<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.megaphone.fm/ARML2708405200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <title>Past Present Future</title>
    <link>https://www.ppfideas.com/</link>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Past Present Future</copyright>
    <description>Past Present Future is a bi-weekly History of Ideas podcast with David Runciman, host and creator of Talking Politics, exploring the history of ideas from politics to philosophy, culture to technology. David talks to historians, novelists, scientists and many others about where the most interesting ideas come from, what they mean, and why they matter.

Ideas from the past, questions about the present, shaping the future.

New episodes every Wednesday and Sunday.





Take back your personal data with Incogni! Use code ppf at the link below and get 60% off annual plans: https://incogni.com/ppf</description>
    
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>The History of Ideas Podcast</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Past Present Future is a bi-weekly History of Ideas podcast with David Runciman, host and creator of Talking Politics, exploring the history of ideas from politics to philosophy, culture to technology. David talks to historians, novelists, scientists and many others about where the most interesting ideas come from, what they mean, and why they matter.

Ideas from the past, questions about the present, shaping the future.

New episodes every Wednesday and Sunday.





Take back your personal data with Incogni! Use code ppf at the link below and get 60% off annual plans: https://incogni.com/ppf</itunes:summary>
    <content:encoded>
      <![CDATA[<p>Past Present Future is a bi-weekly History of Ideas podcast with David Runciman, host and creator of Talking Politics, exploring the history of ideas from politics to philosophy, culture to technology. David talks to historians, novelists, scientists and many others about where the most interesting ideas come from, what they mean, and why they matter.</p>
<p>Ideas from the past, questions about the present, shaping the future.</p>
<p>New episodes every Wednesday and Sunday.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Take back your personal data with Incogni! Use code ppf at the link below and get 60% off annual plans: <a href="https://incogni.com/ppf">https://incogni.com/ppf</a></p>]]>
    </content:encoded>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>D&amp;HR Media Ltd</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>ppfideas@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/2f107d8e-a203-11ef-b85e-f7325ecdf2a3/image/8aff03daadde3855d54e75753ef9b412.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
    <itunes:category text="History">
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="News">
      <itunes:category text="Politics"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
      <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <item>
      <title>Talking … Peter Mandelson and New Labour w/Helen Thompson</title>
      <description>In today’s episode David and Helen Thompson explore the tortured relationship between Peter Mandelson and the New Labour project that he helped to create and now seems finally to have destroyed. How has the whole history of New Labour been shaped by its origin in ideas of betrayal? Why did Tony Blair and Gordon Brown both end up depending on Mandelson while despairing of each other? What held their relationships together and what caused them to fall apart?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: the second part of this conversation in which David and Helen bring the story up to the present: how does the drama ultimately end? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Join us on Wednesday 6th May at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the third film in our new season: a screening of The Third Man followed by a live podcast recording with writer and broadcaster Misha Glenny. Tickets available now https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: South Park: Bigger, Longer &amp; Uncut w/Beeban Kidron
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>17</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>286</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode David and Helen Thompson explore the tortured relationship between Peter Mandelson and the New Labour project that he helped to create and now seems finally to have destroyed. How has the whole history of New Labour been shaped by its origin in ideas of betrayal? Why did Tony Blair and Gordon Brown both end up depending on Mandelson while despairing of each other? What held their relationships together and what caused them to fall apart?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode David and Helen Thompson explore the tortured relationship between Peter Mandelson and the New Labour project that he helped to create and now seems finally to have destroyed. How has the whole history of New Labour been shaped by its origin in ideas of betrayal? Why did Tony Blair and Gordon Brown both end up depending on Mandelson while despairing of each other? What held their relationships together and what caused them to fall apart?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: the second part of this conversation in which David and Helen bring the story up to the present: how does the drama ultimately end? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Join us on Wednesday 6th May at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the third film in our new season: a screening of The Third Man followed by a live podcast recording with writer and broadcaster Misha Glenny. Tickets available now https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: South Park: Bigger, Longer &amp; Uncut w/Beeban Kidron
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode David and Helen Thompson explore the tortured relationship between Peter Mandelson and the New Labour project that he helped to create and now seems finally to have destroyed. How has the whole history of New Labour been shaped by its origin in ideas of betrayal? Why did Tony Blair and Gordon Brown both end up depending on Mandelson while despairing of each other? What held their relationships together and what caused them to fall apart?</p>
<p>Out tomorrow on PPF+: the second part of this conversation in which David and Helen bring the story up to the present: how does the drama ultimately end? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Join us on Wednesday 6th May at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the third film in our new season: a screening of <em>The Third Man </em>followed by a live podcast recording with writer and broadcaster Misha Glenny. Tickets available now <a href="https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY">https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY</a></p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Next Time: <em>South Park: Bigger, Longer &amp; Uncut</em> w/Beeban Kidron</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3413</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[cf83b084-400d-11f1-9efe-973feb888396]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR2949304754.mp3?updated=1777057033" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PPF+: A Taste Of What You’ve Been Missing (Taster 2)</title>
      <description>In today’s extra episode some more highlights from the PPF+ archive in another selection we first put out last summer: here are a few more excerpts we think you might enjoy.

In this episode you’ll hear David talking about In the Loop and the question of why politicians do and don’t resign; Robert Saunders on the legacy of Brexit for politics today; Shannon Vallor on why AI is a vision not of the future but of the past; David on the appeal of High Noon for American presidents; and Alec Ryrie on the relationship between Calvinism, Puritanism and the rise and fall of apartheid South Africa.

To get these and all of our bonus episodes plus all future bonuses and ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now. It’s £5 per month or £50 for the year and you will be helping this podcast to keep going and growing. You can also gift a 6-month or a 12-month PPF+ subscription: https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: Helen Thompson on Peter Mandelson and New Labour
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>22</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>285</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s extra episode some more highlights from the PPF+ archive in another selection we first put out last summer: here are a few more excerpts we think you might enjoy. In this episode you’ll hear David talking about In the Loop and the question of why politicians do and don’t resign; Robert Saunders on the legacy of Brexit for politics today; Shannon Vallor on why AI is a vision not of the future but of the past; David on the appeal of High Noon for American presidents; and Alec Ryrie on the relationship between Calvinism, Puritanism and the rise and fall of apartheid South Africa.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s extra episode some more highlights from the PPF+ archive in another selection we first put out last summer: here are a few more excerpts we think you might enjoy.

In this episode you’ll hear David talking about In the Loop and the question of why politicians do and don’t resign; Robert Saunders on the legacy of Brexit for politics today; Shannon Vallor on why AI is a vision not of the future but of the past; David on the appeal of High Noon for American presidents; and Alec Ryrie on the relationship between Calvinism, Puritanism and the rise and fall of apartheid South Africa.

To get these and all of our bonus episodes plus all future bonuses and ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now. It’s £5 per month or £50 for the year and you will be helping this podcast to keep going and growing. You can also gift a 6-month or a 12-month PPF+ subscription: https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: Helen Thompson on Peter Mandelson and New Labour
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s extra episode some more highlights from the PPF+ archive in another selection we first put out last summer: here are a few more excerpts we think you might enjoy.</p>
<p>In this episode you’ll hear David talking about In the Loop and the question of why politicians do and don’t resign; Robert Saunders on the legacy of Brexit for politics today; Shannon Vallor on why AI is a vision not of the future but of the past; David on the appeal of High Noon for American presidents; and Alec Ryrie on the relationship between Calvinism, Puritanism and the rise and fall of apartheid South Africa.</p>
<p>To get these and all of our bonus episodes plus all future bonuses and ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now. It’s £5 per month or £50 for the year and you will be helping this podcast to keep going and growing. You can also gift a 6-month or a 12-month PPF+ subscription: <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Next Time: Helen Thompson on Peter Mandelson and New Labour</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3609</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3185de1e-3c0e-11f1-9786-3bd3c3d4c73b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR2764871356.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PPF+: A Taste Of What You’ve Been Missing (Taster 1)</title>
      <description>In today’s extra episode some more highlights from the PPF+ archive in a selection we first put out last summer: here are a few more excerpts we think you might enjoy.

In this episode you’ll hear David talking to Helen Thompson about Apocalypse Now, David exploring Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, unpicking the relationship between The Futurist Manifesto and fascism, reflecting on Claude Lanzmann’s epic Holocaust documentary Shoah and in conversation with historian Chris Clark about 1848 and the future of liberal politics. 

To get these and all of our bonus episodes plus all future bonuses and ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now. It’s £5 per month or £50 for the year and you will be helping this podcast to keep going and growing. You can also gift a 6-month or a 12-month PPF+ subscription: https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus. 

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Tomorrow: Some More Of What You’ve Been Missing
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>22</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>284</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s extra episode some more highlights from the PPF+ archive in a selection we first put out last summer: here are a few more excerpts we think you might enjoy. In this episode you’ll hear David talking to Helen Thompson about Apocalypse Now, David exploring Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, unpicking the relationship between The Futurist Manifesto and fascism, reflecting on Claude Lanzmann’s epic Holocaust documentary Shoah and in conversation with historian Chris Clark about 1848 and the future of liberal politics. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s extra episode some more highlights from the PPF+ archive in a selection we first put out last summer: here are a few more excerpts we think you might enjoy.

In this episode you’ll hear David talking to Helen Thompson about Apocalypse Now, David exploring Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, unpicking the relationship between The Futurist Manifesto and fascism, reflecting on Claude Lanzmann’s epic Holocaust documentary Shoah and in conversation with historian Chris Clark about 1848 and the future of liberal politics. 

To get these and all of our bonus episodes plus all future bonuses and ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now. It’s £5 per month or £50 for the year and you will be helping this podcast to keep going and growing. You can also gift a 6-month or a 12-month PPF+ subscription: https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus. 

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Tomorrow: Some More Of What You’ve Been Missing
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s extra episode some more highlights from the PPF+ archive in a selection we first put out last summer: here are a few more excerpts we think you might enjoy.</p>
<p>In this episode you’ll hear David talking to Helen Thompson about Apocalypse Now, David exploring Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, unpicking the relationship between The Futurist Manifesto and fascism, reflecting on Claude Lanzmann’s epic Holocaust documentary Shoah and in conversation with historian Chris Clark about 1848 and the future of liberal politics. </p>
<p>To get these and all of our bonus episodes plus all future bonuses and ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now. It’s £5 per month or £50 for the year and you will be helping this podcast to keep going and growing. You can also gift a 6-month or a 12-month PPF+ subscription: <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a>. </p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Tomorrow: Some More Of What You’ve Been Missing</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3278</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6b9e63fa-3c09-11f1-9c1f-9f26cac8a001]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR6604647747.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PPF+: A Taste Of What You’ve Been Missing (Taster 3)</title>
      <description>Today’s episode features some recent highlights from PPF+ where we have just released our 50th bonus episode. In this selection you’ll hear philosopher Paul Sagar talking about his personal experiences of good and back luck; David talking about what changed for Hiroshima and the world in the moments after the bomb fell; historian of film Harrison Whittaker on the link between It’s A Wonderful Life and Sartrean existentialism; Hannah White from the Institute for Government on why British government doesn’t work at the centre; and historian of Russia Edward Acton on how to understand the confessions at the Moscow Show Trials.

Bonus #50 on PPF+ is the fourth and final part of Orwell’s War, looking at why George Orwell feared that the end of WW2 would lead to war without end. 

To get access to our full archive of 50 PPF+ bonus episodes plus two future bonuses every month and ad-free listening, sign up to PPF+ now. It’s £5 per month or £50 for the year and you will be helping this podcast to keep going and growing https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: Helen Thompson on Peter Mandelson and New Labour
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>22</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>283</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode features some recent highlights from PPF+ where we have just released our 50th bonus episode. In this selection you’ll hear philosopher Paul Sagar talking about his personal experiences of good and back luck; David talking about what changed for Hiroshima and the world in the moments after the bomb fell; historian of film Harrison Whittaker on the link between It’s A Wonderful Life and Sartrean existentialism; Hannah White from the Institute for Government on why British government doesn’t work at the centre; and historian of Russia Edward Acton on how to understand the confessions at the Moscow Show Trials.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode features some recent highlights from PPF+ where we have just released our 50th bonus episode. In this selection you’ll hear philosopher Paul Sagar talking about his personal experiences of good and back luck; David talking about what changed for Hiroshima and the world in the moments after the bomb fell; historian of film Harrison Whittaker on the link between It’s A Wonderful Life and Sartrean existentialism; Hannah White from the Institute for Government on why British government doesn’t work at the centre; and historian of Russia Edward Acton on how to understand the confessions at the Moscow Show Trials.

Bonus #50 on PPF+ is the fourth and final part of Orwell’s War, looking at why George Orwell feared that the end of WW2 would lead to war without end. 

To get access to our full archive of 50 PPF+ bonus episodes plus two future bonuses every month and ad-free listening, sign up to PPF+ now. It’s £5 per month or £50 for the year and you will be helping this podcast to keep going and growing https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: Helen Thompson on Peter Mandelson and New Labour
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode features some recent highlights from PPF+ where we have just released our 50th bonus episode. In this selection you’ll hear philosopher Paul Sagar talking about his personal experiences of good and back luck; David talking about what changed for Hiroshima and the world in the moments after the bomb fell; historian of film Harrison Whittaker on the link between <em>It’s A Wonderful Life</em> and Sartrean existentialism; Hannah White from the Institute for Government on why British government doesn’t work at the centre; and historian of Russia Edward Acton on how to understand the confessions at the Moscow Show Trials.</p>
<p>Bonus #50 on PPF+ is the fourth and final part of Orwell’s War, looking at why George Orwell feared that the end of WW2 would lead to war without end. </p>
<p>To get access to our full archive of 50 PPF+ bonus episodes plus two future bonuses every month and ad-free listening, sign up to PPF+ now. It’s £5 per month or £50 for the year and you will be helping this podcast to keep going and growing <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Next Time: Helen Thompson on Peter Mandelson and New Labour</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3606</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[268d19d8-3a64-11f1-aeba-232968b0a9ca]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR7750885687.mp3?updated=1776618374" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Orwell’s War: Frozen In Time (1942-43)</title>
      <description>Today’s episode in our series about how George Orwell tried – and failed – to make sense of WW2 looks at his response to the vast lurches of fortune from 1942-43 as Hitler’s plans for world domination started to fall apart. Why was Orwell convinced that the summer of 1942 was the last chance for revolution? What persuaded him that Stafford Cripps was the man of the hour? How did his hopes fall apart in 1943? And where did the ideas for 1984 first come from?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: the final episode in this series exploring how Orwell tried to make sense of the end of the war, from a Labour election victory he didn’t see coming to a new ‘cold war’ that he anticipated before anyone else. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next time – PPF+: Some Of What You’ve Been Missing (Taster 3)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>21</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>282</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode in our series about how George Orwell tried – and failed – to make sense of WW2 looks at his response to the vast lurches of fortune from 1942-43 as Hitler’s plans for world domination started to fall apart. Why was Orwell convinced that the summer of 1942 was the last chance for revolution? What persuaded him that Stafford Cripps was the man of the hour? How did his hopes fall apart in 1943? And where did the ideas for 1984 first come from?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode in our series about how George Orwell tried – and failed – to make sense of WW2 looks at his response to the vast lurches of fortune from 1942-43 as Hitler’s plans for world domination started to fall apart. Why was Orwell convinced that the summer of 1942 was the last chance for revolution? What persuaded him that Stafford Cripps was the man of the hour? How did his hopes fall apart in 1943? And where did the ideas for 1984 first come from?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: the final episode in this series exploring how Orwell tried to make sense of the end of the war, from a Labour election victory he didn’t see coming to a new ‘cold war’ that he anticipated before anyone else. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next time – PPF+: Some Of What You’ve Been Missing (Taster 3)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode in our series about how George Orwell tried – and failed – to make sense of WW2 looks at his response to the vast lurches of fortune from 1942-43 as Hitler’s plans for world domination started to fall apart. Why was Orwell convinced that the summer of 1942 was the last chance for revolution? What persuaded him that Stafford Cripps was the man of the hour? How did his hopes fall apart in 1943? And where did the ideas for <em>1984</em> first come from?</p>
<p>Out tomorrow on PPF+: the final episode in this series exploring how Orwell tried to make sense of the end of the war, from a Labour election victory he didn’t see coming to a new ‘cold war’ that he anticipated before anyone else. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Next time – PPF+: Some Of What You’ve Been Missing (Taster 3)</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3427</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[563b8e0e-38b0-11f1-a132-efd733c8aca5]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR7488215414.mp3?updated=1776247044" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Orwell’s War: False Dawn (1940-41)</title>
      <description>Today’s episode in our new series about how George Orwell tried – and failed – to make sense of WW2 as it was happening looks at the events of 1940 and 1941, from the collapse of France to Hitler’s invasion of Russia. Why did Orwell write in March 1940 that there is something ‘deeply appealing’ about Hitler? What convinced him that Churchill ‘must go’? How close did Britain get to revolution in the summer of 1940? Where did the revolution go?

You can listen to David’s earlier episode about Orwell’s The Lion and the Unicorn from our Great Political Essays series on our website here ⁠⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/episodes/history-of-ideas%3A-george-orwell⁠⁠. Or scroll down in your podcast app to find it, originally broadcast on 3rd August 2023.

To hear David’s conversation with Alec Ryrie about The Age of Hitler subscribe to PPF+ to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening ⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus⁠. We put that one out as a PPF+ bonus on 5th July 2025.

Next time in Orwell’s War: Frozen In Time (1942-43)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>21</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>281</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode in our new series about how George Orwell tried – and failed – to make sense of WW2 as it was happening looks at the events of 1940 and 1941, from the collapse of France to Hitler’s invasion of Russia. Why did Orwell write in March 1940 that there is something ‘deeply appealing’ about Hitler? What convinced him that Churchill ‘must go’? How close did Britain get to revolution in the summer of 1940? Where did the revolution go?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode in our new series about how George Orwell tried – and failed – to make sense of WW2 as it was happening looks at the events of 1940 and 1941, from the collapse of France to Hitler’s invasion of Russia. Why did Orwell write in March 1940 that there is something ‘deeply appealing’ about Hitler? What convinced him that Churchill ‘must go’? How close did Britain get to revolution in the summer of 1940? Where did the revolution go?

You can listen to David’s earlier episode about Orwell’s The Lion and the Unicorn from our Great Political Essays series on our website here ⁠⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/episodes/history-of-ideas%3A-george-orwell⁠⁠. Or scroll down in your podcast app to find it, originally broadcast on 3rd August 2023.

To hear David’s conversation with Alec Ryrie about The Age of Hitler subscribe to PPF+ to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening ⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus⁠. We put that one out as a PPF+ bonus on 5th July 2025.

Next time in Orwell’s War: Frozen In Time (1942-43)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode in our new series about how George Orwell tried – and failed – to make sense of WW2 as it was happening looks at the events of 1940 and 1941, from the collapse of France to Hitler’s invasion of Russia. Why did Orwell write in March 1940 that there is something ‘deeply appealing’ about Hitler? What convinced him that Churchill ‘must go’? How close did Britain get to revolution in the summer of 1940? Where did the revolution go?</p>
<p>You can listen to David’s earlier episode about Orwell’s <em>The Lion and the Unicorn</em> from our Great Political Essays series on our website here <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/episodes/history-of-ideas%3A-george-orwell">⁠⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/episodes/history-of-ideas%3A-george-orwell⁠⁠</a>. Or scroll down in your podcast app to find it, originally broadcast on 3rd August 2023.</p>
<p>To hear David’s conversation with Alec Ryrie about <em>The Age of Hitler </em>subscribe to PPF+ to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus⁠</a>. We put that one out as a PPF+ bonus on 5th July 2025.</p>
<p>Next time in Orwell’s War: Frozen In Time (1942-43)</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3388</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1013823c-37df-11f1-87c5-1f8db53f5bbd]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR6938435561.mp3?updated=1776157162" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Orwell’s War: The Nightmare (1938-39)</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is the first in a new series about how the greatest political writer of the 20th century tried – and failed – to make sense of the central political event of the century. How did George Orwell respond in real time to the epochal events of the Second World War and how do his struggles relate to the uncertainties of our own time? What did he get right, what did he get wrong and what did he fail to understand at all? How did a writer who had vigorously opposed the war before it started find himself defending it as soon as it was underway? Who or what did he really want to win? And what did Orwell believe was worse than fascism?

Join us this Friday 17th April at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the second film in our new season: a screening of South Park: Bigger, Longer &amp; Uncut followed by a live podcast recording with David and director and campaigner Beeban Kidron. Tickets available now ⁠https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY⁠

And find details of all our upcoming film events here ⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/events⁠

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website ⁠https://www.ppfideas.com⁠

Next Time on Orwell’s War: False Dawn (1940-41)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>21</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>280</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is the first in a new series about how the greatest political writer of the 20th century tried – and failed – to make sense of the central political event of the century. How did George Orwell respond in real time to the epochal events of the Second World War and how do his struggles relate to the uncertainties of our own time? What did he get right, what did he get wrong and what did he fail to understand at all? How did a writer who had vigorously opposed the war before it started find himself defending it as soon as it was underway? Who or what did he really want to win? And what did Orwell believe was worse than fascism?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is the first in a new series about how the greatest political writer of the 20th century tried – and failed – to make sense of the central political event of the century. How did George Orwell respond in real time to the epochal events of the Second World War and how do his struggles relate to the uncertainties of our own time? What did he get right, what did he get wrong and what did he fail to understand at all? How did a writer who had vigorously opposed the war before it started find himself defending it as soon as it was underway? Who or what did he really want to win? And what did Orwell believe was worse than fascism?

Join us this Friday 17th April at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the second film in our new season: a screening of South Park: Bigger, Longer &amp; Uncut followed by a live podcast recording with David and director and campaigner Beeban Kidron. Tickets available now ⁠https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY⁠

And find details of all our upcoming film events here ⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/events⁠

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website ⁠https://www.ppfideas.com⁠

Next Time on Orwell’s War: False Dawn (1940-41)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is the first in a new series about how the greatest political writer of the 20th century tried – and failed – to make sense of the central political event of the century. How did George Orwell respond in real time to the epochal events of the Second World War and how do his struggles relate to the uncertainties of our own time? What did he get right, what did he get wrong and what did he fail to understand at all? How did a writer who had vigorously opposed the war before it started find himself defending it as soon as it was underway? Who or what did he really want to win? And what did Orwell believe was worse than fascism?</p>
<p>Join us this Friday 17th April at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the second film in our new season: a screening of <em>South Park: Bigger, Longer &amp; Uncut</em> followed by a live podcast recording with David and director and campaigner Beeban Kidron. Tickets available now <a href="https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY">⁠https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY⁠</a></p>
<p>And find details of all our upcoming film events here ⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/events⁠</p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">⁠https://www.ppfideas.com⁠</a></p>
<p>Next Time on Orwell’s War: False Dawn (1940-41)</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3704</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[64b25682-3506-11f1-8c64-d71d3e35b128]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR1880230212.mp3?updated=1775844211" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Live Film Special: Metropolitan w/James Marriott</title>
      <description>Today’s episode was recorded in front of a live audience at the Regent Street Cinema in London: David talks to author and journalist James Marriott about Whit Stillman’s Metropolitan, which dissects the lives, loves and reading habits of a group of well-to-do young New Yorkers during deb party season. It is a film about being young and feeling old and fearing that you don’t have a future any more. Is it all over for the UHBs – the urban haute bourgeoisie? Has history left them behind? Or can one more drink, one more after-party and one more conversation about Jane Austen show them the way to a better tomorrow?

Join us on Friday 17th April at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the next film in our spring and summer season: a screening of South Park: Bigger, Longer &amp; Uncut followed by a live podcast recording with David and director and campaigner Beeban Kidron. Tickets available now ⁠https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY⁠

And find details of all our upcoming film events here ⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/events⁠

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website ⁠https://www.ppfideas.com⁠

Next Time: Orwell’s War
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>16</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>279</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode was recorded in front of a live audience at the Regent Street Cinema in London: David talks to author and journalist James Marriott about Whit Stillman’s Metropolitan, which dissects the lives, loves and reading habits of a group of well-to-do young New Yorkers during deb party season. It is a film about being young and feeling old and fearing that you don’t have a future any more. Is it all over for the UHBs – the urban haute bourgeoisie? Has history left them behind? Or can one more drink, one more after-party and one more conversation about Jane Austen show them the way to a better tomorrow?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode was recorded in front of a live audience at the Regent Street Cinema in London: David talks to author and journalist James Marriott about Whit Stillman’s Metropolitan, which dissects the lives, loves and reading habits of a group of well-to-do young New Yorkers during deb party season. It is a film about being young and feeling old and fearing that you don’t have a future any more. Is it all over for the UHBs – the urban haute bourgeoisie? Has history left them behind? Or can one more drink, one more after-party and one more conversation about Jane Austen show them the way to a better tomorrow?

Join us on Friday 17th April at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the next film in our spring and summer season: a screening of South Park: Bigger, Longer &amp; Uncut followed by a live podcast recording with David and director and campaigner Beeban Kidron. Tickets available now ⁠https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY⁠

And find details of all our upcoming film events here ⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/events⁠

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website ⁠https://www.ppfideas.com⁠

Next Time: Orwell’s War
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode was recorded in front of a live audience at the Regent Street Cinema in London: David talks to author and journalist James Marriott about Whit Stillman’s <em>Metropolitan</em>, which dissects the lives, loves and reading habits of a group of well-to-do young New Yorkers during deb party season. It is a film about being young and feeling old and fearing that you don’t have a future any more. Is it all over for the UHBs – the urban haute bourgeoisie? Has history left them behind? Or can one more drink, one more after-party and one more conversation about Jane Austen show them the way to a better tomorrow?</p>
<p>Join us on Friday 17th April at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the next film in our spring and summer season: a screening of <em>South Park: Bigger, Longer &amp; Uncut</em> followed by a live podcast recording with David and director and campaigner Beeban Kidron. Tickets available now <a href="https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY">⁠https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY⁠</a></p>
<p>And find details of all our upcoming film events here <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/events">⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/events⁠</a></p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">⁠https://www.ppfideas.com⁠</a></p>
<p>Next Time: Orwell’s War</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3661</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8ffb81a0-31bf-11f1-870f-e7329e91ef32]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR8676394409.mp3?updated=1775483991" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Political Conversions: Switching Sides in the 21st Century</title>
      <description>In the final episode of this series David talks to political historian David Klemperer about how political conversion works today. Is this a post-ideological age or have the ideologies simply changed? Is switching sides easier or harder in the age of social media? Who or what might play the role once performed in political conversions by the Soviet Union? Are we still capable of changing our minds?

Join us on Friday 17th April at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the second film in our new season: a screening of South Park: Bigger, Longer &amp; Uncut followed by a live podcast recording with David and director and campaigner Beeban Kidron. Tickets available now https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: PPF Live Film Special – Metropolitan w/James Marriott
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>20</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>278</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the final episode of this series David talks to political historian David Klemperer about how political conversion works today. Is this a post-ideological age or have the ideologies simply changed? Is switching sides easier or harder in the age of social media? Who or what might play the role once performed in political conversions by the Soviet Union? Are we still capable of changing our minds?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the final episode of this series David talks to political historian David Klemperer about how political conversion works today. Is this a post-ideological age or have the ideologies simply changed? Is switching sides easier or harder in the age of social media? Who or what might play the role once performed in political conversions by the Soviet Union? Are we still capable of changing our minds?

Join us on Friday 17th April at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the second film in our new season: a screening of South Park: Bigger, Longer &amp; Uncut followed by a live podcast recording with David and director and campaigner Beeban Kidron. Tickets available now https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: PPF Live Film Special – Metropolitan w/James Marriott
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the final episode of this series David talks to political historian David Klemperer about how political conversion works today. Is this a post-ideological age or have the ideologies simply changed? Is switching sides easier or harder in the age of social media? Who or what might play the role once performed in political conversions by the Soviet Union? Are we still capable of changing our minds?</p>
<p>Join us on Friday 17th April at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the second film in our new season: a screening of <em>South Park: Bigger, Longer &amp; Uncut</em> followed by a live podcast recording with David and director and campaigner Beeban Kidron. Tickets available now <a href="https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY">https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY</a></p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Next Time: PPF Live Film Special – <em>Metropolitan</em> w/James Marriott</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3256</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[24e86074-2a10-11f1-8225-f72fb33b9ccc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR3032492541.mp3?updated=1774638931" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Political Conversions: From Trotskyism to Neoconservatism</title>
      <description>In part three of our series about political conversions David talks to historian David Klemperer about the people who left Trotskyism behind – and where they ended up. From 1940s America to contemporary Britain, from the Second World War to the Iraq War, from James Burnham to Claire Fox, stories of one-time revolutionaries who found themselves in a very different place. What links Trotskyism to neoconservatism? And what happens when the renegade outsiders become establishment insiders?

Join us on Friday 17th April at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the second film in our new season: a screening of South Park: Bigger, Longer &amp; Uncut followed by a live podcast recording with David and director and campaigner Beeban Kidron. Tickets available now https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time on Political Conversions: Switching Sides in the 21st Century
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>20</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>277</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In part three of our series about political conversions David talks to historian David Klemperer about the people who left Trotskyism behind – and where they ended up. From 1940s America to contemporary Britain, from the Second World War to the Iraq War, from James Burnham to Claire Fox, stories of one-time revolutionaries who found themselves in a very different place. What links Trotskyism to neoconservatism? And what happens when the renegade outsiders become establishment insiders?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In part three of our series about political conversions David talks to historian David Klemperer about the people who left Trotskyism behind – and where they ended up. From 1940s America to contemporary Britain, from the Second World War to the Iraq War, from James Burnham to Claire Fox, stories of one-time revolutionaries who found themselves in a very different place. What links Trotskyism to neoconservatism? And what happens when the renegade outsiders become establishment insiders?

Join us on Friday 17th April at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the second film in our new season: a screening of South Park: Bigger, Longer &amp; Uncut followed by a live podcast recording with David and director and campaigner Beeban Kidron. Tickets available now https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time on Political Conversions: Switching Sides in the 21st Century
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In part three of our series about political conversions David talks to historian David Klemperer about the people who left Trotskyism behind – and where they ended up. From 1940s America to contemporary Britain, from the Second World War to the Iraq War, from James Burnham to Claire Fox, stories of one-time revolutionaries who found themselves in a very different place. What links Trotskyism to neoconservatism? And what happens when the renegade outsiders become establishment insiders?</p>
<p>Join us on Friday 17th April at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the second film in our new season: a screening of <em>South Park: Bigger, Longer &amp; Uncut</em> followed by a live podcast recording with David and director and campaigner Beeban Kidron. Tickets available now <a href="https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY">https://bit.ly/3O5rSEY</a></p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Next Time on Political Conversions: Switching Sides in the 21st Century</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3655</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c9f86992-2a0b-11f1-af8b-0bde2fd31a00]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR1462934646.mp3?updated=1774637153" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Political Conversions: Communism – The God That Failed</title>
      <description>In today’s episode David talks to political historian David Klemperer about a group of writers and other intellectuals who embraced and then renounced Communism before and during the Second World War. Was the pull of Communism really comparable to the experience of religious conversion? Why did so many who took up the faith at the start of the 1930s become disillusioned with it by the end of the decade? How did they justify their renunciation and what did it cost them? Why were writers and intellectuals so vulnerable to changing their minds?

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time on Political Conversions: From Trotskyism to Neoconservatism
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>20</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>276</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode David talks to political historian David Klemperer about a group of writers and other intellectuals who embraced and then renounced Communism before and during the Second World War. Was the pull of Communism really comparable to the experience of religious conversion? Why did so many who took up the faith at the start of the 1930s become disillusioned with it by the end of the decade? How did they justify their renunciation and what did it cost them? Why were writers and intellectuals so vulnerable to changing their minds?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode David talks to political historian David Klemperer about a group of writers and other intellectuals who embraced and then renounced Communism before and during the Second World War. Was the pull of Communism really comparable to the experience of religious conversion? Why did so many who took up the faith at the start of the 1930s become disillusioned with it by the end of the decade? How did they justify their renunciation and what did it cost them? Why were writers and intellectuals so vulnerable to changing their minds?

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time on Political Conversions: From Trotskyism to Neoconservatism
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode David talks to political historian David Klemperer about a group of writers and other intellectuals who embraced and then renounced Communism before and during the Second World War. Was the pull of Communism really comparable to the experience of religious conversion? Why did so many who took up the faith at the start of the 1930s become disillusioned with it by the end of the decade? How did they justify their renunciation and what did it cost them? Why were writers and intellectuals so vulnerable to changing their minds?</p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Next Time on Political Conversions: From Trotskyism to Neoconservatism</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3388</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a38e04c8-2868-11f1-bba5-1bb08939257c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR8733469925.mp3?updated=1774457225" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Political Conversions: Going Fascist</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is the first in a new series of conversations with political historian David Klemperer about what causes people to switch sides, ideologies and worldviews – stories of political conversion. We begin with converts from socialism to fascism, looking in particular at the notorious case of Oswald Mosley. Why did he wind up in and then give up on the Labour Party? What made him ditch democratic politics for fascist violence? How does his political journey compare to other socialists turned fascists in continental Europe? Did he ever repent?

Out now on PPF+: a bonus episode in which David explores the myth of the 1945 general election. Why does this event still exert such a grip on the political imagination of Labour politicians? What do they get wrong about how it really happened and what it really meant? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time on Political Conversions: Communism – The God That Failed
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>20</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>275</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is the first in a new series of conversations with political historian David Klemperer about what causes people to switch sides, ideologies and worldviews – stories of political conversion. We begin with converts from socialism to fascism, looking in particular at the notorious case of Oswald Mosley. Why did he wind up in and then give up on the Labour Party? What made him ditch democratic politics for fascist violence? How does his political journey compare to other socialists turned fascists in continental Europe? Did he ever repent?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is the first in a new series of conversations with political historian David Klemperer about what causes people to switch sides, ideologies and worldviews – stories of political conversion. We begin with converts from socialism to fascism, looking in particular at the notorious case of Oswald Mosley. Why did he wind up in and then give up on the Labour Party? What made him ditch democratic politics for fascist violence? How does his political journey compare to other socialists turned fascists in continental Europe? Did he ever repent?

Out now on PPF+: a bonus episode in which David explores the myth of the 1945 general election. Why does this event still exert such a grip on the political imagination of Labour politicians? What do they get wrong about how it really happened and what it really meant? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time on Political Conversions: Communism – The God That Failed
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is the first in a new series of conversations with political historian David Klemperer about what causes people to switch sides, ideologies and worldviews – stories of political conversion. We begin with converts from socialism to fascism, looking in particular at the notorious case of Oswald Mosley. Why did he wind up in and then give up on the Labour Party? What made him ditch democratic politics for fascist violence? How does his political journey compare to other socialists turned fascists in continental Europe? Did he ever repent?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: a bonus episode in which David explores the myth of the 1945 general election. Why does this event still exert such a grip on the political imagination of Labour politicians? What do they get wrong about how it really happened and what it really meant? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Next Time on Political Conversions: Communism – The God That Failed</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3953</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9c1072e0-279f-11f1-8c74-83a70032f411]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR9959325800.mp3?updated=1774370902" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Live Special: Another American Civil War?</title>
      <description>In today’s episode, which was recorded in front of students, parents and teachers from three schools in Oxford, David talks to historian of America Adam Smith about whether the US might be drifting into another civil war. Are the circumstances of today in any way comparable to the 1860s? What are the faultlines in 2026 that might see America tear itself apart? If division doesn’t lead to widespread violence, how else might the federal government fail? What would it mean for the rest of us?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: a bonus episode in which David explores the myth of the 1945 general election. Why does this event still exert such a grip on the political imagination of Labour politicians? What do they get wrong about how it really happened and what it really meant? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: Political Conversions – Going Fascist
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>274</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode, which was recorded in front of students, parents and teachers from three schools in Oxford, David talks to historian of America Adam Smith about whether the US might be drifting into another civil war. Are the circumstances of today in any way comparable to the 1860s? What are the faultlines in 2026 that might see America tear itself apart? If division doesn’t lead to widespread violence, how else might the federal government fail? What would it mean for the rest of us?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode, which was recorded in front of students, parents and teachers from three schools in Oxford, David talks to historian of America Adam Smith about whether the US might be drifting into another civil war. Are the circumstances of today in any way comparable to the 1860s? What are the faultlines in 2026 that might see America tear itself apart? If division doesn’t lead to widespread violence, how else might the federal government fail? What would it mean for the rest of us?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: a bonus episode in which David explores the myth of the 1945 general election. Why does this event still exert such a grip on the political imagination of Labour politicians? What do they get wrong about how it really happened and what it really meant? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: Political Conversions – Going Fascist
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode, which was recorded in front of students, parents and teachers from three schools in Oxford, David talks to historian of America Adam Smith about whether the US might be drifting into another civil war. Are the circumstances of today in any way comparable to the 1860s? What are the faultlines in 2026 that might see America tear itself apart? If division doesn’t lead to widespread violence, how else might the federal government fail? What would it mean for the rest of us?</p>
<p>Out tomorrow on PPF+: a bonus episode in which David explores the myth of the 1945 general election. Why does this event still exert such a grip on the political imagination of Labour politicians? What do they get wrong about how it really happened and what it really meant? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Next Time: Political Conversions – Going Fascist</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3627</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1d610e22-252a-11f1-87c8-8b3cc24456c2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR2053414085.mp3?updated=1774100364" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Live Special: Is This How Democracy Ends? w/Lyse Doucet, Chris Clark &amp; Thant Myint-U</title>
      <description>Today’s episode was recorded last Wednesday in front of a live audience at Friends’ House in London, where David was joined by the BBC’s Lyse Doucet, historian Chris Clark and diplomat and writer Thant Myint-U to discuss the fate of democracy in the long run and in the short term. What does the current war mean for democracy in Iran, democracy in America and democracy in the wider world? If we are at the end of an era, what is it exactly that is coming to an end? Who gets to decide what might come next? Will it be less democracy, a different democracy or no democracy at all?

This event was jointly hosted with the London Review of Books. David’s 2016 article ‘Is This How Democracy Ends?’ is available to read on the LRB website https://bit.ly/416UDUz

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: Live Special – Another American Civil War?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>273</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode was recorded last Wednesday in front of a live audience at Friends’ House in London, where David was joined by the BBC’s Lyse Doucet, historian Chris Clark and diplomat and writer Thant Myint-U to discuss the fate of democracy in the long run and in the short term. What does the current war mean for democracy in Iran, democracy in America and democracy in the wider world? If we are at the end of an era, what is it exactly that is coming to an end? Who gets to decide what might come next? Will it be less democracy, a different democracy or no democracy at all?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode was recorded last Wednesday in front of a live audience at Friends’ House in London, where David was joined by the BBC’s Lyse Doucet, historian Chris Clark and diplomat and writer Thant Myint-U to discuss the fate of democracy in the long run and in the short term. What does the current war mean for democracy in Iran, democracy in America and democracy in the wider world? If we are at the end of an era, what is it exactly that is coming to an end? Who gets to decide what might come next? Will it be less democracy, a different democracy or no democracy at all?

This event was jointly hosted with the London Review of Books. David’s 2016 article ‘Is This How Democracy Ends?’ is available to read on the LRB website https://bit.ly/416UDUz

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: Live Special – Another American Civil War?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode was recorded last Wednesday in front of a live audience at Friends’ House in London, where David was joined by the BBC’s Lyse Doucet, historian Chris Clark and diplomat and writer Thant Myint-U to discuss the fate of democracy in the long run and in the short term. What does the current war mean for democracy in Iran, democracy in America and democracy in the wider world? If we are at the end of an era, what is it exactly that is coming to an end? Who gets to decide what might come next? Will it be less democracy, a different democracy or no democracy at all?</p>
<p>This event was jointly hosted with the <em>London Review of Books</em>. David’s 2016 article ‘Is This How Democracy Ends?’ is available to read on the LRB website <a href="https://bit.ly/416UDUz">https://bit.ly/416UDUz</a></p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Next Time: Live Special – Another American Civil War?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4414</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b9667474-216f-11f1-b9c2-b3bf4ceae32f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR5284070897.mp3?updated=1773690451" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders: The Twists and Turns of the Special Relationship</title>
      <description>Today’s episode looks backwards and forwards from 1946 to explore the different ways the UK has imagined the US over time, as friend and as foe, as inspiration and as warning, as threat and as salvation. David and Robert examine how America has both illuminated and confused Britain’s view of itself for more than two hundred years, from Andrew Jackson to Donald Trump. Is there a common thread? Is there a version to be relied on? Or are we still making it up as we go along?

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: Live Special – Is This How Democracy Ends? with Lyse Doucet, Chris Clark and Thant Myint-U
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>14</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>272</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode looks backwards and forwards from 1946 to explore the different ways the UK has imagined the US over time, as friend and as foe, as inspiration and as warning, as threat and as salvation. David and Robert examine how America has both illuminated and confused Britain’s view of itself for more than two hundred years, from Andrew Jackson to Donald Trump. Is there a common thread? Is there a version to be relied on? Or are we still making it up as we go along?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode looks backwards and forwards from 1946 to explore the different ways the UK has imagined the US over time, as friend and as foe, as inspiration and as warning, as threat and as salvation. David and Robert examine how America has both illuminated and confused Britain’s view of itself for more than two hundred years, from Andrew Jackson to Donald Trump. Is there a common thread? Is there a version to be relied on? Or are we still making it up as we go along?

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: Live Special – Is This How Democracy Ends? with Lyse Doucet, Chris Clark and Thant Myint-U
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode looks backwards and forwards from 1946 to explore the different ways the UK has imagined the US over time, as friend and as foe, as inspiration and as warning, as threat and as salvation. David and Robert examine how America has both illuminated and confused Britain’s view of itself for more than two hundred years, from Andrew Jackson to Donald Trump. Is there a common thread? Is there a version to be relied on? Or are we still making it up as we go along?</p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Next Time: Live Special – Is This How Democracy Ends? with Lyse Doucet, Chris Clark and Thant Myint-U</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3761</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[12fd155c-1e40-11f1-b7c8-5f7d84a65616]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR8780953220.mp3?updated=1773340081" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders: Churchill’s ‘Iron Curtain’ Speech @80</title>
      <description>Today’s episode sees the return of our occasional series with historian Robert Saunders looking at significant political anniversaries: this time it’s the 80th anniversary of Winston Churchill’s ‘Sinews of Peace’ speech given at Fulton, Missouri in March 1946. The speech is best known for introducing the idea of the ‘Iron Curtain’. What was Churchill trying to achieve? Why was his message so controversial in the United States? How did he help inaugurate the Cold War? And where was he right and where was he wrong about the ‘special relationship’?

Out now on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany our recent series with Luke Kemp in which David and Luke talk about how individual experience shapes the way we imagine humanity’s fate and can motivate us to do something about it: the personal and the political. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Join us next Thursday 19th March at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the first film in our new spring and summer season: Whit Stillman’s Metropolitan, followed by a live podcast recording with author and journalist James Marriott. Tickets for this and all our screenings are available now https://www.ppfideas.com/events

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: Two Twists and Turns of the Special Relationship
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>14</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>271</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode sees the return of our occasional series with historian Robert Saunders looking at significant political anniversaries: this time it’s the 80th anniversary of Winston Churchill’s ‘Sinews of Peace’ speech given at Fulton, Missouri in March 1946. The speech is best known for introducing the idea of the ‘Iron Curtain’. What was Churchill trying to achieve? Why was his message so controversial in the United States? How did he help inaugurate the Cold War? And where was he right and where was he wrong about the ‘special relationship’?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode sees the return of our occasional series with historian Robert Saunders looking at significant political anniversaries: this time it’s the 80th anniversary of Winston Churchill’s ‘Sinews of Peace’ speech given at Fulton, Missouri in March 1946. The speech is best known for introducing the idea of the ‘Iron Curtain’. What was Churchill trying to achieve? Why was his message so controversial in the United States? How did he help inaugurate the Cold War? And where was he right and where was he wrong about the ‘special relationship’?

Out now on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany our recent series with Luke Kemp in which David and Luke talk about how individual experience shapes the way we imagine humanity’s fate and can motivate us to do something about it: the personal and the political. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Join us next Thursday 19th March at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the first film in our new spring and summer season: Whit Stillman’s Metropolitan, followed by a live podcast recording with author and journalist James Marriott. Tickets for this and all our screenings are available now https://www.ppfideas.com/events

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: Two Twists and Turns of the Special Relationship
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode sees the return of our occasional series with historian Robert Saunders looking at significant political anniversaries: this time it’s the 80th anniversary of Winston Churchill’s ‘Sinews of Peace’ speech given at Fulton, Missouri in March 1946. The speech is best known for introducing the idea of the ‘Iron Curtain’. What was Churchill trying to achieve? Why was his message so controversial in the United States? How did he help inaugurate the Cold War? And where was he right and where was he wrong about the ‘special relationship’?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany our recent series with Luke Kemp in which David and Luke talk about how individual experience shapes the way we imagine humanity’s fate and can motivate us to do something about it: the personal and the political. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Join us next Thursday 19th March at the Regent Street Cinema in London for the first film in our new spring and summer season: Whit Stillman’s <em>Metropolitan</em>, followed by a live podcast recording with author and journalist James Marriott. Tickets for this and all our screenings are available now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/events">https://www.ppfideas.com/events</a></p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Next Time: Two Twists and Turns of the Special Relationship</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3908</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[57d64c40-1beb-11f1-b00f-273f05495bd4]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR8791076224.mp3?updated=1773083800" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Where Are We Going? Societal Collapse – The Future</title>
      <description>In the fourth and final conversation in this series David talks to Luke Kemp, author of Goliath’s Curse, about where we might be heading. Where does the greatest risk of global collapse lie? Who is ultimately responsible for our fate? What makes states and corporations the agents of doom? How can we humans fight back?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany this series in which David and Luke talk about how individual experience shapes the way we imagine humanity’s fate and can motivate us to do something about it: the personal and the political. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Join us this Wednesday 11th March for a joint LRB/PPF event: The Slow Death of Democracy, with Lyse Doucet, Christopher Clark and Thant Myint-U. Lyse Doucet will be discussing what she saw when she was in Iran for the BBC last month and what the war means for the prospects of democracy there and everywhere else. Tickets are available now https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Luke Kemp’s Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse is available now https://bit.ly/4aFczds

Next Time: Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders – Churchill’s ‘Iron Curtain’ speech @80
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>19</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>270</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the fourth and final conversation in this series David talks to Luke Kemp, author of Goliath’s Curse, about where we might be heading. Where does the greatest risk of global collapse lie? Who is ultimately responsible for our fate? What makes states and corporations the agents of doom? How can we humans fight back?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the fourth and final conversation in this series David talks to Luke Kemp, author of Goliath’s Curse, about where we might be heading. Where does the greatest risk of global collapse lie? Who is ultimately responsible for our fate? What makes states and corporations the agents of doom? How can we humans fight back?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany this series in which David and Luke talk about how individual experience shapes the way we imagine humanity’s fate and can motivate us to do something about it: the personal and the political. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Join us this Wednesday 11th March for a joint LRB/PPF event: The Slow Death of Democracy, with Lyse Doucet, Christopher Clark and Thant Myint-U. Lyse Doucet will be discussing what she saw when she was in Iran for the BBC last month and what the war means for the prospects of democracy there and everywhere else. Tickets are available now https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Luke Kemp’s Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse is available now https://bit.ly/4aFczds

Next Time: Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders – Churchill’s ‘Iron Curtain’ speech @80
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the fourth and final conversation in this series David talks to Luke Kemp, author of <em>Goliath’s Curse</em>, about where we might be heading. Where does the greatest risk of global collapse lie? Who is ultimately responsible for our fate? What makes states and corporations the agents of doom? How can we humans fight back?</p>
<p>Out tomorrow on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany this series in which David and Luke talk about how individual experience shapes the way we imagine humanity’s fate and can motivate us to do something about it: the personal and the political. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Join us this Wednesday 11th March for a joint LRB/PPF event: The Slow Death of Democracy, with Lyse Doucet, Christopher Clark and Thant Myint-U. Lyse Doucet will be discussing what she saw when she was in Iran for the BBC last month and what the war means for the prospects of democracy there and everywhere else. Tickets are available now <a href="https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789">https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789</a></p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of all episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Luke Kemp’s <em>Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse </em>is available now <a href="https://bit.ly/4aFczds">https://bit.ly/4aFczds</a></p>
<p>Next Time: Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders – Churchill’s ‘Iron Curtain’ speech @80</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3863</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a5c1d51e-1989-11f1-ab61-6face255acc5]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR4094207763.mp3?updated=1772821907" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Where Are We Going? Societal Collapse – The Present Day</title>
      <description>In today’s episode David talks to Luke Kemp, author of Goliath’s Curse, about the prospects for societal collapse in the 21st century. Are we living in a global Goliath? Is there any escape in an age when personal data has become the primary lootable resource? Does interconnectedness mean we are more vulnerable to collapse than ever? And what can we learn from the fate of Somalia?

Join us on 11th March for a joint LRB/PPF event: The Slow Death of Democracy, with Lyse Doucet, Christopher Clark and Thant Myint-U. Tickets are available now https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Luke Kemp’s Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse is available now https://bit.ly/4aFczds

Next Time: Societal Collapse – The Future
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>19</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>269</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode David talks to Luke Kemp, author of Goliath’s Curse, about the prospects for societal collapse in the 21st century. Are we living in a global Goliath? Is there any escape in an age when personal data has become the primary lootable resource? Does interconnectedness mean we are more vulnerable to collapse than ever? And what can we learn from the fate of Somalia?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode David talks to Luke Kemp, author of Goliath’s Curse, about the prospects for societal collapse in the 21st century. Are we living in a global Goliath? Is there any escape in an age when personal data has become the primary lootable resource? Does interconnectedness mean we are more vulnerable to collapse than ever? And what can we learn from the fate of Somalia?

Join us on 11th March for a joint LRB/PPF event: The Slow Death of Democracy, with Lyse Doucet, Christopher Clark and Thant Myint-U. Tickets are available now https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Luke Kemp’s Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse is available now https://bit.ly/4aFczds

Next Time: Societal Collapse – The Future
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode David talks to Luke Kemp, author of <em>Goliath’s Curse</em>, about the prospects for societal collapse in the 21st century. Are we living in a global Goliath? Is there any escape in an age when personal data has become the primary lootable resource? Does interconnectedness mean we are more vulnerable to collapse than ever? And what can we learn from the fate of Somalia?</p>
<p>Join us on 11th March for a joint LRB/PPF event: The Slow Death of Democracy, with Lyse Doucet, Christopher Clark and Thant Myint-U. Tickets are available now <a href="https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789">https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789</a></p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Luke Kemp’s <em>Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse </em>is available now <a href="https://bit.ly/4aFczds">https://bit.ly/4aFczds</a></p>
<p>Next Time: Societal Collapse – The Future</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3853</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[56421006-16ed-11f1-adeb-eb585f479bbc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR1149153383.mp3?updated=1772535014" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Where Are We Going? Societal Collapse – The Modern Age</title>
      <description>In today’s episode David talks to Luke Kemp, author of Goliath’s Curse, about the strengths and weaknesses of modern states and modern structures of authority. Are modern states any different from the criminal enterprises of coercion that preceded them? Does democracy change the dynamic of societal collapse? What are the lootable resources of the modern age? And why are all states essentially empires?

Tickets are on sale now for our new film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London – starting on 19th March with James Marriott talking to David about Whit Stillman’s Metropolitan. Details of all our film events are here https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Join us on 11th March for a joint LRB/PPF event: The Slow Death of Democracy, with Lyse Doucet, Christopher Clark and Thant Myint-U. Tickets are available now https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Luke Kemp’s Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse is available now https://bit.ly/4aFczds

Next Time: Societal Collapse – The Present Day
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>19</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>268</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode David talks to Luke Kemp, author of Goliath’s Curse, about the strengths and weaknesses of modern states and modern structures of authority. Are modern states any different from the criminal enterprises of coercion that preceded them? Does democracy change the dynamic of societal collapse? What are the lootable resources of the modern age? And why are all states essentially empires?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode David talks to Luke Kemp, author of Goliath’s Curse, about the strengths and weaknesses of modern states and modern structures of authority. Are modern states any different from the criminal enterprises of coercion that preceded them? Does democracy change the dynamic of societal collapse? What are the lootable resources of the modern age? And why are all states essentially empires?

Tickets are on sale now for our new film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London – starting on 19th March with James Marriott talking to David about Whit Stillman’s Metropolitan. Details of all our film events are here https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Join us on 11th March for a joint LRB/PPF event: The Slow Death of Democracy, with Lyse Doucet, Christopher Clark and Thant Myint-U. Tickets are available now https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Luke Kemp’s Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse is available now https://bit.ly/4aFczds

Next Time: Societal Collapse – The Present Day
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode David talks to Luke Kemp, author of <em>Goliath’s Curse</em>, about the strengths and weaknesses of modern states and modern structures of authority. Are modern states any different from the criminal enterprises of coercion that preceded them? Does democracy change the dynamic of societal collapse? What are the lootable resources of the modern age? And why are all states essentially empires?</p>
<p>Tickets are on sale now for our new film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London – starting on 19th March with James Marriott talking to David about Whit Stillman’s <em>Metropolitan</em>. Details of all our film events are here <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/events">https://www.ppfideas.com/events</a></p>
<p>Join us on 11th March for a joint LRB/PPF event: The Slow Death of Democracy, with Lyse Doucet, Christopher Clark and Thant Myint-U. Tickets are available now <a href="https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789">https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789</a></p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Luke Kemp’s <em>Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse </em>is available now <a href="https://bit.ly/4aFczds">https://bit.ly/4aFczds</a></p>
<p>Next Time: Societal Collapse – The Present Day</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4206</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2fe85444-0e67-11f1-bee7-67bfa6e81bf6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR9648463852.mp3?updated=1771597740" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Where Are We Going? Societal Collapse – Origins</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is the first in a series of conversations about what causes human societies to fall apart and what might come next. David talks to Luke Kemp, author of Goliath’s Curse, about how we build our structures of authority and how they can fail. How were human societies organised before we had governments? What drove the creation of the first hierarchies of domination? Why did rising inequality so often lead to societal collapse? What does this teach us about the vulnerability of our own societies?

Out now on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany our recent exploration of the past, present and future of nuclear warfare in which David discusses John Hersey’s Hiroshima (1946), the definitive account of what it’s actually like to be on the receiving end of a nuclear attack. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Join us on 11th March for a joint LRB/PPF event: The Slow Death of Democracy, with Lyse Doucet, Christopher Clark and Thant Myint-U. Tickets are available now https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789

Tickets are on sale now for our new film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London – starting on 19th March with James Marriott talking to David about Whit Stillman’s Metropolitan. Details of all our film events are here https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Sign up now for our free fortnightly newsletter and you'll receive our 50th edition straight to your inbox https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Luke Kemp’s Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse is available now https://bit.ly/4aFczds

Next Time: Societal Collapse – The Modern Age 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>19</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>267</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is the first in a series of conversations about what causes human societies to fall apart and what might come next. David talks to Luke Kemp, author of Goliath’s Curse, about how we build our structures of authority and how they can fail. How were human societies organised before we had governments? What drove the creation of the first hierarchies of domination? Why did rising inequality so often lead to societal collapse? What does this teach us about the vulnerability of our own societies?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is the first in a series of conversations about what causes human societies to fall apart and what might come next. David talks to Luke Kemp, author of Goliath’s Curse, about how we build our structures of authority and how they can fail. How were human societies organised before we had governments? What drove the creation of the first hierarchies of domination? Why did rising inequality so often lead to societal collapse? What does this teach us about the vulnerability of our own societies?

Out now on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany our recent exploration of the past, present and future of nuclear warfare in which David discusses John Hersey’s Hiroshima (1946), the definitive account of what it’s actually like to be on the receiving end of a nuclear attack. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Join us on 11th March for a joint LRB/PPF event: The Slow Death of Democracy, with Lyse Doucet, Christopher Clark and Thant Myint-U. Tickets are available now https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789

Tickets are on sale now for our new film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London – starting on 19th March with James Marriott talking to David about Whit Stillman’s Metropolitan. Details of all our film events are here https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Sign up now for our free fortnightly newsletter and you'll receive our 50th edition straight to your inbox https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Luke Kemp’s Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse is available now https://bit.ly/4aFczds

Next Time: Societal Collapse – The Modern Age 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is the first in a series of conversations about what causes human societies to fall apart and what might come next. David talks to Luke Kemp, author of <em>Goliath’s Curse</em>, about how we build our structures of authority and how they can fail. How were human societies organised before we had governments? What drove the creation of the first hierarchies of domination? Why did rising inequality so often lead to societal collapse? What does this teach us about the vulnerability of our own societies?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany our recent exploration of the past, present and future of nuclear warfare in which David discusses John Hersey’s <em>Hiroshima</em> (1946), the definitive account of what it’s actually like to be on the receiving end of a nuclear attack. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Join us on 11th March for a joint LRB/PPF event: The Slow Death of Democracy, with Lyse Doucet, Christopher Clark and Thant Myint-U. Tickets are available now <a href="https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789">https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789</a></p>
<p>Tickets are on sale now for our new film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London – starting on 19th March with James Marriott talking to David about Whit Stillman’s <em>Metropolitan</em>. Details of all our film events are here <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/events">https://www.ppfideas.com/events</a></p>
<p>Sign up now for our free fortnightly newsletter and you'll receive our 50th edition straight to your inbox <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Luke Kemp’s <em>Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse </em>is available now <a href="https://bit.ly/4aFczds">https://bit.ly/4aFczds</a></p>
<p>Next Time: Societal Collapse – The Modern Age </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3960</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ef11e84a-0e5c-11f1-9e41-a3b37620df86]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR2207115320.mp3?updated=1771593422" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Where Are We Going? Nuclear War Part 3</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is the third and final of David’s conversations with S. M. Amadae about nuclear weapons and nuclear war, this time looking to the future. What are the prospects for nuclear disarmament in the 21st century? How does the risk of nuclear war intersect with other existential risks, from climate change to AI? Is the world more dangerous than it has ever been? What are the grounds for hope we might still get out of this alive?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany this series of conversations in which David explores John Hersey’s Hiroshima (1946), the definitive account of what it’s actually like to be on the receiving end of a nuclear attack. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Tickets are on sale now for our new film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London – starting on 19th March with James Marriott talking to David about Whit Stillman’s Metropolitan. All the details are here https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Join us on 11th March for a joint LRB/PPF event: The Slow Death of Democracy - with Lyse Doucet, Christopher Clark and Thant Myint-U. Tickets are available now https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: Where Are We Going? Societal Collapse
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>19</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>266</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is the third and final of David’s conversations with S. M. Amadae about nuclear weapons and nuclear war, this time looking to the future. What are the prospects for nuclear disarmament in the 21st century? How does the risk of nuclear war intersect with other existential risks, from climate change to AI? Is the world more dangerous than it has ever been? What are the grounds for hope we might still get out of this alive?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is the third and final of David’s conversations with S. M. Amadae about nuclear weapons and nuclear war, this time looking to the future. What are the prospects for nuclear disarmament in the 21st century? How does the risk of nuclear war intersect with other existential risks, from climate change to AI? Is the world more dangerous than it has ever been? What are the grounds for hope we might still get out of this alive?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany this series of conversations in which David explores John Hersey’s Hiroshima (1946), the definitive account of what it’s actually like to be on the receiving end of a nuclear attack. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Tickets are on sale now for our new film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London – starting on 19th March with James Marriott talking to David about Whit Stillman’s Metropolitan. All the details are here https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Join us on 11th March for a joint LRB/PPF event: The Slow Death of Democracy - with Lyse Doucet, Christopher Clark and Thant Myint-U. Tickets are available now https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com

Next Time: Where Are We Going? Societal Collapse
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is the third and final of David’s conversations with S. M. Amadae about nuclear weapons and nuclear war, this time looking to the future. What are the prospects for nuclear disarmament in the 21st century? How does the risk of nuclear war intersect with other existential risks, from climate change to AI? Is the world more dangerous than it has ever been? What are the grounds for hope we might still get out of this alive?</p>
<p>Out tomorrow on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany this series of conversations in which David explores John Hersey’s <em>Hiroshima</em> (1946), the definitive account of what it’s actually like to be on the receiving end of a nuclear attack. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Tickets are on sale now for our new film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London – starting on 19th March with James Marriott talking to David about Whit Stillman’s <em>Metropolitan</em>. All the details are here <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/events">https://www.ppfideas.com/events</a></p>
<p>Join us on 11th March for a joint LRB/PPF event: The Slow Death of Democracy - with Lyse Doucet, Christopher Clark and Thant Myint-U. Tickets are available now <a href="https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789">https://www.tickettailor.com/events/londonreviewofbooks/2062789</a></p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p>
<p>Next Time: Where Are We Going? Societal Collapse</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3329</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[580414a6-0b63-11f1-8dd0-d396b2cd8c55]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR3648661067.mp3?updated=1771266151" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Where Are We Going? Nuclear War Part 2</title>
      <description>In today’s episode David talks to S. M.  Amadae about what happened when the nuclear age turned into an all-consuming arms race. What is the supposed logic and the terrifying illogic behind the idea of Mutually Assured Destruction? What is the difference between M.A.D. and N.U.T.S.? Do we really believe that our leaders would press the button? And how have we managed to survive to this point – rationality, luck or merely a stay of execution?

Tickets are on sale now for our new film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London – starting on 19th March with James Marriott talking to David about Whit Stillman’s Metropolitan. All the details are here https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next Time: How Will the Nuclear Age End?

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>19</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>265</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode David talks to S. M.  Amadae about what happened when the nuclear age turned into an all-consuming arms race. What is the supposed logic and the terrifying illogic behind the idea of Mutually Assured Destruction? What is the difference between M.A.D. and N.U.T.S.? Do we really believe that our leaders would press the button? And how have we managed to survive to this point – rationality, luck or merely a stay of execution?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode David talks to S. M.  Amadae about what happened when the nuclear age turned into an all-consuming arms race. What is the supposed logic and the terrifying illogic behind the idea of Mutually Assured Destruction? What is the difference between M.A.D. and N.U.T.S.? Do we really believe that our leaders would press the button? And how have we managed to survive to this point – rationality, luck or merely a stay of execution?

Tickets are on sale now for our new film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London – starting on 19th March with James Marriott talking to David about Whit Stillman’s Metropolitan. All the details are here https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next Time: How Will the Nuclear Age End?

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode David talks to S. M.  Amadae about what happened when the nuclear age turned into an all-consuming arms race. What is the supposed logic and the terrifying illogic behind the idea of Mutually Assured Destruction? What is the difference between M.A.D. and N.U.T.S.? Do we really believe that our leaders would press the button? And how have we managed to survive to this point – rationality, luck or merely a stay of execution?</p>
<p>Tickets are on sale now for our new film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London – starting on 19th March with James Marriott talking to David about Whit Stillman’s <em>Metropolitan</em>. All the details are here <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/events">https://www.ppfideas.com/events</a></p>
<p>Next Time: How Will the Nuclear Age End?</p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a> </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3722</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[35969d40-02b1-11f1-9514-4f52d7340e1f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR3149890072.mp3?updated=1770310040" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Where Are We Going? Nuclear War Part 1</title>
      <description>For the first in a new series of conversations exploring the future that faces us all, David talks to S. M. Amadae about what nuclear weapons and the prospect of nuclear war have done to the human condition. Was 1945 the decisive watershed in the history of humanity? What made the possibility of nuclear conflict different from previous ideas of catastrophe? How did we reconcile ourselves to the horrifying consequences of what we had built?

Out now on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany our recent series What’s Wrong With Political Philosophy? in which David and Paul talk about how personal experience shapes our political and philosophical outlook – a conversation exploring luck, accidents, human frailty and human connection. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next Time: M.A.D. and N.U.T.S.

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>19</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>264</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For the first in a new series of conversations exploring the future that faces us all, David talks to S. M. Amadae about what nuclear weapons and the prospect of nuclear war have done to the human condition. Was 1945 the decisive watershed in the history of humanity? What made the possibility of nuclear conflict different from previous ideas of catastrophe? How did we reconcile ourselves to the horrifying consequences of what we had built?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the first in a new series of conversations exploring the future that faces us all, David talks to S. M. Amadae about what nuclear weapons and the prospect of nuclear war have done to the human condition. Was 1945 the decisive watershed in the history of humanity? What made the possibility of nuclear conflict different from previous ideas of catastrophe? How did we reconcile ourselves to the horrifying consequences of what we had built?

Out now on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany our recent series What’s Wrong With Political Philosophy? in which David and Paul talk about how personal experience shapes our political and philosophical outlook – a conversation exploring luck, accidents, human frailty and human connection. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next Time: M.A.D. and N.U.T.S.

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the first in a new series of conversations exploring the future that faces us all, David talks to S. M. Amadae about what nuclear weapons and the prospect of nuclear war have done to the human condition. Was 1945 the decisive watershed in the history of humanity? What made the possibility of nuclear conflict different from previous ideas of catastrophe? How did we reconcile ourselves to the horrifying consequences of what we had built?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany our recent series What’s Wrong With Political Philosophy? in which David and Paul talk about how personal experience shapes our political and philosophical outlook – a conversation exploring luck, accidents, human frailty and human connection. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next Time: M.A.D. and N.U.T.S.</p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a> </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3553</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a265f6a2-02af-11f1-940d-874051e6bc80]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR7974484712.mp3?updated=1770309367" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> What’s Wrong with Political Philosophy? Learning from Bernard Williams and Judith Shklar</title>
      <description>Today’s episode explores the ideas of two late-twentieth-century thinkers who argued that political philosophy needs to be concerned with more than just justice. David talks to Paul Sagar about why Bernard Williams thought we should focus on questions about legitimacy and why Judith Shklar believed we should spend more time worrying about cruelty. Is the fundamental political question about how to achieve the best or is it about how to avoid the worst? And if it’s the second, where should we start?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany this series in which David and Paul talk about how personal experience shapes our political and philosophical outlook – a conversation exploring luck, accidents, human frailty and human connection. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening for £5 a month or £50 for the year, sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Paul Sagar’s Substack is called Diary of a Punter – it is highly recommended https://substack.com/@diaryofapunter

Next Time: Where Are We Going? Nuclear Weapons

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>18</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>263</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode explores the ideas of two late-twentieth-century thinkers who argued that political philosophy needs to be concerned with more than just justice. David talks to Paul Sagar about why Bernard Williams thought we should focus on questions about legitimacy and why Judith Shklar believed we should spend more time worrying about cruelty. Is the fundamental political question about how to achieve the best or is it about how to avoid the worst? And if it’s the second, where should we start?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode explores the ideas of two late-twentieth-century thinkers who argued that political philosophy needs to be concerned with more than just justice. David talks to Paul Sagar about why Bernard Williams thought we should focus on questions about legitimacy and why Judith Shklar believed we should spend more time worrying about cruelty. Is the fundamental political question about how to achieve the best or is it about how to avoid the worst? And if it’s the second, where should we start?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany this series in which David and Paul talk about how personal experience shapes our political and philosophical outlook – a conversation exploring luck, accidents, human frailty and human connection. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening for £5 a month or £50 for the year, sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Paul Sagar’s Substack is called Diary of a Punter – it is highly recommended https://substack.com/@diaryofapunter

Next Time: Where Are We Going? Nuclear Weapons

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode explores the ideas of two late-twentieth-century thinkers who argued that political philosophy needs to be concerned with more than just justice. David talks to Paul Sagar about why Bernard Williams thought we should focus on questions about legitimacy and why Judith Shklar believed we should spend more time worrying about cruelty. Is the fundamental political question about how to achieve the best or is it about how to avoid the worst? And if it’s the second, where should we start?</p>
<p>Out tomorrow on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany this series in which David and Paul talk about how personal experience shapes our political and philosophical outlook – a conversation exploring luck, accidents, human frailty and human connection. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening for £5 a month or £50 for the year, sign up to PPF+ now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Paul Sagar’s Substack is called Diary of a Punter – it is highly recommended <a href="https://substack.com/@diaryofapunter">https://substack.com/@diaryofapunter</a></p>
<p>Next Time: Where Are We Going? Nuclear Weapons</p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4160</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ec7820fe-010f-11f1-96ae-7b4ec36bc488]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR2341945809.mp3?updated=1770130860" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What’s Wrong with Political Philosophy? Learning from Max Weber</title>
      <description>In the third part of our series David and Paul Sagar explore what the German writer and sociologist Max Weber can teach us about the pitfalls of political life and political philosophy. Why is doing politics so hard? Why is it so hard to know what to do for the best when all the options are bad ones? How can we still do our best when the only means at our disposal is violence? And where does all this leave the prospects for lasting political change?

Next Time: Learning from Bernard Williams and Judith Shklar

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>18</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>262</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the third part of our series David and Paul Sagar explore what the German writer and sociologist Max Weber can teach us about the pitfalls of political life and political philosophy. Why is doing politics so hard? Why is it so hard to know what to do for the best when all the options are bad ones? How can we still do our best when the only means at our disposal is violence? And where does all this leave the prospects for lasting political change?

Next Time: Learning from Bernard Williams and Judith Shklar

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the third part of our series David and Paul Sagar explore what the German writer and sociologist Max Weber can teach us about the pitfalls of political life and political philosophy. Why is doing politics so hard? Why is it so hard to know what to do for the best when all the options are bad ones? How can we still do our best when the only means at our disposal is violence? And where does all this leave the prospects for lasting political change?</p>
<p>Next Time: Learning from Bernard Williams and Judith Shklar</p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3858</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6aa136b8-0102-11f1-956a-8fdf376f2e13]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR7095970852.mp3?updated=1770125016" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What’s Wrong with Political Philosophy? Learning from Adam Smith</title>
      <description>In the second episode in our short series about how the history of ideas can help with the deepest puzzles of politics, David talks to political theorist Paul Sagar about the eighteenth-century polymath Adam Smith. Normally thought of as the original champion of free-market economics, Smith was far more interested in history, human psychology and the problems inherent in all political systems. What does it mean to live in a commercial society? How should we understand the promise and pitfalls of equality? Where does human liberty come from? And why has the Adam Smith Institute made a mockery of his name?

Next time: Learning from Max Weber

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>18</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>261</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the second episode in our short series about how the history of ideas can help with the deepest puzzles of politics, David talks to political theorist Paul Sagar about the eighteenth-century polymath Adam Smith. Normally thought of as the original champion of free-market economics, Smith was far more interested in history, human psychology and the problems inherent in all political systems. What does it mean to live in a commercial society? How should we understand the promise and pitfalls of equality? Where does human liberty come from? And why has the Adam Smith Institute made a mockery of his name?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the second episode in our short series about how the history of ideas can help with the deepest puzzles of politics, David talks to political theorist Paul Sagar about the eighteenth-century polymath Adam Smith. Normally thought of as the original champion of free-market economics, Smith was far more interested in history, human psychology and the problems inherent in all political systems. What does it mean to live in a commercial society? How should we understand the promise and pitfalls of equality? Where does human liberty come from? And why has the Adam Smith Institute made a mockery of his name?

Next time: Learning from Max Weber

You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the second episode in our short series about how the history of ideas can help with the deepest puzzles of politics, David talks to political theorist Paul Sagar about the eighteenth-century polymath Adam Smith. Normally thought of as the original champion of free-market economics, Smith was far more interested in history, human psychology and the problems inherent in all political systems. What does it mean to live in a commercial society? How should we understand the promise and pitfalls of equality? Where does human liberty come from? And why has the Adam Smith Institute made a mockery of his name?</p>
<p>Next time: Learning from Max Weber</p>
<p>You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus merch, events and full lists of our episodes and PPF+ bonus episodes on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com</a> </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3642</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e33e3526-fe05-11f0-b182-f7f25445eed3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR4027667050.mp3?updated=1769796642" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What’s Wrong with Political Philosophy? Learning from Aristotle</title>
      <description>Today it’s the first episode in a new series asking why contemporary political philosophy struggles to make sense of the deepest problems of politics and exploring how the history of ideas might help. David talks to political theorist Paul Sagar about why looking for justice might be the wrong place to start. Instead, Paul suggests we start with Aristotle, for whom the search for justice was the problem not the solution. So what should we do instead?

To keep up with what’s coming next and for more news about the podcast do follow us on Bluesky: @ppfideas.bsky.social

Next time: Learning from Adam Smith
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>18</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>260</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today it’s the first episode in a new series asking why contemporary political philosophy struggles to make sense of the deepest problems of politics and exploring how the history of ideas might help. David talks to political theorist Paul Sagar about why looking for justice might be the wrong place to start. Instead, Paul suggests we start with Aristotle, for whom the search for justice was the problem not the solution. So what should we do instead?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today it’s the first episode in a new series asking why contemporary political philosophy struggles to make sense of the deepest problems of politics and exploring how the history of ideas might help. David talks to political theorist Paul Sagar about why looking for justice might be the wrong place to start. Instead, Paul suggests we start with Aristotle, for whom the search for justice was the problem not the solution. So what should we do instead?

To keep up with what’s coming next and for more news about the podcast do follow us on Bluesky: @ppfideas.bsky.social

Next time: Learning from Adam Smith
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today it’s the first episode in a new series asking why contemporary political philosophy struggles to make sense of the deepest problems of politics and exploring how the history of ideas might help. David talks to political theorist Paul Sagar about why looking for justice might be the wrong place to start. Instead, Paul suggests we start with Aristotle, for whom the search for justice was the problem not the solution. So what should we do instead?</p>
<p>To keep up with what’s coming next and for more news about the podcast do follow us on Bluesky: @ppfideas.bsky.social</p>
<p>Next time: Learning from Adam Smith</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4357</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1a2617f0-fc7d-11f0-bfe0-bb5a6d3fafbc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR9926535312.mp3?updated=1769627989" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Talking Geopolitics with Helen Thompson: The Weirdness of American Power Part 2</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is the second part of David’s conversation with Helen Thompson about what makes living in a world dominated by the United States so strange. What has changed about American power in the twenty-first century? Is Trump a deviation from the norm or is he simply an extension of it? Why does Greenland matter? And what is at stake as the contest between the US and China ramps up to the next level?

Next Time: What’s Wrong with Political Philosophy? 

Incogni Special Offer for PPF listeners: https://incogni.com/pastpresentfuture (then use code PPF for 60% off annual plans)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>17</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>259</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is the second part of David’s conversation with Helen Thompson about what makes living in a world dominated by the United States so strange. What has changed about American power in the twenty-first century? Is Trump a deviation from the norm or is he simply an extension of it? Why does Greenland matter? And what is at stake as the contest between the US and China ramps up to the next level?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is the second part of David’s conversation with Helen Thompson about what makes living in a world dominated by the United States so strange. What has changed about American power in the twenty-first century? Is Trump a deviation from the norm or is he simply an extension of it? Why does Greenland matter? And what is at stake as the contest between the US and China ramps up to the next level?

Next Time: What’s Wrong with Political Philosophy? 

Incogni Special Offer for PPF listeners: https://incogni.com/pastpresentfuture (then use code PPF for 60% off annual plans)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is the second part of David’s conversation with Helen Thompson about what makes living in a world dominated by the United States so strange. What has changed about American power in the twenty-first century? Is Trump a deviation from the norm or is he simply an extension of it? Why does Greenland matter? And what is at stake as the contest between the US and China ramps up to the next level?</p>
<p>Next Time: What’s Wrong with Political Philosophy? </p>
<p>Incogni Special Offer for PPF listeners: https://incogni.com/pastpresentfuture (then use code PPF for 60% off annual plans)</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3518</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[77ed9e34-fba2-11f0-a70d-b7bd3dcb9ff5]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR8305628821.mp3?updated=1769534035" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Talking Geopolitics with Helen Thompson: The Weirdness of American Power</title>
      <description>The first of a two-part conversation in which David talks to Helen Thompson about how to understand the extraordinary and unlikely power of the United States, from its origins to its current incarnation. How strange would it once have seemed to live in a world dominated by a state from the Western hemisphere? When did the US overcome its natural disadvantages to achieve superpower potential? What does the rest of the world get wrong about how American power actually operates? And what might come next?

A reminder that the second part of David’s conversation with Glen Rangwala about the trial and execution of Saddam Hussein is available now on PPF+. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next Time: The Weirdness of American Power Part 2 – Trump and the Future
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>17</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>258</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>The first of a two-part conversation in which David talks to Helen Thompson about how to understand the extraordinary and unlikely power of the United States, from its origins to its current incarnation. How strange would it once have seemed to live in a world dominated by a state from the Western hemisphere? When did the US overcome its natural disadvantages to achieve superpower potential? What does the rest of the world get wrong about how American power actually operates? And what might come next?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The first of a two-part conversation in which David talks to Helen Thompson about how to understand the extraordinary and unlikely power of the United States, from its origins to its current incarnation. How strange would it once have seemed to live in a world dominated by a state from the Western hemisphere? When did the US overcome its natural disadvantages to achieve superpower potential? What does the rest of the world get wrong about how American power actually operates? And what might come next?

A reminder that the second part of David’s conversation with Glen Rangwala about the trial and execution of Saddam Hussein is available now on PPF+. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next Time: The Weirdness of American Power Part 2 – Trump and the Future
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The first of a two-part conversation in which David talks to Helen Thompson about how to understand the extraordinary and unlikely power of the United States, from its origins to its current incarnation. How strange would it once have seemed to live in a world dominated by a state from the Western hemisphere? When did the US overcome its natural disadvantages to achieve superpower potential? What does the rest of the world get wrong about how American power actually operates? And what might come next?</p>
<p>A reminder that the second part of David’s conversation with Glen Rangwala about the trial and execution of Saddam Hussein is available now on PPF+. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next Time: The Weirdness of American Power Part 2 – Trump and the Future</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3449</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ca3e821a-f7bb-11f0-ac0c-a789755999c8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR8566044037.mp3?updated=1769105245" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: The Trial and Execution of Saddam Hussein</title>
      <description>For the final episode in this series David talks to historian and political scientist Glen Rangwala about the trial and execution of Saddam Hussein in 2006. What plans did the Americans have for Saddam before the Iraq war began? How was it decided what to charge him with once he had been captured? Did his trial exacerbate rather than overcome the sectarian divisions tearing Iraq apart? Was justice served?

Part 2 of this conversation, in which David and Glen discuss the circumstances of Saddam’s execution and the legacy of his fate for the politics of Iraq and the wider world, is available tomorrow on PPF+. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time: Talking Geopolitics with Helen Thompson – The Weirdness of American Power
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>257</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For the final episode in this series David talks to historian and political scientist Glen Rangwala about the trial and execution of Saddam Hussein in 2006. What plans did the Americans have for Saddam before the Iraq war began? How was it decided what to charge him with once he had been captured? Did his trial exacerbate rather than overcome the sectarian divisions tearing Iraq apart? Was justice served?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the final episode in this series David talks to historian and political scientist Glen Rangwala about the trial and execution of Saddam Hussein in 2006. What plans did the Americans have for Saddam before the Iraq war began? How was it decided what to charge him with once he had been captured? Did his trial exacerbate rather than overcome the sectarian divisions tearing Iraq apart? Was justice served?

Part 2 of this conversation, in which David and Glen discuss the circumstances of Saddam’s execution and the legacy of his fate for the politics of Iraq and the wider world, is available tomorrow on PPF+. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time: Talking Geopolitics with Helen Thompson – The Weirdness of American Power
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the final episode in this series David talks to historian and political scientist Glen Rangwala about the trial and execution of Saddam Hussein in 2006. What plans did the Americans have for Saddam before the Iraq war began? How was it decided what to charge him with once he had been captured? Did his trial exacerbate rather than overcome the sectarian divisions tearing Iraq apart? Was justice served?</p>
<p>Part 2 of this conversation, in which David and Glen discuss the circumstances of Saddam’s execution and the legacy of his fate for the politics of Iraq and the wider world, is available tomorrow on PPF+. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time: Talking Geopolitics with Helen Thompson – The Weirdness of American Power</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3477</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5d56224c-f55f-11f0-8b5f-8b12d81e22eb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR4609703236.mp3?updated=1768845526" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: O. J. Simpson vs the Evidence</title>
      <description>For the penultimate episode in this series David examines the criminal trial of O. J. Simpson in 1995 to ask what it reveals about how power really works in America. How did the prosecution fail to grasp what was really happening in the courtroom? Did jury selection decide the outcome of the case before it had even begun? Why was the massive volume of evidence against Simpson something that worked in his favour? And how does the legacy of the Simpson trial help explain the arrival of Donald Trump in the White House?

Next time: The Trial and Execution of Saddam Hussein
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>256</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For the penultimate episode in this series David examines the criminal trial of O. J. Simpson in 1995 to ask what it reveals about how power really works in America. How did the prosecution fail to grasp what was really happening in the courtroom? Did jury selection decide the outcome of the case before it had even begun? Why was the massive volume of evidence against Simpson something that worked in his favour? And how does the legacy of the Simpson trial help explain the arrival of Donald Trump in the White House?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the penultimate episode in this series David examines the criminal trial of O. J. Simpson in 1995 to ask what it reveals about how power really works in America. How did the prosecution fail to grasp what was really happening in the courtroom? Did jury selection decide the outcome of the case before it had even begun? Why was the massive volume of evidence against Simpson something that worked in his favour? And how does the legacy of the Simpson trial help explain the arrival of Donald Trump in the White House?

Next time: The Trial and Execution of Saddam Hussein
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the penultimate episode in this series David examines the criminal trial of O. J. Simpson in 1995 to ask what it reveals about how power really works in America. How did the prosecution fail to grasp what was really happening in the courtroom? Did jury selection decide the outcome of the case before it had even begun? Why was the massive volume of evidence against Simpson something that worked in his favour? And how does the legacy of the Simpson trial help explain the arrival of Donald Trump in the White House?</p>
<p>Next time: The Trial and Execution of Saddam Hussein</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4683</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2e1e4440-f31c-11f0-a3fa-e3dec8fdc584]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR4274573643.mp3?updated=1768596881" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: The Gang of Four vs the New China</title>
      <description>In today’s episode David explores the trial that gripped China at the end of 1980: the case against the three men and one woman accused of being responsible for the worst excesses of the Cultural Revolution (1966-76). How did the court try to hold Mao’s followers responsible for the catastrophe while exculpating Mao himself? How did Mao’s widow Jiang Qing fight back? Who were the others in the dock and what were they doing there? And what made the trial emblematic of the new direction China was taking?

Next time in Politics on Trial: O. J. Simpson vs the Evidence 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>255</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode David explores the trial that gripped China at the end of 1980: the case against the three men and one woman accused of being responsible for the worst excesses of the Cultural Revolution (1966-76). How did the court try to hold Mao’s followers responsible for the catastrophe while exculpating Mao himself? How did Mao’s widow Jiang Qing fight back? Who were the others in the dock and what were they doing there? And what made the trial emblematic of the new direction China was taking?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode David explores the trial that gripped China at the end of 1980: the case against the three men and one woman accused of being responsible for the worst excesses of the Cultural Revolution (1966-76). How did the court try to hold Mao’s followers responsible for the catastrophe while exculpating Mao himself? How did Mao’s widow Jiang Qing fight back? Who were the others in the dock and what were they doing there? And what made the trial emblematic of the new direction China was taking?

Next time in Politics on Trial: O. J. Simpson vs the Evidence 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode David explores the trial that gripped China at the end of 1980: the case against the three men and one woman accused of being responsible for the worst excesses of the Cultural Revolution (1966-76). How did the court try to hold Mao’s followers responsible for the catastrophe while exculpating Mao himself? How did Mao’s widow Jiang Qing fight back? Who were the others in the dock and what were they doing there? And what made the trial emblematic of the new direction China was taking?</p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: O. J. Simpson vs the Evidence </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3660</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[38acc390-efdf-11f0-a081-83e4a089f293]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR9760740420.mp3?updated=1768240771" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Muhammad Ali vs. the Draft</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is about the epic battle between Muhammad Ali and the US government over its attempt to draft him during the Vietnam war and what happened when that fight reached the US Supreme Court. What were Ali’s grounds for claiming to be a conscientious objector? How did that argument cut across wider questions of race, religion and power? Why did the Supreme Court change its original decision against Ali to find unanimously in his favour? And who won and who lost as a result?

Out now on PPF+: Part two of David’s conversation with Robert Saunders about the fight over Irish Home Rule: how close did Britain get to an actual civil war in 1914 before another war intervened? To hear this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: The Gang of Four
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>254</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is about the epic battle between Muhammad Ali and the US government over its attempt to draft him during the Vietnam war and what happened when that fight reached the US Supreme Court. What were Ali’s grounds for claiming to be a conscientious objector? How did that argument cut across wider questions of race, religion and power? Why did the Supreme Court change its original decision against Ali to find unanimously in his favour? And who won and who lost as a result?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is about the epic battle between Muhammad Ali and the US government over its attempt to draft him during the Vietnam war and what happened when that fight reached the US Supreme Court. What were Ali’s grounds for claiming to be a conscientious objector? How did that argument cut across wider questions of race, religion and power? Why did the Supreme Court change its original decision against Ali to find unanimously in his favour? And who won and who lost as a result?

Out now on PPF+: Part two of David’s conversation with Robert Saunders about the fight over Irish Home Rule: how close did Britain get to an actual civil war in 1914 before another war intervened? To hear this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: The Gang of Four
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is about the epic battle between Muhammad Ali and the US government over its attempt to draft him during the Vietnam war and what happened when that fight reached the US Supreme Court. What were Ali’s grounds for claiming to be a conscientious objector? How did that argument cut across wider questions of race, religion and power? Why did the Supreme Court change its original decision against Ali to find unanimously in his favour? And who won and who lost as a result?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: Part two of David’s conversation with Robert Saunders about the fight over Irish Home Rule: how close did Britain get to an actual civil war in 1914 before another war intervened? To hear this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: The Gang of Four</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3654</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5a5ae130-ed86-11f0-b23d-f3798f2afe91]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR9362571952.mp3?updated=1767982650" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders: Home Rule for Ireland! - The Kite</title>
      <description>Today’s episode in our occasional series with historian Robert Saunders on significant political anniversaries looks at the event that blew British politics apart at the start of 1886. The ‘Hawarden Kite’ – when William Gladstone’s son Herbert floated the idea that his father had committed to Irish Home Rule – split the Liberal party, upended political allegiances and set the country on the path to potential civil war. How did it happen? Why were passions running so high on the question of Ireland? And how does it all compare to Brexit?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Robert in which they take the story of the fight over Irish Home Rule up to the crisis of 1912-1914. How close did Britain come to an actual civil war? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: Muhammad Ali vs. the Draft
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>14</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>253</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode in our occasional series with historian Robert Saunders on significant political anniversaries looks at the event that blew British politics apart at the start of 1886. The ‘Hawarden Kite’ – when William Gladstone’s son Herbert floated the idea that his father had committed to Irish Home Rule – split the Liberal party, upended political allegiances and set the country on the path to potential civil war. How did it happen? Why were passions running so high on the question of Ireland? And how does it all compare to Brexit?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode in our occasional series with historian Robert Saunders on significant political anniversaries looks at the event that blew British politics apart at the start of 1886. The ‘Hawarden Kite’ – when William Gladstone’s son Herbert floated the idea that his father had committed to Irish Home Rule – split the Liberal party, upended political allegiances and set the country on the path to potential civil war. How did it happen? Why were passions running so high on the question of Ireland? And how does it all compare to Brexit?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Robert in which they take the story of the fight over Irish Home Rule up to the crisis of 1912-1914. How close did Britain come to an actual civil war? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: Muhammad Ali vs. the Draft
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode in our occasional series with historian Robert Saunders on significant political anniversaries looks at the event that blew British politics apart at the start of 1886. The ‘Hawarden Kite’ – when William Gladstone’s son Herbert floated the idea that his father had committed to Irish Home Rule – split the Liberal party, upended political allegiances and set the country on the path to potential civil war. How did it happen? Why were passions running so high on the question of Ireland? And how does it all compare to Brexit?</p>
<p>Out tomorrow on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Robert in which they take the story of the fight over Irish Home Rule up to the crisis of 1912-1914. How close did Britain come to an actual civil war? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: Muhammad Ali vs. the Draft</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3428</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5212af3a-eaf2-11f0-93c7-7bceea6b55cb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR2891045671.mp3?updated=1767699226" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Films of Ideas extra: The Designated Mourner</title>
      <description>An extra episode to accompany our Films of Ideas series: David explores The Designated Mourner by Wallace Shawn, the writer and co-star of My Dinner with Andre. How did a play first performed in 1996 turn into a prophetic text for our times? How was it shaped by Shawn’s experiences in Central America and his view of Reagan’s America? What makes it one of the greatest of all contemporary political fictions?

Next time – Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders: Home Rule for Ireland!
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2026 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>16</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>252</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>An extra episode to accompany our Films of Ideas series: David explores The Designated Mourner by Wallace Shawn, the writer and co-star of My Dinner with Andre. How did a play first performed in 1996 turn into a prophetic text for our times? How was it shaped by Shawn’s experiences in Central America and his view of Reagan’s America? What makes it one of the greatest of all contemporary political fictions?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>An extra episode to accompany our Films of Ideas series: David explores The Designated Mourner by Wallace Shawn, the writer and co-star of My Dinner with Andre. How did a play first performed in 1996 turn into a prophetic text for our times? How was it shaped by Shawn’s experiences in Central America and his view of Reagan’s America? What makes it one of the greatest of all contemporary political fictions?

Next time – Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders: Home Rule for Ireland!
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>An extra episode to accompany our Films of Ideas series: David explores <em>The Designated Mourner</em> by Wallace Shawn, the writer and co-star of <em>My Dinner with Andre.</em> How did a play first performed in 1996 turn into a prophetic text for our times? How was it shaped by Shawn’s experiences in Central America and his view of Reagan’s America? What makes it one of the greatest of all contemporary political fictions?</p>
<p>Next time – Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders: Home Rule for Ireland!</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3608</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[dae603f2-e7fa-11f0-b972-3b3a998074e2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR9079892192.mp3?updated=1767373018" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Films of Ideas: Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind w/Beeban Kidron</title>
      <description>Today it’s the last in our series of live episodes recorded at the Regent Street Cinema in London: David talks to film director and campaigner Beeban Kidron about Michel Gondry’s Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004), a much-loved film that’s also chock full of interesting ideas. Is memory the same as identity? Are all relationships founded on manipulation? What happens when we try to curate our mental distress? How should we resist the tech panacea of a painless existence? Who gets to choose what we remember and what we forget?

Next time: The Designated Mourner
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>16</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>251</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today it’s the last in our series of live episodes recorded at the Regent Street Cinema in London: David talks to film director and campaigner Beeban Kidron about Michel Gondry’s Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004), a much-loved film that’s also chock full of interesting ideas. Is memory the same as identity? Are all relationships founded on manipulation? What happens when we try to curate our mental distress? How should we resist the tech panacea of a painless existence? Who gets to choose what we remember and what we forget?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today it’s the last in our series of live episodes recorded at the Regent Street Cinema in London: David talks to film director and campaigner Beeban Kidron about Michel Gondry’s Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004), a much-loved film that’s also chock full of interesting ideas. Is memory the same as identity? Are all relationships founded on manipulation? What happens when we try to curate our mental distress? How should we resist the tech panacea of a painless existence? Who gets to choose what we remember and what we forget?

Next time: The Designated Mourner
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today it’s the last in our series of live episodes recorded at the Regent Street Cinema in London: David talks to film director and campaigner Beeban Kidron about Michel Gondry’s <em>Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind</em> (2004), a much-loved film that’s also chock full of interesting ideas. Is memory the same as identity? Are all relationships founded on manipulation? What happens when we try to curate our mental distress? How should we resist the tech panacea of a painless existence? Who gets to choose what we remember and what we forget?</p>
<p>Next time: <em>The Designated Mourner</em></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3862</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c33f297a-dc3a-11f0-8255-cfe06bd9001f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR3156730446.mp3?updated=1767018499" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Films of Ideas: Wittgenstein w/Nikhil Krishnan</title>
      <description>The fourth episode in our season of live recordings from the Regent Street Cinema is about another film that explores the relationship between biography and philosophy: Derek Jarman’s Wittgenstein (1993), which tells the story of an extraordinary life in a way that is both light and profound. David talks to writer and philosopher Nikhil Krishnan about Ludwig Wittengenstein’s ideas of war, science, truth, freedom, sexuality, language, loyalty and communism and how they are portrayed on screen. Does the life explain the ideas or do the ideas explain the life?

Next time: Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind w/Beeban Kidron
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>16</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>250</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>The fourth episode in our season of live recordings from the Regent Street Cinema is about another film that explores the relationship between biography and philosophy: Derek Jarman’s Wittgenstein (1993), which tells the story of an extraordinary life in a way that is both light and profound. David talks to writer and philosopher Nikhil Krishnan about Ludwig Wittengenstein’s ideas of war, science, truth, freedom, sexuality, language, loyalty and communism and how they are portrayed on screen. Does the life explain the ideas or do the ideas explain the life?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The fourth episode in our season of live recordings from the Regent Street Cinema is about another film that explores the relationship between biography and philosophy: Derek Jarman’s Wittgenstein (1993), which tells the story of an extraordinary life in a way that is both light and profound. David talks to writer and philosopher Nikhil Krishnan about Ludwig Wittengenstein’s ideas of war, science, truth, freedom, sexuality, language, loyalty and communism and how they are portrayed on screen. Does the life explain the ideas or do the ideas explain the life?

Next time: Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind w/Beeban Kidron
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The fourth episode in our season of live recordings from the Regent Street Cinema is about another film that explores the relationship between biography and philosophy: Derek Jarman’s <em>Wittgenstein</em> (1993), which tells the story of an extraordinary life in a way that is both light and profound. David talks to writer and philosopher Nikhil Krishnan about Ludwig Wittengenstein’s ideas of war, science, truth, freedom, sexuality, language, loyalty and communism and how they are portrayed on screen. Does the life explain the ideas or do the ideas explain the life?</p>
<p>Next time: <em>Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind</em> w/Beeban Kidron</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3569</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[68b562c2-dc02-11f0-a956-ebeba2002b92]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR4722320416.mp3?updated=1766056857" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Films of Ideas: Rosa Luxemburg w/Lea Ypi</title>
      <description>Today’s episode in our season of live recordings from the Regent Street Cinema looks at the biopic of a revolutionary: Margaretha von Trotta’s Rosa Luxemburg (1986), which explores the deeply unstable relationship between the personal and the political. David talks to writer and philosopher Lea Ypi (Free, Indignity) about where biography ends and philosophy begins and whether revolutionary politics requires the leading of a revolutionary life. What was Rosa Luxemburg’s true cause? Who or what betrayed her and her ideas? And how does her legacy live on?

Out now on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany this series in which David and film historian Harrison Whitaker discuss the greatest Christmas film of ideas: Frank Capra’s It’s A Wonderful Life, which is much more than just a seasonal tearjerker. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time: Wittgenstein w/Nikhil Krishnan
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>16</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>249</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode in our season of live recordings from the Regent Street Cinema looks at the biopic of a revolutionary: Margaretha von Trotta’s Rosa Luxemburg (1986), which explores the deeply unstable relationship between the personal and the political. David talks to writer and philosopher Lea Ypi (Free, Indignity) about where biography ends and philosophy begins and whether revolutionary politics requires the leading of a revolutionary life. What was Rosa Luxemburg’s true cause? Who or what betrayed her and her ideas? And how does her legacy live on?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode in our season of live recordings from the Regent Street Cinema looks at the biopic of a revolutionary: Margaretha von Trotta’s Rosa Luxemburg (1986), which explores the deeply unstable relationship between the personal and the political. David talks to writer and philosopher Lea Ypi (Free, Indignity) about where biography ends and philosophy begins and whether revolutionary politics requires the leading of a revolutionary life. What was Rosa Luxemburg’s true cause? Who or what betrayed her and her ideas? And how does her legacy live on?

