminalizing revenge porn, joins us for the second half to debate criticisms of these laws. Tune in for a spirited debate about free speech, over-criminalization, and the proper way to address the troubling issue of revenge porn.

For part one of this two-part series, please listen to Revenge Porn: Societal Costs and Legislative Solutions.

Lee Rowland is a Staff Attorney with the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. Prior to joining the ACLU, she was a voting rights counsel with the Brennan Center for Justice, where she successfully represented the League of Women Voters of Florida and others in constitutional challenges to Florida's 2011 election law. Rowland previously ran the Reno office of the ACLU of Nevada, where she regularly argued before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Nevada Supreme Court.

Marc Randazza is a First Amendment lawyer for the Randazza Legal Group located in Las Vegas, Nevada. A graduate of Georgetown University Law Center, he found his passion for the First Amendment while attending the University of Massachusetts at Amherst Journalism Program. Randazza has law offices in five states and represents both adult entertainment companies and private individuals. He is a regular contributor to news sources such as CNN and Fox News, and is a frequent commentator on legal issues to the international media.

Professor Mary Anne Franks is the Vice President of Cyber Civil Rights Initiative and an Associate Professor of Law at the University of Miami School of Law. She holds a Juris Doctor degree from Harvard Law School and prior to her teaching career, obtained both her Masters and Ph.D. in Modern Languages and Literature as a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford University. As part of her continuing efforts with the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, she works with state legislatures to draft legislation against non-consensual pornography.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Six states have passed laws to address revenge porn, but critics say those laws may infringe upon First Amendment rights and subject people to needless criminal prosecution. Critics of anti-revenge porn laws believe the laws as drafted are overly broad, fail to exempt acceptable behavior, and create a chilling effect on otherwise legal expression. On this follow up episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Lee Rowland from the ACLU and Marc Randazza from the Randazza Legal Group. Together we discuss the potentially harmful components of non-consensual porn legislation and consider alternative avenues of redress for victims. Professor Mary Anne Franks of the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, a proponent of criminalizing revenge porn, joins us for the second half to debate criticisms of these laws. Tune in for a spirited debate about free speech, over-criminalization, and the proper way to address the troubling issue of revenge porn.</p>
<p>For part one of this two-part series, please listen to Revenge Porn: Societal Costs and Legislative Solutions.</p>
<p>Lee Rowland is a Staff Attorney with the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. Prior to joining the ACLU, she was a voting rights counsel with the Brennan Center for Justice, where she successfully represented the League of Women Voters of Florida and others in constitutional challenges to Florida's 2011 election law. Rowland previously ran the Reno office of the ACLU of Nevada, where she regularly argued before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Nevada Supreme Court.</p>
<p>Marc Randazza is a First Amendment lawyer for the Randazza Legal Group located in Las Vegas, Nevada. A graduate of Georgetown University Law Center, he found his passion for the First Amendment while attending the University of Massachusetts at Amherst Journalism Program. Randazza has law offices in five states and represents both adult entertainment companies and private individuals. He is a regular contributor to news sources such as CNN and Fox News, and is a frequent commentator on legal issues to the international media.</p>
<p>Professor Mary Anne Franks is the Vice President of Cyber Civil Rights Initiative and an Associate Professor of Law at the University of Miami School of Law. She holds a Juris Doctor degree from Harvard Law School and prior to her teaching career, obtained both her Masters and Ph.D. in Modern Languages and Literature as a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford University. As part of her continuing efforts with the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, she works with state legislatures to draft legislation against non-consensual pornography.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2572</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[249ec80003d7f7354bbee900eea576d7]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9441032553.mp3?updated=1623961870" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Revenge Porn: Societal Costs and Legislative Solutions</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/03/revenge-porn-societal-costs-legislative-solutions</link>
      <description>The non-consensual posting of nude or sexual media by one person of another is known as Revenge Porn. Many victims report that this practice has had detrimental effects on their lives. Of those surveyed, 90 percent are women and 49 percent say they've been stalked or harassed. Despite the growing number of reports, most states' laws do not address the issue. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview victim-advocate Dr. Holly Jacobs, a victim of revenge porn herself, and Professor Mary Anne Franks, both of the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative. Together, they discuss the technical aspects of various states' laws that allow some types of posts while forbidding others. Many factors and technicalities, including who took the picture, how the image or video was obtained, and who posted it, can dictate whether posting the item was illegal. Tune in to this very special episode to learn what individual states and the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative are doing to combat Revenge Porn. A follow up episode with guest Lee Rowland from the American Civil Liberties Union will examine other legal issues regarding Revenge Porn. It will be released on April 8th.

Dr. Holly Jacobs is the Founder, President, and Executive Director of Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, which is the parent organization for the End Revenge Porn Campaign. She is a national commentator and writer on the subject and holds a PhD in Industrial/Organizational Psychology. While pursuing her graduate degrees, Jacobs became a victim of revenge porn and has since dedicated her life towards providing resources and advocacy to victims of online harassment.

Professor Mary Anne Franks is the Vice President of Cyber Civil Rights Initiative and an Associate Professor of Law at the University of Miami School of Law. She holds a JD from Harvard Law School and prior to her teaching career, obtained both her Masters and PhD in Modern Languages and Literature as a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford University. As part of her continuing efforts with the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, she works with state legislatures to draft legislation against non-consensual pornography.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Revenge Porn: Societal Costs and Legislative Solutions</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>385</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/def71eb8-cfa9-11eb-92b9-d78c74dd7a47/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The non-consensual posting of nude or sexual media by one person of another is known as Revenge Porn. Many victims report that this practice has had detrimental effects on their lives. Of those surveyed, 90 percent are women and 49 percent say they've...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The non-consensual posting of nude or sexual media by one person of another is known as Revenge Porn. Many victims report that this practice has had detrimental effects on their lives. Of those surveyed, 90 percent are women and 49 percent say they've been stalked or harassed. Despite the growing number of reports, most states' laws do not address the issue. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview victim-advocate Dr. Holly Jacobs, a victim of revenge porn herself, and Professor Mary Anne Franks, both of the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative. Together, they discuss the technical aspects of various states' laws that allow some types of posts while forbidding others. Many factors and technicalities, including who took the picture, how the image or video was obtained, and who posted it, can dictate whether posting the item was illegal. Tune in to this very special episode to learn what individual states and the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative are doing to combat Revenge Porn. A follow up episode with guest Lee Rowland from the American Civil Liberties Union will examine other legal issues regarding Revenge Porn. It will be released on April 8th.

Dr. Holly Jacobs is the Founder, President, and Executive Director of Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, which is the parent organization for the End Revenge Porn Campaign. She is a national commentator and writer on the subject and holds a PhD in Industrial/Organizational Psychology. While pursuing her graduate degrees, Jacobs became a victim of revenge porn and has since dedicated her life towards providing resources and advocacy to victims of online harassment.

Professor Mary Anne Franks is the Vice President of Cyber Civil Rights Initiative and an Associate Professor of Law at the University of Miami School of Law. She holds a JD from Harvard Law School and prior to her teaching career, obtained both her Masters and PhD in Modern Languages and Literature as a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford University. As part of her continuing efforts with the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, she works with state legislatures to draft legislation against non-consensual pornography.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The non-consensual posting of nude or sexual media by one person of another is known as Revenge Porn. Many victims report that this practice has had detrimental effects on their lives. Of those surveyed, 90 percent are women and 49 percent say they've been stalked or harassed. Despite the growing number of reports, most states' laws do not address the issue. On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview victim-advocate Dr. Holly Jacobs, a victim of revenge porn herself, and Professor Mary Anne Franks, both of the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative. Together, they discuss the technical aspects of various states' laws that allow some types of posts while forbidding others. Many factors and technicalities, including who took the picture, how the image or video was obtained, and who posted it, can dictate whether posting the item was illegal. Tune in to this very special episode to learn what individual states and the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative are doing to combat Revenge Porn. A follow up episode with guest Lee Rowland from the American Civil Liberties Union will examine other legal issues regarding Revenge Porn. It will be released on April 8th.</p>
<p>Dr. Holly Jacobs is the Founder, President, and Executive Director of Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, which is the parent organization for the End Revenge Porn Campaign. She is a national commentator and writer on the subject and holds a PhD in Industrial/Organizational Psychology. While pursuing her graduate degrees, Jacobs became a victim of revenge porn and has since dedicated her life towards providing resources and advocacy to victims of online harassment.</p>
<p>Professor Mary Anne Franks is the Vice President of Cyber Civil Rights Initiative and an Associate Professor of Law at the University of Miami School of Law. She holds a JD from Harvard Law School and prior to her teaching career, obtained both her Masters and PhD in Modern Languages and Literature as a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford University. As part of her continuing efforts with the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, she works with state legislatures to draft legislation against non-consensual pornography.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2029</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4d3ef374c613a89fdd73fa253c8e529c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4666093723.mp3?updated=1623961870" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Ramifications of NSA Monitoring on Attorney-Client Privilege and the Bill of Rights</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/03/ramifications-nsa-monitoring-attorney-client-privilege-bill-rights</link>
      <description>Attorney-Client Privilege predates US history and is a fixture of Western Law. Pro advocates of its proliferation declare its necessity to a fair and adequate defense. According to many legal experts, NSA monitoring of privileged attorney-client communications stands in direct violation to the United States Bill of Rights and yet others disagree. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams shed light on this issue with guests Dean Erwin Chemerinsky of the University of California, Irvine School of Law and Dr. John Eastman of Chapman University Fowler School of Law.

Erwin Chemerinsky is the founding Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, and Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, at the University of California, Irvine School of Law. His areas of expertise include, but are not limited to, constitutional law, federal practice, and civil rights. Erwin is a renowned author of seven books and nearly 200 articles in top law reviews. He has argued before the nation's highest courts and has been counsel to detainees in Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp in the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba. He is also a regular commentator on legal issues before the national and local media.

Dr. John Eastman is the Henry Salvatori Professor of Law and Community Service at Chapman University Fowler School of Law. He was the School's Dean from June 2007 to January 2010, when he stepped down to pursue a bid for California Attorney General. John is the Founding Director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, former law clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas, and has served as the Director of Congressional and Public Affairs at the United States Commission on Civil Rights during the Reagan administration. He is also a regular commentator on legal issues before the national and local media.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:25:42 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Ramifications of NSA Monitoring on Attorney-Client Privilege and the Bill of Rights</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>384</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/df1ae08c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-f354a5c58d4b/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Attorney-Client Privilege predates US history and is a fixture of Western Law. Pro advocates of its proliferation declare its necessity to a fair and adequate defense. According to many legal experts, NSA monitoring of privileged attorney-client...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Attorney-Client Privilege predates US history and is a fixture of Western Law. Pro advocates of its proliferation declare its necessity to a fair and adequate defense. According to many legal experts, NSA monitoring of privileged attorney-client communications stands in direct violation to the United States Bill of Rights and yet others disagree. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams shed light on this issue with guests Dean Erwin Chemerinsky of the University of California, Irvine School of Law and Dr. John Eastman of Chapman University Fowler School of Law.

Erwin Chemerinsky is the founding Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, and Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, at the University of California, Irvine School of Law. His areas of expertise include, but are not limited to, constitutional law, federal practice, and civil rights. Erwin is a renowned author of seven books and nearly 200 articles in top law reviews. He has argued before the nation's highest courts and has been counsel to detainees in Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp in the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba. He is also a regular commentator on legal issues before the national and local media.

Dr. John Eastman is the Henry Salvatori Professor of Law and Community Service at Chapman University Fowler School of Law. He was the School's Dean from June 2007 to January 2010, when he stepped down to pursue a bid for California Attorney General. John is the Founding Director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, former law clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas, and has served as the Director of Congressional and Public Affairs at the United States Commission on Civil Rights during the Reagan administration. He is also a regular commentator on legal issues before the national and local media.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Attorney-Client Privilege predates US history and is a fixture of Western Law. Pro advocates of its proliferation declare its necessity to a fair and adequate defense. According to many legal experts, NSA monitoring of privileged attorney-client communications stands in direct violation to the United States Bill of Rights and yet others disagree. In this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams shed light on this issue with guests Dean Erwin Chemerinsky of the University of California, Irvine School of Law and Dr. John Eastman of Chapman University Fowler School of Law.</p>
<p>Erwin Chemerinsky is the founding Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, and Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, at the University of California, Irvine School of Law. His areas of expertise include, but are not limited to, constitutional law, federal practice, and civil rights. Erwin is a renowned author of seven books and nearly 200 articles in top law reviews. He has argued before the nation's highest courts and has been counsel to detainees in Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp in the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba. He is also a regular commentator on legal issues before the national and local media.</p>
<p>Dr. John Eastman is the Henry Salvatori Professor of Law and Community Service at Chapman University Fowler School of Law. He was the School's Dean from June 2007 to January 2010, when he stepped down to pursue a bid for California Attorney General. John is the Founding Director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, former law clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas, and has served as the Director of Congressional and Public Affairs at the United States Commission on Civil Rights during the Reagan administration. He is also a regular commentator on legal issues before the national and local media.</p>
<p>Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1789</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0316d5d8ccc1c526d829ba816fce27ec]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5905615648.mp3?updated=1623961870" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Marijuana, Federal Law, and the States: The Great Legal Divide</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/02/marijuana-federal-law-states-great-legal-divide</link>
      <description>Federal law bans marijuana nationwide and yet some states have decided to license its trade. So, where does this leave citizens, local government, and attorneys who work in the cannabis industry? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Brian Vicente, Dan Riffle and Kathy Haddock to discuss the challenges and liabilities that persist in the void between federal and state drug laws.

Brian Vicente is a Colorado criminal defense attorney and founding partner of Vicente Sederberg. He also serves as Executive Director for Sensible Colorado, chairs the Denver Mayor's Marijuana Policy Review Panel, and coordinates the Colorado Bar Association's Drug Policy Project.

Dan Riffle is a former assistant prosecutor for Vinton County, Ohio who has turned lobbyist on Capitol Hill. He currently serves as the Director of Federal Policies for Marijuana Policy Project and has shepherded 2013 legislation through Illinois making it the second largest medical marijuana state.

Kathy Haddock is the Senior Assistant City Attorney for the City of Boulder, Colorado. She is primarily responsible for advising finance, records, elections, airport, special districts, and special projects including medical and recreational marijuana. She has also been responsible for drafting the laws that license and govern medical marijuana businesses in Boulder, Colorado.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:49:17 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Marijuana, Federal Law, and the States: The Great Legal Divide</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>383</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/df3efcce-cfa9-11eb-92b9-ffde7978ff04/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Federal law bans marijuana nationwide and yet some states have decided to license its trade. So, where does this leave citizens, local government, and attorneys who work in the cannabis industry? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Federal law bans marijuana nationwide and yet some states have decided to license its trade. So, where does this leave citizens, local government, and attorneys who work in the cannabis industry? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Brian Vicente, Dan Riffle and Kathy Haddock to discuss the challenges and liabilities that persist in the void between federal and state drug laws.

Brian Vicente is a Colorado criminal defense attorney and founding partner of Vicente Sederberg. He also serves as Executive Director for Sensible Colorado, chairs the Denver Mayor's Marijuana Policy Review Panel, and coordinates the Colorado Bar Association's Drug Policy Project.

Dan Riffle is a former assistant prosecutor for Vinton County, Ohio who has turned lobbyist on Capitol Hill. He currently serves as the Director of Federal Policies for Marijuana Policy Project and has shepherded 2013 legislation through Illinois making it the second largest medical marijuana state.

Kathy Haddock is the Senior Assistant City Attorney for the City of Boulder, Colorado. She is primarily responsible for advising finance, records, elections, airport, special districts, and special projects including medical and recreational marijuana. She has also been responsible for drafting the laws that license and govern medical marijuana businesses in Boulder, Colorado.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Federal law bans marijuana nationwide and yet some states have decided to license its trade. So, where does this leave citizens, local government, and attorneys who work in the cannabis industry? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Brian Vicente, Dan Riffle and Kathy Haddock to discuss the challenges and liabilities that persist in the void between federal and state drug laws.</p>
<p>Brian Vicente is a Colorado criminal defense attorney and founding partner of Vicente Sederberg. He also serves as Executive Director for Sensible Colorado, chairs the Denver Mayor's Marijuana Policy Review Panel, and coordinates the Colorado Bar Association's Drug Policy Project.</p>
<p>Dan Riffle is a former assistant prosecutor for Vinton County, Ohio who has turned lobbyist on Capitol Hill. He currently serves as the Director of Federal Policies for Marijuana Policy Project and has shepherded 2013 legislation through Illinois making it the second largest medical marijuana state.</p>
<p>Kathy Haddock is the Senior Assistant City Attorney for the City of Boulder, Colorado. She is primarily responsible for advising finance, records, elections, airport, special districts, and special projects including medical and recreational marijuana. She has also been responsible for drafting the laws that license and govern medical marijuana businesses in Boulder, Colorado.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1817</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a0326982775f53055e8490deb533a875]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8321023187.mp3?updated=1623961870" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Enhanced 911, The FCC, and a Grandfather’s Mandate for Direct Dial</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/02/enhanced-911-fcc-grandfathers-mandate-direct-dial</link>
      <description>In an emergency, seconds count. What if you couldn't call 911 because you couldn't reach an outside line? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Henry "Hank" Hunt, the man petitioning for Kari's Law, and FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai. Together they discuss the importance of uniform dialing for 911.

Henry Hunt's nine year old granddaughter, through no fault of her own, could not reach 911 to save her mother. Despite her multiple attempts, the calls would not connect because the hotel's phone system required dialing 9 to get an outside line. In the wake of these events, this Texas grandfather started the Kari's Law petition which calls for mandated direct-dial 911.

Ajit Pai serves as FCC Commissioner focusing on regulatory environments where competition and innovation flourish. He is the former Associate General Counsel at Verizon. In addition, he has served as Senior Counsel with the Department of Justice and Chief Counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Property Rights.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:03:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Enhanced 911, The FCC, and a Grandfather’s Mandate for Direct Dial</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>382</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/df656224-cfa9-11eb-92b9-b7d6aa9b1846/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In an emergency, seconds count. What if you couldn't call 911 because you couldn't reach an outside line? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Henry "Hank" Hunt, the man petitioning for Kari's Law, and FCC Commissioner...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In an emergency, seconds count. What if you couldn't call 911 because you couldn't reach an outside line? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Henry "Hank" Hunt, the man petitioning for Kari's Law, and FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai. Together they discuss the importance of uniform dialing for 911.

Henry Hunt's nine year old granddaughter, through no fault of her own, could not reach 911 to save her mother. Despite her multiple attempts, the calls would not connect because the hotel's phone system required dialing 9 to get an outside line. In the wake of these events, this Texas grandfather started the Kari's Law petition which calls for mandated direct-dial 911.

Ajit Pai serves as FCC Commissioner focusing on regulatory environments where competition and innovation flourish. He is the former Associate General Counsel at Verizon. In addition, he has served as Senior Counsel with the Department of Justice and Chief Counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Property Rights.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In an emergency, seconds count. What if you couldn't call 911 because you couldn't reach an outside line? On this episode of Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host J. Craig Williams interviews Henry "Hank" Hunt, the man petitioning for Kari's Law, and FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai. Together they discuss the importance of uniform dialing for 911.</p>
<p>Henry Hunt's nine year old granddaughter, through no fault of her own, could not reach 911 to save her mother. Despite her multiple attempts, the calls would not connect because the hotel's phone system required dialing 9 to get an outside line. In the wake of these events, this Texas grandfather started the Kari's Law petition which calls for mandated direct-dial 911.</p>
<p>Ajit Pai serves as FCC Commissioner focusing on regulatory environments where competition and innovation flourish. He is the former Associate General Counsel at Verizon. In addition, he has served as Senior Counsel with the Department of Justice and Chief Counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Property Rights.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1666</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ab660a8704fed4bbb0674c23796a0fa2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2348752921.mp3?updated=1624285468" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Diploma Privilege: Why Some Believe Bar Exams Should be Eliminated</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/01/diploma-privilege-believe-bar-exams-eliminated/</link>
      <description>Are Bar Exams really necessary? The Iowa State Bar Association isn't so sure. In this episode of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Iowa State Bar Association President Guy Cook and Clinical Professor of Law John Whiston to learn why Iowa could soon offer Diploma Privilege for its law graduates. Cook is the current president of the Iowa State Bar Association. He is an Iowa native who has been practicing law for over 30 years. Guy is a board certified trial attorney, former federal prosecutor, and senior partner for Grefe and Sidney, P.L.C. where he practices exclusively in litigation. He also serves on the Board of Counselors of Drake University Law School. Whiston is a clinical professor of law at The University of Iowa College of Law. He teaches in the Clinical Legal Programs as well as courses in Evidence, Deposition Practice, Worker's Compensation, and Trial Advocacy. John is a former partner with Rossbach and Whiston, P.C. and has been admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:57:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Diploma Privilege: Why Some Believe Bar Exams Should be Eliminated</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>381</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/df877f44-cfa9-11eb-92b9-d777625018ab/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Are Bar Exams really necessary? The Iowa State Bar Association isn't so sure. In this episode of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Iowa State Bar Association President Guy Cook and Clinical Professor of Law John Whiston...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Are Bar Exams really necessary? The Iowa State Bar Association isn't so sure. In this episode of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Iowa State Bar Association President Guy Cook and Clinical Professor of Law John Whiston to learn why Iowa could soon offer Diploma Privilege for its law graduates. Cook is the current president of the Iowa State Bar Association. He is an Iowa native who has been practicing law for over 30 years. Guy is a board certified trial attorney, former federal prosecutor, and senior partner for Grefe and Sidney, P.L.C. where he practices exclusively in litigation. He also serves on the Board of Counselors of Drake University Law School. Whiston is a clinical professor of law at The University of Iowa College of Law. He teaches in the Clinical Legal Programs as well as courses in Evidence, Deposition Practice, Worker's Compensation, and Trial Advocacy. John is a former partner with Rossbach and Whiston, P.C. and has been admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Are Bar Exams really necessary? The Iowa State Bar Association isn't so sure. In this episode of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams interview Iowa State Bar Association President Guy Cook and Clinical Professor of Law John Whiston to learn why Iowa could soon offer Diploma Privilege for its law graduates. Cook is the current president of the Iowa State Bar Association. He is an Iowa native who has been practicing law for over 30 years. Guy is a board certified trial attorney, former federal prosecutor, and senior partner for Grefe and Sidney, P.L.C. where he practices exclusively in litigation. He also serves on the Board of Counselors of Drake University Law School. Whiston is a clinical professor of law at The University of Iowa College of Law. He teaches in the Clinical Legal Programs as well as courses in Evidence, Deposition Practice, Worker's Compensation, and Trial Advocacy. John is a former partner with Rossbach and Whiston, P.C. and has been admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1685</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[324b6953490a9b605307ffb723f9e517]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4311401239.mp3?updated=1623961871" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Issues Behind Bitcoin's Rise in Value and Popularity</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2014/01/legal-issues-behind-bitcoins-rise-value-popularity/</link>
      <description>If you had bought $1,000 worth of Bitcoins in 2010, you would have $2.4 million dollars today. The anonymous, Internet-based currency has seen an exponential rise in value and popularity since its inception in 2009. This raises legal questions regarding the legitimacy, the legalities, and what lawyers need to know about this new currency. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite Bitcoin experts, attorney Lowell D. Ness and journalist Kashmir Hill, to provide some answers and a foretelling of the e-currency's future. Ness is a partner of the nationwide law firm Perkins Coie which has extensive experience in virtual currency. The firm's Virtual Currency Report Blog, which Lowell regularly contributes to, provides a legal outlook on the state of bitcoin and the market. Lowell's practice focuses on high-growth emerging companies and involves venture capital financings, mergers and acquisitions, public offerings, and private placements. Senior Online Editor of Forbes, Hill is a privacy pragmatist with an interest in the intersection of law, technology, social media, and personal information. Former editor of Above the Law, she has been following the Bitcoin story from the start, and will be releasing an e-book documenting Bitcoin's rise later this year. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:16:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Issues Behind Bitcoin's Rise in Value and Popularity</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>380</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dfa871c2-cfa9-11eb-92b9-23cf9d94f6d7/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>If you had bought $1,000 worth of Bitcoins in 2010, you would have $2.4 million dollars today. The anonymous, Internet-based currency has seen an exponential rise in value and popularity since its inception in 2009. This raises legal questions...</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>If you had bought $1,000 worth of Bitcoins in 2010, you would have $2.4 million dollars today. The anonymous, Internet-based currency has seen an exponential rise in value and popularity since its inception in 2009. This raises legal questions regarding the legitimacy, the legalities, and what lawyers need to know about this new currency. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite Bitcoin experts, attorney Lowell D. Ness and journalist Kashmir Hill, to provide some answers and a foretelling of the e-currency's future. Ness is a partner of the nationwide law firm Perkins Coie which has extensive experience in virtual currency. The firm's Virtual Currency Report Blog, which Lowell regularly contributes to, provides a legal outlook on the state of bitcoin and the market. Lowell's practice focuses on high-growth emerging companies and involves venture capital financings, mergers and acquisitions, public offerings, and private placements. Senior Online Editor of Forbes, Hill is a privacy pragmatist with an interest in the intersection of law, technology, social media, and personal information. Former editor of Above the Law, she has been following the Bitcoin story from the start, and will be releasing an e-book documenting Bitcoin's rise later this year. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>If you had bought $1,000 worth of Bitcoins in 2010, you would have $2.4 million dollars today. The anonymous, Internet-based currency has seen an exponential rise in value and popularity since its inception in 2009. This raises legal questions regarding the legitimacy, the legalities, and what lawyers need to know about this new currency. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite Bitcoin experts, attorney Lowell D. Ness and journalist Kashmir Hill, to provide some answers and a foretelling of the e-currency's future. Ness is a partner of the nationwide law firm Perkins Coie which has extensive experience in virtual currency. The firm's Virtual Currency Report Blog, which Lowell regularly contributes to, provides a legal outlook on the state of bitcoin and the market. Lowell's practice focuses on high-growth emerging companies and involves venture capital financings, mergers and acquisitions, public offerings, and private placements. Senior Online Editor of Forbes, Hill is a privacy pragmatist with an interest in the intersection of law, technology, social media, and personal information. Former editor of Above the Law, she has been following the Bitcoin story from the start, and will be releasing an e-book documenting Bitcoin's rise later this year. Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1663</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f64c58802dc63976fdd6fd326faa03d9]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7177141554.mp3?updated=1624285456" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Top Legal Stories of 2013</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/12/top-legal-stories-of-2013</link>
      <description>In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite Allen Pusey and Molly McDonough of the ABA Journal to recap the past year’s legal news. Consider this a crash course on news stories such as Edward Snowden, gun control, and Obamacare. The discussion will not only cover the top stories of the year but also find the common themes in this year’s news and foretell what to keep an eye on in 2014.

Pusey has been with the ABA Journal since 2007 and was named editor and publisher in 2011. Prior to the ABA Journal, he worked for 26 years at the Dallas Morning News as an investigative reporter, feature writer, special projects editor, and U.S. Supreme Court correspondent.

McDonough is the deputy managing editor of the ABA Journal. She currently oversees online operations and special projects, including the Legal Rebels series and the annual Blawg 100. Molly has covered the courts and the legal profession for more than 20 years. She has been a reporter and editor for the National Law Journal, as well as a reporter for many other news sources.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 10:40:05 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Top Legal Stories of 2013</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>379</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dfc62cda-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5bccd001dd0c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Top Legal Stories of 2013</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite Allen Pusey and Molly McDonough of the ABA Journal to recap the past year’s legal news. Consider this a crash course on news stories such as Edward Snowden, gun control, and Obamacare. The discussion will not only cover the top stories of the year but also find the common themes in this year’s news and foretell what to keep an eye on in 2014.

Pusey has been with the ABA Journal since 2007 and was named editor and publisher in 2011. Prior to the ABA Journal, he worked for 26 years at the Dallas Morning News as an investigative reporter, feature writer, special projects editor, and U.S. Supreme Court correspondent.

McDonough is the deputy managing editor of the ABA Journal. She currently oversees online operations and special projects, including the Legal Rebels series and the annual Blawg 100. Molly has covered the courts and the legal profession for more than 20 years. She has been a reporter and editor for the National Law Journal, as well as a reporter for many other news sources.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite Allen Pusey and Molly McDonough of the ABA Journal to recap the past year’s legal news. Consider this a crash course on news stories such as Edward Snowden, gun control, and Obamacare. The discussion will not only cover the top stories of the year but also find the common themes in this year’s news and foretell what to keep an eye on in 2014.<br>
<br>
Pusey has been with the ABA Journal since 2007 and was named editor and publisher in 2011. Prior to the ABA Journal, he worked for 26 years at the Dallas Morning News as an investigative reporter, feature writer, special projects editor, and U.S. Supreme Court correspondent.<br>
<br>
McDonough is the deputy managing editor of the ABA Journal. She currently oversees online operations and special projects, including the Legal Rebels series and the annual Blawg 100. Molly has covered the courts and the legal profession for more than 20 years. She has been a reporter and editor for the National Law Journal, as well as a reporter for many other news sources.<br>
<br>
Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1750</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[CACA424C-040E-435C-8AD3-C2DC9DB1EC31-1632-0000070ACE368E14-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8461080900.mp3?updated=1624285467" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Turbulence Facing Amazon’s Drones</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/12/the-legal-turbulence-facing-amazons-drones</link>
      <description>News of Amazon’s plans to use delivery drones surprised many, but the fact is that a number of companies are developing drones for commercial uses. However, before any of these commercial drones can take flight, they need to clear a series of legal hurdles, from winning FAA approval to sorting out liability and privacy issues. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi invites industry lawyer Ben Gielow and Above the Law editor Elie Mystal to discuss the legal issues facing commercial drones and how they are likely to play out.

Ben Gielow is the government relations manager and general counsel for the advocacy sector of the Association of Unmanned Vehicle Systems International. He has been featured in interviews covering the concept of commercial drones since the beginning regarding what legislation and other requirements are necessary for us to see commercial drones in our airways.

Elie Mystal is the editor of Above the Law. A graduate of Harvard Law School, he left his life as a litigator to pursue a career as an online provocateur. He has written editorials for The New York Daily News, The New York Times, and appeared on MSNBC and Fox News.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:52:04 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Turbulence Facing Amazon’s Drones</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>378</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/dfe2d2f4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-e7a348f19ee8/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Legal Turbulence Facing Amazon’s Drones</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>News of Amazon’s plans to use delivery drones surprised many, but the fact is that a number of companies are developing drones for commercial uses. However, before any of these commercial drones can take flight, they need to clear a series of legal hurdles, from winning FAA approval to sorting out liability and privacy issues. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi invites industry lawyer Ben Gielow and Above the Law editor Elie Mystal to discuss the legal issues facing commercial drones and how they are likely to play out.

Ben Gielow is the government relations manager and general counsel for the advocacy sector of the Association of Unmanned Vehicle Systems International. He has been featured in interviews covering the concept of commercial drones since the beginning regarding what legislation and other requirements are necessary for us to see commercial drones in our airways.

Elie Mystal is the editor of Above the Law. A graduate of Harvard Law School, he left his life as a litigator to pursue a career as an online provocateur. He has written editorials for The New York Daily News, The New York Times, and appeared on MSNBC and Fox News.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[News of Amazon’s plans to use delivery drones surprised many, but the fact is that a number of companies are developing drones for commercial uses. However, before any of these commercial drones can take flight, they need to clear a series of legal hurdles, from winning FAA approval to sorting out liability and privacy issues. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi invites industry lawyer Ben Gielow and Above the Law editor Elie Mystal to discuss the legal issues facing commercial drones and how they are likely to play out.<br>
<br>
Ben Gielow is the government relations manager and general counsel for the advocacy sector of the Association of Unmanned Vehicle Systems International. He has been featured in interviews covering the concept of commercial drones since the beginning regarding what legislation and other requirements are necessary for us to see commercial drones in our airways.<br>
<br>
Elie Mystal is the editor of Above the Law. A graduate of Harvard Law School, he left his life as a litigator to pursue a career as an online provocateur. He has written editorials for The New York Daily News, The New York Times, and appeared on MSNBC and Fox News.<br>
<br>
Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1733</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[A7525AF9-41F8-49BE-9D2A-0942D1A58BAF-610-000002A1551C98B5-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4130145137.mp3?updated=1624285468" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google v. Authors Guild: The 8-Year-Legal Battle Comes to a Close</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/12/google-v-authors-guild-the-8-year-legal-battle-comes-to-a-close</link>
      <description>This landmark case, involving Google’s digitization project of scanning 20-million books to make them searchable through the Internet, was decided in favor of Google. “In my mind, this is a fair-use case that we will never see again,” Andrew Albanese, senior writer for Publisher’s Weekly, said, declaring the case a benchmark for future decisions. It was ruled that Google met the requirements of fair use and all four factors in defense of copyright infringement. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams chat with Andrew Albanese about the case, whether this constitutes transformative use, and what this case means for the online-media industry as a whole.

Andrew Albanese has been covering Google vs. Authors Guild since it’s inception in 2005. As senior writer for Publishers Weekly, he focuses on copyright wars and how the Internet is changing protected works. His book, The Battle of $9.99: How Apple, Amazon and the “Big Six” Publishers Changed the E-Book Business Overnight, covered the Apple price-fixing case and the introduction of e-books to society.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 11:50:17 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Google v. Authors Guild: The 8-Year-Legal Battle Comes to a Close</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>377</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e004e632-cfa9-11eb-92b9-6f83e4ddfad2/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Google v. Authors’ Guild: The 8-Year-Legal Battle Comes to a Close</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This landmark case, involving Google’s digitization project of scanning 20-million books to make them searchable through the Internet, was decided in favor of Google. “In my mind, this is a fair-use case that we will never see again,” Andrew Albanese, senior writer for Publisher’s Weekly, said, declaring the case a benchmark for future decisions. It was ruled that Google met the requirements of fair use and all four factors in defense of copyright infringement. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams chat with Andrew Albanese about the case, whether this constitutes transformative use, and what this case means for the online-media industry as a whole.

Andrew Albanese has been covering Google vs. Authors Guild since it’s inception in 2005. As senior writer for Publishers Weekly, he focuses on copyright wars and how the Internet is changing protected works. His book, The Battle of $9.99: How Apple, Amazon and the “Big Six” Publishers Changed the E-Book Business Overnight, covered the Apple price-fixing case and the introduction of e-books to society.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[This landmark case, involving Google’s digitization project of scanning 20-million books to make them searchable through the Internet, was decided in favor of Google. “In my mind, this is a fair-use case that we will never see again,” Andrew Albanese, senior writer for Publisher’s Weekly, said, declaring the case a benchmark for future decisions. It was ruled that Google met the requirements of fair use and all four factors in defense of copyright infringement. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams chat with Andrew Albanese about the case, whether this constitutes transformative use, and what this case means for the online-media industry as a whole.<br>
<br>
Andrew Albanese has been covering Google vs. Authors Guild since it’s inception in 2005. As senior writer for Publishers Weekly, he focuses on copyright wars and how the Internet is changing protected works. His book, The Battle of $9.99: How Apple, Amazon and the “Big Six” Publishers Changed the E-Book Business Overnight, covered the Apple price-fixing case and the introduction of e-books to society.<br>
<br>
Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1851</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[29B1A189-9280-4031-9EB7-8DB3B3406D11-1494-000006880DB3D46B-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8749960828.mp3?updated=1624285469" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is U.S. District Judge Scheindlin’s Removal a Question of Judges’ First Amendment Rights?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/11/is-u-s-district-judge-scheindlins-removal-a-question-of-judges-first-amendment-rights</link>
      <description>“It’s impossible to figure out exactly what the judge did wrong,” University of Pennsylvania Law Professor Kermit Roosevelt says, discussing Federal District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin’s removal from Floyd, et al. v. The City of New York, known as the “stop-and-frisk” case. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the Judge “ran afoul” of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges given her participation in media interviews and by making public statements about the “stop and frisk” case. The 2nd Circuit’s ruling did not provide further detail or examples. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, your host J. Craig Williams invites Roosevelt to discuss Scheindlin’s removal, whether this action is a question of judge’s first amendment rights, and the possible outcomes of her appeal.

Roosevelt is a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. Working in a diverse range of fields, he focuses in constitutional law and conflict law. Professor Roosevelt was recently a part of a New York Times Room for Debate, discussing Scheindlin’s removal and what restrictions should be placed on judges. He has also served as a law clerk to Supreme Court Associate Justice David H. Souter and D.C. Circuit Court Judge Stephen F. Williams.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 09:50:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Is U.S. District Judge Scheindlin’s Removal a Question of Judges’ First Amendment Rights?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>376</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e038e478-cfa9-11eb-92b9-03560e181d15/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Is U.S. District Judge Scheindlin’s Removal a Question of Judges’ First Amendment Rights?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>“It’s impossible to figure out exactly what the judge did wrong,” University of Pennsylvania Law Professor Kermit Roosevelt says, discussing Federal District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin’s removal from Floyd, et al. v. The City of New York, known as the “stop-and-frisk” case. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the Judge “ran afoul” of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges given her participation in media interviews and by making public statements about the “stop and frisk” case. The 2nd Circuit’s ruling did not provide further detail or examples. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, your host J. Craig Williams invites Roosevelt to discuss Scheindlin’s removal, whether this action is a question of judge’s first amendment rights, and the possible outcomes of her appeal.

Roosevelt is a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. Working in a diverse range of fields, he focuses in constitutional law and conflict law. Professor Roosevelt was recently a part of a New York Times Room for Debate, discussing Scheindlin’s removal and what restrictions should be placed on judges. He has also served as a law clerk to Supreme Court Associate Justice David H. Souter and D.C. Circuit Court Judge Stephen F. Williams.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[“It’s impossible to figure out exactly what the judge did wrong,” University of Pennsylvania Law Professor Kermit Roosevelt says, discussing Federal District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin’s removal from Floyd, et al. v. The City of New York, known as the “stop-and-frisk” case. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the Judge “ran afoul” of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges given her participation in media interviews and by making public statements about the “stop and frisk” case. The 2nd Circuit’s ruling did not provide further detail or examples. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, your host J. Craig Williams invites Roosevelt to discuss Scheindlin’s removal, whether this action is a question of judge’s first amendment rights, and the possible outcomes of her appeal.<br>
<br>
Roosevelt is a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. Working in a diverse range of fields, he focuses in constitutional law and conflict law. Professor Roosevelt was recently a part of a New York Times Room for Debate, discussing Scheindlin’s removal and what restrictions should be placed on judges. He has also served as a law clerk to Supreme Court Associate Justice David H. Souter and D.C. Circuit Court Judge Stephen F. Williams.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1299</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7AFE7395-7DB8-494C-B90C-3F7ECB865903-425-000000C29F82F46C-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7798581732.mp3?updated=1624285461" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Lavabit Legal Battle: Should the Government Have Access to Secure Email?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/11/the-lavabit-legal-battle-should-the-government-have-access-to-secure-email</link>
      <description>Several email providers across the nation have chosen to shut down in reaction to the government subpoena of Lavabit's data. Ladar Levison, CEO of secure email provider Lavabit, chose to end operations after the government requested the company's SSL keys, which would grant access to more than 400,000 users' emails. Levison challenged the subpoenas under the fourth amendment and organizations including the ACLU and EFF have filed amicus briefs on behalf of Lavabit but at this juncture, the security of secure email is unknown. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite Attorney Jesse R. Binnall, Levison's counsel, to discuss the case, what it means for all secure email providers, and how it affects lawyers' responsibility for protecting their clients' digital information.  Jesse R. Binnall is a partner of Bronley and Binnall, PLLC. His practice areas include civil litigation, small business and non-profit law, commercial lease disputes, appellate litigation, and election law. He has litigated cases in some of the busiest and most respected courts in the nation, including the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia and the Fairfax County Circuit Court. He also maintains an active appellate practice.  Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:50:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Lavabit Legal Battle: Should the Government Have Access to Secure Email?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>375</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e0605f76-cfa9-11eb-92b9-4737be7d198c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Lavabit Legal Battle: Should the Government Have Access to Secure Email?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Several email providers across the nation have chosen to shut down in reaction to the government subpoena of Lavabit's data. Ladar Levison, CEO of secure email provider Lavabit, chose to end operations after the government requested the company's SSL keys, which would grant access to more than 400,000 users' emails. Levison challenged the subpoenas under the fourth amendment and organizations including the ACLU and EFF have filed amicus briefs on behalf of Lavabit but at this juncture, the security of secure email is unknown. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite Attorney Jesse R. Binnall, Levison's counsel, to discuss the case, what it means for all secure email providers, and how it affects lawyers' responsibility for protecting their clients' digital information.  Jesse R. Binnall is a partner of Bronley and Binnall, PLLC. His practice areas include civil litigation, small business and non-profit law, commercial lease disputes, appellate litigation, and election law. He has litigated cases in some of the busiest and most respected courts in the nation, including the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia and the Fairfax County Circuit Court. He also maintains an active appellate practice.  Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Several email providers across the nation have chosen to shut down in reaction to the government subpoena of Lavabit's data. Ladar Levison, CEO of secure email provider Lavabit, chose to end operations after the government requested the company's SSL keys, which would grant access to more than 400,000 users' emails. Levison challenged the subpoenas under the fourth amendment and organizations including the ACLU and EFF have filed amicus briefs on behalf of Lavabit but at this juncture, the security of secure email is unknown. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite Attorney Jesse R. Binnall, Levison's counsel, to discuss the case, what it means for all secure email providers, and how it affects lawyers' responsibility for protecting their clients' digital information.<br> <br> Jesse R. Binnall is a partner of Bronley and Binnall, PLLC. His practice areas include civil litigation, small business and non-profit law, commercial lease disputes, appellate litigation, and election law. He has litigated cases in some of the busiest and most respected courts in the nation, including the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia and the Fairfax County Circuit Court. He also maintains an active appellate practice.<br> <br> Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1434</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[A3646795-C8C4-4737-90BA-8CB4FF1F2E88-1266-000006113116FF62-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1537461157.mp3?updated=1624285464" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>F. Lee Bailey and Kenneth Fishman Discuss Excellence in Cross Examination</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/10/f-lee-bailey-and-kenneth-fishman-discuss-excellence-in-cross-examination/</link>
      <description>Cross-examination is a skill that every trial lawyer hopes to master, but few do. In the new book, Excellence in Cross Examination, published by Thomson Reuters, two giants of the trial bar, F. Lee Bailey and Judge Kenneth J. Fishman, share their insights and lessons on how to excel in cross-examination. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi invites Bailey and Fishman to discuss their newest book and the key skills lawyers need to be effective in cross.

Having represented high-profile names such as O.J. Simpson, Dr. Sam Sheppard, and Captain Ernest Medina, F. Lee Bailey is known for his successful career as a trial lawyer in criminal and civil cases. He has been a licensed attorney for more than 50 years, authored and co-authored 21 books, and is a licensed private investigator. In addition to his legal career, he has worked as a designated naval aviator with the U.S. Marine Corps.

The Honorable Kenneth J. Fishman was a practicing attorney for nearly 30 years before he moved to the bench. This marks his tenth year as an associate justice for the Massachusetts Superior Court. A former law partner with Bailey, he is a frequent speaker and lecturer for the Massachusetts Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and The Massachusetts Bar Institute.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:35:08 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>F. Lee Bailey and Kenneth Fishman Discuss Excellence in Cross Examination</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>374</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e08d5094-cfa9-11eb-92b9-a3386b4246dd/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>F. Lee Bailey and Kenneth Fishman Discuss Excellence in Cross Examination</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Cross-examination is a skill that every trial lawyer hopes to master, but few do. In the new book, Excellence in Cross Examination, published by Thomson Reuters, two giants of the trial bar, F. Lee Bailey and Judge Kenneth J. Fishman, share their insights and lessons on how to excel in cross-examination. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi invites Bailey and Fishman to discuss their newest book and the key skills lawyers need to be effective in cross.

Having represented high-profile names such as O.J. Simpson, Dr. Sam Sheppard, and Captain Ernest Medina, F. Lee Bailey is known for his successful career as a trial lawyer in criminal and civil cases. He has been a licensed attorney for more than 50 years, authored and co-authored 21 books, and is a licensed private investigator. In addition to his legal career, he has worked as a designated naval aviator with the U.S. Marine Corps.

The Honorable Kenneth J. Fishman was a practicing attorney for nearly 30 years before he moved to the bench. This marks his tenth year as an associate justice for the Massachusetts Superior Court. A former law partner with Bailey, he is a frequent speaker and lecturer for the Massachusetts Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and The Massachusetts Bar Institute.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Cross-examination is a skill that every trial lawyer hopes to master, but few do. In the new book, Excellence in Cross Examination, published by Thomson Reuters, two giants of the trial bar, F. Lee Bailey and Judge Kenneth J. Fishman, share their insights and lessons on how to excel in cross-examination. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi invites Bailey and Fishman to discuss their newest book and the key skills lawyers need to be effective in cross.<br>
<br>
Having represented high-profile names such as O.J. Simpson, Dr. Sam Sheppard, and Captain Ernest Medina, F. Lee Bailey is known for his successful career as a trial lawyer in criminal and civil cases. He has been a licensed attorney for more than 50 years, authored and co-authored 21 books, and is a licensed private investigator. In addition to his legal career, he has worked as a designated naval aviator with the U.S. Marine Corps.<br>
<br>
The Honorable Kenneth J. Fishman was a practicing attorney for nearly 30 years before he moved to the bench. This marks his tenth year as an associate justice for the Massachusetts Superior Court. A former law partner with Bailey, he is a frequent speaker and lecturer for the Massachusetts Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and The Massachusetts Bar Institute.<br>
<br>
Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2015</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[A165C8C7-336E-44EF-B463-9D5A1012A862-3445-000011BF89BBA7B3-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3997218115.mp3?updated=1623961873" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What to Expect for the 2013-2014 Supreme Court Term</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/10/what-to-expect-for-the-2013-2014-supreme-court-term</link>
      <description>We saw a number of high-profile cases in the last Supreme Court term. With the nation currently alert to gay rights and Obamacare, some say this new term has fallen under the radar. But take note – as the spotlight shifts to campaign finance laws, free speech, and the president’s power to make recess appointments – the upcoming docket could have some monumental decisions in store. On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite the editor of the SCOTUSblog Amy Howe and LA Times Supreme Court correspondent David Savage to discuss the new term.

• Amy Howe has been with SCOTUSblog since 2003. She has served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and has argued two cases there. Howe has also co-taught Supreme Court litigation courses at Stanford and Harvard law schools.

• David Savage has been covering the court for nearly three decades. In addition to his work with the LA Times, he also writes a monthly column for the ABA Journal and is regularly featured on NPR’s Talk of the Nation. In 1992 he published Turning Right: The Making of the Rehnquist Supreme Court, outlining the efforts of the Reagan and first Bush administrations to remake the high court.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 11:09:45 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>What to Expect for the 2013-2014 Supreme Court Term</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>373</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e0b10da4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-d72bb6c3fb1e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>What to Expect for the 2013-2014 Supreme Court Term</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>We saw a number of high-profile cases in the last Supreme Court term. With the nation currently alert to gay rights and Obamacare, some say this new term has fallen under the radar. But take note – as the spotlight shifts to campaign finance laws, free speech, and the president’s power to make recess appointments – the upcoming docket could have some monumental decisions in store. On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite the editor of the SCOTUSblog Amy Howe and LA Times Supreme Court correspondent David Savage to discuss the new term.

• Amy Howe has been with SCOTUSblog since 2003. She has served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and has argued two cases there. Howe has also co-taught Supreme Court litigation courses at Stanford and Harvard law schools.

• David Savage has been covering the court for nearly three decades. In addition to his work with the LA Times, he also writes a monthly column for the ABA Journal and is regularly featured on NPR’s Talk of the Nation. In 1992 he published Turning Right: The Making of the Rehnquist Supreme Court, outlining the efforts of the Reagan and first Bush administrations to remake the high court.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[We saw a number of high-profile cases in the last Supreme Court term. With the nation currently alert to gay rights and Obamacare, some say this new term has fallen under the radar. But take note – as the spotlight shifts to campaign finance laws, free speech, and the president’s power to make recess appointments – the upcoming docket could have some monumental decisions in store. On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite the editor of the SCOTUSblog Amy Howe and LA Times Supreme Court correspondent David Savage to discuss the new term.<br>
<br>
• Amy Howe has been with SCOTUSblog since 2003. She has served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and has argued two cases there. Howe has also co-taught Supreme Court litigation courses at Stanford and Harvard law schools.<br>
<br>
• David Savage has been covering the court for nearly three decades. In addition to his work with the LA Times, he also writes a monthly column for the ABA Journal and is regularly featured on NPR’s Talk of the Nation. In 1992 he published Turning Right: The Making of the Rehnquist Supreme Court, outlining the efforts of the Reagan and first Bush administrations to remake the high court.<br>
<br>
Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1912</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8A7799C1-F836-4B34-9CA1-5BAF6E9DABC6-4365-000015EF3D19C8E6-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6368099573.mp3?updated=1623961873" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How You Could Be Sued for Sending a Text Message</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/09/how-you-could-be-sued-for-sending-a-text-message</link>
      <description>The New Jersey State Appeals Court recently ruled that texting someone while that person is driving may cause the sender to be liable if an accident occurs. Supporting arguments say those texting drivers are “virtually present” at the accident. This potential liability affects the distribution of responsibility amongst drivers when a collision occurs. On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, your hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite Attorneys Ted Frank and Marc Saperstein to the discuss the case ruling, whether this advisory ruling will effectively prevent distracted driving, if it’s a fair allocation of responsibility, and more.

• New Jersey Attorney Marc Saperstein is a founding member of Davis, Saperstein, and Solomon and a part of the New Jersey Association for Justice. He regularly lectures to fellow lawyers on current case law, class actions, and injury law. Saperstein has a special interest in distracted driving education and prevention.

• Manhattan Institute Attorney Ted Frank is the founder and president of Center for Class Action Fairness. He has written law reviews for The Washington Post, The Washington Journal, and The American Spectator. Frank is also on the executive committee of the Federalist Society Litigation Practice Group.

Thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:53:54 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>How You Could Be Sued for Sending a Text Message</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>372</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e0d79f1e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-1389d0888a37/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>How You Could Be Sued for Sending a Text Message</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The New Jersey State Appeals Court recently ruled that texting someone while that person is driving may cause the sender to be liable if an accident occurs. Supporting arguments say those texting drivers are “virtually present” at the accident. This potential liability affects the distribution of responsibility amongst drivers when a collision occurs. On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, your hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite Attorneys Ted Frank and Marc Saperstein to the discuss the case ruling, whether this advisory ruling will effectively prevent distracted driving, if it’s a fair allocation of responsibility, and more.

• New Jersey Attorney Marc Saperstein is a founding member of Davis, Saperstein, and Solomon and a part of the New Jersey Association for Justice. He regularly lectures to fellow lawyers on current case law, class actions, and injury law. Saperstein has a special interest in distracted driving education and prevention.

• Manhattan Institute Attorney Ted Frank is the founder and president of Center for Class Action Fairness. He has written law reviews for The Washington Post, The Washington Journal, and The American Spectator. Frank is also on the executive committee of the Federalist Society Litigation Practice Group.

Thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The New Jersey State Appeals Court recently ruled that texting someone while that person is driving may cause the sender to be liable if an accident occurs. Supporting arguments say those texting drivers are “virtually present” at the accident. This potential liability affects the distribution of responsibility amongst drivers when a collision occurs. On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, your hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite Attorneys Ted Frank and Marc Saperstein to the discuss the case ruling, whether this advisory ruling will effectively prevent distracted driving, if it’s a fair allocation of responsibility, and more.<br>
<br>
• New Jersey Attorney Marc Saperstein is a founding member of Davis, Saperstein, and Solomon and a part of the New Jersey Association for Justice. He regularly lectures to fellow lawyers on current case law, class actions, and injury law. Saperstein has a special interest in distracted driving education and prevention.<br>
<br>
• Manhattan Institute Attorney Ted Frank is the founder and president of Center for Class Action Fairness. He has written law reviews for The Washington Post, The Washington Journal, and The American Spectator. Frank is also on the executive committee of the Federalist Society Litigation Practice Group.<br>
<br>
Thanks to our sponsor, Clio.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1945</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[D66102EA-951C-4227-BE13-8F32A9C16743-2538-00000B63C9DAC624-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1314096023.mp3?updated=1623961874" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Defining the ObamaCare Essential Health Benefits</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/09/defining-the-obamacare-essential-health-benefits</link>
      <description>On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, your host J. Craig Williams speaks with Dr. Shana Alex Lavarreda and David Cusano, Esq., two health-insurance industry professionals, on the implementation of the Essential Health Benefits within the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. ObamaCare. There are ten Essential Health Benefits that all states are required to include, but the missing element is the lack of definitions for these benefits – which leaves us all wondering how to confirm the 50 states are correctly implementing them. 

• Dr. Shana Alex Lavarreda is the director of health insurance studies for the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. Her research focuses on discontinuous health insurance, under insurance, as well as the political issues surrounding healthcare reform, at the state and federal level.

 • David Cusano, Esq., works in Georgetown’s State Health Reform Assistance Network to provide technical assistance to state officials on implementing the Essential Health Benefits and the Affordable Care Act. He has previously worked as in-house counsel for insurance providers where he advised them on how to implement the ACA’s new requirements and on their day-to-day health care plan operations.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:21:06 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Defining the ObamaCare Essential Health Benefits</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>371</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e0f880c6-cfa9-11eb-92b9-87caab605253/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Defining the ObamaCare Essential Health Benefits</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, your host J. Craig Williams speaks with Dr. Shana Alex Lavarreda and David Cusano, Esq., two health-insurance industry professionals, on the implementation of the Essential Health Benefits within the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. ObamaCare. There are ten Essential Health Benefits that all states are required to include, but the missing element is the lack of definitions for these benefits – which leaves us all wondering how to confirm the 50 states are correctly implementing them. 

• Dr. Shana Alex Lavarreda is the director of health insurance studies for the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. Her research focuses on discontinuous health insurance, under insurance, as well as the political issues surrounding healthcare reform, at the state and federal level.

 • David Cusano, Esq., works in Georgetown’s State Health Reform Assistance Network to provide technical assistance to state officials on implementing the Essential Health Benefits and the Affordable Care Act. He has previously worked as in-house counsel for insurance providers where he advised them on how to implement the ACA’s new requirements and on their day-to-day health care plan operations.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, your host J. Craig Williams speaks with Dr. Shana Alex Lavarreda and David Cusano, Esq., two health-insurance industry professionals, on the implementation of the Essential Health Benefits within the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. ObamaCare. There are ten Essential Health Benefits that all states are required to include, but the missing element is the lack of definitions for these benefits – which leaves us all wondering how to confirm the 50 states are correctly implementing them. <br>
<br>
• Dr. Shana Alex Lavarreda is the director of health insurance studies for the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. Her research focuses on discontinuous health insurance, under insurance, as well as the political issues surrounding healthcare reform, at the state and federal level.<br>
<br>
 • David Cusano, Esq., works in Georgetown’s State Health Reform Assistance Network to provide technical assistance to state officials on implementing the Essential Health Benefits and the Affordable Care Act. He has previously worked as in-house counsel for insurance providers where he advised them on how to implement the ACA’s new requirements and on their day-to-day health care plan operations.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1949</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[F14A1999-BFEF-4DA9-AA04-4DE08EF67A85-2234-00000ADED62E0F54-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2244670771.mp3?updated=1623961874" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can We Constitutionally Implement Stop and Frisk?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/08/can-we-constitutionally-implement-stop-and-frisk</link>
      <description>On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, Bob Ambrogi speaks with Sunita Patel of the Constitutional Center for Human Rights and Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research on Judge Scheindlin's recent ruling, Floyd vs. City of New York, which deemed the NYPD’s use of the stop-and-frisk policy unconstitutional.

• Sunita Patel, an attorney for the Center for Constitutional Rights, litigates racial profiling, immigrant justice, and other human rights issues. She represents the named plaintiffs in the Floyd class action, four minority men who argued that the stop-and-frisk law was being upheld unconstitutionally and caused indirect racial profiling. The case was filed by the CCR.

• Heather Mac Donald is a John M. Olin fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a contributing editor at the City Journal. She covers a number of topics including immigration, policing and racial profiling, and the New York courts. She has been featured in numerous publications regarding why the stop-and-frisk ruling will increase New York crime.

Tune in to hear Patel and Mac Donald’s opinions on the stop-and-frisk policy and how it affects crime rates, what the ruling means for the NYPD and similar policies nationwide, and if they think stop and frisk can be carried out constitutionally.

 A special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:33:33 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Can We Constitutionally Implement Stop and Frisk?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>370</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e1196fca-cfa9-11eb-92b9-8b91b5cab27a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Can We Constitutionally Implement Stop and Frisk?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, Bob Ambrogi speaks with Sunita Patel of the Constitutional Center for Human Rights and Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research on Judge Scheindlin's recent ruling, Floyd vs. City of New York, which deemed the NYPD’s use of the stop-and-frisk policy unconstitutional.

• Sunita Patel, an attorney for the Center for Constitutional Rights, litigates racial profiling, immigrant justice, and other human rights issues. She represents the named plaintiffs in the Floyd class action, four minority men who argued that the stop-and-frisk law was being upheld unconstitutionally and caused indirect racial profiling. The case was filed by the CCR.

• Heather Mac Donald is a John M. Olin fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a contributing editor at the City Journal. She covers a number of topics including immigration, policing and racial profiling, and the New York courts. She has been featured in numerous publications regarding why the stop-and-frisk ruling will increase New York crime.

Tune in to hear Patel and Mac Donald’s opinions on the stop-and-frisk policy and how it affects crime rates, what the ruling means for the NYPD and similar policies nationwide, and if they think stop and frisk can be carried out constitutionally.

 A special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, Bob Ambrogi speaks with Sunita Patel of the Constitutional Center for Human Rights and Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research on Judge Scheindlin's recent ruling, Floyd vs. City of New York, which deemed the NYPD’s use of the stop-and-frisk policy unconstitutional.<br>
<br>
• Sunita Patel, an attorney for the Center for Constitutional Rights, litigates racial profiling, immigrant justice, and other human rights issues. She represents the named plaintiffs in the Floyd class action, four minority men who argued that the stop-and-frisk law was being upheld unconstitutionally and caused indirect racial profiling. The case was filed by the CCR.<br>
<br>
• Heather Mac Donald is a John M. Olin fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a contributing editor at the City Journal. She covers a number of topics including immigration, policing and racial profiling, and the New York courts. She has been featured in numerous publications regarding why the stop-and-frisk ruling will increase New York crime.<br>
<br>
Tune in to hear Patel and Mac Donald’s opinions on the stop-and-frisk policy and how it affects crime rates, what the ruling means for the NYPD and similar policies nationwide, and if they think stop and frisk can be carried out constitutionally.<br>
<br>
 A special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2114</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[BBFA7400-50CC-4F3C-BE5D-1F09CE419B2E-3042-00000F21B79126DC-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6919866697.mp3?updated=1624285482" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New American Bar Association President James Silkenat Outlines His 2013-2014 Agenda</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/08/new-american-bar-association-president-james-silkenat-outlines-his-2013-2014-agenda</link>
      <description>On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams speak with ABA President James Silkenat, on his first day in office, about his goals and initiatives for the ABA agenda.

James Silkenat has been working in international law for more than forty years. He joined the ABA’s first delegation to China in the mid-1970s and since then has chaired the International Law Section. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and of the American Law Institute, and has served as a Fellow in the U.S. State Department Scholar/Diplomat Program. As well as numerous other positions in and outside of the ABA, he will now serve as the president of the nation’s largest legal organization.

Silkenat will discuss his major platform goals for his presidency, including the legal education financing system and student debt, a legal job corps, the ABA’s stance on gun violence, and more. 

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 15:14:53 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>New American Bar Association President James Silkenat Outlines His 2013-2014 Agenda</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>369</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e13cd974-cfa9-11eb-92b9-73b93612e51e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>New American Bar Association President James Silkenat Outlines His 2013-2014 Agenda</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams speak with ABA President James Silkenat, on his first day in office, about his goals and initiatives for the ABA agenda.

James Silkenat has been working in international law for more than forty years. He joined the ABA’s first delegation to China in the mid-1970s and since then has chaired the International Law Section. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and of the American Law Institute, and has served as a Fellow in the U.S. State Department Scholar/Diplomat Program. As well as numerous other positions in and outside of the ABA, he will now serve as the president of the nation’s largest legal organization.

Silkenat will discuss his major platform goals for his presidency, including the legal education financing system and student debt, a legal job corps, the ABA’s stance on gun violence, and more. 

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams speak with ABA President James Silkenat, on his first day in office, about his goals and initiatives for the ABA agenda.<br>
<br>
James Silkenat has been working in international law for more than forty years. He joined the ABA’s first delegation to China in the mid-1970s and since then has chaired the International Law Section. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and of the American Law Institute, and has served as a Fellow in the U.S. State Department Scholar/Diplomat Program. As well as numerous other positions in and outside of the ABA, he will now serve as the president of the nation’s largest legal organization.<br>
<br>
Silkenat will discuss his major platform goals for his presidency, including the legal education financing system and student debt, a legal job corps, the ABA’s stance on gun violence, and more. <br>
<br>
Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1769</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[82604962-5C8E-4429-81DF-B956B6AF5996-2870-00000E1A6BB07283-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4856705358.mp3?updated=1624285460" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Should a Chimpanzee Have Human Rights?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/07/should-a-chimpanzee-have-human-rights</link>
      <description>If it’s not legally a human, it’s a thing. But animal rights advocates argue these alternatives fail to recognize that there are many cognitively complex species who deserve to be treated as people. The Nonhuman Rights Project is planning to file a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a chimp to grant her the right to bodily liberty. This will release her from the cage she is currently living in, and the project will have her admitted into a cageless sanctuary. Steven M. Wise, president of The Nonhuman Rights Project, has been researching and planning this case for 20 years.

Steven M. Wise has been practicing animal protection law nationwide for for the past 30 years. He was the first professor to teach animal law at Harvard University and is still teaching animal law courses all over the world. He has published four books on the matter, including Rattling the Cage – Toward Legal Rights for Animals.

On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams will talk with Wise about the case to grant a chimp the right to bodily liberty and The Nonhuman Rights Project’s long-term plans for animal rights

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:18:18 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Should a Chimpanzee Have Human Rights?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>368</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e15d57c6-cfa9-11eb-92b9-d756b3351ab5/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Should a Chimpanzee Have Human Rights?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>If it’s not legally a human, it’s a thing. But animal rights advocates argue these alternatives fail to recognize that there are many cognitively complex species who deserve to be treated as people. The Nonhuman Rights Project is planning to file a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a chimp to grant her the right to bodily liberty. This will release her from the cage she is currently living in, and the project will have her admitted into a cageless sanctuary. Steven M. Wise, president of The Nonhuman Rights Project, has been researching and planning this case for 20 years.

Steven M. Wise has been practicing animal protection law nationwide for for the past 30 years. He was the first professor to teach animal law at Harvard University and is still teaching animal law courses all over the world. He has published four books on the matter, including Rattling the Cage – Toward Legal Rights for Animals.

On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams will talk with Wise about the case to grant a chimp the right to bodily liberty and The Nonhuman Rights Project’s long-term plans for animal rights

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[If it’s not legally a human, it’s a thing. But animal rights advocates argue these alternatives fail to recognize that there are many cognitively complex species who deserve to be treated as people. The Nonhuman Rights Project is planning to file a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a chimp to grant her the right to bodily liberty. This will release her from the cage she is currently living in, and the project will have her admitted into a cageless sanctuary. Steven M. Wise, president of The Nonhuman Rights Project, has been researching and planning this case for 20 years.<br>
<br>
Steven M. Wise has been practicing animal protection law nationwide for for the past 30 years. He was the first professor to teach animal law at Harvard University and is still teaching animal law courses all over the world. He has published four books on the matter, including Rattling the Cage – Toward Legal Rights for Animals.<br>
<br>
On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams will talk with Wise about the case to grant a chimp the right to bodily liberty and The Nonhuman Rights Project’s long-term plans for animal rights<br>
<br>
Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1746</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1C419E81-C2A9-4709-AB67-E44F3691447E-1613-00000776AC1247FD-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4915573673.mp3?updated=1623961875" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Post DOMA and Prop 8 Rulings: The Next Move for Gay Rights</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/07/post-doma-and-prop-8-rulings-the-next-move-for-gay-rights</link>
      <description>With the Supreme Court’s Prop 8 and DOMA rulings, same-sex marriage is now legal in California and same-sex married couples can receive federal benefits across the nation. These landmark decisions for gay rights have sparked the question: is nationwide marriage equality on the way? On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams will talk with Constitutional Law Professors Mark Tushnet and William Eskridge about what the history of both the gay rights and the civil rights movements have to say for the future of gay rights in America.

• Harvard Law Professor Mark Tushnet specializes in constitutional law and theory, with a focus in examining the practice of judicial review in the U.S. and worldwide. He has served as a law clerk to Justice Thurgood Marshall. Currently, his focus is in constitutional history and the development of civil liberties. He is known for his critical and controversial analysis of Supreme Court rulings, including Brown v. The Board of Education and Roe v. Wade.

• William Eskridge, Yale Law Professor, focuses in statutory interpretation. He represented a same-sex-married couple from 1990-1995 who sued for recognition of their marriage and has published many books covering the political framework of gay rights. The historical component of his book GayLaw was the basis of an amicus brief he drafted for the Cato Institute and for much of the Court’s (and dissenting opinion’s) analysis in Lawrence vs. Texas, the decision which made same-sex sexual activity legal in every U.S. state.

These law professors will provide unique insight to the future of gay rights through their knowledge and experience with Supreme Court rulings and civil liberties movements.

Thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:15:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Post DOMA and Prop 8 Rulings: The Next Move for Gay Rights</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>367</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e17e532c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-f305f0e3945b/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Post DOMA and Prop 8 Rulings: The Next Move for Gay Rights</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With the Supreme Court’s Prop 8 and DOMA rulings, same-sex marriage is now legal in California and same-sex married couples can receive federal benefits across the nation. These landmark decisions for gay rights have sparked the question: is nationwide marriage equality on the way? On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams will talk with Constitutional Law Professors Mark Tushnet and William Eskridge about what the history of both the gay rights and the civil rights movements have to say for the future of gay rights in America.

• Harvard Law Professor Mark Tushnet specializes in constitutional law and theory, with a focus in examining the practice of judicial review in the U.S. and worldwide. He has served as a law clerk to Justice Thurgood Marshall. Currently, his focus is in constitutional history and the development of civil liberties. He is known for his critical and controversial analysis of Supreme Court rulings, including Brown v. The Board of Education and Roe v. Wade.

• William Eskridge, Yale Law Professor, focuses in statutory interpretation. He represented a same-sex-married couple from 1990-1995 who sued for recognition of their marriage and has published many books covering the political framework of gay rights. The historical component of his book GayLaw was the basis of an amicus brief he drafted for the Cato Institute and for much of the Court’s (and dissenting opinion’s) analysis in Lawrence vs. Texas, the decision which made same-sex sexual activity legal in every U.S. state.

These law professors will provide unique insight to the future of gay rights through their knowledge and experience with Supreme Court rulings and civil liberties movements.

Thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[With the Supreme Court’s Prop 8 and DOMA rulings, same-sex marriage is now legal in California and same-sex married couples can receive federal benefits across the nation. These landmark decisions for gay rights have sparked the question: is nationwide marriage equality on the way? On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams will talk with Constitutional Law Professors Mark Tushnet and William Eskridge about what the history of both the gay rights and the civil rights movements have to say for the future of gay rights in America.<br>
<br>
• Harvard Law Professor Mark Tushnet specializes in constitutional law and theory, with a focus in examining the practice of judicial review in the U.S. and worldwide. He has served as a law clerk to Justice Thurgood Marshall. Currently, his focus is in constitutional history and the development of civil liberties. He is known for his critical and controversial analysis of Supreme Court rulings, including Brown v. The Board of Education and Roe v. Wade.<br>
<br>
• William Eskridge, Yale Law Professor, focuses in statutory interpretation. He represented a same-sex-married couple from 1990-1995 who sued for recognition of their marriage and has published many books covering the political framework of gay rights. The historical component of his book GayLaw was the basis of an amicus brief he drafted for the Cato Institute and for much of the Court’s (and dissenting opinion’s) analysis in Lawrence vs. Texas, the decision which made same-sex sexual activity legal in every U.S. state.<br>
<br>
These law professors will provide unique insight to the future of gay rights through their knowledge and experience with Supreme Court rulings and civil liberties movements.<br>
<br>
Thanks to our sponsor, Clio.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2144</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[B8808D45-A26D-4C05-BE74-ED789A74D664-3265-000011160E9D5A55-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9699593342.mp3?updated=1623961875" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Batman Legally Dead?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/07/is-batman-legally-dead/</link>
      <description>On this episode of Lawyer2Lawyer, J. Craig Williams chats with Entertainment Lawyer Michael Baroni and superhero-law expert James Daily about the ending of The Dark Knight Rises. Proceed with caution – there are spoilers ahead! The city of Gotham sees Batman die at the end of the film. Does that mean that Bruce Wayne is legally dead, as well? And if so, who gets the batmobiles? Legally speaking, Warner Brothers’ design patent on the batmobile will run out, as will their patent on the story. Will another company fill the role and bring back Batman?

• Baroni has been watching the Batman films since he was a kid and continues to be an enthusiast. Batman fan by night, he works as general counsel for Palace Entertainment by day. He is also a member of the Orange County Bar Association.

• Daily is co-author of the book The Law of Superheroes and the blog Law and Multiverse. Both publications discuss the hypothetical legal ramifications behind comic book characters and their powers. When James isn’t meticulously analyzing the law of comic books and characters, he works in intellectual property and patent law.

Tune in for, what Baroni describes as, the perfect “legal cocktail chatter” on the legalities behind Batman’s death, what he left behind, and the chances of a resurrection of one of America’s most beloved comic-book characters.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 15:00:38 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Is Batman Legally Dead?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>366</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e1a03c62-cfa9-11eb-92b9-efbedd1bb27d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Is Batman Legally Dead?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On this episode of Lawyer2Lawyer, J. Craig Williams chats with Entertainment Lawyer Michael Baroni and superhero-law expert James Daily about the ending of The Dark Knight Rises. Proceed with caution – there are spoilers ahead! The city of Gotham sees Batman die at the end of the film. Does that mean that Bruce Wayne is legally dead, as well? And if so, who gets the batmobiles? Legally speaking, Warner Brothers’ design patent on the batmobile will run out, as will their patent on the story. Will another company fill the role and bring back Batman?

• Baroni has been watching the Batman films since he was a kid and continues to be an enthusiast. Batman fan by night, he works as general counsel for Palace Entertainment by day. He is also a member of the Orange County Bar Association.

• Daily is co-author of the book The Law of Superheroes and the blog Law and Multiverse. Both publications discuss the hypothetical legal ramifications behind comic book characters and their powers. When James isn’t meticulously analyzing the law of comic books and characters, he works in intellectual property and patent law.

Tune in for, what Baroni describes as, the perfect “legal cocktail chatter” on the legalities behind Batman’s death, what he left behind, and the chances of a resurrection of one of America’s most beloved comic-book characters.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On this episode of Lawyer2Lawyer, J. Craig Williams chats with Entertainment Lawyer Michael Baroni and superhero-law expert James Daily about the ending of The Dark Knight Rises. Proceed with caution – there are spoilers ahead! The city of Gotham sees Batman die at the end of the film. Does that mean that Bruce Wayne is legally dead, as well? And if so, who gets the batmobiles? Legally speaking, Warner Brothers’ design patent on the batmobile will run out, as will their patent on the story. Will another company fill the role and bring back Batman?<br>
<br>
• Baroni has been watching the Batman films since he was a kid and continues to be an enthusiast. Batman fan by night, he works as general counsel for Palace Entertainment by day. He is also a member of the Orange County Bar Association.<br>
<br>
• Daily is co-author of the book The Law of Superheroes and the blog Law and Multiverse. Both publications discuss the hypothetical legal ramifications behind comic book characters and their powers. When James isn’t meticulously analyzing the law of comic books and characters, he works in intellectual property and patent law.<br>
<br>
Tune in for, what Baroni describes as, the perfect “legal cocktail chatter” on the legalities behind Batman’s death, what he left behind, and the chances of a resurrection of one of America’s most beloved comic-book characters.<br>
<br>
Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1672</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[F5612D4B-C289-4220-80D6-84DE1A376E6A-842-00000D38098A59C8-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5103882527.mp3?updated=1624285471" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Personal Audio vs. Electronic Frontier Foundation: The “Podcast Patent” Dispute</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/06/personal-audio-vs-electronic-frontier-foundation-the-podcast-patent-dispute</link>
      <description>Personal Audio’s founder Jim Logan created and patented an idea which, in his eyes, covers the concept of podcasting. “This is the story of the American inventor,” Richard Baker, Personal Audio’s vice president of licensing, says. Personal Audio has filed lawsuits against several podcasters and media companies, claiming patent infringement by popular programs such as NBC’s The Adam Carolla Show and by CBS for its podcast distribution of multiple shows including The Voice and Meet the Press. On the other side, The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has spearheaded a campaign dubbed “Save Podcasting!” to rescind Personal Audio’s patent. EFF’s goal is to revoke Personal Audio’s right to compensation from any podcast program. Daniel Nazer, a staff attorney working on the campaign, represents EFF on the program.

On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams talk with Richard Baker and Brad Liddle, Personal Audio’s president of licensing, and Daniel Nazer of EFF to hear their thoughts on what defines a patent troll, the specifics behind the cases, and more.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:27:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Personal Audio vs. Electronic Frontier Foundation: The “Podcast Patent” Dispute</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>365</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e1c2b788-cfa9-11eb-92b9-274ce0986af8/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Personal Audio vs. Electronic Frontier Foundation: The “Podcast Patent” Dispute</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Personal Audio’s founder Jim Logan created and patented an idea which, in his eyes, covers the concept of podcasting. “This is the story of the American inventor,” Richard Baker, Personal Audio’s vice president of licensing, says. Personal Audio has filed lawsuits against several podcasters and media companies, claiming patent infringement by popular programs such as NBC’s The Adam Carolla Show and by CBS for its podcast distribution of multiple shows including The Voice and Meet the Press. On the other side, The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has spearheaded a campaign dubbed “Save Podcasting!” to rescind Personal Audio’s patent. EFF’s goal is to revoke Personal Audio’s right to compensation from any podcast program. Daniel Nazer, a staff attorney working on the campaign, represents EFF on the program.

On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams talk with Richard Baker and Brad Liddle, Personal Audio’s president of licensing, and Daniel Nazer of EFF to hear their thoughts on what defines a patent troll, the specifics behind the cases, and more.

Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Personal Audio’s founder Jim Logan created and patented an idea which, in his eyes, covers the concept of podcasting. “This is the story of the American inventor,” Richard Baker, Personal Audio’s vice president of licensing, says. Personal Audio has filed lawsuits against several podcasters and media companies, claiming patent infringement by popular programs such as NBC’s The Adam Carolla Show and by CBS for its podcast distribution of multiple shows including The Voice and Meet the Press. On the other side, The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has spearheaded a campaign dubbed “Save Podcasting!” to rescind Personal Audio’s patent. EFF’s goal is to revoke Personal Audio’s right to compensation from any podcast program. Daniel Nazer, a staff attorney working on the campaign, represents EFF on the program.<br>
<br>
On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams talk with Richard Baker and Brad Liddle, Personal Audio’s president of licensing, and Daniel Nazer of EFF to hear their thoughts on what defines a patent troll, the specifics behind the cases, and more.<br>
<br>
Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1990</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3F66B8E6-71A7-4CC1-830C-1F565A4D133D-544-000007419A3F6733-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5078040208.mp3?updated=1623961875" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sacramento’s New One-Day Divorce Program</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/06/sacramentos-new-one-day-divorce-program</link>
      <description>On this episode of Lawyer2Lawyer, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams invite California Judge James Mize to discuss his first-of-its-kind idea to address the heavy congestion of divorce cases in Sacramento’s family court: The One-Day Divorce Program. This allows couples, who meet the specified requirements, to participate in an expedited divorce process that finalizes the separation in just one day. This program aims to serve couples who can’t afford a divorce lawyer. According to Judge Mize, 72% of family law litigants in California don’t have representation.

Judge Mize began his career with an undergraduate degree in psychology, followed by graduate work at the School of Social Welfare where he earned his Master of Social Work. He found his work in social issues to be a defining part of his 26 years working as an attorney, and his current work on the bench. He has served as the presiding judge of the Sacramento Superior Court and is currently the supervising judge of Sacramento’s Family Court. Judge Mize is best known for his civil reform efforts which have garnered him several honors including the California Judge Association’s Alba Witkin Humanitarian Award and Sacramento County Bar Association’s Judge of the Year Award.

Tune into to hear about the inner workings of the new one-day divorce program, who qualifies, how it’s run, and more.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:57:29 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Sacramento’s New One-Day Divorce Program</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>364</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e1eecb84-cfa9-11eb-92b9-b72801949ea3/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sacramento’s New One-Day Divorce Program</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On this episode of Lawyer2Lawyer, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams invite California Judge James Mize to discuss his first-of-its-kind idea to address the heavy congestion of divorce cases in Sacramento’s family court: The One-Day Divorce Program. This allows couples, who meet the specified requirements, to participate in an expedited divorce process that finalizes the separation in just one day. This program aims to serve couples who can’t afford a divorce lawyer. According to Judge Mize, 72% of family law litigants in California don’t have representation.

Judge Mize began his career with an undergraduate degree in psychology, followed by graduate work at the School of Social Welfare where he earned his Master of Social Work. He found his work in social issues to be a defining part of his 26 years working as an attorney, and his current work on the bench. He has served as the presiding judge of the Sacramento Superior Court and is currently the supervising judge of Sacramento’s Family Court. Judge Mize is best known for his civil reform efforts which have garnered him several honors including the California Judge Association’s Alba Witkin Humanitarian Award and Sacramento County Bar Association’s Judge of the Year Award.

Tune into to hear about the inner workings of the new one-day divorce program, who qualifies, how it’s run, and more.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On this episode of Lawyer2Lawyer, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams invite California Judge James Mize to discuss his first-of-its-kind idea to address the heavy congestion of divorce cases in Sacramento’s family court: The One-Day Divorce Program. This allows couples, who meet the specified requirements, to participate in an expedited divorce process that finalizes the separation in just one day. This program aims to serve couples who can’t afford a divorce lawyer. According to Judge Mize, 72% of family law litigants in California don’t have representation.<br>
<br>
Judge Mize began his career with an undergraduate degree in psychology, followed by graduate work at the School of Social Welfare where he earned his Master of Social Work. He found his work in social issues to be a defining part of his 26 years working as an attorney, and his current work on the bench. He has served as the presiding judge of the Sacramento Superior Court and is currently the supervising judge of Sacramento’s Family Court. Judge Mize is best known for his civil reform efforts which have garnered him several honors including the California Judge Association’s Alba Witkin Humanitarian Award and Sacramento County Bar Association’s Judge of the Year Award.<br>
<br>
Tune into to hear about the inner workings of the new one-day divorce program, who qualifies, how it’s run, and more.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1670</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8EFBE652-6FA2-402E-8302-15D9D19BE631-523-000007A2E09D3983-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6352207095.mp3?updated=1623961876" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Private Prisons, Profits, and Prisoners’ Rights</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/05/private-prisons-profits-and-prisoners-rights</link>
      <description>On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer host Bob Ambrogi discusses private prisons with Susan Herman, president of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and Adrian Moore, vice president of the Reason Foundation, a non-profit in support of libertarian principles and privatization.

Susan Herman was elected president of the ACLU in October 2008. As Centennial Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School, she teaches courses in the area of Criminal Law and Procedure and Constitutional Law. The ACLU has been studying and protesting against private prisons as a for-profit business for decades.

Dr. Adrian Moore is vice president of policy at the Reason Foundation. He has conducted studies, written publications and scholarly articles on the privatization of prisons and how they yield quality corrections at a lower cost. He has served on boards and commissions developing or overseeing privatization at the federal, state, and local level.

Tune in to hear Herman and Moore debate and discuss the colossal incarceration rate, the profit motives of private prisons, the politics behind it all, and the impact on prisoners’ rights.

Special Thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:56:35 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Private Prisons, Profits, and Prisoners’ Rights</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>363</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e2177750-cfa9-11eb-92b9-8f9b2fe16714/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Private Prisons, Profits, and Prisoners’ Rights</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer host Bob Ambrogi discusses private prisons with Susan Herman, president of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and Adrian Moore, vice president of the Reason Foundation, a non-profit in support of libertarian principles and privatization.

Susan Herman was elected president of the ACLU in October 2008. As Centennial Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School, she teaches courses in the area of Criminal Law and Procedure and Constitutional Law. The ACLU has been studying and protesting against private prisons as a for-profit business for decades.

Dr. Adrian Moore is vice president of policy at the Reason Foundation. He has conducted studies, written publications and scholarly articles on the privatization of prisons and how they yield quality corrections at a lower cost. He has served on boards and commissions developing or overseeing privatization at the federal, state, and local level.

Tune in to hear Herman and Moore debate and discuss the colossal incarceration rate, the profit motives of private prisons, the politics behind it all, and the impact on prisoners’ rights.

Special Thanks to our sponsor, Clio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer host Bob Ambrogi discusses private prisons with Susan Herman, president of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and Adrian Moore, vice president of the Reason Foundation, a non-profit in support of libertarian principles and privatization.

Susan Herman was elected president of the ACLU in October 2008. As Centennial Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School, she teaches courses in the area of Criminal Law and Procedure and Constitutional Law. The ACLU has been studying and protesting against private prisons as a for-profit business for decades.

Dr. Adrian Moore is vice president of policy at the Reason Foundation. He has conducted studies, written publications and scholarly articles on the privatization of prisons and how they yield quality corrections at a lower cost. He has served on boards and commissions developing or overseeing privatization at the federal, state, and local level.

Tune in to hear Herman and Moore debate and discuss the colossal incarceration rate, the profit motives of private prisons, the politics behind it all, and the impact on prisoners’ rights.

Special Thanks to our sponsor, Clio.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2039</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[A07AF2C5-09E3-4812-861E-9E2B75B0ED42-818-00000D931C21C6A0-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1160657791.mp3?updated=1623961876" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will Accused Boston Marathon Bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Get the Death Penalty?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/05/will-accused-boston-marathon-bomber-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-get-the-death-penalty</link>
      <description>Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the surviving brother of the accused for the Boston marathon bombings, has become a face of the media lately. His prosecution and potential sentence raises many questions for both the public and the legal world. Attorneys and co-hosts Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Attorney Jack Cunha and Professor Douglas Berman to discuss the prosecution and trial of the suspect.

• Jack Cunha, of Cunha &amp; Holcomb, is a practicing criminal attorney based in Boston, Massachusetts. A former instructor at Suffolk and Harvard Law Schools, Cunha lectures nationally for various associations and schools such as The National Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys, Harvard Law, and CLE Programs mainly on criminal defense.

• Douglas Berman, Professor of Law at The Ohio State University’s Moritz College of Law, has taught a myriad of courses at Ohio State including criminal law, criminal punishment and sentencing, and the death penalty. He is co-author of a casebook, Sentencing Law and Policy: Cases, Statutes, and Guidelines. He also writes a popular blog titled Sentencing Law and Policy.

Tune in to hear what these experienced professionals have to say as they answer questions such as: Although Massachusetts outlawed the death penalty in 1984, will prosecutors use federal law to seek the death penalty for Tsarnaev? Will the fact that the suspect is only 19 call for mitigation? and more.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 17:03:30 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Will Accused Boston Marathon Bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Get the Death Penalty?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>362</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e24a0c4c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-8b588ed7c25e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Will Accused Boston Marathon Bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Get the Death Penalty?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the surviving brother of the accused for the Boston marathon bombings, has become a face of the media lately. His prosecution and potential sentence raises many questions for both the public and the legal world. Attorneys and co-hosts Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Attorney Jack Cunha and Professor Douglas Berman to discuss the prosecution and trial of the suspect.

• Jack Cunha, of Cunha &amp; Holcomb, is a practicing criminal attorney based in Boston, Massachusetts. A former instructor at Suffolk and Harvard Law Schools, Cunha lectures nationally for various associations and schools such as The National Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys, Harvard Law, and CLE Programs mainly on criminal defense.

• Douglas Berman, Professor of Law at The Ohio State University’s Moritz College of Law, has taught a myriad of courses at Ohio State including criminal law, criminal punishment and sentencing, and the death penalty. He is co-author of a casebook, Sentencing Law and Policy: Cases, Statutes, and Guidelines. He also writes a popular blog titled Sentencing Law and Policy.

Tune in to hear what these experienced professionals have to say as they answer questions such as: Although Massachusetts outlawed the death penalty in 1984, will prosecutors use federal law to seek the death penalty for Tsarnaev? Will the fact that the suspect is only 19 call for mitigation? and more.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the surviving brother of the accused for the Boston marathon bombings, has become a face of the media lately. His prosecution and potential sentence raises many questions for both the public and the legal world. Attorneys and co-hosts Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi join Attorney Jack Cunha and Professor Douglas Berman to discuss the prosecution and trial of the suspect.

• Jack Cunha, of Cunha &amp; Holcomb, is a practicing criminal attorney based in Boston, Massachusetts. A former instructor at Suffolk and Harvard Law Schools, Cunha lectures nationally for various associations and schools such as The National Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys, Harvard Law, and CLE Programs mainly on criminal defense.

• Douglas Berman, Professor of Law at The Ohio State University’s Moritz College of Law, has taught a myriad of courses at Ohio State including criminal law, criminal punishment and sentencing, and the death penalty. He is co-author of a casebook, Sentencing Law and Policy: Cases, Statutes, and Guidelines. He also writes a popular blog titled Sentencing Law and Policy.

