<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.megaphone.fm/ADV6021107157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <title>Fashion Consort News Bytes</title>
    <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/podcast-news-bytes/</link>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>© 2020 Fashion Consort</copyright>
    <description>A unique, short-format podcast that features insights and perspectives on breaking news and current issues, all focused on the multi-faceted business that is fashion. News Bytes is written by Joshua Williams, produced by Fashion Consort and distributed in partnership with FashionUnited, your trusted global network for fashion news, business intelligence and jobs.</description>
    
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>Insights and Perspectives on Fashion News</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>A unique, short-format podcast that features insights and perspectives on breaking news and current issues, all focused on the multi-faceted business that is fashion. News Bytes is written by Joshua Williams, produced by Fashion Consort and distributed in partnership with FashionUnited, your trusted global network for fashion news, business intelligence and jobs.</itunes:summary>
    <content:encoded>
      <![CDATA[<p>A unique, short-format podcast that features insights and perspectives on breaking news and current issues, all focused on the multi-faceted business that is fashion. News Bytes is written by Joshua Williams, produced by Fashion Consort and distributed in partnership with FashionUnited, your trusted global network for fashion news, business intelligence and jobs.</p>]]>
    </content:encoded>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Customer Service</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>contact@fashionconsort.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/image/NewsBytes_Cover_Art_4.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
    <itunes:category text="News">
      <itunes:category text="News Commentary"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Arts">
      <itunes:category text="Fashion &amp; Beauty"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.megaphone.fm/ADV6021107157</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <item>
      <title>The Ins and Outs of Fashion</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/the-ins-and-outs-of-fashion/</link>
      <description>Fashion by definition, is the style or styles worn by the majority of a population at any given time. In other words, whatever most people are wearing right now—a particular, color, pattern, cut or silhouette—is “in fashion,” “in style,” “a la mode.” 
Contrary to popular parlance then, fashion is more about fitting in than standing out. It emphasizes group identity, highlighting those groups who wield the most power, or social significance, in the moment. Fashion underscores and externalizes the cultural zeitgeist. And by recognizing what is “in fashion” companies are able to best engage their audience and make a profit.
It seems then that fashion companies should simply be keen observers of the present in order to ensure their ongoing viability. And yet, it’s not quite so simple in an industry where determining what to produce often begins two years before a product arrives. This requires companies then to be constantly ahead of the curve in terms of potential societal trends, in order to deliver appropriate styles. Experts in trend analysis help to facilitate this process—and have become highly sophisticated at mining data to do so--albeit still victim to global health pandemics and Mother Nature. But there is another interesting tool at play—and that is the role of marketing in selling a particular trend. It starts in the business-to-business space—mills selling brands what fabrics they determine will be “in style,” brands then selling retail buyers on the clothes made from these fabrics at trade shows or on the runway, and then retailers selling customers on these same looks. In short, it’s the fashion industry, at large, that sells society on what will be “in fashion.”
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Ins and Outs of Fashion</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/9c152656-af6b-11ec-b3ed-27d3dd3410ad/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_20.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, “The Ins and Outs of Fashion,” we explore the cost of doing business in an individual consumer driven economy.  </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Fashion by definition, is the style or styles worn by the majority of a population at any given time. In other words, whatever most people are wearing right now—a particular, color, pattern, cut or silhouette—is “in fashion,” “in style,” “a la mode.” 
Contrary to popular parlance then, fashion is more about fitting in than standing out. It emphasizes group identity, highlighting those groups who wield the most power, or social significance, in the moment. Fashion underscores and externalizes the cultural zeitgeist. And by recognizing what is “in fashion” companies are able to best engage their audience and make a profit.
It seems then that fashion companies should simply be keen observers of the present in order to ensure their ongoing viability. And yet, it’s not quite so simple in an industry where determining what to produce often begins two years before a product arrives. This requires companies then to be constantly ahead of the curve in terms of potential societal trends, in order to deliver appropriate styles. Experts in trend analysis help to facilitate this process—and have become highly sophisticated at mining data to do so--albeit still victim to global health pandemics and Mother Nature. But there is another interesting tool at play—and that is the role of marketing in selling a particular trend. It starts in the business-to-business space—mills selling brands what fabrics they determine will be “in style,” brands then selling retail buyers on the clothes made from these fabrics at trade shows or on the runway, and then retailers selling customers on these same looks. In short, it’s the fashion industry, at large, that sells society on what will be “in fashion.”