Out now on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany this series in which David and film historian Harrison Whitaker discuss the greatest Christmas film of ideas: Frank Capra’s It’s A Wonderful Life, which is much more than just a seasonal tearjerker. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time: Wittgenstein w/Nikhil Krishnan
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode in our season of live recordings from the Regent Street Cinema looks at the biopic of a revolutionary: Margaretha von Trotta’s <em>Rosa Luxemburg </em>(1986), which explores the deeply unstable relationship between the personal and the political. David talks to writer and philosopher Lea Ypi (<em>Free</em>, <em>Indignity</em>) about where biography ends and philosophy begins and whether revolutionary politics requires the leading of a revolutionary life. What was Rosa Luxemburg’s true cause? Who or what betrayed her and her ideas? And how does her legacy live on?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany this series in which David and film historian Harrison Whitaker discuss the greatest Christmas film of ideas: Frank Capra’s <em>It’s A Wonderful Life, </em>which is much more than just a seasonal tearjerker. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time: <em>Wittgenstein</em> w/Nikhil Krishnan</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3715</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3f6b496a-da7f-11f0-af3a-23e235798cba]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR2760272435.mp3?updated=1765890649" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Films of Ideas: My Dinner with Andre w/Lee Hall</title>
      <description>The second episode in our live series from the Regent Street Cinema explores Louis Malle’s My Dinner with Andre (1981), in which two men discuss the meaning of theatre, capitalism, love, science, faith and freedom over a meal. David talks to playwright and screenwriter Lee Hall (Billy Elliot, Rocketman) about how a great film can be made out of a single conversation. Who was the real Andre? How scripted was the dialogue? Who won the argument? And why has this film had such an extraordinary afterlife?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany this series in which David and film historian Harrison Whitaker discuss the greatest Christmas film of ideas: Frank Capra’s It’s A Wonderful Life, which is much more than just a seasonal tearjerker. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

If you are looking for last minute Christmas presents we have 6- and 12-month gift subscriptions to PPF+ giving access to all our bonus episodes, ad-free listening and automatic sign-up to our fortnightly newsletter – which can be delivered to the recipient of your choice on Christmas Day! ⁠https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts⁠

Next time: Rosa Luxemburg w/Lea Ypi
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>16</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>248</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>The second episode in our live series from the Regent Street Cinema explores Louis Malle’s My Dinner with Andre (1981), in which two men discuss the meaning of theatre, capitalism, love, science, faith and freedom over a meal. David talks to playwright and screenwriter Lee Hall (Billy Elliot, Rocketman) about how a great film can be made out of a single conversation. Who was the real Andre? How scripted was the dialogue? Who won the argument? And why has this film had such an extraordinary afterlife?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The second episode in our live series from the Regent Street Cinema explores Louis Malle’s My Dinner with Andre (1981), in which two men discuss the meaning of theatre, capitalism, love, science, faith and freedom over a meal. David talks to playwright and screenwriter Lee Hall (Billy Elliot, Rocketman) about how a great film can be made out of a single conversation. Who was the real Andre? How scripted was the dialogue? Who won the argument? And why has this film had such an extraordinary afterlife?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany this series in which David and film historian Harrison Whitaker discuss the greatest Christmas film of ideas: Frank Capra’s It’s A Wonderful Life, which is much more than just a seasonal tearjerker. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

If you are looking for last minute Christmas presents we have 6- and 12-month gift subscriptions to PPF+ giving access to all our bonus episodes, ad-free listening and automatic sign-up to our fortnightly newsletter – which can be delivered to the recipient of your choice on Christmas Day! ⁠https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts⁠

Next time: Rosa Luxemburg w/Lea Ypi
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The second episode in our live series from the Regent Street Cinema explores Louis Malle’s <em>My Dinner with Andre</em> (1981), in which two men discuss the meaning of theatre, capitalism, love, science, faith and freedom over a meal. David talks to playwright and screenwriter Lee Hall (<em>Billy Elliot</em>, <em>Rocketman</em>) about how a great film can be made out of a single conversation. Who was the real Andre? How scripted was the dialogue? Who won the argument? And why has this film had such an extraordinary afterlife?</p>
<p>Out tomorrow on PPF+: a bonus episode to accompany this series in which David and film historian Harrison Whitaker discuss the greatest Christmas film of ideas: Frank Capra’s <em>It’s A Wonderful Life,</em> which is much more than just a seasonal tearjerker. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>If you are looking for last minute Christmas presents we have 6- and 12-month gift subscriptions to PPF+ giving access to all our bonus episodes, ad-free listening and automatic sign-up to our fortnightly newsletter – which can be delivered to the recipient of your choice on Christmas Day! <a href="https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts">⁠https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts⁠</a></p>
<p>Next time: <em>Rosa Luxemburg</em> w/Lea Ypi</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4001</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[62feae76-d8db-11f0-95e9-87fa3ae4bf62]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR3653426077.mp3?updated=1765710318" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Films of Ideas: Rope w/Nicci Gerrard &amp; Sean French</title>
      <description>Today it’s the first in our series of live episodes recorded at the Regent Street Cinema in London: David talks to the crime writers Nicci Gerrard and Sean French (aka Nicci French) about Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope (1948), based on Patrick Hamilton’s play of the same name, itself based on the real-life case of Leopold and Loeb. What is the true subject of this film: murder, sex, morality or something else? Why is James Stewart so hopelessly miscast? And how does all this connect to Nietzsche?

If you are still looking for Christmas presents we have 6- and 12-month gift subscriptions to PPF+ giving access to all our bonus episodes, ad-free listening and automatic sign-up to our fortnightly newsletter – which can be delivered to the recipient of your choice on Christmas Day! ⁠https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts⁠

Next time: My Dinner with Andre w/Lee Hall
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>16</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>247</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today it’s the first in our series of live episodes recorded at the Regent Street Cinema in London: David talks to the crime writers Nicci Gerrard and Sean French (aka Nicci French) about Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope (1948), based on Patrick Hamilton’s play of the same name, itself based on the real-life case of Leopold and Loeb. What is the true subject of this film: murder, sex, morality or something else? Why is James Stewart so hopelessly miscast? And how does all this connect to Nietzsche?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today it’s the first in our series of live episodes recorded at the Regent Street Cinema in London: David talks to the crime writers Nicci Gerrard and Sean French (aka Nicci French) about Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope (1948), based on Patrick Hamilton’s play of the same name, itself based on the real-life case of Leopold and Loeb. What is the true subject of this film: murder, sex, morality or something else? Why is James Stewart so hopelessly miscast? And how does all this connect to Nietzsche?

If you are still looking for Christmas presents we have 6- and 12-month gift subscriptions to PPF+ giving access to all our bonus episodes, ad-free listening and automatic sign-up to our fortnightly newsletter – which can be delivered to the recipient of your choice on Christmas Day! ⁠https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts⁠

Next time: My Dinner with Andre w/Lee Hall
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today it’s the first in our series of live episodes recorded at the Regent Street Cinema in London: David talks to the crime writers Nicci Gerrard and Sean French (aka Nicci French) about Alfred Hitchcock’s <em>Rope</em> (1948), based on Patrick Hamilton’s play of the same name, itself based on the real-life case of Leopold and Loeb. What is the true subject of this film: murder, sex, morality or something else? Why is James Stewart so hopelessly miscast? And how does all this connect to Nietzsche?</p>
<p>If you are still looking for Christmas presents we have 6- and 12-month gift subscriptions to PPF+ giving access to all our bonus episodes, ad-free listening and automatic sign-up to our fortnightly newsletter – which can be delivered to the recipient of your choice on Christmas Day! <a href="https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts">⁠https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts⁠</a></p>
<p>Next time: <em>My Dinner with Andre</em> w/Lee Hall</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3557</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ae47f330-d532-11f0-8cf8-2f210c4e8325]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR5585998363.mp3?updated=1765307997" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Nelson Mandela vs Apartheid</title>
      <description>Today’s episode explores the trials of Nelson Mandela, variously charged by South Africa’s apartheid state with treason, incitement, illegal foreign travel, sabotage and conspiracy across a decade that saw him more often in court than out. How did Mandela defend himself? What changed from his first trial to his last? Could any justice be found in a system of blatant oppression? And what happens when the line between lawyer, defendant and prisoner becomes impossibly blurred?

The final film in our season at the Regent Street Cinema in London is coming up on Friday 19th December: a screening of David Cronenberg’s A Dangerous Method followed by a live recording of PPF with writer, psychoanalyst and feminist Susie Orbach. Do join us – tickets are still available https://bit.ly/3KHBp3g

Next time we start our season of Films of Ideas: Hitchcock’s Rope w/Nicci Gerrard and Sean French
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>246</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode explores the trials of Nelson Mandela, variously charged by South Africa’s apartheid state with treason, incitement, illegal foreign travel, sabotage and conspiracy across a decade that saw him more often in court than out. How did Mandela defend himself? What changed from his first trial to his last? Could any justice be found in a system of blatant oppression? And what happens when the line between lawyer, defendant and prisoner becomes impossibly blurred?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode explores the trials of Nelson Mandela, variously charged by South Africa’s apartheid state with treason, incitement, illegal foreign travel, sabotage and conspiracy across a decade that saw him more often in court than out. How did Mandela defend himself? What changed from his first trial to his last? Could any justice be found in a system of blatant oppression? And what happens when the line between lawyer, defendant and prisoner becomes impossibly blurred?

The final film in our season at the Regent Street Cinema in London is coming up on Friday 19th December: a screening of David Cronenberg’s A Dangerous Method followed by a live recording of PPF with writer, psychoanalyst and feminist Susie Orbach. Do join us – tickets are still available https://bit.ly/3KHBp3g

Next time we start our season of Films of Ideas: Hitchcock’s Rope w/Nicci Gerrard and Sean French
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode explores the trials of Nelson Mandela, variously charged by South Africa’s apartheid state with treason, incitement, illegal foreign travel, sabotage and conspiracy across a decade that saw him more often in court than out. How did Mandela defend himself? What changed from his first trial to his last? Could any justice be found in a system of blatant oppression? And what happens when the line between lawyer, defendant and prisoner becomes impossibly blurred?</p>
<p>The final film in our season at the Regent Street Cinema in London is coming up on Friday 19th December: a screening of David Cronenberg’s <em>A Dangerous Method</em> followed by a live recording of PPF with writer, psychoanalyst and feminist Susie Orbach. Do join us – tickets are still available <a href="https://bit.ly/3KHBp3g">https://bit.ly/3KHBp3g</a></p>
<p>Next time we start our season of Films of Ideas: Hitchcock’s <em>Rope</em> w/Nicci Gerrard and Sean French</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3907</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4fcc9dbc-d52b-11f0-8bee-0fe9beac399f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR8648260644.mp3?updated=1765304807" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Eichmann in Jerusalem</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is about a momentous trial and the incendiary book that followed: the trial was of Adolf Eichmann, convicted by an Israeli court in 1961 of orchestrating the Holocaust, and the book was Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem (1963), which questioned the grounds on which he was prosecuted. What did Arendt mean by ‘the banality of evil’? Why was she convinced that the case against Eichmann was badly misjudged? Was the trial really intended to serve as a history lesson? And if it was, what was it designed to teach?

Next time in Politics on Trial: Nelson Mandela vs Apartheid
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>245</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is about a momentous trial and the incendiary book that followed: the trial was of Adolf Eichmann, convicted by an Israeli court in 1961 of orchestrating the Holocaust, and the book was Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem (1963), which questioned the grounds on which he was prosecuted. What did Arendt mean by ‘the banality of evil’? Why was she convinced that the case against Eichmann was badly misjudged? Was the trial really intended to serve as a history lesson? And if it was, what was it designed to teach?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is about a momentous trial and the incendiary book that followed: the trial was of Adolf Eichmann, convicted by an Israeli court in 1961 of orchestrating the Holocaust, and the book was Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem (1963), which questioned the grounds on which he was prosecuted. What did Arendt mean by ‘the banality of evil’? Why was she convinced that the case against Eichmann was badly misjudged? Was the trial really intended to serve as a history lesson? And if it was, what was it designed to teach?

Next time in Politics on Trial: Nelson Mandela vs Apartheid
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is about a momentous trial and the incendiary book that followed: the trial was of Adolf Eichmann, convicted by an Israeli court in 1961 of orchestrating the Holocaust, and the book was Hannah Arendt’s <em>Eichmann in Jerusalem</em> (1963), which questioned the grounds on which he was prosecuted. What did Arendt mean by ‘the banality of evil’? Why was she convinced that the case against Eichmann was badly misjudged? Was the trial really intended to serve as a history lesson? And if it was, what was it designed to teach?</p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: Nelson Mandela vs Apartheid</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3906</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ec1f7248-d10c-11f0-a8ae-d71b8fef1bb6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR4906112208.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Lady Chatterley’s Lover</title>
      <description>Today we return to our series about epoch-making trials with the case of the book they tried and failed to ban. In 1960 Penguin Books was prosecuted at the Old Bailey under the new Obscene Publications Act (1959) over its plans to produce a cheap, unexpurgated edition of D. H. Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover. How did the prosecution try to persuade the jury that the book was a menace to public morals? Who were the expert witnesses called in its defence? What were the decisive arguments? And why was the judge’s summing-up such a mistake?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: David discusses the book at the heart of the case. Was Lady Chatterley’s Lover really all about sex? Or was it all about class? Or was it in fact about something else entirely? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

If you are looking for Christmas presents we have 6- and 12-month gift subscriptions to PPF+ giving access to all our bonus episodes, ad-free listening and automatic sign-up to our fortnightly newsletter – which can be delivered to the recipient of your choice on Christmas Day! https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts

Plus we have gorgeous PPF canvas tote bags and bone china PPF mugs, all available now https://www.ppfideas.com/merch

Next time in Politics on Trial: Eichmann in Jerusalem
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>244</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today we return to our series about epoch-making trials with the case of the book they tried and failed to ban. In 1960 Penguin Books was prosecuted at the Old Bailey under the new Obscene Publications Act (1959) over its plans to produce a cheap, unexpurgated edition of D. H. Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover. How did the prosecution try to persuade the jury that the book was a menace to public morals? Who were the expert witnesses called in its defence? What were the decisive arguments? And why was the judge’s summing-up such a mistake?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today we return to our series about epoch-making trials with the case of the book they tried and failed to ban. In 1960 Penguin Books was prosecuted at the Old Bailey under the new Obscene Publications Act (1959) over its plans to produce a cheap, unexpurgated edition of D. H. Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover. How did the prosecution try to persuade the jury that the book was a menace to public morals? Who were the expert witnesses called in its defence? What were the decisive arguments? And why was the judge’s summing-up such a mistake?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: David discusses the book at the heart of the case. Was Lady Chatterley’s Lover really all about sex? Or was it all about class? Or was it in fact about something else entirely? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

If you are looking for Christmas presents we have 6- and 12-month gift subscriptions to PPF+ giving access to all our bonus episodes, ad-free listening and automatic sign-up to our fortnightly newsletter – which can be delivered to the recipient of your choice on Christmas Day! https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts

Plus we have gorgeous PPF canvas tote bags and bone china PPF mugs, all available now https://www.ppfideas.com/merch

Next time in Politics on Trial: Eichmann in Jerusalem
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today we return to our series about epoch-making trials with the case of the book they tried and failed to ban. In 1960 Penguin Books was prosecuted at the Old Bailey under the new Obscene Publications Act (1959) over its plans to produce a cheap, unexpurgated edition of D. H. Lawrence’s <em>Lady Chatterley’s Lover</em>. How did the prosecution try to persuade the jury that the book was a menace to public morals? Who were the expert witnesses called in its defence? What were the decisive arguments? And why was the judge’s summing-up such a mistake?</p>
<p>Out tomorrow on PPF+: David discusses the book at the heart of the case. Was <em>Lady Chatterley’s Lover</em> really all about sex? Or was it all about class? Or was it in fact about something else entirely? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>If you are looking for Christmas presents we have 6- and 12-month gift subscriptions to PPF+ giving access to all our bonus episodes, ad-free listening and automatic sign-up to our fortnightly newsletter – which can be delivered to the recipient of your choice on Christmas Day! <a href="https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts">https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts</a></p>
<p>Plus we have gorgeous PPF canvas tote bags and bone china PPF mugs, all available now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/merch">https://www.ppfideas.com/merch</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: Eichmann in Jerusalem</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3536</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[cb4d9a0e-cfa4-11f0-83d8-a7cb4348df04]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR5686739723.mp3?updated=1764697265" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ian McEwan on the Present as Future Past</title>
      <description>David talks to novelist Ian McEwan, who was our first ever guest on PPF, about how the future will view our present once the disasters we are brewing come to pass. How might humanity scrape through the rest of the century? Will future generations see us as intellectually vibrant or essentially trivial? If we turn out to be unknowable to those who follow us, does that mean we are unknowable to ourselves? A wide-ranging conversation about how past, present and future co-exist in time.

Ian McEwan’s latest novel is What We Can Know https://bit.ly/4ogYN5u

If you are looking for Christmas presents we have 6- and 12-month gift subscriptions to PPF+ giving access to all our bonus episodes, ad-free listening and automatic sign-up to our fortnightly newsletter – which can be delivered to the recipient of your choice on Christmas Day! https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts

Plus we have gorgeous PPF canvas tote bags and bone china PPF mugs, all available now https://www.ppfideas.com/merch

Next time in Politics on Trial: Lady Chatterley’s Lover 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>243</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>David talks to novelist Ian McEwan, who was our first ever guest on PPF, about how the future will view our present once the disasters we are brewing come to pass. How might humanity scrape through the rest of the century? Will future generations see us as intellectually vibrant or essentially trivial? If we turn out to be unknowable to those who follow us, does that mean we are unknowable to ourselves? A wide-ranging conversation about how past, present and future co-exist in time.

Ian McEwan’s latest novel is What We Can Know https://bit.ly/4ogYN5u

If you are looking for Christmas presents we have 6- and 12-month gift subscriptions to PPF+ giving access to all our bonus episodes, ad-free listening and automatic sign-up to our fortnightly newsletter – which can be delivered to the recipient of your choice on Christmas Day! https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts

Plus we have gorgeous PPF canvas tote bags and bone china PPF mugs, all available now https://www.ppfideas.com/merch

Next time in Politics on Trial: Lady Chatterley’s Lover 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>David talks to novelist Ian McEwan, who was our first ever guest on PPF, about how the future will view our present once the disasters we are brewing come to pass. How might humanity scrape through the rest of the century? Will future generations see us as intellectually vibrant or essentially trivial? If we turn out to be unknowable to those who follow us, does that mean we are unknowable to ourselves? A wide-ranging conversation about how past, present and future co-exist in time.</p>
<p>Ian McEwan’s latest novel is What We Can Know <a href="https://bit.ly/4ogYN5u">https://bit.ly/4ogYN5u</a></p>
<p>If you are looking for Christmas presents we have 6- and 12-month gift subscriptions to PPF+ giving access to all our bonus episodes, ad-free listening and automatic sign-up to our fortnightly newsletter – which can be delivered to the recipient of your choice on Christmas Day! <a href="https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts">https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts</a></p>
<p>Plus we have gorgeous PPF canvas tote bags and bone china PPF mugs, all available now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/merch">https://www.ppfideas.com/merch</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: Lady Chatterley’s Lover </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3644</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[af62b6a2-cc44-11f0-99d2-b765b19cbcb9]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR1137678074.mp3?updated=1764534821" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders: Thatcher@100 – Her Legacy</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is the second part of David’s conversation with historian Robert Saunders about the life and legacy of Margaret Thatcher. What is the meaning of Thatcherism in the twenty-first century? Why is she still such a polarising figure? Was she a distinctively British political phenomenon? Which politicians can plausibly claim to be channelling her example today?

If you are looking for Christmas presents, how about a gift subscription to PPF+? You can choose between 6- and 12-months subscriptions – giving access to our entire archive of bonus episodes, plus two new bonuses every month, ad-free listening and automatic sign-up to our fortnightly newsletter – to be delivered to the recipient of your choice on Christmas Day. All the details you need are here https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts

Next Time: Novelist Ian McEwan on imagining the present as a future past  
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>14</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>242</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is the second part of David’s conversation with historian Robert Saunders about the life and legacy of Margaret Thatcher. What is the meaning of Thatcherism in the twenty-first century? Why is she still such a polarising figure? Was she a distinctively British political phenomenon? Which politicians can plausibly claim to be channelling her example today?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is the second part of David’s conversation with historian Robert Saunders about the life and legacy of Margaret Thatcher. What is the meaning of Thatcherism in the twenty-first century? Why is she still such a polarising figure? Was she a distinctively British political phenomenon? Which politicians can plausibly claim to be channelling her example today?

If you are looking for Christmas presents, how about a gift subscription to PPF+? You can choose between 6- and 12-months subscriptions – giving access to our entire archive of bonus episodes, plus two new bonuses every month, ad-free listening and automatic sign-up to our fortnightly newsletter – to be delivered to the recipient of your choice on Christmas Day. All the details you need are here https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts

Next Time: Novelist Ian McEwan on imagining the present as a future past  
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is the second part of David’s conversation with historian Robert Saunders about the life and legacy of Margaret Thatcher. What is the meaning of Thatcherism in the twenty-first century? Why is she still such a polarising figure? Was she a distinctively British political phenomenon? Which politicians can plausibly claim to be channelling her example today?</p>
<p>If you are looking for Christmas presents, how about a gift subscription to PPF+? You can choose between 6- and 12-months subscriptions – giving access to our entire archive of bonus episodes, plus two new bonuses every month, ad-free listening and automatic sign-up to our fortnightly newsletter – to be delivered to the recipient of your choice on Christmas Day. All the details you need are here <a href="https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts">https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts</a></p>
<p>Next Time: Novelist Ian McEwan on imagining the present as a future past  </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3819</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7adc0792-ca20-11f0-919a-1381f4891c0c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR3485794253.mp3?updated=1764090606" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders: Thatcher@100 – Her Life</title>
      <description>Today’s episode in our occasional series about momentous political anniversaries with historian Robert Saunders looks at the life and legacy of Margaret Thatcher one hundred years on from her birth. What made Thatcher such a distinctive politician? What did she believe in before she became prime minister? How did her time is power alter her political outlook? And did she succumb to her own myth in the end?

Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Henry Gee about the rise and fall of Homo sapiens – how near are we to the end? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

We would love to hear from anyone who uses this podcast in an educational setting –  teachers, lecturers or students – to help us understand what other educational resources we can add and what would be helpful. Do get in touch with your comments, ideas and suggestions https://www.ppfideas.com/contact 

Next time: Thatcher@100 – Her Legacy
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>14</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>241</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode in our occasional series about momentous political anniversaries with historian Robert Saunders looks at the life and legacy of Margaret Thatcher one hundred years on from her birth. What made Thatcher such a distinctive politician? What did she believe in before she became prime minister? How did her time is power alter her political outlook? And did she succumb to her own myth in the end?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode in our occasional series about momentous political anniversaries with historian Robert Saunders looks at the life and legacy of Margaret Thatcher one hundred years on from her birth. What made Thatcher such a distinctive politician? What did she believe in before she became prime minister? How did her time is power alter her political outlook? And did she succumb to her own myth in the end?

Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Henry Gee about the rise and fall of Homo sapiens – how near are we to the end? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

We would love to hear from anyone who uses this podcast in an educational setting –  teachers, lecturers or students – to help us understand what other educational resources we can add and what would be helpful. Do get in touch with your comments, ideas and suggestions https://www.ppfideas.com/contact 

Next time: Thatcher@100 – Her Legacy
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode in our occasional series about momentous political anniversaries with historian Robert Saunders looks at the life and legacy of Margaret Thatcher one hundred years on from her birth. What made Thatcher such a distinctive politician? What did she believe in before she became prime minister? How did her time is power alter her political outlook? And did she succumb to her own myth in the end?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Henry Gee about the rise and fall of <em>Homo sapiens</em> – how near are we to the end? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>We would love to hear from anyone who uses this podcast in an educational setting –  teachers, lecturers or students – to help us understand what other educational resources we can add and what would be helpful. Do get in touch with your comments, ideas and suggestions <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/contact">https://www.ppfideas.com/contact</a> </p>
<p>Next time: Thatcher@100 – Her Legacy</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4168</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e03f8300-ca1d-11f0-8039-dfe7f4bf420f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR4796696921.mp3?updated=1764089515" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Rise and Fall of Homo Sapiens</title>
      <description>Today’s episode explores some very big picture history: David talks to palaeontologist and science writer Henry Gee about the story of the human species from origin to peak to inevitable decline. When and how did Homo sapiens see off the competition from its rivals in the human and animal world? Why did that point mark the start of an inexorable drift towards extinction? In what ways are our strengths as a species also our fatal weaknesses? And how near are we to the end?

Part two of this conversation, which takes the story of human species from the hunter-gatherer period to the present and beyond to explore how long we have left, is available tomorrow on PPF+. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Henry Gee’s The Decline and Fall of the Human Empire is available wherever you get your books https://bit.ly/4pshODe

Read more by David about depopulation and human extinction in the current issue of the London Review of Books https://bit.ly/43FEwiO

There are still a few tickets remaining for the next film in our autumn 'Films of Ideas' season at the Regent Street Cinema in London: join us on Friday 28th November for a screening of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind followed by a live recording of PPF with special guest Beeban Kidron https://bit.ly/4a78KyZ

Next time – Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders: Thatcher @100
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>240</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode explores some very big picture history: David talks to palaeontologist and science writer Henry Gee about the story of the human species from origin to peak to inevitable decline. When and how did Homo sapiens see off the competition from its rivals in the human and animal world? Why did that point mark the start of an inexorable drift towards extinction? In what ways are our strengths as a species also our fatal weaknesses? And how near are we to the end?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode explores some very big picture history: David talks to palaeontologist and science writer Henry Gee about the story of the human species from origin to peak to inevitable decline. When and how did Homo sapiens see off the competition from its rivals in the human and animal world? Why did that point mark the start of an inexorable drift towards extinction? In what ways are our strengths as a species also our fatal weaknesses? And how near are we to the end?

Part two of this conversation, which takes the story of human species from the hunter-gatherer period to the present and beyond to explore how long we have left, is available tomorrow on PPF+. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Henry Gee’s The Decline and Fall of the Human Empire is available wherever you get your books https://bit.ly/4pshODe

Read more by David about depopulation and human extinction in the current issue of the London Review of Books https://bit.ly/43FEwiO

There are still a few tickets remaining for the next film in our autumn 'Films of Ideas' season at the Regent Street Cinema in London: join us on Friday 28th November for a screening of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind followed by a live recording of PPF with special guest Beeban Kidron https://bit.ly/4a78KyZ

Next time – Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders: Thatcher @100
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode explores some <em>very</em> big picture history: David talks to palaeontologist and science writer Henry Gee about the story of the human species from origin to peak to inevitable decline. When and how did <em>Homo sapiens</em> see off the competition from its rivals in the human and animal world? Why did that point mark the start of an inexorable drift towards extinction? In what ways are our strengths as a species also our fatal weaknesses? And how near are we to the end?</p>
<p>Part two of this conversation, which takes the story of human species from the hunter-gatherer period to the present and beyond to explore how long we have left, is available tomorrow on PPF+. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Henry Gee’s <em>The Decline and Fall of the Human Empire</em> is available wherever you get your books <a href="https://bit.ly/4pshODe">https://bit.ly/4pshODe</a></p>
<p>Read more by David about depopulation and human extinction in the current issue of the <em>London Review of Books</em> <a href="https://bit.ly/43FEwiO">https://bit.ly/43FEwiO</a></p>
<p>There are still a few tickets remaining for the next film in our autumn 'Films of Ideas' season at the Regent Street Cinema in London: join us on Friday 28th November for a screening of <em>Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind</em> followed by a live recording of PPF with special guest Beeban Kidron <a href="https://bit.ly/4a78KyZ">https://bit.ly/4a78KyZ</a></p>
<p>Next time – Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders: Thatcher @100</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3262</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7e2283ae-c705-11f0-bf1d-4fb1a37b960a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR7663827377.mp3?updated=1763749165" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trump-like Leadership in German History w/Chris Clark: Part 2 – Chancellor, Tyrant, Emperor?</title>
      <description>Part two of David’s conversation with historian Chris Clark asks whether the best historical insights into Trump-like leadership come from comparison with kings or commoners, democrats or dictators. Does Trump’s leadership style share much if anything with an epoch-making politician like Bismarck? Should Trump’s public persona be understood as standing outside the norm of presidential politics or as quintessentially American? And what can we learn from a close reading of his magnum opus, The Art of the Deal?

Next time: The Rise and Fall of Homo sapiens
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>239</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Part two of David’s conversation with historian Chris Clark asks whether the best historical insights into Trump-like leadership come from comparison with kings or commoners, democrats or dictators. Does Trump’s leadership style share much if anything with an epoch-making politician like Bismarck? Should Trump’s public persona be understood as standing outside the norm of presidential politics or as quintessentially American? And what can we learn from a close reading of his magnum opus, The Art of the Deal?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Part two of David’s conversation with historian Chris Clark asks whether the best historical insights into Trump-like leadership come from comparison with kings or commoners, democrats or dictators. Does Trump’s leadership style share much if anything with an epoch-making politician like Bismarck? Should Trump’s public persona be understood as standing outside the norm of presidential politics or as quintessentially American? And what can we learn from a close reading of his magnum opus, The Art of the Deal?

Next time: The Rise and Fall of Homo sapiens
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Part two of David’s conversation with historian Chris Clark asks whether the best historical insights into Trump-like leadership come from comparison with kings or commoners, democrats or dictators. Does Trump’s leadership style share much if anything with an epoch-making politician like Bismarck? Should Trump’s public persona be understood as standing outside the norm of presidential politics or as quintessentially American? And what can we learn from a close reading of his magnum opus, <em>The Art of the Deal</em>?</p>
<p>Next time: The Rise and Fall of <em>Homo sapiens</em></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3534</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[63e3d6d2-c246-11f0-a953-4359037a6fb0]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR9236795433.mp3?updated=1763227312" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trump-like Leadership in German History w/Chris Clark: Part 1 – Kaiser Wilhelm II?</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is the first of a two-part conversation with historian Chris Clark exploring how German history might help us understand Trump-like leadership, but not through looking at the Nazi period. Instead, David and Chris explore the character and leadership style of Kaiser Wilhelm II, a monarch with many Trumpian qualities. Was Wilhelm a populist or an elitist? Did he know what he was doing and what he was saying? Or was he out of his depth? Plus, how did his maverick and mercurial behaviour impact on those around him trying to run the country - and how did it help lead his country to ruin?

Next time on Trump-like leadership in German History: Chancellor, Tyrant, Emperor?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>238</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is the first of a two-part conversation with historian Chris Clark exploring how German history might help us understand Trump-like leadership, but not through looking at the Nazi period. Instead, David and Chris explore the character and leadership style of Kaiser Wilhelm II, a monarch with many Trumpian qualities. Was Wilhelm a populist or an elitist? Did he know what he was doing and what he was saying? Or was he out of his depth? Plus, how did his maverick and mercurial behaviour impact on those around him trying to run the country - and how did it help lead his country to ruin?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is the first of a two-part conversation with historian Chris Clark exploring how German history might help us understand Trump-like leadership, but not through looking at the Nazi period. Instead, David and Chris explore the character and leadership style of Kaiser Wilhelm II, a monarch with many Trumpian qualities. Was Wilhelm a populist or an elitist? Did he know what he was doing and what he was saying? Or was he out of his depth? Plus, how did his maverick and mercurial behaviour impact on those around him trying to run the country - and how did it help lead his country to ruin?

Next time on Trump-like leadership in German History: Chancellor, Tyrant, Emperor?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is the first of a two-part conversation with historian Chris Clark exploring how German history might help us understand Trump-like leadership, but not through looking at the Nazi period. Instead, David and Chris explore the character and leadership style of Kaiser Wilhelm II, a monarch with many Trumpian qualities. Was Wilhelm a populist or an elitist? Did he know what he was doing and what he was saying? Or was he out of his depth? Plus, how did his maverick and mercurial behaviour impact on those around him trying to run the country - and how did it help lead his country to ruin?</p>
<p>Next time on Trump-like leadership in German History: Chancellor, Tyrant, Emperor?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3113</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9d730a8e-c17a-11f0-b34b-0791dd36f33f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR7863870693.mp3?updated=1763139738" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: France on Trial Part 2 – Vichy vs the Jews</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is the second part of David’s conversation with historian Julian Jackson about the case of Marshal Pétain and the crimes of the Vichy regime. Did Pétain really play a ‘double game’ in which he tried to deceive the Nazis? How then to explain the vicious antisemitism of the Vichy regime? Why did the fate of France’s Jews not get more attention at Pétain’s trial? And how does the case of Pétain and the question of Vichy still resonate in French politics today? 

Julian Jackson’s France on Trial: The Case of Marshal Pétain is available wherever you get your books https://bit.ly/4oTHcRP

Next Time: Chris Clark on Trump-like leaders from German history (and it’s not the one you think!)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>237</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is the second part of David’s conversation with historian Julian Jackson about the case of Marshal Pétain and the crimes of the Vichy regime. Did Pétain really play a ‘double game’ in which he tried to deceive the Nazis? How then to explain the vicious antisemitism of the Vichy regime? Why did the fate of France’s Jews not get more attention at Pétain’s trial? And how does the case of Pétain and the question of Vichy still resonate in French politics today? </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is the second part of David’s conversation with historian Julian Jackson about the case of Marshal Pétain and the crimes of the Vichy regime. Did Pétain really play a ‘double game’ in which he tried to deceive the Nazis? How then to explain the vicious antisemitism of the Vichy regime? Why did the fate of France’s Jews not get more attention at Pétain’s trial? And how does the case of Pétain and the question of Vichy still resonate in French politics today? 

Julian Jackson’s France on Trial: The Case of Marshal Pétain is available wherever you get your books https://bit.ly/4oTHcRP

Next Time: Chris Clark on Trump-like leaders from German history (and it’s not the one you think!)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is the second part of David’s conversation with historian Julian Jackson about the case of Marshal Pétain and the crimes of the Vichy regime. Did Pétain really play a ‘double game’ in which he tried to deceive the Nazis? How then to explain the vicious antisemitism of the Vichy regime? Why did the fate of France’s Jews not get more attention at Pétain’s trial? And how does the case of Pétain and the question of Vichy still resonate in French politics today? </p>
<p>Julian Jackson’s <em>France on Trial: The Case of Marshal Pétain</em> is available wherever you get your books <a href="https://bit.ly/4oTHcRP">https://bit.ly/4oTHcRP</a></p>
<p>Next Time: Chris Clark on Trump-like leaders from German history (and it’s not the one you think!)</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3110</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[887b54c2-be6b-11f0-86ad-cff77606d274]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR2505741403.mp3?updated=1762803418" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: France on Trial – Pétain vs De Gaulle</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is the first of two on the extraordinary treason trial of Marshal Pétain in the summer of 1945 that ended up putting wartime France in the dock. David talks to historian of modern France Julian Jackson about how Pétain found himself so quickly charged with treason and who was judging him. What was the essence of Pétain’s crime? Conspiracy? Surrender? Collaboration? Complicity in genocide? And what on earth was his defence?

Julian Jackson’s France on Trial: The Case of Marshal Pétain is available wherever you get your books https://bit.ly/4oTHcRP

Available now on PPF+: our second episode on the Moscow Show Trials in which David and Edward Acton discuss the 1938 trial of Nikolai Bukharin, the most celebrated defendant of them all, whose case inspired some of the world’s great political literature.  To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: The Case of Marshal Pétain Part 2
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>236</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is the first of two on the extraordinary treason trial of Marshal Pétain in the summer of 1945 that ended up putting wartime France in the dock. David talks to historian of modern France Julian Jackson about how Pétain found himself so quickly charged with treason and who was judging him. What was the essence of Pétain’s crime? Conspiracy? Surrender? Collaboration? Complicity in genocide? And what on earth was his defence?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is the first of two on the extraordinary treason trial of Marshal Pétain in the summer of 1945 that ended up putting wartime France in the dock. David talks to historian of modern France Julian Jackson about how Pétain found himself so quickly charged with treason and who was judging him. What was the essence of Pétain’s crime? Conspiracy? Surrender? Collaboration? Complicity in genocide? And what on earth was his defence?

Julian Jackson’s France on Trial: The Case of Marshal Pétain is available wherever you get your books https://bit.ly/4oTHcRP

Available now on PPF+: our second episode on the Moscow Show Trials in which David and Edward Acton discuss the 1938 trial of Nikolai Bukharin, the most celebrated defendant of them all, whose case inspired some of the world’s great political literature.  To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: The Case of Marshal Pétain Part 2
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is the first of two on the extraordinary treason trial of Marshal Pétain in the summer of 1945 that ended up putting wartime France in the dock. David talks to historian of modern France Julian Jackson about how Pétain found himself so quickly charged with treason and who was judging him. What was the essence of Pétain’s crime? Conspiracy? Surrender? Collaboration? Complicity in genocide? And what on earth was his defence?</p>
<p>Julian Jackson’s <em>France on Trial: The Case of Marshal Pétain</em> is available wherever you get your books <a href="https://bit.ly/4oTHcRP">https://bit.ly/4oTHcRP</a></p>
<p>Available now on PPF+: our second episode on the Moscow Show Trials in which David and Edward Acton discuss the 1938 trial of Nikolai Bukharin, the most celebrated defendant of them all, whose case inspired some of the world’s great political literature.  To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: The Case of Marshal Pétain Part 2</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3934</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[595522f6-bcbb-11f0-8e02-9fc7f34800be]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR5858975877.mp3?updated=1762617843" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: The Moscow Show Trials</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is the first of two exploring the origins, conduct and legacy of the Moscow Show Trials that Stalin staged from 1936-38. David talks to historian of Russia Edward Acton about what motivated these grotesque spectacles, how the defendants were chosen, how their confessions were extracted, why the rhetoric was so violent and who was fooled by what they saw and heard. Plus: how did the trials of these few lead to the murders of so many?

Available tomorrow on PPF+: our second episode on the Moscow Show Trials in which David and Edward discuss the 1938 trial of Nikolai Bukharin, the most celebrated defendant of them all, whose case inspired some of the world’s great political literature.  To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: De Gaulle vs Pétain
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>235</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is the first of two exploring the origins, conduct and legacy of the Moscow Show Trials that Stalin staged from 1936-38. David talks to historian of Russia Edward Acton about what motivated these grotesque spectacles, how the defendants were chosen, how their confessions were extracted, why the rhetoric was so violent and who was fooled by what they saw and heard. Plus: how did the trials of these few lead to the murders of so many?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is the first of two exploring the origins, conduct and legacy of the Moscow Show Trials that Stalin staged from 1936-38. David talks to historian of Russia Edward Acton about what motivated these grotesque spectacles, how the defendants were chosen, how their confessions were extracted, why the rhetoric was so violent and who was fooled by what they saw and heard. Plus: how did the trials of these few lead to the murders of so many?

Available tomorrow on PPF+: our second episode on the Moscow Show Trials in which David and Edward discuss the 1938 trial of Nikolai Bukharin, the most celebrated defendant of them all, whose case inspired some of the world’s great political literature.  To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: De Gaulle vs Pétain
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is the first of two exploring the origins, conduct and legacy of the Moscow Show Trials that Stalin staged from 1936-38. David talks to historian of Russia Edward Acton about what motivated these grotesque spectacles, how the defendants were chosen, how their confessions were extracted, why the rhetoric was so violent and who was fooled by what they saw and heard. Plus: how did the trials of these few lead to the murders of so many?</p>
<p>Available tomorrow on PPF+: our second episode on the Moscow Show Trials in which David and Edward discuss the 1938 trial of Nikolai Bukharin, the most celebrated defendant of them all, whose case inspired some of the world’s great political literature.  To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: De Gaulle vs Pétain</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3301</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3874e3a6-b98b-11f0-b488-371b77cd1951]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR6075337301.mp3?updated=1762267267" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Politics on Trial: Darwin vs God / Darrow vs Bryan – the Scopes ‘Monkey’ Trial</title>
      <description>We return to our series about the most significant trials in history with the trial of the twentieth century: Scopes ‘Monkey’ (1925), which was meant to be about a Tennessee schoolteacher but became a battle between science and religion and everything in between. What made it such a blockbuster showdown? Who really won and who really lost? And how are arguments from one hundred years ago still roiling American politics today? 

To get our free fortnightly newsletter delivered to your inbox with guides, clips and much more to accompany all our episodes sign up now https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters

Next time in Politics on Trial: the Moscow Show Trials
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>234</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>We return to our series about the most significant trials in history with the trial of the twentieth century: Scopes ‘Monkey’ (1925), which was meant to be about a Tennessee schoolteacher but became a battle between science and religion and everything in between. What made it such a blockbuster showdown? Who really won and who really lost? And how are arguments from one hundred years ago still roiling American politics today? </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>We return to our series about the most significant trials in history with the trial of the twentieth century: Scopes ‘Monkey’ (1925), which was meant to be about a Tennessee schoolteacher but became a battle between science and religion and everything in between. What made it such a blockbuster showdown? Who really won and who really lost? And how are arguments from one hundred years ago still roiling American politics today? 

To get our free fortnightly newsletter delivered to your inbox with guides, clips and much more to accompany all our episodes sign up now https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters

Next time in Politics on Trial: the Moscow Show Trials
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We return to our series about the most significant trials in history with <em>the</em> trial of the twentieth century: Scopes ‘Monkey’ (1925), which was meant to be about a Tennessee schoolteacher but became a battle between science and religion and everything in between. What made it such a blockbuster showdown? Who really won and who really lost? And how are arguments from one hundred years ago still roiling American politics today? </p>
<p>To get our free fortnightly newsletter delivered to your inbox with guides, clips and much more to accompany all our episodes sign up now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: the Moscow Show Trials</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3625</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[095bd8c4-b4bb-11f0-9a89-0f554d7fdaf3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR6795284112.mp3?updated=1761738054" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Live Special: Who Rules the World? Trump, Tech and the Fight for the Future</title>
      <description>Today’s episode was recorded in front of a live audience at the Cheltenham Literature Festival: David talks to Bruno Maçães and Sarah Wynn-Williams about who is winning in the fight for control between China and America, between state power and corporate power and between AI and humanity. Where are the battlegrounds in the fight for the future? What are the weapons? And how will we know what victory looks like?

Out now on PPF+: A bonus episode with more of your questions and suggestions for how to fix democracy and more answers from the two Davids. Should MPs be chosen by lottery? What has happened to the centre-right? Which needs fixing first: democracy or capitalism? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

The 4th film in our autumn Films of Ideas season at the Regent Street Cinema in London is coming up on Weds 5th November: a screening of Derek Jarman’s Wittgenstein followed by a live recording of PPF with writer and philosopher Nikhil Krishnan. Get your tickets now https://bit.ly/47bsJcN
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>233</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode was recorded in front of a live audience at the Cheltenham Literature Festival: David talks to Bruno Maçães and Sarah Wynn-Williams about who is winning in the fight for control between China and America, between state power and corporate power and between AI and humanity. Where are the battlegrounds in the fight for the future? What are the weapons? And how will we know what victory looks like?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode was recorded in front of a live audience at the Cheltenham Literature Festival: David talks to Bruno Maçães and Sarah Wynn-Williams about who is winning in the fight for control between China and America, between state power and corporate power and between AI and humanity. Where are the battlegrounds in the fight for the future? What are the weapons? And how will we know what victory looks like?

Out now on PPF+: A bonus episode with more of your questions and suggestions for how to fix democracy and more answers from the two Davids. Should MPs be chosen by lottery? What has happened to the centre-right? Which needs fixing first: democracy or capitalism? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

The 4th film in our autumn Films of Ideas season at the Regent Street Cinema in London is coming up on Weds 5th November: a screening of Derek Jarman’s Wittgenstein followed by a live recording of PPF with writer and philosopher Nikhil Krishnan. Get your tickets now https://bit.ly/47bsJcN
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode was recorded in front of a live audience at the Cheltenham Literature Festival: David talks to Bruno Maçães and Sarah Wynn-Williams about who is winning in the fight for control between China and America, between state power and corporate power and between AI and humanity. Where are the battlegrounds in the fight for the future? What are the weapons? And how will we know what victory looks like?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: A bonus episode with more of your questions and suggestions for how to fix democracy and more answers from the two Davids. Should MPs be chosen by lottery? What has happened to the centre-right? Which needs fixing first: democracy or capitalism? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>The 4th film in our autumn Films of Ideas season at the Regent Street Cinema in London is coming up on Weds 5th November: a screening of Derek Jarman’s <em>Wittgenstein</em> followed by a live recording of PPF with writer and philosopher Nikhil Krishnan. Get your tickets now <a href="https://bit.ly/47bsJcN">https://bit.ly/47bsJcN</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3435</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8860031e-b404-11f0-bb8a-9b272d852516]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR5454747930.mp3?updated=1761659700" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fixing Democracy Q&amp;A w/David Klemperer: Oligarchy, Ageing Populations and How to Make Things Worse</title>
      <description>In today’s episode the two Davids try to answer some of the hundreds of questions, comments and suggestions we have had in response to this series, ranging from the very broad to the very specific. How do we know if democracy is broken? Have we ever had a real democracy anyway? Should old people be banned from voting? Or should we simply ban the internet instead? Plus much, much more.

Out tomorrow on PPF+: A bonus episode with more questions on how to fix democracy and more answers from the two Davids. Should MPs be chosen by lottery? What has happened to the centre-right? Which needs fixing first: democracy or capitalism? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time: PPF Live Special recorded at the Cheltenham Literature Festival – Who Rules the World? w/ Sarah Wynn-Williams and Bruno Maçães
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>15</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>232</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode the two Davids try to answer some of the hundreds of questions, comments and suggestions we have had in response to this series, ranging from the very broad to the very specific. How do we know if democracy is broken? Have we ever had a real democracy anyway? Should old people be banned from voting? Or should we simply ban the internet instead? Plus much, much more.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode the two Davids try to answer some of the hundreds of questions, comments and suggestions we have had in response to this series, ranging from the very broad to the very specific. How do we know if democracy is broken? Have we ever had a real democracy anyway? Should old people be banned from voting? Or should we simply ban the internet instead? Plus much, much more.

Out tomorrow on PPF+: A bonus episode with more questions on how to fix democracy and more answers from the two Davids. Should MPs be chosen by lottery? What has happened to the centre-right? Which needs fixing first: democracy or capitalism? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time: PPF Live Special recorded at the Cheltenham Literature Festival – Who Rules the World? w/ Sarah Wynn-Williams and Bruno Maçães
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode the two Davids try to answer some of the hundreds of questions, comments and suggestions we have had in response to this series, ranging from the very broad to the very specific. How do we know if democracy is broken? Have we ever had a real democracy anyway? Should old people be banned from voting? Or should we simply ban the internet instead? Plus much, much more.</p>
<p>Out tomorrow on PPF+: A bonus episode with more questions on how to fix democracy and more answers from the two Davids. Should MPs be chosen by lottery? What has happened to the centre-right? Which needs fixing first: democracy or capitalism? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time: PPF Live Special recorded at the Cheltenham Literature Festival – Who Rules the World? w/ Sarah Wynn-Williams and Bruno Maçães</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3854</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[11a120a8-af74-11f0-b4d8-6f11ad46bc02]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR8258492915.mp3?updated=1761157850" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fixing Democracy: Confronting the Strongmen</title>
      <description>For the final episode in this series David talks to historian Ayse Zarakol about the prospects for democracy in the age of strongman politics, from Trump to Erdogan, from Orban to Modi. Where did the strongmen come from? How unusual is this kind of politics in the broad sweep of history? Does democracy have the wherewithal to resist its pull? And if not, what happens next?

The 4th film in our autumn season at the Regent Street Cinema in London is coming up on Wednesday 5th November: a screening of Derek Jarman’s Wittgenstein followed by a live recording of PPF with writer and philosopher Nikhil Krishnan. Get your tickets now https://bit.ly/47bsJcN

Up next: Fixing Democracy Q &amp; A w/David Klemperer
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>15</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>231</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For the final episode in this series David talks to historian Ayse Zarakol about the prospects for democracy in the age of strongman politics, from Trump to Erdogan, from Orban to Modi. Where did the strongmen come from? How unusual is this kind of politics in the broad sweep of history? Does democracy have the wherewithal to resist its pull? And if not, what happens next?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the final episode in this series David talks to historian Ayse Zarakol about the prospects for democracy in the age of strongman politics, from Trump to Erdogan, from Orban to Modi. Where did the strongmen come from? How unusual is this kind of politics in the broad sweep of history? Does democracy have the wherewithal to resist its pull? And if not, what happens next?

The 4th film in our autumn season at the Regent Street Cinema in London is coming up on Wednesday 5th November: a screening of Derek Jarman’s Wittgenstein followed by a live recording of PPF with writer and philosopher Nikhil Krishnan. Get your tickets now https://bit.ly/47bsJcN

Up next: Fixing Democracy Q &amp; A w/David Klemperer
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the final episode in this series David talks to historian Ayse Zarakol about the prospects for democracy in the age of strongman politics, from Trump to Erdogan, from Orban to Modi. Where did the strongmen come from? How unusual is this kind of politics in the broad sweep of history? Does democracy have the wherewithal to resist its pull? And if not, what happens next?</p>
<p>The 4th film in our autumn season at the Regent Street Cinema in London is coming up on Wednesday 5th November: a screening of Derek Jarman’s <em>Wittgenstein</em> followed by a live recording of PPF with writer and philosopher Nikhil Krishnan. Get your tickets now <a href="https://bit.ly/47bsJcN">https://bit.ly/47bsJcN</a></p>
<p>Up next: Fixing Democracy Q &amp; A w/David Klemperer</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4302</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[bbe6445c-ad13-11f0-9a8e-23d6ef98eac3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR7295805224.mp3?updated=1760896588" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fixing Democracy: TikTok, Disinformation and Distraction</title>
      <description>In our penultimate episode in this series David talks to writer Sam Freedman about whether democracy can cope with the demands of the social media age. Are we really more vulnerable to disinformation than we have ever been? Is the bigger problem our ever-shrinking attention spans or our ever-divided politics? What happens to democracy as visual communication squeezes out the written word? And what might make things better?

Sam Freedman’s Substack is Comment is Freed https://samf.substack.com/

Next time on Fixing Democracy: Confronting the Strongmen
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>15</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>230</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In our penultimate episode in this series David talks to writer Sam Freedman about whether democracy can cope with the demands of the social media age. Are we really more vulnerable to disinformation than we have ever been? Is the bigger problem our ever-shrinking attention spans or our ever-divided politics? What happens to democracy as visual communication squeezes out the written word? And what might make things better?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In our penultimate episode in this series David talks to writer Sam Freedman about whether democracy can cope with the demands of the social media age. Are we really more vulnerable to disinformation than we have ever been? Is the bigger problem our ever-shrinking attention spans or our ever-divided politics? What happens to democracy as visual communication squeezes out the written word? And what might make things better?

Sam Freedman’s Substack is Comment is Freed https://samf.substack.com/

Next time on Fixing Democracy: Confronting the Strongmen
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In our penultimate episode in this series David talks to writer Sam Freedman about whether democracy can cope with the demands of the social media age. Are we really more vulnerable to disinformation than we have ever been? Is the bigger problem our ever-shrinking attention spans or our ever-divided politics? What happens to democracy as visual communication squeezes out the written word? And what might make things better?</p>
<p>Sam Freedman’s Substack is Comment is Freed <a href="https://samf.substack.com/">https://samf.substack.com/</a></p>
<p>Next time on Fixing Democracy: Confronting the Strongmen</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3655</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[79b907e8-ab62-11f0-8e7a-a78d05350230]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR6481750538.mp3?updated=1760710471" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Live Special: Prime Minister Farage?  </title>
      <description>In this special live episode recorded in front of pupils from Hill House and Hayfield schools in Doncaster, David talks to political scientist Rob Ford about whether Nigel Farage is really going to be the UK’s next PM. Is there anything comparable to the prospect of a Farage premiership in British political history? What are the electoral routes that might lead Farage to No 10? What are the events or scandals that might derail him? Plus we hear from the pupils as well – what do they think of Reform and its leader?

Next time on Fixing Democracy: What is TikTok doing to Politics?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>229</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this special live episode recorded in front of pupils from Hill House and Hayfield schools in Doncaster, David talks to political scientist Rob Ford about whether Nigel Farage is really going to be the UK’s next PM. Is there anything comparable to the prospect of a Farage premiership in British political history? What are the electoral routes that might lead Farage to No 10? What are the events or scandals that might derail him? Plus we hear from the pupils as well – what do they think of Reform and its leader?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this special live episode recorded in front of pupils from Hill House and Hayfield schools in Doncaster, David talks to political scientist Rob Ford about whether Nigel Farage is really going to be the UK’s next PM. Is there anything comparable to the prospect of a Farage premiership in British political history? What are the electoral routes that might lead Farage to No 10? What are the events or scandals that might derail him? Plus we hear from the pupils as well – what do they think of Reform and its leader?

Next time on Fixing Democracy: What is TikTok doing to Politics?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this special live episode recorded in front of pupils from Hill House and Hayfield schools in Doncaster, David talks to political scientist Rob Ford about whether Nigel Farage is really going to be the UK’s next PM. Is there anything comparable to the prospect of a Farage premiership in British political history? What are the electoral routes that might lead Farage to No 10? What are the events or scandals that might derail him? Plus we hear from the pupils as well – what do they think of Reform and its leader?</p>
<p>Next time on Fixing Democracy: What is TikTok doing to Politics?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3719</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[27eab45e-a84f-11f0-af67-b314f3297550]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR1248781381.mp3?updated=1760372320" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fixing Democracy: Better Rhetoric</title>
      <description>David talks to political theorist Alan Finlayson about what’s gone wrong with political speech and how it can be improved. Why do so many contemporary political arguments feel so sterile? What can we learn from the ancient art of rhetoric about how to do democratic politics better? Does the problem lie with the politicians or with the tools of communication at their disposal? And is good political speech something that all citizens should aspire to?

Out now on PPF+: A bonus episode on Fixing Democracy with Nic Cheeseman exploring whether there should be quotas for female representation in democratic politics. It’s much more common than you might think. Why? Why only women? Who else deserves seeing more people like them in parliament? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Fixing Democracy Q&amp;A coming up! Do send in your questions and suggestions on Fixing Democracy now: ⁠⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/contact⁠⁠

Next time: PPF Live Special: Prime Minister Farage? 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>15</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>228</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>David talks to political theorist Alan Finlayson about what’s gone wrong with political speech and how it can be improved. Why do so many contemporary political arguments feel so sterile? What can we learn from the ancient art of rhetoric about how to do democratic politics better? Does the problem lie with the politicians or with the tools of communication at their disposal? And is good political speech something that all citizens should aspire to?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>David talks to political theorist Alan Finlayson about what’s gone wrong with political speech and how it can be improved. Why do so many contemporary political arguments feel so sterile? What can we learn from the ancient art of rhetoric about how to do democratic politics better? Does the problem lie with the politicians or with the tools of communication at their disposal? And is good political speech something that all citizens should aspire to?

Out now on PPF+: A bonus episode on Fixing Democracy with Nic Cheeseman exploring whether there should be quotas for female representation in democratic politics. It’s much more common than you might think. Why? Why only women? Who else deserves seeing more people like them in parliament? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Fixing Democracy Q&amp;A coming up! Do send in your questions and suggestions on Fixing Democracy now: ⁠⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/contact⁠⁠

Next time: PPF Live Special: Prime Minister Farage? 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>David talks to political theorist Alan Finlayson about what’s gone wrong with political speech and how it can be improved. Why do so many contemporary political arguments feel so sterile? What can we learn from the ancient art of rhetoric about how to do democratic politics better? Does the problem lie with the politicians or with the tools of communication at their disposal? And is good political speech something that all citizens should aspire to?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: A bonus episode on Fixing Democracy with Nic Cheeseman exploring whether there should be quotas for female representation in democratic politics. It’s much more common than you might think. Why? Why only women? Who else deserves seeing more people like them in parliament? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Fixing Democracy Q&amp;A coming up! Do send in your questions and suggestions on Fixing Democracy now: <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/contact">⁠⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/contact⁠⁠</a></p>
<p>Next time: PPF Live Special: Prime Minister Farage? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4032</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[01ed4806-a134-11f0-a919-1370afe5cf51]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR3870214719.mp3?updated=1760122463" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fixing Democracy: Compulsory Voting</title>
      <description>In today’s episode David talks to political historian David Klemperer about whether voting should be required by law and what might change if non-participation was no longer an option. Why have some countries made voting compulsory? What difference has it made? Can the people who think democracy has got nothing to offer them be made to think otherwise? Can the politicians who normally ignore the wishes of those people be forced to pay more attention?

Available on Saturday on PPF+: A bonus episode on Fixing Democracy with Nic Cheeseman exploring whether there should be quotas for female representation in democratic politics. It’s much more common than you might think. Why? Why only women? Who else deserves to see more people like them in parliament? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today ⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus⁠

And send in your questions and suggestions on Fixing Democracy for David and David now: ⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/contact⁠ 

Tickets are available now for our live PPF recording at the Cheltenham Literature Festival on 15th October with Bruno Maçães and very special guest Sarah Wynn-Williams - 'Who Rules The World? Trump, Tech and the Fight for the Future'. Tickets are available now: https://www.cheltenhamfestivals.org/events/who-rules-the-world-trump-tech-and-the-fight-for-the-future

Next Up in Fixing Democracy: Better Rhetoric
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>15</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>227</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode David talks to political historian David Klemperer about whether voting should be required by law and what might change if non-participation was no longer an option. Why have some countries made voting compulsory? What difference has it made? Can the people who think democracy has got nothing to offer them be made to think otherwise? Can the politicians who normally ignore the wishes of those people be forced to pay more attention?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode David talks to political historian David Klemperer about whether voting should be required by law and what might change if non-participation was no longer an option. Why have some countries made voting compulsory? What difference has it made? Can the people who think democracy has got nothing to offer them be made to think otherwise? Can the politicians who normally ignore the wishes of those people be forced to pay more attention?

Available on Saturday on PPF+: A bonus episode on Fixing Democracy with Nic Cheeseman exploring whether there should be quotas for female representation in democratic politics. It’s much more common than you might think. Why? Why only women? Who else deserves to see more people like them in parliament? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today ⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus⁠

And send in your questions and suggestions on Fixing Democracy for David and David now: ⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/contact⁠ 

Tickets are available now for our live PPF recording at the Cheltenham Literature Festival on 15th October with Bruno Maçães and very special guest Sarah Wynn-Williams - 'Who Rules The World? Trump, Tech and the Fight for the Future'. Tickets are available now: https://www.cheltenhamfestivals.org/events/who-rules-the-world-trump-tech-and-the-fight-for-the-future

Next Up in Fixing Democracy: Better Rhetoric
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode David talks to political historian David Klemperer about whether voting should be required by law and what might change if non-participation was no longer an option. Why have some countries made voting compulsory? What difference has it made? Can the people who think democracy has got nothing to offer them be made to think otherwise? Can the politicians who normally ignore the wishes of those people be forced to pay more attention?</p>
<p>Available on Saturday on PPF+: A bonus episode on Fixing Democracy with Nic Cheeseman exploring whether there should be quotas for female representation in democratic politics. It’s much more common than you might think. Why? Why only women? Who else deserves to see more people like them in parliament? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus⁠</a></p>
<p>And send in your questions and suggestions on Fixing Democracy for David and David now: <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/contact">⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/contact⁠</a> </p>
<p>Tickets are available now for our live PPF recording at the Cheltenham Literature Festival on 15th October with Bruno Maçães and very special guest Sarah Wynn-Williams - 'Who Rules The World? Trump, Tech and the Fight for the Future'. Tickets are available now: <a href="https://www.cheltenhamfestivals.org/events/who-rules-the-world-trump-tech-and-the-fight-for-the-future">https://www.cheltenhamfestivals.org/events/who-rules-the-world-trump-tech-and-the-fight-for-the-future</a></p>
<p>Next Up in Fixing Democracy: Better Rhetoric</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3473</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ca00f26c-a07a-11f0-a160-ab86c51a7b9f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR9571828215.mp3?updated=1759511415" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fixing Democracy: What’s Wrong with Referendums?</title>
      <description>In today’s episode David talks to Alan Renwick from UCL’s Constitution Unit about the pros and cons of referendums. When does a democratic question need to be put direct to the people? Do some countries do it better than others? How can referendums be used to open up political debate? And how can we avoid a rerun of the pitfalls of the Brexit referendum?

There are just a few tickets left for the 3rd film in our autumn film season at the Regent Street cinema on Thursday 9th October: a screening of Rosa Luxemburg, followed by a live recording of PPF with philosopher and writer Lea Ypi. We’d love to see you there https://bit.ly/4nDuKoY

Next Up in Fixing Democracy: Compulsory Voting
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>15</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>226</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode David talks to Alan Renwick from UCL’s Constitution Unit about the pros and cons of referendums. When does a democratic question need to be put direct to the people? Do some countries do it better than others? How can referendums be used to open up political debate? And how can we avoid a rerun of the pitfalls of the Brexit referendum?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode David talks to Alan Renwick from UCL’s Constitution Unit about the pros and cons of referendums. When does a democratic question need to be put direct to the people? Do some countries do it better than others? How can referendums be used to open up political debate? And how can we avoid a rerun of the pitfalls of the Brexit referendum?

There are just a few tickets left for the 3rd film in our autumn film season at the Regent Street cinema on Thursday 9th October: a screening of Rosa Luxemburg, followed by a live recording of PPF with philosopher and writer Lea Ypi. We’d love to see you there https://bit.ly/4nDuKoY

Next Up in Fixing Democracy: Compulsory Voting
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode David talks to Alan Renwick from UCL’s Constitution Unit about the pros and cons of referendums. When does a democratic question need to be put direct to the people? Do some countries do it better than others? How can referendums be used to open up political debate? And how can we avoid a rerun of the pitfalls of the Brexit referendum?</p>
<p>There are just a few tickets left for the 3rd film in our autumn film season at the Regent Street cinema on Thursday 9th October: a screening of <em>Rosa Luxemburg</em>, followed by a live recording of PPF with philosopher and writer Lea Ypi. We’d love to see you there <a href="https://bit.ly/4nDuKoY">https://bit.ly/4nDuKoY</a></p>
<p>Next Up in Fixing Democracy: Compulsory Voting</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3650</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[aa828038-9ddf-11f0-a2d9-1b749f0de23b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR5775868349.mp3?updated=1759224922" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders: From Kinnock to Corbyn to Starmer</title>
      <description>The second part of David’s conversation with Robert Saunders marking the 40th anniversary of Neil Kinnock’s party conference speech attacking the Militant tendency takes the story up to the present and beyond. Was Jeremy Corbyn’s victory in the Labour leadership contest of 2015 the revenge of the ‘Loony Left’? What’s the difference between Momentum and Militant? Which parts of the Labour Party pose the biggest threat to Keir Starmer today? And what lessons might events in Liverpool forty years ago have to teach the Democratic Party in 2025?

Next time in Fixing Democracy: What’s Wrong with Referendums?

Find out everything you need to know about PPF on our website https://www.ppfideas.com/ 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>14</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>225</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>The second part of David’s conversation with Robert Saunders marking the 40th anniversary of Neil Kinnock’s party conference speech attacking the Militant tendency takes the story up to the present and beyond. Was Jeremy Corbyn’s victory in the Labour leadership contest of 2015 the revenge of the ‘Loony Left’? What’s the difference between Momentum and Militant? Which parts of the Labour Party pose the biggest threat to Keir Starmer today? And what lessons might events in Liverpool forty years ago have to teach the Democratic Party in 2025?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The second part of David’s conversation with Robert Saunders marking the 40th anniversary of Neil Kinnock’s party conference speech attacking the Militant tendency takes the story up to the present and beyond. Was Jeremy Corbyn’s victory in the Labour leadership contest of 2015 the revenge of the ‘Loony Left’? What’s the difference between Momentum and Militant? Which parts of the Labour Party pose the biggest threat to Keir Starmer today? And what lessons might events in Liverpool forty years ago have to teach the Democratic Party in 2025?

Next time in Fixing Democracy: What’s Wrong with Referendums?

Find out everything you need to know about PPF on our website https://www.ppfideas.com/ 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The second part of David’s conversation with Robert Saunders marking the 40th anniversary of Neil Kinnock’s party conference speech attacking the Militant tendency takes the story up to the present and beyond. Was Jeremy Corbyn’s victory in the Labour leadership contest of 2015 the revenge of the ‘Loony Left’? What’s the difference between Momentum and Militant? Which parts of the Labour Party pose the biggest threat to Keir Starmer today? And what lessons might events in Liverpool forty years ago have to teach the Democratic Party in 2025?</p>
<p>Next time in Fixing Democracy: What’s Wrong with Referendums?</p>
<p>Find out everything you need to know about PPF on our website https://www.ppfideas.com/ </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3707</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5fe8dcec-9d27-11f0-a166-7f9974312696]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR7404362464.mp3?updated=1759145805" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders: Neil Kinnock vs Militant</title>
      <description>Today’s episode in our occasional series with Robert Saunders to mark momentous events in British political history explores the lasting consequences of a speech delivered 40 years ago this week. Labour leader Neil Kinnock’s attack on Militant at his party’s annual conference in 1985 brought a long-running conflict out into the open. Who were Militant? Why did the speech have such an explosive impact? What did it mean for the past, present and future of the Labour Party?

Next time: From Kinnock to Corbyn to Starmer
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>14</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>224</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode in our occasional series with Robert Saunders to mark momentous events in British political history explores the lasting consequences of a speech delivered 40 years ago this week. Labour leader Neil Kinnock’s attack on Militant at his party’s annual conference in 1985 brought a long-running conflict out into the open. Who were Militant? Why did the speech have such an explosive impact? What did it mean for the past, present and future of the Labour Party?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode in our occasional series with Robert Saunders to mark momentous events in British political history explores the lasting consequences of a speech delivered 40 years ago this week. Labour leader Neil Kinnock’s attack on Militant at his party’s annual conference in 1985 brought a long-running conflict out into the open. Who were Militant? Why did the speech have such an explosive impact? What did it mean for the past, present and future of the Labour Party?

Next time: From Kinnock to Corbyn to Starmer
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode in our occasional series with Robert Saunders to mark momentous events in British political history explores the lasting consequences of a speech delivered 40 years ago this week. Labour leader Neil Kinnock’s attack on Militant at his party’s annual conference in 1985 brought a long-running conflict out into the open. Who were Militant? Why did the speech have such an explosive impact? What did it mean for the past, present and future of the Labour Party?</p>
<p>Next time: From Kinnock to Corbyn to Starmer</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3756</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e6f4d13e-9aff-11f0-9c9d-1fb335a97fdd]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR4091419747.mp3?updated=1758908953" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fixing Democracy: How to Stop Election Rigging</title>
      <description>In today’s episode on how to fix democracy David talks to political scientist Nic Cheeseman about how to stop governments rigging elections around the world, from Africa to the United States. How widespread is the problem? Has digital technology made it worse? What makes an election free and fair? And what are the chances that the next US presidential election will be a free and fair one?

Tickets are available for the 3rd film in our PPF Films of Ideas season at the Regent Street Cinema in London on Thursday 9th October: join us for a screening of the biopic Rosa Luxemburg followed by a live recording of the podcast with Lea Ypi https://bit.ly/4mNzNCT

Next Time: Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders on Neil Kinnock, Labour and Militant
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>15</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>223</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode on how to fix democracy David talks to political scientist Nic Cheeseman about how to stop governments rigging elections around the world, from Africa to the United States. How widespread is the problem? Has digital technology made it worse? What makes an election free and fair? And what are the chances that the next US presidential election will be a free and fair one?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode on how to fix democracy David talks to political scientist Nic Cheeseman about how to stop governments rigging elections around the world, from Africa to the United States. How widespread is the problem? Has digital technology made it worse? What makes an election free and fair? And what are the chances that the next US presidential election will be a free and fair one?

Tickets are available for the 3rd film in our PPF Films of Ideas season at the Regent Street Cinema in London on Thursday 9th October: join us for a screening of the biopic Rosa Luxemburg followed by a live recording of the podcast with Lea Ypi https://bit.ly/4mNzNCT

Next Time: Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders on Neil Kinnock, Labour and Militant
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode on how to fix democracy David talks to political scientist Nic Cheeseman about how to stop governments rigging elections around the world, from Africa to the United States. How widespread is the problem? Has digital technology made it worse? What makes an election free and fair? And what are the chances that the next US presidential election will be a free and fair one?</p>
<p>Tickets are available for the 3rd film in our PPF Films of Ideas season at the Regent Street Cinema in London on Thursday 9th October: join us for a screening of the biopic <em>Rosa Luxemburg</em> followed by a live recording of the podcast with Lea Ypi <a href="https://bit.ly/4mNzNCT">https://bit.ly/4mNzNCT</a></p>
<p>Next Time: Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders on Neil Kinnock, Labour and Militant</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3819</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8fda95ea-8c05-11f0-b573-1304f2825424]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR3065861590.mp3?updated=1757262079" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fixing Democracy: Citizens’ Assemblies</title>
      <description>David talks to Claudia Chwalisz, founder and CEO of Democracy Next, about how citizens’ assemblies could help fix what’s wrong with democracy. Where does the idea of a jury of citizens chosen at random to answer political questions come from? What are the kinds of contemporary questions it could help to settle? How does it work? And what would encourage politicians to listen to citizens’ assemblies rather than to their electorates?

Out now on PPF+: The second half of David’s conversation with Hannah White in which they discuss how we could get better decision-making at the heart of government. Why do politicians find it so hard to address the biggest challenges that they face? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

The 2nd film in our autumn Films of Ideas season at the Regent Street cinema is coming up on Thursday 25th September: a screening of My Dinner with Andre, followed by a live recording of PPF with playwright and screenwriter Lee Hall, creator of Billy Elliot. Tickets are available now https://bit.ly/4fWDa7V

Tickets are also now available for a special recording of PPF Live at the Cheltenham Literature Festival on Wednesday 15th October: Who Rules The World? Trump, Tech and the Fight for the Future. David will be talking to writer, philosopher and ex-politician Bruno Maçães – plus a special guest to be announced – about where the power really lies. Get your tickets now https://bit.ly/4m2pZno

Next Up in Fixing Democracy: How To Stop Election Rigging
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>15</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>222</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>David talks to Claudia Chwalisz, founder and CEO of Democracy Next, about how citizens’ assemblies could help fix what’s wrong with democracy. Where does the idea of a jury of citizens chosen at random to answer political questions come from? What are the kinds of contemporary questions it could help to settle? How does it work? And what would encourage politicians to listen to citizens’ assemblies rather than to their electorates?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>David talks to Claudia Chwalisz, founder and CEO of Democracy Next, about how citizens’ assemblies could help fix what’s wrong with democracy. Where does the idea of a jury of citizens chosen at random to answer political questions come from? What are the kinds of contemporary questions it could help to settle? How does it work? And what would encourage politicians to listen to citizens’ assemblies rather than to their electorates?

Out now on PPF+: The second half of David’s conversation with Hannah White in which they discuss how we could get better decision-making at the heart of government. Why do politicians find it so hard to address the biggest challenges that they face? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

The 2nd film in our autumn Films of Ideas season at the Regent Street cinema is coming up on Thursday 25th September: a screening of My Dinner with Andre, followed by a live recording of PPF with playwright and screenwriter Lee Hall, creator of Billy Elliot. Tickets are available now https://bit.ly/4fWDa7V

Tickets are also now available for a special recording of PPF Live at the Cheltenham Literature Festival on Wednesday 15th October: Who Rules The World? Trump, Tech and the Fight for the Future. David will be talking to writer, philosopher and ex-politician Bruno Maçães – plus a special guest to be announced – about where the power really lies. Get your tickets now https://bit.ly/4m2pZno

Next Up in Fixing Democracy: How To Stop Election Rigging
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>David talks to Claudia Chwalisz, founder and CEO of Democracy Next, about how citizens’ assemblies could help fix what’s wrong with democracy. Where does the idea of a jury of citizens chosen at random to answer political questions come from? What are the kinds of contemporary questions it could help to settle? How does it work? And what would encourage politicians to listen to citizens’ assemblies rather than to their electorates?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: The second half of David’s conversation with Hannah White in which they discuss how we could get better decision-making at the heart of government. Why do politicians find it so hard to address the biggest challenges that they face? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ today <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>The 2nd film in our autumn Films of Ideas season at the Regent Street cinema is coming up on Thursday 25th September: a screening of <em>My Dinner with Andre</em>, followed by a live recording of PPF with playwright and screenwriter Lee Hall, creator of <em>Billy Elliot</em>. Tickets are available now <a href="https://bit.ly/4fWDa7V">https://bit.ly/4fWDa7V</a></p>
<p>Tickets are also now available for a special recording of PPF Live at the Cheltenham Literature Festival on Wednesday 15th October: <em>Who Rules The World? Trump, Tech and the Fight for the Future</em>. David will be talking to writer, philosopher and ex-politician Bruno Maçães – plus a special guest to be announced – about where the power really lies. Get your tickets now <a href="https://bit.ly/4m2pZno">https://bit.ly/4m2pZno</a></p>
<p>Next Up in Fixing Democracy: How To Stop Election Rigging</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3951</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3f2a7f5a-8bdf-11f0-afbc-7ba85c3802dc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR2031805840.mp3?updated=1757245634" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fixing Democracy: Parliamentary Reform</title>
      <description>In today’s episode David talks to Hannah White, Director of the Institute for Government, about legislatures in general and the British parliament in particular. Are law-making bodies really being sidelined by strongarm executives? What would enable parliaments to work better? How can they better fulfil their role of scrutinising what government does? And why oh why oh why has it taken forever to reform the House of Lords?

Available from Saturday on PPF+: The second half of David’s conversation with Hannah White in which they discuss how we could get better decision-making at the heart of government. Why do politicians find it so hard to address the biggest challenges that they face? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

The 2nd film in our autumn film season at the Regent Street cinema is coming up on Thursday 25thSeptember: a screening of My Dinner with Andre, followed by a live recording of PPF with playwright and screenwriter Lee Hall, creator of Billy Elliot. Tickets are available now https://bit.ly/4fWDa7V

Next Up in Fixing Democracy: Citizens’ Assemblies
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>15</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>221</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode David talks to Hannah White, Director of the Institute for Government, about legislatures in general and the British parliament in particular. Are law-making bodies really being sidelined by strongarm executives? What would enable parliaments to work better? How can they better fulfil their role of scrutinising what government does? And why oh why oh why has it taken forever to reform the House of Lords?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode David talks to Hannah White, Director of the Institute for Government, about legislatures in general and the British parliament in particular. Are law-making bodies really being sidelined by strongarm executives? What would enable parliaments to work better? How can they better fulfil their role of scrutinising what government does? And why oh why oh why has it taken forever to reform the House of Lords?

Available from Saturday on PPF+: The second half of David’s conversation with Hannah White in which they discuss how we could get better decision-making at the heart of government. Why do politicians find it so hard to address the biggest challenges that they face? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

The 2nd film in our autumn film season at the Regent Street cinema is coming up on Thursday 25thSeptember: a screening of My Dinner with Andre, followed by a live recording of PPF with playwright and screenwriter Lee Hall, creator of Billy Elliot. Tickets are available now https://bit.ly/4fWDa7V

Next Up in Fixing Democracy: Citizens’ Assemblies
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode David talks to Hannah White, Director of the Institute for Government, about legislatures in general and the British parliament in particular. Are law-making bodies really being sidelined by strongarm executives? What would enable parliaments to work better? How can they better fulfil their role of scrutinising what government does? And why oh why oh why has it taken forever to reform the House of Lords?</p>
<p>Available from Saturday on PPF+: The second half of David’s conversation with Hannah White in which they discuss how we could get better decision-making at the heart of government. Why do politicians find it so hard to address the biggest challenges that they face? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>The 2nd film in our autumn film season at the Regent Street cinema is coming up on Thursday 25thSeptember: a screening of <em>My Dinner with Andre</em>, followed by a live recording of PPF with playwright and screenwriter Lee Hall, creator of <em>Billy Elliot</em>. Tickets are available now <a href="https://bit.ly/4fWDa7V">https://bit.ly/4fWDa7V</a></p>
<p>Next Up in Fixing Democracy: Citizens’ Assemblies</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3563</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5a7f7096-8b51-11f0-b484-2bc111fa7e4e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR4987261514.mp3?updated=1757184686" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fixing Democracy: Electoral Reform</title>
      <description>For the first episode in a new series about the ideas that could help democracy work better David talks to David Klemperer of the Constitution Society about proportional representation. How did nineteenth-century advocates of PR think it could improve democratic representation? Why did PR get adopted in some places but not in others during the twentieth century? What are the advantages of proportional systems? And when will we get serious electoral reform in the UK?

The 2nd film in our autumn season of Films of Ideas at the Regent Street cinema is coming up on Thursday 25th September: a screening of My Dinner with Andre, followed by a live recording of PPF with playwright and screenwriter Lee Hall, creator of Billy Elliot. Tickets are available now ⁠https://bit.ly/4fWDa7V⁠

Next Up in Fixing Democracy: Parliamentary Reform
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>15</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>220</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For the first episode in a new series about the ideas that could help democracy work better David talks to David Klemperer of the Constitution Society about proportional representation. How did nineteenth-century advocates of PR think it could improve democratic representation? Why did PR get adopted in some places but not in others during the twentieth century? What are the advantages of proportional systems? And when will we get serious electoral reform in the UK?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the first episode in a new series about the ideas that could help democracy work better David talks to David Klemperer of the Constitution Society about proportional representation. How did nineteenth-century advocates of PR think it could improve democratic representation? Why did PR get adopted in some places but not in others during the twentieth century? What are the advantages of proportional systems? And when will we get serious electoral reform in the UK?

The 2nd film in our autumn season of Films of Ideas at the Regent Street cinema is coming up on Thursday 25th September: a screening of My Dinner with Andre, followed by a live recording of PPF with playwright and screenwriter Lee Hall, creator of Billy Elliot. Tickets are available now ⁠https://bit.ly/4fWDa7V⁠

Next Up in Fixing Democracy: Parliamentary Reform
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the first episode in a new series about the ideas that could help democracy work better David talks to David Klemperer of the Constitution Society about proportional representation. How did nineteenth-century advocates of PR think it could improve democratic representation? Why did PR get adopted in some places but not in others during the twentieth century? What are the advantages of proportional systems? And when will we get serious electoral reform in the UK?</p>
<p>The 2nd film in our autumn season of Films of Ideas at the Regent Street cinema is coming up on Thursday 25th September: a screening of <em>My Dinner with Andre</em>, followed by a live recording of PPF with playwright and screenwriter Lee Hall, creator of <em>Billy Elliot</em>. Tickets are available now <a href="https://bit.ly/4fWDa7V">⁠https://bit.ly/4fWDa7V⁠</a></p>
<p>Next Up in Fixing Democracy: Parliamentary Reform</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3544</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b8c8ecfe-8679-11f0-a322-b3e20ad16c7a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR8275594677.mp3?updated=1756652293" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indignity w/Lea Ypi</title>
      <description>David talks to Lea Ypi about her new book Indignity: A Life Reimagined, which tells the story of her grandmother’s extraordinary life and in doing so uncovers the hidden history of mid-twentieth-century Europe. But it is also a book about the different philosophies of dignity and how those ideas can shape, make and break individual human lives. A conversation about death and displacement, identity and betrayal, secrecy and salvation. 

Indignity: A Life Reimagined by Lea Ypi is out now – get it wherever you get your books. ⁠https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/458930/indignity-by-ypi-lea/9780241661925⁠

The 2nd film in our autumn season of Films of Ideas at the Regent Street cinema is coming up on Thursday 25th September: a screening of My Dinner with Andre, followed by a live recording of PPF with playwright and screenwriter Lee Hall, creator of Billy Elliot. Tickets are available now ⁠https://bit.ly/4fWDa7V⁠

Next up, the start of a new series: Fixing Democracy
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>219</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>David talks to Lea Ypi about her new book Indignity: A Life Reimagined, which tells the story of her grandmother’s extraordinary life and in doing so uncovers the hidden history of mid-twentieth-century Europe. But it is also a book about the different philosophies of dignity and how those ideas can shape, make and break individual human lives. A conversation about death and displacement, identity and betrayal, secrecy and salvation. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>David talks to Lea Ypi about her new book Indignity: A Life Reimagined, which tells the story of her grandmother’s extraordinary life and in doing so uncovers the hidden history of mid-twentieth-century Europe. But it is also a book about the different philosophies of dignity and how those ideas can shape, make and break individual human lives. A conversation about death and displacement, identity and betrayal, secrecy and salvation. 

Indignity: A Life Reimagined by Lea Ypi is out now – get it wherever you get your books. ⁠https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/458930/indignity-by-ypi-lea/9780241661925⁠

The 2nd film in our autumn season of Films of Ideas at the Regent Street cinema is coming up on Thursday 25th September: a screening of My Dinner with Andre, followed by a live recording of PPF with playwright and screenwriter Lee Hall, creator of Billy Elliot. Tickets are available now ⁠https://bit.ly/4fWDa7V⁠

Next up, the start of a new series: Fixing Democracy
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>David talks to Lea Ypi about her new book <em>Indignity: A Life Reimagined</em>, which tells the story of her grandmother’s extraordinary life and in doing so uncovers the hidden history of mid-twentieth-century Europe. But it is also a book about the different philosophies of dignity and how those ideas can shape, make and break individual human lives. A conversation about death and displacement, identity and betrayal, secrecy and salvation. </p>
<p><em>Indignity: A Life Reimagined</em> by Lea Ypi is out now – get it wherever you get your books. <a href="https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/458930/indignity-by-ypi-lea/9780241661925">⁠https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/458930/indignity-by-ypi-lea/9780241661925⁠</a></p>
<p>The 2nd film in our autumn season of Films of Ideas at the Regent Street cinema is coming up on Thursday 25th September: a screening of <em>My Dinner with Andre</em>, followed by a live recording of PPF with playwright and screenwriter Lee Hall, creator of <em>Billy Elliot</em>. Tickets are available now <a href="https://bit.ly/4fWDa7V">⁠https://bit.ly/4fWDa7V⁠</a></p>
<p>Next up, the start of a new series: Fixing Democracy</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4008</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e0a2b878-84c0-11f0-aac5-2bd076b64641]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR7086198305.mp3?updated=1756462960" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dignity and Indignity w/Lea Ypi</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is the first in a three-part conversation with philosopher and writer Lea Ypi about the idea of dignity and its role in the history of ideas and in the story of our lives. What is the difference between dignity and dignitas? How does our conception of dignity shape the ways that we think about death? And why is Kant so important for showing what the idea of dignity is capable of?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: Part 2 of this conversation, in which David and Lea explore the role of dignity in human rights and in identity politics and ask how much it matters that our politics has become so undignified. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Lea Ypi’s new book is Indignity: A Life Reimagined – get it wherever you get your books. ⁠https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/458930/indignity-by-ypi-lea/9780241661925⁠

Tickets are available now for a special recording of PPF Live at the Cheltenham Literature Festival on Wednesday 15th October: Who Rules The World? Trump, Tech and the Fight for the Future. David will be talking to writer, philosopher and ex-politician Bruno Macaes plus a special guest to be announced about where the power really lies. Get your tickets now ⁠https://www.cheltenhamfestivals.org/events/who-rules-the-world-trump-tech-and-the-fight-for-the-future⁠

Next time: Lea Ypi talks about her remarkable new book Indignity: A Life Reimagined
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>218</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is the first in a three-part conversation with philosopher and writer Lea Ypi about the idea of dignity and its role in the history of ideas and in the story of our lives. What is the difference between dignity and dignitas? How does our conception of dignity shape the ways that we think about death? And why is Kant so important for showing what the idea of dignity is capable of?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is the first in a three-part conversation with philosopher and writer Lea Ypi about the idea of dignity and its role in the history of ideas and in the story of our lives. What is the difference between dignity and dignitas? How does our conception of dignity shape the ways that we think about death? And why is Kant so important for showing what the idea of dignity is capable of?

Out tomorrow on PPF+: Part 2 of this conversation, in which David and Lea explore the role of dignity in human rights and in identity politics and ask how much it matters that our politics has become so undignified. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Lea Ypi’s new book is Indignity: A Life Reimagined – get it wherever you get your books. ⁠https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/458930/indignity-by-ypi-lea/9780241661925⁠

Tickets are available now for a special recording of PPF Live at the Cheltenham Literature Festival on Wednesday 15th October: Who Rules The World? Trump, Tech and the Fight for the Future. David will be talking to writer, philosopher and ex-politician Bruno Macaes plus a special guest to be announced about where the power really lies. Get your tickets now ⁠https://www.cheltenhamfestivals.org/events/who-rules-the-world-trump-tech-and-the-fight-for-the-future⁠

Next time: Lea Ypi talks about her remarkable new book Indignity: A Life Reimagined
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is the first in a three-part conversation with philosopher and writer Lea Ypi about the idea of dignity and its role in the history of ideas and in the story of our lives. What is the difference between dignity and <em>dignitas</em>? How does our conception of dignity shape the ways that we think about death? And why is Kant so important for showing what the idea of dignity is capable of?</p>
<p>Out tomorrow on PPF+: Part 2 of this conversation, in which David and Lea explore the role of dignity in human rights and in identity politics and ask how much it matters that our politics has become so undignified. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Lea Ypi’s new book is <em>Indignity: A Life Reimagined</em> – get it wherever you get your books. <a href="https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/458930/indignity-by-ypi-lea/9780241661925">⁠https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/458930/indignity-by-ypi-lea/9780241661925⁠</a></p>
<p>Tickets are available now for a special recording of PPF Live at the Cheltenham Literature Festival on Wednesday 15th October: <em>Who Rules The World? Trump, Tech and the Fight for the Future</em>. David will be talking to writer, philosopher and ex-politician Bruno Macaes plus a special guest to be announced about where the power really lies. Get your tickets now <a href="https://www.cheltenhamfestivals.org/events/who-rules-the-world-trump-tech-and-the-fight-for-the-future">⁠https://www.cheltenhamfestivals.org/events/who-rules-the-world-trump-tech-and-the-fight-for-the-future⁠</a></p>
<p>Next time: Lea Ypi talks about her remarkable new book <em>Indignity: A Life Reimagined</em></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3599</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f84108e0-835d-11f0-b8bd-fbf6d6f59c2e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR9883390285.mp3?updated=1756310530" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PPF+: More of What You’ve Been Missing!</title>
      <description>In today’s episode some more highlights from the PPF+ archive of 35 bonus episodes and counting: here are a few more excerpts we think you might enjoy.

In this episode you’ll hear David talking about In the Loop and the question of why politicians do and don’t resign; Robert Saunders on the legacy of Brexit for politics in 2025; Shannon Vallor on why AI is a vision not of the future but of the past; David on the appeal of High Noon for American presidents; and Alec Ryrie on the relationship between Calvinism, Puritanism and the rise and fall of apartheid South Africa.

To get all these episodes along with the whole of our PPF+ archive, two new bonus episodes every month, plus ad-free listening and automatic sign up for our fortnightly newsletter, join PPF+ now. It’s £5 per month or £50 per year – and every subscription really helps support this podcast https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

If you would like to gift a PPF+ subscription to someone you know who is starting college or university or a new school or who you think might be interested in what we do for whatever reason, it’s easy: sign them up here https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts

Next time in Politics on Trial: Hitler vs Weimar
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>217</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode some more highlights from the PPF+ archive of 35 bonus episodes and counting: here are a few more excerpts we think you might enjoy. In this episode you’ll hear David talking about In the Loop and the question of why politicians do and don’t resign; Robert Saunders on the legacy of Brexit for politics in 2025; Shannon Vallor on why AI is a vision not of the future but of the past; David on the appeal of High Noon for American presidents; and Alec Ryrie on the relationship between Calvinism, Puritanism and the rise and fall of apartheid South Africa.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode some more highlights from the PPF+ archive of 35 bonus episodes and counting: here are a few more excerpts we think you might enjoy.

In this episode you’ll hear David talking about In the Loop and the question of why politicians do and don’t resign; Robert Saunders on the legacy of Brexit for politics in 2025; Shannon Vallor on why AI is a vision not of the future but of the past; David on the appeal of High Noon for American presidents; and Alec Ryrie on the relationship between Calvinism, Puritanism and the rise and fall of apartheid South Africa.

To get all these episodes along with the whole of our PPF+ archive, two new bonus episodes every month, plus ad-free listening and automatic sign up for our fortnightly newsletter, join PPF+ now. It’s £5 per month or £50 per year – and every subscription really helps support this podcast https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

If you would like to gift a PPF+ subscription to someone you know who is starting college or university or a new school or who you think might be interested in what we do for whatever reason, it’s easy: sign them up here https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts

Next time in Politics on Trial: Hitler vs Weimar
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode some more highlights from the PPF+ archive of 35 bonus episodes and counting: here are a few more excerpts we think you might enjoy.</p>
<p>In this episode you’ll hear David talking about <em>In the Loop</em> and the question of why politicians do and don’t resign; Robert Saunders on the legacy of Brexit for politics in 2025; Shannon Vallor on why AI is a vision not of the future but of the past; David on the appeal of <em>High Noon</em> for American presidents; and Alec Ryrie on the relationship between Calvinism, Puritanism and the rise and fall of apartheid South Africa.</p>
<p>To get all these episodes along with the whole of our PPF+ archive, two new bonus episodes every month, plus ad-free listening and automatic sign up for our fortnightly newsletter, join PPF+ now. It’s £5 per month or £50 per year – and every subscription really helps support this podcast <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>If you would like to gift a PPF+ subscription to someone you know who is starting college or university or a new school or who you think might be interested in what we do for whatever reason, it’s easy: sign them up here <a href="https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts">https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: Hitler vs Weimar</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3671</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[02897684-7f85-11f0-b037-8bd08260a8fb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR9237209525.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Hitler vs Weimar</title>
      <description>Today’s epic political trial is the one that should have been the end of Adolf Hitler but ended up being the making of him: his treason trial in 1924 for the so-called Beer Hall Putsch. How close did Hitler’s attempted coup come to succeeding? Why was he allowed to turn the court that tried him into a platform for his poisonous politics? What were the missed opportunities to silence him once and for all?

Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Fintan O’Toole about the Easter Rising trials of 1916 – here they explore the treason trial of Sir Roger Casement and the question of what makes a traitor. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Tickets are still available for the first screening in our autumn Films of Ideas season at the Regent Street Cinema in London on 5th September: Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope followed by a live recording of PPF with special guests Nicci Gerrard and Sean French, aka the best-selling husband-and-wife crime-writing due Nicci French. Get your tickets here https://bit.ly/4fOp2xx

Next Up: Lea Ypi on Dignity
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>216</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s epic political trial is the one that should have been the end of Adolf Hitler but ended up being the making of him: his treason trial in 1924 for the so-called Beer Hall Putsch. How close did Hitler’s attempted coup come to succeeding? Why was he allowed to turn the court that tried him into a platform for his poisonous politics? What were the missed opportunities to silence him once and for all?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s epic political trial is the one that should have been the end of Adolf Hitler but ended up being the making of him: his treason trial in 1924 for the so-called Beer Hall Putsch. How close did Hitler’s attempted coup come to succeeding? Why was he allowed to turn the court that tried him into a platform for his poisonous politics? What were the missed opportunities to silence him once and for all?

Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Fintan O’Toole about the Easter Rising trials of 1916 – here they explore the treason trial of Sir Roger Casement and the question of what makes a traitor. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Tickets are still available for the first screening in our autumn Films of Ideas season at the Regent Street Cinema in London on 5th September: Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope followed by a live recording of PPF with special guests Nicci Gerrard and Sean French, aka the best-selling husband-and-wife crime-writing due Nicci French. Get your tickets here https://bit.ly/4fOp2xx

Next Up: Lea Ypi on Dignity
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s epic political trial is the one that should have been the end of Adolf Hitler but ended up being the making of him: his treason trial in 1924 for the so-called Beer Hall Putsch. How close did Hitler’s attempted coup come to succeeding? Why was he allowed to turn the court that tried him into a platform for his poisonous politics? What were the missed opportunities to silence him once and for all?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Fintan O’Toole about the Easter Rising trials of 1916 – here they explore the treason trial of Sir Roger Casement and the question of what makes a traitor. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Tickets are still available for the first screening in our autumn Films of Ideas season at the Regent Street Cinema in London on 5th September: Alfred Hitchcock’s <em>Rope</em> followed by a live recording of PPF with special guests Nicci Gerrard and Sean French, aka the best-selling husband-and-wife crime-writing due Nicci French. Get your tickets here <a href="https://bit.ly/4fOp2xx">https://bit.ly/4fOp2xx</a></p>
<p>Next Up: Lea Ypi on Dignity</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3908</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5eb1d890-7f74-11f0-9c6f-efa7a21da575]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR6384890607.mp3?updated=1755880393" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Easter Rising 1916 w/Fintan O’Toole</title>
      <description>Today it’s the first of two episodes with journalist and historian Fintan O’Toole about the trials that followed the 1916 Easter Rising in Ireland. What did the leaders of the rising hope to achieve, with or without German help? How and why did the British get it so wrong by court martialling the supposed ring leaders in secret? Were those trials anything more than kangaroo courts? And why are fourteen martyrs more potent than thousands of victims?

Available from Saturday on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Fintan O’Toole, where they explore the treason trial of Sir Roger Casement and the question of what makes a traitor. Plus, what part was played by George Bernard Shaw? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Tickets are still available for the first screening in our autumn film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London on 5th September: Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope followed by a live recording of PPF with special guests Nicci Gerrard and Sean French, aka the best-selling husband-and-wife crime-writing duo Nicci French. Get your tickets here https://bit.ly/4fOp2xx

Next Up: Hitler vs Weimar
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>215</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today it’s the first of two episodes with journalist and historian Fintan O’Toole about the trials that followed the 1916 Easter Rising in Ireland. What did the leaders of the rising hope to achieve, with or without German help? How and why did the British get it so wrong by court martialling the supposed ring leaders in secret? Were those trials anything more than kangaroo courts? And why are fourteen martyrs more potent than thousands of victims?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today it’s the first of two episodes with journalist and historian Fintan O’Toole about the trials that followed the 1916 Easter Rising in Ireland. What did the leaders of the rising hope to achieve, with or without German help? How and why did the British get it so wrong by court martialling the supposed ring leaders in secret? Were those trials anything more than kangaroo courts? And why are fourteen martyrs more potent than thousands of victims?

Available from Saturday on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Fintan O’Toole, where they explore the treason trial of Sir Roger Casement and the question of what makes a traitor. Plus, what part was played by George Bernard Shaw? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Tickets are still available for the first screening in our autumn film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London on 5th September: Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope followed by a live recording of PPF with special guests Nicci Gerrard and Sean French, aka the best-selling husband-and-wife crime-writing duo Nicci French. Get your tickets here https://bit.ly/4fOp2xx

Next Up: Hitler vs Weimar
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today it’s the first of two episodes with journalist and historian Fintan O’Toole about the trials that followed the 1916 Easter Rising in Ireland. What did the leaders of the rising hope to achieve, with or without German help? How and why did the British get it so wrong by court martialling the supposed ring leaders in secret? Were those trials anything more than kangaroo courts? And why are fourteen martyrs more potent than thousands of victims?</p>
<p>Available from Saturday on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Fintan O’Toole, where they explore the treason trial of Sir Roger Casement and the question of what makes a traitor. Plus, what part was played by George Bernard Shaw? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Tickets are still available for the first screening in our autumn film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London on 5th September: Alfred Hitchcock’s <em>Rope</em> followed by a live recording of PPF with special guests Nicci Gerrard and Sean French, aka the best-selling husband-and-wife crime-writing duo Nicci French. Get your tickets here <a href="https://bit.ly/4fOp2xx">https://bit.ly/4fOp2xx</a></p>
<p>Next Up: Hitler vs Weimar</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3549</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[63053aa8-8100-11f0-98b4-5bf5d92c570c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR3399122249.mp3?updated=1756050461" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PPF+: A Taste of What You've Been Missing!</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is something a little bit different – it is nearly 18 months since we started PPF+ and there are now 34 bonus episodes waiting for you as soon as you sign up. It costs £5 per month or £50 per year and you will get two new bonus episodes every month along with ad-free listening, automatic sign-up to our newsletter and access to the whole archive. It’s easy and we would really value your support https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

In this episode you’ll hear some PPF+ highlights: David talking to Helen Thompson about Apocalypse Now, David exploring Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, unpicking the relationship between The Futurist Manifesto and fascism, reflecting on Claude Lanzmann’s epic Holocaust documentary Shoah and in conversation with historian Chris Clark about 1848 and the future of liberal politics. All these episodes and many more are available as soon as you sign up.

If you would like to gift a 6-month or 12-month PPF+ subscription to someone you know who is starting college or university or a new school or who you think might be interested in what we do for whatever reason, it’s also easy: sign them up here https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts

Next time in Politics on Trial: Fintan O’Toole on The Trials of the Easter Rising 1916.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>214</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is something a little bit different – it is nearly 18 months since we started PPF+ and there are now 34 bonus episodes waiting for you as soon as you sign up. It costs £5 per month or £50 per year and you will get two new bonus episodes every month along with ad-free listening, automatic sign-up to our newsletter and access to the whole archive. It’s easy and we would really value your support ⁠https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is something a little bit different – it is nearly 18 months since we started PPF+ and there are now 34 bonus episodes waiting for you as soon as you sign up. It costs £5 per month or £50 per year and you will get two new bonus episodes every month along with ad-free listening, automatic sign-up to our newsletter and access to the whole archive. It’s easy and we would really value your support https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

In this episode you’ll hear some PPF+ highlights: David talking to Helen Thompson about Apocalypse Now, David exploring Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, unpicking the relationship between The Futurist Manifesto and fascism, reflecting on Claude Lanzmann’s epic Holocaust documentary Shoah and in conversation with historian Chris Clark about 1848 and the future of liberal politics. All these episodes and many more are available as soon as you sign up.

If you would like to gift a 6-month or 12-month PPF+ subscription to someone you know who is starting college or university or a new school or who you think might be interested in what we do for whatever reason, it’s also easy: sign them up here https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts

Next time in Politics on Trial: Fintan O’Toole on The Trials of the Easter Rising 1916.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is something a little bit different – it is nearly 18 months since we started PPF+ and there are now 34 bonus episodes waiting for you as soon as you sign up. It costs £5 per month or £50 per year and you will get two new bonus episodes every month along with ad-free listening, automatic sign-up to our newsletter and access to the whole archive. It’s easy and we would really value your support <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>In this episode you’ll hear some PPF+ highlights: David talking to Helen Thompson about <em>Apocalypse Now, </em>David exploring Mary Shelley’s <em>Frankenstein</em>, unpicking the relationship between <em>The Futurist Manifesto</em> and fascism, reflecting on Claude Lanzmann’s epic Holocaust documentary <em>Shoah</em> and in conversation with historian Chris Clark about 1848 and the future of liberal politics. All these episodes and many more are available as soon as you sign up.</p>
<p>If you would like to gift a 6-month or 12-month PPF+ subscription to someone you know who is starting college or university or a new school or who you think might be interested in what we do for whatever reason, it’s also easy: sign them up here <a href="https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts">https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: Fintan O’Toole on The Trials of the Easter Rising 1916.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3327</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b8fee386-7099-11f0-94f2-4356e03c7b53]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR5347704573.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial 100th Anniversary Special: Franz Kafka’s The Trial</title>
      <description>Today’s episode in Politics on Trial is about the most famous trial in literature and one that never actually takes place. David talks to writer and literary scholar Ian Ellison about Franz Kafka’s The Trial, first published in 1925. What is the meaning of a book about a legal process that never happens? How was it inspired by Kafka’s failed love life? Why has it given rise to so many different understandings of what makes our world Kafkaesque? And how did a work of fiction that is full of weird and wonderful ideas get associated with mindless bureaucracy?