Tune in to hear what these experienced professionals have to say as they answer questions such as: Although Massachusetts outlawed the death penalty in 1984, will prosecutors use federal law to seek the death penalty for Tsarnaev? Will the fact that the suspect is only 19 call for mitigation? and more.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2160</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[86FDA06B-99C7-4387-8016-0DC344E12754-573-000009B2C6572757-FFA]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7217776051.mp3?updated=1624285499" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyer2Lawyer: A Retrospective</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/10/lawyer2lawyer-a-retrospective/</link>
      <description>We started Lawyer2Lawyer back in August of 2005 with the idea of providing quality content and discussion of timely legal news and information for the legal profession with regularly published podcasts and often videos too.  Since our inception, we have set the precedent for legal podcasting in numbers of listeners globally, but more importantly, we’ve been one of the leaders in great content - our priority over the past 7 years. On this final edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, talk about their personal experiences over the years with this legal podcast.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:16:45 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyer2Lawyer: A Retrospective</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>361</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e26ae138-cfa9-11eb-92b9-93486f552483/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyer2Lawyer: A Retrospective</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>We started Lawyer2Lawyer back in August of 2005 with the idea of providing quality content and discussion of timely legal news and information for the legal profession with regularly published podcasts and often videos too.  Since our inception, we have set the precedent for legal podcasting in numbers of listeners globally, but more importantly, we’ve been one of the leaders in great content - our priority over the past 7 years. On this final edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, talk about their personal experiences over the years with this legal podcast.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[We started Lawyer2Lawyer back in August of 2005 with the idea of providing quality content and discussion of timely legal news and information for the legal profession with regularly published podcasts and often videos too.  Since our inception, we have set the precedent for legal podcasting in numbers of listeners globally, but more importantly, we’ve been one of the leaders in great content - our priority over the past 7 years. On this final edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, talk about their personal experiences over the years with this legal podcast.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>925</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/10/lawyer2lawyer-a-retrospective/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6740260036.mp3?updated=1624285517" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Implications Surrounding the Meningitis Scare</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/10/legal-implications-surrounding-the-meningitis-scare/</link>
      <description>The New England Compounding Center (NECC) shipped out tainted steroid shots to 23 states  in what authorities believe resulted in a national fungal meningitis outbreak. Lawyer2Lawyer host Craig Williams chats with Attorney Michael F. Barrett, a personal injury attorney from the firm, Saltz Mongeluzzi Barrett &amp; Bendesky, PC and Glenn Cohen, Assistant Professor of Law and Co-Director of the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School, about the litigation stemming from this meningitis scare, the role of the FDA and CDC and regulation.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:36:13 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Implications Surrounding the Meningitis Scare</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>360</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e28c629a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-8f87a9989313/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Implications Surrounding the Meningitis Scare</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The New England Compounding Center (NECC) shipped out tainted steroid shots to 23 states  in what authorities believe resulted in a national fungal meningitis outbreak. Lawyer2Lawyer host Craig Williams chats with Attorney Michael F. Barrett, a personal injury attorney from the firm, Saltz Mongeluzzi Barrett &amp; Bendesky, PC and Glenn Cohen, Assistant Professor of Law and Co-Director of the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School, about the litigation stemming from this meningitis scare, the role of the FDA and CDC and regulation.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The New England Compounding Center (NECC) shipped out tainted steroid shots to 23 states  in what authorities believe resulted in a national fungal meningitis outbreak. Lawyer2Lawyer host Craig Williams chats with Attorney Michael F. Barrett, a personal injury attorney from the firm, Saltz Mongeluzzi Barrett &amp; Bendesky, PC and Glenn Cohen, Assistant Professor of Law and Co-Director of the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School, about the litigation stemming from this meningitis scare, the role of the FDA and CDC and regulation.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2241</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/10/legal-implications-surrounding-the-meningitis-scare/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3551705439.mp3?updated=1623961877" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Prop 34, The Death Penalty Initiative Statute</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/10/proposition-34-the-death-penalty-initiative-statute/</link>
      <description>On November 6, 2012, Proposition 34 will be one of the initiatives on the ballot in the state of California. If approved, Prop 34 will eliminate the death penalty in California and replace it with life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.  Lawyer2Lawyer host Craig Williams joins Attorney Donald H. Heller to discuss Proposition 34, support and opposition and ultimately the impact on our prison and justice system.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:22:57 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Prop 34, The Death Penalty Initiative Statute</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>358</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e2ac4d8a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-af8bf5e7e85c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Prop 34, The Death Penalty Initiative Statute</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On November 6, 2012, Proposition 34 will be one of the initiatives on the ballot in the state of California. If approved, Prop 34 will eliminate the death penalty in California and replace it with life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.  Lawyer2Lawyer host Craig Williams joins Attorney Donald H. Heller to discuss Proposition 34, support and opposition and ultimately the impact on our prison and justice system.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On November 6, 2012, Proposition 34 will be one of the initiatives on the ballot in the state of California. If approved, Prop 34 will eliminate the death penalty in California and replace it with life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.  Lawyer2Lawyer host Craig Williams joins Attorney Donald H. Heller to discuss Proposition 34, support and opposition and ultimately the impact on our prison and justice system.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2115</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/10/proposition-34-the-death-penalty-initiative-statute/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8099015551.mp3?updated=1624285487" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Defending a Serial Killer</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/10/defending-a-serial-killer/</link>
      <description>What is it like to defend one of America’s most infamous serial killers? Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join retired judge and lawyer, Sam L. Amirante, and retired lawyer, Daniel J. Broderick,  to discuss their new book, John Wayne Gacy: Defending a Monster,  and the constitutional right to a defense.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 15:34:38 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Defending a Serial Killer</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>357</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e2cae18c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-2f8fe27b3997/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Defending a Serial Killer</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What is it like to defend one of America’s most infamous serial killers? Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join retired judge and lawyer, Sam L. Amirante, and retired lawyer, Daniel J. Broderick,  to discuss their new book, John Wayne Gacy: Defending a Monster,  and the constitutional right to a defense.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What is it like to defend one of America’s most infamous serial killers? Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join retired judge and lawyer, Sam L. Amirante, and retired lawyer, Daniel J. Broderick,  to discuss their new book, John Wayne Gacy: Defending a Monster,  and the constitutional right to a defense.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2115</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/10/defending-a-serial-killer/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9315271822.mp3?updated=1624285465" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Presidential Race and the Judiciary</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/09/the-presidential-race-and-the-judiciary/</link>
      <description>On November 6, 2012, people across the States will cast their vote for President.  Whatever the outcome, it will influence our justice system. Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Kenneth L. Manning, a professor of political science at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth and Professor Carl Tobias from the University of Richmond School of Law, to discuss everything from diversity in the courts, Supreme Court vacancies and obstruction and the impact on the justice system.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:18:52 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Presidential Race and the Judiciary</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>356</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e2f2e18c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5fa601319b07/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Presidential Race and the Judiciary</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On November 6, 2012, people across the States will cast their vote for President.  Whatever the outcome, it will influence our justice system. Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Kenneth L. Manning, a professor of political science at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth and Professor Carl Tobias from the University of Richmond School of Law, to discuss everything from diversity in the courts, Supreme Court vacancies and obstruction and the impact on the justice system.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On November 6, 2012, people across the States will cast their vote for President.  Whatever the outcome, it will influence our justice system. Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Kenneth L. Manning, a professor of political science at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth and Professor Carl Tobias from the University of Richmond School of Law, to discuss everything from diversity in the courts, Supreme Court vacancies and obstruction and the impact on the justice system.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2317</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/09/the-presidential-race-and-the-judiciary/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2905339123.mp3?updated=1624285520" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Key changes to Patent Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/09/key-changes-to-patent-law/</link>
      <description>Back on September 16, 2011, President Obama signed the America Invents Act (AIA) into law, vastly changing the core of the patent system and patent law. Now, a year later, some of the key provisions are going into effect. Lawyer2Lawyer host Bob Ambrogi talks with Attorney Matthew I. Kreeger, the Co-Chair of Morrison Foerster’s Patent Interferences Practice Group and Dennis Crouch, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Missouri School of Law and editor of Patently-O, about the implementation of some of the most important provisions of the America Invents Act and their impact.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:13:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Key changes to Patent Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>355</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e319223e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-cf2e265b676f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Key changes to Patent Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Back on September 16, 2011, President Obama signed the America Invents Act (AIA) into law, vastly changing the core of the patent system and patent law. Now, a year later, some of the key provisions are going into effect. Lawyer2Lawyer host Bob Ambrogi talks with Attorney Matthew I. Kreeger, the Co-Chair of Morrison Foerster’s Patent Interferences Practice Group and Dennis Crouch, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Missouri School of Law and editor of Patently-O, about the implementation of some of the most important provisions of the America Invents Act and their impact.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Back on September 16, 2011, President Obama signed the America Invents Act (AIA) into law, vastly changing the core of the patent system and patent law. Now, a year later, some of the key provisions are going into effect. Lawyer2Lawyer host Bob Ambrogi talks with Attorney Matthew I. Kreeger, the Co-Chair of Morrison Foerster’s Patent Interferences Practice Group and Dennis Crouch, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Missouri School of Law and editor of Patently-O, about the implementation of some of the most important provisions of the America Invents Act and their impact.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2401</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/09/key-changes-to-patent-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8173995515.mp3?updated=1624285469" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Civility as an Art Form in Diplomacy and the Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/09/civility-as-an-art-form-in-diplomacy-and-the-law/</link>
      <description>Civility is a skill in the management of differences, disagreements and conflict and is good for the law profession.  So how essential is civility to the legal profession? And is it practiced well by lawyers?  Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Dick A. Semerdjian from the firm Schwartz Semerdjian Ballard &amp; Cauley LLP and chair of the ABA Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section (TIPS), to discuss the status of civility in the legal profession.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:30:16 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Civility as an Art Form in Diplomacy and the Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>354</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e3396904-cfa9-11eb-92b9-6394efea4eeb/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Civility as an Art Form in Diplomacy and the Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Civility is a skill in the management of differences, disagreements and conflict and is good for the law profession.  So how essential is civility to the legal profession? And is it practiced well by lawyers?  Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Dick A. Semerdjian from the firm Schwartz Semerdjian Ballard &amp; Cauley LLP and chair of the ABA Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section (TIPS), to discuss the status of civility in the legal profession.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Civility is a skill in the management of differences, disagreements and conflict and is good for the law profession.  So how essential is civility to the legal profession? And is it practiced well by lawyers?  Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Dick A. Semerdjian from the firm Schwartz Semerdjian Ballard &amp; Cauley LLP and chair of the ABA Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section (TIPS), to discuss the status of civility in the legal profession.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2302</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/09/civility-as-an-art-form-in-diplomacy-and-the-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4914391677.mp3?updated=1624285500" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Predictive Policing and the Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/09/predictive-policing-and-the-law/</link>
      <description>Some law enforcement agencies, like the Los Angeles Police Department, are turning to crime prediction software to aid in decreasing the rising crime rate, better known as predictive policing. Weighing the advantages of these programs to reduce crime raises questions about racial profiling within specific neighborhoods and our civil liberties. Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Dr. Jeff Brantingham, co-founder of the company, PredPol and Professor Andrew G. Ferguson from the University of the District of Columbia David A. Clarke School of Law, as they look at the legal issues surrounding predictive policing.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:11:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Predictive Policing and the Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>353</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e35a6fa0-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5f16986f9784/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Predictive Policing and the Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Some law enforcement agencies, like the Los Angeles Police Department, are turning to crime prediction software to aid in decreasing the rising crime rate, better known as predictive policing. Weighing the advantages of these programs to reduce crime raises questions about racial profiling within specific neighborhoods and our civil liberties. Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Dr. Jeff Brantingham, co-founder of the company, PredPol and Professor Andrew G. Ferguson from the University of the District of Columbia David A. Clarke School of Law, as they look at the legal issues surrounding predictive policing.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Some law enforcement agencies, like the Los Angeles Police Department, are turning to crime prediction software to aid in decreasing the rising crime rate, better known as predictive policing. Weighing the advantages of these programs to reduce crime raises questions about racial profiling within specific neighborhoods and our civil liberties. Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Dr. Jeff Brantingham, co-founder of the company, PredPol and Professor Andrew G. Ferguson from the University of the District of Columbia David A. Clarke School of Law, as they look at the legal issues surrounding predictive policing.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2448</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/09/predictive-policing-and-the-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7577678820.mp3?updated=1623961879" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyer2Lawyer 7th Anniversary</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/08/lawyer2lawyer-7th-anniversary/</link>
      <description>On the longest continually produced legal podcast, Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and J.Craig Williams share their experiences with great guests and insightful legal topics - some serious and some not so serious. And hear a behind the scenes special interview.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:14:57 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyer2Lawyer 7th Anniversary</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>352</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e3adec48-cfa9-11eb-92b9-43308be6c93a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyer2Lawyer 7th Anniversary</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On the longest continually produced legal podcast, Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and J.Craig Williams share their experiences with great guests and insightful legal topics - some serious and some not so serious. And hear a behind the scenes special interview.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On the longest continually produced legal podcast, Lawyer2Lawyer hosts Bob Ambrogi and J.Craig Williams share their experiences with great guests and insightful legal topics - some serious and some not so serious. And hear a behind the scenes special interview.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2577</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/08/lawyer2lawyer-7th-anniversary/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6691827572.mp3?updated=1623961879" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>From the Courtroom to the Comedy Club</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/08/from-the-courtroom-to-the-comedy-club/</link>
      <description>Lawyers are very often the brunt of jokes, but there is a group of attorneys that has turned the tables and is making people laugh with them instead of at them. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, share the stage with two of the Comedians At Law.  Alex Barnett and Matt Ritter explain how they transitioned from lawyers to comics and how they now make people laugh at the lighter side of the law.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:32:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>From the Courtroom to the Comedy Club</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>351</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e3d92d04-cfa9-11eb-92b9-87824cd8c0db/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>From the Courtroom to the Comedy Club</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Lawyers are very often the brunt of jokes, but there is a group of attorneys that has turned the tables and is making people laugh with them instead of at them. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, share the stage with two of the Comedians At Law.  Alex Barnett and Matt Ritter explain how they transitioned from lawyers to comics and how they now make people laugh at the lighter side of the law.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Lawyers are very often the brunt of jokes, but there is a group of attorneys that has turned the tables and is making people laugh with them instead of at them. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, share the stage with two of the Comedians At Law.  Alex Barnett and Matt Ritter explain how they transitioned from lawyers to comics and how they now make people laugh at the lighter side of the law.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2215</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/08/from-the-courtroom-to-the-comedy-club/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6967165200.mp3?updated=1624285489" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Back to School Spotlight on Law Students</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/08/back-to-school-spotlight-on-law-students/</link>
      <description>It’s about that time of year again where law students brush off the summer days and head back to school. In this very special "Back to School" edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host and attorney, Craig Williams, chats with law students Daren Gottlieb from Western State College of Law in Fullerton, California and Han Fang from New England Law Boston, about why they chose law school, top concerns, personal goals, jobs, competition and next steps after graduation.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:22:20 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Back to School Spotlight on Law Students</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>350</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e3f4e9fe-cfa9-11eb-92b9-afb6a0c3a70b/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Back to School Spotlight on Law Students</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It’s about that time of year again where law students brush off the summer days and head back to school. In this very special "Back to School" edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host and attorney, Craig Williams, chats with law students Daren Gottlieb from Western State College of Law in Fullerton, California and Han Fang from New England Law Boston, about why they chose law school, top concerns, personal goals, jobs, competition and next steps after graduation.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[It’s about that time of year again where law students brush off the summer days and head back to school. In this very special "Back to School" edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host and attorney, Craig Williams, chats with law students Daren Gottlieb from Western State College of Law in Fullerton, California and Han Fang from New England Law Boston, about why they chose law school, top concerns, personal goals, jobs, competition and next steps after graduation.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2228</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/08/back-to-school-spotlight-on-law-students/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6694204727.mp3?updated=1623961880" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Impact of Voter ID Laws and Voter Purges</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/08/the-impact-of-voter-id-laws-and-voter-purges/</link>
      <description>Before 2006, not a single US state required voters to show identification before marking a ballot.  But now, 30 states have enacted some sort of voter identification law.  Are these laws necessary to prevent voter fraud or are laws being passed to discourage low income groups, the elderly and minorities from voting?  Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, Craig Williams, joins Professor Richard L. Hasen, from the University of California, Irvine and Wendy Weiser, Director of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, to talk voter ID laws in battleground states, voter purges and the potential impact on the upcoming election.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 10:48:41 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Impact of Voter ID Laws and Voter Purges</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>349</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e41f3d4e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-1b142542ef96/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Impact of Voter ID Laws and Voter Purges</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Before 2006, not a single US state required voters to show identification before marking a ballot.  But now, 30 states have enacted some sort of voter identification law.  Are these laws necessary to prevent voter fraud or are laws being passed to discourage low income groups, the elderly and minorities from voting?  Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, Craig Williams, joins Professor Richard L. Hasen, from the University of California, Irvine and Wendy Weiser, Director of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, to talk voter ID laws in battleground states, voter purges and the potential impact on the upcoming election.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Before 2006, not a single US state required voters to show identification before marking a ballot.  But now, 30 states have enacted some sort of voter identification law.  Are these laws necessary to prevent voter fraud or are laws being passed to discourage low income groups, the elderly and minorities from voting?  Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, Craig Williams, joins Professor Richard L. Hasen, from the University of California, Irvine and Wendy Weiser, Director of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, to talk voter ID laws in battleground states, voter purges and the potential impact on the upcoming election.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2290</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/08/the-impact-of-voter-id-laws-and-voter-purges/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3304123491.mp3?updated=1624285523" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Issues Surrounding the Colorado Movie Massacre</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/08/legal-issues-surrounding-the-colorado-movie-massacre/</link>
      <description>The Aurora, Colorado movie theater massacre left 12 people dead and 58 wounded. The latest mass shooting in America brings up many legal issues on a national scale, including gun control, the insanity defense, liability and the death penalty.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, analyze the legal arguments of this case with Professor Adam Winkler from UCLA School of Law and Professor Daniel Filler from the Earle Mack School of Law at Drexel University.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:36:25 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Controversial War on Drugs</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>348</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e43e9324-cfa9-11eb-92b9-f35e76fb3643/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Issues Surrounding the Colorado Movie Massacre</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Aurora, Colorado movie theater massacre left 12 people dead and 58 wounded. The latest mass shooting in America brings up many legal issues on a national scale, including gun control, the insanity defense, liability and the death penalty.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, analyze the legal arguments of this case with Professor Adam Winkler from UCLA School of Law and Professor Daniel Filler from the Earle Mack School of Law at Drexel University.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The Aurora, Colorado movie theater massacre left 12 people dead and 58 wounded. The latest mass shooting in America brings up many legal issues on a national scale, including gun control, the insanity defense, liability and the death penalty.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, analyze the legal arguments of this case with Professor Adam Winkler from UCLA School of Law and Professor Daniel Filler from the Earle Mack School of Law at Drexel University.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2203</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/08/legal-issues-surrounding-the-colorado-movie-massacre/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9029000933.mp3?updated=1623961881" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Controversial War on Drugs</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/07/the-controversial-war-on-drugs/</link>
      <description>Back in 1971, Richard Nixon declared a "war on drugs" claiming "America’s Public Enemy No. 1 in the United States is drug abuse".  Forty years later, we are still waging a war against drugs.   Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Ethan Nadelmann, founder and executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance and Judge Jim Gray, author of Why Our Drug Laws Have Failed and What We Can Do About It, as they spotlight the controversial war on drugs including: the legalization of Marijuana, the rise in prescription drug use, sentencing reform and what needs to happen legally to eliminate this growing problem.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:26:56 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Controversial War on Drugs</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>347</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e462fac0-cfa9-11eb-92b9-c355c359166b/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Controversial War on Drugs</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Back in 1971, Richard Nixon declared a "war on drugs" claiming "America’s Public Enemy No. 1 in the United States is drug abuse".  Forty years later, we are still waging a war against drugs.   Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Ethan Nadelmann, founder and executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance and Judge Jim Gray, author of Why Our Drug Laws Have Failed and What We Can Do About It, as they spotlight the controversial war on drugs including: the legalization of Marijuana, the rise in prescription drug use, sentencing reform and what needs to happen legally to eliminate this growing problem.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Back in 1971, Richard Nixon declared a "war on drugs" claiming "America’s Public Enemy No. 1 in the United States is drug abuse".  Forty years later, we are still waging a war against drugs.   Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Ethan Nadelmann, founder and executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance and Judge Jim Gray, author of Why Our Drug Laws Have Failed and What We Can Do About It, as they spotlight the controversial war on drugs including: the legalization of Marijuana, the rise in prescription drug use, sentencing reform and what needs to happen legally to eliminate this growing problem.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2417</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/07/the-controversial-war-on-drugs/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9119096172.mp3?updated=1623961881" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Return of Black Lung and the Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/07/the-return-of-black-lung-and-the-law/</link>
      <description>A recent investigation found the rate of miners diagnosed with Black Lung Disease is surging after nearly three decades of decline.  Some blame lenient regulations, lax enforcement, even manipulation of air samples from mines.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, get the reasons behind this shocking increase and a breakdown of Black Lung litigation from Chris Hamby, the author of the Center for Public Integrity report, and Attorney Stephen Sanders, the director of Appalachian Citizens’ Law Center.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:11:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Return of Black Lung and the Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>346</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e48f5b56-cfa9-11eb-92b9-a75b87ad2efd/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Return of Black Lung and the Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A recent investigation found the rate of miners diagnosed with Black Lung Disease is surging after nearly three decades of decline.  Some blame lenient regulations, lax enforcement, even manipulation of air samples from mines.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, get the reasons behind this shocking increase and a breakdown of Black Lung litigation from Chris Hamby, the author of the Center for Public Integrity report, and Attorney Stephen Sanders, the director of Appalachian Citizens’ Law Center.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A recent investigation found the rate of miners diagnosed with Black Lung Disease is surging after nearly three decades of decline.  Some blame lenient regulations, lax enforcement, even manipulation of air samples from mines.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, get the reasons behind this shocking increase and a breakdown of Black Lung litigation from Chris Hamby, the author of the Center for Public Integrity report, and Attorney Stephen Sanders, the director of Appalachian Citizens’ Law Center.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2228</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/07/the-return-of-black-lung-and-the-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5539486043.mp3?updated=1623961881" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Social Media and Lawsuits</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/07/social-media-and-lawsuits/</link>
      <description>From "tweets" to Facebook status updates, social media has taken over how we communicate with the outside world.  It has also become a large part of our legal system.  Social media is now considered key evidence in both criminal cases and civil lawsuits.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi examine the surge in social media-based evidence and claims in litigation, as well as the importance of educating attorneys on the ins and outs of social media with  Attorney Antigone Peyton, Founder and CEO of Cloudigy® Law, PLLC and Attorney Ernest Svenson, solo attorney and blogger.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:40:12 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Social Media and Lawsuits</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>345</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e4ab6b8e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-57950e6fcfc1/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Social Media and Lawsuits</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>From "tweets" to Facebook status updates, social media has taken over how we communicate with the outside world.  It has also become a large part of our legal system.  Social media is now considered key evidence in both criminal cases and civil lawsuits.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi examine the surge in social media-based evidence and claims in litigation, as well as the importance of educating attorneys on the ins and outs of social media with  Attorney Antigone Peyton, Founder and CEO of Cloudigy® Law, PLLC and Attorney Ernest Svenson, solo attorney and blogger.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[From "tweets" to Facebook status updates, social media has taken over how we communicate with the outside world.  It has also become a large part of our legal system.  Social media is now considered key evidence in both criminal cases and civil lawsuits.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi examine the surge in social media-based evidence and claims in litigation, as well as the importance of educating attorneys on the ins and outs of social media with  Attorney Antigone Peyton, Founder and CEO of Cloudigy® Law, PLLC and Attorney Ernest Svenson, solo attorney and blogger.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2303</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/07/social-media-and-lawsuits/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1729781387.mp3?updated=1624285531" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Radical or Rational SCOTUS Session?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/07/a-radical-or-rational-scotus-session/</link>
      <description>After one of the most historic United States Supreme Court sessions in years, emotions ran high and charges of radicalism ran amuck as the Justices handed down rulings on immigration enforcement, national healthcare, campaign finance law, stolen valor and more.  But in the end, did SCOTUS simply uphold the law of the land? Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, get the legal facts behind the decisions from New York University School of Law Professor Roderick Hills, Jr. and Temple University Beasley School of Law Professor Jan Ting.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 14:41:17 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>A Radical or Rational SCOTUS Session?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>344</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e4ca9798-cfa9-11eb-92b9-c3901ffd6636/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>A Radical or Rational SCOTUS Session?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>After one of the most historic United States Supreme Court sessions in years, emotions ran high and charges of radicalism ran amuck as the Justices handed down rulings on immigration enforcement, national healthcare, campaign finance law, stolen valor and more.  But in the end, did SCOTUS simply uphold the law of the land? Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, get the legal facts behind the decisions from New York University School of Law Professor Roderick Hills, Jr. and Temple University Beasley School of Law Professor Jan Ting.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[After one of the most historic United States Supreme Court sessions in years, emotions ran high and charges of radicalism ran amuck as the Justices handed down rulings on immigration enforcement, national healthcare, campaign finance law, stolen valor and more.  But in the end, did SCOTUS simply uphold the law of the land? Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, get the legal facts behind the decisions from New York University School of Law Professor Roderick Hills, Jr. and Temple University Beasley School of Law Professor Jan Ting.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2310</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/07/a-radical-or-rational-scotus-session/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2896642501.mp3?updated=1624285536" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are American Law Schools Failing Students?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/06/are-american-law-schools-failing-students/</link>
      <description>In his new book, Failing Law Schools, Washington University Law Professor Brian Tamanaha claims the American law school system is broken. He blames many institutional practices including skyrocketing tuition, bloated faculties, and unnecessary school rankings. But is this a fair critique? Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, examine these issues and more with Professor Tamanaha and Dean Susan Poser from the University of Nebraska College of Law.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:49:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Are American Law Schools Failing Students?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>343</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e4ee12cc-cfa9-11eb-92b9-eb79d4f54827/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Are American Law Schools Failing Students?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In his new book, Failing Law Schools, Washington University Law Professor Brian Tamanaha claims the American law school system is broken. He blames many institutional practices including skyrocketing tuition, bloated faculties, and unnecessary school rankings. But is this a fair critique? Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, examine these issues and more with Professor Tamanaha and Dean Susan Poser from the University of Nebraska College of Law.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In his new book, Failing Law Schools, Washington University Law Professor Brian Tamanaha claims the American law school system is broken. He blames many institutional practices including skyrocketing tuition, bloated faculties, and unnecessary school rankings. But is this a fair critique? Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, examine these issues and more with Professor Tamanaha and Dean Susan Poser from the University of Nebraska College of Law.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2413</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/06/are-american-law-schools-failing-students/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9002981468.mp3?updated=1624285470" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Recommendations for a Social, Mobile and Global Legal Profession</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/06/recommendations-for-a-social-mobile-and-global-legal-profession/</link>
      <description>The ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20 has released its latest recommendations so that the rules and ethics of the legal profession keep up with the incredible pace of technology.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, get the details from the ABA Commission’s Chief Reporter, Professor Andrew Perlman, and debate these suggestions with Attorney Bradley Shear.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:14:03 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Recommendations for a Social, Mobile and Global Legal Profession</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>342</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e51f13b8-cfa9-11eb-92b9-dba68d646e49/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Recommendations for a Social, Mobile and Global Legal Profession</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20 has released its latest recommendations so that the rules and ethics of the legal profession keep up with the incredible pace of technology.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, get the details from the ABA Commission’s Chief Reporter, Professor Andrew Perlman, and debate these suggestions with Attorney Bradley Shear.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20 has released its latest recommendations so that the rules and ethics of the legal profession keep up with the incredible pace of technology.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, get the details from the ABA Commission’s Chief Reporter, Professor Andrew Perlman, and debate these suggestions with Attorney Bradley Shear.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2348</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/06/recommendations-for-a-social-mobile-and-global-legal-profession/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2683452677.mp3?updated=1624285544" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Texting While Driving and the Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/06/texting-while-driving-and-the-law/</link>
      <description>Texting while driving is a growing danger on American roads.  Every day, people are severely injured and even killed by these distracted drivers.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, get the legal lowdown on texting while driving laws and recent high-profile cases, including one where both parties involved in a texting conversation were sued from Attorney Matthew Weiss from Weiss &amp; Associates, PC,  Attorney Robert M. Schartz from the firm of Abrahams Kaslow &amp; Cassman LLP and from Attorney Stephen "Skippy" Weinstein, a personal injury attorney at Stephen S. Weinstein, PC.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:57:57 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Liability After Facebook’s IPO</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>341</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e554b87e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-c3077e3f3eb0/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Texting While Driving and the Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Texting while driving is a growing danger on American roads.  Every day, people are severely injured and even killed by these distracted drivers.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, get the legal lowdown on texting while driving laws and recent high-profile cases, including one where both parties involved in a texting conversation were sued from Attorney Matthew Weiss from Weiss &amp; Associates, PC,  Attorney Robert M. Schartz from the firm of Abrahams Kaslow &amp; Cassman LLP and from Attorney Stephen "Skippy" Weinstein, a personal injury attorney at Stephen S. Weinstein, PC.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Texting while driving is a growing danger on American roads.  Every day, people are severely injured and even killed by these distracted drivers.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, get the legal lowdown on texting while driving laws and recent high-profile cases, including one where both parties involved in a texting conversation were sued from Attorney Matthew Weiss from Weiss &amp; Associates, PC,  Attorney Robert M. Schartz from the firm of Abrahams Kaslow &amp; Cassman LLP and from Attorney Stephen "Skippy" Weinstein, a personal injury attorney at Stephen S. Weinstein, PC.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2393</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/06/texting-while-driving-and-the-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4812671424.mp3?updated=1623961883" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Liability After Facebook’s IPO</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/06/liability-after-facebooks-ipo/</link>
      <description>Facebook’s super-hyped IPO quickly turned into Wall Street folly.  Lawsuits were filed almost immediately. Accusations of selective financial disclosure, investor deception and NASDAQ negligence are flying.  So who is to blame? And who is liable?  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, get the legal story of Facebook’s botched IPO and pending litigation from John P. ("Sean") Coffey, Managing Director at BlackRobe Capital Partners, and Scott M. Berman, Partner at Friedman Kaplan Seiler &amp; Adelman.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:04:57 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Liability After Facebook’s IPO</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>340</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e579e64e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-87bd908d2a32/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Liability After Facebook’s IPO</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Facebook’s super-hyped IPO quickly turned into Wall Street folly.  Lawsuits were filed almost immediately. Accusations of selective financial disclosure, investor deception and NASDAQ negligence are flying.  So who is to blame? And who is liable?  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, get the legal story of Facebook’s botched IPO and pending litigation from John P. ("Sean") Coffey, Managing Director at BlackRobe Capital Partners, and Scott M. Berman, Partner at Friedman Kaplan Seiler &amp; Adelman.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Facebook’s super-hyped IPO quickly turned into Wall Street folly.  Lawsuits were filed almost immediately. Accusations of selective financial disclosure, investor deception and NASDAQ negligence are flying.  So who is to blame? And who is liable?  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, get the legal story of Facebook’s botched IPO and pending litigation from John P. ("Sean") Coffey, Managing Director at BlackRobe Capital Partners, and Scott M. Berman, Partner at Friedman Kaplan Seiler &amp; Adelman.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2280</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/06/liability-after-facebooks-ipo/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4914111392.mp3?updated=1624285463" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Domestic Drones and Privacy Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/05/domestic-drones-and-privacy-law/</link>
      <description>On February 14, 2012, President Obama signed the Federal Aviation Administration Modernization and Reform Act into law.  This Act requires the FAA to allow others to fly drones, including law enforcement agencies, private companies and even individual hobbyists, over American neighborhoods.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, talk to the experts, Ryan Calo, Director for Privacy and Robotics, for the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School and Jennifer Lynch, a staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, about drones, transparency, public safety and the potential impact on privacy law.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 12:16:22 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Domestic Drones and Privacy Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>339</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e5a15c6a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-ef91eeb19add/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Domestic Drones and Privacy Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On February 14, 2012, President Obama signed the Federal Aviation Administration Modernization and Reform Act into law.  This Act requires the FAA to allow others to fly drones, including law enforcement agencies, private companies and even individual hobbyists, over American neighborhoods.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, talk to the experts, Ryan Calo, Director for Privacy and Robotics, for the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School and Jennifer Lynch, a staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, about drones, transparency, public safety and the potential impact on privacy law.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On February 14, 2012, President Obama signed the Federal Aviation Administration Modernization and Reform Act into law.  This Act requires the FAA to allow others to fly drones, including law enforcement agencies, private companies and even individual hobbyists, over American neighborhoods.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, talk to the experts, Ryan Calo, Director for Privacy and Robotics, for the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School and Jennifer Lynch, a staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, about drones, transparency, public safety and the potential impact on privacy law.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2175</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/05/domestic-drones-and-privacy-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2668412439.mp3?updated=1624285531" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Your Food Safe?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/05/is-your-food-safe/</link>
      <description>3,000 Americans die every year from food-borne illnesses.  Recent warnings include listeria in lettuce, salmonella in tuna and E. coli in ground beef.  So, is the food Americans eat safe?  Are the FDA, USDA and federal laws doing enough to keep our food supply free from potentially deadly pathogens? Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, Craig Williams gets the facts from food safety experts, William Marler, Managing Partner of Marler Clark and Editor of Food Safety News, and Dr. Michael Doyle, the Director of the University of Georgia’s Center for Food Safety.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:41:34 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Is Your Food Safe?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>338</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e5c9dd52-cfa9-11eb-92b9-c7b7b251c72d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Is Your Food Safe?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>3,000 Americans die every year from food-borne illnesses.  Recent warnings include listeria in lettuce, salmonella in tuna and E. coli in ground beef.  So, is the food Americans eat safe?  Are the FDA, USDA and federal laws doing enough to keep our food supply free from potentially deadly pathogens? Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, Craig Williams gets the facts from food safety experts, William Marler, Managing Partner of Marler Clark and Editor of Food Safety News, and Dr. Michael Doyle, the Director of the University of Georgia’s Center for Food Safety.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[3,000 Americans die every year from food-borne illnesses.  Recent warnings include listeria in lettuce, salmonella in tuna and E. coli in ground beef.  So, is the food Americans eat safe?  Are the FDA, USDA and federal laws doing enough to keep our food supply free from potentially deadly pathogens? Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, Craig Williams gets the facts from food safety experts, William Marler, Managing Partner of Marler Clark and Editor of Food Safety News, and Dr. Michael Doyle, the Director of the University of Georgia’s Center for Food Safety.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2135</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/05/is-your-food-safe/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7069270451.mp3?updated=1624285533" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Transgender Family Law in the Courts</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/05/transgender-family-law-in-the-courts/</link>
      <description>Advocates for the transgender community say this segment of the population faces an extremely difficult time in court because of bias and misunderstanding, especially in cases of parental rights and protection for transgender youth. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, Bob Ambrogi  breaks down the difficulties the transgender community faces every day with Attorney Jennifer L. Levi, the director of GLAD's Transgender Rights Project and Attorney Elizabeth E. Monnin-Browder from Ropes &amp; Gray and a former GLAD attorney. Jennifer and Liz also discuss their new book, Transgender Family Law: A Guide to Effective Advocacy.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:29:08 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Transgender Family Law in the Courts</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>337</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e5e57ed6-cfa9-11eb-92b9-cf5a7e26bb4a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Transgender Family Law in the Courts</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Advocates for the transgender community say this segment of the population faces an extremely difficult time in court because of bias and misunderstanding, especially in cases of parental rights and protection for transgender youth. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, Bob Ambrogi  breaks down the difficulties the transgender community faces every day with Attorney Jennifer L. Levi, the director of GLAD's Transgender Rights Project and Attorney Elizabeth E. Monnin-Browder from Ropes &amp; Gray and a former GLAD attorney. Jennifer and Liz also discuss their new book, Transgender Family Law: A Guide to Effective Advocacy.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Advocates for the transgender community say this segment of the population faces an extremely difficult time in court because of bias and misunderstanding, especially in cases of parental rights and protection for transgender youth. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, Bob Ambrogi  breaks down the difficulties the transgender community faces every day with Attorney Jennifer L. Levi, the director of GLAD's Transgender Rights Project and Attorney Elizabeth E. Monnin-Browder from Ropes &amp; Gray and a former GLAD attorney. Jennifer and Liz also discuss their new book, Transgender Family Law: A Guide to Effective Advocacy.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2238</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/05/transgender-family-law-in-the-courts/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2188719304.mp3?updated=1623961884" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Defense Attorneys Turning to Social Media</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/05/defense-attorneys-turning-to-social-media/</link>
      <description>Lead counsel for accused murderer George Zimmerman calls social media an unavoidable component of high profile cases.  So, should blogging, posting and tweeting become standard practices in defense strategies?  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, debate the pros and cons, as well as the legal and ethical issues of social media with Dr. Amy Singer, founder of Trial Consultants Inc., and Attorney Scott Greenfield, Of Counsel at Hull McGuire, PC.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 12:50:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Defense Attorneys Turning to Social Media</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>336</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e6021898-cfa9-11eb-92b9-33f086dabdde/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Defense Attorneys Turning to Social Media</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Lead counsel for accused murderer George Zimmerman calls social media an unavoidable component of high profile cases.  So, should blogging, posting and tweeting become standard practices in defense strategies?  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, debate the pros and cons, as well as the legal and ethical issues of social media with Dr. Amy Singer, founder of Trial Consultants Inc., and Attorney Scott Greenfield, Of Counsel at Hull McGuire, PC.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Lead counsel for accused murderer George Zimmerman calls social media an unavoidable component of high profile cases.  So, should blogging, posting and tweeting become standard practices in defense strategies?  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, debate the pros and cons, as well as the legal and ethical issues of social media with Dr. Amy Singer, founder of Trial Consultants Inc., and Attorney Scott Greenfield, Of Counsel at Hull McGuire, PC.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2157</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/05/defense-attorneys-turning-to-social-media/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8606054158.mp3?updated=1624285462" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Limits of Sports Violence</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/05/the-legal-limits-of-sports-violence/</link>
      <description>The infamous elbow jab of Metta World Peace, NFL "Bounty Hunters," soccer riots, high school hockey brawls ...where is the legal line drawn when it comes to violence in sports? Or is it just the nature of the game? Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams turn to  Attorney Eldon L. Ham, an adjunct professor at Chicago-Kent College of Law and Professor Matthew Mitten, Director of the National Sports Law Institute at Marquette University Law School, for their take on whether there should be legal implications when an athlete goes too far.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 15:11:58 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Limits of Sports Violence</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>335</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e627dd4e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-536ff582d861/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Legal Limits of Sports Violence</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The infamous elbow jab of Metta World Peace, NFL "Bounty Hunters," soccer riots, high school hockey brawls ...where is the legal line drawn when it comes to violence in sports? Or is it just the nature of the game? Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams turn to  Attorney Eldon L. Ham, an adjunct professor at Chicago-Kent College of Law and Professor Matthew Mitten, Director of the National Sports Law Institute at Marquette University Law School, for their take on whether there should be legal implications when an athlete goes too far.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The infamous elbow jab of Metta World Peace, NFL "Bounty Hunters," soccer riots, high school hockey brawls ...where is the legal line drawn when it comes to violence in sports? Or is it just the nature of the game? Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams turn to  Attorney Eldon L. Ham, an adjunct professor at Chicago-Kent College of Law and Professor Matthew Mitten, Director of the National Sports Law Institute at Marquette University Law School, for their take on whether there should be legal implications when an athlete goes too far.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2257</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/05/the-legal-limits-of-sports-violence/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6689674063.mp3?updated=1624285566" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Crackdown on Human Trafficking</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/04/legal-crackdown-on-human-trafficking/</link>
      <description>Human trafficking is "modern-day slavery." And if you think it isn’t happening near you, think again. The United Nations estimates nearly 2.4 million people may be the victims of this crime.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams take a legal look at this troubling issue with Professor Bridgette Carr from the University of Michigan Law School, Attorney Ann Johnson from Houston, Texas and Mary C. Ellison, Director of Policy for Polaris Project.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:54:12 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Crackdown on Human Trafficking</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>334</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e6520862-cfa9-11eb-92b9-9f3536f088ef/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Crackdown on Human Trafficking</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Human trafficking is "modern-day slavery." And if you think it isn’t happening near you, think again. The United Nations estimates nearly 2.4 million people may be the victims of this crime.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams take a legal look at this troubling issue with Professor Bridgette Carr from the University of Michigan Law School, Attorney Ann Johnson from Houston, Texas and Mary C. Ellison, Director of Policy for Polaris Project.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Human trafficking is "modern-day slavery." And if you think it isn’t happening near you, think again. The United Nations estimates nearly 2.4 million people may be the victims of this crime.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams take a legal look at this troubling issue with Professor Bridgette Carr from the University of Michigan Law School, Attorney Ann Johnson from Houston, Texas and Mary C. Ellison, Director of Policy for Polaris Project.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2337</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/04/legal-crackdown-on-human-trafficking/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7886725490.mp3?updated=1624285544" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Transparency in Congressional Travel</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/04/transparency-in-congressional-travel/</link>
      <description>Members of Congress and their staffers who travel at the expense of private organizations must follow a long list of legal restrictions and requirements.  However, there is a little known exemption that allows the same federal employees to travel with virtually no accountability and very little transparency.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, along with ProPublica.org reporter Justin Elliott and Washington University Law Professor Kathleen Clark examine the ethics, legalities and secrecy of these Congressional trips abroad.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:10:18 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Transparency in Congressional Travel</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>333</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e675277a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-83009f5186ee/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Transparency in Congressional Travel</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Members of Congress and their staffers who travel at the expense of private organizations must follow a long list of legal restrictions and requirements.  However, there is a little known exemption that allows the same federal employees to travel with virtually no accountability and very little transparency.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, along with ProPublica.org reporter Justin Elliott and Washington University Law Professor Kathleen Clark examine the ethics, legalities and secrecy of these Congressional trips abroad.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Members of Congress and their staffers who travel at the expense of private organizations must follow a long list of legal restrictions and requirements.  However, there is a little known exemption that allows the same federal employees to travel with virtually no accountability and very little transparency.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, along with ProPublica.org reporter Justin Elliott and Washington University Law Professor Kathleen Clark examine the ethics, legalities and secrecy of these Congressional trips abroad.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2221</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/04/transparency-in-congressional-travel/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7216236310.mp3?updated=1624285541" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Controversial Legislation in Women’s Health</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/04/controversial-legislation-in-womens-health/</link>
      <description>From the Obama Administration’s decision on female contraception coverage, to the Congressional hearing on women’s health featuring an all-male panel of witnesses, to the Rush Limbaugh/Sandra Fluke firestorm, legislation targeting women's health is causing quite the political controversy across the country. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, Craig Williams, joins Attorney Shari Rendall, Director of Legislation and Public Policy for Concerned Women for America and Attorney Gretchen Borchelt, Senior Counsel for Health and Reproductive Rights for the National Women’s Law Center, to discuss current legislation aimed at women's issues, reaction from women’s groups and the present state of women's rights.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:57:41 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Controversial Legislation in Women’s Health</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>332</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e6aa37a8-cfa9-11eb-92b9-bb86ebbf21b8/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Controversial Legislation in Women’s Health</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>From the Obama Administration’s decision on female contraception coverage, to the Congressional hearing on women’s health featuring an all-male panel of witnesses, to the Rush Limbaugh/Sandra Fluke firestorm, legislation targeting women's health is causing quite the political controversy across the country. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, Craig Williams, joins Attorney Shari Rendall, Director of Legislation and Public Policy for Concerned Women for America and Attorney Gretchen Borchelt, Senior Counsel for Health and Reproductive Rights for the National Women’s Law Center, to discuss current legislation aimed at women's issues, reaction from women’s groups and the present state of women's rights.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[From the Obama Administration’s decision on female contraception coverage, to the Congressional hearing on women’s health featuring an all-male panel of witnesses, to the Rush Limbaugh/Sandra Fluke firestorm, legislation targeting women's health is causing quite the political controversy across the country. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, Craig Williams, joins Attorney Shari Rendall, Director of Legislation and Public Policy for Concerned Women for America and Attorney Gretchen Borchelt, Senior Counsel for Health and Reproductive Rights for the National Women’s Law Center, to discuss current legislation aimed at women's issues, reaction from women’s groups and the present state of women's rights.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2525</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/04/controversial-legislation-in-womens-health/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8327280177.mp3?updated=1623961886" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside the Trayvon Martin Tragedy</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/03/inside-the-trayvon-martin-tragedy/</link>
      <description>The shooting death of 17 year old Trayvon Martin in Florida has sparked outrage across the country. On February 26, 2012, Trayvon died from a single gunshot to the chest.  Police say neighborhood watch captain, George Zimmerman, fired that shot.  Zimmerman is using Florida’s "Stand Your Ground" Law to justify the killing.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, welcome Professor Michelle Jacobs, from the University of Florida's Levin College of Law and Professor Kenneth Novak, Ph.D., Chair of the Department of Criminal Justice at the University of Missouri - Kansas City, to explore the legal issues surrounding the "Stand Your Ground" law, neighborhood watches, and the possibility of racial profiling.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:03:54 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside the Trayvon Martin Tragedy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>330</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e6e82540-cfa9-11eb-92b9-a31f74137718/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Inside the Trayvon Martin Tragedy</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The shooting death of 17 year old Trayvon Martin in Florida has sparked outrage across the country. On February 26, 2012, Trayvon died from a single gunshot to the chest.  Police say neighborhood watch captain, George Zimmerman, fired that shot.  Zimmerman is using Florida’s "Stand Your Ground" Law to justify the killing.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, welcome Professor Michelle Jacobs, from the University of Florida's Levin College of Law and Professor Kenneth Novak, Ph.D., Chair of the Department of Criminal Justice at the University of Missouri - Kansas City, to explore the legal issues surrounding the "Stand Your Ground" law, neighborhood watches, and the possibility of racial profiling.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The shooting death of 17 year old Trayvon Martin in Florida has sparked outrage across the country. On February 26, 2012, Trayvon died from a single gunshot to the chest.  Police say neighborhood watch captain, George Zimmerman, fired that shot.  Zimmerman is using Florida’s "Stand Your Ground" Law to justify the killing.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, welcome Professor Michelle Jacobs, from the University of Florida's Levin College of Law and Professor Kenneth Novak, Ph.D., Chair of the Department of Criminal Justice at the University of Missouri - Kansas City, to explore the legal issues surrounding the "Stand Your Ground" law, neighborhood watches, and the possibility of racial profiling.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2220</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/03/inside-the-trayvon-martin-tragedy/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4583681394.mp3?updated=1623961886" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gambling on Sports and the Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/03/gambling-on-sports-and-the-law/</link>
      <description>What are the odds that your office NCAA basketball pool for March Madness is illegal?  Are you willing to bet that gambling outside of a casino on any sporting event breaks both state and federal laws?  So then, why is it a crapshoot that you will be prosecuted under these laws?  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, take a look at America’s gambling legislation with Professor Marc Edelman of Barry University's Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law and Author and Attorney Clay Travis from Counsel On Call.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:36:40 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Gambling on Sports and the Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>329</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e7030c8e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-f710d5abde64/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Gambling on Sports and the Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What are the odds that your office NCAA basketball pool for March Madness is illegal?  Are you willing to bet that gambling outside of a casino on any sporting event breaks both state and federal laws?  So then, why is it a crapshoot that you will be prosecuted under these laws?  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, take a look at America’s gambling legislation with Professor Marc Edelman of Barry University's Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law and Author and Attorney Clay Travis from Counsel On Call.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What are the odds that your office NCAA basketball pool for March Madness is illegal?  Are you willing to bet that gambling outside of a casino on any sporting event breaks both state and federal laws?  So then, why is it a crapshoot that you will be prosecuted under these laws?  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, take a look at America’s gambling legislation with Professor Marc Edelman of Barry University's Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law and Author and Attorney Clay Travis from Counsel On Call.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2375</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/03/gambling-on-sports-and-the-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1145034402.mp3?updated=1624285546" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In-Vitro Fertilization, Custody Rights and Family Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/03/in-vitro-fertilization-custody-rights-and-family-law/</link>
      <description>A Massachusetts court orders a man to pay child support for twin girls, born through In-vitro fertilization and with donor sperm and eggs, even though he was estranged from his wife at the time of conception.  Is this fair?  With the rise in IVF treatments, there are more and more cases across the country with complicated custody matters. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Attorney Maureen McBrien from the firm, Todd &amp; Weld LLP and Certified Family Law Specialist and trial attorney Violet P. Woodhouse, to explore the legal issues surrounding in-vitro fertilization, custody rights and family law.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:26:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>In-Vitro Fertilization, Custody Rights and Family Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>328</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e722a012-cfa9-11eb-92b9-3f6e3f79acdd/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In-Vitro Fertilization, Custody Rights and Family Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A Massachusetts court orders a man to pay child support for twin girls, born through In-vitro fertilization and with donor sperm and eggs, even though he was estranged from his wife at the time of conception.  Is this fair?  With the rise in IVF treatments, there are more and more cases across the country with complicated custody matters. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Attorney Maureen McBrien from the firm, Todd &amp; Weld LLP and Certified Family Law Specialist and trial attorney Violet P. Woodhouse, to explore the legal issues surrounding in-vitro fertilization, custody rights and family law.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A Massachusetts court orders a man to pay child support for twin girls, born through In-vitro fertilization and with donor sperm and eggs, even though he was estranged from his wife at the time of conception.  Is this fair?  With the rise in IVF treatments, there are more and more cases across the country with complicated custody matters. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join Attorney Maureen McBrien from the firm, Todd &amp; Weld LLP and Certified Family Law Specialist and trial attorney Violet P. Woodhouse, to explore the legal issues surrounding in-vitro fertilization, custody rights and family law.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2138</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/03/in-vitro-fertilization-custody-rights-and-family-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7582871556.mp3?updated=1624285519" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Issues Created by Story World Communities and Transmedia</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/03/legal-issues-created-by-story-world-communities-and-transmedia/</link>
      <description>The rise of interactive story world communities and transmedia marketing campaigns has brought about scores of intellectual property, copyright law and creation rights issues.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, bring together Esther Lim, the Founder of The Estuary and Scott Walker, the President of Brain Candy, for an in-depth analysis of the questions and concerns generated by collaborative entertainment and multi-platform interactive engagement.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:01:29 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Issues Created by Story World Communities and Transmedia</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>327</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e748f1f4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-27b798d3f426/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Issues Created by Story World Communities and Transmedia</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The rise of interactive story world communities and transmedia marketing campaigns has brought about scores of intellectual property, copyright law and creation rights issues.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, bring together Esther Lim, the Founder of The Estuary and Scott Walker, the President of Brain Candy, for an in-depth analysis of the questions and concerns generated by collaborative entertainment and multi-platform interactive engagement.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The rise of interactive story world communities and transmedia marketing campaigns has brought about scores of intellectual property, copyright law and creation rights issues.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, bring together Esther Lim, the Founder of The Estuary and Scott Walker, the President of Brain Candy, for an in-depth analysis of the questions and concerns generated by collaborative entertainment and multi-platform interactive engagement.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2293</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/03/legal-issues-created-by-story-world-communities-and-transmedia/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1343520100.mp3?updated=1623961887" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cost-Effective Law Practice Management</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/03/cost-effective-law-practice-management/</link>
      <description>As law firms slowly climb out of this recession, have their legal practice management skills changed? Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Rudy Bazelmans, Regional Director of Expense Reduction Analysts and Jim Calloway, Director of the Oklahoma Bar Association's Management Assistance Program, to explain the current state of the legal industry, new law practice management skills, what attorneys have done to cut costs and how to keep costs down in the future.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:48:38 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Cost-Effective Law Practice Management</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>326</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e76e5322-cfa9-11eb-92b9-633e7e43bb1f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Cost-Effective Law Practice Management</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As law firms slowly climb out of this recession, have their legal practice management skills changed? Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Rudy Bazelmans, Regional Director of Expense Reduction Analysts and Jim Calloway, Director of the Oklahoma Bar Association's Management Assistance Program, to explain the current state of the legal industry, new law practice management skills, what attorneys have done to cut costs and how to keep costs down in the future.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[As law firms slowly climb out of this recession, have their legal practice management skills changed? Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Rudy Bazelmans, Regional Director of Expense Reduction Analysts and Jim Calloway, Director of the Oklahoma Bar Association's Management Assistance Program, to explain the current state of the legal industry, new law practice management skills, what attorneys have done to cut costs and how to keep costs down in the future.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1986</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/03/cost-effective-law-practice-management/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9865495490.mp3?updated=1624285459" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal End of Affirmative Action?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/02/the-legal-end-of-affirmative-action/</link>
      <description>The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear "Fisher v. University of Texas." This case could bring about the end of college admissions policies based on race.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, along with Huffington Post Supreme Court Correspondent Mike Sacks and UCLA School of Law Professor Richard Sander, examine the possible fate of affirmative action in college admissions.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:25:53 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legal End of Affirmative Action?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>325</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e78e9d30-cfa9-11eb-92b9-27e8597064aa/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Legal End of Affirmative Action?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear "Fisher v. University of Texas." This case could bring about the end of college admissions policies based on race.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, along with Huffington Post Supreme Court Correspondent Mike Sacks and UCLA School of Law Professor Richard Sander, examine the possible fate of affirmative action in college admissions.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear "Fisher v. University of Texas." This case could bring about the end of college admissions policies based on race.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, along with Huffington Post Supreme Court Correspondent Mike Sacks and UCLA School of Law Professor Richard Sander, examine the possible fate of affirmative action in college admissions.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2152</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/02/the-legal-end-of-affirmative-action/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9992426037.mp3?updated=1623961887" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Constitutionality of Prop 8 and the Future of Gay Marriage</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/02/constitutionality-of-prop-8-and-the-future-of-gay-marriage/</link>
      <description>Just this month, after a long three year legal battle, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that California’s Proposition 8, which is the ballot measure that banned gay marriage, is unconstitutional. The question remains-will this case now head to the U.S. Supreme Court?  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, join Jennifer C. Pizer, Legal Director at the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law and Vikram David Amar, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law,  to take a look at this ruling and what this means for the future of gay marriage in America.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:27:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Constitutionality of Prop 8 and the Future of Gay Marriage</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>324</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e7afecec-cfa9-11eb-92b9-a3c6ee1ac5cd/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Constitutionality of Prop 8 and the Future of Gay Marriage</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Just this month, after a long three year legal battle, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that California’s Proposition 8, which is the ballot measure that banned gay marriage, is unconstitutional. The question remains-will this case now head to the U.S. Supreme Court?  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, join Jennifer C. Pizer, Legal Director at the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law and Vikram David Amar, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law,  to take a look at this ruling and what this means for the future of gay marriage in America.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Just this month, after a long three year legal battle, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that California’s Proposition 8, which is the ballot measure that banned gay marriage, is unconstitutional. The question remains-will this case now head to the U.S. Supreme Court?  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, join Jennifer C. Pizer, Legal Director at the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law and Vikram David Amar, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law,  to take a look at this ruling and what this means for the future of gay marriage in America.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2205</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/02/constitutionality-of-prop-8-and-the-future-of-gay-marriage/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9910240020.mp3?updated=1624285578" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Law and the Liability of Eugenics</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/02/the-law-and-the-liability-of-eugenics/</link>
      <description>For decades, a program called Eugenics gave state boards the right to deem someone "unfit to procreate."   The outcome of this was 66,000 Americans were selectively sterilized between the late 1920’s and the 1980’s. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Professor Alfred Brophy, from the University of North Carolina School of Law and Attorney James Bowden from Waller Lansden, to discuss this controversial practice, the US Supreme Court’s shocking decision on eugenics and why forced sterilization "is" technically constitutional.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:06:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Law and the Liability of Eugenics</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>323</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e7e3b7ca-cfa9-11eb-92b9-bb2c834a9177/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Law and the Liability of Eugenics</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For decades, a program called Eugenics gave state boards the right to deem someone "unfit to procreate."   The outcome of this was 66,000 Americans were selectively sterilized between the late 1920’s and the 1980’s. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Professor Alfred Brophy, from the University of North Carolina School of Law and Attorney James Bowden from Waller Lansden, to discuss this controversial practice, the US Supreme Court’s shocking decision on eugenics and why forced sterilization "is" technically constitutional.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[For decades, a program called Eugenics gave state boards the right to deem someone "unfit to procreate."   The outcome of this was 66,000 Americans were selectively sterilized between the late 1920’s and the 1980’s. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Professor Alfred Brophy, from the University of North Carolina School of Law and Attorney James Bowden from Waller Lansden, to discuss this controversial practice, the US Supreme Court’s shocking decision on eugenics and why forced sterilization "is" technically constitutional.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2005</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/02/the-law-and-the-liability-of-eugenics/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9241299298.mp3?updated=1623961888" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Talk Network Live at LegalTechNY 2012- Bob Ambrogi on Why LegalTechNY is a Top Show for Lawyers</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/02/legal-talk-network-live-at-legaltechny-2012-bob-ambrogi-on-why-legaltechny-is-a-top-show-for-lawyers/</link>
      <description>Bob Ambrogi, co-host of Lawyer2Lawyer and longtime legal technologist, travels to  LegalTechNY and explains why it is one of the pre-eminent legal technology shows. This year’s emphasis is on e-discovery, case management and cloud computing.  Bob also tells us why he’s looking forward to seeing all the new and exciting tech products targeting the legal community. Be sure to watch the interview, hosted by Legal Talk Network producer, Kate Kenney.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:35:45 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Talk Network Live at LegalTechNY 2012- Bob Ambrogi on Why LegalTechNY is a Top Show for Lawyers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>322</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e8054a3e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-ef65754a4b54/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Talk Network Live at LegalTechNY 2012- Bob Ambrogi on Why LegalTechNY is a Top Show for Lawyers</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Bob Ambrogi, co-host of Lawyer2Lawyer and longtime legal technologist, travels to  LegalTechNY and explains why it is one of the pre-eminent legal technology shows. This year’s emphasis is on e-discovery, case management and cloud computing.  Bob also tells us why he’s looking forward to seeing all the new and exciting tech products targeting the legal community. Be sure to watch the interview, hosted by Legal Talk Network producer, Kate Kenney.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Bob Ambrogi, co-host of Lawyer2Lawyer and longtime legal technologist, travels to  LegalTechNY and explains why it is one of the pre-eminent legal technology shows. This year’s emphasis is on e-discovery, case management and cloud computing.  Bob also tells us why he’s looking forward to seeing all the new and exciting tech products targeting the legal community. Be sure to watch the interview, hosted by Legal Talk Network producer, Kate Kenney.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>102</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/02/legal-talk-network-live-at-legaltechny-2012-bob-ambrogi-on-why-legaltechny-is-a-top-show-for-lawyers/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6791312394.mp3?updated=1771864460" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Crusade to Save Endangered Species</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/02/the-legal-crusade-to-save-endangered-species/</link>
      <description>The world’s tiger population has declined by 97%. The African elephant population has been cut in half. 33% of open-ocean sharks are now threatened with extinction. These and other alarming statistics have created worldwide legal action to save the Earth’s endangered species. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney J. Craig Williams explores laws and initiatives designed to save threatened species with attorney and WildAid board member, David Kracke of Nichols and Associates in Portland, Oregon.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:57:38 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Crusade to Save Endangered Species</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>321</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e82cc794-cfa9-11eb-92b9-0f7cefd98e2a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Legal Crusade to Save Endangered Species</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The world’s tiger population has declined by 97%. The African elephant population has been cut in half. 33% of open-ocean sharks are now threatened with extinction. These and other alarming statistics have created worldwide legal action to save the Earth’s endangered species. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney J. Craig Williams explores laws and initiatives designed to save threatened species with attorney and WildAid board member, David Kracke of Nichols and Associates in Portland, Oregon.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The world’s tiger population has declined by 97%. The African elephant population has been cut in half. 33% of open-ocean sharks are now threatened with extinction. These and other alarming statistics have created worldwide legal action to save the Earth’s endangered species. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney J. Craig Williams explores laws and initiatives designed to save threatened species with attorney and WildAid board member, David Kracke of Nichols and Associates in Portland, Oregon.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2166</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/02/the-legal-crusade-to-save-endangered-species/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3729364264.mp3?updated=1624285464" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Liability in the Costa Concordia Cruise Ship Tragedy</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/01/liability-in-the-costa-concordia-cruise-ship-tragedy/</link>
      <description>The capsizing of the luxury cruise ship, Costa Concordia, off the coast of Italy has created a torrent of possible criminal charges against the captain and civil litigation against the cruise line company in courtrooms around the world.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, along with Attorney Joseph McFaul, special counsel for Sedgwick LLP in Irvine, California, sort through the plethora of legal issues associated with this cruise ship tragedy.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:23:23 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Liability in the Costa Concordia Cruise Ship Tragedy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>320</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e864fed4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-c3074a082dfc/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Liability in the Costa Concordia Cruise Ship Tragedy</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The capsizing of the luxury cruise ship, Costa Concordia, off the coast of Italy has created a torrent of possible criminal charges against the captain and civil litigation against the cruise line company in courtrooms around the world.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, along with Attorney Joseph McFaul, special counsel for Sedgwick LLP in Irvine, California, sort through the plethora of legal issues associated with this cruise ship tragedy.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The capsizing of the luxury cruise ship, Costa Concordia, off the coast of Italy has created a torrent of possible criminal charges against the captain and civil litigation against the cruise line company in courtrooms around the world.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, along with Attorney Joseph McFaul, special counsel for Sedgwick LLP in Irvine, California, sort through the plethora of legal issues associated with this cruise ship tragedy.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2122</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/01/liability-in-the-costa-concordia-cruise-ship-tragedy/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2134326857.mp3?updated=1623961889" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Revisiting Citizens United in an Election Year</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/01/revisiting-citizens-united-in-an-election-year/</link>
      <description>Since 2010, there has been great debate over the controversial ruling, Citizens United. Most recently, the Montana Supreme Court challenged the decision while Senator McCain called it "one of the worst decisions I have ever seen." Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome, Attorney Joseph M. Birkenstock, former chief counsel of the Democratic National Committee and Bradley A. Smith, Chairman and Co-Founder of the Center for Competitive Politics and former Commissioner on the Federal Election Commission, for an in-depth discussion on the impact of the ruling during an election year and its influence on the upcoming Presidential election.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:18:15 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Revisiting Citizens United in an Election Year</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>319</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e887da4e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-9b0fb5ed734d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Revisiting Citizens United in an Election Year</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Since 2010, there has been great debate over the controversial ruling, Citizens United. Most recently, the Montana Supreme Court challenged the decision while Senator McCain called it "one of the worst decisions I have ever seen." Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome, Attorney Joseph M. Birkenstock, former chief counsel of the Democratic National Committee and Bradley A. Smith, Chairman and Co-Founder of the Center for Competitive Politics and former Commissioner on the Federal Election Commission, for an in-depth discussion on the impact of the ruling during an election year and its influence on the upcoming Presidential election.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Since 2010, there has been great debate over the controversial ruling, Citizens United. Most recently, the Montana Supreme Court challenged the decision while Senator McCain called it "one of the worst decisions I have ever seen." Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome, Attorney Joseph M. Birkenstock, former chief counsel of the Democratic National Committee and Bradley A. Smith, Chairman and Co-Founder of the Center for Competitive Politics and former Commissioner on the Federal Election Commission, for an in-depth discussion on the impact of the ruling during an election year and its influence on the upcoming Presidential election.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2120</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/01/revisiting-citizens-united-in-an-election-year/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5425530335.mp3?updated=1623961890" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What’s Trending in 2012?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/01/what%E2%80%99s-trending-in-2012/</link>
      <description>Decriminalizing medical marijuana, fighting to repeal healthcare reform and using social media as evidence are just a few of the topics trending in the legal industry in 2012.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, J. Craig Williams discusses the hottest trends currently transforming the legal world with attorney and legal trend-watcher Danny Cevallos, the founding partner of Cevallos &amp; Wong, L.L.P.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:07:07 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>What’s Trending in 2012?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>318</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e8a6a7da-cfa9-11eb-92b9-f772b2af0ddb/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>What’s Trending in 2012?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Decriminalizing medical marijuana, fighting to repeal healthcare reform and using social media as evidence are just a few of the topics trending in the legal industry in 2012.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, J. Craig Williams discusses the hottest trends currently transforming the legal world with attorney and legal trend-watcher Danny Cevallos, the founding partner of Cevallos &amp; Wong, L.L.P.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Decriminalizing medical marijuana, fighting to repeal healthcare reform and using social media as evidence are just a few of the topics trending in the legal industry in 2012.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, J. Craig Williams discusses the hottest trends currently transforming the legal world with attorney and legal trend-watcher Danny Cevallos, the founding partner of Cevallos &amp; Wong, L.L.P.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2067</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/01/what%E2%80%99s-trending-in-2012/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2307825453.mp3?updated=1624285459" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 2011 Year in Review &amp; Legal Predictions for 2012</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/01/the-2011-year-in-review-legal-predictions-for-2012/</link>
      <description>From the spectacle of the Casey Anthony trial, to the great debate over the health care law, to the controversial immigration law in Arizona, 2011 was a big year in the law. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome returning guest, Stephen L. Kaplan from the firm Hicks, Mims, Kaplan &amp; Burns, to review his 2011 predictions and look ahead to a brand new year, 2012!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:56:15 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The 2011 Year in Review &amp; Legal Predictions for 2012</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>317</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e8c94d58-cfa9-11eb-92b9-3f4ef57c12b6/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The 2011 Year in Review &amp; Legal Predictions for 2012</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>From the spectacle of the Casey Anthony trial, to the great debate over the health care law, to the controversial immigration law in Arizona, 2011 was a big year in the law. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome returning guest, Stephen L. Kaplan from the firm Hicks, Mims, Kaplan &amp; Burns, to review his 2011 predictions and look ahead to a brand new year, 2012!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[From the spectacle of the Casey Anthony trial, to the great debate over the health care law, to the controversial immigration law in Arizona, 2011 was a big year in the law. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome returning guest, Stephen L. Kaplan from the firm Hicks, Mims, Kaplan &amp; Burns, to review his 2011 predictions and look ahead to a brand new year, 2012!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2328</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/01/the-2011-year-in-review-legal-predictions-for-2012/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9855340382.mp3?updated=1623961891" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Fight for the Legal Rights of War Dogs</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/12/the-fight-for-the-legal-rights-of-war-dogs/</link>
      <description>War dogs serve bravely alongside the men and women of the U.S. Military.  Their handlers consider them heroes, but the military still classifies military working dogs as equipment.  Up until recently, these canine soldiers were left behind or even euthanized after the fighting stopped.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Ron Aiello, the president and co-founder of The United States War Dogs Association, and Carter Dillard, the director of litigation for the Animal Legal Defense Fund, and discuss what laws need to change so that war dogs get the respect that they deserve from the U.S. military.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:33:56 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Fight for the Legal Rights of War Dogs</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>316</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e8f5e9f8-cfa9-11eb-92b9-8f5e7ef2ea31/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Fight for the Legal Rights of War Dogs</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>War dogs serve bravely alongside the men and women of the U.S. Military.  Their handlers consider them heroes, but the military still classifies military working dogs as equipment.  Up until recently, these canine soldiers were left behind or even euthanized after the fighting stopped.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Ron Aiello, the president and co-founder of The United States War Dogs Association, and Carter Dillard, the director of litigation for the Animal Legal Defense Fund, and discuss what laws need to change so that war dogs get the respect that they deserve from the U.S. military.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[War dogs serve bravely alongside the men and women of the U.S. Military.  Their handlers consider them heroes, but the military still classifies military working dogs as equipment.  Up until recently, these canine soldiers were left behind or even euthanized after the fighting stopped.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Ron Aiello, the president and co-founder of The United States War Dogs Association, and Carter Dillard, the director of litigation for the Animal Legal Defense Fund, and discuss what laws need to change so that war dogs get the respect that they deserve from the U.S. military.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2382</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/12/the-fight-for-the-legal-rights-of-war-dogs/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3412368312.mp3?updated=1624285465" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The PeaceTones Legal Empowerment Project &amp; the Power of Music</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/12/the-peacetones-legal-empowerment-project-the-power-of-music/</link>
      <description>Music makes the world go ‘round and on this holiday edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi celebrate with a music themed show!  First up, Bob and Craig welcome Attorney Jeffrey M. Aresty, founder and current President of Internetbar.org and Attorney Ruha Devanesan, the Executive Director &amp; Vice President of IBO, to talk about the mission of the Internet Bar's PeaceTones Legal Empowerment project. Later in the program, we share a holiday treat from a great songwriter and longtime friend, Attorney Larry Savell! Happy Holidays!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:07:04 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The PeaceTones Legal Empowerment Project &amp; the Power of Music</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>315</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e91ea320-cfa9-11eb-92b9-07f78145e168/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The PeaceTones Legal Empowerment Project &amp; the Power of Music</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Music makes the world go ‘round and on this holiday edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi celebrate with a music themed show!  First up, Bob and Craig welcome Attorney Jeffrey M. Aresty, founder and current President of Internetbar.org and Attorney Ruha Devanesan, the Executive Director &amp; Vice President of IBO, to talk about the mission of the Internet Bar's PeaceTones Legal Empowerment project. Later in the program, we share a holiday treat from a great songwriter and longtime friend, Attorney Larry Savell! Happy Holidays!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Music makes the world go ‘round and on this holiday edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi celebrate with a music themed show!  First up, Bob and Craig welcome Attorney Jeffrey M. Aresty, founder and current President of Internetbar.org and Attorney Ruha Devanesan, the Executive Director &amp; Vice President of IBO, to talk about the mission of the Internet Bar's PeaceTones Legal Empowerment project. Later in the program, we share a holiday treat from a great songwriter and longtime friend, Attorney Larry Savell! Happy Holidays!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2046</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/12/the-peacetones-legal-empowerment-project-the-power-of-music/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9157079643.mp3?updated=1624285458" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Controversy over Cameras in the U.S. Supreme Court</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/12/the-controversy-over-cameras-in-the-u-s-supreme-court/</link>
      <description>Should the U.S. Supreme Court broadcast its sessions to the American public or should cameras be kept out of the SCOTUS chamber? Proponents of cameras say they are needed for transparency.  Opponents call the idea potentially unconstitutional and harmful.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Nancy Marder, Professor of Law at Chicago-Kent College of Law and Eric P. Robinson, Deputy Director of the Donald W. Reynolds Center for Courts and Media at the University of Nevada in Reno, for an in depth discussion on both sides of this very important issue.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:01:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Controversy over Cameras in the U.S. Supreme Court</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>314</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e9471102-cfa9-11eb-92b9-ef47c1d85870/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Controversy over Cameras in the U.S. Supreme Court</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Should the U.S. Supreme Court broadcast its sessions to the American public or should cameras be kept out of the SCOTUS chamber? Proponents of cameras say they are needed for transparency.  Opponents call the idea potentially unconstitutional and harmful.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Nancy Marder, Professor of Law at Chicago-Kent College of Law and Eric P. Robinson, Deputy Director of the Donald W. Reynolds Center for Courts and Media at the University of Nevada in Reno, for an in depth discussion on both sides of this very important issue.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Should the U.S. Supreme Court broadcast its sessions to the American public or should cameras be kept out of the SCOTUS chamber? Proponents of cameras say they are needed for transparency.  Opponents call the idea potentially unconstitutional and harmful.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Nancy Marder, Professor of Law at Chicago-Kent College of Law and Eric P. Robinson, Deputy Director of the Donald W. Reynolds Center for Courts and Media at the University of Nevada in Reno, for an in depth discussion on both sides of this very important issue.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2397</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/12/the-controversy-over-cameras-in-the-u-s-supreme-court/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9464953714.mp3?updated=1624285569" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Assistance for our Troops, Veterans &amp; Military Families</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/12/legal-assistance-for-our-troops-veterans-military-families/</link>
      <description>With two wars winding down, there are great efforts in the legal community to help returning troops, their families and all other veterans with the many legal issues they face back home.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join Attorney Nan Heald, the Executive Director of Pine Tree Legal Assistance and Jim Strickland, a nationally recognized expert on disability benefits, to discuss their personal missions to assist our service members with disability benefits and the Service Members Civil Relief Act.  They also talk about the role of the VA and how lawyers can help these brave men and women who serve our country.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:37:27 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Assistance for our Troops, Veterans &amp; Military Families</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>313</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e96b83d4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-2f05d5cca274/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Assistance for our Troops, Veterans &amp; Military Families</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With two wars winding down, there are great efforts in the legal community to help returning troops, their families and all other veterans with the many legal issues they face back home.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join Attorney Nan Heald, the Executive Director of Pine Tree Legal Assistance and Jim Strickland, a nationally recognized expert on disability benefits, to discuss their personal missions to assist our service members with disability benefits and the Service Members Civil Relief Act.  They also talk about the role of the VA and how lawyers can help these brave men and women who serve our country.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[With two wars winding down, there are great efforts in the legal community to help returning troops, their families and all other veterans with the many legal issues they face back home.  Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join Attorney Nan Heald, the Executive Director of Pine Tree Legal Assistance and Jim Strickland, a nationally recognized expert on disability benefits, to discuss their personal missions to assist our service members with disability benefits and the Service Members Civil Relief Act.  They also talk about the role of the VA and how lawyers can help these brave men and women who serve our country.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2338</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/12/legal-assistance-for-our-troops-veterans-military-families/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9008601934.mp3?updated=1623961892" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Battle Against Drunk Driving</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/12/the-legal-battle-against-drunk-driving/</link>
      <description>The fight against drunk driving has been going on for more than a century.  On this week’s Lawyer2Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Atlanta DUI Defense Attorney, George Stein and the author of One for the Road: Drunk Driving since 1900, Dr. Barron Lerner of Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, for an in-depth discussion on the history, laws, initiatives, and successes and failures surrounding drunk driving.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 12:55:18 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Battle Against Drunk Driving</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>312</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e9a0d336-cfa9-11eb-92b9-9f1477a9a031/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Legal Battle Against Drunk Driving</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The fight against drunk driving has been going on for more than a century.  On this week’s Lawyer2Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Atlanta DUI Defense Attorney, George Stein and the author of One for the Road: Drunk Driving since 1900, Dr. Barron Lerner of Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, for an in-depth discussion on the history, laws, initiatives, and successes and failures surrounding drunk driving.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The fight against drunk driving has been going on for more than a century.  On this week’s Lawyer2Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Atlanta DUI Defense Attorney, George Stein and the author of One for the Road: Drunk Driving since 1900, Dr. Barron Lerner of Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, for an in-depth discussion on the history, laws, initiatives, and successes and failures surrounding drunk driving.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2327</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/12/the-legal-battle-against-drunk-driving/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8364018811.mp3?updated=1624285466" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Impact of Budget Cuts on the Court System</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/11/the-impact-of-budget-cuts-on-the-court-system/</link>
      <description>With court closings, dismissal of cases, and giant backlogs, the American court system is in crisis. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join Attorney Laura Abel from the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and Attorney Stephen N. Zack, former President of the American Bar Association, to take a look at the impact of massive budget cuts on our courts, the cases, the staff and just how long this will all last.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:41:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Impact of Budget Cuts on the Court System</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>311</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e9bf9ea6-cfa9-11eb-92b9-47f243939026/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Impact of Budget Cuts on the Court System</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With court closings, dismissal of cases, and giant backlogs, the American court system is in crisis. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join Attorney Laura Abel from the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and Attorney Stephen N. Zack, former President of the American Bar Association, to take a look at the impact of massive budget cuts on our courts, the cases, the staff and just how long this will all last.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>With court closings, dismissal of cases, and giant backlogs, the American court system is in crisis. In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join Attorney Laura Abel from the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and Attorney Stephen N. Zack, former President of the American Bar Association, to take a look at the impact of massive budget cuts on our courts, the cases, the staff and just how long this will all last.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2265</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/11/the-impact-of-budget-cuts-on-the-court-system/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3034292379.mp3?updated=1623961893" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Penn State Football Scandal</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/11/the-penn-state-football-scandal/</link>
      <description>With former defensive football coach Jerry Sandusky accused of raping children and university officials charged with covering up the crimes,  the Penn State child sex abuse scandal raises countless legal questions.  Could the university be held liable? Could other university officials, including legendary coach Joe Paterno face criminal charges? What laws need to be changed to prevent this from happening again? In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams along with Professor Marci Hamilton of the Cardozo School of Law and Attorney Philip Masorti, Senior Partner at Masorti-Sullivan P.C. discuss the complexities of this growing scandal.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:54:27 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Penn State Football Scandal</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>310</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e9e0cb58-cfa9-11eb-92b9-9fa6fc938643/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Penn State Football Scandal</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With former defensive football coach Jerry Sandusky accused of raping children and university officials charged with covering up the crimes,  the Penn State child sex abuse scandal raises countless legal questions.  Could the university be held liable? Could other university officials, including legendary coach Joe Paterno face criminal charges? What laws need to be changed to prevent this from happening again? In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams along with Professor Marci Hamilton of the Cardozo School of Law and Attorney Philip Masorti, Senior Partner at Masorti-Sullivan P.C. discuss the complexities of this growing scandal.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[With former defensive football coach Jerry Sandusky accused of raping children and university officials charged with covering up the crimes,  the Penn State child sex abuse scandal raises countless legal questions.  Could the university be held liable? Could other university officials, including legendary coach Joe Paterno face criminal charges? What laws need to be changed to prevent this from happening again? In this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams along with Professor Marci Hamilton of the Cardozo School of Law and Attorney Philip Masorti, Senior Partner at Masorti-Sullivan P.C. discuss the complexities of this growing scandal.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2326</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/11/the-penn-state-football-scandal/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7283149713.mp3?updated=1623961893" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Issues Facing Teens Today</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/11/legal-issues-facing-teens-today/</link>
      <description>Cyberbullying, sexting, downloading music illegally.  What is a teen to do when they find themselves in legal trouble or maybe even a victim of a possible crime? On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host and attorney, Bob Ambrogi chats with Judge Thomas A. Jacobs, founder of AsktheJudge.info, about this interactive legal forum for teens. Judge Jacobs explains how technology has changed the face of law in the teen community, what teens everywhere need to know about their personal rights and how they can educate themselves through laws and recent court decisions.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:02:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Issues Facing Teens Today</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>309</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ea03d5da-cfa9-11eb-92b9-af6a7808f1de/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Issues Facing Teens Today</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Cyberbullying, sexting, downloading music illegally.  What is a teen to do when they find themselves in legal trouble or maybe even a victim of a possible crime? On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host and attorney, Bob Ambrogi chats with Judge Thomas A. Jacobs, founder of AsktheJudge.info, about this interactive legal forum for teens. Judge Jacobs explains how technology has changed the face of law in the teen community, what teens everywhere need to know about their personal rights and how they can educate themselves through laws and recent court decisions.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Cyberbullying, sexting, downloading music illegally.  What is a teen to do when they find themselves in legal trouble or maybe even a victim of a possible crime? On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host and attorney, Bob Ambrogi chats with Judge Thomas A. Jacobs, founder of AsktheJudge.info, about this interactive legal forum for teens. Judge Jacobs explains how technology has changed the face of law in the teen community, what teens everywhere need to know about their personal rights and how they can educate themselves through laws and recent court decisions.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2408</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/11/legal-issues-facing-teens-today/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2500625025.mp3?updated=1624285464" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Attorney Horace Hunter’s Blog Controversy &amp; First Amendment Rights</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/11/attorney-horace-hunters-blog-controversy-first-amendment-rights/</link>
      <description>On our last podcast, Legal Blogging, Ethics and First Amendment Rights, we were joined by three bloggers who discussed the case surrounding Richmond, Virginia attorney, Horace Hunter and the Virginia State Bar Association, over a controversial blog post.  On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host and attorney, Bob Ambrogi chats with  Attorney Horace F. Hunter from Hunter &amp; Lipton, PC,  about this widely-publicized controversy, his appeal and the impact of his now infamous blog post on the legal blogosphere.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:13:33 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Attorney Horace Hunter’s Blog Controversy &amp; First Amendment Rights</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>308</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ea30bf82-cfa9-11eb-92b9-03724e34199c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Attorney Horace Hunter’s Blog Controversy &amp; First Amendment Rights</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On our last podcast, Legal Blogging, Ethics and First Amendment Rights, we were joined by three bloggers who discussed the case surrounding Richmond, Virginia attorney, Horace Hunter and the Virginia State Bar Association, over a controversial blog post.  On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host and attorney, Bob Ambrogi chats with  Attorney Horace F. Hunter from Hunter &amp; Lipton, PC,  about this widely-publicized controversy, his appeal and the impact of his now infamous blog post on the legal blogosphere.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On our last podcast, Legal Blogging, Ethics and First Amendment Rights, we were joined by three bloggers who discussed the case surrounding Richmond, Virginia attorney, Horace Hunter and the Virginia State Bar Association, over a controversial blog post.  On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host and attorney, Bob Ambrogi chats with  Attorney Horace F. Hunter from Hunter &amp; Lipton, PC,  about this widely-publicized controversy, his appeal and the impact of his now infamous blog post on the legal blogosphere.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2207</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/11/attorney-horace-hunters-blog-controversy-first-amendment-rights/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5937753319.mp3?updated=1623961894" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Blogging, Ethics and First Amendment Rights</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/10/legal-blogging-ethics-and-first-amendment-rights/</link>
      <description>Should lawyers blog about specifics in their cases? The Virginia State Bar Association has sanctioned Attorney Horace Hunter for blogging about a case and he’s appealing based on First Amendment rights. A Washington Post article first brought attention to this story which has wide impact in the legal blogosphere.. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Kevin O’Keefe, CEO and Publisher of LexBlog, Eric E. Johnson from The University of North Dakota School of Law and Peter Vieth, Legal Editor for Virginia Lawyers Weekly, to talk about this controversial case, lawyers blogging and their First Amendment rights.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:08:59 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Blogging, Ethics and First Amendment Rights</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>307</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ea4c5fee-cfa9-11eb-92b9-4fec5bba9eea/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Blogging, Ethics and First Amendment Rights</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Should lawyers blog about specifics in their cases? The Virginia State Bar Association has sanctioned Attorney Horace Hunter for blogging about a case and he’s appealing based on First Amendment rights. A Washington Post article first brought attention to this story which has wide impact in the legal blogosphere.. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Kevin O’Keefe, CEO and Publisher of LexBlog, Eric E. Johnson from The University of North Dakota School of Law and Peter Vieth, Legal Editor for Virginia Lawyers Weekly, to talk about this controversial case, lawyers blogging and their First Amendment rights.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Should lawyers blog about specifics in their cases? The Virginia State Bar Association has sanctioned Attorney Horace Hunter for blogging about a case and he’s appealing based on First Amendment rights. A Washington Post article first brought attention to this story which has wide impact in the legal blogosphere.. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Kevin O’Keefe, CEO and Publisher of LexBlog, Eric E. Johnson from The University of North Dakota School of Law and Peter Vieth, Legal Editor for Virginia Lawyers Weekly, to talk about this controversial case, lawyers blogging and their First Amendment rights.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2287</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/10/legal-blogging-ethics-and-first-amendment-rights/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9787918743.mp3?updated=1623961894" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Budget Cuts &amp; Topeka’s Misdemeanor Domestic Battery Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/10/budget-cuts-topeka%e2%80%99s-misdemeanor-domestic-battery-law/</link>
      <description>There is a public debate in Topeka, Kansas regarding prosecution of misdemeanors in some domestic violence prosecutions, stemming from serious budget cuts to the judicial system. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join Attorney Joyce Grover, Executive Director at Kansas Coalition Against Sexual &amp; Domestic Violence and Viktoria Kristiansson an Attorney Advisor for AEquitas, to take a look at this controversy’s impact on domestic abuse victims, the general public’s response, the District Attorney’s change of heart and spotlight National Domestic Violence Awareness Month.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:14:46 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Budget Cuts &amp; Topeka’s Misdemeanor Domestic Battery Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>306</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ea733632-cfa9-11eb-92b9-2f25518fde4d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Budget Cuts &amp; Topeka’s Misdemeanor Domestic Battery Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>There is a public debate in Topeka, Kansas regarding prosecution of misdemeanors in some domestic violence prosecutions, stemming from serious budget cuts to the judicial system. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join Attorney Joyce Grover, Executive Director at Kansas Coalition Against Sexual &amp; Domestic Violence and Viktoria Kristiansson an Attorney Advisor for AEquitas, to take a look at this controversy’s impact on domestic abuse victims, the general public’s response, the District Attorney’s change of heart and spotlight National Domestic Violence Awareness Month.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[There is a public debate in Topeka, Kansas regarding prosecution of misdemeanors in some domestic violence prosecutions, stemming from serious budget cuts to the judicial system. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join Attorney Joyce Grover, Executive Director at Kansas Coalition Against Sexual &amp; Domestic Violence and Viktoria Kristiansson an Attorney Advisor for AEquitas, to take a look at this controversy’s impact on domestic abuse victims, the general public’s response, the District Attorney’s change of heart and spotlight National Domestic Violence Awareness Month.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2305</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/10/budget-cuts-topeka%e2%80%99s-misdemeanor-domestic-battery-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4242418108.mp3?updated=1623961895" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Impact of Steve Jobs on the Legal Profession</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/10/the-impact-of-steve-jobs-on-the-legal-profession/</link>
      <description>Steve Jobs and Apple changed the way we communicate, listen to music, watch movies and conduct business through technology. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, J. Craig Williams joins Ben Stevens, a practicing attorney and blogger for the popular blog, The MacLawyer and Finis Price,  attorney and co-founder of Technoesq Presentations, as they take a  look at the influence of Steve Jobs and Apple on the legal profession, the current state of tech within the legal community and if Jobs’ ideas have driven innovation in other ways that have impacted lawyers.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:24:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Impact of Steve Jobs on the Legal Profession</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>305</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ea946ec4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5f6ecd69bdf6/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Impact of Steve Jobs on the Legal Profession</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Steve Jobs and Apple changed the way we communicate, listen to music, watch movies and conduct business through technology. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, J. Craig Williams joins Ben Stevens, a practicing attorney and blogger for the popular blog, The MacLawyer and Finis Price,  attorney and co-founder of Technoesq Presentations, as they take a  look at the influence of Steve Jobs and Apple on the legal profession, the current state of tech within the legal community and if Jobs’ ideas have driven innovation in other ways that have impacted lawyers.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Steve Jobs and Apple changed the way we communicate, listen to music, watch movies and conduct business through technology. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney, J. Craig Williams joins Ben Stevens, a practicing attorney and blogger for the popular blog, The MacLawyer and Finis Price,  attorney and co-founder of Technoesq Presentations, as they take a  look at the influence of Steve Jobs and Apple on the legal profession, the current state of tech within the legal community and if Jobs’ ideas have driven innovation in other ways that have impacted lawyers.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2349</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/10/the-impact-of-steve-jobs-on-the-legal-profession/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6988716546.mp3?updated=1623961895" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wall Street Protests, Dodd-Frank &amp; Banking Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/10/wall-street-protests-dodd-frank-banking-law/</link>
      <description>With people filling the streets in "Occupy Wall Street" protests, Bank of America planning to charge for debit card usage and foreclosure rates on mortgages still on the rise, the general public has had enough. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join Professor Tamar Frankel from Boston University School of Law and Attorney Lanny Davis, principal in the Washington D.C. law firm of Lanny J. Davis &amp; Associates, as they take a look at banking laws after the so-called ‘Dodd-Frank reform,’ pending litigation relating to banking and try to examine this wave of dissatisfaction with our financial systems.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:23:25 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Wall Street Protests, Dodd-Frank &amp; Banking Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>304</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/eaaff6bc-cfa9-11eb-92b9-937be4a8db2a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Wall Street Protests, Dodd-Frank &amp; Banking Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With people filling the streets in "Occupy Wall Street" protests, Bank of America planning to charge for debit card usage and foreclosure rates on mortgages still on the rise, the general public has had enough. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join Professor Tamar Frankel from Boston University School of Law and Attorney Lanny Davis, principal in the Washington D.C. law firm of Lanny J. Davis &amp; Associates, as they take a look at banking laws after the so-called ‘Dodd-Frank reform,’ pending litigation relating to banking and try to examine this wave of dissatisfaction with our financial systems.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[With people filling the streets in "Occupy Wall Street" protests, Bank of America planning to charge for debit card usage and foreclosure rates on mortgages still on the rise, the general public has had enough. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams join Professor Tamar Frankel from Boston University School of Law and Attorney Lanny Davis, principal in the Washington D.C. law firm of Lanny J. Davis &amp; Associates, as they take a look at banking laws after the so-called ‘Dodd-Frank reform,’ pending litigation relating to banking and try to examine this wave of dissatisfaction with our financial systems.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2264</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/10/wall-street-protests-dodd-frank-banking-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5892431178.mp3?updated=1624285463" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2011-2012 U.S. Supreme Court Term Preview</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/09/2011-2012-u-s-supreme-court-term-preview/</link>
      <description>There are many cases on the U.S. Supreme Court docket to watch, from the highly publicized Fourth Amendment GPS tracking case in United States v. Jones, to indecency in FCC v. Fox Television, to a prisoner strip search case, Florence v. Board of Freeholders. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams  join Attorney Amy Howe, editor of SCOTUSblog.com and Wilson R. Huhn , a C. Blake McDowell, Jr., Professor and a Constitutional Law Research Fellow at The University of Akron School of Law, to spotlight the biggest cases of the upcoming term, the Justices and which cases will get the most attention.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:33:58 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>2011-2012 U.S. Supreme Court Term Preview</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>303</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/eacfd6bc-cfa9-11eb-92b9-7b9d7ec647e6/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>2011-2012 U.S. Supreme Court Term Preview</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>There are many cases on the U.S. Supreme Court docket to watch, from the highly publicized Fourth Amendment GPS tracking case in United States v. Jones, to indecency in FCC v. Fox Television, to a prisoner strip search case, Florence v. Board of Freeholders. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams  join Attorney Amy Howe, editor of SCOTUSblog.com and Wilson R. Huhn , a C. Blake McDowell, Jr., Professor and a Constitutional Law Research Fellow at The University of Akron School of Law, to spotlight the biggest cases of the upcoming term, the Justices and which cases will get the most attention.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[There are many cases on the U.S. Supreme Court docket to watch, from the highly publicized Fourth Amendment GPS tracking case in United States v. Jones, to indecency in FCC v. Fox Television, to a prisoner strip search case, Florence v. Board of Freeholders. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams  join Attorney Amy Howe, editor of SCOTUSblog.com and Wilson R. Huhn , a C. Blake McDowell, Jr., Professor and a Constitutional Law Research Fellow at The University of Akron School of Law, to spotlight the biggest cases of the upcoming term, the Justices and which cases will get the most attention.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2277</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/09/2011-2012-u-s-supreme-court-term-preview/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6863834605.mp3?updated=1624285573" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyer2Lawyer Celebrates 6 Year Anniversary</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/09/lawyer2lawyer-celebrates-6-year-anniversary/</link>
      <description>Six years ago, a little legal podcast, Lawyer2Lawyer,  entered the world of podcasting and grew in popularity, thanks to our loyal listeners, great guests and two star attorneys! Today, Lawyer2Lawyer is the longest running legal podcast with 304 podcasts published at Legal Talk Network. Since 2005, attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams  have discussed everything from technology in the legal profession, controversial Supreme Court decisions to debates over legal topics in just about every legal practice area you can imagine.  On this very special edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, Bob and Craig reflect on the past 6 years and share some of their favorite highlights, guests and shows and some words of wisdom!  And for some fun - hear some outtakes of Bob and Craig too!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:26:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyer2Lawyer Celebrates 6 Year Anniversary</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>302</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/eaf1376c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-0be26ebb8072/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyer2Lawyer Celebrates 6 Year Anniversary</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Six years ago, a little legal podcast, Lawyer2Lawyer,  entered the world of podcasting and grew in popularity, thanks to our loyal listeners, great guests and two star attorneys! Today, Lawyer2Lawyer is the longest running legal podcast with 304 podcasts published at Legal Talk Network. Since 2005, attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams  have discussed everything from technology in the legal profession, controversial Supreme Court decisions to debates over legal topics in just about every legal practice area you can imagine.  On this very special edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, Bob and Craig reflect on the past 6 years and share some of their favorite highlights, guests and shows and some words of wisdom!  And for some fun - hear some outtakes of Bob and Craig too!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Six years ago, a little legal podcast, Lawyer2Lawyer,  entered the world of podcasting and grew in popularity, thanks to our loyal listeners, great guests and two star attorneys! Today, Lawyer2Lawyer is the longest running legal podcast with 304 podcasts published at Legal Talk Network. Since 2005, attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams  have discussed everything from technology in the legal profession, controversial Supreme Court decisions to debates over legal topics in just about every legal practice area you can imagine.  On this very special edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, Bob and Craig reflect on the past 6 years and share some of their favorite highlights, guests and shows and some words of wisdom!  And for some fun - hear some outtakes of Bob and Craig too!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2885</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/09/lawyer2lawyer-celebrates-6-year-anniversary/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3831597348.mp3?updated=1624285509" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>9/11: The Impact on the Legal System Ten Years Later</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/09/911-the-impact-on-the-legal-system-ten-years-later/</link>
      <description>This year marks the 10th Anniversary of 9/11 where our world changed forever. Since that tragic day, the legal community has pitched in - sometimes quietly advocating for victim’s families.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Leo Boyle from the law firm, Meehan, Boyle, Black &amp; Bogdanow and one of the founders of Trial Lawyers Care and Marilyn Berger executive producer, writer and co-director of the film, Out of the Ashes: 9/11, to look back at 9/11, discuss how lawyers got involved after the attacks, the legal issues that remain, the Victim’s Compensation Fund and how this tragedy has impacted and shaped the legal system.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:56:54 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>9/11: The Impact on the Legal System Ten Years Later</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>301</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/eb15c1cc-cfa9-11eb-92b9-037d7c3e5c5d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>9/11: The Impact on the Legal System Ten Years Later</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This year marks the 10th Anniversary of 9/11 where our world changed forever. Since that tragic day, the legal community has pitched in - sometimes quietly advocating for victim’s families.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Leo Boyle from the law firm, Meehan, Boyle, Black &amp; Bogdanow and one of the founders of Trial Lawyers Care and Marilyn Berger executive producer, writer and co-director of the film, Out of the Ashes: 9/11, to look back at 9/11, discuss how lawyers got involved after the attacks, the legal issues that remain, the Victim’s Compensation Fund and how this tragedy has impacted and shaped the legal system.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[This year marks the 10th Anniversary of 9/11 where our world changed forever. Since that tragic day, the legal community has pitched in - sometimes quietly advocating for victim’s families.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Leo Boyle from the law firm, Meehan, Boyle, Black &amp; Bogdanow and one of the founders of Trial Lawyers Care and Marilyn Berger executive producer, writer and co-director of the film, Out of the Ashes: 9/11, to look back at 9/11, discuss how lawyers got involved after the attacks, the legal issues that remain, the Victim’s Compensation Fund and how this tragedy has impacted and shaped the legal system.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2327</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/09/911-the-impact-on-the-legal-system-ten-years-later/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1183943953.mp3?updated=1624285567" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Feds Antitrust Challenge to AT&amp;T Merger with T-Mobile</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/09/feds-antitrust-challenge-to-att-merger-with-t-mobile/</link>
      <description>The U.S. Department of Justice is suing to block AT&amp;T’s takeover of T-Mobile USA. After reviewing the details of the 39-billion-dollar deal, the DOJ said this acquisition would not be good for consumers.  AT&amp;T disagrees. On Lawyer2Lawyer, attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Maurice E. Stucke, from the University of Tennessee College of Law, Attorney Allen Grunes from the firm, Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck and Evan Koblentz, a reporter for Law Technology News, to discuss the suit and the impact on the mobile technology world and consumers.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:57:40 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Feds Antitrust Challenge to AT&amp;T Merger with T-Mobile</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>300</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/eb384486-cfa9-11eb-92b9-7f44a9290e99/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Feds Antitrust Challenge to AT&amp;T Merger with T-Mobile</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The U.S. Department of Justice is suing to block AT&amp;T’s takeover of T-Mobile USA. After reviewing the details of the 39-billion-dollar deal, the DOJ said this acquisition would not be good for consumers.  AT&amp;T disagrees. On Lawyer2Lawyer, attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Maurice E. Stucke, from the University of Tennessee College of Law, Attorney Allen Grunes from the firm, Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck and Evan Koblentz, a reporter for Law Technology News, to discuss the suit and the impact on the mobile technology world and consumers.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The U.S. Department of Justice is suing to block AT&amp;T’s takeover of T-Mobile USA. After reviewing the details of the 39-billion-dollar deal, the DOJ said this acquisition would not be good for consumers.  AT&amp;T disagrees. On Lawyer2Lawyer, attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Maurice E. Stucke, from the University of Tennessee College of Law, Attorney Allen Grunes from the firm, Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck and Evan Koblentz, a reporter for Law Technology News, to discuss the suit and the impact on the mobile technology world and consumers.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2279</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/09/feds-antitrust-challenge-to-att-merger-with-t-mobile/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4562454527.mp3?updated=1623961897" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The New Legal Battle over Song Rights</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/09/the-new-legal-battle-over-song-rights/</link>
      <description>A little noted change in copyright law 35 years ago is starting a multi-billion dollar battle today between musicians and record companies.  This provision gives artists such as Bruce Springsteen, Billy Joel, Bob Dylan and Barbra Streisand the right to reclaim ownership of their work and pocket all the profits, but record companies are singing a different tune.  The industry says master recordings and profits belong to them in perpetuity.  Where is this legal debate going? Listen as Attorney and Lawyer2Lawyer co-host, J. Craig Williams, along with Attorney and artist advocate Kenneth Abdo of the Lommen Abdo Law Firm and Attorney and author Steve Gordon of Steve Gordon Law discuss the intricate details of this fight over copyright law.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:32:03 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The New Legal Battle over Song Rights</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>299</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/eb5f64e4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-b7e02f97bf80/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The New Legal Battle over Song Rights</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A little noted change in copyright law 35 years ago is starting a multi-billion dollar battle today between musicians and record companies.  This provision gives artists such as Bruce Springsteen, Billy Joel, Bob Dylan and Barbra Streisand the right to reclaim ownership of their work and pocket all the profits, but record companies are singing a different tune.  The industry says master recordings and profits belong to them in perpetuity.  Where is this legal debate going? Listen as Attorney and Lawyer2Lawyer co-host, J. Craig Williams, along with Attorney and artist advocate Kenneth Abdo of the Lommen Abdo Law Firm and Attorney and author Steve Gordon of Steve Gordon Law discuss the intricate details of this fight over copyright law.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A little noted change in copyright law 35 years ago is starting a multi-billion dollar battle today between musicians and record companies.  This provision gives artists such as Bruce Springsteen, Billy Joel, Bob Dylan and Barbra Streisand the right to reclaim ownership of their work and pocket all the profits, but record companies are singing a different tune.  The industry says master recordings and profits belong to them in perpetuity.  Where is this legal debate going? Listen as Attorney and Lawyer2Lawyer co-host, J. Craig Williams, along with Attorney and artist advocate Kenneth Abdo of the Lommen Abdo Law Firm and Attorney and author Steve Gordon of Steve Gordon Law discuss the intricate details of this fight over copyright law.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2404</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/09/the-new-legal-battle-over-song-rights/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5580824119.mp3?updated=1623961897" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Release of the "West Memphis Three"</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/08/the-release-of-the-west-memphis-three/</link>
      <description>After serving eighteen years behind bars, three men, better known as the "West Memphis Three", were released from prison, after maintaining their innocence for years.  Back In 1993, teenagers, Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin and Jessie Misskelley, Jr., were jailed after three eight year old boys were found brutally murdered in West Memphis, Arkansas.  Attorney and co-host  J. Craig Williams joins Laura H. Nirider, Staff Attorney and Adjunct Professor at the Center on Wrongful Convictions of Youth (CWCY), Attorney Ken Swindle, organizer of Attorneys of Conscience and Lonnie Soury, a media expert with experience in high profile criminal and civil litigation and wrongful convictions, to discuss this highly controversial case, reaction from the community, the Alford plea and what the future holds for these men and the victims’ families.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:20:19 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Release of the "West Memphis Three"</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>298</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/eb80b8ce-cfa9-11eb-92b9-1b6afd4e0cdd/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Release of the "West Memphis Three"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>After serving eighteen years behind bars, three men, better known as the "West Memphis Three", were released from prison, after maintaining their innocence for years.  Back In 1993, teenagers, Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin and Jessie Misskelley, Jr., were jailed after three eight year old boys were found brutally murdered in West Memphis, Arkansas.  Attorney and co-host  J. Craig Williams joins Laura H. Nirider, Staff Attorney and Adjunct Professor at the Center on Wrongful Convictions of Youth (CWCY), Attorney Ken Swindle, organizer of Attorneys of Conscience and Lonnie Soury, a media expert with experience in high profile criminal and civil litigation and wrongful convictions, to discuss this highly controversial case, reaction from the community, the Alford plea and what the future holds for these men and the victims’ families.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[After serving eighteen years behind bars, three men, better known as the "West Memphis Three", were released from prison, after maintaining their innocence for years.  Back In 1993, teenagers, Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin and Jessie Misskelley, Jr., were jailed after three eight year old boys were found brutally murdered in West Memphis, Arkansas.  Attorney and co-host  J. Craig Williams joins Laura H. Nirider, Staff Attorney and Adjunct Professor at the Center on Wrongful Convictions of Youth (CWCY), Attorney Ken Swindle, organizer of Attorneys of Conscience and Lonnie Soury, a media expert with experience in high profile criminal and civil litigation and wrongful convictions, to discuss this highly controversial case, reaction from the community, the Alford plea and what the future holds for these men and the victims’ families.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2160</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/08/the-release-of-the-west-memphis-three/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2699585161.mp3?updated=1623961898" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Flash-Mob Protests, The First Amendment &amp; Public Safety</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/08/flash-mob-protests-the-first-amendment-public-safety/</link>
      <description>Do authorities have a right to shut down cell phone service in the wake of flash-mob protests?  Case in point: Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), after a confrontation in San Francisco’s Civic Center station, sparking protests.  Claiming public safety and fear of more protests, BART recently closed various San Francisco stations and disabled wireless reception, enraging passengers. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Marvin Ammori, Visiting Scholar at Stanford Law School's Center for Internet &amp; Society and Gene Policinski, Executive Director of the First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University, to take a look at this new challenge to public safety and balancing First Amendment rights.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:01:08 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Flash-Mob Protests, The First Amendment &amp; Public Safety</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>297</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/eba3cb34-cfa9-11eb-92b9-9fa0aba54263/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Flash-Mob Protests, The First Amendment &amp; Public Safety</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Do authorities have a right to shut down cell phone service in the wake of flash-mob protests?  Case in point: Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), after a confrontation in San Francisco’s Civic Center station, sparking protests.  Claiming public safety and fear of more protests, BART recently closed various San Francisco stations and disabled wireless reception, enraging passengers. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Marvin Ammori, Visiting Scholar at Stanford Law School's Center for Internet &amp; Society and Gene Policinski, Executive Director of the First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University, to take a look at this new challenge to public safety and balancing First Amendment rights.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Do authorities have a right to shut down cell phone service in the wake of flash-mob protests?  Case in point: Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), after a confrontation in San Francisco’s Civic Center station, sparking protests.  Claiming public safety and fear of more protests, BART recently closed various San Francisco stations and disabled wireless reception, enraging passengers. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Marvin Ammori, Visiting Scholar at Stanford Law School's Center for Internet &amp; Society and Gene Policinski, Executive Director of the First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University, to take a look at this new challenge to public safety and balancing First Amendment rights.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2071</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/08/flash-mob-protests-the-first-amendment-public-safety/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7961523404.mp3?updated=1624285569" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NBA Lockout and Lawsuits</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/08/nba-lockout-and-lawsuits/</link>
      <description>Coming off the heels of an NFL Lockout, the NBA officially locked out its players on July 1, 2011, when players and owners failed to agree on a new contract. Then, the NBA filed two claims against the National Basketball Players Association (NBPA) before union players could file an anti-trust lawsuit against them.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Professor Daniel E. Lazaroff, Director of the Loyola Sports Law Institute and Professor Gabriel A. Feldman, Director of the Tulane Sports Law Program, to discuss the legal and business issues surrounding the lockout. They take a look at the impact of the lockout on players, employees and fans and the fate of the 2011-2012 season.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:15:53 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>NBA Lockout and Lawsuits</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>296</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ebcd7d1c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5f3f9b71f821/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>NBA Lockout and Lawsuits</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coming off the heels of an NFL Lockout, the NBA officially locked out its players on July 1, 2011, when players and owners failed to agree on a new contract. Then, the NBA filed two claims against the National Basketball Players Association (NBPA) before union players could file an anti-trust lawsuit against them.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Professor Daniel E. Lazaroff, Director of the Loyola Sports Law Institute and Professor Gabriel A. Feldman, Director of the Tulane Sports Law Program, to discuss the legal and business issues surrounding the lockout. They take a look at the impact of the lockout on players, employees and fans and the fate of the 2011-2012 season.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coming off the heels of an NFL Lockout, the NBA officially locked out its players on July 1, 2011, when players and owners failed to agree on a new contract. Then, the NBA filed two claims against the National Basketball Players Association (NBPA) before union players could file an anti-trust lawsuit against them.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Professor Daniel E. Lazaroff, Director of the Loyola Sports Law Institute and Professor Gabriel A. Feldman, Director of the Tulane Sports Law Program, to discuss the legal and business issues surrounding the lockout. They take a look at the impact of the lockout on players, employees and fans and the fate of the 2011-2012 season.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2085</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/08/nba-lockout-and-lawsuits/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2387603773.mp3?updated=1624285579" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Debate over Background Checks &amp; Hiring Practices</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/08/the-debate-over-background-checks-hiring-practices/</link>
      <description>The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission better known as the EEOC held a hearing last month to examine arrest and conviction records as a hiring barrier. The question today is whether employers’ hiring practices today can be considered discriminatory. Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi  welcomes Attorney Charles H. Kaplan, a partner in Sedgwick LLP’s New York office, Attorney Maurice Emsellem, Policy Co-Director of the National Employment Law Project and Attorney Ray P. McClain, Director of the Employment Discrimination Project from the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, to explore the debate over background checks and applicants.  They look at the process of conducting criminal background checks on applicants, the responsibility of employers when hiring and how the hiring process can impact those with criminal histories.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:46:50 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Debate over Background Checks &amp; Hiring Practices</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>295</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ebf139d2-cfa9-11eb-92b9-937e2c46810c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Debate over Background Checks &amp; Hiring Practices</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission better known as the EEOC held a hearing last month to examine arrest and conviction records as a hiring barrier. The question today is whether employers’ hiring practices today can be considered discriminatory. Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi  welcomes Attorney Charles H. Kaplan, a partner in Sedgwick LLP’s New York office, Attorney Maurice Emsellem, Policy Co-Director of the National Employment Law Project and Attorney Ray P. McClain, Director of the Employment Discrimination Project from the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, to explore the debate over background checks and applicants.  They look at the process of conducting criminal background checks on applicants, the responsibility of employers when hiring and how the hiring process can impact those with criminal histories.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission better known as the EEOC held a hearing last month to examine arrest and conviction records as a hiring barrier. The question today is whether employers’ hiring practices today can be considered discriminatory. Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi  welcomes Attorney Charles H. Kaplan, a partner in Sedgwick LLP’s New York office, Attorney Maurice Emsellem, Policy Co-Director of the National Employment Law Project and Attorney Ray P. McClain, Director of the Employment Discrimination Project from the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, to explore the debate over background checks and applicants.  They look at the process of conducting criminal background checks on applicants, the responsibility of employers when hiring and how the hiring process can impact those with criminal histories.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2308</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8671EA19-23B8-4CC6-946B-5Ahttp://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/08/the-debate-over-background-checks-hiring-practices/AD5157C050]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7029229474.mp3?updated=1624285467" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyers Helping Victims of Disasters</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/07/lawyers-helping-victims-of-disasters/</link>
      <description>2011 has been a year filled with devastating disasters from a record number of deadly tornadoes in the U.S., including Alabama, Missouri, and Massachusetts to the earthquake and tsunami that ravaged Fukushima, Japan.  Hear attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams on Lawyer2Lawyer talk with Attorney Randy J. Aliment, Chair-Elect of the American Bar Association's Tort Trial &amp; Insurance Practice Section (TIPS) and Attorney Dennis D. Palmer from the law firm Polsinelli Shughart out of Kansas City, Missouri, about the legal issues that victims can face, disaster preparedness and how lawyers deploy to help those affected.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:15:16 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyers Helping Victims of Disasters</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>294</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ec1638f4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-27976bfe493f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyers Helping Victims of Disasters</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>2011 has been a year filled with devastating disasters from a record number of deadly tornadoes in the U.S., including Alabama, Missouri, and Massachusetts to the earthquake and tsunami that ravaged Fukushima, Japan.  Hear attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams on Lawyer2Lawyer talk with Attorney Randy J. Aliment, Chair-Elect of the American Bar Association's Tort Trial &amp; Insurance Practice Section (TIPS) and Attorney Dennis D. Palmer from the law firm Polsinelli Shughart out of Kansas City, Missouri, about the legal issues that victims can face, disaster preparedness and how lawyers deploy to help those affected.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[2011 has been a year filled with devastating disasters from a record number of deadly tornadoes in the U.S., including Alabama, Missouri, and Massachusetts to the earthquake and tsunami that ravaged Fukushima, Japan.  Hear attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams on Lawyer2Lawyer talk with Attorney Randy J. Aliment, Chair-Elect of the American Bar Association's Tort Trial &amp; Insurance Practice Section (TIPS) and Attorney Dennis D. Palmer from the law firm Polsinelli Shughart out of Kansas City, Missouri, about the legal issues that victims can face, disaster preparedness and how lawyers deploy to help those affected.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2159</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/07/lawyers-helping-victims-of-disasters/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3929176212.mp3?updated=1623961899" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside Rupert Murdoch’s Phone Hacking Scandal</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/07/inside-rupert-murdochs-phone-hacking-scandal/</link>
      <description>Media giant, Rupert Murdoch and his now defunct British tabloid, News of the World, are under fire over reports that journalists allegedly hacked into individuals’ phones and allegedly took part in police bribery in a quest to get inside information.  Hear Mike Koehler, Assistant Professor of Business Law at Butler University and Jane E. Kirtley, the Silha Professor of Media Ethics and Law at the School of Journalism and Mass Communication at the University of Minnesota,  talk with Lawyer2Lawyer co-host, Bob Ambrogi, about the legal issues including charges, privacy rights, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the scandal’s impact on journalism and the fate of the Murdoch news empire.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:04:03 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside Rupert Murdoch’s Phone Hacking Scandal</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>293</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ec3b2f9c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-8f7b560d4a4f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Inside Rupert Murdoch’s Phone Hacking Scandal</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Media giant, Rupert Murdoch and his now defunct British tabloid, News of the World, are under fire over reports that journalists allegedly hacked into individuals’ phones and allegedly took part in police bribery in a quest to get inside information.  Hear Mike Koehler, Assistant Professor of Business Law at Butler University and Jane E. Kirtley, the Silha Professor of Media Ethics and Law at the School of Journalism and Mass Communication at the University of Minnesota,  talk with Lawyer2Lawyer co-host, Bob Ambrogi, about the legal issues including charges, privacy rights, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the scandal’s impact on journalism and the fate of the Murdoch news empire.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Media giant, Rupert Murdoch and his now defunct British tabloid, News of the World, are under fire over reports that journalists allegedly hacked into individuals’ phones and allegedly took part in police bribery in a quest to get inside information.  Hear Mike Koehler, Assistant Professor of Business Law at Butler University and Jane E. Kirtley, the Silha Professor of Media Ethics and Law at the School of Journalism and Mass Communication at the University of Minnesota,  talk with Lawyer2Lawyer co-host, Bob Ambrogi, about the legal issues including charges, privacy rights, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the scandal’s impact on journalism and the fate of the Murdoch news empire.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2259</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/07/inside-rupert-murdochs-phone-hacking-scandal/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2472176509.mp3?updated=1624285463" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyer Advertising and Marketing Online</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/07/lawyer-advertising-and-marketing-online/</link>
      <description>Where do lawyers stand on the issues of advertising and ethics, especially when online technology is in the picture? Hear Andrew Perlman, the Chief Reporter for the American Bar Association’s Commission on Ethics 20/20 and Nathan Darling, the 2010 President of the Legal Marketing Association (LMA), talk with Lawyer2Lawyer co-host,  J. Craig Williams  to spotlight the ABA's Commission on Ethics 20/20’s preliminary issue paper about restrictions on lawyers’ use of technology for marketing and advertising, reaction to the proposed rule changes and what this all means in reality.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:34:42 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyer Advertising and Marketing Online</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>292</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ec62ef3c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-674f963d0cf2/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyer Advertising and Marketing Online</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Where do lawyers stand on the issues of advertising and ethics, especially when online technology is in the picture? Hear Andrew Perlman, the Chief Reporter for the American Bar Association’s Commission on Ethics 20/20 and Nathan Darling, the 2010 President of the Legal Marketing Association (LMA), talk with Lawyer2Lawyer co-host,  J. Craig Williams  to spotlight the ABA's Commission on Ethics 20/20’s preliminary issue paper about restrictions on lawyers’ use of technology for marketing and advertising, reaction to the proposed rule changes and what this all means in reality.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Where do lawyers stand on the issues of advertising and ethics, especially when online technology is in the picture? Hear Andrew Perlman, the Chief Reporter for the American Bar Association’s Commission on Ethics 20/20 and Nathan Darling, the 2010 President of the Legal Marketing Association (LMA), talk with Lawyer2Lawyer co-host,  J. Craig Williams  to spotlight the ABA's Commission on Ethics 20/20’s preliminary issue paper about restrictions on lawyers’ use of technology for marketing and advertising, reaction to the proposed rule changes and what this all means in reality.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2278</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/07/lawyer-advertising-and-marketing-online/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2707829543.mp3?updated=1623961899" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The North Carolina Racial Justice Act</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/06/the-north-carolina-racial-justice-act/</link>
      <description>When the North Carolina General Assembly passed the Racial Justice Act in 2009, it guaranteed that no individual would be put to death because of racial bias within the state’s justice system.  Since then, there’s been a battle in the North Carolina legislature to repeal it. What’s behind this debate?  Some say clogged courts and unfounded claims by death row inmates. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, along with  Cassandra Stubbs, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU Capital Punishment Project and James E. Coleman Jr.,  the John S. Bradway Professor of Law at Duke University Law School and Co-director of Duke's Wrongful Convictions Clinic, take a look inside the issues. They explore the great debate, the repeal and what this means for inmates on death row.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:58:14 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The North Carolina Racial Justice Act</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>291</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ec84dd7c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-636389550e35/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The North Carolina Racial Justice Act</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>When the North Carolina General Assembly passed the Racial Justice Act in 2009, it guaranteed that no individual would be put to death because of racial bias within the state’s justice system.  Since then, there’s been a battle in the North Carolina legislature to repeal it. What’s behind this debate?  Some say clogged courts and unfounded claims by death row inmates. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, along with  Cassandra Stubbs, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU Capital Punishment Project and James E. Coleman Jr.,  the John S. Bradway Professor of Law at Duke University Law School and Co-director of Duke's Wrongful Convictions Clinic, take a look inside the issues. They explore the great debate, the repeal and what this means for inmates on death row.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When the North Carolina General Assembly passed the Racial Justice Act in 2009, it guaranteed that no individual would be put to death because of racial bias within the state’s justice system.  Since then, there’s been a battle in the North Carolina legislature to repeal it. What’s behind this debate?  Some say clogged courts and unfounded claims by death row inmates. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, along with  Cassandra Stubbs, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU Capital Punishment Project and James E. Coleman Jr.,  the John S. Bradway Professor of Law at Duke University Law School and Co-director of Duke's Wrongful Convictions Clinic, take a look inside the issues. They explore the great debate, the repeal and what this means for inmates on death row.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2112</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/06/the-north-carolina-racial-justice-act/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9992403192.mp3?updated=1624285464" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Case Against Mobster Whitey Bulger</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/06/the-legal-case-against-mobster-whitey-bulger/</link>
      <description>One of the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted and infamous Boston gangster, James "Whitey" Bulger, is captured. Now the epic legal case begins. Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams is joined by guests, F. Lee Bailey, famed defense attorney and best-selling author, Dan Rea, long-time TV and radio journalist and lawyer from Boston and David E. Frank, Managing Editor from Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, to get inside this incredible story and unfolding legal case. They discuss the prosecution’s case against 81-year old Whitey Bulger and his long-time girlfriend, Catherine Greig, who eluded capture for more than 16 years, as well as the type of defense we should expect to see and the ultimate fate of the notorious crime boss.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:22:15 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Case Against Mobster Whitey Bulger</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>290</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/eca74b46-cfa9-11eb-92b9-73159d1ded31/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Legal Case Against Mobster Whitey Bulger</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>One of the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted and infamous Boston gangster, James "Whitey" Bulger, is captured. Now the epic legal case begins. Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams is joined by guests, F. Lee Bailey, famed defense attorney and best-selling author, Dan Rea, long-time TV and radio journalist and lawyer from Boston and David E. Frank, Managing Editor from Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, to get inside this incredible story and unfolding legal case. They discuss the prosecution’s case against 81-year old Whitey Bulger and his long-time girlfriend, Catherine Greig, who eluded capture for more than 16 years, as well as the type of defense we should expect to see and the ultimate fate of the notorious crime boss.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[One of the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted and infamous Boston gangster, James "Whitey" Bulger, is captured. Now the epic legal case begins. Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams is joined by guests, F. Lee Bailey, famed defense attorney and best-selling author, Dan Rea, long-time TV and radio journalist and lawyer from Boston and David E. Frank, Managing Editor from Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, to get inside this incredible story and unfolding legal case. They discuss the prosecution’s case against 81-year old Whitey Bulger and his long-time girlfriend, Catherine Greig, who eluded capture for more than 16 years, as well as the type of defense we should expect to see and the ultimate fate of the notorious crime boss.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2195</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/06/the-legal-case-against-mobster-whitey-bulger/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6312508262.mp3?updated=1623961900" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Online Law Schools</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/06/online-law-schools/</link>
      <description>With tuition costs for traditional law schools rising and law students struggling to pay off debt, online legal education can be an alternative for some.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Ellen Murphy, the Program Director for Concord Law School’s Small Business Practice LLM and Attorney Ross E. Mitchell, a graduate of Concord Law School of Kaplan University, to get an inside look at an online legal education. They talk about the online process, interaction, accreditation and what the future holds for online legal education.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:47:18 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Online Law Schools</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>289</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ecca2e18-cfa9-11eb-92b9-cf20a56c623f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Online Law Schools</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With tuition costs for traditional law schools rising and law students struggling to pay off debt, online legal education can be an alternative for some.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Ellen Murphy, the Program Director for Concord Law School’s Small Business Practice LLM and Attorney Ross E. Mitchell, a graduate of Concord Law School of Kaplan University, to get an inside look at an online legal education. They talk about the online process, interaction, accreditation and what the future holds for online legal education.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[With tuition costs for traditional law schools rising and law students struggling to pay off debt, online legal education can be an alternative for some.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Ellen Murphy, the Program Director for Concord Law School’s Small Business Practice LLM and Attorney Ross E. Mitchell, a graduate of Concord Law School of Kaplan University, to get an inside look at an online legal education. They talk about the online process, interaction, accreditation and what the future holds for online legal education.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1959</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/06/online-law-schools/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7045693431.mp3?updated=1624285461" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Campaign Finance Law in the John Edwards Indictment</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/06/campaign-finance-law-in-the-john-edwards-indictment/</link>