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Fashion by definition, is the style or styles worn by the majority of a population at any given time. In other words, whatever most people are wearing right now—a particular, color, pattern, cut or silhouette—is “in fashion,” “in style,” “a la mode.” </p><p>Contrary to popular parlance then, fashion is more about fitting in than standing out. It emphasizes group identity, highlighting those groups who wield the most power, or social significance, in the moment. Fashion underscores and externalizes the cultural zeitgeist. And by recognizing what is “in fashion” companies are able to best engage their audience and make a profit.</p><p>It seems then that fashion companies should simply be keen observers of the present in order to ensure their ongoing viability. And yet, it’s not quite so simple in an industry where determining what to produce often begins two years before a product arrives. This requires companies then to be constantly ahead of the curve in terms of potential societal trends, in order to deliver appropriate styles. Experts in trend analysis help to facilitate this process—and have become highly sophisticated at mining data to do so--albeit still victim to global health pandemics and Mother Nature. But there is another interesting tool at play—and that is the role of marketing in selling a particular trend. It starts in the business-to-business space—mills selling brands what fabrics they determine will be “in style,” brands then selling retail buyers on the clothes made from these fabrics at trade shows or on the runway, and then retailers selling customers on these same looks. In short, it’s the fashion industry, at large, that sells society on what will be “in fashion.”</p><p>For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>406</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9c152656-af6b-11ec-b3ed-27d3dd3410ad]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV9716485434.mp3?updated=1648564135" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Conversation with Schanel Bakkouche: Retaining Exclusivity via Social Media</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/Retaining-Exclusivity-via-Social-Media</link>
      <description>Joshua Williams: Luxury brands are increasingly under stress to expand their market beyond their typical customer base. And in some cases, many brands have been effective, but in other cases, it's alienated the core customer. So, my question for you, Schanel, is can luxury brands retain their exclusivity, notwithstanding the consistency required around digital content distribution.
Schanel Bakkouche: Thank you for having me again. Social platforms characterized by their mass appeal, accessibility, and availability, contradict the very concept of luxury. Obviously, if we think exclusivity of brand, we can think of iconic items from renowned luxury brands; and not everyone owns them. This exclusivity helps luxury brands to maintain their stature: known by all, but paradoxically consumed by a few. 
I would mention a few points that are very important. First would be apply the personal touch and stay more authentic. Too often luxury brands will use one generic message. 
Then another point that it's very important is use consumer data. I think that customer data needs to be used to gain insight into what customer browse and add to their shopping cart, the offers that resonate with them and they respond to. By using signals such as purchasing behavior, interest, context, and location, luxury brands can make consumer feel that the communication are explicitly tailored to them, to receive personal attention, not to be addressed as a member of a broader audience. You know, this mindset can help luxury brands approach content and service in more meaningful ways. 
The other point would be experience. Obviously social media platforms are taking steps to embed the entire shopping journey from discovery to checkout. So, incorporating live streaming sales, integrated product catalog, and now even AR. So, the experience is very crucial point here again, to keep the exclusivity of luxury brands. 
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Conversation with Schanel Bakkouche: Retaining Exclusivity via Social Media</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/584a143e-aa45-11ec-a95c-3fa3a7a7f4b8/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_19f.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, “Retaining Exclusivity via Social Media,” the final episode of a three-part series featuring Schanel Bakkouche, editor and stylist at Vogue International Publications and founder and creative director at the advertising agency, SFB Creative, we further discuss the strategies luxury fashion brands employ to engage current customers and to attract a new clientele. And stay tuned after this episode for a special add-on—to hear Schanel’s thoughts on brand collaborations.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Joshua Williams: Luxury brands are increasingly under stress to expand their market beyond their typical customer base. And in some cases, many brands have been effective, but in other cases, it's alienated the core customer. So, my question for you, Schanel, is can luxury brands retain their exclusivity, notwithstanding the consistency required around digital content distribution.