If you’d like to get tickets for the first screening in our autumn film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London on 5th September – Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope, followed by a live recording of PPF with the crime writers Nicci Gerard and Sean French – they are available now https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Coming Next: a PPF+ Highlights Special
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>213</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode in Politics on Trial is about the most famous trial in literature and one that never actually takes place. David talks to writer and literary scholar Ian Ellison about Franz Kafka’s The Trial, first published in 1925. What is the meaning of a book about a legal process that never happens? How was it inspired by Kafka’s failed love life? Why has it given rise to so many different understandings of what makes our world Kafkaesque? And how did a work of fiction that is full of weird and wonderful ideas get associated with mindless bureaucracy?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode in Politics on Trial is about the most famous trial in literature and one that never actually takes place. David talks to writer and literary scholar Ian Ellison about Franz Kafka’s The Trial, first published in 1925. What is the meaning of a book about a legal process that never happens? How was it inspired by Kafka’s failed love life? Why has it given rise to so many different understandings of what makes our world Kafkaesque? And how did a work of fiction that is full of weird and wonderful ideas get associated with mindless bureaucracy?

If you’d like to get tickets for the first screening in our autumn film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London on 5th September – Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope, followed by a live recording of PPF with the crime writers Nicci Gerard and Sean French – they are available now https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Coming Next: a PPF+ Highlights Special
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode in Politics on Trial is about the most famous trial in literature and one that never actually takes place. David talks to writer and literary scholar Ian Ellison about Franz Kafka’s <em>The Trial</em>, first published in 1925. What is the meaning of a book about a legal process that never happens? How was it inspired by Kafka’s failed love life? Why has it given rise to so many different understandings of what makes our world Kafkaesque? And how did a work of fiction that is full of weird and wonderful ideas get associated with mindless bureaucracy?</p>
<p>If you’d like to get tickets for the first screening in our autumn film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London on 5th September – Alfred Hitchcock’s <em>Rope</em>, followed by a live recording of PPF with the crime writers Nicci Gerard and Sean French – they are available now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/events">https://www.ppfideas.com/events</a></p>
<p>Coming Next: a PPF+ Highlights Special</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3560</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[bfd66688-74a0-11f0-a284-970d5ecf9d33]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR1119436210.mp3?updated=1754689951" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Dreyfus vs the Conspiracy Theory</title>
      <description>Today in Politics on Trial David tells the tale of the Dreyfus Affair that split France down the middle at the turn of the last century and revealed the grip of a whole host of conspiracy theories. Across a series of courts martial, libel trials, treason trials and parliamentary commissions, the story of a letter found in a wastebin turned into a saga about who really controlled the country. Was it the Jews? The Jesuits? The Freemasons? The army? The Germans? Or nobody at all? Why did Alfred Dreyfus find himself at the centre of it all? And what does all this madness tell us about the paranoid state of American politics today?

Tickets are available now for our autumn film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London, starting on 5th September with a screening of Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope followed by a live recording of PPF with special guests Nicci Gerrard and Sean French, aka the best-selling husband-and-wife crime-writing duo Nicci French. For tickets and details on all the films https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next Time in Politics on Trial: Anniversary Special: Kafka’s The Trial at 100
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>212</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today in Politics on Trial David tells the tale of the Dreyfus Affair that split France down the middle at the turn of the last century and revealed the grip of a whole host of conspiracy theories. Across a series of courts martial, libel trials, treason trials and parliamentary commissions, the story of a letter found in a wastebin turned into a saga about who really controlled the country. Was it the Jews? The Jesuits? The Freemasons? The army? The Germans? Or nobody at all? Why did Alfred Dreyfus find himself at the centre of it all? And what does all this madness tell us about the paranoid state of American politics today?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today in Politics on Trial David tells the tale of the Dreyfus Affair that split France down the middle at the turn of the last century and revealed the grip of a whole host of conspiracy theories. Across a series of courts martial, libel trials, treason trials and parliamentary commissions, the story of a letter found in a wastebin turned into a saga about who really controlled the country. Was it the Jews? The Jesuits? The Freemasons? The army? The Germans? Or nobody at all? Why did Alfred Dreyfus find himself at the centre of it all? And what does all this madness tell us about the paranoid state of American politics today?

Tickets are available now for our autumn film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London, starting on 5th September with a screening of Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope followed by a live recording of PPF with special guests Nicci Gerrard and Sean French, aka the best-selling husband-and-wife crime-writing duo Nicci French. For tickets and details on all the films https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next Time in Politics on Trial: Anniversary Special: Kafka’s The Trial at 100
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today in Politics on Trial David tells the tale of the Dreyfus Affair that split France down the middle at the turn of the last century and revealed the grip of a whole host of conspiracy theories. Across a series of courts martial, libel trials, treason trials and parliamentary commissions, the story of a letter found in a wastebin turned into a saga about who really controlled the country. Was it the Jews? The Jesuits? The Freemasons? The army? The Germans? Or nobody at all? Why did Alfred Dreyfus find himself at the centre of it all? And what does all this madness tell us about the paranoid state of American politics today?</p>
<p>Tickets are available now for our autumn film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London, starting on 5th September with a screening of Alfred Hitchcock’s <em>Rope</em> followed by a live recording of PPF with special guests Nicci Gerrard and Sean French, aka the best-selling husband-and-wife crime-writing duo Nicci French. For tickets and details on all the films <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/events">https://www.ppfideas.com/events</a></p>
<p>Next Time in Politics on Trial: Anniversary Special: Kafka’s <em>The Trial</em> at 100</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3991</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2032595c-6fc8-11f0-ad95-1b133d9edb2b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR4680553212.mp3?updated=1754157091" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Oscar Wilde vs the Philistines</title>
      <description>Today’s episode in Politics on Trial is about three trials that took place over two months in the late spring of 1895 that brought about the destruction of Oscar Wilde. Why did Wilde trigger his own doom by suing his nemesis Lord Queensbury for libel? What did he fail to understand about how he would come across in a courtroom? And how did the persecution of Wilde and his gay lifestyle reveal the hidden terrors of late Victorian England and its high society, up to and including the prime minister?

Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s latest conversation with Robert Saunders in which they talk about the past, present and future of the politics of unemployment. Can Labour ever again be the party of labour? Whose work is it anyway? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Tickets are now available for our autumn film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London, starting on 5th September with a screening of Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope followed by a live recording of PPF with special guests Nicci Gerrard and Sean French, aka the best-selling husband-and-wife crime-writing duo Nicci French. For tickets and details on all the films https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next time in Politics on Trial: Dreyfus vs the Conspiracy Theory
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>211</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode in Politics on Trial is about three trials that took place over two months in the late spring of 1895 that brought about the destruction of Oscar Wilde. Why did Wilde trigger his own doom by suing his nemesis Lord Queensbury for libel? What did he fail to understand about how he would come across in a courtroom? And how did the persecution of Wilde and his gay lifestyle reveal the hidden terrors of late Victorian England and its high society, up to and including the prime minister?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode in Politics on Trial is about three trials that took place over two months in the late spring of 1895 that brought about the destruction of Oscar Wilde. Why did Wilde trigger his own doom by suing his nemesis Lord Queensbury for libel? What did he fail to understand about how he would come across in a courtroom? And how did the persecution of Wilde and his gay lifestyle reveal the hidden terrors of late Victorian England and its high society, up to and including the prime minister?

Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s latest conversation with Robert Saunders in which they talk about the past, present and future of the politics of unemployment. Can Labour ever again be the party of labour? Whose work is it anyway? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Tickets are now available for our autumn film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London, starting on 5th September with a screening of Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope followed by a live recording of PPF with special guests Nicci Gerrard and Sean French, aka the best-selling husband-and-wife crime-writing duo Nicci French. For tickets and details on all the films https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next time in Politics on Trial: Dreyfus vs the Conspiracy Theory
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode in Politics on Trial is about three trials that took place over two months in the late spring of 1895 that brought about the destruction of Oscar Wilde. Why did Wilde trigger his own doom by suing his nemesis Lord Queensbury for libel? What did he fail to understand about how he would come across in a courtroom? And how did the persecution of Wilde and his gay lifestyle reveal the hidden terrors of late Victorian England and its high society, up to and including the prime minister?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s latest conversation with Robert Saunders in which they talk about the past, present and future of the politics of unemployment. Can Labour ever again be the party of labour? Whose work is it anyway? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Tickets are now available for our autumn film season at the Regent Street Cinema in London, starting on 5th September with a screening of Alfred Hitchcock’s <em>Rope</em> followed by a live recording of PPF with special guests Nicci Gerrard and Sean French, aka the best-selling husband-and-wife crime-writing duo Nicci French. For tickets and details on all the films <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/events">https://www.ppfideas.com/events</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: Dreyfus vs the Conspiracy Theory</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3803</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[602db552-6fc7-11f0-9413-cfc09706c4c8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR4337774173.mp3?updated=1754156735" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Now &amp; Then with Robert Saunders: Whatever Happened to Unemployment?</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is the first in a new strand with the historian Robert Saunders looking at significant political anniversaries and their meaning for today. Summer 2025 is 70 years since the UK recorded its lowest ever unemployment rate in peacetime: just 1% (or 215,800 people) in July 1955. David and Robert explore the history of unemployment: how it’s been measured, what it means, why it matters and when it changes the course of political history. From Victorian trade unionism to the Thatcher revolution: who gets to decide on the value of work?

Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of this conversation taking the story from the 1980s to the present, via New Labour, the financial crisis of 2008 and Covid. How has the meaning of work changed over that period? How has it got mixed up with the politics of immigration? And is the Labour Party still the party of labour? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: Oscar Wilde vs the Philistines
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>14</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>210</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is the first in a new strand with the historian Robert Saunders looking at significant political anniversaries and their meaning for today. Summer 2025 is 70 years since the UK recorded its lowest ever unemployment rate in peacetime: just 1% (or 215,800 people) in July 1955. David and Robert explore the history of unemployment: how it’s been measured, what it means, why it matters and when it changes the course of political history. From Victorian trade unionism to the Thatcher revolution: who gets to decide on the value of work?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is the first in a new strand with the historian Robert Saunders looking at significant political anniversaries and their meaning for today. Summer 2025 is 70 years since the UK recorded its lowest ever unemployment rate in peacetime: just 1% (or 215,800 people) in July 1955. David and Robert explore the history of unemployment: how it’s been measured, what it means, why it matters and when it changes the course of political history. From Victorian trade unionism to the Thatcher revolution: who gets to decide on the value of work?

Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of this conversation taking the story from the 1980s to the present, via New Labour, the financial crisis of 2008 and Covid. How has the meaning of work changed over that period? How has it got mixed up with the politics of immigration? And is the Labour Party still the party of labour? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: Oscar Wilde vs the Philistines
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is the first in a new strand with the historian Robert Saunders looking at significant political anniversaries and their meaning for today. Summer 2025 is 70 years since the UK recorded its lowest ever unemployment rate in peacetime: just 1% (or 215,800 people) in July 1955. David and Robert explore the history of unemployment: how it’s been measured, what it means, why it matters and when it changes the course of political history. From Victorian trade unionism to the Thatcher revolution: who gets to decide on the value of work?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of this conversation taking the story from the 1980s to the present, via New Labour, the financial crisis of 2008 and Covid. How has the meaning of work changed over that period? How has it got mixed up with the politics of immigration? And is the Labour Party still the party of labour? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: Oscar Wilde vs the Philistines</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3890</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7ca35318-7300-11f0-aa3e-6bc9cfe92f4b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR3939247050.mp3?updated=1754511131" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Charles Parnell vs the English</title>
      <description>For today’s episode in Politics on Trial it’s two trials for the price of one, which between them changed the course of British and Irish history. In 1889 the leading Irish politician Charles Parnell was cleared of any involvement in the notorious Phoenix Park murders by Irish republican terrorists seven years earlier. In 1890 Parnell was found to be the adulterer in a divorce case involving his mistress and her husband. That scandal destroyed him, permanently split the campaign for Irish self-government and upended Liberal politics in Britain. How did Parnell come to have such a hold on British and Irish politics? Why could he survive accusations of terrorism but not of adultery? And what does his fate reveal about the high-wire politics of a highly decorous and extremely dangerous age?

For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next Time: Now and Then w/Robert Saunders: Whatever Happened to Full Employment?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>209</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For today’s episode in Politics on Trial it’s two trials for the price of one, which between them changed the course of British and Irish history. In 1889 the leading Irish politician Charles Parnell was cleared of any involvement in the notorious Phoenix Park murders by Irish republican terrorists seven years earlier. In 1890 Parnell was found to be the adulterer in a divorce case involving his mistress and her husband. That scandal destroyed him, permanently split the campaign for Irish self-government and upended Liberal politics in Britain. How did Parnell come to have such a hold on British and Irish politics? Why could he survive accusations of terrorism but not of adultery? And what does his fate reveal about the high-wire politics of a highly decorous and extremely dangerous age?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For today’s episode in Politics on Trial it’s two trials for the price of one, which between them changed the course of British and Irish history. In 1889 the leading Irish politician Charles Parnell was cleared of any involvement in the notorious Phoenix Park murders by Irish republican terrorists seven years earlier. In 1890 Parnell was found to be the adulterer in a divorce case involving his mistress and her husband. That scandal destroyed him, permanently split the campaign for Irish self-government and upended Liberal politics in Britain. How did Parnell come to have such a hold on British and Irish politics? Why could he survive accusations of terrorism but not of adultery? And what does his fate reveal about the high-wire politics of a highly decorous and extremely dangerous age?

For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next Time: Now and Then w/Robert Saunders: Whatever Happened to Full Employment?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For today’s episode in Politics on Trial it’s two trials for the price of one, which between them changed the course of British and Irish history. In 1889 the leading Irish politician Charles Parnell was cleared of any involvement in the notorious Phoenix Park murders by Irish republican terrorists seven years earlier. In 1890 Parnell was found to be the adulterer in a divorce case involving his mistress and her husband. That scandal destroyed him, permanently split the campaign for Irish self-government and upended Liberal politics in Britain. How did Parnell come to have such a hold on British and Irish politics? Why could he survive accusations of terrorism but not of adultery? And what does his fate reveal about the high-wire politics of a highly decorous and extremely dangerous age?</p>
<p>For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/events">https://www.ppfideas.com/events</a></p>
<p>Next Time: Now and Then w/Robert Saunders: Whatever Happened to Full Employment?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3534</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[88acf8a8-67e3-11f0-901d-f33d7f69576b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR2120182941.mp3?updated=1753933220" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: The Haymarket Eight vs the Police</title>
      <description>Today’s political trial is one of the most notorious in American history: eight men charged with and convicted of murder in 1886 for a terrorist outrage that none of them committed. A bomb had been thrown at the police during a workers’ rally in Chicago but this trial was not about punishing the person who threw it. Rather it was a witch hunt of the men and the movement that were thought to have inspired it. Anarchism was put on trial and condemned in the Haymarket case. Who promoted and who resisted the invasion of paranoia and conspiracy theories into an American courtroom? And was it anarchists or was it the forces of law and order that were ultimately responsible for Chicago’s descent into violence and retribution?

For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next time in Politics on Trial: Charles Parnell vs the English




Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>208</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s political trial is one of the most notorious in American history: eight men charged with and convicted of murder in 1886 for a terrorist outrage that none of them committed. A bomb had been thrown at the police during a workers’ rally in Chicago but this trial was not about punishing the person who threw it. Rather it was a witch hunt of the men and the movement that were thought to have inspired it. Anarchism was put on trial and condemned in the Haymarket case. Who promoted and who resisted the invasion of paranoia and conspiracy theories into an American courtroom? And was it anarchists or was it the forces of law and order that were ultimately responsible for Chicago’s descent into violence and retribution?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s political trial is one of the most notorious in American history: eight men charged with and convicted of murder in 1886 for a terrorist outrage that none of them committed. A bomb had been thrown at the police during a workers’ rally in Chicago but this trial was not about punishing the person who threw it. Rather it was a witch hunt of the men and the movement that were thought to have inspired it. Anarchism was put on trial and condemned in the Haymarket case. Who promoted and who resisted the invasion of paranoia and conspiracy theories into an American courtroom? And was it anarchists or was it the forces of law and order that were ultimately responsible for Chicago’s descent into violence and retribution?

For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next time in Politics on Trial: Charles Parnell vs the English




Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s political trial is one of the most notorious in American history: eight men charged with and convicted of murder in 1886 for a terrorist outrage that none of them committed. A bomb had been thrown at the police during a workers’ rally in Chicago but this trial was not about punishing the person who threw it. Rather it was a witch hunt of the men and the movement that were thought to have inspired it. Anarchism was put on trial and condemned in the Haymarket case. Who promoted and who resisted the invasion of paranoia and conspiracy theories into an American courtroom? And was it anarchists or was it the forces of law and order that were ultimately responsible for Chicago’s descent into violence and retribution?</p>
<p>For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/events">https://www.ppfideas.com/events</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: Charles Parnell vs the English</p>
<p><br></p>
<p><br></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3431</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4eeaf870-6623-11f0-bd4b-b3a600670513]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR9454593848.mp3?updated=1753925045" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: John Brown vs Slavery</title>
      <description>Today’s great political trial concerns the prosecution and execution of John Brown in 1859 for his raid on Harper’s Ferry in the attempt to free America’s slaves, an event that helped precipitate the American Civil War. It was also a trial that produced three of the greatest speeches in American history: by Brown himself, by Henry Thoreau and by Frederick Douglass, which between them constitute an indictment of slavery for the ages. How did one man’s unilateral declaration of war convulse an entire nation? And how did his trial confirm what was becoming increasingly clear: that a house divided against itself cannot stand?

For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next time in Politics on Trial: The Haymarket Eight vs the Police
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>207</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s great political trial concerns the prosecution and execution of John Brown in 1859 for his raid on Harper’s Ferry in the attempt to free America’s slaves, an event that helped precipitate the American Civil War. It was also a trial that produced three of the greatest speeches in American history: by Brown himself, by Henry Thoreau and by Frederick Douglass, which between them constitute an indictment of slavery for the ages. How did one man’s unilateral declaration of war convulse an entire nation? And how did his trial confirm what was becoming increasingly clear: that a house divided against itself cannot stand?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s great political trial concerns the prosecution and execution of John Brown in 1859 for his raid on Harper’s Ferry in the attempt to free America’s slaves, an event that helped precipitate the American Civil War. It was also a trial that produced three of the greatest speeches in American history: by Brown himself, by Henry Thoreau and by Frederick Douglass, which between them constitute an indictment of slavery for the ages. How did one man’s unilateral declaration of war convulse an entire nation? And how did his trial confirm what was becoming increasingly clear: that a house divided against itself cannot stand?

For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next time in Politics on Trial: The Haymarket Eight vs the Police
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s great political trial concerns the prosecution and execution of John Brown in 1859 for his raid on Harper’s Ferry in the attempt to free America’s slaves, an event that helped precipitate the American Civil War. It was also a trial that produced three of the greatest speeches in American history: by Brown himself, by Henry Thoreau and by Frederick Douglass, which between them constitute an indictment of slavery for the ages. How did one man’s unilateral declaration of war convulse an entire nation? And how did his trial confirm what was becoming increasingly clear: that a house divided against itself cannot stand?</p>
<p>For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/events">https://www.ppfideas.com/events</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: The Haymarket Eight vs the Police</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3503</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[59372b02-6595-11f0-b3f0-d74644fec08f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR4260021079.mp3?updated=1753926435" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Aaron Burr vs the Constitution</title>
      <description>For today’s epic political trial, David talks to American historian and PPF regular Gary Gerstle about the treason trial of Aaron Burr in 1807. Why was Burr not put on trial for killing Alexander Hamilton in a duel? Was Burr really planning to invade Mexico or was it a set-up? Why was President Thomas Jefferson so determined to bring Burr down? Why was Supreme Court Chief Justice Thomas Marshall so determined to prevent that from happening? And why did being acquitted of treason still end Burr’s career once and for all?

For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next time in Politics on Trial: John Brown vs Slavery
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>206</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For today’s epic political trial, David talks to American historian and PPF regular Gary Gerstle about the treason trial of Aaron Burr in 1807. Why was Burr not put on trial for killing Alexander Hamilton in a duel? Was Burr really planning to invade Mexico or was it a set-up? Why was President Thomas Jefferson so determined to bring Burr down? Why was Supreme Court Chief Justice Thomas Marshall so determined to prevent that from happening? And why did being acquitted of treason still end Burr’s career once and for all?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For today’s epic political trial, David talks to American historian and PPF regular Gary Gerstle about the treason trial of Aaron Burr in 1807. Why was Burr not put on trial for killing Alexander Hamilton in a duel? Was Burr really planning to invade Mexico or was it a set-up? Why was President Thomas Jefferson so determined to bring Burr down? Why was Supreme Court Chief Justice Thomas Marshall so determined to prevent that from happening? And why did being acquitted of treason still end Burr’s career once and for all?

For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next time in Politics on Trial: John Brown vs Slavery
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For today’s epic political trial, David talks to American historian and PPF regular Gary Gerstle about the treason trial of Aaron Burr in 1807. Why was Burr <em>not</em> put on trial for killing Alexander Hamilton in a duel? Was Burr really planning to invade Mexico or was it a set-up? Why was President Thomas Jefferson so determined to bring Burr down? Why was Supreme Court Chief Justice Thomas Marshall so determined to prevent that from happening? And why did being acquitted of treason still end Burr’s career once and for all?</p>
<p>For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/events">https://www.ppfideas.com/events</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: John Brown vs Slavery</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3325</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a057b14e-6574-11f0-9402-a7ce00599985]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR6910994874.mp3?updated=1753935596" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Louis XVI vs the People</title>
      <description>Today’s epoch-making political trial concerns the interrogation, conviction and execution of Louis XVI at the heart of the French Revolution in 1792-3. For many at the time and since this event had powerful echoes of the trial and execution of Charles I - but in fact the trial of Louis was very different in almost every way. Why and how did Louis choose to defend himself? Was he condemned because he was a king or because he was no longer a king? Was the decision to send him to the guillotine really only decided by one vote out of more than seven hundred? And who won in the court of history?

Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Alexander Douglas about the pitfalls of the search for identity, from Silicon Valley to ‘impostor syndrome’. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next time in Politics on Trial: Aaron Burr vs the Constitution w/Gary Gerstle
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>205</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s epoch-making political trial concerns the interrogation, conviction and execution of Louis XVI at the heart of the French Revolution in 1792-3. For many at the time and since this event had powerful echoes of the trial and execution of Charles I - but in fact the trial of Louis was very different in almost every way. Why and how did Louis choose to defend himself? Was he condemned because he was a king or because he was no longer a king? Was the decision to send him to the guillotine really only decided by one vote out of more than seven hundred? And who won in the court of history?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s epoch-making political trial concerns the interrogation, conviction and execution of Louis XVI at the heart of the French Revolution in 1792-3. For many at the time and since this event had powerful echoes of the trial and execution of Charles I - but in fact the trial of Louis was very different in almost every way. Why and how did Louis choose to defend himself? Was he condemned because he was a king or because he was no longer a king? Was the decision to send him to the guillotine really only decided by one vote out of more than seven hundred? And who won in the court of history?

Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Alexander Douglas about the pitfalls of the search for identity, from Silicon Valley to ‘impostor syndrome’. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next time in Politics on Trial: Aaron Burr vs the Constitution w/Gary Gerstle
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s epoch-making political trial concerns the interrogation, conviction and execution of Louis XVI at the heart of the French Revolution in 1792-3. For many at the time and since this event had powerful echoes of the trial and execution of Charles I - but in fact the trial of Louis was very different in almost every way. Why and how did Louis choose to defend himself? Was he condemned because he was a king or because he was no longer a king? Was the decision to send him to the guillotine really only decided by one vote out of more than seven hundred? And who won in the court of history?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Alexander Douglas about the pitfalls of the search for identity, from Silicon Valley to ‘impostor syndrome’. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/events">https://www.ppfideas.com/events</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: Aaron Burr vs the Constitution w/Gary Gerstle</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3569</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3a4a512a-60df-11f0-b220-c3dc6a78f12d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR5624637926.mp3?updated=1752517797" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Warren Hastings vs the British Empire</title>
      <description>To start our new instalment of episodes about the most consequential political trials in history David explores the trial of the eighteenth century: the impeachment of Warren Hastings that ran in the British parliament from 1788-95. Hastings had been Governor-General of Bengal, controlling much of India for Britain and for the East India Company and making himself and many others rich in the process. So why did his former allies turn on him? Why did his trial last for seven years? Why did it end up as a festival of hypocrisy and madness? And why would its closest twenty-first century parallel be the impeachment of Elon Musk?

Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Alexander Douglas in which they talk about how Silicon Valley took a philosophical concept of identity and turned it into a commodity to be marketed. Plus, how should we think about ‘impostor syndrome’? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next time in Politics on Trial: Louis XVI vs the People


Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>204</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>To start our new instalment of episodes about the most consequential political trials in history David explores the trial of the eighteenth century: the impeachment of Warren Hastings that ran in the British parliament from 1788-95. Hastings had been Governor-General of Bengal, controlling much of India for Britain and for the East India Company and making himself and many others rich in the process. So why did his former allies turn on him? Why did his trial last for seven years? Why did it end up as a festival of hypocrisy and madness? And why would its closest twenty-first century parallel be the impeachment of Elon Musk?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>To start our new instalment of episodes about the most consequential political trials in history David explores the trial of the eighteenth century: the impeachment of Warren Hastings that ran in the British parliament from 1788-95. Hastings had been Governor-General of Bengal, controlling much of India for Britain and for the East India Company and making himself and many others rich in the process. So why did his former allies turn on him? Why did his trial last for seven years? Why did it end up as a festival of hypocrisy and madness? And why would its closest twenty-first century parallel be the impeachment of Elon Musk?

Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Alexander Douglas in which they talk about how Silicon Valley took a philosophical concept of identity and turned it into a commodity to be marketed. Plus, how should we think about ‘impostor syndrome’? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: https://www.ppfideas.com/events

Next time in Politics on Trial: Louis XVI vs the People


Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>To start our new instalment of episodes about the most consequential political trials in history David explores <em>the</em> trial of the eighteenth century: the impeachment of Warren Hastings that ran in the British parliament from 1788-95. Hastings had been Governor-General of Bengal, controlling much of India for Britain and for the East India Company and making himself and many others rich in the process. So why did his former allies turn on him? Why did his trial last for seven years? Why did it end up as a festival of hypocrisy and madness? And why would its closest twenty-first century parallel be the impeachment of Elon Musk?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Alexander Douglas in which they talk about how Silicon Valley took a philosophical concept of identity and turned it into a commodity to be marketed. Plus, how should we think about ‘impostor syndrome’? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>For all the information about our autumn season of screenings and live recordings, 'Films of Ideas', and to book tickets, go to our website: <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/events">https://www.ppfideas.com/events</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: Louis XVI vs the People</p>
<p><br></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3794</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[78f655c0-601e-11f0-8849-6f0b7dece033]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR1503459823.mp3?updated=1752434926" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Identity</title>
      <description>For the final episode in our current series on the history of bad ideas, David talks to philosopher Alexander Douglas about the damage that can be done by the idea of identity. Why is the search for a distinctive personal identity such a futile quest? How does it lead to an identity politics of exclusion and violence? What can we learn from the philosopher Spinoza about having an identity without identity? And what can we glean from the experience of dementia about losing ourselves?

'Against Identity: The Wisdom of Escaping the Self' by Alexander Douglas is out now wherever you get your books https://bit.ly/40d8xES

Available from Saturday on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Alexander Douglas in which they talk about how Silicon Valley took a philosophical concept of identity and turned it into a commodity to be marketed. Plus, how should we think about ‘impostor syndrome’? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time we return to Politics on Trial with an 18th-century blockbuster: Warren Hastings vs the British Empire


Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>203</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For the final episode in our current series on the history of bad ideas, David talks to philosopher Alexander Douglas about the damage that can be done by the idea of identity. Why is the search for a distinctive personal identity such a futile quest? How does it lead to an identity politics of exclusion and violence? What can we learn from the philosopher Spinoza about having an identity without identity? And what can we glean from the experience of dementia about losing ourselves?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the final episode in our current series on the history of bad ideas, David talks to philosopher Alexander Douglas about the damage that can be done by the idea of identity. Why is the search for a distinctive personal identity such a futile quest? How does it lead to an identity politics of exclusion and violence? What can we learn from the philosopher Spinoza about having an identity without identity? And what can we glean from the experience of dementia about losing ourselves?

'Against Identity: The Wisdom of Escaping the Self' by Alexander Douglas is out now wherever you get your books https://bit.ly/40d8xES

Available from Saturday on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Alexander Douglas in which they talk about how Silicon Valley took a philosophical concept of identity and turned it into a commodity to be marketed. Plus, how should we think about ‘impostor syndrome’? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time we return to Politics on Trial with an 18th-century blockbuster: Warren Hastings vs the British Empire


Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the final episode in our current series on the history of bad ideas, David talks to philosopher Alexander Douglas about the damage that can be done by the idea of identity. Why is the search for a distinctive personal identity such a futile quest? How does it lead to an identity politics of exclusion and violence? What can we learn from the philosopher Spinoza about having an identity without identity? And what can we glean from the experience of dementia about losing ourselves?</p>
<p>'Against Identity: The Wisdom of Escaping the Self' by Alexander Douglas is out now wherever you get your books <a href="https://bit.ly/40d8xES">https://bit.ly/40d8xES</a></p>
<p>Available from Saturday on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Alexander Douglas in which they talk about how Silicon Valley took a philosophical concept of identity and turned it into a commodity to be marketed. Plus, how should we think about ‘impostor syndrome’? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time we return to Politics on Trial with an 18th-century blockbuster: Warren Hastings vs the British Empire</p>
<p><br></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3695</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[58683fb8-5fdc-11f0-9943-378047beaf6f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR8137423280.mp3?updated=1752406545" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Behaviourism</title>
      <description>In today’s episode of the history of bad ideas, David talks to political philosopher Alan Finlayson about behaviourism, a theory of psychology that has penetrated to the heart of politics. How did we get from Pavlov’s Dog to a prescription for a better society? What is the relationship between behavioural utopianism and contemporary economics? How did behaviourism get turned into something called ‘Nudge’? And if we are being nudged into better behaviour, what is left for politics?

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Identity
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>202</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode of the history of bad ideas, David talks to political philosopher Alan Finlayson about behaviourism, a theory of psychology that has penetrated to the heart of politics. How did we get from Pavlov’s Dog to a prescription for a better society? What is the relationship between behavioural utopianism and contemporary economics? How did behaviourism get turned into something called ‘Nudge’? And if we are being nudged into better behaviour, what is left for politics?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode of the history of bad ideas, David talks to political philosopher Alan Finlayson about behaviourism, a theory of psychology that has penetrated to the heart of politics. How did we get from Pavlov’s Dog to a prescription for a better society? What is the relationship between behavioural utopianism and contemporary economics? How did behaviourism get turned into something called ‘Nudge’? And if we are being nudged into better behaviour, what is left for politics?

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Identity
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode of the history of bad ideas, David talks to political philosopher Alan Finlayson about behaviourism, a theory of psychology that has penetrated to the heart of politics. How did we get from Pavlov’s Dog to a prescription for a better society? What is the relationship between behavioural utopianism and contemporary economics? How did behaviourism get turned into something called ‘Nudge’? And if we are being nudged into better behaviour, what is left for politics?</p>
<p>Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Identity</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3857</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d57f7d3a-5e70-11f0-b2d1-efcb4ae67797]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR7179662190.mp3?updated=1752250400" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Polycrisis</title>
      <description>Today’s bad idea is one with a short history but a big reach: the term polycrisis only came into being at the end of the last century but now it seems to be everywhere. David talks to historian Gary Gerstle about how this idea was originally conceived, what its current vogue says about the times in which we live and whether this really is a polycrisis or something else. Why is it comforting to think that the crises through which we are living are all connected in some way? Why is it also dangerous to think like that? And what does it say about our sense of powerlessness that we haven’t got a better way of describing the problems of our world?

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Behaviourism
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>201</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s bad idea is one with a short history but a big reach: the term polycrisis only came into being at the end of the last century but now it seems to be everywhere. David talks to historian Gary Gerstle about how this idea was originally conceived, what its current vogue says about the times in which we live and whether this really is a polycrisis or something else. Why is it comforting to think that the crises through which we are living are all connected in some way? Why is it also dangerous to think like that? And what does it say about our sense of powerlessness that we haven’t got a better way of describing the problems of our world?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s bad idea is one with a short history but a big reach: the term polycrisis only came into being at the end of the last century but now it seems to be everywhere. David talks to historian Gary Gerstle about how this idea was originally conceived, what its current vogue says about the times in which we live and whether this really is a polycrisis or something else. Why is it comforting to think that the crises through which we are living are all connected in some way? Why is it also dangerous to think like that? And what does it say about our sense of powerlessness that we haven’t got a better way of describing the problems of our world?

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Behaviourism
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s bad idea is one with a short history but a big reach: the term polycrisis only came into being at the end of the last century but now it seems to be everywhere. David talks to historian Gary Gerstle about how this idea was originally conceived, what its current vogue says about the times in which we live and whether this really is a polycrisis or something else. Why is it comforting to think that the crises through which we are living are all connected in some way? Why is it also dangerous to think like that? And what does it say about our sense of powerlessness that we haven’t got a better way of describing the problems of our world?</p>
<p>Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Behaviourism</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3550</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f108fab6-5724-11f0-a492-63b81e7ea378]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR8691980330.mp3?updated=1751448129" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Value-Free Tech</title>
      <description>For today’s episode in the history of bad ideas David talks to philosopher Shannon Vallor about the myth that technology can be value free. It’s easy to see why Silicon Valley is so keen on the idea that it’s never the fault of the tech, only of the people who use it. But why do we let them get away with it? Where did this idea come from? How has it also poisoned arguments about gun laws and nuclear weapons? And what can we do to fight it and try to get technology that works with – not against – basic human values?

Out now on PPF+: A bonus episode with historian of religion Alec Ryrie exploring ‘The Age of Hitler’. When did not being like Hitler rather than trying to be like Jesus become the benchmark of moral conduct? And why is that period coming to an end? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Polycrisis
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>200</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For today’s episode in the history of bad ideas David talks to philosopher Shannon Vallor about the myth that technology can be value free. It’s easy to see why Silicon Valley is so keen on the idea that it’s never the fault of the tech, only of the people who use it. But why do we let them get away with it? Where did this idea come from? How has it also poisoned arguments about gun laws and nuclear weapons? And what can we do to fight it and try to get technology that works with – not against – basic human values?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For today’s episode in the history of bad ideas David talks to philosopher Shannon Vallor about the myth that technology can be value free. It’s easy to see why Silicon Valley is so keen on the idea that it’s never the fault of the tech, only of the people who use it. But why do we let them get away with it? Where did this idea come from? How has it also poisoned arguments about gun laws and nuclear weapons? And what can we do to fight it and try to get technology that works with – not against – basic human values?

Out now on PPF+: A bonus episode with historian of religion Alec Ryrie exploring ‘The Age of Hitler’. When did not being like Hitler rather than trying to be like Jesus become the benchmark of moral conduct? And why is that period coming to an end? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Polycrisis
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For today’s episode in the history of bad ideas David talks to philosopher Shannon Vallor about the myth that technology can be value free. It’s easy to see why Silicon Valley is so keen on the idea that it’s never the fault of the tech, only of the people who use it. But why do we let them get away with it? Where did this idea come from? How has it also poisoned arguments about gun laws and nuclear weapons? And what can we do to fight it and try to get technology that works with – not against – basic human values?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: A bonus episode with historian of religion Alec Ryrie exploring ‘The Age of Hitler’. When did not being like Hitler rather than trying to be like Jesus become the benchmark of moral conduct? And why is that period coming to an end? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Polycrisis</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3663</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3bbbf51e-58ff-11f0-ad4b-a7015fe8744c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR6185912450.mp3?updated=1751651862" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Monopoly</title>
      <description>For today’s episode in the history of bad ideas David talks to economic historian Marc Palen about monopoly, an idea that has always had its defenders as well as its fierce critics. Why do monopolies arise even in supposedly competitive economies? How did the anti-monopoly movement of Henry George in the late-19th century argue that the monopolists could be taken down? How are those struggles echoed in the fight against Silicon Valley monopolists today? And what has all this got to do with Monopoly the board game?

Coming on Saturday on PPF+: A bonus episode with historian of religion Alec Ryrie exploring ‘The Age of Hitler’. Why did not being like Hitler rather than trying to be like Jesus become the benchmark of moral conduct? And why is that period now coming to an end? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Value-free Tech
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>199</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For today’s episode in the history of bad ideas David talks to economic historian Marc Palen about monopoly, an idea that has always had its defenders as well as its fierce critics. Why do monopolies arise even in supposedly competitive economies? How did the anti-monopoly movement of Henry George in the late-19th century argue that the monopolists could be taken down? How are those struggles echoed in the fight against Silicon Valley monopolists today? And what has all this got to do with Monopoly the board game?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For today’s episode in the history of bad ideas David talks to economic historian Marc Palen about monopoly, an idea that has always had its defenders as well as its fierce critics. Why do monopolies arise even in supposedly competitive economies? How did the anti-monopoly movement of Henry George in the late-19th century argue that the monopolists could be taken down? How are those struggles echoed in the fight against Silicon Valley monopolists today? And what has all this got to do with Monopoly the board game?

Coming on Saturday on PPF+: A bonus episode with historian of religion Alec Ryrie exploring ‘The Age of Hitler’. Why did not being like Hitler rather than trying to be like Jesus become the benchmark of moral conduct? And why is that period now coming to an end? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Value-free Tech
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For today’s episode in the history of bad ideas David talks to economic historian Marc Palen about monopoly, an idea that has always had its defenders as well as its fierce critics. Why do monopolies arise even in supposedly competitive economies? How did the anti-monopoly movement of Henry George in the late-19th century argue that the monopolists could be taken down? How are those struggles echoed in the fight against Silicon Valley monopolists today? And what has all this got to do with Monopoly the board game?</p>
<p>Coming on Saturday on PPF+: A bonus episode with historian of religion Alec Ryrie exploring ‘The Age of Hitler’. Why did not being like Hitler rather than trying to be like Jesus become the benchmark of moral conduct? And why is that period now coming to an end? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Value-free Tech</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3431</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9faa2780-5346-11f0-8490-ff6ba54bcaae]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR8911857577.mp3?updated=1751118799" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Meritocracy</title>
      <description>Today’s bad idea is one that started out as satire and ended as a political slogan. David talks to historian of ideas Ben Jackson about meritocracy and its origins in Michael Young’s book The Rise of the Meritocracy published in 1958. Young foresaw a populist revolt against the meritocratic elite in the year 2034. Was his vision prophetic? Why did politicians like Tony Blair embrace a concept that Young thought was antithetical to a fair and just society? And who are the winners and losers from meritocracy today?

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Monopoly
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>198</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s bad idea is one that started out as satire and ended as a political slogan. David talks to historian of ideas Ben Jackson about meritocracy and its origins in Michael Young’s book The Rise of the Meritocracy published in 1958. Young foresaw a populist revolt against the meritocratic elite in the year 2034. Was his vision prophetic? Why did politicians like Tony Blair embrace a concept that Young thought was antithetical to a fair and just society? And who are the winners and losers from meritocracy today?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s bad idea is one that started out as satire and ended as a political slogan. David talks to historian of ideas Ben Jackson about meritocracy and its origins in Michael Young’s book The Rise of the Meritocracy published in 1958. Young foresaw a populist revolt against the meritocratic elite in the year 2034. Was his vision prophetic? Why did politicians like Tony Blair embrace a concept that Young thought was antithetical to a fair and just society? And who are the winners and losers from meritocracy today?

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Monopoly
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s bad idea is one that started out as satire and ended as a political slogan. David talks to historian of ideas Ben Jackson about meritocracy and its origins in Michael Young’s book <em>The Rise of the Meritocracy</em> published in 1958. Young foresaw a populist revolt against the meritocratic elite in the year 2034. Was his vision prophetic? Why did politicians like Tony Blair embrace a concept that Young thought was antithetical to a fair and just society? And who are the winners and losers from meritocracy today?</p>
<p>Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Monopoly</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3719</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2404f2fc-526c-11f0-9399-df4ae701824b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR1263906488.mp3?updated=1750929017" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Charisma</title>
      <description>For today’s episode in the history of bad ideas David talks to cultural historian Tom Wright about charisma, a term that often feels essential for understanding modern politics but which ends up obscuring far more than it explains. How did an old idea from Christian theology get used to explain the hold that political leaders have over crowds? Why is it so important not to confuse charm with charisma? What has made a word from early twentieth-century social science ubiquitous on twenty-first-century dating sites? And if Trump hasn’t got charisma, then what has he got?

Out now on PPF+: A bonus bad ideas episode in which David and Dan Snow talk about all sorts of ‘decisive battles’ that weren’t what they seem: Yarmuk, Hastings, Agincourt, Trafalgar, Warsaw 1920, Stalingrad, and more. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Meritocracy
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>197</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For today’s episode in the history of bad ideas David talks to cultural historian Tom Wright about charisma, a term that often feels essential for understanding modern politics but which ends up obscuring far more than it explains. How did an old idea from Christian theology get used to explain the hold that political leaders have over crowds? Why is it so important not to confuse charm with charisma? What has made a word from early twentieth-century social science ubiquitous on twenty-first-century dating sites? And if Trump hasn’t got charisma, then what has he got?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For today’s episode in the history of bad ideas David talks to cultural historian Tom Wright about charisma, a term that often feels essential for understanding modern politics but which ends up obscuring far more than it explains. How did an old idea from Christian theology get used to explain the hold that political leaders have over crowds? Why is it so important not to confuse charm with charisma? What has made a word from early twentieth-century social science ubiquitous on twenty-first-century dating sites? And if Trump hasn’t got charisma, then what has he got?

Out now on PPF+: A bonus bad ideas episode in which David and Dan Snow talk about all sorts of ‘decisive battles’ that weren’t what they seem: Yarmuk, Hastings, Agincourt, Trafalgar, Warsaw 1920, Stalingrad, and more. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Meritocracy
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For today’s episode in the history of bad ideas David talks to cultural historian Tom Wright about charisma, a term that often feels essential for understanding modern politics but which ends up obscuring far more than it explains. How did an old idea from Christian theology get used to explain the hold that political leaders have over crowds? Why is it so important not to confuse charm with charisma? What has made a word from early twentieth-century social science ubiquitous on twenty-first-century dating sites? And if Trump hasn’t got charisma, then what has he got?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: A bonus bad ideas episode in which David and Dan Snow talk about all sorts of ‘decisive battles’ that weren’t what they seem: Yarmuk, Hastings, Agincourt, Trafalgar, Warsaw 1920, Stalingrad, and more. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Meritocracy</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3581</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[03d6bb6a-4d3e-11f0-9f10-57bc8c601385]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR2535232611.mp3?updated=1750359402" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: The Decisive Battle</title>
      <description>In today’s episode about the power of bad ideas, David talks to historian and podcaster Dan Snow about the myth that wars are settled on the battlefield. Why are we so drawn to the idea of the decisive military showdown? Is Napoleon to blame? What are the forces that actually settle military conflicts? Plus: were Abba really so wrong that Waterloo won the war?

Out tomorrow: A bonus episode in which David and Dan explore a range of battles to see what got settled and what didn’t: Yarmuk, Hastings, Agincourt, Trafalgar, Warsaw 1920, Stalingrad. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Charisma


Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>196</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode about the power of bad ideas, David talks to historian and podcaster Dan Snow about the myth that wars are settled on the battlefield. Why are we so drawn to idea of the decisive military showdown? Is Napoleon to blame? What are the forces that actually settle military conflicts? Plus: were Abba really so wrong that Waterloo won the war?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode about the power of bad ideas, David talks to historian and podcaster Dan Snow about the myth that wars are settled on the battlefield. Why are we so drawn to the idea of the decisive military showdown? Is Napoleon to blame? What are the forces that actually settle military conflicts? Plus: were Abba really so wrong that Waterloo won the war?

Out tomorrow: A bonus episode in which David and Dan explore a range of battles to see what got settled and what didn’t: Yarmuk, Hastings, Agincourt, Trafalgar, Warsaw 1920, Stalingrad. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Charisma


Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode about the power of bad ideas, David talks to historian and podcaster Dan Snow about the myth that wars are settled on the battlefield. Why are we so drawn to the idea of the decisive military showdown? Is Napoleon to blame? What are the forces that actually settle military conflicts? Plus: were Abba really so wrong that Waterloo won the war?</p>
<p>Out tomorrow: A bonus episode in which David and Dan explore a range of battles to see what got settled and what didn’t: Yarmuk, Hastings, Agincourt, Trafalgar, Warsaw 1920, Stalingrad. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Charisma</p>
<p><br></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3607</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[951820c6-4c6e-11f0-977e-c7b04489d1fa]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR4857411083.mp3?updated=1750517506" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Genius</title>
      <description>Today’s bad idea is ‘genius’, the label that has enabled all sorts of terrible behaviour through the ages. Writer and broadcaster Helen Lewis explains how and why the idea of genius gets misapplied to people and things that just aren’t. Why are geniuses meant to be tortured? Why are individual geniuses prized over the collaborations that lie behind most innovations? Why do we think that people who are brilliant at one thing will be good at everything else? Plus, David makes the case for Dickens as a bona fide genius.

The Genius Myth by Helen Lewis is out from today wherever you get your books https://bit.ly/3FSAKda

David’s new 20-part series Postwar – about the 1945 general election and the making of modern Britain – is available now on BBC Radio 4 and BBC Sounds. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002d8v1

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: The Decisive Battle w/Dan Snow
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>195</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s bad idea is ‘genius’, the label that has enabled all sorts of terrible behaviour through the ages. Writer and broadcaster Helen Lewis explains how and why the idea of genius gets misapplied to people and things that just aren’t. Why are geniuses meant to be tortured? Why are individual geniuses prized over the collaborations that lie behind most innovations? Why do we think that people who are brilliant at one thing will be good at everything else? Plus, David makes the case for Dickens as a bona fide genius.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s bad idea is ‘genius’, the label that has enabled all sorts of terrible behaviour through the ages. Writer and broadcaster Helen Lewis explains how and why the idea of genius gets misapplied to people and things that just aren’t. Why are geniuses meant to be tortured? Why are individual geniuses prized over the collaborations that lie behind most innovations? Why do we think that people who are brilliant at one thing will be good at everything else? Plus, David makes the case for Dickens as a bona fide genius.

The Genius Myth by Helen Lewis is out from today wherever you get your books https://bit.ly/3FSAKda

David’s new 20-part series Postwar – about the 1945 general election and the making of modern Britain – is available now on BBC Radio 4 and BBC Sounds. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002d8v1

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: The Decisive Battle w/Dan Snow
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s bad idea is ‘genius’, the label that has enabled all sorts of terrible behaviour through the ages. Writer and broadcaster Helen Lewis explains how and why the idea of genius gets misapplied to people and things that just aren’t. Why are geniuses meant to be tortured? Why are individual geniuses prized over the collaborations that lie behind most innovations? Why do we think that people who are brilliant at one thing will be good at everything else? Plus, David makes the case for Dickens as a bona fide genius.</p>
<p><em>The Genius Myth</em> by Helen Lewis is out from today wherever you get your books <a href="https://bit.ly/3FSAKda">https://bit.ly/3FSAKda</a></p>
<p>David’s new 20-part series <em>Postwar</em> – about the 1945 general election and the making of modern Britain – is available now on BBC Radio 4 and BBC Sounds. <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002d8v1">https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002d8v1</a></p>
<p>Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: The Decisive Battle w/Dan Snow</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3367</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c6200838-4a0b-11f0-a278-cf803a9e963c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR9149068906.mp3?updated=1750007990" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Austerity</title>
      <description>For the first episode in our new series about how bad ideas take hold, David talks to economist Mark Blyth about austerity, the cost-cutting idea that refuses to die. Why is it an article of faith that states need periodic purging to stop them getting too greedy? Why does this so often happen at times when it does most harm, from the 1930s to the financial crisis that began in 2008? And how is the politics of austerity playing out today, in Starmer’s Britain, in Milei’s Argentina and in the DOGE wars happening in Trump’s America?

David’s new 20-part series Postwar – about the 1945 general election and the making of modern Britain – is available now on BBC Radio 4 and BBC Sounds https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/series/m002d8v1

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Genius w/Helen Lewis
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>194</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For the first episode in our new series about how bad ideas take hold, David talks to economist Mark Blyth about austerity, the cost-cutting idea that refuses to die. Why is it an article of faith that states need periodic purging to stop them getting too greedy? Why does this so often happen at times when it does most harm, from the 1930s to the financial crisis that began in 2008? And how is the politics of austerity playing out today, in Starmer’s Britain, in Milei’s Argentina and in the DOGE wars happening in Trump’s America?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the first episode in our new series about how bad ideas take hold, David talks to economist Mark Blyth about austerity, the cost-cutting idea that refuses to die. Why is it an article of faith that states need periodic purging to stop them getting too greedy? Why does this so often happen at times when it does most harm, from the 1930s to the financial crisis that began in 2008? And how is the politics of austerity playing out today, in Starmer’s Britain, in Milei’s Argentina and in the DOGE wars happening in Trump’s America?

David’s new 20-part series Postwar – about the 1945 general election and the making of modern Britain – is available now on BBC Radio 4 and BBC Sounds https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/series/m002d8v1

Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Genius w/Helen Lewis
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the first episode in our new series about how bad ideas take hold, David talks to economist Mark Blyth about austerity, the cost-cutting idea that refuses to die. Why is it an article of faith that states need periodic purging to stop them getting too greedy? Why does this so often happen at times when it does most harm, from the 1930s to the financial crisis that began in 2008? And how is the politics of austerity playing out today, in Starmer’s Britain, in Milei’s Argentina and in the DOGE wars happening in Trump’s America?</p>
<p>David’s new 20-part series <em>Postwar</em> – about the 1945 general election and the making of modern Britain – is available now on BBC Radio 4 and BBC Sounds <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002d8v1">https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/series/m002d8v1</a></p>
<p>Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Genius w/Helen Lewis</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3516</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5542403e-4887-11f0-9dda-2b8b86c50524]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR4489867794.mp3?updated=1749841128" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Charles I vs Parliament</title>
      <description>Today’s political trial is perhaps the most consequential in English history: the trial and execution of King Charles I for treason in January 1649. How could a king commit treason when treason was a crime against the king? How could a court try a king when a king has no peers? How could anyone claim to speak for the people after a civil war when so many people had been on opposite sides? The answers to these questions would cost more than one person his life – but they would also change forever the prospect of holding tyrants to account.

Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Robert Saunders about the 1975 European referendum and the question of why it all ended up so differently in the Brexit referendum of 2016. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

David’s new 20-part series Postwar – about the 1945 general election and the making of modern Britain – is available now on BBC Radio 4 and BBC Sounds. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002d8v1

Next time: The History of Bad Ideas: Austerity w/Mark Blyth
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>193</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s political trial is perhaps the most consequential in English history: the trial and execution of King Charles I for treason in January 1649. How could a king commit treason when treason was a crime against the king? How could a court try a king when a king has no peers? How could anyone claim to speak for the people after a civil war when so many people had been on opposite sides? The answers to these questions would cost more than one person his life – but they would also change forever the prospect of holding tyrants to account.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s political trial is perhaps the most consequential in English history: the trial and execution of King Charles I for treason in January 1649. How could a king commit treason when treason was a crime against the king? How could a court try a king when a king has no peers? How could anyone claim to speak for the people after a civil war when so many people had been on opposite sides? The answers to these questions would cost more than one person his life – but they would also change forever the prospect of holding tyrants to account.

Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Robert Saunders about the 1975 European referendum and the question of why it all ended up so differently in the Brexit referendum of 2016. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

David’s new 20-part series Postwar – about the 1945 general election and the making of modern Britain – is available now on BBC Radio 4 and BBC Sounds. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002d8v1

Next time: The History of Bad Ideas: Austerity w/Mark Blyth
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s political trial is perhaps the most consequential in English history: the trial and execution of King Charles I for treason in January 1649. How could a king commit treason when treason was a crime against the king? How could a court try a king when a king has no peers? How could anyone claim to speak for the people after a civil war when so many people had been on opposite sides? The answers to these questions would cost more than one person his life – but they would also change forever the prospect of holding tyrants to account.</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Robert Saunders about the 1975 European referendum and the question of why it all ended up so differently in the Brexit referendum of 2016. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>David’s new 20-part series <em>Postwar</em> – about the 1945 general election and the making of modern Britain – is available now on BBC Radio 4 and BBC Sounds. <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002d8v1">https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002d8v1</a></p>
<p>Next time: The History of Bad Ideas: Austerity w/Mark Blyth</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3760</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6c607be4-4514-11f0-a002-17a27f53f215]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR2207388358.mp3?updated=1749462003" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Galileo vs the Inquisition</title>
      <description>Today’s trial is one of the most notorious in history but also one of the most misremembered. Galileo’s epic confrontation with the Catholic Church over the question of whether the earth moves round the sun – culminating with his interrogation and condemnation in Rome in 1633 – was not just a matter of truth vs ignorance or science vs superstition. It was also twenty-year long struggle on the part of both sides to find a way to co-exist. Did they succeed? Not exactly, but it wasn’t for want of trying. Then – and perhaps now – science and religion needed each other.

Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Robert Saunders about the 1975 European referendum and the question of why it all ended up so differently in the Brexit referendum of 2016. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

David’s new 20-part series Postwar – about the 1945 general election and the making of modern Britain – starts on BBC Radio 4 tomorrow and the first 10 episodes will be available to download on BBC Sounds https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002d8v1

Next time in Politics on Trial: Charles I vs Parliament
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>192</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s trial is one of the most notorious in history but also one of the most misremembered. Galileo’s epic confrontation with the Catholic Church over the question of whether the earth moves round the sun – culminating with his interrogation and condemnation in Rome in 1633 – was not just a matter of truth vs ignorance or science vs superstition. It was also twenty-year long struggle on the part of both sides to find a way to co-exist. Did they succeed? Not exactly, but it wasn’t for want of trying. Then – and perhaps now – science and religion needed each other.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s trial is one of the most notorious in history but also one of the most misremembered. Galileo’s epic confrontation with the Catholic Church over the question of whether the earth moves round the sun – culminating with his interrogation and condemnation in Rome in 1633 – was not just a matter of truth vs ignorance or science vs superstition. It was also twenty-year long struggle on the part of both sides to find a way to co-exist. Did they succeed? Not exactly, but it wasn’t for want of trying. Then – and perhaps now – science and religion needed each other.

Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Robert Saunders about the 1975 European referendum and the question of why it all ended up so differently in the Brexit referendum of 2016. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

David’s new 20-part series Postwar – about the 1945 general election and the making of modern Britain – starts on BBC Radio 4 tomorrow and the first 10 episodes will be available to download on BBC Sounds https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002d8v1

Next time in Politics on Trial: Charles I vs Parliament
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s trial is one of the most notorious in history but also one of the most misremembered. Galileo’s epic confrontation with the Catholic Church over the question of whether the earth moves round the sun – culminating with his interrogation and condemnation in Rome in 1633 – was not just a matter of truth vs ignorance or science vs superstition. It was also twenty-year long struggle on the part of both sides to find a way to co-exist. Did they succeed? Not exactly, but it wasn’t for want of trying. Then – and perhaps now – science and religion needed each other.</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: Part 2 of David’s conversation with Robert Saunders about the 1975 European referendum and the question of why it all ended up so differently in the Brexit referendum of 2016. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>David’s new 20-part series <em>Postwar</em> – about the 1945 general election and the making of modern Britain – starts on BBC Radio 4 tomorrow and the first 10 episodes will be available to download on BBC Sounds <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002d8v1">https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002d8v1</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: Charles I vs Parliament</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3883</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8ba38f26-438b-11f0-8c90-a733ff9f6d38]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR8467607649.mp3?updated=1749293338" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>50th Anniversary Special: The 1975 European Referendum w/Robert Saunders</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is about a pivotal event in British history that took place exactly 50 years ago: the 1975 referendum on Britain’s membership of the European Community. David talks to historian Robert Saunders about why it was so different in so many ways from the Brexit referendum in 2016. Why in 1975 were Labour and the SNP the Eurosceptic parties? What made the Tories pro-European? Where was immigration as an election issue? How did the Yes campaign overturn a big deficit in the polls? Plus: why didn’t it settle the question, so that another referendum had to be held four decades later?

Available tomorrow on PPF+: Part 2 of this conversation in which David and Robert try to make sense of the many differences between the 1975 and 2016 referendums as well as exploring where Britain stands in relation to Europe in 2025. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Robert Saunders’s definitive history of the 1975 referendum Yes To Europe! is available wherever you get your books https://bit.ly/3FE04mP

Next time in Politics on Trial: Galileo vs the Inquisition
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>6</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>191</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is about a pivotal event in British history that took place exactly 50 years ago: the 1975 referendum on Britain’s membership of the European Community. David talks to historian Robert Saunders about why it was so different in so many ways from the Brexit referendum in 2016. Why in 1975 were Labour and the SNP the Eurosceptic parties? What made the Tories pro-European? Where was immigration as an election issue? How did the Yes campaign overturn a big deficit in the polls? Plus: why didn’t it settle the question, so that another referendum had to be held four decades later?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is about a pivotal event in British history that took place exactly 50 years ago: the 1975 referendum on Britain’s membership of the European Community. David talks to historian Robert Saunders about why it was so different in so many ways from the Brexit referendum in 2016. Why in 1975 were Labour and the SNP the Eurosceptic parties? What made the Tories pro-European? Where was immigration as an election issue? How did the Yes campaign overturn a big deficit in the polls? Plus: why didn’t it settle the question, so that another referendum had to be held four decades later?

Available tomorrow on PPF+: Part 2 of this conversation in which David and Robert try to make sense of the many differences between the 1975 and 2016 referendums as well as exploring where Britain stands in relation to Europe in 2025. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Robert Saunders’s definitive history of the 1975 referendum Yes To Europe! is available wherever you get your books https://bit.ly/3FE04mP

Next time in Politics on Trial: Galileo vs the Inquisition
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is about a pivotal event in British history that took place exactly 50 years ago: the 1975 referendum on Britain’s membership of the European Community. David talks to historian Robert Saunders about why it was so different in so many ways from the Brexit referendum in 2016. Why in 1975 were Labour and the SNP the Eurosceptic parties? What made the Tories pro-European? Where was immigration as an election issue? How did the Yes campaign overturn a big deficit in the polls? Plus: why didn’t it settle the question, so that another referendum had to be held four decades later?</p>
<p>Available tomorrow on PPF+: Part 2 of this conversation in which David and Robert try to make sense of the many differences between the 1975 and 2016 referendums as well as exploring where Britain stands in relation to Europe in 2025. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Robert Saunders’s definitive history of the 1975 referendum <em>Yes To Europe!</em> is available wherever you get your books <a href="https://bit.ly/3FE04mP">https://bit.ly/3FE04mP</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: Galileo vs the Inquisition</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3617</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[550496a6-3f97-11f0-a0fe-570577b33609]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR1785712369.mp3?updated=1748858494" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Mary Queen of Scots vs the Secret State</title>
      <description>In today’s episode an extraordinary political trial that culminated in the execution of one queen at the behest of another: Mary Queen of Scots, convicted of treason in 1586 and beheaded in 1587. But who really wanted her dead, Queen Elizabeth or Elizabeth’s powerful political servants? Why did Mary demand to be tried before parliament rather than a court of noblemen? How did she attempt to defend herself in the face of apparently overwhelming incriminating evidence against her? And who was the only person who voted for her acquittal?

Listen to David’s episode about Schiller’s Mary Stuart as part of our Great Political Fictions series https://www.ppfideas.com/episodes/the-great-political-fictions%3A-mary-stuart

Next time: 50 years on from the 1975 Europe Referendum w/Robert Saunders

Coming soon in Politics on Trial: Galileo vs the Inquisition  
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>190</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode an extraordinary political trial that culminated in the execution of one queen at the behest of another: Mary Queen of Scots, convicted of treason in 1586 and beheaded in 1587. But who really wanted her dead, Queen Elizabeth or Elizabeth’s powerful political servants? Why did Mary demand to be tried before parliament rather than a court of noblemen? How did she attempt to defend herself in the face of apparently overwhelming incriminating evidence against her? And who was the only person who voted for her acquittal?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode an extraordinary political trial that culminated in the execution of one queen at the behest of another: Mary Queen of Scots, convicted of treason in 1586 and beheaded in 1587. But who really wanted her dead, Queen Elizabeth or Elizabeth’s powerful political servants? Why did Mary demand to be tried before parliament rather than a court of noblemen? How did she attempt to defend herself in the face of apparently overwhelming incriminating evidence against her? And who was the only person who voted for her acquittal?

Listen to David’s episode about Schiller’s Mary Stuart as part of our Great Political Fictions series https://www.ppfideas.com/episodes/the-great-political-fictions%3A-mary-stuart

Next time: 50 years on from the 1975 Europe Referendum w/Robert Saunders

Coming soon in Politics on Trial: Galileo vs the Inquisition  
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode an extraordinary political trial that culminated in the execution of one queen at the behest of another: Mary Queen of Scots, convicted of treason in 1586 and beheaded in 1587. But who really wanted her dead, Queen Elizabeth or Elizabeth’s powerful political servants? Why did Mary demand to be tried before parliament rather than a court of noblemen? How did she attempt to defend herself in the face of apparently overwhelming incriminating evidence against her? And who was the only person who voted for her acquittal?</p>
<p>Listen to David’s episode about Schiller’s <em>Mary Stuart</em> as part of our Great Political Fictions series <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/episodes/the-great-political-fictions%3A-mary-stuart">https://www.ppfideas.com/episodes/the-great-political-fictions%3A-mary-stuart</a></p>
<p>Next time: 50 years on from the 1975 Europe Referendum w/Robert Saunders</p>
<p>Coming soon in Politics on Trial: Galileo vs the Inquisition  </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3282</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[662837b8-3bb3-11f0-bf37-4b91e69f4d0c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9437230975.mp3?updated=1748430701" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Thomas More vs the King</title>
      <description>In today’s episode another trial that forms the basis for great drama: the case of Thomas More, tried and executed in 1535, events dramatised by Robert Bolt in A Man for All Seasons and Hilary Mantel in Wolf Hall. How did More try to argue that silence was no evidence of treason? Why was his defence so legalistic? Was he really ‘the Socrates of England’? And who was the true villain in this case: Thomas Cromwell, Richard Rich or the King himself?

Available now on PPF+: Socrates part 2, in which David explores the verdict of history on this case and the fierce arguments it still inspires. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: Mary Queen of Scots vs the Secret State
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>189</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode another trial that forms the basis for great drama: the case of Thomas More, tried and executed in 1535, events dramatised by Robert Bolt in A Man for All Seasons and Hilary Mantel in Wolf Hall. How did More try to argue that silence was no evidence of treason? Why was his defence so legalistic? Was he really ‘the Socrates of England’? And who was the true villain in this case: Thomas Cromwell, Richard Rich or the King himself?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode another trial that forms the basis for great drama: the case of Thomas More, tried and executed in 1535, events dramatised by Robert Bolt in A Man for All Seasons and Hilary Mantel in Wolf Hall. How did More try to argue that silence was no evidence of treason? Why was his defence so legalistic? Was he really ‘the Socrates of England’? And who was the true villain in this case: Thomas Cromwell, Richard Rich or the King himself?

Available now on PPF+: Socrates part 2, in which David explores the verdict of history on this case and the fierce arguments it still inspires. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: Mary Queen of Scots vs the Secret State
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode another trial that forms the basis for great drama: the case of Thomas More, tried and executed in 1535, events dramatised by Robert Bolt in A Man for All Seasons and Hilary Mantel in Wolf Hall. How did More try to argue that silence was no evidence of treason? Why was his defence so legalistic? Was he really ‘the Socrates of England’? And who was the true villain in this case: Thomas Cromwell, Richard Rich or the King himself?</p>
<p>Available now on PPF+: Socrates part 2, in which David explores the verdict of history on this case and the fierce arguments it still inspires. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: Mary Queen of Scots vs the Secret State</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3434</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7a93965c-373a-11f0-bdef-a3a08ea1f4f0]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3863728988.mp3?updated=1747938966" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Joan of Arc vs the Church</title>
      <description>Today’s political trial took place in 1431 though it was still being re-litigated right through to the twentieth century: the case of Joan of Arc, charged with heresy by the Church and burned at the stake. Why was a political prisoner tried in an ecclesiastical court? Why were her interrogators so obsessed by her choice in clothes? How did Joan seek to explain her visions? And was this trial any more of a fix than the later trials that exonerated her?

Available now on PPF+: Socrates part 2, in which David explores the verdict of history on this case and the fierce arguments it still inspires. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: Thomas More vs the King


Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>188</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s political trial took place in 1431 though it was still being re-litigated right through to the twentieth century: the case of Joan of Arc, charged with heresy by the Church and burned at the stake. Why was a political prisoner tried in an ecclesiastical court? Why were her interrogators so obsessed by her choice in clothes? How did Joan seek to explain her visions? And was this trial any more of a fix than the later trials that exonerated her?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s political trial took place in 1431 though it was still being re-litigated right through to the twentieth century: the case of Joan of Arc, charged with heresy by the Church and burned at the stake. Why was a political prisoner tried in an ecclesiastical court? Why were her interrogators so obsessed by her choice in clothes? How did Joan seek to explain her visions? And was this trial any more of a fix than the later trials that exonerated her?

Available now on PPF+: Socrates part 2, in which David explores the verdict of history on this case and the fierce arguments it still inspires. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: Thomas More vs the King


Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s political trial took place in 1431 though it was still being re-litigated right through to the twentieth century: the case of Joan of Arc, charged with heresy by the Church and burned at the stake. Why was a political prisoner tried in an ecclesiastical court? Why were her interrogators so obsessed by her choice in clothes? How did Joan seek to explain her visions? And was this trial any more of a fix than the later trials that exonerated her?</p>
<p>Available now on PPF+: Socrates part 2, in which David explores the verdict of history on this case and the fierce arguments it still inspires. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: Thomas More vs the King</p>
<p><br></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3601</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[59fc7a02-35a6-11f0-ae24-172eb2f6ddc1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7857360357.mp3?updated=1747765387" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: Socrates vs Democracy</title>
      <description>The first political trial in our new series is the one that set the template for all the others: the trial of Socrates in Athens in 399 BCE, which ended with a death sentence for the philosopher and a permanent stain on the reputation of Athenian democracy. Why, after a lifetime of philosophy, was Socrates finally prosecuted at the age of 70? Was the case motivated by private grievance or public outrage? What should Socrates have said in his own defence? Why, in the end, did he choose defiance instead?

Out on Saturday on PPF+: Socrates part 2 - David explores the verdict of history on this case and the fierce arguments it still inspires. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: Joan of Arc vs the Church
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>187</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>The first political trial in our new series is the one that set the template for all the others: the trial of Socrates in Athens in 399 BCE, which ended with a death sentence for the philosopher and a permanent stain on the reputation of Athenian democracy. Why, after a lifetime of philosophy, was Socrates finally prosecuted at the age of 70? Was the case motivated by private grievance or public outrage? What should Socrates have said in his own defence? Why, in the end, did he choose defiance instead?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The first political trial in our new series is the one that set the template for all the others: the trial of Socrates in Athens in 399 BCE, which ended with a death sentence for the philosopher and a permanent stain on the reputation of Athenian democracy. Why, after a lifetime of philosophy, was Socrates finally prosecuted at the age of 70? Was the case motivated by private grievance or public outrage? What should Socrates have said in his own defence? Why, in the end, did he choose defiance instead?

Out on Saturday on PPF+: Socrates part 2 - David explores the verdict of history on this case and the fierce arguments it still inspires. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: Joan of Arc vs the Church
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The first political trial in our new series is the one that set the template for all the others: the trial of Socrates in Athens in 399 BCE, which ended with a death sentence for the philosopher and a permanent stain on the reputation of Athenian democracy. Why, after a lifetime of philosophy, was Socrates finally prosecuted at the age of 70? Was the case motivated by private grievance or public outrage? What should Socrates have said in his own defence? Why, in the end, did he choose defiance instead?</p>
<p>Out on Saturday on PPF+: Socrates part 2 - David explores the verdict of history on this case and the fierce arguments it still inspires. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: Joan of Arc vs the Church</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3237</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4382bfae-3009-11f0-a8cd-97a22a6d31b5]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3499313069.mp3?updated=1747148558" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Politics on Trial: A History of Lawfare</title>
      <description>To introduce our new series about historic political trials – from Socrates to Marine Le Pen – David explores what makes political confrontations in a court of law so fascinating and so revealing. Why do even the worst of dictators still want to play by the rules? What happens when realpolitik and legal principles collide? How does the political system often find itself in the dock? Who wins and who loses in the great game of lawfare?

Out now: a new bonus episode on PPF+ where David tries to answer your questions about Trump and the international order. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: Socrates vs Democracy




Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>13</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>186</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>To introduce our new series about historic political trials – from Socrates to Marine Le Pen – David explores what makes political confrontations in a court of law so fascinating and so revealing. Why do even the worst of dictators still want to play by the rules? What happens when realpolitik and legal principles collide? How does the political system often find itself in the dock? Who wins and who loses in the great game of lawfare?

Out now: a new bonus episode on PPF+ where David tries to answer your questions about Trump and the international order. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time in Politics on Trial: Socrates vs Democracy




Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>To introduce our new series about historic political trials – from Socrates to Marine Le Pen – David explores what makes political confrontations in a court of law so fascinating and so revealing. Why do even the worst of dictators still want to play by the rules? What happens when realpolitik and legal principles collide? How does the political system often find itself in the dock? Who wins and who loses in the great game of lawfare?</p>
<p>Out now: a new bonus episode on PPF+ where David tries to answer your questions about Trump and the international order. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time in Politics on Trial: Socrates vs Democracy</p>
<p><br></p>
<p><br></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3066</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ab90d2b6-2f5a-11f0-a32b-8f03092d2f80]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1878883468.mp3?updated=1747073171" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ideas of Globalisation: What’s Gone Wrong? w/Dani Rodrik</title>
      <description>For the final episode in this series David talks to the leading economist Dani Rodrik about the case he made in the early 2000s that globalisation was unsustainable in its current form. How does he think this prediction has been borne out? What forms of globalisation might work in the 21st century? Where are the strengths and weaknesses of the existing system? And what does he make of the antics of Donald Trump?

Available from Saturday on PPF+: David tries to answer your questions about Trump and the international order. Is it over? Is he over? When will it all be over? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time: Politics on Trial: A History of Lawfare
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>12</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>185</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For the final episode in this series David talks to the leading economist Dani Rodrik about the case he made in the early 2000s that globalisation was unsustainable in its current form. How does he think this prediction has been borne out? What forms of globalisation might work in the 21st century? Where are the strengths and weaknesses of the existing system? And what does he make of the antics of Donald Trump?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the final episode in this series David talks to the leading economist Dani Rodrik about the case he made in the early 2000s that globalisation was unsustainable in its current form. How does he think this prediction has been borne out? What forms of globalisation might work in the 21st century? Where are the strengths and weaknesses of the existing system? And what does he make of the antics of Donald Trump?

Available from Saturday on PPF+: David tries to answer your questions about Trump and the international order. Is it over? Is he over? When will it all be over? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time: Politics on Trial: A History of Lawfare
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the final episode in this series David talks to the leading economist Dani Rodrik about the case he made in the early 2000s that globalisation was unsustainable in its current form. How does he think this prediction has been borne out? What forms of globalisation might work in the 21st century? Where are the strengths and weaknesses of the existing system? And what does he make of the antics of Donald Trump?</p>
<p>Available from Saturday on PPF+: David tries to answer your questions about Trump and the international order. Is it over? Is he over? When will it all be over? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time: Politics on Trial: A History of Lawfare</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3185</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a3114986-2b77-11f0-9dd1-0bdf2fffc9ec]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9066065245.mp3?updated=1746645795" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ideas of Globalisation: The Crisis of the 1970s (and Trump!)</title>
      <description>David talks to historian Meg Jacobs about how the 1970s changed everything for America’s understanding of its place in the global economy. How did first the Nixon Shock and then the Oil Shock reshape American politics? Why did America’s politicians respond to these shocks not with tariffs or sabre-rattling but with calls to national self-sacrifice? Did anyone heed those calls? And what lessons did Donald Trump draw from America’s crisis decade?

The latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter is out now with guides, insights and clips to accompany this series, plus David writes about whether Nigel Farage really spells the end of two-party politics in the UK. It’s easy to sign up https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters

Next time on Ideas of Globalisation: What’s Gone Wrong? w/Dani Rodrik
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>12</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>184</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>David talks to historian Meg Jacobs about how the 1970s changed everything for America’s understanding of its place in the global economy. How did first the Nixon Shock and then the Oil Shock reshape American politics? Why did America’s politicians respond to these shocks not with tariffs or sabre-rattling but with calls to national self-sacrifice? Did anyone heed those calls? And what lessons did Donald Trump draw from America’s crisis decade?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>David talks to historian Meg Jacobs about how the 1970s changed everything for America’s understanding of its place in the global economy. How did first the Nixon Shock and then the Oil Shock reshape American politics? Why did America’s politicians respond to these shocks not with tariffs or sabre-rattling but with calls to national self-sacrifice? Did anyone heed those calls? And what lessons did Donald Trump draw from America’s crisis decade?

The latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter is out now with guides, insights and clips to accompany this series, plus David writes about whether Nigel Farage really spells the end of two-party politics in the UK. It’s easy to sign up https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters

Next time on Ideas of Globalisation: What’s Gone Wrong? w/Dani Rodrik
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>David talks to historian Meg Jacobs about how the 1970s changed everything for America’s understanding of its place in the global economy. How did first the Nixon Shock and then the Oil Shock reshape American politics? Why did America’s politicians respond to these shocks not with tariffs or sabre-rattling but with calls to national self-sacrifice? Did anyone heed those calls? And what lessons did Donald Trump draw from America’s crisis decade?</p>
<p>The latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter is out now with guides, insights and clips to accompany this series, plus David writes about whether Nigel Farage really spells the end of two-party politics in the UK. It’s easy to sign up <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p>
<p>Next time on Ideas of Globalisation: What’s Gone Wrong? w/Dani Rodrik</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3798</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[83992b40-2a65-11f0-8649-5f9f07f57459]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4538488191.mp3?updated=1746528271" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ideas of Globalisation: Central Banks vs the People (and Trump!)</title>
      <description>Today David talks to political and economic theorist Leah Downey about the role that central banks in general – and the Federal Reserve in particular – have played in the story of globalisation. How has the Fed tried to reconcile its obligations to American democracy with its obligations to the global order? Is the Eurodollar a token of American strength or American vulnerability? Are the world’s central bankers really just a private club? And what does history tell us about the likely outcome of Trump vs Powell?

The latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter is out tomorrow with guides, insights and clips to accompany this series, plus David writes about whether Nigel Farage really spells the end of two-party politics in the UK. Sign up now https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters

Next time on Ideas of Globalisation: The Crisis of the 1970s (and Trump!)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>12</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>183</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today David talks to political and economic theorist Leah Downey about the role that central banks in general – and the Federal Reserve in particular – have played in the story of globalisation. How has the Fed tried to reconcile its obligations to American democracy with its obligations to the global order? Is the Eurodollar a token of American strength or American vulnerability? Are the world’s central bankers really just a private club? And what does history tell us about the likely outcome of Trump vs Powell?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today David talks to political and economic theorist Leah Downey about the role that central banks in general – and the Federal Reserve in particular – have played in the story of globalisation. How has the Fed tried to reconcile its obligations to American democracy with its obligations to the global order? Is the Eurodollar a token of American strength or American vulnerability? Are the world’s central bankers really just a private club? And what does history tell us about the likely outcome of Trump vs Powell?

The latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter is out tomorrow with guides, insights and clips to accompany this series, plus David writes about whether Nigel Farage really spells the end of two-party politics in the UK. Sign up now https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters

Next time on Ideas of Globalisation: The Crisis of the 1970s (and Trump!)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today David talks to political and economic theorist Leah Downey about the role that central banks in general – and the Federal Reserve in particular – have played in the story of globalisation. How has the Fed tried to reconcile its obligations to American democracy with its obligations to the global order? Is the Eurodollar a token of American strength or American vulnerability? Are the world’s central bankers really just a private club? And what does history tell us about the likely outcome of Trump vs Powell?</p>
<p>The latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter is out tomorrow with guides, insights and clips to accompany this series, plus David writes about whether Nigel Farage really spells the end of two-party politics in the UK. Sign up now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p>
<p>Next time on Ideas of Globalisation: The Crisis of the 1970s (and Trump!)</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3353</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1afecc3e-29d9-11f0-8635-97eb8f7009de]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7772964170.mp3?updated=1746467827" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ideas of Globalisation: Hoover and Smoot-Hawley (and Trump!)</title>
      <description>David talks to historian Gary Gerstle about the last time the Republican party got caught up in a tariffs disaster and how it changed American politics. The Smoot-Hawley Act of 1930 brought tariffs back and helped bring down both the Republican Party and the global economy. Why didn’t Hoover stop it? What did the fiasco reveal about the limits of presidential power back then? And what does it suggest about the limits of presidential power today?

Next time on Ideas of Globalisation: Central Banks vs the People (and Trump!)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>12</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>182</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>David talks to historian Gary Gerstle about the last time the Republican party got caught up in a tariffs disaster and how it changed American politics. The Smoot-Hawley Act of 1930 brought tariffs back and helped bring down both the Republican Party and the global economy. Why didn’t Hoover stop it? What did the fiasco reveal about the limits of presidential power back then? And what does it suggest about the limits of presidential power today?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>David talks to historian Gary Gerstle about the last time the Republican party got caught up in a tariffs disaster and how it changed American politics. The Smoot-Hawley Act of 1930 brought tariffs back and helped bring down both the Republican Party and the global economy. Why didn’t Hoover stop it? What did the fiasco reveal about the limits of presidential power back then? And what does it suggest about the limits of presidential power today?

Next time on Ideas of Globalisation: Central Banks vs the People (and Trump!)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>David talks to historian Gary Gerstle about the last time the Republican party got caught up in a tariffs disaster and how it changed American politics. The Smoot-Hawley Act of 1930 brought tariffs back and helped bring down both the Republican Party and the global economy. Why didn’t Hoover stop it? What did the fiasco reveal about the limits of presidential power back then? And what does it suggest about the limits of presidential power today?</p>
<p>Next time on Ideas of Globalisation: Central Banks vs the People (and Trump!)</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3660</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c29f72bc-267e-11f0-8147-2340c9838317]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6819866802.mp3?updated=1746099092" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ideas of Globalisation: Chamberlain and the Tariff Wars (and Trump!)</title>
      <description>Today we explore the explosive fight over tariffs that took place in Britain in the first decade of the twentieth century. David talks to historian Robert Saunders about how Joseph Chamberlain made tariff reform a great popular cause and how it nearly destroyed his party. Are there parallels with Trump’s tariff wars today? Yes! Are there lessons for Trump’s opponents too? Yes!

Out now on PPF+: Lenin and Trotsky part 2, taking the story on from 1917 to explore civil war, the rise of Stalin and the re-invention of Trotskyism. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time on Ideas of Globalisation: The Smoot-Hawley disaster (and Trump!)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>12</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>181</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today we explore the explosive fight over tariffs that took place in Britain in the first decade of the twentieth century. David talks to historian Robert Saunders about how Joseph Chamberlain made tariff reform a great popular cause and how it nearly destroyed his party. Are there parallels with Trump’s tariff wars today? Yes! Are there lessons for Trump’s opponents too? Yes!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today we explore the explosive fight over tariffs that took place in Britain in the first decade of the twentieth century. David talks to historian Robert Saunders about how Joseph Chamberlain made tariff reform a great popular cause and how it nearly destroyed his party. Are there parallels with Trump’s tariff wars today? Yes! Are there lessons for Trump’s opponents too? Yes!

Out now on PPF+: Lenin and Trotsky part 2, taking the story on from 1917 to explore civil war, the rise of Stalin and the re-invention of Trotskyism. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time on Ideas of Globalisation: The Smoot-Hawley disaster (and Trump!)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today we explore the explosive fight over tariffs that took place in Britain in the first decade of the twentieth century. David talks to historian Robert Saunders about how Joseph Chamberlain made tariff reform a great popular cause and how it nearly destroyed his party. Are there parallels with Trump’s tariff wars today? Yes! Are there lessons for Trump’s opponents too? Yes!</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: Lenin and Trotsky part 2, taking the story on from 1917 to explore civil war, the rise of Stalin and the re-invention of Trotskyism. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time on Ideas of Globalisation: The Smoot-Hawley disaster (and Trump!)</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3426</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[84462c04-25b1-11f0-b687-b3d687231a12]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4555360009.mp3?updated=1746011884" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ideas of Globalisation: Trade, Race and Empire (and Trump!)</title>
      <description>We start a new mini-series on the history of ideas of globalisation by exploring how arguments from 150 years ago foreshadow what’s happening with Trump today. David talks to economic historian Marc Palen about the nineteenth-century fight between economic nationalists and the champions of an open economy. Was free trade for everyone or just for white people? Was it possible to be an imperialist and a globalist? What did the socialists want? And who thought that Canada should be annexed by the United States?

Out now on PPF+: Lenin and Trotsky part 2, taking the story on from 1917 to explore civil war, the rise of Stalin and the re-invention of Trotskyism. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time on Ideas of Globalisation: The Tariff Wars of the 1900s. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>12</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>180</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>We start a new mini-series on the history of ideas of globalisation by exploring how arguments from 150 years ago foreshadow what’s happening with Trump today. David talks to economic historian Marc Palen about the nineteenth-century fight between economic nationalists and the champions of an open economy. Was free trade for everyone or just for white people? Was it possible to be an imperialist and a globalist? What did the socialists want? And who thought that Canada should be annexed by the United States?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>We start a new mini-series on the history of ideas of globalisation by exploring how arguments from 150 years ago foreshadow what’s happening with Trump today. David talks to economic historian Marc Palen about the nineteenth-century fight between economic nationalists and the champions of an open economy. Was free trade for everyone or just for white people? Was it possible to be an imperialist and a globalist? What did the socialists want? And who thought that Canada should be annexed by the United States?