      <description>Former presidential candidate John Edwards was recently indicted by a federal grand jury for conspiracy, allegedly accepting campaign contributions to cover-up the extramarital affair with his former aide, Rielle Hunter. Did John Edwards violate federal election law?  Or is this a campaign ethics violation? Attorneys and co-host J. Craig Williams welcome Peter J. Henning, Professor at Wayne State University Law School and Professor Richard L. Hasen, a nationally-recognized expert in election law and campaign finance regulation from the University of California, Irvine School of Law, to discuss the charges and how the prosecution and defense will handle this controversial legal case.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:24:43 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Campaign Finance Law in the John Edwards Indictment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>288</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ece9ed52-cfa9-11eb-92b9-ab245d762a45/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Campaign Finance Law in the John Edwards Indictment</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Former presidential candidate John Edwards was recently indicted by a federal grand jury for conspiracy, allegedly accepting campaign contributions to cover-up the extramarital affair with his former aide, Rielle Hunter. Did John Edwards violate federal election law?  Or is this a campaign ethics violation? Attorneys and co-host J. Craig Williams welcome Peter J. Henning, Professor at Wayne State University Law School and Professor Richard L. Hasen, a nationally-recognized expert in election law and campaign finance regulation from the University of California, Irvine School of Law, to discuss the charges and how the prosecution and defense will handle this controversial legal case.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Former presidential candidate John Edwards was recently indicted by a federal grand jury for conspiracy, allegedly accepting campaign contributions to cover-up the extramarital affair with his former aide, Rielle Hunter. Did John Edwards violate federal election law?  Or is this a campaign ethics violation? Attorneys and co-host J. Craig Williams welcome Peter J. Henning, Professor at Wayne State University Law School and Professor Richard L. Hasen, a nationally-recognized expert in election law and campaign finance regulation from the University of California, Irvine School of Law, to discuss the charges and how the prosecution and defense will handle this controversial legal case.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2139</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/06/campaign-finance-law-in-the-john-edwards-indictment/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8811416916.mp3?updated=1623961901" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Baby Boomer Lawyers and Retirement</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/06/baby-boomer-lawyers-and-retirement/</link>
      <description>Nelson Schwartz from The New York Times recently wrote an article titled, Easing Out the Gray-Haired. Or Not. , spotlighting the fate of the Baby Boomer generation within law firms.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Valerie C. Samuels, a partner in the firm Posternak Blankstein &amp; Lund LLP and co-chair of the Employment Law Group, and  Attorney Roy Ginsburg, to take a look at this generation of baby boomers within law firms, retirement, their fate within the firm, options upon retirement and what this means for law firms: big, small and solo.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:00:44 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Baby Boomer Lawyers and Retirement</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>287</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ed17f846-cfa9-11eb-92b9-1b5ede66711b/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Baby Boomer Lawyers and Retirement</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Nelson Schwartz from The New York Times recently wrote an article titled, Easing Out the Gray-Haired. Or Not. , spotlighting the fate of the Baby Boomer generation within law firms.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Valerie C. Samuels, a partner in the firm Posternak Blankstein &amp; Lund LLP and co-chair of the Employment Law Group, and  Attorney Roy Ginsburg, to take a look at this generation of baby boomers within law firms, retirement, their fate within the firm, options upon retirement and what this means for law firms: big, small and solo.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Nelson Schwartz from The New York Times recently wrote an article titled, Easing Out the Gray-Haired. Or Not. , spotlighting the fate of the Baby Boomer generation within law firms.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Valerie C. Samuels, a partner in the firm Posternak Blankstein &amp; Lund LLP and co-chair of the Employment Law Group, and  Attorney Roy Ginsburg, to take a look at this generation of baby boomers within law firms, retirement, their fate within the firm, options upon retirement and what this means for law firms: big, small and solo.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2236</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/06/baby-boomer-lawyers-and-retirement/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6151090663.mp3?updated=1624285600" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Debate over Law School Data Reporting</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/05/the-debate-over-law-school-data-reporting/</link>
      <description>Many law students across the nation are concerned about jobs in the legal profession and are pushing for reform in data reporting as it pertains to legal education.  Nate Burris, President of the Law Student Association at Boston College Law School and William D. Henderson, a Professor at the Indiana University Maurer School of Law, are guests on Lawyer2Lawyer with Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams to discuss the issues, including the role of the ABA and law schools, law students’ concerns about their education debt and the current legal job market.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 15:15:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Debate over Law School Data Reporting</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>286</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ed480392-cfa9-11eb-92b9-f3d1e92d5500/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Debate over Law School Data Reporting</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Many law students across the nation are concerned about jobs in the legal profession and are pushing for reform in data reporting as it pertains to legal education.  Nate Burris, President of the Law Student Association at Boston College Law School and William D. Henderson, a Professor at the Indiana University Maurer School of Law, are guests on Lawyer2Lawyer with Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams to discuss the issues, including the role of the ABA and law schools, law students’ concerns about their education debt and the current legal job market.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Many law students across the nation are concerned about jobs in the legal profession and are pushing for reform in data reporting as it pertains to legal education.  Nate Burris, President of the Law Student Association at Boston College Law School and William D. Henderson, a Professor at the Indiana University Maurer School of Law, are guests on Lawyer2Lawyer with Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams to discuss the issues, including the role of the ABA and law schools, law students’ concerns about their education debt and the current legal job market.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2336</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/05/the-debate-over-law-school-data-reporting/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4695069003.mp3?updated=1623961901" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Divorce, Custody Battles and Illness</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/05/divorce-custody-battles-and-illness/</link>
      <description>Recently in North Carolina, Judge Nancy Gordon ruled that Alaina Giordano, a mother of two living with Stage 4 breast cancer, be denied primary custody of her children after a bitter custody battle with her husband.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Lee S. Rosen from the Rosen Law firm and Attorney Sherri Donovan from Sherri Donovan &amp; Associates, PC, to discuss the many components to this controversial custody case.  Lee and Sherri take a look at the ruling, the power of the media and social media, the impact of custody battles and how illness should be treated in custody disputes</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 12:04:04 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Divorce, Custody Battles and Illness</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>285</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ed6df502-cfa9-11eb-92b9-07cb7f700895/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Divorce, Custody Battles and Illness</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Recently in North Carolina, Judge Nancy Gordon ruled that Alaina Giordano, a mother of two living with Stage 4 breast cancer, be denied primary custody of her children after a bitter custody battle with her husband.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Lee S. Rosen from the Rosen Law firm and Attorney Sherri Donovan from Sherri Donovan &amp; Associates, PC, to discuss the many components to this controversial custody case.  Lee and Sherri take a look at the ruling, the power of the media and social media, the impact of custody battles and how illness should be treated in custody disputes</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Recently in North Carolina, Judge Nancy Gordon ruled that Alaina Giordano, a mother of two living with Stage 4 breast cancer, be denied primary custody of her children after a bitter custody battle with her husband.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Lee S. Rosen from the Rosen Law firm and Attorney Sherri Donovan from Sherri Donovan &amp; Associates, PC, to discuss the many components to this controversial custody case.  Lee and Sherri take a look at the ruling, the power of the media and social media, the impact of custody battles and how illness should be treated in custody disputes]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2283</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/05/divorce-custody-battles-and-illness/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7743591640.mp3?updated=1623961901" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Sony PlayStation Security Breach</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/05/the-sony-playstation-security-breach/</link>
      <description>Sony Corporation suffered a huge security breach in its video game online network with names, addresses, and credit card numbers of 100 million PlayStation and PC game network users stolen by hackers.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Justin Brookman, the Director for the Center for Democracy &amp; Technology’s Project on Consumer Privacy and Attorney John H. Lacey from the McCormack Firm, LLC and author of "Massachusetts Data Privacy Law Blog,” to take a look at one of the largest online security breaches. Justin and John talk about litigation, potential legislation and how this breach could impact Sony.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 11:37:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Sony PlayStation Security Breach</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>284</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/edb18768-cfa9-11eb-92b9-0329076c33d7/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Sony PlayStation Security Breach</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Sony Corporation suffered a huge security breach in its video game online network with names, addresses, and credit card numbers of 100 million PlayStation and PC game network users stolen by hackers.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Justin Brookman, the Director for the Center for Democracy &amp; Technology’s Project on Consumer Privacy and Attorney John H. Lacey from the McCormack Firm, LLC and author of "Massachusetts Data Privacy Law Blog,” to take a look at one of the largest online security breaches. Justin and John talk about litigation, potential legislation and how this breach could impact Sony.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sony Corporation suffered a huge security breach in its video game online network with names, addresses, and credit card numbers of 100 million PlayStation and PC game network users stolen by hackers.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Justin Brookman, the Director for the Center for Democracy &amp; Technology’s Project on Consumer Privacy and Attorney John H. Lacey from the McCormack Firm, LLC and author of "Massachusetts Data Privacy Law Blog,” to take a look at one of the largest online security breaches. Justin and John talk about litigation, potential legislation and how this breach could impact Sony.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2290</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/05/the-sony-playstation-security-breach/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8895044614.mp3?updated=1623961901" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Digital Privacy and Your Smartphone</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/05/digital-privacy-and-your-smartphone/</link>
      <description>The debate over digital privacy is making big headlines with a recent controversy surrounding iPhone/iPad location tracking.  Attorneys and co-host J. Craig Williams welcome Joshua A. Engel, Vice President and General Counsel for the Lycurgus Group and author of the Stockycat blog and Jeff Hermes, Associate Director of the Digital Media Law Project and a Fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard, to discuss the controversy. Joshua and Jeff look at privacy, legal concerns with the collection and storage of information and current litigation.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 15:40:46 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Digital Privacy and Your Smartphone</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>283</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/eddecb06-cfa9-11eb-92b9-2b05a3b59223/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Digital Privacy and Your Smartphone</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The debate over digital privacy is making big headlines with a recent controversy surrounding iPhone/iPad location tracking.  Attorneys and co-host J. Craig Williams welcome Joshua A. Engel, Vice President and General Counsel for the Lycurgus Group and author of the Stockycat blog and Jeff Hermes, Associate Director of the Digital Media Law Project and a Fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard, to discuss the controversy. Joshua and Jeff look at privacy, legal concerns with the collection and storage of information and current litigation.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The debate over digital privacy is making big headlines with a recent controversy surrounding iPhone/iPad location tracking.  Attorneys and co-host J. Craig Williams welcome Joshua A. Engel, Vice President and General Counsel for the Lycurgus Group and author of the Stockycat blog and Jeff Hermes, Associate Director of the Digital Media Law Project and a Fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard, to discuss the controversy. Joshua and Jeff look at privacy, legal concerns with the collection and storage of information and current litigation.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2175</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/05/digital-privacy-and-your-smartphone/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4189469522.mp3?updated=1624285463" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chief Judge Alex Kozinski: The First Amendment, Technology and More</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/04/chief-judge-alex-kozinski-the-first-amendment-technology-and-more/</link>
      <description>Chief Judge Alex Kozinski of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently spoke at Golden Gate University School of Law's third annual Intellectual Property Distinguished Speaker Program, where he created a buzz when he shared his insight on technology today and how it has greatly impacted the First Amendment.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome the Honorable Alex Kozinski to the program and talk about technology, bloggers, the First Amendment, his role as a Judge and a lot more.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:42:20 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Chief Judge Alex Kozinski: The First Amendment, Technology and More</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>282</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ee05e27c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-53a65e2238f0/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Chief Judge Alex Kozinski: The First Amendment, Technology and More</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Chief Judge Alex Kozinski of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently spoke at Golden Gate University School of Law's third annual Intellectual Property Distinguished Speaker Program, where he created a buzz when he shared his insight on technology today and how it has greatly impacted the First Amendment.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome the Honorable Alex Kozinski to the program and talk about technology, bloggers, the First Amendment, his role as a Judge and a lot more.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Chief Judge Alex Kozinski of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently spoke at Golden Gate University School of Law's third annual Intellectual Property Distinguished Speaker Program, where he created a buzz when he shared his insight on technology today and how it has greatly impacted the First Amendment.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome the Honorable Alex Kozinski to the program and talk about technology, bloggers, the First Amendment, his role as a Judge and a lot more.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2617</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/04/chief-judge-alex-kozinski-the-first-amendment-technology-and-more/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8708865511.mp3?updated=1624285467" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Love and the Law: Online Dating Lawsuits</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/04/love-and-the-law-online-dating-lawsuits/</link>
      <description>Some estimates say 20 million Americans use internet dating services to find romance.  But when things don’t work out, should the dating service be held accountable and to what extent?  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Mark Brooks, an authority on the business of internet dating and Principal Consultant at Courtland Brooks and Brian Carver, Assistant Professor at UC Berkeley's School of Information, to discuss recent litigation against dating sites. Mark and Brian take a look at a recent lawsuits, background checks and online dating sites legal responsibility.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 12:48:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Love and the Law: Online Dating Lawsuits</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>281</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ee225916-cfa9-11eb-92b9-af96c5c60133/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Love and the Law: Online Dating Lawsuits</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Some estimates say 20 million Americans use internet dating services to find romance.  But when things don’t work out, should the dating service be held accountable and to what extent?  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Mark Brooks, an authority on the business of internet dating and Principal Consultant at Courtland Brooks and Brian Carver, Assistant Professor at UC Berkeley's School of Information, to discuss recent litigation against dating sites. Mark and Brian take a look at a recent lawsuits, background checks and online dating sites legal responsibility.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Some estimates say 20 million Americans use internet dating services to find romance.  But when things don’t work out, should the dating service be held accountable and to what extent?  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Mark Brooks, an authority on the business of internet dating and Principal Consultant at Courtland Brooks and Brian Carver, Assistant Professor at UC Berkeley's School of Information, to discuss recent litigation against dating sites. Mark and Brian take a look at a recent lawsuits, background checks and online dating sites legal responsibility.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2188</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/04/love-and-the-law-online-dating-lawsuits/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1837169154.mp3?updated=1623961902" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Play in the NFL Lockout</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/04/legal-play-in-the-nfl-lockout/</link>
      <description>The National Football League (NFL) ordered a lockout on March 12th, after negotiations between the league and the players’ union collapsed. Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams welcomes legal analyst for Sport Illustrated, Professor Michael McCann of The Vermont Law School and attorney, blogger, author and radio host, Clay Travis, to get an in-depth look at the NFL lockout.  Mike and Clay discuss the circumstances that led up to the lockout, recent developments and how long this battle between owners and players could go on.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:17:07 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Play in the NFL Lockout</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>280</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ee44adcc-cfa9-11eb-92b9-abcfde46b898/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Play in the NFL Lockout</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The National Football League (NFL) ordered a lockout on March 12th, after negotiations between the league and the players’ union collapsed. Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams welcomes legal analyst for Sport Illustrated, Professor Michael McCann of The Vermont Law School and attorney, blogger, author and radio host, Clay Travis, to get an in-depth look at the NFL lockout.  Mike and Clay discuss the circumstances that led up to the lockout, recent developments and how long this battle between owners and players could go on.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The National Football League (NFL) ordered a lockout on March 12th, after negotiations between the league and the players’ union collapsed. Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams welcomes legal analyst for Sport Illustrated, Professor Michael McCann of The Vermont Law School and attorney, blogger, author and radio host, Clay Travis, to get an in-depth look at the NFL lockout.  Mike and Clay discuss the circumstances that led up to the lockout, recent developments and how long this battle between owners and players could go on.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1866</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/04/legal-play-in-the-nfl-lockout/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9472235331.mp3?updated=1624285573" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google Books Settlement Overturned: Now What?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/04/google-books-settlement-overturned-now-what/</link>
      <description>Google and a group of authors and publishers who sued the internet giant, are heading back to the bargaining table after a federal court judge declined to approve a proposed 125-million-dollar settlement between the two parties.  Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams welcomes George H. Pike, Director of the Barco Law Library and Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and Attorney Lois F. Wasoff General Counsel for Publishers International Linking Association ("CrossRef"),  to discuss this latest decision. They talk about the Judge’s decision and his reasons for rejecting the settlement, the “opt-in” vs.“opt-out” agreement and the possibility of Microsoft or Amazon fighting any new settlement.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:02:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Google Books Settlement Overturned: Now What?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>279</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ee6ac548-cfa9-11eb-92b9-4314ee290703/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Google Books Settlement Overturned: Now What?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Google and a group of authors and publishers who sued the internet giant, are heading back to the bargaining table after a federal court judge declined to approve a proposed 125-million-dollar settlement between the two parties.  Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams welcomes George H. Pike, Director of the Barco Law Library and Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and Attorney Lois F. Wasoff General Counsel for Publishers International Linking Association ("CrossRef"),  to discuss this latest decision. They talk about the Judge’s decision and his reasons for rejecting the settlement, the “opt-in” vs.“opt-out” agreement and the possibility of Microsoft or Amazon fighting any new settlement.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Google and a group of authors and publishers who sued the internet giant, are heading back to the bargaining table after a federal court judge declined to approve a proposed 125-million-dollar settlement between the two parties.  Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams welcomes George H. Pike, Director of the Barco Law Library and Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and Attorney Lois F. Wasoff General Counsel for Publishers International Linking Association ("CrossRef"),  to discuss this latest decision. They talk about the Judge’s decision and his reasons for rejecting the settlement, the “opt-in” vs.“opt-out” agreement and the possibility of Microsoft or Amazon fighting any new settlement.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1771</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/04/google-books-settlement-overturned-now-what/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1213092712.mp3?updated=1624285454" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Battle of the Smartphones: iPhone v. Android</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/03/battle-of-the-smartphones-iphone-v-android/</link>
      <description>There is an ongoing  debate in the legal community about whether the iPhone or the Android is best for attorneys and their practices.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Richard M. Georges, blogger for FutureLawyer and Attorney Jeff Richardson, from Adams and Reese LLP and blogger for iPhone J.D., to take the gloves off on Lawyer2Lawyer about the pros and cons of each, look at the best applications for attorneys and security issues surrounding smartphones.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:57:08 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Battle of the Smartphones: iPhone v. Android</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>278</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ee8d8916-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5b7ba3d09b79/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Battle of the Smartphones: iPhone v. Android</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>There is an ongoing  debate in the legal community about whether the iPhone or the Android is best for attorneys and their practices.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Richard M. Georges, blogger for FutureLawyer and Attorney Jeff Richardson, from Adams and Reese LLP and blogger for iPhone J.D., to take the gloves off on Lawyer2Lawyer about the pros and cons of each, look at the best applications for attorneys and security issues surrounding smartphones.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[There is an ongoing  debate in the legal community about whether the iPhone or the Android is best for attorneys and their practices.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Richard M. Georges, blogger for FutureLawyer and Attorney Jeff Richardson, from Adams and Reese LLP and blogger for iPhone J.D., to take the gloves off on Lawyer2Lawyer about the pros and cons of each, look at the best applications for attorneys and security issues surrounding smartphones.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2262</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/03/battle-of-the-smartphones-iphone-v-android/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9020873165.mp3?updated=1624285467" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fallout in Japan and the Safety of Nuclear Power Plants</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/03/fallout-in-japan-and-the-safety-of-nuclear-power-plants/</link>
      <description>As the world anxiously watches the nuclear crisis unfold in Japan, there are growing concerns about the safety of nuclear power plants right here in the United States.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Martin G. Malsch, a partner with Egan, Fitzpatrick, Malsch &amp; Lawrence, PLLC and Geoffrey H. Fettus, a senior project attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC's) nuclear program, to discuss the aftermath of the nuclear crisis in Japan and the safety of nuclear plants here in the States. Marty and Geoff question if American plants are safe, who would be held legally responsible in case of a nuclear accident in America and how this recent disaster has affected the environment. Later in the program, Bob and Craig visit the great debate over the iPhone v. Android.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:27:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fallout in Japan and the Safety of Nuclear Power Plants</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>277</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/eeaed904-cfa9-11eb-92b9-ab81e8e85c66/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Fallout in Japan and the Safety of Nuclear Power Plants</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As the world anxiously watches the nuclear crisis unfold in Japan, there are growing concerns about the safety of nuclear power plants right here in the United States.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Martin G. Malsch, a partner with Egan, Fitzpatrick, Malsch &amp; Lawrence, PLLC and Geoffrey H. Fettus, a senior project attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC's) nuclear program, to discuss the aftermath of the nuclear crisis in Japan and the safety of nuclear plants here in the States. Marty and Geoff question if American plants are safe, who would be held legally responsible in case of a nuclear accident in America and how this recent disaster has affected the environment. Later in the program, Bob and Craig visit the great debate over the iPhone v. Android.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[As the world anxiously watches the nuclear crisis unfold in Japan, there are growing concerns about the safety of nuclear power plants right here in the United States.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Martin G. Malsch, a partner with Egan, Fitzpatrick, Malsch &amp; Lawrence, PLLC and Geoffrey H. Fettus, a senior project attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC's) nuclear program, to discuss the aftermath of the nuclear crisis in Japan and the safety of nuclear plants here in the States. Marty and Geoff question if American plants are safe, who would be held legally responsible in case of a nuclear accident in America and how this recent disaster has affected the environment. Later in the program, Bob and Craig visit the great debate over the iPhone v. Android.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2432</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/03/fallout-in-japan-and-the-safety-of-nuclear-power-plants/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7629984132.mp3?updated=1624285587" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sunshine Week</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/03/sunshine-week/</link>
      <description>Transparency in government is talked about but is it reality?  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Mark Rumold, the Open Government Legal Fellow at the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Kenneth Bunting, Executive Director of the National Freedom of Information Coalition at the University of Missouri School of Journalism, to take a look inside Sunshine Week.  Mark and Ken discuss which states have made the most strides for transparency, if technological advances are helping governments be more transparent and why it is important for government to stay transparent.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:46:05 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Sunshine Week</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>276</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/eedae0c6-cfa9-11eb-92b9-67bbec3aa928/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sunshine Week</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Transparency in government is talked about but is it reality?  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Mark Rumold, the Open Government Legal Fellow at the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Kenneth Bunting, Executive Director of the National Freedom of Information Coalition at the University of Missouri School of Journalism, to take a look inside Sunshine Week.  Mark and Ken discuss which states have made the most strides for transparency, if technological advances are helping governments be more transparent and why it is important for government to stay transparent.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Transparency in government is talked about but is it reality?  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Mark Rumold, the Open Government Legal Fellow at the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Kenneth Bunting, Executive Director of the National Freedom of Information Coalition at the University of Missouri School of Journalism, to take a look inside Sunshine Week.  Mark and Ken discuss which states have made the most strides for transparency, if technological advances are helping governments be more transparent and why it is important for government to stay transparent.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2115</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/03/sunshine-week/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5040632975.mp3?updated=1624285533" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Marketing: Stateside and Worldwide</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/03/legal-marketing-stateside-and-worldwide/</link>
      <description>There is no doubt that the legal industry has gone global.  Political, economic, social and technological advances around the world have created a very competitive environment. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Nick Jervis, Director and Founder of Samson Consulting in Bristol, England, to discuss the best ways to market to clients and the importance of a legal marketing strategy.  Later in the program, Bob and Craig chat with  Ross Fishman, JD, CEO of Fishman Marketing, about new legal marketing trends and how a law firm can stay ahead of the competition through their marketing, stateside and worldwide.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:26:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Marketing: Stateside and Worldwide</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>275</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/eef6351a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-4b781ecfedb9/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Marketing: Stateside and Worldwide</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>There is no doubt that the legal industry has gone global.  Political, economic, social and technological advances around the world have created a very competitive environment. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Nick Jervis, Director and Founder of Samson Consulting in Bristol, England, to discuss the best ways to market to clients and the importance of a legal marketing strategy.  Later in the program, Bob and Craig chat with  Ross Fishman, JD, CEO of Fishman Marketing, about new legal marketing trends and how a law firm can stay ahead of the competition through their marketing, stateside and worldwide.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[There is no doubt that the legal industry has gone global.  Political, economic, social and technological advances around the world have created a very competitive environment. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Nick Jervis, Director and Founder of Samson Consulting in Bristol, England, to discuss the best ways to market to clients and the importance of a legal marketing strategy.  Later in the program, Bob and Craig chat with  Ross Fishman, JD, CEO of Fishman Marketing, about new legal marketing trends and how a law firm can stay ahead of the competition through their marketing, stateside and worldwide.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2581</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/03/legal-marketing-stateside-and-worldwide/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9423332795.mp3?updated=1623961905" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Defense of Marriage Act</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/03/the-defense-of-marriage-act/</link>
      <description>On February 23rd, 2011, Attorney General Eric Holder announced the Obama administration would no longer defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in cases pending in federal court.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Tobias Barrington Wolff, Professor of Law at the University of Pennsylvania Law School and Ken Klukowski, Director of the Center for Religious Liberty at the Family Research Council, to discuss this controversial decision. Tobias and Ken discuss how this decision could affect current court cases, the impact on same sex-marriage and if this is the beginning of a DOMA repeal.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:02:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Defense of Marriage Act</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>274</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ef181810-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5bc0b375ee24/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Defense of Marriage Act</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On February 23rd, 2011, Attorney General Eric Holder announced the Obama administration would no longer defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in cases pending in federal court.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Tobias Barrington Wolff, Professor of Law at the University of Pennsylvania Law School and Ken Klukowski, Director of the Center for Religious Liberty at the Family Research Council, to discuss this controversial decision. Tobias and Ken discuss how this decision could affect current court cases, the impact on same sex-marriage and if this is the beginning of a DOMA repeal.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On February 23rd, 2011, Attorney General Eric Holder announced the Obama administration would no longer defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in cases pending in federal court.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Tobias Barrington Wolff, Professor of Law at the University of Pennsylvania Law School and Ken Klukowski, Director of the Center for Religious Liberty at the Family Research Council, to discuss this controversial decision. Tobias and Ken discuss how this decision could affect current court cases, the impact on same sex-marriage and if this is the beginning of a DOMA repeal.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2391</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/03/the-defense-of-marriage-act/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9118559449.mp3?updated=1624285468" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Making of Out of the Ashes: 9/11</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/02/the-making-of-out-of-the-ashes-911/</link>
      <description>Just days after the devastation of September 11, 2001, the federal  government created the Victim Compensation Fund, a fund designed to help grieving families get through the tragedy. From this tragedy a documentary titled, Out of the Ashes: 9/11 was born.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes executive producer, writer and co-director of this documentary, Marilyn J. Berger from the Seattle University School of Law and Debra Brown Steinberg, partner with the firm, Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP, to get an in-depth look at the making of the incredibly compelling documentary.  This documentary examines the legal, moral, and ethical ramifications of the Victim Compensation Fund and its impact on the civil justice system.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:22:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Making of Out of the Ashes: 9/11</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>273</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ef4bd6fa-cfa9-11eb-92b9-53e728d48cdb/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Making of Out of the Ashes: 9/11</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Just days after the devastation of September 11, 2001, the federal  government created the Victim Compensation Fund, a fund designed to help grieving families get through the tragedy. From this tragedy a documentary titled, Out of the Ashes: 9/11 was born.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes executive producer, writer and co-director of this documentary, Marilyn J. Berger from the Seattle University School of Law and Debra Brown Steinberg, partner with the firm, Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP, to get an in-depth look at the making of the incredibly compelling documentary.  This documentary examines the legal, moral, and ethical ramifications of the Victim Compensation Fund and its impact on the civil justice system.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Just days after the devastation of September 11, 2001, the federal  government created the Victim Compensation Fund, a fund designed to help grieving families get through the tragedy. From this tragedy a documentary titled, Out of the Ashes: 9/11 was born.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes executive producer, writer and co-director of this documentary, Marilyn J. Berger from the Seattle University School of Law and Debra Brown Steinberg, partner with the firm, Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP, to get an in-depth look at the making of the incredibly compelling documentary.  This documentary examines the legal, moral, and ethical ramifications of the Victim Compensation Fund and its impact on the civil justice system.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2310</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/02/the-making-of-out-of-the-ashes-911/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6037591999.mp3?updated=1623961906" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Issues Surrounding Pharmacy Errors</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/02/the-legal-issues-surrounding-pharmacy-errors/</link>
      <description>Recently a young woman, Mareena Silva, was mistakenly given the wrong medication intended for another customer, Maria Silva, at a Safeway pharmacy in Colorado. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Chad Cook, a member of the Mass Torts Section at Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis &amp; Miles, P.C. and Dr. Shannon J. Johnson, a pharmacist with PharmDmand, a private pharmacy-consulting firm, to take a look at this incident and pharmacy errors. They talk about the legal issues pharmacies can face due to prescription errors and pharmacy misfills, get a pharmacist’s perspective and discuss how these errors can be prevented.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:48:34 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Issues Surrounding Pharmacy Errors</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>272</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ef7ffd18-cfa9-11eb-92b9-17cee5eaa4e0/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Legal Issues Surrounding Pharmacy Errors</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Recently a young woman, Mareena Silva, was mistakenly given the wrong medication intended for another customer, Maria Silva, at a Safeway pharmacy in Colorado. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Chad Cook, a member of the Mass Torts Section at Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis &amp; Miles, P.C. and Dr. Shannon J. Johnson, a pharmacist with PharmDmand, a private pharmacy-consulting firm, to take a look at this incident and pharmacy errors. They talk about the legal issues pharmacies can face due to prescription errors and pharmacy misfills, get a pharmacist’s perspective and discuss how these errors can be prevented.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Recently a young woman, Mareena Silva, was mistakenly given the wrong medication intended for another customer, Maria Silva, at a Safeway pharmacy in Colorado. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Chad Cook, a member of the Mass Torts Section at Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis &amp; Miles, P.C. and Dr. Shannon J. Johnson, a pharmacist with PharmDmand, a private pharmacy-consulting firm, to take a look at this incident and pharmacy errors. They talk about the legal issues pharmacies can face due to prescription errors and pharmacy misfills, get a pharmacist’s perspective and discuss how these errors can be prevented.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2099</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/02/the-legal-issues-surrounding-pharmacy-errors/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3921245241.mp3?updated=1624285589" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Snow and Ice Litigation</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/02/snow-and-ice-litigation/</link>
      <description>From roof collapse to slip and falls to property damage, the recent snowstorms across the country have created a variety of problems.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney David W. White, founding member of the law firm Breakstone, White &amp; Gluck, PC and Attorney James T. Scamby, partner in the law firm of Tucker, Heifetz &amp; Saltzman, LLP, to discuss the legal risks associated with snow and ice and who is responsible for slips, falls and injuries after a storm. They spotlight the Papadopoulos v. Target Corp case, the Massachusetts court ruling which raised the legal risk for property owners who don't shovel their snow and the responsibility of the property owner or manager.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:08:41 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Snow and Ice Litigation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>271</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/eff37b3a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-232e3936fd8b/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Snow and Ice Litigation</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>From roof collapse to slip and falls to property damage, the recent snowstorms across the country have created a variety of problems.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney David W. White, founding member of the law firm Breakstone, White &amp; Gluck, PC and Attorney James T. Scamby, partner in the law firm of Tucker, Heifetz &amp; Saltzman, LLP, to discuss the legal risks associated with snow and ice and who is responsible for slips, falls and injuries after a storm. They spotlight the Papadopoulos v. Target Corp case, the Massachusetts court ruling which raised the legal risk for property owners who don't shovel their snow and the responsibility of the property owner or manager.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[From roof collapse to slip and falls to property damage, the recent snowstorms across the country have created a variety of problems.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney David W. White, founding member of the law firm Breakstone, White &amp; Gluck, PC and Attorney James T. Scamby, partner in the law firm of Tucker, Heifetz &amp; Saltzman, LLP, to discuss the legal risks associated with snow and ice and who is responsible for slips, falls and injuries after a storm. They spotlight the Papadopoulos v. Target Corp case, the Massachusetts court ruling which raised the legal risk for property owners who don't shovel their snow and the responsibility of the property owner or manager.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2278</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/02/snow-and-ice-litigation/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3487107945.mp3?updated=1623961906" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Current Legal Job Market</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/02/the-current-legal-job-market/</link>
      <description>The legal job market has been greatly impacted by the down economy, but has there been a turnaround? Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Charles "Chad" Volkert, Executive Director of Robert Half Legal, to give an update on the legal job market.  Attorney Volkert talks about the current job market for lawyers and recent law school graduates and offers advice for job seekers.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:08:03 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Current Legal Job Market</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>270</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f0177044-cfa9-11eb-92b9-bf3e083dd273/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Current Legal Job Market</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The legal job market has been greatly impacted by the down economy, but has there been a turnaround? Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Charles "Chad" Volkert, Executive Director of Robert Half Legal, to give an update on the legal job market.  Attorney Volkert talks about the current job market for lawyers and recent law school graduates and offers advice for job seekers.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The legal job market has been greatly impacted by the down economy, but has there been a turnaround? Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Charles "Chad" Volkert, Executive Director of Robert Half Legal, to give an update on the legal job market.  Attorney Volkert talks about the current job market for lawyers and recent law school graduates and offers advice for job seekers.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2108</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/02/the-current-legal-job-market/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9895589112.mp3?updated=1623961907" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyers USA: Top Ten Jury Verdicts of 2010</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/01/lawyers-usa-top-ten-jury-verdicts-of-2010/</link>
      <description>2010 was a big year for jury verdicts in courts across the nation. From tobacco litigation to asbestos to car roll-overs, plaintiffs were big winners in the courts.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Reni Gertner, News Editor of Lawyers USA and Attorney Kevin J. Dunne from the law office of Sedgwick, Detert, Moran &amp; Arnold LLP, to discuss Lawyers USA’s "Top Ten Jury Verdicts of 2010".  They take an in-depth look at these specific cases and get a defense attorney’s perspective.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:14:18 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyers USA: Top Ten Jury Verdicts of 2010</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>269</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f03de472-cfa9-11eb-92b9-43cccc06206e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyers USA: Top Ten Jury Verdicts of 2010</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>2010 was a big year for jury verdicts in courts across the nation. From tobacco litigation to asbestos to car roll-overs, plaintiffs were big winners in the courts.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Reni Gertner, News Editor of Lawyers USA and Attorney Kevin J. Dunne from the law office of Sedgwick, Detert, Moran &amp; Arnold LLP, to discuss Lawyers USA’s "Top Ten Jury Verdicts of 2010".  They take an in-depth look at these specific cases and get a defense attorney’s perspective.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[2010 was a big year for jury verdicts in courts across the nation. From tobacco litigation to asbestos to car roll-overs, plaintiffs were big winners in the courts.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Reni Gertner, News Editor of Lawyers USA and Attorney Kevin J. Dunne from the law office of Sedgwick, Detert, Moran &amp; Arnold LLP, to discuss Lawyers USA’s "Top Ten Jury Verdicts of 2010".  They take an in-depth look at these specific cases and get a defense attorney’s perspective.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2170</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/01/lawyers-usa-top-ten-jury-verdicts-of-2010/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9068939632.mp3?updated=1624285466" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gun Control Legislation Debate after the Tucson shootings</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/01/gun-control-legislation-debate-after-the-tucson-shootings/</link>
      <description>The recent shootings in Tucson, Arizona rocked the nation and the world.  Since this tragedy, a nationwide gun debate has raged on between gun rights supporters and gun control supporters. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome David B. Kopel, Research Director at the Independence Institute in Golden, Colorado and Adam Winkler, professor of constitutional law at UCLA School of Law and author of the soon-to-be released book, Gunfight, to discuss the gun debate. They a look at the law at the heart of this debate and new legislation prompted by the shootings.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:13:54 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Gun Control Legislation Debate after the Tucson shootings</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>268</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f064e1ee-cfa9-11eb-92b9-176dd177d15d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Gun Control Legislation Debate after the Tucson shootings</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The recent shootings in Tucson, Arizona rocked the nation and the world.  Since this tragedy, a nationwide gun debate has raged on between gun rights supporters and gun control supporters. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome David B. Kopel, Research Director at the Independence Institute in Golden, Colorado and Adam Winkler, professor of constitutional law at UCLA School of Law and author of the soon-to-be released book, Gunfight, to discuss the gun debate. They a look at the law at the heart of this debate and new legislation prompted by the shootings.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The recent shootings in Tucson, Arizona rocked the nation and the world.  Since this tragedy, a nationwide gun debate has raged on between gun rights supporters and gun control supporters. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome David B. Kopel, Research Director at the Independence Institute in Golden, Colorado and Adam Winkler, professor of constitutional law at UCLA School of Law and author of the soon-to-be released book, Gunfight, to discuss the gun debate. They a look at the law at the heart of this debate and new legislation prompted by the shootings.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2168</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/01/gun-control-legislation-debate-after-the-tucson-shootings/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5566253408.mp3?updated=1623961907" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Challenging Universal Health Care: Merlina vs. Massachusetts</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/01/challenging-universal-health-care-merlina-vs-massachusetts/</link>
      <description>A challenge to Massachusetts’ Universal Health Care law may reveal some insight into what may lie ahead for the Federal Health Care law. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Michael Merlina, a resident of Massachusetts who is representing himself in court after being fined $2,000 by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for not having health insurance and Attorney David Harlow, a seasoned Health Care attorney, consultant and blogger, to talk about this case and the questions this case raises in our nationwide debate.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:20:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Challenging Universal Health Care: Merlina vs. Massachusetts</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>267</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f082aad0-cfa9-11eb-92b9-e7f283d7009a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Challenging Universal Health Care: Merlina vs. Massachusetts</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A challenge to Massachusetts’ Universal Health Care law may reveal some insight into what may lie ahead for the Federal Health Care law. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Michael Merlina, a resident of Massachusetts who is representing himself in court after being fined $2,000 by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for not having health insurance and Attorney David Harlow, a seasoned Health Care attorney, consultant and blogger, to talk about this case and the questions this case raises in our nationwide debate.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A challenge to Massachusetts’ Universal Health Care law may reveal some insight into what may lie ahead for the Federal Health Care law. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Michael Merlina, a resident of Massachusetts who is representing himself in court after being fined $2,000 by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for not having health insurance and Attorney David Harlow, a seasoned Health Care attorney, consultant and blogger, to talk about this case and the questions this case raises in our nationwide debate.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2144</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2011/01/challenging-universal-health-care-merlina-vs-massachusetts/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1721411032.mp3?updated=1624285469" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yule Hear from our Lawyers &amp; Lawyer2Lawyer’s Best of 2010!</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/12/yule-hear-from-our-lawyers-lawyer2lawyers-best-of-2010/</link>
      <description>It is that time of year where we recover from the holiday madness, dig ourselves out of the snow and look ahead to a brand new year! Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome returning musical guest,  Attorney Larry Savell from the law firm of Chadbourne &amp; Parke LLP, to talk about his new album, Yule Hear from Our Lawyers.  Later in the show, Bob and Craig reflect on this past year with Lawyer2Lawyer’s Best of 2010!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 16:06:46 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Yule Hear from our Lawyers &amp; Lawyer2Lawyer’s Best of 2010!</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>266</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f09f4d3e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-cf8dd62ca6e9/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yule Hear from our Lawyers &amp; Lawyer2Lawyer’s Best of 2010!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It is that time of year where we recover from the holiday madness, dig ourselves out of the snow and look ahead to a brand new year! Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome returning musical guest,  Attorney Larry Savell from the law firm of Chadbourne &amp; Parke LLP, to talk about his new album, Yule Hear from Our Lawyers.  Later in the show, Bob and Craig reflect on this past year with Lawyer2Lawyer’s Best of 2010!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[It is that time of year where we recover from the holiday madness, dig ourselves out of the snow and look ahead to a brand new year! Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome returning musical guest,  Attorney Larry Savell from the law firm of Chadbourne &amp; Parke LLP, to talk about his new album, Yule Hear from Our Lawyers.  Later in the show, Bob and Craig reflect on this past year with Lawyer2Lawyer’s Best of 2010!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2951</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/12/yule-hear-from-our-lawyers-lawyer2lawyers-best-of-2010/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5382498897.mp3?updated=1623961908" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Oracle’s Billion Dollar Verdict</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/12/oracles-billion-dollar-verdict/</link>
      <description>Recently in an Oakland, California courtroom, a jury awarded Oracle Corp., a whopping $1.3 billion verdict against competitor, SAP AG, a market and technology leader in business management software, for damages due to copyright infringement by a now-defunct software maintenance unit called, TomorrowNow.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Carol Smith, from Hiaring + Smith LLP and David H. Levitt, Partner at the firm, Hinshaw &amp; Culbertson LLP, as they take a look at this complicated case that is sweeping the legal community. They discuss  copyright infringement and stolen intellectual property, SAP’s admitted liability, the significance of the billion-dollar jury award and the impact of this case on future cases.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:48:42 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Oracle’s Billion Dollar Verdict</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>265</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f0bf2622-cfa9-11eb-92b9-63ba733d14dd/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Oracle’s Billion Dollar Verdict</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Recently in an Oakland, California courtroom, a jury awarded Oracle Corp., a whopping $1.3 billion verdict against competitor, SAP AG, a market and technology leader in business management software, for damages due to copyright infringement by a now-defunct software maintenance unit called, TomorrowNow.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Carol Smith, from Hiaring + Smith LLP and David H. Levitt, Partner at the firm, Hinshaw &amp; Culbertson LLP, as they take a look at this complicated case that is sweeping the legal community. They discuss  copyright infringement and stolen intellectual property, SAP’s admitted liability, the significance of the billion-dollar jury award and the impact of this case on future cases.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Recently in an Oakland, California courtroom, a jury awarded Oracle Corp., a whopping $1.3 billion verdict against competitor, SAP AG, a market and technology leader in business management software, for damages due to copyright infringement by a now-defunct software maintenance unit called, TomorrowNow.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Carol Smith, from Hiaring + Smith LLP and David H. Levitt, Partner at the firm, Hinshaw &amp; Culbertson LLP, as they take a look at this complicated case that is sweeping the legal community. They discuss  copyright infringement and stolen intellectual property, SAP’s admitted liability, the significance of the billion-dollar jury award and the impact of this case on future cases.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2190</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/12/oracles-billion-dollar-verdict/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1203857717.mp3?updated=1623961909" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Judge Finds Health Care Law Provision Unconstitutional</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/12/judge-finds-health-care-law-provision-unconstitutional/</link>
      <description>A major blow to the National Health Care Law! Just this week in Richmond, Virginia, U.S. District Court Judge Henry E. Hudson determined a central provision of the national health care law, the Affordable Care Act, to be unconstitutional.   Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome health care law expert Professor Timothy S. Jost from the Washington and Lee University School of Law and Adam Winkler, a constitutional law specialist from UCLA Law School, to discuss this recent ruling, the constitutionality of this provision and the health care law and the impact of this ruling on other states and those in need of health care.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:37:31 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Judge Finds Health Care Law Provision Unconstitutional</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>264</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f0e08588-cfa9-11eb-92b9-03adc7da14c3/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Judge Finds Health Care Law Provision Unconstitutional</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A major blow to the National Health Care Law! Just this week in Richmond, Virginia, U.S. District Court Judge Henry E. Hudson determined a central provision of the national health care law, the Affordable Care Act, to be unconstitutional.   Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome health care law expert Professor Timothy S. Jost from the Washington and Lee University School of Law and Adam Winkler, a constitutional law specialist from UCLA Law School, to discuss this recent ruling, the constitutionality of this provision and the health care law and the impact of this ruling on other states and those in need of health care.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A major blow to the National Health Care Law! Just this week in Richmond, Virginia, U.S. District Court Judge Henry E. Hudson determined a central provision of the national health care law, the Affordable Care Act, to be unconstitutional.   Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome health care law expert Professor Timothy S. Jost from the Washington and Lee University School of Law and Adam Winkler, a constitutional law specialist from UCLA Law School, to discuss this recent ruling, the constitutionality of this provision and the health care law and the impact of this ruling on other states and those in need of health care.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2182</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/12/judge-finds-health-care-law-provision-unconstitutional/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5659494232.mp3?updated=1623961909" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Supreme Court and the Walmart Gender Discrimination Class-Action</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/12/the-supreme-court-and-the-walmart-gender-discrimination-class-action/</link>
      <description>A lawsuit on behalf of 500,000 women employees against Walmart is under review by the Supreme Court to decide whether it can proceed as a class action. Guest host, Attorney Marsha Kazarosian welcomes Professor Marcia L. McCormick, from Saint Louis University School of Law and co-editor and contributor to the Workplace Prof Blog, to discuss the largest employment discrimination case in U.S. history. They take a look at the alleged gender discrimination at Walmart, the criteria for the Supreme Court to decide on this class action issue and the impact this case could have on employment law and discrimination within companies.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 16:20:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Supreme Court and the Walmart Gender Discrimination Class-Action</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>263</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f0fdacf8-cfa9-11eb-92b9-6bfbaaae6da5/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Supreme Court and the Walmart Gender Discrimination Class-Action</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A lawsuit on behalf of 500,000 women employees against Walmart is under review by the Supreme Court to decide whether it can proceed as a class action. Guest host, Attorney Marsha Kazarosian welcomes Professor Marcia L. McCormick, from Saint Louis University School of Law and co-editor and contributor to the Workplace Prof Blog, to discuss the largest employment discrimination case in U.S. history. They take a look at the alleged gender discrimination at Walmart, the criteria for the Supreme Court to decide on this class action issue and the impact this case could have on employment law and discrimination within companies.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A lawsuit on behalf of 500,000 women employees against Walmart is under review by the Supreme Court to decide whether it can proceed as a class action. Guest host, Attorney Marsha Kazarosian welcomes Professor Marcia L. McCormick, from Saint Louis University School of Law and co-editor and contributor to the Workplace Prof Blog, to discuss the largest employment discrimination case in U.S. history. They take a look at the alleged gender discrimination at Walmart, the criteria for the Supreme Court to decide on this class action issue and the impact this case could have on employment law and discrimination within companies.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1943</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/12/the-supreme-court-and-the-walmart-gender-discrimination-class-action/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9159184006.mp3?updated=1624285467" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Full-Body Scans, Pat Downs &amp; the TSA</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/11/full-body-scans-pat-downs-the-tsa/</link>
      <description>In recent weeks, there has been a huge backlash against the Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) over full-body scanners and pat downs at select airports across the country. Attorneys and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Patrick Smith, airline pilot, author, and air travel columnist, who writes the column, Ask the Pilot, for Salon.com and Jim Harper, Director of Information Policy Studies at the Cato Institute, to discuss the latest on this nationwide controversy. They take a look at the fallout from travelers, the potential legal issues, the impact on traveling and what the future holds for security and the TSA on their quest to fight terrorism.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:07:52 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Full-Body Scans, Pat Downs &amp; the TSA</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>262</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f11e4fe4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-4325d3ba91eb/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Full-Body Scans, Pat Downs &amp; the TSA</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In recent weeks, there has been a huge backlash against the Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) over full-body scanners and pat downs at select airports across the country. Attorneys and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Patrick Smith, airline pilot, author, and air travel columnist, who writes the column, Ask the Pilot, for Salon.com and Jim Harper, Director of Information Policy Studies at the Cato Institute, to discuss the latest on this nationwide controversy. They take a look at the fallout from travelers, the potential legal issues, the impact on traveling and what the future holds for security and the TSA on their quest to fight terrorism.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In recent weeks, there has been a huge backlash against the Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) over full-body scanners and pat downs at select airports across the country. Attorneys and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Patrick Smith, airline pilot, author, and air travel columnist, who writes the column, Ask the Pilot, for Salon.com and Jim Harper, Director of Information Policy Studies at the Cato Institute, to discuss the latest on this nationwide controversy. They take a look at the fallout from travelers, the potential legal issues, the impact on traveling and what the future holds for security and the TSA on their quest to fight terrorism.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2178</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/11/full-body-scans-pat-downs-the-tsa/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8209056211.mp3?updated=1623961910" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Test Lab for Social Media in the Courts</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/11/a-test-lab-for-social-media-in-the-courts/</link>
      <description>The Order in the Court 2.0  project will turn a Massachusetts courtroom into a test lab for how courts deal with social media, electronic journalism and digital technology. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams discuss this pioneering project with John Davidow, the wbur.org executive editor who helped WBUR win a $250,000 grant from the Knight News Challenge to launch the project, and Judge Mark S. Coven, presiding justice at Quincy District Court, where the project will be based. They take a look at the program’s goals and challenges and the broader issues raised by bloggers, tweeters and other forms of new media in courtrooms nationwide.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:07:41 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>A Test Lab for Social Media in the Courts</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>261</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f14141ca-cfa9-11eb-92b9-bf614e20967c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>A Test Lab for Social Media in the Courts</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Order in the Court 2.0  project will turn a Massachusetts courtroom into a test lab for how courts deal with social media, electronic journalism and digital technology. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams discuss this pioneering project with John Davidow, the wbur.org executive editor who helped WBUR win a $250,000 grant from the Knight News Challenge to launch the project, and Judge Mark S. Coven, presiding justice at Quincy District Court, where the project will be based. They take a look at the program’s goals and challenges and the broader issues raised by bloggers, tweeters and other forms of new media in courtrooms nationwide.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The Order in the Court 2.0  project will turn a Massachusetts courtroom into a test lab for how courts deal with social media, electronic journalism and digital technology. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams discuss this pioneering project with John Davidow, the wbur.org executive editor who helped WBUR win a $250,000 grant from the Knight News Challenge to launch the project, and Judge Mark S. Coven, presiding justice at Quincy District Court, where the project will be based. They take a look at the program’s goals and challenges and the broader issues raised by bloggers, tweeters and other forms of new media in courtrooms nationwide.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2375</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/11/a-test-lab-for-social-media-in-the-courts/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3165684422.mp3?updated=1623961910" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Power of Civics Education</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/11/the-power-of-civic-education/</link>
      <description>Civics education is vital to developing the skills and dispositions that young people need to succeed in the 21st Century.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Stephen N. Zack, President of the American Bar Association, to discuss his fight to bring civic education to our schools and to the people of our nation. Bob and Stephen talk about the Commission on Civic Education in the Nation’s Schools, the Constitution and civic engagement and inspiring the Latino community to enter the legal profession through the Commission on Hispanic Legal Rights and Responsibilities.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:25:02 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Power of Civics Education</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>260</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f173ab74-cfa9-11eb-92b9-1fd32d5b851f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Power of Civics Education</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Civics education is vital to developing the skills and dispositions that young people need to succeed in the 21st Century.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Stephen N. Zack, President of the American Bar Association, to discuss his fight to bring civic education to our schools and to the people of our nation. Bob and Stephen talk about the Commission on Civic Education in the Nation’s Schools, the Constitution and civic engagement and inspiring the Latino community to enter the legal profession through the Commission on Hispanic Legal Rights and Responsibilities.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Civics education is vital to developing the skills and dispositions that young people need to succeed in the 21st Century.  Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Stephen N. Zack, President of the American Bar Association, to discuss his fight to bring civic education to our schools and to the people of our nation. Bob and Stephen talk about the Commission on Civic Education in the Nation’s Schools, the Constitution and civic engagement and inspiring the Latino community to enter the legal profession through the Commission on Hispanic Legal Rights and Responsibilities.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2310</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/11/the-power-of-civic-education/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9124087594.mp3?updated=1623961910" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Pioneer &amp; Hope For Vision</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/11/legal-pioneer-hope-for-vision/</link>
      <description>Attorney Issac Lidsky was the first blind law clerk to serve the U.S. Supreme Court, working under Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Recently, Tony Mauro highlighted Issac in the National Law Journal. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Issac J. Lidsky from the firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld LLP and founder of Hope For Vision, to discuss his legal career, his Supreme Court clerkship, being visually impaired and a lawyer and take a look at Hope For Vision, which is raising awareness and helping those with blinding diseases.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:36:35 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Pioneer &amp; Hope For Vision</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>259</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f1d7eb98-cfa9-11eb-92b9-f759a9ce0a29/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Pioneer &amp; Hope For Vision</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Attorney Issac Lidsky was the first blind law clerk to serve the U.S. Supreme Court, working under Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Recently, Tony Mauro highlighted Issac in the National Law Journal. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Issac J. Lidsky from the firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld LLP and founder of Hope For Vision, to discuss his legal career, his Supreme Court clerkship, being visually impaired and a lawyer and take a look at Hope For Vision, which is raising awareness and helping those with blinding diseases.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Attorney Issac Lidsky was the first blind law clerk to serve the U.S. Supreme Court, working under Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Recently, Tony Mauro highlighted Issac in the National Law Journal. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Issac J. Lidsky from the firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld LLP and founder of Hope For Vision, to discuss his legal career, his Supreme Court clerkship, being visually impaired and a lawyer and take a look at Hope For Vision, which is raising awareness and helping those with blinding diseases.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2111</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/11/legal-pioneer-hope-for-vision/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9097360157.mp3?updated=1624285527" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Entertainment Law &amp; the Challenges of Celebrity</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/10/entertainment-law-the-challenges-of-celebrity/</link>
      <description>From music to film to theatre, celebrities can be a challenge in an entertainment law practice. Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Gordon Firemark, an entertainment and new media lawyer in Los Angeles, to take a look at entertainment litigation and working with a celebrity. Bob &amp; Gordon look at the various legal cases in Hollywood and chat about Gordon’s new e-book, The Podcast, Blog &amp; New Media Producer’s Legal Survival Guide.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:12:15 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Entertainment Law &amp; the Challenges of Celebrity</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>258</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f2064e5c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-ab913ca3bd4a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Entertainment Law &amp; the Challenges of Celebrity</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>From music to film to theatre, celebrities can be a challenge in an entertainment law practice. Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Gordon Firemark, an entertainment and new media lawyer in Los Angeles, to take a look at entertainment litigation and working with a celebrity. Bob &amp; Gordon look at the various legal cases in Hollywood and chat about Gordon’s new e-book, The Podcast, Blog &amp; New Media Producer’s Legal Survival Guide.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[From music to film to theatre, celebrities can be a challenge in an entertainment law practice. Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Gordon Firemark, an entertainment and new media lawyer in Los Angeles, to take a look at entertainment litigation and working with a celebrity. Bob &amp; Gordon look at the various legal cases in Hollywood and chat about Gordon’s new e-book, The Podcast, Blog &amp; New Media Producer’s Legal Survival Guide.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2297</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/10/entertainment-law-the-challenges-of-celebrity/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8397379586.mp3?updated=1623961911" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Facebook Privacy Breach</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/10/the-facebook-privacy-breach/</link>
      <description>According to a Wall Street Journal investigation, many of the public’s favorite Facebook applications like Farmville, Texas HoldEm Poker and FrontierVille, are allegedly sharing users’ personal information with third-party advertisers and Internet tracking companies.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams  welcome Kimberley Isbell, a Fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society and Mark G. McCreary from the firm Fox Rothschild LLP, to discuss this matter.  They look at the potential impact of this privacy breach, the legal issues and how this breach could affect the business of Facebook.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:20:17 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Facebook Privacy Breach</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>257</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f25d63b8-cfa9-11eb-92b9-3bc768f4b2ed/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Facebook Privacy Breach</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>According to a Wall Street Journal investigation, many of the public’s favorite Facebook applications like Farmville, Texas HoldEm Poker and FrontierVille, are allegedly sharing users’ personal information with third-party advertisers and Internet tracking companies.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams  welcome Kimberley Isbell, a Fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society and Mark G. McCreary from the firm Fox Rothschild LLP, to discuss this matter.  They look at the potential impact of this privacy breach, the legal issues and how this breach could affect the business of Facebook.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[According to a Wall Street Journal investigation, many of the public’s favorite Facebook applications like Farmville, Texas HoldEm Poker and FrontierVille, are allegedly sharing users’ personal information with third-party advertisers and Internet tracking companies.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams  welcome Kimberley Isbell, a Fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society and Mark G. McCreary from the firm Fox Rothschild LLP, to discuss this matter.  They look at the potential impact of this privacy breach, the legal issues and how this breach could affect the business of Facebook.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2125</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/10/the-facebook-privacy-breach/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7711863864.mp3?updated=1624285464" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Betty Anne Waters: A Crusade for Innocence</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/10/betty-anne-waters-a-crusade-for-innocence/</link>
      <description>In the film Conviction, Betty Anne Waters, a wife and mother of two, puts herself through high school, college and ultimately law school, in an 18 year long crusade to prove her brother Kenny’s innocence after he is convicted of murder sentenced to life without parole. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams spotlight Betty Anne , her story and her thoughts on the new film and how she continues to help others like her brother.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:39:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Betty Anne Waters: A Crusade for Innocence</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>256</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f2b13bdc-cfa9-11eb-92b9-e3bbd4502981/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Betty Anne Waters: A Crusade for Innocence</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the film Conviction, Betty Anne Waters, a wife and mother of two, puts herself through high school, college and ultimately law school, in an 18 year long crusade to prove her brother Kenny’s innocence after he is convicted of murder sentenced to life without parole. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams spotlight Betty Anne , her story and her thoughts on the new film and how she continues to help others like her brother.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In the film Conviction, Betty Anne Waters, a wife and mother of two, puts herself through high school, college and ultimately law school, in an 18 year long crusade to prove her brother Kenny’s innocence after he is convicted of murder sentenced to life without parole. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams spotlight Betty Anne , her story and her thoughts on the new film and how she continues to help others like her brother.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1631</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/10/betty-anne-waters-a-crusade-for-innocence/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1963604515.mp3?updated=1623961912" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Suicide of Rutgers student Tyler Clementi: Legal Issues</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/10/suicide-of-rutgers-student-tyler-clementi-legal-issues/</link>
      <description>Tyler Clementi, a Rutgers University student, jumped to his death after his college roommate used a hidden webcam to stream a sexual encounter between Clementi and another man online. Two students, Dharun Rhavi and Molly Wei were charged with invasion of privacy and could face additional charges. Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams discusses these complex legal issues with three guests: Attorney Henry E. Klingeman, defense attorney and former federal prosecutor, Attorney Nancy Willard, Executive Director of the Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use, and Attorney Jim Harper, Director of Information Policy Studies at the Cato Institute. They take an inside legal look at invasion of privacy through technology and the potential criminal case against the two students involved.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:39:03 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Suicide of Rutgers student Tyler Clementi: Legal Issues</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>255</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f2ddd962-cfa9-11eb-92b9-974c9cf0450c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Suicide of Rutgers student Tyler Clementi: Legal Issues</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Tyler Clementi, a Rutgers University student, jumped to his death after his college roommate used a hidden webcam to stream a sexual encounter between Clementi and another man online. Two students, Dharun Rhavi and Molly Wei were charged with invasion of privacy and could face additional charges. Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams discusses these complex legal issues with three guests: Attorney Henry E. Klingeman, defense attorney and former federal prosecutor, Attorney Nancy Willard, Executive Director of the Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use, and Attorney Jim Harper, Director of Information Policy Studies at the Cato Institute. They take an inside legal look at invasion of privacy through technology and the potential criminal case against the two students involved.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Tyler Clementi, a Rutgers University student, jumped to his death after his college roommate used a hidden webcam to stream a sexual encounter between Clementi and another man online. Two students, Dharun Rhavi and Molly Wei were charged with invasion of privacy and could face additional charges. Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams discusses these complex legal issues with three guests: Attorney Henry E. Klingeman, defense attorney and former federal prosecutor, Attorney Nancy Willard, Executive Director of the Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use, and Attorney Jim Harper, Director of Information Policy Studies at the Cato Institute. They take an inside legal look at invasion of privacy through technology and the potential criminal case against the two students involved.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2200</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/10/suicide-of-rutgers-student-tyler-clementi-legal-issues/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7684223852.mp3?updated=1623961913" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Upcoming 2010-2011 Supreme Court Term</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/10/the-upcoming-2010-2011-supreme-court-term/</link>
      <description>The 2010-2011 Supreme Court term is upon us, with controversial issues like same-sex marriage and health care reform that will likely play a role when the session gets underway Monday, October 4th. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, welcome Professor Wilson R. Huhn, Constitutional Law Research Fellow at the University of Akron School of Law, Professor Steven H. Goldberg, from Pace Law School and Greg Stohr, Bloomberg News Reporter, to explore the standout cases.  They discuss the role of Justice Elena Kagan on the High Court and spotlight the big issues that are sure to keep the court busy and the legal community and general public talking.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:48:44 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Upcoming 2010-2011 Supreme Court Term</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>254</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f3189110-cfa9-11eb-92b9-6b87664294af/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Upcoming 2010-2011 Supreme Court Term</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The 2010-2011 Supreme Court term is upon us, with controversial issues like same-sex marriage and health care reform that will likely play a role when the session gets underway Monday, October 4th. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, welcome Professor Wilson R. Huhn, Constitutional Law Research Fellow at the University of Akron School of Law, Professor Steven H. Goldberg, from Pace Law School and Greg Stohr, Bloomberg News Reporter, to explore the standout cases.  They discuss the role of Justice Elena Kagan on the High Court and spotlight the big issues that are sure to keep the court busy and the legal community and general public talking.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The 2010-2011 Supreme Court term is upon us, with controversial issues like same-sex marriage and health care reform that will likely play a role when the session gets underway Monday, October 4th. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, welcome Professor Wilson R. Huhn, Constitutional Law Research Fellow at the University of Akron School of Law, Professor Steven H. Goldberg, from Pace Law School and Greg Stohr, Bloomberg News Reporter, to explore the standout cases.  They discuss the role of Justice Elena Kagan on the High Court and spotlight the big issues that are sure to keep the court busy and the legal community and general public talking.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2261</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/10/the-upcoming-2010-2011-supreme-court-term/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2207891259.mp3?updated=1624285607" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Stem Cell Research Court Battle</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/09/the-stem-cell-research-court-battle/</link>
      <description>U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth recently ruled to temporarily block federal funding of embryonic stem cell research, citing a violation of the Dickey-Wicker Amendment, a 1996 law that prohibits the destruction of human embryos. The ban has been temporarily lifted, but the court battle continues.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, welcome Russell Korobkin, Professor of Law at the UCLA School of Law and Author of Stem Cell Century: Law and Policy for a Breakthrough Technology and Charles P. Kindregan Jr., professor of family law and assisted reproduction law at Suffolk University Law School, to explore this controversial debate, legislative, ethical and religious aspects of stem cell research and this recent legal ruling’s impact on scientific research.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:40:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Stem Cell Research Court Battle</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>253</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f33ce024-cfa9-11eb-92b9-6370a098592e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Stem Cell Research Court Battle</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth recently ruled to temporarily block federal funding of embryonic stem cell research, citing a violation of the Dickey-Wicker Amendment, a 1996 law that prohibits the destruction of human embryos. The ban has been temporarily lifted, but the court battle continues.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, welcome Russell Korobkin, Professor of Law at the UCLA School of Law and Author of Stem Cell Century: Law and Policy for a Breakthrough Technology and Charles P. Kindregan Jr., professor of family law and assisted reproduction law at Suffolk University Law School, to explore this controversial debate, legislative, ethical and religious aspects of stem cell research and this recent legal ruling’s impact on scientific research.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth recently ruled to temporarily block federal funding of embryonic stem cell research, citing a violation of the Dickey-Wicker Amendment, a 1996 law that prohibits the destruction of human embryos. The ban has been temporarily lifted, but the court battle continues.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, welcome Russell Korobkin, Professor of Law at the UCLA School of Law and Author of Stem Cell Century: Law and Policy for a Breakthrough Technology and Charles P. Kindregan Jr., professor of family law and assisted reproduction law at Suffolk University Law School, to explore this controversial debate, legislative, ethical and religious aspects of stem cell research and this recent legal ruling’s impact on scientific research.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2366</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/09/the-stem-cell-research-court-battle/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4226160388.mp3?updated=1623961914" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pastor Terry Jones, Religion &amp; The First Amendment</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/09/pastor-terry-jones-religion-the-first-amendment/</link>
      <description>While many around the world were paying tribute to those who lost their lives on September 11, 2001, Pastor Terry Jones, from the Dove World Outreach Center, had announced that he would burn 200 copies of the Quran on the anniversary of 9/11 in a protest against Islam. Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams joins Mark Potok, Director of the Southern Poverty Law Center and Dr. Charles C. Haynes, Director of the Religious Freedom Education Project at the Newseum and senior scholar at the First Amendment Center, to look inside this controversy. They discuss the First Amendment, religion, Jones’ potential impact on national security, attitude toward the Muslim community and how other countries view America when it comes to religion.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:31:44 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Pastor Terry Jones, Religion &amp; The First Amendment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>252</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f365fbe4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-1743f5d8f6f4/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Pastor Terry Jones, Religion &amp; The First Amendment</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>While many around the world were paying tribute to those who lost their lives on September 11, 2001, Pastor Terry Jones, from the Dove World Outreach Center, had announced that he would burn 200 copies of the Quran on the anniversary of 9/11 in a protest against Islam. Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams joins Mark Potok, Director of the Southern Poverty Law Center and Dr. Charles C. Haynes, Director of the Religious Freedom Education Project at the Newseum and senior scholar at the First Amendment Center, to look inside this controversy. They discuss the First Amendment, religion, Jones’ potential impact on national security, attitude toward the Muslim community and how other countries view America when it comes to religion.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[While many around the world were paying tribute to those who lost their lives on September 11, 2001, Pastor Terry Jones, from the Dove World Outreach Center, had announced that he would burn 200 copies of the Quran on the anniversary of 9/11 in a protest against Islam. Attorney and co-host J. Craig Williams joins Mark Potok, Director of the Southern Poverty Law Center and Dr. Charles C. Haynes, Director of the Religious Freedom Education Project at the Newseum and senior scholar at the First Amendment Center, to look inside this controversy. They discuss the First Amendment, religion, Jones’ potential impact on national security, attitude toward the Muslim community and how other countries view America when it comes to religion.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2104</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/09/pastor-terry-jones-religion-the-first-amendment/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9604419641.mp3?updated=1623961914" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is GPS Tracking Legal for Law Enforcement?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/09/is-gps-tracking-legal-for-law-enforcement/</link>
      <description>In the US vs. Pineda-Moreno decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Law enforcement agents can legally place a GPS device on an individual’s car without their knowledge and without a warrant from a judge.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, welcome Orin S. Kerr, contributing blogger to the Volokh Conspiracy and Professor of Law at the George Washington University Law School, to discuss the legality of GPS tracking in light of the Fourth Amendment, privacy rights, the role of technology and the possibility that this case and others like it will reach the Supreme Court.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:24:40 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Is GPS Tracking Legal for Law Enforcement?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>251</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f38a85a4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-3fbc2a12843e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Is GPS Tracking Legal for Law Enforcement?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the US vs. Pineda-Moreno decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Law enforcement agents can legally place a GPS device on an individual’s car without their knowledge and without a warrant from a judge.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, welcome Orin S. Kerr, contributing blogger to the Volokh Conspiracy and Professor of Law at the George Washington University Law School, to discuss the legality of GPS tracking in light of the Fourth Amendment, privacy rights, the role of technology and the possibility that this case and others like it will reach the Supreme Court.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In the US vs. Pineda-Moreno decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Law enforcement agents can legally place a GPS device on an individual’s car without their knowledge and without a warrant from a judge.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, welcome Orin S. Kerr, contributing blogger to the Volokh Conspiracy and Professor of Law at the George Washington University Law School, to discuss the legality of GPS tracking in light of the Fourth Amendment, privacy rights, the role of technology and the possibility that this case and others like it will reach the Supreme Court.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2119</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/09/is-gps-tracking-legal-for-law-enforcement/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1985686432.mp3?updated=1623961915" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyer2Lawyer &amp; Pioneers of Legal Podcasting</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/09/lawyer2lawyer-pioneers-of-legal-podcasting/</link>
      <description>Back on August 31st 2005, the Legal Talk Network launched this podcast that would become the longest running legal podcast. And 250 podcasts later, the award-winning Lawyer2Lawyer podcast is celebrating its 5th anniversary. Attorneys and co-hosts  Bob Ambrogi and   J.Craig Williams, spotlight two other pioneers of legal podcasting, Denise Howell, the host of This Week in Law and Struan Robertson, Legal Director for Pinsent Masons LLP and founding editor of OUT-LAW.com/OUT-LAW Radio . They take a look at the value of a podcast for a lawyer today, as well as time commitment, differentiation, and a bit of fun.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:23:22 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyer2Lawyer &amp; Pioneers of Legal Podcasting</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>250</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f3b05770-cfa9-11eb-92b9-37726ad0c1f3/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyer2Lawyer &amp; Pioneers of Legal Podcasting</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Back on August 31st 2005, the Legal Talk Network launched this podcast that would become the longest running legal podcast. And 250 podcasts later, the award-winning Lawyer2Lawyer podcast is celebrating its 5th anniversary. Attorneys and co-hosts  Bob Ambrogi and   J.Craig Williams, spotlight two other pioneers of legal podcasting, Denise Howell, the host of This Week in Law and Struan Robertson, Legal Director for Pinsent Masons LLP and founding editor of OUT-LAW.com/OUT-LAW Radio . They take a look at the value of a podcast for a lawyer today, as well as time commitment, differentiation, and a bit of fun.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Back on August 31st 2005, the Legal Talk Network launched this podcast that would become the longest running legal podcast. And 250 podcasts later, the award-winning Lawyer2Lawyer podcast is celebrating its 5th anniversary. Attorneys and co-hosts  Bob Ambrogi and   J.Craig Williams, spotlight two other pioneers of legal podcasting, Denise Howell, the host of This Week in Law and Struan Robertson, Legal Director for Pinsent Masons LLP and founding editor of OUT-LAW.com/OUT-LAW Radio . They take a look at the value of a podcast for a lawyer today, as well as time commitment, differentiation, and a bit of fun.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2213</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/09/lawyer2lawyer-pioneers-of-legal-podcasting/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8049475594.mp3?updated=1623961915" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Clemens Indictment: F. Lee Bailey on Legal Strategy</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/08/the-clemens-indictment-f-lee-bailey-on-legal-strategy/</link>
      <description>Should former MLB pitcher, Roger Clemens and his former trainer Brian McNamee take polygraph tests? That's just one of the topics discussed on this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and  J.Craig Williams, welcome legendary defense counsel, Attorney F. Lee Bailey and Michael S. Schmidt, reporter for The New York Times, to discuss the Clemens indictment on charges that he allegedly lied to Congress back in 2008, when he testified that he never used performance-enhancing drugs. They explore legal strategy, the use of physical evidence, the credibility of testimonies and the future of Roger Clemens.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:56:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Clemens Indictment: F. Lee Bailey on Legal Strategy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>249</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f3d6a6dc-cfa9-11eb-92b9-ab97ad0cf2c6/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Clemens Indictment: F. Lee Bailey on Legal Strategy</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Should former MLB pitcher, Roger Clemens and his former trainer Brian McNamee take polygraph tests? That's just one of the topics discussed on this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and  J.Craig Williams, welcome legendary defense counsel, Attorney F. Lee Bailey and Michael S. Schmidt, reporter for The New York Times, to discuss the Clemens indictment on charges that he allegedly lied to Congress back in 2008, when he testified that he never used performance-enhancing drugs. They explore legal strategy, the use of physical evidence, the credibility of testimonies and the future of Roger Clemens.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Should former MLB pitcher, Roger Clemens and his former trainer Brian McNamee take polygraph tests? That's just one of the topics discussed on this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and  J.Craig Williams, welcome legendary defense counsel, Attorney F. Lee Bailey and Michael S. Schmidt, reporter for The New York Times, to discuss the Clemens indictment on charges that he allegedly lied to Congress back in 2008, when he testified that he never used performance-enhancing drugs. They explore legal strategy, the use of physical evidence, the credibility of testimonies and the future of Roger Clemens.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2190</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/08/the-clemens-indictment-f-lee-bailey-on-legal-strategy/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6033458329.mp3?updated=1623961916" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Justice Denied in Philip Markoff case?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/08/justice-denied-in-philip-markoff-case/</link>
      <description>A Boston medical student and accused Craigslist killer, Philip Markoff commits suicide in jail awaiting trial for first degree murder, prompting reactions ranging from frustration to relief. On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Douglas Berman, Law Professor at Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, who first prompts the question on his blog,  Sentencing Law and Policy, about how we react to this turn of events in the legal process, along with special guests Elie Mystal, Editor at Above the Law, and Leslie Walker, Executive Director of Prisoners’ Legal Services in Boston for a discussion about justice denied.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:04:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Justice Denied in Philip Markoff case?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>248</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f3fdd482-cfa9-11eb-92b9-eb3adf3e2c0c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Justice Denied in Philip Markoff case?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A Boston medical student and accused Craigslist killer, Philip Markoff commits suicide in jail awaiting trial for first degree murder, prompting reactions ranging from frustration to relief. On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Douglas Berman, Law Professor at Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, who first prompts the question on his blog,  Sentencing Law and Policy, about how we react to this turn of events in the legal process, along with special guests Elie Mystal, Editor at Above the Law, and Leslie Walker, Executive Director of Prisoners’ Legal Services in Boston for a discussion about justice denied.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A Boston medical student and accused Craigslist killer, Philip Markoff commits suicide in jail awaiting trial for first degree murder, prompting reactions ranging from frustration to relief. On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Douglas Berman, Law Professor at Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, who first prompts the question on his blog,  Sentencing Law and Policy, about how we react to this turn of events in the legal process, along with special guests Elie Mystal, Editor at Above the Law, and Leslie Walker, Executive Director of Prisoners’ Legal Services in Boston for a discussion about justice denied.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2244</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/08/justice-denied-in-philip-markoff-case/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4481881758.mp3?updated=1623961916" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Elena Kagan’s Supreme Court Confirmation</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/08/elena-kagans-supreme-court-confirmation/</link>
      <description>With a vote of 63-37, the Senate confirmed Elena Kagan as a Supreme Court justice making her the 112th justice, and the fourth woman ever to serve on the Supreme Court. Attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Professor Joel Grossman, a professor of political science, and a constitutional law scholar from Johns Hopkins University and University of Maryland School of Law and Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for The National Law Journal and for ALM Media, to discuss the latest on the confirmation of Elena Kagan. They look at her background, some of the controversy over her confirmation and what kind of impact she will ultimately have on the Supreme Court.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:45:46 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Elena Kagan’s Supreme Court Confirmation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>247</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f42ca4b0-cfa9-11eb-92b9-0fc9c7085b3b/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Elena Kagan’s Supreme Court Confirmation</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With a vote of 63-37, the Senate confirmed Elena Kagan as a Supreme Court justice making her the 112th justice, and the fourth woman ever to serve on the Supreme Court. Attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Professor Joel Grossman, a professor of political science, and a constitutional law scholar from Johns Hopkins University and University of Maryland School of Law and Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for The National Law Journal and for ALM Media, to discuss the latest on the confirmation of Elena Kagan. They look at her background, some of the controversy over her confirmation and what kind of impact she will ultimately have on the Supreme Court.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[With a vote of 63-37, the Senate confirmed Elena Kagan as a Supreme Court justice making her the 112th justice, and the fourth woman ever to serve on the Supreme Court. Attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Professor Joel Grossman, a professor of political science, and a constitutional law scholar from Johns Hopkins University and University of Maryland School of Law and Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for The National Law Journal and for ALM Media, to discuss the latest on the confirmation of Elena Kagan. They look at her background, some of the controversy over her confirmation and what kind of impact she will ultimately have on the Supreme Court.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2143</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/08/elena-kagans-supreme-court-confirmation/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3291203008.mp3?updated=1624285559" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Landmark Decision on Prop 8</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/08/a-landmark-decision-on-prop-8/</link>
      <description>In a landmark decision in Perry v. Schwarzenegger, U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker in San Francisco struck down the controversial and highly-debated, Proposition 8 in California, which was approved by the state's voters in November 2008 and overturned a state supreme court ruling that resulted in the legalization of same sex marriage.  Attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Adam Winkler from UCLA Law School,  Professor Nelson Tebbe from Brooklyn Law School and Attorney Thomas J. Barbar, the Mass Bar Association's Family Law Chair and principal with Deutsch Williams, Brooks, DeRensis &amp; Holland PC., to sort through all the twists and turns. They look at reaction to the ruling, the legal issues surrounding gay marriage and the likelihood of this issue reaching the U.S. Supreme Court.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:02:20 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>A Landmark Decision on Prop 8</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>246</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f458a466-cfa9-11eb-92b9-fbdd9722b4a7/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>A Landmark Decision on Prop 8</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In a landmark decision in Perry v. Schwarzenegger, U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker in San Francisco struck down the controversial and highly-debated, Proposition 8 in California, which was approved by the state's voters in November 2008 and overturned a state supreme court ruling that resulted in the legalization of same sex marriage.  Attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Adam Winkler from UCLA Law School,  Professor Nelson Tebbe from Brooklyn Law School and Attorney Thomas J. Barbar, the Mass Bar Association's Family Law Chair and principal with Deutsch Williams, Brooks, DeRensis &amp; Holland PC., to sort through all the twists and turns. They look at reaction to the ruling, the legal issues surrounding gay marriage and the likelihood of this issue reaching the U.S. Supreme Court.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In a landmark decision in Perry v. Schwarzenegger, U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker in San Francisco struck down the controversial and highly-debated, Proposition 8 in California, which was approved by the state's voters in November 2008 and overturned a state supreme court ruling that resulted in the legalization of same sex marriage.  Attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Adam Winkler from UCLA Law School,  Professor Nelson Tebbe from Brooklyn Law School and Attorney Thomas J. Barbar, the Mass Bar Association's Family Law Chair and principal with Deutsch Williams, Brooks, DeRensis &amp; Holland PC., to sort through all the twists and turns. They look at reaction to the ruling, the legal issues surrounding gay marriage and the likelihood of this issue reaching the U.S. Supreme Court.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2309</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/08/a-landmark-decision-on-prop-8/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1411814706.mp3?updated=1624285589" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Impact of the New Financial Reform Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/07/the-impact-of-the-new-financial-reform-law/</link>
      <description>President Obama recently signed into law the Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010, better known as the Financial Reform Bill. This new legislation is aimed to crack down on the excesses of Wall Street and corporate America by overhauling banking and Wall Street regulations. Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Martin E. Lybecker, a partner in Wilmer Hale’s Regulatory and Government Affairs and Securities Departments, to discuss the latest on this legislation.  They look at the new financial reform law, the role of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and how this new legislation impacts the banking industry, businesses, law firms’ workload and consumers.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:56:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Impact of the New Financial Reform Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>245</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f480e818-cfa9-11eb-92b9-33bcbdab7fb5/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Impact of the New Financial Reform Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>President Obama recently signed into law the Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010, better known as the Financial Reform Bill. This new legislation is aimed to crack down on the excesses of Wall Street and corporate America by overhauling banking and Wall Street regulations. Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Martin E. Lybecker, a partner in Wilmer Hale’s Regulatory and Government Affairs and Securities Departments, to discuss the latest on this legislation.  They look at the new financial reform law, the role of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and how this new legislation impacts the banking industry, businesses, law firms’ workload and consumers.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[President Obama recently signed into law the Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010, better known as the Financial Reform Bill. This new legislation is aimed to crack down on the excesses of Wall Street and corporate America by overhauling banking and Wall Street regulations. Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Martin E. Lybecker, a partner in Wilmer Hale’s Regulatory and Government Affairs and Securities Departments, to discuss the latest on this legislation.  They look at the new financial reform law, the role of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and how this new legislation impacts the banking industry, businesses, law firms’ workload and consumers.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2075</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/07/the-impact-of-the-new-financial-reform-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9783099293.mp3?updated=1623961918" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Law Student Applications Rise: Massachusetts’ First Public Law School</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/07/law-student-applications-rise-massachusetts%E2%80%99-first-public-law-school/</link>
      <description>2010 marks the first year for the University of Massachusetts School of Law – Dartmouth, the state’s first public law school. Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Dean Robert V. Ward, Jr., to talk about the new UMass Law school. They discuss the rise in applications in a down economy, the incoming class and faculty, accreditation and the opportunities available for students after they leave law school.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:22:36 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Law Student Applications Rise: Massachusetts’ First Public Law School</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>244</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f4b39a4c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-4377a050f300/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Law Student Applications Rise: Massachusetts’ First Public Law School</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>2010 marks the first year for the University of Massachusetts School of Law – Dartmouth, the state’s first public law school. Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Dean Robert V. Ward, Jr., to talk about the new UMass Law school. They discuss the rise in applications in a down economy, the incoming class and faculty, accreditation and the opportunities available for students after they leave law school.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[2010 marks the first year for the University of Massachusetts School of Law – Dartmouth, the state’s first public law school. Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Dean Robert V. Ward, Jr., to talk about the new UMass Law school. They discuss the rise in applications in a down economy, the incoming class and faculty, accreditation and the opportunities available for students after they leave law school.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2040</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/07/law-student-applications-rise-massachusetts%E2%80%99-first-public-law-school/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9019119265.mp3?updated=1623961918" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Issues Surrounding Social Media</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/07/legal-issues-surrounding-social-media/</link>
      <description>The allure of social media has attracted businesses, law firms and the general public, but with the popularity of social media in and out of the workplace, comes potential legal issues. Attorney and co-host, J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Daliah Saper, Principal at Saper Law Offices and Attorney Bradley S. Shear, Founder and Managing Partner of the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC, to take a look at legal issues such as defamation, privacy issues, employee use of social media and how firms and businesses can protect themselves from a potential lawsuit.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:52:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Issues Surrounding Social Media</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>243</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f4f4fa28-cfa9-11eb-92b9-8f4b8fc974ec/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Issues Surrounding Social Media</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The allure of social media has attracted businesses, law firms and the general public, but with the popularity of social media in and out of the workplace, comes potential legal issues. Attorney and co-host, J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Daliah Saper, Principal at Saper Law Offices and Attorney Bradley S. Shear, Founder and Managing Partner of the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC, to take a look at legal issues such as defamation, privacy issues, employee use of social media and how firms and businesses can protect themselves from a potential lawsuit.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The allure of social media has attracted businesses, law firms and the general public, but with the popularity of social media in and out of the workplace, comes potential legal issues. Attorney and co-host, J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Daliah Saper, Principal at Saper Law Offices and Attorney Bradley S. Shear, Founder and Managing Partner of the Law Office of Bradley S. Shear, LLC, to take a look at legal issues such as defamation, privacy issues, employee use of social media and how firms and businesses can protect themselves from a potential lawsuit.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2009</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/07/legal-issues-surrounding-social-media/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7732870109.mp3?updated=1624285464" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The U.S. Supreme Court Review July 2010</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/07/the-u-s-supreme-court-review-july-2010/</link>
      <description>With the end of the U.S. Supreme Court term came some stand-out rulings including handgun case, McDonald v. City of Chicago and patent law case, Bilski v. Kappos. Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Adam Winkler, a constitutional law specialist from UCLA School of Law and Attorney Amy Howe, the editor of SCOTUSblog, to discuss the Supreme Court round-up. In addition, they discuss recent rulings, a liberal vs. conservative Supreme Court, the Elena Kagan confirmation hearings and take a look back at some landmark decisions.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 11:47:43 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The U.S. Supreme Court Review July 2010</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>242</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f51f5f84-cfa9-11eb-92b9-13ce689812bf/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The U.S. Supreme Court Review July 2010</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With the end of the U.S. Supreme Court term came some stand-out rulings including handgun case, McDonald v. City of Chicago and patent law case, Bilski v. Kappos. Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Adam Winkler, a constitutional law specialist from UCLA School of Law and Attorney Amy Howe, the editor of SCOTUSblog, to discuss the Supreme Court round-up. In addition, they discuss recent rulings, a liberal vs. conservative Supreme Court, the Elena Kagan confirmation hearings and take a look back at some landmark decisions.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[With the end of the U.S. Supreme Court term came some stand-out rulings including handgun case, McDonald v. City of Chicago and patent law case, Bilski v. Kappos. Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Adam Winkler, a constitutional law specialist from UCLA School of Law and Attorney Amy Howe, the editor of SCOTUSblog, to discuss the Supreme Court round-up. In addition, they discuss recent rulings, a liberal vs. conservative Supreme Court, the Elena Kagan confirmation hearings and take a look back at some landmark decisions.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2223</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/07/the-u-s-supreme-court-review-july-2010/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5683778023.mp3?updated=1624285598" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Issues of Blogs, Fair Use and Attribution</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/07/the-legal-issues-of-blogs-fair-use-and-attribution/</link>
      <description>Preserving the professional rules with regard to original content reporting and attribution to original sources is the topic on this Lawyer2Lawyer.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Alan Schwarz, a prolific sports writer from The New York Times, to discuss the legal and ethical issues pertaining to digital media. They discuss copyright law, the extent to which bloggers should give credit to original reportorial sources and the ethical guidelines bloggers and journalists should be following when it comes to content.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:49:22 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Issues of Blogs, Fair Use and Attribution</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>241</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f55fdadc-cfa9-11eb-92b9-fb639a7c9bcf/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Legal Issues of Blogs, Fair Use and Attribution</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Preserving the professional rules with regard to original content reporting and attribution to original sources is the topic on this Lawyer2Lawyer.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Alan Schwarz, a prolific sports writer from The New York Times, to discuss the legal and ethical issues pertaining to digital media. They discuss copyright law, the extent to which bloggers should give credit to original reportorial sources and the ethical guidelines bloggers and journalists should be following when it comes to content.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Preserving the professional rules with regard to original content reporting and attribution to original sources is the topic on this Lawyer2Lawyer.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Alan Schwarz, a prolific sports writer from The New York Times, to discuss the legal and ethical issues pertaining to digital media. They discuss copyright law, the extent to which bloggers should give credit to original reportorial sources and the ethical guidelines bloggers and journalists should be following when it comes to content.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2157</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/07/the-legal-issues-of-blogs-fair-use-and-attribution/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5911317083.mp3?updated=1623961919" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>States Rights or International Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/06/states-rights-or-international-law/</link>
      <description>Senate resolution 519 opposes U.S. signing of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, a human rights treaty protecting the rights of children.  Attorney and co-host, J. Craig Williams welcomes Michael P. Farris, President of ParentalRights.org and Sara A. Dillon, Professor of Law at Suffolk University Law School.  They take a look at the treaty, Senate Resolution 519, the key issues of debate on the signing of this treaty and the potential legal conflicts.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:24:13 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>States Rights or International Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>240</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f589950c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-7f4b8d1c4a09/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>States Rights or International Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Senate resolution 519 opposes U.S. signing of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, a human rights treaty protecting the rights of children.  Attorney and co-host, J. Craig Williams welcomes Michael P. Farris, President of ParentalRights.org and Sara A. Dillon, Professor of Law at Suffolk University Law School.  They take a look at the treaty, Senate Resolution 519, the key issues of debate on the signing of this treaty and the potential legal conflicts.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Senate resolution 519 opposes U.S. signing of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, a human rights treaty protecting the rights of children.  Attorney and co-host, J. Craig Williams welcomes Michael P. Farris, President of ParentalRights.org and Sara A. Dillon, Professor of Law at Suffolk University Law School.  They take a look at the treaty, Senate Resolution 519, the key issues of debate on the signing of this treaty and the potential legal conflicts.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2257</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/06/states-rights-or-international-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2955303883.mp3?updated=1623961920" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tweeting and Blogging from the Courtroom</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/06/tweeting-and-blogging-from-the-courtroom/</link>
      <description>With the wave of technology dominating the legal world, reporting from the courtroom has gone from scribbling notes on a pad of paper to live coverage through blogs, video and even tweets. Attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Ron Sylvester, Staff Writer for Interactive News for The Wichita Eagle/Kansas.com and Attorney Eric P. Robinson, an attorney in New York who specializes in media and Internet law, to talk about the latest in live reporting from the courtroom. They discuss procedure for getting permission from a Judge, cameras in the courtroom and how live reporting has affected traditional journalism in the courtroom.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:02:23 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Tweeting and Blogging from the Courtroom</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>239</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f5b42d62-cfa9-11eb-92b9-f3a56e4517a9/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Tweeting and Blogging from the Courtroom</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With the wave of technology dominating the legal world, reporting from the courtroom has gone from scribbling notes on a pad of paper to live coverage through blogs, video and even tweets. Attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Ron Sylvester, Staff Writer for Interactive News for The Wichita Eagle/Kansas.com and Attorney Eric P. Robinson, an attorney in New York who specializes in media and Internet law, to talk about the latest in live reporting from the courtroom. They discuss procedure for getting permission from a Judge, cameras in the courtroom and how live reporting has affected traditional journalism in the courtroom.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[With the wave of technology dominating the legal world, reporting from the courtroom has gone from scribbling notes on a pad of paper to live coverage through blogs, video and even tweets. Attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Ron Sylvester, Staff Writer for Interactive News for The Wichita Eagle/Kansas.com and Attorney Eric P. Robinson, an attorney in New York who specializes in media and Internet law, to talk about the latest in live reporting from the courtroom. They discuss procedure for getting permission from a Judge, cameras in the courtroom and how live reporting has affected traditional journalism in the courtroom.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2132</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/06/tweeting-and-blogging-from-the-courtroom/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5334829112.mp3?updated=1624285586" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Law.Gov Movement</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/06/the-law-gov-movement/</link>
      <description>The "Law.Gov" movement is a campaign to put all primary legal materials in the public domain. Some call it "democratizing" law. Attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Carl Malamud, founder of Public.Resource.org and Tom Bruce, the Director of the Legal Information Institute at Cornell University Law School, to share with us the latest on Law.Gov.  Carl and Tom explore the Law.Gov movement, the benefit of public access to legal materials and who opposes the idea as well as the various workshops across the states.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:28:44 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Law.Gov Movement</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>238</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f5e20d68-cfa9-11eb-92b9-3bba01eabcf7/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Law.Gov Movement</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The "Law.Gov" movement is a campaign to put all primary legal materials in the public domain. Some call it "democratizing" law. Attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Carl Malamud, founder of Public.Resource.org and Tom Bruce, the Director of the Legal Information Institute at Cornell University Law School, to share with us the latest on Law.Gov.  Carl and Tom explore the Law.Gov movement, the benefit of public access to legal materials and who opposes the idea as well as the various workshops across the states.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The "Law.Gov" movement is a campaign to put all primary legal materials in the public domain. Some call it "democratizing" law. Attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Carl Malamud, founder of Public.Resource.org and Tom Bruce, the Director of the Legal Information Institute at Cornell University Law School, to share with us the latest on Law.Gov.  Carl and Tom explore the Law.Gov movement, the benefit of public access to legal materials and who opposes the idea as well as the various workshops across the states.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2165</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/06/the-law-gov-movement/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7839919800.mp3?updated=1624285604" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The BP Oil Spill: Environmental Concerns, Maritime Liability &amp; a Criminal Investigation</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/06/the-bp-oil-spill-environmental-concerns-maritime-liability-a-criminal-investigation/</link>
      <description>The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill is considered one of the worst environmental disasters in recent years, with gallons of oil seeping into the Gulf of Mexico and beyond. Attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Rhon E. Jones, Environmental Section Head at Beasley Allen, Crow, Methvin, Ports &amp; Miles, and P.C. and Professor Robert Force, Director of the Maritime Law Center at Tulane University Law School, to discuss the latest on this devastating spill. They look at the environmental legal issues and concerns surrounding the spill, maritime law and touch upon the launching of a criminal investigation.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:30:26 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The BP Oil Spill: Environmental Concerns, Maritime Liability &amp; a Criminal Investigation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>237</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f60a9d0a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-43802d18e6a4/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The BP Oil Spill: Environmental Concerns, Maritime Liability &amp; a Criminal Investigation</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill is considered one of the worst environmental disasters in recent years, with gallons of oil seeping into the Gulf of Mexico and beyond. Attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Rhon E. Jones, Environmental Section Head at Beasley Allen, Crow, Methvin, Ports &amp; Miles, and P.C. and Professor Robert Force, Director of the Maritime Law Center at Tulane University Law School, to discuss the latest on this devastating spill. They look at the environmental legal issues and concerns surrounding the spill, maritime law and touch upon the launching of a criminal investigation.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill is considered one of the worst environmental disasters in recent years, with gallons of oil seeping into the Gulf of Mexico and beyond. Attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Rhon E. Jones, Environmental Section Head at Beasley Allen, Crow, Methvin, Ports &amp; Miles, and P.C. and Professor Robert Force, Director of the Maritime Law Center at Tulane University Law School, to discuss the latest on this devastating spill. They look at the environmental legal issues and concerns surrounding the spill, maritime law and touch upon the launching of a criminal investigation.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2225</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/06/the-bp-oil-spill-environmental-concerns-maritime-liability-a-criminal-investigation/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6524157642.mp3?updated=1623961921" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Needle, Inc. v. NFL</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/05/american-needle-inc-v-nfl/</link>
      <description>With a unanimous vote, the Surpreme Court ruled 9-0 against the NFL in the American Needle v. NFL case—one of the most important legal cases in sports.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Marc Edelman from Barry University's Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law and Professor Michael McCann, Associate Law Professor at Vermont Law School and Legal Analyst for Sports Illustrated, to discuss this latest ruling. They talk about anti-trust law, intellectual property issues and how this decision could affect the NFL and other sports franchises.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 13:15:59 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>American Needle, Inc. v. NFL</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>236</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f642af6a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-7322aab751a5/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>American Needle, Inc. v. NFL</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With a unanimous vote, the Surpreme Court ruled 9-0 against the NFL in the American Needle v. NFL case—one of the most important legal cases in sports.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Marc Edelman from Barry University's Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law and Professor Michael McCann, Associate Law Professor at Vermont Law School and Legal Analyst for Sports Illustrated, to discuss this latest ruling. They talk about anti-trust law, intellectual property issues and how this decision could affect the NFL and other sports franchises.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[With a unanimous vote, the Surpreme Court ruled 9-0 against the NFL in the American Needle v. NFL case—one of the most important legal cases in sports.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Marc Edelman from Barry University's Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law and Professor Michael McCann, Associate Law Professor at Vermont Law School and Legal Analyst for Sports Illustrated, to discuss this latest ruling. They talk about anti-trust law, intellectual property issues and how this decision could affect the NFL and other sports franchises.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2074</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/05/american-needle-inc-v-nfl/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1906901720.mp3?updated=1623961921" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The North Carolina State Bar &amp; Cloud Computing</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/05/the-north-carolina-state-bar-cloud-computing/</link>
      <description>The North Carolina State Bar has just finished drafting a proposed Formal Ethics Opinion that allows the use of cloud computing in a law office.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Alice N. Mine, Senior Ethics Counsel and Assistant Executive Director for the North Carolina State Bar and Jack Newton, Co-founder and President of Clio, to look at the legal ethical issues surrounding cloud computing. They explore the proposed Formal Ethics Opinion, what it mean for lawyers and the future of cloud computing.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 14:41:50 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The North Carolina State Bar &amp; Cloud Computing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>235</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f66b2670-cfa9-11eb-92b9-13ad10734900/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The North Carolina State Bar &amp; Cloud Computing</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The North Carolina State Bar has just finished drafting a proposed Formal Ethics Opinion that allows the use of cloud computing in a law office.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Alice N. Mine, Senior Ethics Counsel and Assistant Executive Director for the North Carolina State Bar and Jack Newton, Co-founder and President of Clio, to look at the legal ethical issues surrounding cloud computing. They explore the proposed Formal Ethics Opinion, what it mean for lawyers and the future of cloud computing.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The North Carolina State Bar has just finished drafting a proposed Formal Ethics Opinion that allows the use of cloud computing in a law office.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Alice N. Mine, Senior Ethics Counsel and Assistant Executive Director for the North Carolina State Bar and Jack Newton, Co-founder and President of Clio, to look at the legal ethical issues surrounding cloud computing. They explore the proposed Formal Ethics Opinion, what it mean for lawyers and the future of cloud computing.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2281</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/05/the-north-carolina-state-bar-cloud-computing/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6110926377.mp3?updated=1624285468" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Justice Finally Prevails for Joseph Salvati</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/05/justice-finally-prevails-for-joseph-salvati/</link>
      <description>Joe Salvati of Boston spent nearly 30 years in prison as an innocent man, along with three other men, convicted for a murder they did not commit. After years of legal twists and some unbelievable turns, the Justice Department declined an appeal of a $101.7 million settlement for all four men. Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Victor J. Garo, Joe Salvati’s lawyer for more than 30 years and Attorney and Journalist Dan Rea, to discuss one of the worst cases of injustice and wrongful imprisonment. They talk about Federal Judge Nancy Gertner’s ruling and her criticism of the FBI,  the power of the press, reaction to this bittersweet victory and fighting to the end for your client.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 10:46:25 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Justice Finally Prevails for Joseph Salvati</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>234</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f6afa7a0-cfa9-11eb-92b9-d352771cc9b7/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Justice Finally Prevails for Joseph Salvati</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Joe Salvati of Boston spent nearly 30 years in prison as an innocent man, along with three other men, convicted for a murder they did not commit. After years of legal twists and some unbelievable turns, the Justice Department declined an appeal of a $101.7 million settlement for all four men. Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Victor J. Garo, Joe Salvati’s lawyer for more than 30 years and Attorney and Journalist Dan Rea, to discuss one of the worst cases of injustice and wrongful imprisonment. They talk about Federal Judge Nancy Gertner’s ruling and her criticism of the FBI,  the power of the press, reaction to this bittersweet victory and fighting to the end for your client.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Joe Salvati of Boston spent nearly 30 years in prison as an innocent man, along with three other men, convicted for a murder they did not commit. After years of legal twists and some unbelievable turns, the Justice Department declined an appeal of a $101.7 million settlement for all four men. Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Victor J. Garo, Joe Salvati’s lawyer for more than 30 years and Attorney and Journalist Dan Rea, to discuss one of the worst cases of injustice and wrongful imprisonment. They talk about Federal Judge Nancy Gertner’s ruling and her criticism of the FBI,  the power of the press, reaction to this bittersweet victory and fighting to the end for your client.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2604</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/05/justice-finally-prevails-for-joseph-salvati/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7675420781.mp3?updated=1623961922" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Mystery of the Missing iPhone</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/05/the-mystery-of-the-missing-iphone/</link>
      <description>The technology and legal world was abuzz over an incident involving a prototype of the iPhone 4G. An Apple engineer allegedly left behind the iPhone, which eventually ended up in the hands of Gizmodo.com,  a technology weblog. After pictures surfaced on the Gizmodo site, a search of a Gizmodo editor’s home and computer was issued.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Sam Bayard, the Assistant Director of the Citizen Media Law Project and Eric Goldman, Director of the High Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara University School of Law, to discuss the legal issues behind this complex debacle. They look at the shield law, the validity of the search warrant and the legal battle that could possibly lie ahead.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 16:48:53 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Mystery of the Missing iPhone</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>233</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f6dc6420-cfa9-11eb-92b9-7f8edd1398f7/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Mystery of the Missing iPhone</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The technology and legal world was abuzz over an incident involving a prototype of the iPhone 4G. An Apple engineer allegedly left behind the iPhone, which eventually ended up in the hands of Gizmodo.com,  a technology weblog. After pictures surfaced on the Gizmodo site, a search of a Gizmodo editor’s home and computer was issued.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Sam Bayard, the Assistant Director of the Citizen Media Law Project and Eric Goldman, Director of the High Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara University School of Law, to discuss the legal issues behind this complex debacle. They look at the shield law, the validity of the search warrant and the legal battle that could possibly lie ahead.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The technology and legal world was abuzz over an incident involving a prototype of the iPhone 4G. An Apple engineer allegedly left behind the iPhone, which eventually ended up in the hands of Gizmodo.com,  a technology weblog. After pictures surfaced on the Gizmodo site, a search of a Gizmodo editor’s home and computer was issued.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Sam Bayard, the Assistant Director of the Citizen Media Law Project and Eric Goldman, Director of the High Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara University School of Law, to discuss the legal issues behind this complex debacle. They look at the shield law, the validity of the search warrant and the legal battle that could possibly lie ahead.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2173</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/05/the-mystery-of-the-missing-iphone/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4600277449.mp3?updated=1624285605" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Arizona Immigration Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/04/the-arizona-immigration-law/</link>
      <description>Governor of Arizona, Jan Brewer, recently signed into law a strict immigration bill, the Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act (SB1070 Act), igniting a nationwide discussion. Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Marielena Hincapié, Executive Director of the National Immigration Law Center and Professor Paul Bender, at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University, to look at both sides of this controversial debate . They discuss the legality and constitutionality of this new law and what this means for the state of Arizona and immigration reform.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:08:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Arizona Immigration Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>232</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f6fd386c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-ab6625407ee3/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Arizona Immigration Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Governor of Arizona, Jan Brewer, recently signed into law a strict immigration bill, the Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act (SB1070 Act), igniting a nationwide discussion. Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Marielena Hincapié, Executive Director of the National Immigration Law Center and Professor Paul Bender, at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University, to look at both sides of this controversial debate . They discuss the legality and constitutionality of this new law and what this means for the state of Arizona and immigration reform.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Governor of Arizona, Jan Brewer, recently signed into law a strict immigration bill, the Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act (SB1070 Act), igniting a nationwide discussion. Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Marielena Hincapié, Executive Director of the National Immigration Law Center and Professor Paul Bender, at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University, to look at both sides of this controversial debate . They discuss the legality and constitutionality of this new law and what this means for the state of Arizona and immigration reform.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2005</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/04/the-arizona-immigration-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8217754491.mp3?updated=1623961923" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The SEC vs. Goldman Sachs</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/04/the-sec-vs-goldman-sachs/</link>
      <description>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently filed civil fraud charges against investment bank, Goldman Sachs Group Inc.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Jacob S. Frenkel, from Shulman Rogers Gandal Pordy &amp; Ecker, P.A and Attorney Palmer C. Hamilton, a member of the Government Relations Practice Group at Jones Walker, to discuss the details of this lawsuit.  They take a look at the SEC’s current role, the impact of the lawsuit, financial regulation legislation and what this means for Wall Street.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:37:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>he SEC vs. Goldman Sachs</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>231</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f724808e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-87dc7f6567ef/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The SEC vs. Goldman Sachs</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently filed civil fraud charges against investment bank, Goldman Sachs Group Inc.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Jacob S. Frenkel, from Shulman Rogers Gandal Pordy &amp; Ecker, P.A and Attorney Palmer C. Hamilton, a member of the Government Relations Practice Group at Jones Walker, to discuss the details of this lawsuit.  They take a look at the SEC’s current role, the impact of the lawsuit, financial regulation legislation and what this means for Wall Street.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The Securities and Exchange Commission recently filed civil fraud charges against investment bank, Goldman Sachs Group Inc.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Jacob S. Frenkel, from Shulman Rogers Gandal Pordy &amp; Ecker, P.A and Attorney Palmer C. Hamilton, a member of the Government Relations Practice Group at Jones Walker, to discuss the details of this lawsuit.  They take a look at the SEC’s current role, the impact of the lawsuit, financial regulation legislation and what this means for Wall Street.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2216</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/04/the-sec-vs-goldman-sachs/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6916079558.mp3?updated=1624285591" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Workers’ Compensation Claims for NFL Players Coping With Dementia</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/04/workers%E2%80%99-compensation-claims-for-nfl-players-coping-with-dementia/</link>
      <description>As first reported in a series of New York Times articles by reporter Alan Schwartz, researchers have linked pro football careers and concussions with climbing rates of depression, dementia and even Alzheimer’s disease. Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Christopher Nowinski, President and CEO of the Sports Legacy Institute and Attorney Alan S. Pierce from the Law offices of Alan S. Pierce &amp; Associates and host of Workers’ Comp Matters, to discuss the latest in workers’ comp claims against the NFL. They focus on the long-term effects of concussions from football, the NFL’s role in helping these players, the workers’ comp issues involved and creating public awareness about this serious issue in the NFL and in other sports. For more information on this important issue, including over 100 New York Times articles by Alan Schwarz, click here.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:11:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Workers’ Compensation Claims for NFL Players Coping With Dementia</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>230</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f74cdbba-cfa9-11eb-92b9-475c09a16d31/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Workers’ Compensation Claims for NFL Players Coping With Dementia</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As first reported in a series of New York Times articles by reporter Alan Schwartz, researchers have linked pro football careers and concussions with climbing rates of depression, dementia and even Alzheimer’s disease. Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Christopher Nowinski, President and CEO of the Sports Legacy Institute and Attorney Alan S. Pierce from the Law offices of Alan S. Pierce &amp; Associates and host of Workers’ Comp Matters, to discuss the latest in workers’ comp claims against the NFL. They focus on the long-term effects of concussions from football, the NFL’s role in helping these players, the workers’ comp issues involved and creating public awareness about this serious issue in the NFL and in other sports. For more information on this important issue, including over 100 New York Times articles by Alan Schwarz, click here.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[As first reported in a series of New York Times articles by reporter Alan Schwartz, researchers have linked pro football careers and concussions with climbing rates of depression, dementia and even Alzheimer’s disease. Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Christopher Nowinski, President and CEO of the Sports Legacy Institute and Attorney Alan S. Pierce from the Law offices of Alan S. Pierce &amp; Associates and host of Workers’ Comp Matters, to discuss the latest in workers’ comp claims against the NFL. They focus on the long-term effects of concussions from football, the NFL’s role in helping these players, the workers’ comp issues involved and creating public awareness about this serious issue in the NFL and in other sports. For more information on this important issue, including over 100 New York Times articles by Alan Schwarz, click here.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2107</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/04/workers%E2%80%99-compensation-claims-for-nfl-players-coping-with-dementia/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1544292441.mp3?updated=1624285603" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Two Appointments &amp; the Future of the NLRB</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/04/two-appointments-the-future-of-the-nlrb/</link>
      <description>Recently, President Obama appointed two union lawyers, Craig Becker and Mark Pearce to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) creating a labor law controversy. Some say that the addition of Becker and Pearce will restore balance, while others, like business groups, fear their influence on the board will cater to unions on big issues. Co-host and Attorney Bob Ambrogi welcomes Nancy Schiffer, Associate General Counsel with the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, (AFL-CIO) and Attorney Charles I. Cohen, senior counsel in Morgan Lewis &amp; Bockius’ Labor and Employment Practice, to get their reaction to the recess appointments of Becker and Pearce to the NLRB.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:11:08 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Two Appointments &amp; the Future of the NLRB</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>229</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f7767c2c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-e3ed4f138ffe/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Two Appointments &amp; the Future of the NLRB</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Recently, President Obama appointed two union lawyers, Craig Becker and Mark Pearce to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) creating a labor law controversy. Some say that the addition of Becker and Pearce will restore balance, while others, like business groups, fear their influence on the board will cater to unions on big issues. Co-host and Attorney Bob Ambrogi welcomes Nancy Schiffer, Associate General Counsel with the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, (AFL-CIO) and Attorney Charles I. Cohen, senior counsel in Morgan Lewis &amp; Bockius’ Labor and Employment Practice, to get their reaction to the recess appointments of Becker and Pearce to the NLRB.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Recently, President Obama appointed two union lawyers, Craig Becker and Mark Pearce to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) creating a labor law controversy. Some say that the addition of Becker and Pearce will restore balance, while others, like business groups, fear their influence on the board will cater to unions on big issues. Co-host and Attorney Bob Ambrogi welcomes Nancy Schiffer, Associate General Counsel with the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, (AFL-CIO) and Attorney Charles I. Cohen, senior counsel in Morgan Lewis &amp; Bockius’ Labor and Employment Practice, to get their reaction to the recess appointments of Becker and Pearce to the NLRB.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2131</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/04/two-appointments-the-future-of-the-nlrb/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5933098241.mp3?updated=1623961924" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Challenges to the New Health Care Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/04/legal-challenges-to-the-new-health-care-law/</link>
      <description>Under a storm of controversy and additional “fixes” to healthcare reform, President Obama finally signed the highly contested health care bill into law. At least 14 States have filed suits challenging the constitutionality of the new Health Care Law. Lawyer2Lawyer host, J. Craig Williams, and guest co-host, David E. Frank welcome Lanny J. Davis, partner in the law firm of McDermott Will &amp; Emery LLP and David B. Rivkin, Jr., partner in the Washington office of Baker Hostetler LLP, to talk about these legal challenges to the new law.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:00:32 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Challenges to the New Health Care Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>228</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f79e076a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-53c766cce27c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Challenges to the New Health Care Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Under a storm of controversy and additional “fixes” to healthcare reform, President Obama finally signed the highly contested health care bill into law. At least 14 States have filed suits challenging the constitutionality of the new Health Care Law. Lawyer2Lawyer host, J. Craig Williams, and guest co-host, David E. Frank welcome Lanny J. Davis, partner in the law firm of McDermott Will &amp; Emery LLP and David B. Rivkin, Jr., partner in the Washington office of Baker Hostetler LLP, to talk about these legal challenges to the new law.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Under a storm of controversy and additional “fixes” to healthcare reform, President Obama finally signed the highly contested health care bill into law. At least 14 States have filed suits challenging the constitutionality of the new Health Care Law. Lawyer2Lawyer host, J. Craig Williams, and guest co-host, David E. Frank welcome Lanny J. Davis, partner in the law firm of McDermott Will &amp; Emery LLP and David B. Rivkin, Jr., partner in the Washington office of Baker Hostetler LLP, to talk about these legal challenges to the new law.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2096</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/04/legal-challenges-to-the-new-health-care-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4102520283.mp3?updated=1623961924" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Clergy Abuse Cover-up: From Ireland to the Vatican and Beyond</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/03/the-clergy-abuse-cover-up-from-ireland-to-the-vatican-and-beyond/</link>
      <description>A three and a half year government investigation in Ireland, called the Murphy report, revealed a cover-up of three decades of clergy sexual abuse in the Catholic church. And, in an official pastoral letter to Irish sexual abuse victims, Pope Benedict XVI apologized to Ireland’s Catholics. Co-Host and attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes guests Attorney Helen L. McGonigle, a victim of clergy abuse and victim’s advocate and Vincent Shannon, Senior Partner of Shannons Solicitors in Dublin, Ireland. They discuss the investigations into allegations of sexual abuse at the hands of priests, the Vatican’s tepid response, legal jurisdictions versus canon law and what victims of clergy sexual abuse can do legally here and abroad.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:06:29 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Clergy Abuse Cover-up: From Ireland to the Vatican and Beyond</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>227</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f7c344c6-cfa9-11eb-92b9-7364a11b7f7f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Clergy Abuse Cover-up: From Ireland to the Vatican and Beyond</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A three and a half year government investigation in Ireland, called the Murphy report, revealed a cover-up of three decades of clergy sexual abuse in the Catholic church. And, in an official pastoral letter to Irish sexual abuse victims, Pope Benedict XVI apologized to Ireland’s Catholics. Co-Host and attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes guests Attorney Helen L. McGonigle, a victim of clergy abuse and victim’s advocate and Vincent Shannon, Senior Partner of Shannons Solicitors in Dublin, Ireland. They discuss the investigations into allegations of sexual abuse at the hands of priests, the Vatican’s tepid response, legal jurisdictions versus canon law and what victims of clergy sexual abuse can do legally here and abroad.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A three and a half year government investigation in Ireland, called the Murphy report, revealed a cover-up of three decades of clergy sexual abuse in the Catholic church. And, in an official pastoral letter to Irish sexual abuse victims, Pope Benedict XVI apologized to Ireland’s Catholics. Co-Host and attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes guests Attorney Helen L. McGonigle, a victim of clergy abuse and victim’s advocate and Vincent Shannon, Senior Partner of Shannons Solicitors in Dublin, Ireland. They discuss the investigations into allegations of sexual abuse at the hands of priests, the Vatican’s tepid response, legal jurisdictions versus canon law and what victims of clergy sexual abuse can do legally here and abroad.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2074</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/03/the-clergy-abuse-cover-up-from-ireland-to-the-vatican-and-beyond/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6257923470.mp3?updated=1624285579" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Can't Lawyers Fix Washington D.C.?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/03/why-cant-lawyers-fix-washington-d-c/</link>
      <description>In every city and town in America, there has been an overwhelming reaction to the political gridlock in Washington D.C. over healthcare, economic recovery, taxes, Afghanistan (almost everything). So why can’t the lawyers in Congress who specialize in negotiating solutions to problems fix Washington? Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Philip K. Howard, a well-known leader of legal reform in America and founder of Common Good, to examine the problem.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Why Can't Lawyers Fix Washington D.C.?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>226</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f7ebeb56-cfa9-11eb-92b9-7f9db2eea95a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why Can't Lawyers Fix Washington D.C.?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In every city and town in America, there has been an overwhelming reaction to the political gridlock in Washington D.C. over healthcare, economic recovery, taxes, Afghanistan (almost everything). So why can’t the lawyers in Congress who specialize in negotiating solutions to problems fix Washington? Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Philip K. Howard, a well-known leader of legal reform in America and founder of Common Good, to examine the problem.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In every city and town in America, there has been an overwhelming reaction to the political gridlock in Washington D.C. over healthcare, economic recovery, taxes, Afghanistan (almost everything). So why can’t the lawyers in Congress who specialize in negotiating solutions to problems fix Washington? Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Philip K. Howard, a well-known leader of legal reform in America and founder of Common Good, to examine the problem.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1965</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/03/why-cant-lawyers-fix-washington-d-c/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6068865583.mp3?updated=1624285566" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google Books Settlement: Part Two</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/03/google-books-settlement-part-two/</link>
      <description>In the second part of Lawyer2Lawyer on the Google Books Settlement, attorneys and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Jonathan Band and Attorney Cindy Cohn, Legal Director for the Electronic Frontier Foundation , to take a closer look at the complex Google Books Settlement. They explore the deeper legal issues like privacy, copyright and antitrust issues, who this settlement could ultimately benefit or hurt and whether consumers are better off with or without a settlement.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:44:17 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Google Books Settlement: Part Two</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>225</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f817a16a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-0f57c195ef79/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Google Books Settlement: Part Two</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the second part of Lawyer2Lawyer on the Google Books Settlement, attorneys and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Jonathan Band and Attorney Cindy Cohn, Legal Director for the Electronic Frontier Foundation , to take a closer look at the complex Google Books Settlement. They explore the deeper legal issues like privacy, copyright and antitrust issues, who this settlement could ultimately benefit or hurt and whether consumers are better off with or without a settlement.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In the second part of Lawyer2Lawyer on the Google Books Settlement, attorneys and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Jonathan Band and Attorney Cindy Cohn, Legal Director for the Electronic Frontier Foundation , to take a closer look at the complex Google Books Settlement. They explore the deeper legal issues like privacy, copyright and antitrust issues, who this settlement could ultimately benefit or hurt and whether consumers are better off with or without a settlement.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2260</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/03/google-books-settlement-part-two/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3633306044.mp3?updated=1623961925" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Google Books Settlement</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/03/the-google-books-settlement/</link>
      <description>Access to more digital information or copyright infringement and privacy issues? Recently, Federal Judge Denny Chin postponed the controversial Google books settlement due to the voluminous amount of feedback on both sides of the settlement. Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Professor James Grimmelmann, Associate Professor at New York Law School and a member of its Institute for Information Law and Policy and Attorney Jonathan Band, to talk about the latest developments in the Google Books Settlement. Later in the show, Bob and Craig will be joined by Lee Ann Enquist,  Vice President of West Professional Development, to discuss the new partnership between West LegalEdcenter and Legal Talk Network.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:54:30 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Google Books Settlement</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>224</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f83c2788-cfa9-11eb-92b9-97396656904a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Google Books Settlement</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Access to more digital information or copyright infringement and privacy issues? Recently, Federal Judge Denny Chin postponed the controversial Google books settlement due to the voluminous amount of feedback on both sides of the settlement. Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Professor James Grimmelmann, Associate Professor at New York Law School and a member of its Institute for Information Law and Policy and Attorney Jonathan Band, to talk about the latest developments in the Google Books Settlement. Later in the show, Bob and Craig will be joined by Lee Ann Enquist,  Vice President of West Professional Development, to discuss the new partnership between West LegalEdcenter and Legal Talk Network.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Access to more digital information or copyright infringement and privacy issues? Recently, Federal Judge Denny Chin postponed the controversial Google books settlement due to the voluminous amount of feedback on both sides of the settlement. Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Professor James Grimmelmann, Associate Professor at New York Law School and a member of its Institute for Information Law and Policy and Attorney Jonathan Band, to talk about the latest developments in the Google Books Settlement. Later in the show, Bob and Craig will be joined by Lee Ann Enquist,  Vice President of West Professional Development, to discuss the new partnership between West LegalEdcenter and Legal Talk Network.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2107</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/03/the-google-books-settlement/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9242551110.mp3?updated=1624285594" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside the Death with Dignity Act</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/02/inside-the-death-with-dignity-act/</link>
      <description>The legal and social debate over death with dignity and assisted suicide is reignited. Recently, the Death with Dignity bill surfaced in Massachusetts, where Representative Louis Kafka filed the bill on behalf of Al Lipkind of Stoughton, Massachusetts, who fought for legislation prior to his death after battling stomach cancer.Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Barbara Coombs Lee, President of Compassion &amp; Choices to look at both sides of the controversial Death with Dignity Act, assisted suicide, ethical objections and current legislation here in the States and abroad.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:50:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside the Death with Dignity Act</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>223</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f8672a14-cfa9-11eb-92b9-d7fc454e0c23/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Inside the Death with Dignity Act</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The legal and social debate over death with dignity and assisted suicide is reignited. Recently, the Death with Dignity bill surfaced in Massachusetts, where Representative Louis Kafka filed the bill on behalf of Al Lipkind of Stoughton, Massachusetts, who fought for legislation prior to his death after battling stomach cancer.Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Barbara Coombs Lee, President of Compassion &amp; Choices to look at both sides of the controversial Death with Dignity Act, assisted suicide, ethical objections and current legislation here in the States and abroad.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The legal and social debate over death with dignity and assisted suicide is reignited. Recently, the Death with Dignity bill surfaced in Massachusetts, where Representative Louis Kafka filed the bill on behalf of Al Lipkind of Stoughton, Massachusetts, who fought for legislation prior to his death after battling stomach cancer.Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Barbara Coombs Lee, President of Compassion &amp; Choices to look at both sides of the controversial Death with Dignity Act, assisted suicide, ethical objections and current legislation here in the States and abroad.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1943</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/02/inside-the-death-with-dignity-act/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8296610961.mp3?updated=1624285574" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cyberbullying and the Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/02/cyberbullying-and-the-law/</link>
      <description>Just recently 15-year old student Phoebe Prince from South Hadley, Massachusetts took her own life after she was being constantly "cyberbullied" by a group of students at her school.  Phoebe's story is one of many that has left communities reeling, schools in the hot seat and parents enraged by the lack of protection of their children and a lack of discipline against the perpetrators. Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome David T. Tirella, partner at the firm Eaton, Powell &amp; Tirella and Debra Johnston,  founder of Students For Safer Schools and mother of Jeffrey Johnston, a victim of cyberbullying, to discuss the latest in cyberbulling prevention, legislation against cyberbullying and what to do if your child becomes a victim.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:08:25 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Cyberbullying and the Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>222</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f88c2e72-cfa9-11eb-92b9-37b6a93be51f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Cyberbullying and the Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Just recently 15-year old student Phoebe Prince from South Hadley, Massachusetts took her own life after she was being constantly "cyberbullied" by a group of students at her school.  Phoebe's story is one of many that has left communities reeling, schools in the hot seat and parents enraged by the lack of protection of their children and a lack of discipline against the perpetrators. Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome David T. Tirella, partner at the firm Eaton, Powell &amp; Tirella and Debra Johnston,  founder of Students For Safer Schools and mother of Jeffrey Johnston, a victim of cyberbullying, to discuss the latest in cyberbulling prevention, legislation against cyberbullying and what to do if your child becomes a victim.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Just recently 15-year old student Phoebe Prince from South Hadley, Massachusetts took her own life after she was being constantly "cyberbullied" by a group of students at her school.  Phoebe's story is one of many that has left communities reeling, schools in the hot seat and parents enraged by the lack of protection of their children and a lack of discipline against the perpetrators. Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome David T. Tirella, partner at the firm Eaton, Powell &amp; Tirella and Debra Johnston,  founder of Students For Safer Schools and mother of Jeffrey Johnston, a victim of cyberbullying, to discuss the latest in cyberbulling prevention, legislation against cyberbullying and what to do if your child becomes a victim.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2147</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/02/cyberbullying-and-the-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3033406850.mp3?updated=1623961926" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Toyota Recall: Legal Troubles for Toyota</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/02/toyota-recall-legal-troubles-for-toyota/</link>
      <description>Car giant Toyota ordered a global recall of 400,000 Priuses for brake problems. This comes on the heels of earlier incidents where reported gas pedals were becoming stuck in floor mats in different makes and models of Toyotas. On  Lawyer2Lawyer, co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Dee Miles from the law firm, Beasley Allen and Mike Rozembajgier, Director of Recalls for ExpertRECALL™,  to discuss the latest. They take a look at the Toyota recall, the legal troubles that surround this recall and how the recall will impact customers and ultimately Toyota.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:16:26 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Toyota Recall: Legal Troubles for Toyota</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>221</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f8b86c80-cfa9-11eb-92b9-e71ccd9f10f0/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Toyota Recall: Legal Troubles for Toyota</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Car giant Toyota ordered a global recall of 400,000 Priuses for brake problems. This comes on the heels of earlier incidents where reported gas pedals were becoming stuck in floor mats in different makes and models of Toyotas. On  Lawyer2Lawyer, co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Dee Miles from the law firm, Beasley Allen and Mike Rozembajgier, Director of Recalls for ExpertRECALL™,  to discuss the latest. They take a look at the Toyota recall, the legal troubles that surround this recall and how the recall will impact customers and ultimately Toyota.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Car giant Toyota ordered a global recall of 400,000 Priuses for brake problems. This comes on the heels of earlier incidents where reported gas pedals were becoming stuck in floor mats in different makes and models of Toyotas. On  Lawyer2Lawyer, co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Dee Miles from the law firm, Beasley Allen and Mike Rozembajgier, Director of Recalls for ExpertRECALL™,  to discuss the latest. They take a look at the Toyota recall, the legal troubles that surround this recall and how the recall will impact customers and ultimately Toyota.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2012</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/02/toyota-recall-legal-troubles-for-toyota/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5460472328.mp3?updated=1623961926" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Call to Action: Re-examine Laws on Domestic Violence</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/02/a-call-to-action-re-examine-laws-on-domestic-violence/</link>
      <description>The murder of a young woman in Massachusetts raises new questions about the laws and the legal system in cases involving abusive relationships.