Schanel Bakkouche: Thank you for having me again. Social platforms characterized by their mass appeal, accessibility, and availability, contradict the very concept of luxury. Obviously, if we think exclusivity of brand, we can think of iconic items from renowned luxury brands; and not everyone owns them. This exclusivity helps luxury brands to maintain their stature: known by all, but paradoxically consumed by a few. 
I would mention a few points that are very important. First would be apply the personal touch and stay more authentic. Too often luxury brands will use one generic message. 
Then another point that it's very important is use consumer data. I think that customer data needs to be used to gain insight into what customer browse and add to their shopping cart, the offers that resonate with them and they respond to. By using signals such as purchasing behavior, interest, context, and location, luxury brands can make consumer feel that the communication are explicitly tailored to them, to receive personal attention, not to be addressed as a member of a broader audience. You know, this mindset can help luxury brands approach content and service in more meaningful ways. 
The other point would be experience. Obviously social media platforms are taking steps to embed the entire shopping journey from discovery to checkout. So, incorporating live streaming sales, integrated product catalog, and now even AR. So, the experience is very crucial point here again, to keep the exclusivity of luxury brands. 
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Joshua Williams:</strong> Luxury brands are increasingly under stress to expand their market beyond their typical customer base. And in some cases, many brands have been effective, but in other cases, it's alienated the core customer. So, my question for you, Schanel, is can luxury brands retain their exclusivity, notwithstanding the consistency required around digital content distribution.</p><p><strong>Schanel Bakkouche:</strong> Thank you for having me again. Social platforms characterized by their mass appeal, accessibility, and availability, contradict the very concept of luxury. Obviously, if we think exclusivity of brand, we can think of iconic items from renowned luxury brands; and not everyone owns them. This exclusivity helps luxury brands to maintain their stature: known by all, but paradoxically consumed by a few. </p><p>I would mention a few points that are very important. First would be apply the personal touch and stay more authentic. Too often luxury brands will use one generic message. </p><p>Then another point that it's very important is use consumer data. I think that customer data needs to be used to gain insight into what customer browse and add to their shopping cart, the offers that resonate with them and they respond to. By using signals such as purchasing behavior, interest, context, and location, luxury brands can make consumer feel that the communication are explicitly tailored to them, to receive personal attention, not to be addressed as a member of a broader audience. You know, this mindset can help luxury brands approach content and service in more meaningful ways. </p><p>The other point would be experience. Obviously social media platforms are taking steps to embed the entire shopping journey from discovery to checkout. So, incorporating live streaming sales, integrated product catalog, and now even AR. So, the experience is very crucial point here again, to keep the exclusivity of luxury brands. </p><p>For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>711</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[584a143e-aa45-11ec-a95c-3fa3a7a7f4b8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV3521773734.mp3?updated=1647998233" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Conversation with Schanel Bakkouche: Content Snacking</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/Conversation-with-Schanel-Bakkouche-Content-Snacking</link>
      <description>Welcome back Schanel. It's so nice to have you. What is content snacking? 
Schanel Bakkouche: Yes, of course. So, we all love snacks, right? So they can never compare to a lavish spread, but the instant gratification that snacks give is undeniable. It's the same with the way we consume content.
If we take today Twitter and I think Twitter is very good example, who would have thought, a few years ago, that this just 140 character medium of expression will change the way we communicate with each other. I feel like, the discipline of word limits imposed on Twitter user has saved us from rambling often found on the internet. And which actually made it even a better tool today and even a more relevant tool.
Joshua Williams: And you're absolutely right about Twitter in the sense that in many ways it's easier to consume. It comes in much more curated means. What does that mean for a luxury brand? How do they create strategies around content snacking, when usually their focus is on telling a much more lavish, as you said, story or narrative about their brand? 
Schanel Bakkouche: I mean, I would say that due to the fact that we are living in a time where visibility matters most, the flip side is that competition and growth within the luxury industry here is forcing brands to find new ways of developing creative brand awareness. I think this is where, like, you know, content snacking means a lot for brands, to develop their marketing strategy because they just need to communicate differently.
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Conversation with Schanel Bakkouche: Content Snacking</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/9ff7b88c-9fb8-11ec-b058-53c7442a4ad8/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_18.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, Content Snacking, part two of a three part series featuring Schanel Bakkouche, editor and stylist at Vogue International Publications and founder and creative director at the advertising agency, SFB Creative. We further discuss the strategies, luxury fashion brands employ to engage current customers and to attract a new client.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Welcome back Schanel. It's so nice to have you. What is content snacking? 