Out now on PPF+: Lenin and Trotsky part 2, taking the story on from 1917 to explore civil war, the rise of Stalin and the re-invention of Trotskyism. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Next time on Ideas of Globalisation: The Tariff Wars of the 1900s. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We start a new mini-series on the history of ideas of globalisation by exploring how arguments from 150 years ago foreshadow what’s happening with Trump today. David talks to economic historian Marc Palen about the nineteenth-century fight between economic nationalists and the champions of an open economy. Was free trade for everyone or just for white people? Was it possible to be an imperialist and a globalist? What did the socialists want? And who thought that Canada should be annexed by the United States?</p>
<p>Out now on PPF+: Lenin and Trotsky part 2, taking the story on from 1917 to explore civil war, the rise of Stalin and the re-invention of Trotskyism. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p>
<p>Next time on Ideas of Globalisation: The Tariff Wars of the 1900s. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3548</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7dad746e-22b0-11f0-a19f-03d0f8f4a3f6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2607757586.mp3?updated=1745680705" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Lenin and Trotsky</title>
      <description>To conclude this part of our revolutionary ideas series, we explore the overlapping lives and thinking of two emblematic twentieth-century revolutionaries: Lenin and Trotsky. David talks to historian of Russia Edward Acton about what inspired them, what connected them and what divided them. How were they radicalised? How did they interpret the failure of the 1905 revolution? How did they make the 1917 revolution happen?
Available from Saturday on PPF+: Lenin and Trotsky part 2, taking the story on from 1917 to explore civil war, the rise of Stalin and the re-invention of Trotskyism. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Out tomorrow a new edition of our free fortnightly newsletter with links, clips and guides to all our recent episodes. Join our mailing list https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time the start of a new series: The History of Globalisation
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>179</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>To conclude this part of our revolutionary ideas series, we explore the overlapping lives and thinking of two emblematic twentieth-century revolutionaries: Lenin and Trotsky. David talks to historian of Russia Edward Acton about what inspired them, what connected them and what divided them. How were they radicalised? How did they interpret the failure of the 1905 revolution? How did they make the 1917 revolution happen?
Available from Saturday on PPF+: Lenin and Trotsky part 2, taking the story on from 1917 to explore civil war, the rise of Stalin and the re-invention of Trotskyism. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Out tomorrow a new edition of our free fortnightly newsletter with links, clips and guides to all our recent episodes. Join our mailing list https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time the start of a new series: The History of Globalisation
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>To conclude this part of our revolutionary ideas series, we explore the overlapping lives and thinking of two emblematic twentieth-century revolutionaries: Lenin and Trotsky. David talks to historian of Russia Edward Acton about what inspired them, what connected them and what divided them. How were they radicalised? How did they interpret the failure of the 1905 revolution? How did they make the 1917 revolution happen?</p><p>Available from Saturday on PPF+: Lenin and Trotsky part 2, taking the story on from 1917 to explore civil war, the rise of Stalin and the re-invention of Trotskyism. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Out tomorrow a new edition of our free fortnightly newsletter with links, clips and guides to all our recent episodes. Join our mailing list <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p><p>Next time the start of a new series: The History of Globalisation</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3324</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d08234d2-2034-11f0-9a9b-2be4389899d6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7679604793.mp3?updated=1745407782" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PPF Live Special: Churchill – The Politician With Nine Lives w/Robert Saunders</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is the second of our two recent live recordings of PPF, this one in front of an audience at the Bath Curious Minds Festival. David talks to historian Robert Saunders about the life of Winston Churchill and all its twists and turns of fortune: from disgrace in WWI, economic disaster in the 1920s, wilderness in the 1930s, through to redemption in 1945 and rejection by the voters in the same year. How to make sense of it all? Is there a thread that connects the ups and downs? Has there ever – anywhere – been another political life like it?
Out now on PPF+: David discusses the influence of Marinetti’s Futurist Manifesto (1909) – from cars to cod liver oil, from fascism to techno-optimism, from the madness of pre-WWI Europe to the craziness of Silicon Valley today. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Lenin and Trotsky
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>178</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is the second of our two recent live recordings of PPF, this one in front of an audience at the Bath Curious Minds Festival. David talks to historian Robert Saunders about the life of Winston Churchill and all its twists and turns of fortune: from disgrace in WWI, economic disaster in the 1920s, wilderness in the 1930s, through to redemption in 1945 and rejection by the voters in the same year. How to make sense of it all? Is there a thread that connects the ups and downs? Has there ever – anywhere – been another political life like it?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is the second of our two recent live recordings of PPF, this one in front of an audience at the Bath Curious Minds Festival. David talks to historian Robert Saunders about the life of Winston Churchill and all its twists and turns of fortune: from disgrace in WWI, economic disaster in the 1920s, wilderness in the 1930s, through to redemption in 1945 and rejection by the voters in the same year. How to make sense of it all? Is there a thread that connects the ups and downs? Has there ever – anywhere – been another political life like it?
Out now on PPF+: David discusses the influence of Marinetti’s Futurist Manifesto (1909) – from cars to cod liver oil, from fascism to techno-optimism, from the madness of pre-WWI Europe to the craziness of Silicon Valley today. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Lenin and Trotsky
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is the second of our two recent live recordings of PPF, this one in front of an audience at the Bath Curious Minds Festival. David talks to historian Robert Saunders about the life of Winston Churchill and all its twists and turns of fortune: from disgrace in WWI, economic disaster in the 1920s, wilderness in the 1930s, through to redemption in 1945 and rejection by the voters in the same year. How to make sense of it all? Is there a thread that connects the ups and downs? Has there ever – anywhere – been another political life like it?</p><p>Out now on PPF+: David discusses the influence of Marinetti’s<em> Futurist Manifesto</em> (1909) – from cars to cod liver oil, from fascism to techno-optimism, from the madness of pre-WWI Europe to the craziness of Silicon Valley today. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time: The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Lenin and Trotsky</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3757</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[375def2e-1bbd-11f0-8218-7b0d3b7ec858]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7207796586.mp3?updated=1744916596" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: The Rite of Spring w/Dominic Dromgoole</title>
      <description>Our third Parisian revolution is another explosive night in the theatre, this time in the world of dance. David talks to Dominic Dromgoole about Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring, which provoked absolute outrage when it premiered in 1913. Is that what its impresario Diaghilev wanted? How did Nijinsky cope? Did the response foreshadow the trauma to come in 1914? And how did the set designer Roerich end up playing a part in American presidential history?
Dominic Dromgoole’s Astonish Me! First Nights that Changed the World is available wherever you get your books https://profilebooks.com/work/astonish-me/
Out this weekend: a new bonus episode on PPF+ exploring the far-reaching impact of Marinetti’s Futurist Manifesto (1909), from pre-WWI Europe to Silicon Valley. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: PPF Live: Churchill – The Politician With Nine Lives
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>177</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Our third Parisian revolution is another explosive night in the theatre, this time in the world of dance. David talks to Dominic Dromgoole about Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring, which provoked absolute outrage when it premiered in 1913. Is that what its impresario Diaghilev wanted? How did Nijinsky cope? Did the response foreshadow the trauma to come in 1914? And how did the set designer Roerich end up playing a part in American presidential history?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Our third Parisian revolution is another explosive night in the theatre, this time in the world of dance. David talks to Dominic Dromgoole about Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring, which provoked absolute outrage when it premiered in 1913. Is that what its impresario Diaghilev wanted? How did Nijinsky cope? Did the response foreshadow the trauma to come in 1914? And how did the set designer Roerich end up playing a part in American presidential history?
Dominic Dromgoole’s Astonish Me! First Nights that Changed the World is available wherever you get your books https://profilebooks.com/work/astonish-me/
Out this weekend: a new bonus episode on PPF+ exploring the far-reaching impact of Marinetti’s Futurist Manifesto (1909), from pre-WWI Europe to Silicon Valley. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: PPF Live: Churchill – The Politician With Nine Lives
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our third Parisian revolution is another explosive night in the theatre, this time in the world of dance. David talks to Dominic Dromgoole about Stravinsky’s <em>The Rite of Spring</em>, which provoked absolute outrage when it premiered in 1913. Is that what its impresario Diaghilev wanted? How did Nijinsky cope? Did the response foreshadow the trauma to come in 1914? And how did the set designer Roerich end up playing a part in American presidential history?</p><p>Dominic Dromgoole’s <em>Astonish Me! First Nights that Changed the World</em> is available wherever you get your books <a href="https://profilebooks.com/work/astonish-me/">https://profilebooks.com/work/astonish-me/</a></p><p>Out this weekend: a new bonus episode on PPF+ exploring the far-reaching impact of Marinetti’s <em>Futurist Manifesto</em> (1909), from pre-WWI Europe to Silicon Valley. Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time: PPF Live: Churchill – The Politician With Nine Lives</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2753</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8b41fdfa-1add-11f0-992c-0ba1f98c2eb8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6863757209.mp3?updated=1744820497" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Ubu Roi w/Dominic Dromgoole</title>
      <description>Today’s Parisian revolution is a theatrical performance that produced a riot. David talks to theatre director Dominic Dromgoole about Alfred Jarry’s Ubu Roi (1896), which only ran for a couple of nights but left an indelible mark on the culture of the age and has resonated ever since. Why did a play effectively written by children provoke such a storm among the adults? What made it it blow the mind of W. B. Yeats who was in the audience? How can something so bad be so liberating?
Next time: Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>176</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s Parisian revolution is a theatrical performance that produced a riot. David talks to theatre director Dominic Dromgoole about Alfred Jarry’s Ubu Roi (1896), which only ran for a couple of nights but left an indelible mark on the culture of the age and has resonated ever since. Why did a play effectively written by children provoke such a storm among the adults? What made it it blow the mind of W. B. Yeats who was in the audience? How can something so bad be so liberating?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s Parisian revolution is a theatrical performance that produced a riot. David talks to theatre director Dominic Dromgoole about Alfred Jarry’s Ubu Roi (1896), which only ran for a couple of nights but left an indelible mark on the culture of the age and has resonated ever since. Why did a play effectively written by children provoke such a storm among the adults? What made it it blow the mind of W. B. Yeats who was in the audience? How can something so bad be so liberating?
Next time: Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s Parisian revolution is a theatrical performance that produced a riot. David talks to theatre director Dominic Dromgoole about Alfred Jarry’s <em>Ubu Roi</em> (1896), which only ran for a couple of nights but left an indelible mark on the culture of the age and has resonated ever since. Why did a play effectively written by children provoke such a storm among the adults? What made it it blow the mind of W. B. Yeats who was in the audience? How can something so bad be so liberating?</p><p>Next time: Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2701</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0b21f58a-1961-11f0-943e-53788367d398]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2231510409.mp3?updated=1744656947" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Salon Des Refusés w/Dominic Dromgoole</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is the first of three this week with the theatre director and writer Dominic Dromgoole, exploring revolutionary events in the world of art and theatre, starting with the opening of the Salon des Refusés in Paris in May 1863. How did the Emperor Napoleon end up sponsoring such a counter-cultural event? Why did it provoke such public outrage and astonishment? And in what ways did Manet’s Le Déjeuner sur l’herbe revolutionise what was possible in the creation and consumption of modern art?
A new edition of our newsletter is out now with guides to the events of the Paris Commune and much more. Sign up to get it every fortnight https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: Ubu Roi w/Dominic Dromgoole
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>175</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is the first of three this week with the theatre director and writer Dominic Dromgoole, exploring revolutionary events in the world of art and theatre, starting with the opening of the Salon des Refusés in Paris in May 1863. How did the Emperor Napoleon end up sponsoring such a counter-cultural event? Why did it provoke such public outrage and astonishment? And in what ways did Manet’s Le Déjeuner sur l’herbe revolutionise what was possible in the creation and consumption of modern art?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is the first of three this week with the theatre director and writer Dominic Dromgoole, exploring revolutionary events in the world of art and theatre, starting with the opening of the Salon des Refusés in Paris in May 1863. How did the Emperor Napoleon end up sponsoring such a counter-cultural event? Why did it provoke such public outrage and astonishment? And in what ways did Manet’s Le Déjeuner sur l’herbe revolutionise what was possible in the creation and consumption of modern art?
A new edition of our newsletter is out now with guides to the events of the Paris Commune and much more. Sign up to get it every fortnight https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: Ubu Roi w/Dominic Dromgoole
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is the first of three this week with the theatre director and writer Dominic Dromgoole, exploring revolutionary events in the world of art and theatre, starting with the opening of the Salon des Refusés in Paris in May 1863. How did the Emperor Napoleon end up sponsoring such a counter-cultural event? Why did it provoke such public outrage and astonishment? And in what ways did Manet’s <em>Le Déjeuner sur l’herbe</em> revolutionise what was possible in the creation and consumption of modern art?</p><p>A new edition of our newsletter is out now with guides to the events of the Paris Commune and much more. Sign up to get it every fortnight <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p><p>Next time: Ubu Roi w/Dominic Dromgoole</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2504</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[32650216-16ca-11f0-a1e3-23cbf24475f2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9756212105.mp3?updated=1744373711" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Marx and the Paris Commune</title>
      <description>Today the first of four episodes about Parisian revolutions. We start with the definitive nineteenth-century revolutionary and his definitive revolution: David talks to historian Bruno Leipold about why Karl Marx thought the Paris Commune in 1871 was the model of a workers' uprising and provided a vision of the socialist future. How had the Communards reinvented democracy? Was this a social, an economic or a political revolution? And how did Marx reconcile himself to its bloody failure?
Bruno Leipold’s intellectual biography of Marx and Marxism Citizen Marx is available now https://bit.ly/4i8Gmga
A new edition of our free fortnightly newsletter is out tomorrow with guides to the events of the Paris Commune and much more. Sign up now https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: Salon des Refusés w/Dominic Dromgoole
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>174</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today the first of four episodes about Parisian revolutions. We start with the definitive nineteenth-century revolutionary and his definitive revolution: David talks to historian Bruno Leipold about why Karl Marx thought the Paris Commune in 1871 was the model of a workers' uprising and provided a vision of the socialist future. How had the Communards reinvented democracy? Was this a social, an economic or a political revolution? And how did Marx reconcile himself to its bloody failure?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today the first of four episodes about Parisian revolutions. We start with the definitive nineteenth-century revolutionary and his definitive revolution: David talks to historian Bruno Leipold about why Karl Marx thought the Paris Commune in 1871 was the model of a workers' uprising and provided a vision of the socialist future. How had the Communards reinvented democracy? Was this a social, an economic or a political revolution? And how did Marx reconcile himself to its bloody failure?
Bruno Leipold’s intellectual biography of Marx and Marxism Citizen Marx is available now https://bit.ly/4i8Gmga
A new edition of our free fortnightly newsletter is out tomorrow with guides to the events of the Paris Commune and much more. Sign up now https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: Salon des Refusés w/Dominic Dromgoole
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today the first of four episodes about Parisian revolutions. We start with the definitive nineteenth-century revolutionary and his definitive revolution: David talks to historian Bruno Leipold about why Karl Marx thought the Paris Commune in 1871 was the model of a workers' uprising and provided a vision of the socialist future. How had the Communards reinvented democracy? Was this a social, an economic or a political revolution? And how did Marx reconcile himself to its bloody failure?</p><p>Bruno Leipold’s intellectual biography of Marx and Marxism <em>Citizen Marx</em> is available now <a href="https://bit.ly/4i8Gmga">https://bit.ly/4i8Gmga</a></p><p>A new edition of our free fortnightly newsletter is out tomorrow with guides to the events of the Paris Commune and much more. Sign up now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p><p>Next time: Salon des Refusés w/Dominic Dromgoole</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3324</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[63b3f0e6-155f-11f0-99d8-db6bf759c420]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7463143545.mp3?updated=1744217407" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Free Speech</title>
      <description>Today’s revolutionary idea is one with a long history, not all of it revolutionary: David talks to the historian Fara Dabhoiwala about the idea of free speech. When did free speech first get articulated as a fundamental right? How has that right been used and abused, from the eighteenth century to the present? And what changed in the history of the idea of free speech with the publication of J. S. Mill’s On Liberty in 1859?
Fara Dabhoiwala’s What Is Free Speech? is available now https://bit.ly/4jgcvDt
Next time: Marx and the Paris Commune w/Bruno Leipold
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>173</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s revolutionary idea is one with a long history, not all of it revolutionary: David talks to the historian Fara Dabhoiwala about the idea of free speech. When did free speech first get articulated as a fundamental right? How has that right been used and abused, from the eighteenth century to the present? And what changed in the history of the idea of free speech with the publication of J. S. Mill’s On Liberty in 1859?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s revolutionary idea is one with a long history, not all of it revolutionary: David talks to the historian Fara Dabhoiwala about the idea of free speech. When did free speech first get articulated as a fundamental right? How has that right been used and abused, from the eighteenth century to the present? And what changed in the history of the idea of free speech with the publication of J. S. Mill’s On Liberty in 1859?
Fara Dabhoiwala’s What Is Free Speech? is available now https://bit.ly/4jgcvDt
Next time: Marx and the Paris Commune w/Bruno Leipold
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s revolutionary idea is one with a long history, not all of it revolutionary: David talks to the historian Fara Dabhoiwala about the idea of free speech. When did free speech first get articulated as a fundamental right? How has that right been used and abused, from the eighteenth century to the present? And what changed in the history of the idea of free speech with the publication of J. S. Mill’s <em>On Liberty</em> in 1859?</p><p>Fara Dabhoiwala’s <em>What Is Free Speech?</em> is available now <a href="https://bit.ly/4jgcvDt">https://bit.ly/4jgcvDt</a></p><p>Next time: Marx and the Paris Commune w/Bruno Leipold</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3758</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[07096bea-1231-11f0-8b36-a7332e90a9da]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6793621419.mp3?updated=1743866783" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PPF Live Film Special: Network w/Helen Lewis</title>
      <description>We take a brief break from revolutionary ideas for a special live episode of PPF recorded in front of an audience at the Regent Street Cinema in London. David talks to writer and journalist Helen Lewis about Network (1976), a film still best remembered for its catchphrase: ‘I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore!’ Just how prophetic is that cry of rage in the age of Trump? What does the film say about the continuing power of television in the era of social media? And who or what does it remind us of: Ye, Tucker Carlson, Russell Brand, WWE wrestling… or is it about something else entirely?
Out now on PPF+: the second part of David’s conversation with Adam Rutherford about Darwin and the most revolutionary idea of them all. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: J. S. Mill and Free Speech w/Fara Dabhoiwala
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>172</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>We take a brief break from revolutionary ideas for a special live episode of PPF recorded in front of an audience at the Regent Street Cinema in London. David talks to writer and journalist Helen Lewis about Network (1976), a film still best remembered for its catchphrase: ‘I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore!’ Just how prophetic is that cry of rage in the age of Trump? What does the film say about the continuing power of television in the era of social media? And who or what does it remind us of: Ye, Tucker Carlson, Russell Brand, WWE wrestling… or is it about something else entirely?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>We take a brief break from revolutionary ideas for a special live episode of PPF recorded in front of an audience at the Regent Street Cinema in London. David talks to writer and journalist Helen Lewis about Network (1976), a film still best remembered for its catchphrase: ‘I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore!’ Just how prophetic is that cry of rage in the age of Trump? What does the film say about the continuing power of television in the era of social media? And who or what does it remind us of: Ye, Tucker Carlson, Russell Brand, WWE wrestling… or is it about something else entirely?
Out now on PPF+: the second part of David’s conversation with Adam Rutherford about Darwin and the most revolutionary idea of them all. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: J. S. Mill and Free Speech w/Fara Dabhoiwala
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We take a brief break from revolutionary ideas for a special live episode of PPF recorded in front of an audience at the Regent Street Cinema in London. David talks to writer and journalist Helen Lewis about <em>Network</em> (1976), a film still best remembered for its catchphrase: ‘I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore!’ Just how prophetic is that cry of rage in the age of Trump? What does the film say about the continuing power of television in the era of social media? And who or what does it remind us of: Ye, Tucker Carlson, Russell Brand, WWE wrestling… or is it about something else entirely?</p><p>Out now on PPF+: the second part of David’s conversation with Adam Rutherford about Darwin and the most revolutionary idea of them all. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time: J. S. Mill and Free Speech w/Fara Dabhoiwala</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3900</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3a990bbe-0fde-11f0-a8ea-dfe359bccaef]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4881336099.mp3?updated=1743611363" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Darwin w/Adam Rutherford</title>
      <description>David talks to geneticist and science writer Adam Rutherford about the book that fundamentally altered our understanding of just about everything: Darwin’s On The Origin of Species (1859). What made the idea of natural selection so different from the theories of evolution that preceded it? How did Darwin arrive at it? What changed when he published his theory and why is it, in so many ways, the most revolutionary idea of them all?
Out tomorrow on PPF+ Darwin Part 2: Adam Rutherford explores how Darwin’s ideas evolved after 1859 and how the revolution in thinking that he started has continued to this day. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: PPF Live recorded at the Regent Street Cinema: Network w/Helen Lewis
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>171</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>David talks to geneticist and science writer Adam Rutherford about the book that fundamentally altered our understanding of just about everything: Darwin’s On The Origin of Species (1859). What made the idea of natural selection so different from the theories of evolution that preceded it? How did Darwin arrive at it? What changed when he published his theory and why is it, in so many ways, the most revolutionary idea of them all?
Out tomorrow on PPF+ Darwin Part 2: Adam Rutherford explores how Darwin’s ideas evolved after 1859 and how the revolution in thinking that he started has continued to this day. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: PPF Live recorded at the Regent Street Cinema: Network w/Helen Lewis
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>David talks to geneticist and science writer Adam Rutherford about the book that fundamentally altered our understanding of just about everything: Darwin’s <em>On The Origin of Species</em> (1859). What made the idea of natural selection so different from the theories of evolution that preceded it? How did Darwin arrive at it? What changed when he published his theory and why is it, in so many ways, the most revolutionary idea of them all?</p><p>Out tomorrow on PPF+ Darwin Part 2: Adam Rutherford explores how Darwin’s ideas evolved after 1859 and how the revolution in thinking that he started has continued to this day. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time: PPF Live recorded at the Regent Street Cinema: Network w/Helen Lewis</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3218</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[cbb5a894-0a7c-11f0-a9bf-c7fa104546fe]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2893427164.mp3?updated=1743019808" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: The Taiping Revolution</title>
      <description>Today’s revolutionary ideas come from China: David talks to historian Julia Lovell about the Taiping Revolution, another massive mid-19th-century upheaval that nearly overturned the established order. How did Christianity inspire an uprising against the Qing dynasty? Was it a revolution or a civil war? What was the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom? And where does this cataclysmic event fit into China’s 20th-century revolutionary history?
Out now: a bonus episode on 1848 with Chris Clark looking at the counter-revolution – how did the ruling regimes of Europe fight back? To get this and a year’s worth of bonus episodes sign up to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Available tomorrow: the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter with clips, guides, further reading and much more. Sign up now https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: Darwin w/Adam Rutherford
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>170</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s revolutionary ideas come from China: David talks to historian Julia Lovell about the Taiping Revolution, another massive mid-19th-century upheaval that nearly overturned the established order. How did Christianity inspire an uprising against the Qing dynasty? Was it a revolution or a civil war? What was the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom? And where does this cataclysmic event fit into China’s 20th-century revolutionary history?
Out now: a bonus episode on 1848 with Chris Clark looking at the counter-revolution – how did the ruling regimes of Europe fight back? To get this and a year’s worth of bonus episodes sign up to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Available tomorrow: the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter with clips, guides, further reading and much more. Sign up now https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: Darwin w/Adam Rutherford
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s revolutionary ideas come from China: David talks to historian Julia Lovell about the Taiping Revolution, another massive mid-19th-century upheaval that nearly overturned the established order. How did Christianity inspire an uprising against the Qing dynasty? Was it a revolution or a civil war? What was the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom? And where does this cataclysmic event fit into China’s 20th-century revolutionary history?</p><p>Out now: a bonus episode on 1848 with Chris Clark looking at the counter-revolution – how did the ruling regimes of Europe fight back? To get this and a year’s worth of bonus episodes sign up to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Available tomorrow: the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter with clips, guides, further reading and much more. Sign up now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p><p>Next time: Darwin w/Adam Rutherford</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3948</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3333cc60-08e0-11f0-972b-9f1840513fa8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3447647939.mp3?updated=1743007209" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: 1848: The Radical Revolution w/Chris Clark</title>
      <description>In our second of three episodes on the revolutions that swept through Europe in 1848 David and Chris Clark explore the forces demanding radical change. What was ‘the Social Question’ and who was asking it? Where did the violence that erupted in the summer of 1848 come from? What, if anything did it achieve? And who paid the price?
Out tomorrow: a final bonus episode on 1848 looking at the counter-revolution: how did the ruling regimes of Europe fight back? To get this and a year’s worth of bonus episodes sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: The Taiping Revolution w/Julia Lovell
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>169</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In our second of three episodes on the revolutions that swept through Europe in 1848 David and Chris Clark explore the forces demanding radical change. What was ‘the Social Question’ and who was asking it? Where did the violence that erupted in the summer of 1848 come from? What, if anything did it achieve? And who paid the price?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In our second of three episodes on the revolutions that swept through Europe in 1848 David and Chris Clark explore the forces demanding radical change. What was ‘the Social Question’ and who was asking it? Where did the violence that erupted in the summer of 1848 come from? What, if anything did it achieve? And who paid the price?
Out tomorrow: a final bonus episode on 1848 looking at the counter-revolution: how did the ruling regimes of Europe fight back? To get this and a year’s worth of bonus episodes sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: The Taiping Revolution w/Julia Lovell
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In our second of three episodes on the revolutions that swept through Europe in 1848 David and Chris Clark explore the forces demanding radical change. What was ‘the Social Question’ and who was asking it? Where did the violence that erupted in the summer of 1848 come from? What, if anything did it achieve? And who paid the price?</p><p>Out tomorrow: a final bonus episode on 1848 looking at the counter-revolution: how did the ruling regimes of Europe fight back? To get this and a year’s worth of bonus episodes sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time: The Taiping Revolution w/Julia Lovell</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3150</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a52c3d64-0685-11f0-8779-a3998283588f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4176105312.mp3?updated=1742583912" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: 1848: The Liberal Revolution w/Chris Clark</title>
      <description>In the first of three episodes about the revolutions that swept through Europe in 1848 David is joined by historian Chris Clark to explore the ideas behind this continental upheaval. We start with the ‘Liberal Revolution’: Who were the liberals and what had turned them into revolutionaries? How did the original French Revolution overshadow their hopes and fears? Were parliaments and constitutions capable of sustaining revolutionary fervour? And did the liberals of 1848 realise what they had unleashed?
Come to see PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: join us on Saturday March 29th to hear David in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives https://bit.ly/42GPp3X
Next time: 1848: The Radical Revolution w/Chris Clark
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>168</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the first of three episodes about the revolutions that swept through Europe in 1848 David is joined by historian Chris Clark to explore the ideas behind this continental upheaval. We start with the ‘Liberal Revolution’: Who were the liberals and what had turned them into revolutionaries? How did the original French Revolution overshadow their hopes and fears? Were parliaments and constitutions capable of sustaining revolutionary fervour? And did the liberals of 1848 realise what they had unleashed?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the first of three episodes about the revolutions that swept through Europe in 1848 David is joined by historian Chris Clark to explore the ideas behind this continental upheaval. We start with the ‘Liberal Revolution’: Who were the liberals and what had turned them into revolutionaries? How did the original French Revolution overshadow their hopes and fears? Were parliaments and constitutions capable of sustaining revolutionary fervour? And did the liberals of 1848 realise what they had unleashed?
Come to see PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: join us on Saturday March 29th to hear David in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives https://bit.ly/42GPp3X
Next time: 1848: The Radical Revolution w/Chris Clark
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the first of three episodes about the revolutions that swept through Europe in 1848 David is joined by historian Chris Clark to explore the ideas behind this continental upheaval. We start with the ‘Liberal Revolution’: Who were the liberals and what had turned them into revolutionaries? How did the original French Revolution overshadow their hopes and fears? Were parliaments and constitutions capable of sustaining revolutionary fervour? And did the liberals of 1848 realise what they had unleashed?</p><p>Come to see PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: join us on Saturday March 29th to hear David in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives <a href="https://bit.ly/42GPp3X">https://bit.ly/42GPp3X</a></p><p>Next time: 1848: The Radical Revolution w/Chris Clark</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3355</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c181c6b0-03fa-11f0-9aa7-a75abaca2f65]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3417950878.mp3?updated=1742304166" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: The Bayesian Revolution w/David Spiegelhalter</title>
      <description>Today’s revolutionary idea is something a bit different: David talks to statistician David Spiegelhalter about how an eighteenth-century theory of probability emerged from relative obscurity in the twentieth century to reconfigure our understanding of the relationship between past, present and future. What was Thomas Bayes’s original idea about doing probability in reverse: from effect to cause? What happened when this way of thinking passed through the vortex of the French Revolution? How has it come to lie behind recent innovations in political polling, AI, self-driving cars, medical research and so much more? Why does it remain controversial to this day?
The latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter is available: to get it in your inbox sign up now https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletter 
Next time: 1848: The Liberal Revolution w/Chris Clark
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>167</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s revolutionary idea is something a bit different: David talks to statistician David Spiegelhalter about how an eighteenth-century theory of probability emerged from relative obscurity in the twentieth century to reconfigure our understanding of the relationship between past, present and future. What was Thomas Bayes’s original idea about doing probability in reverse: from effect to cause? What happened when this way of thinking passed through the vortex of the French Revolution? How has it come to lie behind recent innovations in political polling, AI, self-driving cars, medical research and so much more? Why does it remain controversial to this day?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s revolutionary idea is something a bit different: David talks to statistician David Spiegelhalter about how an eighteenth-century theory of probability emerged from relative obscurity in the twentieth century to reconfigure our understanding of the relationship between past, present and future. What was Thomas Bayes’s original idea about doing probability in reverse: from effect to cause? What happened when this way of thinking passed through the vortex of the French Revolution? How has it come to lie behind recent innovations in political polling, AI, self-driving cars, medical research and so much more? Why does it remain controversial to this day?
The latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter is available: to get it in your inbox sign up now https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletter 
Next time: 1848: The Liberal Revolution w/Chris Clark
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s revolutionary idea is something a bit different: David talks to statistician David Spiegelhalter about how an eighteenth-century theory of probability emerged from relative obscurity in the twentieth century to reconfigure our understanding of the relationship between past, present and future. What was Thomas Bayes’s original idea about doing probability in reverse: from effect to cause? What happened when this way of thinking passed through the vortex of the French Revolution? How has it come to lie behind recent innovations in political polling, AI, self-driving cars, medical research and so much more? Why does it remain controversial to this day?</p><p>The latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter is available: to get it in your inbox sign up now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletter">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletter</a> </p><p>Next time: 1848: The Liberal Revolution w/Chris Clark</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3636</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[83a72948-00f8-11f0-9c88-efe491a73e46]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4997637682.mp3?updated=1741973253" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Slave Uprising: The Haitian Revolution</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is about a very different revolution from any we’ve discussed so far: David talks to historian Hank Gonzalez about the Haitian Revolution, which for the first time in history saw a slave revolt result in an independent free state. How did the Haitian Revolution intersect with the American and French Revolutions that preceded it? Why were European powers unable to reverse it despite massive military intervention? What is its legacy for the state of Haiti today?
Tickets are still available for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: join us on Saturday 29th March to hear David in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives https://bit.ly/42GPp3X
Out tomorrow the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter: to get it in your inbox sign up now https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: The Bayesian revolution w/David Spiegelhalter
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>166</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is about a very different revolution from any we’ve discussed so far: David talks to historian Hank Gonzalez about the Haitian Revolution, which for the first time in history saw a slave revolt result in an independent free state. How did the Haitian Revolution intersect with the American and French Revolutions that preceded it? Why were European powers unable to reverse it despite massive military intervention? What is its legacy for the state of Haiti today?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is about a very different revolution from any we’ve discussed so far: David talks to historian Hank Gonzalez about the Haitian Revolution, which for the first time in history saw a slave revolt result in an independent free state. How did the Haitian Revolution intersect with the American and French Revolutions that preceded it? Why were European powers unable to reverse it despite massive military intervention? What is its legacy for the state of Haiti today?
Tickets are still available for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: join us on Saturday 29th March to hear David in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives https://bit.ly/42GPp3X
Out tomorrow the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter: to get it in your inbox sign up now https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: The Bayesian revolution w/David Spiegelhalter
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is about a very different revolution from any we’ve discussed so far: David talks to historian Hank Gonzalez about the Haitian Revolution, which for the first time in history saw a slave revolt result in an independent free state. How did the Haitian Revolution intersect with the American and French Revolutions that preceded it? Why were European powers unable to reverse it despite massive military intervention? What is its legacy for the state of Haiti today?</p><p>Tickets are still available for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: join us on Saturday 29th March to hear David in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives <a href="https://bit.ly/42GPp3X">https://bit.ly/42GPp3X</a></p><p>Out tomorrow the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter: to get it in your inbox sign up now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p><p>Next time: The Bayesian revolution w/David Spiegelhalter</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3421</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2b373216-ff37-11ef-8e1c-e3956a2493ae]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3684854220.mp3?updated=1741780801" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: French Revolution 3: Paine</title>
      <description>For our third episode on the ideas behind the French Revolution, David talks to Richard Whatmore about the ubiquitous Thomas Paine, the Englishman who championed revolutionary politics around the world. How did Paine come to see France as the locus of all his revolutionary hopes? How were those hopes ultimately disappointed? And what happened to Paine’s vision of the Rights of Man?
Out now on PPF+: a special bonus episode on King Donald The First. David explores the arguments being made in 2025 for the restoration of monarchy in America. Who’s making them and why? What on earth are they thinking? Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: Slave uprising: the Haitian Revolution
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>165</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For our third episode on the ideas behind the French Revolution, David talks to Richard Whatmore about the ubiquitous Thomas Paine, the Englishman who championed revolutionary politics around the world. How did Paine come to see France as the locus of all his revolutionary hopes? How were those hopes ultimately disappointed? And what happened to Paine’s vision of the Rights of Man?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For our third episode on the ideas behind the French Revolution, David talks to Richard Whatmore about the ubiquitous Thomas Paine, the Englishman who championed revolutionary politics around the world. How did Paine come to see France as the locus of all his revolutionary hopes? How were those hopes ultimately disappointed? And what happened to Paine’s vision of the Rights of Man?
Out now on PPF+: a special bonus episode on King Donald The First. David explores the arguments being made in 2025 for the restoration of monarchy in America. Who’s making them and why? What on earth are they thinking? Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: Slave uprising: the Haitian Revolution
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For our third episode on the ideas behind the French Revolution, David talks to Richard Whatmore about the ubiquitous Thomas Paine, the Englishman who championed revolutionary politics around the world. How did Paine come to see France as the locus of all his revolutionary hopes? How were those hopes ultimately disappointed? And what happened to Paine’s vision of the Rights of Man?</p><p>Out now on PPF+: a special bonus episode on King Donald The First. David explores the arguments being made in 2025 for the restoration of monarchy in America. Who’s making them and why? What on earth are they thinking? Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time: Slave uprising: the Haitian Revolution</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3505</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[316460f2-fb7a-11ef-b566-87c3b7f24619]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML5368475679.mp3?updated=1741369348" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: French Revolution 2: Robespierre</title>
      <description>For our second episode on the people and ideas behind the French Revolution David talks to historian and biographer Ruth Scurr about the man who came to embody the revolution in all its radicalism and all its terror: Maximilien Robespierre. Who was he and how did he rise so fast once the upheaval was underway? How did he harness the power of the Jacobin Club? How did he marshal the violence of the streets? What did he believe in? And what made him think it was possible to reconcile virtue with terror?
Out now: a special bonus episode for PPF+ subscribers on King Donald The First: David explores the arguments being made in 2025 for the restoration of monarchy in America. Who’s making them and why? What on earth are they thinking? Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: French Revolution 3: Paine
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>164</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For our second episode on the people and ideas behind the French Revolution David talks to historian and biographer Ruth Scurr about the man who came to embody the revolution in all its radicalism and all its terror: Maximilien Robespierre. Who was he and how did he rise so fast once the upheaval was underway? How did he harness the power of the Jacobin Club? How did he marshal the violence of the streets? What did he believe in? And what made him think it was possible to reconcile virtue with terror?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For our second episode on the people and ideas behind the French Revolution David talks to historian and biographer Ruth Scurr about the man who came to embody the revolution in all its radicalism and all its terror: Maximilien Robespierre. Who was he and how did he rise so fast once the upheaval was underway? How did he harness the power of the Jacobin Club? How did he marshal the violence of the streets? What did he believe in? And what made him think it was possible to reconcile virtue with terror?
Out now: a special bonus episode for PPF+ subscribers on King Donald The First: David explores the arguments being made in 2025 for the restoration of monarchy in America. Who’s making them and why? What on earth are they thinking? Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: French Revolution 3: Paine
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For our second episode on the people and ideas behind the French Revolution David talks to historian and biographer Ruth Scurr about the man who came to embody the revolution in all its radicalism and all its terror: Maximilien Robespierre. Who was he and how did he rise so fast once the upheaval was underway? How did he harness the power of the Jacobin Club? How did he marshal the violence of the streets? What did he believe in? And what made him think it was possible to reconcile virtue with terror?</p><p>Out now: a special bonus episode for PPF+ subscribers on King Donald The First: David explores the arguments being made in 2025 for the restoration of monarchy in America. Who’s making them and why? What on earth are they thinking? Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time: French Revolution 3: Paine</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3215</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9f034090-f929-11ef-b4fd-7761abd48fec]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7041901926.mp3?updated=1741114774" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: French Revolution 1: Sieyès</title>
      <description>In the first of three episodes about the people and ideas behind the French Revolution, David talks to Lucia Rubinelli about the man who helped kickstart it all: the Abbé Sieyès. How did an obscure cleric galvanise a nation? What did he mean by the Third Estate and why did he think it was everything? What went wrong with his idea of a new constitutional order for France? And what happened when Sieyès encountered Napoleon?
Out now on PPF+: a special bonus episode on King Donald The First. David explores the arguments being made in 2025 for the restoration of monarchy in America. Who’s making them and why? What on earth are they thinking? Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: French Revolution 2: Robespierre
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>163</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the first of three episodes about the people and ideas behind the French Revolution, David talks to Lucia Rubinelli about the man who helped kickstart it all: the Abbé Sieyès. How did an obscure cleric galvanise a nation? What did he mean by the Third Estate and why did he think it was everything? What went wrong with his idea of a new constitutional order for France? And what happened when Sieyès encountered Napoleon?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the first of three episodes about the people and ideas behind the French Revolution, David talks to Lucia Rubinelli about the man who helped kickstart it all: the Abbé Sieyès. How did an obscure cleric galvanise a nation? What did he mean by the Third Estate and why did he think it was everything? What went wrong with his idea of a new constitutional order for France? And what happened when Sieyès encountered Napoleon?
Out now on PPF+: a special bonus episode on King Donald The First. David explores the arguments being made in 2025 for the restoration of monarchy in America. Who’s making them and why? What on earth are they thinking? Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: French Revolution 2: Robespierre
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the first of three episodes about the people and ideas behind the French Revolution, David talks to Lucia Rubinelli about the man who helped kickstart it all: the Abbé Sieyès. How did an obscure cleric galvanise a nation? What did he mean by the Third Estate and why did he think it was everything? What went wrong with his idea of a new constitutional order for France? And what happened when Sieyès encountered Napoleon?</p><p>Out now on PPF+: a special bonus episode on King Donald The First. David explores the arguments being made in 2025 for the restoration of monarchy in America. Who’s making them and why? What on earth are they thinking? Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time: French Revolution 2: Robespierre</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3455</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d45a7f88-f6c2-11ef-bac4-0fadee0219d5]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2132597673.mp3?updated=1740850742" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: American Revolution 2: The Constitution</title>
      <description>In the second of our two episodes about the American Revolution David talks to historian Eric Nelson about the ideas that shaped the US Constitution. Was the office of President a victory for the people who still wanted a king or for those who never wanted one again? What was old and what was new about the idea of the separation of powers? What really divided the Federalists and the Antifederalists? And how are these arguments still being played out in the early days of Trump 2.0?
Out tomorrow: a special bonus episode for PPF+ subscribers on King Donald The First: David explores the arguments being made in 2025 for the restoration of monarchy in America. Who’s making them and why? What on earth are they thinking? Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Also sign up now for the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter out tomorrow https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: French Revolution 1: Sieyes
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>162</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the second of our two episodes about the American Revolution David talks to historian Eric Nelson about the ideas that shaped the US Constitution. Was the office of President a victory for the people who still wanted a king or for those who never wanted one again? What was old and what was new about the idea of the separation of powers? What really divided the Federalists and the Antifederalists? And how are these arguments still being played out in the early days of Trump 2.0?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the second of our two episodes about the American Revolution David talks to historian Eric Nelson about the ideas that shaped the US Constitution. Was the office of President a victory for the people who still wanted a king or for those who never wanted one again? What was old and what was new about the idea of the separation of powers? What really divided the Federalists and the Antifederalists? And how are these arguments still being played out in the early days of Trump 2.0?
Out tomorrow: a special bonus episode for PPF+ subscribers on King Donald The First: David explores the arguments being made in 2025 for the restoration of monarchy in America. Who’s making them and why? What on earth are they thinking? Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Also sign up now for the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter out tomorrow https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: French Revolution 1: Sieyes
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the second of our two episodes about the American Revolution David talks to historian Eric Nelson about the ideas that shaped the US Constitution. Was the office of President a victory for the people who still wanted a king or for those who never wanted one again? What was old and what was new about the idea of the separation of powers? What really divided the Federalists and the Antifederalists? And how are these arguments still being played out in the early days of Trump 2.0?</p><p>Out tomorrow: a special bonus episode for PPF+ subscribers on King Donald The First: David explores the arguments being made in 2025 for the restoration of monarchy in America. Who’s making them and why? What on earth are they thinking? Sign up now to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Also sign up now for the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter out tomorrow <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p><p>Next time: French Revolution 1: Sieyes</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3833</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a5ca56ea-f396-11ef-a71a-f3ed43330281]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6822568520.mp3?updated=1740502052" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: American Revolution 1: The Declaration of Independence</title>
      <description>Today it’s the first of two episodes about one of the most significant revolutions of all: the American Revolution. David talks to historian Eric Nelson about the ideas behind America’s Declaration of Independence in 1776. How did a fight with the British parliament become a repudiation of the British king? What turned royalists into republicans? What kind of republic did they think they were building? And whose consent was going to be needed to build it?
Next time: American Revolution 2: The Constitution
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>161</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today it’s the first of two episodes about one of the most significant revolutions of all: the American Revolution. David talks to historian Eric Nelson about the ideas behind America’s Declaration of Independence in 1776. How did a fight with the British parliament become a repudiation of the British king? What turned royalists into republicans? What kind of republic did they think they were building? And whose consent was going to be needed to build it?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today it’s the first of two episodes about one of the most significant revolutions of all: the American Revolution. David talks to historian Eric Nelson about the ideas behind America’s Declaration of Independence in 1776. How did a fight with the British parliament become a repudiation of the British king? What turned royalists into republicans? What kind of republic did they think they were building? And whose consent was going to be needed to build it?
Next time: American Revolution 2: The Constitution
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today it’s the first of two episodes about one of the most significant revolutions of all: the American Revolution. David talks to historian Eric Nelson about the ideas behind America’s Declaration of Independence in 1776. How did a fight with the British parliament become a repudiation of the British king? What turned royalists into republicans? What kind of republic did they think they were building? And whose consent was going to be needed to build it?</p><p>Next time: American Revolution 2: The Constitution</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3602</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8197bd22-f115-11ef-820f-cf6b9410942d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9407174279.mp3?updated=1740226602" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: The Industrial Revolution</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is about a revolution that started 250 years ago and is still going on (in the form of the digital revolution): the Industrial Revolution. David talks to economic historian Alexis Litvine about how new ways of making things changed human understanding of the world around us. Did the Industrial Revolution invent the idea of progress? Did it revolutionise the concept of nature? Did it upend the way we think about time? And what was the cost?
Tickets are available for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: on Saturday 29th March David will be in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives https://bit.ly/42GPp3X
Next time: American Revolution: The Declaration of Independence
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>160</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is about a revolution that started 250 years ago and is still going on (in the form of the digital revolution): the Industrial Revolution. David talks to economic historian Alexis Litvine about how new ways of making things changed human understanding of the world around us. Did the Industrial Revolution invent the idea of progress? Did it revolutionise the concept of nature? Did it upend the way we think about time? And what was the cost?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is about a revolution that started 250 years ago and is still going on (in the form of the digital revolution): the Industrial Revolution. David talks to economic historian Alexis Litvine about how new ways of making things changed human understanding of the world around us. Did the Industrial Revolution invent the idea of progress? Did it revolutionise the concept of nature? Did it upend the way we think about time? And what was the cost?
Tickets are available for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: on Saturday 29th March David will be in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives https://bit.ly/42GPp3X
Next time: American Revolution: The Declaration of Independence
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is about a revolution that started 250 years ago and is still going on (in the form of the digital revolution): the Industrial Revolution. David talks to economic historian Alexis Litvine about how new ways of making things changed human understanding of the world around us. Did the Industrial Revolution invent the idea of progress? Did it revolutionise the concept of nature? Did it upend the way we think about time? And what was the cost?</p><p>Tickets are available for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: on Saturday 29th March David will be in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives <a href="https://bit.ly/42GPp3X">https://bit.ly/42GPp3X</a></p><p>Next time: American Revolution: The Declaration of Independence</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3203</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[dad967b4-eed6-11ef-854a-4f5c26b8fc45]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9140589736.mp3?updated=1739980987" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: English Revolution 2: 1688</title>
      <description>In the second of our episodes with historian Clare Jackson on the English revolutions of the 17th century we discuss the one that usually gets called ‘Glorious’: the revolution of 1688. Was it a revolution or was it an invasion? What rights did parliament win and what powers did it acquire? Was this the beginning of the modern military state? And does the Glorious Revolution deserve its name?
Out now: the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter with guides to the most recent episodes, links, clips and further reading: sign up now https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Tickets are available for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: on Saturday March 29th David will be in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives https://bit.ly/42GPp3X. Come be a part of recording PPF live!
Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: The Industrial Revolution
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>159</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the second of our episodes with historian Clare Jackson on the English revolutions of the 17th century we discuss the one that usually gets called ‘Glorious’: the revolution of 1688. Was it a revolution or was it an invasion? What rights did parliament win and what powers did it acquire? Was this the beginning of the modern military state? And does the Glorious Revolution deserve its name?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the second of our episodes with historian Clare Jackson on the English revolutions of the 17th century we discuss the one that usually gets called ‘Glorious’: the revolution of 1688. Was it a revolution or was it an invasion? What rights did parliament win and what powers did it acquire? Was this the beginning of the modern military state? And does the Glorious Revolution deserve its name?
Out now: the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter with guides to the most recent episodes, links, clips and further reading: sign up now https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Tickets are available for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: on Saturday March 29th David will be in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives https://bit.ly/42GPp3X. Come be a part of recording PPF live!
Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: The Industrial Revolution
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the second of our episodes with historian Clare Jackson on the English revolutions of the 17th century we discuss the one that usually gets called ‘Glorious’: the revolution of 1688. Was it a revolution or was it an invasion? What rights did parliament win and what powers did it acquire? Was this the beginning of the modern military state? And does the Glorious Revolution deserve its name?</p><p>Out now: the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter with guides to the most recent episodes, links, clips and further reading: sign up now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p><p>Tickets are available for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: on Saturday March 29th David will be in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives <a href="https://bit.ly/42GPp3X">https://bit.ly/42GPp3X</a>. Come be a part of recording PPF live!</p><p>Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: The Industrial Revolution</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3363</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[88b07016-eb13-11ef-84ec-8325f01ef8c0]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1681427756.mp3?updated=1739566062" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: English Revolution 1: Civil War</title>
      <description>Today’s episode in our history of revolutionary ideas is about the event that is sometimes – but not always – called the English Revolution: the Civil War of the 1640s and the short-lived republic that followed. David talks to historian Clare Jackson about whether this really was a revolution and about the thinking that inspired it. What was old, what was new, what was borrowed and what was left when it was all over – what happened to the dreams of a brave new world?
Out tomorrow: the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter with guides to the most recent episodes, links, clips and further reading: sign up now https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Tickets are available for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: on Saturday March 29th David will be in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives https://bit.ly/42GPp3X
Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: English Revolution 2: 1688
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>158</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5069b762-e8b1-11ef-9f40-5352ce708436/image/e1d23eea16a1db98e890202e37e42944.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode in our history of revolutionary ideas is about the event that is sometimes – but not always – called the English Revolution: the Civil War of the 1640s and the short-lived republic that followed. David talks to historian Clare Jackson about whether this really was a revolution and about the thinking that inspired it. What was old, what was new, what was borrowed and what was left when it was all over – what happened to the dreams of a brave new world?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode in our history of revolutionary ideas is about the event that is sometimes – but not always – called the English Revolution: the Civil War of the 1640s and the short-lived republic that followed. David talks to historian Clare Jackson about whether this really was a revolution and about the thinking that inspired it. What was old, what was new, what was borrowed and what was left when it was all over – what happened to the dreams of a brave new world?
Out tomorrow: the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter with guides to the most recent episodes, links, clips and further reading: sign up now https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Tickets are available for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: on Saturday March 29th David will be in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives https://bit.ly/42GPp3X
Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: English Revolution 2: 1688
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode in our history of revolutionary ideas is about the event that is sometimes – but not always – called the English Revolution: the Civil War of the 1640s and the short-lived republic that followed. David talks to historian Clare Jackson about whether this really was a revolution and about the thinking that inspired it. What was old, what was new, what was borrowed and what was left when it was all over – what happened to the dreams of a brave new world?</p><p>Out tomorrow: the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter with guides to the most recent episodes, links, clips and further reading: sign up now <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p><p>Tickets are available for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: on Saturday March 29th David will be in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives <a href="https://bit.ly/42GPp3X">https://bit.ly/42GPp3X</a></p><p>Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: English Revolution 2: 1688</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3402</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5069b762-e8b1-11ef-9f40-5352ce708436]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1364775087.mp3?updated=1739303922" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: The Scientific Revolution</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is about a revolution that took centuries to happen if it ever really happened at all: The Scientific Revolution. David talks to historian of science Simon Schaffer about what changed in human understanding – and what didn’t – in the age of Galileo and Newton. Was the new science a revolution of ideas or of practices? What did it mean for the hold of religious and political authority? Who or what were the driving forces behind it? And did the people who lived through it realise what was happening?
Out now on PPF+: David’s conversation with Alec Ryrie about Jean Calvin, who may have been the Reformation’s true revolutionary. What was Calvinism and how did it change the world? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Tickets are available now for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: join us on Saturday 29th March to hear David in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives https://bit.ly/42GPp3X
Next Time on the History of Revolutionary Ideas: The English Revolutions (part one): The Civil War
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>157</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is about a revolution that took centuries to happen if it ever really happened at all: The Scientific Revolution. David talks to historian of science Simon Schaffer about what changed in human understanding – and what didn’t – in the age of Galileo and Newton. Was the new science a revolution of ideas or of practices? What did it mean for the hold of religious and political authority? Who or what were the driving forces behind it? And did the people who lived through it realise what was happening?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is about a revolution that took centuries to happen if it ever really happened at all: The Scientific Revolution. David talks to historian of science Simon Schaffer about what changed in human understanding – and what didn’t – in the age of Galileo and Newton. Was the new science a revolution of ideas or of practices? What did it mean for the hold of religious and political authority? Who or what were the driving forces behind it? And did the people who lived through it realise what was happening?
Out now on PPF+: David’s conversation with Alec Ryrie about Jean Calvin, who may have been the Reformation’s true revolutionary. What was Calvinism and how did it change the world? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Tickets are available now for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: join us on Saturday 29th March to hear David in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives https://bit.ly/42GPp3X
Next Time on the History of Revolutionary Ideas: The English Revolutions (part one): The Civil War
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is about a revolution that took centuries to happen if it ever really happened at all: The Scientific Revolution. David talks to historian of science Simon Schaffer about what changed in human understanding – and what didn’t – in the age of Galileo and Newton. Was the new science a revolution of ideas or of practices? What did it mean for the hold of religious and political authority? Who or what were the driving forces behind it? And did the people who lived through it realise what was happening?</p><p>Out now on PPF+: David’s conversation with Alec Ryrie about Jean Calvin, who may have been the Reformation’s true revolutionary. What was Calvinism and how did it change the world? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Tickets are available now for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: join us on Saturday 29th March to hear David in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives <a href="https://bit.ly/42GPp3X">https://bit.ly/42GPp3X</a></p><p>Next Time on the History of Revolutionary Ideas: The English Revolutions (part one): The Civil War</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3940</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[43c20612-e58d-11ef-9da6-3b2dd882f063]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML5537701035.mp3?updated=1738958653" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: The Reformation (part 1): Luther</title>
      <description>Today’s revolutionary thinker is Martin Luther, the man who upended the religious, political and intellectual life of Europe, maybe without entirely meaning to. David talks to historian Alec Ryrie about how a German monk took on the entire authority of the Catholic Church and survived the experience. What did he hope to achieve? Who were his principal backers? How did he reimagine the idea of human freedom? And where is his influence most widely felt today?

Out tomorrow on PPF+ a new bonus episode: David talks to Alec Ryrie about Calvin, who may have been the Reformation’s true revolutionary. What was Calvinism and how did it change the world? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Tickets are available now for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: on Saturday March 29th David will be in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives https://bit.ly/42GPp3X

Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: The Scientific Revolution

Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>156</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s revolutionary thinker is Martin Luther, the man who upended the religious, political and intellectual life of Europe, maybe without entirely meaning to. David talks to historian Alec Ryrie about how a German monk took on the entire authority of the Catholic Church and survived the experience. What did he hope to achieve? Who were his principal backers? How did he reimagine the idea of human freedom? And where is his influence most widely felt today?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s revolutionary thinker is Martin Luther, the man who upended the religious, political and intellectual life of Europe, maybe without entirely meaning to. David talks to historian Alec Ryrie about how a German monk took on the entire authority of the Catholic Church and survived the experience. What did he hope to achieve? Who were his principal backers? How did he reimagine the idea of human freedom? And where is his influence most widely felt today?

Out tomorrow on PPF+ a new bonus episode: David talks to Alec Ryrie about Calvin, who may have been the Reformation’s true revolutionary. What was Calvinism and how did it change the world? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus

Tickets are available now for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: on Saturday March 29th David will be in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives https://bit.ly/42GPp3X

Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: The Scientific Revolution

Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s revolutionary thinker is Martin Luther, the man who upended the religious, political and intellectual life of Europe, maybe without entirely meaning to. David talks to historian Alec Ryrie about how a German monk took on the entire authority of the Catholic Church and survived the experience. What did he hope to achieve? Who were his principal backers? How did he reimagine the idea of human freedom? And where is his influence most widely felt today?</p><p><br></p><p>Out tomorrow on PPF+ a new bonus episode: David talks to Alec Ryrie about Calvin, who may have been the Reformation’s true revolutionary. What was Calvinism and how did it change the world? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+<a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p><br></p><p>Tickets are available now for PPF Live at the Bath Curious Minds Festival: on Saturday March 29th David will be in conversation with Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician with Nine Lives <a href="https://bit.ly/42GPp3X">https://bit.ly/42GPp3X</a></p><p><br></p><p>Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: The Scientific Revolution</p><p><br></p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3367</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3b11a2b2-e31b-11ef-9ce8-ff8cacd5989a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7660210344.mp3?updated=1738689683" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Humanism</title>
      <description>Today’s episode in our history of revolutionary ideas is about a medieval movement that used the ancient past to rethink and reimagine the present and the future. David talks to historian Eric Nelson about humanism and its enormous impact on the history of ideas. How did humanism emerge out of catastrophe? What did it do to the hold of Church and Empire on the medieval mind? Was humanist politics really revolutionary politics? And where is the ‘human’ in humanism?
As part of our Great Political Films series we are hosting a special screening of Network (1976) at the Regent Street Cinema in London on 18th March, followed by a live podcast recording with David and Helen Lewis. Aaron Sorkin said: ‘No predictor of the future – not even Orwell – has ever been as right as Network.’ Come see why! Tickets now available https://www.ppfideas.com/event-list
Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: The Reformation 1: Luther
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>155</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode in our history of revolutionary ideas is about a medieval movement that used the ancient past to rethink and reimagine the present and the future. David talks to historian Eric Nelson about humanism and its enormous impact on the history of ideas. How did humanism emerge out of catastrophe? What did it do to the hold of Church and Empire on the medieval mind? Was humanist politics really revolutionary politics? And where is the ‘human’ in humanism?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode in our history of revolutionary ideas is about a medieval movement that used the ancient past to rethink and reimagine the present and the future. David talks to historian Eric Nelson about humanism and its enormous impact on the history of ideas. How did humanism emerge out of catastrophe? What did it do to the hold of Church and Empire on the medieval mind? Was humanist politics really revolutionary politics? And where is the ‘human’ in humanism?
As part of our Great Political Films series we are hosting a special screening of Network (1976) at the Regent Street Cinema in London on 18th March, followed by a live podcast recording with David and Helen Lewis. Aaron Sorkin said: ‘No predictor of the future – not even Orwell – has ever been as right as Network.’ Come see why! Tickets now available https://www.ppfideas.com/event-list
Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: The Reformation 1: Luther
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode in our history of revolutionary ideas is about a medieval movement that used the ancient past to rethink and reimagine the present and the future. David talks to historian Eric Nelson about humanism and its enormous impact on the history of ideas. How did humanism emerge out of catastrophe? What did it do to the hold of Church and Empire on the medieval mind? Was humanist politics really revolutionary politics? And where is the ‘human’ in humanism?</p><p>As part of our Great Political Films series we are hosting a special screening of <em>Network</em> (1976) at the Regent Street Cinema in London on 18th March, followed by a live podcast recording with David and Helen Lewis. Aaron Sorkin said: ‘No predictor of the future – not even Orwell – has ever been as right as <em>Network</em>.’ Come see why! Tickets now available <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/event-list">https://www.ppfideas.com/event-list</a></p><p>Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: The Reformation 1: Luther</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3587</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ba25ca36-df35-11ef-b6f4-c787caefa068]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1493142424.mp3?updated=1738261229" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Magna Carta</title>
      <description>Today’s episode in our history of revolutionary ideas is about a medieval document that is sometimes thought to contain a ground-breaking promise of basic political rights. David talks to historian Nick Vincent about Magna Carta (1215) and what it did and didn’t actually say. Why did the warring parties agree to it? Was it a constitutional charter or a peace treaty? What happened when its terms were broken? And how did it come to acquire the totemic significance it has today?
Sign up now to get our free fortnightly newsletter out tomorrow – with writing, clips, links and more to accompany this series https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Come to see PPF recorded live! As part of the Curious Minds festival in Bath David will be in conversation with regular PPF contributor Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician With Nine Lives. It’s happening at the Komedia in Bath at 11am on Saturday 29th March. Tickets now available https://www.ppfideas.com/event-list
Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Humanism
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>154</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode in our history of revolutionary ideas is about a medieval document that is sometimes thought to contain a ground-breaking promise of basic political rights. David talks to historian Nick Vincent about Magna Carta (1215) and what it did and didn’t actually say. Why did the warring parties agree to it? Was it a constitutional charter or a peace treaty? What happened when its terms were broken? And how did it come to acquire the totemic significance it has today?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode in our history of revolutionary ideas is about a medieval document that is sometimes thought to contain a ground-breaking promise of basic political rights. David talks to historian Nick Vincent about Magna Carta (1215) and what it did and didn’t actually say. Why did the warring parties agree to it? Was it a constitutional charter or a peace treaty? What happened when its terms were broken? And how did it come to acquire the totemic significance it has today?
Sign up now to get our free fortnightly newsletter out tomorrow – with writing, clips, links and more to accompany this series https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Come to see PPF recorded live! As part of the Curious Minds festival in Bath David will be in conversation with regular PPF contributor Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician With Nine Lives. It’s happening at the Komedia in Bath at 11am on Saturday 29th March. Tickets now available https://www.ppfideas.com/event-list
Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Humanism
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode in our history of revolutionary ideas is about a medieval document that is sometimes thought to contain a ground-breaking promise of basic political rights. David talks to historian Nick Vincent about Magna Carta (1215) and what it did and didn’t actually say. Why did the warring parties agree to it? Was it a constitutional charter or a peace treaty? What happened when its terms were broken? And how did it come to acquire the totemic significance it has today?</p><p>Sign up now to get our free fortnightly newsletter out tomorrow – with writing, clips, links and more to accompany this series <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p><p><strong>Come to see PPF recorded live!</strong> As part of the Curious Minds festival in Bath David will be in conversation with regular PPF contributor Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician With Nine Lives. It’s happening at the Komedia in Bath at 11am on Saturday 29th March. Tickets now available <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/event-list">https://www.ppfideas.com/event-list</a></p><p>Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Humanism</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3964</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9945ce0e-dce9-11ef-abd8-6397ff28be5e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7594366284.mp3?updated=1738008761" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Islam</title>
      <description>Today’s episode in our history of revolutionary ideas explores the world-altering impact of Islam from the seventh century onwards. David talks to the leading Islamic scholar Tim Winter (Abdal Hakim Murad) about what changed – and what didn’t – with the appearance of Islamic law, Islamic culture and Islamic ideas of community. Was Islam really egalitarian? How could a universalist religion encompass so much variety? Why did it spread so fast? And what caused it to split so soon?
Come see PPF recorded live! As part of the Curious Minds festival in Bath David will be in conversation with regular PPF contributor Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician With Nine Lives. It’s happening at the Komedia in Bath at 11am on Saturday 29th March. Priority booking for PPF listeners opens at 9am on Tuesday 28th January – just go to our website for more info and to get your tickets: https://www.ppfideas.com/event-list 
Out now on PPF+: the second part of David’s conversation with Agnes Callard about Socrates, exploring politics, AI, therapy and death. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes (21 and counting!) plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Magna Carta
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>153</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode in our history of revolutionary ideas explores the world-altering impact of Islam from the seventh century onwards. David talks to the leading Islamic scholar Tim Winter (Abdal Hakim Murad) about what changed – and what didn’t – with the appearance of Islamic law, Islamic culture and Islamic ideas of community. Was Islam really egalitarian? How could a universalist religion encompass so much variety? Why did it spread so fast? And what caused it to split so soon?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode in our history of revolutionary ideas explores the world-altering impact of Islam from the seventh century onwards. David talks to the leading Islamic scholar Tim Winter (Abdal Hakim Murad) about what changed – and what didn’t – with the appearance of Islamic law, Islamic culture and Islamic ideas of community. Was Islam really egalitarian? How could a universalist religion encompass so much variety? Why did it spread so fast? And what caused it to split so soon?
Come see PPF recorded live! As part of the Curious Minds festival in Bath David will be in conversation with regular PPF contributor Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician With Nine Lives. It’s happening at the Komedia in Bath at 11am on Saturday 29th March. Priority booking for PPF listeners opens at 9am on Tuesday 28th January – just go to our website for more info and to get your tickets: https://www.ppfideas.com/event-list 
Out now on PPF+: the second part of David’s conversation with Agnes Callard about Socrates, exploring politics, AI, therapy and death. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes (21 and counting!) plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Magna Carta
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode in our history of revolutionary ideas explores the world-altering impact of Islam from the seventh century onwards. David talks to the leading Islamic scholar Tim Winter (Abdal Hakim Murad) about what changed – and what didn’t – with the appearance of Islamic law, Islamic culture and Islamic ideas of community. Was Islam really egalitarian? How could a universalist religion encompass so much variety? Why did it spread so fast? And what caused it to split so soon?</p><p><strong>Come see PPF recorded live!</strong> As part of the Curious Minds festival in Bath David will be in conversation with regular PPF contributor Robert Saunders about the legacy of Winston Churchill: The Politician With Nine Lives. It’s happening at the Komedia in Bath at 11am on Saturday 29th March. Priority booking for PPF listeners opens at 9am on Tuesday 28th January – just go to our website for more info and to get your tickets: <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/event-list">https://www.ppfideas.com/event-list</a> </p><p>Out now on PPF+: the second part of David’s conversation with Agnes Callard about Socrates, exploring politics, AI, therapy and death. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes (21 and counting!) plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Magna Carta</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3727</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e6003a56-db4d-11ef-886d-ebddc2854237]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6399058820.mp3?updated=1737832114" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Christianity w/Tom Holland</title>
      <description>Today’s episode in our series on revolutionary ideas is a conversation covering two millennia with the historian Tom Holland exploring the never-ending upending of human understanding brought about by Christianity. How can weakness be the ultimate strength? How can political order be built out of the glorification of suffering? How can a universal religion create so much hierarchical division? And in a Christian world, is it ever possible to escape the charge of hypocrisy?
Out now on PPF+: the second part of David’s conversation with Agnes Callard about Socrates, exploring politics, AI, therapy and death. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Islam w/Tim Winter
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>152</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode in our series on revolutionary ideas is a conversation covering two millennia with the historian Tom Holland exploring the never-ending upending of human understanding brought about by Christianity. How can weakness be the ultimate strength? How can political order be built out of the glorification of suffering? How can a universal religion create so much hierarchical division? And in a Christian world, is it ever possible to escape the charge of hypocrisy?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode in our series on revolutionary ideas is a conversation covering two millennia with the historian Tom Holland exploring the never-ending upending of human understanding brought about by Christianity. How can weakness be the ultimate strength? How can political order be built out of the glorification of suffering? How can a universal religion create so much hierarchical division? And in a Christian world, is it ever possible to escape the charge of hypocrisy?
Out now on PPF+: the second part of David’s conversation with Agnes Callard about Socrates, exploring politics, AI, therapy and death. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Islam w/Tim Winter
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode in our series on revolutionary ideas is a conversation covering two millennia with the historian Tom Holland exploring the never-ending upending of human understanding brought about by Christianity. How can weakness be the ultimate strength? How can political order be built out of the glorification of suffering? How can a universal religion create so much hierarchical division? And in a Christian world, is it ever possible to escape the charge of hypocrisy?</p><p>Out now on PPF+: the second part of David’s conversation with Agnes Callard about Socrates, exploring politics, AI, therapy and death. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Islam w/Tim Winter</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3404</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2cb09422-d75d-11ef-90ba-431c9febf5e4]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML5041008044.mp3?updated=1737398559" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Socrates w/Agnes Callard</title>
      <description>To begin our history of revolutionary ideas in earnest, David talks to the philosopher Agnes Callard about Socrates, the philosopher who changed – and can still change – everything. Just what is so radical about the Socratic method? How does it open up new ways of thinking about the meaning of life? Can anyone do it? And where does it leave 2000+ years of intervening philosophy?
Out tomorrow on PPF+: the second part of David’s conversation with Agnes Callard about Socrates, exploring politics, AI, therapy and death. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Open Socrates: The Case for a Philosophical Life by Agnes Callard is available now https://bit.ly/4h0pZmg
Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Christianity w/Tom Holland
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>151</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>To begin our history of revolutionary ideas in earnest, David talks to the philosopher Agnes Callard about Socrates, the philosopher who changed – and can still change – everything. Just what is so radical about the Socratic method? How does it open up new ways of thinking about the meaning of life? Can anyone do it? And where does it leave 2000+ years of intervening philosophy?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>To begin our history of revolutionary ideas in earnest, David talks to the philosopher Agnes Callard about Socrates, the philosopher who changed – and can still change – everything. Just what is so radical about the Socratic method? How does it open up new ways of thinking about the meaning of life? Can anyone do it? And where does it leave 2000+ years of intervening philosophy?
Out tomorrow on PPF+: the second part of David’s conversation with Agnes Callard about Socrates, exploring politics, AI, therapy and death. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Open Socrates: The Case for a Philosophical Life by Agnes Callard is available now https://bit.ly/4h0pZmg
Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Christianity w/Tom Holland
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>To begin our history of revolutionary ideas in earnest, David talks to the philosopher Agnes Callard about Socrates, the philosopher who changed – and can still change – everything. Just what is so radical about the Socratic method? How does it open up new ways of thinking about the meaning of life? Can anyone do it? And where does it leave 2000+ years of intervening philosophy?</p><p>Out tomorrow on PPF+: the second part of David’s conversation with Agnes Callard about Socrates, exploring politics, AI, therapy and death. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Open Socrates: The Case for a Philosophical Life by Agnes Callard is available now <a href="https://bit.ly/4h0pZmg">https://bit.ly/4h0pZmg</a></p><p>Next up in The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Christianity w/Tom Holland</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3210</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[278b7912-d500-11ef-84f0-ebaf848a13a2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7646624806.mp3?updated=1737138698" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Revolutionary Ideas: What Makes a Revolutionary Idea?</title>
      <description>To kick off our new series on revolutionary ideas past, present and future David talks to two regular PPF contributors – the philosopher Lea Ypi and the scientist Adam Rutherford – about what makes an idea truly revolutionary. Do revolutionary ideas change the world? Can the world be changed without them? Can bad ideas ever be revolutionary ideas? And where should we be looking for revolutionary ideas today?
Sign up to our free fortnightly newsletter to get more ideas, clips, reading suggestions and extra insights to accompany this and all our series. Join our mailing list now: https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next Time: The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Socrates w/Agnes Callard
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>11</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>150</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>To kick off our new series on revolutionary ideas past, present and future David talks to two regular PPF contributors – the philosopher Lea Ypi and the scientist Adam Rutherford – about what makes an idea truly revolutionary. Do revolutionary ideas change the world? Can the world be changed without them? Can bad ideas ever be revolutionary ideas? And where should we be looking for revolutionary ideas today?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>To kick off our new series on revolutionary ideas past, present and future David talks to two regular PPF contributors – the philosopher Lea Ypi and the scientist Adam Rutherford – about what makes an idea truly revolutionary. Do revolutionary ideas change the world? Can the world be changed without them? Can bad ideas ever be revolutionary ideas? And where should we be looking for revolutionary ideas today?
Sign up to our free fortnightly newsletter to get more ideas, clips, reading suggestions and extra insights to accompany this and all our series. Join our mailing list now: https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next Time: The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Socrates w/Agnes Callard
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>To kick off our new series on revolutionary ideas past, present and future David talks to two regular PPF contributors – the philosopher Lea Ypi and the scientist Adam Rutherford – about what makes an idea truly revolutionary. Do revolutionary ideas change the world? Can the world be changed without them? Can bad ideas ever be revolutionary ideas? And where should we be looking for revolutionary ideas today?</p><p>Sign up to our free fortnightly newsletter to get more ideas, clips, reading suggestions and extra insights to accompany this and all our series. Join our mailing list now: <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p><p>Next Time: The History of Revolutionary Ideas: Socrates w/Agnes Callard</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3284</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[82f728fe-d295-11ef-b30f-c3de814ca2af]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7804704299.mp3?updated=1736873102" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: The Zone of Interest</title>
      <description>The final episode in our great political films series explores Jonathan Glazer’s The Zone of Interest (2023), his haunting take on the home life of the man who ran Auschwitz. This is a film like nothing else. It is not about the banality of evil or the proximity of innocence to horror. Instead it takes us inside a nightmare world from which there is no escape: the grimmest fairy story of them all.

Out now: a new bonus episodes on PPF+ exploring the joys of Armando Iannucci’s In The Loop, not just one of the smartest films about contemporary politics but also the funniest. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Coming next: we begin our new series on The History of Revolutionary Ideas
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>149</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>The final episode in our great political films series explores Jonathan Glazer’s The Zone of Interest (2023), his haunting take on the home life of the man who ran Auschwitz. This is a film like nothing else. It is not about the banality of evil or the proximity of innocence to horror. Instead it takes us inside a nightmare world from which there is no escape: the grimmest fairy story of them all.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The final episode in our great political films series explores Jonathan Glazer’s The Zone of Interest (2023), his haunting take on the home life of the man who ran Auschwitz. This is a film like nothing else. It is not about the banality of evil or the proximity of innocence to horror. Instead it takes us inside a nightmare world from which there is no escape: the grimmest fairy story of them all.