19-year old Allison Myrick was stabbed to death  -  her ex-boyfriend charged with murder. Authorities and family members revealed details including two restraining orders which did not prevent this tragic crime.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Marsha Kazarosian from the Kazarosian Law Offices and the Honorable Judge Eugene M. Hyman from the Santa Clara County Superior Court in California, to explore what could have gone so terribly wrong. They will  look at how the legal system, lawyers, legislators and others can better protect victims in abusive relationships and how we as a community can prevent these tragedies.

 

Show Notes: If you or someone you know is involved in an abusive relationship, call National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-SAFE (1-800-799-7233) or contact Break The Cycle.  You may donate in Allison Myrick's honor on line at: www.breakthecycle.org/donate.html  or by phone at, 310-286-3383 x805</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:32:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>A Call to Action: Re-examine Laws on Domestic Violence</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>220</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f8df613c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-fbd115bb982a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>A Call to Action: Re-examine Laws on Domestic Violence</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The murder of a young woman in Massachusetts raises new questions about the laws and the legal system in cases involving abusive relationships.

19-year old Allison Myrick was stabbed to death  -  her ex-boyfriend charged with murder. Authorities and family members revealed details including two restraining orders which did not prevent this tragic crime.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Marsha Kazarosian from the Kazarosian Law Offices and the Honorable Judge Eugene M. Hyman from the Santa Clara County Superior Court in California, to explore what could have gone so terribly wrong. They will  look at how the legal system, lawyers, legislators and others can better protect victims in abusive relationships and how we as a community can prevent these tragedies.

 

Show Notes: If you or someone you know is involved in an abusive relationship, call National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-SAFE (1-800-799-7233) or contact Break The Cycle.  You may donate in Allison Myrick's honor on line at: www.breakthecycle.org/donate.html  or by phone at, 310-286-3383 x805</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The murder of a young woman in Massachusetts raises new questions about the laws and the legal system in cases involving abusive relationships.

19-year old Allison Myrick was stabbed to death  -  her ex-boyfriend charged with murder. Authorities and family members revealed details including two restraining orders which did not prevent this tragic crime.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Marsha Kazarosian from the Kazarosian Law Offices and the Honorable Judge Eugene M. Hyman from the Santa Clara County Superior Court in California, to explore what could have gone so terribly wrong. They will  look at how the legal system, lawyers, legislators and others can better protect victims in abusive relationships and how we as a community can prevent these tragedies.

 