Out now: a new bonus episodes on PPF+ exploring the joys of Armando Iannucci’s In The Loop, not just one of the smartest films about contemporary politics but also the funniest. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Coming next: we begin our new series on The History of Revolutionary Ideas
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The final episode in our great political films series explores Jonathan Glazer’s The Zone of Interest (2023), his haunting take on the home life of the man who ran Auschwitz. This is a film like nothing else. It is not about the banality of evil or the proximity of innocence to horror. Instead it takes us inside a nightmare world from which there is no escape: the grimmest fairy story of them all.</p><p><br></p><p>Out now: a new bonus episodes on PPF+ exploring the joys of Armando Iannucci’s In The Loop, not just one of the smartest films about contemporary politics but also the funniest. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Coming next: we begin our new series on The History of Revolutionary Ideas</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3438</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f9c21d80-d057-11ef-9ec8-97020548300e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9145787117.mp3?updated=1736626765" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: Zero Dark Thirty</title>
      <description>The penultimate episode in our great political films series explores Kathryn Bigelow’s Zero Dark Thirty (2012), her controversial take on the War on Terror. Tracking the CIA’s years-long pursuit of Osama Bin Laden, it’s part spy procedural, part story of a female outsider in a man’s world, and part a complex disquisition on political violence. Where does bureaucracy end and killing begin? Can torture ever be justified? And whose judgment is ultimately the one that counts?
Out now: a new bonus episodes on PPF+ exploring the joys of Armando Iannucci’s In The Loop, not just one of the smartest films about contemporary politics but also the funniest. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: The Zone of Interest
Coming soon: a new series on The History of Revolutionary Ideas
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>148</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>The penultimate episode in our great political films series explores Kathryn Bigelow’s Zero Dark Thirty (2012), her controversial take on the War on Terror. Tracking the CIA’s years-long pursuit of Osama Bin Laden, it’s part spy procedural, part story of a female outsider in a man’s world, and part a complex disquisition on political violence. Where does bureaucracy end and killing begin? Can torture ever be justified? And whose judgment is ultimately the one that counts?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The penultimate episode in our great political films series explores Kathryn Bigelow’s Zero Dark Thirty (2012), her controversial take on the War on Terror. Tracking the CIA’s years-long pursuit of Osama Bin Laden, it’s part spy procedural, part story of a female outsider in a man’s world, and part a complex disquisition on political violence. Where does bureaucracy end and killing begin? Can torture ever be justified? And whose judgment is ultimately the one that counts?
Out now: a new bonus episodes on PPF+ exploring the joys of Armando Iannucci’s In The Loop, not just one of the smartest films about contemporary politics but also the funniest. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: The Zone of Interest
Coming soon: a new series on The History of Revolutionary Ideas
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The penultimate episode in our great political films series explores Kathryn Bigelow’s Zero Dark Thirty (2012), her controversial take on the War on Terror. Tracking the CIA’s years-long pursuit of Osama Bin Laden, it’s part spy procedural, part story of a female outsider in a man’s world, and part a complex disquisition on political violence. Where does bureaucracy end and killing begin? Can torture ever be justified? And whose judgment is ultimately the one that counts?</p><p>Out now: a new bonus episodes on PPF+ exploring the joys of Armando Iannucci’s In The Loop, not just one of the smartest films about contemporary politics but also the funniest. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time: The Zone of Interest</p><p>Coming soon: a new series on The History of Revolutionary Ideas</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3625</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[498a57f6-cdb0-11ef-ba4d-33a935794ab5]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9343079714.mp3?updated=1736334795" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: The Social Network</title>
      <description>The second David Fincher film in our series (after Fight Club) is The Social Network (2010), the Aaron Sorkin-scripted take on how Mark Zuckerberg created Facebook and the price paid by everyone else. A tale of power and privilege, innocence and cynicism, it is also about how exploitation can be sold as exclusivity. What is left when we have given away our control over who we are in order to decide who counts as a friend?
Out later this week: a new bonus episodes on PPF+ exploring the joys of Armando Iannucci’s In The Loop, not just one of the smartest films about contemporary politics but also the funniest. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: Zero Dark Thirty
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>147</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>The second David Fincher film in our series (after Fight Club) is The Social Network (2010), the Aaron Sorkin-scripted take on how Mark Zuckerberg created Facebook and the price paid by everyone else. A tale of power and privilege, innocence and cynicism, it is also about how exploitation can be sold as exclusivity. What is left when we have given away our control over who we are in order to decide who counts as a friend?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The second David Fincher film in our series (after Fight Club) is The Social Network (2010), the Aaron Sorkin-scripted take on how Mark Zuckerberg created Facebook and the price paid by everyone else. A tale of power and privilege, innocence and cynicism, it is also about how exploitation can be sold as exclusivity. What is left when we have given away our control over who we are in order to decide who counts as a friend?
Out later this week: a new bonus episodes on PPF+ exploring the joys of Armando Iannucci’s In The Loop, not just one of the smartest films about contemporary politics but also the funniest. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: Zero Dark Thirty
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The second David Fincher film in our series (after Fight Club) is The Social Network (2010), the Aaron Sorkin-scripted take on how Mark Zuckerberg created Facebook and the price paid by everyone else. A tale of power and privilege, innocence and cynicism, it is also about how exploitation can be sold as exclusivity. What is left when we have given away our control over who we are in order to decide who counts as a friend?</p><p>Out later this week: a new bonus episodes on PPF+ exploring the joys of Armando Iannucci’s In The Loop, not just one of the smartest films about contemporary politics but also the funniest. Sign up now for £5 per month or £50 for a whole year to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time: Zero Dark Thirty</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3327</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ddd6f93a-cae7-11ef-9f5f-0f70e6ce25d0]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9585577754.mp3?updated=1736028842" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: There Will Be Blood</title>
      <description>Our great political films series reaches the twenty-first century with Paul Thomas Anderson’s unforgettable There Will Be Blood (2007), starring Daniel Day-Lewis as oilman Daniel Plainview in one of the all-time great screen performances. Based on Upton Sinclair’s novel Oil! (1927), the movie swaps out Marx for Nietzsche and tells a story of money vs religion and family vs both. What, in the end, is the force that cannot be overcome?
Out now: two bonus episodes on PPF+ to accompany this series: Shoah part one and Shoah part two, exploring Claude Lanzmann’s path-breaking, harrowing, unforgettable 9-hour documentary about the Holocaust. Sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: The Social Network
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>146</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Our great political films series reaches the twenty-first century with Paul Thomas Anderson’s unforgettable There Will Be Blood (2007), starring Daniel Day-Lewis as oilman Daniel Plainview in one of the all-time great screen performances. Based on Upton Sinclair’s novel Oil! (1927), the movie swaps out Marx for Nietzsche and tells a story of money vs religion and family vs both. What, in the end, is the force that cannot be overcome?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Our great political films series reaches the twenty-first century with Paul Thomas Anderson’s unforgettable There Will Be Blood (2007), starring Daniel Day-Lewis as oilman Daniel Plainview in one of the all-time great screen performances. Based on Upton Sinclair’s novel Oil! (1927), the movie swaps out Marx for Nietzsche and tells a story of money vs religion and family vs both. What, in the end, is the force that cannot be overcome?
Out now: two bonus episodes on PPF+ to accompany this series: Shoah part one and Shoah part two, exploring Claude Lanzmann’s path-breaking, harrowing, unforgettable 9-hour documentary about the Holocaust. Sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: The Social Network
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our great political films series reaches the twenty-first century with Paul Thomas Anderson’s unforgettable There Will Be Blood (2007), starring Daniel Day-Lewis as oilman Daniel Plainview in one of the all-time great screen performances. Based on Upton Sinclair’s novel Oil! (1927), the movie swaps out Marx for Nietzsche and tells a story of money vs religion and family vs both. What, in the end, is the force that cannot be overcome?</p><p>Out now: two bonus episodes on PPF+ to accompany this series: Shoah part one and Shoah part two, exploring Claude Lanzmann’s path-breaking, harrowing, unforgettable 9-hour documentary about the Holocaust. Sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time: The Social Network</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3229</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[fb47325c-c76b-11ef-96ca-2bda55db8733]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6788791060.mp3?updated=1735645741" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: Fight Club w/ Helen Lewis</title>
      <description>David talks to writer and journalist Helen Lewis about David Fincher’s Fight Club (1999), the film that launched a thousand memes. Does this tale of thwarted masculinity and corporate malfeasance code left or code right? Who, in the end, is Tyler Durden: Joe Rogan or Jordan Peterson, Elon Musk or Andrew Tate? Is Fight Club a relic of the pre-digital age or a prophetic vision of what was coming? And … Meat Loaf?!
Out now: two new bonus episodes on PPF+ to accompany this series: Shoah part one and Shoah part two, exploring Claude Lanzmann’s path-breaking, harrowing, unforgettable 9-hour documentary about the Holocaust. Sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next Time: There Will Be Blood
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2024 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>145</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>David talks to writer and journalist Helen Lewis about David Fincher’s Fight Club (1999), the film that launched a thousand memes. Does this tale of thwarted masculinity and corporate malfeasance code left or code right? Who, in the end, is Tyler Durden: Joe Rogan or Jordan Peterson, Elon Musk or Andrew Tate? Is Fight Club a relic of the pre-digital age or a prophetic vision of what was coming? And … Meat Loaf?!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>David talks to writer and journalist Helen Lewis about David Fincher’s Fight Club (1999), the film that launched a thousand memes. Does this tale of thwarted masculinity and corporate malfeasance code left or code right? Who, in the end, is Tyler Durden: Joe Rogan or Jordan Peterson, Elon Musk or Andrew Tate? Is Fight Club a relic of the pre-digital age or a prophetic vision of what was coming? And … Meat Loaf?!
Out now: two new bonus episodes on PPF+ to accompany this series: Shoah part one and Shoah part two, exploring Claude Lanzmann’s path-breaking, harrowing, unforgettable 9-hour documentary about the Holocaust. Sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next Time: There Will Be Blood
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>David talks to writer and journalist Helen Lewis about David Fincher’s Fight Club (1999), the film that launched a thousand memes. Does this tale of thwarted masculinity and corporate malfeasance code left or code right? Who, in the end, <em>is</em> Tyler Durden: Joe Rogan or Jordan Peterson, Elon Musk or Andrew Tate? Is Fight Club a relic of the pre-digital age or a prophetic vision of what was coming? And … Meat Loaf?!</p><p>Out now: two new bonus episodes on PPF+ to accompany this series: Shoah part one and Shoah part two, exploring Claude Lanzmann’s path-breaking, harrowing, unforgettable 9-hour documentary about the Holocaust. Sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next Time: There Will Be Blood</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3461</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6ff293d2-c481-11ef-868d-1756d84cd6f9]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9362314906.mp3?updated=1735325045" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: Do The Right Thing</title>
      <description>Our political films season has reached the late 1980s with Do The Right Thing (1989), Spike Lee’s searing take on racial tension on a Brooklyn block on a boiling hot summer’s day. How does a fight over pizza turn into a full-blown riot? With everyone feeling exploited, who is really to blame? And where do Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcom X – not to mention Jesse Jackson Jr. – fit in?
Out now: two new bonus episodes on PPF+ to accompany this series: Shoah part one and Shoah part two, exploring Claude Lanzmann’s path-breaking, harrowing, unforgettable 9-hour documentary about the Holocaust. Sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: Fight Club w/ Helen Lewis
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2024 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>144</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Our political films season has reached the late 1980s with Do The Right Thing (1989), Spike Lee’s searing take on racial tension on a Brooklyn block on a boiling hot summer’s day. How does a fight over pizza turn into a full-blown riot? With everyone feeling exploited, who is really to blame? And where do Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcom X – not to mention Jesse Jackson Jr. – fit in?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Our political films season has reached the late 1980s with Do The Right Thing (1989), Spike Lee’s searing take on racial tension on a Brooklyn block on a boiling hot summer’s day. How does a fight over pizza turn into a full-blown riot? With everyone feeling exploited, who is really to blame? And where do Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcom X – not to mention Jesse Jackson Jr. – fit in?
Out now: two new bonus episodes on PPF+ to accompany this series: Shoah part one and Shoah part two, exploring Claude Lanzmann’s path-breaking, harrowing, unforgettable 9-hour documentary about the Holocaust. Sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: Fight Club w/ Helen Lewis
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our political films season has reached the late 1980s with Do The Right Thing (1989), Spike Lee’s searing take on racial tension on a Brooklyn block on a boiling hot summer’s day. How does a fight over pizza turn into a full-blown riot? With everyone feeling exploited, who is really to blame? And where do Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcom X – not to mention Jesse Jackson Jr. – fit in?</p><p>Out now: two new bonus episodes on PPF+ to accompany this series: Shoah part one and Shoah part two, exploring Claude Lanzmann’s path-breaking, harrowing, unforgettable 9-hour documentary about the Holocaust. Sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time: Fight Club w/ Helen Lewis</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3021</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e05f3ba2-bef5-11ef-b033-13454b9a21ee]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2736278403.mp3?updated=1734886160" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: Kagemusha</title>
      <description>Today’s great political film is Akira Kurosawa’s epic of war and deception Kagemusha (1980). Set in late sixteenth-century Japan it tells the story of a thief tasked with impersonating a warlord. Can physical resemblance translate into political authority? How far does the conspiracy need to go? And who in the end is the real criminal?
Out now: two new bonus episodes on PPF+ to accompany this series: Shoah part one and Shoah part two, exploring Claude Lanzmann’s path-breaking, harrowing, unforgettable 9-hour documentary about the Holocaust. Sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: Spike Lee’s Do The Right Thing
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2024 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>143</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s great political film is Akira Kurosawa’s epic of war and deception Kagemusha (1980). Set in late sixteenth-century Japan it tells the story of a thief tasked with impersonating a warlord. Can physical resemblance translate into political authority? How far does the conspiracy need to go? And who in the end is the real criminal?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s great political film is Akira Kurosawa’s epic of war and deception Kagemusha (1980). Set in late sixteenth-century Japan it tells the story of a thief tasked with impersonating a warlord. Can physical resemblance translate into political authority? How far does the conspiracy need to go? And who in the end is the real criminal?
Out now: two new bonus episodes on PPF+ to accompany this series: Shoah part one and Shoah part two, exploring Claude Lanzmann’s path-breaking, harrowing, unforgettable 9-hour documentary about the Holocaust. Sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: Spike Lee’s Do The Right Thing
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s great political film is Akira Kurosawa’s epic of war and deception Kagemusha (1980). Set in late sixteenth-century Japan it tells the story of a thief tasked with impersonating a warlord. Can physical resemblance translate into political authority? How far does the conspiracy need to go? And who in the end is the real criminal?</p><p>Out now: two new bonus episodes on PPF+ to accompany this series: Shoah part one and Shoah part two, exploring Claude Lanzmann’s path-breaking, harrowing, unforgettable 9-hour documentary about the Holocaust. Sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time: Spike Lee’s Do The Right Thing</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3232</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[aa81d218-bec5-11ef-abb8-9f352407c80d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7846802190.mp3?updated=1734695471" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: Jeanne Dielman</title>
      <description>Today’s great political film is Chantal Akerman’s Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles (1975), voted the greatest film of all time in the 2022 Sight and Sound poll. A classic of feminist cinema it is also a film about the meaning of time and the illusions of choice. How can a movie which shows a woman peeling potatoes in real time have you on the edge of your seat? If the personal is the political, what do three days in the life of a Belgian housewife tell us about the true nature of power?
Coming this weekend on PPF+: two new bonus episodes to accompany this series: Shoah part one and Shoah part two, exploring Claude Lanzmann’s path-breaking, harrowing, unforgettable 9-hour documentary about the Holocaust. Sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time in our regular slot: Kagemusha (1980)
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>142</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s great political film is Chantal Akerman’s Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles (1975), voted the greatest film of all time in the 2022 Sight and Sound poll. A classic of feminist cinema it is also a film about the meaning of time and the illusions of choice. How can a movie which shows a woman peeling potatoes in real time have you on the edge of your seat? If the personal is the political, what do three days in the life of a Belgian housewife tell us about the true nature of power?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s great political film is Chantal Akerman’s Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles (1975), voted the greatest film of all time in the 2022 Sight and Sound poll. A classic of feminist cinema it is also a film about the meaning of time and the illusions of choice. How can a movie which shows a woman peeling potatoes in real time have you on the edge of your seat? If the personal is the political, what do three days in the life of a Belgian housewife tell us about the true nature of power?
Coming this weekend on PPF+: two new bonus episodes to accompany this series: Shoah part one and Shoah part two, exploring Claude Lanzmann’s path-breaking, harrowing, unforgettable 9-hour documentary about the Holocaust. Sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time in our regular slot: Kagemusha (1980)
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s great political film is Chantal Akerman’s Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles (1975), voted the greatest film of all time in the 2022 Sight and Sound poll. A classic of feminist cinema it is also a film about the meaning of time and the illusions of choice. How can a movie which shows a woman peeling potatoes in real time have you on the edge of your seat? If the personal is the political, what do three days in the life of a Belgian housewife tell us about the true nature of power?</p><p>Coming this weekend on PPF+: two new bonus episodes to accompany this series: Shoah part one and Shoah part two, exploring Claude Lanzmann’s path-breaking, harrowing, unforgettable 9-hour documentary about the Holocaust. Sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time in our regular slot: Kagemusha (1980)</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3189</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a2c4883e-bc92-11ef-a53c-67b25786b2bb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML8848998161.mp3?updated=1734452829" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: The Candidate w/Chris Smith</title>
      <description>Today’s episode is a conversation between David and the former politician Chris Smith (long-time MP and Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport in Tony Blair’s first government) about The Candidate (1972), the first great political film of the 1970s. How does its portrayal of the compromises of running for office hold up today? Is it a cynical film or an inspiring one? And what lessons does it have for politics in the age of Trump?
To find out about gifting a PPF+ subscription for Christmas and beyond just click on the link https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts
Next time: Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles (voted the greatest film of all time in the 2022 Sight and Sound critics’ poll) 
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2024 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>141</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode is a conversation between David and the former politician Chris Smith (long-time MP and Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport in Tony Blair’s first government) about The Candidate (1972), the first great political film of the 1970s. How does its portrayal of the compromises of running for office hold up today? Is it a cynical film or an inspiring one? And what lessons does it have for politics in the age of Trump?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is a conversation between David and the former politician Chris Smith (long-time MP and Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport in Tony Blair’s first government) about The Candidate (1972), the first great political film of the 1970s. How does its portrayal of the compromises of running for office hold up today? Is it a cynical film or an inspiring one? And what lessons does it have for politics in the age of Trump?
To find out about gifting a PPF+ subscription for Christmas and beyond just click on the link https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts
Next time: Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles (voted the greatest film of all time in the 2022 Sight and Sound critics’ poll) 
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is a conversation between David and the former politician Chris Smith (long-time MP and Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport in Tony Blair’s first government) about The Candidate (1972), the first great political film of the 1970s. How does its portrayal of the compromises of running for office hold up today? Is it a cynical film or an inspiring one? And what lessons does it have for politics in the age of Trump?</p><p>To find out about gifting a PPF+ subscription for Christmas and beyond just click on the link <a href="https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts">https://ppf.supportingcast.fm/gifts</a></p><p>Next time: Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles (voted the greatest film of all time in the 2022 <em>Sight and Sound</em> critics’ poll) </p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3474</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c79c1a5e-ba72-11ef-a576-f3e68a20db6c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML8483431547.mp3?updated=1734219240" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: Z</title>
      <description>We resume our series on the great political films with Costa-Gavras’s Z (1969), the quintessential late 60s movie about assassination, conspiracy, street politics and police brutality. How could a film shot in Algeria and starring French actors so faithfully reconstruct a recent Greek political killing? How did it capture the spirit of the times? And what does it say about the relationship between politics as violence and politics as story-telling?
To find out about our gift offerings for Christmas and beyond visit the gift page on our website https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next time: The Candidate (1972) w/Chris Smith
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>140</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>We resume our series on the great political films with Costa-Gavras’s Z (1969), the quintessential late 60s movie about assassination, conspiracy, street politics and police brutality. How could a film shot in Algeria and starring French actors so faithfully reconstruct a recent Greek political killing? How did it capture the spirit of the times? And what does it say about the relationship between politics as violence and politics as story-telling?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>We resume our series on the great political films with Costa-Gavras’s Z (1969), the quintessential late 60s movie about assassination, conspiracy, street politics and police brutality. How could a film shot in Algeria and starring French actors so faithfully reconstruct a recent Greek political killing? How did it capture the spirit of the times? And what does it say about the relationship between politics as violence and politics as story-telling?
To find out about our gift offerings for Christmas and beyond visit the gift page on our website https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next time: The Candidate (1972) w/Chris Smith
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We resume our series on the great political films with Costa-Gavras’s <em>Z</em> (1969), the quintessential late 60s movie about assassination, conspiracy, street politics and police brutality. How could a film shot in Algeria and starring French actors so faithfully reconstruct a recent Greek political killing? How did it capture the spirit of the times? And what does it say about the relationship between politics as violence and politics as story-telling?</p><p>To find out about our gift offerings for Christmas and beyond visit the gift page on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts">https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts</a></p><p>Next time: The Candidate (1972) w/Chris Smith</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3589</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6e2c443e-b6ef-11ef-b5d4-9f0cee3f046d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML8506146297.mp3?updated=1733833014" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Televised Leadership Debates</title>
      <description>To finish this series of bad ideas, David tries to persuade Gary Gerstle of the futility of televised leadership debates. From Nixon vs Kennedy to Harris vs Trump, do the voters really learn anything from these supposed exchanges of ideas? Are they ever much more than a competition to avoid gaffes? And what did British politics gain when it introduced prime ministerial election debates (apart from a brief attack of Cleggmania)?
A new bonus bad idea is available to accompany this series: David talks to Lucia Rubinelli about what’s wrong with the idea of sovereignty. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
To find out about our gift offerings for Christmas and beyond visit the gift page on our website https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
The latest edition of the PPF newsletter is out now - sign up to get it every fortnight https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters 
Next time: The Great Political Films resumes with Z (1969)
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2024 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>139</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>To finish this series of bad ideas, David tries to persuade Gary Gerstle of the futility of televised leadership debates. From Nixon vs Kennedy to Harris vs Trump, do the voters really learn anything from these supposed exchanges of ideas? Are they ever much more than a competition to avoid gaffes? And what did British politics gain when it introduced prime ministerial election debates (apart from a brief attack of Cleggmania)?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>To finish this series of bad ideas, David tries to persuade Gary Gerstle of the futility of televised leadership debates. From Nixon vs Kennedy to Harris vs Trump, do the voters really learn anything from these supposed exchanges of ideas? Are they ever much more than a competition to avoid gaffes? And what did British politics gain when it introduced prime ministerial election debates (apart from a brief attack of Cleggmania)?
A new bonus bad idea is available to accompany this series: David talks to Lucia Rubinelli about what’s wrong with the idea of sovereignty. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
To find out about our gift offerings for Christmas and beyond visit the gift page on our website https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
The latest edition of the PPF newsletter is out now - sign up to get it every fortnight https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters 
Next time: The Great Political Films resumes with Z (1969)
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>To finish this series of bad ideas, David tries to persuade Gary Gerstle of the futility of televised leadership debates. From Nixon vs Kennedy to Harris vs Trump, do the voters really learn anything from these supposed exchanges of ideas? Are they ever much more than a competition to avoid gaffes? And what did British politics gain when it introduced prime ministerial election debates (apart from a brief attack of Cleggmania)?</p><p>A new bonus bad idea is available to accompany this series: David talks to Lucia Rubinelli about what’s wrong with the idea of sovereignty. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>To find out about our gift offerings for Christmas and beyond visit the gift page on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts">https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts</a></p><p>The latest edition of the PPF newsletter is out now - sign up to get it every fortnight <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a> </p><p>Next time: The Great Political Films resumes with Z (1969)</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3534</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[64a31fd4-b3c8-11ef-9072-fbd27f267017]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3976151073.mp3?updated=1733486358" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Party Members Choosing Leaders</title>
      <description>For our penultimate bad idea in this series, David talks to Robert Saunders about what’s gone wrong with British politics since party members got to decide who leads the party – and in some cases who gets to be prime minister. Is the problem the principle of the thing or the people who end up in charge (Corbyn, Truss)? How did reforms undertaken in the name of democracy manage to undermine democracy? And what are the alternatives?
A new bonus bad idea is available to accompany this series: David talks to Lucia Rubinelli about what’s gone wrong with the idea of sovereignty. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
To find out about our gift offerings for Christmas and beyond visit the gift page on our website https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next Bad Idea: Televised Leadership Debates
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>138</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For our penultimate bad idea in this series, David talks to Robert Saunders about what’s gone wrong with British politics since party members got to decide who leads the party – and in some cases who gets to be prime minister. Is the problem the principle of the thing or the people who end up in charge (Corbyn, Truss)? How did reforms undertaken in the name of democracy manage to undermine democracy? And what are the alternatives?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For our penultimate bad idea in this series, David talks to Robert Saunders about what’s gone wrong with British politics since party members got to decide who leads the party – and in some cases who gets to be prime minister. Is the problem the principle of the thing or the people who end up in charge (Corbyn, Truss)? How did reforms undertaken in the name of democracy manage to undermine democracy? And what are the alternatives?
A new bonus bad idea is available to accompany this series: David talks to Lucia Rubinelli about what’s gone wrong with the idea of sovereignty. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
To find out about our gift offerings for Christmas and beyond visit the gift page on our website https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next Bad Idea: Televised Leadership Debates
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For our penultimate bad idea in this series, David talks to Robert Saunders about what’s gone wrong with British politics since party members got to decide who leads the party – and in some cases who gets to be prime minister. Is the problem the principle of the thing or the people who end up in charge (Corbyn, Truss)? How did reforms undertaken in the name of democracy manage to undermine democracy? And what are the alternatives?</p><p>A new bonus bad idea is available to accompany this series: David talks to Lucia Rubinelli about what’s gone wrong with the idea of sovereignty. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up now to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>To find out about our gift offerings for Christmas and beyond visit the gift page on our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts">https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts</a></p><p>Next Bad Idea: Televised Leadership Debates</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3342</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b0b00f5e-b1a2-11ef-9bc4-c354e36c1454]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3730047287.mp3?updated=1733250245" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Steady State Theory</title>
      <description>Today’s bad idea is a theory of the universe: David talks to astrophysicist Chris Lintott about Steady State Theory, the rival cosmological model to the Big Bang, which held its own for a while in the 1940s and 1950s but turned out to be unsustainable. Why did its best-known champion Fred Hoyle have so much faith in it? What did it expose about the limitations of Big Bang theory? And what does it reveal about scientific hubris and human weakness in the face of the unknown?
Available now is a new bonus bad idea to accompany this series: David talks to Lucia Rubinelli about what’s gone wrong with the idea of sovereignty. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next Bad Idea: Party Members Choosing Leaders
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2024 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>137</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s bad idea is a theory of the universe: David talks to astrophysicist Chris Lintott about Steady State Theory, the rival cosmological model to the Big Bang, which held its own for a while in the 1940s and 1950s but turned out to be unsustainable. Why did its best-known champion Fred Hoyle have so much faith in it? What did it expose about the limitations of Big Bang theory? And what does it reveal about scientific hubris and human weakness in the face of the unknown?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s bad idea is a theory of the universe: David talks to astrophysicist Chris Lintott about Steady State Theory, the rival cosmological model to the Big Bang, which held its own for a while in the 1940s and 1950s but turned out to be unsustainable. Why did its best-known champion Fred Hoyle have so much faith in it? What did it expose about the limitations of Big Bang theory? And what does it reveal about scientific hubris and human weakness in the face of the unknown?
Available now is a new bonus bad idea to accompany this series: David talks to Lucia Rubinelli about what’s gone wrong with the idea of sovereignty. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next Bad Idea: Party Members Choosing Leaders
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s bad idea is a theory of the universe: David talks to astrophysicist Chris Lintott about Steady State Theory, the rival cosmological model to the Big Bang, which held its own for a while in the 1940s and 1950s but turned out to be unsustainable. Why did its best-known champion Fred Hoyle have so much faith in it? What did it expose about the limitations of Big Bang theory? And what does it reveal about scientific hubris and human weakness in the face of the unknown?</p><p>Available now is a new bonus bad idea to accompany this series: David talks to Lucia Rubinelli about what’s gone wrong with the idea of sovereignty. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next Bad Idea: Party Members Choosing Leaders</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3577</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[84975976-af50-11ef-9307-63c5054ff1fc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7403054599.mp3?updated=1732995113" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: The End of History</title>
      <description>Today’s bad idea concerns history itself: David talks to world historian Ayse Zarakol about the temptations and the pitfalls of the idea of The End of History. Francis Fukuyama popularised the phrase in 1989 at the end of the Cold War. What did his vision of the triumph of liberal democracy miss? Was it a Western fantasy or a modern fantasy or both? How has history exacted its revenge? And if history doesn’t end, does it repeat?
Coming on Saturday a bonus bad idea to accompany this series: David talks to Lucia Rubinelli about what’s gone wrong with the idea of sovereignty. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next Bad Idea: Steady State Theory
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>136</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s bad idea concerns history itself: David talks to world historian Ayse Zarakol about the temptations and the pitfalls of the idea of The End of History. Francis Fukuyama popularised the phrase in 1989 at the end of the Cold War. What did his vision of the triumph of liberal democracy miss? Was it a Western fantasy or a modern fantasy or both? How has history exacted its revenge? And if history doesn’t end, does it repeat?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s bad idea concerns history itself: David talks to world historian Ayse Zarakol about the temptations and the pitfalls of the idea of The End of History. Francis Fukuyama popularised the phrase in 1989 at the end of the Cold War. What did his vision of the triumph of liberal democracy miss? Was it a Western fantasy or a modern fantasy or both? How has history exacted its revenge? And if history doesn’t end, does it repeat?
Coming on Saturday a bonus bad idea to accompany this series: David talks to Lucia Rubinelli about what’s gone wrong with the idea of sovereignty. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next Bad Idea: Steady State Theory
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s bad idea concerns history itself: David talks to world historian Ayse Zarakol about the temptations and the pitfalls of the idea of The End of History. Francis Fukuyama popularised the phrase in 1989 at the end of the Cold War. What did his vision of the triumph of liberal democracy miss? Was it a Western fantasy or a modern fantasy or both? How has history exacted its revenge? And if history doesn’t end, does it repeat?</p><p>Coming on Saturday a bonus bad idea to accompany this series: David talks to Lucia Rubinelli about what’s gone wrong with the idea of sovereignty. To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts">https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts</a></p><p>Next Bad Idea: Steady State Theory</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave Podcast Network</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3404</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[49c77d86-aced-11ef-9805-83e32ce6d124]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7045609696.mp3?updated=1732732833" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Modernisation!</title>
      <description>For today’s bad idea David talks to political philosopher Alan Finlayson about what goes wrong when politicians get their hands on the concept of modernisation. Why does it leave them so in thrall to new technology? What does it miss about how change really happens? And where does the modernisation project end?
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next Bad Idea: The End of History
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave podcast network.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>135</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For today’s bad idea David talks to political philosopher Alan Finlayson about what goes wrong when politicians get their hands on the concept of modernisation. Why does it leave them so in thrall to new technology? What does it miss about how change really happens? And where does the modernisation project end?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For today’s bad idea David talks to political philosopher Alan Finlayson about what goes wrong when politicians get their hands on the concept of modernisation. Why does it leave them so in thrall to new technology? What does it miss about how change really happens? And where does the modernisation project end?
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next Bad Idea: The End of History
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave podcast network.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For today’s bad idea David talks to political philosopher Alan Finlayson about what goes wrong when politicians get their hands on the concept of modernisation. Why does it leave them so in thrall to new technology? What does it miss about how change really happens? And where does the modernisation project end?</p><p>Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts">https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts</a></p><p>Next Bad Idea: The End of History</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave podcast network.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3473</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3cfed078-a9a9-11ef-bc52-975563efdb16]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7500360493.mp3?updated=1732373528" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: The Marketplace of Ideas</title>
      <description>Today’s bad idea is about how ideas get adopted, argued over and rejected: David talks to political philosopher Alan Finlayson about what’s wrong with seeing this as a competitive marketplace. From St. Paul to Citizens United, from John Stuart Mill to Jordan Peterson, what happens when ideas get turned into commodities? Who wins and who loses? And what is an ‘ideological entrepreneur’?
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
To sign up for the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter, out tomorrow, join our mailing list https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next Bad Idea: Modernisation!
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave podcast network.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>134</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s bad idea is about how ideas get adopted, argued over and rejected: David talks to political philosopher Alan Finlayson about what’s wrong with seeing this as a competitive marketplace. From St. Paul to Citizens United, from John Stuart Mill to Jordan Peterson, what happens when ideas get turned into commodities? Who wins and who loses? And what is an ‘ideological entrepreneur’?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s bad idea is about how ideas get adopted, argued over and rejected: David talks to political philosopher Alan Finlayson about what’s wrong with seeing this as a competitive marketplace. From St. Paul to Citizens United, from John Stuart Mill to Jordan Peterson, what happens when ideas get turned into commodities? Who wins and who loses? And what is an ‘ideological entrepreneur’?
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
To sign up for the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter, out tomorrow, join our mailing list https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next Bad Idea: Modernisation!
Past Present Future is part of the Airwave podcast network.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s bad idea is about how ideas get adopted, argued over and rejected: David talks to political philosopher Alan Finlayson about what’s wrong with seeing this as a competitive marketplace. From St. Paul to Citizens United, from John Stuart Mill to Jordan Peterson, what happens when ideas get turned into commodities? Who wins and who loses? And what is an ‘ideological entrepreneur’?</p><p>Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts">https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts</a></p><p>To sign up for the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter, out tomorrow, join our mailing list <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p><p>Next Bad Idea: Modernisation!</p><p>Past Present Future is part of the Airwave podcast network.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3638</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[463b3fb0-a769-11ef-a72b-4f3b7032a3cb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2456396180.mp3?updated=1732134166" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Nobel Prizes</title>
      <description>For our latest bad idea with an interesting history David talks to the geneticist and science writer Adam Rutherford about what’s wrong with Nobel Prizes. Why do we revere the winners of the science prizes when we know how contrived the other prizes are? What makes us so attached to this relic of an outmoded idea of scientific progress? And what happens when someone is struck down with ‘Nobelitis’?
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. PPF merch available too! Find out more at https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next up on Bad Ideas: The Marketplace of Ideas
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>133</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>For our latest bad idea with an interesting history David talks to the geneticist and science writer Adam Rutherford about what’s wrong with Nobel Prizes. Why do we revere the winners of the science prizes when we know how contrived the other prizes are? What makes us so attached to this relic of an outmoded idea of scientific progress? And what happens when someone is struck down with ‘Nobelitis’?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For our latest bad idea with an interesting history David talks to the geneticist and science writer Adam Rutherford about what’s wrong with Nobel Prizes. Why do we revere the winners of the science prizes when we know how contrived the other prizes are? What makes us so attached to this relic of an outmoded idea of scientific progress? And what happens when someone is struck down with ‘Nobelitis’?
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. PPF merch available too! Find out more at https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next up on Bad Ideas: The Marketplace of Ideas
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For our latest bad idea with an interesting history David talks to the geneticist and science writer Adam Rutherford about what’s wrong with Nobel Prizes. Why do we revere the winners of the science prizes when we know how contrived the other prizes are? What makes us so attached to this relic of an outmoded idea of scientific progress? And what happens when someone is struck down with ‘Nobelitis’?</p><p>Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. PPF merch available too! Find out more at <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts">https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts</a></p><p>Next up on Bad Ideas: The Marketplace of Ideas</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3325</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b0575dca-a42b-11ef-af3d-33b835a91397]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1136157564.mp3?updated=1732134123" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: The Silent Majority</title>
      <description>To kick off our new series on the history of bad ideas David talks to historian Sophie Scott-Brown about the idea of ‘the silent majority’, beloved by American presidents from Nixon to Trump. Where does this idea come from? Is it conservative or revolutionary? If the majority are actually silent, how can anyone know what they are thinking? And aren’t the silent majority really the dead?
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next up on Bad Ideas: Nobel Prizes
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 18:07:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>132</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>To kick off our new series on the history of bad ideas David talks to historian Sophie Scott-Brown about the idea of ‘the silent majority’, beloved by American presidents from Nixon to Trump. Where does this idea come from? Is it conservative or revolutionary? If the majority are actually silent, how can anyone know what they are thinking? And aren’t the silent majority really the dead?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>To kick off our new series on the history of bad ideas David talks to historian Sophie Scott-Brown about the idea of ‘the silent majority’, beloved by American presidents from Nixon to Trump. Where does this idea come from? Is it conservative or revolutionary? If the majority are actually silent, how can anyone know what they are thinking? And aren’t the silent majority really the dead?
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next up on Bad Ideas: Nobel Prizes
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>To kick off our new series on the history of bad ideas David talks to historian Sophie Scott-Brown about the idea of ‘the silent majority’, beloved by American presidents from Nixon to Trump. Where does this idea come from? Is it conservative or revolutionary? If the majority are actually silent, how can anyone know what they are thinking? And aren’t the silent majority really the dead?</p><p>Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts">https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts</a></p><p>Next up on Bad Ideas: Nobel Prizes</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3428</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5aa66fca-a2b3-11ef-9fe1-6b2b63ba0eda]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2904972858.mp3?updated=1732134141" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Elections: 2024: The Meaning of Trump’s Triumph</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/672fbc2be745a302d3b8d7a6</link>
      <description>For the final (extended) episode in our American Elections series David talks to Gary Gerstle about the historical significance of Donald Trump’s decisive victory this week. Was this election and its outcome unprecedented in American history or are there parallels to guide us? Can Trump be both an existential threat to American democracy and a politician it’s possible for his opponents to work with? What is the likely shape of the new political order that his administration represents? And will democracy itself survive the experience?
Out now: a new bonus episode to accompany our Great Political Films series in which David talks to Helen Thompson about Apocalypse Now, the ultimate film about war and madness. Sign up now to PPF+ to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next time: The History of Bad Ideas: The Silent Majority
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2024 21:30:27 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>American Elections: 2024: The Meaning of Trump’s Triumph</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>131</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/2fbbf510-a203-11ef-8350-ef1f87b1e060/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For the final (extended) episode in our American Elections series David talks to Gary Gerstle about the historical significance of Donald Trump’s decisive victory this week. Was this election and its outcome unprecedented in American history or are there parallels to guide us? Can Trump be both an existential threat to American democracy and a politician it’s possible for his opponents to work with? What is the likely shape of the new political order that his administration represents? And will democracy itself survive the experience?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Out now: a new bonus episode to accompany our Great Political Films series in which David talks to Helen Thompson about&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Apocalypse Now&lt;/em&gt;, the ultimate film about war and madness.&amp;nbsp;Sign up now to PPF+ to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Looking for Christmas presents?&amp;nbsp;We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas.&amp;nbsp;Find out more&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: The History of Bad Ideas: The Silent Majority&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the final (extended) episode in our American Elections series David talks to Gary Gerstle about the historical significance of Donald Trump’s decisive victory this week. Was this election and its outcome unprecedented in American history or are there parallels to guide us? Can Trump be both an existential threat to American democracy and a politician it’s possible for his opponents to work with? What is the likely shape of the new political order that his administration represents? And will democracy itself survive the experience?
Out now: a new bonus episode to accompany our Great Political Films series in which David talks to Helen Thompson about Apocalypse Now, the ultimate film about war and madness. Sign up now to PPF+ to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next time: The History of Bad Ideas: The Silent Majority
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the final (extended) episode in our American Elections series David talks to Gary Gerstle about the historical significance of Donald Trump’s decisive victory this week. Was this election and its outcome unprecedented in American history or are there parallels to guide us? Can Trump be both an existential threat to American democracy and a politician it’s possible for his opponents to work with? What is the likely shape of the new political order that his administration represents? And will democracy itself survive the experience?</p><p>Out now: a new bonus episode to accompany our Great Political Films series in which David talks to Helen Thompson about <em>Apocalypse Now</em>, the ultimate film about war and madness. Sign up now to PPF+ to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts">https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts</a></p><p>Next time: The History of Bad Ideas: The Silent Majority</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5022</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[672fbc2be745a302d3b8d7a6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1571289125.mp3?updated=1731679243" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: The Battle of Algiers</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/672a733d8e1942910783ea60</link>
      <description>For the last episode in this season of great political films David explores Gillo Pontecorvo’s The Battle of Algiers (1966), which changed the face of political movie-making forever. Filmed to look like archive footage, featuring actual participants in the events it describes, and showing both sides of the vicious contest between insurgents and counter-insurgents, it humanises a horrifying conflict. It also raises the question: where is the line between realism and rage?
Coming on Saturday: a new bonus episode to accompany this series in which David talks to Helen Thompson about Apocalypse Now, the ultimate film about war and madness. Sign up now to PPF+ to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
To get our free fortnightly newsletter with guides, writing and clips exploring the themes of these episodes join our mailing list https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Christmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next time: Gary Gerstle on the 2024 Presidential Election
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 06:00:30 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Films: The Battle of Algiers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>130</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/301f498a-a203-11ef-8350-ff3fd64be7a9/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For the last episode in this season of great political films David explores Gillo Pontecorvo’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The Battle of Algiers&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;(1966), which changed the face of political movie-making forever. Filmed to look like archive footage, featuring actual participants in the events it describes, and showing both sides of the vicious contest between insurgents and counter-insurgents, it humanises a horrifying conflict.&amp;nbsp;It also raises the question: where is the line between realism and rage?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming on Saturday: a new bonus episode to accompany this series in which David talks to Helen Thompson about&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Apocalypse Now&lt;/em&gt;, the ultimate film about war and madness.&amp;nbsp;Sign up now to PPF+ to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To get our free fortnightly newsletter with guides, writing and clips exploring the themes of these episodes join our mailing list&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Looking for Christmas presents?&amp;nbsp;We have a special Christmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas.&amp;nbsp;Find out more&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Gary Gerstle on the 2024 Presidential Election&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the last episode in this season of great political films David explores Gillo Pontecorvo’s The Battle of Algiers (1966), which changed the face of political movie-making forever. Filmed to look like archive footage, featuring actual participants in the events it describes, and showing both sides of the vicious contest between insurgents and counter-insurgents, it humanises a horrifying conflict. It also raises the question: where is the line between realism and rage?
Coming on Saturday: a new bonus episode to accompany this series in which David talks to Helen Thompson about Apocalypse Now, the ultimate film about war and madness. Sign up now to PPF+ to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
To get our free fortnightly newsletter with guides, writing and clips exploring the themes of these episodes join our mailing list https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Christmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next time: Gary Gerstle on the 2024 Presidential Election
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the last episode in this season of great political films David explores Gillo Pontecorvo’s <em>The Battle of Algiers </em>(1966), which changed the face of political movie-making forever. Filmed to look like archive footage, featuring actual participants in the events it describes, and showing both sides of the vicious contest between insurgents and counter-insurgents, it humanises a horrifying conflict. It also raises the question: where is the line between realism and rage?</p><p>Coming on Saturday: a new bonus episode to accompany this series in which David talks to Helen Thompson about <em>Apocalypse Now</em>, the ultimate film about war and madness. Sign up now to PPF+ to get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>To get our free fortnightly newsletter with guides, writing and clips exploring the themes of these episodes join our mailing list <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p><p>Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Christmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts">https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts</a></p><p>Next time: Gary Gerstle on the 2024 Presidential Election</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3399</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[672a733d8e1942910783ea60]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1311963188.mp3?updated=1731679155" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: Dr Strangelove &amp; Fail Safe w/ Jill Lepore</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6723792ed85a37ba0903ae59</link>
      <description>This episode is about two great films on the same dark theme: David talks to American historian Jill Lepore about Stanley Kubrick’s Dr Strangelove and Sidney Lumet’s Fail Safe, which appeared within a few months of each other in 1964. Both films explore what might happen if America’s nuclear defence system went rogue. One is grimly hilarious; the other is utterly terrifying. Which packs the biggest punch today?
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next time: The Battle of Algiers
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2024 06:00:52 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Films: Dr Strangelove &amp; Fail Safe w/ Jill Lepore</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>129</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/307cd992-a203-11ef-8350-a35896fd5812/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This episode is about two great films on the same dark theme: David talks to American historian Jill Lepore about Stanley Kubrick’s Dr Strangelove and Sidney Lumet’s Fail Safe, which appeared within a few months of each other in 1964.&amp;nbsp;Both films explore what might happen if America’s nuclear defence system went rogue.&amp;nbsp;One is grimly hilarious; the other is utterly terrifying.&amp;nbsp;Which packs the biggest punch today?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas.&amp;nbsp;Find out more&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: The Battle of Algiers&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This episode is about two great films on the same dark theme: David talks to American historian Jill Lepore about Stanley Kubrick’s Dr Strangelove and Sidney Lumet’s Fail Safe, which appeared within a few months of each other in 1964. Both films explore what might happen if America’s nuclear defence system went rogue. One is grimly hilarious; the other is utterly terrifying. Which packs the biggest punch today?
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next time: The Battle of Algiers
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode is about two great films on the same dark theme: David talks to American historian Jill Lepore about Stanley Kubrick’s Dr Strangelove and Sidney Lumet’s Fail Safe, which appeared within a few months of each other in 1964. Both films explore what might happen if America’s nuclear defence system went rogue. One is grimly hilarious; the other is utterly terrifying. Which packs the biggest punch today?</p><p>Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Xmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts">https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts</a></p><p>Next time: The Battle of Algiers</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3186</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6723792ed85a37ba0903ae59]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2946260023.mp3?updated=1731679145" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: The Leopard w/ Lucia Rubinelli</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6721324dfab47fdf26235390</link>
      <description>For today’s great political film David discusses Luchino Visconti’s The Leopard (1963) with the Italian historian of ideas Lucia Rubinelli. How did a communist aristocrat from Milan come to make a film about a Sicilian prince? How did Burt Lancaster get cast in the leading role? Is this a political film or a film against politics? And what is the real meaning of the celebrated line: ‘If we want things to stay as they are, things must change…’?
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Christmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next time: Dr Strangelove &amp; Fail Safe w/ Jill Lepore
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2024 06:00:06 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Films: The Leopard w/ Lucia Rubinelli</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>128</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/30d84b56-a203-11ef-8350-afb8fe124b9e/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For today’s great political film David discusses Luchino Visconti’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The Leopard&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(1963) with the Italian historian of ideas Lucia Rubinelli. How did a communist aristocrat from Milan come to make a film about a Sicilian prince? How did Burt Lancaster get cast in the leading role? Is this a political film or a film against politics? And what is the real meaning of the celebrated line: ‘If we want things to stay as they are, things must change…’?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Christmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas.&amp;nbsp;Find out more&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Dr Strangelove &amp;amp; Fail Safe w/ Jill Lepore&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For today’s great political film David discusses Luchino Visconti’s The Leopard (1963) with the Italian historian of ideas Lucia Rubinelli. How did a communist aristocrat from Milan come to make a film about a Sicilian prince? How did Burt Lancaster get cast in the leading role? Is this a political film or a film against politics? And what is the real meaning of the celebrated line: ‘If we want things to stay as they are, things must change…’?
Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Christmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts
Next time: Dr Strangelove &amp; Fail Safe w/ Jill Lepore
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For today’s great political film David discusses Luchino Visconti’s <em>The Leopard</em> (1963) with the Italian historian of ideas Lucia Rubinelli. How did a communist aristocrat from Milan come to make a film about a Sicilian prince? How did Burt Lancaster get cast in the leading role? Is this a political film or a film against politics? And what is the real meaning of the celebrated line: ‘If we want things to stay as they are, things must change…’?</p><p>Looking for Christmas presents? We have a special Christmas gift offer: give a subscription to PPF+ and your recipient will also receive a personally inscribed copy of David’s new book The History of Ideas. Find out more <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts">https://www.ppfideas.com/gifts</a></p><p>Next time: Dr Strangelove &amp; Fail Safe w/ Jill Lepore</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3369</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6721324dfab47fdf26235390]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2678536415.mp3?updated=1731679166" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: The Manchurian Candidate</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/671d1747e1ae5a1f287f9b5c</link>
      <description>Today’s great political film is John Frankenheimer’s masterpiece of Cold War paranoia The Manchurian Candidate (1962), which came out the week of the Cuban Missile Crisis. It’s a 1960s movie about 1950s fears: brainwashing, the Korean War, McCarthyism, all shot through with Kennedy-era anxieties about sexual potency and psychoanalysis. Who’s a Soviet agent? Who’s a mummy’s boy? And it managed to anticipate what was coming next in American politics: the age of assassination.
A new bonus episode to accompany this series is out now: David explores why so many American presidents choose High Noon as their favourite film. Sign up now to PPF+ for just £5 per month or £50 a year and get all our other bonuses plus ad free listening too. https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
To get our free fortnightly newsletter with guides, writing and clips exploring the themes of these episodes join our mailing list https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: The Leopard w/ Lucia Rubinelli
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2024 05:00:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Films: The Manchurian Candidate</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>127</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/313745ac-a203-11ef-8350-e79e88be355f/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Today’s great political film is John Frankenheimer’s masterpiece of Cold War paranoia&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The Manchurian Candidate&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(1962), which came out the week of the Cuban Missile Crisis. It’s a 1960s movie about 1950s fears: brainwashing, the Korean War, McCarthyism, all shot through with Kennedy-era anxieties about sexual potency and psychoanalysis. Who’s a Soviet agent? Who’s a mummy’s boy? And it managed to anticipate what was coming next in American politics: the age of assassination.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A new bonus episode to accompany this series is out now: David explores why so many American presidents choose High Noon as their favourite film.&amp;nbsp;Sign up now to PPF+ for just £5 per month or £50 a year and get all our other bonuses plus ad free listening too.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To get our free fortnightly newsletter with guides, writing and clips exploring the themes of these episodes join our mailing list&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: The Leopard w/ Lucia Rubinelli&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s great political film is John Frankenheimer’s masterpiece of Cold War paranoia The Manchurian Candidate (1962), which came out the week of the Cuban Missile Crisis. It’s a 1960s movie about 1950s fears: brainwashing, the Korean War, McCarthyism, all shot through with Kennedy-era anxieties about sexual potency and psychoanalysis. Who’s a Soviet agent? Who’s a mummy’s boy? And it managed to anticipate what was coming next in American politics: the age of assassination.
A new bonus episode to accompany this series is out now: David explores why so many American presidents choose High Noon as their favourite film. Sign up now to PPF+ for just £5 per month or £50 a year and get all our other bonuses plus ad free listening too. https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
To get our free fortnightly newsletter with guides, writing and clips exploring the themes of these episodes join our mailing list https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: The Leopard w/ Lucia Rubinelli
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s great political film is John Frankenheimer’s masterpiece of Cold War paranoia <em>The Manchurian Candidate</em> (1962), which came out the week of the Cuban Missile Crisis. It’s a 1960s movie about 1950s fears: brainwashing, the Korean War, McCarthyism, all shot through with Kennedy-era anxieties about sexual potency and psychoanalysis. Who’s a Soviet agent? Who’s a mummy’s boy? And it managed to anticipate what was coming next in American politics: the age of assassination.</p><p>A new bonus episode to accompany this series is out now: David explores why so many American presidents choose High Noon as their favourite film. Sign up now to PPF+ for just £5 per month or £50 a year and get all our other bonuses plus ad free listening too. <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>To get our free fortnightly newsletter with guides, writing and clips exploring the themes of these episodes join our mailing list <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p><p>Next time: The Leopard w/ Lucia Rubinelli</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3750</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[671d1747e1ae5a1f287f9b5c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3725647181.mp3?updated=1731679205" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/67165951e3d9082a5a736e3c</link>
      <description>In today’s episode David discusses Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger’s The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp (1943), a great patriotic anti-war film made in the depths of WWII. Why did Churchill want the film’s production stopped and was he right to suspect it was about him? What does the film say about the politics of nostalgia and the illusions of heroism? And how is Blimp’s moustache like Kane’s Rosebud?
A new bonus episode to accompany this series is out on Saturday: David explores why so many American presidents choose High Noon as their favourite film. Sign up now to PPF+ for just £5 per month or £50 a year and get all our other bonuses plus ad free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
To get our free fortnightly newsletter with guides, writing and clips exploring the themes of these episodes join our mailing list https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: The Manchurian Candidate
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 05:00:39 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Films: The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>126</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3195cc62-a203-11ef-8350-07971201c390/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In today’s episode David discusses Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger’s The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp (1943), a great patriotic anti-war film made in the depths of WWII.&amp;nbsp;Why did Churchill want the film’s production stopped and was he right to suspect it was about him? What does the film say about the politics of nostalgia and the illusions of heroism?&amp;nbsp;And how is Blimp’s moustache like Kane’s Rosebud?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A new bonus episode to accompany this series is out on Saturday: David explores why so many American presidents choose High Noon as their favourite film. Sign up now to PPF+ for just £5 per month or £50 a year and get all our other bonuses plus ad free listening&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To get our free fortnightly newsletter with guides, writing and clips exploring the themes of these episodes join our mailing list&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: The Manchurian Candidate&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode David discusses Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger’s The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp (1943), a great patriotic anti-war film made in the depths of WWII. Why did Churchill want the film’s production stopped and was he right to suspect it was about him? What does the film say about the politics of nostalgia and the illusions of heroism? And how is Blimp’s moustache like Kane’s Rosebud?
A new bonus episode to accompany this series is out on Saturday: David explores why so many American presidents choose High Noon as their favourite film. Sign up now to PPF+ for just £5 per month or £50 a year and get all our other bonuses plus ad free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
To get our free fortnightly newsletter with guides, writing and clips exploring the themes of these episodes join our mailing list https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: The Manchurian Candidate
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode David discusses Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger’s The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp (1943), a great patriotic anti-war film made in the depths of WWII. Why did Churchill want the film’s production stopped and was he right to suspect it was about him? What does the film say about the politics of nostalgia and the illusions of heroism? And how is Blimp’s moustache like Kane’s Rosebud?</p><p>A new bonus episode to accompany this series is out on Saturday: David explores why so many American presidents choose High Noon as their favourite film. Sign up now to PPF+ for just £5 per month or £50 a year and get all our other bonuses plus ad free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>To get our free fortnightly newsletter with guides, writing and clips exploring the themes of these episodes join our mailing list <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p><p>Next time: The Manchurian Candidate</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3192</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[67165951e3d9082a5a736e3c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7332914344.mp3?updated=1731679197" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: Citizen Kane</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/670fd76e95a9a2047596ff64</link>
      <description>Orson Welles’s Citizen Kane (1941) is many people’s favourite film of all time, including Donald Trump’s. Why does Trump love it so? What does he get right and what does he get wrong about the trajectory of the life of Charles Foster Kane? What does the film reveal about the relationship between celebrity, influence and political power? And why is Rosebud not the real mystery at the heart of this story?
Like Kane, want more stuff? To get PPF merch – either an ethically-sourced canvas tote bag or a bone china mug – just go to our website https://www.ppfideas.com/merch
Next time: The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2024 05:00:34 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Films: Citizen Kane</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>125</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/31f5781a-a203-11ef-8350-23d6371b3d4d/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Orson Welles’s Citizen Kane (1941) is many people’s favourite film of all time, including Donald Trump’s.&amp;nbsp;Why does Trump love it so?&amp;nbsp;What does he get right and what does he get wrong about the trajectory of the life of Charles Foster Kane?&amp;nbsp;What does the film reveal about the relationship between celebrity, influence and political power?&amp;nbsp;And why is Rosebud not the real mystery at the heart of this story?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Like Kane, want more stuff?&amp;nbsp;To get PPF merch – either an ethically-sourced canvas tote bag or a bone china mug – just go to our website&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/merch" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/merch&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Orson Welles’s Citizen Kane (1941) is many people’s favourite film of all time, including Donald Trump’s. Why does Trump love it so? What does he get right and what does he get wrong about the trajectory of the life of Charles Foster Kane? What does the film reveal about the relationship between celebrity, influence and political power? And why is Rosebud not the real mystery at the heart of this story?
Like Kane, want more stuff? To get PPF merch – either an ethically-sourced canvas tote bag or a bone china mug – just go to our website https://www.ppfideas.com/merch
Next time: The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Orson Welles’s Citizen Kane (1941) is many people’s favourite film of all time, including Donald Trump’s. Why does Trump love it so? What does he get right and what does he get wrong about the trajectory of the life of Charles Foster Kane? What does the film reveal about the relationship between celebrity, influence and political power? And why is Rosebud not the real mystery at the heart of this story?</p><p>Like Kane, want more stuff? To get PPF merch – either an ethically-sourced canvas tote bag or a bone china mug – just go to our website <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/merch">https://www.ppfideas.com/merch</a></p><p>Next time: The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3317</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[670fd76e95a9a2047596ff64]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2590455287.mp3?updated=1731679150" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: Mr Smith Goes to Washington</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/670d5273883ece1258662df0</link>
      <description>Today’s great political film is Frank Capra’s Mr Smith Goes to Washington (1939), a much-loved tale of the little guy taking on the corrupt establishment. But there’s far more to it than that, including an origin story that suggests Jefferson Smith (James Stewart) might not be what he seems. From filibusters to fascism, from the New Deal to America First, from Burton K. Wheeler to Harry S. Truman, this is a heart-warming film that still manages to go to the dark heart of American politics.
To hear our bonus episode on Philip Roth’s The Plot Against America (in which Burton K. Wheeler becomes America’s Hitler) sign up now to PPF+ for just £5 per month or £50 a year and get all our other bonuses plus ad free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: Citizen Kane
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 05:00:26 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Films: Mr Smith Goes to Washington</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>124</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3258f89a-a203-11ef-8350-6709babd3bea/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Today’s great political film is Frank Capra’s Mr Smith Goes to Washington (1939), a much-loved tale of the little guy taking on the corrupt establishment.&amp;nbsp;But there’s far more to it than that, including an origin story that suggests Jefferson Smith (James Stewart) might not be what he seems.&amp;nbsp;From filibusters to fascism, from the New Deal to America First, from Burton K. Wheeler to Harry S. Truman, this is a heart-warming film that still manages to go to the dark heart of American politics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To hear our bonus episode on Philip Roth’s The Plot Against America (in which Burton K. Wheeler becomes America’s Hitler) sign up now to PPF+ for just £5 per month or £50 a year and get all our other bonuses plus ad free listening&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Citizen Kane&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s great political film is Frank Capra’s Mr Smith Goes to Washington (1939), a much-loved tale of the little guy taking on the corrupt establishment. But there’s far more to it than that, including an origin story that suggests Jefferson Smith (James Stewart) might not be what he seems. From filibusters to fascism, from the New Deal to America First, from Burton K. Wheeler to Harry S. Truman, this is a heart-warming film that still manages to go to the dark heart of American politics.
To hear our bonus episode on Philip Roth’s The Plot Against America (in which Burton K. Wheeler becomes America’s Hitler) sign up now to PPF+ for just £5 per month or £50 a year and get all our other bonuses plus ad free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: Citizen Kane
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s great political film is Frank Capra’s Mr Smith Goes to Washington (1939), a much-loved tale of the little guy taking on the corrupt establishment. But there’s far more to it than that, including an origin story that suggests Jefferson Smith (James Stewart) might not be what he seems. From filibusters to fascism, from the New Deal to America First, from Burton K. Wheeler to Harry S. Truman, this is a heart-warming film that still manages to go to the dark heart of American politics.</p><p>To hear our bonus episode on Philip Roth’s The Plot Against America (in which Burton K. Wheeler becomes America’s Hitler) sign up now to PPF+ for just £5 per month or £50 a year and get all our other bonuses plus ad free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time: Citizen Kane</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3347</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[670d5273883ece1258662df0]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6157911877.mp3?updated=1731679190" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Films: La Grande Illusion</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/67080b3414b366c897ba2a64</link>
      <description>For the first episode in our new series David explores Jean Renoir’s La Grande Illusion (1937), a great anti-war film that is also a melancholy meditation on friendship between enemies, love across borders, and the inevitability of loss. What, in the end, is the great illusion: war itself, or the belief that we can escape its baleful consequences?
Our bonus episode with Chris Clark on how Europe’s elites sleepwalked into war in 1914 is available on PPF+. Sign up now for just £5 per month or £50 a year to get 24 bonus episodes a year plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: Mr Smith Goes to Washington
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2024 05:00:14 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Films: La Grande Illusion</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>10</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>123</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/32d00cc8-a203-11ef-8350-df685a07428c/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For the first episode in our new series David explores Jean Renoir’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;La Grande Illusion&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(1937), a great anti-war film that is also a melancholy meditation on friendship between enemies, love across borders, and the inevitability of loss.&amp;nbsp;What, in the end, is the great illusion: war itself, or the belief that we can escape its baleful consequences?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our bonus episode with Chris Clark on how Europe’s elites sleepwalked into war in 1914 is available on PPF+. Sign up now for just £5 per month or £50 a year to get 24 bonus episodes a year plus ad-free listening&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Mr Smith Goes to Washington&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the first episode in our new series David explores Jean Renoir’s La Grande Illusion (1937), a great anti-war film that is also a melancholy meditation on friendship between enemies, love across borders, and the inevitability of loss. What, in the end, is the great illusion: war itself, or the belief that we can escape its baleful consequences?
Our bonus episode with Chris Clark on how Europe’s elites sleepwalked into war in 1914 is available on PPF+. Sign up now for just £5 per month or £50 a year to get 24 bonus episodes a year plus ad-free listening https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: Mr Smith Goes to Washington
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the first episode in our new series David explores Jean Renoir’s <em>La Grande Illusion</em> (1937), a great anti-war film that is also a melancholy meditation on friendship between enemies, love across borders, and the inevitability of loss. What, in the end, is the great illusion: war itself, or the belief that we can escape its baleful consequences?</p><p>Our bonus episode with Chris Clark on how Europe’s elites sleepwalked into war in 1914 is available on PPF+. Sign up now for just £5 per month or £50 a year to get 24 bonus episodes a year plus ad-free listening <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time: Mr Smith Goes to Washington</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3201</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[67080b3414b366c897ba2a64]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2763044320.mp3?updated=1731679207" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Michael Lewis on Sam Bankman-Fried and Effective Altruism</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/67057e11ed8ff5205ef7436c</link>
      <description>David talks to author Michael Lewis about SBF and EA: about the man he got to know before, during and after his spectacular fall and about the philosophy with which he was associated. What did Sam Bankman-Fried believe was the purpose of making so much money? How did he manage to get so side-tracked from doing good? Why when it all went wrong did he fail to save himself? A conversation about utilitarianism, risk and human weakness.
Going Infinite: The Rise and Fall of a New Tycoon by Michael Lewis is out now in paperback with a new afterword https://bit.ly/3ZXr88u 
The second bonus episode to accompany our recent series on Thinking Machines is available now: David and Shannon Vallor talk about where AI is really taking us, sorting the reality from the hype. Sign up to PPF+ for just £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
To get the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter (out tomorrow), with lots more on SBF and EA and plenty else besides, sign up here https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: The Great Political Films: La Grande Illusion
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 05:00:03 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Michael Lewis on Sam Bankman-Fried and Effective Altruism</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>122</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/332fb61e-a203-11ef-8350-37a5af651089/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;David talks to author Michael Lewis about SBF and EA: about the man he got to know before, during and after his spectacular fall and about the philosophy with which he was associated.&amp;nbsp;What did Sam Bankman-Fried believe was the purpose of making so much money?&amp;nbsp;How did he manage to get so side-tracked from doing good?&amp;nbsp;Why when it all went wrong did he fail to save himself?&amp;nbsp;A conversation about utilitarianism, risk and human weakness.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Going Infinite: The Rise and Fall of a New Tycoon by Michael Lewis is out now in paperback with a new afterword&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3ZXr88u" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://bit.ly/3ZXr88u&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The second bonus episode to accompany our recent series on Thinking Machines is available now: David and Shannon Vallor talk about where AI is really taking us, sorting the reality from the hype.&amp;nbsp;Sign up to PPF+ for just £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To get the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter (out tomorrow), with lots more on SBF and EA and plenty else besides, sign up here&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: The Great Political Films:&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;La Grande Illusion&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>David talks to author Michael Lewis about SBF and EA: about the man he got to know before, during and after his spectacular fall and about the philosophy with which he was associated. What did Sam Bankman-Fried believe was the purpose of making so much money? How did he manage to get so side-tracked from doing good? Why when it all went wrong did he fail to save himself? A conversation about utilitarianism, risk and human weakness.
Going Infinite: The Rise and Fall of a New Tycoon by Michael Lewis is out now in paperback with a new afterword https://bit.ly/3ZXr88u 
The second bonus episode to accompany our recent series on Thinking Machines is available now: David and Shannon Vallor talk about where AI is really taking us, sorting the reality from the hype. Sign up to PPF+ for just £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
To get the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter (out tomorrow), with lots more on SBF and EA and plenty else besides, sign up here https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: The Great Political Films: La Grande Illusion
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>David talks to author Michael Lewis about SBF and EA: about the man he got to know before, during and after his spectacular fall and about the philosophy with which he was associated. What did Sam Bankman-Fried believe was the purpose of making so much money? How did he manage to get so side-tracked from doing good? Why when it all went wrong did he fail to save himself? A conversation about utilitarianism, risk and human weakness.</p><p>Going Infinite: The Rise and Fall of a New Tycoon by Michael Lewis is out now in paperback with a new afterword <a href="https://bit.ly/3ZXr88u">https://bit.ly/3ZXr88u</a> </p><p>The second bonus episode to accompany our recent series on Thinking Machines is available now: David and Shannon Vallor talk about where AI is really taking us, sorting the reality from the hype. Sign up to PPF+ for just £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>To get the latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter (out tomorrow), with lots more on SBF and EA and plenty else besides, sign up here <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p><p>Next time: The Great Political Films: <em>La Grande Illusion</em></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3562</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[67057e11ed8ff5205ef7436c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6563533164.mp3?updated=1731679196" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Elections: 2024: Is Anyone Winning?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/67014cd86575842b7331ef6b</link>
      <description>David checks in with Gary Gerstle one more time before November to explore where things now stand with the US presidential election. In a conversation recorded in the immediate aftermath of the Walz/Vance debate, they discuss dead cats, October headwinds, comparisons with 2016 and a president missing in action. Plus, if the result really is too close to call, can the American Republic survive the fallout?
There is another bonus episode out now to accompany our recent series on Thinking Machines: David and Shannon Vallor talk about where AI is really taking us, sorting the reality from the hype. Sign up now for just £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
New PPF merch is available on our website: choose from a canvas tote bag or a bone china mug https://www.ppfideas.com/merch
Next time: Michael Lewis on Sam Bankman-Fried and Effective Altruism
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Oct 2024 05:00:43 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>American Elections: 2024: Is Anyone Winning?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>121</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/338f63ac-a203-11ef-8350-2356a6acdc33/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;David checks in with Gary Gerstle one more time before November to explore where things now stand with the US presidential election.&amp;nbsp;In a conversation recorded in the immediate aftermath of the Walz/Vance debate, they discuss dead cats, October headwinds, comparisons with 2016 and a president missing in action.&amp;nbsp;Plus, if the result really is too close to call, can the American Republic survive the fallout?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is another bonus episode out now to accompany our recent series on Thinking Machines: David and Shannon Vallor talk about where AI is really taking us, sorting the reality from the hype.&amp;nbsp;Sign up now for just £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;New PPF merch is available on our website: choose from a canvas tote bag or a bone china mug&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/merch" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/merch&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Michael Lewis on Sam Bankman-Fried and Effective Altruism&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>David checks in with Gary Gerstle one more time before November to explore where things now stand with the US presidential election. In a conversation recorded in the immediate aftermath of the Walz/Vance debate, they discuss dead cats, October headwinds, comparisons with 2016 and a president missing in action. Plus, if the result really is too close to call, can the American Republic survive the fallout?
There is another bonus episode out now to accompany our recent series on Thinking Machines: David and Shannon Vallor talk about where AI is really taking us, sorting the reality from the hype. Sign up now for just £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
New PPF merch is available on our website: choose from a canvas tote bag or a bone china mug https://www.ppfideas.com/merch
Next time: Michael Lewis on Sam Bankman-Fried and Effective Altruism
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>David checks in with Gary Gerstle one more time before November to explore where things now stand with the US presidential election. In a conversation recorded in the immediate aftermath of the Walz/Vance debate, they discuss dead cats, October headwinds, comparisons with 2016 and a president missing in action. Plus, if the result really is too close to call, can the American Republic survive the fallout?</p><p>There is another bonus episode out now to accompany our recent series on Thinking Machines: David and Shannon Vallor talk about where AI is really taking us, sorting the reality from the hype. Sign up now for just £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>New PPF merch is available on our website: choose from a canvas tote bag or a bone china mug <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/merch">https://www.ppfideas.com/merch</a></p><p>Next time: Michael Lewis on Sam Bankman-Fried and Effective Altruism</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3487</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[67014cd86575842b7331ef6b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7084043772.mp3?updated=1731679185" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thinking About Thinking Machines: Monk &amp; Robot</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66fd480b687515ec942a6982</link>
      <description>For episode four of our series on the history of thinking about thinking machines, David and Shannon discuss a very different sci-fi sensibility: Becky Chambers’ Monk &amp; Robot series (A Psalm for the Wild-Built (2021) and A Prayer for the Crown-Shy (2022)). What would it mean for robots to ‘wake up’? How might robots teach humans about the nature of care and about the care of nature? And where do robots fit into a neurodiverse world? Plus: robots vs octopi. 
There is another bonus episode to accompany this series available from Saturday on PPF+: David and Shannon talk about where AI is really taking us, sorting the reality from the hype. Sign up now for just £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes. https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
New PPF merch is available on our website: choose from a canvas tote bag or a bone china mug https://www.ppfideas.com/merch
Next time: Gary Gerstle on the current state of the American election.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 05:00:02 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Thinking About Thinking Machines: Monk &amp; Robot</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>9</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>120</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/33ec8d52-a203-11ef-8350-d7e87bba2267/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For episode four of our series on the history of thinking about thinking machines, David and Shannon discuss a very different sci-fi sensibility: Becky Chambers’ Monk &amp;amp; Robot series (&lt;em&gt;A Psalm for the Wild-Built&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(2021) and&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;A Prayer for the Crown-Shy&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(2022)).&amp;nbsp;What would it mean for robots to ‘wake up’?&amp;nbsp;How might robots teach humans about the nature of care and about the care of nature?&amp;nbsp;And where do robots fit into a neurodiverse world? Plus: robots vs octopi.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is another bonus episode to accompany this series available from Saturday on PPF+: David and Shannon talk about where AI is really taking us, sorting the reality from the hype.&amp;nbsp;Sign up now for just £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;New PPF merch is available on our website: choose from a canvas tote bag or a bone china mug&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/merch" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/merch&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Gary Gerstle on the current state of the American election.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For episode four of our series on the history of thinking about thinking machines, David and Shannon discuss a very different sci-fi sensibility: Becky Chambers’ Monk &amp; Robot series (A Psalm for the Wild-Built (2021) and A Prayer for the Crown-Shy (2022)). What would it mean for robots to ‘wake up’? How might robots teach humans about the nature of care and about the care of nature? And where do robots fit into a neurodiverse world? Plus: robots vs octopi. 
There is another bonus episode to accompany this series available from Saturday on PPF+: David and Shannon talk about where AI is really taking us, sorting the reality from the hype. Sign up now for just £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes. https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
New PPF merch is available on our website: choose from a canvas tote bag or a bone china mug https://www.ppfideas.com/merch
Next time: Gary Gerstle on the current state of the American election.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For episode four of our series on the history of thinking about thinking machines, David and Shannon discuss a very different sci-fi sensibility: Becky Chambers’ Monk &amp; Robot series (<em>A Psalm for the Wild-Built</em> (2021) and <em>A Prayer for the Crown-Shy</em> (2022)). What would it mean for robots to ‘wake up’? How might robots teach humans about the nature of care and about the care of nature? And where do robots fit into a neurodiverse world? Plus: robots vs octopi. </p><p>There is another bonus episode to accompany this series available from Saturday on PPF+: David and Shannon talk about where AI is really taking us, sorting the reality from the hype. Sign up now for just £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes. <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>New PPF merch is available on our website: choose from a canvas tote bag or a bone china mug <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/merch">https://www.ppfideas.com/merch</a></p><br><p>Next time: Gary Gerstle on the current state of the American election.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3542</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66fd480b687515ec942a6982]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4184766693.mp3?updated=1731679238" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thinking About Thinking Machines: Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66f6faa1acfe1ec5ec98ecb1</link>
      <description>Today’s episode in our series on the history of thinking about thinking machines explores the novel that inspired Blade Runner: Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (1968). David talks to Shannon Vallor about what the book has that the film lacks and how it comprehensively messes with the line between human and machine, the natural and the artificial. What is the meaning of the electric sheep?
To hear a bonus episode on Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein to accompany this series sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes. https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
PPF merch is now available on our website: choose from a canvas tote bag or a bone china mug https://www.ppfideas.com/merch
Next time: Becky Chambers’ Monk &amp; Robot series.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2024 05:00:14 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Thinking About Thinking Machines: Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>9</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>119</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/344ad448-a203-11ef-8350-073a7153adaf/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Today’s episode in our series on the history of thinking about thinking machines explores the novel that inspired&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Blade Runner&lt;/em&gt;: Philip K. Dick’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;(1968).&amp;nbsp;David talks to Shannon Vallor about what the book has that the film lacks and how it comprehensively messes with the line between human and machine, the natural and the artificial.&amp;nbsp;What&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;the meaning of the electric sheep?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To hear a bonus episode on Mary Shelley’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Frankenstein&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;to accompany this series sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PPF merch is now available on our website: choose from a canvas tote bag or a bone china mug&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/merch" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/merch&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Becky Chambers’ Monk &amp;amp; Robot series.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode in our series on the history of thinking about thinking machines explores the novel that inspired Blade Runner: Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (1968). David talks to Shannon Vallor about what the book has that the film lacks and how it comprehensively messes with the line between human and machine, the natural and the artificial. What is the meaning of the electric sheep?
To hear a bonus episode on Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein to accompany this series sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes. https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
PPF merch is now available on our website: choose from a canvas tote bag or a bone china mug https://www.ppfideas.com/merch
Next time: Becky Chambers’ Monk &amp; Robot series.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode in our series on the history of thinking about thinking machines explores the novel that inspired <em>Blade Runner</em>: Philip K. Dick’s <em>Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? </em>(1968). David talks to Shannon Vallor about what the book has that the film lacks and how it comprehensively messes with the line between human and machine, the natural and the artificial. What is the meaning of the electric sheep?</p><p>To hear a bonus episode on Mary Shelley’s <em>Frankenstein</em> to accompany this series sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes. <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>PPF merch is now available on our website: choose from a canvas tote bag or a bone china mug <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/merch">https://www.ppfideas.com/merch</a></p><br><p>Next time: Becky Chambers’ Monk &amp; Robot series.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3510</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66f6faa1acfe1ec5ec98ecb1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3551358536.mp3?updated=1731679158" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thinking About Thinking Machines: Isaac Asimov’s ‘Franchise’</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66f29e04edf5e82f603de347</link>
      <description>In today’s episode in our series on the history of thinking about thinking machines, David and Shannon discuss Isaac Asimov’s 1955 short story ‘Franchise’, which imagines the American presidential election of 2008 as decided by one voter and a giant computer. Part prophecy, part parody: have either its predictions or its warnings about democracy come true? How does the power of technology shape contemporary politics? And why was Asimov’s vision of the future so reactionary?
To hear a bonus episode on Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein to accompany this series sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes. https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
The latest edition of our free newsletter is out tomorrow with guides, clips and links for this series: join our mailing list https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters 
Next time: Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 05:00:39 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Thinking About Thinking Machines: Isaac Asimov’s ‘Franchise’</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>9</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>118</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/34a6f76e-a203-11ef-8350-7be950dc89df/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In today’s episode in our series on the history of thinking about thinking machines, David and Shannon discuss Isaac Asimov’s 1955 short story ‘Franchise’, which imagines the American presidential election of 2008 as decided by one voter and a giant computer.&amp;nbsp;Part prophecy, part parody: have either its predictions or its warnings about democracy come true?&amp;nbsp;How does the power of technology shape contemporary politics?&amp;nbsp;And why was Asimov’s vision of the future so reactionary?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To hear a bonus episode on Mary Shelley’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Frankenstein&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;to accompany this series sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The latest edition of our free newsletter is out tomorrow with guides, clips and links for this series: join our mailing list&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Philip K. Dick’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode in our series on the history of thinking about thinking machines, David and Shannon discuss Isaac Asimov’s 1955 short story ‘Franchise’, which imagines the American presidential election of 2008 as decided by one voter and a giant computer. Part prophecy, part parody: have either its predictions or its warnings about democracy come true? How does the power of technology shape contemporary politics? And why was Asimov’s vision of the future so reactionary?
To hear a bonus episode on Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein to accompany this series sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes. https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
The latest edition of our free newsletter is out tomorrow with guides, clips and links for this series: join our mailing list https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters 
Next time: Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode in our series on the history of thinking about thinking machines, David and Shannon discuss Isaac Asimov’s 1955 short story ‘Franchise’, which imagines the American presidential election of 2008 as decided by one voter and a giant computer. Part prophecy, part parody: have either its predictions or its warnings about democracy come true? How does the power of technology shape contemporary politics? And why was Asimov’s vision of the future so reactionary?</p><p>To hear a bonus episode on Mary Shelley’s <em>Frankenstein</em> to accompany this series sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes. <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>The latest edition of our free newsletter is out tomorrow with guides, clips and links for this series: join our mailing list <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a> </p><p>Next time: Philip K. Dick’s <em>Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?</em></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3377</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66f29e04edf5e82f603de347]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2276630145.mp3?updated=1731679229" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thinking About Thinking Machines: Metropolis</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66eedd95135604007e97cd98</link>
      <description>For the first episode in our new series on the history of thinking about thinking machines, David talks to philosopher Shannon Vallor about Fritz Lang’s Metropolis (1927). The last great silent film is the most futuristic: a vision of robots and artificial life, it is also about where the human heart fits into an increasingly mechanised world. Is it prophetic? Is it monstrous? And who are the winners and losers when war is declared on the machines?
To hear a bonus episode on Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein to accompany this series sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes. https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: Isaac Asimov’s ‘Franchise’ 
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2024 05:00:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Thinking About Thinking Machines: Metropolis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>9</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>117</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3505d284-a203-11ef-8350-6b1477020025/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For the first episode in our new series on the history of thinking about thinking machines, David talks to philosopher Shannon Vallor about Fritz Lang’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Metropolis&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(1927).&amp;nbsp;The last great silent film is the most futuristic: a vision of robots and artificial life, it is also about where the human heart fits into an increasingly mechanised world.&amp;nbsp;Is it prophetic?&amp;nbsp;Is it monstrous?&amp;nbsp;And who are the winners and losers when war is declared on the machines?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To hear a bonus episode on Mary Shelley’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Frankenstein&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;to accompany this series sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Isaac Asimov’s ‘Franchise’&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the first episode in our new series on the history of thinking about thinking machines, David talks to philosopher Shannon Vallor about Fritz Lang’s Metropolis (1927). The last great silent film is the most futuristic: a vision of robots and artificial life, it is also about where the human heart fits into an increasingly mechanised world. Is it prophetic? Is it monstrous? And who are the winners and losers when war is declared on the machines?
To hear a bonus episode on Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein to accompany this series sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes. https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: Isaac Asimov’s ‘Franchise’ 
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the first episode in our new series on the history of thinking about thinking machines, David talks to philosopher Shannon Vallor about Fritz Lang’s <em>Metropolis</em> (1927). The last great silent film is the most futuristic: a vision of robots and artificial life, it is also about where the human heart fits into an increasingly mechanised world. Is it prophetic? Is it monstrous? And who are the winners and losers when war is declared on the machines?</p><p>To hear a bonus episode on Mary Shelley’s <em>Frankenstein</em> to accompany this series sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes. <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time: Isaac Asimov’s ‘Franchise’ </p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3302</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66eedd95135604007e97cd98]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9096506947.mp3?updated=1731679227" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What if… Scotland Had Voted for Independence?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66e9bc24075fcb2b8fc543eb</link>
      <description>For our last episode in this series of historical counterfactuals, David talks to the historian Ben Jackson about what might have happened if the 2014 Scottish Independence referendum had gone the other way. How close was the vote and what could have swung it differently? Were the dark warnings about the consequences of independence likely to have been borne out? And what would an independent Scotland mean for the world today?
To hear the second part of David’s conversation with Chris Clark about the fateful origins of the First World War sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Coming next: a new series on the history of thinking about thinking machines, from films to novels to short stories, with Shannon Vallor, author of The AI Mirror. First up: Metropolis. 
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:00:21 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>What if… Scotland Had Voted for Independence?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>7</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>116</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3565a434-a203-11ef-8350-9392102d71f9/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For our last episode in this series of historical counterfactuals, David talks to the historian Ben Jackson about what might have happened if the 2014 Scottish Independence referendum had gone the other way.&amp;nbsp;How close was the vote and what could have swung it differently?&amp;nbsp;Were the dark warnings about the consequences of independence likely to have been borne out?&amp;nbsp;And what would an independent Scotland mean for the world today?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To hear the second part of David’s conversation with Chris Clark about the fateful origins of the First World War sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming next: a new series on the history of thinking about thinking machines, from films to novels to short stories, with Shannon Vallor, author of&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The AI Mirror&lt;/em&gt;.&amp;nbsp;First up:&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Metropolis&lt;/em&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For our last episode in this series of historical counterfactuals, David talks to the historian Ben Jackson about what might have happened if the 2014 Scottish Independence referendum had gone the other way. How close was the vote and what could have swung it differently? Were the dark warnings about the consequences of independence likely to have been borne out? And what would an independent Scotland mean for the world today?
To hear the second part of David’s conversation with Chris Clark about the fateful origins of the First World War sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Coming next: a new series on the history of thinking about thinking machines, from films to novels to short stories, with Shannon Vallor, author of The AI Mirror. First up: Metropolis. 
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For our last episode in this series of historical counterfactuals, David talks to the historian Ben Jackson about what might have happened if the 2014 Scottish Independence referendum had gone the other way. How close was the vote and what could have swung it differently? Were the dark warnings about the consequences of independence likely to have been borne out? And what would an independent Scotland mean for the world today?</p><p>To hear the second part of David’s conversation with Chris Clark about the fateful origins of the First World War sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Coming next: a new series on the history of thinking about thinking machines, from films to novels to short stories, with Shannon Vallor, author of <em>The AI Mirror</em>. First up: <em>Metropolis</em>. </p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3601</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66e9bc24075fcb2b8fc543eb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1191289777.mp3?updated=1731679206" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What if… The Berlin Wall Hadn’t Fallen?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66e552f62dcefcfc9310105c</link>
      <description>Our counterfactuals series moves forward to 1989: David talks to Lea Ypi about what might have happened if the Berlin Wall hadn’t fallen when it did. Was the night it came down really just one big accident? How long could the East German regime have lasted? And what does the fate of non-European communist states tell us about how it could have gone very differently? 
To hear the second part of David’s conversation with Chris Clark about the fateful origins of the First World War sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Sign up here for our free fortnightly newsletter: the new edition is out now to go with our latest counterfactual episodes https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: What If… Scotland Had Voted For Independence in 2014? 
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2024 05:00:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>What if… The Berlin Wall Hadn’t Fallen?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>7</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>115</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/35c74de2-a203-11ef-8350-67ab1512f5cc/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Our counterfactuals series moves forward to 1989: David talks to Lea Ypi about what might have happened if the Berlin Wall hadn’t fallen when it did.&amp;nbsp;Was the night it came down really just one big accident?&amp;nbsp;How long could the East German regime have lasted?&amp;nbsp;And what does the fate of non-European communist states tell us about how it could have gone very differently?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To hear the second part of David’s conversation with Chris Clark about the fateful origins of the First World War sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up here for our free fortnightly newsletter: the new edition is out now to go with our latest counterfactual episodes&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: What If… Scotland Had Voted For Independence in 2014?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Our counterfactuals series moves forward to 1989: David talks to Lea Ypi about what might have happened if the Berlin Wall hadn’t fallen when it did. Was the night it came down really just one big accident? How long could the East German regime have lasted? And what does the fate of non-European communist states tell us about how it could have gone very differently? 
To hear the second part of David’s conversation with Chris Clark about the fateful origins of the First World War sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Sign up here for our free fortnightly newsletter: the new edition is out now to go with our latest counterfactual episodes https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: What If… Scotland Had Voted For Independence in 2014? 
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our counterfactuals series moves forward to 1989: David talks to Lea Ypi about what might have happened if the Berlin Wall hadn’t fallen when it did. Was the night it came down really just one big accident? How long could the East German regime have lasted? And what does the fate of non-European communist states tell us about how it could have gone very differently? </p><br><p>To hear the second part of David’s conversation with Chris Clark about the fateful origins of the First World War sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Sign up here for our free fortnightly newsletter: the new edition is out now to go with our latest counterfactual episodes <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p><p>Next time: What If… Scotland Had Voted For Independence in 2014? </p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3373</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66e552f62dcefcfc9310105c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML8688776871.mp3?updated=1731679141" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What if… The 1919 Paris Peace Conference Had Actually Kept the Peace?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66e0b2d86a253561efa10eed</link>
      <description>David talks to historian Margaret MacMillan, author of the prize-winning Peacemakers, about whether the 1919 Paris Peace Conference deserves its reputation as a missed opportunity and the harbinger of another war. Could the peace have been fairer to the Germans? Could the League of Nations have been given real teeth? Could the Bolsheviks have been involved? Or did the peacemakers make the best of a bad job?
To hear the second part of David’s conversation with Chris Clark about the fateful origins of the First World War, sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes: https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Sign up here for our free fortnightly newsletter: the new edition is out tomorrow to go with our latest counterfactual episodes: https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: What If… The Berlin Wall Hadn’t Fallen? 
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 05:00:51 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>What if… The 1919 Paris Peace Conference Had Actually Kept the Peace?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>7</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>114</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/362f55a4-a203-11ef-8350-3bf31a14865c/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;David talks to historian Margaret MacMillan, author of the prize-winning&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Peacemakers&lt;/em&gt;, about whether the 1919 Paris Peace Conference deserves its reputation as a missed opportunity and the harbinger of another war.&amp;nbsp;Could the peace have been fairer to the Germans?&amp;nbsp;Could the League of Nations have been given real teeth?&amp;nbsp;Could the Bolsheviks have been involved?&amp;nbsp;Or did the peacemakers make the best of a bad job?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To hear the second part of David’s conversation with Chris Clark about the fateful origins of the First World War, sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up here for our free fortnightly newsletter: the new edition is out tomorrow to go with our latest counterfactual episodes:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: What If… The Berlin Wall Hadn’t Fallen?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>David talks to historian Margaret MacMillan, author of the prize-winning Peacemakers, about whether the 1919 Paris Peace Conference deserves its reputation as a missed opportunity and the harbinger of another war. Could the peace have been fairer to the Germans? Could the League of Nations have been given real teeth? Could the Bolsheviks have been involved? Or did the peacemakers make the best of a bad job?
To hear the second part of David’s conversation with Chris Clark about the fateful origins of the First World War, sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes: https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Sign up here for our free fortnightly newsletter: the new edition is out tomorrow to go with our latest counterfactual episodes: https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters
Next time: What If… The Berlin Wall Hadn’t Fallen? 
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>David talks to historian Margaret MacMillan, author of the prize-winning <em>Peacemakers</em>, about whether the 1919 Paris Peace Conference deserves its reputation as a missed opportunity and the harbinger of another war. Could the peace have been fairer to the Germans? Could the League of Nations have been given real teeth? Could the Bolsheviks have been involved? Or did the peacemakers make the best of a bad job?</p><br><p>To hear the second part of David’s conversation with Chris Clark about the fateful origins of the First World War, sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes: <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Sign up here for our free fortnightly newsletter: the new edition is out tomorrow to go with our latest counterfactual episodes: <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters">https://www.ppfideas.com/newsletters</a></p><p>Next time: What If… The Berlin Wall Hadn’t Fallen? </p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3518</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66e0b2d86a253561efa10eed]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2121285866.mp3?updated=1731679275" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What If… The Russian Revolution Hadn’t Been Bolshevik? </title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66d99b6cd4991eb8a6d39ac6</link>
      <description>Today’s episode is another big early twentieth-century counterfactual: David talks to the historian of Russia Edward Acton about how the Russian Revolution might have unfolded if the Left SRs and not the Bolsheviks had come out on top. Could Lenin have been sidelined? Might the Terror have been avoided? And what would it have meant to the wider world if revolutionary socialism had been liberated from Marxist communism?
To hear the second part of David’s conversation with Chris Clark about the fateful origins of the First World War sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: What if… The 1919 Paris Peace Conference Had Actually Kept the Peace?
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2024 05:00:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>What If… The Russian Revolution Hadn’t Been Bolshevik? </itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>7</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>113</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/36cdfe52-a203-11ef-8350-57da85ce7171/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Today’s episode is another big early twentieth-century counterfactual: David talks to the historian of Russia Edward Acton about how the Russian Revolution might have unfolded if the Left SRs and not the Bolsheviks had come out on top.&amp;nbsp;Could Lenin have been sidelined?&amp;nbsp;Might the Terror have been avoided?&amp;nbsp;And what would it have meant to the wider world if revolutionary socialism had been liberated from Marxist communism?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To hear the second part of David’s conversation with Chris Clark about the fateful origins of the First World War sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: What if… The 1919 Paris Peace Conference Had Actually Kept the Peace?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode is another big early twentieth-century counterfactual: David talks to the historian of Russia Edward Acton about how the Russian Revolution might have unfolded if the Left SRs and not the Bolsheviks had come out on top. Could Lenin have been sidelined? Might the Terror have been avoided? And what would it have meant to the wider world if revolutionary socialism had been liberated from Marxist communism?
To hear the second part of David’s conversation with Chris Clark about the fateful origins of the First World War sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Next time: What if… The 1919 Paris Peace Conference Had Actually Kept the Peace?
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode is another big early twentieth-century counterfactual: David talks to the historian of Russia Edward Acton about how the Russian Revolution might have unfolded if the Left SRs and not the Bolsheviks had come out on top. Could Lenin have been sidelined? Might the Terror have been avoided? And what would it have meant to the wider world if revolutionary socialism had been liberated from Marxist communism?</p><br><p>To hear the second part of David’s conversation with Chris Clark about the fateful origins of the First World War sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonuses too: £5 per month or £50 a year for 24 bonus episodes <a href="https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Next time: What if… The 1919 Paris Peace Conference Had Actually Kept the Peace?</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3512</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66d99b6cd4991eb8a6d39ac6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9484346226.mp3?updated=1731679160" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What If… Franz Ferdinand Had Survived Sarajevo?  </title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66d7490e3895e5a9f8a6a470</link>
      <description>We return to our series on historical counterfactuals with the big one: how might WWI have been avoided? David talks to Chris Clark, author of The Sleepwalkers, the definitive history of the July crisis of 1914, to explore how it might have turned out differently. What would have happened if Franz Ferdinand had survived the assassination attempt in Sarajevo? Why did his death spark the greatest European conflict of them all?
To hear the second part of this conversation – where David and Chris discuss how the great powers responded to the assassination – sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonus episodes https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Part 2 with Chris Clark will be out on PPF+ tomorrow. 
Next time: What if… The Russian Revolution Hadn’t Been Bolshevik?
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 05:00:54 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>What If… Franz Ferdinand Had Survived Sarajevo?  </itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>7</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>112</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/372a23bc-a203-11ef-8350-b3d221d386a9/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;We return to our series on historical counterfactuals with the big one: how might WWI have been avoided?&amp;nbsp;David talks to Chris Clark, author of&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The Sleepwalkers&lt;/em&gt;, the definitive history of the July crisis of 1914, to explore how it might have turned out differently.&amp;nbsp;What would have happened if Franz Ferdinand had survived the assassination attempt in Sarajevo?&amp;nbsp;Why did his death spark the greatest European conflict of them all?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To hear the second part of this conversation – where David and Chris discuss how the great powers responded to the assassination – sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonus episodes&lt;em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Part 2 with Chris Clark will be out on PPF+ tomorrow.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: What if… The Russian Revolution Hadn’t Been Bolshevik?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>We return to our series on historical counterfactuals with the big one: how might WWI have been avoided? David talks to Chris Clark, author of The Sleepwalkers, the definitive history of the July crisis of 1914, to explore how it might have turned out differently. What would have happened if Franz Ferdinand had survived the assassination attempt in Sarajevo? Why did his death spark the greatest European conflict of them all?
To hear the second part of this conversation – where David and Chris discuss how the great powers responded to the assassination – sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonus episodes https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus
Part 2 with Chris Clark will be out on PPF+ tomorrow. 
Next time: What if… The Russian Revolution Hadn’t Been Bolshevik?
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We return to our series on historical counterfactuals with the big one: how might WWI have been avoided? David talks to Chris Clark, author of <em>The Sleepwalkers</em>, the definitive history of the July crisis of 1914, to explore how it might have turned out differently. What would have happened if Franz Ferdinand had survived the assassination attempt in Sarajevo? Why did his death spark the greatest European conflict of them all?</p><br><p>To hear the second part of this conversation – where David and Chris discuss how the great powers responded to the assassination – sign up now to PPF+ and get ad-free listening and all our other bonus episodes<em> </em><a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus</a></p><p>Part 2 with Chris Clark will be out on PPF+ tomorrow. </p><p>Next time: What if… The Russian Revolution Hadn’t Been Bolshevik?</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3284</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66d7490e3895e5a9f8a6a470]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2857974709.mp3?updated=1731679148" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Hamilton</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66bf6328328d26fd6c0e5add</link>
      <description>Our Great Political Fictions re-release concludes with a musical: Lin-Manuel Miranda’s wildly popular and increasingly controversial Hamilton (2015). What does it get right and what does it get wrong about America’s founding fathers? How fair is it to judge a Broadway musical by the standards of academic history? And why does a product of the Obama era still resonate so powerfully in the age of Trump and Biden?
 Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2024 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Hamilton</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>8</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>111</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3785bbe6-a203-11ef-8350-5fb5a77a9951/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Our Great Political Fictions re-release concludes with a musical: Lin-Manuel Miranda’s wildly popular and increasingly controversial&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Hamilton&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(2015).&amp;nbsp;What does it get right and what does it get wrong about America’s founding fathers?&amp;nbsp;How fair is it to judge a Broadway musical by the standards of academic history?&amp;nbsp;And why does a product of the Obama era still resonate so powerfully in the age of Trump and Biden?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website &lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt; where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Our Great Political Fictions re-release concludes with a musical: Lin-Manuel Miranda’s wildly popular and increasingly controversial Hamilton (2015). What does it get right and what does it get wrong about America’s founding fathers? How fair is it to judge a Broadway musical by the standards of academic history? And why does a product of the Obama era still resonate so powerfully in the age of Trump and Biden?
 Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our Great Political Fictions re-release concludes with a musical: Lin-Manuel Miranda’s wildly popular and increasingly controversial <em>Hamilton</em> (2015). What does it get right and what does it get wrong about America’s founding fathers? How fair is it to judge a Broadway musical by the standards of academic history? And why does a product of the Obama era still resonate so powerfully in the age of Trump and Biden?</p><br><p><em> </em>Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com">www.ppfideas.com</a> where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.</p><br><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3462</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66bf6328328d26fd6c0e5add]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6971471723.mp3?updated=1731679179" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: American Wife</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66bf59bd8d5b0e0994beab03</link>
      <description>The penultimate episode in our Great Political Fictions re-release is about Curtis Sittenfeld’s American Wife (2008), which re-imagines the life of First Lady Laura Bush.One of the great novels about the intimacy of power and the accidents of politics, it sticks to the historical record while radically retelling it. What does the standard version leave out about the Bush presidency? How does an ordinary life become an extraordinary one? And where is the line between fact and fiction?
Tomorrow: Lin-Manuel Miranda’s Hamilton
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2024 05:00:43 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: American Wife</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>8</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>110</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/382b52b8-a203-11ef-8350-130d8c6e2d5c/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;The penultimate episode in our Great Political Fictions re-release is about Curtis Sittenfeld’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;American Wife&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(2008), which re-imagines the life of First Lady Laura Bush.One of the great novels about the intimacy of power and the accidents of politics, it sticks to the historical record while radically retelling it.&amp;nbsp;What does the standard version leave out about the Bush presidency?&amp;nbsp;How does an ordinary life become an extraordinary one?&amp;nbsp;And where is the line between fact and fiction?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow: Lin-Manuel Miranda’s &lt;em&gt;Hamilton&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website &lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt; where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The penultimate episode in our Great Political Fictions re-release is about Curtis Sittenfeld’s American Wife (2008), which re-imagines the life of First Lady Laura Bush.One of the great novels about the intimacy of power and the accidents of politics, it sticks to the historical record while radically retelling it. What does the standard version leave out about the Bush presidency? How does an ordinary life become an extraordinary one? And where is the line between fact and fiction?
Tomorrow: Lin-Manuel Miranda’s Hamilton
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The penultimate episode in our Great Political Fictions re-release is about Curtis Sittenfeld’s <em>American Wife</em> (2008), which re-imagines the life of First Lady Laura Bush.One of the great novels about the intimacy of power and the accidents of politics, it sticks to the historical record while radically retelling it. What does the standard version leave out about the Bush presidency? How does an ordinary life become an extraordinary one? And where is the line between fact and fiction?</p><br><p>Tomorrow: Lin-Manuel Miranda’s <em>Hamilton</em></p><br><p>Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com">www.ppfideas.com</a> where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.</p><br><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3377</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66bf59bd8d5b0e0994beab03]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9511089302.mp3?updated=1731679142" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: The Line of Beauty</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66bf580b8d5b0e0994be05d6</link>
      <description>Today’s Great Political Fiction is Alan Hollinghurst’s The Line of Beauty (2004), which is set between Thatcher’s two dominant general election victories of 1983 and 1987. A novel about the intersection between gay life and Tory life, high politics and low conduct, beauty and betrayal, it explores the price of power and the risks of liberation. It also contains perhaps the greatest of all fictional portrayals of a real-life prime minster: Thatcher dancing the night away.
Tomorrow: Curtis Sittingfield’s American Wife
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.


 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 08:30:34 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: The Line of Beauty</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>8</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>109</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/388b05fa-a203-11ef-8350-cbb182ee6ec3/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Today’s Great Political Fiction is Alan Hollinghurst’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The Line of Beauty&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(2004), which is set between Thatcher’s two dominant general election victories of 1983 and 1987.&amp;nbsp;A novel about the intersection between gay life and Tory life, high politics and low conduct, beauty and betrayal, it explores the price of power and the risks of liberation.&amp;nbsp;It also contains perhaps the greatest of all fictional portrayals of a real-life prime minster: Thatcher dancing the night away.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow: Curtis Sittingfield’s &lt;em&gt;American Wife&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website &lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt; where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s Great Political Fiction is Alan Hollinghurst’s The Line of Beauty (2004), which is set between Thatcher’s two dominant general election victories of 1983 and 1987. A novel about the intersection between gay life and Tory life, high politics and low conduct, beauty and betrayal, it explores the price of power and the risks of liberation. It also contains perhaps the greatest of all fictional portrayals of a real-life prime minster: Thatcher dancing the night away.
Tomorrow: Curtis Sittingfield’s American Wife
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.


 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s Great Political Fiction is Alan Hollinghurst’s <em>The Line of Beauty</em> (2004), which is set between Thatcher’s two dominant general election victories of 1983 and 1987. A novel about the intersection between gay life and Tory life, high politics and low conduct, beauty and betrayal, it explores the price of power and the risks of liberation. It also contains perhaps the greatest of all fictional portrayals of a real-life prime minster: Thatcher dancing the night away.</p><br><p>Tomorrow: Curtis Sittingfield’s <em>American Wife</em></p><br><p>Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com">www.ppfideas.com</a> where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.</p><br><p><br></p><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3299</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66bf580b8d5b0e0994be05d6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML5125150419.mp3?updated=1731679163" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: The Handmaid’s Tale</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66bf5668328d26fd6c0a5bd1</link>
      <description>For the twelfth episode in our Great Political Fictions re-release, David discusses Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale (1985), her unforgettable dystopian vision of a future American patriarchy. Where is Gilead? When is Gilead? How did it happen? How can it be stopped? From puritanism and slavery to Iran and Romania, from demography and racism to Playboy and Scrabble, this novel takes the familiar and the known and makes them hauntingly and terrifyingly new.
Tomorrow: Alan Hollinghurst’s The Line of Beauty
 Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 05:00:31 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: The Handmaid’s Tale</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>8</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>108</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/38e5ce9a-a203-11ef-8350-d31b5f6b34c3/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For the twelfth episode in our Great Political Fictions re-release, David discusses Margaret Atwood’s The&amp;nbsp;Handmaid’s&amp;nbsp;Tale&amp;nbsp;(1985), her unforgettable dystopian vision of a future American patriarchy.&amp;nbsp;Where is Gilead?&amp;nbsp;When is Gilead?&amp;nbsp;How did it happen?&amp;nbsp;How can it be stopped?&amp;nbsp;From puritanism and slavery to Iran and Romania, from demography and racism to Playboy and Scrabble, this novel takes the familiar and the known and makes them hauntingly and terrifyingly new.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow: Alan Hollinghurst’s &lt;em&gt;The Line of Beauty&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website &lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt; where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the twelfth episode in our Great Political Fictions re-release, David discusses Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale (1985), her unforgettable dystopian vision of a future American patriarchy. Where is Gilead? When is Gilead? How did it happen? How can it be stopped? From puritanism and slavery to Iran and Romania, from demography and racism to Playboy and Scrabble, this novel takes the familiar and the known and makes them hauntingly and terrifyingly new.
Tomorrow: Alan Hollinghurst’s The Line of Beauty
 Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the twelfth episode in our Great Political Fictions re-release, David discusses Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale (1985), her unforgettable dystopian vision of a future American patriarchy. Where is Gilead? When is Gilead? How did it happen? How can it be stopped? From puritanism and slavery to Iran and Romania, from demography and racism to Playboy and Scrabble, this novel takes the familiar and the known and makes them hauntingly and terrifyingly new.</p><br><p>Tomorrow: Alan Hollinghurst’s <em>The Line of Beauty</em></p><br><p><em> </em>Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com">www.ppfideas.com</a> where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.</p><br><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3275</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66bf5668328d26fd6c0a5bd1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML8336139997.mp3?updated=1731679152" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Midnight’s Children</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66bf54ed328d26fd6c0a0358</link>
      <description>In today’s Great Political Fiction David explores Salman Rushdie’s 1981 masterpiece Midnight’s Children, the great novel about the life and death of Indian democracy. How can one boy stand in for the whole of India? How can a nation as diverse as India ever have a single politics? And how is a jar of pickle the answer to these questions? Plus, how does Rushdie’s story read today, in the age of Modi?
Tomorrow: Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 05:00:48 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Midnight’s Children</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>8</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>107</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/393d0f66-a203-11ef-8350-7b09e60077bc/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In today’s Great Political Fiction David explores Salman Rushdie’s 1981 masterpiece Midnight’s Children, the great novel about the life and death of Indian democracy.&amp;nbsp;How can one boy stand in for the whole of India?&amp;nbsp;How can a nation as diverse as India ever have a single politics?&amp;nbsp;And how is a jar of pickle the answer to these questions?&amp;nbsp;Plus, how does Rushdie’s story read today, in the age of Modi?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow: Margaret Atwood’s &lt;em&gt;The Handmaid’s Tale&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website &lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt; where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s Great Political Fiction David explores Salman Rushdie’s 1981 masterpiece Midnight’s Children, the great novel about the life and death of Indian democracy. How can one boy stand in for the whole of India? How can a nation as diverse as India ever have a single politics? And how is a jar of pickle the answer to these questions? Plus, how does Rushdie’s story read today, in the age of Modi?
Tomorrow: Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s Great Political Fiction David explores Salman Rushdie’s 1981 masterpiece Midnight’s Children, the great novel about the life and death of Indian democracy. How can one boy stand in for the whole of India? How can a nation as diverse as India ever have a single politics? And how is a jar of pickle the answer to these questions? Plus, how does Rushdie’s story read today, in the age of Modi?</p><br><p>Tomorrow: Margaret Atwood’s <em>The Handmaid’s Tale</em></p><br><p>Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com">www.ppfideas.com</a> where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.</p><br><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3308</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66bf54ed328d26fd6c0a0358]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3434292153.mp3?updated=1731679200" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Atlas Shrugged</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66bf51898d5b0e0994bbfdf7</link>
      <description>In today’s episode David discusses Ayn Rand’s insanely long and insanely influential Atlas Shrugged (1957), the bible of free-market entrepreneurialism and source book to this day for vicious anti-socialist polemics. Why is this novel so adored by Silicon Valley tech titans? How can something so bad have so much lasting power? And what did Rand have against her arch-villain Robert Oppenheimer?
Tomorrow: Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 05:00:36 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Atlas Shrugged</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>8</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>106</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/39979a30-a203-11ef-8350-7fe06df0a483/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In today’s episode David discusses Ayn Rand’s insanely long and insanely influential&amp;nbsp;Atlas&amp;nbsp;Shrugged&amp;nbsp;(1957), the bible of free-market entrepreneurialism and source book to this day for vicious anti-socialist polemics.&amp;nbsp;Why is this novel so adored by Silicon Valley tech titans?&amp;nbsp;How can something so bad have so much lasting power?&amp;nbsp;And what did Rand have against her arch-villain Robert Oppenheimer?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow: Salman Rushdie’s &lt;em&gt;Midnight’s Children&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website &lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt; where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode David discusses Ayn Rand’s insanely long and insanely influential Atlas Shrugged (1957), the bible of free-market entrepreneurialism and source book to this day for vicious anti-socialist polemics. Why is this novel so adored by Silicon Valley tech titans? How can something so bad have so much lasting power? And what did Rand have against her arch-villain Robert Oppenheimer?
Tomorrow: Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode David discusses Ayn Rand’s insanely long and insanely influential Atlas Shrugged (1957), the bible of free-market entrepreneurialism and source book to this day for vicious anti-socialist polemics. Why is this novel so adored by Silicon Valley tech titans? How can something so bad have so much lasting power? And what did Rand have against her arch-villain Robert Oppenheimer?</p><br><p>Tomorrow: Salman Rushdie’s <em>Midnight’s Children</em></p><br><p>Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com">www.ppfideas.com</a> where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.</p><br><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3615</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66bf51898d5b0e0994bbfdf7]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4266963308.mp3?updated=1731679211" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Mother Courage &amp; Her Children</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66bf4f4b328d26fd6c08819a</link>
      <description>Our ninth Great Political Fiction is Bertolt Brecht’s classic anti-war play, written in 1939 at the start of one terrible European war but set in the time of another: the Thirty Years’ War of the 17th century. How did Brecht think a three-hundred-year gap could help us to understand our own capacity for violence and cruelty? Why did he make Mother Courage such an unlovable character? Why do we feel for her plight anyway? And what can we do about it?
Tomorrow: Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 05:00:50 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Mother Courage &amp; Her Children</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>8</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>105</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/39f30aa0-a203-11ef-8350-7380bcc9d9ee/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Our ninth Great Political Fiction is Bertolt Brecht’s classic anti-war play, written in 1939 at the start of one terrible European war but set in the time of another: the Thirty Years’ War of the 17th&amp;nbsp;century.&amp;nbsp;How did Brecht think a three-hundred-year gap could help us to understand our own capacity for violence and cruelty?&amp;nbsp;Why did he make Mother Courage such an unlovable character?&amp;nbsp;Why do we feel for her plight anyway?&amp;nbsp;And what can we do about it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow: Ayn Rand’s &lt;em&gt;Atlas Shrugged&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website &lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt; where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Our ninth Great Political Fiction is Bertolt Brecht’s classic anti-war play, written in 1939 at the start of one terrible European war but set in the time of another: the Thirty Years’ War of the 17th century. How did Brecht think a three-hundred-year gap could help us to understand our own capacity for violence and cruelty? Why did he make Mother Courage such an unlovable character? Why do we feel for her plight anyway? And what can we do about it?
Tomorrow: Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our ninth Great Political Fiction is Bertolt Brecht’s classic anti-war play, written in 1939 at the start of one terrible European war but set in the time of another: the Thirty Years’ War of the 17th century. How did Brecht think a three-hundred-year gap could help us to understand our own capacity for violence and cruelty? Why did he make Mother Courage such an unlovable character? Why do we feel for her plight anyway? And what can we do about it?</p><br><p>Tomorrow: Ayn Rand’s <em>Atlas Shrugged</em></p><br><p>Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com">www.ppfideas.com</a> where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.</p><br><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3329</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66bf4f4b328d26fd6c08819a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3203872584.mp3?updated=1731679163" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: The Time Machine</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66bf498e328d26fd6c067b8d</link>
      <description>Our eighth Great Political Fiction is H. G. Wells’ The Time Machine (1895) which isn’t just a book about time travel. It’s also full of late-19th century fear and paranoia about what evolution and progress might do to human beings in the long run. Why will the class struggle turn into savagery and human sacrifice? Who will end up on top? And how will the world ultimately end?
Tomorrow: Bertolt Brecht’s Mother Courage &amp; Her Children
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2024 05:00:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: The Time Machine</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>8</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>104</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3a4e2174-a203-11ef-8350-a32cef70ab66/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Our eighth Great Political Fiction is H. G. Wells’ The Time Machine (1895) which isn’t just a book about time travel.&amp;nbsp;It’s also full of late-19th&amp;nbsp;century fear and paranoia about what evolution and progress might do to human beings in the long run.&amp;nbsp;Why will the class struggle turn into savagery and human sacrifice?&amp;nbsp;Who will end up on top?&amp;nbsp;And how will the world ultimately end?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow: Bertolt Brecht’s &lt;em&gt;Mother Courage &amp;amp; Her Children&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website &lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt; where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Our eighth Great Political Fiction is H. G. Wells’ The Time Machine (1895) which isn’t just a book about time travel. It’s also full of late-19th century fear and paranoia about what evolution and progress might do to human beings in the long run. Why will the class struggle turn into savagery and human sacrifice? Who will end up on top? And how will the world ultimately end?
Tomorrow: Bertolt Brecht’s Mother Courage &amp; Her Children
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our eighth Great Political Fiction is H. G. Wells’ The Time Machine (1895) which isn’t just a book about time travel. It’s also full of late-19th century fear and paranoia about what evolution and progress might do to human beings in the long run. Why will the class struggle turn into savagery and human sacrifice? Who will end up on top? And how will the world ultimately end?</p><br><p>Tomorrow: Bertolt Brecht’s <em>Mother Courage &amp; Her Children</em></p><br><p>Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com">www.ppfideas.com</a> where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.</p><br><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3453</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66bf498e328d26fd6c067b8d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML8120808579.mp3?updated=1731679167" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Dr Jekyll &amp; Mr Hyde</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66bf46a94a224df83af80230</link>
      <description>Today’s Great Political Fiction is Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (1886) - a story that it’s easy to know without really knowing it at all. David explores all the ways that Robert Louis Stevenson’s tale confounds our expectations about good and evil. What does Dr Jekyll really want? What are all the men in the book trying to hide? And what has any of this got to do with Q-Anon and Hillary Clinton?
Tomorrow: H. G. Wells’ The Time Machine
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.


 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2024 05:00:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Dr Jekyll &amp; Mr Hyde</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>8</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>103</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3aa79f42-a203-11ef-8350-2b2516736a9d/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Today’s Great Political Fiction is Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (1886) - a story that it’s easy to know without really knowing it at all.&amp;nbsp;David&amp;nbsp;explores all the ways that Robert Louis Stevenson’s tale confounds our expectations about good and evil.&amp;nbsp;What does Dr Jekyll really want?&amp;nbsp;What are all the men in the book trying to hide?&amp;nbsp;And what has any of this got to do with Q-Anon and Hillary Clinton?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow: H. G. Wells’ &lt;em&gt;The Time Machine&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website &lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt; where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s Great Political Fiction is Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (1886) - a story that it’s easy to know without really knowing it at all. David explores all the ways that Robert Louis Stevenson’s tale confounds our expectations about good and evil. What does Dr Jekyll really want? What are all the men in the book trying to hide? And what has any of this got to do with Q-Anon and Hillary Clinton?
Tomorrow: H. G. Wells’ The Time Machine
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.


 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s Great Political Fiction is Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (1886) - a story that it’s easy to know without really knowing it at all. David explores all the ways that Robert Louis Stevenson’s tale confounds our expectations about good and evil. What does Dr Jekyll really want? What are all the men in the book trying to hide? And what has any of this got to do with Q-Anon and Hillary Clinton?</p><br><p>Tomorrow: H. G. Wells’ <em>The Time Machine</em></p><br><p>Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com">www.ppfideas.com</a> where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.</p><br><p><br></p><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3161</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66bf46a94a224df83af80230]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML5332697854.mp3?updated=1731679151" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Phineas Redux</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66bf426c47151aa1d3cabca3</link>
      <description>The sixth Great Political Fiction in our summer re-release is Anthony Trollope’s Phineas Redux (1874), his lightly and luridly fictionalised account of parliamentary polarisation in the age of Gladstone and Disraeli. A tale of political and personal melodrama, it explores what happens when political parties steal each other’s clothes and politicians find themselves hung out to dry by their colleagues. A story of integrity and hypocrisy and how hard it is to tell them apart.
Tomorrow: Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr Jekyll &amp; Mr Hyde
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Phineas Redux</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>8</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>102</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3afeacba-a203-11ef-8350-7b065d18a624/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;The sixth Great Political Fiction in our summer re-release is Anthony Trollope’s Phineas Redux (1874), his lightly and luridly fictionalised account of parliamentary polarisation in the age of Gladstone and Disraeli.&amp;nbsp;A tale of political and personal melodrama, it explores what happens when political parties steal each other’s clothes and politicians find themselves hung out to dry by their colleagues.&amp;nbsp;A story of integrity and hypocrisy and how hard it is to tell them apart.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow: Robert Louis Stevenson’s &lt;em&gt;Dr Jekyll &amp;amp; Mr Hyde&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website &lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt; where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The sixth Great Political Fiction in our summer re-release is Anthony Trollope’s Phineas Redux (1874), his lightly and luridly fictionalised account of parliamentary polarisation in the age of Gladstone and Disraeli. A tale of political and personal melodrama, it explores what happens when political parties steal each other’s clothes and politicians find themselves hung out to dry by their colleagues. A story of integrity and hypocrisy and how hard it is to tell them apart.
Tomorrow: Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr Jekyll &amp; Mr Hyde
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The sixth Great Political Fiction in our summer re-release is Anthony Trollope’s Phineas Redux (1874), his lightly and luridly fictionalised account of parliamentary polarisation in the age of Gladstone and Disraeli. A tale of political and personal melodrama, it explores what happens when political parties steal each other’s clothes and politicians find themselves hung out to dry by their colleagues. A story of integrity and hypocrisy and how hard it is to tell them apart.</p><br><p>Tomorrow: Robert Louis Stevenson’s <em>Dr Jekyll &amp; Mr Hyde</em></p><br><p>Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com">www.ppfideas.com</a> where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.</p><br><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3340</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66bf426c47151aa1d3cabca3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7906986300.mp3?updated=1731679213" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Middlemarch Part 2</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66bf1b96844d445153b81a9f</link>
      <description>This second episode about George Eliot’s masterpiece explores questions of politics and religion, reputation and deception, truth and public opinion. What is the relationship between personal power and faith in a higher power? Is it ever possible to escape from the gossip of your friends once it turns against you? Who can rescue the ambitious when their ambitions are their undoing?
Tomorrow: Anthony Trollope’s Phineas Redux
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 05:00:43 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Middlemarch Part 2</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>8</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>101</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3b557482-a203-11ef-8350-5bd88a5b8e18/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This second episode about George Eliot’s masterpiece explores questions of politics and religion, reputation and deception, truth and public opinion.&amp;nbsp;What is the relationship between personal power and faith in a higher power?&amp;nbsp;Is it ever possible to escape from the gossip of your friends once it turns against you?&amp;nbsp;Who can rescue the ambitious when their ambitions are their undoing?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow: Anthony Trollope’s &lt;em&gt;Phineas Redux&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website &lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt; where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This second episode about George Eliot’s masterpiece explores questions of politics and religion, reputation and deception, truth and public opinion. What is the relationship between personal power and faith in a higher power? Is it ever possible to escape from the gossip of your friends once it turns against you? Who can rescue the ambitious when their ambitions are their undoing?
Tomorrow: Anthony Trollope’s Phineas Redux
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This second episode about George Eliot’s masterpiece explores questions of politics and religion, reputation and deception, truth and public opinion. What is the relationship between personal power and faith in a higher power? Is it ever possible to escape from the gossip of your friends once it turns against you? Who can rescue the ambitious when their ambitions are their undoing?</p><br><p>Tomorrow: Anthony Trollope’s <em>Phineas Redux</em></p><br><p>Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com">www.ppfideas.com</a> where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.</p><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3137</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66bf1b96844d445153b81a9f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6874514808.mp3?updated=1731679169" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Middlemarch Part 1</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66bf19264a224df83aeb1962</link>
      <description>Today’s Great Political Fiction is George Eliot’s Middlemarch (1872), which has so much going on that it needs two episodes to unpack it. In this episode David discusses the significance of the book being set in 1829-32 and the reasons why Nietzsche was so wrong to characterise it as a moralistic tale. Plus he explains why a book about personal relationships is also a deeply political novel.
Also today: Middlemarch Part 2
Tomorrow: Anthony Trollope’s Phineas Redux
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 05:00:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Middlemarch Part 1</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>8</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>100</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3baf0ccc-a203-11ef-8350-1fee2c70f4ac/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Today’s Great Political Fiction is George Eliot’s Middlemarch (1872), which has so much going on that it needs two episodes to unpack it.&amp;nbsp;In this episode David discusses the significance of the book being set in 1829-32 and the reasons why Nietzsche was so wrong to characterise it as a moralistic tale.&amp;nbsp;Plus he explains why a book about personal relationships is also a deeply political novel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also today: &lt;em&gt;Middlemarch&lt;/em&gt; Part 2&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow: Anthony Trollope’s &lt;em&gt;Phineas Redux&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website &lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt; where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s Great Political Fiction is George Eliot’s Middlemarch (1872), which has so much going on that it needs two episodes to unpack it. In this episode David discusses the significance of the book being set in 1829-32 and the reasons why Nietzsche was so wrong to characterise it as a moralistic tale. Plus he explains why a book about personal relationships is also a deeply political novel.
Also today: Middlemarch Part 2
Tomorrow: Anthony Trollope’s Phineas Redux
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s Great Political Fiction is George Eliot’s Middlemarch (1872), which has so much going on that it needs two episodes to unpack it. In this episode David discusses the significance of the book being set in 1829-32 and the reasons why Nietzsche was so wrong to characterise it as a moralistic tale. Plus he explains why a book about personal relationships is also a deeply political novel.</p><br><p>Also today: <em>Middlemarch</em> Part 2</p><br><p>Tomorrow: Anthony Trollope’s <em>Phineas Redux</em></p><br><p>Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com">www.ppfideas.com</a> where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.</p><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3076</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66bf19264a224df83aeb1962]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2207776563.mp3?updated=1731679195" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Fathers and Sons</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66bf09674a224df83ae707ee</link>
      <description>Our fourth Great Political Fiction is Ivan Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons (1862), the definitive novel about the politics – and emotions – of intergenerational conflict. How did Turgenev manage to write a wistful novel about nihilism? What made Russian politics in the early 1860s so chock-full of frustration? Why did Turgenev’s book infuriate his contemporaries – including Dostoyevsky?
Tomorrow: George Eliot’s Middlemarch Parts 1 &amp; 2
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 05:00:29 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Fathers and Sons</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>8</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>99</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3c09f4e8-a203-11ef-8350-3f1880b5e240/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Our fourth Great Political Fiction is Ivan Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons (1862), the definitive novel about the politics – and emotions – of intergenerational conflict. How did Turgenev manage to write a wistful novel about nihilism? What made Russian politics in the early 1860s so chock-full of frustration? Why did Turgenev’s book infuriate his contemporaries – including Dostoyevsky?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow: George Eliot’s &lt;em&gt;Middlemarch Parts 1 &amp;amp; 2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website &lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt; where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Our fourth Great Political Fiction is Ivan Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons (1862), the definitive novel about the politics – and emotions – of intergenerational conflict. How did Turgenev manage to write a wistful novel about nihilism? What made Russian politics in the early 1860s so chock-full of frustration? Why did Turgenev’s book infuriate his contemporaries – including Dostoyevsky?
Tomorrow: George Eliot’s Middlemarch Parts 1 &amp; 2
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our fourth Great Political Fiction is Ivan Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons (1862), the definitive novel about the politics – and emotions – of intergenerational conflict. How did Turgenev manage to write a wistful novel about nihilism? What made Russian politics in the early 1860s so chock-full of frustration? Why did Turgenev’s book infuriate his contemporaries – including Dostoyevsky?</p><br><p>Tomorrow: George Eliot’s <em>Middlemarch Parts 1 &amp; 2</em></p><br><p>Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com">www.ppfideas.com</a> where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.</p><br><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3328</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66bf09674a224df83ae707ee]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1279111427.mp3?updated=1731679161" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Mary Stuart</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66bf06bd47151aa1d3ba5664</link>
      <description>Our third Great Political Fiction is Friedrich Schiller’s monumental play Mary Stuart (1800), which lays bare the impossible choices faced by two queens – Elizabeth I of England and Mary Queen of Scots – in a world of men. Schiller imagines a meeting between them that never took place and unpicks its fearsome consequences. Why does it do such damage to them both? How does the powerless Mary maintain her hold over the imperious Elizabeth? Who suffers most in the end and what is that suffering really worth?
Tomorrow: Ivan Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 05:00:05 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Mary Stuart</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>8</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>98</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3c65ce1c-a203-11ef-8350-ef47e2560dcd/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Our third Great Political Fiction is Friedrich Schiller’s monumental play Mary Stuart (1800), which lays bare the impossible choices faced by two queens – Elizabeth I of England and Mary Queen of Scots – in a world of men.&amp;nbsp;Schiller imagines a meeting between them that never took place and unpicks its fearsome consequences.&amp;nbsp;Why does it do such damage to them both?&amp;nbsp;How does the powerless Mary maintain her hold over the imperious Elizabeth?&amp;nbsp;Who suffers most in the end and what is that suffering really worth?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow: Ivan Turgenev’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Fathers and Sons&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website &lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt; where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Our third Great Political Fiction is Friedrich Schiller’s monumental play Mary Stuart (1800), which lays bare the impossible choices faced by two queens – Elizabeth I of England and Mary Queen of Scots – in a world of men. Schiller imagines a meeting between them that never took place and unpicks its fearsome consequences. Why does it do such damage to them both? How does the powerless Mary maintain her hold over the imperious Elizabeth? Who suffers most in the end and what is that suffering really worth?
Tomorrow: Ivan Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our third Great Political Fiction is Friedrich Schiller’s monumental play Mary Stuart (1800), which lays bare the impossible choices faced by two queens – Elizabeth I of England and Mary Queen of Scots – in a world of men. Schiller imagines a meeting between them that never took place and unpicks its fearsome consequences. Why does it do such damage to them both? How does the powerless Mary maintain her hold over the imperious Elizabeth? Who suffers most in the end and what is that suffering really worth?</p><br><p>Tomorrow: Ivan Turgenev’s <em>Fathers and Sons</em></p><br><p>Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com">www.ppfideas.com</a> where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3380</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66bf06bd47151aa1d3ba5664]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7150742750.mp3?updated=1731679161" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Gulliver’s Travels</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66be24ff7599e899664dbef6</link>
      <description>Today’s episode on the Great Political Fictions is about Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels (1726) – part adventure story, part satire of early-eighteenth-century party politics, but above all a coruscating reflection on the failures of human perspective and self-knowledge. Why do we find it so hard to see ourselves for who we really are? What makes us so vulnerable to mindless feuds and wild conspiracy theories? And what could we learn from the talking horses?
Tomorrow: Friedrich Schiller’s Mary Stuart
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 05:00:17 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Gulliver’s Travels</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>8</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>97</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3cc3538e-a203-11ef-8350-bf7fc9c75b65/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Today’s episode on the Great Political Fictions is about Jonathan Swift’s&amp;nbsp;Gulliver’s Travels&amp;nbsp;(1726) – part adventure story, part satire of early-eighteenth-century party politics, but above all a coruscating reflection on the failures of human perspective and self-knowledge.&amp;nbsp;Why do we find it so hard to see ourselves for who we really are?&amp;nbsp;What makes us so vulnerable to mindless feuds and wild conspiracy theories?&amp;nbsp;And what could we learn from the talking horses?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow: Friedrich Schiller’s &lt;em&gt;Mary Stuart&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website &lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt; where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode on the Great Political Fictions is about Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels (1726) – part adventure story, part satire of early-eighteenth-century party politics, but above all a coruscating reflection on the failures of human perspective and self-knowledge. Why do we find it so hard to see ourselves for who we really are? What makes us so vulnerable to mindless feuds and wild conspiracy theories? And what could we learn from the talking horses?
Tomorrow: Friedrich Schiller’s Mary Stuart
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode on the Great Political Fictions is about Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels (1726) – part adventure story, part satire of early-eighteenth-century party politics, but above all a coruscating reflection on the failures of human perspective and self-knowledge. Why do we find it so hard to see ourselves for who we really are? What makes us so vulnerable to mindless feuds and wild conspiracy theories? And what could we learn from the talking horses?</p><br><p>Tomorrow: Friedrich Schiller’s <em>Mary Stuart</em></p><br><p>Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com">www.ppfideas.com</a> where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3394</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66be24ff7599e899664dbef6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3464577287.mp3?updated=1731679202" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Coriolanus</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66be17d6328d26fd6cba714a</link>
      <description>In the first episode of the summer daily re-release of our series on the Great Political Fictions, David talks about Shakespeare’s Coriolanus (1608-9), the last of his tragedies and perhaps his most politically contentious play. Why has Coriolanus been subject to so many wildly different political interpretations? Is pride really the tragic flaw of the military monster at its heart? What does it say about the struggle between elite power and popular resistance and about the limits of political argument?
Tomorrow: Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:00:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fifteen Fictions for Summer re-release: Coriolanus</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>8</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>96</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3d1eb8f0-a203-11ef-8350-73112664c8f4/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In the first episode of the summer daily re-release of our series on the Great Political Fictions, David talks about Shakespeare’s Coriolanus (1608-9), the last of his tragedies and perhaps his most politically contentious play.&amp;nbsp;Why has Coriolanus been subject to so many wildly different political interpretations?&amp;nbsp;Is pride really the tragic flaw of the military monster at its heart?&amp;nbsp;What does it say about the struggle between elite power and popular resistance and about the limits of political argument?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow: Jonathan Swift’s &lt;em&gt;Gulliver’s Travels&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website &lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt; where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the first episode of the summer daily re-release of our series on the Great Political Fictions, David talks about Shakespeare’s Coriolanus (1608-9), the last of his tragedies and perhaps his most politically contentious play. Why has Coriolanus been subject to so many wildly different political interpretations? Is pride really the tragic flaw of the military monster at its heart? What does it say about the struggle between elite power and popular resistance and about the limits of political argument?
Tomorrow: Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels
Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website www.ppfideas.com where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the first episode of the summer daily re-release of our series on the Great Political Fictions, David talks about Shakespeare’s Coriolanus (1608-9), the last of his tragedies and perhaps his most politically contentious play. Why has Coriolanus been subject to so many wildly different political interpretations? Is pride really the tragic flaw of the military monster at its heart? What does it say about the struggle between elite power and popular resistance and about the limits of political argument?</p><br><p>Tomorrow: Jonathan Swift’s <em>Gulliver’s Travels</em></p><br><p>Find out more about Past Present Future on our new website <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com">www.ppfideas.com</a> where you can also join PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3495</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66be17d6328d26fd6cba714a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML8691681355.mp3?updated=1731679235" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What If… The Vietnam War Had Ended in 1964?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66c2122dd357bd132f64a5c6</link>
      <description>What If… The Vietnam War Had Ended in 1964?
For our latest counterfactual David talks to historian Thant Myint-U about his grandfather U Thant, UN Secretary General for most of the 1960s and the man who might have ended the Vietnam War before it really got started. How close did U Thant get to bringing LBJ and the Vietcong to the negotiating table in 1964? What ultimately scuppered his chances? And how differently might the Cold War have turned out if he had succeeded?
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes: available now a new bonus on Michel Houellebecq’s explosive political fiction Submission www.ppfideas.com 
Coming soon: More What Ifs… on WWI, the Russian Revolution and the Fall of the Berlin Wall.
Up next: Fifteen Fiction for Summer from Coriolanus to Hamilton
 
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:24:29 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>What If… The Vietnam War Had Ended in 1964?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>7</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>95</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3d75d1ee-a203-11ef-8350-9b439340c308/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;What If… The Vietnam War Had Ended in 1964?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;For our latest counterfactual David talks to historian Thant Myint-U about his grandfather U Thant, UN Secretary General for most of the 1960s and the man who might have ended the Vietnam War before it really got started.&amp;nbsp;How close did U Thant get to bringing LBJ and the Vietcong to the negotiating table in 1964?&amp;nbsp;What ultimately scuppered his chances?&amp;nbsp;And how differently might the Cold War have turned out if he had succeeded?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus&amp;nbsp;episodes: available now a new bonus on Michel Houellebecq’s explosive political fiction&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Submission&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming soon: More What Ifs… on WWI, the Russian Revolution and the Fall of the Berlin Wall.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Up next: Fifteen Fiction for Summer from&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Coriolanus&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Hamilton&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What If… The Vietnam War Had Ended in 1964?
For our latest counterfactual David talks to historian Thant Myint-U about his grandfather U Thant, UN Secretary General for most of the 1960s and the man who might have ended the Vietnam War before it really got started. How close did U Thant get to bringing LBJ and the Vietcong to the negotiating table in 1964? What ultimately scuppered his chances? And how differently might the Cold War have turned out if he had succeeded?
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes: available now a new bonus on Michel Houellebecq’s explosive political fiction Submission www.ppfideas.com 
Coming soon: More What Ifs… on WWI, the Russian Revolution and the Fall of the Berlin Wall.
Up next: Fifteen Fiction for Summer from Coriolanus to Hamilton
 