Show Notes: If you or someone you know is involved in an abusive relationship, call National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-SAFE (1-800-799-7233) or contact Break The Cycle.  You may donate in Allison Myrick's honor on line at: www.breakthecycle.org/donate.html  or by phone at, 310-286-3383 x805]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2246</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/02/a-call-to-action-re-examine-laws-on-domestic-violence/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2413476450.mp3?updated=1623961926" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Supreme Court Ruling on Campaign Finance</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/01/the-supreme-court-ruling-on-campaign-finance/</link>
      <description>Last week in a 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission,  the Supreme Court ruled under the First Amendment, the government may not ban political spending by corporations and unions in candidate elections, radically changing campaign finance law. Co-host and Attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Professor Ned Foley, Professor of Law at Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law and Professor Adam Winkler, Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law,  to discuss this Supreme Court ruling and the impact this ruling will have on state, judicial and legislative elections.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:13:03 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Supreme Court Ruling on Campaign Finance</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>219</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f9091cfc-cfa9-11eb-92b9-03c62c8e64be/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Supreme Court Ruling on Campaign Finance</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Last week in a 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission,  the Supreme Court ruled under the First Amendment, the government may not ban political spending by corporations and unions in candidate elections, radically changing campaign finance law. Co-host and Attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Professor Ned Foley, Professor of Law at Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law and Professor Adam Winkler, Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law,  to discuss this Supreme Court ruling and the impact this ruling will have on state, judicial and legislative elections.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Last week in a 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission,  the Supreme Court ruled under the First Amendment, the government may not ban political spending by corporations and unions in candidate elections, radically changing campaign finance law. Co-host and Attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Professor Ned Foley, Professor of Law at Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law and Professor Adam Winkler, Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law,  to discuss this Supreme Court ruling and the impact this ruling will have on state, judicial and legislative elections.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1954</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/01/the-supreme-court-ruling-on-campaign-finance/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7397576930.mp3?updated=1623961927" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Two Big Stories: Stunning MA Senate Election and The Haiti Disaster - What Lawyers Can Do to Help</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/01/two-big-stories-stunning-ma-senate-election-and-the-haiti-disaster-what-lawyers-can-do-to-help/</link>
      <description>Seeing the people of Haiti suffer from the effects of a devastating earthquake is heart-wrenching. On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host Attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Brian Concannon Jr., Director of the Institute for Justice &amp; Democracy in Haiti (IJDH) and Ben Hemingway, Deputy Director of Operations for International Medical Corps, to discuss the enormous response by the medical profession and what lawyers are doing or can do to help. At the top of the show, Craig chats with Dan Rea, host of the radio talk show,  NightSide on WBZ 1030 radio in Boston, about the historic election in Massachusetts.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:48:19 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Two Big Stories: Stunning MA Senate Election and The Haiti Disaster - What Lawyers Can Do to Help</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>218</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f9313b2e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5bbd0ea2e319/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Two Big Stories: Stunning MA Senate Election and The Haiti Disaster - What Lawyers Can Do to Help</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Seeing the people of Haiti suffer from the effects of a devastating earthquake is heart-wrenching. On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host Attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Brian Concannon Jr., Director of the Institute for Justice &amp; Democracy in Haiti (IJDH) and Ben Hemingway, Deputy Director of Operations for International Medical Corps, to discuss the enormous response by the medical profession and what lawyers are doing or can do to help. At the top of the show, Craig chats with Dan Rea, host of the radio talk show,  NightSide on WBZ 1030 radio in Boston, about the historic election in Massachusetts.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Seeing the people of Haiti suffer from the effects of a devastating earthquake is heart-wrenching. On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host Attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Brian Concannon Jr., Director of the Institute for Justice &amp; Democracy in Haiti (IJDH) and Ben Hemingway, Deputy Director of Operations for International Medical Corps, to discuss the enormous response by the medical profession and what lawyers are doing or can do to help. At the top of the show, Craig chats with Dan Rea, host of the radio talk show,  NightSide on WBZ 1030 radio in Boston, about the historic election in Massachusetts.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1988</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/01/two-big-stories-stunning-ma-senate-election-and-the-haiti-disaster-what-lawyers-can-do-to-help/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5451577928.mp3?updated=1624285597" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Meet President-Elect of the American Bar Association: Stephen N. Zack</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/01/meet-president-elect-of-the-american-bar-association-stephen-n-zack/</link>
      <description>A new year is upon us and the American Bar Association is carving out a new agenda with a new President.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome President-elect of the American Bar Association, Attorney Stephen N. Zack, to discuss his new role as President, the importance of civics education, inspiring our students through law and his fight for Hispanic rights.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:17:25 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Meet President-Elect of the American Bar Association: Stephen N. Zack</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>217</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f9571e02-cfa9-11eb-92b9-03d6028ef3bf/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Meet President-Elect of the American Bar Association: Stephen N. Zack</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A new year is upon us and the American Bar Association is carving out a new agenda with a new President.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome President-elect of the American Bar Association, Attorney Stephen N. Zack, to discuss his new role as President, the importance of civics education, inspiring our students through law and his fight for Hispanic rights.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A new year is upon us and the American Bar Association is carving out a new agenda with a new President.  Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome President-elect of the American Bar Association, Attorney Stephen N. Zack, to discuss his new role as President, the importance of civics education, inspiring our students through law and his fight for Hispanic rights.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2002</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/01/meet-president-elect-of-the-american-bar-association-stephen-n-zack/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3278035077.mp3?updated=1623961928" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 2010 Annual Predictions Show</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/01/the-2010-annual-predictions-show/</link>
      <description>2009 was a tumultuous year, filled with lows and highs. From the inauguration of President Obama and Captain Sullenberger’s miraculous landing on the Hudson to layoffs and cutbacks in the legal community and the passing of Senator Ted Kennedy.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi will talk to returning guest, Attorney Stephen L. Kaplan,  principal in the law firm of Hicks, Mims, Kaplan &amp; Burns, to reflect on 2009 and look ahead to the new year of 2010 and a new decade!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:03:39 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The 2010 Annual Predictions Show</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>216</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f980f47a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-fba2e2996bf4/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The 2010 Annual Predictions Show</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>2009 was a tumultuous year, filled with lows and highs. From the inauguration of President Obama and Captain Sullenberger’s miraculous landing on the Hudson to layoffs and cutbacks in the legal community and the passing of Senator Ted Kennedy.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi will talk to returning guest, Attorney Stephen L. Kaplan,  principal in the law firm of Hicks, Mims, Kaplan &amp; Burns, to reflect on 2009 and look ahead to the new year of 2010 and a new decade!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[2009 was a tumultuous year, filled with lows and highs. From the inauguration of President Obama and Captain Sullenberger’s miraculous landing on the Hudson to layoffs and cutbacks in the legal community and the passing of Senator Ted Kennedy.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, attorney and co-host, Bob Ambrogi will talk to returning guest, Attorney Stephen L. Kaplan,  principal in the law firm of Hicks, Mims, Kaplan &amp; Burns, to reflect on 2009 and look ahead to the new year of 2010 and a new decade!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2118</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2010/01/the-2010-annual-predictions-show/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2777368653.mp3?updated=1624285594" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Law Students &amp; the Legal Job Market</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/12/law-students-the-legal-job-market/</link>
      <description>Over the past year, the legal community has been dogged by a down economy resulting in layoffs, pay cuts and lack of jobs from the largest law firms down to the smallest law firms.  What does this mean for law students?  On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Professor William D. Henderson from Indiana University Maurer School of Law and Dr. Silvia Hodges from Fordham University School of Law, to discuss what law students need to learn while in school, the present legal job market and what the future holds for law students when they graduate from law school.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:07:06 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Law Students &amp; the Legal Job Market</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>215</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f9a76af6-cfa9-11eb-92b9-eb0928ca2770/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Law Students &amp; the Legal Job Market</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Over the past year, the legal community has been dogged by a down economy resulting in layoffs, pay cuts and lack of jobs from the largest law firms down to the smallest law firms.  What does this mean for law students?  On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Professor William D. Henderson from Indiana University Maurer School of Law and Dr. Silvia Hodges from Fordham University School of Law, to discuss what law students need to learn while in school, the present legal job market and what the future holds for law students when they graduate from law school.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Over the past year, the legal community has been dogged by a down economy resulting in layoffs, pay cuts and lack of jobs from the largest law firms down to the smallest law firms.  What does this mean for law students?  On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Professor William D. Henderson from Indiana University Maurer School of Law and Dr. Silvia Hodges from Fordham University School of Law, to discuss what law students need to learn while in school, the present legal job market and what the future holds for law students when they graduate from law school.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1995</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/12/law-students-the-legal-job-market/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3738259518.mp3?updated=1623961928" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Joy of Adoption</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/12/the-joy-of-adoption/</link>
      <description>Adoption does not only affect the families involved for a lifetime, but also the lawyers and judges who oversee the process. On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Kathleen Hogan Morrison and Judge Bettina Borders, First Justice out of Bristol County, Massachusetts,  to discuss the joy of adoption, the process and the work of attorneys and judges who complete the circle of bringing families together.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:06:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Joy of Adoption</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>214</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f9d48518-cfa9-11eb-92b9-0f690bb09c61/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Joy of Adoption</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Adoption does not only affect the families involved for a lifetime, but also the lawyers and judges who oversee the process. On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Kathleen Hogan Morrison and Judge Bettina Borders, First Justice out of Bristol County, Massachusetts,  to discuss the joy of adoption, the process and the work of attorneys and judges who complete the circle of bringing families together.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Adoption does not only affect the families involved for a lifetime, but also the lawyers and judges who oversee the process. On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Kathleen Hogan Morrison and Judge Bettina Borders, First Justice out of Bristol County, Massachusetts,  to discuss the joy of adoption, the process and the work of attorneys and judges who complete the circle of bringing families together.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2103</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/12/the-joy-of-adoption/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7671232007.mp3?updated=1624285598" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyer2Lawyer Spreads Some Holiday Cheer</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/12/lawyer2lawyer-spreads-some-holiday-cheer/</link>
      <description>The holiday season is upon us—and we would like to wish all our listeners out there a happy holiday! On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will celebrate the holidays by spotlighting three very special attorneys who are spreading some holiday cheer in some shape or form this holiday season! Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Larry Savell from the law firm of Chadbourne &amp; Parke LLP, to talk about his new album,  Season’s Briefings from the LawTunes.   In addition, Bob &amp; Craig invite Attorney Reid Trautz of ReidMyBlog.com fame to share his gift ideas with The 2009 Holiday Gift Guide for Lawyers  and Attorney Lisa Solomon, Co-Founder of The Billable Hour Company, talks about her one-of-a-kind gifts and greeting cards for legal professionals.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:34:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyer2Lawyer Spreads Some Holiday Cheer</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>213</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f9fe0f50-cfa9-11eb-92b9-d7c430611772/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyer2Lawyer Spreads Some Holiday Cheer</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The holiday season is upon us—and we would like to wish all our listeners out there a happy holiday! On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will celebrate the holidays by spotlighting three very special attorneys who are spreading some holiday cheer in some shape or form this holiday season! Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Larry Savell from the law firm of Chadbourne &amp; Parke LLP, to talk about his new album,  Season’s Briefings from the LawTunes.   In addition, Bob &amp; Craig invite Attorney Reid Trautz of ReidMyBlog.com fame to share his gift ideas with The 2009 Holiday Gift Guide for Lawyers  and Attorney Lisa Solomon, Co-Founder of The Billable Hour Company, talks about her one-of-a-kind gifts and greeting cards for legal professionals.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The holiday season is upon us—and we would like to wish all our listeners out there a happy holiday! On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will celebrate the holidays by spotlighting three very special attorneys who are spreading some holiday cheer in some shape or form this holiday season! Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Larry Savell from the law firm of Chadbourne &amp; Parke LLP, to talk about his new album,  Season’s Briefings from the LawTunes.   In addition, Bob &amp; Craig invite Attorney Reid Trautz of ReidMyBlog.com fame to share his gift ideas with The 2009 Holiday Gift Guide for Lawyers  and Attorney Lisa Solomon, Co-Founder of The Billable Hour Company, talks about her one-of-a-kind gifts and greeting cards for legal professionals.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2042</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/12/lawyer2lawyer-spreads-some-holiday-cheer/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7980704738.mp3?updated=1624285552" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Fight Against Homelessness</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/12/the-fight-against-homelessness/</link>
      <description>As we come to the end of a tough economic year, we take note of some of the effects of the recession, one of which is homelessness on the rise.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Steve Binder, a deputy public defender with the San Diego Office of the Public Defender and founder of  the Homeless Court Program and Attorney Maria Foscarinis, founder and executive director of the National Law Center on Homelessness &amp; Poverty, to discuss the issues, including the jobless rate impact and the legal requirements of cities and towns to cope with homelessness.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:09:25 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Fight Against Homelessness</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>212</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fa253a1c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-4bbab809df05/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Fight Against Homelessness</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As we come to the end of a tough economic year, we take note of some of the effects of the recession, one of which is homelessness on the rise.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Steve Binder, a deputy public defender with the San Diego Office of the Public Defender and founder of  the Homeless Court Program and Attorney Maria Foscarinis, founder and executive director of the National Law Center on Homelessness &amp; Poverty, to discuss the issues, including the jobless rate impact and the legal requirements of cities and towns to cope with homelessness.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[As we come to the end of a tough economic year, we take note of some of the effects of the recession, one of which is homelessness on the rise.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Steve Binder, a deputy public defender with the San Diego Office of the Public Defender and founder of  the Homeless Court Program and Attorney Maria Foscarinis, founder and executive director of the National Law Center on Homelessness &amp; Poverty, to discuss the issues, including the jobless rate impact and the legal requirements of cities and towns to cope with homelessness.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1952</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/12/the-fight-against-homelessness/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1705426324.mp3?updated=1624285571" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Tiger Woods Saga</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/12/the-tiger-woods-saga/</link>
      <description>Golf pro Tiger Woods suffered injuries in a car crash in his own car near his home, igniting a media frenzy and a lot of public attention with speculation swirling about his public image. Co-host, Attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Joshua P. Galper, partner in Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe's Washington, D.C., office and Richard T. Karcher, Director of the Center for Law and Sports at Florida Coastal School of Law, to discuss the legal issues, privacy rights, the impact on endorsement contracts and ultimately Tiger Woods' public image.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:46:15 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Tiger Woods Saga</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>211</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fa560e58-cfa9-11eb-92b9-e31682e230ae/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Tiger Woods Saga</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Golf pro Tiger Woods suffered injuries in a car crash in his own car near his home, igniting a media frenzy and a lot of public attention with speculation swirling about his public image. Co-host, Attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Joshua P. Galper, partner in Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe's Washington, D.C., office and Richard T. Karcher, Director of the Center for Law and Sports at Florida Coastal School of Law, to discuss the legal issues, privacy rights, the impact on endorsement contracts and ultimately Tiger Woods' public image.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Golf pro Tiger Woods suffered injuries in a car crash in his own car near his home, igniting a media frenzy and a lot of public attention with speculation swirling about his public image. Co-host, Attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Joshua P. Galper, partner in Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe's Washington, D.C., office and Richard T. Karcher, Director of the Center for Law and Sports at Florida Coastal School of Law, to discuss the legal issues, privacy rights, the impact on endorsement contracts and ultimately Tiger Woods' public image.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2047</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/12/the-tiger-woods-saga/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5404526672.mp3?updated=1624285572" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanksgiving Edition: Giving Back to Those in Need</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/thanksgiving-edition-giving-back-to-those-in-need/</link>
      <description>Thanksgiving is a time when we’re all reminded to be thankful for what we have and to think about those less fortunate than ourselves especially this year in this economy Co-host, Attorney Bob Ambrogi welcomes Elizabeth M. Lynch, Executive Director, of the Massachusetts Bar Foundation, Scott Inman, Senior Corporate Relations Manager at the Home for Little Wanderers and Attorney Neal J. Philip,  Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Lawyers Helping Hungry Children, to talk about their organizations and helping those in need, not only during the holidays but year round.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:09:05 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Thanksgiving Edition: Giving Back to Those in Need</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>210</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fa7c563a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-fbb71e1b84ae/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Thanksgiving Edition: Giving Back to Those in Need</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Thanksgiving is a time when we’re all reminded to be thankful for what we have and to think about those less fortunate than ourselves especially this year in this economy Co-host, Attorney Bob Ambrogi welcomes Elizabeth M. Lynch, Executive Director, of the Massachusetts Bar Foundation, Scott Inman, Senior Corporate Relations Manager at the Home for Little Wanderers and Attorney Neal J. Philip,  Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Lawyers Helping Hungry Children, to talk about their organizations and helping those in need, not only during the holidays but year round.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Thanksgiving is a time when we’re all reminded to be thankful for what we have and to think about those less fortunate than ourselves especially this year in this economy Co-host, Attorney Bob Ambrogi welcomes Elizabeth M. Lynch, Executive Director, of the Massachusetts Bar Foundation, Scott Inman, Senior Corporate Relations Manager at the Home for Little Wanderers and Attorney Neal J. Philip,  Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Lawyers Helping Hungry Children, to talk about their organizations and helping those in need, not only during the holidays but year round.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2129</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/thanksgiving-edition-giving-back-to-those-in-need/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9299145527.mp3?updated=1623961930" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Controversial Terror Trial in New York</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/the-controversial-terror-trial-in-new-york/</link>
      <description>The admitted mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other suspects will head to New York City, blocks from Ground Zero,  to face a federal trial in civilian court and it is creating quite the controversy.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Tara L. Murray, U.S. Counsel for Reprieve and Gregory S. McNeal, a visiting assistant professor of law at Penn State’s Dickinson School of Law , to discuss this controversial federal trial in a NY civilian court, the ongoing legal work in Guantanamo and ultimately the closing of Guantanamo.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:55:08 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Controversial Terror Trial in New York</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>209</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/faa10336-cfa9-11eb-92b9-db4506411737/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Controversial Terror Trial in New York</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The admitted mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other suspects will head to New York City, blocks from Ground Zero,  to face a federal trial in civilian court and it is creating quite the controversy.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Tara L. Murray, U.S. Counsel for Reprieve and Gregory S. McNeal, a visiting assistant professor of law at Penn State’s Dickinson School of Law , to discuss this controversial federal trial in a NY civilian court, the ongoing legal work in Guantanamo and ultimately the closing of Guantanamo.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The admitted mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other suspects will head to New York City, blocks from Ground Zero,  to face a federal trial in civilian court and it is creating quite the controversy.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Tara L. Murray, U.S. Counsel for Reprieve and Gregory S. McNeal, a visiting assistant professor of law at Penn State’s Dickinson School of Law , to discuss this controversial federal trial in a NY civilian court, the ongoing legal work in Guantanamo and ultimately the closing of Guantanamo.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2023</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/the-controversial-terror-trial-in-new-york/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8198630641.mp3?updated=1624285468" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Impact of Civil Gideon</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/the-impact-of-civil-gideon/</link>
      <description>"Civil Gideon" is now law in the state of California providing counsel to those who cannot afford an attorney in civil cases, predominantly child custody cases and foreclosures. On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host and attorney, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Robert L. Rothman, partner of the firm Arnall Golden Gregory LLP and Attorney James J. Brosnahan, senior partner with Morrison &amp; Foerster and member of the California Commission on Access to Justice, to take a look at the impact of this new law in California and how it could potentially change the legal system nationwide.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:04:33 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Impact of Civil Gideon</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>208</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/facb0546-cfa9-11eb-92b9-cb4f59eec265/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Impact of Civil Gideon</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>"Civil Gideon" is now law in the state of California providing counsel to those who cannot afford an attorney in civil cases, predominantly child custody cases and foreclosures. On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host and attorney, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Robert L. Rothman, partner of the firm Arnall Golden Gregory LLP and Attorney James J. Brosnahan, senior partner with Morrison &amp; Foerster and member of the California Commission on Access to Justice, to take a look at the impact of this new law in California and how it could potentially change the legal system nationwide.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA["Civil Gideon" is now law in the state of California providing counsel to those who cannot afford an attorney in civil cases, predominantly child custody cases and foreclosures. On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host and attorney, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Robert L. Rothman, partner of the firm Arnall Golden Gregory LLP and Attorney James J. Brosnahan, senior partner with Morrison &amp; Foerster and member of the California Commission on Access to Justice, to take a look at the impact of this new law in California and how it could potentially change the legal system nationwide.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2323</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/the-impact-of-civil-gideon/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8557175902.mp3?updated=1624285456" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Fourth Amendment and Email</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/the-fourth-amendment-and-email/</link>
      <description>The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution gives us protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. But what about a search of your email - is it afforded the same protection?   Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Orin S. Kerr , Professor of Law at the George Washington University Law School and Jason Paroff Esq. ,  Director of Computer Forensics Operations with the ESI Consulting practice at Kroll Ontrack to look at the recent opinion handed down by U.S. District Judge Mosman with respect to the Fourth Amendment and email along with our experts' look at what can be retrieved and used in court when it comes to email.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:52:58 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Fourth Amendment and Email</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>207</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/faf09068-cfa9-11eb-92b9-ff68376eb18a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Fourth Amendment and Email</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution gives us protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. But what about a search of your email - is it afforded the same protection?   Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Orin S. Kerr , Professor of Law at the George Washington University Law School and Jason Paroff Esq. ,  Director of Computer Forensics Operations with the ESI Consulting practice at Kroll Ontrack to look at the recent opinion handed down by U.S. District Judge Mosman with respect to the Fourth Amendment and email along with our experts' look at what can be retrieved and used in court when it comes to email.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution gives us protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. But what about a search of your email - is it afforded the same protection?   Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Orin S. Kerr , Professor of Law at the George Washington University Law School and Jason Paroff Esq. ,  Director of Computer Forensics Operations with the ESI Consulting practice at Kroll Ontrack to look at the recent opinion handed down by U.S. District Judge Mosman with respect to the Fourth Amendment and email along with our experts' look at what can be retrieved and used in court when it comes to email.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2051</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/11/the-fourth-amendment-and-email/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2443867682.mp3?updated=1623961932" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawsuits Over Birth Control Pills Yaz and Yazmin</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/10/lawsuits-over-birth-control-pills-yaz-yazmin/</link>
      <description>Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals is facing a growing number of lawsuits claiming that the company concealed the health risks associated with the top-selling birth control pills Yaz and Yasmin.  Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi  welcome Attorney Mike Danko from the Danko Law Firm and James T. O'Reilly, Professor of Law at University of Cincinnati College of Law, to a look at the basis for the litigation, the reported side affects, the FDA’s role, Bayer’s continued marketing campaign and the federal lawsuit against the makers of Yaz and Yasmin.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:13:07 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawsuits Over Birth Control Pills Yaz and Yazmin</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>206</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fb1e37ca-cfa9-11eb-92b9-577ff8ab1355/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawsuits Over Birth Control Pills Yaz and Yazmin</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals is facing a growing number of lawsuits claiming that the company concealed the health risks associated with the top-selling birth control pills Yaz and Yasmin.  Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi  welcome Attorney Mike Danko from the Danko Law Firm and James T. O'Reilly, Professor of Law at University of Cincinnati College of Law, to a look at the basis for the litigation, the reported side affects, the FDA’s role, Bayer’s continued marketing campaign and the federal lawsuit against the makers of Yaz and Yasmin.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals is facing a growing number of lawsuits claiming that the company concealed the health risks associated with the top-selling birth control pills Yaz and Yasmin.  Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi  welcome Attorney Mike Danko from the Danko Law Firm and James T. O'Reilly, Professor of Law at University of Cincinnati College of Law, to a look at the basis for the litigation, the reported side affects, the FDA’s role, Bayer’s continued marketing campaign and the federal lawsuit against the makers of Yaz and Yasmin.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1997</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/10/lawsuits-over-birth-control-pills-yaz-yazmin/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8930563360.mp3?updated=1623961931" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside Amended New York Labor Law: Section 195</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/10/inside-amended-new-york-labor-law-section-195/</link>
      <description>Effective October 26, 2009, amended New York Labor Law: Section 195 will require employers to provide written notification to their employees, at the time of hiring, of their rate of pay and obtain a written acknowledgment from each employee of the receipt of this written notice. Co-host, Attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Charles H. Kaplan, Partner in the NY office of Sedgwick, Detert, Moran &amp; Arnold LLP and Barbara S. Mehlsack, Esq., Partner in the New York firm of Gorlick Kravitz &amp; Listhaus, P.C. to get two perspectives on amended New York Labor Law: Section 195, compliance and what this newly amended law means for New York employers as well as their employees.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:28:40 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside Amended New York Labor Law: Section 195</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>205</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fb46f4c6-cfa9-11eb-92b9-dfcbafe6130d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Inside Amended New York Labor Law: Section 195</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Effective October 26, 2009, amended New York Labor Law: Section 195 will require employers to provide written notification to their employees, at the time of hiring, of their rate of pay and obtain a written acknowledgment from each employee of the receipt of this written notice. Co-host, Attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Charles H. Kaplan, Partner in the NY office of Sedgwick, Detert, Moran &amp; Arnold LLP and Barbara S. Mehlsack, Esq., Partner in the New York firm of Gorlick Kravitz &amp; Listhaus, P.C. to get two perspectives on amended New York Labor Law: Section 195, compliance and what this newly amended law means for New York employers as well as their employees.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Effective October 26, 2009, amended New York Labor Law: Section 195 will require employers to provide written notification to their employees, at the time of hiring, of their rate of pay and obtain a written acknowledgment from each employee of the receipt of this written notice. Co-host, Attorney J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Charles H. Kaplan, Partner in the NY office of Sedgwick, Detert, Moran &amp; Arnold LLP and Barbara S. Mehlsack, Esq., Partner in the New York firm of Gorlick Kravitz &amp; Listhaus, P.C. to get two perspectives on amended New York Labor Law: Section 195, compliance and what this newly amended law means for New York employers as well as their employees.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2175</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/10/inside-amended-new-york-labor-law-section-195/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7318698509.mp3?updated=1624285453" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The FTC's New Guidelines &amp; the Blogosphere</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/10/the-ftcs-new-guidelines-the-blogosphere/</link>
      <description>Attention bloggers: The Federal Trade Commission approved new Web guidelines pertaining to "Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising."  The FTC wants bloggers to disclose free products or payments they have received from companies for reviewing their products.  Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Eric P. Robinson, Staff Attorney at the Media Law Resource Center and Attorney Barry J. Reingold, partner in the Washington D.C. office of Perkins Coie,  to clarify the FTC’s new guidelines, look at the ethics of blogging, blogger abuse and how these new guidelines will impact the blogosphere.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:48:35 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The FTC's New Guidelines &amp; the Blogosphere</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>204</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fb73368a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-d320167eea1a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The FTC's New Guidelines &amp; the Blogosphere</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Attention bloggers: The Federal Trade Commission approved new Web guidelines pertaining to "Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising."  The FTC wants bloggers to disclose free products or payments they have received from companies for reviewing their products.  Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Eric P. Robinson, Staff Attorney at the Media Law Resource Center and Attorney Barry J. Reingold, partner in the Washington D.C. office of Perkins Coie,  to clarify the FTC’s new guidelines, look at the ethics of blogging, blogger abuse and how these new guidelines will impact the blogosphere.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Attention bloggers: The Federal Trade Commission approved new Web guidelines pertaining to "Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising."  The FTC wants bloggers to disclose free products or payments they have received from companies for reviewing their products.  Co-hosts and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Eric P. Robinson, Staff Attorney at the Media Law Resource Center and Attorney Barry J. Reingold, partner in the Washington D.C. office of Perkins Coie,  to clarify the FTC’s new guidelines, look at the ethics of blogging, blogger abuse and how these new guidelines will impact the blogosphere.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2131</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/10/the-ftcs-new-guidelines-the-blogosphere/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8942186841.mp3?updated=1623961932" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Landmark Decision in Connecticut v AEP</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/10/the-landmark-decision-in-connecticut-v-aep/</link>
      <description>In a landmark decision in Connecticut v. American Electric Power Co. Inc., the 2nd U.S Circuit Court of Appeals sided with a group of eight states, the City of New York and various environmental groups, who had filed a public nuisance lawsuit against five of the nation’s biggest coal-burning utilities.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Matthew F. Pawa from Law Offices of Matthew F. Pawa, P.C. and  Attorney Thomas J. Heiden, partner in the Chicago office of Latham &amp; Watkins, to dissect Connecticut v. AEP, get reaction from both sides of this landmark case and how this decision will impact power companies, as well as future environmental litigation.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:22:04 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Landmark Decision in Connecticut v AEP</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>203</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fbaa1510-cfa9-11eb-92b9-4b3c6308d5b2/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Landmark Decision in Connecticut v AEP</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In a landmark decision in Connecticut v. American Electric Power Co. Inc., the 2nd U.S Circuit Court of Appeals sided with a group of eight states, the City of New York and various environmental groups, who had filed a public nuisance lawsuit against five of the nation’s biggest coal-burning utilities.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Matthew F. Pawa from Law Offices of Matthew F. Pawa, P.C. and  Attorney Thomas J. Heiden, partner in the Chicago office of Latham &amp; Watkins, to dissect Connecticut v. AEP, get reaction from both sides of this landmark case and how this decision will impact power companies, as well as future environmental litigation.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In a landmark decision in Connecticut v. American Electric Power Co. Inc., the 2nd U.S Circuit Court of Appeals sided with a group of eight states, the City of New York and various environmental groups, who had filed a public nuisance lawsuit against five of the nation’s biggest coal-burning utilities.  Attorneys and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Matthew F. Pawa from Law Offices of Matthew F. Pawa, P.C. and  Attorney Thomas J. Heiden, partner in the Chicago office of Latham &amp; Watkins, to dissect Connecticut v. AEP, get reaction from both sides of this landmark case and how this decision will impact power companies, as well as future environmental litigation.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1886</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/10/the-landmark-decision-in-connecticut-v-aep/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4078041231.mp3?updated=1623961932" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Red Flags Rule Impact on the Legal Community</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/10/the-red-flags-rule-impact-on-the-legal-community/</link>
      <description>The American Bar Association filed suit against the Federal Trade Commission after they applied the Red Flags Rule to lawyers, leaving the legal communirty reeling. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Andrew M. Smith, Partner at the Washington DC office of Morrison &amp; Foerster and chair of the American Bar Association’s Red Flags Task Force and privacy expert, Attorney Mari J. Frank to spotlight the Red Flags Rule. They will take a look at the controversial Red Flags Rule, the suit filed by the ABA, and how this rule could ultimately affect the legal community.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:18:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Red Flags Rule Impact on the Legal Community</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>202</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fbda2070-cfa9-11eb-92b9-ef768cfe1471/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Red Flags Rule Impact on the Legal Community</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The American Bar Association filed suit against the Federal Trade Commission after they applied the Red Flags Rule to lawyers, leaving the legal communirty reeling. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Andrew M. Smith, Partner at the Washington DC office of Morrison &amp; Foerster and chair of the American Bar Association’s Red Flags Task Force and privacy expert, Attorney Mari J. Frank to spotlight the Red Flags Rule. They will take a look at the controversial Red Flags Rule, the suit filed by the ABA, and how this rule could ultimately affect the legal community.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The American Bar Association filed suit against the Federal Trade Commission after they applied the Red Flags Rule to lawyers, leaving the legal communirty reeling. Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Andrew M. Smith, Partner at the Washington DC office of Morrison &amp; Foerster and chair of the American Bar Association’s Red Flags Task Force and privacy expert, Attorney Mari J. Frank to spotlight the Red Flags Rule. They will take a look at the controversial Red Flags Rule, the suit filed by the ABA, and how this rule could ultimately affect the legal community.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2083</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/10/the-red-flags-rule-impact-on-the-legal-community/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4560308612.mp3?updated=1624285579" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Debate over Medical Liability Reform</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/09/the-great-debate-over-medical-liability-reform/</link>
      <description>When the issue of medical liability reform came up in President Obama’s speech on Health Care reform in front of Congress, it was met with boos from Democrats and a standing ovation from Republicans. Co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome medical malpractice reform expert,  Professor Stephan Landsman  the Robert A. Clifford Chair in Tort Law and Social Policy from DePaul University College of Law and Darren McKinney Director of Communications from the American Tort Reform Association to look at both sides of medical liability reform as the debate plays out for trial attorneys and the medical profession.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:44:08 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Debate over Medical Liability Reform</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>201</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fc11fb6c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5bd2ae4115c8/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Great Debate over Medical Liability Reform</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>When the issue of medical liability reform came up in President Obama’s speech on Health Care reform in front of Congress, it was met with boos from Democrats and a standing ovation from Republicans. Co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome medical malpractice reform expert,  Professor Stephan Landsman  the Robert A. Clifford Chair in Tort Law and Social Policy from DePaul University College of Law and Darren McKinney Director of Communications from the American Tort Reform Association to look at both sides of medical liability reform as the debate plays out for trial attorneys and the medical profession.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When the issue of medical liability reform came up in President Obama’s speech on Health Care reform in front of Congress, it was met with boos from Democrats and a standing ovation from Republicans. Co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome medical malpractice reform expert,  Professor Stephan Landsman  the Robert A. Clifford Chair in Tort Law and Social Policy from DePaul University College of Law and Darren McKinney Director of Communications from the American Tort Reform Association to look at both sides of medical liability reform as the debate plays out for trial attorneys and the medical profession.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2409</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/09/the-great-debate-over-medical-liability-reform/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6653261821.mp3?updated=1624285510" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside the ABA Journal's Legal Rebels Project</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/09/inside-the-aba-journals-legal-rebels-project/</link>
      <description>With a legal community today that is embracing technology and new media that we’re all too familiar with here at Legal Talk Network, our friends and colleagues in print media are turning to new media to expand and reach a growing audience.  Co-Hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome the ABA Journal's editor, Edward A. Adams,  and Rachael M. Zahorsky, legal affairs writer for the ABA Journal, to give you an inside look at the ABA Journal's latest venture, The Legal Rebels Project. They will explore the transition to new media, how lawyers and law firms are reinventing themselves in the current economy and take a look at life on the road on the Legal Rebels Tour ’09.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:20:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Inside the ABA Journal's Legal Rebels Project</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>200</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fc43476c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-4f244fc44375/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Inside the ABA Journal's Legal Rebels Project</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With a legal community today that is embracing technology and new media that we’re all too familiar with here at Legal Talk Network, our friends and colleagues in print media are turning to new media to expand and reach a growing audience.  Co-Hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome the ABA Journal's editor, Edward A. Adams,  and Rachael M. Zahorsky, legal affairs writer for the ABA Journal, to give you an inside look at the ABA Journal's latest venture, The Legal Rebels Project. They will explore the transition to new media, how lawyers and law firms are reinventing themselves in the current economy and take a look at life on the road on the Legal Rebels Tour ’09.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[With a legal community today that is embracing technology and new media that we’re all too familiar with here at Legal Talk Network, our friends and colleagues in print media are turning to new media to expand and reach a growing audience.  Co-Hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome the ABA Journal's editor, Edward A. Adams,  and Rachael M. Zahorsky, legal affairs writer for the ABA Journal, to give you an inside look at the ABA Journal's latest venture, The Legal Rebels Project. They will explore the transition to new media, how lawyers and law firms are reinventing themselves in the current economy and take a look at life on the road on the Legal Rebels Tour ’09.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2178</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/09/inside-the-aba-journals-legal-rebels-project/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7235438313.mp3?updated=1624285605" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Unveiling of UCI Law School</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/09/the-unveiling-of-uci-law-school/</link>
      <description>It's back to school and many law students face a new curriculum, the large workload and the hefty price of tuition. But University of California, Irvine School of Law stands out with a new agenda, creating a hands-on approach to law school, a concentration in public service and free tuition for their inaugural class through donations. Co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean and Distinguished Professor at UCI Law, to chat about his new venture, the new approach to law school, students and what lies ahead.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:41:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Unveiling of UCI Law School</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>199</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fcc725a0-cfa9-11eb-92b9-b707cfe4d76d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Unveiling of UCI Law School</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It's back to school and many law students face a new curriculum, the large workload and the hefty price of tuition. But University of California, Irvine School of Law stands out with a new agenda, creating a hands-on approach to law school, a concentration in public service and free tuition for their inaugural class through donations. Co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean and Distinguished Professor at UCI Law, to chat about his new venture, the new approach to law school, students and what lies ahead.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[It's back to school and many law students face a new curriculum, the large workload and the hefty price of tuition. But University of California, Irvine School of Law stands out with a new agenda, creating a hands-on approach to law school, a concentration in public service and free tuition for their inaugural class through donations. Co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean and Distinguished Professor at UCI Law, to chat about his new venture, the new approach to law school, students and what lies ahead.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1910</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/09/the-unveiling-of-uci-law-school/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5325608510.mp3?updated=1624285559" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Credit Card Consumers &amp; Arbitration Part 2</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/09/credit-card-consumers-arbitration-part-2/</link>
      <description>In part one of Credit Card Consumers &amp; Arbitration, co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams discussed consumer rights and mandatory arbitration used when a dispute between the credit card holder and the credit card company arises. In part two, Bob &amp; Craig welcome back Attorney Deepak Gupta,  staff attorney at Public Citizen Litigation Group and Attorney Alan Kaplinsky, senior partner at the firm, Ballard Spahr Andrews and Ingersoll,  to discuss the Arbitration Fairness Act, what's next in arbitration and  add their insight to the already lively discussion on this controversial topic.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:02:22 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Credit Card Consumers &amp; Arbitration Part 2</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>198</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fcef9fd0-cfa9-11eb-92b9-2f4c9091914b/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Credit Card Consumers &amp; Arbitration Part 2</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In part one of Credit Card Consumers &amp; Arbitration, co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams discussed consumer rights and mandatory arbitration used when a dispute between the credit card holder and the credit card company arises. In part two, Bob &amp; Craig welcome back Attorney Deepak Gupta,  staff attorney at Public Citizen Litigation Group and Attorney Alan Kaplinsky, senior partner at the firm, Ballard Spahr Andrews and Ingersoll,  to discuss the Arbitration Fairness Act, what's next in arbitration and  add their insight to the already lively discussion on this controversial topic.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In part one of Credit Card Consumers &amp; Arbitration, co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams discussed consumer rights and mandatory arbitration used when a dispute between the credit card holder and the credit card company arises. In part two, Bob &amp; Craig welcome back Attorney Deepak Gupta,  staff attorney at Public Citizen Litigation Group and Attorney Alan Kaplinsky, senior partner at the firm, Ballard Spahr Andrews and Ingersoll,  to discuss the Arbitration Fairness Act, what's next in arbitration and  add their insight to the already lively discussion on this controversial topic.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2202</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/09/credit-card-consumers-arbitration-part-2/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3473391270.mp3?updated=1624285520" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Credit Card Consumers &amp; Arbitration</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/08/credit-card-consumers-arbitration/</link>
      <description>Mandatory arbitration in credit card agreements are in the legal spotlight again after the Minnesota Attorney General recently sued the largest national arbitration firm, National Arbitration Forum. That resulted in a settlement shutting down part of NAF's business and has raised questions about the outcomes of arbitration versus action in civil court for consumers. Lawer2Lawyer co-hosts, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams call on experts on both sides of this controversy, Attorney Deepak Gupta from Public Citizen Litigation Group, who focuses on consumer rights and Attorney Alan Kaplinsky, senior partner at Ballard Spahr Andrews and Ingersoll in Philadelphia, who pioneered the use of pre-dispute arbitration.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:50:22 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Credit Card Consumers &amp; Arbitration</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>197</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fd16b250-cfa9-11eb-92b9-2b880f278925/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Credit Card Consumers &amp; Arbitration</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Mandatory arbitration in credit card agreements are in the legal spotlight again after the Minnesota Attorney General recently sued the largest national arbitration firm, National Arbitration Forum. That resulted in a settlement shutting down part of NAF's business and has raised questions about the outcomes of arbitration versus action in civil court for consumers. Lawer2Lawyer co-hosts, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams call on experts on both sides of this controversy, Attorney Deepak Gupta from Public Citizen Litigation Group, who focuses on consumer rights and Attorney Alan Kaplinsky, senior partner at Ballard Spahr Andrews and Ingersoll in Philadelphia, who pioneered the use of pre-dispute arbitration.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Mandatory arbitration in credit card agreements are in the legal spotlight again after the Minnesota Attorney General recently sued the largest national arbitration firm, National Arbitration Forum. That resulted in a settlement shutting down part of NAF's business and has raised questions about the outcomes of arbitration versus action in civil court for consumers. Lawer2Lawyer co-hosts, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams call on experts on both sides of this controversy, Attorney Deepak Gupta from Public Citizen Litigation Group, who focuses on consumer rights and Attorney Alan Kaplinsky, senior partner at Ballard Spahr Andrews and Ingersoll in Philadelphia, who pioneered the use of pre-dispute arbitration.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2268</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/08/credit-card-consumers-arbitration/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7555941620.mp3?updated=1624285463" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>101 Year Old Lawyer Jack Borden</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/08/101-year-old-lawyer-jack-borden/</link>
      <description>Why retire? So says Attorney Jack Borden, who is in his law office at 6:30 every morning, doing what he loves - practicing law. Recently, Borden celebrated his 101st birthday, being named 'America's Outstanding Oldest Worker for 2009,' by Experience Works. Now he is the special guest on this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer with co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi , who discuss the gamut with Borden, senior partner at Borden &amp; Westhoff, LLP. Hear his vivid stories from the past century about the legal profession, tips for young lawyers and his secret to longevity.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:02:16 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>101 Year Old Lawyer Jack Borden</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>196</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fd3ec510-cfa9-11eb-92b9-974a6ee23773/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>101 Year Old Lawyer Jack Borden</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Why retire? So says Attorney Jack Borden, who is in his law office at 6:30 every morning, doing what he loves - practicing law. Recently, Borden celebrated his 101st birthday, being named 'America's Outstanding Oldest Worker for 2009,' by Experience Works. Now he is the special guest on this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer with co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi , who discuss the gamut with Borden, senior partner at Borden &amp; Westhoff, LLP. Hear his vivid stories from the past century about the legal profession, tips for young lawyers and his secret to longevity.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Why retire? So says Attorney Jack Borden, who is in his law office at 6:30 every morning, doing what he loves - practicing law. Recently, Borden celebrated his 101st birthday, being named 'America's Outstanding Oldest Worker for 2009,' by Experience Works. Now he is the special guest on this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer with co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi , who discuss the gamut with Borden, senior partner at Borden &amp; Westhoff, LLP. Hear his vivid stories from the past century about the legal profession, tips for young lawyers and his secret to longevity.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2097</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/08/101-year-old-lawyer-jack-borden/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5552883386.mp3?updated=1624285501" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An Inside Look at the Peer-to-Patent System</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/08/an-inside-look-at-the-peer-to-patent-system/</link>
      <description>It can be said that patents are the key to sustaining innovative products and patent law is certainly an active area of legal practice in the U.S. But the U.S. Patent and Trademark office has been overwhelmed and undermanned. Could the Peer-to-Patent system be the answer? Co-Host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Professor Mark Webbink, Executive Director of the Center for Patent Innovations, a research and development arm of New York Law School's Institute for Information Law &amp; Property and Attorney Stephanie Scruggs , an expert in patent litigation from the firm of Hanify &amp; King, to take an in-depth look at the innovative Peer-to Patent system, that employs a crowdsourcing and open source model using experts in the patent process.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:45:25 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>An Inside Look at the Peer-to-Patent System</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>195</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fd73424a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-63e193f082d3/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>An Inside Look at the Peer-to-Patent System</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It can be said that patents are the key to sustaining innovative products and patent law is certainly an active area of legal practice in the U.S. But the U.S. Patent and Trademark office has been overwhelmed and undermanned. Could the Peer-to-Patent system be the answer? Co-Host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Professor Mark Webbink, Executive Director of the Center for Patent Innovations, a research and development arm of New York Law School's Institute for Information Law &amp; Property and Attorney Stephanie Scruggs , an expert in patent litigation from the firm of Hanify &amp; King, to take an in-depth look at the innovative Peer-to Patent system, that employs a crowdsourcing and open source model using experts in the patent process.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[It can be said that patents are the key to sustaining innovative products and patent law is certainly an active area of legal practice in the U.S. But the U.S. Patent and Trademark office has been overwhelmed and undermanned. Could the Peer-to-Patent system be the answer? Co-Host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Professor Mark Webbink, Executive Director of the Center for Patent Innovations, a research and development arm of New York Law School's Institute for Information Law &amp; Property and Attorney Stephanie Scruggs , an expert in patent litigation from the firm of Hanify &amp; King, to take an in-depth look at the innovative Peer-to Patent system, that employs a crowdsourcing and open source model using experts in the patent process.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2166</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/08/an-inside-look-at-the-peer-to-patent-system/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5348829690.mp3?updated=1624285517" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Swimsuits, Steroids &amp; Regulations in the Sports World</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/08/swimsuits-steroids-regulations-in-the-sports-world/</link>
      <description>Recently the world of sports has been plagued by scandal - from a controversial polyurethane swimsuit used in swimming  to steroids putting a cloud over major league baseball. Co-hosts and attorneys Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Professor Matt Mitten,  the Director of the National Sports Law Institute at Marquette University Law School and Attorney John P. Collins from the firm Collins &amp; Collins, to take a look at the impact of these controversies and regulations in sports today.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:35:52 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Swimsuits, Steroids &amp; Regulations in the Sports World</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>194</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fd9c0f0e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-5f3458f13bbe/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Swimsuits, Steroids &amp; Regulations in the Sports World</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Recently the world of sports has been plagued by scandal - from a controversial polyurethane swimsuit used in swimming  to steroids putting a cloud over major league baseball. Co-hosts and attorneys Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Professor Matt Mitten,  the Director of the National Sports Law Institute at Marquette University Law School and Attorney John P. Collins from the firm Collins &amp; Collins, to take a look at the impact of these controversies and regulations in sports today.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Recently the world of sports has been plagued by scandal - from a controversial polyurethane swimsuit used in swimming  to steroids putting a cloud over major league baseball. Co-hosts and attorneys Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Professor Matt Mitten,  the Director of the National Sports Law Institute at Marquette University Law School and Attorney John P. Collins from the firm Collins &amp; Collins, to take a look at the impact of these controversies and regulations in sports today.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2117</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/08/swimsuits-steroids-regulations-in-the-sports-world/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1173889472.mp3?updated=1624285458" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lessons Learned from Professor Gates' Arrest</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/07/lessons-learned-from-professor-gates-arrest/</link>
      <description>The arrest of Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. at his home in Cambridge, Massachusetts ignited a wide range of legal and social debate as well as a media firestorm worldwide. Attorneys Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome famed attorney, Jack Greenberg, the former director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund who, together with Thurgood Marshall, argued Brown v. Board of Education before the Supreme Court in 1954. Now the Alphonse Fletcher Professor of Law at Columbia Law School, Greenberg shares his perspective on racial profiling, civil rights and what we still need to learn about race relations.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:08:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lessons Learned from Professor Gates' Arrest</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>193</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fdbf3aba-cfa9-11eb-92b9-77866abeb225/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lessons Learned from Professor Gates' Arrest</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The arrest of Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. at his home in Cambridge, Massachusetts ignited a wide range of legal and social debate as well as a media firestorm worldwide. Attorneys Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome famed attorney, Jack Greenberg, the former director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund who, together with Thurgood Marshall, argued Brown v. Board of Education before the Supreme Court in 1954. Now the Alphonse Fletcher Professor of Law at Columbia Law School, Greenberg shares his perspective on racial profiling, civil rights and what we still need to learn about race relations.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The arrest of Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. at his home in Cambridge, Massachusetts ignited a wide range of legal and social debate as well as a media firestorm worldwide. Attorneys Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome famed attorney, Jack Greenberg, the former director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund who, together with Thurgood Marshall, argued Brown v. Board of Education before the Supreme Court in 1954. Now the Alphonse Fletcher Professor of Law at Columbia Law School, Greenberg shares his perspective on racial profiling, civil rights and what we still need to learn about race relations.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1693</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/07/lessons-learned-from-professor-gates-arrest/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6844026431.mp3?updated=1623961935" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Debate over Health Care Reform</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/07/the-great-debate-over-health-care-reform/</link>
      <description>Debate continues over Health Care reform. Co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Dr. David Orentlicher, professor and co-director of the Center for Law and Health at Indiana University Schools of Law and Medicine  and Attorney Joel L. Michaels, the partner-in-charge of the Health Law Department in McDermott Will &amp; Emery LLP’s Washington, D.C. office, to discuss legal issues surrounding healthcare reform, its impact on businesses, hospitals, and individuals and the role of federal government in the marketplace of health care insurance.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:29:19 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Debate over Health Care Reform</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>192</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fe5974ae-cfa9-11eb-92b9-bff5b59498ad/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Great Debate over Health Care Reform</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Debate continues over Health Care reform. Co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Dr. David Orentlicher, professor and co-director of the Center for Law and Health at Indiana University Schools of Law and Medicine  and Attorney Joel L. Michaels, the partner-in-charge of the Health Law Department in McDermott Will &amp; Emery LLP’s Washington, D.C. office, to discuss legal issues surrounding healthcare reform, its impact on businesses, hospitals, and individuals and the role of federal government in the marketplace of health care insurance.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Debate continues over Health Care reform. Co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Dr. David Orentlicher, professor and co-director of the Center for Law and Health at Indiana University Schools of Law and Medicine  and Attorney Joel L. Michaels, the partner-in-charge of the Health Law Department in McDermott Will &amp; Emery LLP’s Washington, D.C. office, to discuss legal issues surrounding healthcare reform, its impact on businesses, hospitals, and individuals and the role of federal government in the marketplace of health care insurance.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2444</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/07/the-great-debate-over-health-care-reform/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9235849063.mp3?updated=1624285538" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chinese Drywall Litigation</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/07/chinese-drywall-litigation/</link>
      <description>Lawsuits are on the rise from Chinese drywall used to build homes especially in Southeastern states causing crippling effects on residents’ property, as well as their health. Co-host J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Scott G. Wolfe, Jr. a construction litigator at Wolfe Law Group and Attorney John F. Mullen, Sr. from the firm, Nelson Levine de Luca &amp; Horst, to look at both sides of Chinese drywall litigation, the effects of Chinese drywall, the mounting lawsuits and what the future holds for the affected residents.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:01:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Chinese Drywall Litigation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>191</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fe84c08c-cfa9-11eb-92b9-97b1971fec35/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Chinese Drywall Litigation</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Lawsuits are on the rise from Chinese drywall used to build homes especially in Southeastern states causing crippling effects on residents’ property, as well as their health. Co-host J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Scott G. Wolfe, Jr. a construction litigator at Wolfe Law Group and Attorney John F. Mullen, Sr. from the firm, Nelson Levine de Luca &amp; Horst, to look at both sides of Chinese drywall litigation, the effects of Chinese drywall, the mounting lawsuits and what the future holds for the affected residents.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Lawsuits are on the rise from Chinese drywall used to build homes especially in Southeastern states causing crippling effects on residents’ property, as well as their health. Co-host J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Scott G. Wolfe, Jr. a construction litigator at Wolfe Law Group and Attorney John F. Mullen, Sr. from the firm, Nelson Levine de Luca &amp; Horst, to look at both sides of Chinese drywall litigation, the effects of Chinese drywall, the mounting lawsuits and what the future holds for the affected residents.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1915</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/07/chinese-drywall-litigation/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2930390925.mp3?updated=1624285585" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Issues in Michael Jackson’s Will</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/07/legal-issues-in-michael-jacksons-will/</link>
      <description>With the passing of Michael Jackson, his will is being dissected and many questions remain on the future of his estate.  Host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Lawrence H. Heller, an international tax and estate planning attorney at the firm Bryan Cave LLP and Professor Tom Featherston, the Mills Cox Professor of Law at Baylor Law School to discuss the fate of Michael Jackson's estate.  They will take a look at the handling of Jackson's estate, the role of the appointed executors and the importance of having a will.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:51:38 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Issues in Michael Jackson’s Will</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>190</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/feb1f3ea-cfa9-11eb-92b9-872871f553f3/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Issues in Michael Jackson’s Will</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With the passing of Michael Jackson, his will is being dissected and many questions remain on the future of his estate.  Host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Lawrence H. Heller, an international tax and estate planning attorney at the firm Bryan Cave LLP and Professor Tom Featherston, the Mills Cox Professor of Law at Baylor Law School to discuss the fate of Michael Jackson's estate.  They will take a look at the handling of Jackson's estate, the role of the appointed executors and the importance of having a will.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[With the passing of Michael Jackson, his will is being dissected and many questions remain on the future of his estate.  Host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Lawrence H. Heller, an international tax and estate planning attorney at the firm Bryan Cave LLP and Professor Tom Featherston, the Mills Cox Professor of Law at Baylor Law School to discuss the fate of Michael Jackson's estate.  They will take a look at the handling of Jackson's estate, the role of the appointed executors and the importance of having a will.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2053</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/07/legal-issues-in-michael-jacksons-will/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4210483679.mp3?updated=1624285576" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyers Advertising on Craigslist</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/07/lawyers-advertising-on-craigslist/</link>
      <description>Solo and small-firm practitioners have discovered that Craigslist has been a great source for generating business, but are challenged by a growing number of lawyer ads and individual state’s advertising rules.  Host J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Susan Beecher, a solo practitioner out of Kent, Washington and Attorney William Hornsby, counsel in the American Bar Association's Division for Legal Services, to look at the upside and downside of advertising on Craigslist and the legal ethics issues surrounding advertising on these free online sites.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:18:15 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyers Advertising on Craigslist</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>189</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fef60530-cfa9-11eb-92b9-23c2ea6c1f9f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyers Advertising on Craigslist</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Solo and small-firm practitioners have discovered that Craigslist has been a great source for generating business, but are challenged by a growing number of lawyer ads and individual state’s advertising rules.  Host J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Susan Beecher, a solo practitioner out of Kent, Washington and Attorney William Hornsby, counsel in the American Bar Association's Division for Legal Services, to look at the upside and downside of advertising on Craigslist and the legal ethics issues surrounding advertising on these free online sites.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Solo and small-firm practitioners have discovered that Craigslist has been a great source for generating business, but are challenged by a growing number of lawyer ads and individual state’s advertising rules.  Host J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Susan Beecher, a solo practitioner out of Kent, Washington and Attorney William Hornsby, counsel in the American Bar Association's Division for Legal Services, to look at the upside and downside of advertising on Craigslist and the legal ethics issues surrounding advertising on these free online sites.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1993</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/07/lawyers-advertising-on-craigslist/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4082098625.mp3?updated=1624285496" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Air France Crash Legal Issues</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/06/air-france-crash-legal-issues/</link>
      <description>On May 31, 2009, Air France flight 447, out of Rio de Janerio bound for Paris, vanished into thin air. A frantic search for passengers and the black boxes, turned up with a number of bodies but no black boxes. Hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite Attorney Justin T. Green, partner with the firm Kreindler &amp; Kreindler and Attorney John A. Greaves from the firm Baum, Hedlund, Aristei &amp; Goldman, PC , to discuss the crash, the litigation and jurisdiction issues and the quest for compensation for the victims' families.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:41:23 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Air France Crash Legal Issues</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>188</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ff2f2e64-cfa9-11eb-92b9-07fc23ef4cec/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Air France Crash Legal Issues</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On May 31, 2009, Air France flight 447, out of Rio de Janerio bound for Paris, vanished into thin air. A frantic search for passengers and the black boxes, turned up with a number of bodies but no black boxes. Hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite Attorney Justin T. Green, partner with the firm Kreindler &amp; Kreindler and Attorney John A. Greaves from the firm Baum, Hedlund, Aristei &amp; Goldman, PC , to discuss the crash, the litigation and jurisdiction issues and the quest for compensation for the victims' families.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On May 31, 2009, Air France flight 447, out of Rio de Janerio bound for Paris, vanished into thin air. A frantic search for passengers and the black boxes, turned up with a number of bodies but no black boxes. Hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams invite Attorney Justin T. Green, partner with the firm Kreindler &amp; Kreindler and Attorney John A. Greaves from the firm Baum, Hedlund, Aristei &amp; Goldman, PC , to discuss the crash, the litigation and jurisdiction issues and the quest for compensation for the victims' families.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2110</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/06/air-france-crash-legal-issues/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3550262916.mp3?updated=1624285517" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The First Amendment, Hate Speech and Hate Crimes</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/06/the-first-amendment-hate-speech-and-hate-crimes/</link>
      <description>When an 88-year old white supremacist walked into the Holocaust Museum in Washington DC opening fire, reaction was swift to question if this tragedy could have been prevented. And with those questions comes the examination of First Amendment rights. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome  Attorney Brian Cuban, a Dallas Attorney working for Mark Cuban Companies, Attorney Steve Freeman, Director of Legal Affairs for the Anti-Defamation League  and renowned trial lawyer and First Amendment lawyer, Attorney Martin Garbus, to discuss First Amendment rights - the balance between protecting free speech for the many and restricting hate speech for the few.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:06:48 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The First Amendment, Hate Speech and Hate Crimes</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>187</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ff5a738a-cfa9-11eb-92b9-47670cabf2f8/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The First Amendment, Hate Speech and Hate Crimes</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>When an 88-year old white supremacist walked into the Holocaust Museum in Washington DC opening fire, reaction was swift to question if this tragedy could have been prevented. And with those questions comes the examination of First Amendment rights. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome  Attorney Brian Cuban, a Dallas Attorney working for Mark Cuban Companies, Attorney Steve Freeman, Director of Legal Affairs for the Anti-Defamation League  and renowned trial lawyer and First Amendment lawyer, Attorney Martin Garbus, to discuss First Amendment rights - the balance between protecting free speech for the many and restricting hate speech for the few.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When an 88-year old white supremacist walked into the Holocaust Museum in Washington DC opening fire, reaction was swift to question if this tragedy could have been prevented. And with those questions comes the examination of First Amendment rights. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome  Attorney Brian Cuban, a Dallas Attorney working for Mark Cuban Companies, Attorney Steve Freeman, Director of Legal Affairs for the Anti-Defamation League  and renowned trial lawyer and First Amendment lawyer, Attorney Martin Garbus, to discuss First Amendment rights - the balance between protecting free speech for the many and restricting hate speech for the few.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1974</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/06/the-first-amendment-hate-speech-and-hate-crimes/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7154249083.mp3?updated=1624285514" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Job Insecurity at the Firm</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/06/job-insecurity-at-the-firm/</link>
      <description>Layoffs in the legal profession have been in the news lately, but downsizing from the top?  More experienced attorneys, even senior partners in some larger law firms are not as secure in their jobs as they once were in what may be more signs of practicing law as a business.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Ed Poll, a recognized expert and author in law practice management and Stephen E. Seckler, president of Seckler Legal Consulting, to discuss the new benchmarks the legal profession is seeing in job performance and what the business of law may look like in the future.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:10:48 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Job Insecurity at the Firm</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>186</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ff8d5de0-cfa9-11eb-92b9-bbf2eb1eb5c8/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Job Insecurity at the Firm</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Layoffs in the legal profession have been in the news lately, but downsizing from the top?  More experienced attorneys, even senior partners in some larger law firms are not as secure in their jobs as they once were in what may be more signs of practicing law as a business.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Ed Poll, a recognized expert and author in law practice management and Stephen E. Seckler, president of Seckler Legal Consulting, to discuss the new benchmarks the legal profession is seeing in job performance and what the business of law may look like in the future.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Layoffs in the legal profession have been in the news lately, but downsizing from the top?  More experienced attorneys, even senior partners in some larger law firms are not as secure in their jobs as they once were in what may be more signs of practicing law as a business.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Ed Poll, a recognized expert and author in law practice management and Stephen E. Seckler, president of Seckler Legal Consulting, to discuss the new benchmarks the legal profession is seeing in job performance and what the business of law may look like in the future.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2147</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/06/job-insecurity-at-the-firm/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5426706154.mp3?updated=1624285535" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>College Quarterback vs. EA Sports and NCAA</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/06/college-quarterback-vs-ea-sports-and-ncaa/</link>
      <description>This month, former Nebraska quarterback Sam Keller filed a lawsuit against EA Sports and its partner, the NCAA,  claiming they illegally used the likenesses of college athletes in video games without sharing profits with players. Bob Ambrogi  welcomes Peter Goplerud, Dean and Professor of Law at Florida Coastal School of Law and Clay Travis,  attorney, former editor at Deadspin.com and writer for FanHouse.com, to discuss the legal issues behind this lawsuit and how athlete's can legally protect their image.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:25:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>College Quarterback vs. EA Sports and NCAA</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>185</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ffbdb5e4-cfa9-11eb-92b9-c3fc91dae4ce/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>College Quarterback vs. EA Sports and NCAA</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This month, former Nebraska quarterback Sam Keller filed a lawsuit against EA Sports and its partner, the NCAA,  claiming they illegally used the likenesses of college athletes in video games without sharing profits with players. Bob Ambrogi  welcomes Peter Goplerud, Dean and Professor of Law at Florida Coastal School of Law and Clay Travis,  attorney, former editor at Deadspin.com and writer for FanHouse.com, to discuss the legal issues behind this lawsuit and how athlete's can legally protect their image.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[This month, former Nebraska quarterback Sam Keller filed a lawsuit against EA Sports and its partner, the NCAA,  claiming they illegally used the likenesses of college athletes in video games without sharing profits with players. Bob Ambrogi  welcomes Peter Goplerud, Dean and Professor of Law at Florida Coastal School of Law and Clay Travis,  attorney, former editor at Deadspin.com and writer for FanHouse.com, to discuss the legal issues behind this lawsuit and how athlete's can legally protect their image.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1955</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/06/college-quarterback-vs-ea-sports-and-ncaa/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6021172434.mp3?updated=1624285510" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Nomination of Sonia Sotomayor</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/05/the-nomination-of-sonia-sotomayor-2/</link>
      <description>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi discuss the Sotomayor nomination with Professor Jenny Rivera, Director of Center on Latino and Latina Rights and Equality and Professor of Law at CUNY School of Law, and Professor Stephen Wermiel, Supreme Court expert and adjunct professor at American University Washington College. Together they offer a unique perspective on this important nomination.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:46:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Nomination of Sonia Sotomayor</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>184</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ffe70c1e-cfa9-11eb-92b9-3378c5818ecf/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Nomination of Sonia Sotomayor</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi discuss the Sotomayor nomination with Professor Jenny Rivera, Director of Center on Latino and Latina Rights and Equality and Professor of Law at CUNY School of Law, and Professor Stephen Wermiel, Supreme Court expert and adjunct professor at American University Washington College. Together they offer a unique perspective on this important nomination.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi discuss the Sotomayor nomination with Professor Jenny Rivera, Director of Center on Latino and Latina Rights and Equality and Professor of Law at CUNY School of Law, and Professor Stephen Wermiel, Supreme Court expert and adjunct professor at American University Washington College. Together they offer a unique perspective on this important nomination.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2105</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/05/the-nomination-of-sonia-sotomayor-2/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8303118812.mp3?updated=1624285536" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Impact of the Recession on Law Firms and Lawyers</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/05/the-impact-of-the-recession-on-law-firms-and-lawyers/</link>
      <description>The economic downturn has taken its toll on law firms, especially lawyers.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Skip Simpson from the Law Offices of Skip Simpson  to explore the rash of suicides hitting the legal community and what law firms need to do to prevent them.  Later in the program, Bob and Craig welcome Peter Zeughauser from the Zeughauser Group to take a look at the long-term changes in law practice caused by the recession.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:01:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Impact of the Recession on Law Firms and Lawyers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>183</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/000cb798-cfaa-11eb-92b9-3344f7ba21a4/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Impact of the Recession on Law Firms and Lawyers</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The economic downturn has taken its toll on law firms, especially lawyers.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Skip Simpson from the Law Offices of Skip Simpson  to explore the rash of suicides hitting the legal community and what law firms need to do to prevent them.  Later in the program, Bob and Craig welcome Peter Zeughauser from the Zeughauser Group to take a look at the long-term changes in law practice caused by the recession.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The economic downturn has taken its toll on law firms, especially lawyers.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Skip Simpson from the Law Offices of Skip Simpson  to explore the rash of suicides hitting the legal community and what law firms need to do to prevent them.  Later in the program, Bob and Craig welcome Peter Zeughauser from the Zeughauser Group to take a look at the long-term changes in law practice caused by the recession.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2241</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/05/the-impact-of-the-recession-on-law-firms-and-lawyers/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5973679415.mp3?updated=1624285540" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Exploring Asbestos Litigation</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/05/exploring-asbestos-litigation/</link>
      <description>There has been a lot of talk in the mainstream media lately about a revival of sorts in asbestos litigation. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Kirk Hartley from the firm  Butler Rubin Saltarelli &amp; Boyd and Attorney Steven Kazan Managing Partner at Kazan, McClain, Abrams, Lyons, Greenwood &amp; Harley, to discuss the recent victory for W.R. Grace in a Montana trial, how attorneys have been filing cases in other states with friendlier courts and what is being done to put the asbestos litigation system on the right path.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:07:16 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Exploring Asbestos Litigation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>182</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/003ac6d8-cfaa-11eb-92b9-5b8398d03531/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Exploring Asbestos Litigation</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>There has been a lot of talk in the mainstream media lately about a revival of sorts in asbestos litigation. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Kirk Hartley from the firm  Butler Rubin Saltarelli &amp; Boyd and Attorney Steven Kazan Managing Partner at Kazan, McClain, Abrams, Lyons, Greenwood &amp; Harley, to discuss the recent victory for W.R. Grace in a Montana trial, how attorneys have been filing cases in other states with friendlier courts and what is being done to put the asbestos litigation system on the right path.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[There has been a lot of talk in the mainstream media lately about a revival of sorts in asbestos litigation. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Kirk Hartley from the firm  Butler Rubin Saltarelli &amp; Boyd and Attorney Steven Kazan Managing Partner at Kazan, McClain, Abrams, Lyons, Greenwood &amp; Harley, to discuss the recent victory for W.R. Grace in a Montana trial, how attorneys have been filing cases in other states with friendlier courts and what is being done to put the asbestos litigation system on the right path.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2078</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/05/exploring-asbestos-litigation/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9729206091.mp3?updated=1624285457" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Change for the U.S. Supreme Court</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/05/change-for-the-us-supreme-court/</link>
      <description>At the age of 69 and after 18 years on the Supreme Court,  Justice David Souter made the announcement that he would be retiring from the Supreme Court at the end of this year’s term in June.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Professor Daniel J. Meador, James Monroe Professor of Law Emeritus at the University of Virginia School of Law and Kermit Roosevelt, Professor of Law at University of Pennsylvania Law School and Justice Souter's former law clerk, to reflect on Justice Souter's career, look at the potential list of replacements and the opportunity for President Obama to leave an imprint with his choice for the High Court.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:25:33 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Change for the U.S. Supreme Court</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>181</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/00649120-cfaa-11eb-92b9-bb27cd5fa8dd/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Change for the U.S. Supreme Court</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>At the age of 69 and after 18 years on the Supreme Court,  Justice David Souter made the announcement that he would be retiring from the Supreme Court at the end of this year’s term in June.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Professor Daniel J. Meador, James Monroe Professor of Law Emeritus at the University of Virginia School of Law and Kermit Roosevelt, Professor of Law at University of Pennsylvania Law School and Justice Souter's former law clerk, to reflect on Justice Souter's career, look at the potential list of replacements and the opportunity for President Obama to leave an imprint with his choice for the High Court.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[At the age of 69 and after 18 years on the Supreme Court,  Justice David Souter made the announcement that he would be retiring from the Supreme Court at the end of this year’s term in June.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Professor Daniel J. Meador, James Monroe Professor of Law Emeritus at the University of Virginia School of Law and Kermit Roosevelt, Professor of Law at University of Pennsylvania Law School and Justice Souter's former law clerk, to reflect on Justice Souter's career, look at the potential list of replacements and the opportunity for President Obama to leave an imprint with his choice for the High Court.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1985</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/05/change-for-the-us-supreme-court/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6776010343.mp3?updated=1624285454" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Case Against a Pirate</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/04/legal-case-against-a-pirate/</link>
      <description>The first prosecution of a pirate in the U.S. in 100 years! The world watched closely as Richard Phillips, Captain of the Maersk Alabama cargo ship was rescued, after being held hostage by four Somali pirates.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome piracy law expert, Professor Samuel P. Menefee, Maury Fellow at University of Virgina’s Center for Ocean Law and Policy and Attorney Joseph R. McFaul from Sedgwick, Detert, Moran &amp; Arnold LLP and a retired Commander in the U.S. Coast Guard Reserve,  to explore the legal issues on the high seas surrounding the Somali pirates, the future of the captured pirate and how this case could be a deterrent in other incidents of piracy.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:17:06 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Case Against a Pirate</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>179</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/008e4948-cfaa-11eb-92b9-7bc23ff7e271/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Case Against a Pirate</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The first prosecution of a pirate in the U.S. in 100 years! The world watched closely as Richard Phillips, Captain of the Maersk Alabama cargo ship was rescued, after being held hostage by four Somali pirates.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome piracy law expert, Professor Samuel P. Menefee, Maury Fellow at University of Virgina’s Center for Ocean Law and Policy and Attorney Joseph R. McFaul from Sedgwick, Detert, Moran &amp; Arnold LLP and a retired Commander in the U.S. Coast Guard Reserve,  to explore the legal issues on the high seas surrounding the Somali pirates, the future of the captured pirate and how this case could be a deterrent in other incidents of piracy.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The first prosecution of a pirate in the U.S. in 100 years! The world watched closely as Richard Phillips, Captain of the Maersk Alabama cargo ship was rescued, after being held hostage by four Somali pirates.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome piracy law expert, Professor Samuel P. Menefee, Maury Fellow at University of Virgina’s Center for Ocean Law and Policy and Attorney Joseph R. McFaul from Sedgwick, Detert, Moran &amp; Arnold LLP and a retired Commander in the U.S. Coast Guard Reserve,  to explore the legal issues on the high seas surrounding the Somali pirates, the future of the captured pirate and how this case could be a deterrent in other incidents of piracy.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2108</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/04/legal-case-against-a-pirate/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6259133921.mp3?updated=1624285574" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Online Interference in the Jury Box</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/04/online-interference-in-the-jury-box/</link>
      <description>Jurors Twittering details of a trial. Jurors Googling information about a case. And last month, a Judge declaring a mistrial in a big federal drug case in Florida when jurors conducted research online.  On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, we're talking about the advances in technology, communication and information flow interfering with the justice system and the potential effect on 'trial by jury.' Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams welcomes jury behavior expert, Dr. Edward P. Schwartz, Attorney Peter Raben, defense attorney from Miami, Florida and Attorney Sean Ellsworth managing partner at Ellsworth Law Firm P.A, to discuss this hot legal topic.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:00:52 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Online Interference in the Jury Box</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>178</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/00b59a20-cfaa-11eb-92b9-7728265d1b57/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Online Interference in the Jury Box</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Jurors Twittering details of a trial. Jurors Googling information about a case. And last month, a Judge declaring a mistrial in a big federal drug case in Florida when jurors conducted research online.  On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, we're talking about the advances in technology, communication and information flow interfering with the justice system and the potential effect on 'trial by jury.' Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams welcomes jury behavior expert, Dr. Edward P. Schwartz, Attorney Peter Raben, defense attorney from Miami, Florida and Attorney Sean Ellsworth managing partner at Ellsworth Law Firm P.A, to discuss this hot legal topic.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Jurors Twittering details of a trial. Jurors Googling information about a case. And last month, a Judge declaring a mistrial in a big federal drug case in Florida when jurors conducted research online.  On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, we're talking about the advances in technology, communication and information flow interfering with the justice system and the potential effect on 'trial by jury.' Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams welcomes jury behavior expert, Dr. Edward P. Schwartz, Attorney Peter Raben, defense attorney from Miami, Florida and Attorney Sean Ellsworth managing partner at Ellsworth Law Firm P.A, to discuss this hot legal topic.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2135</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/04/online-interference-in-the-jury-box/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5680783830.mp3?updated=1624285542" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Software as a Service</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/04/software-as-a-service/</link>
      <description>If you've been hearing a lot about legal software as a service or SaaS lately, you'll want to listen to this Lawyer2Lawyer program. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Willliams with guests, Jack Newton, Co-founder and President of Clio, who holds an M.Sc. in Computer Science and Erik Mazzone, the Director of the Center for Practice Management for the North Carolina Bar Association to take an in-depth look at the advantages, disadvantages, risks and even ethical issues when it comes to legal (SaaS).</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:24:13 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Software as a Service</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>177</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/00d90866-cfaa-11eb-92b9-ebd169c47b87/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Software as a Service</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>If you've been hearing a lot about legal software as a service or SaaS lately, you'll want to listen to this Lawyer2Lawyer program. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Willliams with guests, Jack Newton, Co-founder and President of Clio, who holds an M.Sc. in Computer Science and Erik Mazzone, the Director of the Center for Practice Management for the North Carolina Bar Association to take an in-depth look at the advantages, disadvantages, risks and even ethical issues when it comes to legal (SaaS).</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[If you've been hearing a lot about legal software as a service or SaaS lately, you'll want to listen to this Lawyer2Lawyer program. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Willliams with guests, Jack Newton, Co-founder and President of Clio, who holds an M.Sc. in Computer Science and Erik Mazzone, the Director of the Center for Practice Management for the North Carolina Bar Association to take an in-depth look at the advantages, disadvantages, risks and even ethical issues when it comes to legal (SaaS).]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1972</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/04/software-as-a-service/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5725599947.mp3?updated=1623961940" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Both Sides of the Employee Free Choice Act Debate</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/04/both-sides-of-the-employee-free-choice-act-debate/</link>
      <description>There has been much debate as of late on the proposed Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) of 2009. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they welcome Professor Richard A. Epstein, Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School and Attorney Nancy Schiffer, Associate General Counsel with the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO),  to explore both sides of the Employee Free Choice Act debate and what the outcome would mean for the future of unions and employers and the lawyers who represent them.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:18:58 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Both Sides of the Employee Free Choice Act Debate</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>176</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0106d142-cfaa-11eb-92b9-c7260b6c196d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Both Sides of the Employee Free Choice Act Debate</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>There has been much debate as of late on the proposed Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) of 2009. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they welcome Professor Richard A. Epstein, Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School and Attorney Nancy Schiffer, Associate General Counsel with the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO),  to explore both sides of the Employee Free Choice Act debate and what the outcome would mean for the future of unions and employers and the lawyers who represent them.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[There has been much debate as of late on the proposed Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) of 2009. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they welcome Professor Richard A. Epstein, Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School and Attorney Nancy Schiffer, Associate General Counsel with the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO),  to explore both sides of the Employee Free Choice Act debate and what the outcome would mean for the future of unions and employers and the lawyers who represent them.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2187</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/04/both-sides-of-the-employee-free-choice-act-debate/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8605047166.mp3?updated=1624285564" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AIG Mess: Executive Contracts</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/03/aig-mess-executive-contracts/</link>
      <description>With outraged taxpayers reeling from AIG bonuses awarded to executives after a bailout, the question of executive contracts comes into play. Join Law.com blogger and co-host, Bob Ambrogi as he welcomes Franklin G. Snyder, Professor of Law at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law and editor-in-chief of ContractsProf Blog and Professor Deborah W. Post, the interim dean for Academic Affairs and Faculty Development at Touro Law Center, as they take a look at how the AIG case will provide precedent going forward and maybe even change the future of contracts.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:14:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>AIG Mess: Executive Contracts</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>175</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/01333df4-cfaa-11eb-92b9-5f34d7368c73/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>AIG Mess: Executive Contracts</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With outraged taxpayers reeling from AIG bonuses awarded to executives after a bailout, the question of executive contracts comes into play. Join Law.com blogger and co-host, Bob Ambrogi as he welcomes Franklin G. Snyder, Professor of Law at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law and editor-in-chief of ContractsProf Blog and Professor Deborah W. Post, the interim dean for Academic Affairs and Faculty Development at Touro Law Center, as they take a look at how the AIG case will provide precedent going forward and maybe even change the future of contracts.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[With outraged taxpayers reeling from AIG bonuses awarded to executives after a bailout, the question of executive contracts comes into play. Join Law.com blogger and co-host, Bob Ambrogi as he welcomes Franklin G. Snyder, Professor of Law at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law and editor-in-chief of ContractsProf Blog and Professor Deborah W. Post, the interim dean for Academic Affairs and Faculty Development at Touro Law Center, as they take a look at how the AIG case will provide precedent going forward and maybe even change the future of contracts.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2256</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/03/aig-mess-executive-contracts/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6604872386.mp3?updated=1624285558" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bernie Madoff: A Look Inside the Scandal</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/03/bernie-madoff-a-look-inside-the-scandal/</link>
      <description>While Bernie Madoff awaits sentencing for the largest Ponzi scheme in U.S. history, hear from one of his victims - Lawrence R. Velvel, Dean of the Massachusetts School of Law. Join Lawyer2Lawyer co-host, J. Craig Williams  as Dean Velvel tells his story and how he is turning his experience into activism, along with special guest, Attorney Ross B. Intelisano, partner of the law firm Rich &amp; Intelisano LLP, who represents other Madoff victims. They will take a look at the fate of the victims and who else could be involved.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:57:53 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Bernie Madoff: A Look Inside the Scandal</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>174</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/015bcb52-cfaa-11eb-92b9-4382f6bc63e3/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Bernie Madoff: A Look Inside the Scandal</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>While Bernie Madoff awaits sentencing for the largest Ponzi scheme in U.S. history, hear from one of his victims - Lawrence R. Velvel, Dean of the Massachusetts School of Law. Join Lawyer2Lawyer co-host, J. Craig Williams  as Dean Velvel tells his story and how he is turning his experience into activism, along with special guest, Attorney Ross B. Intelisano, partner of the law firm Rich &amp; Intelisano LLP, who represents other Madoff victims. They will take a look at the fate of the victims and who else could be involved.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[While Bernie Madoff awaits sentencing for the largest Ponzi scheme in U.S. history, hear from one of his victims - Lawrence R. Velvel, Dean of the Massachusetts School of Law. Join Lawyer2Lawyer co-host, J. Craig Williams  as Dean Velvel tells his story and how he is turning his experience into activism, along with special guest, Attorney Ross B. Intelisano, partner of the law firm Rich &amp; Intelisano LLP, who represents other Madoff victims. They will take a look at the fate of the victims and who else could be involved.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2321</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/03/bernie-madoff-a-look-inside-the-scandal/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2907582682.mp3?updated=1624285567" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Impact of SUPCO Ruling on Wyeth v. Levine</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/03/impact-of-supco-ruling-on-wyeth-v-levine/</link>
      <description>How will the pharmaceutical companies, doctors and patients and legal cases be impacted by the recent SUPCO ruling in the Wyeth v. Levine case?  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they welcome Wyeth’s attorney, Bert W. Rein, founding partner of the law firm, Wiley Rein LLP, to discuss the wide-reaching impact this ruling will have for many years to come.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:52:40 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Impact of SUPCO Ruling on Wyeth v. Levine</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>173</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/018ba71e-cfaa-11eb-92b9-2b368ed4ce5a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Impact of SUPCO Ruling on Wyeth v. Levine</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>How will the pharmaceutical companies, doctors and patients and legal cases be impacted by the recent SUPCO ruling in the Wyeth v. Levine case?  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they welcome Wyeth’s attorney, Bert W. Rein, founding partner of the law firm, Wiley Rein LLP, to discuss the wide-reaching impact this ruling will have for many years to come.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How will the pharmaceutical companies, doctors and patients and legal cases be impacted by the recent SUPCO ruling in the Wyeth v. Levine case?  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they welcome Wyeth’s attorney, Bert W. Rein, founding partner of the law firm, Wiley Rein LLP, to discuss the wide-reaching impact this ruling will have for many years to come.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2038</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/03/impact-of-supco-ruling-on-wyeth-v-levine/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3174801585.mp3?updated=1623961941" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Paralegals in a Down Economy</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/03/paralegals-in-a-down-economy/</link>
      <description>Layoffs at law firms and the recession seem to be putting a heavier load on paralegals to assist busy attorneys. Many paralegals are taking on huge projects, while working long hours and burning the midnight oil. Join Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi , with guests, Linda J. Wolf, ACP the current President of NALA and Christine Parizo a PACE Registered Paralegal who writes the blog, “A Paralegal’s Blog”, to discuss the work of a paralegal through the present economic crisis.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:58:42 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Paralegals in a Down Economy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>172</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/01b5594c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-abdb99fb4164/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Paralegals in a Down Economy</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Layoffs at law firms and the recession seem to be putting a heavier load on paralegals to assist busy attorneys. Many paralegals are taking on huge projects, while working long hours and burning the midnight oil. Join Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi , with guests, Linda J. Wolf, ACP the current President of NALA and Christine Parizo a PACE Registered Paralegal who writes the blog, “A Paralegal’s Blog”, to discuss the work of a paralegal through the present economic crisis.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Layoffs at law firms and the recession seem to be putting a heavier load on paralegals to assist busy attorneys. Many paralegals are taking on huge projects, while working long hours and burning the midnight oil. Join Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi , with guests, Linda J. Wolf, ACP the current President of NALA and Christine Parizo a PACE Registered Paralegal who writes the blog, “A Paralegal’s Blog”, to discuss the work of a paralegal through the present economic crisis.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1890</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/03/paralegals-in-a-down-economy/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9557234184.mp3?updated=1624285550" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Life After Lawyering</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/02/life-after-lawyering/</link>
      <description>Freezing salaries and even layoffs are a couple ways firms are dealing with their present economic situation, while law students look ahead to a potentially grim future. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J . Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi ,as they welcome William D. Henderson, Associate Professor of Law at Indiana University Maurer School of Law and Attorney Paul J. Semenza, a Trial Attorney, formerly with the Law Office of Arthur E. Levine,  to discuss life after lawyering. They will hear a real life story from a trial attorney who has experienced the ups and downs after a layoff and look at the present economy and its impact on law firms, large &amp; small.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:29:54 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Life After Lawyering</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>171</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/01dc1bfe-cfaa-11eb-92b9-cbbc68f8be44/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Life After Lawyering</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Freezing salaries and even layoffs are a couple ways firms are dealing with their present economic situation, while law students look ahead to a potentially grim future. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J . Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi ,as they welcome William D. Henderson, Associate Professor of Law at Indiana University Maurer School of Law and Attorney Paul J. Semenza, a Trial Attorney, formerly with the Law Office of Arthur E. Levine,  to discuss life after lawyering. They will hear a real life story from a trial attorney who has experienced the ups and downs after a layoff and look at the present economy and its impact on law firms, large &amp; small.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Freezing salaries and even layoffs are a couple ways firms are dealing with their present economic situation, while law students look ahead to a potentially grim future. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J . Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi ,as they welcome William D. Henderson, Associate Professor of Law at Indiana University Maurer School of Law and Attorney Paul J. Semenza, a Trial Attorney, formerly with the Law Office of Arthur E. Levine,  to discuss life after lawyering. They will hear a real life story from a trial attorney who has experienced the ups and downs after a layoff and look at the present economy and its impact on law firms, large &amp; small.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2036</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/02/life-after-lawyering/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9039653290.mp3?updated=1624285560" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Celebrating Abraham Lincoln</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/02/celebrating-abraham-lincoln/</link>
      <description>Abraham Lincoln has become synonymous with the American Civil War and the abolition of slavery.  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi , as they welcome Lincoln historians Professor Paul Finkelman from the Albany Law School and Professor Jennifer L. Weber, assistant professor of history at the University of Kansas, to discuss the legacy of the first Republican president on his 200th birthday.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:39:41 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Celebrating Abraham Lincoln</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>170</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0202f7f6-cfaa-11eb-92b9-1f8a015274ac/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Celebrating Abraham Lincoln</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Abraham Lincoln has become synonymous with the American Civil War and the abolition of slavery.  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi , as they welcome Lincoln historians Professor Paul Finkelman from the Albany Law School and Professor Jennifer L. Weber, assistant professor of history at the University of Kansas, to discuss the legacy of the first Republican president on his 200th birthday.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Abraham Lincoln has become synonymous with the American Civil War and the abolition of slavery.  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi , as they welcome Lincoln historians Professor Paul Finkelman from the Albany Law School and Professor Jennifer L. Weber, assistant professor of history at the University of Kansas, to discuss the legacy of the first Republican president on his 200th birthday.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2379</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/02/celebrating-abraham-lincoln/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6841318831.mp3?updated=1624285463" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/02/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg/</link>
      <description>Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently underwent surgery for "early-stage" pancreatic cancer. While everyone is concerned about Justice Ginsburg’s health first, there is also speculation about a possible opening on the U.S. Supreme Court if she retires early. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi along with Attorney Patricia A. Millett from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld and contributor to the SCOTUSblog and Professor Cruz Reynoso from UC Davis School of Law, to discuss the impact on the high court and how the Obama adminstration would fill a possible vacancy.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:53:52 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>169</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/02250dd2-cfaa-11eb-92b9-97a765ef0b20/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently underwent surgery for "early-stage" pancreatic cancer. While everyone is concerned about Justice Ginsburg’s health first, there is also speculation about a possible opening on the U.S. Supreme Court if she retires early. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi along with Attorney Patricia A. Millett from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld and contributor to the SCOTUSblog and Professor Cruz Reynoso from UC Davis School of Law, to discuss the impact on the high court and how the Obama adminstration would fill a possible vacancy.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently underwent surgery for "early-stage" pancreatic cancer. While everyone is concerned about Justice Ginsburg’s health first, there is also speculation about a possible opening on the U.S. Supreme Court if she retires early. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi along with Attorney Patricia A. Millett from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld and contributor to the SCOTUSblog and Professor Cruz Reynoso from UC Davis School of Law, to discuss the impact on the high court and how the Obama adminstration would fill a possible vacancy.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2364</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/02/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7442513086.mp3?updated=1624285461" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LegalTech NY 2009 Ten Tech Stars</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/02/legaltech-ny-2009-ten-tech-stars/</link>
      <description>Want to know what's hot in technology from LegalTech NY 2009? Join Law.com hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi , as Bob reports from Legal Tech NY 2009. Bob will walk the floors of LegalTech NY, check out the latest in technology and fill us in on the stand-out tech stars!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:55:22 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>LegalTech NY 2009 Ten Tech Stars</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>168</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/024e6a6a-cfaa-11eb-92b9-4b6a4a9c66b1/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>LegalTech NY 2009 Ten Tech Stars</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Want to know what's hot in technology from LegalTech NY 2009? Join Law.com hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi , as Bob reports from Legal Tech NY 2009. Bob will walk the floors of LegalTech NY, check out the latest in technology and fill us in on the stand-out tech stars!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Want to know what's hot in technology from LegalTech NY 2009? Join Law.com hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi , as Bob reports from Legal Tech NY 2009. Bob will walk the floors of LegalTech NY, check out the latest in technology and fill us in on the stand-out tech stars!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1564</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/02/legaltech-ny-2009-ten-tech-stars/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4837408906.mp3?updated=1624285535" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Implications of Guantanamo</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/01/the-legal-implications-of-guantanamo/</link>
      <description>President Obama and his administration have quickly implemented changes in a lot of categories including the closing of Guantanamo. Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Aziz Huq, Deputy Director from the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, to discuss the legal implications surrounding the closing of Guantanamo, discuss the fear of critics and the future of the detainees.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:59:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Implications of Guantanamo</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>167</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0282695a-cfaa-11eb-92b9-4f07fb5982f7/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Legal Implications of Guantanamo</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>President Obama and his administration have quickly implemented changes in a lot of categories including the closing of Guantanamo. Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Aziz Huq, Deputy Director from the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, to discuss the legal implications surrounding the closing of Guantanamo, discuss the fear of critics and the future of the detainees.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[President Obama and his administration have quickly implemented changes in a lot of categories including the closing of Guantanamo. Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams welcomes Attorney Aziz Huq, Deputy Director from the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, to discuss the legal implications surrounding the closing of Guantanamo, discuss the fear of critics and the future of the detainees.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2065</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/01/the-legal-implications-of-guantanamo/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3592662662.mp3?updated=1624285557" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Aftermath of the TVA Disaster</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/01/the-aftermath-of-the-tva-disaster/</link>
      <description>On December 22, 2008, there was a major coal ash spill at the Tennessee Valley Authority's Kingston Fossil Plant, which poured 1.1 billion gallons of toxic material over 300 acres. Join Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams as he turns to the experts, Attorney Robin Greenwald, head of Weitz &amp; Luxenberg's Environmental Toxic Tort practice and Attorney Lisa Evans from Earthjustice, as they discuss the aftermath of this disaster. They will take a look at the TVA disaster, environmental litigation and get a first-hand account of the damage and the effect on the surrounding residents.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:10:19 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Aftermath of the TVA Disaster</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>166</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/02c52984-cfaa-11eb-92b9-e3614a21f822/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Aftermath of the TVA Disaster</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On December 22, 2008, there was a major coal ash spill at the Tennessee Valley Authority's Kingston Fossil Plant, which poured 1.1 billion gallons of toxic material over 300 acres. Join Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams as he turns to the experts, Attorney Robin Greenwald, head of Weitz &amp; Luxenberg's Environmental Toxic Tort practice and Attorney Lisa Evans from Earthjustice, as they discuss the aftermath of this disaster. They will take a look at the TVA disaster, environmental litigation and get a first-hand account of the damage and the effect on the surrounding residents.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On December 22, 2008, there was a major coal ash spill at the Tennessee Valley Authority's Kingston Fossil Plant, which poured 1.1 billion gallons of toxic material over 300 acres. Join Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams as he turns to the experts, Attorney Robin Greenwald, head of Weitz &amp; Luxenberg's Environmental Toxic Tort practice and Attorney Lisa Evans from Earthjustice, as they discuss the aftermath of this disaster. They will take a look at the TVA disaster, environmental litigation and get a first-hand account of the damage and the effect on the surrounding residents.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2284</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/01/the-aftermath-of-the-tva-disaster/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4162621464.mp3?updated=1624285459" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Pros &amp; Cons of Twitter</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/01/the-pros-cons-of-twitter/</link>
      <description>The stand-out free social networking and micro-blogging service, Twitter, has been praised and shunned by legal professionals. What do YOU think?  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Kevin O’Keefe, CEO of LexBlog and Owner of LexMonitor and Attorney Scott Greenfield who writes the blog, Simple Justice, to discuss the pros and cons of Twitter and discuss whether it is a phenomenon or a necessity for lawyers and law firms.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:42:14 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Pros &amp; Cons of Twitter</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>165</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/02eb9e70-cfaa-11eb-92b9-17420f671f39/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Pros &amp; Cons of Twitter</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The stand-out free social networking and micro-blogging service, Twitter, has been praised and shunned by legal professionals. What do YOU think?  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Kevin O’Keefe, CEO of LexBlog and Owner of LexMonitor and Attorney Scott Greenfield who writes the blog, Simple Justice, to discuss the pros and cons of Twitter and discuss whether it is a phenomenon or a necessity for lawyers and law firms.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The stand-out free social networking and micro-blogging service, Twitter, has been praised and shunned by legal professionals. What do YOU think?  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Kevin O’Keefe, CEO of LexBlog and Owner of LexMonitor and Attorney Scott Greenfield who writes the blog, Simple Justice, to discuss the pros and cons of Twitter and discuss whether it is a phenomenon or a necessity for lawyers and law firms.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2289</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/01/the-pros-cons-of-twitter/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7734462910.mp3?updated=1624285470" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Top Legal Stories and Stand-Out Attorneys of 2008</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/01/the-top-legal-stories-and-stand-out-attorneys-of-2008/</link>
      <description>2008 brought a lot of legal stories into the headlines, from the dismal economy affecting law firms to the always controversial Supreme Court rulings. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, along with the editors from two of the most prominent legal publications, Edward Adams, editor and publisher of the ABA Journal and Steven Fromm, Editor-in-Chief of the National Law Journal, to discuss the top legal stories of 2008, standout lawyers  from the year gone by and look ahead to what may be on the horizon for 2009.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:12:44 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Top Legal Stories and Stand-Out Attorneys of 2008</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>164</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/03184d12-cfaa-11eb-92b9-47a12f126c4f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Top Legal Stories and Stand-Out Attorneys of 2008</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>2008 brought a lot of legal stories into the headlines, from the dismal economy affecting law firms to the always controversial Supreme Court rulings. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, along with the editors from two of the most prominent legal publications, Edward Adams, editor and publisher of the ABA Journal and Steven Fromm, Editor-in-Chief of the National Law Journal, to discuss the top legal stories of 2008, standout lawyers  from the year gone by and look ahead to what may be on the horizon for 2009.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[2008 brought a lot of legal stories into the headlines, from the dismal economy affecting law firms to the always controversial Supreme Court rulings. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, along with the editors from two of the most prominent legal publications, Edward Adams, editor and publisher of the ABA Journal and Steven Fromm, Editor-in-Chief of the National Law Journal, to discuss the top legal stories of 2008, standout lawyers  from the year gone by and look ahead to what may be on the horizon for 2009.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2495</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2009/01/the-top-legal-stories-and-stand-out-attorneys-of-2008/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3493803116.mp3?updated=1624285462" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Predictions 2009</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/12/predictions-2009/</link>
      <description>What a year it has been! From the economic crisis, to the auto industry bailout, foreclosures, the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the election of Barack Obama and many important court decisions. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, as they welcome returning guest and prediction guru, Stephen L. Kaplan, partner in the Orange County California office of Hicks, Mims, Kaplan and Burns to discuss his 2009 Predictions and you'll find out his track record!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:43:13 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Predictions 2009</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>163</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/03577c1c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-73a70b76e166/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Predictions 2009</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What a year it has been! From the economic crisis, to the auto industry bailout, foreclosures, the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the election of Barack Obama and many important court decisions. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, as they welcome returning guest and prediction guru, Stephen L. Kaplan, partner in the Orange County California office of Hicks, Mims, Kaplan and Burns to discuss his 2009 Predictions and you'll find out his track record!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What a year it has been! From the economic crisis, to the auto industry bailout, foreclosures, the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the election of Barack Obama and many important court decisions. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, as they welcome returning guest and prediction guru, Stephen L. Kaplan, partner in the Orange County California office of Hicks, Mims, Kaplan and Burns to discuss his 2009 Predictions and you'll find out his track record!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2281</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/12/predictions-2009/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3585225348.mp3?updated=1624285574" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The "So-Called Death" of the Billable Hour</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/12/the-so-called-death-of-the-billable-hour/</link>
      <description>For about 50 years the ‘billable hour’ has been a dominant feature of the legal profession. Coined by some as the “cockroach of the legal world,” many argue that it’s all about the ‘quality’ of time spent on a client, not ‘quantity’. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, as they welcome Attorney Stewart Weltman from the Weltman Law Firm to discuss the status of the ‘billable hour’. They talk about the shift in legal billing practices and reaction from the legal community.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:26:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The "So-Called Death" of the Billable Hour</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>162</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/037f06f6-cfaa-11eb-92b9-2f1138f95eb1/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The "So-Called Death" of the Billable Hour</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For about 50 years the ‘billable hour’ has been a dominant feature of the legal profession. Coined by some as the “cockroach of the legal world,” many argue that it’s all about the ‘quality’ of time spent on a client, not ‘quantity’. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, as they welcome Attorney Stewart Weltman from the Weltman Law Firm to discuss the status of the ‘billable hour’. They talk about the shift in legal billing practices and reaction from the legal community.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[For about 50 years the ‘billable hour’ has been a dominant feature of the legal profession. Coined by some as the “cockroach of the legal world,” many argue that it’s all about the ‘quality’ of time spent on a client, not ‘quantity’. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, as they welcome Attorney Stewart Weltman from the Weltman Law Firm to discuss the status of the ‘billable hour’. They talk about the shift in legal billing practices and reaction from the legal community.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2160</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/12/the-so-called-death-of-the-billable-hour/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6377735463.mp3?updated=1624285457" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Controversy Surrounding Gardasil</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/12/the-controversy-surrounding-gardasil/</link>
      <description>You may have heard about the Gardasil vaccine for teenage girls, but you may not have heard about the serious side effects, allegedly affecting some young women.  Merck, the company that manufactures the vaccine, the CDC and the FDA all say Gardasil is safe, effective, and important. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, who will discuss this controversy and the litigation swirling around Gardasil with experts, Attorney Tom Girardi, nationally known plaintiff lawyer from the California firm, Girardi &amp; Keese and Erin Brockovich, (yes the real Erin Brockovich from the movie by the same name), President of Brockovich Research &amp; Consulting. They will take a look at the side effects in some cases, Gardasil litigation and focus in on the efforts to educate young women about this controversial vaccine.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:03:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Controversy Surrounding Gardasil</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>161</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/03a56f1c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-db9a96f26151/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Controversy Surrounding Gardasil</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>You may have heard about the Gardasil vaccine for teenage girls, but you may not have heard about the serious side effects, allegedly affecting some young women.  Merck, the company that manufactures the vaccine, the CDC and the FDA all say Gardasil is safe, effective, and important. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, who will discuss this controversy and the litigation swirling around Gardasil with experts, Attorney Tom Girardi, nationally known plaintiff lawyer from the California firm, Girardi &amp; Keese and Erin Brockovich, (yes the real Erin Brockovich from the movie by the same name), President of Brockovich Research &amp; Consulting. They will take a look at the side effects in some cases, Gardasil litigation and focus in on the efforts to educate young women about this controversial vaccine.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[You may have heard about the Gardasil vaccine for teenage girls, but you may not have heard about the serious side effects, allegedly affecting some young women.  Merck, the company that manufactures the vaccine, the CDC and the FDA all say Gardasil is safe, effective, and important. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, who will discuss this controversy and the litigation swirling around Gardasil with experts, Attorney Tom Girardi, nationally known plaintiff lawyer from the California firm, Girardi &amp; Keese and Erin Brockovich, (yes the real Erin Brockovich from the movie by the same name), President of Brockovich Research &amp; Consulting. They will take a look at the side effects in some cases, Gardasil litigation and focus in on the efforts to educate young women about this controversial vaccine.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2288</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/12/the-controversy-surrounding-gardasil/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4954944586.mp3?updated=1623961950" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Diversity in the Legal Profession</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/12/diversity-in-the-legal-profession/</link>
      <description>People are making a difference in the legal community. The American Bar Association Commission on Racial and Ethnic Diversity in the Profession recently announced their selection of judges, lawyers, a legislator and a law professor to receive the 2009 Spirit of Excellence Awards, honoring efforts to promote a more diverse legal profession. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Fred Alvarez, chair of the ABA Commission on Opportunities for Racial and Ethnic Minorities in the Profession and award recipients Attorney Richard A. Soden, of counsel to the Boston office of the national law firm of Goodwin Procter LLP and Justice Dan Sosa Jr., retired Justice of the New Mexico Supreme Court, to talk about diversity in the legal profession. They will discuss the progress over the years, how they have overcome barriers and made opportunities available to others and how they encourage young people to pursue law as a career.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:39:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Diversity in the Legal Profession</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>160</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/03c50ade-cfaa-11eb-92b9-ef76d5d75072/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Diversity in the Legal Profession</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>People are making a difference in the legal community. The American Bar Association Commission on Racial and Ethnic Diversity in the Profession recently announced their selection of judges, lawyers, a legislator and a law professor to receive the 2009 Spirit of Excellence Awards, honoring efforts to promote a more diverse legal profession. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Fred Alvarez, chair of the ABA Commission on Opportunities for Racial and Ethnic Minorities in the Profession and award recipients Attorney Richard A. Soden, of counsel to the Boston office of the national law firm of Goodwin Procter LLP and Justice Dan Sosa Jr., retired Justice of the New Mexico Supreme Court, to talk about diversity in the legal profession. They will discuss the progress over the years, how they have overcome barriers and made opportunities available to others and how they encourage young people to pursue law as a career.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[People are making a difference in the legal community. The American Bar Association Commission on Racial and Ethnic Diversity in the Profession recently announced their selection of judges, lawyers, a legislator and a law professor to receive the 2009 Spirit of Excellence Awards, honoring efforts to promote a more diverse legal profession. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Fred Alvarez, chair of the ABA Commission on Opportunities for Racial and Ethnic Minorities in the Profession and award recipients Attorney Richard A. Soden, of counsel to the Boston office of the national law firm of Goodwin Procter LLP and Justice Dan Sosa Jr., retired Justice of the New Mexico Supreme Court, to talk about diversity in the legal profession. They will discuss the progress over the years, how they have overcome barriers and made opportunities available to others and how they encourage young people to pursue law as a career.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2267</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/12/diversity-in-the-legal-profession/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2709805527.mp3?updated=1624285559" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Economy's Effect on UK Law Firms</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/12/the-economys-effect-on-uk-law-firms/</link>
      <description>The failing economy is having an impact on law firms and not just in the U.S. Firms are cutting staff, scrapping bonuses and some law firms are even collapsing. Across the pond in the UK, law firms are facing similar troubles.   Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, welcome Ronnie Fox, Principal of the UK law firm Fox and Jonathan Fagan, Solicitor and Managing Director of Ten Percent Legal Recruitment, also in the UK, to talk about how the present economic crisis is affecting not only law firms here, but firms in the UK.  They will discuss the obstacles that UK law firms face and what needs to be done to get through these hard times.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:30:54 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Economy's Effect on UK Law Firms</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>159</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/03e4bc80-cfaa-11eb-92b9-ff6c3f07ecf6/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Economy's Effect on UK Law Firms</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The failing economy is having an impact on law firms and not just in the U.S. Firms are cutting staff, scrapping bonuses and some law firms are even collapsing. Across the pond in the UK, law firms are facing similar troubles.   Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, welcome Ronnie Fox, Principal of the UK law firm Fox and Jonathan Fagan, Solicitor and Managing Director of Ten Percent Legal Recruitment, also in the UK, to talk about how the present economic crisis is affecting not only law firms here, but firms in the UK.  They will discuss the obstacles that UK law firms face and what needs to be done to get through these hard times.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The failing economy is having an impact on law firms and not just in the U.S. Firms are cutting staff, scrapping bonuses and some law firms are even collapsing. Across the pond in the UK, law firms are facing similar troubles.   Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, welcome Ronnie Fox, Principal of the UK law firm Fox and Jonathan Fagan, Solicitor and Managing Director of Ten Percent Legal Recruitment, also in the UK, to talk about how the present economic crisis is affecting not only law firms here, but firms in the UK.  They will discuss the obstacles that UK law firms face and what needs to be done to get through these hard times.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2071</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/12/the-economys-effect-on-uk-law-firms/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4658558023.mp3?updated=1624285560" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Corporate Governance: In Need of Reform?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/11/corporate-governance-in-need-of-reform/</link>
      <description>It was only six years ago that Sarbanes-Oxley was passed by Congress with the intent on restoring public confidence after corporate scandals affected companies like Enron. However in light of recent bailout requests from AIG, Citigroup and now GM, the focus is once again on more stringent corporate governance. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi with special guests Mary Mack, Corporate Technology Counsel at Fios, Inc and Professor Nancy Rapoport, Gordon &amp; Silver, Ltd. Professor at the William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Together they look at this important new phase of corporate governance.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:39:03 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Corporate Governance: In Need of Reform?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>158</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/04088fca-cfaa-11eb-92b9-336c2d694bd2/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Corporate Governance: In Need of Reform?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It was only six years ago that Sarbanes-Oxley was passed by Congress with the intent on restoring public confidence after corporate scandals affected companies like Enron. However in light of recent bailout requests from AIG, Citigroup and now GM, the focus is once again on more stringent corporate governance. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi with special guests Mary Mack, Corporate Technology Counsel at Fios, Inc and Professor Nancy Rapoport, Gordon &amp; Silver, Ltd. Professor at the William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Together they look at this important new phase of corporate governance.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[It was only six years ago that Sarbanes-Oxley was passed by Congress with the intent on restoring public confidence after corporate scandals affected companies like Enron. However in light of recent bailout requests from AIG, Citigroup and now GM, the focus is once again on more stringent corporate governance. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi with special guests Mary Mack, Corporate Technology Counsel at Fios, Inc and Professor Nancy Rapoport, Gordon &amp; Silver, Ltd. Professor at the William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Together they look at this important new phase of corporate governance.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2052</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/11/corporate-governance-in-need-of-reform/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3023514226.mp3?updated=1624285539" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Economic Bailout: Options &amp; Legal Perspectives</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/11/economic-bailout-options-legal-perspectives/</link>
      <description>Bailout or bankruptcy for the U.S. automakers to the tune of 25-Billion? Law. com blogger and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes experts, Professor Eugene F. Fama, the Robert R. McCormick Distinguished Service Professor of Finance at the University of Chicago, Booth School of Business, Attorney Andrew Z. Schwartz,head of the Bankruptcy and Restructuring Group, at Foley Hoag LLP and Attorney Lisa C. Wood, Partner and Co-Chair of Securities and Corporate Disputes Practice,at Foley Hoag LLP, to discuss the economic and legal options and consequences.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:04:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Economic Bailout: Options &amp; Legal Perspectives</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>157</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0431fc5c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-8b076b9fc460/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Economic Bailout: Options &amp; Legal Perspectives</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Bailout or bankruptcy for the U.S. automakers to the tune of 25-Billion? Law. com blogger and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes experts, Professor Eugene F. Fama, the Robert R. McCormick Distinguished Service Professor of Finance at the University of Chicago, Booth School of Business, Attorney Andrew Z. Schwartz,head of the Bankruptcy and Restructuring Group, at Foley Hoag LLP and Attorney Lisa C. Wood, Partner and Co-Chair of Securities and Corporate Disputes Practice,at Foley Hoag LLP, to discuss the economic and legal options and consequences.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Bailout or bankruptcy for the U.S. automakers to the tune of 25-Billion? Law. com blogger and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes experts, Professor Eugene F. Fama, the Robert R. McCormick Distinguished Service Professor of Finance at the University of Chicago, Booth School of Business, Attorney Andrew Z. Schwartz,head of the Bankruptcy and Restructuring Group, at Foley Hoag LLP and Attorney Lisa C. Wood, Partner and Co-Chair of Securities and Corporate Disputes Practice,at Foley Hoag LLP, to discuss the economic and legal options and consequences.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2106</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/11/economic-bailout-options-legal-perspectives/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8763940182.mp3?updated=1624285456" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Public Defenders' Side of Justice</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/11/public-defenders-side-of-justice/</link>
      <description>It takes a special kind of lawyer to be a public defender today. Case overload is just one issue causing seven Public Defender's offices across the country to refuse to take on new cases or sue to limit their workload. Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida in Miami-Dade County and David Carroll, Director of Research for the National Legal Aid &amp; Defender Association (NLADA) to take a look at the state of the public defender system.  They will discuss the common issues that public defenders are struggling with, the effect on defendants and what is being done to faciliate the process and put the quality back into public representation.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:41:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Public Defenders' Side of Justice</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>156</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/04585d0c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-2ba248785866/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Public Defenders' Side of Justice</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It takes a special kind of lawyer to be a public defender today. Case overload is just one issue causing seven Public Defender's offices across the country to refuse to take on new cases or sue to limit their workload. Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida in Miami-Dade County and David Carroll, Director of Research for the National Legal Aid &amp; Defender Association (NLADA) to take a look at the state of the public defender system.  They will discuss the common issues that public defenders are struggling with, the effect on defendants and what is being done to faciliate the process and put the quality back into public representation.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[It takes a special kind of lawyer to be a public defender today. Case overload is just one issue causing seven Public Defender's offices across the country to refuse to take on new cases or sue to limit their workload. Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida in Miami-Dade County and David Carroll, Director of Research for the National Legal Aid &amp; Defender Association (NLADA) to take a look at the state of the public defender system.  They will discuss the common issues that public defenders are struggling with, the effect on defendants and what is being done to faciliate the process and put the quality back into public representation.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2340</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/11/public-defenders-side-of-justice/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4031536409.mp3?updated=1624285454" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Business Case of the Century: Wyeth V. Levine</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/11/the-business-case-of-the-century-wyeth-v-levine/</link>
      <description>This week, the highly publicized case of Wyeth V. Levine came before the Supreme Court. The case involves Diana Levine, who lost her arm to gangrene due to an IV push with the drug, Phenergen. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, welcome Attorney Michael A. Ferrara, Jr. from the Ferrara Law firm and Attorney James Beck from the firm Dechert LLP and blogger for Drug and Device Law Blog, to discuss this big case. They will will look at Wyeth v. Levine, discuss the power of the FDA, federal pre-emption and what the upcoming ruling means for the future of Pharmaceutical companies and the FDA.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:07:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Business Case of the Century: Wyeth V. Levine</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>155</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/047c9afa-cfaa-11eb-92b9-8370f29d0a54/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Business Case of the Century: Wyeth V. Levine</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week, the highly publicized case of Wyeth V. Levine came before the Supreme Court. The case involves Diana Levine, who lost her arm to gangrene due to an IV push with the drug, Phenergen. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, welcome Attorney Michael A. Ferrara, Jr. from the Ferrara Law firm and Attorney James Beck from the firm Dechert LLP and blogger for Drug and Device Law Blog, to discuss this big case. They will will look at Wyeth v. Levine, discuss the power of the FDA, federal pre-emption and what the upcoming ruling means for the future of Pharmaceutical companies and the FDA.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week, the highly publicized case of Wyeth V. Levine came before the Supreme Court. The case involves Diana Levine, who lost her arm to gangrene due to an IV push with the drug, Phenergen. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, welcome Attorney Michael A. Ferrara, Jr. from the Ferrara Law firm and Attorney James Beck from the firm Dechert LLP and blogger for Drug and Device Law Blog, to discuss this big case. They will will look at Wyeth v. Levine, discuss the power of the FDA, federal pre-emption and what the upcoming ruling means for the future of Pharmaceutical companies and the FDA.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2197</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/11/the-business-case-of-the-century-wyeth-v-levine/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6340148283.mp3?updated=1624285554" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Social Media, Twitter &amp; Law Firms</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/10/social-media-twitter-law-firms/</link>
      <description>Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook-social networking has hit the mainstream. How about in the legal community? Some firms look at social networking as a great PR tool for business, where others fear it. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome experts, Brian Carter, keynote speaker and Director of Search Engine Marketing (PPC), SEO, and Social Media at Fuel Interactive and Heather M. Milligan, Director of Marketing at Barger &amp; Wolen LLP. They will explore Twitter, discuss why some lawyers are skeptical of Web 2.0. and take a look at how networking sites can be a marketing and business tool.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:26:38 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Social Media, Twitter &amp; Law Firms</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>154</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/04a4d3e4-cfaa-11eb-92b9-477f3f946b67/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Social Media, Twitter &amp; Law Firms</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook-social networking has hit the mainstream. How about in the legal community? Some firms look at social networking as a great PR tool for business, where others fear it. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome experts, Brian Carter, keynote speaker and Director of Search Engine Marketing (PPC), SEO, and Social Media at Fuel Interactive and Heather M. Milligan, Director of Marketing at Barger &amp; Wolen LLP. They will explore Twitter, discuss why some lawyers are skeptical of Web 2.0. and take a look at how networking sites can be a marketing and business tool.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook-social networking has hit the mainstream. How about in the legal community? Some firms look at social networking as a great PR tool for business, where others fear it. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome experts, Brian Carter, keynote speaker and Director of Search Engine Marketing (PPC), SEO, and Social Media at Fuel Interactive and Heather M. Milligan, Director of Marketing at Barger &amp; Wolen LLP. They will explore Twitter, discuss why some lawyers are skeptical of Web 2.0. and take a look at how networking sites can be a marketing and business tool.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2068</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/10/social-media-twitter-law-firms/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7356322956.mp3?updated=1624285453" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Voter Fraud &amp; Election Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/10/voter-fraud-election-law/</link>
      <description>Voter fraud, faulty equipment, voter purges, 3rd party registration problems-These are just some of the issues plaguing elections past and present. Law.com blogger and host, J. Craig Williams welcome experts, Attorney Brenda Wright, Legal Director of Demos, and Attorney Edward Still a Birmingham lawyer who specializes in voting law and founder of the blog, Votelaw.com. They will discuss legal issues surrounding voter’s rights, voter fraud, election litigation and what can and can't be done to recruit voters.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:10:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Voter Fraud &amp; Election Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>153</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/04e4abfe-cfaa-11eb-92b9-fbb0ee920fa5/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Voter Fraud &amp; Election Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Voter fraud, faulty equipment, voter purges, 3rd party registration problems-These are just some of the issues plaguing elections past and present. Law.com blogger and host, J. Craig Williams welcome experts, Attorney Brenda Wright, Legal Director of Demos, and Attorney Edward Still a Birmingham lawyer who specializes in voting law and founder of the blog, Votelaw.com. They will discuss legal issues surrounding voter’s rights, voter fraud, election litigation and what can and can't be done to recruit voters.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Voter fraud, faulty equipment, voter purges, 3rd party registration problems-These are just some of the issues plaguing elections past and present. Law.com blogger and host, J. Craig Williams welcome experts, Attorney Brenda Wright, Legal Director of Demos, and Attorney Edward Still a Birmingham lawyer who specializes in voting law and founder of the blog, Votelaw.com. They will discuss legal issues surrounding voter’s rights, voter fraud, election litigation and what can and can't be done to recruit voters.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1987</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/10/voter-fraud-election-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5754115319.mp3?updated=1624285533" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The New Federal Rule of Evidence 502</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/10/the-new-federal-rule-of-evidence-502/</link>
      <description>Every lawyer knows the costs of discovery can escalate. Last month on September 19, 2008, President Bush signed Senate Bill 2450 into law, which establishes Federal Rule of Evidence 502 and is effective immediately.  This law creates a new rule of evidence limiting certain attorney-client privilege and work product waivers.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, welcome Attorney Robert D. Owen, a partner in Fulbright &amp; Jaworski L.L.P., to take a look at New Federal Rule of Evidence 502 and see how this new rule will affect litigation and litigation costs as well as clients.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:54:30 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The New Federal Rule of Evidence 502</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>152</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/05115eba-cfaa-11eb-92b9-b311dcd6de05/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The New Federal Rule of Evidence 502</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Every lawyer knows the costs of discovery can escalate. Last month on September 19, 2008, President Bush signed Senate Bill 2450 into law, which establishes Federal Rule of Evidence 502 and is effective immediately.  This law creates a new rule of evidence limiting certain attorney-client privilege and work product waivers.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, welcome Attorney Robert D. Owen, a partner in Fulbright &amp; Jaworski L.L.P., to take a look at New Federal Rule of Evidence 502 and see how this new rule will affect litigation and litigation costs as well as clients.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Every lawyer knows the costs of discovery can escalate. Last month on September 19, 2008, President Bush signed Senate Bill 2450 into law, which establishes Federal Rule of Evidence 502 and is effective immediately.  This law creates a new rule of evidence limiting certain attorney-client privilege and work product waivers.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, welcome Attorney Robert D. Owen, a partner in Fulbright &amp; Jaworski L.L.P., to take a look at New Federal Rule of Evidence 502 and see how this new rule will affect litigation and litigation costs as well as clients.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1962</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/10/the-new-federal-rule-of-evidence-502/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2287108488.mp3?updated=1624285564" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Altria V. Good: Deceptive Advertising Before the Supreme Court</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/10/altria-v-good-deceptive-advertising-before-the-supreme-court/</link>
      <description>Will the U.S. Supreme Court dismiss a class action suit brought by smokers in Maine, who say they were misled into believing that "low tar" and "light" cigarettes are a healthier alternative to regular cigarettes? Arguments heard before the high court this week, pit tobacco giant, Phillip Morris against smokers. Law.com blogger and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Dr. Jeffrey Wigand, a nationally known whistleblower involving tobacco company, Brown &amp; Williamson. Wigand's courageous story ultimately led to a landmark case against big tobacco, changes in cigarette advertising and was the basis for the movie, The Insider. He is now founder of SMOKE-FREE KIDS, Inc. Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for Legal Times and Law.com, also joins us to discuss this important case with insights from inside the courtroom.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 08:21:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Altria V. Good: Deceptive Advertising Before the Supreme Court</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>151</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/053a0c0c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-d76f71dacef9/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Altria V. Good: Deceptive Advertising Before the Supreme Court</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Will the U.S. Supreme Court dismiss a class action suit brought by smokers in Maine, who say they were misled into believing that "low tar" and "light" cigarettes are a healthier alternative to regular cigarettes? Arguments heard before the high court this week, pit tobacco giant, Phillip Morris against smokers. Law.com blogger and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Dr. Jeffrey Wigand, a nationally known whistleblower involving tobacco company, Brown &amp; Williamson. Wigand's courageous story ultimately led to a landmark case against big tobacco, changes in cigarette advertising and was the basis for the movie, The Insider. He is now founder of SMOKE-FREE KIDS, Inc. Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for Legal Times and Law.com, also joins us to discuss this important case with insights from inside the courtroom.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Will the U.S. Supreme Court dismiss a class action suit brought by smokers in Maine, who say they were misled into believing that "low tar" and "light" cigarettes are a healthier alternative to regular cigarettes? Arguments heard before the high court this week, pit tobacco giant, Phillip Morris against smokers. Law.com blogger and co-host, Bob Ambrogi welcomes Dr. Jeffrey Wigand, a nationally known whistleblower involving tobacco company, Brown &amp; Williamson. Wigand's courageous story ultimately led to a landmark case against big tobacco, changes in cigarette advertising and was the basis for the movie, The Insider. He is now founder of SMOKE-FREE KIDS, Inc. Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for Legal Times and Law.com, also joins us to discuss this important case with insights from inside the courtroom.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2251</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/10/altria-v-good-deceptive-advertising-before-the-supreme-court/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6015815775.mp3?updated=1624285583" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyer2Lawyer Celebrates 3rd Anniversary!</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/10/lawyer2lawyer-celebrates-3rd-anniversary/</link>
      <description>A special edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, marking our 3rd anniversary and our 150th show!  We have covered a lot of legal stories over the course of three years and Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi will talk to returning guests and play clips from some stand out shows with guests who have inspired, educated and even made us laugh. Bob &amp; Craig welcome back Professor Eugene Volokh, professor at the UCLA School of Law and blogger for the Volokh Conspiracy and Attorney/musician Larry Savell of Chadbourne &amp; Parke to discuss his new album, "The Lawtunes: Live At Blackacre" and introduce a new theme song made especially for Lawyer2Lawyer! And extra thanks to YOU, our audience, for making Lawyer2Lawyer one of the top legal podcasts in the legal community!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:08:22 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyer2Lawyer Celebrates 3rd Anniversary!</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>150</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/055f3e32-cfaa-11eb-92b9-c3af6e244c7c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyer2Lawyer Celebrates 3rd Anniversary!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A special edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, marking our 3rd anniversary and our 150th show!  We have covered a lot of legal stories over the course of three years and Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi will talk to returning guests and play clips from some stand out shows with guests who have inspired, educated and even made us laugh. Bob &amp; Craig welcome back Professor Eugene Volokh, professor at the UCLA School of Law and blogger for the Volokh Conspiracy and Attorney/musician Larry Savell of Chadbourne &amp; Parke to discuss his new album, "The Lawtunes: Live At Blackacre" and introduce a new theme song made especially for Lawyer2Lawyer! And extra thanks to YOU, our audience, for making Lawyer2Lawyer one of the top legal podcasts in the legal community!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A special edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, marking our 3rd anniversary and our 150th show!  We have covered a lot of legal stories over the course of three years and Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi will talk to returning guests and play clips from some stand out shows with guests who have inspired, educated and even made us laugh. Bob &amp; Craig welcome back Professor Eugene Volokh, professor at the UCLA School of Law and blogger for the Volokh Conspiracy and Attorney/musician Larry Savell of Chadbourne &amp; Parke to discuss his new album, "The Lawtunes: Live At Blackacre" and introduce a new theme song made especially for Lawyer2Lawyer! And extra thanks to YOU, our audience, for making Lawyer2Lawyer one of the top legal podcasts in the legal community!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2287</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/10/lawyer2lawyer-celebrates-3rd-anniversary/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3215308692.mp3?updated=1623961953" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Aftermath of Hurricane Ike</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/09/the-aftermath-of-hurricane-ike/</link>
      <description>When Hurricane Ike hit the Texas coast, many were left to deal with the devastation of the storm which toppled businesses, firms and homes.  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams &amp; Bob Ambrogi  as they speak to Bill Livesay, Executive Director from Andrews Kurth LLP and Miriam Rozen, staff reporter from Texas Lawyer, to get their personal accounts of Hurricane Ike.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, you'll hear how it has affected law firms and look at what firms are doing to assist their employees, their clients and those in need.

* If you would like to help those affected by Hurricane Ike, you can donate here at the Gulf Coast Ike Relief Fund.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:41:41 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Aftermath of Hurricane Ike</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>149</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/057ff9ec-cfaa-11eb-92b9-9b5a3c7cb0e5/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Aftermath of Hurricane Ike</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>When Hurricane Ike hit the Texas coast, many were left to deal with the devastation of the storm which toppled businesses, firms and homes.  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams &amp; Bob Ambrogi  as they speak to Bill Livesay, Executive Director from Andrews Kurth LLP and Miriam Rozen, staff reporter from Texas Lawyer, to get their personal accounts of Hurricane Ike.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, you'll hear how it has affected law firms and look at what firms are doing to assist their employees, their clients and those in need.

* If you would like to help those affected by Hurricane Ike, you can donate here at the Gulf Coast Ike Relief Fund.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[When Hurricane Ike hit the Texas coast, many were left to deal with the devastation of the storm which toppled businesses, firms and homes.  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams &amp; Bob Ambrogi  as they speak to Bill Livesay, Executive Director from Andrews Kurth LLP and Miriam Rozen, staff reporter from Texas Lawyer, to get their personal accounts of Hurricane Ike.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, you'll hear how it has affected law firms and look at what firms are doing to assist their employees, their clients and those in need.