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>What If… The Vietnam War Had Ended in 1964?</p><br><p>For our latest counterfactual David talks to historian Thant Myint-U about his grandfather U Thant, UN Secretary General for most of the 1960s and the man who might have ended the Vietnam War before it really got started. How close did U Thant get to bringing LBJ and the Vietcong to the negotiating table in 1964? What ultimately scuppered his chances? And how differently might the Cold War have turned out if he had succeeded?</p><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes: available now a new bonus on Michel Houellebecq’s explosive political fiction <em>Submission </em><a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a> </p><br><p>Coming soon: More What Ifs… on WWI, the Russian Revolution and the Fall of the Berlin Wall.</p><p>Up next: Fifteen Fiction for Summer from <em>Coriolanus</em> to <em>Hamilton</em></p><p> </p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3545</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66c2122dd357bd132f64a5c6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4441713144.mp3?updated=1731679171" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What If… Wallace not Truman Had Become US President in 1945?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66bc69490ca3a86a26d4a448</link>
      <description>Today’s episode explores one of the big counterfactuals of twentieth-century American politics: David talks to historian Benn Steil about how close the ultraliberal Henry Wallace came to being FDR’s running mate in 1944 and successor as president in 1945. How near did Wallace get to making it onto the ticket at the 1944 Democratic National Convention? Who or what stopped him? What would his presidency have meant for the Cold War and the nuclear arms race? Was getting President Truman instead a missed opportunity or a lucky escape?
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes: coming very soon a new bonus on Michel Houellebecq’s explosive political fiction Submission www.ppfideas.com 
Next time: What if… the Vietnam War had ended in 1964?
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2024 05:00:17 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>What If… Wallace not Truman Had Become US President in 1945?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>7</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>94</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3dcdabbc-a203-11ef-8350-df5085f25ad8/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Today’s episode explores one of the big counterfactuals of twentieth-century American politics: David talks to historian Benn Steil about how close the ultraliberal Henry Wallace came to being FDR’s running mate in 1944 and successor as president in 1945. How near did Wallace get to making it onto the ticket at the 1944 Democratic National Convention?&amp;nbsp;Who or what stopped him?&amp;nbsp;What would his presidency have meant for the Cold War and the nuclear arms race?&amp;nbsp;Was getting President Truman instead a missed opportunity or a lucky escape?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes: coming very soon a new bonus on Michel Houellebecq’s explosive political fiction&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Submission&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: What if… the Vietnam War had ended in 1964?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode explores one of the big counterfactuals of twentieth-century American politics: David talks to historian Benn Steil about how close the ultraliberal Henry Wallace came to being FDR’s running mate in 1944 and successor as president in 1945. How near did Wallace get to making it onto the ticket at the 1944 Democratic National Convention? Who or what stopped him? What would his presidency have meant for the Cold War and the nuclear arms race? Was getting President Truman instead a missed opportunity or a lucky escape?
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes: coming very soon a new bonus on Michel Houellebecq’s explosive political fiction Submission www.ppfideas.com 
Next time: What if… the Vietnam War had ended in 1964?
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode explores one of the big counterfactuals of twentieth-century American politics: David talks to historian Benn Steil about how close the ultraliberal Henry Wallace came to being FDR’s running mate in 1944 and successor as president in 1945. How near did Wallace get to making it onto the ticket at the 1944 Democratic National Convention? Who or what stopped him? What would his presidency have meant for the Cold War and the nuclear arms race? Was getting President Truman instead a missed opportunity or a lucky escape?</p><br><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes: coming very soon a new bonus on Michel Houellebecq’s explosive political fiction <em>Submission</em> <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a> </p><br><p>Next time: What if… the Vietnam War had ended in 1964?</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3708</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66bc69490ca3a86a26d4a448]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6134683330.mp3?updated=1731679227" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What If… The French Revolution Had Happened in China?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66b4ed735a08b599188f2af4</link>
      <description>For our second episode on big historical counterfactuals, David talks to world historian Ayse Zarakol about how the East might well have risen to global dominance before the West. What if the key revolutions of the modern world – political and industrial – had happened in Asia first? What if there had been an Iranian Napoleon? And how much of our understanding of modern history is based on the biases of hindsight?
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes: 24 bonuses per year for just £5 a month or a £50 annual subscription www.ppfideas.com 
Next time: What if… Henry Wallace had become American President in 1945?
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2024 05:00:46 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>What If… The French Revolution Had Happened in China?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>7</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>93</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3e2c61ac-a203-11ef-8350-0bc069bb95c0/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For our second episode on big historical counterfactuals, David talks to world historian Ayse Zarakol about how the East might well have risen to global dominance before the West.&amp;nbsp;What if the key revolutions of the modern world – political and industrial – had happened in Asia first?&amp;nbsp;What if there had been an Iranian Napoleon?&amp;nbsp;And how much of our understanding of modern history is based on the biases of hindsight?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes: 24 bonuses per year for just £5 a month or a £50 annual subscription&lt;em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: What if… Henry Wallace had become American President in 1945?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For our second episode on big historical counterfactuals, David talks to world historian Ayse Zarakol about how the East might well have risen to global dominance before the West. What if the key revolutions of the modern world – political and industrial – had happened in Asia first? What if there had been an Iranian Napoleon? And how much of our understanding of modern history is based on the biases of hindsight?
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes: 24 bonuses per year for just £5 a month or a £50 annual subscription www.ppfideas.com 
Next time: What if… Henry Wallace had become American President in 1945?
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For our second episode on big historical counterfactuals, David talks to world historian Ayse Zarakol about how the East might well have risen to global dominance before the West. What if the key revolutions of the modern world – political and industrial – had happened in Asia first? What if there had been an Iranian Napoleon? And how much of our understanding of modern history is based on the biases of hindsight?</p><br><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes: 24 bonuses per year for just £5 a month or a £50 annual subscription<em> </em><a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a> </p><br><p>Next time: What if… Henry Wallace had become American President in 1945?</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3333</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66b4ed735a08b599188f2af4]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7999477859.mp3?updated=1731679218" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What If… Science Counterfactuals w/ Adam Rutherford</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66b25007129e9b2ef64be4df</link>
      <description>To kick off our new series on counterfactual histories David talks to the geneticist and science writer Adam Rutherford about whether ‘What Ifs’ make sense in science. If one person doesn’t make the big discovery, will someone else do it? Are scientific breakthroughs the product of genius or of wealth and power? And how might the world have been a completely different place if the Haber-Bosch process had not been developed in Germany in 1913?
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes: 24 bonuses per year for just £5 a month or a £50 annual subscription www.ppfideas.com 
Next time: What if… the French Revolution had happened in China?
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 05:00:05 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>What If… Science Counterfactuals w/ Adam Rutherford</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>7</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>92</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3e8d4274-a203-11ef-8350-07748727b89c/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;To kick off our new series on counterfactual histories David talks to the geneticist and science writer Adam Rutherford about whether ‘What Ifs’ make sense in science.&amp;nbsp;If one person doesn’t make the big discovery, will someone else do it?&amp;nbsp;Are scientific breakthroughs the product of genius or of wealth and power? And how might the world have been a completely different place if the Haber-Bosch process had not been developed in Germany in 1913?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes: 24 bonuses per year for just £5 a month or a £50 annual subscription&lt;em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: What if… the French Revolution had happened in China?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>To kick off our new series on counterfactual histories David talks to the geneticist and science writer Adam Rutherford about whether ‘What Ifs’ make sense in science. If one person doesn’t make the big discovery, will someone else do it? Are scientific breakthroughs the product of genius or of wealth and power? And how might the world have been a completely different place if the Haber-Bosch process had not been developed in Germany in 1913?
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes: 24 bonuses per year for just £5 a month or a £50 annual subscription www.ppfideas.com 
Next time: What if… the French Revolution had happened in China?
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>To kick off our new series on counterfactual histories David talks to the geneticist and science writer Adam Rutherford about whether ‘What Ifs’ make sense in science. If one person doesn’t make the big discovery, will someone else do it? Are scientific breakthroughs the product of genius or of wealth and power? And how might the world have been a completely different place if the Haber-Bosch process had not been developed in Germany in 1913?</p><br><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes: 24 bonuses per year for just £5 a month or a £50 annual subscription<em> </em><a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a> </p><br><p>Next time: What if… the French Revolution had happened in China?</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3585</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66b25007129e9b2ef64be4df]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML5019981890.mp3?updated=1731679054" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: Tim Rice on Evita</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66abcaf45019f44891228332</link>
      <description>Something different for our last episode on the Great Political Fictions as this time David talks to the person who wrote it: Tim Rice, the lyricist of the epic musical about the life of Eva Peron, Evita (co-written with Andrew Lloyd-Webber). Where did the idea for such an unlikely subject come from? Why has it struck a chord with politicians from Thatcher to Trump? What does it say about the relationship between celebrity, populism and power?
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes – including a new bonus episode on Philip Roth’s The Plot Against America www.ppfideas.com 
Next time: Adam Rutherford on counterfactual science to kick off our new series on ‘What Ifs…’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2024 05:00:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: Tim Rice on Evita</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>91</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3ee72f96-a203-11ef-8350-63c421685bfc/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Something different for our last&amp;nbsp;episode&amp;nbsp;on the Great Political Fictions as this time David talks to the person who wrote it: Tim Rice, the lyricist of the epic musical about the life of Eva Peron,&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Evita&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(co-written with Andrew Lloyd-Webber). Where did the idea for such an unlikely subject come from?&amp;nbsp;Why has it struck a chord with politicians from Thatcher to Trump?&amp;nbsp;What does it say about the relationship between celebrity, populism and power?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus&amp;nbsp;episodes&amp;nbsp;– including a new bonus&amp;nbsp;episode&amp;nbsp;on Philip Roth’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The Plot Against America&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Adam Rutherford on counterfactual science to kick off our new series on ‘What Ifs…’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Something different for our last episode on the Great Political Fictions as this time David talks to the person who wrote it: Tim Rice, the lyricist of the epic musical about the life of Eva Peron, Evita (co-written with Andrew Lloyd-Webber). Where did the idea for such an unlikely subject come from? Why has it struck a chord with politicians from Thatcher to Trump? What does it say about the relationship between celebrity, populism and power?
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes – including a new bonus episode on Philip Roth’s The Plot Against America www.ppfideas.com 
Next time: Adam Rutherford on counterfactual science to kick off our new series on ‘What Ifs…’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Something different for our last episode on the Great Political Fictions as this time David talks to the person who wrote it: Tim Rice, the lyricist of the epic musical about the life of Eva Peron, <em>Evita</em> (co-written with Andrew Lloyd-Webber). Where did the idea for such an unlikely subject come from? Why has it struck a chord with politicians from Thatcher to Trump? What does it say about the relationship between celebrity, populism and power?</p><br><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes – including a new bonus episode on Philip Roth’s <em>The Plot Against America</em> <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a> </p><br><p>Next time: Adam Rutherford on counterfactual science to kick off our new series on ‘What Ifs…’</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3115</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66abcaf45019f44891228332]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML5548403539.mp3?updated=1731679117" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: Helen Lewis on To Kill A Mockingbird</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66a8d898beb76fc5ebe08c10</link>
      <description>David talks to the writer and broadcaster Helen Lewis about Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mockingbird (1960), one of the most widely read and best-loved novels of the twentieth century, and in the twenty-first century increasingly one of the most controversial. Is the book an attack on or an apology for Southern racism? How does its view of race relate to the picture it paints of class and caste in 1930s Alabama? And what on earth are we to make of the recently published prequel/sequel Go Set A Watchman? Plus we discuss Demon Copperhead, JD Vance, and more.
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes – including a new bonus episode on Philip Roth’s The Plot Against America www.ppfideas.com 
Our free fortnightly newsletter will be out tomorrow, including more to read, watch and listen to about To Kill A Mockingbird – just sign up here https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Next time: Tim Rice talks about Evita
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 05:00:32 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: Helen Lewis on To Kill A Mockingbird</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>90</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3f45e414-a203-11ef-8350-97fce251a4dd/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;David talks to the writer and broadcaster Helen Lewis about Harper Lee’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;To Kill A Mockingbird&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;(1960), one of the most widely read and best-loved novels of the twentieth century, and in the twenty-first century increasingly one of the most controversial.&amp;nbsp;Is the book an attack on or an apology for Southern racism?&amp;nbsp;How does its view of race relate to the picture it paints of class and caste in 1930s Alabama?&amp;nbsp;And what on earth are we to make of the recently published prequel/sequel&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Go Set A Watchman&lt;/em&gt;?&amp;nbsp;Plus we discuss&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Demon Copperhead&lt;/em&gt;, JD Vance, and more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes – including a new bonus episode on Philip Roth’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The Plot Against America&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our free fortnightly newsletter will be out tomorrow, including more to read, watch and listen to about&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;To Kill A Mockingbird&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;– just sign up here&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://linktr.ee/ppfideas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Tim Rice talks about&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Evita&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>David talks to the writer and broadcaster Helen Lewis about Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mockingbird (1960), one of the most widely read and best-loved novels of the twentieth century, and in the twenty-first century increasingly one of the most controversial. Is the book an attack on or an apology for Southern racism? How does its view of race relate to the picture it paints of class and caste in 1930s Alabama? And what on earth are we to make of the recently published prequel/sequel Go Set A Watchman? Plus we discuss Demon Copperhead, JD Vance, and more.
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes – including a new bonus episode on Philip Roth’s The Plot Against America www.ppfideas.com 
Our free fortnightly newsletter will be out tomorrow, including more to read, watch and listen to about To Kill A Mockingbird – just sign up here https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Next time: Tim Rice talks about Evita
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>David talks to the writer and broadcaster Helen Lewis about Harper Lee’s <em>To Kill A Mockingbird </em>(1960), one of the most widely read and best-loved novels of the twentieth century, and in the twenty-first century increasingly one of the most controversial. Is the book an attack on or an apology for Southern racism? How does its view of race relate to the picture it paints of class and caste in 1930s Alabama? And what on earth are we to make of the recently published prequel/sequel <em>Go Set A Watchman</em>? Plus we discuss <em>Demon Copperhead</em>, JD Vance, and more.</p><br><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes – including a new bonus episode on Philip Roth’s <em>The Plot Against America</em> <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a> </p><br><p>Our free fortnightly newsletter will be out tomorrow, including more to read, watch and listen to about <em>To Kill A Mockingbird</em> – just sign up here <a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas">https://linktr.ee/ppfideas</a></p><br><p>Next time: Tim Rice talks about <em>Evita</em></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3724</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66a8d898beb76fc5ebe08c10]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4001978400.mp3?updated=1731679166" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: Lea Ypi on The Wild Duck</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66a250dd31e950595822c0fc</link>
      <description>The writer and political philosopher Lea Ypi talks about the impact on her of Henrik Ibsen’s The Wild Duck (1884), which she first read when she was eight – thinking it was a children’s book (it isn’t!) – and has been returning to ever since. A play about family and betrayal, idealism and disappointment, temptation and self-destruction, is it also a parable about the illusions of politics? And how might it shake a person’s faith?
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes – coming soon a special bonus episode on Philip Roth’s The Plot Against America www.ppfideas.com  
Next time: Helen Lewis on To Kill A Mockingbird
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2024 05:00:06 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: Lea Ypi on The Wild Duck</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>89</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3fbde3a6-a203-11ef-8350-5febcd0487f2/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;The writer and political philosopher Lea Ypi talks about the impact on her of Henrik Ibsen’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The&amp;nbsp;Wild&amp;nbsp;Duck&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(1884), which she first read when she was eight – thinking it was a children’s book (it isn’t!) – and has been returning to ever since.&amp;nbsp;A play about family and betrayal, idealism and disappointment, temptation and self-destruction, is it also a parable about the illusions of politics?&amp;nbsp;And how might it shake a person’s faith?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes – coming soon a special bonus episode on Philip Roth’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The Plot Against America&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Helen Lewis on&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;To Kill A Mockingbird&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The writer and political philosopher Lea Ypi talks about the impact on her of Henrik Ibsen’s The Wild Duck (1884), which she first read when she was eight – thinking it was a children’s book (it isn’t!) – and has been returning to ever since. A play about family and betrayal, idealism and disappointment, temptation and self-destruction, is it also a parable about the illusions of politics? And how might it shake a person’s faith?
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes – coming soon a special bonus episode on Philip Roth’s The Plot Against America www.ppfideas.com  
Next time: Helen Lewis on To Kill A Mockingbird
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The writer and political philosopher Lea Ypi talks about the impact on her of Henrik Ibsen’s <em>The Wild Duck</em> (1884), which she first read when she was eight – thinking it was a children’s book (it isn’t!) – and has been returning to ever since. A play about family and betrayal, idealism and disappointment, temptation and self-destruction, is it also a parable about the illusions of politics? And how might it shake a person’s faith?</p><br><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes – coming soon a special bonus episode on Philip Roth’s <em>The Plot Against America</em> <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a>  </p><br><p>Next time: Helen Lewis on <em>To Kill A Mockingbird</em></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3700</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66a250dd31e950595822c0fc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2542123092.mp3?updated=1731679218" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Poems</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66a0df0b6e2c3d2a5daa61a3</link>
      <description>David talks to Mark Ford and Seamus Perry, hosts of the LRB’s Close Readings poetry podcast, about what makes a great political poem. Can great poetry be ideological? How much does context matter? And is it possible to tell political truths in verse? From Yeats’s ‘Easter 1916’ to Owen’s ‘Strange Meeting’ to Auden’s ‘Spain 1937’: a conversation about political conviction and poetic ambiguity.
To find out more about Close Readings and how to subscribe, just visit the LRB’s website https://www.lrb.co.uk/podcasts-and-videos/podcasts/close-readings
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes – including bonuses on the Great Political Fictions www.ppfideas.com
Next time: Lea Ypi on Ibsen’s The Wild Duck
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 05:00:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Poems</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>88</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/40170be8-a203-11ef-8350-f3d81593a827/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;David talks to Mark Ford and Seamus Perry, hosts of the LRB’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Close Readings&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;poetry podcast, about what makes a great political poem.&amp;nbsp;Can great poetry be ideological?&amp;nbsp;How much does context matter?&amp;nbsp;And is it possible to tell political truths in verse?&amp;nbsp;From Yeats’s ‘Easter 1916’ to Owen’s ‘Strange Meeting’ to Auden’s ‘Spain 1937’: a conversation about political conviction and poetic ambiguity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To find out more about&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Close Readings&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;and how to subscribe, just visit the LRB’s website&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/podcasts-and-videos/podcasts/close-readings" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.lrb.co.uk/podcasts-and-videos/podcasts/close-readings&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes – including bonuses on the Great Political Fictions&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Lea Ypi on Ibsen’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The Wild Duck&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>David talks to Mark Ford and Seamus Perry, hosts of the LRB’s Close Readings poetry podcast, about what makes a great political poem. Can great poetry be ideological? How much does context matter? And is it possible to tell political truths in verse? From Yeats’s ‘Easter 1916’ to Owen’s ‘Strange Meeting’ to Auden’s ‘Spain 1937’: a conversation about political conviction and poetic ambiguity.
To find out more about Close Readings and how to subscribe, just visit the LRB’s website https://www.lrb.co.uk/podcasts-and-videos/podcasts/close-readings
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes – including bonuses on the Great Political Fictions www.ppfideas.com
Next time: Lea Ypi on Ibsen’s The Wild Duck
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>David talks to Mark Ford and Seamus Perry, hosts of the LRB’s <em>Close Readings</em> poetry podcast, about what makes a great political poem. Can great poetry be ideological? How much does context matter? And is it possible to tell political truths in verse? From Yeats’s ‘Easter 1916’ to Owen’s ‘Strange Meeting’ to Auden’s ‘Spain 1937’: a conversation about political conviction and poetic ambiguity.</p><br><p>To find out more about <em>Close Readings</em> and how to subscribe, just visit the LRB’s website <a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/podcasts-and-videos/podcasts/close-readings">https://www.lrb.co.uk/podcasts-and-videos/podcasts/close-readings</a></p><br><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and all our bonus episodes – including bonuses on the Great Political Fictions <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>Next time: Lea Ypi on Ibsen’s <em>The Wild Duck</em></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3413</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66a0df0b6e2c3d2a5daa61a3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1965875542.mp3?updated=1731679182" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Elections: The Republican Convention</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/669c0b21fc4972011bbad326</link>
      <description>This week we check back in with Gary Gerstle to discuss what’s been happening in American politics after a tumultuous week. What does it say about Trump’s electoral strategy that he picked J.D. Vance as his running mate? How would the Republican party have coped if the assassin’s bullet hadn’t missed? Who might replace Biden at the top of the Democratic ticket and how? Plus, what fate lies in store for Bidenomics if Trump plasters his name all over it?
Our free fortnightly newsletter is out now, including reflections on Biden’s and America’s looming choices – just sign up here https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
And sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes along with ad-free listening: available now for PPF+ subscribers, Robert Saunders on his favourite political novel, George Eliot’s Felix Holt
Next time: The Great Political Poems
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2024 05:00:31 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>American Elections: The Republican Convention</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>87</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/406e905c-a203-11ef-8350-cb7c99f6bd57/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week we check back in with Gary Gerstle to discuss what’s been happening in American politics after a tumultuous week.&amp;nbsp;What does it say about Trump’s electoral strategy that he picked J.D. Vance as his running mate?&amp;nbsp;How would the Republican party have coped if the assassin’s bullet hadn’t missed?&amp;nbsp;Who might replace Biden at the top of the Democratic ticket and how?&amp;nbsp;Plus, what fate lies in store for Bidenomics if Trump plasters his name all over it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our free fortnightly newsletter is out now, including reflections on Biden’s and America’s looming choices – just sign up here&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://linktr.ee/ppfideas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;And sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes along with ad-free listening: available now for PPF+ subscribers, Robert Saunders on his favourite political novel, George Eliot’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Felix Holt&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: The Great Political Poems&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week we check back in with Gary Gerstle to discuss what’s been happening in American politics after a tumultuous week. What does it say about Trump’s electoral strategy that he picked J.D. Vance as his running mate? How would the Republican party have coped if the assassin’s bullet hadn’t missed? Who might replace Biden at the top of the Democratic ticket and how? Plus, what fate lies in store for Bidenomics if Trump plasters his name all over it?
Our free fortnightly newsletter is out now, including reflections on Biden’s and America’s looming choices – just sign up here https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
And sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes along with ad-free listening: available now for PPF+ subscribers, Robert Saunders on his favourite political novel, George Eliot’s Felix Holt
Next time: The Great Political Poems
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we check back in with Gary Gerstle to discuss what’s been happening in American politics after a tumultuous week. What does it say about Trump’s electoral strategy that he picked J.D. Vance as his running mate? How would the Republican party have coped if the assassin’s bullet hadn’t missed? Who might replace Biden at the top of the Democratic ticket and how? Plus, what fate lies in store for Bidenomics if Trump plasters his name all over it?</p><br><p>Our free fortnightly newsletter is out now, including reflections on Biden’s and America’s looming choices – just sign up here <a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas">https://linktr.ee/ppfideas</a></p><br><p>And sign up to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes along with ad-free listening: available now for PPF+ subscribers, Robert Saunders on his favourite political novel, George Eliot’s <em>Felix Holt</em></p><br><p>Next time: The Great Political Poems</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3726</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[669c0b21fc4972011bbad326]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9070940674.mp3?updated=1731679181" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: Hamilton</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6697974d2521c5391a24a634</link>
      <description>Our series concludes with a musical: Lin-Manuel Miranda’s wildly popular and increasingly controversial Hamilton (2015). What does it get right and what does it get wrong about America’s founding fathers? How fair is it to judge a Broadway musical by the standards of academic history? And why does a product of the Obama era still resonate so powerfully in the age of Trump and Biden?
The latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter - which accompanies the last three episodes in this Fictions series including Hamilton - is out tomorrow, with lots of extra info, clips and reflections – just sign up here: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
And sign up now to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes along with ad-free listening: coming very soon for PPF+ subscribers Robert Saunders on his favourite political novel plus a special episode on Evita: www.ppfideas.com
Next time: Gary Gerstle on the Republican National Convention
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 05:00:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: Hamilton</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>86</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/40c8bd16-a203-11ef-8350-773ca2cba251/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Our series concludes with a musical: Lin-Manuel Miranda’s wildly popular and increasingly controversial&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Hamilton&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(2015).&amp;nbsp;What does it get right and what does it get wrong about America’s founding fathers?&amp;nbsp;How fair is it to judge a Broadway musical by the standards of academic history?&amp;nbsp;And why does a product of the Obama era still resonate so powerfully in the age of Trump and Biden?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;The latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter - which accompanies the last three episodes in this Fictions series including &lt;em&gt;Hamilton&lt;/em&gt; - is out tomorrow, with lots of extra info, clips and reflections – just sign up here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://linktr.ee/ppfideas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;And sign up now to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes along with ad-free listening: coming very soon for PPF+ subscribers Robert Saunders on his favourite political novel plus a special episode on&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Evita:&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Gary Gerstle on the Republican National Convention&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Our series concludes with a musical: Lin-Manuel Miranda’s wildly popular and increasingly controversial Hamilton (2015). What does it get right and what does it get wrong about America’s founding fathers? How fair is it to judge a Broadway musical by the standards of academic history? And why does a product of the Obama era still resonate so powerfully in the age of Trump and Biden?
The latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter - which accompanies the last three episodes in this Fictions series including Hamilton - is out tomorrow, with lots of extra info, clips and reflections – just sign up here: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
And sign up now to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes along with ad-free listening: coming very soon for PPF+ subscribers Robert Saunders on his favourite political novel plus a special episode on Evita: www.ppfideas.com
Next time: Gary Gerstle on the Republican National Convention
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our series concludes with a musical: Lin-Manuel Miranda’s wildly popular and increasingly controversial <em>Hamilton</em> (2015). What does it get right and what does it get wrong about America’s founding fathers? How fair is it to judge a Broadway musical by the standards of academic history? And why does a product of the Obama era still resonate so powerfully in the age of Trump and Biden?</p><br><p>The latest edition of our free fortnightly newsletter - which accompanies the last three episodes in this Fictions series including <em>Hamilton</em> - is out tomorrow, with lots of extra info, clips and reflections – just sign up here: <a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas">https://linktr.ee/ppfideas</a></p><br><p>And sign up now to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes along with ad-free listening: coming very soon for PPF+ subscribers Robert Saunders on his favourite political novel plus a special episode on <em>Evita:</em> <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>Next time: Gary Gerstle on the Republican National Convention</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3432</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6697974d2521c5391a24a634]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1349633532.mp3?updated=1731679111" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: American Wife</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66903b785d66becbc6fc986d</link>
      <description>The penultimate episode in our fictions series is about Curtis Sittenfeld’s American Wife (2008), which re-imagines the life of First Lady Laura Bush. One of the great novels about the intimacy of power and the accidents of politics, it sticks to the historical record while radically retelling it. What does the standard version leave out about the Bush presidency? How does an ordinary life become an extraordinary one? And where is the line between fact and fiction?
Sign up now to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes along with ad-free listening: coming soon for PPF+ subscribers Robert Saunders on his favourite political novel plus a special episode on Evita: www.ppfideas.com
Next time: Lin-Manuel Miranda’s Hamilton
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2024 05:00:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: American Wife</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>85</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/412319aa-a203-11ef-8350-c7c86a61ad90/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;The penultimate episode in our fictions series is about Curtis Sittenfeld’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;American Wife&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(2008), which re-imagines the life of First Lady Laura Bush.&amp;nbsp;One of the great novels about the intimacy of power and the accidents of politics, it sticks to the historical record while radically retelling it.&amp;nbsp;What does the standard version leave out about the Bush presidency?&amp;nbsp;How does an ordinary life become an extraordinary one?&amp;nbsp;And where is the line between fact and fiction?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes along with ad-free listening: coming soon for PPF+ subscribers Robert Saunders on his favourite political novel plus a special episode on&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Evita: &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Lin-Manuel Miranda’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Hamilton&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The penultimate episode in our fictions series is about Curtis Sittenfeld’s American Wife (2008), which re-imagines the life of First Lady Laura Bush. One of the great novels about the intimacy of power and the accidents of politics, it sticks to the historical record while radically retelling it. What does the standard version leave out about the Bush presidency? How does an ordinary life become an extraordinary one? And where is the line between fact and fiction?
Sign up now to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes along with ad-free listening: coming soon for PPF+ subscribers Robert Saunders on his favourite political novel plus a special episode on Evita: www.ppfideas.com
Next time: Lin-Manuel Miranda’s Hamilton
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The penultimate episode in our fictions series is about Curtis Sittenfeld’s <em>American Wife</em> (2008), which re-imagines the life of First Lady Laura Bush. One of the great novels about the intimacy of power and the accidents of politics, it sticks to the historical record while radically retelling it. What does the standard version leave out about the Bush presidency? How does an ordinary life become an extraordinary one? And where is the line between fact and fiction?</p><br><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes along with ad-free listening: coming soon for PPF+ subscribers Robert Saunders on his favourite political novel plus a special episode on <em>Evita: </em><a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>Next time: Lin-Manuel Miranda’s <em>Hamilton</em></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3408</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66903b785d66becbc6fc986d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1760624724.mp3?updated=1731679207" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: The Line of Beauty</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/668d4d3ac4d72731df2e8c2d</link>
      <description>Our political fictions series returns with Alan Hollinghurst’s The Line of Beauty (2004), which is set between Thatcher’s two dominant general election victories of 1983 and 1987. A novel about the intersection between gay life and Tory life, high politics and low conduct, beauty and betrayal, it explores the price of power and the risks of liberation. It also contains perhaps the greatest of all fictional portrayals of a real-life prime minster: Thatcher dancing the night away.
Sign up now to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes along with ad-free listening: coming soon for PPF+ subscribers Robert Saunders on his favourite political novel plus a special episode on Evita: www.ppfideas.com
Next time: Curtis Sittenfeld re-imagines Laura Bush in American Wife
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 05:00:53 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: The Line of Beauty</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>84</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/417bc3e8-a203-11ef-8350-7338a8e4a11e/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Our political fictions series returns with Alan Hollinghurst’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The Line of Beauty&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(2004), which is set between Thatcher’s two dominant general election victories of 1983 and 1987.&amp;nbsp;A novel about the intersection between gay life and Tory life, high politics and low conduct, beauty and betrayal, it explores the price of power and the risks of liberation.&amp;nbsp;It also contains perhaps the greatest of all fictional portrayals of a real-life prime minster: Thatcher dancing the night away.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes along with ad-free listening: coming soon for PPF+ subscribers Robert Saunders on his favourite political novel plus a special episode on&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Evita&lt;/em&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Curtis Sittenfeld re-imagines Laura Bush in&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;American Wife&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Our political fictions series returns with Alan Hollinghurst’s The Line of Beauty (2004), which is set between Thatcher’s two dominant general election victories of 1983 and 1987. A novel about the intersection between gay life and Tory life, high politics and low conduct, beauty and betrayal, it explores the price of power and the risks of liberation. It also contains perhaps the greatest of all fictional portrayals of a real-life prime minster: Thatcher dancing the night away.
Sign up now to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes along with ad-free listening: coming soon for PPF+ subscribers Robert Saunders on his favourite political novel plus a special episode on Evita: www.ppfideas.com
Next time: Curtis Sittenfeld re-imagines Laura Bush in American Wife
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our political fictions series returns with Alan Hollinghurst’s <em>The Line of Beauty</em> (2004), which is set between Thatcher’s two dominant general election victories of 1983 and 1987. A novel about the intersection between gay life and Tory life, high politics and low conduct, beauty and betrayal, it explores the price of power and the risks of liberation. It also contains perhaps the greatest of all fictional portrayals of a real-life prime minster: Thatcher dancing the night away.</p><br><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get all our bonus episodes along with ad-free listening: coming soon for PPF+ subscribers Robert Saunders on his favourite political novel plus a special episode on <em>Evita</em>: <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>Next time: Curtis Sittenfeld re-imagines Laura Bush in <em>American Wife</em></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3376</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[668d4d3ac4d72731df2e8c2d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4350287761.mp3?updated=1731679154" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UK General Elections: 2024</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66896916fc882c395b446e8c</link>
      <description>To wrap up our series David and Robert attempt some instant history on the election result that’s just happened: in some ways predictable, in others utterly remarkable. What does such a big win for Labour on such a relatively small vote mean? What’s happening in Scotland? Where next for the Tories? And is the UK now an outlier in a world of increasing political turmoil, or is the turmoil just under the surface here too?
Our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this series is out now, with fact, figures, clips and reflections on all these elections and more – just sign up here: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses too: www.ppfideas.com
Coming Up: More Great Political Fictions
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 18:00:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>UK General Elections: 2024</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>6</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>83</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/41d70424-a203-11ef-8350-0f5c571c88a1/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;To wrap up our series David and Robert attempt some instant history on the election result that’s just happened: in some ways predictable, in others utterly remarkable.&amp;nbsp;What does such a big win for Labour on such a relatively small vote mean?&amp;nbsp;What’s happening in Scotland?&amp;nbsp;Where next for the Tories?&amp;nbsp;And is the UK now an outlier in a world of increasing political turmoil, or is the turmoil just under the surface here too?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this series is out now, with fact, figures, clips and reflections on all these elections and more – just sign up here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://linktr.ee/ppfideas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses too:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming Up: More Great Political Fictions&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>To wrap up our series David and Robert attempt some instant history on the election result that’s just happened: in some ways predictable, in others utterly remarkable. What does such a big win for Labour on such a relatively small vote mean? What’s happening in Scotland? Where next for the Tories? And is the UK now an outlier in a world of increasing political turmoil, or is the turmoil just under the surface here too?
Our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this series is out now, with fact, figures, clips and reflections on all these elections and more – just sign up here: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses too: www.ppfideas.com
Coming Up: More Great Political Fictions
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>To wrap up our series David and Robert attempt some instant history on the election result that’s just happened: in some ways predictable, in others utterly remarkable. What does such a big win for Labour on such a relatively small vote mean? What’s happening in Scotland? Where next for the Tories? And is the UK now an outlier in a world of increasing political turmoil, or is the turmoil just under the surface here too?</p><br><p>Our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this series is out now, with fact, figures, clips and reflections on all these elections and more – just sign up here: <a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas">https://linktr.ee/ppfideas</a></p><br><p>To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses too: <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>Coming Up: More Great Political Fictions</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3471</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66896916fc882c395b446e8c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4293305611.mp3?updated=1731679149" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UK General Elections: 2019</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66853cd3f364c64008065ad3</link>
      <description>For election day, David and Robert discuss the previous general election in December 2019, which saw Boris Johnson win a decisive victory under the slogan ‘Get Brexit Done’. How did he (or Dominic Cummings) do it? Was Corbyn to blame for Labour’s defeat? And how the hell did the Tories get from that resounding victory to their current disarray in just 4½ years?
To get our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this series, with fact, figures, clips and reflections on all these elections and more, just sign up via the Newsletter button here: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses too: www.ppfideas.com
Coming next: 2024 – What Happened?
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:00:56 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>UK General Elections: 2019</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>6</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>82</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4235372e-a203-11ef-8350-db500d160035/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For election day, David and Robert discuss the previous general election in December 2019, which saw Boris Johnson win a decisive victory under the slogan ‘Get Brexit Done’.&amp;nbsp;How did he (or Dominic Cummings) do it?&amp;nbsp;Was Corbyn to blame for Labour’s defeat?&amp;nbsp;And how the hell did the Tories get from that resounding victory to their current disarray in just 4½ years?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To get our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this series, with fact, figures, clips and reflections on all these elections and more, just sign up via the Newsletter button here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://linktr.ee/ppfideas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses too:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming next: 2024 – What Happened?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For election day, David and Robert discuss the previous general election in December 2019, which saw Boris Johnson win a decisive victory under the slogan ‘Get Brexit Done’. How did he (or Dominic Cummings) do it? Was Corbyn to blame for Labour’s defeat? And how the hell did the Tories get from that resounding victory to their current disarray in just 4½ years?
To get our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this series, with fact, figures, clips and reflections on all these elections and more, just sign up via the Newsletter button here: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses too: www.ppfideas.com
Coming next: 2024 – What Happened?
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For election day, David and Robert discuss the previous general election in December 2019, which saw Boris Johnson win a decisive victory under the slogan ‘Get Brexit Done’. How did he (or Dominic Cummings) do it? Was Corbyn to blame for Labour’s defeat? And how the hell did the Tories get from that resounding victory to their current disarray in just 4½ years?</p><br><p>To get our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this series, with fact, figures, clips and reflections on all these elections and more, just sign up via the Newsletter button here: <a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas">https://linktr.ee/ppfideas</a></p><br><p>To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses too: <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>Coming next: 2024 – What Happened?</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3370</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66853cd3f364c64008065ad3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2914188017.mp3?updated=1731679134" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UK General Elections: 1997</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6682f89cda59509cbac60fcb</link>
      <description>In this extra episode for election week David talks to historian Robert Saunders about the last great Labour landslide of 1997, when Tony Blair won the biggest majority in his party’s history (till now?). Why did the Tories get no credit for a strong economy? How did New Labour change political campaigning? Was this the election that did for the prospects of proportional representation? Plus – the Millennium Dome: totemic or tat?
To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses too www.ppfideas.com
For election day tomorrow: the Boris + Brexit election of 2019
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 05:00:29 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>UK General Elections: 1997</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>6</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>81</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/429817cc-a203-11ef-8350-a707dad669e1/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In this extra episode for election week David talks to historian Robert Saunders about the last great Labour landslide of&amp;nbsp;1997, when Tony Blair won the biggest majority in his party’s history (till now?).&amp;nbsp;Why did the Tories get no credit for a strong economy?&amp;nbsp;How did New Labour change political campaigning?&amp;nbsp;Was this the election that did for the prospects of proportional representation?&amp;nbsp;Plus – the Millennium Dome: totemic or tat?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses too&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;For election day tomorrow: the Boris + Brexit election of 2019&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this extra episode for election week David talks to historian Robert Saunders about the last great Labour landslide of 1997, when Tony Blair won the biggest majority in his party’s history (till now?). Why did the Tories get no credit for a strong economy? How did New Labour change political campaigning? Was this the election that did for the prospects of proportional representation? Plus – the Millennium Dome: totemic or tat?
To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses too www.ppfideas.com
For election day tomorrow: the Boris + Brexit election of 2019
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this extra episode for election week David talks to historian Robert Saunders about the last great Labour landslide of 1997, when Tony Blair won the biggest majority in his party’s history (till now?). Why did the Tories get no credit for a strong economy? How did New Labour change political campaigning? Was this the election that did for the prospects of proportional representation? Plus – the Millennium Dome: totemic or tat?</p><br><p>To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses too <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>For election day tomorrow: the Boris + Brexit election of 2019</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3510</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6682f89cda59509cbac60fcb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3581413289.mp3?updated=1731679209" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UK General Elections: 1979</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/667ea6dd482fca9c1b4b621a</link>
      <description>Today’s pivotal UK election is the one that brought Margaret Thatcher to Downing Street in 1979. David talks to historian Robert Saunders about how she did it and how it could have turned out very differently. What might have happened if the election had been called the previous year? Did Thatcherism already exist in 1979 or had it still to be invented? And how close did the Labour party come to permanent schism in the years following her victory?
To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses: www.ppfideas.com
Next time: 1997 and the New Labour landslide
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2024 05:00:50 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>UK General Elections: 1979</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>6</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>80</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/42efa5f0-a203-11ef-8350-3fab145b2248/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Today’s pivotal UK election is the one that brought Margaret Thatcher to Downing Street in 1979. David talks to historian Robert Saunders about how she did it and how it could have turned out very differently.&amp;nbsp;What might have happened if the election had been called the previous year?&amp;nbsp;Did Thatcherism already exist in 1979 or had it still to be invented?&amp;nbsp;And how close did the Labour party come to permanent schism in the years following her victory?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: 1997 and the New Labour landslide&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s pivotal UK election is the one that brought Margaret Thatcher to Downing Street in 1979. David talks to historian Robert Saunders about how she did it and how it could have turned out very differently. What might have happened if the election had been called the previous year? Did Thatcherism already exist in 1979 or had it still to be invented? And how close did the Labour party come to permanent schism in the years following her victory?
To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses: www.ppfideas.com
Next time: 1997 and the New Labour landslide
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s pivotal UK election is the one that brought Margaret Thatcher to Downing Street in 1979. David talks to historian Robert Saunders about how she did it and how it could have turned out very differently. What might have happened if the election had been called the previous year? Did Thatcherism already exist in 1979 or had it still to be invented? And how close did the Labour party come to permanent schism in the years following her victory?</p><br><p>To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses: <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>Next time: 1997 and the New Labour landslide</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3722</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[667ea6dd482fca9c1b4b621a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4293223929.mp3?updated=1731679194" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UK General Elections: 1945</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/667ae4a954d76294c68a3b78</link>
      <description>In today’s episode on pivotal UK elections David talks to historian Robert Saunders about the first great Labour landslide of 1945 and how it changed Britain. Why did Churchill not get his expected reward for winning the war? How genuinely radical and popular was the Labour programme? What made the mild-mannered Attlee such an effective leader? And how did the Tories – and Churchill – manage to get themselves back in the game?
To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses: www.ppfideas.com.
Next time: 1979 and the advent of Thatcherism
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 05:00:35 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>UK General Elections: 1945</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>6</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>79</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4349f9c4-a203-11ef-8350-df8629a1dc75/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In today’s episode on pivotal UK elections David talks to historian Robert Saunders about the first great Labour landslide of 1945 and how it changed Britain.&amp;nbsp;Why did Churchill not get his expected reward for winning the war?&amp;nbsp;How genuinely radical and popular was the Labour programme?&amp;nbsp;What made the mild-mannered Attlee such an effective leader?&amp;nbsp;And how did the Tories – and Churchill – manage to get themselves back in the game?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: 1979 and the advent of Thatcherism&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode on pivotal UK elections David talks to historian Robert Saunders about the first great Labour landslide of 1945 and how it changed Britain. Why did Churchill not get his expected reward for winning the war? How genuinely radical and popular was the Labour programme? What made the mild-mannered Attlee such an effective leader? And how did the Tories – and Churchill – manage to get themselves back in the game?
To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses: www.ppfideas.com.
Next time: 1979 and the advent of Thatcherism
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode on pivotal UK elections David talks to historian Robert Saunders about the first great Labour landslide of 1945 and how it changed Britain. Why did Churchill not get his expected reward for winning the war? How genuinely radical and popular was the Labour programme? What made the mild-mannered Attlee such an effective leader? And how did the Tories – and Churchill – manage to get themselves back in the game?</p><br><p>To hear our bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses: <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a>.</p><br><p>Next time: 1979 and the advent of Thatcherism</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3501</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[667ae4a954d76294c68a3b78]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML5793025272.mp3?updated=1731679176" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UK General Elections: 1906</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6675b4c9d93b3d0012cc0a11</link>
      <description>The first episode in our new series with historian Robert Saunders on pivotal general elections is about the Tory disaster and Liberal triumph of 1906. David and Robert explore the reasons behind the worst result in modern Conservative party history – until now? How did the Liberals achieve their landslide? What made ‘Big Loaf, Little Loaf’ a winning election slogan? And who was Henry Campbell-Bannerman, the great forgotten prime minister?
For our next bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses too: www.ppfideas.com.
Coming up: the Labour landslide of 1945
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2024 05:00:31 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>UK General Elections: 1906</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>6</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>78</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/43a4c926-a203-11ef-8350-6fa206ed275f/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;The first episode in our new series with historian Robert Saunders on pivotal general elections is about the Tory disaster and Liberal triumph of 1906.&amp;nbsp;David and Robert explore the reasons behind the worst result in modern Conservative party history – until now?&amp;nbsp;How did the Liberals achieve their landslide?&amp;nbsp;What made ‘Big Loaf, Little Loaf’ a winning election slogan?&amp;nbsp;And who was Henry Campbell-Bannerman, the great forgotten prime minister?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;For our next bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses too:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming up: the Labour landslide of 1945&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The first episode in our new series with historian Robert Saunders on pivotal general elections is about the Tory disaster and Liberal triumph of 1906. David and Robert explore the reasons behind the worst result in modern Conservative party history – until now? How did the Liberals achieve their landslide? What made ‘Big Loaf, Little Loaf’ a winning election slogan? And who was Henry Campbell-Bannerman, the great forgotten prime minister?
For our next bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses too: www.ppfideas.com.
Coming up: the Labour landslide of 1945
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The first episode in our new series with historian Robert Saunders on pivotal general elections is about the Tory disaster and Liberal triumph of 1906. David and Robert explore the reasons behind the worst result in modern Conservative party history – until now? How did the Liberals achieve their landslide? What made ‘Big Loaf, Little Loaf’ a winning election slogan? And who was Henry Campbell-Bannerman, the great forgotten prime minister?</p><br><p>For our next bonus episode on the epochal election of 1924 sign up now to PPF+ and you’ll get ad-free listening plus all past, present and future bonuses too: <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a>.</p><br><p>Coming up: the Labour landslide of 1945</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3375</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6675b4c9d93b3d0012cc0a11]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9892749796.mp3?updated=1731679213" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: The Handmaid’s Tale</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66719a1baaaf802da845126a</link>
      <description>For the final episode in the current series, David discusses Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale (1985), her unforgettable dystopian vision of a future American patriarchy.  Where is Gilead?  When is Gilead?  How did it happen?  How can it be stopped?  From puritanism and slavery to Iran and Romania, from demography and racism to Playboy and Scrabble, this novel takes the familiar and the known and makes them hauntingly and terrifyingly new.
Coming next: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections, starting with the game-changing election of 1906.
Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the Newsletter link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 05:00:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: The Handmaid’s Tale</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>77</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/43ff878a-a203-11ef-8350-affe20da6191/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For the final episode in the current series, David discusses Margaret Atwood’s The&amp;nbsp;Handmaid’s&amp;nbsp;Tale&amp;nbsp;(1985), her unforgettable dystopian vision of a future American patriarchy.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Where is Gilead?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;When is Gilead?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;How did it happen?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;How can it be stopped?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;From puritanism and slavery to Iran and Romania, from demography and racism to Playboy and Scrabble, this novel takes the familiar and the known and makes them hauntingly and terrifyingly new.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming next: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections, starting with the game-changing election of 1906.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the Newsletter link in our Link Tree:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://linktr.ee/ppfideas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the final episode in the current series, David discusses Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale (1985), her unforgettable dystopian vision of a future American patriarchy.  Where is Gilead?  When is Gilead?  How did it happen?  How can it be stopped?  From puritanism and slavery to Iran and Romania, from demography and racism to Playboy and Scrabble, this novel takes the familiar and the known and makes them hauntingly and terrifyingly new.
Coming next: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections, starting with the game-changing election of 1906.
Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the Newsletter link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the final episode in the current series, David discusses Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale (1985), her unforgettable dystopian vision of a future American patriarchy.  Where is Gilead?  When is Gilead?  How did it happen?  How can it be stopped?  From puritanism and slavery to Iran and Romania, from demography and racism to Playboy and Scrabble, this novel takes the familiar and the known and makes them hauntingly and terrifyingly new.</p><br><p>Coming next: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections, starting with the game-changing election of 1906.</p><br><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the Newsletter link in our Link Tree: <a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas">https://linktr.ee/ppfideas</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3354</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66719a1baaaf802da845126a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3819855658.mp3?updated=1731679144" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: Midnight’s Children</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/666973133484e000123fbaa2</link>
      <description>In the penultimate episode of the current part of our Fictions series, David explores Salman Rushdie’s 1981 masterpiece Midnight’s Children, the great novel about the life and death of Indian democracy.  How can one boy stand in for the whole of India?  How can a nation as diverse as India ever have a single politics?  And how is a jar of pickle the answer to these questions?  Plus, how does Rushdie’s story read today, in the age of Modi?
Next time: Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale
Coming next week on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections
Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:00:08 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: Midnight’s Children</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>76</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/445b476e-a203-11ef-8350-ef634d3bdd1d/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In the penultimate episode of the current part of our Fictions series, David explores Salman Rushdie’s 1981 masterpiece Midnight’s Children, the great novel about the life and death of Indian democracy.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;How can one boy stand in for the whole of India?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;How can a nation as diverse as India ever have a single politics?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;And how is a jar of pickle the answer to these questions?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Plus, how does Rushdie’s story read today, in the age of Modi?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming next week on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the penultimate episode of the current part of our Fictions series, David explores Salman Rushdie’s 1981 masterpiece Midnight’s Children, the great novel about the life and death of Indian democracy.  How can one boy stand in for the whole of India?  How can a nation as diverse as India ever have a single politics?  And how is a jar of pickle the answer to these questions?  Plus, how does Rushdie’s story read today, in the age of Modi?
Next time: Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale
Coming next week on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections
Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the penultimate episode of the current part of our Fictions series, David explores Salman Rushdie’s 1981 masterpiece Midnight’s Children, the great novel about the life and death of Indian democracy.  How can one boy stand in for the whole of India?  How can a nation as diverse as India ever have a single politics?  And how is a jar of pickle the answer to these questions?  Plus, how does Rushdie’s story read today, in the age of Modi?</p><br><p>Next time: Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale</p><br><p>Coming next week on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections</p><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3395</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[666973133484e000123fbaa2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7450570002.mp3?updated=1731679153" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: Atlas Shrugged</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6669a2b12868cb0011093338</link>
      <description>In this episode David discusses Ayn Rand’s insanely long and insanely influential Atlas Shrugged (1957), the bible of free-market entrepreneurialism and source book to this day for vicious anti-socialist polemics.  Why is this novel so adored by Silicon Valley tech titans?  How can something so bad have so much lasting power?  And what did Rand have against her arch-villain Robert Oppenheimer?
Next time: Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children
Coming soon on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections
Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:00:23 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: Atlas Shrugged</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>75</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/44b4253c-a203-11ef-8350-eb4765b8d73b/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In this episode David discusses Ayn Rand’s insanely long and insanely influential&amp;nbsp;Atlas&amp;nbsp;Shrugged&amp;nbsp;(1957), the bible of free-market entrepreneurialism and source book to this day for vicious anti-socialist polemics.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Why is this novel so adored by Silicon Valley tech titans?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;How can something so bad have so much lasting power?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;And what did Rand have against her arch-villain Robert Oppenheimer?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming soon on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode David discusses Ayn Rand’s insanely long and insanely influential Atlas Shrugged (1957), the bible of free-market entrepreneurialism and source book to this day for vicious anti-socialist polemics.  Why is this novel so adored by Silicon Valley tech titans?  How can something so bad have so much lasting power?  And what did Rand have against her arch-villain Robert Oppenheimer?
Next time: Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children
Coming soon on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections
Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode David discusses Ayn Rand’s insanely long and insanely influential Atlas Shrugged (1957), the bible of free-market entrepreneurialism and source book to this day for vicious anti-socialist polemics.  Why is this novel so adored by Silicon Valley tech titans?  How can something so bad have so much lasting power?  And what did Rand have against her arch-villain Robert Oppenheimer?</p><br><p>Next time: Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children</p><br><p>Coming soon on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections</p><br><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3675</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6669a2b12868cb0011093338]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4471373606.mp3?updated=1731679187" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: Mother Courage and Her Children</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66620e7ff688a10012544be8</link>
      <description>Bertolt Brecht’s classic anti-war play was written in 1939 at the start of one terrible European war but set in the time of another: the Thirty Years’ War of the 17th century. How did Brecht think a three-hundred-year gap could help us to understand our own capacity for violence and cruelty? Why did he make Mother Courage such an unlovable character? Why do we feel for her plight anyway? And what can we do about it?
Next time: Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged
Coming next week on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections
Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2024 05:00:50 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: Mother Courage and Her Children</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>74</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/450eafd4-a203-11ef-8350-2bf70a39f69e/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Bertolt Brecht’s classic anti-war play was written in 1939 at the start of one terrible European war but set in the time of another: the Thirty Years’ War of the 17th&amp;nbsp;century.&amp;nbsp;How did Brecht think a three-hundred-year gap could help us to understand our own capacity for violence and cruelty?&amp;nbsp;Why did he make Mother Courage such an unlovable character?&amp;nbsp;Why do we feel for her plight anyway?&amp;nbsp;And what can we do about it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming next week on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Bertolt Brecht’s classic anti-war play was written in 1939 at the start of one terrible European war but set in the time of another: the Thirty Years’ War of the 17th century. How did Brecht think a three-hundred-year gap could help us to understand our own capacity for violence and cruelty? Why did he make Mother Courage such an unlovable character? Why do we feel for her plight anyway? And what can we do about it?
Next time: Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged
Coming next week on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections
Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Bertolt Brecht’s classic anti-war play was written in 1939 at the start of one terrible European war but set in the time of another: the Thirty Years’ War of the 17th century. How did Brecht think a three-hundred-year gap could help us to understand our own capacity for violence and cruelty? Why did he make Mother Courage such an unlovable character? Why do we feel for her plight anyway? And what can we do about it?</p><br><p>Next time: Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged</p><br><p>Coming next week on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections</p><br><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3385</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66620e7ff688a10012544be8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3096159712.mp3?updated=1731679193" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: The Time Machine</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/665edbe1d7478f0012ea67f0</link>
      <description>H. G. Wells’ The Time Machine (1895) isn’t just a book about time travel. It’s also full of late-19th century fear and paranoia about what evolution and progress might do to human beings in the long run. Why will the class struggle turn into savagery and human sacrifice? Who will end up on top? And how will the world ultimately end?
Next time: Bertolt Brecht’s Mother Courage and Her Children
Coming soon on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections
To receive our fortnightly newsletter just follow the link here https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
 
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 05:00:43 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: The Time Machine</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>73</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/457424c2-a203-11ef-8350-1bcfadb3e0fc/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;H. G. Wells’ The Time Machine (1895) isn’t just a book about time travel.&amp;nbsp;It’s also full of late-19th&amp;nbsp;century fear and paranoia about what evolution and progress might do to human beings in the long run.&amp;nbsp;Why will the class struggle turn into savagery and human sacrifice?&amp;nbsp;Who will end up on top?&amp;nbsp;And how will the world ultimately end?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Bertolt Brecht’s Mother Courage and Her Children&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming soon on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To receive our fortnightly newsletter just follow the link here&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://linktr.ee/ppfideas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus&amp;nbsp;episodes&amp;nbsp;every month and ad-free listening&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>H. G. Wells’ The Time Machine (1895) isn’t just a book about time travel. It’s also full of late-19th century fear and paranoia about what evolution and progress might do to human beings in the long run. Why will the class struggle turn into savagery and human sacrifice? Who will end up on top? And how will the world ultimately end?
Next time: Bertolt Brecht’s Mother Courage and Her Children
Coming soon on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections
To receive our fortnightly newsletter just follow the link here https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
 
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>H. G. Wells’ The Time Machine (1895) isn’t just a book about time travel. It’s also full of late-19th century fear and paranoia about what evolution and progress might do to human beings in the long run. Why will the class struggle turn into savagery and human sacrifice? Who will end up on top? And how will the world ultimately end?</p><br><p>Next time: Bertolt Brecht’s Mother Courage and Her Children</p><br><p>Coming soon on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections</p><br><p>To receive our fortnightly newsletter just follow the link here <a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas">https://linktr.ee/ppfideas</a></p><br><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p> </p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3505</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[665edbe1d7478f0012ea67f0]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1780632648.mp3?updated=1731679191" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66589100068f690012a34b9c</link>
      <description>Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (1886) is a story that it’s easy to know without really knowing it at all. This week’s episode explores all the ways that Robert Louis Stevenson’s tale confounds our expectations about good and evil. What does Dr Jekyll really want? What are all the men in the book trying to hide? And what has any of this got to do with Q-Anon and Hillary Clinton?
Next time: H.G. Wells’s The Time Machine.
Coming next month on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections
Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2024 05:00:34 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>72</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/45f7a658-a203-11ef-8350-8f684dc77b66/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (1886) is a story that it’s easy to know without really knowing it at all.&amp;nbsp;This week’s&amp;nbsp;episode&amp;nbsp;explores all the ways that Robert Louis Stevenson’s tale confounds our expectations about good and evil.&amp;nbsp;What does Dr Jekyll really want?&amp;nbsp;What are all the men in the book trying to hide?&amp;nbsp;And what has any of this got to do with Q-Anon and Hillary Clinton?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: H.G. Wells’s The Time Machine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming next month on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus&amp;nbsp;episodes&amp;nbsp;every month and ad-free listening&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (1886) is a story that it’s easy to know without really knowing it at all. This week’s episode explores all the ways that Robert Louis Stevenson’s tale confounds our expectations about good and evil. What does Dr Jekyll really want? What are all the men in the book trying to hide? And what has any of this got to do with Q-Anon and Hillary Clinton?
Next time: H.G. Wells’s The Time Machine.
Coming next month on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections
Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (1886) is a story that it’s easy to know without really knowing it at all. This week’s episode explores all the ways that Robert Louis Stevenson’s tale confounds our expectations about good and evil. What does Dr Jekyll really want? What are all the men in the book trying to hide? And what has any of this got to do with Q-Anon and Hillary Clinton?</p><br><p>Next time: H.G. Wells’s The Time Machine.</p><br><p>Coming next month on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections</p><br><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3238</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66589100068f690012a34b9c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3969062230.mp3?updated=1731679166" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: Phineas Redux</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66561a942287560012a518fc</link>
      <description>This week's great political novel is Anthony Trollope’s Phineas Redux (1874), his lightly and luridly fictionalised account of parliamentary polarisation in the age of Gladstone and Disraeli. A tale of political and personal melodrama, it explores what happens when political parties steal each other’s clothes and politicians find themselves hung out to dry by their colleagues. A story of integrity and hypocrisy and how hard it is to tell them apart.
Next time: Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde.
Coming next month on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections
Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 05:00:41 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: Phineas Redux</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>71</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/465567de-a203-11ef-8350-dfa9e3ed1160/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week's great political novel is Anthony Trollope’s Phineas Redux (1874), his lightly and luridly fictionalised account of parliamentary polarisation in the age of Gladstone and Disraeli.&amp;nbsp;A tale of political and personal melodrama, it explores what happens when political parties steal each other’s clothes and politicians find themselves hung out to dry by their colleagues.&amp;nbsp;A story of integrity and hypocrisy and how hard it is to tell them apart.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming next month on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week's great political novel is Anthony Trollope’s Phineas Redux (1874), his lightly and luridly fictionalised account of parliamentary polarisation in the age of Gladstone and Disraeli. A tale of political and personal melodrama, it explores what happens when political parties steal each other’s clothes and politicians find themselves hung out to dry by their colleagues. A story of integrity and hypocrisy and how hard it is to tell them apart.
Next time: Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde.
Coming next month on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections
Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week's great political novel is Anthony Trollope’s Phineas Redux (1874), his lightly and luridly fictionalised account of parliamentary polarisation in the age of Gladstone and Disraeli. A tale of political and personal melodrama, it explores what happens when political parties steal each other’s clothes and politicians find themselves hung out to dry by their colleagues. A story of integrity and hypocrisy and how hard it is to tell them apart.</p><br><p>Next time: Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde.</p><br><p>Coming next month on PPF: The Ideas Behind UK General Elections</p><br><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get 2 bonus episodes every month and ad-free listening <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3383</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66561a942287560012a518fc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1215776731.mp3?updated=1731679200" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: Middlemarch (part 2)</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/665083d31a4a3f00117a3e35</link>
      <description>This second episode about George Eliot’s masterpiece explores questions of politics and religion, reputation and deception, truth and public opinion. What is the relationship between personal power and faith in a higher power? Is it ever possible to escape from the gossip of your friends once it turns against you? Who can rescue the ambitious when their ambitions are their undoing?
To get two bonus episodes from our recent Bad Ideas series – on Email and VAR – sign up now to PPF+ and enjoy ad-free listening as well www.ppfideas.com
Next time: Trollope’s Phineas Redux, the great novel of parliamentary ups and downs.
Coming soon on the Great Political Fictions: Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, The Time Machine, Mother Courage and her Children, Atlas Shrugged, Midnight’s Children, The Handmaid’s Tale, and much more.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2024 05:00:40 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: Middlemarch (part 2)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>70</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/46af814c-a203-11ef-8350-47364dc8354d/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This second episode about George Eliot’s masterpiece explores questions of politics and religion, reputation and deception, truth and public opinion.&amp;nbsp;What is the relationship between personal power and faith in a higher power?&amp;nbsp;Is it ever possible to escape from the gossip of your friends once it turns against you?&amp;nbsp;Who can rescue the ambitious when their ambitions are their undoing?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To get two bonus episodes from our recent Bad Ideas series – on Email and VAR – sign up now to PPF+ and enjoy ad-free listening as well&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Trollope’s Phineas Redux, the great novel of parliamentary ups and downs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming soon on the Great Political Fictions: Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, The Time Machine, Mother Courage and her Children, Atlas Shrugged, Midnight’s Children, The Handmaid’s Tale, and much more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This second episode about George Eliot’s masterpiece explores questions of politics and religion, reputation and deception, truth and public opinion. What is the relationship between personal power and faith in a higher power? Is it ever possible to escape from the gossip of your friends once it turns against you? Who can rescue the ambitious when their ambitions are their undoing?
To get two bonus episodes from our recent Bad Ideas series – on Email and VAR – sign up now to PPF+ and enjoy ad-free listening as well www.ppfideas.com
Next time: Trollope’s Phineas Redux, the great novel of parliamentary ups and downs.
Coming soon on the Great Political Fictions: Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, The Time Machine, Mother Courage and her Children, Atlas Shrugged, Midnight’s Children, The Handmaid’s Tale, and much more.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This second episode about George Eliot’s masterpiece explores questions of politics and religion, reputation and deception, truth and public opinion. What is the relationship between personal power and faith in a higher power? Is it ever possible to escape from the gossip of your friends once it turns against you? Who can rescue the ambitious when their ambitions are their undoing?</p><br><p>To get two bonus episodes from our recent Bad Ideas series – on Email and VAR – sign up now to PPF+ and enjoy ad-free listening as well <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><p>Next time: Trollope’s Phineas Redux, the great novel of parliamentary ups and downs.</p><br><p>Coming soon on the Great Political Fictions: Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, The Time Machine, Mother Courage and her Children, Atlas Shrugged, Midnight’s Children, The Handmaid’s Tale, and much more.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3182</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[665083d31a4a3f00117a3e35]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1354521427.mp3?updated=1731679122" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: Middlemarch (part 1)</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/664ca6262830620012e20c28</link>
      <description>Our series on the great political novels and plays resumes with George Eliot’s Middlemarch (1872), which has so much going on that it needs two episodes to unpack it. In this episode David discusses the significance of the book being set in 1829-32 and the reasons why Nietzsche was so wrong to characterise it as a moralistic tale. Plus he explains why a book about personal relationships is also a deeply political novel.
To get two bonus episodes from our recent Bad Ideas series – on Email and VAR – sign up now to PPF+ and enjoy ad-free listening as well www.ppfideas.com
Next time: Middlemarch (part 2) on marriage, hypocrisy, guilt and redemption.
Coming soon on the Great Political Fictions: Phineas Redux, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, The Time Machine, Mother Courage and her Children, and much more.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2024 05:00:18 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: Middlemarch (part 1)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>69</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4709dcbe-a203-11ef-8350-f70bcf1a12fc/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Our series on the great political novels and plays resumes with George Eliot’s Middlemarch (1872), which has so much going on that it needs two episodes to unpack it.&amp;nbsp;In this episode David discusses the significance of the book being set in 1829-32 and the reasons why Nietzsche was so wrong to characterise it as a moralistic tale.&amp;nbsp;Plus he explains why a book about personal relationships is also a deeply political novel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To get two bonus episodes from our recent Bad Ideas series – on Email and VAR – sign up now to PPF+ and enjoy ad-free listening as well&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: Middlemarch (part 2) on marriage, hypocrisy, guilt and redemption.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming soon on the Great Political Fictions: Phineas Redux, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, The Time Machine, Mother Courage and her Children, and much more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Our series on the great political novels and plays resumes with George Eliot’s Middlemarch (1872), which has so much going on that it needs two episodes to unpack it. In this episode David discusses the significance of the book being set in 1829-32 and the reasons why Nietzsche was so wrong to characterise it as a moralistic tale. Plus he explains why a book about personal relationships is also a deeply political novel.
To get two bonus episodes from our recent Bad Ideas series – on Email and VAR – sign up now to PPF+ and enjoy ad-free listening as well www.ppfideas.com
Next time: Middlemarch (part 2) on marriage, hypocrisy, guilt and redemption.
Coming soon on the Great Political Fictions: Phineas Redux, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, The Time Machine, Mother Courage and her Children, and much more.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our series on the great political novels and plays resumes with George Eliot’s Middlemarch (1872), which has so much going on that it needs two episodes to unpack it. In this episode David discusses the significance of the book being set in 1829-32 and the reasons why Nietzsche was so wrong to characterise it as a moralistic tale. Plus he explains why a book about personal relationships is also a deeply political novel.</p><br><p>To get two bonus episodes from our recent Bad Ideas series – on Email and VAR – sign up now to PPF+ and enjoy ad-free listening as well <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>Next time: Middlemarch (part 2) on marriage, hypocrisy, guilt and redemption.</p><br><p>Coming soon on the Great Political Fictions: Phineas Redux, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, The Time Machine, Mother Courage and her Children, and much more.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3273</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[664ca6262830620012e20c28]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4645999713.mp3?updated=1731679160" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Mesmerism</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6647694556d2d80012f87d2d</link>
      <description>For our last episode in this series David is joined by Helen Lewis to discuss Mesmerism – aka animal magnetism – an eighteenth-century method of hypnosis for which great medical benefits were claimed. Was its originator, Franz Mesmer, a charlatan or a healer? Was his movement science or religion or something in between? And what can it tell us about twenty-first century phenomena from online social contagion to hypnotherapy? 
To get two bonus Bad Ideas episodes – on Email and VAR – sign up now to PPF+, where you will also get all our past and future bonus episodes plus ad-free listening www.ppfieas.com 
Coming next: The Great Political Fictions resumes with Middlemarch, the greatest of them all.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2024 05:00:40 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The History of Bad Ideas: Mesmerism</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>68</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/47635d98-a203-11ef-8350-df44f87fb4af/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For our last&amp;nbsp;episode&amp;nbsp;in this series David is joined by Helen Lewis to discuss Mesmerism – aka animal magnetism – an eighteenth-century method of hypnosis for which great medical benefits were claimed.&amp;nbsp;Was its originator, Franz Mesmer, a charlatan or a healer?&amp;nbsp;Was his movement science or religion or something in between?&amp;nbsp;And what can it tell us about twenty-first century phenomena from online social contagion to hypnotherapy?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To get two bonus Bad Ideas&amp;nbsp;episodes&amp;nbsp;– on Email and VAR – sign up now to PPF+, where you will also get all our past and future bonus&amp;nbsp;episodes&amp;nbsp;plus ad-free listening&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfieas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfieas.com&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming next: The Great Political Fictions resumes with&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Middlemarch&lt;/em&gt;, the greatest of them all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For our last episode in this series David is joined by Helen Lewis to discuss Mesmerism – aka animal magnetism – an eighteenth-century method of hypnosis for which great medical benefits were claimed. Was its originator, Franz Mesmer, a charlatan or a healer? Was his movement science or religion or something in between? And what can it tell us about twenty-first century phenomena from online social contagion to hypnotherapy? 
To get two bonus Bad Ideas episodes – on Email and VAR – sign up now to PPF+, where you will also get all our past and future bonus episodes plus ad-free listening www.ppfieas.com 
Coming next: The Great Political Fictions resumes with Middlemarch, the greatest of them all.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For our last episode in this series David is joined by Helen Lewis to discuss Mesmerism – aka animal magnetism – an eighteenth-century method of hypnosis for which great medical benefits were claimed. Was its originator, Franz Mesmer, a charlatan or a healer? Was his movement science or religion or something in between? And what can it tell us about twenty-first century phenomena from online social contagion to hypnotherapy? </p><br><p>To get two bonus Bad Ideas episodes – on Email and VAR – sign up now to PPF+, where you will also get all our past and future bonus episodes plus ad-free listening <a href="http://www.ppfieas.com/">www.ppfieas.com</a> </p><br><p>Coming next: The Great Political Fictions resumes with <em>Middlemarch</em>, the greatest of them all.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3352</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6647694556d2d80012f87d2d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7889814709.mp3?updated=1731679137" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: The Death of the Author</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/664485834f615400129cad39</link>
      <description>For our penultimate episode in this series David talks to Kathleen Stock about Roland Barthes’s idea of the Death of the Author (1967). Once very fashionable, the notion that readers not writers are the arbiters of what a text means has had a long and sometimes painful afterlife. As well as exploring its curious appeal and its persistent blindspots, Kathleen discusses her personal experience of how it can go wrong.
Two bonus Bad Ideas episodes for PPF+ subscribers – on Email and VAR – will be available very soon. Sign up now and get ad-free listening too! www.ppfideas.com
Coming Next: Helen Lewis on Mesmerism
Coming Soon: The Great Political Fictions Part 2, starting with Middlemarch
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 05:00:22 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The History of Bad Ideas: The Death of the Author</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>67</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/47bc844a-a203-11ef-8350-4b76d683e617/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For our penultimate episode in this series David talks to Kathleen Stock about Roland Barthes’s idea of the Death of the Author (1967).&amp;nbsp;Once very fashionable, the notion that readers not writers are the arbiters of what a text means has had a long and sometimes painful afterlife.&amp;nbsp;As well as exploring its curious appeal and its persistent blindspots, Kathleen discusses her personal experience of how it can go wrong.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Two bonus Bad Ideas episodes for PPF+ subscribers – on Email and VAR – will be available very soon.&amp;nbsp;Sign up now and get ad-free listening too!&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming Next: Helen Lewis on Mesmerism&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming Soon: The Great Political Fictions Part 2, starting with&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Middlemarch&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For our penultimate episode in this series David talks to Kathleen Stock about Roland Barthes’s idea of the Death of the Author (1967). Once very fashionable, the notion that readers not writers are the arbiters of what a text means has had a long and sometimes painful afterlife. As well as exploring its curious appeal and its persistent blindspots, Kathleen discusses her personal experience of how it can go wrong.
Two bonus Bad Ideas episodes for PPF+ subscribers – on Email and VAR – will be available very soon. Sign up now and get ad-free listening too! www.ppfideas.com
Coming Next: Helen Lewis on Mesmerism
Coming Soon: The Great Political Fictions Part 2, starting with Middlemarch
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For our penultimate episode in this series David talks to Kathleen Stock about Roland Barthes’s idea of the Death of the Author (1967). Once very fashionable, the notion that readers not writers are the arbiters of what a text means has had a long and sometimes painful afterlife. As well as exploring its curious appeal and its persistent blindspots, Kathleen discusses her personal experience of how it can go wrong.</p><br><p>Two bonus Bad Ideas episodes for PPF+ subscribers – on Email and VAR – will be available very soon. Sign up now and get ad-free listening too! <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>Coming Next: Helen Lewis on Mesmerism</p><br><p>Coming Soon: The Great Political Fictions Part 2, starting with <em>Middlemarch</em></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3068</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[664485834f615400129cad39]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7667232642.mp3?updated=1731679161" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Anti-Suffragettes</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/663ce6cf1f998c0012ff696f</link>
      <description>In this episode of our series on the lingering hold of bad ideas David talks to the writer and broadcaster Helen Lewis about the arguments made at the turn of the last century against giving the vote to women. Why were so many women against female enfranchisement? What did attitudes to women in politics reveal about the failings of men? And where can the echoes of these arguments still be heard today?
Helen Lewis’s Difficult Women: A History of Feminism in 11 Fights is available wherever you get your books https://bit.ly/3wp8DNX 
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and bonus episodes to accompany every series. Coming soon: two bonus bad ideas just for PPF+ subscribers www.ppfideas.com 
Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Kathleen Stock discusses The Death of the Author.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2024 05:00:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The History of Bad Ideas: Anti-Suffragettes</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>66</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4816867a-a203-11ef-8350-4b6a98be4588/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In this episode of our series on the lingering hold of bad ideas David talks to the writer and broadcaster Helen Lewis about the arguments made at the turn of the last century against giving the vote to women.&amp;nbsp;Why were so many women against female enfranchisement?&amp;nbsp;What did attitudes to women in politics reveal about the failings of men?&amp;nbsp;And where can the echoes of these arguments still be heard today?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Helen Lewis’s Difficult Women: A History of Feminism in 11 Fights is available wherever you get your books&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3wp8DNX" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://bit.ly/3wp8DNX&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and bonus episodes to accompany every series. Coming soon: two bonus bad ideas just for PPF+ subscribers&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;u&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Kathleen Stock discusses The Death of the Author.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of our series on the lingering hold of bad ideas David talks to the writer and broadcaster Helen Lewis about the arguments made at the turn of the last century against giving the vote to women. Why were so many women against female enfranchisement? What did attitudes to women in politics reveal about the failings of men? And where can the echoes of these arguments still be heard today?
Helen Lewis’s Difficult Women: A History of Feminism in 11 Fights is available wherever you get your books https://bit.ly/3wp8DNX 
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and bonus episodes to accompany every series. Coming soon: two bonus bad ideas just for PPF+ subscribers www.ppfideas.com 
Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Kathleen Stock discusses The Death of the Author.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of our series on the lingering hold of bad ideas David talks to the writer and broadcaster Helen Lewis about the arguments made at the turn of the last century against giving the vote to women. Why were so many women against female enfranchisement? What did attitudes to women in politics reveal about the failings of men? And where can the echoes of these arguments still be heard today?</p><br><p>Helen Lewis’s Difficult Women: A History of Feminism in 11 Fights is available wherever you get your books <a href="https://bit.ly/3wp8DNX">https://bit.ly/3wp8DNX</a> </p><br><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and bonus episodes to accompany every series. Coming soon: two bonus bad ideas just for PPF+ subscribers <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/"><u>www.ppfideas.com</u></a> </p><br><p>Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Kathleen Stock discusses The Death of the Author.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3401</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[663ce6cf1f998c0012ff696f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1137436306.mp3?updated=1731679164" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Taxonomy</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/663b4689fe813600125390c2</link>
      <description>For the latest episode in our series about the hold of bad ideas, we welcome back the geneticist Adam Rutherford to talk about Linnaean taxonomy, a seemingly innocuous scheme of classification that has had deeply pernicious consequences. From scientific racism to social stratification to search engine optimisation, taxonomy gets everywhere. Can we escape its grip?
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and bonus episodes to accompany every series. Coming soon: two bonus bad ideas just for PPF+ subscribers www.ppfideas.com 
Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Helen Lewis on women against the enfranchisement of women.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 05:00:26 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The History of Bad Ideas: Taxonomy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>65</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/487569d8-a203-11ef-8350-5790c5fd8369/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For the latest episode in our series about the hold of bad ideas, we welcome back the geneticist Adam Rutherford to talk about Linnaean taxonomy, a seemingly innocuous scheme of classification that has had deeply pernicious consequences.&amp;nbsp;From scientific racism to social stratification to search engine optimisation, taxonomy gets everywhere.&amp;nbsp;Can we escape its grip?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and bonus episodes to accompany every series. Coming soon: two bonus bad ideas just for PPF+ subscribers&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;u&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Helen Lewis on women against the enfranchisement of women.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the latest episode in our series about the hold of bad ideas, we welcome back the geneticist Adam Rutherford to talk about Linnaean taxonomy, a seemingly innocuous scheme of classification that has had deeply pernicious consequences. From scientific racism to social stratification to search engine optimisation, taxonomy gets everywhere. Can we escape its grip?
Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and bonus episodes to accompany every series. Coming soon: two bonus bad ideas just for PPF+ subscribers www.ppfideas.com 
Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Helen Lewis on women against the enfranchisement of women.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the latest episode in our series about the hold of bad ideas, we welcome back the geneticist Adam Rutherford to talk about Linnaean taxonomy, a seemingly innocuous scheme of classification that has had deeply pernicious consequences. From scientific racism to social stratification to search engine optimisation, taxonomy gets everywhere. Can we escape its grip?</p><br><p>Sign up now to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and bonus episodes to accompany every series. Coming soon: two bonus bad ideas just for PPF+ subscribers <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/"><u>www.ppfideas.com</u></a> </p><p>Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Helen Lewis on women against the enfranchisement of women.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2960</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[663b4689fe813600125390c2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML5814429697.mp3?updated=1731679185" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Antisemitism</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6633c93b19f7830012715381</link>
      <description>Today’s bad idea is one with a very long history: David talks to the historian Christopher Clark about antisemitism and the reasons for its endless recurrence. What has made discrimination against the Jews different from other kinds of violent prejudice over the course of European history? How did the ‘Jewish Question’ become the battleground of German politics? Why do so many Christians have a love-hate relationship with Judaism? And where does the state of Israel fit into this story?
For ad-free listening and bonus episodes – including more bad ideas – subscribe to PPF+ www.ppfideas.com
Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Adam Rutherford on Taxonomy.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2024 05:00:19 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The History of Bad Ideas: Antisemitism</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>64</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/48cefd7c-a203-11ef-8350-4f3a5e751fe3/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Today’s bad idea is one with a very long history: David talks to the historian Christopher Clark about&amp;nbsp;antisemitism&amp;nbsp;and the reasons for its endless recurrence.&amp;nbsp;What has made discrimination against the Jews different from other kinds of violent prejudice over the course of European history?&amp;nbsp;How did the ‘Jewish&amp;nbsp;Question’ become the battleground of German politics?&amp;nbsp;Why do so many Christians have a love-hate relationship with Judaism?&amp;nbsp;And where does the state of Israel fit into this story?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;For ad-free listening and bonus episodes – including more bad ideas – subscribe to PPF+&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Adam Rutherford on Taxonomy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s bad idea is one with a very long history: David talks to the historian Christopher Clark about antisemitism and the reasons for its endless recurrence. What has made discrimination against the Jews different from other kinds of violent prejudice over the course of European history? How did the ‘Jewish Question’ become the battleground of German politics? Why do so many Christians have a love-hate relationship with Judaism? And where does the state of Israel fit into this story?
For ad-free listening and bonus episodes – including more bad ideas – subscribe to PPF+ www.ppfideas.com
Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Adam Rutherford on Taxonomy.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today’s bad idea is one with a very long history: David talks to the historian Christopher Clark about antisemitism and the reasons for its endless recurrence. What has made discrimination against the Jews different from other kinds of violent prejudice over the course of European history? How did the ‘Jewish Question’ become the battleground of German politics? Why do so many Christians have a love-hate relationship with Judaism? And where does the state of Israel fit into this story?</p><br><p>For ad-free listening and bonus episodes – including more bad ideas – subscribe to PPF+ <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Adam Rutherford on Taxonomy.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3139</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6633c93b19f7830012715381]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML5374960369.mp3?updated=1731679234" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Facebook Friends</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6630f7ae3a18a600122f1112</link>
      <description>In today’s episode about seemingly good ideas gone badly wrong David talks to the philosopher and journalist Kathleen Stock about Facebook Friends, something that was meant to make us happier and better connected but really didn’t. How did online friendship become so performative? Does its failings say more about Facebook and its business models or does it say more about us? And why are academics so susceptible to the madness of social media?
For ad-free listening and bonus episodes – including more bad ideas – subscribe to PPF+ www.ppfideas.com
Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: historian Christopher Clark on Antisemitism
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 05:00:57 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The History of Bad Ideas: Facebook Friends</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>63</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/49279482-a203-11ef-8350-bf2efc5d0cbe/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In today’s episode about seemingly good ideas gone badly wrong David talks to the philosopher and journalist Kathleen Stock about Facebook Friends, something that was meant to make us happier and better connected but really didn’t.&amp;nbsp;How did online friendship become so performative?&amp;nbsp;Does its failings say more about Facebook and its business models or does it say more about us?&amp;nbsp;And why are academics so susceptible to the madness of social media?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For ad-free listening and bonus episodes – including more bad ideas – subscribe to PPF+&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: historian Christopher Clark on Antisemitism&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode about seemingly good ideas gone badly wrong David talks to the philosopher and journalist Kathleen Stock about Facebook Friends, something that was meant to make us happier and better connected but really didn’t. How did online friendship become so performative? Does its failings say more about Facebook and its business models or does it say more about us? And why are academics so susceptible to the madness of social media?
For ad-free listening and bonus episodes – including more bad ideas – subscribe to PPF+ www.ppfideas.com
Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: historian Christopher Clark on Antisemitism
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode about seemingly good ideas gone badly wrong David talks to the philosopher and journalist Kathleen Stock about Facebook Friends, something that was meant to make us happier and better connected but really didn’t. How did online friendship become so performative? Does its failings say more about Facebook and its business models or does it say more about us? And why are academics so susceptible to the madness of social media?</p><p>For ad-free listening and bonus episodes – including more bad ideas – subscribe to PPF+ <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><p>Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: historian Christopher Clark on Antisemitism</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3154</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6630f7ae3a18a600122f1112]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4921755206.mp3?updated=1731679165" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: The Gold Standard</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/662bd878a1c8cf0012c7127a</link>
      <description>In the second episode in our series on bad ideas David talks to the political economist Helen Thompson about the gold standard, which was meant to anchor the world economy until it all fell apart a hundred years ago. Why does gold so often appear like a stable basis for money in an unstable world – and why not silver? What made the gold standard a source of instability instead?  How can money work if it has no material basis? And is quantitative easing a bad idea as well?
For ad-free listening and bonus episodes – including more bad ideas – subscribe to PPF+ www.ppfideas.com
Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Kathleen Stock on Facebook Friends
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:00:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The History of Bad Ideas: The Gold Standard</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>62</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/49b04264-a203-11ef-8350-b7d07037524e/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In the second&amp;nbsp;episode&amp;nbsp;in our series on bad ideas David talks to the political economist Helen Thompson about the gold standard, which was meant to anchor the world economy until it all fell apart a hundred years ago.&amp;nbsp;Why does gold so often appear like a stable basis for money in an unstable world – and why not silver?&amp;nbsp;What made the gold standard a source of instability instead?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;How can money work if it has no material basis?&amp;nbsp;And is quantitative easing a bad idea as well?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;For ad-free listening and bonus&amp;nbsp;episodes&amp;nbsp;– including more bad ideas – subscribe to PPF+&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Kathleen Stock on Facebook Friends&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the second episode in our series on bad ideas David talks to the political economist Helen Thompson about the gold standard, which was meant to anchor the world economy until it all fell apart a hundred years ago. Why does gold so often appear like a stable basis for money in an unstable world – and why not silver? What made the gold standard a source of instability instead?  How can money work if it has no material basis? And is quantitative easing a bad idea as well?
For ad-free listening and bonus episodes – including more bad ideas – subscribe to PPF+ www.ppfideas.com
Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Kathleen Stock on Facebook Friends
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the second episode in our series on bad ideas David talks to the political economist Helen Thompson about the gold standard, which was meant to anchor the world economy until it all fell apart a hundred years ago. Why does gold so often appear like a stable basis for money in an unstable world – and why not silver? What made the gold standard a source of instability instead?  How can money work if it has no material basis? And is quantitative easing a bad idea as well?</p><br><p>For ad-free listening and bonus episodes – including more bad ideas – subscribe to PPF+ <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Kathleen Stock on Facebook Friends</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2832</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[662bd878a1c8cf0012c7127a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML5546542886.mp3?updated=1731679157" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Bad Ideas: Eugenics</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6628cb246b51e80012d2596e</link>
      <description>For the first episode in our new series about the hold of bad ideas David talks to the geneticist and science broadcaster Adam Rutherford about eugenics: from its origins in the 19th century through its heyday in the 20th century to its continuing legacy today. Is eugenics bad science, bad morality, bad politics – or all three? What are the fears that keep drawing people back to trying to control the consequences of human reproduction? And is a new age of consumerist eugenics upon us?
For ad-free listening and bonus episodes – including more bad ideas – subscribe to PPF+ www.ppfideas.com
Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Helen Thompson on the Gold Standard
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:00:54 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The History of Bad Ideas: Eugenics</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>5</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>61</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4a09b0c4-a203-11ef-8350-7fe5f0ae6883/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For the first episode in our new series about the hold of bad ideas David talks to the geneticist and science broadcaster Adam Rutherford about eugenics: from its origins in the 19th&amp;nbsp;century through its heyday in the 20th&amp;nbsp;century to its continuing legacy today.&amp;nbsp;Is eugenics bad science, bad morality, bad politics – or all three?&amp;nbsp;What are the fears that keep drawing people back to trying to control the consequences of human reproduction?&amp;nbsp;And is a new age of consumerist eugenics upon us?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;For ad-free listening and bonus episodes – including more bad ideas – subscribe to PPF+&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Helen Thompson on the Gold Standard&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the first episode in our new series about the hold of bad ideas David talks to the geneticist and science broadcaster Adam Rutherford about eugenics: from its origins in the 19th century through its heyday in the 20th century to its continuing legacy today. Is eugenics bad science, bad morality, bad politics – or all three? What are the fears that keep drawing people back to trying to control the consequences of human reproduction? And is a new age of consumerist eugenics upon us?
For ad-free listening and bonus episodes – including more bad ideas – subscribe to PPF+ www.ppfideas.com
Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Helen Thompson on the Gold Standard
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the first episode in our new series about the hold of bad ideas David talks to the geneticist and science broadcaster Adam Rutherford about eugenics: from its origins in the 19th century through its heyday in the 20th century to its continuing legacy today. Is eugenics bad science, bad morality, bad politics – or all three? What are the fears that keep drawing people back to trying to control the consequences of human reproduction? And is a new age of consumerist eugenics upon us?</p><br><p>For ad-free listening and bonus episodes – including more bad ideas – subscribe to PPF+ <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>Next time on The History of Bad Ideas: Helen Thompson on the Gold Standard</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3474</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6628cb246b51e80012d2596e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML8266929646.mp3?updated=1731679190" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Freedom w/Lea Ypi: Liberation Movements</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6622499f655c770012d4fea2</link>
      <description>In our final episode David and Lea discuss liberation movements, from post-colonial liberation to women’s liberation, gay liberation and animal liberation. What, if anything, do these movements have in common? Is liberation about equality or is it about difference? And who needs liberating next – children?
You can hear our bonus episodes for this series by signing up to PPF+ www.ppfideas.com In the first bonus episode – available now – David and Lea answer listeners’ questions about AI, technology, online surveillance and brains-in-a-vat: what happens to freedom if we’re living in a computer simulation?
Coming next our brand new series: The History of Bad Ideas, beginning with Adam Rutherford on eugenics.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2024 05:00:53 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The History of Freedom w/Lea Ypi: Liberation Movements</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>60</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4a639f80-a203-11ef-8350-030e5af8358f/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In our final episode David and Lea discuss liberation movements, from post-colonial liberation to women’s liberation, gay liberation and animal liberation.&amp;nbsp;What, if anything, do these movements have in common?&amp;nbsp;Is liberation about equality or is it about difference?&amp;nbsp;And who needs liberating next – children?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can hear our bonus episodes for this series by signing up to PPF+&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;In the first bonus episode – available now – David and Lea answer listeners’ questions about AI, technology, online surveillance and brains-in-a-vat: what happens to freedom if we’re living in a computer simulation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming next our brand new series: The History of Bad Ideas, beginning with Adam Rutherford on eugenics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In our final episode David and Lea discuss liberation movements, from post-colonial liberation to women’s liberation, gay liberation and animal liberation. What, if anything, do these movements have in common? Is liberation about equality or is it about difference? And who needs liberating next – children?
You can hear our bonus episodes for this series by signing up to PPF+ www.ppfideas.com In the first bonus episode – available now – David and Lea answer listeners’ questions about AI, technology, online surveillance and brains-in-a-vat: what happens to freedom if we’re living in a computer simulation?
Coming next our brand new series: The History of Bad Ideas, beginning with Adam Rutherford on eugenics.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In our final episode David and Lea discuss liberation movements, from post-colonial liberation to women’s liberation, gay liberation and animal liberation. What, if anything, do these movements have in common? Is liberation about equality or is it about difference? And who needs liberating next – children?</p><br><p>You can hear our bonus episodes for this series by signing up to PPF+ <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a> In the first bonus episode – available now – David and Lea answer listeners’ questions about AI, technology, online surveillance and brains-in-a-vat: what happens to freedom if we’re living in a computer simulation?</p><br><p>Coming next our brand new series: The History of Bad Ideas, beginning with Adam Rutherford on eugenics.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3514</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6622499f655c770012d4fea2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML5832771760.mp3?updated=1731679049" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Freedom w/Lea Ypi: Existentialism and Psychoanalysis</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6622a06309a9320012c1cbc9</link>
      <description>In the penultimate episode in this series David and Lea discuss two twentieth-century philosophies of freedom and the human psyche. What can existentialism teach us about the nature of free choice under conditions of despair? Is there any escape from bad faith? And what can individuals – or even entire societies – learn about their freedom from being put on the couch?
Sign up to PPF+ to get two bonus episodes to accompany this and all future series along with ad-free listening: www.ppfideas.com
Coming next on the History of Freedom: Liberation Movements
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:00:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The History of Freedom w/Lea Ypi: Existentialism and Psychoanalysis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>59</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4ab79586-a203-11ef-8350-a72234f2b750/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In the penultimate episode in this series David and Lea discuss two twentieth-century philosophies of freedom and the human psyche.&amp;nbsp;What can&amp;nbsp;existentialism&amp;nbsp;teach us about the nature of free choice under conditions of despair?&amp;nbsp;Is there any escape from bad faith?&amp;nbsp;And what can individuals – or even entire societies – learn about their freedom from being put on the couch?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to PPF+ to get two bonus episodes to accompany this and all future series along with ad-free listening:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming next on the History of Freedom: Liberation Movements&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the penultimate episode in this series David and Lea discuss two twentieth-century philosophies of freedom and the human psyche. What can existentialism teach us about the nature of free choice under conditions of despair? Is there any escape from bad faith? And what can individuals – or even entire societies – learn about their freedom from being put on the couch?
Sign up to PPF+ to get two bonus episodes to accompany this and all future series along with ad-free listening: www.ppfideas.com
Coming next on the History of Freedom: Liberation Movements
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the penultimate episode in this series David and Lea discuss two twentieth-century philosophies of freedom and the human psyche. What can existentialism teach us about the nature of free choice under conditions of despair? Is there any escape from bad faith? And what can individuals – or even entire societies – learn about their freedom from being put on the couch?</p><br><p>Sign up to PPF+ to get two bonus episodes to accompany this and all future series along with ad-free listening: <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>Coming next on the History of Freedom: Liberation Movements</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3233</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6622a06309a9320012c1cbc9]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6183179440.mp3?updated=1731679127" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Freedom w/Lea Ypi: Anarchism and Nihilism</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6617dc18b9285e0016e2c969</link>
      <description>In our series about different ideas of freedom David and Lea have reached anarchism and nihilism. What is the positive vision of human freedom behind the anarchist rejection of the established order? What can nineteenth-century anarchists teach us about freedom in the twenty-first century? And if nihilists are against everything, what are they for?
Sign up to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and two bonus episodes a month – just go to ppfideas.com
Coming up next: David and Lea discuss existentialism and psychoanalysis.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2024 05:00:16 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The History of Freedom w/Lea Ypi: Anarchism and Nihilism</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>58</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4b0fe740-a203-11ef-8350-93d9db43e851/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In our series about different ideas of freedom&amp;nbsp;David&amp;nbsp;and Lea have reached anarchism and nihilism.&amp;nbsp;What is the positive vision of human freedom behind the anarchist rejection of the established order?&amp;nbsp;What can nineteenth-century anarchists teach us about freedom in the twenty-first century?&amp;nbsp;And if nihilists are against everything, what are they for?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and two bonus episodes a month – just go to&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming up next:&amp;nbsp;David&amp;nbsp;and Lea discuss existentialism and psychoanalysis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In our series about different ideas of freedom David and Lea have reached anarchism and nihilism. What is the positive vision of human freedom behind the anarchist rejection of the established order? What can nineteenth-century anarchists teach us about freedom in the twenty-first century? And if nihilists are against everything, what are they for?
Sign up to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and two bonus episodes a month – just go to ppfideas.com
Coming up next: David and Lea discuss existentialism and psychoanalysis.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In our series about different ideas of freedom David and Lea have reached anarchism and nihilism. What is the positive vision of human freedom behind the anarchist rejection of the established order? What can nineteenth-century anarchists teach us about freedom in the twenty-first century? And if nihilists are against everything, what are they for?</p><br><p>Sign up to PPF+ to get ad-free listening and two bonus episodes a month – just go to <a href="http://ppfideas.com/">ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>Coming up next: David and Lea discuss existentialism and psychoanalysis.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3164</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6617dc18b9285e0016e2c969]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1291584255.mp3?updated=1731679153" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Freedom w/Lea Ypi: What is the Free Market?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6616ab418d2af10016b769cb</link>
      <description>In the latest episode of our series about different ideas of freedom David and Lea explore what makes the free market free – and where it fails. How does buying and selling stuff advance human freedom? What does the free market free us from? And is it really possible to be free in a world dominated by credit and debt? 
Sign up now for PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com

Next on the History of Freedom: Anarchism and Nihilism
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 05:00:30 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The History of Freedom w/Lea Ypi: What is the Free Market?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>57</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4b6b4c02-a203-11ef-8350-03af09041c5f/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In the latest episode of our series about different ideas of freedom David and Lea explore what makes the free market free – and where it fails.&amp;nbsp;How does buying and selling stuff advance human freedom?&amp;nbsp;What does the free market free us from?&amp;nbsp;And is it really possible to be free in a world dominated by credit and debt?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now for PPF+ to get bonus&amp;nbsp;episodes&amp;nbsp;and ad-free listening&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next on the History of Freedom: Anarchism and Nihilism&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the latest episode of our series about different ideas of freedom David and Lea explore what makes the free market free – and where it fails. How does buying and selling stuff advance human freedom? What does the free market free us from? And is it really possible to be free in a world dominated by credit and debt? 
Sign up now for PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com