* If you would like to help those affected by Hurricane Ike, you can donate here at the Gulf Coast Ike Relief Fund.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2104</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/09/the-aftermath-of-hurricane-ike/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9631730092.mp3?updated=1624285569" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Legal Side of the Lehman Brothers Collapse</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/09/the-legal-side-of-the-lehman-brothers-collapse/</link>
      <description>The largest bankruptcy case in U.S. history is playing out before us with the fall of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., creating chaos in the financial community. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they talk to the top legal experts, Attorney John D. Penn, Partner at the firm, Haynes and Boone, LLP and Attorney Victor Bass, Partner at the firm, Burns &amp; Levinson LLP, about how lawyers will unravel the company’s assets, what will happen to stockholders and customers along with the impact of all that on the economy. Hear their take on the legal options and strategies being used in this unprecedented case.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:05:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Legal Side of the Lehman Brothers Collapse</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>148</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/05a5843c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-7777b7012282/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Legal Side of the Lehman Brothers Collapse</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The largest bankruptcy case in U.S. history is playing out before us with the fall of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., creating chaos in the financial community. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they talk to the top legal experts, Attorney John D. Penn, Partner at the firm, Haynes and Boone, LLP and Attorney Victor Bass, Partner at the firm, Burns &amp; Levinson LLP, about how lawyers will unravel the company’s assets, what will happen to stockholders and customers along with the impact of all that on the economy. Hear their take on the legal options and strategies being used in this unprecedented case.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The largest bankruptcy case in U.S. history is playing out before us with the fall of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., creating chaos in the financial community. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they talk to the top legal experts, Attorney John D. Penn, Partner at the firm, Haynes and Boone, LLP and Attorney Victor Bass, Partner at the firm, Burns &amp; Levinson LLP, about how lawyers will unravel the company’s assets, what will happen to stockholders and customers along with the impact of all that on the economy. Hear their take on the legal options and strategies being used in this unprecedented case.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1969</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/09/the-legal-side-of-the-lehman-brothers-collapse/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7768768869.mp3?updated=1624285571" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Check Scam Targeting Law Firms</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/09/check-scam-targeting-law-firms/</link>
      <description>Attorneys have fallen prey to a new email scam circulating that specifically targets law firms. Join Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams as he dissects this check scam sweeping law firms. Craig welcomes Attorney Gregory Bartko, an Atlanta securities and corporate attorney and Attorney John P. Donohue, Senior Counsel from Thorp Reed &amp; Armstrong in Philadelphia to talk about the details of the scam, how they were targeted, how one lawyer was victimized and one narrowly escaped - this is a story you can't afford to miss!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:14:16 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Check Scam Targeting Law Firms</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>147</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/05cccd4e-cfaa-11eb-92b9-33c7470a23a5/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Check Scam Targeting Law Firms</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Attorneys have fallen prey to a new email scam circulating that specifically targets law firms. Join Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams as he dissects this check scam sweeping law firms. Craig welcomes Attorney Gregory Bartko, an Atlanta securities and corporate attorney and Attorney John P. Donohue, Senior Counsel from Thorp Reed &amp; Armstrong in Philadelphia to talk about the details of the scam, how they were targeted, how one lawyer was victimized and one narrowly escaped - this is a story you can't afford to miss!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Attorneys have fallen prey to a new email scam circulating that specifically targets law firms. Join Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams as he dissects this check scam sweeping law firms. Craig welcomes Attorney Gregory Bartko, an Atlanta securities and corporate attorney and Attorney John P. Donohue, Senior Counsel from Thorp Reed &amp; Armstrong in Philadelphia to talk about the details of the scam, how they were targeted, how one lawyer was victimized and one narrowly escaped - this is a story you can't afford to miss!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2416</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/09/check-scam-targeting-law-firms/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4578634297.mp3?updated=1624285458" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Copyright Law &amp; Guns n' Roses' Chinese Democracy</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/09/federal-copyright-law-guns-n-roses-chinese-democracy/</link>
      <description>Last week, the FBI arrested blogger, Kevin Cogill of Culver City, California, on suspicion of violating a federal copyright law for posting nine tracks from the unreleased and much anticipated Guns n’ Roses album "Chinese Democracy" on his blog. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they discuss this hot legal topic with Attorney Lisa Borodkin, an entertainment attorney in private practice in Los Angeles and Attorney Philip Daniels an associate in the Entertainment, Media and Communications Practice Group at Sheppard Mullin Richter &amp; Hampton LLP. Hear about the legal issues in this case, the new federal copyright law and what the future looks like for Cogill.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:32:56 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Federal Copyright Law &amp; Guns n' Roses' Chinese Democracy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>146</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/05fe74c0-cfaa-11eb-92b9-3f8289714c94/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Federal Copyright Law &amp; Guns n' Roses' Chinese Democracy</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Last week, the FBI arrested blogger, Kevin Cogill of Culver City, California, on suspicion of violating a federal copyright law for posting nine tracks from the unreleased and much anticipated Guns n’ Roses album "Chinese Democracy" on his blog. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they discuss this hot legal topic with Attorney Lisa Borodkin, an entertainment attorney in private practice in Los Angeles and Attorney Philip Daniels an associate in the Entertainment, Media and Communications Practice Group at Sheppard Mullin Richter &amp; Hampton LLP. Hear about the legal issues in this case, the new federal copyright law and what the future looks like for Cogill.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Last week, the FBI arrested blogger, Kevin Cogill of Culver City, California, on suspicion of violating a federal copyright law for posting nine tracks from the unreleased and much anticipated Guns n’ Roses album "Chinese Democracy" on his blog. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they discuss this hot legal topic with Attorney Lisa Borodkin, an entertainment attorney in private practice in Los Angeles and Attorney Philip Daniels an associate in the Entertainment, Media and Communications Practice Group at Sheppard Mullin Richter &amp; Hampton LLP. Hear about the legal issues in this case, the new federal copyright law and what the future looks like for Cogill.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2232</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/09/federal-copyright-law-guns-n-roses-chinese-democracy/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8429770237.mp3?updated=1623961955" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MBTA v. Anderson</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/08/mbta-v-anderson/</link>
      <description>It all started when three MIT students put together a presentation for their Network Security Class at MIT about their findings regarding the security vulnerabilities of Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority's (MBTA) Charlie Card and Charlie Ticket. The MBTA sued the students and MIT in United States District Court in Massachusetts. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they discuss this case with Tuna Chaterjee, a fellow at the Berkman Center and a Staff Attorney with the Citizen Media Law Project and Attorney Marc Randazza, First Amendment attorney with the law firm of Weston, Garrou, Walters &amp; Mooney.  They we will take a look at the legal issues involved in MBTA vs. Anderson, the rights of these students,  the lawsuit filed, First Amendment issues, security issues and what the future holds for these students.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:45:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>MBTA v. Anderson</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>145</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0624cfd0-cfaa-11eb-92b9-2773e45bc2a0/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>MBTA v. Anderson</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It all started when three MIT students put together a presentation for their Network Security Class at MIT about their findings regarding the security vulnerabilities of Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority's (MBTA) Charlie Card and Charlie Ticket. The MBTA sued the students and MIT in United States District Court in Massachusetts. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they discuss this case with Tuna Chaterjee, a fellow at the Berkman Center and a Staff Attorney with the Citizen Media Law Project and Attorney Marc Randazza, First Amendment attorney with the law firm of Weston, Garrou, Walters &amp; Mooney.  They we will take a look at the legal issues involved in MBTA vs. Anderson, the rights of these students,  the lawsuit filed, First Amendment issues, security issues and what the future holds for these students.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[It all started when three MIT students put together a presentation for their Network Security Class at MIT about their findings regarding the security vulnerabilities of Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority's (MBTA) Charlie Card and Charlie Ticket. The MBTA sued the students and MIT in United States District Court in Massachusetts. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they discuss this case with Tuna Chaterjee, a fellow at the Berkman Center and a Staff Attorney with the Citizen Media Law Project and Attorney Marc Randazza, First Amendment attorney with the law firm of Weston, Garrou, Walters &amp; Mooney.  They we will take a look at the legal issues involved in MBTA vs. Anderson, the rights of these students,  the lawsuit filed, First Amendment issues, security issues and what the future holds for these students.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2107</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/08/mbta-v-anderson/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5018611465.mp3?updated=1623961955" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Recruiting at Law Firms: A Recruiter and a Law Student's Perspective</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/08/the-recruitment-story-large-firms-law-students/</link>
      <description>It’s about that time of year again when the law students are heading back to school and thinking ahead to what they want in a law firm once they graduate.  Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams turns to both a recruiter and two law students to get two different perspectives. Craig welcomes Partner and Chair of Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton’s Recruiting Committee, David Leinwand, Matthew Donnelly, third year law student from the University of Iowa College of Law and Roger Smerage third year law student at Suffolk University Law School in Boston, to discuss recruiting at a large firm, what firms are doing to set themselves apart from the competition of other law firms, the interview process, what firms are looking for in a future associate, what students are looking for in a firm and how they are preparing for the competition of other law students.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:31:42 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Recruiting at Law Firms: A Recruiter and a Law Student's Perspective</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>144</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/064dcaa2-cfaa-11eb-92b9-e7f754dc8208/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Recruiting at Law Firms: A Recruiter and a Law Student's Perspective</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It’s about that time of year again when the law students are heading back to school and thinking ahead to what they want in a law firm once they graduate.  Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams turns to both a recruiter and two law students to get two different perspectives. Craig welcomes Partner and Chair of Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton’s Recruiting Committee, David Leinwand, Matthew Donnelly, third year law student from the University of Iowa College of Law and Roger Smerage third year law student at Suffolk University Law School in Boston, to discuss recruiting at a large firm, what firms are doing to set themselves apart from the competition of other law firms, the interview process, what firms are looking for in a future associate, what students are looking for in a firm and how they are preparing for the competition of other law students.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[It’s about that time of year again when the law students are heading back to school and thinking ahead to what they want in a law firm once they graduate.  Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams turns to both a recruiter and two law students to get two different perspectives. Craig welcomes Partner and Chair of Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton’s Recruiting Committee, David Leinwand, Matthew Donnelly, third year law student from the University of Iowa College of Law and Roger Smerage third year law student at Suffolk University Law School in Boston, to discuss recruiting at a large firm, what firms are doing to set themselves apart from the competition of other law firms, the interview process, what firms are looking for in a future associate, what students are looking for in a firm and how they are preparing for the competition of other law students.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2353</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/08/the-recruitment-story-large-firms-law-students/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2008225317.mp3?updated=1623961955" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legendary Trial Attorney: Gerry Spence</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/08/legendary-trial-attorney-gerry-spence/</link>
      <description>Attorney Gerry Spence has practiced law for over fifty years, has never lost a criminal case and is the author of sixteen books. On Lawyer2 Lawyer, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi talk to Attorney Spence about his most prominent cases, life as a trial attorney, his founding of the Trial Lawyers College, his opinion about law school, stepping into the world of blogging and his mission to represent the poor, the injured and the forgotten. Listen and find out why he says "Lawyers disappoint me."</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:23:42 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legendary Trial Attorney: Gerry Spence</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>143</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/066f140a-cfaa-11eb-92b9-af664e6ed63d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legendary Trial Attorney: Gerry Spence</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Attorney Gerry Spence has practiced law for over fifty years, has never lost a criminal case and is the author of sixteen books. On Lawyer2 Lawyer, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi talk to Attorney Spence about his most prominent cases, life as a trial attorney, his founding of the Trial Lawyers College, his opinion about law school, stepping into the world of blogging and his mission to represent the poor, the injured and the forgotten. Listen and find out why he says "Lawyers disappoint me."</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Attorney Gerry Spence has practiced law for over fifty years, has never lost a criminal case and is the author of sixteen books. On Lawyer2 Lawyer, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi talk to Attorney Spence about his most prominent cases, life as a trial attorney, his founding of the Trial Lawyers College, his opinion about law school, stepping into the world of blogging and his mission to represent the poor, the injured and the forgotten. Listen and find out why he says "Lawyers disappoint me."]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2475</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/08/legendary-trial-attorney-gerry-spence/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9990957179.mp3?updated=1624285455" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Summer Associates</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/08/summer-associates/</link>
      <description>How do summer associates programs at major law firms work? Hear the perspectives from current associates who were summers and a leader in the recruitment strategy at a large firm on this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer with co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, both attorneys and Law.com legal bloggers. We welcome guests, Attorney Lydia Kelley, partner and co-chair of the recruiting committee at McDermott, Will &amp; Emery in Chicago along with two young Associates now working at big firms, Claudine Coumbres at White &amp; Case, LLP in New York and Michel Ayer at Quarles &amp; Brady, LLP in Phoenix. Listen to their first hand experiences and opinions.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:13:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Summer Associates</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>142</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/06907faa-cfaa-11eb-92b9-1787e95a9f72/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Summer Associates</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>How do summer associates programs at major law firms work? Hear the perspectives from current associates who were summers and a leader in the recruitment strategy at a large firm on this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer with co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, both attorneys and Law.com legal bloggers. We welcome guests, Attorney Lydia Kelley, partner and co-chair of the recruiting committee at McDermott, Will &amp; Emery in Chicago along with two young Associates now working at big firms, Claudine Coumbres at White &amp; Case, LLP in New York and Michel Ayer at Quarles &amp; Brady, LLP in Phoenix. Listen to their first hand experiences and opinions.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[How do summer associates programs at major law firms work? Hear the perspectives from current associates who were summers and a leader in the recruitment strategy at a large firm on this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer with co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, both attorneys and Law.com legal bloggers. We welcome guests, Attorney Lydia Kelley, partner and co-chair of the recruiting committee at McDermott, Will &amp; Emery in Chicago along with two young Associates now working at big firms, Claudine Coumbres at White &amp; Case, LLP in New York and Michel Ayer at Quarles &amp; Brady, LLP in Phoenix. Listen to their first hand experiences and opinions.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2063</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/08/summer-associates/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7326865267.mp3?updated=1623961956" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Privacy and Piracy: Viacom v. YouTube</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/07/privacy-and-piracy-viacom-v-youtube/</link>
      <description>Viacom accused Google's video sharing website, YouTube of violating its copyright in a $1 billion lawsuit. And as of last week, Google and Viacom reached an agreement to allow Google's YouTube to mask important user information from records before the handover to Viacom. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Kevin A. Thompson from the firm Davis McGrath LLC, and Lauren Gelman, Executive Director of Stanford Law School's Center for Internet and Society to discuss this case. They will discuss the legal issues, privacy rights, piracy issues and what this case means for the users, the source of business for these companies.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:24:44 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Privacy and Piracy: Viacom v. YouTube</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>141</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/06aff646-cfaa-11eb-92b9-5f83e8e14c61/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Privacy and Piracy: Viacom v. YouTube</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Viacom accused Google's video sharing website, YouTube of violating its copyright in a $1 billion lawsuit. And as of last week, Google and Viacom reached an agreement to allow Google's YouTube to mask important user information from records before the handover to Viacom. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Kevin A. Thompson from the firm Davis McGrath LLC, and Lauren Gelman, Executive Director of Stanford Law School's Center for Internet and Society to discuss this case. They will discuss the legal issues, privacy rights, piracy issues and what this case means for the users, the source of business for these companies.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Viacom accused Google's video sharing website, YouTube of violating its copyright in a $1 billion lawsuit. And as of last week, Google and Viacom reached an agreement to allow Google's YouTube to mask important user information from records before the handover to Viacom. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Kevin A. Thompson from the firm Davis McGrath LLC, and Lauren Gelman, Executive Director of Stanford Law School's Center for Internet and Society to discuss this case. They will discuss the legal issues, privacy rights, piracy issues and what this case means for the users, the source of business for these companies.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2334</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/07/privacy-and-piracy-viacom-v-youtube/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9831353438.mp3?updated=1624285453" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jonathan Zittrain and the Future of the Internet</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/07/jonathan-zittrain-and-the-future-of-the-internet/</link>
      <description>To many out there the internet is a necessity, but what will the internet look like 10 years from now? Join Law.com blogger and co-host Bob Ambrogi as he sits down with Harvard Law Professor and co-founder of HLS's Berkman Center for Internet &amp; Society, Jonathan Zittrain, to discuss his new book, The Future of the Internet - And How to Stop It. Bob and John will also talk about the 10th anniversary of the Berkman Center and Jonathan’s concerns and thoughts on the future of the internet.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:34 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Jonathan Zittrain and the Future of the Internet</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>140</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/06cf7836-cfaa-11eb-92b9-b70ca24b8e69/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Jonathan Zittrain and the Future of the Internet</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>To many out there the internet is a necessity, but what will the internet look like 10 years from now? Join Law.com blogger and co-host Bob Ambrogi as he sits down with Harvard Law Professor and co-founder of HLS's Berkman Center for Internet &amp; Society, Jonathan Zittrain, to discuss his new book, The Future of the Internet - And How to Stop It. Bob and John will also talk about the 10th anniversary of the Berkman Center and Jonathan’s concerns and thoughts on the future of the internet.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[To many out there the internet is a necessity, but what will the internet look like 10 years from now? Join Law.com blogger and co-host Bob Ambrogi as he sits down with Harvard Law Professor and co-founder of HLS's Berkman Center for Internet &amp; Society, Jonathan Zittrain, to discuss his new book, The Future of the Internet - And How to Stop It. Bob and John will also talk about the 10th anniversary of the Berkman Center and Jonathan’s concerns and thoughts on the future of the internet.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2011</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/07/jonathan-zittrain-and-the-future-of-the-internet/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5644913463.mp3?updated=1624285454" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Jurist &amp; Legal Blogger</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/07/federal-jurist-legal-blogger/</link>
      <description>A very special guest on this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, Judge Nancy Gertner from the U.S. District Court for Massachusetts, speaks out about her experience as a criminal defense attorney, her career rise to jurist and...blogging as a Judge. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams as they welcome the Honorable Nancy Gertner, recipient of the 2008 Thurgood Marshall Award of the American Bar Association Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities, recognizing her contributions to advancing human rights and civil liberties.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:35:40 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Federal Jurist &amp; Legal Blogger</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>139</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/06f06852-cfaa-11eb-92b9-b39dd6821bd2/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Federal Jurist &amp; Legal Blogger</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A very special guest on this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, Judge Nancy Gertner from the U.S. District Court for Massachusetts, speaks out about her experience as a criminal defense attorney, her career rise to jurist and...blogging as a Judge. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams as they welcome the Honorable Nancy Gertner, recipient of the 2008 Thurgood Marshall Award of the American Bar Association Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities, recognizing her contributions to advancing human rights and civil liberties.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A very special guest on this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, Judge Nancy Gertner from the U.S. District Court for Massachusetts, speaks out about her experience as a criminal defense attorney, her career rise to jurist and...blogging as a Judge. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams as they welcome the Honorable Nancy Gertner, recipient of the 2008 Thurgood Marshall Award of the American Bar Association Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities, recognizing her contributions to advancing human rights and civil liberties.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2031</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/07/federal-jurist-legal-blogger/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9498551851.mp3?updated=1624285457" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Rulings Wrap-Up '08</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/07/supreme-court-rulings-wrap-up-08/</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court wrapped up on June 26th with its final ruling-an Individual Right to Bear Arms. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they talk shop with the experts: Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for Legal Times, American Lawyer Media and Law.com and Amy Howe, from the firm Howe &amp; Russell, PC. and contributor to the SCOTUS Blog. They will discuss these wrap-up rulings, get reactions to the rulings and look at what the Supreme Court will look like at the same time next year when we are under the rule of a new President.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:47:02 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Supreme Court Rulings Wrap-Up '08</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>138</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/07430076-cfaa-11eb-92b9-3787e15ee996/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Supreme Court Rulings Wrap-Up '08</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Supreme Court wrapped up on June 26th with its final ruling-an Individual Right to Bear Arms. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they talk shop with the experts: Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for Legal Times, American Lawyer Media and Law.com and Amy Howe, from the firm Howe &amp; Russell, PC. and contributor to the SCOTUS Blog. They will discuss these wrap-up rulings, get reactions to the rulings and look at what the Supreme Court will look like at the same time next year when we are under the rule of a new President.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The Supreme Court wrapped up on June 26th with its final ruling-an Individual Right to Bear Arms. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they talk shop with the experts: Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for Legal Times, American Lawyer Media and Law.com and Amy Howe, from the firm Howe &amp; Russell, PC. and contributor to the SCOTUS Blog. They will discuss these wrap-up rulings, get reactions to the rulings and look at what the Supreme Court will look like at the same time next year when we are under the rule of a new President.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2050</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/07/supreme-court-rulings-wrap-up-08/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3040953637.mp3?updated=1624285455" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Demise of Bear Stearns</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/06/the-demise-of-bear-stearns/</link>
      <description>Last week Ralph R. Cioffi and Matthew M. Tannin, both former hedge fund managers for Bear Stearns, surrendered to federal agents and were charged with nine counts of securities, mail and wire fraud. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Rich Strassberg, a partner in Goodwin Procter’s Litigation Department and chair of its White Collar Crime &amp; Government Investigations Practice, to discuss the details of this criminal case. They will explore the Bear Stearns scandal, look into the criminal charges against the ex-managers, the state of the mortgage market, the evidence in their email correspondence, tackle the topic of white-collar crime and look at what criminally can happen to these once successful fund managers.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:23:45 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Demise of Bear Stearns</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>137</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/07974938-cfaa-11eb-92b9-3389acab74bd/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Demise of Bear Stearns</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Last week Ralph R. Cioffi and Matthew M. Tannin, both former hedge fund managers for Bear Stearns, surrendered to federal agents and were charged with nine counts of securities, mail and wire fraud. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Rich Strassberg, a partner in Goodwin Procter’s Litigation Department and chair of its White Collar Crime &amp; Government Investigations Practice, to discuss the details of this criminal case. They will explore the Bear Stearns scandal, look into the criminal charges against the ex-managers, the state of the mortgage market, the evidence in their email correspondence, tackle the topic of white-collar crime and look at what criminally can happen to these once successful fund managers.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Last week Ralph R. Cioffi and Matthew M. Tannin, both former hedge fund managers for Bear Stearns, surrendered to federal agents and were charged with nine counts of securities, mail and wire fraud. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Rich Strassberg, a partner in Goodwin Procter’s Litigation Department and chair of its White Collar Crime &amp; Government Investigations Practice, to discuss the details of this criminal case. They will explore the Bear Stearns scandal, look into the criminal charges against the ex-managers, the state of the mortgage market, the evidence in their email correspondence, tackle the topic of white-collar crime and look at what criminally can happen to these once successful fund managers.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1960</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/06/the-demise-of-bear-stearns/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8042232232.mp3?updated=1624285451" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Boumediene v. Bush, Habeas Corpus &amp; the Future of Guantanamo</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/06/boumediene-v-bush-habeas-corpus-the-future-of-guantanamo/</link>
      <description>In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in Boumediene v. Bush, that suspected terrorists and foreign fighters held by the U.S. military at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, have the right to challenge their detention in federal court. Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams, welcomes experts, Aziz Huq, Deputy Director from The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and Attorney Edward Lazarus, partner at the firm, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld LLP and author of Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall, and Future of the Modern Supreme Court to explore this significant ruling.  They will discuss habeas corpus rights of Guantanamo detainees and others, the effect on the war on terrorism and what this means for detainees.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:15:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Boumediene v. Bush, Habeas Corpus &amp; the Future of Guantanamo</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>136</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/07c0855a-cfaa-11eb-92b9-d3244cd84d69/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Boumediene v. Bush, Habeas Corpus &amp; the Future of Guantanamo</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in Boumediene v. Bush, that suspected terrorists and foreign fighters held by the U.S. military at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, have the right to challenge their detention in federal court. Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams, welcomes experts, Aziz Huq, Deputy Director from The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and Attorney Edward Lazarus, partner at the firm, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld LLP and author of Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall, and Future of the Modern Supreme Court to explore this significant ruling.  They will discuss habeas corpus rights of Guantanamo detainees and others, the effect on the war on terrorism and what this means for detainees.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in Boumediene v. Bush, that suspected terrorists and foreign fighters held by the U.S. military at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, have the right to challenge their detention in federal court. Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams, welcomes experts, Aziz Huq, Deputy Director from The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and Attorney Edward Lazarus, partner at the firm, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld LLP and author of Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall, and Future of the Modern Supreme Court to explore this significant ruling.  They will discuss habeas corpus rights of Guantanamo detainees and others, the effect on the war on terrorism and what this means for detainees.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2095</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/06/boumediene-v-bush-habeas-corpus-the-future-of-guantanamo/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3382675105.mp3?updated=1624285463" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Emergence of New Law Schools</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/06/the-emergence-of-new-law-schools/</link>
      <description>A sign of the times ~ more law schools? According to the National Law Journal, law schools are on the rise with as many as ten new ones, and a majority set to open on the East Coast. That's what Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi discuss with experts, Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, founding dean of the Donald Bren School of Law at UC Irvine and Dean Thomas F. Guernsey, President and Dean, Albany Law School. They explore traditional vs. new age law schools, what these new law schools have to offer, the ABA accreditation process and take a look at the reality after law school for students.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:15:33 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Emergence of New Law Schools</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>135</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/07e895c2-cfaa-11eb-92b9-8fb5ab4af584/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Emergence of New Law Schools</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A sign of the times ~ more law schools? According to the National Law Journal, law schools are on the rise with as many as ten new ones, and a majority set to open on the East Coast. That's what Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi discuss with experts, Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, founding dean of the Donald Bren School of Law at UC Irvine and Dean Thomas F. Guernsey, President and Dean, Albany Law School. They explore traditional vs. new age law schools, what these new law schools have to offer, the ABA accreditation process and take a look at the reality after law school for students.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A sign of the times ~ more law schools? According to the National Law Journal, law schools are on the rise with as many as ten new ones, and a majority set to open on the East Coast. That's what Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi discuss with experts, Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, founding dean of the Donald Bren School of Law at UC Irvine and Dean Thomas F. Guernsey, President and Dean, Albany Law School. They explore traditional vs. new age law schools, what these new law schools have to offer, the ABA accreditation process and take a look at the reality after law school for students.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2036</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/06/the-emergence-of-new-law-schools/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1926872673.mp3?updated=1624285461" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vioxx: Reversal of Verdicts</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/06/vioxx-reversal-of-verdicts/</link>
      <description>Vioxx litigation is always upredictable.  A $26 million jury verdict against Merck was overturned in Texas. Separately, an appeals court in New Jersey sharply reduced a verdict in another Vioxx case. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Tommy Fibich, partner in the firm of Fibich, Hampton &amp; Leebron, LLP out of Houston, Texas and Brenda Sapino Jeffreys, reporter from Texas Lawyer, to explore the reversal of these verdicts.  Join us to hear a plaintiff attorney and news reporter’s perspective and see what the future holds for the verdicts of those affected by Vioxx.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:42:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Vioxx: Reversal of Verdicts</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>134</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/08117a78-cfaa-11eb-92b9-a7e2c2d01da9/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Vioxx: Reversal of Verdicts</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Vioxx litigation is always upredictable.  A $26 million jury verdict against Merck was overturned in Texas. Separately, an appeals court in New Jersey sharply reduced a verdict in another Vioxx case. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Tommy Fibich, partner in the firm of Fibich, Hampton &amp; Leebron, LLP out of Houston, Texas and Brenda Sapino Jeffreys, reporter from Texas Lawyer, to explore the reversal of these verdicts.  Join us to hear a plaintiff attorney and news reporter’s perspective and see what the future holds for the verdicts of those affected by Vioxx.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Vioxx litigation is always upredictable.  A $26 million jury verdict against Merck was overturned in Texas. Separately, an appeals court in New Jersey sharply reduced a verdict in another Vioxx case. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Tommy Fibich, partner in the firm of Fibich, Hampton &amp; Leebron, LLP out of Houston, Texas and Brenda Sapino Jeffreys, reporter from Texas Lawyer, to explore the reversal of these verdicts.  Join us to hear a plaintiff attorney and news reporter’s perspective and see what the future holds for the verdicts of those affected by Vioxx.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1958</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/06/vioxx-reversal-of-verdicts/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6724311544.mp3?updated=1624285451" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Books for Attorneys</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/05/books-for-attorneys/</link>
      <description>Harper Lee’s, To Kill a Mockingbird and John Grisham’s The Firm and The Client, all come to mind when thinking about classic books written about the law. On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host and Law.com blogger, Bob Ambrogi, will induct two more books into that classic category, by exploring a classic in the legal community and an upcoming book that is bound to be an instant classic.  Bob talks books with Mark Herrmann, partner resident in the Chicago office of the international law firm, Jones Day and the author of The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law and turns to his co-host, J. Craig Williams, author of How to Get Sued©, to discuss his new release. They will discuss how they got involved in writing, how their experience as attorneys served as a source for their books, the inspiration that led them to write and feedback they have received from their peers in the legal community.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 10:57:57 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Books for Attorneys</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>133</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0835013c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-0380900fb769/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Books for Attorneys</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Harper Lee’s, To Kill a Mockingbird and John Grisham’s The Firm and The Client, all come to mind when thinking about classic books written about the law. On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host and Law.com blogger, Bob Ambrogi, will induct two more books into that classic category, by exploring a classic in the legal community and an upcoming book that is bound to be an instant classic.  Bob talks books with Mark Herrmann, partner resident in the Chicago office of the international law firm, Jones Day and the author of The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law and turns to his co-host, J. Craig Williams, author of How to Get Sued©, to discuss his new release. They will discuss how they got involved in writing, how their experience as attorneys served as a source for their books, the inspiration that led them to write and feedback they have received from their peers in the legal community.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Harper Lee’s, To Kill a Mockingbird and John Grisham’s The Firm and The Client, all come to mind when thinking about classic books written about the law. On Lawyer2Lawyer, co-host and Law.com blogger, Bob Ambrogi, will induct two more books into that classic category, by exploring a classic in the legal community and an upcoming book that is bound to be an instant classic.  Bob talks books with Mark Herrmann, partner resident in the Chicago office of the international law firm, Jones Day and the author of The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law and turns to his co-host, J. Craig Williams, author of How to Get Sued©, to discuss his new release. They will discuss how they got involved in writing, how their experience as attorneys served as a source for their books, the inspiration that led them to write and feedback they have received from their peers in the legal community.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2063</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/05/books-for-attorneys/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2330238281.mp3?updated=1624285460" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The California Ruling &amp; the Gay Marriage Debate</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/05/the-california-ruling-the-gay-marriage-debate/</link>
      <description>On May 15, 2008, in a 4-3 decision, California's Supreme Court ruled in favor of plaintiffs-comprised of gay rights group Equality California, almost two dozen gay couples and the city of San Francisco, who argued that the 2000 law banning same-sex marriage in the state was discriminatory.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Tara Borelli, Staff Attorney in the Western Regional Office of Lambda Legal and Brian S. Brown, Executive Director of the National Organization for Marriage to discuss this ruling.   In this show, we will get specifics on the ruling, reaction from opponents, legal issues behind same-sex marriage and explore this controversial debate on gay marriage.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 12:23:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The California Ruling &amp; the Gay Marriage Debate</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>132</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/085fc0b6-cfaa-11eb-92b9-bb0394b04f6c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The California Ruling &amp; the Gay Marriage Debate</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On May 15, 2008, in a 4-3 decision, California's Supreme Court ruled in favor of plaintiffs-comprised of gay rights group Equality California, almost two dozen gay couples and the city of San Francisco, who argued that the 2000 law banning same-sex marriage in the state was discriminatory.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Tara Borelli, Staff Attorney in the Western Regional Office of Lambda Legal and Brian S. Brown, Executive Director of the National Organization for Marriage to discuss this ruling.   In this show, we will get specifics on the ruling, reaction from opponents, legal issues behind same-sex marriage and explore this controversial debate on gay marriage.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On May 15, 2008, in a 4-3 decision, California's Supreme Court ruled in favor of plaintiffs-comprised of gay rights group Equality California, almost two dozen gay couples and the city of San Francisco, who argued that the 2000 law banning same-sex marriage in the state was discriminatory.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Tara Borelli, Staff Attorney in the Western Regional Office of Lambda Legal and Brian S. Brown, Executive Director of the National Organization for Marriage to discuss this ruling.   In this show, we will get specifics on the ruling, reaction from opponents, legal issues behind same-sex marriage and explore this controversial debate on gay marriage.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1965</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/05/the-california-ruling-the-gay-marriage-debate/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1800098626.mp3?updated=1624285458" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Battle for Superdelegates</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/05/the-battle-for-superdelegates/</link>
      <description>The democratic race for the Presidential nominee has been an exciting one—and as of this week, Senator Obama bypassed Senator Clinton in superdelegates. Law.com blogger and host, J. Craig Williams welcomes the experts, Daniel P.Tokaji, Associate Professor of Law at the Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law and the Associate Director of Election Law @ Moritz and Lanny J. Davis, partner and member of the Litigation Group at the global law firm, Orrick and special CNN political analyst, as they look at the legal issues behind the superdelagates. They will discuss the superdelegate quandary, explore election law, the Michigan/Florida issue and take a look ahead at what this fight to the finish means for the Democratic party.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:53:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Battle for Superdelegates</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>131</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/087ee2c0-cfaa-11eb-92b9-bf4d6bdc75ce/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Battle for Superdelegates</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The democratic race for the Presidential nominee has been an exciting one—and as of this week, Senator Obama bypassed Senator Clinton in superdelegates. Law.com blogger and host, J. Craig Williams welcomes the experts, Daniel P.Tokaji, Associate Professor of Law at the Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law and the Associate Director of Election Law @ Moritz and Lanny J. Davis, partner and member of the Litigation Group at the global law firm, Orrick and special CNN political analyst, as they look at the legal issues behind the superdelagates. They will discuss the superdelegate quandary, explore election law, the Michigan/Florida issue and take a look ahead at what this fight to the finish means for the Democratic party.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The democratic race for the Presidential nominee has been an exciting one—and as of this week, Senator Obama bypassed Senator Clinton in superdelegates. Law.com blogger and host, J. Craig Williams welcomes the experts, Daniel P.Tokaji, Associate Professor of Law at the Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law and the Associate Director of Election Law @ Moritz and Lanny J. Davis, partner and member of the Litigation Group at the global law firm, Orrick and special CNN political analyst, as they look at the legal issues behind the superdelagates. They will discuss the superdelegate quandary, explore election law, the Michigan/Florida issue and take a look ahead at what this fight to the finish means for the Democratic party.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2245</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/05/the-battle-for-superdelegates/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8713808756.mp3?updated=1624285456" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Am Law 100</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/05/the-am-law-100/</link>
      <description>The results of the AM Law 100 are in and total revenues for the Am Law 100 firms have reached $64.5 billion!  Law.com blogger and host, Bob Ambrogi talks to the experts about the AM Law 100.  Bob welcomes Aric Press, Editor-in-Chief of The American Lawyer Magazine and Bruce MacEwen, a lawyer and consultant to law firms on strategic and economic issues and blogger for “Adam Smith, Esq.”  On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, we will look at the AM Law 100, what goes into the research, discuss the final results, go back ten years to see how firms Revenue Per Lawyer has changed and look ahead to what the future looks like for law firms.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:34:45 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Am Law 100</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>130</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/089a9146-cfaa-11eb-92b9-f3dce5494104/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Am Law 100</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The results of the AM Law 100 are in and total revenues for the Am Law 100 firms have reached $64.5 billion!  Law.com blogger and host, Bob Ambrogi talks to the experts about the AM Law 100.  Bob welcomes Aric Press, Editor-in-Chief of The American Lawyer Magazine and Bruce MacEwen, a lawyer and consultant to law firms on strategic and economic issues and blogger for “Adam Smith, Esq.”  On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, we will look at the AM Law 100, what goes into the research, discuss the final results, go back ten years to see how firms Revenue Per Lawyer has changed and look ahead to what the future looks like for law firms.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The results of the AM Law 100 are in and total revenues for the Am Law 100 firms have reached $64.5 billion!  Law.com blogger and host, Bob Ambrogi talks to the experts about the AM Law 100.  Bob welcomes Aric Press, Editor-in-Chief of The American Lawyer Magazine and Bruce MacEwen, a lawyer and consultant to law firms on strategic and economic issues and blogger for “Adam Smith, Esq.”  On this edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, we will look at the AM Law 100, what goes into the research, discuss the final results, go back ten years to see how firms Revenue Per Lawyer has changed and look ahead to what the future looks like for law firms.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2129</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/05/the-am-law-100/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2526226591.mp3?updated=1624285466" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Free Case Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/05/free-case-law/</link>
      <description>The legal publishing market is a nearly $5 billion business. However, some have taken case law into the public domain, calling it free case law, which allows attorneys, legal scholars, and the general public to have public access to decisions for State &amp; Federal Courts and the U.S. Supreme Court.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, discuss this hot topic with the experts: Professor Thomas F. Bruce, Director of the Legal Information Institute at Cornell University Law School, Carl Malamud, founder of Public.Resource.org and Andy Martens, Senior Vice President of New Product Development, from Thomson West.  Bob, Craig and guests will explore the controversy over whose public records are they?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 17:46:46 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Free Case Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>129</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/08b8479a-cfaa-11eb-92b9-cb069d749f27/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Free Case Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The legal publishing market is a nearly $5 billion business. However, some have taken case law into the public domain, calling it free case law, which allows attorneys, legal scholars, and the general public to have public access to decisions for State &amp; Federal Courts and the U.S. Supreme Court.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, discuss this hot topic with the experts: Professor Thomas F. Bruce, Director of the Legal Information Institute at Cornell University Law School, Carl Malamud, founder of Public.Resource.org and Andy Martens, Senior Vice President of New Product Development, from Thomson West.  Bob, Craig and guests will explore the controversy over whose public records are they?</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The legal publishing market is a nearly $5 billion business. However, some have taken case law into the public domain, calling it free case law, which allows attorneys, legal scholars, and the general public to have public access to decisions for State &amp; Federal Courts and the U.S. Supreme Court.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, discuss this hot topic with the experts: Professor Thomas F. Bruce, Director of the Legal Information Institute at Cornell University Law School, Carl Malamud, founder of Public.Resource.org and Andy Martens, Senior Vice President of New Product Development, from Thomson West.  Bob, Craig and guests will explore the controversy over whose public records are they?]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2269</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/05/free-case-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1645690067.mp3?updated=1624285458" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Religion, Polygamy and the Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/04/religion-polygamy-the-law/</link>
      <description>The raid of a polygamist compound in West Texas has raised some important issues of rights of children, women and family as well as religion.   Host and blogger, Bob Ambrogi turns to the experts, Attorney Betsy Branch, from the firm of McCurley, Orsinger, McCurley, Nelson and Downing, LLP and lawyer and social critic, Wendy Kaminer, blogger on civil liberties at thefreeforall.net, to discuss the aftermath of the raid of the FLDS compound.   Bob, Betsy and Wendy will explore DNA testing, civil liberties, the question of child abuse vs. religion, a sect’s legal rights and the fate of the children.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:59:05 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Religion, Polygamy and the Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>128</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/08deb934-cfaa-11eb-92b9-df84ce6b6960/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Religion, Polygamy &amp; the Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The raid of a polygamist compound in West Texas has raised some important issues of rights of children, women and family as well as religion.   Host and blogger, Bob Ambrogi turns to the experts, Attorney Betsy Branch, from the firm of McCurley, Orsinger, McCurley, Nelson and Downing, LLP and lawyer and social critic, Wendy Kaminer, blogger on civil liberties at thefreeforall.net, to discuss the aftermath of the raid of the FLDS compound.   Bob, Betsy and Wendy will explore DNA testing, civil liberties, the question of child abuse vs. religion, a sect’s legal rights and the fate of the children.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The raid of a polygamist compound in West Texas has raised some important issues of rights of children, women and family as well as religion.   Host and blogger, Bob Ambrogi turns to the experts, Attorney Betsy Branch, from the firm of McCurley, Orsinger, McCurley, Nelson and Downing, LLP and lawyer and social critic, Wendy Kaminer, blogger on civil liberties at thefreeforall.net, to discuss the aftermath of the raid of the FLDS compound.   Bob, Betsy and Wendy will explore DNA testing, civil liberties, the question of child abuse vs. religion, a sect’s legal rights and the fate of the children.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2278</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/04/religion-polygamy-the-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2974765999.mp3?updated=1624285460" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Federal Shield Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/04/the-federal-shield-law/</link>
      <description>The Federal Shield Law is pending in Congress.  Meanwhile, reporters have come under fire for protecting the privacy of their sources resulting in jail time and high fines. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they explore the shield law with the experts: Lucy Dalglish, Executive Director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Geoffrey R. Stone, the Edward H. Levi Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago Law School and Attorney Joel Kurtzberg, partner at the firm, Cahill Gordon &amp; Reindel LLP.  They will discuss the federal shield law pending in Congress, high profile cases involving reporters, states’ efforts to enact their own shield laws, punishment given to those who protect their sources and the rights of journalists.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:32:22 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Federal Shield Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>127</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/090e723c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-9fecd641e1b9/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Federal Shield Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Federal Shield Law is pending in Congress.  Meanwhile, reporters have come under fire for protecting the privacy of their sources resulting in jail time and high fines. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they explore the shield law with the experts: Lucy Dalglish, Executive Director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Geoffrey R. Stone, the Edward H. Levi Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago Law School and Attorney Joel Kurtzberg, partner at the firm, Cahill Gordon &amp; Reindel LLP.  They will discuss the federal shield law pending in Congress, high profile cases involving reporters, states’ efforts to enact their own shield laws, punishment given to those who protect their sources and the rights of journalists.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The Federal Shield Law is pending in Congress.  Meanwhile, reporters have come under fire for protecting the privacy of their sources resulting in jail time and high fines. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they explore the shield law with the experts: Lucy Dalglish, Executive Director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Geoffrey R. Stone, the Edward H. Levi Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago Law School and Attorney Joel Kurtzberg, partner at the firm, Cahill Gordon &amp; Reindel LLP.  They will discuss the federal shield law pending in Congress, high profile cases involving reporters, states’ efforts to enact their own shield laws, punishment given to those who protect their sources and the rights of journalists.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2468</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/04/the-federal-shield-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1167631895.mp3?updated=1624285462" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Green Firms</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/04/green-firms/</link>
      <description>With global warming and environmental issues plaguing the world, the legal community is doing its part by taking charge and partaking in individual tasks within their firms to save the environment.  Join Law.com blogger and co-host, Bob Ambrogi as he talks “Green Firms” with the experts: Attorney Carolyn S. Kaplan, Chief Sustainability Officer from Nixon Peabody LLP and Attorney Daniel Eisenberg, the Public Service Vice Chair for the ABA Section on Environment, Energy and Resources (SEER) Air Quality Committee. In this show, we will talk about the emergence of green firms worldwide, how firms can get involved, what going green can do for your firm and what employees within a firm need to do on a daily basis in order to stay green.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:22:44 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Green Firms</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>126</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0934ee58-cfaa-11eb-92b9-3f65489e0c96/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Green Firms</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With global warming and environmental issues plaguing the world, the legal community is doing its part by taking charge and partaking in individual tasks within their firms to save the environment.  Join Law.com blogger and co-host, Bob Ambrogi as he talks “Green Firms” with the experts: Attorney Carolyn S. Kaplan, Chief Sustainability Officer from Nixon Peabody LLP and Attorney Daniel Eisenberg, the Public Service Vice Chair for the ABA Section on Environment, Energy and Resources (SEER) Air Quality Committee. In this show, we will talk about the emergence of green firms worldwide, how firms can get involved, what going green can do for your firm and what employees within a firm need to do on a daily basis in order to stay green.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[With global warming and environmental issues plaguing the world, the legal community is doing its part by taking charge and partaking in individual tasks within their firms to save the environment.  Join Law.com blogger and co-host, Bob Ambrogi as he talks “Green Firms” with the experts: Attorney Carolyn S. Kaplan, Chief Sustainability Officer from Nixon Peabody LLP and Attorney Daniel Eisenberg, the Public Service Vice Chair for the ABA Section on Environment, Energy and Resources (SEER) Air Quality Committee. In this show, we will talk about the emergence of green firms worldwide, how firms can get involved, what going green can do for your firm and what employees within a firm need to do on a daily basis in order to stay green.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1994</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/04/green-firms/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5930824071.mp3?updated=1624285462" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mortgage Fraud</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/04/mortgage-fraud/</link>
      <description>The sub-prime mortgage mess, foreclosures and housing downturn.  The real estate world is stagnant and the U-S is now involved in a huge housing crisis leading many to take advantage and prey on vulnerable homeowners and Mortgage fraud is one product of the fall of the housing market. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they turn to the experts, real estate insider, Richard Hagar and Attorney Melissa Huelsman, to discuss the ins and out of the real estate crisis and mortage fraud. They will highlight the Operation Homewrecker case, the rise in mortgage fraud and how to protect yourself from mortgage fraud and rise above the present real estate crisis.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:05:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Mortgage Fraud</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>125</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/09587670-cfaa-11eb-92b9-7728d7ee47ba/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Mortgage Fraud</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The sub-prime mortgage mess, foreclosures and housing downturn.  The real estate world is stagnant and the U-S is now involved in a huge housing crisis leading many to take advantage and prey on vulnerable homeowners and Mortgage fraud is one product of the fall of the housing market. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they turn to the experts, real estate insider, Richard Hagar and Attorney Melissa Huelsman, to discuss the ins and out of the real estate crisis and mortage fraud. They will highlight the Operation Homewrecker case, the rise in mortgage fraud and how to protect yourself from mortgage fraud and rise above the present real estate crisis.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The sub-prime mortgage mess, foreclosures and housing downturn.  The real estate world is stagnant and the U-S is now involved in a huge housing crisis leading many to take advantage and prey on vulnerable homeowners and Mortgage fraud is one product of the fall of the housing market. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they turn to the experts, real estate insider, Richard Hagar and Attorney Melissa Huelsman, to discuss the ins and out of the real estate crisis and mortage fraud. They will highlight the Operation Homewrecker case, the rise in mortgage fraud and how to protect yourself from mortgage fraud and rise above the present real estate crisis.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2021</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/04/mortgage-fraud/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2070221228.mp3?updated=1624285455" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unmasking the Patent Troll Tracker Blogger</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/03/unmasking-the-patent-troll-tracker-blogger/</link>
      <description>What are the implications of a blogger writing about someone anonymously? Last month, the burning question on everyone’s mind in the patent world was finally answered when the identity of the author of the anonymous, Patent Troll Tracker Blog, was revealed as Rick Frenkel, an IP Director and in-house patent attorney at Cisco Systems. Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams, gets two different perspectives from the experts.  In the first segment, Craig welcomes Attorney Raymond Niro Sr., the attorney who was once a target of Frenkel’s blog. In our second segment, Craig speaks with the popular patent blogger, Dennis Crouch from Patently-O, to get his perspective on the Troll Tracker and the dangers of blogging anonymously.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:50:48 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Unmasking the Patent Troll Tracker Blogger</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>124</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0983c226-cfaa-11eb-92b9-b3b96b44b76c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Unmasking the Patent Troll Tracker Blogger</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What are the implications of a blogger writing about someone anonymously? Last month, the burning question on everyone’s mind in the patent world was finally answered when the identity of the author of the anonymous, Patent Troll Tracker Blog, was revealed as Rick Frenkel, an IP Director and in-house patent attorney at Cisco Systems. Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams, gets two different perspectives from the experts.  In the first segment, Craig welcomes Attorney Raymond Niro Sr., the attorney who was once a target of Frenkel’s blog. In our second segment, Craig speaks with the popular patent blogger, Dennis Crouch from Patently-O, to get his perspective on the Troll Tracker and the dangers of blogging anonymously.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What are the implications of a blogger writing about someone anonymously? Last month, the burning question on everyone’s mind in the patent world was finally answered when the identity of the author of the anonymous, Patent Troll Tracker Blog, was revealed as Rick Frenkel, an IP Director and in-house patent attorney at Cisco Systems. Law.com blogger and co-host, J. Craig Williams, gets two different perspectives from the experts.  In the first segment, Craig welcomes Attorney Raymond Niro Sr., the attorney who was once a target of Frenkel’s blog. In our second segment, Craig speaks with the popular patent blogger, Dennis Crouch from Patently-O, to get his perspective on the Troll Tracker and the dangers of blogging anonymously.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2242</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/03/unmasking-the-patent-troll-tracker-blogger/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7553929797.mp3?updated=1624285470" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Eliot Spitzer: Reaction from the Legal Community</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/03/eliot-spitzer-reaction-from-the-legal-community/</link>
      <description>Considered a hero to many in the legal community for fighting for the little guy, Eliot Spitzer, the now former Governor of NY, became tangled up in a prostitution ring that led him to resign from office.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi turn to the experts, David Frank from Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, Attorney Harvey Silverglate, criminal defense and civil liberties lawyer and Dan Slater, lead writer for The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog, to discuss the rise and fall of Eliot Spitzer.  Bob and Craig will discuss this scandal, take a look at Spitzer’s work as Attorney General, explore the potential criminal charges that he faces and get reaction from the legal community.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:54:48 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Eliot Spitzer: Reaction from the Legal Community</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>123</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/09acf6fa-cfaa-11eb-92b9-7760ad2a664c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Eliot Spitzer: Reaction from the Legal Community</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Considered a hero to many in the legal community for fighting for the little guy, Eliot Spitzer, the now former Governor of NY, became tangled up in a prostitution ring that led him to resign from office.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi turn to the experts, David Frank from Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, Attorney Harvey Silverglate, criminal defense and civil liberties lawyer and Dan Slater, lead writer for The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog, to discuss the rise and fall of Eliot Spitzer.  Bob and Craig will discuss this scandal, take a look at Spitzer’s work as Attorney General, explore the potential criminal charges that he faces and get reaction from the legal community.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Considered a hero to many in the legal community for fighting for the little guy, Eliot Spitzer, the now former Governor of NY, became tangled up in a prostitution ring that led him to resign from office.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi turn to the experts, David Frank from Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, Attorney Harvey Silverglate, criminal defense and civil liberties lawyer and Dan Slater, lead writer for The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog, to discuss the rise and fall of Eliot Spitzer.  Bob and Craig will discuss this scandal, take a look at Spitzer’s work as Attorney General, explore the potential criminal charges that he faces and get reaction from the legal community.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1922</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/03/eliot-spitzer-reaction-from-the-legal-community/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3410048932.mp3?updated=1624285458" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Paralegals: The Backbone of the Law Practice</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/03/paralegals-the-backbone-of-the-law-practice/</link>
      <description>The work of a paralegal is never done. Although paralegals cannot offer legal advice to clients like attorneys, they are considered the backbone of the law practice. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi as they explore the important role of a paralegal.  Lawyer2Lawyer welcomes Tita A. Brewster, Current President of the National Association of Legal Assistants (NALA) and Chere Estrin, CEO of Estrin LegalEd, to discuss a paralegal’s importance to a firm, the hurdles paralegals face, the Richlin Security Service Co v. Chertoff case and the growth of this legal profession.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:13:52 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Paralegals: The Backbone of the Law Practice</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>122</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/09d1de16-cfaa-11eb-92b9-4b4fdb474ba3/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Paralegals: The Backbone of the Law Practice</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The work of a paralegal is never done. Although paralegals cannot offer legal advice to clients like attorneys, they are considered the backbone of the law practice. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi as they explore the important role of a paralegal.  Lawyer2Lawyer welcomes Tita A. Brewster, Current President of the National Association of Legal Assistants (NALA) and Chere Estrin, CEO of Estrin LegalEd, to discuss a paralegal’s importance to a firm, the hurdles paralegals face, the Richlin Security Service Co v. Chertoff case and the growth of this legal profession.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The work of a paralegal is never done. Although paralegals cannot offer legal advice to clients like attorneys, they are considered the backbone of the law practice. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi as they explore the important role of a paralegal.  Lawyer2Lawyer welcomes Tita A. Brewster, Current President of the National Association of Legal Assistants (NALA) and Chere Estrin, CEO of Estrin LegalEd, to discuss a paralegal’s importance to a firm, the hurdles paralegals face, the Richlin Security Service Co v. Chertoff case and the growth of this legal profession.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2006</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/03/paralegals-the-backbone-of-the-law-practice/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5466643181.mp3?updated=1624285452" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Me-too Evidence in Age Discrimination</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/03/me-too-evidence-in-age-discrimination/</link>
      <description>Ellen Mendelsohn, a 51-year old manager for Sprint, was fired in company-wide layoffs and sued citing age discrimination. During the trial, five ex-employees claimed they had also been released because of their age or in lawyer terms "me-too evidence".  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi. as they discuss this highly-publicized case with the experts: Attorney Michael Ketchmark, from Davis Ketchmark &amp; McCreight, Attorney Jeannie DeVeney from Spencer Fane Britt &amp; Browne LLP and Attorney George Lenard, from Harris, Dowell, Fisher &amp; Harris, L.C. They discuss the case and the unanimous decision handed down by the Supreme Court.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:30:35 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Me-too Evidence in Age Discrimination</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>121</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/09f3134c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-0fde5b62ea3d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Me-too Evidence in Age Discrimination</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Ellen Mendelsohn, a 51-year old manager for Sprint, was fired in company-wide layoffs and sued citing age discrimination. During the trial, five ex-employees claimed they had also been released because of their age or in lawyer terms "me-too evidence".  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi. as they discuss this highly-publicized case with the experts: Attorney Michael Ketchmark, from Davis Ketchmark &amp; McCreight, Attorney Jeannie DeVeney from Spencer Fane Britt &amp; Browne LLP and Attorney George Lenard, from Harris, Dowell, Fisher &amp; Harris, L.C. They discuss the case and the unanimous decision handed down by the Supreme Court.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Ellen Mendelsohn, a 51-year old manager for Sprint, was fired in company-wide layoffs and sued citing age discrimination. During the trial, five ex-employees claimed they had also been released because of their age or in lawyer terms "me-too evidence".  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi. as they discuss this highly-publicized case with the experts: Attorney Michael Ketchmark, from Davis Ketchmark &amp; McCreight, Attorney Jeannie DeVeney from Spencer Fane Britt &amp; Browne LLP and Attorney George Lenard, from Harris, Dowell, Fisher &amp; Harris, L.C. They discuss the case and the unanimous decision handed down by the Supreme Court.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2075</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/03/me-too-evidence-in-age-discrimination/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9339160786.mp3?updated=1624285463" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Immigrants &amp; The Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/02/immigrants-the-law/</link>
      <description>The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York issued an opinion that opened with these words: "With disturbing frequency, this Court encounters evidence of ineffective representation by attorneys retained by immigrants seeking legal status in this country." Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, discuss this hot-button issue as they turn to the experts: Attorney Lisa D. Ramirez, immigration lawyer from the Law Office of Lisa D. Ramirez, Attorney Nora Privitera, Special Projects Attorney for The Immigrant Legal Resource Center and Attorney Eleanor Newhoff, part time attorney for Greater Boston Legal Services.  They will question the quality of legal representation of immigrants, why so many are receiving sub par legal assistance and what lawyers are doing to provide their clients with the best possible representation.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:11:20 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Immigrants &amp; The Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>120</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0a14ced8-cfaa-11eb-92b9-63b3f2c893c4/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Immigrants &amp; The Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York issued an opinion that opened with these words: "With disturbing frequency, this Court encounters evidence of ineffective representation by attorneys retained by immigrants seeking legal status in this country." Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, discuss this hot-button issue as they turn to the experts: Attorney Lisa D. Ramirez, immigration lawyer from the Law Office of Lisa D. Ramirez, Attorney Nora Privitera, Special Projects Attorney for The Immigrant Legal Resource Center and Attorney Eleanor Newhoff, part time attorney for Greater Boston Legal Services.  They will question the quality of legal representation of immigrants, why so many are receiving sub par legal assistance and what lawyers are doing to provide their clients with the best possible representation.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York issued an opinion that opened with these words: "With disturbing frequency, this Court encounters evidence of ineffective representation by attorneys retained by immigrants seeking legal status in this country." Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, discuss this hot-button issue as they turn to the experts: Attorney Lisa D. Ramirez, immigration lawyer from the Law Office of Lisa D. Ramirez, Attorney Nora Privitera, Special Projects Attorney for The Immigrant Legal Resource Center and Attorney Eleanor Newhoff, part time attorney for Greater Boston Legal Services.  They will question the quality of legal representation of immigrants, why so many are receiving sub par legal assistance and what lawyers are doing to provide their clients with the best possible representation.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1982</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/02/immigrants-the-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5114946894.mp3?updated=1624285458" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Obama/Clinton: The Remaining Lawyer Candidates</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/02/obamaclinton-the-remaining-lawyer-candidates/</link>
      <description>Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton are neck-in neck in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination and their experience as lawyers is a source of debate between the two. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, also lawyers, welcome the experts on Lawyer2Lawyer: Professor Paul Finkelman, the President William McKinley Distinguished Professor of Law and Public Policy at Albany Law School and Robert J. Spitzer, Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at SUNY Cortland, to discuss lawyers as presidential candidates and presidents. Bob &amp; Craig will also take a look at Obama/Clinton’s actual experience as attorneys.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:16:38 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Obama/Clinton: The Remaining Lawyer Candidates</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>119</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0a3e7a1c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-d73c740d8c41/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Obama/Clinton: The Remaining Lawyer Candidates</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton are neck-in neck in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination and their experience as lawyers is a source of debate between the two. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, also lawyers, welcome the experts on Lawyer2Lawyer: Professor Paul Finkelman, the President William McKinley Distinguished Professor of Law and Public Policy at Albany Law School and Robert J. Spitzer, Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at SUNY Cortland, to discuss lawyers as presidential candidates and presidents. Bob &amp; Craig will also take a look at Obama/Clinton’s actual experience as attorneys.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton are neck-in neck in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination and their experience as lawyers is a source of debate between the two. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, also lawyers, welcome the experts on Lawyer2Lawyer: Professor Paul Finkelman, the President William McKinley Distinguished Professor of Law and Public Policy at Albany Law School and Robert J. Spitzer, Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at SUNY Cortland, to discuss lawyers as presidential candidates and presidents. Bob &amp; Craig will also take a look at Obama/Clinton’s actual experience as attorneys.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2076</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/02/obamaclinton-the-remaining-lawyer-candidates/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3964872744.mp3?updated=1624285462" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LegalTech Recap</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/02/legaltech-recap/</link>
      <description>Want insider information on what really happened at LegalTech New York?   On this Lawyer2Lawyer, Bob Ambrogi reports in with the latest in legal tech straight from the show floor. Join Bob and J. Craig Williams as they discuss the highlights from the world’s leading legal tech trade show. Plus you'll hear interviews with many of the key players in legal technology!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:00:27 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>LegalTech Recap</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>118</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0a600704-cfaa-11eb-92b9-5b5383ddfee7/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>LegalTech Recap</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Want insider information on what really happened at LegalTech New York?   On this Lawyer2Lawyer, Bob Ambrogi reports in with the latest in legal tech straight from the show floor. Join Bob and J. Craig Williams as they discuss the highlights from the world’s leading legal tech trade show. Plus you'll hear interviews with many of the key players in legal technology!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Want insider information on what really happened at LegalTech New York?   On this Lawyer2Lawyer, Bob Ambrogi reports in with the latest in legal tech straight from the show floor. Join Bob and J. Craig Williams as they discuss the highlights from the world’s leading legal tech trade show. Plus you'll hear interviews with many of the key players in legal technology!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2409</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/02/legaltech-recap/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8549480214.mp3?updated=1624285466" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What's New in Legal Technology?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/02/whats-new-in-legal-technology/</link>
      <description>If you're not at the hotspot in legal technology, LegalTech New York, then you need to check out this week's show! Law.com blogger and host, J. Craig Williams, welcomes legal technology guru, Monica Bay, editor-in-chief of Law Technology News and host of Law Technology Now, to discuss what’s new in legal tech and explore the ins and outs of the world’s leading legal technology trade show!  Host Bob Ambrogi will also give you a preview of his upcoming special report featuring interviews with the experts, straight from the floor of LegalTech!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:22:01 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>What's New in Legal Technology?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>117</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0a8b03c8-cfaa-11eb-92b9-171455bbecef/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>What's New in Legal Technology?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>If you're not at the hotspot in legal technology, LegalTech New York, then you need to check out this week's show! Law.com blogger and host, J. Craig Williams, welcomes legal technology guru, Monica Bay, editor-in-chief of Law Technology News and host of Law Technology Now, to discuss what’s new in legal tech and explore the ins and outs of the world’s leading legal technology trade show!  Host Bob Ambrogi will also give you a preview of his upcoming special report featuring interviews with the experts, straight from the floor of LegalTech!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[If you're not at the hotspot in legal technology, LegalTech New York, then you need to check out this week's show! Law.com blogger and host, J. Craig Williams, welcomes legal technology guru, Monica Bay, editor-in-chief of Law Technology News and host of Law Technology Now, to discuss what’s new in legal tech and explore the ins and outs of the world’s leading legal technology trade show!  Host Bob Ambrogi will also give you a preview of his upcoming special report featuring interviews with the experts, straight from the floor of LegalTech!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2085</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/02/whats-new-in-legal-technology/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9645889839.mp3?updated=1624285462" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CLE Travel Programs</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/02/cle-travel-programs/</link>
      <description>Having trouble getting excited about fulfilling your CLE requirements? Well that's all changed as lawyers are now signing up for CLE travel programs taking them to different parts of the world where beautiful scenery and CLE seminars can both be found. On Lawyer2Lawyer, we look at these CLE Programs in-depth, highlighting the pros and cons of the trips, the physicality of taking the attorney out of the office or offline, and give you a first-hand account of the various destinations offered.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi call on the experts: Attorney Jamie Duarte, from Duarte &amp; Associates and Maryann McCool, Director of CLE Abroad, to discuss this fun alternative.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:06:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>CLE Travel Programs</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>116</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0ab09980-cfaa-11eb-92b9-1f6f2e65702b/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>CLE Travel Programs</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Having trouble getting excited about fulfilling your CLE requirements? Well that's all changed as lawyers are now signing up for CLE travel programs taking them to different parts of the world where beautiful scenery and CLE seminars can both be found. On Lawyer2Lawyer, we look at these CLE Programs in-depth, highlighting the pros and cons of the trips, the physicality of taking the attorney out of the office or offline, and give you a first-hand account of the various destinations offered.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi call on the experts: Attorney Jamie Duarte, from Duarte &amp; Associates and Maryann McCool, Director of CLE Abroad, to discuss this fun alternative.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Having trouble getting excited about fulfilling your CLE requirements? Well that's all changed as lawyers are now signing up for CLE travel programs taking them to different parts of the world where beautiful scenery and CLE seminars can both be found. On Lawyer2Lawyer, we look at these CLE Programs in-depth, highlighting the pros and cons of the trips, the physicality of taking the attorney out of the office or offline, and give you a first-hand account of the various destinations offered.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi call on the experts: Attorney Jamie Duarte, from Duarte &amp; Associates and Maryann McCool, Director of CLE Abroad, to discuss this fun alternative.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2069</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/02/cle-travel-programs/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5483395655.mp3?updated=1624285459" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Virtual Law Firms</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/01/virtual-law-firms/</link>
      <description>The emergence of virtual law firms came at the dawn of the internet and in recent years, the increased popularity of virtual firms has proven that the law is in fact changing. On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will take a look at what goes on behind the scenes of a virtual law firm, the advantages and disadvantages of virtual law, and why many lawyers are trading in the traditional firm for a virtual one. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi call on the experts: Larry Bodine, business development consultant, Attorney Wyatt Durrette, from the XDL Group and Mark Harris, CEO of Axiom Legal, to discuss the “future of law”.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:05:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Virtual Law Firms</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>115</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0ad38350-cfaa-11eb-92b9-ffb6340fab82/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Virtual Law Firms</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The emergence of virtual law firms came at the dawn of the internet and in recent years, the increased popularity of virtual firms has proven that the law is in fact changing. On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will take a look at what goes on behind the scenes of a virtual law firm, the advantages and disadvantages of virtual law, and why many lawyers are trading in the traditional firm for a virtual one. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi call on the experts: Larry Bodine, business development consultant, Attorney Wyatt Durrette, from the XDL Group and Mark Harris, CEO of Axiom Legal, to discuss the “future of law”.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The emergence of virtual law firms came at the dawn of the internet and in recent years, the increased popularity of virtual firms has proven that the law is in fact changing. On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will take a look at what goes on behind the scenes of a virtual law firm, the advantages and disadvantages of virtual law, and why many lawyers are trading in the traditional firm for a virtual one. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi call on the experts: Larry Bodine, business development consultant, Attorney Wyatt Durrette, from the XDL Group and Mark Harris, CEO of Axiom Legal, to discuss the “future of law”.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2268</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/01/virtual-law-firms/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1210537791.mp3?updated=1624285441" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Social Networking Sites</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/01/social-networking-sites/</link>
      <description>Social networking sites have reconnected old friends and former colleagues, created networking ties and have rekindled relationships all over the world. On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will explore privacy rights, intellectual property issues and even defamation and cyber bullying, all rising from social networking sites.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome Chris Carfi, co-founder of Cerado, Eric Goldman, Director of the High Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara University School of Law and Kara Swisher, co-executive editor of All Things Digital, to discuss the popularity of these sites and the legal issues surrounding the online world of social networking.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:12:40 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Social Networking Sites</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>114</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0afba128-cfaa-11eb-92b9-dbf8c1d7b30e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Social Networking Sites</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Social networking sites have reconnected old friends and former colleagues, created networking ties and have rekindled relationships all over the world. On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will explore privacy rights, intellectual property issues and even defamation and cyber bullying, all rising from social networking sites.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome Chris Carfi, co-founder of Cerado, Eric Goldman, Director of the High Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara University School of Law and Kara Swisher, co-executive editor of All Things Digital, to discuss the popularity of these sites and the legal issues surrounding the online world of social networking.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Social networking sites have reconnected old friends and former colleagues, created networking ties and have rekindled relationships all over the world. On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will explore privacy rights, intellectual property issues and even defamation and cyber bullying, all rising from social networking sites.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome Chris Carfi, co-founder of Cerado, Eric Goldman, Director of the High Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara University School of Law and Kara Swisher, co-executive editor of All Things Digital, to discuss the popularity of these sites and the legal issues surrounding the online world of social networking.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2078</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/01/social-networking-sites/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4928829325.mp3?updated=1624285449" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Two Good Books for Lawyers</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/01/two-good-books-for-lawyers/</link>
      <description>Many lawyers out there are writing books to benefit their peers in the law, whether it is through giving advice or educating by writing about the history of law.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will feature two attorneys who have recently written books that will appeal to attorneys worldwide.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome returning guest, Attorney Carolyn Elefant, to talk about her new book, Solo by Choice: How to Be the Lawyer You Always Wanted to Be.  Also on the program is Attorney Alan Dershowitz, to discuss his new book entitled, Finding Jefferson: A Lost Letter, a Remarkable Discovery, and the First Amendment in an Age of Terrorism.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:32:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Two Good Books for Lawyers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>113</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0b2596fe-cfaa-11eb-92b9-674cff984c23/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Two Good Books for Lawyers</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Many lawyers out there are writing books to benefit their peers in the law, whether it is through giving advice or educating by writing about the history of law.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will feature two attorneys who have recently written books that will appeal to attorneys worldwide.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome returning guest, Attorney Carolyn Elefant, to talk about her new book, Solo by Choice: How to Be the Lawyer You Always Wanted to Be.  Also on the program is Attorney Alan Dershowitz, to discuss his new book entitled, Finding Jefferson: A Lost Letter, a Remarkable Discovery, and the First Amendment in an Age of Terrorism.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Many lawyers out there are writing books to benefit their peers in the law, whether it is through giving advice or educating by writing about the history of law.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will feature two attorneys who have recently written books that will appeal to attorneys worldwide.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome returning guest, Attorney Carolyn Elefant, to talk about her new book, Solo by Choice: How to Be the Lawyer You Always Wanted to Be.  Also on the program is Attorney Alan Dershowitz, to discuss his new book entitled, Finding Jefferson: A Lost Letter, a Remarkable Discovery, and the First Amendment in an Age of Terrorism.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1994</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/01/two-good-books-for-lawyers/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8873381655.mp3?updated=1623961965" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Predictions for 2008</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/01/predictions-for-2008/</link>
      <description>2007- What a year it was! Now, what’s in store for 2008?  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome returning guest, Stephen L. Kaplan,  part-time seer and full-time partner in the Orange County California office of Hicks, Mims, Kaplan and Burns, as they present,  “The 3rd Annual Predictions Show.” Bob &amp; Craig will take a look back on the year that was and make their predictions for the year ahead, highlighting such topics as, the decline of housing prices, the fate of Tom Delay, the big legal story of 2008 and their choice for the next President of the USA!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:49:43 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Predictions for 2008</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>112</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0b563f8e-cfaa-11eb-92b9-5fb2de73ed0a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Predictions for 2008</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>2007- What a year it was! Now, what’s in store for 2008?  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome returning guest, Stephen L. Kaplan,  part-time seer and full-time partner in the Orange County California office of Hicks, Mims, Kaplan and Burns, as they present,  “The 3rd Annual Predictions Show.” Bob &amp; Craig will take a look back on the year that was and make their predictions for the year ahead, highlighting such topics as, the decline of housing prices, the fate of Tom Delay, the big legal story of 2008 and their choice for the next President of the USA!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[2007- What a year it was! Now, what’s in store for 2008?  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome returning guest, Stephen L. Kaplan,  part-time seer and full-time partner in the Orange County California office of Hicks, Mims, Kaplan and Burns, as they present,  “The 3rd Annual Predictions Show.” Bob &amp; Craig will take a look back on the year that was and make their predictions for the year ahead, highlighting such topics as, the decline of housing prices, the fate of Tom Delay, the big legal story of 2008 and their choice for the next President of the USA!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2221</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2008/01/predictions-for-2008/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1261629158.mp3?updated=1623961965" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Holiday Show-Helping Our Veterans</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/12/holiday-show-helping-our-veterans/</link>
      <description>On this special Holiday edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and  Robert Ambrogi, will profile the work of those who help others not only during the holiday season, but year-round. Bob and Craig welcome Nicholas Henry, two-time Operation Iraqi Freedom veteran and co –founder and administrative director from the John Marshall Law School Veterans Legal Support Center and Clinic and Veterans' advocate, Attorney Gordon P. Erspamer, from the law firm of Morrison &amp; Foerster, to talk about their efforts to legally help wounded war veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. Please go to the Veterans Legal Support Center or Swords to Plowshares to donate your time or funds to our Veterans. Happy Holidays!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:32:07 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Holiday Show-Helping Our Veterans</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>111</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0b7ca5b6-cfaa-11eb-92b9-373aaea993f2/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Holiday Show-Helping Our Veterans</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On this special Holiday edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and  Robert Ambrogi, will profile the work of those who help others not only during the holiday season, but year-round. Bob and Craig welcome Nicholas Henry, two-time Operation Iraqi Freedom veteran and co –founder and administrative director from the John Marshall Law School Veterans Legal Support Center and Clinic and Veterans' advocate, Attorney Gordon P. Erspamer, from the law firm of Morrison &amp; Foerster, to talk about their efforts to legally help wounded war veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. Please go to the Veterans Legal Support Center or Swords to Plowshares to donate your time or funds to our Veterans. Happy Holidays!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On this special Holiday edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and  Robert Ambrogi, will profile the work of those who help others not only during the holiday season, but year-round. Bob and Craig welcome Nicholas Henry, two-time Operation Iraqi Freedom veteran and co –founder and administrative director from the John Marshall Law School Veterans Legal Support Center and Clinic and Veterans' advocate, Attorney Gordon P. Erspamer, from the law firm of Morrison &amp; Foerster, to talk about their efforts to legally help wounded war veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. Please go to the Veterans Legal Support Center or Swords to Plowshares to donate your time or funds to our Veterans. Happy Holidays!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2405</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/12/holiday-show-helping-our-veterans/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7579485130.mp3?updated=1624285447" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blackwater</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/12/blackwater/</link>
      <description>Blackwater Worldwide is the largest private security firm protecting U.S. diplomats in Iraq and they face a number of allegations including the shooting deaths of 17 Iraqi civilians.  Join Law.com blogger J. Craig Williams as he takes a closer look along with the experts: Professor Jordan Paust, law professor from the University of Houston Law Center and Professor Paul R. Verkuil, Professor of Law at Cardozo Law School, Yeshiva University.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will discuss the investigation of Blackwater, the legal issues, the effect the use of private contractors is having on the US, and what the future holds for Blackwater and contractors like them.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:27:02 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Blackwater</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>110</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0ba89234-cfaa-11eb-92b9-133fb011388b/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Blackwater</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Blackwater Worldwide is the largest private security firm protecting U.S. diplomats in Iraq and they face a number of allegations including the shooting deaths of 17 Iraqi civilians.  Join Law.com blogger J. Craig Williams as he takes a closer look along with the experts: Professor Jordan Paust, law professor from the University of Houston Law Center and Professor Paul R. Verkuil, Professor of Law at Cardozo Law School, Yeshiva University.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will discuss the investigation of Blackwater, the legal issues, the effect the use of private contractors is having on the US, and what the future holds for Blackwater and contractors like them.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Blackwater Worldwide is the largest private security firm protecting U.S. diplomats in Iraq and they face a number of allegations including the shooting deaths of 17 Iraqi civilians.  Join Law.com blogger J. Craig Williams as he takes a closer look along with the experts: Professor Jordan Paust, law professor from the University of Houston Law Center and Professor Paul R. Verkuil, Professor of Law at Cardozo Law School, Yeshiva University.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will discuss the investigation of Blackwater, the legal issues, the effect the use of private contractors is having on the US, and what the future holds for Blackwater and contractors like them.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1973</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/12/blackwater/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8855162339.mp3?updated=1623961966" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Faith &amp; the Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/12/faith-the-law/</link>
      <description>From Presidential hopefuls trying to “out-faith” each other on the campaign trail to law schools spreading their faith in the classroom, faith is all around us.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi,  call on the experts, Dean Jeffrey A. Brauch, from the Regent University School of Law and Rob Boston, assistant director of communications, for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, to tackle this hot topic.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss faith and the law, how some are using faith to educate law students, separation of church and state and how faith is coming to the forefront of the race for the Presidency and affecting present day policy issues.  Closing the show, we will speak to Monica Bay about her new role as host of the new Legal Talk Network podcast, Law Technology Now.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:58:59 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Faith &amp; the Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>109</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0bc73fea-cfaa-11eb-92b9-af7e8e50f7f2/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Faith &amp; the Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>From Presidential hopefuls trying to “out-faith” each other on the campaign trail to law schools spreading their faith in the classroom, faith is all around us.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi,  call on the experts, Dean Jeffrey A. Brauch, from the Regent University School of Law and Rob Boston, assistant director of communications, for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, to tackle this hot topic.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss faith and the law, how some are using faith to educate law students, separation of church and state and how faith is coming to the forefront of the race for the Presidency and affecting present day policy issues.  Closing the show, we will speak to Monica Bay about her new role as host of the new Legal Talk Network podcast, Law Technology Now.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[From Presidential hopefuls trying to “out-faith” each other on the campaign trail to law schools spreading their faith in the classroom, faith is all around us.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi,  call on the experts, Dean Jeffrey A. Brauch, from the Regent University School of Law and Rob Boston, assistant director of communications, for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, to tackle this hot topic.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss faith and the law, how some are using faith to educate law students, separation of church and state and how faith is coming to the forefront of the race for the Presidency and affecting present day policy issues.  Closing the show, we will speak to Monica Bay about her new role as host of the new Legal Talk Network podcast, Law Technology Now.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2107</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/12/faith-the-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7594729627.mp3?updated=1623961966" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Daniel Tavares Case: Legal and Political Deja Vu</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/12/the-daniel-tavares-case-legal-and-political-deja-vu/</link>
      <description>Join Attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, co-hosts and and Law.com bloggers for legal analysis on the Tavares case, and the effect this case may have on Mitt Romney’s run for the Presidency. Was the Massachusetts judge who released Daniel Tavares from prison within bounds?  Lawyer 2 Lawyer welcomes Attorney and WBZ News reporter Dan Rea, also host of WBZ Radio's NightSide with Dan Rea and David Frank, Attorney and reporter from Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:15:25 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Daniel Tavares Case: Legal and Political Deja Vu</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>108</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0c1a5342-cfaa-11eb-92b9-bf13735c7f06/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Daniel Tavares Case: Legal and Political Deja Vu</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Join Attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, co-hosts and and Law.com bloggers for legal analysis on the Tavares case, and the effect this case may have on Mitt Romney’s run for the Presidency. Was the Massachusetts judge who released Daniel Tavares from prison within bounds?  Lawyer 2 Lawyer welcomes Attorney and WBZ News reporter Dan Rea, also host of WBZ Radio's NightSide with Dan Rea and David Frank, Attorney and reporter from Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Join Attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, co-hosts and and Law.com bloggers for legal analysis on the Tavares case, and the effect this case may have on Mitt Romney’s run for the Presidency. Was the Massachusetts judge who released Daniel Tavares from prison within bounds?  Lawyer 2 Lawyer welcomes Attorney and WBZ News reporter Dan Rea, also host of WBZ Radio's NightSide with Dan Rea and David Frank, Attorney and reporter from Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2512</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/12/the-daniel-tavares-case-legal-and-political-deja-vu/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3705836147.mp3?updated=1623961967" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Vioxx Settlement</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/11/the-vioxx-settlement/</link>
      <description>Just last week, Merck &amp; Co. decided to settle tens of thousands of claims for $4.85 billion from patients who took the powerful painkiller Vioxx.  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they talk to the experts and take us inside the Vioxx settlement. Lawyer2Lawyer welcomes Attorney Thomas V. Girardi from the law firm of Girardi &amp; Keese and Attorney Leigh O’Dell, member of the Vioxx Litigation Team for the law firm Beasley Allen, as they discuss the Vioxx Settlement, Merck’s strategy, reaction to the settlement and the future of Merck and the drug industry.  Don’t miss it.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:44:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Vioxx Settlement</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>107</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0c3c2d78-cfaa-11eb-92b9-132e9a0d9e90/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Vioxx Settlement</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Just last week, Merck &amp; Co. decided to settle tens of thousands of claims for $4.85 billion from patients who took the powerful painkiller Vioxx.  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they talk to the experts and take us inside the Vioxx settlement. Lawyer2Lawyer welcomes Attorney Thomas V. Girardi from the law firm of Girardi &amp; Keese and Attorney Leigh O’Dell, member of the Vioxx Litigation Team for the law firm Beasley Allen, as they discuss the Vioxx Settlement, Merck’s strategy, reaction to the settlement and the future of Merck and the drug industry.  Don’t miss it.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Just last week, Merck &amp; Co. decided to settle tens of thousands of claims for $4.85 billion from patients who took the powerful painkiller Vioxx.  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they talk to the experts and take us inside the Vioxx settlement. Lawyer2Lawyer welcomes Attorney Thomas V. Girardi from the law firm of Girardi &amp; Keese and Attorney Leigh O’Dell, member of the Vioxx Litigation Team for the law firm Beasley Allen, as they discuss the Vioxx Settlement, Merck’s strategy, reaction to the settlement and the future of Merck and the drug industry.  Don’t miss it.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2090</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/11/the-vioxx-settlement/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1121994521.mp3?updated=1624285525" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Downloading Music Illegally and the Role of the RIAA</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/11/downloading-music-illegally-and-the-role-of-the-riaa/</link>
      <description>From musicians speaking out about the effect illegal downloading is having on the industry, to college students being sued, the issue of illegal music downloading is all around us. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they turn to the experts: Attorney Richard L. Gabriel, from the firm, Holme Roberts &amp; Owen LLP and lead national counsel for the Recording Industry Association of America and Attorney Fred von Lohmann, senior staff attorney specializing in intellectual property issues with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss the ethics behind dowloading music illegally, copyright law, the lawsuits brought by the RIAA, the fate of the music industry and alternatives to illegally downloading music.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:33:59 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Downloading Music Illegally and the Role of the RIAA</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>106</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0c6439ee-cfaa-11eb-92b9-5b2eef1c7522/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Downloading Music Illegally and the Role of the RIAA</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>From musicians speaking out about the effect illegal downloading is having on the industry, to college students being sued, the issue of illegal music downloading is all around us. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they turn to the experts: Attorney Richard L. Gabriel, from the firm, Holme Roberts &amp; Owen LLP and lead national counsel for the Recording Industry Association of America and Attorney Fred von Lohmann, senior staff attorney specializing in intellectual property issues with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss the ethics behind dowloading music illegally, copyright law, the lawsuits brought by the RIAA, the fate of the music industry and alternatives to illegally downloading music.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[From musicians speaking out about the effect illegal downloading is having on the industry, to college students being sued, the issue of illegal music downloading is all around us. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they turn to the experts: Attorney Richard L. Gabriel, from the firm, Holme Roberts &amp; Owen LLP and lead national counsel for the Recording Industry Association of America and Attorney Fred von Lohmann, senior staff attorney specializing in intellectual property issues with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss the ethics behind dowloading music illegally, copyright law, the lawsuits brought by the RIAA, the fate of the music industry and alternatives to illegally downloading music.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2441</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/11/downloading-music-illegally-and-the-role-of-the-riaa/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2088039577.mp3?updated=1623961967" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Early Release of William Flynn</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/11/the-early-release-of-william-flynn/</link>
      <description>William Flynn, the teenage lover who murdered Pamela Smart's husband in 1990 is asking a judge to reduce his prison sentence 11 years before he is set to become eligible for parole in 2018.  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they talk to the experts, Attorney Marsha Kazarosian and Attorney Allan H. Stokke, to discuss the potential early release of William Flynn.  On Lawyer2 Lawyer, we will also discuss how the request is filed and the criteria, the pros and cons in this particular case, and Flynn’s juvenile status at the time of the murder vs. the expectation that “he should pay for what he did”. Join us!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:42:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Early Release of William Flynn</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>105</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0c8421dc-cfaa-11eb-92b9-8f826675a36c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Early Release of William Flynn</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>William Flynn, the teenage lover who murdered Pamela Smart's husband in 1990 is asking a judge to reduce his prison sentence 11 years before he is set to become eligible for parole in 2018.  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they talk to the experts, Attorney Marsha Kazarosian and Attorney Allan H. Stokke, to discuss the potential early release of William Flynn.  On Lawyer2 Lawyer, we will also discuss how the request is filed and the criteria, the pros and cons in this particular case, and Flynn’s juvenile status at the time of the murder vs. the expectation that “he should pay for what he did”. Join us!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[William Flynn, the teenage lover who murdered Pamela Smart's husband in 1990 is asking a judge to reduce his prison sentence 11 years before he is set to become eligible for parole in 2018.  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they talk to the experts, Attorney Marsha Kazarosian and Attorney Allan H. Stokke, to discuss the potential early release of William Flynn.  On Lawyer2 Lawyer, we will also discuss how the request is filed and the criteria, the pros and cons in this particular case, and Flynn’s juvenile status at the time of the murder vs. the expectation that “he should pay for what he did”. Join us!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2032</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/11/the-early-release-of-william-flynn/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4112162400.mp3?updated=1624285421" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Southern California Fires</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/10/the-southern-california-fires/</link>
      <description>The California wildfires ripped through parts of Southern California last week destroying anything in their path and leaving many homeless. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they get first-hand accounts from three San Diego Lawyers affected by the fires: Attorney Mark C. Zebrowski and Katherine L. Parker both from Morrison &amp; Foerster LLP and Attorney Dan Hull, from Hull McGuire PC. On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will take a look at Morrison &amp; Foerester’s, “Helping Handbook”, which provides legal information for victims of the fires, discuss how law firms are coping with this disaster, the legal issues surrounding the fires, and take a look ahead at what is next for firms affected by the fires and how they are dealing with the aftermath of the fires legally.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:22:42 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Southern California Fires</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>104</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0cab806a-cfaa-11eb-92b9-5b95838ca988/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Southern California Fires</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The California wildfires ripped through parts of Southern California last week destroying anything in their path and leaving many homeless. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they get first-hand accounts from three San Diego Lawyers affected by the fires: Attorney Mark C. Zebrowski and Katherine L. Parker both from Morrison &amp; Foerster LLP and Attorney Dan Hull, from Hull McGuire PC. On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will take a look at Morrison &amp; Foerester’s, “Helping Handbook”, which provides legal information for victims of the fires, discuss how law firms are coping with this disaster, the legal issues surrounding the fires, and take a look ahead at what is next for firms affected by the fires and how they are dealing with the aftermath of the fires legally.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The California wildfires ripped through parts of Southern California last week destroying anything in their path and leaving many homeless. Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, as they get first-hand accounts from three San Diego Lawyers affected by the fires: Attorney Mark C. Zebrowski and Katherine L. Parker both from Morrison &amp; Foerster LLP and Attorney Dan Hull, from Hull McGuire PC. On Lawyer2Lawyer, we will take a look at Morrison &amp; Foerester’s, “Helping Handbook”, which provides legal information for victims of the fires, discuss how law firms are coping with this disaster, the legal issues surrounding the fires, and take a look ahead at what is next for firms affected by the fires and how they are dealing with the aftermath of the fires legally.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2172</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/10/the-southern-california-fires/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2806944869.mp3?updated=1624285457" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Both Sides of a Federal Investigation</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/10/both-sides-of-a-federal-investigation/</link>
      <description>If a firm or company finds itself being investigated by the government what should it do?  How does it prepare if one day the feds come knocking? Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi turn to Roscoe C. Howard, Jr., who has been on both sides of federal investigations as a Washington-based partner with Troutman Sanders LLP and a former federal prosecutor.  Attorney Howard will offer his advice to those who find themselves knee-deep in trouble and prepare those who work within the walls of a company or firm by discussing compliance programs, working with investigators and the importance of a right to counsel.  Don’t miss out!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:58:59 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Both Sides of a Federal Investigation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>103</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0cd74b1e-cfaa-11eb-92b9-df2502f6324b/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Both Sides of a Federal Investigation</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>If a firm or company finds itself being investigated by the government what should it do?  How does it prepare if one day the feds come knocking? Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi turn to Roscoe C. Howard, Jr., who has been on both sides of federal investigations as a Washington-based partner with Troutman Sanders LLP and a former federal prosecutor.  Attorney Howard will offer his advice to those who find themselves knee-deep in trouble and prepare those who work within the walls of a company or firm by discussing compliance programs, working with investigators and the importance of a right to counsel.  Don’t miss out!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[If a firm or company finds itself being investigated by the government what should it do?  How does it prepare if one day the feds come knocking? Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi turn to Roscoe C. Howard, Jr., who has been on both sides of federal investigations as a Washington-based partner with Troutman Sanders LLP and a former federal prosecutor.  Attorney Howard will offer his advice to those who find themselves knee-deep in trouble and prepare those who work within the walls of a company or firm by discussing compliance programs, working with investigators and the importance of a right to counsel.  Don’t miss out!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2077</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/10/both-sides-of-a-federal-investigation/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5417765935.mp3?updated=1624285446" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2 Year Anniversary with Dean Chemerinsky and Chancellor Drake</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/10/2-year-anniversary-with-dean-chemerinsky-and-chancellor-drake/</link>
      <description>It is official!  This is the 2 year Anniversary Show of Lawyer 2 Lawyer!  The past two years have been action-packed, covering a wide range of topics from controversial Supreme Court rulings and the effects of Global Warming to the power of E-discovery and the popularity of International Law.  To help celebrate this momentous occasion, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, invite Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and Chancellor Michael V. Drake to talk about what’s new at UC Irvine and a look ahead to a new Dean and a new Law School.  Don’t miss this!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:24:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>2 Year Anniversary with Dean Chemerinsky and Chancellor Drake</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>102</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0cffcdfa-cfaa-11eb-92b9-5fc945b69be4/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>2 Year Anniversary with Chemerinsky and Chancellor Drake</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It is official!  This is the 2 year Anniversary Show of Lawyer 2 Lawyer!  The past two years have been action-packed, covering a wide range of topics from controversial Supreme Court rulings and the effects of Global Warming to the power of E-discovery and the popularity of International Law.  To help celebrate this momentous occasion, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, invite Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and Chancellor Michael V. Drake to talk about what’s new at UC Irvine and a look ahead to a new Dean and a new Law School.  Don’t miss this!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[It is official!  This is the 2 year Anniversary Show of Lawyer 2 Lawyer!  The past two years have been action-packed, covering a wide range of topics from controversial Supreme Court rulings and the effects of Global Warming to the power of E-discovery and the popularity of International Law.  To help celebrate this momentous occasion, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, invite Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and Chancellor Michael V. Drake to talk about what’s new at UC Irvine and a look ahead to a new Dean and a new Law School.  Don’t miss this!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2778</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/10/2-year-anniversary-with-dean-chemerinsky-and-chancellor-drake/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9563237261.mp3?updated=1624285457" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Magic Circle</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/10/the-magic-circle/</link>
      <description>The latest Global 100 report shows the top U.K. firms growing, with a surge in profitability and it is creating quite a stir here in the States. The Magic Circle quintet—5 elite law firms are looking at world domination when it comes to global business and law. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss the power of the Magic Circle, the competition between US and UK firms and other corners of the globe and take a look ahead at what the future holds for business and law in the UK. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi turn to Richard Lloyd, The American Lawyer Magazine’s, Chief European Correspondent, who recently wrote an article on this topic entitled, Magic Circle Firms Have the Magic Touch.  Don’t miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:58:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Magic Circle</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>101</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0d2a14f2-cfaa-11eb-92b9-33f41bed5039/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Magic Circle</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The latest Global 100 report shows the top U.K. firms growing, with a surge in profitability and it is creating quite a stir here in the States. The Magic Circle quintet—5 elite law firms are looking at world domination when it comes to global business and law. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss the power of the Magic Circle, the competition between US and UK firms and other corners of the globe and take a look ahead at what the future holds for business and law in the UK. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi turn to Richard Lloyd, The American Lawyer Magazine’s, Chief European Correspondent, who recently wrote an article on this topic entitled, Magic Circle Firms Have the Magic Touch.  Don’t miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The latest Global 100 report shows the top U.K. firms growing, with a surge in profitability and it is creating quite a stir here in the States. The Magic Circle quintet—5 elite law firms are looking at world domination when it comes to global business and law. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss the power of the Magic Circle, the competition between US and UK firms and other corners of the globe and take a look ahead at what the future holds for business and law in the UK. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi turn to Richard Lloyd, The American Lawyer Magazine’s, Chief European Correspondent, who recently wrote an article on this topic entitled, Magic Circle Firms Have the Magic Touch.  Don’t miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1904</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/10/the-magic-circle/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7362460228.mp3?updated=1623961969" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Ethics and Marketing Behind Lawyer Ranking Sites</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/10/legal-ethics-and-marketing-behind-lawyer-ranking-sites/</link>
      <description>Many questions remain when it comes to lawyer ranking websites: What are the legal ethics issues? Are they credible? Does money play a part in upping a lawyer’s rank?  Is it simply a popularity contest amongst peers? On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss the legal ethics and marketing that surround law ranking websites and what these sites are doing in a quest to build a credible ranking system for attorneys. Law.com blogger and host, Robert Ambrogi turns to the experts to give their vantage point: Katrina Dewey, the founder of Lawdragon, Mark Beese, Chief Marketing Officer for Holland &amp; Hart and Legal Marketing Association Board Member and Ben Cowgill, lawyer, writer and teacher in the field of legal ethics.  Don’t miss this riveting discussion.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:52:40 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Ethics and Marketing Behind Lawyer Ranking Sites</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>100</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0d5038bc-cfaa-11eb-92b9-33f170cebf5b/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Ethics and Marketing Behind Lawyer Ranking Sites</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Many questions remain when it comes to lawyer ranking websites: What are the legal ethics issues? Are they credible? Does money play a part in upping a lawyer’s rank?  Is it simply a popularity contest amongst peers? On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss the legal ethics and marketing that surround law ranking websites and what these sites are doing in a quest to build a credible ranking system for attorneys. Law.com blogger and host, Robert Ambrogi turns to the experts to give their vantage point: Katrina Dewey, the founder of Lawdragon, Mark Beese, Chief Marketing Officer for Holland &amp; Hart and Legal Marketing Association Board Member and Ben Cowgill, lawyer, writer and teacher in the field of legal ethics.  Don’t miss this riveting discussion.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Many questions remain when it comes to lawyer ranking websites: What are the legal ethics issues? Are they credible? Does money play a part in upping a lawyer’s rank?  Is it simply a popularity contest amongst peers? On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss the legal ethics and marketing that surround law ranking websites and what these sites are doing in a quest to build a credible ranking system for attorneys. Law.com blogger and host, Robert Ambrogi turns to the experts to give their vantage point: Katrina Dewey, the founder of Lawdragon, Mark Beese, Chief Marketing Officer for Holland &amp; Hart and Legal Marketing Association Board Member and Ben Cowgill, lawyer, writer and teacher in the field of legal ethics.  Don’t miss this riveting discussion.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2633</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/10/legal-ethics-and-marketing-behind-lawyer-ranking-sites/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6128197130.mp3?updated=1623961969" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>China's Toy Recall</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/09/chinas-toy-recall/</link>