Next on the History of Freedom: Anarchism and Nihilism
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the latest episode of our series about different ideas of freedom David and Lea explore what makes the free market free – and where it fails. How does buying and selling stuff advance human freedom? What does the free market free us from? And is it really possible to be free in a world dominated by credit and debt? </p><br><p>Sign up now for PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p><br></p><p>Next on the History of Freedom: Anarchism and Nihilism</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3179</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6616ab418d2af10016b769cb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7658782334.mp3?updated=1731679185" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Freedom w/Lea Ypi: Kant, Enlightenment and Peace</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/660d8498088d5100152ec579</link>
      <description>In this episode in our series about ideas of freedom David and Lea explore Immanuel Kant’s vision of rational freedom and perpetual peace. Why was Kant so sure that human reason would produce enlightened progress? Was he right? What are the obstacles likely to derail the advance of peace, then and now? How well do his arguments about free speech and free expression hold up in the age of the internet?
Sign up now for PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
Coming up next on the History of Freedom: How Free is the Free Market?
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2024 05:00:13 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The History of Freedom w/Lea Ypi: Kant, Enlightenment and Peace</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>55</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4bc74142-a203-11ef-8350-8b3fc7be7d51/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In this&amp;nbsp;episode&amp;nbsp;in our series about ideas of freedom David and Lea explore Immanuel Kant’s vision of rational freedom and perpetual peace.&amp;nbsp;Why was Kant so sure that human reason would produce enlightened progress?&amp;nbsp;Was he right?&amp;nbsp;What are the obstacles likely to derail the advance of peace, then and now?&amp;nbsp;How well do his arguments about free speech and free expression hold up in the age of the internet?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now for PPF+ to get bonus&amp;nbsp;episodes&amp;nbsp;and ad-free listening&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming up next on the History of Freedom: How Free is the Free Market?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode in our series about ideas of freedom David and Lea explore Immanuel Kant’s vision of rational freedom and perpetual peace. Why was Kant so sure that human reason would produce enlightened progress? Was he right? What are the obstacles likely to derail the advance of peace, then and now? How well do his arguments about free speech and free expression hold up in the age of the internet?
Sign up now for PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
Coming up next on the History of Freedom: How Free is the Free Market?
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode in our series about ideas of freedom David and Lea explore Immanuel Kant’s vision of rational freedom and perpetual peace. Why was Kant so sure that human reason would produce enlightened progress? Was he right? What are the obstacles likely to derail the advance of peace, then and now? How well do his arguments about free speech and free expression hold up in the age of the internet?</p><br><p>Sign up now for PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>Coming up next on the History of Freedom: How Free is the Free Market?</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3387</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[660d8498088d5100152ec579]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4524246362.mp3?updated=1731679190" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Freedom w/ Lea Ypi: Machiavelli and Political Liberty</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/660d50ef9f822b00163d2cbc</link>
      <description>History of Freedom w/ Lea Ypi: Machiavelli and Political Liberty
For the third episode in our series about ideas of freedom David and Lea discuss Machiavelli, republicanism and what it means to live in a free state. What are the institutions that can protect people from domination and exploitation? How can political elites be held to account? Where are human beings most likely to find themselves at the mercy of others – and what can be done to help them escape?
Sign up now for PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
Coming up next on the History of Freedom: Kant, Enlightenment and Peace
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 05:00:19 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The History of Freedom w/ Lea Ypi: Machiavelli and Political Liberty</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>54</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4c2166e0-a203-11ef-8350-d7c94cbf3311/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;History of Freedom w/ Lea Ypi:&amp;nbsp;Machiavelli and Political Liberty&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the third&amp;nbsp;episode&amp;nbsp;in our series about ideas of freedom David and Lea discuss Machiavelli, republicanism and what it means to live in a free state.&amp;nbsp;What are the institutions that can protect people from domination and exploitation?&amp;nbsp;How can political elites be held to account?&amp;nbsp;Where are human beings most likely to find themselves at the mercy of others – and what can be done to help them escape?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now for PPF+ to get bonus&amp;nbsp;episodes&amp;nbsp;and ad-free listening&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming up next on the History of Freedom: Kant, Enlightenment and Peace&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>History of Freedom w/ Lea Ypi: Machiavelli and Political Liberty
For the third episode in our series about ideas of freedom David and Lea discuss Machiavelli, republicanism and what it means to live in a free state. What are the institutions that can protect people from domination and exploitation? How can political elites be held to account? Where are human beings most likely to find themselves at the mercy of others – and what can be done to help them escape?
Sign up now for PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening www.ppfideas.com
Coming up next on the History of Freedom: Kant, Enlightenment and Peace
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><br></p><p>History of Freedom w/ Lea Ypi: Machiavelli and Political Liberty</p><p>For the third episode in our series about ideas of freedom David and Lea discuss Machiavelli, republicanism and what it means to live in a free state. What are the institutions that can protect people from domination and exploitation? How can political elites be held to account? Where are human beings most likely to find themselves at the mercy of others – and what can be done to help them escape?</p><br><p>Sign up now for PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p>Coming up next on the History of Freedom: Kant, Enlightenment and Peace</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3135</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[660d50ef9f822b00163d2cbc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4724520343.mp3?updated=1731679146" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Freedom w/Lea Ypi: The Ancients - Socrates, Seneca &amp; Jesus</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6606abfb28320a0015b4d2e5</link>
      <description>In episode two of our new series David and Lea explore some ancient ideas of freedom and ask what they mean today. What can Socrates teach us about the nature of free inquiry and the pitfalls of democratic freedom? Is Stoicism a guide to emancipation from desire or an exercise in selfishness? And how did Christianity upend the notion of freedom by annexing it to ideas of salvation and love? A conversation about dissent, self-knowledge and faith.
Sign up now for PPF+ to get ad-free listening and bonus episodes to accompany this and all future series. Just follow the top link https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Coming next on the History of Freedom: Machiavelli, republicanism and what it means to live in a free state, then and now.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2024 05:00:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The History of Freedom w/Lea Ypi: The Ancients - Socrates, Seneca &amp; Jesus</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>53</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4c7e4c66-a203-11ef-8350-3780720f3832/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In episode two of our new series David and Lea explore some ancient ideas of freedom and ask what they mean today.&amp;nbsp;What can Socrates teach us about the nature of free inquiry and the pitfalls of democratic freedom?&amp;nbsp;Is Stoicism a guide to emancipation from desire or an exercise in selfishness?&amp;nbsp;And how did Christianity upend the notion of freedom by annexing it to ideas of salvation and love?&amp;nbsp;A conversation about dissent, self-knowledge and faith.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up now for PPF+ to get ad-free listening and bonus episodes to accompany this and all future series.&amp;nbsp;Just follow the top link&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://linktr.ee/ppfideas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming next on the History of Freedom: Machiavelli, republicanism and what it means to live in a free state, then and now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In episode two of our new series David and Lea explore some ancient ideas of freedom and ask what they mean today. What can Socrates teach us about the nature of free inquiry and the pitfalls of democratic freedom? Is Stoicism a guide to emancipation from desire or an exercise in selfishness? And how did Christianity upend the notion of freedom by annexing it to ideas of salvation and love? A conversation about dissent, self-knowledge and faith.
Sign up now for PPF+ to get ad-free listening and bonus episodes to accompany this and all future series. Just follow the top link https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Coming next on the History of Freedom: Machiavelli, republicanism and what it means to live in a free state, then and now.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In episode two of our new series David and Lea explore some ancient ideas of freedom and ask what they mean today. What can Socrates teach us about the nature of free inquiry and the pitfalls of democratic freedom? Is Stoicism a guide to emancipation from desire or an exercise in selfishness? And how did Christianity upend the notion of freedom by annexing it to ideas of salvation and love? A conversation about dissent, self-knowledge and faith.</p><br><p>Sign up now for PPF+ to get ad-free listening and bonus episodes to accompany this and all future series. Just follow the top link <a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas">https://linktr.ee/ppfideas</a></p><br><p>Coming next on the History of Freedom: Machiavelli, republicanism and what it means to live in a free state, then and now.</p><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3381</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6606abfb28320a0015b4d2e5]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3840053166.mp3?updated=1731679170" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The History of Freedom w/Lea Ypi: Why Does It Matter?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/660471af4d8878001612be45</link>
      <description>In the first episode of our new series about the history of freedom, David and Lea discuss what the idea means to them and why it matters so much. What did freedom mean to Lea growing up in communist Albania? Is it possible to know true freedom without also having experienced oppression? And how is being free different from being lucky?
Subscribe now to PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening for this and all future series. Just go to www.ppfideas.com.
Coming up next on the History of Freedom: The Ancients – Socrates, Seneca &amp; Jesus.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 06:00:38 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The History of Freedom w/Lea Ypi: Why Does It Matter?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>52</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4cd82a7e-a203-11ef-8350-4f9e782f645f/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In the first episode of our new series about the history of freedom, David and Lea discuss what the idea means to them and why it matters so much.&amp;nbsp;What did freedom mean to Lea growing up in communist Albania?&amp;nbsp;Is it possible to know true freedom without also having experienced oppression?&amp;nbsp;And how is being free different from being lucky?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Subscribe now to PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening for this and all future series. Just go to &lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming up next on the History of Freedom: The Ancients – Socrates, Seneca &amp;amp; Jesus.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the first episode of our new series about the history of freedom, David and Lea discuss what the idea means to them and why it matters so much. What did freedom mean to Lea growing up in communist Albania? Is it possible to know true freedom without also having experienced oppression? And how is being free different from being lucky?
Subscribe now to PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening for this and all future series. Just go to www.ppfideas.com.
Coming up next on the History of Freedom: The Ancients – Socrates, Seneca &amp; Jesus.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the first episode of our new series about the history of freedom, David and Lea discuss what the idea means to them and why it matters so much. What did freedom mean to Lea growing up in communist Albania? Is it possible to know true freedom without also having experienced oppression? And how is being free different from being lucky?</p><br><p>Subscribe now to PPF+ to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening for this and all future series. Just go to <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a>.</p><br><p>Coming up next on the History of Freedom: The Ancients – Socrates, Seneca &amp; Jesus.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3501</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[660471af4d8878001612be45]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9134818601.mp3?updated=1731679186" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Introducing PPF+  </title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/66044d09fdb4540016843a11</link>
      <description>Sign up now for bonus episodes and ad-free listening – and help support the podcast.
 www.ppfideas.com
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:44:57 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Introducing PPF+  </itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4d307666-a203-11ef-8350-236a20e916ef/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Sign up now for bonus episodes and ad-free listening – and help support the podcast.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;www.ppfideas.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Sign up now for bonus episodes and ad-free listening – and help support the podcast.
 www.ppfideas.com
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Sign up now for bonus episodes and ad-free listening – and help support the podcast.</p><br><p> <a href="http://www.ppfideas.com/">www.ppfideas.com</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>188</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[66044d09fdb4540016843a11]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3978467396.mp3?updated=1731606888" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Elections: 2008</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65febaba403e0d0016949c5d</link>
      <description>For our final episode in this series, David and Gary discuss the election of 2008, which saw Barack Obama’s extraordinary ascent to the presidency. How did he outthink and outmanoeuvre Hilary Clinton? What role did the financial crisis play in his path to the White House? And was it really the vice-presidential candidates in this election who pointed the way to America’s political future?
To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Coming next: our new series – The History of Freedom with Lea Ypi. Plus news of how you can sign up to PPF Plus to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2024 06:00:33 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>American Elections: 2008</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>51</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4d89fad8-a203-11ef-8350-eb0f4e6d3dce/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For our final episode in this series, David and Gary discuss the election of 2008, which saw Barack Obama’s extraordinary ascent to the presidency.&amp;nbsp;How did he outthink and outmanoeuvre Hilary Clinton?&amp;nbsp;What role did the financial crisis play in his path to the White House?&amp;nbsp;And was it really the vice-presidential candidates in this election who pointed the way to America’s political future?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://linktr.ee/ppfideas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming next: our new series – The History of Freedom with Lea Ypi.&amp;nbsp;Plus news of how you can sign up to PPF Plus to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For our final episode in this series, David and Gary discuss the election of 2008, which saw Barack Obama’s extraordinary ascent to the presidency. How did he outthink and outmanoeuvre Hilary Clinton? What role did the financial crisis play in his path to the White House? And was it really the vice-presidential candidates in this election who pointed the way to America’s political future?
To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Coming next: our new series – The History of Freedom with Lea Ypi. Plus news of how you can sign up to PPF Plus to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For our final episode in this series, David and Gary discuss the election of 2008, which saw Barack Obama’s extraordinary ascent to the presidency. How did he outthink and outmanoeuvre Hilary Clinton? What role did the financial crisis play in his path to the White House? And was it really the vice-presidential candidates in this election who pointed the way to America’s political future?</p><br><p>To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: <a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas">https://linktr.ee/ppfideas</a></p><br><p>Coming next: our new series – The History of Freedom with Lea Ypi. Plus news of how you can sign up to PPF Plus to get bonus episodes and ad-free listening.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3583</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65febaba403e0d0016949c5d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3477395230.mp3?updated=1731679168" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> American Elections: 1980</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65fac2001c46ed0017f0c698</link>
      <description>Our series on the Ideas Behind American Elections has reached 1980 and the election of Ronald Reagan. David and Gary discuss whether Jimmy Carter was always doomed, what made Reaganomics different and how Reagan succeeded in being an optimist and a scaremonger at the same time. Did this election really inaugurate a new era in American politics – and if so, are we still living in it?
To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Coming up: 2008 and the election of Barack Obama
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 06:00:22 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title> American Elections: 1980</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>50</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4de5667a-a203-11ef-8350-b7d3139ad501/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Our series on the Ideas Behind American Elections has reached 1980 and the election of Ronald Reagan.&amp;nbsp;David and Gary discuss whether Jimmy Carter was always doomed, what made Reaganomics different and how Reagan succeeded in being an optimist and a scaremonger at the same time.&amp;nbsp;Did this election really inaugurate a new era in American politics – and if so, are we still living in it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://linktr.ee/ppfideas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming up: 2008 and the election of Barack Obama&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Our series on the Ideas Behind American Elections has reached 1980 and the election of Ronald Reagan. David and Gary discuss whether Jimmy Carter was always doomed, what made Reaganomics different and how Reagan succeeded in being an optimist and a scaremonger at the same time. Did this election really inaugurate a new era in American politics – and if so, are we still living in it?
To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Coming up: 2008 and the election of Barack Obama
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our series on the Ideas Behind American Elections has reached 1980 and the election of Ronald Reagan. David and Gary discuss whether Jimmy Carter was always doomed, what made Reaganomics different and how Reagan succeeded in being an optimist and a scaremonger at the same time. Did this election really inaugurate a new era in American politics – and if so, are we still living in it?</p><br><p>To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: <a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas">https://linktr.ee/ppfideas</a></p><br><p>Coming up: 2008 and the election of Barack Obama</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3072</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65fac2001c46ed0017f0c698]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1738726814.mp3?updated=1731679161" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Elections: 1936</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65f4b3d6a0626800171ebcab</link>
      <description>The election of 1936 saw FDR re-elected in a landslide. It was also an election in which fundamental questions about the future direction of America were at stake. David and Gary discuss what made it a turning point for American democracy and ultimately for the wider world. Could the power of the Supreme Court be tamed? What was the true nature of economic freedom? And what threatened the New Deal - dissent at home or looming dangers abroad?
To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Coming up: The election of 1980 and the arrival of Reaganomics.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2024 06:00:44 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>American Elections: 1936</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>49</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4e482b0c-a203-11ef-8350-f3eec72c1361/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;The election of 1936 saw FDR re-elected in a landslide.&amp;nbsp;It was also an election in which fundamental questions about the future direction of America were at stake.&amp;nbsp;David and Gary discuss what made it a turning point for American democracy and ultimately for the wider world.&amp;nbsp;Could the power of the Supreme Court be tamed?&amp;nbsp;What was the true nature of economic freedom?&amp;nbsp;And what threatened the New Deal - dissent at home or looming dangers abroad?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://linktr.ee/ppfideas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming up: The election of 1980 and the arrival of Reaganomics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The election of 1936 saw FDR re-elected in a landslide. It was also an election in which fundamental questions about the future direction of America were at stake. David and Gary discuss what made it a turning point for American democracy and ultimately for the wider world. Could the power of the Supreme Court be tamed? What was the true nature of economic freedom? And what threatened the New Deal - dissent at home or looming dangers abroad?
To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Coming up: The election of 1980 and the arrival of Reaganomics.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The election of 1936 saw FDR re-elected in a landslide. It was also an election in which fundamental questions about the future direction of America were at stake. David and Gary discuss what made it a turning point for American democracy and ultimately for the wider world. Could the power of the Supreme Court be tamed? What was the true nature of economic freedom? And what threatened the New Deal - dissent at home or looming dangers abroad?</p><br><p>To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: <a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas">https://linktr.ee/ppfideas</a></p><br><p>Coming up: The election of 1980 and the arrival of Reaganomics.</p><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3042</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65f4b3d6a0626800171ebcab]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6916397437.mp3?updated=1731679063" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Elections: 1912</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65f1b3022d60f000162d2652</link>
      <description>We’ve reached the twentieth century and today’s episode is about the decisive election of 1912. David and Gary discuss the year when the Republicans split, the Democrats recaptured the White House after an absence of twenty years, and American politics shifted decisively towards progressivism. Who were the real progressives? What was Theodore Roosevelt trying to achieve in setting up a new party? How did Woodrow Wilson mange to win the nomination and the presidency? And was this the election that saw the dawn of a new environmental politics? 
To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Coming up: How the election of 1936 sealed the New Deal.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 06:00:26 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>American Elections: 1912</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>48</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4ebd975c-a203-11ef-8350-979ad6893b8c/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;We’ve reached the twentieth century and today’s episode is about the decisive&amp;nbsp;election&amp;nbsp;of 1912.&amp;nbsp;David and Gary discuss the year when the Republicans split, the Democrats recaptured the White House after an absence of twenty years, and&amp;nbsp;American&amp;nbsp;politics shifted decisively towards progressivism.&amp;nbsp;Who were the real progressives?&amp;nbsp;What was Theodore Roosevelt trying to achieve in setting up a new party?&amp;nbsp;How did Woodrow Wilson mange to win the nomination and the presidency?&amp;nbsp;And was this the&amp;nbsp;election&amp;nbsp;that saw the dawn of a new environmental politics?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://linktr.ee/ppfideas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming up: How the&amp;nbsp;election&amp;nbsp;of 1936 sealed the New Deal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>We’ve reached the twentieth century and today’s episode is about the decisive election of 1912. David and Gary discuss the year when the Republicans split, the Democrats recaptured the White House after an absence of twenty years, and American politics shifted decisively towards progressivism. Who were the real progressives? What was Theodore Roosevelt trying to achieve in setting up a new party? How did Woodrow Wilson mange to win the nomination and the presidency? And was this the election that saw the dawn of a new environmental politics? 
To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Coming up: How the election of 1936 sealed the New Deal.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We’ve reached the twentieth century and today’s episode is about the decisive election of 1912. David and Gary discuss the year when the Republicans split, the Democrats recaptured the White House after an absence of twenty years, and American politics shifted decisively towards progressivism. Who were the real progressives? What was Theodore Roosevelt trying to achieve in setting up a new party? How did Woodrow Wilson mange to win the nomination and the presidency? And was this the election that saw the dawn of a new environmental politics? </p><br><p>To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: <a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas">https://linktr.ee/ppfideas</a></p><br><p>Coming up: How the election of 1936 sealed the New Deal.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2903</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65f1b3022d60f000162d2652]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML8273696588.mp3?updated=1731679154" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Elections: 1896</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65eb091655ff890017eabd3a</link>
      <description>This episode in our series on the Ideas Behind American Elections looks at 1896, when a single speech nearly upended American politics. The speech was William Jennings Bryan’s ‘Cross of Gold’ address at the Democratic Party convention, which won him the nomination. How did a 36-year old outsider from Nebraska get so close to reaching the White House? What made the issue of silver coinage the driving force behind American populism? And why was 1896 the template for a new kind of campaigning, in which the power of oratory had to square off against the power of money?
To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Next time: 1912 and the great Republican split
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2024 06:00:15 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>American Elections: 1896</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>47</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4f170fe4-a203-11ef-8350-6f13aafa8587/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This episode in our series on the Ideas Behind American Elections looks at 1896, when a single speech nearly upended American politics.&amp;nbsp;The speech was William Jennings Bryan’s ‘Cross of Gold’ address at the Democratic Party convention, which won him the nomination.&amp;nbsp;How did a 36-year old outsider from Nebraska get so close to reaching the White House?&amp;nbsp;What made the issue of silver coinage the driving force behind American populism?&amp;nbsp;And why was 1896 the template for a new kind of campaigning, in which the power of oratory had to square off against the power of money?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://linktr.ee/ppfideas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next time: 1912 and the great Republican split&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This episode in our series on the Ideas Behind American Elections looks at 1896, when a single speech nearly upended American politics. The speech was William Jennings Bryan’s ‘Cross of Gold’ address at the Democratic Party convention, which won him the nomination. How did a 36-year old outsider from Nebraska get so close to reaching the White House? What made the issue of silver coinage the driving force behind American populism? And why was 1896 the template for a new kind of campaigning, in which the power of oratory had to square off against the power of money?
To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Next time: 1912 and the great Republican split
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode in our series on the Ideas Behind American Elections looks at 1896, when a single speech nearly upended American politics. The speech was William Jennings Bryan’s ‘Cross of Gold’ address at the Democratic Party convention, which won him the nomination. How did a 36-year old outsider from Nebraska get so close to reaching the White House? What made the issue of silver coinage the driving force behind American populism? And why was 1896 the template for a new kind of campaigning, in which the power of oratory had to square off against the power of money?</p><br><p>To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: <a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas">https://linktr.ee/ppfideas</a></p><br><p>Next time: 1912 and the great Republican split</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3258</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65eb091655ff890017eabd3a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7685279704.mp3?updated=1731679184" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Elections: 1860</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65e85f412fe2910016e56ecc</link>
      <description>In the third episode in our series on the Ideas Behind American Elections David and Gary talk about what was maybe the most significant election of all: 1860, when Lincoln became president and the country careened into civil war. How did the newly formed Republican Party break the stranglehold of the established parties? Why could the South neither unite against it nor accept its victory? What enabled Lincoln to wrestle the Republican nomination at the party's convention in Chicago and what might have happened if he had failed?
To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Coming up: 1896 and the populist revolt
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 07:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>American Elections: 1860</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>46</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4f76970c-a203-11ef-8350-cb1440470960/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In the third episode in our series on the Ideas Behind American Elections David and Gary talk about what was maybe the most significant election of all: 1860, when Lincoln became president and the country careened into civil war.&amp;nbsp;How did the newly formed Republican Party break the stranglehold of the established parties?&amp;nbsp;Why could the South neither unite against it nor accept its victory?&amp;nbsp;What enabled Lincoln to wrestle the Republican nomination at the party's convention in Chicago and what might have happened if he had failed?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://linktr.ee/ppfideas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming up: 1896 and the populist revolt&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the third episode in our series on the Ideas Behind American Elections David and Gary talk about what was maybe the most significant election of all: 1860, when Lincoln became president and the country careened into civil war. How did the newly formed Republican Party break the stranglehold of the established parties? Why could the South neither unite against it nor accept its victory? What enabled Lincoln to wrestle the Republican nomination at the party's convention in Chicago and what might have happened if he had failed?
To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Coming up: 1896 and the populist revolt
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the third episode in our series on the Ideas Behind American Elections David and Gary talk about what was maybe the most significant election of all: 1860, when Lincoln became president and the country careened into civil war. How did the newly formed Republican Party break the stranglehold of the established parties? Why could the South neither unite against it nor accept its victory? What enabled Lincoln to wrestle the Republican nomination at the party's convention in Chicago and what might have happened if he had failed?</p><br><p>To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: <a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas">https://linktr.ee/ppfideas</a></p><br><p>Coming up: 1896 and the populist revolt</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3637</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65e85f412fe2910016e56ecc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7920537481.mp3?updated=1731679197" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Elections: 1828</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65e292c9babcda0016936444</link>
      <description>For the second episode in our new series on the Ideas Behind American Elections, David and Gary discuss 1828: the first great populist election, which saw the arrival of Andrew Jackson and a new style of politics in the White House. What made Jackson different from his predecessors? How did this election reinvent the American party system? And why were Jackson's arguments with Vice-President John Calhoun about economic tariffs so toxic that they brought the country close to civil war?
To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Coming up next: the Election of 1860 and Abraham Lincoln
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2024 06:00:34 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>American Elections: 1828</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>45</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4fd6a444-a203-11ef-8350-d7acf55827b0/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For the second episode in our new series on the Ideas Behind American Elections, David and Gary discuss 1828: the first great populist election, which saw the arrival of Andrew Jackson and a new style of politics in the White House.&amp;nbsp;What made Jackson different from his predecessors?&amp;nbsp;How did this election reinvent the American party system?&amp;nbsp;And why were Jackson's arguments with Vice-President John Calhoun about economic tariffs so toxic that they brought the country close to civil war?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://linktr.ee/ppfideas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming up next: the Election of 1860 and Abraham Lincoln&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the second episode in our new series on the Ideas Behind American Elections, David and Gary discuss 1828: the first great populist election, which saw the arrival of Andrew Jackson and a new style of politics in the White House. What made Jackson different from his predecessors? How did this election reinvent the American party system? And why were Jackson's arguments with Vice-President John Calhoun about economic tariffs so toxic that they brought the country close to civil war?
To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Coming up next: the Election of 1860 and Abraham Lincoln
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the second episode in our new series on the Ideas Behind American Elections, David and Gary discuss 1828: the first great populist election, which saw the arrival of Andrew Jackson and a new style of politics in the White House. What made Jackson different from his predecessors? How did this election reinvent the American party system? And why were Jackson's arguments with Vice-President John Calhoun about economic tariffs so toxic that they brought the country close to civil war?</p><br><p>To sign up for our free fortnightly newsletter to accompany this and future series, just click on the top link in our Link Tree: <a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas">https://linktr.ee/ppfideas</a></p><br><p>Coming up next: the Election of 1860 and Abraham Lincoln</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3236</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65e292c9babcda0016936444]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6853251993.mp3?updated=1731679181" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Elections: 1800</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65df5341acbfff001624ccdb</link>
      <description>In the first episode of our new series on the Ideas Behind American Elections, David and historian Gary Gerstle explore the presidential contest of 1800: scurrilous, complicated, game changing. How did it help create the American party system? Was it really democratic? What would have happened if Aaron Burr had won? Plus, just how accurate is the depiction of the election in Hamilton the musical?
PLUS sign up now for the new PPF newsletter. A free, fortnightly guide to recent episodes, jam-packed with further reading, more to watch and listen to, plus extras from David. Starting with the Great Political Fictions.
To get the newsletter just click on the top link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Next week on the Ideas Behind American Elections: 1828.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 06:00:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>American Elections: 1800</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>44</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/50bafdec-a203-11ef-8350-4ffaa678173d/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In the first episode of our new series on the Ideas Behind American Elections, David and historian Gary Gerstle explore the presidential contest of 1800: scurrilous, complicated, game changing.&amp;nbsp;How did it help create the American party system?&amp;nbsp;Was it really democratic?&amp;nbsp;What would have happened if Aaron Burr had won?&amp;nbsp;Plus, just how accurate is the depiction of the election in Hamilton the musical?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;PLUS sign up now for the new PPF newsletter.&amp;nbsp;A&amp;nbsp;free, fortnightly guide to recent episodes, jam-packed with further reading, more to watch and listen to, plus extras from David. Starting with the Great Political Fictions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To get the newsletter just click on the top link in our Link Tree: &lt;a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://linktr.ee/ppfideas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next week on the Ideas Behind American Elections: 1828.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the first episode of our new series on the Ideas Behind American Elections, David and historian Gary Gerstle explore the presidential contest of 1800: scurrilous, complicated, game changing. How did it help create the American party system? Was it really democratic? What would have happened if Aaron Burr had won? Plus, just how accurate is the depiction of the election in Hamilton the musical?
PLUS sign up now for the new PPF newsletter. A free, fortnightly guide to recent episodes, jam-packed with further reading, more to watch and listen to, plus extras from David. Starting with the Great Political Fictions.
To get the newsletter just click on the top link in our Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/ppfideas
Next week on the Ideas Behind American Elections: 1828.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the first episode of our new series on the Ideas Behind American Elections, David and historian Gary Gerstle explore the presidential contest of 1800: scurrilous, complicated, game changing. How did it help create the American party system? Was it really democratic? What would have happened if Aaron Burr had won? Plus, just how accurate is the depiction of the election in Hamilton the musical?</p><br><p>PLUS sign up now for the new PPF newsletter. A free, fortnightly guide to recent episodes, jam-packed with further reading, more to watch and listen to, plus extras from David. Starting with the Great Political Fictions.</p><br><p>To get the newsletter just click on the top link in our Link Tree: <a href="https://linktr.ee/ppfideas">https://linktr.ee/ppfideas</a></p><br><p>Next week on the Ideas Behind American Elections: 1828.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3457</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65df5341acbfff001624ccdb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2485281798.mp3?updated=1731679181" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Q &amp; A: Shakespeare, Gulliver and Trump</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65d8d4a10276f6001606c7cc</link>
      <description>In an extra episode this week David answers your questions about the most recent series of the History of Ideas - in particular about the political lessons of Gulliver’s Travels, for its own time and for our own. Plus, how is Trump like - and not like - Coriolanus, and where are the female authors for this series? (A: they’re coming!)
Starting in our regular slot next week, PPF moves to two episodes a week as we launch our new series on the Ideas Behind American Elections with Gary Gerstle - beginning with the election of 1800: Adams v Jefferson v Hamilton v Burr.
We will also be letting you know how to sign up to our free fortnightly newsletter - coming soon!
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2024 06:00:06 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Q &amp; A: Shakespeare, Gulliver and Trump</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>43</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/511f2fa6-a203-11ef-8350-abf52de632b4/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In an extra episode this week David answers your questions about the most recent series of the History of Ideas - in particular about the political lessons of Gulliver’s Travels, for its own time and for our own.&amp;nbsp;Plus, how is Trump like - and not like - Coriolanus, and where are the female authors for this series? (A: they’re coming!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Starting in our regular slot next week, PPF moves to two episodes a week as we launch our new series on the Ideas Behind American Elections with Gary Gerstle - beginning with the election of 1800: Adams v Jefferson v Hamilton v Burr.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;We will also be letting you know how to sign up to our free fortnightly newsletter - coming soon!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In an extra episode this week David answers your questions about the most recent series of the History of Ideas - in particular about the political lessons of Gulliver’s Travels, for its own time and for our own. Plus, how is Trump like - and not like - Coriolanus, and where are the female authors for this series? (A: they’re coming!)
Starting in our regular slot next week, PPF moves to two episodes a week as we launch our new series on the Ideas Behind American Elections with Gary Gerstle - beginning with the election of 1800: Adams v Jefferson v Hamilton v Burr.
We will also be letting you know how to sign up to our free fortnightly newsletter - coming soon!
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In an extra episode this week David answers your questions about the most recent series of the History of Ideas - in particular about the political lessons of Gulliver’s Travels, for its own time and for our own. Plus, how is Trump like - and not like - Coriolanus, and where are the female authors for this series? (A: they’re coming!)</p><br><p>Starting in our regular slot next week, PPF moves to two episodes a week as we launch our new series on the Ideas Behind American Elections with Gary Gerstle - beginning with the election of 1800: Adams v Jefferson v Hamilton v Burr.</p><br><p>We will also be letting you know how to sign up to our free fortnightly newsletter - coming soon!</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2747</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65d8d4a10276f6001606c7cc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1886962539.mp3?updated=1731679162" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: Fathers and Sons</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65d51ad2934cb500163f1553</link>
      <description>This week’s Great Political Fiction is Ivan Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons (1862), the definitive novel about the politics – and emotions – of intergenerational conflict. How did Turgenev manage to write a wistful novel about nihilism? What made Russian politics in the early 1860s so chock-full of frustration? Why did Turgenev’s book infuriate his contemporaries – including Dostoyevsky?
More from the LRB:
Pankaj Mishra on the disillusionment of Alexander Herzen 
'"Emancipation", he concluded, "has finally proved to be as insolvent as redemption".'
Julian Barnes on Turgenev and Flaubert 
‘When the two of them meet, they are already presenting themselves as elderly men in their early forties (Turgenev asserts that after 40 the basis of life is renunciation).’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 06:00:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: Fathers and Sons</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>42</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/517d3326-a203-11ef-8350-9feabb84088a/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week’s Great Political Fiction is Ivan Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons (1862), the definitive novel about the politics – and emotions – of intergenerational conflict. How did Turgenev manage to write a wistful novel about nihilism? What made Russian politics in the early 1860s so chock-full of frustration? Why did Turgenev’s book infuriate his contemporaries – including Dostoyevsky?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;More from the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/4bGkPcN" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Pankaj Mishra on the disillusionment of Alexander Herzen&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;'"Emancipation", he concluded, "has finally proved to be as insolvent as redemption".'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3uEmcbs" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Julian Barnes on Turgenev and Flaubert&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘When the two of them meet, they are already presenting themselves as elderly men in their early forties (Turgenev asserts that after 40 the basis of life is renunciation).’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week’s Great Political Fiction is Ivan Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons (1862), the definitive novel about the politics – and emotions – of intergenerational conflict. How did Turgenev manage to write a wistful novel about nihilism? What made Russian politics in the early 1860s so chock-full of frustration? Why did Turgenev’s book infuriate his contemporaries – including Dostoyevsky?
More from the LRB:
Pankaj Mishra on the disillusionment of Alexander Herzen 
'"Emancipation", he concluded, "has finally proved to be as insolvent as redemption".'
Julian Barnes on Turgenev and Flaubert 
‘When the two of them meet, they are already presenting themselves as elderly men in their early forties (Turgenev asserts that after 40 the basis of life is renunciation).’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week’s Great Political Fiction is Ivan Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons (1862), the definitive novel about the politics – and emotions – of intergenerational conflict. How did Turgenev manage to write a wistful novel about nihilism? What made Russian politics in the early 1860s so chock-full of frustration? Why did Turgenev’s book infuriate his contemporaries – including Dostoyevsky?</p><br><p>More from the LRB:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/4bGkPcN">Pankaj Mishra on the disillusionment of Alexander Herzen</a> </p><p>'"Emancipation", he concluded, "has finally proved to be as insolvent as redemption".'</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3uEmcbs">Julian Barnes on Turgenev and Flaubert</a> </p><p>‘When the two of them meet, they are already presenting themselves as elderly men in their early forties (Turgenev asserts that after 40 the basis of life is renunciation).’</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3384</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65d51ad2934cb500163f1553]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6991444182.mp3?updated=1731679144" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: Mary Stuart</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65ccf2e2e9af7100179cf3e9</link>
      <description>This week’s Great Political Fiction is Friedrich Schiller’s monumental play Mary Stuart (1800), which lays bare the impossible choices faced by two queens – Elizabeth I of England and Mary Queen of Scots – in a world of men. Schiller imagines a meeting between them that never took place and unpicks its fearsome consequences. Why does it do such damage to them both? How does the powerless Mary maintain her hold over the imperious Elizabeth? Who suffers most in the end and what is that suffering really worth?
Next week: Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons (1862)
Coming up: The Ideas Behind American Elections – a twice-weekly series running throughout March with Gary Gerstle, looking at 8 American presidential elections from 1800 to 2008 and exploring the ideas that shaped them and helped to shape the world.
Coming soon: sign up to the PPFIdeas newsletter!
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 06:00:18 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: Mary Stuart</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>41</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/51d3e43c-a203-11ef-8350-cb207a5a33b9/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week’s Great Political Fiction is Friedrich Schiller’s monumental play Mary Stuart (1800), which lays bare the impossible choices faced by two queens – Elizabeth I of England and Mary Queen of Scots – in a world of men.&amp;nbsp;Schiller imagines a meeting between them that never took place and unpicks its fearsome consequences.&amp;nbsp;Why does it do such damage to them both?&amp;nbsp;How does the powerless Mary maintain her hold over the imperious Elizabeth?&amp;nbsp;Who suffers most in the end and what is that suffering really worth?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next week: Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons (1862)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming up: The Ideas Behind American Elections – a twice-weekly series running throughout March with Gary Gerstle, looking at 8 American presidential elections from 1800 to 2008 and exploring the ideas that shaped them and helped to shape the world.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming soon: sign up to the PPFIdeas newsletter!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week’s Great Political Fiction is Friedrich Schiller’s monumental play Mary Stuart (1800), which lays bare the impossible choices faced by two queens – Elizabeth I of England and Mary Queen of Scots – in a world of men. Schiller imagines a meeting between them that never took place and unpicks its fearsome consequences. Why does it do such damage to them both? How does the powerless Mary maintain her hold over the imperious Elizabeth? Who suffers most in the end and what is that suffering really worth?
Next week: Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons (1862)
Coming up: The Ideas Behind American Elections – a twice-weekly series running throughout March with Gary Gerstle, looking at 8 American presidential elections from 1800 to 2008 and exploring the ideas that shaped them and helped to shape the world.
Coming soon: sign up to the PPFIdeas newsletter!
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week’s Great Political Fiction is Friedrich Schiller’s monumental play Mary Stuart (1800), which lays bare the impossible choices faced by two queens – Elizabeth I of England and Mary Queen of Scots – in a world of men. Schiller imagines a meeting between them that never took place and unpicks its fearsome consequences. Why does it do such damage to them both? How does the powerless Mary maintain her hold over the imperious Elizabeth? Who suffers most in the end and what is that suffering really worth?</p><p>Next week: Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons (1862)</p><p>Coming up: The Ideas Behind American Elections – a twice-weekly series running throughout March with Gary Gerstle, looking at 8 American presidential elections from 1800 to 2008 and exploring the ideas that shaped them and helped to shape the world.</p><p>Coming soon: sign up to the PPFIdeas newsletter!</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3436</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65ccf2e2e9af7100179cf3e9]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2393288588.mp3?updated=1731679158" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: Gulliver’s Travels</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65c26d2794623a00160c4576</link>
      <description>This week’s episode on the great political fictions is about Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels (1726) – part adventure story, part satire of early-eighteenth-century party politics, but above all a coruscating reflection on the failures of human perspective and self-knowledge. Why do we find it so hard to see ourselves for who we really are? What makes us so vulnerable to mindless feuds and wild conspiracy theories? And what could we learn from the talking horses?
More from the LRB:
Clare Bucknell on Swift the satirist
‘Swift’s satire was fabulous as well as honest, a distorting magnifying glass as well as a mirror.’
Terry Eagleton on Swift’s double standards
‘Swift and Montaigne are outraged by colonial brutality while being deep-dyed authoritarians themselves.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 06:00:12 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: Gulliver’s Travels</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>40</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/522c471c-a203-11ef-8350-93791ab8d588/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week’s episode on the great political fictions is about Jonathan Swift’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Gulliver’s Travels&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(1726) – part adventure story, part satire of early-eighteenth-century party politics, but above all a coruscating reflection on the failures of human perspective and self-knowledge.&amp;nbsp;Why do we find it so hard to see ourselves for who we really are?&amp;nbsp;What makes us so vulnerable to mindless feuds and wild conspiracy theories?&amp;nbsp;And what could we learn from the talking horses?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;More from the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3SoNn1I" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Clare Bucknell on Swift the satirist&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘Swift’s satire was fabulous as well as honest, a distorting magnifying glass as well as a mirror.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3SmrhNm" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Terry Eagleton on Swift’s double standards&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘Swift and Montaigne are outraged by colonial brutality while being deep-dyed authoritarians themselves.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week’s episode on the great political fictions is about Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels (1726) – part adventure story, part satire of early-eighteenth-century party politics, but above all a coruscating reflection on the failures of human perspective and self-knowledge. Why do we find it so hard to see ourselves for who we really are? What makes us so vulnerable to mindless feuds and wild conspiracy theories? And what could we learn from the talking horses?
More from the LRB:
Clare Bucknell on Swift the satirist
‘Swift’s satire was fabulous as well as honest, a distorting magnifying glass as well as a mirror.’
Terry Eagleton on Swift’s double standards
‘Swift and Montaigne are outraged by colonial brutality while being deep-dyed authoritarians themselves.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week’s episode on the great political fictions is about Jonathan Swift’s <em>Gulliver’s Travels</em> (1726) – part adventure story, part satire of early-eighteenth-century party politics, but above all a coruscating reflection on the failures of human perspective and self-knowledge. Why do we find it so hard to see ourselves for who we really are? What makes us so vulnerable to mindless feuds and wild conspiracy theories? And what could we learn from the talking horses?</p><br><p>More from the LRB:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3SoNn1I">Clare Bucknell on Swift the satirist</a></p><p>‘Swift’s satire was fabulous as well as honest, a distorting magnifying glass as well as a mirror.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3SmrhNm">Terry Eagleton on Swift’s double standards</a></p><p>‘Swift and Montaigne are outraged by colonial brutality while being deep-dyed authoritarians themselves.’</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3462</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65c26d2794623a00160c4576]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1984178542.mp3?updated=1731679208" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Political Fictions: Coriolanus</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65ba3ca8c7d0d30016cc31e6</link>
      <description>In the first episode of our new series on the great political fictions, David talks about Shakespeare’s Coriolanus (1608-9), the last of his tragedies and perhaps his most politically contentious play. Why has Coriolanus been subject to so many wildly different political interpretations? Is pride really the tragic flaw of the military monster at its heart? What does it say about the struggle between elite power and popular resistance and about the limits of political argument?
More from the LRB:
Colin Burrow on Ralph Fiennes as Coriolanus 
Michael Wood on Coriolanus in the Hunger Games
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 06:00:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Political Fictions: Coriolanus</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>39</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5286f612-a203-11ef-8350-7bef6f3be7d9/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In the first episode of our new series on the great political fictions, David talks about Shakespeare’s Coriolanus (1608-9), the last of his tragedies and perhaps his most politically contentious play.&amp;nbsp;Why has Coriolanus been subject to so many wildly different political interpretations?&amp;nbsp;Is pride really the tragic flaw of the military monster at its heart?&amp;nbsp;What does it say about the struggle between elite power and popular resistance and about the limits of political argument?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;More from the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/4blduPC" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Colin Burrow on Ralph Fiennes as Coriolanus&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/482aTr4" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Michael Wood on Coriolanus in the Hunger Games&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the first episode of our new series on the great political fictions, David talks about Shakespeare’s Coriolanus (1608-9), the last of his tragedies and perhaps his most politically contentious play. Why has Coriolanus been subject to so many wildly different political interpretations? Is pride really the tragic flaw of the military monster at its heart? What does it say about the struggle between elite power and popular resistance and about the limits of political argument?
More from the LRB:
Colin Burrow on Ralph Fiennes as Coriolanus 
Michael Wood on Coriolanus in the Hunger Games
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the first episode of our new series on the great political fictions, David talks about Shakespeare’s Coriolanus (1608-9), the last of his tragedies and perhaps his most politically contentious play. Why has Coriolanus been subject to so many wildly different political interpretations? Is pride really the tragic flaw of the military monster at its heart? What does it say about the struggle between elite power and popular resistance and about the limits of political argument?</p><p>More from the LRB:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/4blduPC">Colin Burrow on Ralph Fiennes as Coriolanus </a></p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/482aTr4">Michael Wood on Coriolanus in the Hunger Games</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3602</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65ba3ca8c7d0d30016cc31e6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4205312894.mp3?updated=1731679194" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The End of Enlightenment</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65b18a4ce969a60016ba88ac</link>
      <description>This week David talks to Richard Whatmore and Lea Ypi about what caused the loss of faith in the idea of Enlightenment at the end of the eighteenth century and the parallels with our loss of faith today. Why did hopes for a better, more rational world start to seem like wishful thinking? How was Britain implicated in the demise of Enlightenment ideals? And what might have happened if there had been no French Revolution?
Richard Whatmore’s The End of Enlightenment is available now 
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 06:00:57 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The End of Enlightenment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>38</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/52e06850-a203-11ef-8350-ffc166a58dab/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week David talks to Richard Whatmore and Lea Ypi about what caused the loss of faith in the idea of Enlightenment at the end of the eighteenth century and the parallels with our loss of faith today.&amp;nbsp;Why did hopes for a better, more rational world start to seem like wishful thinking?&amp;nbsp;How was Britain implicated in the demise of Enlightenment ideals?&amp;nbsp;And what might have happened if there had been no French Revolution?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Richard Whatmore’s &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/48xYvjH" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;The End of Enlightenment&lt;/a&gt; is available now&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David talks to Richard Whatmore and Lea Ypi about what caused the loss of faith in the idea of Enlightenment at the end of the eighteenth century and the parallels with our loss of faith today. Why did hopes for a better, more rational world start to seem like wishful thinking? How was Britain implicated in the demise of Enlightenment ideals? And what might have happened if there had been no French Revolution?
Richard Whatmore’s The End of Enlightenment is available now 
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week David talks to Richard Whatmore and Lea Ypi about what caused the loss of faith in the idea of Enlightenment at the end of the eighteenth century and the parallels with our loss of faith today. Why did hopes for a better, more rational world start to seem like wishful thinking? How was Britain implicated in the demise of Enlightenment ideals? And what might have happened if there had been no French Revolution?</p><br><p>Richard Whatmore’s <a href="https://bit.ly/48xYvjH">The End of Enlightenment</a> is available now </p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3618</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65b18a4ce969a60016ba88ac]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML8713244939.mp3?updated=1731679224" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rory Stewart: What Does it Mean to be a 21st-Century Tory?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65a7dcf19d76460016dee640</link>
      <description>This week David talks to Rory Stewart about his life in politics and the history of the ideas behind his political philosophy. What does it mean to be a Tory in the twenty-first century? When and how did the Conservative party get taken over by Whigs? Where – if anywhere – can independents find a home in contemporary British democracy? A conversation about the many different forces that shape our politics, from Gulliver’s Travels to Liz Truss. 
Politics on the Edge by Rory Stewart is published by Penguin Books
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 06:00:57 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Rory Stewart: What Does it Mean to be a 21st-Century Tory?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>37</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5337b9de-a203-11ef-8350-f3b9720bd23c/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week David talks to Rory Stewart about his life in politics and the history of the ideas behind his political philosophy.&amp;nbsp;What does it mean to be a Tory in the twenty-first century?&amp;nbsp;When and how did the Conservative party get taken over by Whigs?&amp;nbsp;Where – if anywhere – can independents find a home in contemporary British democracy?&amp;nbsp;A conversation about the many different forces that shape our politics, from Gulliver’s Travels to Liz Truss.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3vD38KI" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Politics on the Edge&lt;/a&gt; by Rory Stewart is published by Penguin Books&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David talks to Rory Stewart about his life in politics and the history of the ideas behind his political philosophy. What does it mean to be a Tory in the twenty-first century? When and how did the Conservative party get taken over by Whigs? Where – if anywhere – can independents find a home in contemporary British democracy? A conversation about the many different forces that shape our politics, from Gulliver’s Travels to Liz Truss. 
Politics on the Edge by Rory Stewart is published by Penguin Books
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week David talks to Rory Stewart about his life in politics and the history of the ideas behind his political philosophy. What does it mean to be a Tory in the twenty-first century? When and how did the Conservative party get taken over by Whigs? Where – if anywhere – can independents find a home in contemporary British democracy? A conversation about the many different forces that shape our politics, from Gulliver’s Travels to Liz Truss. </p><br><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3vD38KI">Politics on the Edge</a> by Rory Stewart is published by Penguin Books</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3015</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65a7dcf19d76460016dee640]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3967453985.mp3?updated=1731679173" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The End of the UK?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/659f14429ed21d00165ddc8d</link>
      <description>This week David talks to the political scientist Mike Kenny about the possible fate of the United Kingdom. What makes the UK such an unusual political arrangement? How has it managed to hold together through war, economic decline, Brexit, Covid? What still threatens to break it apart?
Mike Kenny’s new book is Fractured Union: Politics, Sovereignty and the Fight to Save the UK
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 06:00:29 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The End of the UK?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>36</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/53ba6014-a203-11ef-8350-ab02bba3552a/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week David talks to the political scientist Mike Kenny about the possible fate of the United Kingdom.&amp;nbsp;What makes the UK such an unusual political arrangement?&amp;nbsp;How has it managed to hold together through war, economic decline, Brexit, Covid?&amp;nbsp;What still threatens to break it apart?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mike Kenny’s new book is &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/48Oxnwm" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Fractured Union: Politics, Sovereignty and the Fight to Save the UK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David talks to the political scientist Mike Kenny about the possible fate of the United Kingdom. What makes the UK such an unusual political arrangement? How has it managed to hold together through war, economic decline, Brexit, Covid? What still threatens to break it apart?
Mike Kenny’s new book is Fractured Union: Politics, Sovereignty and the Fight to Save the UK
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week David talks to the political scientist Mike Kenny about the possible fate of the United Kingdom. What makes the UK such an unusual political arrangement? How has it managed to hold together through war, economic decline, Brexit, Covid? What still threatens to break it apart?</p><br><p>Mike Kenny’s new book is <a href="https://bit.ly/48Oxnwm">Fractured Union: Politics, Sovereignty and the Fight to Save the UK</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3665</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[659f14429ed21d00165ddc8d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9266203224.mp3?updated=1731679095" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas 12: Ta-Nehisi Coates</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/658b23137f45f30016d4a474</link>
      <description>Episode 12 in our series on the great essays is about Ta-Nehisi Coates’s ‘The Case for Reparations’, published in the Atlantic in 2014. Black American life has been marked by injustice from the beginning: this essay explores what can – and what can’t – be done to remedy it, from slavery to the housing market, from Mississippi to Chicago. Plus, what has this story got to do with the origins of the state of Israel?
Read the original essay here.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 06:00:23 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas 12: Ta-Nehisi Coates</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5415166c-a203-11ef-8350-2b83ee63cda2/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Episode 12 in our series on the great essays is about Ta-Nehisi Coates’s ‘The Case for Reparations’, published in the Atlantic in 2014.&amp;nbsp;Black American life has been marked by injustice from the beginning: this essay explores what can – and what can’t – be done to remedy it, from slavery to the housing market, from Mississippi to Chicago.&amp;nbsp;Plus, what has this story got to do with the origins of the state of Israel?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the original essay &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/49LEhnC" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 12 in our series on the great essays is about Ta-Nehisi Coates’s ‘The Case for Reparations’, published in the Atlantic in 2014. Black American life has been marked by injustice from the beginning: this essay explores what can – and what can’t – be done to remedy it, from slavery to the housing market, from Mississippi to Chicago. Plus, what has this story got to do with the origins of the state of Israel?
Read the original essay here.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Episode 12 in our series on the great essays is about Ta-Nehisi Coates’s ‘The Case for Reparations’, published in the Atlantic in 2014. Black American life has been marked by injustice from the beginning: this essay explores what can – and what can’t – be done to remedy it, from slavery to the housing market, from Mississippi to Chicago. Plus, what has this story got to do with the origins of the state of Israel?</p><br><p>Read the original essay <a href="https://bit.ly/49LEhnC">here</a>.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3261</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[658b23137f45f30016d4a474]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3484369960.mp3?updated=1731679148" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas 11: Umberto Eco</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/658b21c2fd880f00176e23ab</link>
      <description>Episode 11 in our series on the great essays explores Umberto Eco’s ‘Thoughts on Wikileaks’ (2010). Eco writes about what makes a true scandal, what are real secrets, and what it would mean to expose the hidden workings of power. It is an essay that connects digital technology, medieval mystery and Dan Brown. Plus David talks about the hidden meaning of Julian Assange.
More from the LRB:
Andrew O’Hagan on Julian Assange
‘I’d never been with a person who had such a good cause and such a poor ear.’
Frank Kermode on the Name of the Rose
‘This novel has so much in it that differs from any known kind of detective story that we must look to Eco’s pre-semiotic career for help.’
Jenny Diski on Eco and ugliness
‘The breadth of Eco’s search spreads out to include disgust, horror, fear, obscenity, misogyny, perversity, bigotry, social exclusiveness, repression, inexplicability, evil, deformation, degradation, heterogeneity.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 06:00:54 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas 11: Umberto Eco</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5471bade-a203-11ef-8350-0f679973b715/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Episode 11 in our series on the great essays explores Umberto Eco’s ‘Thoughts on Wikileaks’ (2010).&amp;nbsp;Eco writes about what makes a true scandal, what are real secrets, and what it would mean to expose the hidden workings of power.&amp;nbsp;It is an essay that connects digital technology, medieval mystery and Dan Brown.&amp;nbsp;Plus David talks about the hidden meaning of Julian Assange.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;More from the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/499vYSn" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Andrew O’Hagan on Julian Assange&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘I’d never been with a person who had such a good cause and such a poor ear.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/494hW4k" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Frank Kermode on the Name of the Rose&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘This novel has so much in it that differs from any known kind of detective story that we must look to Eco’s pre-semiotic career for help.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3Fsh77M" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Jenny Diski on Eco and ugliness&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘The breadth of Eco’s search spreads out to include disgust, horror, fear, obscenity, misogyny, perversity, bigotry, social exclusiveness, repression, inexplicability, evil, deformation, degradation, heterogeneity.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 11 in our series on the great essays explores Umberto Eco’s ‘Thoughts on Wikileaks’ (2010). Eco writes about what makes a true scandal, what are real secrets, and what it would mean to expose the hidden workings of power. It is an essay that connects digital technology, medieval mystery and Dan Brown. Plus David talks about the hidden meaning of Julian Assange.
More from the LRB:
Andrew O’Hagan on Julian Assange
‘I’d never been with a person who had such a good cause and such a poor ear.’
Frank Kermode on the Name of the Rose
‘This novel has so much in it that differs from any known kind of detective story that we must look to Eco’s pre-semiotic career for help.’
Jenny Diski on Eco and ugliness
‘The breadth of Eco’s search spreads out to include disgust, horror, fear, obscenity, misogyny, perversity, bigotry, social exclusiveness, repression, inexplicability, evil, deformation, degradation, heterogeneity.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Episode 11 in our series on the great essays explores Umberto Eco’s ‘Thoughts on Wikileaks’ (2010). Eco writes about what makes a true scandal, what are real secrets, and what it would mean to expose the hidden workings of power. It is an essay that connects digital technology, medieval mystery and Dan Brown. Plus David talks about the hidden meaning of Julian Assange.</p><br><p>More from the LRB:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/499vYSn">Andrew O’Hagan on Julian Assange</a></p><p>‘I’d never been with a person who had such a good cause and such a poor ear.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/494hW4k">Frank Kermode on the Name of the Rose</a></p><p>‘This novel has so much in it that differs from any known kind of detective story that we must look to Eco’s pre-semiotic career for help.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3Fsh77M">Jenny Diski on Eco and ugliness</a></p><p>‘The breadth of Eco’s search spreads out to include disgust, horror, fear, obscenity, misogyny, perversity, bigotry, social exclusiveness, repression, inexplicability, evil, deformation, degradation, heterogeneity.’</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2975</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[658b21c2fd880f00176e23ab]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2309512136.mp3?updated=1731679195" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas 10: David Foster Wallace</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/658b211ab17f790017a21b3c</link>
      <description>Episode 10 in our series on the great essays is about David Foster Wallace’s ‘Up, Simba!’, which describes his experiences following the doomed campaign of John McCain for the Republican presidential nomination in 2000. Wallace believed that McCain’s distinctive political style revealed some hard truths about American democracy. Was he right? What did he miss? And how do those truths look now in the age of Trump?
More on David Foster Wallace from the LRB:
Jenny Turner on Wallace and his moment
‘The risk Wallace takes is to guess he is not the only "obscenely well-educated", curiously lost and empty white boy out there; that his sadness is also the experience of a whole historical moment.’
Patricia Lockwood on Wallace and his influence
‘It was the essayists who were left to cope with his almost radioactive influence. He produced a great deal of excellent writing, the majority of it not his own.’
Dale Peck’s notorious takedown of Infinite Jest
‘If nothing else, the success of Infinite Jest is proof that the Great American Hype machine can still work wonders.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 06:00:07 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas 10: David Foster Wallace</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/54ccfc5a-a203-11ef-8350-9fe98bb88c81/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Episode 10 in our series on the great essays is about David Foster Wallace’s ‘Up, Simba!’, which describes his experiences following the doomed campaign of John McCain for the Republican presidential nomination in 2000.&amp;nbsp;Wallace believed that McCain’s distinctive political style revealed some hard truths about American democracy.&amp;nbsp;Was he right?&amp;nbsp;What did he miss?&amp;nbsp;And how do those truths look now in the age of Trump?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;More on David Foster Wallace from the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3LDYjWz" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Jenny Turner on Wallace and his moment&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘The risk Wallace takes is to guess he is not the only "obscenely well-educated", curiously lost and empty white boy out there; that his sadness is also the experience of a whole historical moment.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3RDz2zE" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Patricia Lockwood on Wallace and his influence&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘It was the essayists who were left to cope with his almost radioactive influence.&amp;nbsp;He produced a great deal of excellent writing, the majority of it not his own.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v18/n14/dale-peck/well-duh" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Dale Peck’s notorious takedown of&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Infinite Jest&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘If nothing else, the success of&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Infinite Jest&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;is proof that the Great American Hype machine can still work wonders.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 10 in our series on the great essays is about David Foster Wallace’s ‘Up, Simba!’, which describes his experiences following the doomed campaign of John McCain for the Republican presidential nomination in 2000. Wallace believed that McCain’s distinctive political style revealed some hard truths about American democracy. Was he right? What did he miss? And how do those truths look now in the age of Trump?
More on David Foster Wallace from the LRB:
Jenny Turner on Wallace and his moment
‘The risk Wallace takes is to guess he is not the only "obscenely well-educated", curiously lost and empty white boy out there; that his sadness is also the experience of a whole historical moment.’
Patricia Lockwood on Wallace and his influence
‘It was the essayists who were left to cope with his almost radioactive influence. He produced a great deal of excellent writing, the majority of it not his own.’
Dale Peck’s notorious takedown of Infinite Jest
‘If nothing else, the success of Infinite Jest is proof that the Great American Hype machine can still work wonders.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Episode 10 in our series on the great essays is about David Foster Wallace’s ‘Up, Simba!’, which describes his experiences following the doomed campaign of John McCain for the Republican presidential nomination in 2000. Wallace believed that McCain’s distinctive political style revealed some hard truths about American democracy. Was he right? What did he miss? And how do those truths look now in the age of Trump?</p><br><p>More on David Foster Wallace from the LRB:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3LDYjWz">Jenny Turner on Wallace and his moment</a></p><p>‘The risk Wallace takes is to guess he is not the only "obscenely well-educated", curiously lost and empty white boy out there; that his sadness is also the experience of a whole historical moment.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3RDz2zE">Patricia Lockwood on Wallace and his influence</a></p><p>‘It was the essayists who were left to cope with his almost radioactive influence. He produced a great deal of excellent writing, the majority of it not his own.’</p><p><a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v18/n14/dale-peck/well-duh">Dale Peck’s notorious takedown of <em>Infinite Jest</em></a></p><p>‘If nothing else, the success of <em>Infinite Jest</em> is proof that the Great American Hype machine can still work wonders.’</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3285</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[658b211ab17f790017a21b3c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7590755083.mp3?updated=1731679179" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas 9: Joan Didion</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/658b16426fa7630016ef9da4</link>
      <description>Episode 9 in our series on the great essays is about Joan Didion's 'The White Album' (1979), her haunting, impressionistic account of the fracturing of America in the late 1960s. From Jim Morrison to the Manson murders, Didion offers a series of snapshots of a society coming apart in ways no one seemed to understand. But what was true, what was imagined, and where did the real sickness lie?
More on Joan Didion from the LRB archive:
Thomas Powers on Didion and California:
'The thing that California taught her to fear most was snakes, especially rattlesnakes...This gets close to Didion's core anxiety: watching for something that could be anywhere, was easily overlooked, could kill you or a child playing in the garden – just like that.'
Mary-Kay Wilmers on Didion and memory:
'Reassurance is something Didion doesn't need. She is talking to herself, weighing up the past, going over old stories, keeping herself company. Staging herself.'
Martin Amis on Didion's style:
'The Californian emptiness arrives and Miss Didion attempts to evolve a style, or manner, to answer to it. Here comes divorces, breakdowns, suicide bids, spliced-up paragraphs, 40-word chapters and italicised wedges of prose that used to be called "fractured".'
Patricia Lockwood on reading Didion now:
'To revisit Slouching Towards Bethlehem or The White Album is to read an old up-to-the-minute relevance renewed. Inside these essays the coming revolution feels neither terrifying nor exhilarating but familiar – if you are a reader of Joan Didion, you have been studying it all your life.'
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2024 06:00:46 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas 9: Joan Didion</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5527b136-a203-11ef-8350-075a14c130a0/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Episode 9 in our series on the great essays is about Joan Didion's 'The White Album' (1979), her haunting, impressionistic account of the fracturing of America in the late 1960s. From Jim Morrison to the Manson murders, Didion offers a series of snapshots of a society coming apart in ways no one seemed to understand. But what was true, what was imagined, and where did the real sickness lie?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;More on Joan Didion from the LRB archive:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v44/n21/thomas-powers/fire-or-earthquake" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Thomas Powers on Didion and California:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;'The thing that California taught her to fear most was snakes, especially rattlesnakes...This gets close to Didion's core anxiety: watching for something that could be anywhere, was easily overlooked, could kill you or a child playing in the garden – just like that.'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v33/n21/mary-kay-wilmers/what-if-you-hadn-t-been-home" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Mary-Kay Wilmers on Didion and memory:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;'Reassurance is something Didion doesn't need. She is talking to herself, weighing up the past, going over old stories, keeping herself company. Staging herself.'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v02/n02/martin-amis/joan-didion-s-style" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Martin Amis on Didion's style:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;'The Californian emptiness arrives and Miss Didion attempts to evolve a style, or manner, to answer to it. Here comes divorces, breakdowns, suicide bids, spliced-up paragraphs, 40-word chapters and italicised wedges of prose that used to be called "fractured".'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v40/n01/patricia-lockwood/it-was-gold" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Patricia Lockwood on reading Didion now:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;'To revisit Slouching Towards Bethlehem or The White Album is to read an old up-to-the-minute relevance renewed. Inside these essays the coming revolution feels neither terrifying nor exhilarating but familiar – if you are a reader of Joan Didion, you have been studying it all your life.'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 9 in our series on the great essays is about Joan Didion's 'The White Album' (1979), her haunting, impressionistic account of the fracturing of America in the late 1960s. From Jim Morrison to the Manson murders, Didion offers a series of snapshots of a society coming apart in ways no one seemed to understand. But what was true, what was imagined, and where did the real sickness lie?
More on Joan Didion from the LRB archive:
Thomas Powers on Didion and California:
'The thing that California taught her to fear most was snakes, especially rattlesnakes...This gets close to Didion's core anxiety: watching for something that could be anywhere, was easily overlooked, could kill you or a child playing in the garden – just like that.'
Mary-Kay Wilmers on Didion and memory:
'Reassurance is something Didion doesn't need. She is talking to herself, weighing up the past, going over old stories, keeping herself company. Staging herself.'
Martin Amis on Didion's style:
'The Californian emptiness arrives and Miss Didion attempts to evolve a style, or manner, to answer to it. Here comes divorces, breakdowns, suicide bids, spliced-up paragraphs, 40-word chapters and italicised wedges of prose that used to be called "fractured".'
Patricia Lockwood on reading Didion now:
'To revisit Slouching Towards Bethlehem or The White Album is to read an old up-to-the-minute relevance renewed. Inside these essays the coming revolution feels neither terrifying nor exhilarating but familiar – if you are a reader of Joan Didion, you have been studying it all your life.'
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Episode 9 in our series on the great essays is about Joan Didion's 'The White Album' (1979), her haunting, impressionistic account of the fracturing of America in the late 1960s. From Jim Morrison to the Manson murders, Didion offers a series of snapshots of a society coming apart in ways no one seemed to understand. But what was true, what was imagined, and where did the real sickness lie?</p><br><p>More on Joan Didion from the LRB archive:</p><p><a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v44/n21/thomas-powers/fire-or-earthquake">Thomas Powers on Didion and California:</a></p><p>'The thing that California taught her to fear most was snakes, especially rattlesnakes...This gets close to Didion's core anxiety: watching for something that could be anywhere, was easily overlooked, could kill you or a child playing in the garden – just like that.'</p><p><a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v33/n21/mary-kay-wilmers/what-if-you-hadn-t-been-home">Mary-Kay Wilmers on Didion and memory:</a></p><p>'Reassurance is something Didion doesn't need. She is talking to herself, weighing up the past, going over old stories, keeping herself company. Staging herself.'</p><p><a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v02/n02/martin-amis/joan-didion-s-style">Martin Amis on Didion's style:</a></p><p>'The Californian emptiness arrives and Miss Didion attempts to evolve a style, or manner, to answer to it. Here comes divorces, breakdowns, suicide bids, spliced-up paragraphs, 40-word chapters and italicised wedges of prose that used to be called "fractured".'</p><p><a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v40/n01/patricia-lockwood/it-was-gold">Patricia Lockwood on reading Didion now:</a></p><p>'To revisit Slouching Towards Bethlehem or The White Album is to read an old up-to-the-minute relevance renewed. Inside these essays the coming revolution feels neither terrifying nor exhilarating but familiar – if you are a reader of Joan Didion, you have been studying it all your life.'</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3166</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[658b16426fa7630016ef9da4]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6903678496.mp3?updated=1731679140" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas 8: Susan Sontag</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/658b153d7b100f00171230b3</link>
      <description>Episode 8 in our history of the great essays is about Susan Sontag’s ‘Against Interpretation’ (1963). What was interpretation and why was Sontag so against it? David explores how an argument about art, criticism and the avant-garde can be applied to contemporary politics and can even explain the monstrous appeal of Donald Trump.
Sontag in the LRB:
Terry Castle on Sontag and friendship 
‘At its best, our relationship was rather like the one between Dame Edna and her feeble sidekick Madge – or possibly Stalin and Malenkov.’
James Wolcott on Sontag and polemics
‘The upside of Sontag’s downside was that her ire was generated by the same power supply that electrified her battle for principles that others only espoused.’
Mark Grief on Sontag and identity
‘One of the most appealing things about Susan Sontag was that she didn’t ask to be liked. Sontag’s persona was not personal. It was superior.’
Joanna Biggs on Sontag and Paris
‘Paris let her say no to an academic life, but not to a life of ideas. The best thinking was done in cafes, or in bed, or at the movies, not in libraries.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 06:00:27 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas 8: Susan Sontag</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/559d09a4-a203-11ef-8350-5b333e91b884/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Episode 8 in our history of the great essays is about Susan Sontag’s ‘Against Interpretation’ (1963).&amp;nbsp;What was interpretation and why was Sontag so against it?&amp;nbsp;David explores how an argument about art, criticism and the avant-garde can be applied to contemporary politics and can even explain the monstrous appeal of Donald Trump.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sontag in the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3Yr6URL" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Terry Castle on Sontag and friendship&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘At its best, our relationship was rather like the one between Dame Edna and her feeble sidekick Madge – or possibly Stalin and Malenkov.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/45olmMq" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;James Wolcott on Sontag and polemics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘The upside of Sontag’s downside was that her ire was generated by the same power supply that electrified her battle for principles that others only espoused.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3Ot0vAX" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Mark Grief on Sontag and identity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘One of the most appealing things about Susan Sontag was that she didn’t ask to be liked.&amp;nbsp;Sontag’s persona was not personal.&amp;nbsp;It was superior.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3OxAfWb" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Joanna Biggs on Sontag and Paris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘Paris let her say no to an academic life, but not to a life of ideas.&amp;nbsp;The best thinking was done in cafes, or in bed, or at the movies, not in libraries.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 8 in our history of the great essays is about Susan Sontag’s ‘Against Interpretation’ (1963). What was interpretation and why was Sontag so against it? David explores how an argument about art, criticism and the avant-garde can be applied to contemporary politics and can even explain the monstrous appeal of Donald Trump.
Sontag in the LRB:
Terry Castle on Sontag and friendship 
‘At its best, our relationship was rather like the one between Dame Edna and her feeble sidekick Madge – or possibly Stalin and Malenkov.’
James Wolcott on Sontag and polemics
‘The upside of Sontag’s downside was that her ire was generated by the same power supply that electrified her battle for principles that others only espoused.’
Mark Grief on Sontag and identity
‘One of the most appealing things about Susan Sontag was that she didn’t ask to be liked. Sontag’s persona was not personal. It was superior.’
Joanna Biggs on Sontag and Paris
‘Paris let her say no to an academic life, but not to a life of ideas. The best thinking was done in cafes, or in bed, or at the movies, not in libraries.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Episode 8 in our history of the great essays is about Susan Sontag’s ‘Against Interpretation’ (1963). What was interpretation and why was Sontag so against it? David explores how an argument about art, criticism and the avant-garde can be applied to contemporary politics and can even explain the monstrous appeal of Donald Trump.</p><br><p>Sontag in the LRB:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3Yr6URL">Terry Castle on Sontag and friendship</a> </p><p>‘At its best, our relationship was rather like the one between Dame Edna and her feeble sidekick Madge – or possibly Stalin and Malenkov.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/45olmMq">James Wolcott on Sontag and polemics</a></p><p>‘The upside of Sontag’s downside was that her ire was generated by the same power supply that electrified her battle for principles that others only espoused.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3Ot0vAX">Mark Grief on Sontag and identity</a></p><p>‘One of the most appealing things about Susan Sontag was that she didn’t ask to be liked. Sontag’s persona was not personal. It was superior.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3OxAfWb">Joanna Biggs on Sontag and Paris</a></p><p>‘Paris let her say no to an academic life, but not to a life of ideas. The best thinking was done in cafes, or in bed, or at the movies, not in libraries.’</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3337</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[658b153d7b100f00171230b3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6944018063.mp3?updated=1731679193" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas 7: James Baldwin</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/658b115becedc10016b1ccc9</link>
      <description>Episode 7 in our series on the great essays is about James Baldwin’s ‘Notes of a Native Son’ (1955), an essay that combines autobiography with a searing indictment of America’s racial politics. At its heart it tells the story of Baldwin’s relationship with his father, but it is also about fear, cruelty, violence and the terrible compromises of a country at war. What happens when North and South collide?
More on Baldwin from the LRB:
Michael Wood on Baldwin and power 
‘James Baldwin’s thinking recalls Virginia Woolf’s view of the way that women have been used as mirrors by men.’
Colm Toibin on reading Baldwin
‘James Baldwin’s legacy is both powerful and fluid, allowing it to fit whatever category each reader requires, allowing it to influence each reader in a way that tells us as much about the reader as it does about Baldwin.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2023 06:00:51 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas 7: James Baldwin</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/56204b34-a203-11ef-8350-e72e2efea7a0/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Episode 7 in our series on the great essays is about James Baldwin’s ‘Notes of a Native Son’ (1955), an essay that combines autobiography with a searing indictment of America’s racial politics.&amp;nbsp;At its heart it tells the story of Baldwin’s relationship with his father, but it is also about fear, cruelty, violence and the terrible compromises of a country at war.&amp;nbsp;What happens when North and South collide?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;More on Baldwin from the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3E9AySp" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Michael Wood on Baldwin and power&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘James Baldwin’s thinking recalls Virginia Woolf’s view of the way that women have been used as mirrors by men.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3saHAmQ" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Colm Toibin on reading Baldwin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘James Baldwin’s legacy is both powerful and fluid, allowing it to fit whatever category each reader requires, allowing it to influence each reader in a way that tells us as much about the reader as it does about Baldwin.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 7 in our series on the great essays is about James Baldwin’s ‘Notes of a Native Son’ (1955), an essay that combines autobiography with a searing indictment of America’s racial politics. At its heart it tells the story of Baldwin’s relationship with his father, but it is also about fear, cruelty, violence and the terrible compromises of a country at war. What happens when North and South collide?
More on Baldwin from the LRB:
Michael Wood on Baldwin and power 
‘James Baldwin’s thinking recalls Virginia Woolf’s view of the way that women have been used as mirrors by men.’
Colm Toibin on reading Baldwin
‘James Baldwin’s legacy is both powerful and fluid, allowing it to fit whatever category each reader requires, allowing it to influence each reader in a way that tells us as much about the reader as it does about Baldwin.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Episode 7 in our series on the great essays is about James Baldwin’s ‘Notes of a Native Son’ (1955), an essay that combines autobiography with a searing indictment of America’s racial politics. At its heart it tells the story of Baldwin’s relationship with his father, but it is also about fear, cruelty, violence and the terrible compromises of a country at war. What happens when North and South collide?</p><br><p>More on Baldwin from the LRB:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3E9AySp">Michael Wood on Baldwin and power </a></p><p>‘James Baldwin’s thinking recalls Virginia Woolf’s view of the way that women have been used as mirrors by men.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3saHAmQ">Colm Toibin on reading Baldwin</a></p><p>‘James Baldwin’s legacy is both powerful and fluid, allowing it to fit whatever category each reader requires, allowing it to influence each reader in a way that tells us as much about the reader as it does about Baldwin.’</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3079</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[658b115becedc10016b1ccc9]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3466425187.mp3?updated=1731679175" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas 6: Simone Weil</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/658b0fe6f8d2ee0017abc603</link>
      <description>Episode 6 in our series on the great essays is about Simone Weil’s ‘Human Personality’ (1943). Written shortly before her death aged just 34, it is an uncompromising repudiation of the building blocks of modern life: democracy, rights, personal identity, scientific progress – all these are rejected. What does Weil have to put in their place? The answer is radical and surprising.
Read ‘Human Personality’ here
For more on Weil from the LRB archive:
Toril Moi on living like Weil 
‘If we take Weil as seriously as she took herself, our nice lives will fall apart.’
Alan Bennett on Kafka and Weil
‘Many parents, one imagines, would echo the words of Madame Weil, the mother of Simone Weil, a child every bit as trying as Kafka must have been. Questioned about her pride in the posthumous fame of her ascetic daughter, Madame Weil said: “Oh! How much I would have preferred her to be happy.”’ 
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2023 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas 6: Simone Weil</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/567ad734-a203-11ef-8350-0bec840a4db6/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Episode 6 in our series on the great essays is about Simone Weil’s ‘Human Personality’ (1943).&amp;nbsp;Written shortly before her death aged just 34, it is an uncompromising repudiation of the building blocks of modern life: democracy, rights, personal identity, scientific progress – all these are rejected.&amp;nbsp;What does Weil have to put in their place?&amp;nbsp;The answer is radical and surprising.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read ‘Human Personality’ &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3KCRVhR" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more on Weil from the LRB archive:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/47n0ozz" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Toril Moi on living like Weil&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘If we take Weil as seriously as she took herself, our nice lives will fall apart.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3OvkJKe" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Alan Bennett on Kafka and Weil&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘Many parents, one imagines, would echo the words of Madame Weil, the mother of Simone Weil, a child every bit as trying as Kafka must have been.&amp;nbsp;Questioned about her pride in the posthumous fame of her ascetic daughter, Madame Weil said: “Oh! How much I would have preferred her to be happy.”’&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 6 in our series on the great essays is about Simone Weil’s ‘Human Personality’ (1943). Written shortly before her death aged just 34, it is an uncompromising repudiation of the building blocks of modern life: democracy, rights, personal identity, scientific progress – all these are rejected. What does Weil have to put in their place? The answer is radical and surprising.
Read ‘Human Personality’ here
For more on Weil from the LRB archive:
Toril Moi on living like Weil 
‘If we take Weil as seriously as she took herself, our nice lives will fall apart.’
Alan Bennett on Kafka and Weil
‘Many parents, one imagines, would echo the words of Madame Weil, the mother of Simone Weil, a child every bit as trying as Kafka must have been. Questioned about her pride in the posthumous fame of her ascetic daughter, Madame Weil said: “Oh! How much I would have preferred her to be happy.”’ 
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Episode 6 in our series on the great essays is about Simone Weil’s ‘Human Personality’ (1943). Written shortly before her death aged just 34, it is an uncompromising repudiation of the building blocks of modern life: democracy, rights, personal identity, scientific progress – all these are rejected. What does Weil have to put in their place? The answer is radical and surprising.</p><br><p>Read ‘Human Personality’ <a href="https://bit.ly/3KCRVhR">here</a></p><p>For more on Weil from the LRB archive:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/47n0ozz">Toril Moi on living like Weil </a></p><p>‘If we take Weil as seriously as she took herself, our nice lives will fall apart.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3OvkJKe">Alan Bennett on Kafka and Weil</a></p><p>‘Many parents, one imagines, would echo the words of Madame Weil, the mother of Simone Weil, a child every bit as trying as Kafka must have been. Questioned about her pride in the posthumous fame of her ascetic daughter, Madame Weil said: “Oh! How much I would have preferred her to be happy.”’ </p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3201</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[658b0fe6f8d2ee0017abc603]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2618396038.mp3?updated=1731679209" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas 5: George Orwell</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/658b0c92ecedc10016b13ca1</link>
      <description>Episode 5 in our series on the great essays is about George Orwell. His wartime essay ‘The Lion and the Unicorn’ (1941) is about what it does – and doesn’t – mean to be English. How did the English manage to resist fascism? How are the English going to defeat fascism? These were two different questions with two very different answers: hypocrisy and socialism. David takes the story from there to Brexit and back again.
For more on Orwell from the LRB:
Samuel Hynes on Orwell and politics
‘He was not, in fact, really a political thinker at all: he had no ideology, he proposed no plan of political action, and he was never able to relate himself comfortably to any political party.’
Julian Symons on Orwell and fame
‘If George Orwell had died in 1939 he would be recorded in literary histories of the period as an interesting maverick who wrote some not very successful novels.’
Terry Eagleton on Orwell and experience
‘Orwell detested those, mostly on the left, who theorised about situations without having experienced them, a common empiricist prejudice. There is no need to have your legs chopped off to sympathise with the legless.’
More from the History of Ideas:
Judith Shklar on Hypocrisy
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2023 06:00:22 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas 5: George Orwell</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/56dc3362-a203-11ef-8350-bb016bb3f8f8/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Episode 5 in our series on the great essays is about George Orwell. His wartime essay ‘The Lion and the Unicorn’ (1941) is about what it does – and doesn’t – mean to be English.&amp;nbsp;How did the English manage to resist fascism?&amp;nbsp;How are the English going to defeat fascism?&amp;nbsp;These were two different questions with two very different answers: hypocrisy and socialism.&amp;nbsp;David takes the story from there to Brexit and back again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more on Orwell from the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3OztAff" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Samuel Hynes on Orwell and politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘He was not, in fact, really a political thinker at all: he had no ideology, he proposed no plan of political action, and he was never able to relate himself comfortably to any political party.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3QkX5CM" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Julian Symons on Orwell and fame&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘If George Orwell had died in 1939 he would be recorded in literary histories of the period as an interesting maverick who wrote some not very successful novels.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3OG13Vz" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Terry Eagleton on Orwell and experience&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘Orwell detested those, mostly on the left, who theorised about situations without having experienced them, a common empiricist prejudice.&amp;nbsp;There is no need to have your legs chopped off to sympathise with the legless.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;More from the History of Ideas:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3YjOGRW" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Judith Shklar on Hypocrisy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 5 in our series on the great essays is about George Orwell. His wartime essay ‘The Lion and the Unicorn’ (1941) is about what it does – and doesn’t – mean to be English. How did the English manage to resist fascism? How are the English going to defeat fascism? These were two different questions with two very different answers: hypocrisy and socialism. David takes the story from there to Brexit and back again.
For more on Orwell from the LRB:
Samuel Hynes on Orwell and politics
‘He was not, in fact, really a political thinker at all: he had no ideology, he proposed no plan of political action, and he was never able to relate himself comfortably to any political party.’
Julian Symons on Orwell and fame
‘If George Orwell had died in 1939 he would be recorded in literary histories of the period as an interesting maverick who wrote some not very successful novels.’
Terry Eagleton on Orwell and experience
‘Orwell detested those, mostly on the left, who theorised about situations without having experienced them, a common empiricist prejudice. There is no need to have your legs chopped off to sympathise with the legless.’
More from the History of Ideas:
Judith Shklar on Hypocrisy
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Episode 5 in our series on the great essays is about George Orwell. His wartime essay ‘The Lion and the Unicorn’ (1941) is about what it does – and doesn’t – mean to be English. How did the English manage to resist fascism? How are the English going to defeat fascism? These were two different questions with two very different answers: hypocrisy and socialism. David takes the story from there to Brexit and back again.</p><br><p>For more on Orwell from the LRB:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3OztAff">Samuel Hynes on Orwell and politics</a></p><p>‘He was not, in fact, really a political thinker at all: he had no ideology, he proposed no plan of political action, and he was never able to relate himself comfortably to any political party.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3QkX5CM">Julian Symons on Orwell and fame</a></p><p>‘If George Orwell had died in 1939 he would be recorded in literary histories of the period as an interesting maverick who wrote some not very successful novels.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3OG13Vz">Terry Eagleton on Orwell and experience</a></p><p>‘Orwell detested those, mostly on the left, who theorised about situations without having experienced them, a common empiricist prejudice. There is no need to have your legs chopped off to sympathise with the legless.’</p><p>More from the History of Ideas:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3YjOGRW">Judith Shklar on Hypocrisy</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3187</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[658b0c92ecedc10016b13ca1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML5122138488.mp3?updated=1731679176" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas 4: Virginia Woolf</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/658b0b885876d50017afe98d</link>
      <description>Episode 4 in our series on the great essays is about Virginia Woolf’s masterpiece ‘A Room of One’s Own’ (1929). David discusses how an essay on the conditions for women writing fiction ends up being about so much else besides: anger, power, sex, modernity, independence and transcendence. And how, despite all that, it still manages to be as fresh and funny as anything written since.
Read more on Virginia Woolf in the LRB:
Jacqueline Rose on Woolf and madness
‘It is, one might say, a central paradox of modern family life that its members are required to mould themselves in each other’s image and yet to know, as separate individuals or egos, exactly who they are.’
Gillian Beer on Woolf and reality
‘The “real world” for Virginia Woolf was not solely the liberal humanist world of personal and social relationships: it was the hauntingly difficult world of Einsteinian physics and Wittgenstein’s private languages.’
Rosemary Hill on Woolf and domesticity
‘Woolf, who had once found it humiliating to do her own shopping, spent the last morning of her life dusting with Louie, before she put her duster down and went to drown herself.’
John Bayley on Woolf and writing
‘For Virginia Woolf wish-fulfilment was in words themselves, that protected her from herself and from society.’
Listen to David’s History of Ideas episode about Max Weber’s ‘The Profession and Vocation of Politics’.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2023 06:00:59 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas 4: Virginia Woolf</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/57389cec-a203-11ef-8350-87959cbc5bae/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Episode 4 in our series on the great essays is about Virginia Woolf’s masterpiece ‘A Room of One’s Own’ (1929).&amp;nbsp;David discusses how an essay on the conditions for women writing fiction ends up being about so much else besides: anger, power, sex, modernity, independence and transcendence.&amp;nbsp;And how, despite all that, it still manages to be as fresh and funny as anything written since.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read more on Virginia Woolf in the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3OtRMQa" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Jacqueline Rose on Woolf and madness&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘It is, one might say, a central paradox of modern family life that its members are required to mould themselves in each other’s image and yet to know, as separate individuals or egos, exactly who they are.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3DsFxgp" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Gillian Beer on Woolf and reality&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘The “real world” for Virginia Woolf was not solely the liberal humanist world of personal and social relationships: it was the hauntingly difficult world of Einsteinian physics and Wittgenstein’s private languages.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3KaNryE" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Rosemary Hill on Woolf and domesticity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘Woolf, who had once found it humiliating to do her own shopping, spent the last morning of her life dusting with Louie, before she put her duster down and went to drown herself.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3q7eVP1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;John Bayley on Woolf and writing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘For Virginia Woolf wish-fulfilment was in words themselves, that protected her from herself and from society.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Listen to David’s History of Ideas episode about &lt;a href="https://apple.co/43FZWt1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Max Weber’s ‘The Profession and Vocation of Politics’&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Episode 4 in our series on the great essays is about Virginia Woolf’s masterpiece ‘A Room of One’s Own’ (1929). David discusses how an essay on the conditions for women writing fiction ends up being about so much else besides: anger, power, sex, modernity, independence and transcendence. And how, despite all that, it still manages to be as fresh and funny as anything written since.
Read more on Virginia Woolf in the LRB:
Jacqueline Rose on Woolf and madness
‘It is, one might say, a central paradox of modern family life that its members are required to mould themselves in each other’s image and yet to know, as separate individuals or egos, exactly who they are.’
Gillian Beer on Woolf and reality
‘The “real world” for Virginia Woolf was not solely the liberal humanist world of personal and social relationships: it was the hauntingly difficult world of Einsteinian physics and Wittgenstein’s private languages.’
Rosemary Hill on Woolf and domesticity
‘Woolf, who had once found it humiliating to do her own shopping, spent the last morning of her life dusting with Louie, before she put her duster down and went to drown herself.’
John Bayley on Woolf and writing
‘For Virginia Woolf wish-fulfilment was in words themselves, that protected her from herself and from society.’
Listen to David’s History of Ideas episode about Max Weber’s ‘The Profession and Vocation of Politics’.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Episode 4 in our series on the great essays is about Virginia Woolf’s masterpiece ‘A Room of One’s Own’ (1929). David discusses how an essay on the conditions for women writing fiction ends up being about so much else besides: anger, power, sex, modernity, independence and transcendence. And how, despite all that, it still manages to be as fresh and funny as anything written since.</p><br><p>Read more on Virginia Woolf in the LRB:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3OtRMQa">Jacqueline Rose on Woolf and madness</a></p><p>‘It is, one might say, a central paradox of modern family life that its members are required to mould themselves in each other’s image and yet to know, as separate individuals or egos, exactly who they are.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3DsFxgp">Gillian Beer on Woolf and reality</a></p><p>‘The “real world” for Virginia Woolf was not solely the liberal humanist world of personal and social relationships: it was the hauntingly difficult world of Einsteinian physics and Wittgenstein’s private languages.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3KaNryE">Rosemary Hill on Woolf and domesticity</a></p><p>‘Woolf, who had once found it humiliating to do her own shopping, spent the last morning of her life dusting with Louie, before she put her duster down and went to drown herself.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3q7eVP1">John Bayley on Woolf and writing</a></p><p>‘For Virginia Woolf wish-fulfilment was in words themselves, that protected her from herself and from society.’</p><p>Listen to David’s History of Ideas episode about <a href="https://apple.co/43FZWt1">Max Weber’s ‘The Profession and Vocation of Politics’</a>.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3124</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[658b0b885876d50017afe98d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3200278818.mp3?updated=1731679139" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas 3: Thoreau</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/658b02e7af034200159bf8cd</link>
      <description>Episode three in our series about the great political essays is about Thoreau’s ‘Civil Disobedience’ (1849), a ringing call to resistance against democratic idiocy. Thoreau wanted to resist slavery and unjust wars. How can one citizen turn the tide against majority opinion? Was Thoreau a visionary or a hypocrite? And what do his arguments say about environmental civil disobedience today?
Read Thoreau’s essay here
From the LRB:
Paul Laity on Thoreau and self-sufficiency
Jeremy Harding on XR and civil disobedience 

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2023 06:00:32 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas 3: Thoreau</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/57951a1c-a203-11ef-8350-eb9e43a6940e/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Episode three in our series about the great political essays is about Thoreau’s ‘Civil Disobedience’ (1849), a ringing call to resistance against democratic idiocy.&amp;nbsp;Thoreau wanted to resist slavery and unjust wars.&amp;nbsp;How can one citizen turn the tide against majority opinion?&amp;nbsp;Was Thoreau a visionary or a hypocrite?&amp;nbsp;And what do his arguments say about environmental civil disobedience today?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read Thoreau’s essay &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/44oO144" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;From the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Paul Laity on &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/46LQ2J9" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Thoreau and self-sufficiency&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jeremy Harding on &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/46HOjVh" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;XR and civil disobedience&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Episode three in our series about the great political essays is about Thoreau’s ‘Civil Disobedience’ (1849), a ringing call to resistance against democratic idiocy. Thoreau wanted to resist slavery and unjust wars. How can one citizen turn the tide against majority opinion? Was Thoreau a visionary or a hypocrite? And what do his arguments say about environmental civil disobedience today?
Read Thoreau’s essay here
From the LRB:
Paul Laity on Thoreau and self-sufficiency
Jeremy Harding on XR and civil disobedience 

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Episode three in our series about the great political essays is about Thoreau’s ‘Civil Disobedience’ (1849), a ringing call to resistance against democratic idiocy. Thoreau wanted to resist slavery and unjust wars. How can one citizen turn the tide against majority opinion? Was Thoreau a visionary or a hypocrite? And what do his arguments say about environmental civil disobedience today?</p><p>Read Thoreau’s essay <a href="https://bit.ly/44oO144">here</a></p><br><p>From the LRB:</p><p>Paul Laity on <a href="https://bit.ly/46LQ2J9">Thoreau and self-sufficiency</a></p><p>Jeremy Harding on <a href="https://bit.ly/46HOjVh">XR and civil disobedience </a></p><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3398</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[658b02e7af034200159bf8cd]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7081421937.mp3?updated=1731679170" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas 2: Hume</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6589b5a6b17f79001778230f</link>
      <description>Episode two in our series on the great essays is about David Hume. How can eighteenth-century arguments about the national debt help make sense of American politics today? When does public borrowing become a recipe for national disaster? Who is really in charge of the public finances: the government or the bankers, Washington, D.C. or Wall Street? And what has all this got to do with Hume’s arguments for the morality of suicide?
Read Hume’s original essay ‘Of Public Credit’ here.
For more on Hume from the archive of the LRB:
Jonathan Rée on Hume’s voracious appetites: ‘“The Corpulence of his whole person was better fitted to communicate the Idea of the Turtle-Eating Alderman than of a refined Philosopher,” as a friend put it.’
Fara Dabhoiwala on Hume and mockery: ‘David Hume often resorted to ridicule to undermine hypocrisy or superstition, even if he doubted its capacity to settle controversial questions, arguing that mockery was as likely to distort as to reveal the truth.’
John Dunn on Hume and us: ‘Hume is in some ways so very modern . . . But just because he is in some ways so close to us, it is easy to lose the sense that in many others his beliefs and experiences stand at some little distance from our own.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2023 06:00:06 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas 2: Hume</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/57ec4378-a203-11ef-8350-df842e9e295e/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Episode two in our series on the great essays is about David Hume. How can eighteenth-century arguments about the national debt help make sense of American politics today?&amp;nbsp;When does public borrowing become a recipe for national disaster?&amp;nbsp;Who is really in charge of the public finances: the government or the bankers, Washington, D.C. or Wall Street?&amp;nbsp;And what has all this got to do with Hume’s arguments for the morality of suicide?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read Hume’s original essay ‘Of Public Credit’ &lt;a href="https://davidhume.org/texts/pld/pc" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more on Hume from the archive of the&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;LRB&lt;/em&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3qFgYtE" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Jonathan Rée on Hume’s voracious appetites&lt;/a&gt;: ‘“The Corpulence of his whole person was better fitted to communicate the Idea of the Turtle-Eating Alderman than of a refined Philosopher,” as a friend put it.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3X6KbtK" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Fara Dabhoiwala on Hume and mockery&lt;/a&gt;: ‘David Hume often resorted to ridicule to undermine hypocrisy or superstition, even if he doubted its capacity to settle controversial questions, arguing that mockery was as likely to distort as to reveal the truth.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3qJRwTW" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;John Dunn on Hume and us&lt;/a&gt;: ‘Hume is in some ways so&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;modern . . . But just because he is in some ways so close to us, it is easy to lose the sense that in many others his beliefs and experiences stand at some little distance from our own.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Episode two in our series on the great essays is about David Hume. How can eighteenth-century arguments about the national debt help make sense of American politics today? When does public borrowing become a recipe for national disaster? Who is really in charge of the public finances: the government or the bankers, Washington, D.C. or Wall Street? And what has all this got to do with Hume’s arguments for the morality of suicide?
Read Hume’s original essay ‘Of Public Credit’ here.
For more on Hume from the archive of the LRB:
Jonathan Rée on Hume’s voracious appetites: ‘“The Corpulence of his whole person was better fitted to communicate the Idea of the Turtle-Eating Alderman than of a refined Philosopher,” as a friend put it.’
Fara Dabhoiwala on Hume and mockery: ‘David Hume often resorted to ridicule to undermine hypocrisy or superstition, even if he doubted its capacity to settle controversial questions, arguing that mockery was as likely to distort as to reveal the truth.’
John Dunn on Hume and us: ‘Hume is in some ways so very modern . . . But just because he is in some ways so close to us, it is easy to lose the sense that in many others his beliefs and experiences stand at some little distance from our own.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Episode two in our series on the great essays is about David Hume. How can eighteenth-century arguments about the national debt help make sense of American politics today? When does public borrowing become a recipe for national disaster? Who is really in charge of the public finances: the government or the bankers, Washington, D.C. or Wall Street? And what has all this got to do with Hume’s arguments for the morality of suicide?</p><p>Read Hume’s original essay ‘Of Public Credit’ <a href="https://davidhume.org/texts/pld/pc">here</a>.</p><p>For more on Hume from the archive of the <em>LRB</em>:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3qFgYtE">Jonathan Rée on Hume’s voracious appetites</a>: ‘“The Corpulence of his whole person was better fitted to communicate the Idea of the Turtle-Eating Alderman than of a refined Philosopher,” as a friend put it.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3X6KbtK">Fara Dabhoiwala on Hume and mockery</a>: ‘David Hume often resorted to ridicule to undermine hypocrisy or superstition, even if he doubted its capacity to settle controversial questions, arguing that mockery was as likely to distort as to reveal the truth.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3qJRwTW">John Dunn on Hume and us</a>: ‘Hume is in some ways so <em>very</em> modern . . . But just because he is in some ways so close to us, it is easy to lose the sense that in many others his beliefs and experiences stand at some little distance from our own.’</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3628</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6589b5a6b17f79001778230f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3945722865.mp3?updated=1731679276" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas 1: Montaigne</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6588426980bf1900161a843c</link>
      <description>Episode one in our series on the great essays is about Montaigne, the man who invented a whole new way of writing and being read. From the fear of death to the joys of life, from the perils of atheism to the pitfalls of faith, from sex to religion and back again, Montaigne wrote the book of himself, which was also a guide to what it means to be human. Elephants, civil war, gout, cosmology, torture, tennis balls, disease, diets, and politics too: all life is here. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2023 06:00:14 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas 1: Montaigne</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/58474c50-a203-11ef-8350-878e511155cc/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Episode one in our series on the great essays is about Montaigne, the man who invented a whole new way of writing and being read.&amp;nbsp;From the fear of death to the joys of life, from the perils of atheism to the pitfalls of faith, from sex to religion and back again, Montaigne wrote the book of himself, which was also a guide to what it means to be human.&amp;nbsp;Elephants, civil war, gout, cosmology, torture, tennis balls, disease, diets, and politics too: all life is here.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Episode one in our series on the great essays is about Montaigne, the man who invented a whole new way of writing and being read. From the fear of death to the joys of life, from the perils of atheism to the pitfalls of faith, from sex to religion and back again, Montaigne wrote the book of himself, which was also a guide to what it means to be human. Elephants, civil war, gout, cosmology, torture, tennis balls, disease, diets, and politics too: all life is here. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[Episode one in our series on the great essays is about Montaigne, the man who invented a whole new way of writing and being read. From the fear of death to the joys of life, from the perils of atheism to the pitfalls of faith, from sex to religion and back again, Montaigne wrote the book of himself, which was also a guide to what it means to be human. Elephants, civil war, gout, cosmology, torture, tennis balls, disease, diets, and politics too: all life is here.<br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3176</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6588426980bf1900161a843c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML8622334007.mp3?updated=1731679169" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas Q&amp;A</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6582bdd852b81200167e0d49</link>
      <description>For our last episode before Christmas David answers some of your questions about the History of Ideas series – What would Dickens have made of Trump? How would reparations work? Which essays are missing from the list? 
Coming up: the whole series on the great essays, one a day, every day, starting on Christmas Day.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 06:00:27 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas Q&amp;A</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>35</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/58a2a49c-a203-11ef-8350-df8093c22b3f/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For our last episode before Christmas David answers some of your questions about the History of Ideas series – What would Dickens have made of Trump?&amp;nbsp;How would reparations work?&amp;nbsp;Which essays are missing from the list?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming up: the whole series on the great essays, one a day, every day, starting on Christmas Day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For our last episode before Christmas David answers some of your questions about the History of Ideas series – What would Dickens have made of Trump? How would reparations work? Which essays are missing from the list? 
Coming up: the whole series on the great essays, one a day, every day, starting on Christmas Day.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For our last episode before Christmas David answers some of your questions about the History of Ideas series – What would Dickens have made of Trump? How would reparations work? Which essays are missing from the list? </p><p>Coming up: the whole series on the great essays, one a day, every day, starting on Christmas Day.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3180</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6582bdd852b81200167e0d49]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML8724469006.mp3?updated=1731679200" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Art of the Essay</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65797fea3f126e00121ddabd</link>
      <description>As we wrap up our History of Ideas series David discusses what makes a great essay and whether the best contemporary writing is as good as what went before. The answer is yes, as shown by Jiayang Fan’s brilliant 2020 essay ‘How My Mother and I Became Chinese Propaganda’. David explores why this is such a remarkable example of what can be done with the form and why the art of the essay is alive and well.
Read Jiayang Fan’s essay here
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 06:00:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Art of the Essay</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>34</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/590644fc-a203-11ef-8350-d35d98132b64/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;As we wrap up our History of Ideas series David discusses what makes a great essay and whether the best contemporary writing is as good as what went before.&amp;nbsp;The answer is yes, as shown by Jiayang Fan’s brilliant 2020 essay ‘How My Mother and I Became Chinese Propaganda’.&amp;nbsp;David explores why this is such a remarkable example of what can be done with the form and why the art of the essay is alive and well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read Jiayang Fan’s essay&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/46XTCP8" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As we wrap up our History of Ideas series David discusses what makes a great essay and whether the best contemporary writing is as good as what went before. The answer is yes, as shown by Jiayang Fan’s brilliant 2020 essay ‘How My Mother and I Became Chinese Propaganda’. David explores why this is such a remarkable example of what can be done with the form and why the art of the essay is alive and well.
Read Jiayang Fan’s essay here
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>As we wrap up our History of Ideas series David discusses what makes a great essay and whether the best contemporary writing is as good as what went before. The answer is yes, as shown by Jiayang Fan’s brilliant 2020 essay ‘How My Mother and I Became Chinese Propaganda’. David explores why this is such a remarkable example of what can be done with the form and why the art of the essay is alive and well.</p><br><p>Read Jiayang Fan’s essay <a href="https://bit.ly/46XTCP8">here</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3235</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65797fea3f126e00121ddabd]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML5770803580.mp3?updated=1731679188" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Something’s Got to Give</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6570aa226765f20011e6ab55</link>
      <description>This week David talks to the economists Dieter Helm and Diane Coyle about the challenges of building sustainability into the way we live now. Why is GDP such a poor guide to long-term economic well-being? How can we stop squandering future resources?  What should the next Labour government do to create a sustainable economy – and what will happen if they don’t?
Dieter Helm’s new book is available to download for free here
Read the Bennett Institute report on Universal Basic Infrastructure here
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 06:00:09 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Something’s Got to Give</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>33</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5961cd36-a203-11ef-8350-efe6a8dc452e/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week David talks to the economists Dieter Helm and Diane Coyle about the challenges of building sustainability into the way we live now.&amp;nbsp;Why is GDP such a poor guide to long-term economic well-being?&amp;nbsp;How can we stop squandering future resources?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;What should the next Labour government do to create a sustainable economy – and what will happen if they don’t?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dieter Helm’s new book is available to download for free &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3uNZnSn" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the Bennett Institute report on Universal Basic Infrastructure &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3uNz3YB" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David talks to the economists Dieter Helm and Diane Coyle about the challenges of building sustainability into the way we live now. Why is GDP such a poor guide to long-term economic well-being? How can we stop squandering future resources?  What should the next Labour government do to create a sustainable economy – and what will happen if they don’t?
Dieter Helm’s new book is available to download for free here
Read the Bennett Institute report on Universal Basic Infrastructure here
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week David talks to the economists Dieter Helm and Diane Coyle about the challenges of building sustainability into the way we live now. Why is GDP such a poor guide to long-term economic well-being? How can we stop squandering future resources?  What should the next Labour government do to create a sustainable economy – and what will happen if they don’t?</p><br><p>Dieter Helm’s new book is available to download for free <a href="https://bit.ly/3uNZnSn">here</a></p><p>Read the Bennett Institute report on Universal Basic Infrastructure <a href="https://bit.ly/3uNz3YB">here</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3498</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6570aa226765f20011e6ab55]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9464047799.mp3?updated=1731679187" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Democracy Q&amp;A w/ Lea Ypi</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65675e7282b9f700125931aa</link>
      <description>This week David and Lea answer your questions about democracy. When does democratic freedom shade over into anarchy? What’s the connection between democracy and human rights? Do the voters choose the government or does the government choose the voters? Plus: what makes Lea an optimist about socialism? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 06:00:13 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Democracy Q&amp;A w/ Lea Ypi</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/59bca076-a203-11ef-8350-eff711ab07dd/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week David and Lea answer your questions about democracy. When does democratic freedom shade over into anarchy? What’s the connection between democracy and human rights? Do the voters choose the government or does the government choose the voters? Plus: what makes Lea an optimist about socialism?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David and Lea answer your questions about democracy. When does democratic freedom shade over into anarchy? What’s the connection between democracy and human rights? Do the voters choose the government or does the government choose the voters? Plus: what makes Lea an optimist about socialism? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[This week David and Lea answer your questions about democracy. When does democratic freedom shade over into anarchy? What’s the connection between democracy and human rights? Do the voters choose the government or does the government choose the voters? Plus: what makes Lea an optimist about socialism?<br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3550</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65675e7282b9f700125931aa]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML8984808774.mp3?updated=1731679162" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas: Ta-Nehisi Coates</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/655e23e5c7f93a001273969f</link>
      <description>In the penultimate episode in our series on the great essays, David talks about Ta-Nehisi Coates’s ‘The Case for Reparations’, published in the Atlantic in 2014. Black American life has been marked by injustice from the beginning: this essay explores what can – and what can’t – be done to remedy it, from slavery to the housing market, from Mississippi to Chicago. Plus, what has this story got to do with the origins of the state of Israel?
Read the original essay here.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2023 06:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas: Ta-Nehisi Coates</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5a1499f2-a203-11ef-8350-b3907e2ce1e0/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In the penultimate episode in our series on the great essays, David talks about Ta-Nehisi Coates’s ‘The Case for Reparations’, published in the Atlantic in 2014.&amp;nbsp;Black American life has been marked by injustice from the beginning: this essay explores what can – and what can’t – be done to remedy it, from slavery to the housing market, from Mississippi to Chicago.&amp;nbsp;Plus, what has this story got to do with the origins of the state of Israel?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the original essay &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/49LEhnC" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the penultimate episode in our series on the great essays, David talks about Ta-Nehisi Coates’s ‘The Case for Reparations’, published in the Atlantic in 2014. Black American life has been marked by injustice from the beginning: this essay explores what can – and what can’t – be done to remedy it, from slavery to the housing market, from Mississippi to Chicago. Plus, what has this story got to do with the origins of the state of Israel?
Read the original essay here.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the penultimate episode in our series on the great essays, David talks about Ta-Nehisi Coates’s ‘The Case for Reparations’, published in the Atlantic in 2014. Black American life has been marked by injustice from the beginning: this essay explores what can – and what can’t – be done to remedy it, from slavery to the housing market, from Mississippi to Chicago. Plus, what has this story got to do with the origins of the state of Israel?</p><br><p>Read the original essay <a href="https://bit.ly/49LEhnC">here</a>.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3305</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[655e23e5c7f93a001273969f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9492535505.mp3?updated=1731679186" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Democracy vs Nationalism w/ Lea Ypi</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6555091498eb580012ee2ce0</link>
      <description>In the latest instalment of David’s ongoing conversation with Lea Ypi about the past, present and future of democracy they discuss whether democratic politics can ever break free from the stranglehold of the nation-state. When and why did nationalism take such a strong grip of the idea of democracy? What are the international or cosmopolitan alternatives? And can a democracy police its borders without having actual borders or actual police?
Listen to the previous episodes in this series here.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 06:00:52 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Democracy vs Nationalism w/ Lea Ypi</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5a82d2be-a203-11ef-8350-4f663ea1f728/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;In the latest instalment of David’s ongoing conversation with Lea Ypi about the past, present and future of democracy they discuss whether democratic politics can ever break free from the stranglehold of the nation-state.&amp;nbsp;When and why did nationalism take such a strong grip of the idea of democracy?&amp;nbsp;What are the international or cosmopolitan alternatives?&amp;nbsp;And can a democracy police its borders without having actual borders or actual police?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Listen to the previous episodes in this series &lt;a href="https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/652fb80b93a2360012b7d844" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the latest instalment of David’s ongoing conversation with Lea Ypi about the past, present and future of democracy they discuss whether democratic politics can ever break free from the stranglehold of the nation-state. When and why did nationalism take such a strong grip of the idea of democracy? What are the international or cosmopolitan alternatives? And can a democracy police its borders without having actual borders or actual police?
Listen to the previous episodes in this series here.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the latest instalment of David’s ongoing conversation with Lea Ypi about the past, present and future of democracy they discuss whether democratic politics can ever break free from the stranglehold of the nation-state. When and why did nationalism take such a strong grip of the idea of democracy? What are the international or cosmopolitan alternatives? And can a democracy police its borders without having actual borders or actual police?</p><br><p>Listen to the previous episodes in this series <a href="https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/652fb80b93a2360012b7d844">here</a>.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3269</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6555091498eb580012ee2ce0]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3532886358.mp3?updated=1731679171" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jill Lepore on Trump, Guns and the Red Mirage</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/654b6a6fe33eea0012d6b4c0</link>
      <description>This week David talks to the historian and essayist Jill Lepore about where the chaotic last decade of American politics fits into the longer history of the nation. When and how did gun rights become a matter of principle rather than of pragmatism? What makes insurrection so appealing to so many people? Is another civil war really a possibility? Plus, what did the January 6th Committee miss about January 6th?
Jill Lepore’s new book is The American Beast: Essays 2012-2022
Listen to Gary Gerstle on PPF discussing what happened to the Republican Party

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 06:00:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Jill Lepore on Trump, Guns and the Red Mirage</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5b7402d8-a203-11ef-8350-dbda12a06b52/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week David talks to the historian and essayist Jill Lepore about where the chaotic last decade of American politics fits into the longer history of the nation.&amp;nbsp;When and how did gun rights become a matter of principle rather than of pragmatism?&amp;nbsp;What makes insurrection so appealing to so many people?&amp;nbsp;Is another civil war really a possibility?&amp;nbsp;Plus, what did the January 6th&amp;nbsp;Committee miss about January 6th?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jill Lepore’s new book is &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3MzQvpz" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;The American Beast: Essays 2012-2022&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/64b8dcf1081d350011c99148" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Listen to Gary Gerstle on PPF discussing what happened to the Republican Party&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David talks to the historian and essayist Jill Lepore about where the chaotic last decade of American politics fits into the longer history of the nation. When and how did gun rights become a matter of principle rather than of pragmatism? What makes insurrection so appealing to so many people? Is another civil war really a possibility? Plus, what did the January 6th Committee miss about January 6th?
Jill Lepore’s new book is The American Beast: Essays 2012-2022
Listen to Gary Gerstle on PPF discussing what happened to the Republican Party