      <description>The term, “Made in China” has come under a lot of scrutiny as of late.  The latest worldwide toy recall has created huge image problems for Chinese-manufactured goods.  Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss the toy recall, the effect of the recall on the global economy and the fate of global outsourcing.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Professor Peter Dean, from Hong Kong Polytechnic University School of Design  and a former US toy industry executive and Arthur Kroeber, managing director and head of research at Dragonomics out of Beijing, to discuss this hot topic.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:17:27 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>China's Toy Recall</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>99</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0d7b0132-cfaa-11eb-92b9-436ce816c575/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>China's Toy Recall</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The term, “Made in China” has come under a lot of scrutiny as of late.  The latest worldwide toy recall has created huge image problems for Chinese-manufactured goods.  Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss the toy recall, the effect of the recall on the global economy and the fate of global outsourcing.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Professor Peter Dean, from Hong Kong Polytechnic University School of Design  and a former US toy industry executive and Arthur Kroeber, managing director and head of research at Dragonomics out of Beijing, to discuss this hot topic.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The term, “Made in China” has come under a lot of scrutiny as of late.  The latest worldwide toy recall has created huge image problems for Chinese-manufactured goods.  Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss the toy recall, the effect of the recall on the global economy and the fate of global outsourcing.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Professor Peter Dean, from Hong Kong Polytechnic University School of Design  and a former US toy industry executive and Arthur Kroeber, managing director and head of research at Dragonomics out of Beijing, to discuss this hot topic.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2240</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/09/chinas-toy-recall/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9742827628.mp3?updated=1623961969" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyers Without Borders and Human Rights</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/09/lawyers-without-borders-and-human-rights/</link>
      <description>There are many attorneys out there who are giving back to their communities, whether it is through pro bono work locally or internationally or donating their time and money to help those in need through their humanitarian efforts.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss how attorneys are helping others overseas and will be concentrating on those involved in Human Rights.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Christina M. Storm, Founder and Director of Lawyers Without Borders, Inc. and Attorney Jerry Shestack, trial attorney and world leader in the international human rights movement, to discuss the power of helping others internationally through the law.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:47:15 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyers Without Borders and Human Rights</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>98</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0da16548-cfaa-11eb-92b9-5f586150c02f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyers Without Borders and Human Rights</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>There are many attorneys out there who are giving back to their communities, whether it is through pro bono work locally or internationally or donating their time and money to help those in need through their humanitarian efforts.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss how attorneys are helping others overseas and will be concentrating on those involved in Human Rights.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Christina M. Storm, Founder and Director of Lawyers Without Borders, Inc. and Attorney Jerry Shestack, trial attorney and world leader in the international human rights movement, to discuss the power of helping others internationally through the law.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[There are many attorneys out there who are giving back to their communities, whether it is through pro bono work locally or internationally or donating their time and money to help those in need through their humanitarian efforts.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss how attorneys are helping others overseas and will be concentrating on those involved in Human Rights.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Christina M. Storm, Founder and Director of Lawyers Without Borders, Inc. and Attorney Jerry Shestack, trial attorney and world leader in the international human rights movement, to discuss the power of helping others internationally through the law.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2228</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/09/lawyers-without-borders-and-human-rights/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5074283347.mp3?updated=1624285566" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Age Discrimination in the Legal Profession</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/09/age-discrimination-in-the-legal-profession/</link>
      <description>Many senior attorneys or “gray” lawyers are often forced into retirement by their firms or left jobless facing big decisions with their futures in the law.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer we will discuss age discrimination in the legal profession.  Are older lawyers being pushed out? What alternatives are there for senior lawyers? What is being done to assist these attorneys? Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome Jean Berman, Executive Director of the International Senior Lawyers Project and Kate Madigan, President of the NY State Bar Association, to discuss this growing issue in the legal profession.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:17:45 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Age Discrimination in the Legal Profession</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>97</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0dc5e486-cfaa-11eb-92b9-bf2efbf844c8/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Age Discrimination in the Legal Profession</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Many senior attorneys or “gray” lawyers are often forced into retirement by their firms or left jobless facing big decisions with their futures in the law.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer we will discuss age discrimination in the legal profession.  Are older lawyers being pushed out? What alternatives are there for senior lawyers? What is being done to assist these attorneys? Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome Jean Berman, Executive Director of the International Senior Lawyers Project and Kate Madigan, President of the NY State Bar Association, to discuss this growing issue in the legal profession.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Many senior attorneys or “gray” lawyers are often forced into retirement by their firms or left jobless facing big decisions with their futures in the law.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer we will discuss age discrimination in the legal profession.  Are older lawyers being pushed out? What alternatives are there for senior lawyers? What is being done to assist these attorneys? Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome Jean Berman, Executive Director of the International Senior Lawyers Project and Kate Madigan, President of the NY State Bar Association, to discuss this growing issue in the legal profession.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2114</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/09/age-discrimination-in-the-legal-profession/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9086537890.mp3?updated=1623961970" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Baseball Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/08/baseball-law/</link>
      <description>Steroids scandals, homerun balls, suing for slander—Baseball has become a hotbed of legal activity.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, will discuss what is new in Baseball Law, the reputation of Major League Baseball and preferential treatment of baseball players.  Lawyer 2 Lawyer welcomes two of the world's leading experts on baseball and the law, Professor Paul Finkelman, from Albany Law School in Albany, N.Y., and Professor Howard Wasserman, Visiting Associate Professor of Law at St. Louis University School of Law and Associate Professor of Law at the Florida International University School of Law, who is also a contributor to “Sports Law Blog.”</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:03:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Baseball Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>96</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0e0ccdf6-cfaa-11eb-92b9-130857d67161/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Baseball Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Steroids scandals, homerun balls, suing for slander—Baseball has become a hotbed of legal activity.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, will discuss what is new in Baseball Law, the reputation of Major League Baseball and preferential treatment of baseball players.  Lawyer 2 Lawyer welcomes two of the world's leading experts on baseball and the law, Professor Paul Finkelman, from Albany Law School in Albany, N.Y., and Professor Howard Wasserman, Visiting Associate Professor of Law at St. Louis University School of Law and Associate Professor of Law at the Florida International University School of Law, who is also a contributor to “Sports Law Blog.”</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Steroids scandals, homerun balls, suing for slander—Baseball has become a hotbed of legal activity.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, will discuss what is new in Baseball Law, the reputation of Major League Baseball and preferential treatment of baseball players.  Lawyer 2 Lawyer welcomes two of the world's leading experts on baseball and the law, Professor Paul Finkelman, from Albany Law School in Albany, N.Y., and Professor Howard Wasserman, Visiting Associate Professor of Law at St. Louis University School of Law and Associate Professor of Law at the Florida International University School of Law, who is also a contributor to “Sports Law Blog.”]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2324</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/08/baseball-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8678892999.mp3?updated=1624285445" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Big Dig Indictment</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/08/big-dig-indictment/</link>
      <description>A company indicted for involuntary manslaughter? It raises interesting, timely legal questions involving the company that provided the epoxy blamed in the fatal Big Dig tunnel collapse in Boston killing a woman in a car. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Law.com blogger and host, J. Craig Williams welcomes David Frank, News Reporter from Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly and Attorney Bradley M. Henry, partner in the Boston law firm of Meehan, Boyle, Black &amp; Bogdanow, P.C. and the "Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel" on behalf of the children of the victim in this case, Milena DelValle, to discuss the reaction to this indictment, charging Powers Fasteners with one count of involuntary manslaughter, the cap on criminal penalties for corporations and what the future holds for the other companies who could potentially be charged for this tragedy.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:03:15 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>95</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0e346eb0-cfaa-11eb-92b9-139e0549b383/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Big Dig Indictment</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A company indicted for involuntary manslaughter? It raises interesting, timely legal questions involving the company that provided the epoxy blamed in the fatal Big Dig tunnel collapse in Boston killing a woman in a car. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Law.com blogger and host, J. Craig Williams welcomes David Frank, News Reporter from Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly and Attorney Bradley M. Henry, partner in the Boston law firm of Meehan, Boyle, Black &amp; Bogdanow, P.C. and the "Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel" on behalf of the children of the victim in this case, Milena DelValle, to discuss the reaction to this indictment, charging Powers Fasteners with one count of involuntary manslaughter, the cap on criminal penalties for corporations and what the future holds for the other companies who could potentially be charged for this tragedy.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A company indicted for involuntary manslaughter? It raises interesting, timely legal questions involving the company that provided the epoxy blamed in the fatal Big Dig tunnel collapse in Boston killing a woman in a car. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Law.com blogger and host, J. Craig Williams welcomes David Frank, News Reporter from Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly and Attorney Bradley M. Henry, partner in the Boston law firm of Meehan, Boyle, Black &amp; Bogdanow, P.C. and the "Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel" on behalf of the children of the victim in this case, Milena DelValle, to discuss the reaction to this indictment, charging Powers Fasteners with one count of involuntary manslaughter, the cap on criminal penalties for corporations and what the future holds for the other companies who could potentially be charged for this tragedy.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2139</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/08/big-dig-indictment/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7220087343.mp3?updated=1623961971" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Funding</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/08/legal-funding/</link>
      <description>Legal funding barely existed just a few short years ago and now is perhaps the fastest emerging financial trend in the legal business community.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, will explore what’s new in the industry of legal funding, talk to a plaintiff attorney about what goes into a case with the assistance of legal funding and discuss the ethics and the statues/regulations that apply to legal funding.  Lawyer 2 Lawyer welcomes Gary Chodes, founder and CEO of Oasis Legal Finance, Robert Hawley, Deputy Executive Director of the State Bar of California and Ron Kramer, Plaintiff Attorney out of Utah, to tell us a little more about the Legal Funding Industry.  Join us!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:41:54 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Funding</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>94</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0e613d78-cfaa-11eb-92b9-5fa7a8c0efd6/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Funding</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Legal funding barely existed just a few short years ago and now is perhaps the fastest emerging financial trend in the legal business community.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, will explore what’s new in the industry of legal funding, talk to a plaintiff attorney about what goes into a case with the assistance of legal funding and discuss the ethics and the statues/regulations that apply to legal funding.  Lawyer 2 Lawyer welcomes Gary Chodes, founder and CEO of Oasis Legal Finance, Robert Hawley, Deputy Executive Director of the State Bar of California and Ron Kramer, Plaintiff Attorney out of Utah, to tell us a little more about the Legal Funding Industry.  Join us!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Legal funding barely existed just a few short years ago and now is perhaps the fastest emerging financial trend in the legal business community.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, will explore what’s new in the industry of legal funding, talk to a plaintiff attorney about what goes into a case with the assistance of legal funding and discuss the ethics and the statues/regulations that apply to legal funding.  Lawyer 2 Lawyer welcomes Gary Chodes, founder and CEO of Oasis Legal Finance, Robert Hawley, Deputy Executive Director of the State Bar of California and Ron Kramer, Plaintiff Attorney out of Utah, to tell us a little more about the Legal Funding Industry.  Join us!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2359</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/08/legal-funding/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8039177882.mp3?updated=1623961971" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Climate Change Issues</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/08/climate-change-issues/</link>
      <description>The environment has taken center stage in the media, politics, throughout our households and how we live.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss recent legislation developments, the presence of global warming awareness and the operation of carbon credit trading dynamics.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome David J. Hayes, the Global Chair of the Environment, Land &amp; Resources Department at Latham &amp; Watkins and Michael J. Walsh, Executive Vice President of Chicago Climate Exchange.  Don’t miss out on these important issues!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:20:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Climate Change Issues</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>93</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0e865aea-cfaa-11eb-92b9-7f258060719c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Climate Change Issues</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The environment has taken center stage in the media, politics, throughout our households and how we live.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss recent legislation developments, the presence of global warming awareness and the operation of carbon credit trading dynamics.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome David J. Hayes, the Global Chair of the Environment, Land &amp; Resources Department at Latham &amp; Watkins and Michael J. Walsh, Executive Vice President of Chicago Climate Exchange.  Don’t miss out on these important issues!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The environment has taken center stage in the media, politics, throughout our households and how we live.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss recent legislation developments, the presence of global warming awareness and the operation of carbon credit trading dynamics.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome David J. Hayes, the Global Chair of the Environment, Land &amp; Resources Department at Latham &amp; Watkins and Michael J. Walsh, Executive Vice President of Chicago Climate Exchange.  Don’t miss out on these important issues!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2141</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/08/climate-change-issues/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1511822738.mp3?updated=1624285461" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>You Tube and the Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/07/youtube-and-the-law/</link>
      <description>YouTube has played a huge part in getting a message out.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will look at the vitality of YouTube as a business and marketing tool . We'll see  how law firms are dealing with the popularity of  this  technology  and using  it to one-up the competition. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome Neil Squillante, the publisher of TechnoLawyer, Kevin O’Keefe, the President and founder of LexBlog and Kelly Y. Chang, founder of Law Offices of Kelly Chang and a YouTube user, to discuss this hot topic.  Don’t miss out on this program!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:24:26 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>You Tube and the Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>92</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0eafd9f6-cfaa-11eb-92b9-4f6e47307f40/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>You Tube and the Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>YouTube has played a huge part in getting a message out.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will look at the vitality of YouTube as a business and marketing tool . We'll see  how law firms are dealing with the popularity of  this  technology  and using  it to one-up the competition. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome Neil Squillante, the publisher of TechnoLawyer, Kevin O’Keefe, the President and founder of LexBlog and Kelly Y. Chang, founder of Law Offices of Kelly Chang and a YouTube user, to discuss this hot topic.  Don’t miss out on this program!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[YouTube has played a huge part in getting a message out.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will look at the vitality of YouTube as a business and marketing tool . We'll see  how law firms are dealing with the popularity of  this  technology  and using  it to one-up the competition. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, welcome Neil Squillante, the publisher of TechnoLawyer, Kevin O’Keefe, the President and founder of LexBlog and Kelly Y. Chang, founder of Law Offices of Kelly Chang and a YouTube user, to discuss this hot topic.  Don’t miss out on this program!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2236</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/07/youtube-and-the-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6997468322.mp3?updated=1623961971" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyer Depression</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/07/lawyer-depression/</link>
      <description>Depression among attorneys is becoming a serious problem in a high stress profession.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we focus on the topic of lawyers and their personal battles outside the court room, specifically in the area of mental health and substance abuse with some first hand accounts. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi turn to the experts, Attorney Dan Lukasik of the firm Cantor, Lukasik, Dolce &amp; Panepinto in Buffalo, New York and founder of Lawyers with Depression and Ellen Murphy, Executive Director of the non-profit website, Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers.  Please listen to this important show!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:13:58 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyer Depression</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>91</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0ed60e64-cfaa-11eb-92b9-4b4928aa619d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyer Depression</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Depression among attorneys is becoming a serious problem in a high stress profession.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we focus on the topic of lawyers and their personal battles outside the court room, specifically in the area of mental health and substance abuse with some first hand accounts. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi turn to the experts, Attorney Dan Lukasik of the firm Cantor, Lukasik, Dolce &amp; Panepinto in Buffalo, New York and founder of Lawyers with Depression and Ellen Murphy, Executive Director of the non-profit website, Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers.  Please listen to this important show!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Depression among attorneys is becoming a serious problem in a high stress profession.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we focus on the topic of lawyers and their personal battles outside the court room, specifically in the area of mental health and substance abuse with some first hand accounts. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi turn to the experts, Attorney Dan Lukasik of the firm Cantor, Lukasik, Dolce &amp; Panepinto in Buffalo, New York and founder of Lawyers with Depression and Ellen Murphy, Executive Director of the non-profit website, Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers.  Please listen to this important show!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2181</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/07/lawyer-depression/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3904778492.mp3?updated=1624285456" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AVVO's Reaction</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/07/avvos-reaction/</link>
      <description>Avvo executives speak out on this week's Lawyer2Lawyer with co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi. Hear Avvo CEO and President, Mark Britton and VP of Products &amp; Marketing, Paul Bloom with their reactions to our previous podcast about Avvo, the newest lawyer rating service against which a class action suit has been filed due to dissatisfaction with the service. Listen to their point of view, how they are dealing with feedback and what steps they're taking to improve Avvo. Check it out!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:42:07 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>AVVO's Reaction</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>90</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0ef61c72-cfaa-11eb-92b9-7b2b8cbe4e2d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>AVVO's Reaction</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Avvo executives speak out on this week's Lawyer2Lawyer with co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi. Hear Avvo CEO and President, Mark Britton and VP of Products &amp; Marketing, Paul Bloom with their reactions to our previous podcast about Avvo, the newest lawyer rating service against which a class action suit has been filed due to dissatisfaction with the service. Listen to their point of view, how they are dealing with feedback and what steps they're taking to improve Avvo. Check it out!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Avvo executives speak out on this week's Lawyer2Lawyer with co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi. Hear Avvo CEO and President, Mark Britton and VP of Products &amp; Marketing, Paul Bloom with their reactions to our previous podcast about Avvo, the newest lawyer rating service against which a class action suit has been filed due to dissatisfaction with the service. Listen to their point of view, how they are dealing with feedback and what steps they're taking to improve Avvo. Check it out!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2415</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/07/avvos-reaction/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3888112432.mp3?updated=1624285512" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Week's Supreme Court Rulings and Wrap-up</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/06/this-weeks-supreme-court-rulings-and-wrap-up/</link>
      <description>A big week for the U.S. Supreme Court with five rulings involving free speech, religion and campaign finance. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we discuss them and look ahead to upcoming SUPCO action. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi with the experts: Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for Legal Times, American Lawyer Media, and Law.com and Amy Howe, Partner at Howe &amp; Russell P.C in Washington D.C. and regular contributor to and editor of SCOTUSblog.  Don’t miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:33:52 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>This Week's Supreme Court Rulings and Wrap-up</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>89</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0f19fe6c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-6b351455393f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>This Week's Supreme Court Rulings and Wrap-up</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A big week for the U.S. Supreme Court with five rulings involving free speech, religion and campaign finance. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we discuss them and look ahead to upcoming SUPCO action. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi with the experts: Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for Legal Times, American Lawyer Media, and Law.com and Amy Howe, Partner at Howe &amp; Russell P.C in Washington D.C. and regular contributor to and editor of SCOTUSblog.  Don’t miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A big week for the U.S. Supreme Court with five rulings involving free speech, religion and campaign finance. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we discuss them and look ahead to upcoming SUPCO action. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi with the experts: Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for Legal Times, American Lawyer Media, and Law.com and Amy Howe, Partner at Howe &amp; Russell P.C in Washington D.C. and regular contributor to and editor of SCOTUSblog.  Don’t miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2184</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/06/this-weeks-supreme-court-rulings-and-wrap-up/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8738664556.mp3?updated=1623961972" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pet Food Contamination, Property Damage and Product Liability</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/06/pet-food-contamination-property-damage-and-product-liability/</link>
      <description>On March 16, 2007, Ontario-based Menu Foods recalled more than 60 million cans and pouches of pet food that it marketed under a variety of brand names.  Many pets across the States became ill or even died. Join Law.com blogggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they discuss the pet food recall, the lawsuits and class actions filed against the distributor, product liability and property damage and the significance of pets in our society.  Lawyer 2 Lawyer welcomes Attorney Jay Edelson, partner at the firm Blim &amp; Edelson LLC out of Chicago, who filed one of the first class actions involving the contaminated pet food crisis and Attorney Bruce Wagman, partner with the firm Schiff Hardin LLP in San Francisco and Chief Outside Litigation Counsel of the Animal Legal Defense Fund.   Don’t miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:23:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Pet Food Contamination, Property Damage and Product Liability</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>88</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0f3f863c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-7367368381b1/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Pet Food Contamination, Property Damage and Product Liability</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On March 16, 2007, Ontario-based Menu Foods recalled more than 60 million cans and pouches of pet food that it marketed under a variety of brand names.  Many pets across the States became ill or even died. Join Law.com blogggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they discuss the pet food recall, the lawsuits and class actions filed against the distributor, product liability and property damage and the significance of pets in our society.  Lawyer 2 Lawyer welcomes Attorney Jay Edelson, partner at the firm Blim &amp; Edelson LLC out of Chicago, who filed one of the first class actions involving the contaminated pet food crisis and Attorney Bruce Wagman, partner with the firm Schiff Hardin LLP in San Francisco and Chief Outside Litigation Counsel of the Animal Legal Defense Fund.   Don’t miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On March 16, 2007, Ontario-based Menu Foods recalled more than 60 million cans and pouches of pet food that it marketed under a variety of brand names.  Many pets across the States became ill or even died. Join Law.com blogggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they discuss the pet food recall, the lawsuits and class actions filed against the distributor, product liability and property damage and the significance of pets in our society.  Lawyer 2 Lawyer welcomes Attorney Jay Edelson, partner at the firm Blim &amp; Edelson LLC out of Chicago, who filed one of the first class actions involving the contaminated pet food crisis and Attorney Bruce Wagman, partner with the firm Schiff Hardin LLP in San Francisco and Chief Outside Litigation Counsel of the Animal Legal Defense Fund.   Don’t miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2010</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/06/pet-food-contamination-property-damage-and-product-liability/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3457063890.mp3?updated=1624285544" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Avvo Class Action</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/06/avvo-class-action/</link>
      <description>The online numerical ranking system of lawyers, Avvo, launched last week with mixed reviews.  Many attorneys complained about Avvo's  information and some even called it a popularity contest.   Two Seattle attorneys have filed a class action lawsuit against Avvo.   On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we discuss thoughts about the product, the class action suit, competition among lawyers and the future of Avvo. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome our guests: Attorney John Henry Browne, criminal defense attorney at the Law offices of John Henry Browne out of Seattle and one of the attorneys filing the class action lawsuit, Carolyn Elefant, founder and principal attorney in the Law Offices of Carolyn Elefant and blogger for MyShingle.com and Law.com's Legal Blog Watch and Denise Howell, appellate, intellectual property, and technology lawyer and blogger for Bag and Baggage.  Don't
miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:40:40 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Avvo Class Action</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>87</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0f67f5fe-cfaa-11eb-92b9-8b180a586e6b/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Avvo Class Action</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The online numerical ranking system of lawyers, Avvo, launched last week with mixed reviews.  Many attorneys complained about Avvo's  information and some even called it a popularity contest.   Two Seattle attorneys have filed a class action lawsuit against Avvo.   On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we discuss thoughts about the product, the class action suit, competition among lawyers and the future of Avvo. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome our guests: Attorney John Henry Browne, criminal defense attorney at the Law offices of John Henry Browne out of Seattle and one of the attorneys filing the class action lawsuit, Carolyn Elefant, founder and principal attorney in the Law Offices of Carolyn Elefant and blogger for MyShingle.com and Law.com's Legal Blog Watch and Denise Howell, appellate, intellectual property, and technology lawyer and blogger for Bag and Baggage.  Don't
miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The online numerical ranking system of lawyers, Avvo, launched last week with mixed reviews.  Many attorneys complained about Avvo's  information and some even called it a popularity contest.   Two Seattle attorneys have filed a class action lawsuit against Avvo.   On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we discuss thoughts about the product, the class action suit, competition among lawyers and the future of Avvo. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome our guests: Attorney John Henry Browne, criminal defense attorney at the Law offices of John Henry Browne out of Seattle and one of the attorneys filing the class action lawsuit, Carolyn Elefant, founder and principal attorney in the Law Offices of Carolyn Elefant and blogger for MyShingle.com and Law.com's Legal Blog Watch and Denise Howell, appellate, intellectual property, and technology lawyer and blogger for Bag and Baggage.  Don't
miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2218</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/06/avvo-class-action/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6829722554.mp3?updated=1624285441" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Liability and the TB Scare</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/06/legal-liability-and-the-tb-scare/</link>
      <description>A 31-year-old personal injury lawyer out of Atlanta, Andrew Speaker, stirred up an international public health emergency when he traveled to Europe after being diagnosed with a drug resistant form of tuberculosis.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will talk about the legal liability of this specific case.  What can happen to Andrew Speaker legally?  Can he be disbarred?  As a lawyer, should he have known better?  We will also discuss the doctors’ liability.  Did they give him permission to fly?  Are they at fault?  Join Law.com blogger and host J. Craig Williams as he gets insight from our guests: Professor Stephen Bainbridge, William D. Warren Professor of Law at UCLA and Dr. Robert Klitzman,  co-founder of the Columbia University Center for Bioethics and an associate professor of clinical psychiatry at the university’s College of Physicians and Surgeons.  Please join us!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:09:06 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Liability and the TB Scare</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>86</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0f912ece-cfaa-11eb-92b9-4305ffddbca5/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Liability and the TB Scare</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A 31-year-old personal injury lawyer out of Atlanta, Andrew Speaker, stirred up an international public health emergency when he traveled to Europe after being diagnosed with a drug resistant form of tuberculosis.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will talk about the legal liability of this specific case.  What can happen to Andrew Speaker legally?  Can he be disbarred?  As a lawyer, should he have known better?  We will also discuss the doctors’ liability.  Did they give him permission to fly?  Are they at fault?  Join Law.com blogger and host J. Craig Williams as he gets insight from our guests: Professor Stephen Bainbridge, William D. Warren Professor of Law at UCLA and Dr. Robert Klitzman,  co-founder of the Columbia University Center for Bioethics and an associate professor of clinical psychiatry at the university’s College of Physicians and Surgeons.  Please join us!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A 31-year-old personal injury lawyer out of Atlanta, Andrew Speaker, stirred up an international public health emergency when he traveled to Europe after being diagnosed with a drug resistant form of tuberculosis.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will talk about the legal liability of this specific case.  What can happen to Andrew Speaker legally?  Can he be disbarred?  As a lawyer, should he have known better?  We will also discuss the doctors’ liability.  Did they give him permission to fly?  Are they at fault?  Join Law.com blogger and host J. Craig Williams as he gets insight from our guests: Professor Stephen Bainbridge, William D. Warren Professor of Law at UCLA and Dr. Robert Klitzman,  co-founder of the Columbia University Center for Bioethics and an associate professor of clinical psychiatry at the university’s College of Physicians and Surgeons.  Please join us!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2274</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/06/legal-liability-and-the-tb-scare/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6834243763.mp3?updated=1624285454" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cultural Differences Between Legal Systems</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/06/cultural-differences-between-legal-systems/</link>
      <description>Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will talk to three attorneys to discuss their trip and ask them about the development of the legal system in China, what they learned and what they are bringing back to our legal system here in the States.  We will also speak to another attorney who will give us his outlook on his experience as a lawyer in Hong Kong.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Nicholas Connon, from the firm Connon Wood Scheidemantle LLP, Malcolm S. McNeil, partner in the Los Angeles office of the Hawaii based law firm, Carlsmith Ball, Neville Asherson, Senior Partner in the law firm Asherson, Klein &amp; Darbinian and Roderick Miller, lead partner in the law firm of Miller Peart which is based in Hong Kong. Don’t miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:19:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Cultural Differences Between Legal Systems</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>85</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0fb6e02e-cfaa-11eb-92b9-e7076dd32006/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Cultural Differences Between Legal Systems</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will talk to three attorneys to discuss their trip and ask them about the development of the legal system in China, what they learned and what they are bringing back to our legal system here in the States.  We will also speak to another attorney who will give us his outlook on his experience as a lawyer in Hong Kong.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Nicholas Connon, from the firm Connon Wood Scheidemantle LLP, Malcolm S. McNeil, partner in the Los Angeles office of the Hawaii based law firm, Carlsmith Ball, Neville Asherson, Senior Partner in the law firm Asherson, Klein &amp; Darbinian and Roderick Miller, lead partner in the law firm of Miller Peart which is based in Hong Kong. Don’t miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will talk to three attorneys to discuss their trip and ask them about the development of the legal system in China, what they learned and what they are bringing back to our legal system here in the States.  We will also speak to another attorney who will give us his outlook on his experience as a lawyer in Hong Kong.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome Nicholas Connon, from the firm Connon Wood Scheidemantle LLP, Malcolm S. McNeil, partner in the Los Angeles office of the Hawaii based law firm, Carlsmith Ball, Neville Asherson, Senior Partner in the law firm Asherson, Klein &amp; Darbinian and Roderick Miller, lead partner in the law firm of Miller Peart which is based in Hong Kong. Don’t miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2594</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/06/cultural-differences-between-legal-systems/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7922805237.mp3?updated=1623961977" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Celebrity Criminal Cases</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/05/celebrity-criminal-cases/</link>
      <description>On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we are going to discuss “Celebrity Criminal Cases.”  Why is the public so fascinated with seeing our stars in trouble?  Is there special treatment when it comes to celebrities faced with legal problems or is it just the opposite.  Does media coverage help or hurt a case or the image of the celebrity client?  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi as they get the scoop from the experts.  Lawyer 2 Lawyer welcomes Attorney Tom Mesereau, a partner with the firm of Mesereau &amp; Yu, LLP in Los Angeles, and Attorney Jennifer Keller, a criminal defense attorney in Southern California, to discuss this hot topic! Don’t miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:21:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Celebrity Criminal Cases</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>84</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/106d5ca0-cfaa-11eb-92b9-8fd1ffd82b78/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Celebrity Criminal Cases</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we are going to discuss “Celebrity Criminal Cases.”  Why is the public so fascinated with seeing our stars in trouble?  Is there special treatment when it comes to celebrities faced with legal problems or is it just the opposite.  Does media coverage help or hurt a case or the image of the celebrity client?  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi as they get the scoop from the experts.  Lawyer 2 Lawyer welcomes Attorney Tom Mesereau, a partner with the firm of Mesereau &amp; Yu, LLP in Los Angeles, and Attorney Jennifer Keller, a criminal defense attorney in Southern California, to discuss this hot topic! Don’t miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we are going to discuss “Celebrity Criminal Cases.”  Why is the public so fascinated with seeing our stars in trouble?  Is there special treatment when it comes to celebrities faced with legal problems or is it just the opposite.  Does media coverage help or hurt a case or the image of the celebrity client?  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi as they get the scoop from the experts.  Lawyer 2 Lawyer welcomes Attorney Tom Mesereau, a partner with the firm of Mesereau &amp; Yu, LLP in Los Angeles, and Attorney Jennifer Keller, a criminal defense attorney in Southern California, to discuss this hot topic! Don’t miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1888</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/05/celebrity-criminal-cases/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6897561012.mp3?updated=1624285529" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyer Advertising</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/05/lawyer-advertising/</link>
      <description>This month, verbal chaos ensued when the all-female law firm, Fetman, Garland &amp; Associates, put up a racy 20 ft billboard in a trendy Chicago neighborhood, reading "Life is Short. Get a Divorce."  Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we are going to discuss this controversial ad and question whether the firm went too far.  We will also discuss the fallout and the advertising campaigns effect on the validity of attorneys. Join host and Law.com blogger, J. Craig Williams as he discusses this hot topic with the experts: Larry Bodine, a business development advisor who helps law firms, Tim O’Brien, President/CEO of The Personal Branding Group, Inc. and Jeffery Leving, national litigator and consultant from the Law Offices of Jeffery M. Leving, Ltd. in Chicago.  Don’t miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 16:03:45 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyer Advertising</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>83</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/10a31c00-cfaa-11eb-92b9-cbeadb7f66d1/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyer Advertising</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This month, verbal chaos ensued when the all-female law firm, Fetman, Garland &amp; Associates, put up a racy 20 ft billboard in a trendy Chicago neighborhood, reading "Life is Short. Get a Divorce."  Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we are going to discuss this controversial ad and question whether the firm went too far.  We will also discuss the fallout and the advertising campaigns effect on the validity of attorneys. Join host and Law.com blogger, J. Craig Williams as he discusses this hot topic with the experts: Larry Bodine, a business development advisor who helps law firms, Tim O’Brien, President/CEO of The Personal Branding Group, Inc. and Jeffery Leving, national litigator and consultant from the Law Offices of Jeffery M. Leving, Ltd. in Chicago.  Don’t miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[This month, verbal chaos ensued when the all-female law firm, Fetman, Garland &amp; Associates, put up a racy 20 ft billboard in a trendy Chicago neighborhood, reading "Life is Short. Get a Divorce."  Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we are going to discuss this controversial ad and question whether the firm went too far.  We will also discuss the fallout and the advertising campaigns effect on the validity of attorneys. Join host and Law.com blogger, J. Craig Williams as he discusses this hot topic with the experts: Larry Bodine, a business development advisor who helps law firms, Tim O’Brien, President/CEO of The Personal Branding Group, Inc. and Jeffery Leving, national litigator and consultant from the Law Offices of Jeffery M. Leving, Ltd. in Chicago.  Don’t miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2195</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/05/lawyer-advertising/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7892995453.mp3?updated=1623961978" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Wikis</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/05/legal-wikis/</link>
      <description>On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will explore the world of“Legal Wikis.”  Are they helping or hurting the law?  What does the future hold for Wikis?  Are we reshaping years and years of facts through the click of a button?  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they hear from the experts: Martin Farley, an Intellectual Property Law librarian at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer in London, Tom Mighell, Senior Counsel and Litigation Technology Support Coordinator at Cowles &amp; Thompson in Dallas and Daniel N. Lewis,  entrepreneur and Vice President of Business Development and General Counsel of Wikia, Inc.  Don’t miss this show!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 13:03:20 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Wikis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>82</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/10e97a4c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-1770d36e14eb/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Wikis</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will explore the world of“Legal Wikis.”  Are they helping or hurting the law?  What does the future hold for Wikis?  Are we reshaping years and years of facts through the click of a button?  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they hear from the experts: Martin Farley, an Intellectual Property Law librarian at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer in London, Tom Mighell, Senior Counsel and Litigation Technology Support Coordinator at Cowles &amp; Thompson in Dallas and Daniel N. Lewis,  entrepreneur and Vice President of Business Development and General Counsel of Wikia, Inc.  Don’t miss this show!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will explore the world of“Legal Wikis.”  Are they helping or hurting the law?  What does the future hold for Wikis?  Are we reshaping years and years of facts through the click of a button?  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they hear from the experts: Martin Farley, an Intellectual Property Law librarian at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer in London, Tom Mighell, Senior Counsel and Litigation Technology Support Coordinator at Cowles &amp; Thompson in Dallas and Daniel N. Lewis,  entrepreneur and Vice President of Business Development and General Counsel of Wikia, Inc.  Don’t miss this show!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2113</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/05/legal-wikis/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8769542876.mp3?updated=1623961978" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Patent Law and the Supreme Court</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/05/patent-law-and-the-supreme-court/</link>
      <description>Two important Supreme Court rulings in patent cases this week KSR International Vs. Teleflex Inc., and Microsoft vs. AT&amp;T. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we discuss the decisions and talk to the experts about what this holds for the future of patent law.   Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome guests, Matthew I. Kreeger , a litigator in the San Francisco office of Morrison &amp; Foerster, J. Matthew Buchanan from the firm, Dunlop, Codding and Rogers P.C in Oklahoma and Professor Joshua D. Sarnoff, Assistant Director of the Glushko-Samuelson Intellectual Property Law Clinic, to discuss the Supreme Court's decisions on these patent law cases.  Don't miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 16:29:59 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Patent Law and the Supreme Court</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>81</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/110f6d9c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-07814003c88e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Patent Law and the Supreme Court</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Two important Supreme Court rulings in patent cases this week KSR International Vs. Teleflex Inc., and Microsoft vs. AT&amp;T. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we discuss the decisions and talk to the experts about what this holds for the future of patent law.   Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome guests, Matthew I. Kreeger , a litigator in the San Francisco office of Morrison &amp; Foerster, J. Matthew Buchanan from the firm, Dunlop, Codding and Rogers P.C in Oklahoma and Professor Joshua D. Sarnoff, Assistant Director of the Glushko-Samuelson Intellectual Property Law Clinic, to discuss the Supreme Court's decisions on these patent law cases.  Don't miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Two important Supreme Court rulings in patent cases this week KSR International Vs. Teleflex Inc., and Microsoft vs. AT&amp;T. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we discuss the decisions and talk to the experts about what this holds for the future of patent law.   Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome guests, Matthew I. Kreeger , a litigator in the San Francisco office of Morrison &amp; Foerster, J. Matthew Buchanan from the firm, Dunlop, Codding and Rogers P.C in Oklahoma and Professor Joshua D. Sarnoff, Assistant Director of the Glushko-Samuelson Intellectual Property Law Clinic, to discuss the Supreme Court's decisions on these patent law cases.  Don't miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1917</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/05/patent-law-and-the-supreme-court/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2844876457.mp3?updated=1624285452" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Liability &amp; Virginia Tech</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/04/legal-liability-virginia-tech/</link>
      <description>On April 16, 2007, the tragedy at Virginia Tech rattled the world.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will turn to the experts and discuss the issue of legal liability and the Virginia Tech shootings. Should University officials have done more to prevent the gunman?  Does a recent Virginia Law prevent Universities from throwing out a student with suicidal tendencies?  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams as they get insight from our guests, Professor Anthony Sebok, Centennial Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Research at the Brooklyn School of Law and Attorney Robert B. Smith from the firm Nelson, Kinder, Mosseau, &amp; Saturley.  Don’t miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:35:53 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Liability &amp; Virginia Tech</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>80</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/113341f4-cfaa-11eb-92b9-7bd9500290ca/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Liability &amp; Virginia Tech</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On April 16, 2007, the tragedy at Virginia Tech rattled the world.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will turn to the experts and discuss the issue of legal liability and the Virginia Tech shootings. Should University officials have done more to prevent the gunman?  Does a recent Virginia Law prevent Universities from throwing out a student with suicidal tendencies?  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams as they get insight from our guests, Professor Anthony Sebok, Centennial Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Research at the Brooklyn School of Law and Attorney Robert B. Smith from the firm Nelson, Kinder, Mosseau, &amp; Saturley.  Don’t miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On April 16, 2007, the tragedy at Virginia Tech rattled the world.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will turn to the experts and discuss the issue of legal liability and the Virginia Tech shootings. Should University officials have done more to prevent the gunman?  Does a recent Virginia Law prevent Universities from throwing out a student with suicidal tendencies?  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams as they get insight from our guests, Professor Anthony Sebok, Centennial Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Research at the Brooklyn School of Law and Attorney Robert B. Smith from the firm Nelson, Kinder, Mosseau, &amp; Saturley.  Don’t miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2419</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/04/legal-liability-virginia-tech/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5118142950.mp3?updated=1624285520" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Past &amp; Future: Lawyer-Presidents</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/04/past-future-lawyer-presidents/</link>
      <description>More than half of the 43 US Presidents have been lawyers!  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer,  we  look back throughout history and reflect on the lawyers who used their legal background as a springboard to  reach our Nation's highest office, and compare the backgrounds of the current list of lawyer candidates like Clinton, Edwards and Obama.  Law.com blogger and host, J. Craig Williams turns to the experts, Dr. Barbara Perry, Carter Glass Professor of Government and Executive Director, at the Center for Civic Renewal at Sweet Briar College in Virginia, Professor Kinvin Wroth, Professor of Law at Vermont Law School and Professor David H. Bennett, Meredith Professor of History at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University, to talk lawyer-presidents.  Don’t miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:48:31 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Past &amp; Future: Lawyer-Presidents</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>79</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1159575e-cfaa-11eb-92b9-f78533a01620/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Past &amp; Future: Lawyer-Presidents</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>More than half of the 43 US Presidents have been lawyers!  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer,  we  look back throughout history and reflect on the lawyers who used their legal background as a springboard to  reach our Nation's highest office, and compare the backgrounds of the current list of lawyer candidates like Clinton, Edwards and Obama.  Law.com blogger and host, J. Craig Williams turns to the experts, Dr. Barbara Perry, Carter Glass Professor of Government and Executive Director, at the Center for Civic Renewal at Sweet Briar College in Virginia, Professor Kinvin Wroth, Professor of Law at Vermont Law School and Professor David H. Bennett, Meredith Professor of History at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University, to talk lawyer-presidents.  Don’t miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[More than half of the 43 US Presidents have been lawyers!  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer,  we  look back throughout history and reflect on the lawyers who used their legal background as a springboard to  reach our Nation's highest office, and compare the backgrounds of the current list of lawyer candidates like Clinton, Edwards and Obama.  Law.com blogger and host, J. Craig Williams turns to the experts, Dr. Barbara Perry, Carter Glass Professor of Government and Executive Director, at the Center for Civic Renewal at Sweet Briar College in Virginia, Professor Kinvin Wroth, Professor of Law at Vermont Law School and Professor David H. Bennett, Meredith Professor of History at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University, to talk lawyer-presidents.  Don’t miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2164</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/04/past-future-lawyer-presidents/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4740905168.mp3?updated=1623961979" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Issues &amp; the Imus Controversy</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/04/legal-issues-the-imus-controversy/</link>
      <description>On his April 4th show, Don Imus, controversial radio host, went on the air and made derogatory remarks about the Rutgers’ women’s basketball team that caused a groundswell of controversy.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will ask our experts what the legal issues are in this controversy.  Are there legal issues or are there social issues that are being debated? Law.com blogger and host Bob Ambrogi turn to our guests Eileen O'Connor, counsel at Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe in Washington, D.C. and 24-year veteran broadcast journalist, Attorney Norman A. Pattis, criminal defense attorney and writer for the blog, Crime &amp; Federalism, and Attorney Sandra S.Baron, Esq., Executive Director for the Media Law Resource Center to discuss the Imus controversy.  Don’t miss this discussion!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:49:08 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Issues &amp; the Imus Controversy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>78</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/117a32ee-cfaa-11eb-92b9-bf9c7ffa7c43/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Issues &amp; the Imus Controversy</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On his April 4th show, Don Imus, controversial radio host, went on the air and made derogatory remarks about the Rutgers’ women’s basketball team that caused a groundswell of controversy.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will ask our experts what the legal issues are in this controversy.  Are there legal issues or are there social issues that are being debated? Law.com blogger and host Bob Ambrogi turn to our guests Eileen O'Connor, counsel at Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe in Washington, D.C. and 24-year veteran broadcast journalist, Attorney Norman A. Pattis, criminal defense attorney and writer for the blog, Crime &amp; Federalism, and Attorney Sandra S.Baron, Esq., Executive Director for the Media Law Resource Center to discuss the Imus controversy.  Don’t miss this discussion!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On his April 4th show, Don Imus, controversial radio host, went on the air and made derogatory remarks about the Rutgers’ women’s basketball team that caused a groundswell of controversy.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will ask our experts what the legal issues are in this controversy.  Are there legal issues or are there social issues that are being debated? Law.com blogger and host Bob Ambrogi turn to our guests Eileen O'Connor, counsel at Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe in Washington, D.C. and 24-year veteran broadcast journalist, Attorney Norman A. Pattis, criminal defense attorney and writer for the blog, Crime &amp; Federalism, and Attorney Sandra S.Baron, Esq., Executive Director for the Media Law Resource Center to discuss the Imus controversy.  Don’t miss this discussion!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2376</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/04/legal-issues-the-imus-controversy/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4449604635.mp3?updated=1623961979" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>InternetBar.org</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/04/internetbarorg/</link>
      <description>Some lawyers can be “set in their ways” or “old-fashioned” when it comes to technology.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will take a look inside InternetBar.org and the InternetBar.org Institute and discuss how an online bar aims to shape the future of law worldwide.  Law.com blogger and host Bob Ambrogi welcomes board members from InternetBar.org, Jeffrey M. Aresty, Esq., a Boston lawyer and President of InternetBar.org., Amelia “Mel” Rea Maguire,  partner in the law firm of Amelia Rea Maguire, P.A and Kenneth J. Vacovec, the founding partner of the firm, Vacovec, Mayotte &amp; Singer.  Tune in!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:16:53 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>InternetBar.org</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>77</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/119d1fa2-cfaa-11eb-92b9-b7c5ee0b8684/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>InternetBar.org</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Some lawyers can be “set in their ways” or “old-fashioned” when it comes to technology.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will take a look inside InternetBar.org and the InternetBar.org Institute and discuss how an online bar aims to shape the future of law worldwide.  Law.com blogger and host Bob Ambrogi welcomes board members from InternetBar.org, Jeffrey M. Aresty, Esq., a Boston lawyer and President of InternetBar.org., Amelia “Mel” Rea Maguire,  partner in the law firm of Amelia Rea Maguire, P.A and Kenneth J. Vacovec, the founding partner of the firm, Vacovec, Mayotte &amp; Singer.  Tune in!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Some lawyers can be “set in their ways” or “old-fashioned” when it comes to technology.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will take a look inside InternetBar.org and the InternetBar.org Institute and discuss how an online bar aims to shape the future of law worldwide.  Law.com blogger and host Bob Ambrogi welcomes board members from InternetBar.org, Jeffrey M. Aresty, Esq., a Boston lawyer and President of InternetBar.org., Amelia “Mel” Rea Maguire,  partner in the law firm of Amelia Rea Maguire, P.A and Kenneth J. Vacovec, the founding partner of the firm, Vacovec, Mayotte &amp; Singer.  Tune in!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1898</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/04/internetbarorg/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7243742253.mp3?updated=1624285506" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Misconceptions of E-Discovery</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/03/the-misconceptions-of-e-discovery/</link>
      <description>Today, e-discovery has become vital to attorneys and to their law businesses, however, some misconceptions exist such as Microsoft Vista’s  effect on e-discovery.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Bob Ambrogi talks with the experts, Stephen D. Whetstone, Esq., VP of Client Development &amp; Strategy for Stratify and Attorney Craig Ball, trial attorney and computer forensics examiner, to weigh in on the misconceptions of e-discovery and what the future holds for e-discovery. Co-host and attorney Craig Williams will be back on the next Lawyer 2 Lawyer show!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:08:05 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Misconceptions of E-Discovery</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>76</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/11c722b6-cfaa-11eb-92b9-1f6aa6479f28/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Misconceptions of E-Discovery</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today, e-discovery has become vital to attorneys and to their law businesses, however, some misconceptions exist such as Microsoft Vista’s  effect on e-discovery.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Bob Ambrogi talks with the experts, Stephen D. Whetstone, Esq., VP of Client Development &amp; Strategy for Stratify and Attorney Craig Ball, trial attorney and computer forensics examiner, to weigh in on the misconceptions of e-discovery and what the future holds for e-discovery. Co-host and attorney Craig Williams will be back on the next Lawyer 2 Lawyer show!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Today, e-discovery has become vital to attorneys and to their law businesses, however, some misconceptions exist such as Microsoft Vista’s  effect on e-discovery.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, Bob Ambrogi talks with the experts, Stephen D. Whetstone, Esq., VP of Client Development &amp; Strategy for Stratify and Attorney Craig Ball, trial attorney and computer forensics examiner, to weigh in on the misconceptions of e-discovery and what the future holds for e-discovery. Co-host and attorney Craig Williams will be back on the next Lawyer 2 Lawyer show!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2002</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/03/the-misconceptions-of-e-discovery/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5869755223.mp3?updated=1624285482" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 2007 ABA Tech Show</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/03/the-2007-aba-tech-show/</link>
      <description>Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will be giving a preview of what’s new in the world of tech by taking you to the 2007 ABA Tech Show, taking place this week, at the Sheraton Chicago Hotel &amp; Towers. We will be discussing the latest in tech gadgets, the education and training sessions offered at the ABA Tech Show and looking ahead to technology and how law firms are dealing with the ever-changing tech world.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Willams and Bob Ambrogi welcome the tech experts: Adriana Linares, legal technology trainer for LawTech Partners and blogger for I ♥ Tech  and Dan Pinnington, Director of practicePRO and Chair of the 2007 ABA TechShow. Check it out!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:34:26 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The 2007 ABA Tech Show</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>75</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/11e888de-cfaa-11eb-92b9-77bf7e1e0a5d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The 2007 ABA Tech Show</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will be giving a preview of what’s new in the world of tech by taking you to the 2007 ABA Tech Show, taking place this week, at the Sheraton Chicago Hotel &amp; Towers. We will be discussing the latest in tech gadgets, the education and training sessions offered at the ABA Tech Show and looking ahead to technology and how law firms are dealing with the ever-changing tech world.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Willams and Bob Ambrogi welcome the tech experts: Adriana Linares, legal technology trainer for LawTech Partners and blogger for I ♥ Tech  and Dan Pinnington, Director of practicePRO and Chair of the 2007 ABA TechShow. Check it out!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will be giving a preview of what’s new in the world of tech by taking you to the 2007 ABA Tech Show, taking place this week, at the Sheraton Chicago Hotel &amp; Towers. We will be discussing the latest in tech gadgets, the education and training sessions offered at the ABA Tech Show and looking ahead to technology and how law firms are dealing with the ever-changing tech world.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Willams and Bob Ambrogi welcome the tech experts: Adriana Linares, legal technology trainer for LawTech Partners and blogger for I ♥ Tech  and Dan Pinnington, Director of practicePRO and Chair of the 2007 ABA TechShow. Check it out!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1980</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/03/the-2007-aba-tech-show/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7024764177.mp3?updated=1623961982" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>International Constitutional Law &amp; Counter-terrorism</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/03/international-constitutional-law-counter-terrorism/</link>
      <description>With the invasion of Iraq and the adoption of a new constitution in Iraq, we have stepped into the arena of International Constitutional Law.In a post 9/11 world, we have also been introduced to the importance of Counter-terrorism.  Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will explore International Constitutional Law, the countries involved, the many aspects, what the future holds for international countries and the importance of legal education. We will also take a look inside the world of counter-terrorism and the efforts taken by many to educate and secure the world.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi get insight from two very interesting guests: Professor Amos N. Guiora professor of law at Case Western Reserve University School of Law and director of the Institute for Global Security Law and Policy and Dean Tom Zwart International Dean and LLM-Director at the Utrecht School of Law in the Netherlands.  Don’t miss this show!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:22:46 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>International Constitutional Law &amp; Counter-terrorism</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>74</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/12135302-cfaa-11eb-92b9-e3b4c043eda8/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>International Constitutional Law &amp; Counter-terrorism</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With the invasion of Iraq and the adoption of a new constitution in Iraq, we have stepped into the arena of International Constitutional Law.In a post 9/11 world, we have also been introduced to the importance of Counter-terrorism.  Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will explore International Constitutional Law, the countries involved, the many aspects, what the future holds for international countries and the importance of legal education. We will also take a look inside the world of counter-terrorism and the efforts taken by many to educate and secure the world.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi get insight from two very interesting guests: Professor Amos N. Guiora professor of law at Case Western Reserve University School of Law and director of the Institute for Global Security Law and Policy and Dean Tom Zwart International Dean and LLM-Director at the Utrecht School of Law in the Netherlands.  Don’t miss this show!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[With the invasion of Iraq and the adoption of a new constitution in Iraq, we have stepped into the arena of International Constitutional Law.In a post 9/11 world, we have also been introduced to the importance of Counter-terrorism.  Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will explore International Constitutional Law, the countries involved, the many aspects, what the future holds for international countries and the importance of legal education. We will also take a look inside the world of counter-terrorism and the efforts taken by many to educate and secure the world.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi get insight from two very interesting guests: Professor Amos N. Guiora professor of law at Case Western Reserve University School of Law and director of the Institute for Global Security Law and Policy and Dean Tom Zwart International Dean and LLM-Director at the Utrecht School of Law in the Netherlands.  Don’t miss this show!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2148</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/03/international-constitutional-law-counter-terrorism/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9501584134.mp3?updated=1623961982" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bench &amp; the Bar</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/03/bench-the-bar/</link>
      <description>In the world of law, Judges and attorneys have been working side by side throughout history.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will turn to our expert judges to discover what they look for in an attorney and what they expect.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Judge William W. Bedsworth, an Associate Justice for the California Fourth District Court of Appeal, Honorable William Dressel, President of the National Judicial College in Nevada and Judge Steve Leben, President of the American Judges Association, to discuss their view from behind the bench. the bench.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:44:36 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Bench &amp; the Bar</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>73</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1236c904-cfaa-11eb-92b9-53e959eaa84f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Bench &amp; the Bar</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the world of law, Judges and attorneys have been working side by side throughout history.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will turn to our expert judges to discover what they look for in an attorney and what they expect.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Judge William W. Bedsworth, an Associate Justice for the California Fourth District Court of Appeal, Honorable William Dressel, President of the National Judicial College in Nevada and Judge Steve Leben, President of the American Judges Association, to discuss their view from behind the bench. the bench.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In the world of law, Judges and attorneys have been working side by side throughout history.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will turn to our expert judges to discover what they look for in an attorney and what they expect.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Judge William W. Bedsworth, an Associate Justice for the California Fourth District Court of Appeal, Honorable William Dressel, President of the National Judicial College in Nevada and Judge Steve Leben, President of the American Judges Association, to discuss their view from behind the bench. the bench.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1846</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/03/bench-the-bar/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3668658407.mp3?updated=1623961982" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Marriage &amp; Divorce Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/02/marriage-divorce-law/</link>
      <description>The idea of marriage and divorce is not what it was years ago for many people. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we look at divorce law today and explore the world of marriage and how it has changed over the years.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome experts, Attorney Sherri Donovan, owner of the law firm, Sherri Donovan &amp; Associates, P.C. and author of the published book, "Hit Him Where It Hurts-The Take No Prisoners Guide To Divorce" and Attorney Daniel E. Clement, principal in the Law Offices of Daniel E. Clement, and writer of the blog entitled, “New York Divorce Report, New York’s Family and Law Blog.”  Don’t miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:56:35 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Marriage &amp; Divorce Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>72</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/125c3d38-cfaa-11eb-92b9-eb99eab146fd/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Marriage &amp; Divorce Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The idea of marriage and divorce is not what it was years ago for many people. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we look at divorce law today and explore the world of marriage and how it has changed over the years.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome experts, Attorney Sherri Donovan, owner of the law firm, Sherri Donovan &amp; Associates, P.C. and author of the published book, "Hit Him Where It Hurts-The Take No Prisoners Guide To Divorce" and Attorney Daniel E. Clement, principal in the Law Offices of Daniel E. Clement, and writer of the blog entitled, “New York Divorce Report, New York’s Family and Law Blog.”  Don’t miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The idea of marriage and divorce is not what it was years ago for many people. On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we look at divorce law today and explore the world of marriage and how it has changed over the years.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome experts, Attorney Sherri Donovan, owner of the law firm, Sherri Donovan &amp; Associates, P.C. and author of the published book, "Hit Him Where It Hurts-The Take No Prisoners Guide To Divorce" and Attorney Daniel E. Clement, principal in the Law Offices of Daniel E. Clement, and writer of the blog entitled, “New York Divorce Report, New York’s Family and Law Blog.”  Don’t miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2170</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/02/marriage-divorce-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2582321354.mp3?updated=1624285549" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Supreme Court &amp; Phillip Morris</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/02/the-supreme-court-phillip-morris/</link>
      <description>In the recent case, Philip Morris USA v. Williams, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the corporate giant in a punitive damage suit.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss the power of the tobacco industry and big business, the Supreme Court justices and this controversial ruling.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi turn to the experts, Michael Gerhardt, professor of law at UNC School of Law, J. David Prince, professor of law at the William Mitchell College of Law and Mark Gottlieb, Executive Director of the Public Health Advocacy Institute at Northeastern University School of Law in Boston, to discuss this ruling.  Don’t miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:44:52 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Supreme Court &amp; Phillip Morris</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>71</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/128033be-cfaa-11eb-92b9-439c27a78261/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Supreme Court &amp; Phillip Morris</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the recent case, Philip Morris USA v. Williams, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the corporate giant in a punitive damage suit.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss the power of the tobacco industry and big business, the Supreme Court justices and this controversial ruling.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi turn to the experts, Michael Gerhardt, professor of law at UNC School of Law, J. David Prince, professor of law at the William Mitchell College of Law and Mark Gottlieb, Executive Director of the Public Health Advocacy Institute at Northeastern University School of Law in Boston, to discuss this ruling.  Don’t miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In the recent case, Philip Morris USA v. Williams, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the corporate giant in a punitive damage suit.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will discuss the power of the tobacco industry and big business, the Supreme Court justices and this controversial ruling.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi turn to the experts, Michael Gerhardt, professor of law at UNC School of Law, J. David Prince, professor of law at the William Mitchell College of Law and Mark Gottlieb, Executive Director of the Public Health Advocacy Institute at Northeastern University School of Law in Boston, to discuss this ruling.  Don’t miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2222</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/02/the-supreme-court-phillip-morris/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4789915817.mp3?updated=1623961983" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Libby Trial &amp; Freedom of Speech</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/02/the-libby-trial-freedom-of-speech/</link>
      <description>The First Amendment and freedom of the press are front and center in the “Scooter” Libby Trial.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, we take a look at all the issues and discuss shield laws as well as bloggers in the courtroom. Attorneys and Law.com legal bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, co-hosts of Lawyer2Lawyer, discuss the twists and turns with special guests, Ed Carter, Assistant Professor of Communications at Brigham Young University and Mark Obbie, Director of the Carnegie Legal Reporting Program at the Newhouse School, to get inside this action-packed trial.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:45:32 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Libby Trial &amp; Freedom of Speech</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>70</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/12a57494-cfaa-11eb-92b9-03c348121262/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Libby Trial &amp; Freedom of Speech</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The First Amendment and freedom of the press are front and center in the “Scooter” Libby Trial.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, we take a look at all the issues and discuss shield laws as well as bloggers in the courtroom. Attorneys and Law.com legal bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, co-hosts of Lawyer2Lawyer, discuss the twists and turns with special guests, Ed Carter, Assistant Professor of Communications at Brigham Young University and Mark Obbie, Director of the Carnegie Legal Reporting Program at the Newhouse School, to get inside this action-packed trial.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The First Amendment and freedom of the press are front and center in the “Scooter” Libby Trial.  On Lawyer2Lawyer, we take a look at all the issues and discuss shield laws as well as bloggers in the courtroom. Attorneys and Law.com legal bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, co-hosts of Lawyer2Lawyer, discuss the twists and turns with special guests, Ed Carter, Assistant Professor of Communications at Brigham Young University and Mark Obbie, Director of the Carnegie Legal Reporting Program at the Newhouse School, to get inside this action-packed trial.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2170</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/02/the-libby-trial-freedom-of-speech/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3683429878.mp3?updated=1623961983" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Boston Terror Hoax</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/02/the-boston-terror-hoax/</link>
      <description>Last week, a guerilla marketing stunt headed by Turner Broadcasting went horribly wrong resulting in complete chaos in the city of Boston.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi turn to expert, BU Professor of Law, Professor David Rossman to discuss this hot topic.  Has guerilla marketing gone too far and who should pay for it?  What sort of punishment should offenders who stir up this type of chaos face in a post 9/11 world? Do they deserve punishment at all?  Listen to L2L for a powerful show.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:57:59 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Boston Terror Hoax</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>69</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/12c75dac-cfaa-11eb-92b9-372b495dc5cc/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Boston Terror Hoax</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Last week, a guerilla marketing stunt headed by Turner Broadcasting went horribly wrong resulting in complete chaos in the city of Boston.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi turn to expert, BU Professor of Law, Professor David Rossman to discuss this hot topic.  Has guerilla marketing gone too far and who should pay for it?  What sort of punishment should offenders who stir up this type of chaos face in a post 9/11 world? Do they deserve punishment at all?  Listen to L2L for a powerful show.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Last week, a guerilla marketing stunt headed by Turner Broadcasting went horribly wrong resulting in complete chaos in the city of Boston.  On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi turn to expert, BU Professor of Law, Professor David Rossman to discuss this hot topic.  Has guerilla marketing gone too far and who should pay for it?  What sort of punishment should offenders who stir up this type of chaos face in a post 9/11 world? Do they deserve punishment at all?  Listen to L2L for a powerful show.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1965</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/02/the-boston-terror-hoax/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1491267882.mp3?updated=1624285460" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Part-Time GCs and their New Role</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/01/part-time-gcs-and-their-new-role/</link>
      <description>Bombarded by technology and issues of backdating stock options and fraud, how can General Counsel be an expert in everything?  In this show, we discuss the popularity of hiring part-time GCs and the new role of the GC as the ‘superhero’ of the company. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to the experts, John J. Isaza, Esq. the principal of Isaza Consulting. LLC in Newport Coast, CA and Stuart Blake, co-founder of The General Counsel, LLC based in Newport Beach, Ca, to discuss this topic.  Don’t miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:36:31 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Part-Time GCs and their New Role</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>68</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/12e759ea-cfaa-11eb-92b9-e745bbbfe19e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Part-Time GCs and their New Role</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Bombarded by technology and issues of backdating stock options and fraud, how can General Counsel be an expert in everything?  In this show, we discuss the popularity of hiring part-time GCs and the new role of the GC as the ‘superhero’ of the company. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to the experts, John J. Isaza, Esq. the principal of Isaza Consulting. LLC in Newport Coast, CA and Stuart Blake, co-founder of The General Counsel, LLC based in Newport Beach, Ca, to discuss this topic.  Don’t miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Bombarded by technology and issues of backdating stock options and fraud, how can General Counsel be an expert in everything?  In this show, we discuss the popularity of hiring part-time GCs and the new role of the GC as the ‘superhero’ of the company. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to the experts, John J. Isaza, Esq. the principal of Isaza Consulting. LLC in Newport Coast, CA and Stuart Blake, co-founder of The General Counsel, LLC based in Newport Beach, Ca, to discuss this topic.  Don’t miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1892</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/01/part-time-gcs-and-their-new-role/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2100940393.mp3?updated=1623961984" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Power of e-discovery</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/01/the-power-of-e-discovery/</link>
      <description>Most recently, some major companies have found themselves being investigated by authorities and many of them are discovering that they are losing the battle on how they handle their emails and important corporate documents.  In this show, we will be discussing the recent issues plaguing companies and firms, the power of e-discovery, the world of limitless legal technology and the revised FRCP.  Co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome e-discovery experts, Attorney Thomas I. Barnett, Special Counsel for Sullivan &amp; Cromwell, Michele C.S. Lange, staff attorney in the Electronic Evidence Services group at KrollOntrack Inc. and Attorney Craig Ball, writer for the Law Technology News’ column,  "Ball in your Court.”  Don’t miss it.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:05:30 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Power of e-discovery</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>67</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/13069a8a-cfaa-11eb-92b9-fba37f89f3f8/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Power of e-discovery</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Most recently, some major companies have found themselves being investigated by authorities and many of them are discovering that they are losing the battle on how they handle their emails and important corporate documents.  In this show, we will be discussing the recent issues plaguing companies and firms, the power of e-discovery, the world of limitless legal technology and the revised FRCP.  Co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome e-discovery experts, Attorney Thomas I. Barnett, Special Counsel for Sullivan &amp; Cromwell, Michele C.S. Lange, staff attorney in the Electronic Evidence Services group at KrollOntrack Inc. and Attorney Craig Ball, writer for the Law Technology News’ column,  "Ball in your Court.”  Don’t miss it.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Most recently, some major companies have found themselves being investigated by authorities and many of them are discovering that they are losing the battle on how they handle their emails and important corporate documents.  In this show, we will be discussing the recent issues plaguing companies and firms, the power of e-discovery, the world of limitless legal technology and the revised FRCP.  Co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome e-discovery experts, Attorney Thomas I. Barnett, Special Counsel for Sullivan &amp; Cromwell, Michele C.S. Lange, staff attorney in the Electronic Evidence Services group at KrollOntrack Inc. and Attorney Craig Ball, writer for the Law Technology News’ column,  "Ball in your Court.”  Don’t miss it.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2047</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/01/the-power-of-e-discovery/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1843219400.mp3?updated=1624285424" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>International Employment Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/01/international-employment-law/</link>
      <description>Global business has raised the importance of International Employment Law. And Coast to Coast welcomes a global list of guests on this topic. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi  introduce us to an attorney from the U.S., and employment law practitioners from the UK, Germany and France to discuss the many branches of International Employment Law.  Listen as we hear from U.S.  Attorney Nicholas Connon, partner in the law firm of Connon Wood Scheidemantle, Ramyar Moghadassi a dual-qualified lawyer specializing in international employment law at the firm of Moghadassi &amp; Associates in London, Dr. Gerlind Wisskirchen, partner and specialist in employment and labor law at the firm, CMS Hasche Sigle in Koln Germany and Patrick Thiébart, Esq., the Head of Franklin’s Labor &amp; Employment team in Paris.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:13:42 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>International Employment Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>66</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/132cbee0-cfaa-11eb-92b9-a38fa3a9b9a5/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>International Employment Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Global business has raised the importance of International Employment Law. And Coast to Coast welcomes a global list of guests on this topic. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi  introduce us to an attorney from the U.S., and employment law practitioners from the UK, Germany and France to discuss the many branches of International Employment Law.  Listen as we hear from U.S.  Attorney Nicholas Connon, partner in the law firm of Connon Wood Scheidemantle, Ramyar Moghadassi a dual-qualified lawyer specializing in international employment law at the firm of Moghadassi &amp; Associates in London, Dr. Gerlind Wisskirchen, partner and specialist in employment and labor law at the firm, CMS Hasche Sigle in Koln Germany and Patrick Thiébart, Esq., the Head of Franklin’s Labor &amp; Employment team in Paris.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Global business has raised the importance of International Employment Law. And Coast to Coast welcomes a global list of guests on this topic. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi  introduce us to an attorney from the U.S., and employment law practitioners from the UK, Germany and France to discuss the many branches of International Employment Law.  Listen as we hear from U.S.  Attorney Nicholas Connon, partner in the law firm of Connon Wood Scheidemantle, Ramyar Moghadassi a dual-qualified lawyer specializing in international employment law at the firm of Moghadassi &amp; Associates in London, Dr. Gerlind Wisskirchen, partner and specialist in employment and labor law at the firm, CMS Hasche Sigle in Koln Germany and Patrick Thiébart, Esq., the Head of Franklin’s Labor &amp; Employment team in Paris.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2536</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/01/international-employment-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6887293595.mp3?updated=1623961985" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Predictions for 2007</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/01/legal-predictions-for-2007/</link>
      <description>Happy New Year!  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they ring in the New Year and welcome back last year’s guests for Coast to Coast’s “2nd Annual Predictions Show.” Bob &amp; Craig take a look back on the year that was and make predictions for the year ahead.  C2C welcomes back, Attorney Stephen L. Kaplan, attorney from the law firm of Hicks, Mims &amp; Kaplan out of Los Angeles, California and Attorney Carolyn Elefant, founder and principal attorney in the Law Offices of Carolyn Elefant (LOCE) and author of www.myshingle.com.  Don’t miss the predictions for ‘07!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 12:23:18 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Predictions for 2007</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>65</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/134f44ba-cfaa-11eb-92b9-bbbebf680748/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Predictions for 2007</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Happy New Year!  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they ring in the New Year and welcome back last year’s guests for Coast to Coast’s “2nd Annual Predictions Show.” Bob &amp; Craig take a look back on the year that was and make predictions for the year ahead.  C2C welcomes back, Attorney Stephen L. Kaplan, attorney from the law firm of Hicks, Mims &amp; Kaplan out of Los Angeles, California and Attorney Carolyn Elefant, founder and principal attorney in the Law Offices of Carolyn Elefant (LOCE) and author of www.myshingle.com.  Don’t miss the predictions for ‘07!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Happy New Year!  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they ring in the New Year and welcome back last year’s guests for Coast to Coast’s “2nd Annual Predictions Show.” Bob &amp; Craig take a look back on the year that was and make predictions for the year ahead.  C2C welcomes back, Attorney Stephen L. Kaplan, attorney from the law firm of Hicks, Mims &amp; Kaplan out of Los Angeles, California and Attorney Carolyn Elefant, founder and principal attorney in the Law Offices of Carolyn Elefant (LOCE) and author of www.myshingle.com.  Don’t miss the predictions for ‘07!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2045</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2007/01/legal-predictions-for-2007/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1693302881.mp3?updated=1623961985" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Celebrating the Holidays with the Year in Review</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/12/celebrating-the-holidays-with-the-year-in-review/</link>
      <description>It’s about that time of the year where we put as aside the legal briefs, slip out of the courthouse, turn up those holiday tunes and spread some holiday cheer. Today on Coast to Coast, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi will start the show off by taking a look at the year in review and will discuss their favorite legal topics in this very exciting year.  To end the program, Craig will recite a rendition of “Twas the Night Before Christmas” entitled, “Twas the Night Before Christmas-Legally Speaking.”  Don’t miss this end of year re-cap!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:38:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Celebrating the Holidays with the Year in Review</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>64</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1375e4e4-cfaa-11eb-92b9-6bfc28748540/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Celebrating the Holidays with the Year in Review</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It’s about that time of the year where we put as aside the legal briefs, slip out of the courthouse, turn up those holiday tunes and spread some holiday cheer. Today on Coast to Coast, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi will start the show off by taking a look at the year in review and will discuss their favorite legal topics in this very exciting year.  To end the program, Craig will recite a rendition of “Twas the Night Before Christmas” entitled, “Twas the Night Before Christmas-Legally Speaking.”  Don’t miss this end of year re-cap!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[It’s about that time of the year where we put as aside the legal briefs, slip out of the courthouse, turn up those holiday tunes and spread some holiday cheer. Today on Coast to Coast, Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi will start the show off by taking a look at the year in review and will discuss their favorite legal topics in this very exciting year.  To end the program, Craig will recite a rendition of “Twas the Night Before Christmas” entitled, “Twas the Night Before Christmas-Legally Speaking.”  Don’t miss this end of year re-cap!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1880</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/12/celebrating-the-holidays-with-the-year-in-review/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6411156473.mp3?updated=1624285467" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Day in the Life of a JAG Officer</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/12/a-day-in-the-life-of-a-jag-officer-in-iraq/</link>
      <description>The world of a JAG officer is a challenging one.  Law.com  bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi will turn to Major John A. Engels and discuss his role as a JAG officer stationed in Iraq, his experience over there and a look to the future. In 1998 Major John A. Engels was commissioned as a Judge Advocate in the Minnesota Army National Guard, and is currently serving in Iraq  with the 1st Brigade Combat Team, 34th Infantry Division.  Don't miss out on this show!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:18:33 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>A Day in the Life of a JAG Officer</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>63</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/139da416-cfaa-11eb-92b9-639dc36d433c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>A Day in the Life of a JAG Officer</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The world of a JAG officer is a challenging one.  Law.com  bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi will turn to Major John A. Engels and discuss his role as a JAG officer stationed in Iraq, his experience over there and a look to the future. In 1998 Major John A. Engels was commissioned as a Judge Advocate in the Minnesota Army National Guard, and is currently serving in Iraq  with the 1st Brigade Combat Team, 34th Infantry Division.  Don't miss out on this show!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The world of a JAG officer is a challenging one.  Law.com  bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi will turn to Major John A. Engels and discuss his role as a JAG officer stationed in Iraq, his experience over there and a look to the future. In 1998 Major John A. Engels was commissioned as a Judge Advocate in the Minnesota Army National Guard, and is currently serving in Iraq  with the 1st Brigade Combat Team, 34th Infantry Division.  Don't miss out on this show!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2038</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/12/a-day-in-the-life-of-a-jag-officer-in-iraq/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5012574219.mp3?updated=1623961986" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Global Warming &amp; the Supreme Court</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/12/global-warming-the-supreme-court/</link>
      <description>The highly debated issue of Global Warming takes center stage in the US Supreme Court. Justices questioned the effects of auto and truck emissions on the environment.  The other questions raised were how can the coastlines be saved and should the EPA be called upon to stop this damage.  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, as they discuss the role of the government, the EPA and the Supreme Court in this case.  Coast to Coast welcomes David Doniger, policy director of the Natural Resources Defense Council's (NRDC), Douglas T. Kendall, founder and Executive Director of Community Rights Counsel and Anne Kelly, director of governance programs for Ceres.  Don’t miss this show!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:00:23 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Global Warming &amp; the Supreme Court</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>62</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/13cc6ec2-cfaa-11eb-92b9-37a5ddab1664/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Global Warming &amp; the Supreme Court</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The highly debated issue of Global Warming takes center stage in the US Supreme Court. Justices questioned the effects of auto and truck emissions on the environment.  The other questions raised were how can the coastlines be saved and should the EPA be called upon to stop this damage.  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, as they discuss the role of the government, the EPA and the Supreme Court in this case.  Coast to Coast welcomes David Doniger, policy director of the Natural Resources Defense Council's (NRDC), Douglas T. Kendall, founder and Executive Director of Community Rights Counsel and Anne Kelly, director of governance programs for Ceres.  Don’t miss this show!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The highly debated issue of Global Warming takes center stage in the US Supreme Court. Justices questioned the effects of auto and truck emissions on the environment.  The other questions raised were how can the coastlines be saved and should the EPA be called upon to stop this damage.  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, as they discuss the role of the government, the EPA and the Supreme Court in this case.  Coast to Coast welcomes David Doniger, policy director of the Natural Resources Defense Council's (NRDC), Douglas T. Kendall, founder and Executive Director of Community Rights Counsel and Anne Kelly, director of governance programs for Ceres.  Don’t miss this show!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2002</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/12/global-warming-the-supreme-court/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5312551271.mp3?updated=1623961986" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Compliance Issues/Biggest GC Worry</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/11/compliance-issuesbiggest-gc-worry/</link>
      <description>Corporate governance is one of the main concerns for American corporations. In this show, we will discuss the compliance issues that companies are facing and the General Counsel’s role. Is the GC the ‘guard-dog’ so to speak for corporate compliance? Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi as they welcome our experts. Coast to Coast turns to Attorney Lanny J. Davis, partner from the Washington D.C. office of the global law firm, Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe, Gary Levine, President and Founder of Two Step Software, Inc. that provides tools for compliance and Professor Charles Elson, Chair in Corporate Governance and the Director of the John L. Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:51:42 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Compliance Issues/Biggest GC Worry</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>61</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/13f3eac4-cfaa-11eb-92b9-8f23fa012648/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Compliance Issues/Biggest GC Worry</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Corporate governance is one of the main concerns for American corporations. In this show, we will discuss the compliance issues that companies are facing and the General Counsel’s role. Is the GC the ‘guard-dog’ so to speak for corporate compliance? Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi as they welcome our experts. Coast to Coast turns to Attorney Lanny J. Davis, partner from the Washington D.C. office of the global law firm, Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe, Gary Levine, President and Founder of Two Step Software, Inc. that provides tools for compliance and Professor Charles Elson, Chair in Corporate Governance and the Director of the John L. Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Corporate governance is one of the main concerns for American corporations. In this show, we will discuss the compliance issues that companies are facing and the General Counsel’s role. Is the GC the ‘guard-dog’ so to speak for corporate compliance? Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi as they welcome our experts. Coast to Coast turns to Attorney Lanny J. Davis, partner from the Washington D.C. office of the global law firm, Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe, Gary Levine, President and Founder of Two Step Software, Inc. that provides tools for compliance and Professor Charles Elson, Chair in Corporate Governance and the Director of the John L. Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1853</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/11/compliance-issuesbiggest-gc-worry/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6656058326.mp3?updated=1623961986" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The NLJ 250 &amp; the Growth of Large Law Firms</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/11/the-nlj-250-the-growth-of-large-law-firms/</link>
      <description>Many believe that business has been bad for the economy, but not for the top law firms.  In this show we will explore the trends behind the growth in partners, associates and the new firms who have joined the NLJ 250.  So what are the fields of practice that may be causing this growth and why the rise?  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, ms with three great guests all with different perspectives.  Coast to Coast welcomes Leigh Jones, reporter for the National Law Journal, Attorney Daniel L. Goldberg partner at Bingham McCutchen involved in new business unit, Bingham Sports Consulting LLC and Attorney Eric L. Garner, managing partner of Best, Best &amp; Krieger.  Don’t miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:53:05 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The NLJ 250 &amp; the Growth of Large Law Firms</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>60</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1415f880-cfaa-11eb-92b9-8b55b8cd2821/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The NLJ 250 &amp; the Growth of Large Law Firms</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Many believe that business has been bad for the economy, but not for the top law firms.  In this show we will explore the trends behind the growth in partners, associates and the new firms who have joined the NLJ 250.  So what are the fields of practice that may be causing this growth and why the rise?  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, ms with three great guests all with different perspectives.  Coast to Coast welcomes Leigh Jones, reporter for the National Law Journal, Attorney Daniel L. Goldberg partner at Bingham McCutchen involved in new business unit, Bingham Sports Consulting LLC and Attorney Eric L. Garner, managing partner of Best, Best &amp; Krieger.  Don’t miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Many believe that business has been bad for the economy, but not for the top law firms.  In this show we will explore the trends behind the growth in partners, associates and the new firms who have joined the NLJ 250.  So what are the fields of practice that may be causing this growth and why the rise?  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, ms with three great guests all with different perspectives.  Coast to Coast welcomes Leigh Jones, reporter for the National Law Journal, Attorney Daniel L. Goldberg partner at Bingham McCutchen involved in new business unit, Bingham Sports Consulting LLC and Attorney Eric L. Garner, managing partner of Best, Best &amp; Krieger.  Don’t miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1891</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/11/the-nlj-250-the-growth-of-large-law-firms/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8376272544.mp3?updated=1623961986" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reporting on the law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/11/reporting-on-the-law/</link>
      <description>From print journalists and blawggers to television reporters and radio personalities, the law is constantly changing and we are kept informed by the individuals who bring us the news. On this show we will hear from those who report on the law-a producer and a reporter.  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to those who report the law.  Coast to Coast welcomes, Erin Mooney, producer of NPR’s Justice Talking and David Frank, Senior News Reporter from Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.  Don’t miss it</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:00:33 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Reporting on the law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>59</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/143def52-cfaa-11eb-92b9-0fe3be860bec/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Reporting on the law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>From print journalists and blawggers to television reporters and radio personalities, the law is constantly changing and we are kept informed by the individuals who bring us the news. On this show we will hear from those who report on the law-a producer and a reporter.  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to those who report the law.  Coast to Coast welcomes, Erin Mooney, producer of NPR’s Justice Talking and David Frank, Senior News Reporter from Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.  Don’t miss it</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[From print journalists and blawggers to television reporters and radio personalities, the law is constantly changing and we are kept informed by the individuals who bring us the news. On this show we will hear from those who report on the law-a producer and a reporter.  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to those who report the law.  Coast to Coast welcomes, Erin Mooney, producer of NPR’s Justice Talking and David Frank, Senior News Reporter from Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.  Don’t miss it]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1781</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/11/reporting-on-the-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9453618158.mp3?updated=1623961987" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New E-discovery Rules in the Federal Courts</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/11/new-e-discovery-rules-in-the-federal-courts/</link>
      <description>On December 1, 2006, new amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will take effect and change how civil cases will be tried forever.  In this Coast to Coast we discuss the e-discovery changes, what the impact will be for corporate America andhow companies can prepare themselves before the new rules take effect.  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J.Craig Willams and Robert Ambrogi as they get insight into the world of e-discovery from the experts, Michele C.S. Lange, Esq., staff attorney in the Electronic Evidence Services group at Kroll Ontrack Inc. and Dennis Kennedy, well-known lawyer and legal technology consultant based in St. Louis, Missouri.  Don’t miss this program!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:08:42 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>New E-discovery Rules in the Federal Courts</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>58</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/145b680c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-9394dc9aeac0/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>New E-discovery Rules in the Federal Courts</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On December 1, 2006, new amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will take effect and change how civil cases will be tried forever.  In this Coast to Coast we discuss the e-discovery changes, what the impact will be for corporate America andhow companies can prepare themselves before the new rules take effect.  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J.Craig Willams and Robert Ambrogi as they get insight into the world of e-discovery from the experts, Michele C.S. Lange, Esq., staff attorney in the Electronic Evidence Services group at Kroll Ontrack Inc. and Dennis Kennedy, well-known lawyer and legal technology consultant based in St. Louis, Missouri.  Don’t miss this program!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On December 1, 2006, new amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will take effect and change how civil cases will be tried forever.  In this Coast to Coast we discuss the e-discovery changes, what the impact will be for corporate America andhow companies can prepare themselves before the new rules take effect.  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J.Craig Willams and Robert Ambrogi as they get insight into the world of e-discovery from the experts, Michele C.S. Lange, Esq., staff attorney in the Electronic Evidence Services group at Kroll Ontrack Inc. and Dennis Kennedy, well-known lawyer and legal technology consultant based in St. Louis, Missouri.  Don’t miss this program!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2078</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/11/new-e-discovery-rules-in-the-federal-courts/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1710335363.mp3?updated=1623961987" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Merck's Perspective on the Vioxx Trials</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/10/mercks-perspective-on-the-vioxx-trials/</link>
      <description>Recently a federal jury ruled in favor of Merck &amp; Co. Inc. in a lawsuit over the painkiller Vioxx, finding there was not enough evidence to link the drug to a Kentucky man's heart attack.  In this show, we will speak with a key attorney on the team representing Merck in the Vioxx cases.  On past Coast to Coast shows, we have had lead attorneys for the plaintiffs affected by Vioxx as guests- this time around we will get Merck’s angle. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi as they discuss Merck’s perspective with Attorney Phillip Beck, partner with the firm of Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar &amp; Scott LLP in Chicago.  Don’t miss out on this highly anticipated show!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:27:30 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Merck's Perspective on the Vioxx Trials</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>57</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/14808b0a-cfaa-11eb-92b9-d73f8c438d59/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Merck's Perspective on the Vioxx Trials</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Recently a federal jury ruled in favor of Merck &amp; Co. Inc. in a lawsuit over the painkiller Vioxx, finding there was not enough evidence to link the drug to a Kentucky man's heart attack.  In this show, we will speak with a key attorney on the team representing Merck in the Vioxx cases.  On past Coast to Coast shows, we have had lead attorneys for the plaintiffs affected by Vioxx as guests- this time around we will get Merck’s angle. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi as they discuss Merck’s perspective with Attorney Phillip Beck, partner with the firm of Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar &amp; Scott LLP in Chicago.  Don’t miss out on this highly anticipated show!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Recently a federal jury ruled in favor of Merck &amp; Co. Inc. in a lawsuit over the painkiller Vioxx, finding there was not enough evidence to link the drug to a Kentucky man's heart attack.  In this show, we will speak with a key attorney on the team representing Merck in the Vioxx cases.  On past Coast to Coast shows, we have had lead attorneys for the plaintiffs affected by Vioxx as guests- this time around we will get Merck’s angle. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi as they discuss Merck’s perspective with Attorney Phillip Beck, partner with the firm of Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar &amp; Scott LLP in Chicago.  Don’t miss out on this highly anticipated show!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1980</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/10/mercks-perspective-on-the-vioxx-trials/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6728667891.mp3?updated=1623961987" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Church, State &amp; the First Amendment</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/10/church-state-the-first-amendment/</link>
      <description>Weeks ago, Congress removed a provision in a military bill that would have allowed chaplains to offer prayer at mandatory non-denominational events.  Christian conservatives in Congress are expected to renew their fight to allow military chaplains to pray in the name of Jesus at public events, citing First Amendment rights.  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J.Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they discuss the spirited topic on Coast to Coast with three lively expert guests: Charles L. "Chip" Babcock, one of the top 1st amendment lawyers in the country from Jackson Walker LLP, David W. New, Esq., popular speaker for religious freedom issues, the Constitution and the First Amendment and contributor to Faith &amp; Action and Eliot Mincberg, Vice President, General Counsel and Legal Director of People For the American Way Foundation.  Don’t miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:20:39 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Church, State &amp; the First Amendment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>56</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/14ac79ea-cfaa-11eb-92b9-bfc408ef8ebe/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Church, State &amp; the First Amendment</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Weeks ago, Congress removed a provision in a military bill that would have allowed chaplains to offer prayer at mandatory non-denominational events.  Christian conservatives in Congress are expected to renew their fight to allow military chaplains to pray in the name of Jesus at public events, citing First Amendment rights.  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J.Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they discuss the spirited topic on Coast to Coast with three lively expert guests: Charles L. "Chip" Babcock, one of the top 1st amendment lawyers in the country from Jackson Walker LLP, David W. New, Esq., popular speaker for religious freedom issues, the Constitution and the First Amendment and contributor to Faith &amp; Action and Eliot Mincberg, Vice President, General Counsel and Legal Director of People For the American Way Foundation.  Don’t miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Weeks ago, Congress removed a provision in a military bill that would have allowed chaplains to offer prayer at mandatory non-denominational events.  Christian conservatives in Congress are expected to renew their fight to allow military chaplains to pray in the name of Jesus at public events, citing First Amendment rights.  Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J.Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they discuss the spirited topic on Coast to Coast with three lively expert guests: Charles L. "Chip" Babcock, one of the top 1st amendment lawyers in the country from Jackson Walker LLP, David W. New, Esq., popular speaker for religious freedom issues, the Constitution and the First Amendment and contributor to Faith &amp; Action and Eliot Mincberg, Vice President, General Counsel and Legal Director of People For the American Way Foundation.  Don’t miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1949</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/10/church-state-the-first-amendment/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2778306330.mp3?updated=1623961987" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The HP Spying Scandal</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/10/the-hp-spying-scandal/</link>
      <description>The HP Spying Scandal has rocked Corporate America.  After learning that there were in-house leaks sharing confidential company information with the news media, the top executives of Hewlett-Packard apparently came up with their own way of dealing with the situation and introduced a term called “pretexting”.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi call on our experts to get inside the controversial scandal.  Coast to Coast welcomes Professor Peter Henning from the Wayne State University Law School and co-editor of the White Collar Crime Prof Blog, Attorney William Keane, head of the White Collar Crime and Corporate Investigations Group at the San Francisco law firm of Farella Braun &amp; Martel LLP and Justin Scheck, reporter for The Recorder, a San Francisco-based legal daily. Don’t miss this discussion!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:35:22 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The HP Spying Scandal</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>55</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/14d0338a-cfaa-11eb-92b9-2b5d85d564ca/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The HP Spying Scandal</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The HP Spying Scandal has rocked Corporate America.  After learning that there were in-house leaks sharing confidential company information with the news media, the top executives of Hewlett-Packard apparently came up with their own way of dealing with the situation and introduced a term called “pretexting”.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi call on our experts to get inside the controversial scandal.  Coast to Coast welcomes Professor Peter Henning from the Wayne State University Law School and co-editor of the White Collar Crime Prof Blog, Attorney William Keane, head of the White Collar Crime and Corporate Investigations Group at the San Francisco law firm of Farella Braun &amp; Martel LLP and Justin Scheck, reporter for The Recorder, a San Francisco-based legal daily. Don’t miss this discussion!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The HP Spying Scandal has rocked Corporate America.  After learning that there were in-house leaks sharing confidential company information with the news media, the top executives of Hewlett-Packard apparently came up with their own way of dealing with the situation and introduced a term called “pretexting”.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi call on our experts to get inside the controversial scandal.  Coast to Coast welcomes Professor Peter Henning from the Wayne State University Law School and co-editor of the White Collar Crime Prof Blog, Attorney William Keane, head of the White Collar Crime and Corporate Investigations Group at the San Francisco law firm of Farella Braun &amp; Martel LLP and Justin Scheck, reporter for The Recorder, a San Francisco-based legal daily. Don’t miss this discussion!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1995</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/10/the-hp-spying-scandal/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6053186849.mp3?updated=1623961988" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Baseball Uncyclopedia &amp; the Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/10/the-baseball-uncyclopedia-the-law/</link>
      <description>It’s October and it is that time of season again!  You can smell the hot dogs and cracker jacks in the air!  It’s the baseball Playoffs! Baseball is not only America’s favorite pastime, but a favorite amongst our two guests.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, welcome attorneys and baseball enthusiasts, Howard M. Bloom, a partner in the Boston office of Jackson Lewis LLP and Michael Kun, a partner at Epstein Becker &amp; Green in Los Angeles, to discuss their book, The Baseball Uncyclopedia: A Highly Opinionated, Myth-Busting Guide to the Great American Game. Don’t miss out as Howard and Michael shatter the myths of baseball.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 17:12:08 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Baseball Uncyclopedia &amp; the Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>54</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/14f9736c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-975edf44b934/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Baseball Uncyclopedia &amp; the Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It’s October and it is that time of season again!  You can smell the hot dogs and cracker jacks in the air!  It’s the baseball Playoffs! Baseball is not only America’s favorite pastime, but a favorite amongst our two guests.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, welcome attorneys and baseball enthusiasts, Howard M. Bloom, a partner in the Boston office of Jackson Lewis LLP and Michael Kun, a partner at Epstein Becker &amp; Green in Los Angeles, to discuss their book, The Baseball Uncyclopedia: A Highly Opinionated, Myth-Busting Guide to the Great American Game. Don’t miss out as Howard and Michael shatter the myths of baseball.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[It’s October and it is that time of season again!  You can smell the hot dogs and cracker jacks in the air!  It’s the baseball Playoffs! Baseball is not only America’s favorite pastime, but a favorite amongst our two guests.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, welcome attorneys and baseball enthusiasts, Howard M. Bloom, a partner in the Boston office of Jackson Lewis LLP and Michael Kun, a partner at Epstein Becker &amp; Green in Los Angeles, to discuss their book, The Baseball Uncyclopedia: A Highly Opinionated, Myth-Busting Guide to the Great American Game. Don’t miss out as Howard and Michael shatter the myths of baseball.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2263</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/10/the-baseball-uncyclopedia-the-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2458583035.mp3?updated=1624285452" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Online CLE</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/09/online-cle/</link>
      <description>The days of sitting in a stuffy classroom are over!  With the popularity of the internet, online classes have been accessible to many lawyers.  Online CLE is continuing legal education and many attorneys want to take classes and do not have time to attend, so online credit is offered.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi call on our experts to walk us through Online CLE and to see what the future holds.  Coast to Coast welcomes Brian Emerson, head of Online CLE for Law.com and Pete Glowacki, Director of the ABA Center for Continuing Legal Education, to discuss the ins and outs of Online CLE.  Don't miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:09:53 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Online CLE</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>53</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/151f3bf6-cfaa-11eb-92b9-97ad73f472e4/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Online CLE</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The days of sitting in a stuffy classroom are over!  With the popularity of the internet, online classes have been accessible to many lawyers.  Online CLE is continuing legal education and many attorneys want to take classes and do not have time to attend, so online credit is offered.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi call on our experts to walk us through Online CLE and to see what the future holds.  Coast to Coast welcomes Brian Emerson, head of Online CLE for Law.com and Pete Glowacki, Director of the ABA Center for Continuing Legal Education, to discuss the ins and outs of Online CLE.  Don't miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The days of sitting in a stuffy classroom are over!  With the popularity of the internet, online classes have been accessible to many lawyers.  Online CLE is continuing legal education and many attorneys want to take classes and do not have time to attend, so online credit is offered.  Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi call on our experts to walk us through Online CLE and to see what the future holds.  Coast to Coast welcomes Brian Emerson, head of Online CLE for Law.com and Pete Glowacki, Director of the ABA Center for Continuing Legal Education, to discuss the ins and outs of Online CLE.  Don't miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1805</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/09/online-cle/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3773941331.mp3?updated=1623961988" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Backdating Stock Options</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/09/backdating-stock-options/</link>
      <description>The Justice Department and SEC are serious, investigating companies for falsifying documents and as a result, lying to shareholders about what stock option awards cost the company. Criminal and civil charges are being filed! Even corporate officers are under scrutiny! What IS backdating stock options? Has your company or client done it? Join Coast to Coast hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they get answers from the 'go-to' expert on the topic. Special guest, Attorney Steven R. Barth, partner with Foley and Lardner LLP in Milwaukee, who provides legal analysis on issues such as this to public and private companies, is the Chairperson of the National Directors Institute focusing on corporate governance issues. He takes us through what backdating stock options means, how to discover it,  how to prevent it and what to do if the government comes knocking. Listen and hear what YOU need to know!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:13:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Backdating Stock Options</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>52</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1570e5b4-cfaa-11eb-92b9-3b7507f3f3e5/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Backdating Stock Options</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Justice Department and SEC are serious, investigating companies for falsifying documents and as a result, lying to shareholders about what stock option awards cost the company. Criminal and civil charges are being filed! Even corporate officers are under scrutiny! What IS backdating stock options? Has your company or client done it? Join Coast to Coast hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they get answers from the 'go-to' expert on the topic. Special guest, Attorney Steven R. Barth, partner with Foley and Lardner LLP in Milwaukee, who provides legal analysis on issues such as this to public and private companies, is the Chairperson of the National Directors Institute focusing on corporate governance issues. He takes us through what backdating stock options means, how to discover it,  how to prevent it and what to do if the government comes knocking. Listen and hear what YOU need to know!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The Justice Department and SEC are serious, investigating companies for falsifying documents and as a result, lying to shareholders about what stock option awards cost the company. Criminal and civil charges are being filed! Even corporate officers are under scrutiny! What IS backdating stock options? Has your company or client done it? Join Coast to Coast hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they get answers from the 'go-to' expert on the topic. Special guest, Attorney Steven R. Barth, partner with Foley and Lardner LLP in Milwaukee, who provides legal analysis on issues such as this to public and private companies, is the Chairperson of the National Directors Institute focusing on corporate governance issues. He takes us through what backdating stock options means, how to discover it,  how to prevent it and what to do if the government comes knocking. Listen and hear what YOU need to know!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1991</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/09/backdating-stock-options/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6491944802.mp3?updated=1623961989" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>9/11 Anniversary and Comair Flight 5191</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/09/911-anniversary-and-comair-flight-5191/</link>
      <description>This week on Coast to Coast we would like to remember the victims of 9/11 and their families.  It has been 5 years since the United States was attacked on 9/11 on American soil and the victims will never be forgotten. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Robert Haefele, from the national firm of Motley Rice, to discuss the considerable amount of pro-bono work Motley Rice has done to help 9/11 families. In contrast, Coast to Coast touches upon a story about a law firm whose tactics are being criticized with respect to the recent Kentucky crash of Comair Flight 5191. Coast to Coast welcomes Attorney Ben Cowgill and Attorney Steve Frederick, both Kentucky attorneys, to discuss the crash and the actions of plaintiff attorneys.  Don’t miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:19:07 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>9/11 Anniversary and Comair Flight 5191</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>51</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/159ebc82-cfaa-11eb-92b9-9b8e1bfbe412/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>9/11 Anniversary and Comair Flight 5191</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week on Coast to Coast we would like to remember the victims of 9/11 and their families.  It has been 5 years since the United States was attacked on 9/11 on American soil and the victims will never be forgotten. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Robert Haefele, from the national firm of Motley Rice, to discuss the considerable amount of pro-bono work Motley Rice has done to help 9/11 families. In contrast, Coast to Coast touches upon a story about a law firm whose tactics are being criticized with respect to the recent Kentucky crash of Comair Flight 5191. Coast to Coast welcomes Attorney Ben Cowgill and Attorney Steve Frederick, both Kentucky attorneys, to discuss the crash and the actions of plaintiff attorneys.  Don’t miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[This week on Coast to Coast we would like to remember the victims of 9/11 and their families.  It has been 5 years since the United States was attacked on 9/11 on American soil and the victims will never be forgotten. Law.com bloggers and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams welcome Attorney Robert Haefele, from the national firm of Motley Rice, to discuss the considerable amount of pro-bono work Motley Rice has done to help 9/11 families. In contrast, Coast to Coast touches upon a story about a law firm whose tactics are being criticized with respect to the recent Kentucky crash of Comair Flight 5191. Coast to Coast welcomes Attorney Ben Cowgill and Attorney Steve Frederick, both Kentucky attorneys, to discuss the crash and the actions of plaintiff attorneys.  Don’t miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1973</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/09/911-anniversary-and-comair-flight-5191/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1152230768.mp3?updated=1624285449" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Latest in Vioxx</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/09/the-latest-in-vioxx/</link>
      <description>In an interesting development in Vioxx news, a New Orleans judge ruled that the $50M in compensatory damages were “grossly excessive.” The judge upheld the verdict finding Merck liable in the case, but he said a new trial must be held to decide how much the manufacturer must pay a retired FBI agent who suffered a 2002 heart attack after taking the painkiller for 2½ years. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to our expert attorneys representing Vioxx clients.  Coast to Coast welcomes Attorney Tom Girardi of the well-known firm of Girardi Keese in Los Angeles and Attorney Paul Sizemore from the national firm of Beasley Allen located in Montgomery, Alabama.  Don’t miss the latest news!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:39:46 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Latest in Vioxx</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>50</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/15de978a-cfaa-11eb-92b9-0fe2b13dd9cb/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Latest in Vioxx</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In an interesting development in Vioxx news, a New Orleans judge ruled that the $50M in compensatory damages were “grossly excessive.” The judge upheld the verdict finding Merck liable in the case, but he said a new trial must be held to decide how much the manufacturer must pay a retired FBI agent who suffered a 2002 heart attack after taking the painkiller for 2½ years. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to our expert attorneys representing Vioxx clients.  Coast to Coast welcomes Attorney Tom Girardi of the well-known firm of Girardi Keese in Los Angeles and Attorney Paul Sizemore from the national firm of Beasley Allen located in Montgomery, Alabama.  Don’t miss the latest news!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In an interesting development in Vioxx news, a New Orleans judge ruled that the $50M in compensatory damages were “grossly excessive.” The judge upheld the verdict finding Merck liable in the case, but he said a new trial must be held to decide how much the manufacturer must pay a retired FBI agent who suffered a 2002 heart attack after taking the painkiller for 2½ years. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to our expert attorneys representing Vioxx clients.  Coast to Coast welcomes Attorney Tom Girardi of the well-known firm of Girardi Keese in Los Angeles and Attorney Paul Sizemore from the national firm of Beasley Allen located in Montgomery, Alabama.  Don’t miss the latest news!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1930</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/09/the-latest-in-vioxx/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6059889420.mp3?updated=1623961989" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Podcasting Anniversary Show</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/09/podcasting-anniversary-show/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast, hosted by attorneys and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi is celebrating 1-Year in the legal podcasting arena here on the LegalTalkNetwork. Great guests and interesting legal topics keep us at the top of the listening list! We thank you. Hear what Craig and Bob have to say about how it works, who is listening and what's ahead in technology for podcasters along with guests, Attorney Evan Schaeffer, a veteran legal blogger and podcaster and Attorney Denise Howell, legal blogger and a newcomer to legal podcasting, as well as LegalTalkNetwork Co-founder Lu Ann Reeb.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 10:06:15 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Podcasting Anniversary Show</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>49</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/16059b32-cfaa-11eb-92b9-ff6282855ce4/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Podcasting Anniversary Show</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast, hosted by attorneys and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi is celebrating 1-Year in the legal podcasting arena here on the LegalTalkNetwork. Great guests and interesting legal topics keep us at the top of the listening list! We thank you. Hear what Craig and Bob have to say about how it works, who is listening and what's ahead in technology for podcasters along with guests, Attorney Evan Schaeffer, a veteran legal blogger and podcaster and Attorney Denise Howell, legal blogger and a newcomer to legal podcasting, as well as LegalTalkNetwork Co-founder Lu Ann Reeb.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast, hosted by attorneys and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi is celebrating 1-Year in the legal podcasting arena here on the LegalTalkNetwork. Great guests and interesting legal topics keep us at the top of the listening list! We thank you. Hear what Craig and Bob have to say about how it works, who is listening and what's ahead in technology for podcasters along with guests, Attorney Evan Schaeffer, a veteran legal blogger and podcaster and Attorney Denise Howell, legal blogger and a newcomer to legal podcasting, as well as LegalTalkNetwork Co-founder Lu Ann Reeb.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2040</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/09/podcasting-anniversary-show/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5971685963.mp3?updated=1623961989" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Go-to Lawyers</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/08/go-to-lawyers/</link>
      <description>What makes a Go-to Lawyer? Many believe that a go-to lawyer possesses a certain confidence or style.  And what makes a great Go-To Firm?  Is it good results and smooth transactions?  In this show, we will speak to the experts on what makes a go-to lawyer and which firms are the go-to firms.  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to our experts for the answers. Coast to Coast welcomes Daniel J. DiLucchio, principal of Altman Weil, Inc. and Tamara Loomis, a contributing writer for Corporate Counsel who just recently worked on the survey on the top firms who represent corporate America.  Don't miss it.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:00:20 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Go-to Lawyers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>48</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/162e0284-cfaa-11eb-92b9-7f611d3c796f/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Go-to Lawyers</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What makes a Go-to Lawyer? Many believe that a go-to lawyer possesses a certain confidence or style.  And what makes a great Go-To Firm?  Is it good results and smooth transactions?  In this show, we will speak to the experts on what makes a go-to lawyer and which firms are the go-to firms.  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to our experts for the answers. Coast to Coast welcomes Daniel J. DiLucchio, principal of Altman Weil, Inc. and Tamara Loomis, a contributing writer for Corporate Counsel who just recently worked on the survey on the top firms who represent corporate America.  Don't miss it.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What makes a Go-to Lawyer? Many believe that a go-to lawyer possesses a certain confidence or style.  And what makes a great Go-To Firm?  Is it good results and smooth transactions?  In this show, we will speak to the experts on what makes a go-to lawyer and which firms are the go-to firms.  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to our experts for the answers. Coast to Coast welcomes Daniel J. DiLucchio, principal of Altman Weil, Inc. and Tamara Loomis, a contributing writer for Corporate Counsel who just recently worked on the survey on the top firms who represent corporate America.  Don't miss it.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1931</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/08/go-to-lawyers/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8597858334.mp3?updated=1623961989" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Asia: The New Frontier for In-House Counsel</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/08/asia-the-new-frontier-for-u-s-lawyers/</link>
      <description>Is Asia the next frontier for American lawyers? And is it going to be a boom or a bust? Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they explore the American lawyer in Asia.  Coast to Coast welcomes our experts, Michael Shimokaji, from the law firm of Shimokaji &amp; Associates, P.C and Jay Ponazecki, attorney for Morrison Foerster, Tokyo.  Don't miss this one.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:37:18 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Asia: The New Frontier for In-House Counsel</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>47</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/165977de-cfaa-11eb-92b9-1f9599b078a5/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Asia: The New Frontier for In-House Counsel</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Is Asia the next frontier for American lawyers? And is it going to be a boom or a bust? Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they explore the American lawyer in Asia.  Coast to Coast welcomes our experts, Michael Shimokaji, from the law firm of Shimokaji &amp; Associates, P.C and Jay Ponazecki, attorney for Morrison Foerster, Tokyo.  Don't miss this one.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Is Asia the next frontier for American lawyers? And is it going to be a boom or a bust? Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they explore the American lawyer in Asia.  Coast to Coast welcomes our experts, Michael Shimokaji, from the law firm of Shimokaji &amp; Associates, P.C and Jay Ponazecki, attorney for Morrison Foerster, Tokyo.  Don't miss this one.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2035</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/08/asia-the-new-frontier-for-u-s-lawyers/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2941336562.mp3?updated=1623961990" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Technology: A Double Edged Sword?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/08/legal-technology-a-double-edged-sword/</link>
      <description>Some people in the legal world say that the growth in technology be it software, hardware or telecommunications is both a blessing and a curse. Is Legal Technology a double edged sword?  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams as they peer into the world of Legal Technology and get some answers.  Coast to Coast welcomes Ron Friedmann, President of Prism Legal Consulting and Ross Kodner, President and founder of Wisconsin’s MicroLaw, Inc.  Do not miss this one!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:48:19 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Technology: A Double Edged Sword?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>46</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/168724cc-cfaa-11eb-92b9-d7eaad7cddb0/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Technology: A Double Edged Sword?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Some people in the legal world say that the growth in technology be it software, hardware or telecommunications is both a blessing and a curse. Is Legal Technology a double edged sword?  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams as they peer into the world of Legal Technology and get some answers.  Coast to Coast welcomes Ron Friedmann, President of Prism Legal Consulting and Ross Kodner, President and founder of Wisconsin’s MicroLaw, Inc.  Do not miss this one!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Some people in the legal world say that the growth in technology be it software, hardware or telecommunications is both a blessing and a curse. Is Legal Technology a double edged sword?  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams as they peer into the world of Legal Technology and get some answers.  Coast to Coast welcomes Ron Friedmann, President of Prism Legal Consulting and Ross Kodner, President and founder of Wisconsin’s MicroLaw, Inc.  Do not miss this one!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1981</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/08/legal-technology-a-double-edged-sword/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3432613086.mp3?updated=1624285451" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blawgging at Big Law Firms</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/08/blawgging-at-big-law-firms/</link>
      <description>Blogging has become a very popular way to share facts and opinions on any topic that you could imagine. The majority of legal bloggers are attorneys from small and individually owned firms, while lawyers at large firms have, for the most part, stayed away from it.  Join hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they speak to top blawggers, Attorney Denise Howell, whose blawg is Bag and Baggage, Attorney Ernie Svenson, who writes “Ernie the Attorney”  and Attorney Howard Bashman, whose blawg is entitled “How Appealing.”  Coast to Coast is sponsored by Law.com.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:15:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Blawgging at Big Law Firms</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>45</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/16b2cb36-cfaa-11eb-92b9-1bd6b88671aa/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Blawgging at Big Law Firms</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Blogging has become a very popular way to share facts and opinions on any topic that you could imagine. The majority of legal bloggers are attorneys from small and individually owned firms, while lawyers at large firms have, for the most part, stayed away from it.  Join hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they speak to top blawggers, Attorney Denise Howell, whose blawg is Bag and Baggage, Attorney Ernie Svenson, who writes “Ernie the Attorney”  and Attorney Howard Bashman, whose blawg is entitled “How Appealing.”  Coast to Coast is sponsored by Law.com.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Blogging has become a very popular way to share facts and opinions on any topic that you could imagine. The majority of legal bloggers are attorneys from small and individually owned firms, while lawyers at large firms have, for the most part, stayed away from it.  Join hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they speak to top blawggers, Attorney Denise Howell, whose blawg is Bag and Baggage, Attorney Ernie Svenson, who writes “Ernie the Attorney”  and Attorney Howard Bashman, whose blawg is entitled “How Appealing.”  Coast to Coast is sponsored by Law.com.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2204</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/08/blawgging-at-big-law-firms/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2203472593.mp3?updated=1624285459" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Highest Paid General Counsel</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/07/highest-paid-general-counsel/</link>
      <description>In-house counsel can be one of the most coveted jobs in the legal field and
with good reason. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and
Bob Ambrogi as they get the lowdown on these high powered men and women of
the legal world, their salaries, bonuses, perks, etc. The legal magazine,
Corporate Counsel, compiles a list of the 100 Highest Paid General Counsel
every year. Bob and Craig welcome Robin Sparkman, the Editor-in-Chief of
Corporate Counsel Magazine, to Coast to Coast to discuss the ins-and-outs of
this survey. Don't miss it.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:25:23 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Highest Paid General Counsel</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>44</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/16d5e468-cfaa-11eb-92b9-53090bdcf208/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Highest Paid General Counsel</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In-house counsel can be one of the most coveted jobs in the legal field and
with good reason. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and
Bob Ambrogi as they get the lowdown on these high powered men and women of
the legal world, their salaries, bonuses, perks, etc. The legal magazine,
Corporate Counsel, compiles a list of the 100 Highest Paid General Counsel
every year. Bob and Craig welcome Robin Sparkman, the Editor-in-Chief of
Corporate Counsel Magazine, to Coast to Coast to discuss the ins-and-outs of
this survey. Don't miss it.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In-house counsel can be one of the most coveted jobs in the legal field and<br>
with good reason. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and<br>
Bob Ambrogi as they get the lowdown on these high powered men and women of<br>
the legal world, their salaries, bonuses, perks, etc. The legal magazine,<br>
Corporate Counsel, compiles a list of the 100 Highest Paid General Counsel<br>
every year. Bob and Craig welcome Robin Sparkman, the Editor-in-Chief of<br>
Corporate Counsel Magazine, to Coast to Coast to discuss the ins-and-outs of<br>
this survey. Don't miss it.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1915</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/07/highest-paid-general-counsel/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5223512911.mp3?updated=1623961990" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tech Training for Lawyers</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/07/tech-training-for-lawyers/</link>
      <description>Listen up technically challenged lawyers AND technically savvy lawyers! What do you need to know and how do you get the training for the technology that will make practicing law easier and quicker for you?  Coast to Coast hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi turn to our guests Todd Sons, IT Director for Jackson Walker, Adriana Linares, founder of LawTech Partners and Andy Adkins, Director of the Legal Technology Institute at the University of Florida, Levin College of Law for information you can't miss!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:19:31 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Tech Training for Lawyers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>43</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/17000fcc-cfaa-11eb-92b9-5f17219ee36d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Tech Training for Lawyers</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Listen up technically challenged lawyers AND technically savvy lawyers! What do you need to know and how do you get the training for the technology that will make practicing law easier and quicker for you?  Coast to Coast hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi turn to our guests Todd Sons, IT Director for Jackson Walker, Adriana Linares, founder of LawTech Partners and Andy Adkins, Director of the Legal Technology Institute at the University of Florida, Levin College of Law for information you can't miss!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Listen up technically challenged lawyers AND technically savvy lawyers! What do you need to know and how do you get the training for the technology that will make practicing law easier and quicker for you?  Coast to Coast hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi turn to our guests Todd Sons, IT Director for Jackson Walker, Adriana Linares, founder of LawTech Partners and Andy Adkins, Director of the Legal Technology Institute at the University of Florida, Levin College of Law for information you can't miss!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1935</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/07/tech-training-for-lawyers/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7263975811.mp3?updated=1623961991" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Today</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/07/supreme-court-today/</link>
      <description>Big changes over the past year in the U-S Supreme Court. The death of Chief Justice William Rehnquist, the resignation of nominee Harriet Miers and the controversial choices of Justice Samuel Alito and Chief Justice John Roberts have created a new complexion for the high court.
Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, analyze what's happened with our two experts. Coast to Coast welcomes Rex Heinke, partner at the firm of Akin Gump Straus Hauer and Feld LLP and Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for Legal Times, American Lawyer Media, and Law.com. Don’t miss this roundup!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:00:01 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Supreme Court Today</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>42</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1722335e-cfaa-11eb-92b9-d75e1ce6067a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Supreme Court Today</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Big changes over the past year in the U-S Supreme Court. The death of Chief Justice William Rehnquist, the resignation of nominee Harriet Miers and the controversial choices of Justice Samuel Alito and Chief Justice John Roberts have created a new complexion for the high court.
Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, analyze what's happened with our two experts. Coast to Coast welcomes Rex Heinke, partner at the firm of Akin Gump Straus Hauer and Feld LLP and Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for Legal Times, American Lawyer Media, and Law.com. Don’t miss this roundup!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Big changes over the past year in the U-S Supreme Court. The death of Chief Justice William Rehnquist, the resignation of nominee Harriet Miers and the controversial choices of Justice Samuel Alito and Chief Justice John Roberts have created a new complexion for the high court.<br>
Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, analyze what's happened with our two experts. Coast to Coast welcomes Rex Heinke, partner at the firm of Akin Gump Straus Hauer and Feld LLP and Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for Legal Times, American Lawyer Media, and Law.com. Don’t miss this roundup!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1861</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/07/supreme-court-today/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6952780964.mp3?updated=1623961991" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>E-Filing</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/07/e-filing/</link>
      <description>Are you way behind on the legal technology curve? Know about e-filings? Join Coast to Coast hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi for an exclusive survey from the American Bar Association and special guest, ABA Senior Research Specialist Laura Ikens from the ABA Legal Technology Resource Center. Hear important information from the ABA Legal Survey Report about how e-filings are underway nationwide. You'll also hear about e-filings in practical experience from Attorney Tom Mighell, Senior Counsel and Litigation Technology Support Coordinator at Cowles &amp; Thompson in Texas, who we welcome back to the show! If you’re still avoiding e-filings, just listen!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 11:46:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>E-Filing</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>41</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1749a1a0-cfaa-11eb-92b9-f7f8e4f0dc9e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>E-Filing</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Are you way behind on the legal technology curve? Know about e-filings? Join Coast to Coast hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi for an exclusive survey from the American Bar Association and special guest, ABA Senior Research Specialist Laura Ikens from the ABA Legal Technology Resource Center. Hear important information from the ABA Legal Survey Report about how e-filings are underway nationwide. You'll also hear about e-filings in practical experience from Attorney Tom Mighell, Senior Counsel and Litigation Technology Support Coordinator at Cowles &amp; Thompson in Texas, who we welcome back to the show! If you’re still avoiding e-filings, just listen!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Are you way behind on the legal technology curve? Know about e-filings? Join Coast to Coast hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi for an exclusive survey from the American Bar Association and special guest, ABA Senior Research Specialist Laura Ikens from the ABA Legal Technology Resource Center. Hear important information from the ABA Legal Survey Report about how e-filings are underway nationwide. You'll also hear about e-filings in practical experience from Attorney Tom Mighell, Senior Counsel and Litigation Technology Support Coordinator at Cowles &amp; Thompson in Texas, who we welcome back to the show! If you’re still avoiding e-filings, just listen!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1809</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/07/e-filing/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8131535831.mp3?updated=1624285448" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Fun Side of Lawyers</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/06/the-fun-side-of-lawyers/</link>
      <description>Lawyers make up one of the hardest-working professions - no one here denies that! But what do lawyers do outside the courtroom and the legal practice? Coast to Coast is going to shatter the belief that lawyers are one dimensional people, dominated by the minute details of the law. Join Law.com bloggers and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they look into the “Fun Side of Lawyers.” Our nationwide search for 'fun' lawyers turned up our guests on this show: Attorney Noley Bice, General Counsel at the Baylor University Law School - he's an Elvis Presley impersonator; Attorney Elena Albamonte, who has spent most of her legal career at the Federal Government - she's the President of Lawyers in Love; Attorney Grant Hardacre from Blum, Propper &amp; Hardacre, Inc.- he’s the President of the Association of Surfing Lawyers and; Attorney Paul Kenney, trial lawyer and partner at Kenney &amp; Conley, P.C., host on Legal Talk Network- he is a musician, composer, book author and screenwriter. Don’t miss the fun.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:35:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Fun Side of Lawyers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>40</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/17715164-cfaa-11eb-92b9-f340e59a7df5/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Fun Side of Lawyers</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Lawyers make up one of the hardest-working professions - no one here denies that! But what do lawyers do outside the courtroom and the legal practice? Coast to Coast is going to shatter the belief that lawyers are one dimensional people, dominated by the minute details of the law. Join Law.com bloggers and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they look into the “Fun Side of Lawyers.” Our nationwide search for 'fun' lawyers turned up our guests on this show: Attorney Noley Bice, General Counsel at the Baylor University Law School - he's an Elvis Presley impersonator; Attorney Elena Albamonte, who has spent most of her legal career at the Federal Government - she's the President of Lawyers in Love; Attorney Grant Hardacre from Blum, Propper &amp; Hardacre, Inc.- he’s the President of the Association of Surfing Lawyers and; Attorney Paul Kenney, trial lawyer and partner at Kenney &amp; Conley, P.C., host on Legal Talk Network- he is a musician, composer, book author and screenwriter. Don’t miss the fun.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Lawyers make up one of the hardest-working professions - no one here denies that! But what do lawyers do outside the courtroom and the legal practice? Coast to Coast is going to shatter the belief that lawyers are one dimensional people, dominated by the minute details of the law. Join Law.com bloggers and attorneys J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they look into the “Fun Side of Lawyers.” Our nationwide search for 'fun' lawyers turned up our guests on this show: Attorney Noley Bice, General Counsel at the Baylor University Law School - he's an Elvis Presley impersonator; Attorney Elena Albamonte, who has spent most of her legal career at the Federal Government - she's the President of Lawyers in Love; Attorney Grant Hardacre from Blum, Propper &amp; Hardacre, Inc.- he’s the President of the Association of Surfing Lawyers and; Attorney Paul Kenney, trial lawyer and partner at Kenney &amp; Conley, P.C., host on Legal Talk Network- he is a musician, composer, book author and screenwriter. Don’t miss the fun.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2613</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/06/the-fun-side-of-lawyers/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6043407900.mp3?updated=1623961991" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Juror Background Checks</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/06/juror-background-checks/</link>
      <description>Jurors who lie or conceal information on their jury questionnaires are causing problems in the courts. Should there be background checks performed on jurors?  Is this a violation of our rights?  Join Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, both attorneys and Law.com bloggers, as they discover what is going on in the jury system across the United States.  Coast to Coast welcomes, Professor Randy Jonakait, professor of law at the New York Law School and author of 'The American Jury System" and Dr. Phillip K. Anthony, CEO of DecisionQuest and a highly sought after expert on trial consulting. This show is sponsored by Law.com.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:59:17 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Juror Background Checks</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>39</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1796dcd6-cfaa-11eb-92b9-2f07db22aaa6/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Juror Background Checks</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Jurors who lie or conceal information on their jury questionnaires are causing problems in the courts. Should there be background checks performed on jurors?  Is this a violation of our rights?  Join Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, both attorneys and Law.com bloggers, as they discover what is going on in the jury system across the United States.  Coast to Coast welcomes, Professor Randy Jonakait, professor of law at the New York Law School and author of 'The American Jury System" and Dr. Phillip K. Anthony, CEO of DecisionQuest and a highly sought after expert on trial consulting. This show is sponsored by Law.com.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Jurors who lie or conceal information on their jury questionnaires are causing problems in the courts. Should there be background checks performed on jurors?  Is this a violation of our rights?  Join Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, both attorneys and Law.com bloggers, as they discover what is going on in the jury system across the United States.  Coast to Coast welcomes, Professor Randy Jonakait, professor of law at the New York Law School and author of 'The American Jury System" and Dr. Phillip K. Anthony, CEO of DecisionQuest and a highly sought after expert on trial consulting. This show is sponsored by Law.com.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1920</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/06/juror-background-checks/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9553765842.mp3?updated=1623961992" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Limits to Attorney-Client Privilege?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/06/limits-to-attorney-client-privilege/</link>
      <description>This edition of Coast to Coast explores what happened when in-house counsel became the focal point during the TIVO vs. EchoStar patent infringement case with regard to attorney-client privilege.  Join co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, both attorneys and Law.com bloggers, as they peek inside the TiVo V. EchoStar case with the experts - Attorney Blair Jacobs, partner at Sutherland Asbill &amp; Brennan LLP and Attorney Christine Byrd, a litigation partner with Irell &amp; Manella LLP and a member of the legal team for TiVo at trial. You'll hear how 'advice of counsel' played a role. Coast to Coast is sponsored by Law.com.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:31:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Limits to Attorney-Client Privilege?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>38</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/17b413a0-cfaa-11eb-92b9-279d851cc202/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Limits to Attorney-Client Privilege?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This edition of Coast to Coast explores what happened when in-house counsel became the focal point during the TIVO vs. EchoStar patent infringement case with regard to attorney-client privilege.  Join co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, both attorneys and Law.com bloggers, as they peek inside the TiVo V. EchoStar case with the experts - Attorney Blair Jacobs, partner at Sutherland Asbill &amp; Brennan LLP and Attorney Christine Byrd, a litigation partner with Irell &amp; Manella LLP and a member of the legal team for TiVo at trial. You'll hear how 'advice of counsel' played a role. Coast to Coast is sponsored by Law.com.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[This edition of Coast to Coast explores what happened when in-house counsel became the focal point during the TIVO vs. EchoStar patent infringement case with regard to attorney-client privilege.  Join co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, both attorneys and Law.com bloggers, as they peek inside the TiVo V. EchoStar case with the experts - Attorney Blair Jacobs, partner at Sutherland Asbill &amp; Brennan LLP and Attorney Christine Byrd, a litigation partner with Irell &amp; Manella LLP and a member of the legal team for TiVo at trial. You'll hear how 'advice of counsel' played a role. Coast to Coast is sponsored by Law.com.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2005</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/06/limits-to-attorney-client-privilege/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3121305004.mp3?updated=1623961992" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A View From the Bench</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/06/a-view-from-the-bench/</link>
      <description>The courtroom is a very serious place, but once in a while, it becomes a theatre for human comedy as the search for justice unfolds. On this Coast to Coast show, you'll hear the classic humor of real-life courtroom stories from special guest, Judge Jerry Buchmeyer, a senior District Court Judge in Dallas. Judge Buchmeyer has documented funny legal moments since 1980 in his "Say What!?" column on the State Bar of Texas website. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi and listen for a laugh.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 17:28:19 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>A View From the Bench</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>37</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/17d5de18-cfaa-11eb-92b9-3fa7f0f8db77/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>A View From the Bench</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The courtroom is a very serious place, but once in a while, it becomes a theatre for human comedy as the search for justice unfolds. On this Coast to Coast show, you'll hear the classic humor of real-life courtroom stories from special guest, Judge Jerry Buchmeyer, a senior District Court Judge in Dallas. Judge Buchmeyer has documented funny legal moments since 1980 in his "Say What!?" column on the State Bar of Texas website. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi and listen for a laugh.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The courtroom is a very serious place, but once in a while, it becomes a theatre for human comedy as the search for justice unfolds. On this Coast to Coast show, you'll hear the classic humor of real-life courtroom stories from special guest, Judge Jerry Buchmeyer, a senior District Court Judge in Dallas. Judge Buchmeyer has documented funny legal moments since 1980 in his "Say What!?" column on the State Bar of Texas website. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi and listen for a laugh.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1438</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/06/a-view-from-the-bench/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3992869655.mp3?updated=1623961992" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Law Professor Blogs</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/06/law-professor-blogs/</link>
      <description>Law professors’ blogs are getting a lot of attention on college campuses across the country. We all know the blog is a powerful tool. And postings reach people around the world in seconds.  Tech savvy law professors have already joined the blogging craze.  But the question has been raised - should those blogs be part of their "academic pursuit?”  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to our experts to get their insight on the credibility of the blog and look into the debate of law professor blogs vs. law professor articles.  Craig and Bob welcome, Professor Susan Crawford, law professor at the Cardozo Law School, Professor Eugene Volokh, professor at UCLA Law School and founder of the blog, The Volokh Conspiracy and Professor Miriam Cherry, visiting professor at Hofstra and blogger for ContractsProf and Concurring Opinions.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:56:50 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Law Professor Blogs</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>36</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/17fa5dba-cfaa-11eb-92b9-933235a8d0bc/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Law Professor Blogs</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Law professors’ blogs are getting a lot of attention on college campuses across the country. We all know the blog is a powerful tool. And postings reach people around the world in seconds.  Tech savvy law professors have already joined the blogging craze.  But the question has been raised - should those blogs be part of their "academic pursuit?”  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to our experts to get their insight on the credibility of the blog and look into the debate of law professor blogs vs. law professor articles.  Craig and Bob welcome, Professor Susan Crawford, law professor at the Cardozo Law School, Professor Eugene Volokh, professor at UCLA Law School and founder of the blog, The Volokh Conspiracy and Professor Miriam Cherry, visiting professor at Hofstra and blogger for ContractsProf and Concurring Opinions.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Law professors’ blogs are getting a lot of attention on college campuses across the country. We all know the blog is a powerful tool. And postings reach people around the world in seconds.  Tech savvy law professors have already joined the blogging craze.  But the question has been raised - should those blogs be part of their "academic pursuit?”  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to our experts to get their insight on the credibility of the blog and look into the debate of law professor blogs vs. law professor articles.  Craig and Bob welcome, Professor Susan Crawford, law professor at the Cardozo Law School, Professor Eugene Volokh, professor at UCLA Law School and founder of the blog, The Volokh Conspiracy and Professor Miriam Cherry, visiting professor at Hofstra and blogger for ContractsProf and Concurring Opinions.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1791</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/06/law-professor-blogs/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6008920870.mp3?updated=1623961993" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Patent Law and eBay</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/05/patent-law-and-ebay/</link>
      <description>A recent Supreme Court ruling in favor of internet-auction-giant, E-bay, has brought Patent Law to the forefront of the Legal World. This case and other patent cases, such as the Blackberry lawsuit, are causing quite a stir in much of the corporate and consumer world. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to our experts to look inside these cases and discuss patent law.  Craig and Bob welcome Attorney Rachel Krevans, partner and patent attorney at the law firm of Morrison and Foerster in San Francisco and Attorney Dennis Crouch, patent attorney at the law firm of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert &amp; Berghoff in Chicago and blogger for Patently-O.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 14:15:44 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Patent Law and eBay</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>35</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/182ef3e0-cfaa-11eb-92b9-4f160bb2323a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Patent Law and eBay</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A recent Supreme Court ruling in favor of internet-auction-giant, E-bay, has brought Patent Law to the forefront of the Legal World. This case and other patent cases, such as the Blackberry lawsuit, are causing quite a stir in much of the corporate and consumer world. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to our experts to look inside these cases and discuss patent law.  Craig and Bob welcome Attorney Rachel Krevans, partner and patent attorney at the law firm of Morrison and Foerster in San Francisco and Attorney Dennis Crouch, patent attorney at the law firm of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert &amp; Berghoff in Chicago and blogger for Patently-O.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[A recent Supreme Court ruling in favor of internet-auction-giant, E-bay, has brought Patent Law to the forefront of the Legal World. This case and other patent cases, such as the Blackberry lawsuit, are causing quite a stir in much of the corporate and consumer world. Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they turn to our experts to look inside these cases and discuss patent law.  Craig and Bob welcome Attorney Rachel Krevans, partner and patent attorney at the law firm of Morrison and Foerster in San Francisco and Attorney Dennis Crouch, patent attorney at the law firm of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert &amp; Berghoff in Chicago and blogger for Patently-O.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1857</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/05/patent-law-and-ebay/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8097879679.mp3?updated=1623961993" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Immigration Laws</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/05/immigration-laws/</link>
      <description>Sweeping proposals to change Immigration Laws from Congress and from the President have been met with strong emotions from Americans everywhere. In this edition of Coast to Coast, we will turn to our experts to get their reaction to Bush’s proposed plan on Immigration and will get their feedback on what the future holds for illegal immigrants.  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, as they get insight from Gregory Siskind, founding partner and immigration lawyer from Siskind Susser in Memphis, Tennessee and Monica Guizar, the Employment Policy Attorney at the National Immigration Law Center in Los Angeles.  You will not want to miss this show!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 18:28:46 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Immigration Laws</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>34</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/184d8558-cfaa-11eb-92b9-9b5bcda7d7ec/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Immigration Laws</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Sweeping proposals to change Immigration Laws from Congress and from the President have been met with strong emotions from Americans everywhere. In this edition of Coast to Coast, we will turn to our experts to get their reaction to Bush’s proposed plan on Immigration and will get their feedback on what the future holds for illegal immigrants.  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, as they get insight from Gregory Siskind, founding partner and immigration lawyer from Siskind Susser in Memphis, Tennessee and Monica Guizar, the Employment Policy Attorney at the National Immigration Law Center in Los Angeles.  You will not want to miss this show!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Sweeping proposals to change Immigration Laws from Congress and from the President have been met with strong emotions from Americans everywhere. In this edition of Coast to Coast, we will turn to our experts to get their reaction to Bush’s proposed plan on Immigration and will get their feedback on what the future holds for illegal immigrants.  Join co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, as they get insight from Gregory Siskind, founding partner and immigration lawyer from Siskind Susser in Memphis, Tennessee and Monica Guizar, the Employment Policy Attorney at the National Immigration Law Center in Los Angeles.  You will not want to miss this show!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1980</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/05/immigration-laws/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6791336547.mp3?updated=1624285454" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fosamax - is it the next VIOXX?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/05/fosamax-is-it-the-next-vioxx/</link>
      <description>On this edition of Coast to Coast, find out more about personal injury lawsuits and class actions being filed against Merck by women who took the drug, Fosamax. Many now suffer severe medical and dental problems. Co-hosts &amp; Attorneys J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi explore what's going on with Fosamax with the lawyer taking the lead nationwide in Fosamax litigation - Attorney Tim O'Brien at the firm of Levin, Papantonio,Thomas, Mitchell, Ecshner &amp; Proctor in Pensacola.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 19:37:59 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fosamax - is it the next VIOXX?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>33</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1876f56e-cfaa-11eb-92b9-a3e95cea672d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Fosamax - is it the next VIOXX?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On this edition of Coast to Coast, find out more about personal injury lawsuits and class actions being filed against Merck by women who took the drug, Fosamax. Many now suffer severe medical and dental problems. Co-hosts &amp; Attorneys J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi explore what's going on with Fosamax with the lawyer taking the lead nationwide in Fosamax litigation - Attorney Tim O'Brien at the firm of Levin, Papantonio,Thomas, Mitchell, Ecshner &amp; Proctor in Pensacola.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[On this edition of Coast to Coast, find out more about personal injury lawsuits and class actions being filed against Merck by women who took the drug, Fosamax. Many now suffer severe medical and dental problems. Co-hosts &amp; Attorneys J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi explore what's going on with Fosamax with the lawyer taking the lead nationwide in Fosamax litigation - Attorney Tim O'Brien at the firm of Levin, Papantonio,Thomas, Mitchell, Ecshner &amp; Proctor in Pensacola.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1849</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/05/fosamax-is-it-the-next-vioxx/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4130417934.mp3?updated=1623961994" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>E-discovery</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/05/e-discovery/</link>
      <description>E-discovery - an important part of a lawyer's world today. Want to learn how e-discovery works and why it is an essential part of legal research? Coast to Coast with co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, get insight from two e-discovery experts, Attorney Eric Meyer, with Dilworth Paxson LLP, and Stephen Prignano, partner and member of the Class Action &amp; Mass Litigation Group of Edwards Angell Palmer &amp; Dodge.  E-discover this show!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 14:02:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>E-discovery</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/18ab8cb6-cfaa-11eb-92b9-cbc7aa7b7533/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>E-discovery</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>E-discovery - an important part of a lawyer's world today. Want to learn how e-discovery works and why it is an essential part of legal research? Coast to Coast with co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, get insight from two e-discovery experts, Attorney Eric Meyer, with Dilworth Paxson LLP, and Stephen Prignano, partner and member of the Class Action &amp; Mass Litigation Group of Edwards Angell Palmer &amp; Dodge.  E-discover this show!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[E-discovery - an important part of a lawyer's world today. Want to learn how e-discovery works and why it is an essential part of legal research? Coast to Coast with co-hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, get insight from two e-discovery experts, Attorney Eric Meyer, with Dilworth Paxson LLP, and Stephen Prignano, partner and member of the Class Action &amp; Mass Litigation Group of Edwards Angell Palmer &amp; Dodge.  E-discover this show!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1846</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/05/e-discovery/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9091119084.mp3?updated=1623961994" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AM LAW 100</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/05/am-law-100/</link>
      <description>The Am Law 100 list is out from The American Lawyer - the top 100 law firms by gross revenue! What firms are on it? Any changes from past years and what's the growing trend for the billion dollar firm? You'll find out on this edition of Coast to Coast with co-hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi with special guest Aric Press, Editorial Director for American Lawyer Media which publishes The American Lawyer.  Don't miss listening to this show!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 16:14:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>AM LAW 100</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/18ca7dc4-cfaa-11eb-92b9-0f6f1ab15ce0/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>AM LAW 100</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Am Law 100 list is out from The American Lawyer - the top 100 law firms by gross revenue! What firms are on it? Any changes from past years and what's the growing trend for the billion dollar firm? You'll find out on this edition of Coast to Coast with co-hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi with special guest Aric Press, Editorial Director for American Lawyer Media which publishes The American Lawyer.  Don't miss listening to this show!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The Am Law 100 list is out from The American Lawyer - the top 100 law firms by gross revenue! What firms are on it? Any changes from past years and what's the growing trend for the billion dollar firm? You'll find out on this edition of Coast to Coast with co-hosts and Law.com bloggers J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi with special guest Aric Press, Editorial Director for American Lawyer Media which publishes The American Lawyer.  Don't miss listening to this show!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1975</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/05/am-law-100/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5174646390.mp3?updated=1623961995" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ABA TECHSHOW</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/04/aba-techshow/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast is on the road at the ABA TECHSHOW in Chicago!  Join co-hosts Robert Ambrogi, Massachusetts Attorney and J. Craig Williams, California Attorney - both Law.com bloggers with experts who focus on what's new in technology for lawyers today. Ambrogi reports from the TECHSHOW with guests, Attorney Tom Mighell, member of the ABA TECHSHOW Planning Board, and David Snow, editor of Law.com's Legal Technology.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:04:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>ABA TECHSHOW</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/18ee0a50-cfaa-11eb-92b9-c3529c53feb5/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>ABA TECHSHOW</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast is on the road at the ABA TECHSHOW in Chicago!  Join co-hosts Robert Ambrogi, Massachusetts Attorney and J. Craig Williams, California Attorney - both Law.com bloggers with experts who focus on what's new in technology for lawyers today. Ambrogi reports from the TECHSHOW with guests, Attorney Tom Mighell, member of the ABA TECHSHOW Planning Board, and David Snow, editor of Law.com's Legal Technology.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast is on the road at the ABA TECHSHOW in Chicago!  Join co-hosts Robert Ambrogi, Massachusetts Attorney and J. Craig Williams, California Attorney - both Law.com bloggers with experts who focus on what's new in technology for lawyers today. Ambrogi reports from the TECHSHOW with guests, Attorney Tom Mighell, member of the ABA TECHSHOW Planning Board, and David Snow, editor of Law.com's Legal Technology.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1690</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/04/aba-techshow/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5736596697.mp3?updated=1623961995" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyers' Websites</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/04/lawyers-websites/</link>
      <description>Does your website have the right stuff for a lawyer? Is your website really a good representation of your law firm?  On this show, Coast to Coast co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, both attorneys and Law.com legal bloggers, get the answers from the experts. You'll hear from Tim Stanley, former CEO and co-founder of  FindLaw who now runs Justia, a web design company for law firms and member of the California Bar, Pete Boyd, Florida Attorney and President of PaperStreet which he founded in law school and legal technology consultant, Dennis Kennedy who is also on the boards of Law Practice Today and the ABA Techshow. Craig and Bob get to the bottom of what every lawyer needs to know!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 16:26:52 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyers' Websites</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/190e1142-cfaa-11eb-92b9-1f2c0afb91fe/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyers' Websites</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Does your website have the right stuff for a lawyer? Is your website really a good representation of your law firm?  On this show, Coast to Coast co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, both attorneys and Law.com legal bloggers, get the answers from the experts. You'll hear from Tim Stanley, former CEO and co-founder of  FindLaw who now runs Justia, a web design company for law firms and member of the California Bar, Pete Boyd, Florida Attorney and President of PaperStreet which he founded in law school and legal technology consultant, Dennis Kennedy who is also on the boards of Law Practice Today and the ABA Techshow. Craig and Bob get to the bottom of what every lawyer needs to know!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Does your website have the right stuff for a lawyer? Is your website really a good representation of your law firm?  On this show, Coast to Coast co-hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, both attorneys and Law.com legal bloggers, get the answers from the experts. You'll hear from Tim Stanley, former CEO and co-founder of  FindLaw who now runs Justia, a web design company for law firms and member of the California Bar, Pete Boyd, Florida Attorney and President of PaperStreet which he founded in law school and legal technology consultant, Dennis Kennedy who is also on the boards of Law Practice Today and the ABA Techshow. Craig and Bob get to the bottom of what every lawyer needs to know!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1873</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/04/lawyers-websites/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4956946998.mp3?updated=1624285450" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Katrina Update</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/04/katrina-update/</link>
      <description>What's the status of the legal profession and the judicial system in Louisiana 7 months after Katrina? Coast to Coast hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, attorneys and Law.com bloggers find out why some law firms are back up and running, while others are still rebuilding or out of business. You'll hear first-hand accounts from Attorney Ernie Svenson, solo practitioner in New Orleans and author of the legal blog, "Ernie the Attorney," as well as Tim Doody, Firm Administrator for Chaffe McCall LLP, with headquarters in New Orleans and the Tom O'Connell, President of XOsoft, a technology company that helped law firms restore important legal files after the hurricane. And don't miss a special segment with Monica Bay, editor-in-chief of Law Technology News about her recent experiences in post-Katrina New Orleans!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 17:21:31 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Katrina Update</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/192c4b58-cfaa-11eb-92b9-d3b1fe414b1a/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Katrina Update</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What's the status of the legal profession and the judicial system in Louisiana 7 months after Katrina? Coast to Coast hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, attorneys and Law.com bloggers find out why some law firms are back up and running, while others are still rebuilding or out of business. You'll hear first-hand accounts from Attorney Ernie Svenson, solo practitioner in New Orleans and author of the legal blog, "Ernie the Attorney," as well as Tim Doody, Firm Administrator for Chaffe McCall LLP, with headquarters in New Orleans and the Tom O'Connell, President of XOsoft, a technology company that helped law firms restore important legal files after the hurricane. And don't miss a special segment with Monica Bay, editor-in-chief of Law Technology News about her recent experiences in post-Katrina New Orleans!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[What's the status of the legal profession and the judicial system in Louisiana 7 months after Katrina? Coast to Coast hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, attorneys and Law.com bloggers find out why some law firms are back up and running, while others are still rebuilding or out of business. You'll hear first-hand accounts from Attorney Ernie Svenson, solo practitioner in New Orleans and author of the legal blog, "Ernie the Attorney," as well as Tim Doody, Firm Administrator for Chaffe McCall LLP, with headquarters in New Orleans and the Tom O'Connell, President of XOsoft, a technology company that helped law firms restore important legal files after the hurricane. And don't miss a special segment with Monica Bay, editor-in-chief of Law Technology News about her recent experiences in post-Katrina New Orleans!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1989</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/04/katrina-update/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9108658110.mp3?updated=1623961999" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Public Defenders</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/03/public-defenders/</link>
      <description>Some of the best lawyers in the country are our Public Defenders. They have heavy caseloads, longer hours than most lawyers and they take starting salaries of $35K! in many parts of the U-S! Why do they do it? On this week's Coast to Coast with hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, our guests give us a window on their world as Public Defenders. We're fortunate to have Attorney Josh Hayne from the Massachusetts Public Defender's office, Attorney Greg Apt, Public Defender in Los Angeles County and Attorney Robert Spangenberg, President of The Spangenberg Group, conducting research on civil and criminal justice system-related topics for over 20 years. You can't miss this compelling show, sponsored by Law.com!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:12:46 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Public Defenders</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>27</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/194aeee6-cfaa-11eb-92b9-8f282bf53c41/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Public Defenders</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Some of the best lawyers in the country are our Public Defenders. They have heavy caseloads, longer hours than most lawyers and they take starting salaries of $35K! in many parts of the U-S! Why do they do it? On this week's Coast to Coast with hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, our guests give us a window on their world as Public Defenders. We're fortunate to have Attorney Josh Hayne from the Massachusetts Public Defender's office, Attorney Greg Apt, Public Defender in Los Angeles County and Attorney Robert Spangenberg, President of The Spangenberg Group, conducting research on civil and criminal justice system-related topics for over 20 years. You can't miss this compelling show, sponsored by Law.com!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Some of the best lawyers in the country are our Public Defenders. They have heavy caseloads, longer hours than most lawyers and they take starting salaries of $35K! in many parts of the U-S! Why do they do it? On this week's Coast to Coast with hosts and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, our guests give us a window on their world as Public Defenders. We're fortunate to have Attorney Josh Hayne from the Massachusetts Public Defender's office, Attorney Greg Apt, Public Defender in Los Angeles County and Attorney Robert Spangenberg, President of The Spangenberg Group, conducting research on civil and criminal justice system-related topics for over 20 years. You can't miss this compelling show, sponsored by Law.com!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1997</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/03/public-defenders/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN4307958212.mp3?updated=1623961999" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Gender Gap</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/03/legal-gender-gap/</link>
      <description>Is the gender gap in the legal profession widening? Only about 17 percent of partners at major law firms nationwide are women. That's the hot topic on this Coast to Coast show with hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi , attorneys and Law.com bloggers. You'll hear about interviews with lawyers across the country from Attorney Lauren Stiller Rikleen, senior partner at Bowditch &amp; Dewey and author of "Ending the Gauntlet: Removing Barriers to Women’s Success in the Law."  Also on the show is New England School of Law Professor Ronald Chester, who has written extensively about the legal gender gap and is a faculty expert on women in law and Attorney Mary Musette Stewart, President of the Central Florida Association of Women Lawyers, devoted to promoting the advancement of women in the legal profession. Don't miss this important discussion!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:42:17 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Gender Gap</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/196790e6-cfaa-11eb-92b9-b7f0c69e7068/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Gender Gap</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Is the gender gap in the legal profession widening? Only about 17 percent of partners at major law firms nationwide are women. That's the hot topic on this Coast to Coast show with hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi , attorneys and Law.com bloggers. You'll hear about interviews with lawyers across the country from Attorney Lauren Stiller Rikleen, senior partner at Bowditch &amp; Dewey and author of "Ending the Gauntlet: Removing Barriers to Women’s Success in the Law."  Also on the show is New England School of Law Professor Ronald Chester, who has written extensively about the legal gender gap and is a faculty expert on women in law and Attorney Mary Musette Stewart, President of the Central Florida Association of Women Lawyers, devoted to promoting the advancement of women in the legal profession. Don't miss this important discussion!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Is the gender gap in the legal profession widening? Only about 17 percent of partners at major law firms nationwide are women. That's the hot topic on this Coast to Coast show with hosts, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi , attorneys and Law.com bloggers. You'll hear about interviews with lawyers across the country from Attorney Lauren Stiller Rikleen, senior partner at Bowditch &amp; Dewey and author of "Ending the Gauntlet: Removing Barriers to Women’s Success in the Law."  Also on the show is New England School of Law Professor Ronald Chester, who has written extensively about the legal gender gap and is a faculty expert on women in law and Attorney Mary Musette Stewart, President of the Central Florida Association of Women Lawyers, devoted to promoting the advancement of women in the legal profession. Don't miss this important discussion!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1974</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/03/legal-gender-gap/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2778689063.mp3?updated=1623961999" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Class Action Fairness Act</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/03/class-action-fairness-act/</link>
      <description>The Class Action Fairness Act became law in the U.S. in February of 2005.  But has CAFA been a real benefit to the justice system across the country? Join Coast to Coast hosts, attorneys and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, for an in depth debate with their guests, appellate Attorney Howard Bashman, columnist for Law.com and The Legal Intelligencer of ALM Media, legal reporter Shannon Duffy, who also writes for The Legal Intelligencer and other ALM Media publications and Attorney Richard W. Cohen of Lowey Dannenberg Bemporad and Selinger, P.C. with first-hand experience in an ongoing class action case affected by the CAFA. You'll get the details of CAFA's first year from every side of the issue on this edition.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:07:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Class Action Fairness Act</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>25</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/198e127a-cfaa-11eb-92b9-b31c6c33b078/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Class Action Fairness Act</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Class Action Fairness Act became law in the U.S. in February of 2005.  But has CAFA been a real benefit to the justice system across the country? Join Coast to Coast hosts, attorneys and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, for an in depth debate with their guests, appellate Attorney Howard Bashman, columnist for Law.com and The Legal Intelligencer of ALM Media, legal reporter Shannon Duffy, who also writes for The Legal Intelligencer and other ALM Media publications and Attorney Richard W. Cohen of Lowey Dannenberg Bemporad and Selinger, P.C. with first-hand experience in an ongoing class action case affected by the CAFA. You'll get the details of CAFA's first year from every side of the issue on this edition.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[The Class Action Fairness Act became law in the U.S. in February of 2005.  But has CAFA been a real benefit to the justice system across the country? Join Coast to Coast hosts, attorneys and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, for an in depth debate with their guests, appellate Attorney Howard Bashman, columnist for Law.com and The Legal Intelligencer of ALM Media, legal reporter Shannon Duffy, who also writes for The Legal Intelligencer and other ALM Media publications and Attorney Richard W. Cohen of Lowey Dannenberg Bemporad and Selinger, P.C. with first-hand experience in an ongoing class action case affected by the CAFA. You'll get the details of CAFA's first year from every side of the issue on this edition.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1860</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/03/class-action-fairness-act/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6866331955.mp3?updated=1623962001" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Associate Salaries</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/03/associate-salaries/</link>
      <description>After a few stagnant years, salaries for first year Law Associates are exploding.  Starting pay is an incredible $145,000  at some large firms.  What is causing this first year salary boom?  What do graduating law school students think about this?  Attorneys and law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi examine the reasons for these new salary heights with expert insight from Melissa Lennon of The Beasley School of Law at Temple University, Carey Bertolet of BCG Attorney Search and Michel Ayer, a student at the University of Iowa Law School.  This is an invaluable  discussion for all firms looking for new talent and law students looking for jobs!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:50:31 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Associate Salaries</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/19ab527c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-3787937d1482/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Associate Salaries</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>After a few stagnant years, salaries for first year Law Associates are exploding.  Starting pay is an incredible $145,000  at some large firms.  What is causing this first year salary boom?  What do graduating law school students think about this?  Attorneys and law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi examine the reasons for these new salary heights with expert insight from Melissa Lennon of The Beasley School of Law at Temple University, Carey Bertolet of BCG Attorney Search and Michel Ayer, a student at the University of Iowa Law School.  This is an invaluable  discussion for all firms looking for new talent and law students looking for jobs!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[After a few stagnant years, salaries for first year Law Associates are exploding.  Starting pay is an incredible $145,000  at some large firms.  What is causing this first year salary boom?  What do graduating law school students think about this?  Attorneys and law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi examine the reasons for these new salary heights with expert insight from Melissa Lennon of The Beasley School of Law at Temple University, Carey Bertolet of BCG Attorney Search and Michel Ayer, a student at the University of Iowa Law School.  This is an invaluable  discussion for all firms looking for new talent and law students looking for jobs!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1943</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/03/associate-salaries/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7494264062.mp3?updated=1623962000" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Big Firms: Big Business</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/03/big-firms-big-business/</link>
      <description>Everyday we read about law firm mergers or acquisitions, becoming, or so it seems, much like big corporate America. Coast to Coast hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi - West Coast and East Coast attorneys and law.com bloggers, explore this growing trend toward the mega firm on this show. Our guests are experts with compelling insights on this topic: Attorney and national legal writer, Eric J. Sinrod, partner in the San Francisco office of Duane Morris LLP - one of the largest firms in the U-S and; Attorney and well-known legal consultant, Bruce MacEwen from New York. Can mega firms better serve legal clients in a new global legal community? Don't miss this discussion, sponsored by Law.com.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 14:11:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Big Firms: Big Business</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/19dde1d8-cfaa-11eb-92b9-2fe3fec11fce/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Big Firms: Big Business</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Everyday we read about law firm mergers or acquisitions, becoming, or so it seems, much like big corporate America. Coast to Coast hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi - West Coast and East Coast attorneys and law.com bloggers, explore this growing trend toward the mega firm on this show. Our guests are experts with compelling insights on this topic: Attorney and national legal writer, Eric J. Sinrod, partner in the San Francisco office of Duane Morris LLP - one of the largest firms in the U-S and; Attorney and well-known legal consultant, Bruce MacEwen from New York. Can mega firms better serve legal clients in a new global legal community? Don't miss this discussion, sponsored by Law.com.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Everyday we read about law firm mergers or acquisitions, becoming, or so it seems, much like big corporate America. Coast to Coast hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi - West Coast and East Coast attorneys and law.com bloggers, explore this growing trend toward the mega firm on this show. Our guests are experts with compelling insights on this topic: Attorney and national legal writer, Eric J. Sinrod, partner in the San Francisco office of Duane Morris LLP - one of the largest firms in the U-S and; Attorney and well-known legal consultant, Bruce MacEwen from New York. Can mega firms better serve legal clients in a new global legal community? Don't miss this discussion, sponsored by Law.com.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1747</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/03/big-firms-big-business/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1208068892.mp3?updated=1623962000" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trial of Saddam Hussein</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/02/trial-of-saddam-hussein/</link>
      <description>Chaos is an every day occurence in the Saddam Hussein trial. The courtroom has seen 3 different judges, 2 assassinations, postponements, outbursts, walk-outs, no-shows. It is nothing like what we're accustomed to seeing in the U-S Justice system. On this edition of Coast to Coast, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, who are attorneys and law.com bloggers, discuss what is really going on, with a very special guest, Simone Monasebian, Chief of the United Nations' Office of Drugs and Crime.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:01:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Trial of Saddam Hussein</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/19ffadd6-cfaa-11eb-92b9-cf22bb75e824/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Trial of Saddam Hussein</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Chaos is an every day occurence in the Saddam Hussein trial. The courtroom has seen 3 different judges, 2 assassinations, postponements, outbursts, walk-outs, no-shows. It is nothing like what we're accustomed to seeing in the U-S Justice system. On this edition of Coast to Coast, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, who are attorneys and law.com bloggers, discuss what is really going on, with a very special guest, Simone Monasebian, Chief of the United Nations' Office of Drugs and Crime.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Chaos is an every day occurence in the Saddam Hussein trial. The courtroom has seen 3 different judges, 2 assassinations, postponements, outbursts, walk-outs, no-shows. It is nothing like what we're accustomed to seeing in the U-S Justice system. On this edition of Coast to Coast, hosts J. Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, who are attorneys and law.com bloggers, discuss what is really going on, with a very special guest, Simone Monasebian, Chief of the United Nations' Office of Drugs and Crime.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1881</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/02/trial-of-saddam-hussein/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7915731373.mp3?updated=1623962000" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Law is Business</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/02/law-is-business/</link>
      <description>Being a lawyer today takes more than a legal degree -  it also means running a business! Coast to Coast hosts J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, both of whom are lawyers and law.com bloggers discuss the complexities of the business of law beyond the courthouse.  Our special guest is Reid Trautz, who serves as Director of the D.C. Bar Practice Management Advisory Service, where he provides practice management information and consulting services to lawyers to help them improve their businesses. Reid is a nationally recognized  author and he is a frequent CLE presenter at the ABA and conferences nationwide.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:35:51 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Law is Business</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1a2a35a6-cfaa-11eb-92b9-431258570b6b/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Law is Business</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Being a lawyer today takes more than a legal degree -  it also means running a business! Coast to Coast hosts J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, both of whom are lawyers and law.com bloggers discuss the complexities of the business of law beyond the courthouse.  Our special guest is Reid Trautz, who serves as Director of the D.C. Bar Practice Management Advisory Service, where he provides practice management information and consulting services to lawyers to help them improve their businesses. Reid is a nationally recognized  author and he is a frequent CLE presenter at the ABA and conferences nationwide.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Being a lawyer today takes more than a legal degree -  it also means running a business! Coast to Coast hosts J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, both of whom are lawyers and law.com bloggers discuss the complexities of the business of law beyond the courthouse.  Our special guest is Reid Trautz, who serves as Director of the D.C. Bar Practice Management Advisory Service, where he provides practice management information and consulting services to lawyers to help them improve their businesses. Reid is a nationally recognized  author and he is a frequent CLE presenter at the ABA and conferences nationwide.<br>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1906</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/02/law-is-business/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN1187709474.mp3?updated=1623962001" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Diversity in Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/02/diversity-in-law/</link>
      <description>Back in 1999, the Chief Legal Officers of 500 large corporations agreed to push their outside legal firms into hiring more minorities and women.  Has their promise been kept?  Have law firms diversified their staff?  Coast to Coast, hosted by Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi,  tackle this topic with in depth analysis from Veta Richardson, the Executive Director for the Minority Corporate Counsel Association, and Attorney Ron Jordan, the founding Principal of Carter-White &amp; Shaw.  This is expert insight you shouldn't miss!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 17:47:16 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Diversity in Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1a537a92-cfaa-11eb-92b9-c743497f01ef/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Diversity in Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Back in 1999, the Chief Legal Officers of 500 large corporations agreed to push their outside legal firms into hiring more minorities and women.  Has their promise been kept?  Have law firms diversified their staff?  Coast to Coast, hosted by Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi,  tackle this topic with in depth analysis from Veta Richardson, the Executive Director for the Minority Corporate Counsel Association, and Attorney Ron Jordan, the founding Principal of Carter-White &amp; Shaw.  This is expert insight you shouldn't miss!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Back in 1999, the Chief Legal Officers of 500 large corporations agreed to push their outside legal firms into hiring more minorities and women.  Has their promise been kept?  Have law firms diversified their staff?  Coast to Coast, hosted by Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi,  tackle this topic with in depth analysis from Veta Richardson, the Executive Director for the Minority Corporate Counsel Association, and Attorney Ron Jordan, the founding Principal of Carter-White &amp; Shaw.  This is expert insight you shouldn't miss!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1876</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/02/diversity-in-law/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6281344531.mp3?updated=1623962001" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tort Reform</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/01/tort-reform/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast, hosted by Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, brings the two sides of tort reform together in a lively debate over the issues. Among the big issues for 2006 are asbestos and obesity lawsuits. Our special guests are Laurie Beacham, Communications director for the Center for Justice and Democracy, who explains the 'dangers' of tort reform and Tiger Joyce, President of the American Tort Reform Association (ATRA) dedicated to bringing 'fairness and efficiency' to the civil justice system. If you care about our legal system, you'll want to listen!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:31:01 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Tort Reform</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1a775ff2-cfaa-11eb-92b9-77c00ab4ca5e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Tort Reform</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast, hosted by Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, brings the two sides of tort reform together in a lively debate over the issues. Among the big issues for 2006 are asbestos and obesity lawsuits. Our special guests are Laurie Beacham, Communications director for the Center for Justice and Democracy, who explains the 'dangers' of tort reform and Tiger Joyce, President of the American Tort Reform Association (ATRA) dedicated to bringing 'fairness and efficiency' to the civil justice system. If you care about our legal system, you'll want to listen!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast, hosted by Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, brings the two sides of tort reform together in a lively debate over the issues. Among the big issues for 2006 are asbestos and obesity lawsuits. Our special guests are Laurie Beacham, Communications director for the Center for Justice and Democracy, who explains the 'dangers' of tort reform and Tiger Joyce, President of the American Tort Reform Association (ATRA) dedicated to bringing 'fairness and efficiency' to the civil justice system. If you care about our legal system, you'll want to listen!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2006</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/01/tort-reform/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3583412132.mp3?updated=1623962004" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DNA Evidence</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/01/dna-evidence/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast, hosted by Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, looks at how DNA is being used in many cases to prove previously convicted people innocent of crimes for which many have served decades in jail. You'll hear about the Innocence Project, a non-profit legal clinic founded by Barry Scheck, of O.J. Simpson trial fame and his partner, Peter Neufeld, which has freed 172 wrongly convicted men and women. Joining us is Attorney Robert N. Feldman, partner at the Boston firm, Birnbaum &amp; Godkin, LLP, and one of the founders of the New England Innocence Project.  Is there a downside? Also joining us is Attorney Josh Marquis, District Attorney of Clatsop County in Oregon and Vice President of the National District Attorneys Association as well as a frequest guest on national radio and TV discussing criminal justice. Its a discussion you won't want to miss!</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:00:57 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>DNA Evidence</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1aa0b80c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-ffa2cce2deac/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>DNA Evidence</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast, hosted by Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, looks at how DNA is being used in many cases to prove previously convicted people innocent of crimes for which many have served decades in jail. You'll hear about the Innocence Project, a non-profit legal clinic founded by Barry Scheck, of O.J. Simpson trial fame and his partner, Peter Neufeld, which has freed 172 wrongly convicted men and women. Joining us is Attorney Robert N. Feldman, partner at the Boston firm, Birnbaum &amp; Godkin, LLP, and one of the founders of the New England Innocence Project.  Is there a downside? Also joining us is Attorney Josh Marquis, District Attorney of Clatsop County in Oregon and Vice President of the National District Attorneys Association as well as a frequest guest on national radio and TV discussing criminal justice. Its a discussion you won't want to miss!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast, hosted by Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, looks at how DNA is being used in many cases to prove previously convicted people innocent of crimes for which many have served decades in jail. You'll hear about the Innocence Project, a non-profit legal clinic founded by Barry Scheck, of O.J. Simpson trial fame and his partner, Peter Neufeld, which has freed 172 wrongly convicted men and women. Joining us is Attorney Robert N. Feldman, partner at the Boston firm, Birnbaum &amp; Godkin, LLP, and one of the founders of the New England Innocence Project.  Is there a downside? Also joining us is Attorney Josh Marquis, District Attorney of Clatsop County in Oregon and Vice President of the National District Attorneys Association as well as a frequest guest on national radio and TV discussing criminal justice. Its a discussion you won't want to miss!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2111</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/01/dna-evidence/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN5209133503.mp3?updated=1624285450" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Predictions for 2006</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/01/legal-predictions-for-2006/</link>
      <description>Looking into the crystal ball on Coast to Coast with co-hosts J.Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, both attorneys and legal bloggers for Law.com. Special guests and prognosticators (also lawyers) Norman Pattis, one of the best-known criminal defense lawyers in the country along with Washington D.C. Attorney Carolyn Elefant, who specialized in energy regulatory issues and Stephen Kaplan from the Los Angeles firm of Hicks, Mims and Kaplan focusing on business law. Listen to the show for their predictions for 2006 ranging from the Alito hearings to terrorism to legal technology...and legal podcasting!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:37:27 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Predictions for 2006</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1abeb7ee-cfaa-11eb-92b9-3feb7921ba79/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Predictions for 2006</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Looking into the crystal ball on Coast to Coast with co-hosts J.Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, both attorneys and legal bloggers for Law.com. Special guests and prognosticators (also lawyers) Norman Pattis, one of the best-known criminal defense lawyers in the country along with Washington D.C. Attorney Carolyn Elefant, who specialized in energy regulatory issues and Stephen Kaplan from the Los Angeles firm of Hicks, Mims and Kaplan focusing on business law. Listen to the show for their predictions for 2006 ranging from the Alito hearings to terrorism to legal technology...and legal podcasting!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Looking into the crystal ball on Coast to Coast with co-hosts J.Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi, both attorneys and legal bloggers for Law.com. Special guests and prognosticators (also lawyers) Norman Pattis, one of the best-known criminal defense lawyers in the country along with Washington D.C. Attorney Carolyn Elefant, who specialized in energy regulatory issues and Stephen Kaplan from the Los Angeles firm of Hicks, Mims and Kaplan focusing on business law. Listen to the show for their predictions for 2006 ranging from the Alito hearings to terrorism to legal technology...and legal podcasting!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1819</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2006/01/legal-predictions-for-2006/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8173027562.mp3?updated=1623962004" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Battle Over The BlackBerry - 12/20/05</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/12/legal-battle-over-the-blackberry/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast, hosted by Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, looks at the legal wranglings over the gizmo that keeps many lawyers connected - the BlackBerry! The legal spotlight is on the patent infringement lawsuit brought by a company called NTP against Research in Motion, the company that makes the BlackBerry. To guide us through the recent developments is our special guest, Attorney Eric J. Sinrod, partner in the firm of Duane Morris LLP, who is experienced in Internet, technology and intellectual property law as well as major class actions. Mr. Sinrod writes weekly legal columns for USATODAY.com, and he is a regular guest speaker covering legal issues for Tech TV, Live Online News and CNET Radio.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:50:25 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Legal Battle Over The BlackBerry</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1ae1f9de-cfaa-11eb-92b9-7fa2ba1a7588/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Battle Over The BlackBerry - 12/20/05</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast, hosted by Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, looks at the legal wranglings over the gizmo that keeps many lawyers connected - the BlackBerry! The legal spotlight is on the patent infringement lawsuit brought by a company called NTP against Research in Motion, the company that makes the BlackBerry. To guide us through the recent developments is our special guest, Attorney Eric J. Sinrod, partner in the firm of Duane Morris LLP, who is experienced in Internet, technology and intellectual property law as well as major class actions. Mr. Sinrod writes weekly legal columns for USATODAY.com, and he is a regular guest speaker covering legal issues for Tech TV, Live Online News and CNET Radio.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast, hosted by Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, looks at the legal wranglings over the gizmo that keeps many lawyers connected - the BlackBerry! The legal spotlight is on the patent infringement lawsuit brought by a company called NTP against Research in Motion, the company that makes the BlackBerry. To guide us through the recent developments is our special guest, Attorney Eric J. Sinrod, partner in the firm of Duane Morris LLP, who is experienced in Internet, technology and intellectual property law as well as major class actions. Mr. Sinrod writes weekly legal columns for USATODAY.com, and he is a regular guest speaker covering legal issues for Tech TV, Live Online News and CNET Radio.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1672</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/12/legal-battle-over-the-blackberry/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3540094916.mp3?updated=1624285395" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Holidays with Lawyers</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/12/holidays-with-lawyers/</link>
      <description>Put the briefs and blackberrys away and have a good-spirited laugh at the legal community. Coast to Coast, hosted by Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, brings listeners a special treat for the holidays. Lawrence Savell, Esq. from the New York firm of Chadbourne &amp; Parke LLP, shares his musical scales of justice from LAWTUNES just in time for your holiday listening. You Don't Want To Cross Santa (just one song you'll hear). It's music, it's humor and it will be one of the best half-hours you'll spend between the holiday crush and the courthouses this season! Happy Holidays!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 07:34:46 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Holidays with Lawyers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1b05e470-cfaa-11eb-92b9-0f7fe61d2298/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Holidays with Lawyers</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Put the briefs and blackberrys away and have a good-spirited laugh at the legal community. Coast to Coast, hosted by Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, brings listeners a special treat for the holidays. Lawrence Savell, Esq. from the New York firm of Chadbourne &amp; Parke LLP, shares his musical scales of justice from LAWTUNES just in time for your holiday listening. You Don't Want To Cross Santa (just one song you'll hear). It's music, it's humor and it will be one of the best half-hours you'll spend between the holiday crush and the courthouses this season! Happy Holidays!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Put the briefs and blackberrys away and have a good-spirited laugh at the legal community. Coast to Coast, hosted by Attorneys and Law.com bloggers, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, brings listeners a special treat for the holidays. Lawrence Savell, Esq. from the New York firm of Chadbourne &amp; Parke LLP, shares his musical scales of justice from LAWTUNES just in time for your holiday listening. You Don't Want To Cross Santa (just one song you'll hear). It's music, it's humor and it will be one of the best half-hours you'll spend between the holiday crush and the courthouses this season! Happy Holidays!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1941</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/12/holidays-with-lawyers/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8318578596.mp3?updated=1623962004" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUPCO Test for Military Recruiting at Law Schools</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/12/supco-test-for-military-recruiting-at-law-schools/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast, hosted by Law.com bloggers, Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams takes on the Solomon Amendment and arguments before the Supreme Court in Rumsfeld v. FAIR which may impact law schools across the country. Hear a portion of the actual argument from the Solicitor General, Paul Clement, arguing for the Justice Department and reaction from our special guest, Attorney Lara Schwartz, chief legislative counsel for HRC (Human Rights Campaign). The issue pits a broad group of law professors against the federal government. Don't miss it!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:15:03 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>SUPCO Test for Military Recruiting at Law Schools</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1b26f4b2-cfaa-11eb-92b9-479cd0351172/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>SUPCO Test for Military Recruiting at Law Schools</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast, hosted by Law.com bloggers, Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams takes on the Solomon Amendment and arguments before the Supreme Court in Rumsfeld v. FAIR which may impact law schools across the country. Hear a portion of the actual argument from the Solicitor General, Paul Clement, arguing for the Justice Department and reaction from our special guest, Attorney Lara Schwartz, chief legislative counsel for HRC (Human Rights Campaign). The issue pits a broad group of law professors against the federal government. Don't miss it!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast, hosted by Law.com bloggers, Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams takes on the Solomon Amendment and arguments before the Supreme Court in Rumsfeld v. FAIR which may impact law schools across the country. Hear a portion of the actual argument from the Solicitor General, Paul Clement, arguing for the Justice Department and reaction from our special guest, Attorney Lara Schwartz, chief legislative counsel for HRC (Human Rights Campaign). The issue pits a broad group of law professors against the federal government. Don't miss it!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2018</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/12/supco-test-for-military-recruiting-at-law-schools/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9803853687.mp3?updated=1623962005" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court and the Abortion Issue</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/12/supreme-court-and-the-abortion-issue/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast, hosted by Law.com bloggers, Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams discuss the arguments before the Supreme Court in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood with high stakes for the abortion issue.  Special guests are Professor Neil S. Siegel from Duke Law, who recently completed a clerkship with Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Mathew D. Staver, President and General Counsel of Liberty Counsel, which cooperates and coordinates its efforts with other religious liberty, pro-life and pro-family organizations.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:10:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Supreme Court and the Abortion Issue</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1b4a815c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-1b9aa2d657f8/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Supreme Court and the Abortion Issue</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast, hosted by Law.com bloggers, Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams discuss the arguments before the Supreme Court in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood with high stakes for the abortion issue.  Special guests are Professor Neil S. Siegel from Duke Law, who recently completed a clerkship with Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Mathew D. Staver, President and General Counsel of Liberty Counsel, which cooperates and coordinates its efforts with other religious liberty, pro-life and pro-family organizations.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast, hosted by Law.com bloggers, Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams discuss the arguments before the Supreme Court in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood with high stakes for the abortion issue.  Special guests are Professor Neil S. Siegel from Duke Law, who recently completed a clerkship with Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Mathew D. Staver, President and General Counsel of Liberty Counsel, which cooperates and coordinates its efforts with other religious liberty, pro-life and pro-family organizations.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1844</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/12/supreme-court-and-the-abortion-issue/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2507861582.mp3?updated=1624285452" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Patriot Act</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/11/the-patriot-act/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams brings into focus a discussion of the Patriot Act up for debate as some of the provisions are set to expire December 31st. Although designed to give federal law enforcement and intellegence agencies tools in the fight against terror, some say civil liberties are being violated. Hear former FBI agent and now candidate for Congress, Coleen Rowley, talk about the frontline need for information balanced with the protection of rights. And our other guest is Attorney Jameel Jaffer with the American Civil Liberties Union who is currently counsel for plaintiffs in challenges to the provisions of the Patriot Act. Join us for this important show!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:19:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Patriot Act</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1b6f05f4-cfaa-11eb-92b9-ab73ec69f70c/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Patriot Act</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams brings into focus a discussion of the Patriot Act up for debate as some of the provisions are set to expire December 31st. Although designed to give federal law enforcement and intellegence agencies tools in the fight against terror, some say civil liberties are being violated. Hear former FBI agent and now candidate for Congress, Coleen Rowley, talk about the frontline need for information balanced with the protection of rights. And our other guest is Attorney Jameel Jaffer with the American Civil Liberties Union who is currently counsel for plaintiffs in challenges to the provisions of the Patriot Act. Join us for this important show!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams brings into focus a discussion of the Patriot Act up for debate as some of the provisions are set to expire December 31st. Although designed to give federal law enforcement and intellegence agencies tools in the fight against terror, some say civil liberties are being violated. Hear former FBI agent and now candidate for Congress, Coleen Rowley, talk about the frontline need for information balanced with the protection of rights. And our other guest is Attorney Jameel Jaffer with the American Civil Liberties Union who is currently counsel for plaintiffs in challenges to the provisions of the Patriot Act. Join us for this important show!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1877</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/11/the-patriot-act/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9060702018.mp3?updated=1623962005" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VIOXX: The Next Step</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/11/vioxx-the-next-step/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast, with J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, takes a hard look at the future for VIOXX litigation nationwide, particularly after the recent win for Merck Pharmaceuticals in the New Jersey trial.  Very special guests in our discussion are nationally recognized Attorney Tom Girardi of the L-A firm of Girardi-Keese known for taking on goliaths in the past, Attorney Dawn Barrios of the Louisiana firm, Barrios, Kingsdorf &amp; Casteix  - both of whom serve on the Liason Committee for MDL-1657 for VIOXX product liability litigation - and NJ Law Journal reporter, Lisa Brennan who covered the recent NJ VIOXX trial and has spoken to jurors and the lawyers on both sides since the verdict. You can't miss the opportunity to hear this discussion!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:53:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>VIOXX: The Next Step</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1b9adfda-cfaa-11eb-92b9-37a5adf84b18/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>VIOXX: The Next Step</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast, with J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, takes a hard look at the future for VIOXX litigation nationwide, particularly after the recent win for Merck Pharmaceuticals in the New Jersey trial.  Very special guests in our discussion are nationally recognized Attorney Tom Girardi of the L-A firm of Girardi-Keese known for taking on goliaths in the past, Attorney Dawn Barrios of the Louisiana firm, Barrios, Kingsdorf &amp; Casteix  - both of whom serve on the Liason Committee for MDL-1657 for VIOXX product liability litigation - and NJ Law Journal reporter, Lisa Brennan who covered the recent NJ VIOXX trial and has spoken to jurors and the lawyers on both sides since the verdict. You can't miss the opportunity to hear this discussion!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast, with J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi, takes a hard look at the future for VIOXX litigation nationwide, particularly after the recent win for Merck Pharmaceuticals in the New Jersey trial.  Very special guests in our discussion are nationally recognized Attorney Tom Girardi of the L-A firm of Girardi-Keese known for taking on goliaths in the past, Attorney Dawn Barrios of the Louisiana firm, Barrios, Kingsdorf &amp; Casteix  - both of whom serve on the Liason Committee for MDL-1657 for VIOXX product liability litigation - and NJ Law Journal reporter, Lisa Brennan who covered the recent NJ VIOXX trial and has spoken to jurors and the lawyers on both sides since the verdict. You can't miss the opportunity to hear this discussion!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1897</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/11/vioxx-the-next-step/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN9094589865.mp3?updated=1623962005" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Nominee Take 2</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/11/supreme-court-nominee-take-2/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast, with co-hosts, Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams takes up the controversial discussion of the President's latest nominee to the Supreme Court, Judge Samuel Alito, with special guests with special insights. Join us along with Matt Margolis, the founder/editor of Blogs for Bush,  distinguished Law Professor, Carl Tobias from the University of Richmond School of Law and Drucilla Ramey, Executive Director of the National Association of Women Judges. This show is a must listen!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 15:57:59 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Supreme Court Nominee Take 2</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1bbc1a1a-cfaa-11eb-92b9-ab74560deb41/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Supreme Court Nominee Take 2</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast, with co-hosts, Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams takes up the controversial discussion of the President's latest nominee to the Supreme Court, Judge Samuel Alito, with special guests with special insights. Join us along with Matt Margolis, the founder/editor of Blogs for Bush,  distinguished Law Professor, Carl Tobias from the University of Richmond School of Law and Drucilla Ramey, Executive Director of the National Association of Women Judges. This show is a must listen!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast, with co-hosts, Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams takes up the controversial discussion of the President's latest nominee to the Supreme Court, Judge Samuel Alito, with special guests with special insights. Join us along with Matt Margolis, the founder/editor of Blogs for Bush,  distinguished Law Professor, Carl Tobias from the University of Richmond School of Law and Drucilla Ramey, Executive Director of the National Association of Women Judges. This show is a must listen!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1826</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/11/supreme-court-nominee-take-2/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8225488868.mp3?updated=1623962006" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/10/lawyers-guns-money/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams sparks a rapid-fire discussion about the new law that shields gunmakers from crime victim lawsuits, called The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms.  Our special guests are Josh Horowitz, Exec. Dir., the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, David Kopel, Research Dir., Independence Institute and editor-in-chief, Journal on Firearms &amp; Public Policy and Professor Eugene Volokh from the UCLA School of Law whose blog is The Volokh Conspiracy.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:23:20 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1beeafde-cfaa-11eb-92b9-afcdca853578/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams sparks a rapid-fire discussion about the new law that shields gunmakers from crime victim lawsuits, called The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms.  Our special guests are Josh Horowitz, Exec. Dir., the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, David Kopel, Research Dir., Independence Institute and editor-in-chief, Journal on Firearms &amp; Public Policy and Professor Eugene Volokh from the UCLA School of Law whose blog is The Volokh Conspiracy.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams sparks a rapid-fire discussion about the new law that shields gunmakers from crime victim lawsuits, called The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms.  Our special guests are Josh Horowitz, Exec. Dir., the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, David Kopel, Research Dir., Independence Institute and editor-in-chief, Journal on Firearms &amp; Public Policy and Professor Eugene Volokh from the UCLA School of Law whose blog is The Volokh Conspiracy.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2317</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/10/lawyers-guns-money/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6308851619.mp3?updated=1623962006" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The New Bankruptcy Law</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/10/the-new-bankruptcy-law-101805/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers, takes up a discussion of the new bankruptcy law that has bankruptcy attorneys' offices swamped! Our special guests are Attorney Henry Sommer, a leading authority on consumer bankruptcy and Editor-in-Chief of Collier on Bankruptcy from Philadelphia and Attorney Gibson Pagter, Jr. a bankruptcy lawyer from the firm Pagter and Miller, APLC, of Santa Ana, California. Join us as we sort through the first major revision in U-S bankruptcy law in a quarter century!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:38:22 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The New Bankruptcy Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1c1fcaa6-cfaa-11eb-92b9-139eb7dd911e/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The New Bankruptcy Law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers, takes up a discussion of the new bankruptcy law that has bankruptcy attorneys' offices swamped! Our special guests are Attorney Henry Sommer, a leading authority on consumer bankruptcy and Editor-in-Chief of Collier on Bankruptcy from Philadelphia and Attorney Gibson Pagter, Jr. a bankruptcy lawyer from the firm Pagter and Miller, APLC, of Santa Ana, California. Join us as we sort through the first major revision in U-S bankruptcy law in a quarter century!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers, takes up a discussion of the new bankruptcy law that has bankruptcy attorneys' offices swamped! Our special guests are Attorney Henry Sommer, a leading authority on consumer bankruptcy and Editor-in-Chief of Collier on Bankruptcy from Philadelphia and Attorney Gibson Pagter, Jr. a bankruptcy lawyer from the firm Pagter and Miller, APLC, of Santa Ana, California. Join us as we sort through the first major revision in U-S bankruptcy law in a quarter century!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1874</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/10/the-new-bankruptcy-law-101805/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN7446441227.mp3?updated=1624285468" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The New Jersey VIOXX Trial - 10/11/05 Update</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/10/the-new-jersey-vioxx-trial-101105/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers gets first hand accounts from inside the courtroom at the VIOXX trial underway in New Jersey. A 60-yr old war veteran claims VIOXX caused his heart attack. Special guest, Attorney Sam Davis, from Davis, Saperstein &amp; Solomon, P.C., who has been attending the trial to gather information for his own plaintiffs' cases against Merck Pharmaceuticals, recounts developments in the trial including some outbursts between Merck lead defense counsel and Judge Carol Higbee. Also joining us on the show is NJ Law Journal reporter Lisa Brennan and well-known defense Attorney Alan Klein from Duane Morris LLP, who was MDL liason counsel for a pharmaceutical manufacturer in the diet drug fen-phen litigation. Three important perspectives you won't want to miss!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:33:34 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The New Jersey VIOXX Trial</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1c43b34e-cfaa-11eb-92b9-9b6b271766a2/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The New Jersey VIOXX Trial - 10/11/05 Update</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers gets first hand accounts from inside the courtroom at the VIOXX trial underway in New Jersey. A 60-yr old war veteran claims VIOXX caused his heart attack. Special guest, Attorney Sam Davis, from Davis, Saperstein &amp; Solomon, P.C., who has been attending the trial to gather information for his own plaintiffs' cases against Merck Pharmaceuticals, recounts developments in the trial including some outbursts between Merck lead defense counsel and Judge Carol Higbee. Also joining us on the show is NJ Law Journal reporter Lisa Brennan and well-known defense Attorney Alan Klein from Duane Morris LLP, who was MDL liason counsel for a pharmaceutical manufacturer in the diet drug fen-phen litigation. Three important perspectives you won't want to miss!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers gets first hand accounts from inside the courtroom at the VIOXX trial underway in New Jersey. A 60-yr old war veteran claims VIOXX caused his heart attack. Special guest, Attorney Sam Davis, from Davis, Saperstein &amp; Solomon, P.C., who has been attending the trial to gather information for his own plaintiffs' cases against Merck Pharmaceuticals, recounts developments in the trial including some outbursts between Merck lead defense counsel and Judge Carol Higbee. Also joining us on the show is NJ Law Journal reporter Lisa Brennan and well-known defense Attorney Alan Klein from Duane Morris LLP, who was MDL liason counsel for a pharmaceutical manufacturer in the diet drug fen-phen litigation. Three important perspectives you won't want to miss!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1821</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/10/the-new-jersey-vioxx-trial-101105/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8386914348.mp3?updated=1623962007" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Diversity Among Legal Bloggers?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/10/diversity-among-legal-bloggers-100405/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast, with co-hosts, Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers, takes on an important issue about diversity (or lack thereof) in the legal blogosphere. Are the ranks of women, and minorities being heard? Are they getting the recognition they deserve? Our special guests are Lisa Stone, originator of BlogHer, a blogger and a journalist whose work has appeared in the NY Times and the LA Times, Attorney Sean Carter, a syndicated writer, blogger and legal humorist who writes Lawpsided, and Monica Bay, editor in chief of Law Technology News and who writes The Common Scold.  Don't miss the revealing discussion on this show!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 18:42:20 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Diversity Among Legal Bloggers?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1c6c48fe-cfaa-11eb-92b9-f79c656f51e2/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Diversity Among Legal Bloggers?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast, with co-hosts, Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers, takes on an important issue about diversity (or lack thereof) in the legal blogosphere. Are the ranks of women, and minorities being heard? Are they getting the recognition they deserve? Our special guests are Lisa Stone, originator of BlogHer, a blogger and a journalist whose work has appeared in the NY Times and the LA Times, Attorney Sean Carter, a syndicated writer, blogger and legal humorist who writes Lawpsided, and Monica Bay, editor in chief of Law Technology News and who writes The Common Scold.  Don't miss the revealing discussion on this show!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast, with co-hosts, Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers, takes on an important issue about diversity (or lack thereof) in the legal blogosphere. Are the ranks of women, and minorities being heard? Are they getting the recognition they deserve? Our special guests are Lisa Stone, originator of BlogHer, a blogger and a journalist whose work has appeared in the NY Times and the LA Times, Attorney Sean Carter, a syndicated writer, blogger and legal humorist who writes Lawpsided, and Monica Bay, editor in chief of Law Technology News and who writes The Common Scold.  Don't miss the revealing discussion on this show!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1858</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/10/diversity-among-legal-bloggers-100405/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6483917885.mp3?updated=1624285465" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Where Are The Pro Bono Lawyers? Plus a Look Ahead at SCOTUS</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/09/where-are-the-pro-bono-lawyers-plus-a-look-ahead-at-scotus-92705/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers. Why aren't there more lawyers doing pro bono work? We explore that with special guests Mark O'Brien, Deputy Director of Probono.net, a non-profit organization in NYC that provides access to justice through innovative technology and volunteer lawyer participation and Ken Babcock, the Executive Director and General Counsel for Public Law Center in its 24th year providing free civil legal services for residents in Orange County, California. And as the Supreme Court approaches a new session, what's in store - what are the cases to watch? We're thrilled to have on the show, Marcia Coyle, Washington Bureau Chief for the National Law Journal and Commentator for PBS. We know you won't want to miss news from the Blogosphere too!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:01:48 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Where Are The Pro Bono Lawyers? Plus a Look Ahead at SCOTUS</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1c904e34-cfaa-11eb-92b9-2bb3b0dd4673/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Where Are The Pro Bono Lawyers? Plus a Look Ahead at SCOTUS</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers. Why aren't there more lawyers doing pro bono work? We explore that with special guests Mark O'Brien, Deputy Director of Probono.net, a non-profit organization in NYC that provides access to justice through innovative technology and volunteer lawyer participation and Ken Babcock, the Executive Director and General Counsel for Public Law Center in its 24th year providing free civil legal services for residents in Orange County, California. And as the Supreme Court approaches a new session, what's in store - what are the cases to watch? We're thrilled to have on the show, Marcia Coyle, Washington Bureau Chief for the National Law Journal and Commentator for PBS. We know you won't want to miss news from the Blogosphere too!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers. Why aren't there more lawyers doing pro bono work? We explore that with special guests Mark O'Brien, Deputy Director of Probono.net, a non-profit organization in NYC that provides access to justice through innovative technology and volunteer lawyer participation and Ken Babcock, the Executive Director and General Counsel for Public Law Center in its 24th year providing free civil legal services for residents in Orange County, California. And as the Supreme Court approaches a new session, what's in store - what are the cases to watch? We're thrilled to have on the show, Marcia Coyle, Washington Bureau Chief for the National Law Journal and Commentator for PBS. We know you won't want to miss news from the Blogosphere too!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1778</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/09/where-are-the-pro-bono-lawyers-plus-a-look-ahead-at-scotus-92705/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3143748473.mp3?updated=1624285578" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bloggers as Journalists: Making New Rules</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/esi-report/2005/09/bloggers-as-journalists-making-new-rules/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers engage a feisty topic on this show - Bloggers as Journalists: Making New Rules.  Our special guests are long-time broadcast journalist and CBS News National Editor Bill Felling, Wendy Seltzer, visiting Assistant Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School teaching Internet law and privacy as well as a well known blogger, Jeff Lewis, partner at Enterprise Counsel Group in Irvine, California, who also writes the SoCalLawBlog, and Kurt Opsahl, staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation focusing on civil liberties, free speech and privacy law. Its a vibrant discussion about bloggers and journalists as the lines blurr and the right to free speech is protected in the legal system.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:22:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Bloggers as Journalists: Making New Rules</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1cb35c30-cfaa-11eb-92b9-d7e86751ed62/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Bloggers as Journalists: Making New Rules</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers engage a feisty topic on this show - Bloggers as Journalists: Making New Rules.  Our special guests are long-time broadcast journalist and CBS News National Editor Bill Felling, Wendy Seltzer, visiting Assistant Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School teaching Internet law and privacy as well as a well known blogger, Jeff Lewis, partner at Enterprise Counsel Group in Irvine, California, who also writes the SoCalLawBlog, and Kurt Opsahl, staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation focusing on civil liberties, free speech and privacy law. Its a vibrant discussion about bloggers and journalists as the lines blurr and the right to free speech is protected in the legal system.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers engage a feisty topic on this show - Bloggers as Journalists: Making New Rules.  Our special guests are long-time broadcast journalist and CBS News National Editor Bill Felling, Wendy Seltzer, visiting Assistant Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School teaching Internet law and privacy as well as a well known blogger, Jeff Lewis, partner at Enterprise Counsel Group in Irvine, California, who also writes the SoCalLawBlog, and Kurt Opsahl, staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation focusing on civil liberties, free speech and privacy law. Its a vibrant discussion about bloggers and journalists as the lines blurr and the right to free speech is protected in the legal system.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1672</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/esi-report/2005/09/bloggers-as-journalists-making-new-rules/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN2025782009.mp3?updated=1623962007" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Katrina's Aftermath: The Gulf Coast Legal Community</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/09/katrinas-aftermath-the-gulf-coast-legal-community-91405/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers. We get the latest from the legal community crippled by Hurricane Katrina. You'll hear first-hand accounts from Louisiana attorneys and top law bloggers, Ernie Svenson and Raymond P. Ward, both of whom have relocated their practices for now. Their stories are compelling and attitudes amazingly positive considering the devastation and long-term effects for lawyers, their clients and the courts.  Texas has opened up their big hearts to help the legal professionals from the Gulf Coast. You'll hear from Texas State Supreme Court Justice Dale Wainwright, President of the Texas Bar, Eduardo Roberto Rodriguez and former President of the Texas Bar, Kelly Frels. Find out how lawyers nationwide can help!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:28:45 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Katrina's Aftermath: The Gulf Coast Legal Community</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1cdf2d9c-cfaa-11eb-92b9-73650f796d4d/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Katrina's Aftermath: The Gulf Coast Legal Community</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers. We get the latest from the legal community crippled by Hurricane Katrina. You'll hear first-hand accounts from Louisiana attorneys and top law bloggers, Ernie Svenson and Raymond P. Ward, both of whom have relocated their practices for now. Their stories are compelling and attitudes amazingly positive considering the devastation and long-term effects for lawyers, their clients and the courts.  Texas has opened up their big hearts to help the legal professionals from the Gulf Coast. You'll hear from Texas State Supreme Court Justice Dale Wainwright, President of the Texas Bar, Eduardo Roberto Rodriguez and former President of the Texas Bar, Kelly Frels. Find out how lawyers nationwide can help!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast, with Robert Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams from Law.com's arsenal of law bloggers. We get the latest from the legal community crippled by Hurricane Katrina. You'll hear first-hand accounts from Louisiana attorneys and top law bloggers, Ernie Svenson and Raymond P. Ward, both of whom have relocated their practices for now. Their stories are compelling and attitudes amazingly positive considering the devastation and long-term effects for lawyers, their clients and the courts.  Texas has opened up their big hearts to help the legal professionals from the Gulf Coast. You'll hear from Texas State Supreme Court Justice Dale Wainwright, President of the Texas Bar, Eduardo Roberto Rodriguez and former President of the Texas Bar, Kelly Frels. Find out how lawyers nationwide can help!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2077</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/09/katrinas-aftermath-the-gulf-coast-legal-community-91405/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN6839900047.mp3?updated=1624285468" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>John Roberts Chief Justice?</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/08/roberts-rocky-road-9605/</link>
      <description>Coast to Coast, with J. Craig Williams (May It Please The Court) and Robert Ambrogi (Lawsites) from Law.com's arsenal of top law bloggers zero in on a lively discussion of John Roberts nomination for Chief Justice of the U-S Supreme Court. Guests on the show are Professor Craig Bradley from Indiana University School of Law, who clerked for the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist, Elliot Mincberg, Vice President and Legal Director of People for the American Way, a nationally known advocacy group opposing the Roberts nomination, Professor Gail Heriot from the San Diego School of Law, former counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee and who writes the Right Coast legal blog and Lyle Denniston who has been one of America's leading Supreme Court reporters for 45 years. Its an insightful group weighing in on one of the most historic times for America's high court.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 19:37:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>John Roberts Chief Justice?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1d2232d6-cfaa-11eb-92b9-cb74f02fd850/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>John Roberts Chief Justice?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Coast to Coast, with J. Craig Williams (May It Please The Court) and Robert Ambrogi (Lawsites) from Law.com's arsenal of top law bloggers zero in on a lively discussion of John Roberts nomination for Chief Justice of the U-S Supreme Court. Guests on the show are Professor Craig Bradley from Indiana University School of Law, who clerked for the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist, Elliot Mincberg, Vice President and Legal Director of People for the American Way, a nationally known advocacy group opposing the Roberts nomination, Professor Gail Heriot from the San Diego School of Law, former counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee and who writes the Right Coast legal blog and Lyle Denniston who has been one of America's leading Supreme Court reporters for 45 years. Its an insightful group weighing in on one of the most historic times for America's high court.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Coast to Coast, with J. Craig Williams (May It Please The Court) and Robert Ambrogi (Lawsites) from Law.com's arsenal of top law bloggers zero in on a lively discussion of John Roberts nomination for Chief Justice of the U-S Supreme Court. Guests on the show are Professor Craig Bradley from Indiana University School of Law, who clerked for the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist, Elliot Mincberg, Vice President and Legal Director of People for the American Way, a nationally known advocacy group opposing the Roberts nomination, Professor Gail Heriot from the San Diego School of Law, former counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee and who writes the Right Coast legal blog and Lyle Denniston who has been one of America's leading Supreme Court reporters for 45 years. Its an insightful group weighing in on one of the most historic times for America's high court.]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1937</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/08/roberts-rocky-road-9605/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN8812743215.mp3?updated=1623962008" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Law.com Bloggers' Inaugural Show, "Coast to Coast" !</title>
      <link>http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/08/inaugural-show-two-great-guests-83105/</link>
      <description>"Coast to Coast" with J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi from Law.com's arsenal of top law bloggers debuts with a great show! American Bar Association President Michael S. Greco is our special guest to talk about the challenges and goals for American lawyers over the next year. And from the Duke Law School, we're fortunate to have Professor Erwin Chemerinsky on the show to talk about the far-reaching effects of the recent Supreme Court decision on a city's reach to take private property under eminent doman in Kelo v. New London. Plus you won't want to miss the news from the Blogosphere!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:18:58 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Law.com Bloggers' Inaugural Show, "Coast to Coast" !</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Attorney J. Craig Williams and Legal Talk Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1d4a0de2-cfaa-11eb-92b9-8371ad38e3c4/image/L2L-4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Law.com Bloggers' Inaugural Show, "Coast to Coast" !</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>"Coast to Coast" with J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi from Law.com's arsenal of top law bloggers debuts with a great show! American Bar Association President Michael S. Greco is our special guest to talk about the challenges and goals for American lawyers over the next year. And from the Duke Law School, we're fortunate to have Professor Erwin Chemerinsky on the show to talk about the far-reaching effects of the recent Supreme Court decision on a city's reach to take private property under eminent doman in Kelo v. New London. Plus you won't want to miss the news from the Blogosphere!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA["Coast to Coast" with J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi from Law.com's arsenal of top law bloggers debuts with a great show! American Bar Association President Michael S. Greco is our special guest to talk about the challenges and goals for American lawyers over the next year. And from the Duke Law School, we're fortunate to have Professor Erwin Chemerinsky on the show to talk about the far-reaching effects of the recent Supreme Court decision on a city's reach to take private property under eminent doman in Kelo v. New London. Plus you won't want to miss the news from the Blogosphere!]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1710</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2005/08/inaugural-show-two-great-guests-83105/]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LTN3462328245.mp3?updated=1623962008" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