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week David talks to the historian and essayist Jill Lepore about where the chaotic last decade of American politics fits into the longer history of the nation. When and how did gun rights become a matter of principle rather than of pragmatism? What makes insurrection so appealing to so many people? Is another civil war really a possibility? Plus, what did the January 6th Committee miss about January 6th?</p><p>Jill Lepore’s new book is <a href="https://bit.ly/3MzQvpz">The American Beast: Essays 2012-2022</a></p><p><a href="https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/64b8dcf1081d350011c99148">Listen to Gary Gerstle on PPF discussing what happened to the Republican Party</a></p><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3310</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[654b6a6fe33eea0012d6b4c0]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2721991236.mp3?updated=1731679197" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Leviacene: Defining Our Times</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65428b4bdf8cb80012a5c578</link>
      <description>This week David explores a different way of thinking about the current epoch: what if this isn’t the Anthropocene but the Leviacene? Who or what is really driving planetary destruction? Can human nature explain it? Or should we be looking at the political and economic superpowers that are leaving their marks all over the natural world?
For more on these themes, David’s new book The Handover is available now, including as an audiobook. 
Listen to our earlier podcast with historian of science Meehan Crist on Malthus and Malthusianism.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 06:00:36 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Leviacene: Defining Our Times</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5c02a89e-a203-11ef-8350-bf0c574d33f1/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week David explores a different way of thinking about the current epoch: what if this isn’t the Anthropocene but the Leviacene?&amp;nbsp;Who or what is really driving planetary destruction?&amp;nbsp;Can human nature explain it?&amp;nbsp;Or should we be looking at the political and economic superpowers that are leaving their marks all over the natural world?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more on these themes, David’s new book&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3shDzh0" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Handover&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;is available now, including as an audiobook.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6492d1a18759ac00112913ba" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Listen&lt;/a&gt; to our earlier podcast with historian of science Meehan Crist on Malthus and Malthusianism.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David explores a different way of thinking about the current epoch: what if this isn’t the Anthropocene but the Leviacene? Who or what is really driving planetary destruction? Can human nature explain it? Or should we be looking at the political and economic superpowers that are leaving their marks all over the natural world?
For more on these themes, David’s new book The Handover is available now, including as an audiobook. 
Listen to our earlier podcast with historian of science Meehan Crist on Malthus and Malthusianism.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week David explores a different way of thinking about the current epoch: what if this isn’t the Anthropocene but the Leviacene? Who or what is really driving planetary destruction? Can human nature explain it? Or should we be looking at the political and economic superpowers that are leaving their marks all over the natural world?</p><p>For more on these themes, David’s new book <a href="https://bit.ly/3shDzh0"><em>The Handover</em></a> is available now, including as an audiobook. </p><p><a href="https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6492d1a18759ac00112913ba">Listen</a> to our earlier podcast with historian of science Meehan Crist on Malthus and Malthusianism.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3311</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65428b4bdf8cb80012a5c578]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7072776628.mp3?updated=1731679181" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas: Umberto Eco</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6538ccc0bc6f9000126947b2</link>
      <description>This week’s episode in our series on the great essays and great essayists explores Umberto Eco’s ‘Thoughts on Wikileaks’ (2010). Eco writes about what makes a true scandal, what are real secrets, and what it would mean to expose the hidden workings of power. It is an essay that connects digital technology, medieval mystery and Dan Brown. Plus David talks about the hidden meaning of Julian Assange.
More from the LRB:
Andrew O’Hagan on Julian Assange
‘I’d never been with a person who had such a good cause and such a poor ear.’
Frank Kermode on the Name of the Rose
‘This novel has so much in it that differs from any known kind of detective story that we must look to Eco’s pre-semiotic career for help.’
Jenny Diski on Eco and ugliness
‘The breadth of Eco’s search spreads out to include disgust, horror, fear, obscenity, misogyny, perversity, bigotry, social exclusiveness, repression, inexplicability, evil, deformation, degradation, heterogeneity.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2023 05:00:14 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas: Umberto Eco</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>27</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5c9ad83a-a203-11ef-8350-eb420fdd5667/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week’s episode in our series on the great essays and great essayists explores Umberto Eco’s ‘Thoughts on Wikileaks’ (2010).&amp;nbsp;Eco writes about what makes a true scandal, what are real secrets, and what it would mean to expose the hidden workings of power.&amp;nbsp;It is an essay that connects digital technology, medieval mystery and Dan Brown.&amp;nbsp;Plus David talks about the hidden meaning of Julian Assange.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;More from the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/499vYSn" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Andrew O’Hagan on Julian Assange&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘I’d never been with a person who had such a good cause and such a poor ear.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/494hW4k" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Frank Kermode on the Name of the Rose&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘This novel has so much in it that differs from any known kind of detective story that we must look to Eco’s pre-semiotic career for help.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3Fsh77M" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Jenny Diski on Eco and ugliness&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘The breadth of Eco’s search spreads out to include disgust, horror, fear, obscenity, misogyny, perversity, bigotry, social exclusiveness, repression, inexplicability, evil, deformation, degradation, heterogeneity.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week’s episode in our series on the great essays and great essayists explores Umberto Eco’s ‘Thoughts on Wikileaks’ (2010). Eco writes about what makes a true scandal, what are real secrets, and what it would mean to expose the hidden workings of power. It is an essay that connects digital technology, medieval mystery and Dan Brown. Plus David talks about the hidden meaning of Julian Assange.
More from the LRB:
Andrew O’Hagan on Julian Assange
‘I’d never been with a person who had such a good cause and such a poor ear.’
Frank Kermode on the Name of the Rose
‘This novel has so much in it that differs from any known kind of detective story that we must look to Eco’s pre-semiotic career for help.’
Jenny Diski on Eco and ugliness
‘The breadth of Eco’s search spreads out to include disgust, horror, fear, obscenity, misogyny, perversity, bigotry, social exclusiveness, repression, inexplicability, evil, deformation, degradation, heterogeneity.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week’s episode in our series on the great essays and great essayists explores Umberto Eco’s ‘Thoughts on Wikileaks’ (2010). Eco writes about what makes a true scandal, what are real secrets, and what it would mean to expose the hidden workings of power. It is an essay that connects digital technology, medieval mystery and Dan Brown. Plus David talks about the hidden meaning of Julian Assange.</p><br><p>More from the LRB:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/499vYSn">Andrew O’Hagan on Julian Assange</a></p><p>‘I’d never been with a person who had such a good cause and such a poor ear.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/494hW4k">Frank Kermode on the Name of the Rose</a></p><p>‘This novel has so much in it that differs from any known kind of detective story that we must look to Eco’s pre-semiotic career for help.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3Fsh77M">Jenny Diski on Eco and ugliness</a></p><p>‘The breadth of Eco’s search spreads out to include disgust, horror, fear, obscenity, misogyny, perversity, bigotry, social exclusiveness, repression, inexplicability, evil, deformation, degradation, heterogeneity.’</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3043</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6538ccc0bc6f9000126947b2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2668580924.mp3?updated=1731679136" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rethinking Democracy w/ Lea Ypi</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/652fb80b93a2360012b7d844</link>
      <description>This week David and Lea resume their conversation – and their differences of opinion – about how to understand politics in the modern world. What is it reasonable to expect of democracy? Are its failures because of bad design or bad faith? And why don’t we have more democracy at the international level where it’s really needed? This is the start of a series of monthly conversations between David and Lea about rethinking the ideas that made the modern world. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 05:00:30 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Rethinking Democracy w/ Lea Ypi</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5cf74ea8-a203-11ef-8350-db1ef0c64a83/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week David and Lea resume their conversation – and their differences of opinion – about how to understand politics in the modern world.&amp;nbsp;What is it reasonable to expect of democracy?&amp;nbsp;Are its failures because of bad design or bad faith?&amp;nbsp;And why don’t we have more democracy at the international level where it’s really needed?&amp;nbsp;This is the start of a series of monthly conversations between David and Lea about rethinking the ideas that made the modern world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David and Lea resume their conversation – and their differences of opinion – about how to understand politics in the modern world. What is it reasonable to expect of democracy? Are its failures because of bad design or bad faith? And why don’t we have more democracy at the international level where it’s really needed? This is the start of a series of monthly conversations between David and Lea about rethinking the ideas that made the modern world. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[This week David and Lea resume their conversation – and their differences of opinion – about how to understand politics in the modern world. What is it reasonable to expect of democracy? Are its failures because of bad design or bad faith? And why don’t we have more democracy at the international level where it’s really needed? This is the start of a series of monthly conversations between David and Lea about rethinking the ideas that made the modern world.<br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3245</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[652fb80b93a2360012b7d844]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3461454838.mp3?updated=1731679144" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mary Beard on Caesar, Augustus &amp; Zuckerberg</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/65268ca82646e80012486515</link>
      <description>This week David asks Mary Beard what the Roman Empire can tell us about the nature of unaccountable power, then and now. How did Roman emperors rule when they had so little knowledge of the lives of their subjects? Can absolute personal power ever escape the limits of biology, from sex to death? And who are the modern-day equivalent of the Caesars: democratic populists or tech titans?
Mary Beard’s new book is Emperor of Rome 
Read or listen to Mary Beard’s LRB lecture on Women in Power 

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 05:00:59 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Mary Beard on Caesar, Augustus &amp; Zuckerberg</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>25</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5d5547e2-a203-11ef-8350-b780e7e7e9d8/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week David asks Mary Beard what the Roman Empire can tell us about the nature of unaccountable power, then and now.&amp;nbsp;How did Roman emperors rule when they had so little knowledge of the lives of their subjects?&amp;nbsp;Can absolute personal power ever escape the limits of biology, from sex to death?&amp;nbsp;And who are the modern-day equivalent of the Caesars: democratic populists or tech titans?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mary Beard’s new book is &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3FbAh1K" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Emperor of Rome&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read or listen to Mary Beard’s LRB lecture on &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3RW7kOL" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Women in Power&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David asks Mary Beard what the Roman Empire can tell us about the nature of unaccountable power, then and now. How did Roman emperors rule when they had so little knowledge of the lives of their subjects? Can absolute personal power ever escape the limits of biology, from sex to death? And who are the modern-day equivalent of the Caesars: democratic populists or tech titans?
Mary Beard’s new book is Emperor of Rome 
Read or listen to Mary Beard’s LRB lecture on Women in Power 

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week David asks Mary Beard what the Roman Empire can tell us about the nature of unaccountable power, then and now. How did Roman emperors rule when they had so little knowledge of the lives of their subjects? Can absolute personal power ever escape the limits of biology, from sex to death? And who are the modern-day equivalent of the Caesars: democratic populists or tech titans?</p><br><p>Mary Beard’s new book is <a href="https://bit.ly/3FbAh1K">Emperor of Rome</a> </p><br><p>Read or listen to Mary Beard’s LRB lecture on <a href="https://bit.ly/3RW7kOL">Women in Power</a> </p><br><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3129</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[65268ca82646e80012486515]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3946127043.mp3?updated=1731679175" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zadie Smith on Dickens, Hypocrisy &amp; Justice</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/651d3e89b1175d00115278a5</link>
      <description>This week David talks to the novelist Zadie Smith about Charles Dickens: what he means to her, why we still read him, and what’s missing from the Dickensian view of the world. It’s a conversation about other writers as well – Turgenev, George Orwell and Toni Morrison – and about whether fiction shows us how to live or rather helps us to see the ways in which the truth about how we live is hidden from view.
Zadie Smith’s new novel is The Fraud, available now.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 05:00:20 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Zadie Smith on Dickens, Hypocrisy &amp; Justice</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5db787c2-a203-11ef-8350-d7c003a4b938/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week David talks to the novelist Zadie Smith about Charles Dickens: what he means to her, why we still read him, and what’s missing from the Dickensian view of the world.&amp;nbsp;It’s a conversation about other writers as well – Turgenev, George Orwell and Toni Morrison – and about whether fiction shows us how to live or rather helps us to see the ways in which the truth about how we live is hidden from view.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Zadie Smith’s new novel is &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/48DUdYr" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;The Fraud&lt;/a&gt;, available now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David talks to the novelist Zadie Smith about Charles Dickens: what he means to her, why we still read him, and what’s missing from the Dickensian view of the world. It’s a conversation about other writers as well – Turgenev, George Orwell and Toni Morrison – and about whether fiction shows us how to live or rather helps us to see the ways in which the truth about how we live is hidden from view.
Zadie Smith’s new novel is The Fraud, available now.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week David talks to the novelist Zadie Smith about Charles Dickens: what he means to her, why we still read him, and what’s missing from the Dickensian view of the world. It’s a conversation about other writers as well – Turgenev, George Orwell and Toni Morrison – and about whether fiction shows us how to live or rather helps us to see the ways in which the truth about how we live is hidden from view.</p><br><p>Zadie Smith’s new novel is <a href="https://bit.ly/48DUdYr">The Fraud</a>, available now.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2958</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[651d3e89b1175d00115278a5]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7636250005.mp3?updated=1731679147" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas: David Foster Wallace</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6513f6a5ea278b00116aac72</link>
      <description>This week’s episode in our series on the great political essays is about David Foster Wallace’s ‘Up, Simba!’, which describes his experiences following the doomed campaign of John McCain for the Republican presidential nomination in 2000. Wallace believed that McCain’s distinctive political style revealed some hard truths about American democracy. Was he right? What did he miss? And how do those truths look now in the age of Trump?
More on David Foster Wallace from the LRB:
Jenny Turner on Wallace and his moment
‘The risk Wallace takes is to guess he is not the only "obscenely well-educated", curiously lost and empty white boy out there; that his sadness is also the experience of a whole historical moment.’
Patricia Lockwood on Wallace and his influence
‘It was the essayists who were left to cope with his almost radioactive influence. He produced a great deal of excellent writing, the majority of it not his own.’
Dale Peck’s notorious takedown of Infinite Jest
‘If nothing else, the success of Infinite Jest is proof that the Great American Hype machine can still work wonders.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 05:00:56 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas: David Foster Wallace</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5e133c20-a203-11ef-8350-d3054a94fcf4/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week’s episode in our series on the great political essays is about David Foster Wallace’s ‘Up, Simba!’, which describes his experiences following the doomed campaign of John McCain for the Republican presidential nomination in 2000.&amp;nbsp;Wallace believed that McCain’s distinctive political style revealed some hard truths about American democracy.&amp;nbsp;Was he right?&amp;nbsp;What did he miss?&amp;nbsp;And how do those truths look now in the age of Trump?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;More on David Foster Wallace from the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3LDYjWz" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Jenny Turner on Wallace and his moment&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘The risk Wallace takes is to guess he is not the only "obscenely well-educated", curiously lost and empty white boy out there; that his sadness is also the experience of a whole historical moment.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3RDz2zE" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Patricia Lockwood on Wallace and his influence&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘It was the essayists who were left to cope with his almost radioactive influence.&amp;nbsp;He produced a great deal of excellent writing, the majority of it not his own.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v18/n14/dale-peck/well-duh" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Dale Peck’s notorious takedown of&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Infinite Jest&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘If nothing else, the success of&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Infinite Jest&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;is proof that the Great American Hype machine can still work wonders.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week’s episode in our series on the great political essays is about David Foster Wallace’s ‘Up, Simba!’, which describes his experiences following the doomed campaign of John McCain for the Republican presidential nomination in 2000. Wallace believed that McCain’s distinctive political style revealed some hard truths about American democracy. Was he right? What did he miss? And how do those truths look now in the age of Trump?
More on David Foster Wallace from the LRB:
Jenny Turner on Wallace and his moment
‘The risk Wallace takes is to guess he is not the only "obscenely well-educated", curiously lost and empty white boy out there; that his sadness is also the experience of a whole historical moment.’
Patricia Lockwood on Wallace and his influence
‘It was the essayists who were left to cope with his almost radioactive influence. He produced a great deal of excellent writing, the majority of it not his own.’
Dale Peck’s notorious takedown of Infinite Jest
‘If nothing else, the success of Infinite Jest is proof that the Great American Hype machine can still work wonders.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week’s episode in our series on the great political essays is about David Foster Wallace’s ‘Up, Simba!’, which describes his experiences following the doomed campaign of John McCain for the Republican presidential nomination in 2000. Wallace believed that McCain’s distinctive political style revealed some hard truths about American democracy. Was he right? What did he miss? And how do those truths look now in the age of Trump?</p><br><p>More on David Foster Wallace from the LRB:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3LDYjWz">Jenny Turner on Wallace and his moment</a></p><p>‘The risk Wallace takes is to guess he is not the only "obscenely well-educated", curiously lost and empty white boy out there; that his sadness is also the experience of a whole historical moment.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3RDz2zE">Patricia Lockwood on Wallace and his influence</a></p><p>‘It was the essayists who were left to cope with his almost radioactive influence. He produced a great deal of excellent writing, the majority of it not his own.’</p><p><a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v18/n14/dale-peck/well-duh">Dale Peck’s notorious takedown of <em>Infinite Jest</em></a></p><p>‘If nothing else, the success of <em>Infinite Jest</em> is proof that the Great American Hype machine can still work wonders.’</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3357</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6513f6a5ea278b00116aac72]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML8685030060.mp3?updated=1731679133" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Animal Farm and Other Allegories</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/650aa7c98257800011a37c1c</link>
      <description>This week David talks to novelists Adam Biles and John Lanchester about the timeless appeal of George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Why has it retained its hold far longer than other political allegories? Do readers need to know about the Russian history it describes? What makes the animals so relatable? Plus we discuss other favourite political allegories, from The Wizard of Oz to WALL-E.
Adam Biles’s new novel – inspired by Animal Farm – is Beasts of England, available now.
Read John Lanchester in the current issue of the LRB.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 05:00:16 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Animal Farm and Other Allegories</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5e74fe7e-a203-11ef-8350-ef73e244322f/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week David talks to novelists Adam Biles and John Lanchester about the timeless appeal of George Orwell’s Animal Farm.&amp;nbsp;Why has it retained its hold far longer than other political allegories?&amp;nbsp;Do readers need to know about the Russian history it describes?&amp;nbsp;What makes the animals so relatable?&amp;nbsp;Plus we discuss other favourite political allegories, from The Wizard of Oz to WALL-E.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Adam Biles’s new novel – inspired by Animal Farm – is &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/45X7OIu" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Beasts of England&lt;/a&gt;, available now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3PrS3m3" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Read John Lanchester in the current issue of the LRB.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David talks to novelists Adam Biles and John Lanchester about the timeless appeal of George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Why has it retained its hold far longer than other political allegories? Do readers need to know about the Russian history it describes? What makes the animals so relatable? Plus we discuss other favourite political allegories, from The Wizard of Oz to WALL-E.
Adam Biles’s new novel – inspired by Animal Farm – is Beasts of England, available now.
Read John Lanchester in the current issue of the LRB.

 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week David talks to novelists Adam Biles and John Lanchester about the timeless appeal of George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Why has it retained its hold far longer than other political allegories? Do readers need to know about the Russian history it describes? What makes the animals so relatable? Plus we discuss other favourite political allegories, from The Wizard of Oz to WALL-E.</p><p>Adam Biles’s new novel – inspired by Animal Farm – is <a href="https://bit.ly/45X7OIu">Beasts of England</a>, available now.</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3PrS3m3">Read John Lanchester in the current issue of the LRB.</a></p><br><p><br></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3166</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[650aa7c98257800011a37c1c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML8064047178.mp3?updated=1731679213" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Other 9/11: Chile &amp; Allende</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6501828e86fecb00111f86d6</link>
      <description>This week is the fiftieth anniversary of the coup in Chile that ended the life of Salvador Allende and marked the temporary death of Chilean democracy. We talk to the politician and economist Andrés Velasco and the writer and translator Lorna Scott Fox about their memories of the coup and their understanding of its significance today. What does it say about the unfulfilled promise and ongoing fragility of democratic politics, in Chile and beyond?
More from the LRB:
Lorna Scott Fox on the feminisation of Chile:
‘I doubt any of the men in a cabinet meeting are worrying about whether there is loo paper at home, as I do.’
Greg Grandin on Allende in power:
‘Allende was a pacifist, a democrat and a socialist by conviction not convenience.’
Michael Wood on Neruda and death:
‘The dead are never entirely dead in Neruda’s poems, forgetting and remembering are always entangled.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 05:00:56 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Other 9/11: Chile &amp; Allende</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5ecf2976-a203-11ef-8350-7b34dba6b08d/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week is the fiftieth anniversary of the coup in Chile that ended the life of Salvador Allende and marked the temporary death of Chilean democracy.&amp;nbsp;We talk to the politician and economist Andrés Velasco and the writer and translator Lorna Scott Fox about their memories of the coup and their understanding of its significance today.&amp;nbsp;What does it say about the unfulfilled promise and ongoing fragility of democratic politics, in Chile and beyond?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;More from the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3RALQqL" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Lorna Scott Fox on the feminisation of Chile:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘I doubt any of the men in a cabinet meeting are worrying about whether there is loo paper at home, as I do.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3Pgxs3X" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Greg Grandin on Allende in power:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘Allende was a pacifist, a democrat and a socialist by conviction not convenience.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/462TY7P" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Michael Wood on Neruda and death:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘The dead are never entirely dead in Neruda’s poems, forgetting and remembering are always entangled.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week is the fiftieth anniversary of the coup in Chile that ended the life of Salvador Allende and marked the temporary death of Chilean democracy. We talk to the politician and economist Andrés Velasco and the writer and translator Lorna Scott Fox about their memories of the coup and their understanding of its significance today. What does it say about the unfulfilled promise and ongoing fragility of democratic politics, in Chile and beyond?
More from the LRB:
Lorna Scott Fox on the feminisation of Chile:
‘I doubt any of the men in a cabinet meeting are worrying about whether there is loo paper at home, as I do.’
Greg Grandin on Allende in power:
‘Allende was a pacifist, a democrat and a socialist by conviction not convenience.’
Michael Wood on Neruda and death:
‘The dead are never entirely dead in Neruda’s poems, forgetting and remembering are always entangled.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week is the fiftieth anniversary of the coup in Chile that ended the life of Salvador Allende and marked the temporary death of Chilean democracy. We talk to the politician and economist Andrés Velasco and the writer and translator Lorna Scott Fox about their memories of the coup and their understanding of its significance today. What does it say about the unfulfilled promise and ongoing fragility of democratic politics, in Chile and beyond?</p><br><p>More from the LRB:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3RALQqL">Lorna Scott Fox on the feminisation of Chile:</a></p><p>‘I doubt any of the men in a cabinet meeting are worrying about whether there is loo paper at home, as I do.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3Pgxs3X">Greg Grandin on Allende in power:</a></p><p>‘Allende was a pacifist, a democrat and a socialist by conviction not convenience.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/462TY7P">Michael Wood on Neruda and death:</a></p><p>‘The dead are never entirely dead in Neruda’s poems, forgetting and remembering are always entangled.’</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3929</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6501828e86fecb00111f86d6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7240737391.mp3?updated=1731679195" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Handover</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/64f89fc3aa4e5a0011d75e4c</link>
      <description>This week Lea Ypi joins David to talk about some of the ideas in his new book, The Handover: How We Gave Control of Our Lives to Corporations, States and AIs. They discuss how to think about the power of the state in the modern world: Can it be changed? Can it be controlled? Can it be anything other than capitalist? Plus, how will AI alter the relationship between human beings and the corporate machines that rule our world?
To order the Handover and support independent bookshops, please use the code HANDOVER at checkout here.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2023 05:00:15 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Handover</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5f27c6da-a203-11ef-8350-8317794b26a1/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week Lea Ypi joins David to talk about some of the ideas in his new book, The Handover: How We Gave Control of Our Lives to Corporations, States and AIs.&amp;nbsp;They discuss how to think about the power of the state in the modern world: Can it be changed?&amp;nbsp;Can it be controlled?&amp;nbsp;Can it be anything other than capitalist?&amp;nbsp;Plus, how will AI alter the relationship between human beings and the corporate machines that rule our world?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To order the Handover and support independent bookshops, please use the code HANDOVER at checkout &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3P7pk5V" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week Lea Ypi joins David to talk about some of the ideas in his new book, The Handover: How We Gave Control of Our Lives to Corporations, States and AIs. They discuss how to think about the power of the state in the modern world: Can it be changed? Can it be controlled? Can it be anything other than capitalist? Plus, how will AI alter the relationship between human beings and the corporate machines that rule our world?
To order the Handover and support independent bookshops, please use the code HANDOVER at checkout here.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week Lea Ypi joins David to talk about some of the ideas in his new book, The Handover: How We Gave Control of Our Lives to Corporations, States and AIs. They discuss how to think about the power of the state in the modern world: Can it be changed? Can it be controlled? Can it be anything other than capitalist? Plus, how will AI alter the relationship between human beings and the corporate machines that rule our world?</p><br><p>To order the Handover and support independent bookshops, please use the code HANDOVER at checkout <a href="https://bit.ly/3P7pk5V">here</a>.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3247</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[64f89fc3aa4e5a0011d75e4c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3403282980.mp3?updated=1731679173" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Great Essays: Q &amp; A</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/64f31cd46f3d080012a07bd7</link>
      <description>In this bonus episode David answers some of your questions about our series on the great political essays and essayists, from Montaigne to Joan Didion. Can great political thinkers also be committed members of political parties? Which of these writers would make a good prime minister? And where are the great essays being written today? With PPF producer Ben Walker posing the questions. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2023 05:00:05 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Great Essays: Q &amp; A</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5f817fe0-a203-11ef-8350-5ffd32d69c17/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this bonus episode David answers some of your questions about our series on the great political essays and essayists, from Montaigne to Joan Didion.&amp;nbsp;Can great political thinkers also be committed members of political parties?&amp;nbsp;Which of these writers would make a good prime minister?&amp;nbsp;And where are the great essays being written today?&amp;nbsp;With PPF producer Ben Walker posing the questions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this bonus episode David answers some of your questions about our series on the great political essays and essayists, from Montaigne to Joan Didion. Can great political thinkers also be committed members of political parties? Which of these writers would make a good prime minister? And where are the great essays being written today? With PPF producer Ben Walker posing the questions. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[In this bonus episode David answers some of your questions about our series on the great political essays and essayists, from Montaigne to Joan Didion. Can great political thinkers also be committed members of political parties? Which of these writers would make a good prime minister? And where are the great essays being written today? With PPF producer Ben Walker posing the questions.<br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3377</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[64f31cd46f3d080012a07bd7]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4155531626.mp3?updated=1731679146" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas: Joan Didion</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/64ef16077b9ac00011fe0456</link>
      <description>For the last episode in our summer season on the great twentieth-century essays and essayists, David discusses Joan Didion's 'The White Album' (1979), her haunting, impressionistic account of the fracturing of America in the late 1960s. From Jim Morrison to the Manson murders, Didion offers a series of snapshots of a society coming apart in ways no one seemed to understand. But what was true, what was imagined, and where did the real sickness lie?
More on Joan Didion from the LRB archive:
Thomas Powers on Didion and California:
'The thing that California taught her to fear most was snakes, especially rattlesnakes...This gets close to Didion's core anxiety: watching for something that could be anywhere, was easily overlooked, could kill you or a child playing in the garden – just like that.'
Mary-Kay Wilmers on Didion and memory:
'Reassurance is something Didion doesn't need. She is talking to herself, weighing up the past, going over old stories, keeping herself company. Staging herself.'
Martin Amis on Didion's style:
'The Californian emptiness arrives and Miss Didion attempts to evolve a style, or manner, to answer to it. Here comes divorces, breakdowns, suicide bids, spliced-up paragraphs, 40-word chapters and italicised wedges of prose that used to be called "fractured".'
Patricia Lockwood on reading Didion now:
'To revisit Slouching Towards Bethlehem or The White Album is to read an old up-to-the-minute relevance renewed. Inside these essays the coming revolution feels neither terrifying nor exhilarating but familiar – if you are a reader of Joan Didion, you have been studying it all your life.'
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 05:00:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas: Joan Didion</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5fdad84c-a203-11ef-8350-e3820f159369/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For the last episode in our summer season on the great twentieth-century essays and essayists, David discusses Joan Didion's 'The White Album' (1979), her haunting, impressionistic account of the fracturing of America in the late 1960s. From Jim Morrison to the Manson murders, Didion offers a series of snapshots of a society coming apart in ways no one seemed to understand. But what was true, what was imagined, and where did the real sickness lie?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;More on Joan Didion from the LRB archive:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v44/n21/thomas-powers/fire-or-earthquake" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Thomas Powers on Didion and California:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;'The thing that California taught her to fear most was snakes, especially rattlesnakes...This gets close to Didion's core anxiety: watching for something that could be anywhere, was easily overlooked, could kill you or a child playing in the garden – just like that.'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v33/n21/mary-kay-wilmers/what-if-you-hadn-t-been-home" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Mary-Kay Wilmers on Didion and memory:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;'Reassurance is something Didion doesn't need. She is talking to herself, weighing up the past, going over old stories, keeping herself company. Staging herself.'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v02/n02/martin-amis/joan-didion-s-style" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Martin Amis on Didion's style:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;'The Californian emptiness arrives and Miss Didion attempts to evolve a style, or manner, to answer to it. Here comes divorces, breakdowns, suicide bids, spliced-up paragraphs, 40-word chapters and italicised wedges of prose that used to be called "fractured".'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v40/n01/patricia-lockwood/it-was-gold" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Patricia Lockwood on reading Didion now:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;'To revisit Slouching Towards Bethlehem or The White Album is to read an old up-to-the-minute relevance renewed. Inside these essays the coming revolution feels neither terrifying nor exhilarating but familiar – if you are a reader of Joan Didion, you have been studying it all your life.'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the last episode in our summer season on the great twentieth-century essays and essayists, David discusses Joan Didion's 'The White Album' (1979), her haunting, impressionistic account of the fracturing of America in the late 1960s. From Jim Morrison to the Manson murders, Didion offers a series of snapshots of a society coming apart in ways no one seemed to understand. But what was true, what was imagined, and where did the real sickness lie?
More on Joan Didion from the LRB archive:
Thomas Powers on Didion and California:
'The thing that California taught her to fear most was snakes, especially rattlesnakes...This gets close to Didion's core anxiety: watching for something that could be anywhere, was easily overlooked, could kill you or a child playing in the garden – just like that.'
Mary-Kay Wilmers on Didion and memory:
'Reassurance is something Didion doesn't need. She is talking to herself, weighing up the past, going over old stories, keeping herself company. Staging herself.'
Martin Amis on Didion's style:
'The Californian emptiness arrives and Miss Didion attempts to evolve a style, or manner, to answer to it. Here comes divorces, breakdowns, suicide bids, spliced-up paragraphs, 40-word chapters and italicised wedges of prose that used to be called "fractured".'
Patricia Lockwood on reading Didion now:
'To revisit Slouching Towards Bethlehem or The White Album is to read an old up-to-the-minute relevance renewed. Inside these essays the coming revolution feels neither terrifying nor exhilarating but familiar – if you are a reader of Joan Didion, you have been studying it all your life.'
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the last episode in our summer season on the great twentieth-century essays and essayists, David discusses Joan Didion's 'The White Album' (1979), her haunting, impressionistic account of the fracturing of America in the late 1960s. From Jim Morrison to the Manson murders, Didion offers a series of snapshots of a society coming apart in ways no one seemed to understand. But what was true, what was imagined, and where did the real sickness lie?</p><br><p>More on Joan Didion from the LRB archive:</p><p><a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v44/n21/thomas-powers/fire-or-earthquake">Thomas Powers on Didion and California:</a></p><p>'The thing that California taught her to fear most was snakes, especially rattlesnakes...This gets close to Didion's core anxiety: watching for something that could be anywhere, was easily overlooked, could kill you or a child playing in the garden – just like that.'</p><p><a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v33/n21/mary-kay-wilmers/what-if-you-hadn-t-been-home">Mary-Kay Wilmers on Didion and memory:</a></p><p>'Reassurance is something Didion doesn't need. She is talking to herself, weighing up the past, going over old stories, keeping herself company. Staging herself.'</p><p><a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v02/n02/martin-amis/joan-didion-s-style">Martin Amis on Didion's style:</a></p><p>'The Californian emptiness arrives and Miss Didion attempts to evolve a style, or manner, to answer to it. Here comes divorces, breakdowns, suicide bids, spliced-up paragraphs, 40-word chapters and italicised wedges of prose that used to be called "fractured".'</p><p><a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v40/n01/patricia-lockwood/it-was-gold">Patricia Lockwood on reading Didion now:</a></p><p>'To revisit Slouching Towards Bethlehem or The White Album is to read an old up-to-the-minute relevance renewed. Inside these essays the coming revolution feels neither terrifying nor exhilarating but familiar – if you are a reader of Joan Didion, you have been studying it all your life.'</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3264</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[64ef16077b9ac00011fe0456]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4349217185.mp3?updated=1731679155" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas: Susan Sontag</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/64e48dfb4423e20011a6bbf6</link>
      <description>This episode in our history of the great essays and great essayists is about Susan Sontag’s ‘Against Interpretation’ (1963). What was interpretation and why was Sontag so against it? David explores how an argument about art, criticism and the avant-garde can be applied to contemporary politics and can even explain the monstrous appeal of Donald Trump.
Sontag in the LRB:
Terry Castle on Sontag and friendship 
‘At its best, our relationship was rather like the one between Dame Edna and her feeble sidekick Madge – or possibly Stalin and Malenkov.’
James Wolcott on Sontag and polemics
‘The upside of Sontag’s downside was that her ire was generated by the same power supply that electrified her battle for principles that others only espoused.’
Mark Grief on Sontag and identity
‘One of the most appealing things about Susan Sontag was that she didn’t ask to be liked. Sontag’s persona was not personal. It was superior.’
Joanna Biggs on Sontag and Paris
‘Paris let her say no to an academic life, but not to a life of ideas. The best thinking was done in cafes, or in bed, or at the movies, not in libraries.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 05:00:51 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas: Susan Sontag</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/6036ecb8-a203-11ef-8350-773586362a45/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This episode in our history of the great essays and great essayists is about Susan Sontag’s ‘Against Interpretation’ (1963).&amp;nbsp;What was interpretation and why was Sontag so against it?&amp;nbsp;David explores how an argument about art, criticism and the avant-garde can be applied to contemporary politics and can even explain the monstrous appeal of Donald Trump.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sontag in the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3Yr6URL" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Terry Castle on Sontag and friendship&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘At its best, our relationship was rather like the one between Dame Edna and her feeble sidekick Madge – or possibly Stalin and Malenkov.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/45olmMq" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;James Wolcott on Sontag and polemics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘The upside of Sontag’s downside was that her ire was generated by the same power supply that electrified her battle for principles that others only espoused.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3Ot0vAX" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Mark Grief on Sontag and identity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘One of the most appealing things about Susan Sontag was that she didn’t ask to be liked.&amp;nbsp;Sontag’s persona was not personal.&amp;nbsp;It was superior.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3OxAfWb" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Joanna Biggs on Sontag and Paris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘Paris let her say no to an academic life, but not to a life of ideas.&amp;nbsp;The best thinking was done in cafes, or in bed, or at the movies, not in libraries.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This episode in our history of the great essays and great essayists is about Susan Sontag’s ‘Against Interpretation’ (1963). What was interpretation and why was Sontag so against it? David explores how an argument about art, criticism and the avant-garde can be applied to contemporary politics and can even explain the monstrous appeal of Donald Trump.
Sontag in the LRB:
Terry Castle on Sontag and friendship 
‘At its best, our relationship was rather like the one between Dame Edna and her feeble sidekick Madge – or possibly Stalin and Malenkov.’
James Wolcott on Sontag and polemics
‘The upside of Sontag’s downside was that her ire was generated by the same power supply that electrified her battle for principles that others only espoused.’
Mark Grief on Sontag and identity
‘One of the most appealing things about Susan Sontag was that she didn’t ask to be liked. Sontag’s persona was not personal. It was superior.’
Joanna Biggs on Sontag and Paris
‘Paris let her say no to an academic life, but not to a life of ideas. The best thinking was done in cafes, or in bed, or at the movies, not in libraries.’
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode in our history of the great essays and great essayists is about Susan Sontag’s ‘Against Interpretation’ (1963). What was interpretation and why was Sontag so against it? David explores how an argument about art, criticism and the avant-garde can be applied to contemporary politics and can even explain the monstrous appeal of Donald Trump.</p><br><p>Sontag in the LRB:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3Yr6URL">Terry Castle on Sontag and friendship</a> </p><p>‘At its best, our relationship was rather like the one between Dame Edna and her feeble sidekick Madge – or possibly Stalin and Malenkov.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/45olmMq">James Wolcott on Sontag and polemics</a></p><p>‘The upside of Sontag’s downside was that her ire was generated by the same power supply that electrified her battle for principles that others only espoused.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3Ot0vAX">Mark Grief on Sontag and identity</a></p><p>‘One of the most appealing things about Susan Sontag was that she didn’t ask to be liked. Sontag’s persona was not personal. It was superior.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3OxAfWb">Joanna Biggs on Sontag and Paris</a></p><p>‘Paris let her say no to an academic life, but not to a life of ideas. The best thinking was done in cafes, or in bed, or at the movies, not in libraries.’</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3426</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[64e48dfb4423e20011a6bbf6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9400605623.mp3?updated=1731679157" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas: James Baldwin</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/64d948ddcbaac50011600c91</link>
      <description>This week David discusses James Baldwin’s ‘Notes of a Native Son’ (1955), an essay that combines autobiography with a searing indictment of America’s racial politics. At its heart it tells the story of Baldwin’s relationship with his father, but it is also about fear, cruelty, violence and the terrible compromises of a country at war. What happens when North and South collide?
More on Baldwin from the LRB:
Michael Wood on Baldwin and power 
‘James Baldwin’s thinking recalls Virginia Woolf’s view of the way that women have been used as mirrors by men.’
Colm Toibin on reading Baldwin
‘James Baldwin’s legacy is both powerful and fluid, allowing it to fit whatever category each reader requires, allowing it to influence each reader in a way that tells us as much about the reader as it does about Baldwin.’
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 05:00:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas: James Baldwin</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/608e552a-a203-11ef-8350-9334abbaa967/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week David discusses James Baldwin’s ‘Notes of a Native Son’ (1955), an essay that combines autobiography with a searing indictment of America’s racial politics.&amp;nbsp;At its heart it tells the story of Baldwin’s relationship with his father, but it is also about fear, cruelty, violence and the terrible compromises of a country at war.&amp;nbsp;What happens when North and South collide?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;More on Baldwin from the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3E9AySp" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Michael Wood on Baldwin and power&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘James Baldwin’s thinking recalls Virginia Woolf’s view of the way that women have been used as mirrors by men.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3saHAmQ" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Colm Toibin on reading Baldwin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘James Baldwin’s legacy is both powerful and fluid, allowing it to fit whatever category each reader requires, allowing it to influence each reader in a way that tells us as much about the reader as it does about Baldwin.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to LRB Close Readings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Directly in Apple: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://apple.co/3pJoFPq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other podcast apps: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;lrb.supportingcast.fm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David discusses James Baldwin’s ‘Notes of a Native Son’ (1955), an essay that combines autobiography with a searing indictment of America’s racial politics. At its heart it tells the story of Baldwin’s relationship with his father, but it is also about fear, cruelty, violence and the terrible compromises of a country at war. What happens when North and South collide?
More on Baldwin from the LRB:
Michael Wood on Baldwin and power 
‘James Baldwin’s thinking recalls Virginia Woolf’s view of the way that women have been used as mirrors by men.’
Colm Toibin on reading Baldwin
‘James Baldwin’s legacy is both powerful and fluid, allowing it to fit whatever category each reader requires, allowing it to influence each reader in a way that tells us as much about the reader as it does about Baldwin.’
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week David discusses James Baldwin’s ‘Notes of a Native Son’ (1955), an essay that combines autobiography with a searing indictment of America’s racial politics. At its heart it tells the story of Baldwin’s relationship with his father, but it is also about fear, cruelty, violence and the terrible compromises of a country at war. What happens when North and South collide?</p><br><p>More on Baldwin from the LRB:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3E9AySp">Michael Wood on Baldwin and power </a></p><p>‘James Baldwin’s thinking recalls Virginia Woolf’s view of the way that women have been used as mirrors by men.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3saHAmQ">Colm Toibin on reading Baldwin</a></p><p>‘James Baldwin’s legacy is both powerful and fluid, allowing it to fit whatever category each reader requires, allowing it to influence each reader in a way that tells us as much about the reader as it does about Baldwin.’</p><br><p>Sign up to LRB Close Readings:</p><p>Directly in Apple: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup">https://apple.co/3pJoFPq</a></p><p>In other podcast apps: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup">lrb.supportingcast.fm</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3184</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[64d948ddcbaac50011600c91]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6797308312.mp3?updated=1731679145" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas: Simone Weil</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/64d377687f057d0011c2b213</link>
      <description>This week’s episode in our series on the great essays and great essayists is about Simone Weil’s ‘Human Personality’ (1943). Written shortly before her death aged just 34, it is an uncompromising repudiation of the building blocks of modern life: democracy, rights, personal identity, scientific progress – all these are rejected. What does Weil have to put in their place? The answer is radical and surprising.
Read ‘Human Personality’ here
For more on Weil from the LRB archive:
Toril Moi on living like Weil 
‘If we take Weil as seriously as she took herself, our nice lives will fall apart.’
Alan Bennett on Kafka and Weil
‘Many parents, one imagines, would echo the words of Madame Weil, the mother of Simone Weil, a child every bit as trying as Kafka must have been. Questioned about her pride in the posthumous fame of her ascetic daughter, Madame Weil said: “Oh! How much I would have preferred her to be happy.”’ 
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 05:00:12 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas: Simone Weil</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/60ed10e2-a203-11ef-8350-fbb55c5ad79c/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week’s episode in our series on the great essays and great essayists is about Simone Weil’s ‘Human Personality’ (1943).&amp;nbsp;Written shortly before her death aged just 34, it is an uncompromising repudiation of the building blocks of modern life: democracy, rights, personal identity, scientific progress – all these are rejected.&amp;nbsp;What does Weil have to put in their place?&amp;nbsp;The answer is radical and surprising.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read ‘Human Personality’ &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3KCRVhR" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more on Weil from the LRB archive:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/47n0ozz" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Toril Moi on living like Weil&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘If we take Weil as seriously as she took herself, our nice lives will fall apart.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3OvkJKe" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Alan Bennett on Kafka and Weil&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘Many parents, one imagines, would echo the words of Madame Weil, the mother of Simone Weil, a child every bit as trying as Kafka must have been.&amp;nbsp;Questioned about her pride in the posthumous fame of her ascetic daughter, Madame Weil said: “Oh! How much I would have preferred her to be happy.”’&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to LRB Close Readings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Directly in Apple: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://apple.co/3pJoFPq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other podcast apps: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;lrb.supportingcast.fm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week’s episode in our series on the great essays and great essayists is about Simone Weil’s ‘Human Personality’ (1943). Written shortly before her death aged just 34, it is an uncompromising repudiation of the building blocks of modern life: democracy, rights, personal identity, scientific progress – all these are rejected. What does Weil have to put in their place? The answer is radical and surprising.
Read ‘Human Personality’ here
For more on Weil from the LRB archive:
Toril Moi on living like Weil 
‘If we take Weil as seriously as she took herself, our nice lives will fall apart.’
Alan Bennett on Kafka and Weil
‘Many parents, one imagines, would echo the words of Madame Weil, the mother of Simone Weil, a child every bit as trying as Kafka must have been. Questioned about her pride in the posthumous fame of her ascetic daughter, Madame Weil said: “Oh! How much I would have preferred her to be happy.”’ 
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week’s episode in our series on the great essays and great essayists is about Simone Weil’s ‘Human Personality’ (1943). Written shortly before her death aged just 34, it is an uncompromising repudiation of the building blocks of modern life: democracy, rights, personal identity, scientific progress – all these are rejected. What does Weil have to put in their place? The answer is radical and surprising.</p><br><p>Read ‘Human Personality’ <a href="https://bit.ly/3KCRVhR">here</a></p><p>For more on Weil from the LRB archive:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/47n0ozz">Toril Moi on living like Weil </a></p><p>‘If we take Weil as seriously as she took herself, our nice lives will fall apart.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3OvkJKe">Alan Bennett on Kafka and Weil</a></p><p>‘Many parents, one imagines, would echo the words of Madame Weil, the mother of Simone Weil, a child every bit as trying as Kafka must have been. Questioned about her pride in the posthumous fame of her ascetic daughter, Madame Weil said: “Oh! How much I would have preferred her to be happy.”’ </p><br><p>Sign up to LRB Close Readings:</p><p>Directly in Apple: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup">https://apple.co/3pJoFPq</a></p><p>In other podcast apps: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup">lrb.supportingcast.fm</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3313</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[64d377687f057d0011c2b213]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4337132210.mp3?updated=1731679180" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas: George Orwell</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/64ca9149d6095c0011b1f57d</link>
      <description>This week David discusses George Orwell’s ‘The Lion and the Unicorn’ (1941), his great wartime essay about what it does – and doesn’t – mean to be English. How did the English manage to resist fascism? How are the English going to defeat fascism? These were two different questions with two very different answers: hypocrisy and socialism. David takes the story from there to Brexit and back again.
For more on Orwell from the LRB:
Samuel Hynes on Orwell and politics
‘He was not, in fact, really a political thinker at all: he had no ideology, he proposed no plan of political action, and he was never able to relate himself comfortably to any political party.’
Julian Symons on Orwell and fame
‘If George Orwell had died in 1939 he would be recorded in literary histories of the period as an interesting maverick who wrote some not very successful novels.’
Terry Eagleton on Orwell and experience
‘Orwell detested those, mostly on the left, who theorised about situations without having experienced them, a common empiricist prejudice. There is no need to have your legs chopped off to sympathise with the legless.’
More from the History of Ideas:
Judith Shklar on Hypocrisy
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 05:00:05 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas: George Orwell</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/6152651e-a203-11ef-8350-771af4a06e4f/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week David discusses George Orwell’s ‘The Lion and the Unicorn’ (1941), his great wartime essay about what it does – and doesn’t – mean to be English.&amp;nbsp;How did the English manage to resist fascism?&amp;nbsp;How are the English going to defeat fascism?&amp;nbsp;These were two different questions with two very different answers: hypocrisy and socialism.&amp;nbsp;David takes the story from there to Brexit and back again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more on Orwell from the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3OztAff" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Samuel Hynes on Orwell and politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘He was not, in fact, really a political thinker at all: he had no ideology, he proposed no plan of political action, and he was never able to relate himself comfortably to any political party.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3QkX5CM" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Julian Symons on Orwell and fame&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘If George Orwell had died in 1939 he would be recorded in literary histories of the period as an interesting maverick who wrote some not very successful novels.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3OG13Vz" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Terry Eagleton on Orwell and experience&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘Orwell detested those, mostly on the left, who theorised about situations without having experienced them, a common empiricist prejudice.&amp;nbsp;There is no need to have your legs chopped off to sympathise with the legless.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;More from the History of Ideas:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3YjOGRW" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Judith Shklar on Hypocrisy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to LRB Close Readings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Directly in Apple: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://apple.co/3pJoFPq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other podcast apps: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;lrb.supportingcast.fm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David discusses George Orwell’s ‘The Lion and the Unicorn’ (1941), his great wartime essay about what it does – and doesn’t – mean to be English. How did the English manage to resist fascism? How are the English going to defeat fascism? These were two different questions with two very different answers: hypocrisy and socialism. David takes the story from there to Brexit and back again.
For more on Orwell from the LRB:
Samuel Hynes on Orwell and politics
‘He was not, in fact, really a political thinker at all: he had no ideology, he proposed no plan of political action, and he was never able to relate himself comfortably to any political party.’
Julian Symons on Orwell and fame
‘If George Orwell had died in 1939 he would be recorded in literary histories of the period as an interesting maverick who wrote some not very successful novels.’
Terry Eagleton on Orwell and experience
‘Orwell detested those, mostly on the left, who theorised about situations without having experienced them, a common empiricist prejudice. There is no need to have your legs chopped off to sympathise with the legless.’
More from the History of Ideas:
Judith Shklar on Hypocrisy
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week David discusses George Orwell’s ‘The Lion and the Unicorn’ (1941), his great wartime essay about what it does – and doesn’t – mean to be English. How did the English manage to resist fascism? How are the English going to defeat fascism? These were two different questions with two very different answers: hypocrisy and socialism. David takes the story from there to Brexit and back again.</p><br><p>For more on Orwell from the LRB:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3OztAff">Samuel Hynes on Orwell and politics</a></p><p>‘He was not, in fact, really a political thinker at all: he had no ideology, he proposed no plan of political action, and he was never able to relate himself comfortably to any political party.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3QkX5CM">Julian Symons on Orwell and fame</a></p><p>‘If George Orwell had died in 1939 he would be recorded in literary histories of the period as an interesting maverick who wrote some not very successful novels.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3OG13Vz">Terry Eagleton on Orwell and experience</a></p><p>‘Orwell detested those, mostly on the left, who theorised about situations without having experienced them, a common empiricist prejudice. There is no need to have your legs chopped off to sympathise with the legless.’</p><p>More from the History of Ideas:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3YjOGRW">Judith Shklar on Hypocrisy</a></p><br><p>Sign up to LRB Close Readings:</p><p>Directly in Apple: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup">https://apple.co/3pJoFPq</a></p><p>In other podcast apps: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup">lrb.supportingcast.fm</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3286</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[64ca9149d6095c0011b1f57d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML4920340416.mp3?updated=1731679200" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas: Virginia Woolf</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/64bfd9138577ee0011f4d8fb</link>
      <description>This week our history of the great essays and great essayists reaches the twentieth century and Virginia Woolf’s masterpiece ‘A Room of One’s Own’ (1929). David discusses how an essay on the conditions for women writing fiction ends up being about so much else besides: anger, power, sex, modernity, independence and transcendence. And how, despite all that, it still manages to be as fresh and funny as anything written since.
Read more on Virginia Woolf in the LRB:
Jacqueline Rose on Woolf and madness
‘It is, one might say, a central paradox of modern family life that its members are required to mould themselves in each other’s image and yet to know, as separate individuals or egos, exactly who they are.’
Gillian Beer on Woolf and reality
‘The “real world” for Virginia Woolf was not solely the liberal humanist world of personal and social relationships: it was the hauntingly difficult world of Einsteinian physics and Wittgenstein’s private languages.’
Rosemary Hill on Woolf and domesticity
‘Woolf, who had once found it humiliating to do her own shopping, spent the last morning of her life dusting with Louie, before she put her duster down and went to drown herself.’
John Bayley on Woolf and writing
‘For Virginia Woolf wish-fulfilment was in words themselves, that protected her from herself and from society.’
Listen to David’s History of Ideas episode about Max Weber’s ‘The Profession and Vocation of Politics’.
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 05:00:33 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas: Virginia Woolf</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/61b0294c-a203-11ef-8350-1ba5fd94fbe7/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week our history of the great essays and great essayists reaches the twentieth century and Virginia Woolf’s masterpiece ‘A Room of One’s Own’ (1929).&amp;nbsp;David discusses how an essay on the conditions for women writing fiction ends up being about so much else besides: anger, power, sex, modernity, independence and transcendence.&amp;nbsp;And how, despite all that, it still manages to be as fresh and funny as anything written since.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read more on Virginia Woolf in the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3OtRMQa" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Jacqueline Rose on Woolf and madness&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘It is, one might say, a central paradox of modern family life that its members are required to mould themselves in each other’s image and yet to know, as separate individuals or egos, exactly who they are.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3DsFxgp" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Gillian Beer on Woolf and reality&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘The “real world” for Virginia Woolf was not solely the liberal humanist world of personal and social relationships: it was the hauntingly difficult world of Einsteinian physics and Wittgenstein’s private languages.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3KaNryE" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Rosemary Hill on Woolf and domesticity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘Woolf, who had once found it humiliating to do her own shopping, spent the last morning of her life dusting with Louie, before she put her duster down and went to drown herself.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3q7eVP1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;John Bayley on Woolf and writing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘For Virginia Woolf wish-fulfilment was in words themselves, that protected her from herself and from society.’&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Listen to David’s History of Ideas episode about &lt;a href="https://apple.co/43FZWt1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Max Weber’s ‘The Profession and Vocation of Politics’&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to LRB Close Readings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Directly in Apple: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://apple.co/3pJoFPq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other podcast apps: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;lrb.supportingcast.fm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week our history of the great essays and great essayists reaches the twentieth century and Virginia Woolf’s masterpiece ‘A Room of One’s Own’ (1929). David discusses how an essay on the conditions for women writing fiction ends up being about so much else besides: anger, power, sex, modernity, independence and transcendence. And how, despite all that, it still manages to be as fresh and funny as anything written since.
Read more on Virginia Woolf in the LRB:
Jacqueline Rose on Woolf and madness
‘It is, one might say, a central paradox of modern family life that its members are required to mould themselves in each other’s image and yet to know, as separate individuals or egos, exactly who they are.’
Gillian Beer on Woolf and reality
‘The “real world” for Virginia Woolf was not solely the liberal humanist world of personal and social relationships: it was the hauntingly difficult world of Einsteinian physics and Wittgenstein’s private languages.’
Rosemary Hill on Woolf and domesticity
‘Woolf, who had once found it humiliating to do her own shopping, spent the last morning of her life dusting with Louie, before she put her duster down and went to drown herself.’
John Bayley on Woolf and writing
‘For Virginia Woolf wish-fulfilment was in words themselves, that protected her from herself and from society.’
Listen to David’s History of Ideas episode about Max Weber’s ‘The Profession and Vocation of Politics’.
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week our history of the great essays and great essayists reaches the twentieth century and Virginia Woolf’s masterpiece ‘A Room of One’s Own’ (1929). David discusses how an essay on the conditions for women writing fiction ends up being about so much else besides: anger, power, sex, modernity, independence and transcendence. And how, despite all that, it still manages to be as fresh and funny as anything written since.</p><br><p>Read more on Virginia Woolf in the LRB:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3OtRMQa">Jacqueline Rose on Woolf and madness</a></p><p>‘It is, one might say, a central paradox of modern family life that its members are required to mould themselves in each other’s image and yet to know, as separate individuals or egos, exactly who they are.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3DsFxgp">Gillian Beer on Woolf and reality</a></p><p>‘The “real world” for Virginia Woolf was not solely the liberal humanist world of personal and social relationships: it was the hauntingly difficult world of Einsteinian physics and Wittgenstein’s private languages.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3KaNryE">Rosemary Hill on Woolf and domesticity</a></p><p>‘Woolf, who had once found it humiliating to do her own shopping, spent the last morning of her life dusting with Louie, before she put her duster down and went to drown herself.’</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/3q7eVP1">John Bayley on Woolf and writing</a></p><p>‘For Virginia Woolf wish-fulfilment was in words themselves, that protected her from herself and from society.’</p><p>Listen to David’s History of Ideas episode about <a href="https://apple.co/43FZWt1">Max Weber’s ‘The Profession and Vocation of Politics’</a>.</p><br><p>Sign up to LRB Close Readings:</p><p>Directly in Apple: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup">https://apple.co/3pJoFPq</a></p><p>In other podcast apps: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup">lrb.supportingcast.fm</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3284</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[64bfd9138577ee0011f4d8fb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6742304171.mp3?updated=1731679177" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>From Lincoln to Trump: What Happened to the Republican Party?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/64b8dcf1081d350011c99148</link>
      <description>This week David talks to American historian Gary Gerstle about the shape-shifting journey of the US Republican Party, from the Civil War to the battles of today. How did the party of the North become the party of the South? When did the war party lose its appetite for war? Why does an organisation born out of anti-Catholicism now see its mission as to get Catholics onto the Supreme Court? And what could finally break the party apart?
Gary Gerstle’s latest book is The Rise and Fall of the Neoliberal Order.
For more on the Great Abortion Switcheroo of the 1970s.
Listen again to David’s episode on Hume and American default.
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 07:06:23 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>From Lincoln to Trump: What Happened to the Republican Party?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/6247d134-a203-11ef-8350-a7a6b4810bf7/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week David talks to American historian Gary Gerstle about the shape-shifting journey of the US Republican Party, from the Civil War to the battles of today.&amp;nbsp;How did the party of the North become the party of the South?&amp;nbsp;When did the war party lose its appetite for war?&amp;nbsp;Why does an organisation born out of anti-Catholicism now see its mission as to get Catholics onto the Supreme Court?&amp;nbsp;And what could finally break the party apart?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gary Gerstle’s latest book is &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/44vPi9p" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;The Rise and Fall of the Neoliberal Order&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more on the &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3OgYWHu" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Great Abortion Switcheroo of the 1970s&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Listen again to David’s &lt;a href="https://apple.co/3Djp5yV" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;episode on Hume and American default&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to LRB Close Readings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Directly in Apple: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://apple.co/3pJoFPq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other podcast apps: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;lrb.supportingcast.fm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David talks to American historian Gary Gerstle about the shape-shifting journey of the US Republican Party, from the Civil War to the battles of today. How did the party of the North become the party of the South? When did the war party lose its appetite for war? Why does an organisation born out of anti-Catholicism now see its mission as to get Catholics onto the Supreme Court? And what could finally break the party apart?
Gary Gerstle’s latest book is The Rise and Fall of the Neoliberal Order.
For more on the Great Abortion Switcheroo of the 1970s.
Listen again to David’s episode on Hume and American default.
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week David talks to American historian Gary Gerstle about the shape-shifting journey of the US Republican Party, from the Civil War to the battles of today. How did the party of the North become the party of the South? When did the war party lose its appetite for war? Why does an organisation born out of anti-Catholicism now see its mission as to get Catholics onto the Supreme Court? And what could finally break the party apart?</p><p>Gary Gerstle’s latest book is <a href="https://bit.ly/44vPi9p">The Rise and Fall of the Neoliberal Order</a>.</p><p>For more on the <a href="https://bit.ly/3OgYWHu">Great Abortion Switcheroo of the 1970s</a>.</p><p>Listen again to David’s <a href="https://apple.co/3Djp5yV">episode on Hume and American default</a>.</p><p>Sign up to LRB Close Readings:</p><p>Directly in Apple: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup">https://apple.co/3pJoFPq</a></p><p>In other podcast apps: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup">lrb.supportingcast.fm</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3623</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[64b8dcf1081d350011c99148]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML6512327793.mp3?updated=1731679213" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas: Thoreau</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/64ae9a707aecf600113daa05</link>
      <description>For the third episode in this series about the great political essays, David explores Thoreau’s ‘Civil Disobedience’ (1849), a ringing call to resistance against democratic idiocy. Thoreau wanted to resist slavery and unjust wars. How can one citizen turn the tide against majority opinion? Was Thoreau a visionary or a hypocrite? And what do his arguments say about environmental civil disobedience today?
Read Thoreau’s essay here
From the LRB:
Paul Laity on Thoreau and self-sufficiency
Jeremy Harding on XR and civil disobedience 
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 05:00:43 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas: Thoreau</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/62a3bf26-a203-11ef-8350-a74cc3ff0de7/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For the third episode in this series about the great political essays, David explores Thoreau’s ‘Civil Disobedience’ (1849), a ringing call to resistance against democratic idiocy.&amp;nbsp;Thoreau wanted to resist slavery and unjust wars.&amp;nbsp;How can one citizen turn the tide against majority opinion?&amp;nbsp;Was Thoreau a visionary or a hypocrite?&amp;nbsp;And what do his arguments say about environmental civil disobedience today?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read Thoreau’s essay &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/44oO144" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;From the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Paul Laity on &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/46LQ2J9" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Thoreau and self-sufficiency&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jeremy Harding on &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/46HOjVh" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;XR and civil disobedience&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to LRB Close Readings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Directly in Apple: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://apple.co/3pJoFPq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other podcast apps: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;lrb.supportingcast.fm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the third episode in this series about the great political essays, David explores Thoreau’s ‘Civil Disobedience’ (1849), a ringing call to resistance against democratic idiocy. Thoreau wanted to resist slavery and unjust wars. How can one citizen turn the tide against majority opinion? Was Thoreau a visionary or a hypocrite? And what do his arguments say about environmental civil disobedience today?
Read Thoreau’s essay here
From the LRB:
Paul Laity on Thoreau and self-sufficiency
Jeremy Harding on XR and civil disobedience 
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the third episode in this series about the great political essays, David explores Thoreau’s ‘Civil Disobedience’ (1849), a ringing call to resistance against democratic idiocy. Thoreau wanted to resist slavery and unjust wars. How can one citizen turn the tide against majority opinion? Was Thoreau a visionary or a hypocrite? And what do his arguments say about environmental civil disobedience today?</p><p>Read Thoreau’s essay <a href="https://bit.ly/44oO144">here</a></p><br><p>From the LRB:</p><p>Paul Laity on <a href="https://bit.ly/46LQ2J9">Thoreau and self-sufficiency</a></p><p>Jeremy Harding on <a href="https://bit.ly/46HOjVh">XR and civil disobedience </a></p><br><p>Sign up to LRB Close Readings:</p><p>Directly in Apple: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup">https://apple.co/3pJoFPq</a></p><p>In other podcast apps: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup">lrb.supportingcast.fm</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3512</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[64ae9a707aecf600113daa05]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1927818755.mp3?updated=1731679226" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Whose Space is it Anyway?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/64a549546439940011f4d979</link>
      <description>This week we talk to astrophysicist Chris Lintott and writer Tom Stevenson about the threat from outer space: is it the asteroids, is it the aliens, or is it us? What changed when space travel moved from a Cold War battleground to a billionaire’s playground? Are China and America about to re-start the space race? And what will happen if we do find evidence of extraterrestrial life - will anyone believe it? 
Read more from Chris and Tom about space in the LRB:
Space Snooker
Where are the Space Arks?
Flying Pancakes from Space
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2023 05:00:16 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Whose Space is it Anyway?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/62fc242c-a203-11ef-8350-7ba7d703b6a8/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week we talk to astrophysicist Chris Lintott and writer Tom Stevenson about the threat from outer space: is it the asteroids, is it the aliens, or is it us?&amp;nbsp;What changed when space travel moved from a Cold War battleground to a billionaire’s playground?&amp;nbsp;Are China and America about to re-start the space race?&amp;nbsp;And what will happen if we do find evidence of extraterrestrial life - will anyone believe it?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read more from Chris and Tom about space in the LRB:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/448YnFh" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Space Snooker&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/44xUx8c" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Where are the Space Arks?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/46Mo3cu" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Flying Pancakes from Space&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to LRB Close Readings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Directly in Apple: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://apple.co/3pJoFPq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other podcast apps: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;lrb.supportingcast.fm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week we talk to astrophysicist Chris Lintott and writer Tom Stevenson about the threat from outer space: is it the asteroids, is it the aliens, or is it us? What changed when space travel moved from a Cold War battleground to a billionaire’s playground? Are China and America about to re-start the space race? And what will happen if we do find evidence of extraterrestrial life - will anyone believe it? 
Read more from Chris and Tom about space in the LRB:
Space Snooker
Where are the Space Arks?
Flying Pancakes from Space
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we talk to astrophysicist Chris Lintott and writer Tom Stevenson about the threat from outer space: is it the asteroids, is it the aliens, or is it us? What changed when space travel moved from a Cold War battleground to a billionaire’s playground? Are China and America about to re-start the space race? And what will happen if we do find evidence of extraterrestrial life - will anyone believe it? </p><p>Read more from Chris and Tom about space in the LRB:</p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/448YnFh">Space Snooker</a></p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/44xUx8c">Where are the Space Arks?</a></p><p><a href="https://bit.ly/46Mo3cu">Flying Pancakes from Space</a></p><br><p>Sign up to LRB Close Readings:</p><p>Directly in Apple: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup">https://apple.co/3pJoFPq</a></p><p>In other podcast apps: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup">lrb.supportingcast.fm</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3273</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[64a549546439940011f4d979]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2099444406.mp3?updated=1731679192" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why J.S. Mill Matters w/ Tara Westover</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/649c42952aaf1b0011f36083</link>
      <description>This week David talks to Tara Westover and the philosopher Clare Chambers about the enduring legacy of John Stuart Mill. Reading Mill’s Essays on Religion changed Tara’s life: she explains what happened, and discusses how Mill speaks to contemporary concerns about identity, conviction and doubt. Plus we talk free speech, the marketplace of ideas, the subjection of women - and why Mill isn’t comfort reading (but Thomas Carlyle is!).
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2023 05:00:07 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Why J.S. Mill Matters w/ Tara Westover</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/635680b6-a203-11ef-8350-0f12df2d75f8/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week David talks to Tara Westover and the philosopher Clare Chambers about the enduring legacy of John Stuart Mill.&amp;nbsp;Reading Mill’s Essays on Religion changed Tara’s life: she explains what happened, and discusses how Mill speaks to contemporary concerns about identity, conviction and doubt.&amp;nbsp;Plus we talk free speech, the marketplace of ideas, the subjection of women - and why Mill isn’t comfort reading (but Thomas Carlyle is!).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to LRB Close Readings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Directly in Apple: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://apple.co/3pJoFPq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other podcast apps: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;lrb.supportingcast.fm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David talks to Tara Westover and the philosopher Clare Chambers about the enduring legacy of John Stuart Mill. Reading Mill’s Essays on Religion changed Tara’s life: she explains what happened, and discusses how Mill speaks to contemporary concerns about identity, conviction and doubt. Plus we talk free speech, the marketplace of ideas, the subjection of women - and why Mill isn’t comfort reading (but Thomas Carlyle is!).
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week David talks to Tara Westover and the philosopher Clare Chambers about the enduring legacy of John Stuart Mill. Reading Mill’s Essays on Religion changed Tara’s life: she explains what happened, and discusses how Mill speaks to contemporary concerns about identity, conviction and doubt. Plus we talk free speech, the marketplace of ideas, the subjection of women - and why Mill isn’t comfort reading (but Thomas Carlyle is!).</p><br><p>Sign up to LRB Close Readings:</p><p>Directly in Apple: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup">https://apple.co/3pJoFPq</a></p><p>In other podcast apps: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup">lrb.supportingcast.fm</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3740</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[649c42952aaf1b0011f36083]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7546968131.mp3?updated=1731679165" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are There Too Many People?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6492d1a18759ac00112913ba</link>
      <description>This week David talks to science writer Meehan Crist about Thomas Malthus and the perennial question of overpopulation. Malthus wrote 225 years ago and was wrong about almost everything, yet his ideas still have a powerful hold on our imaginations and our fears. How many people is too many? What are the limits of population in the age of climate change? And why does Elon Musk think we should all be having more children?
Thomas Malthus, ‘An Essay on the Principle of Overpopulation’ (1798) 
Meehan Crist’s 2020 LRB lecture, ‘Is it OK to Have a Child?’
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 05:00:38 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Are There Too Many People?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/63b54c68-a203-11ef-8350-4b5adc8ad6ea/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week David talks to science writer Meehan Crist about Thomas Malthus and the perennial question of overpopulation. Malthus wrote 225 years ago and was wrong about almost everything, yet his ideas still have a powerful hold on our imaginations and our fears. How many people is too many? What are the limits of population in the age of climate change? And why does Elon Musk think we should all be having more children?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thomas Malthus, &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3pbT5cN" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;‘An Essay on the Principle of Overpopulation’ &lt;/a&gt;(1798)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Meehan Crist’s 2020 LRB lecture,&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/444D7Qg" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt; ‘Is it OK to Have a Child?’&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to LRB Close Readings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Directly in Apple: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://apple.co/3pJoFPq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other podcast apps: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;lrb.supportingcast.fm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David talks to science writer Meehan Crist about Thomas Malthus and the perennial question of overpopulation. Malthus wrote 225 years ago and was wrong about almost everything, yet his ideas still have a powerful hold on our imaginations and our fears. How many people is too many? What are the limits of population in the age of climate change? And why does Elon Musk think we should all be having more children?
Thomas Malthus, ‘An Essay on the Principle of Overpopulation’ (1798) 
Meehan Crist’s 2020 LRB lecture, ‘Is it OK to Have a Child?’
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week David talks to science writer Meehan Crist about Thomas Malthus and the perennial question of overpopulation. Malthus wrote 225 years ago and was wrong about almost everything, yet his ideas still have a powerful hold on our imaginations and our fears. How many people is too many? What are the limits of population in the age of climate change? And why does Elon Musk think we should all be having more children?</p><p>Thomas Malthus, <a href="https://bit.ly/3pbT5cN">‘An Essay on the Principle of Overpopulation’ </a>(1798) </p><p>Meehan Crist’s 2020 LRB lecture,<a href="https://bit.ly/444D7Qg"> ‘Is it OK to Have a Child?’</a></p><br><p>Sign up to LRB Close Readings:</p><p>Directly in Apple: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup">https://apple.co/3pJoFPq</a></p><p>In other podcast apps: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup">lrb.supportingcast.fm</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3577</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6492d1a18759ac00112913ba]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML8813751684.mp3?updated=1731679187" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas: Hume</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/64898e371cc6f70011ad20b9</link>
      <description>For the second episode in this season of History of Ideas, David discusses the Scottish philosopher David Hume and explores how eighteenth-century arguments about the national debt can help make sense of American politics today. When does public borrowing become a recipe for national disaster? Who is really in charge of the public finances: the government or the bankers, Washington, D.C. or Wall Street? And what has all this got to do with Hume’s arguments for the morality of suicide?
Read Hume’s original essay ‘Of Public Credit’ here: https://davidhume.org/texts/pld/pc
For more on Hume from the archive of the LRB:
Jonathan Rée on Hume’s voracious appetites: ‘“The Corpulence of his whole person was better fitted to communicate the Idea of the Turtle-Eating Alderman than of a refined Philosopher,” as a friend put it.’ https://bit.ly/3qFgYtE
Fara Dabhoiwala on Hume and mockery: ‘David Hume often resorted to ridicule to undermine hypocrisy or superstition, even if he doubted its capacity to settle controversial questions, arguing that mockery was as likely to distort as to reveal the truth.’ https://bit.ly/3X6KbtK
John Dunn on Hume and us: ‘Hume is in some ways so very modern . . . But just because he is in some ways so close to us, it is easy to lose the sense that in many others his beliefs and experiences stand at some little distance from our own.’ https://bit.ly/3qJRwTW
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 05:00:43 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas: Hume</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/64151c74-a203-11ef-8350-7f1783adaca6/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For the second episode in this season of History of Ideas, David discusses the Scottish philosopher David Hume and explores how eighteenth-century arguments about the national debt can help make sense of American politics today.&amp;nbsp;When does public borrowing become a recipe for national disaster?&amp;nbsp;Who is really in charge of the public finances: the government or the bankers, Washington, D.C. or Wall Street?&amp;nbsp;And what has all this got to do with Hume’s arguments for the morality of suicide?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read Hume’s original essay ‘Of Public Credit’ here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://davidhume.org/texts/pld/pc" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://davidhume.org/texts/pld/pc&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more on Hume from the archive of the&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;LRB&lt;/em&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jonathan Rée on Hume’s voracious appetites: ‘“The Corpulence of his whole person was better fitted to communicate the Idea of the Turtle-Eating Alderman than of a refined Philosopher,” as a friend put it.’&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3qFgYtE" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://bit.ly/3qFgYtE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fara Dabhoiwala on Hume and mockery: ‘David Hume often resorted to ridicule to undermine hypocrisy or superstition, even if he doubted its capacity to settle controversial questions, arguing that mockery was as likely to distort as to reveal the truth.’&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3X6KbtK" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://bit.ly/3X6KbtK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;John Dunn on Hume and us: ‘Hume is in some ways so&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;modern . . . But just because he is in some ways so close to us, it is easy to lose the sense that in many others his beliefs and experiences stand at some little distance from our own.’&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3qJRwTW" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://bit.ly/3qJRwTW&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to LRB Close Readings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Directly in Apple: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://apple.co/3pJoFPq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other podcast apps: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;lrb.supportingcast.fm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the second episode in this season of History of Ideas, David discusses the Scottish philosopher David Hume and explores how eighteenth-century arguments about the national debt can help make sense of American politics today. When does public borrowing become a recipe for national disaster? Who is really in charge of the public finances: the government or the bankers, Washington, D.C. or Wall Street? And what has all this got to do with Hume’s arguments for the morality of suicide?
Read Hume’s original essay ‘Of Public Credit’ here: https://davidhume.org/texts/pld/pc
For more on Hume from the archive of the LRB:
Jonathan Rée on Hume’s voracious appetites: ‘“The Corpulence of his whole person was better fitted to communicate the Idea of the Turtle-Eating Alderman than of a refined Philosopher,” as a friend put it.’ https://bit.ly/3qFgYtE
Fara Dabhoiwala on Hume and mockery: ‘David Hume often resorted to ridicule to undermine hypocrisy or superstition, even if he doubted its capacity to settle controversial questions, arguing that mockery was as likely to distort as to reveal the truth.’ https://bit.ly/3X6KbtK
John Dunn on Hume and us: ‘Hume is in some ways so very modern . . . But just because he is in some ways so close to us, it is easy to lose the sense that in many others his beliefs and experiences stand at some little distance from our own.’ https://bit.ly/3qJRwTW
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the second episode in this season of History of Ideas, David discusses the Scottish philosopher David Hume and explores how eighteenth-century arguments about the national debt can help make sense of American politics today. When does public borrowing become a recipe for national disaster? Who is really in charge of the public finances: the government or the bankers, Washington, D.C. or Wall Street? And what has all this got to do with Hume’s arguments for the morality of suicide?</p><p>Read Hume’s original essay ‘Of Public Credit’ here: <a href="https://davidhume.org/texts/pld/pc">https://davidhume.org/texts/pld/pc</a></p><p>For more on Hume from the archive of the <em>LRB</em>:</p><p>Jonathan Rée on Hume’s voracious appetites: ‘“The Corpulence of his whole person was better fitted to communicate the Idea of the Turtle-Eating Alderman than of a refined Philosopher,” as a friend put it.’ <a href="https://bit.ly/3qFgYtE">https://bit.ly/3qFgYtE</a></p><p>Fara Dabhoiwala on Hume and mockery: ‘David Hume often resorted to ridicule to undermine hypocrisy or superstition, even if he doubted its capacity to settle controversial questions, arguing that mockery was as likely to distort as to reveal the truth.’ <a href="https://bit.ly/3X6KbtK">https://bit.ly/3X6KbtK</a></p><p>John Dunn on Hume and us: ‘Hume is in some ways so <em>very</em> modern . . . But just because he is in some ways so close to us, it is easy to lose the sense that in many others his beliefs and experiences stand at some little distance from our own.’ <a href="https://bit.ly/3qJRwTW">https://bit.ly/3qJRwTW</a></p><br><p>Sign up to LRB Close Readings:</p><p>Directly in Apple: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup">https://apple.co/3pJoFPq</a></p><p>In other podcast apps: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup">lrb.supportingcast.fm</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3690</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[64898e371cc6f70011ad20b9]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9353102054.mp3?updated=1731679148" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rawls, Capitalism &amp; Justice</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/64805c0ca0ac590011090b10</link>
      <description>This week Daniel Chandler and Lea Ypi join David to talk about the legacy of the great American political philosopher John Rawls and his theory of justice. Did Rawls provide a prescription for the only fair way of doing capitalism? Or did he really show why capitalism and justice will never be reconciled? What can Rawls teach us about how to treat each other as equals? And does it even make sense to talk about justice in Britain or America when the world as a whole remains so fundamentally unequal?
Daniel Chandler’s new book is Free and Equal: What Would a Fair Society Look Like? 
Lea Ypi’s Free: Coming of Age at the End of History is out now in paperback.
You can hear David’s History of Ideas episode about Rawls and the theory of justice here.
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 05:00:08 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Rawls, Capitalism &amp; Justice</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/6471e31e-a203-11ef-8350-fb2a6c1b1b31/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week Daniel Chandler and Lea Ypi join David to talk about the legacy of the great American political philosopher John Rawls and his theory of justice.&amp;nbsp;Did Rawls provide a prescription for the only fair way of doing capitalism?&amp;nbsp;Or did he really show why capitalism and justice will never be reconciled?&amp;nbsp;What can Rawls teach us about how to treat each other as equals?&amp;nbsp;And does it even make sense to talk about justice in Britain or America when the world as a whole remains so fundamentally unequal?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Daniel Chandler’s new book is&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3qwDN2D" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Free and Equal: What Would a Fair Society Look Like?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lea Ypi’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3oOTP7l" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Free: Coming of Age at the End of History&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;is out now in paperback.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can hear David’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;History of Ideas&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;episode about Rawls and the theory of justice &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3MUxZaL" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to LRB Close Readings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Directly in Apple: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://apple.co/3pJoFPq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other podcast apps: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;lrb.supportingcast.fm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week Daniel Chandler and Lea Ypi join David to talk about the legacy of the great American political philosopher John Rawls and his theory of justice. Did Rawls provide a prescription for the only fair way of doing capitalism? Or did he really show why capitalism and justice will never be reconciled? What can Rawls teach us about how to treat each other as equals? And does it even make sense to talk about justice in Britain or America when the world as a whole remains so fundamentally unequal?
Daniel Chandler’s new book is Free and Equal: What Would a Fair Society Look Like? 
Lea Ypi’s Free: Coming of Age at the End of History is out now in paperback.
You can hear David’s History of Ideas episode about Rawls and the theory of justice here.
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week Daniel Chandler and Lea Ypi join David to talk about the legacy of the great American political philosopher John Rawls and his theory of justice. Did Rawls provide a prescription for the only fair way of doing capitalism? Or did he really show why capitalism and justice will never be reconciled? What can Rawls teach us about how to treat each other as equals? And does it even make sense to talk about justice in Britain or America when the world as a whole remains so fundamentally unequal?</p><br><p>Daniel Chandler’s new book is <a href="https://bit.ly/3qwDN2D"><em>Free and Equal: What Would a Fair Society Look Like?</em></a><em> </em></p><br><p>Lea Ypi’s <a href="https://bit.ly/3oOTP7l"><em>Free: Coming of Age at the End of History</em></a> is out now in paperback.</p><br><p>You can hear David’s <em>History of Ideas</em> episode about Rawls and the theory of justice <a href="https://bit.ly/3MUxZaL">here</a>.</p><br><p>Sign up to LRB Close Readings:</p><p>Directly in Apple: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup">https://apple.co/3pJoFPq</a></p><p>In other podcast apps: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup">lrb.supportingcast.fm</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3621</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[64805c0ca0ac590011090b10]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML9572104398.mp3?updated=1731679229" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Live Special: The American Century w/ David Miliband</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6477435ea95f1f00112ceccc</link>
      <description>This week’s episode was recorded live at the Hay Festival, where David was joined on stage by David Miliband and Helen Thompson to discuss the past, present and future of American power. What explains American global dominance? Can it be justified? How will it be replaced? They discuss the fall-out of the Ukraine war, the threat posed by China, the challenge of climate change and the possibility of a second Trump presidency and ask – is the American century over?
David Miliband writes about the consequences of the Ukraine war in Foreign Affairs.
Hear more from Helen Thompson on the These Times podcast from UnHerd. 
Follow Past Present Future on Twitter @PPFIdeas
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 05:00:41 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Live Special: The American Century w/ David Miliband</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/64cca826-a203-11ef-8350-336e8cdafe11/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week’s episode was recorded live at the Hay Festival, where David was joined on stage by David Miliband and Helen Thompson to discuss the past, present and future of American power.&amp;nbsp;What explains American global dominance?&amp;nbsp;Can it be justified?&amp;nbsp;How will it be replaced?&amp;nbsp;They discuss the fall-out of the Ukraine war, the threat posed by China, the challenge of climate change and the possibility of a second Trump presidency and ask – is the American century over?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;David Miliband writes about the consequences of the Ukraine war in&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=" https://bit.ly/3C3zI8y" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Foreign Affairs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hear more from Helen Thompson on the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/43dj2qW" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;em&gt;These Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;podcast from&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;UnHerd.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Follow Past Present Future on Twitter @PPFIdeas&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to LRB Close Readings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Directly in Apple: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://apple.co/3pJoFPq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other podcast apps: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;lrb.supportingcast.fm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week’s episode was recorded live at the Hay Festival, where David was joined on stage by David Miliband and Helen Thompson to discuss the past, present and future of American power. What explains American global dominance? Can it be justified? How will it be replaced? They discuss the fall-out of the Ukraine war, the threat posed by China, the challenge of climate change and the possibility of a second Trump presidency and ask – is the American century over?
David Miliband writes about the consequences of the Ukraine war in Foreign Affairs.
Hear more from Helen Thompson on the These Times podcast from UnHerd. 
Follow Past Present Future on Twitter @PPFIdeas
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week’s episode was recorded live at the Hay Festival, where David was joined on stage by David Miliband and Helen Thompson to discuss the past, present and future of American power. What explains American global dominance? Can it be justified? How will it be replaced? They discuss the fall-out of the Ukraine war, the threat posed by China, the challenge of climate change and the possibility of a second Trump presidency and ask – is the American century over?</p><br><p>David Miliband writes about the consequences of the Ukraine war in <a href="%20https://bit.ly/3C3zI8y"><em>Foreign Affairs</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Hear more from Helen Thompson on the <a href="https://bit.ly/43dj2qW"><em>These Times</em></a> podcast from <em>UnHerd. </em></p><p>Follow Past Present Future on Twitter @PPFIdeas</p><br><p>Sign up to LRB Close Readings:</p><p>Directly in Apple: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup">https://apple.co/3pJoFPq</a></p><p>In other podcast apps: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup">lrb.supportingcast.fm</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3378</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6477435ea95f1f00112ceccc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2291005637.mp3?updated=1731679158" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI: Can the Machines Really Think?</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/646e01d33108730011527d82</link>
      <description>Gary Marcus and John Lanchester join David to discuss all things AI, from ChatGPT to the Turing test. Why is the Turing test such a bad judge of machine intelligence? If these machines aren’t thinking, what is it they are doing? And what are we doing giving them so much power to shape our lives? Plus we discuss self-driving cars, the coming jobs apocalypse, how children learn, and what it is that makes us truly human.
Gary’s new podcast is Humans vs. Machines.
Read Turing’s original paper here.
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 05:00:23 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>AI: Can the Machines Really Think?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/652723be-a203-11ef-8350-d369885f8997/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Gary Marcus and John Lanchester join David to discuss all things AI, from ChatGPT to the Turing test.&amp;nbsp;Why is the Turing test such a bad judge of machine intelligence?&amp;nbsp;If these machines aren’t thinking, what is it they are doing?&amp;nbsp;And what are we doing giving them so much power to shape our lives?&amp;nbsp;Plus we discuss self-driving cars, the coming jobs apocalypse, how children learn, and what it is that makes us truly human.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gary’s new podcast is &lt;a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/humans-vs-machines-with-gary-marcus/id1532110146" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Humans vs. Machines&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read Turing’s original paper &lt;a href="https://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/activities/ieg/e-library/sources/t_article.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to LRB Close Readings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Directly in Apple: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://apple.co/3pJoFPq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other podcast apps: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;lrb.supportingcast.fm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Gary Marcus and John Lanchester join David to discuss all things AI, from ChatGPT to the Turing test. Why is the Turing test such a bad judge of machine intelligence? If these machines aren’t thinking, what is it they are doing? And what are we doing giving them so much power to shape our lives? Plus we discuss self-driving cars, the coming jobs apocalypse, how children learn, and what it is that makes us truly human.
Gary’s new podcast is Humans vs. Machines.
Read Turing’s original paper here.
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Gary Marcus and John Lanchester join David to discuss all things AI, from ChatGPT to the Turing test. Why is the Turing test such a bad judge of machine intelligence? If these machines aren’t thinking, what is it they are doing? And what are we doing giving them so much power to shape our lives? Plus we discuss self-driving cars, the coming jobs apocalypse, how children learn, and what it is that makes us truly human.</p><br><p>Gary’s new podcast is <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/humans-vs-machines-with-gary-marcus/id1532110146">Humans vs. Machines</a>.</p><br><p>Read Turing’s original paper <a href="https://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/activities/ieg/e-library/sources/t_article.pdf">here</a>.</p><br><p>Sign up to LRB Close Readings:</p><p>Directly in Apple: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup">https://apple.co/3pJoFPq</a></p><p>In other podcast apps: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup">lrb.supportingcast.fm</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3286</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[646e01d33108730011527d82]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML7803263293.mp3?updated=1731679198" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>History of Ideas: Montaigne</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/64621c4410dbac0011b3e12f</link>
      <description>For the first episode in the new series of History of Ideas – on the great essays and the great essayists – David discusses Montaigne, the man who invented a whole new way of writing and being read. From the fear of death to the joys of life, from the perils of atheism to the pitfalls of faith, from sex to religion and back again, Montaigne wrote the book of himself, which was also a guide to what it means to be human. Elephants, civil war, gout, cosmology, torture, tennis balls, disease, diets, and politics too: all life is here.
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2023 05:00:16 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>History of Ideas: Montaigne</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/657f780c-a203-11ef-8350-5bc91fb4bbc1/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;For the first episode in the new series of History of Ideas – on the great essays and the great essayists – David discusses Montaigne, the man who invented a whole new way of writing and being read.&amp;nbsp;From the fear of death to the joys of life, from the perils of atheism to the pitfalls of faith, from sex to religion and back again, Montaigne wrote the book of himself, which was also a guide to what it means to be human.&amp;nbsp;Elephants, civil war, gout, cosmology, torture, tennis balls, disease, diets, and politics too: all life is here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to LRB Close Readings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Directly in Apple: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://apple.co/3pJoFPq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other podcast apps: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;lrb.supportingcast.fm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the first episode in the new series of History of Ideas – on the great essays and the great essayists – David discusses Montaigne, the man who invented a whole new way of writing and being read. From the fear of death to the joys of life, from the perils of atheism to the pitfalls of faith, from sex to religion and back again, Montaigne wrote the book of himself, which was also a guide to what it means to be human. Elephants, civil war, gout, cosmology, torture, tennis balls, disease, diets, and politics too: all life is here.
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the first episode in the new series of History of Ideas – on the great essays and the great essayists – David discusses Montaigne, the man who invented a whole new way of writing and being read. From the fear of death to the joys of life, from the perils of atheism to the pitfalls of faith, from sex to religion and back again, Montaigne wrote the book of himself, which was also a guide to what it means to be human. Elephants, civil war, gout, cosmology, torture, tennis balls, disease, diets, and politics too: all life is here.</p><br><p>Sign up to LRB Close Readings:</p><p>Directly in Apple: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup">https://apple.co/3pJoFPq</a></p><p>In other podcast apps: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup">lrb.supportingcast.fm</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3273</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[64621c4410dbac0011b3e12f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML1145931310.mp3?updated=1731679165" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Living Behind the Iron Curtain</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/645a27901ddd9f00115c6a56</link>
      <description>This week David talks to Katja Hoyer and Lea Ypi about life under communism. East Germany was the most successful of the communist states of Eastern Europe, measured by economic prosperity and sporting success. Did the GDR ever really offer a model of how Soviet-style communism could give people what they wanted, including social mobility and consumerism? Why did it fall apart in the end? And how did the GDR experiment look from inside Albania, where Lea grew up? A conversation about freedom, dissent, paranoia and blue jeans.
Katja Hoyer’s latest book is Beyond the Wall: East Germany 1949-1990.
Lea Ypi’s prize-winning Free: Coming of Age at the End of History is available in paperback now.
To hear more about Rosa Luxemburg, this is from Season 2 of History of Ideas.
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 05:00:07 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Living Behind the Iron Curtain</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/65d8f328-a203-11ef-8350-d7b9ddc8507c/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week David talks to Katja Hoyer and Lea Ypi about life under communism.&amp;nbsp;East Germany was the most successful of the communist states of Eastern Europe, measured by economic prosperity and sporting success.&amp;nbsp;Did the GDR ever really offer a model of how Soviet-style communism could give people what they wanted, including social mobility and consumerism?&amp;nbsp;Why did it fall apart in the end?&amp;nbsp;And how did the GDR experiment look from inside Albania, where Lea grew up?&amp;nbsp;A conversation about freedom, dissent, paranoia and blue jeans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Katja Hoyer’s latest book is&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=" https://bit.ly/3B55wJS" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Beyond the Wall: East Germany 1949-1990&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lea Ypi’s prize-winning&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3pjv2IA" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Free: Coming of Age at the End of History&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;is available in paperback now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To hear more about Rosa Luxemburg, &lt;a href="https://play.acast.com/s/history-of-ideas/luxemburgonrevolution" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;this is from Season 2 of History of Ideas&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to LRB Close Readings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Directly in Apple: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://apple.co/3pJoFPq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other podcast apps: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;lrb.supportingcast.fm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David talks to Katja Hoyer and Lea Ypi about life under communism. East Germany was the most successful of the communist states of Eastern Europe, measured by economic prosperity and sporting success. Did the GDR ever really offer a model of how Soviet-style communism could give people what they wanted, including social mobility and consumerism? Why did it fall apart in the end? And how did the GDR experiment look from inside Albania, where Lea grew up? A conversation about freedom, dissent, paranoia and blue jeans.
Katja Hoyer’s latest book is Beyond the Wall: East Germany 1949-1990.
Lea Ypi’s prize-winning Free: Coming of Age at the End of History is available in paperback now.
To hear more about Rosa Luxemburg, this is from Season 2 of History of Ideas.
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week David talks to Katja Hoyer and Lea Ypi about life under communism. East Germany was the most successful of the communist states of Eastern Europe, measured by economic prosperity and sporting success. Did the GDR ever really offer a model of how Soviet-style communism could give people what they wanted, including social mobility and consumerism? Why did it fall apart in the end? And how did the GDR experiment look from inside Albania, where Lea grew up? A conversation about freedom, dissent, paranoia and blue jeans.</p><p>Katja Hoyer’s latest book is <a href="%20https://bit.ly/3B55wJS"><em>Beyond the Wall: East Germany 1949-1990</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Lea Ypi’s prize-winning <a href="https://bit.ly/3pjv2IA"><em>Free: Coming of Age at the End of History</em></a> is available in paperback now.</p><p>To hear more about Rosa Luxemburg, <a href="https://play.acast.com/s/history-of-ideas/luxemburgonrevolution">this is from Season 2 of History of Ideas</a>.</p><br><p>Sign up to LRB Close Readings:</p><p>Directly in Apple: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup">https://apple.co/3pJoFPq</a></p><p>In other podcast apps: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup">lrb.supportingcast.fm</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3391</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[645a27901ddd9f00115c6a56]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML2103554738.mp3?updated=1731679170" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Dallas Saw the Future</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6451402d7308540011734d75</link>
      <description>This week David talks to Helen Thompson about Dallas and the end of oil. How did the world’s most popular soap opera come to explain the energy crisis and the future of a world hooked on fossil fuels? Is the fate of the Ewing family – fire and ruin – going to be the fate of America? And did J.R. Ewing really pave the way for President Donald Trump? Plus David and Helen discuss ‘oil fictions’, from Isaac Asimov to Italo Calvino.
Watch the moment when ‘Miss Ellie Saves the Day’.
Helen Thompson on ’the cosmic stakes of the age of oil’.
Isaac Asimov’s imaginary report on a world without oil.
Italo Calvino’s short story, ’The Petrol Pump’.
Past Present Future is brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books.
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 05:00:41 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>How Dallas Saw the Future</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/6632dbcc-a203-11ef-8350-0fe23c8fdaa5/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;This week David talks to Helen Thompson about&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Dallas&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;and the end of oil.&amp;nbsp;How did the world’s most popular soap opera come to explain the energy crisis and the future of a world hooked on fossil fuels?&amp;nbsp;Is the fate of the Ewing family – fire and ruin – going to be the fate of America?&amp;nbsp;And did J.R. Ewing really pave the way for President Donald Trump?&amp;nbsp;Plus David and Helen discuss ‘oil fictions’, from Isaac Asimov to Italo Calvino.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Watch the moment when &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HNiGjsxEkc" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;‘Miss Ellie Saves the Day’&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Helen Thompson on &lt;a href="https://unherd.com/2022/10/the-demonic-power-of-oil/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;’the cosmic stakes of the age of oil’&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Isaac Asimov’s &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/425pCPo" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;imaginary report on a world without oil&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Italo Calvino’s short story, &lt;a href="https://bit.ly/3Nok2DA" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;’The Petrol Pump’&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Past Present Future is brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to LRB Close Readings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Directly in Apple: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://apple.co/3pJoFPq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other podcast apps: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;lrb.supportingcast.fm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week David talks to Helen Thompson about Dallas and the end of oil. How did the world’s most popular soap opera come to explain the energy crisis and the future of a world hooked on fossil fuels? Is the fate of the Ewing family – fire and ruin – going to be the fate of America? And did J.R. Ewing really pave the way for President Donald Trump? Plus David and Helen discuss ‘oil fictions’, from Isaac Asimov to Italo Calvino.
Watch the moment when ‘Miss Ellie Saves the Day’.
Helen Thompson on ’the cosmic stakes of the age of oil’.
Isaac Asimov’s imaginary report on a world without oil.
Italo Calvino’s short story, ’The Petrol Pump’.
Past Present Future is brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books.
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week David talks to Helen Thompson about <em>Dallas</em> and the end of oil. How did the world’s most popular soap opera come to explain the energy crisis and the future of a world hooked on fossil fuels? Is the fate of the Ewing family – fire and ruin – going to be the fate of America? And did J.R. Ewing really pave the way for President Donald Trump? Plus David and Helen discuss ‘oil fictions’, from Isaac Asimov to Italo Calvino.</p><br><p>Watch the moment when <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HNiGjsxEkc">‘Miss Ellie Saves the Day’</a>.</p><p>Helen Thompson on <a href="https://unherd.com/2022/10/the-demonic-power-of-oil/">’the cosmic stakes of the age of oil’</a>.</p><p>Isaac Asimov’s <a href="https://bit.ly/425pCPo">imaginary report on a world without oil</a>.</p><p>Italo Calvino’s short story, <a href="https://bit.ly/3Nok2DA">’The Petrol Pump’</a>.</p><p>Past Present Future is brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books.</p><br><p>Sign up to LRB Close Readings:</p><p>Directly in Apple: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup">https://apple.co/3pJoFPq</a></p><p>In other podcast apps: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup">lrb.supportingcast.fm</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3184</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6451402d7308540011734d75]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML8808744470.mp3?updated=1731679149" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Novel that Unravels Democracy</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6449739152b8d300117de9f9</link>
      <description>David talks to Ian McEwan about Italo Calvino’s The Watcher (1963), one of the greatest of all works of political fiction. Challenging, disturbing, redemptive: this is a book about who gets to count and who doesn’t, and what identity politics really means. David and Ian also discuss how political fiction works - and why the climate change novel is so hard to write. Plus they argue about whether children should be allowed to vote. 
Next week: Helen Thompson on Dallas and the end of oil.
Ian McEwan’s latest novel is Lessons, available now.
To read more about Calvino, here is a recent appreciation of his later writings in the New Yorker.
On the children’s focus groups, here is the report. 
For more links and info about future episodes, follow Past Present Future on Twitter @PPFIdeas
Past Present Future is brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books.
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 05:00:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Novel that Unravels Democracy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/668c1372-a203-11ef-8350-bb00b636a5cc/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;David talks to Ian McEwan about Italo Calvino’s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The Watcher&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(1963), one of the greatest of all works of political fiction.&amp;nbsp;Challenging, disturbing, redemptive: this is a book about who gets to count and who doesn’t, and what identity politics really means.&amp;nbsp;David and Ian also discuss how political fiction works - and why the climate change novel is so hard to write. Plus they argue about whether children should be allowed to vote.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next week: Helen Thompson on&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Dallas&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;and the end of oil.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ian McEwan’s latest novel is&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.ianmcewan.com/books/lessons.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Lessons&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, available&amp;nbsp;now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To read more about Calvino,&amp;nbsp;here&amp;nbsp;is a &lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/03/06/the-worlds-of-italo-calvino" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;recent appreciation of his later writings in the&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;New Yorker.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the children’s focus groups, here is&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.bennettinstitute.cam.ac.uk/publications/do-children-want-the-vote/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;the report&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more links and info about future episodes, follow Past Present Future on Twitter @PPFIdeas&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Past Present Future is brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sign up to LRB Close Readings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Directly in Apple: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;https://apple.co/3pJoFPq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other podcast apps: &lt;a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;lrb.supportingcast.fm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>David talks to Ian McEwan about Italo Calvino’s The Watcher (1963), one of the greatest of all works of political fiction. Challenging, disturbing, redemptive: this is a book about who gets to count and who doesn’t, and what identity politics really means. David and Ian also discuss how political fiction works - and why the climate change novel is so hard to write. Plus they argue about whether children should be allowed to vote. 
Next week: Helen Thompson on Dallas and the end of oil.
Ian McEwan’s latest novel is Lessons, available now.
To read more about Calvino, here is a recent appreciation of his later writings in the New Yorker.
On the children’s focus groups, here is the report. 
For more links and info about future episodes, follow Past Present Future on Twitter @PPFIdeas
Past Present Future is brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books.
Sign up to LRB Close Readings:
Directly in Apple: https://apple.co/3pJoFPq
In other podcast apps: lrb.supportingcast.fm
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>David talks to Ian McEwan about Italo Calvino’s <em>The Watcher</em> (1963), one of the greatest of all works of political fiction. Challenging, disturbing, redemptive: this is a book about who gets to count and who doesn’t, and what identity politics really means. David and Ian also discuss how political fiction works - and why the climate change novel is so hard to write. Plus they argue about whether children should be allowed to vote. </p><p>Next week: Helen Thompson on <em>Dallas</em> and the end of oil.</p><br><p>Ian McEwan’s latest novel is <a href="https://www.ianmcewan.com/books/lessons.html"><em>Lessons</em></a>, available now.</p><p>To read more about Calvino, here is a <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/03/06/the-worlds-of-italo-calvino">recent appreciation of his later writings in the <em>New Yorker.</em></a></p><p>On the children’s focus groups, here is <a href="https://www.bennettinstitute.cam.ac.uk/publications/do-children-want-the-vote/">the report</a>. </p><p>For more links and info about future episodes, follow Past Present Future on Twitter @PPFIdeas</p><p>Past Present Future is brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books.</p><br><p>Sign up to LRB Close Readings:</p><p>Directly in Apple: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfapplesignup">https://apple.co/3pJoFPq</a></p><p>In other podcast apps: <a href="https://lrb.me/ppfsignup">lrb.supportingcast.fm</a></p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3305</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6449739152b8d300117de9f9]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML5874019305.mp3?updated=1731679152" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Introducing Past Present Future</title>
      <link>https://shows.acast.com/pastpresentfuture/episodes/6435692b378bed001120a130</link>
      <description>Past Present Future is a new weekly podcast with David Runciman, host and creator of Talking Politics, exploring the history of ideas from politics to philosophy, culture to technology. David talks to historians, novelists, scientists and many others about where the most interesting ideas come from, what they mean, and why they matter. 
Ideas from the past, questions about the present, shaping the future. 
Brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books.
New episodes every Thursday.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:18:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Introducing Past Present Future</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>trailer</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>David Runciman</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/66e7e3aa-a203-11ef-8350-6f50482a89b7/image/e1c504548e5cd994774a89632f7a9a1f.jpeg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>&lt;p&gt;Past Present Future is a new weekly podcast with David Runciman, host and creator of Talking Politics, exploring the history of ideas from politics to philosophy, culture to technology.&amp;nbsp;David talks to historians, novelists, scientists and many others about where the most interesting ideas come from, what they mean, and why they matter.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ideas from the past, questions about the present, shaping the future.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;New episodes every Thursday.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'&gt; Hosted on Acast. See &lt;a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'&gt;acast.com/privacy&lt;/a&gt; for more information.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Past Present Future is a new weekly podcast with David Runciman, host and creator of Talking Politics, exploring the history of ideas from politics to philosophy, culture to technology. David talks to historians, novelists, scientists and many others about where the most interesting ideas come from, what they mean, and why they matter. 
Ideas from the past, questions about the present, shaping the future. 
Brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books.
New episodes every Thursday.
 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Past Present Future is a new weekly podcast with David Runciman, host and creator of Talking Politics, exploring the history of ideas from politics to philosophy, culture to technology. David talks to historians, novelists, scientists and many others about where the most interesting ideas come from, what they mean, and why they matter. </p><p>Ideas from the past, questions about the present, shaping the future. </p><p>Brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books.</p><p>New episodes every Thursday.</p><br><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>254</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6435692b378bed001120a130]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/ARML3280209386.mp3?updated=1731606956" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