Schanel Bakkouche: Yes, of course. So, we all love snacks, right? So they can never compare to a lavish spread, but the instant gratification that snacks give is undeniable. It's the same with the way we consume content.
If we take today Twitter and I think Twitter is very good example, who would have thought, a few years ago, that this just 140 character medium of expression will change the way we communicate with each other. I feel like, the discipline of word limits imposed on Twitter user has saved us from rambling often found on the internet. And which actually made it even a better tool today and even a more relevant tool.
Joshua Williams: And you're absolutely right about Twitter in the sense that in many ways it's easier to consume. It comes in much more curated means. What does that mean for a luxury brand? How do they create strategies around content snacking, when usually their focus is on telling a much more lavish, as you said, story or narrative about their brand? 
Schanel Bakkouche: I mean, I would say that due to the fact that we are living in a time where visibility matters most, the flip side is that competition and growth within the luxury industry here is forcing brands to find new ways of developing creative brand awareness. I think this is where, like, you know, content snacking means a lot for brands, to develop their marketing strategy because they just need to communicate differently.
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Welcome back Schanel. It's so nice to have you. What is content snacking? </p><p><strong>Schanel Bakkouche:</strong> Yes, of course. So, we all love snacks, right? So they can never compare to a lavish spread, but the instant gratification that snacks give is undeniable. It's the same with the way we consume content.</p><p>If we take today Twitter and I think Twitter is very good example, who would have thought, a few years ago, that this just 140 character medium of expression will change the way we communicate with each other. I feel like, the discipline of word limits imposed on Twitter user has saved us from rambling often found on the internet. And which actually made it even a better tool today and even a more relevant tool.</p><p><strong>Joshua Williams:</strong> And you're absolutely right about Twitter in the sense that in many ways it's easier to consume. It comes in much more curated means. What does that mean for a luxury brand? How do they create strategies around content snacking, when usually their focus is on telling a much more lavish, as you said, story or narrative about their brand? </p><p><strong>Schanel Bakkouche:</strong> I mean, I would say that due to the fact that we are living in a time where visibility matters most, the flip side is that competition and growth within the luxury industry here is forcing brands to find new ways of developing creative brand awareness. I think this is where, like, you know, content snacking means a lot for brands, to develop their marketing strategy because they just need to communicate differently.</p><p>For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>599</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9ff7b88c-9fb8-11ec-b058-53c7442a4ad8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV1347888003.mp3?updated=1646837885" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are Fashion Collaborations Successful?</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/Are-Fashion-Collaborations-Successful</link>
      <description>On the surface, fashion collaborations might seem like an exciting way to generate new business and overall sales performance. Whether the collaboration is relatively obvious, such as Gucci and Adidas, or more surprising, such as Crocs and Balenciaga or Alexander McQueen and Target, they certainly create interest and engagement, typically in terms of generating new customers. And it’s relatively clear that in terms of luxury brands collaborating with more mass brands, the goal is to connect with the aspirational customer.
Dig below the surface, and the efficacy of these collaborations, and their ability to truly capture new customers and increase sales, is dubious at best, especially for the luxury brand. It’s not like the typical Target customer all of the sudden shopped at the McQueen boutique, paying $1000s more for an item that was under $100 at Target. In fact, for many brands, these high-profile collaborations often raise a bar that cannot be easily or consistently recreated—forcing luxury brands to chase after their business, which is hardly the modus operandi of luxury brands and their quest for exclusivity. In fact, often these collaborations are a signal that all is not well with a brand—and that without relying on the affinity or success of another more accessible brand—they are not meeting their numbers. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Are Fashion Collaborations Successful?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0c100b7a-967a-11ec-b741-abe77bea1ff5/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_17.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, “Are Fashion Collaborations Successful?,” we question the reasoning for and efficacy of collaborations for luxury brands, and if they signal an issue around relevance. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>On the surface, fashion collaborations might seem like an exciting way to generate new business and overall sales performance. Whether the collaboration is relatively obvious, such as Gucci and Adidas, or more surprising, such as Crocs and Balenciaga or Alexander McQueen and Target, they certainly create interest and engagement, typically in terms of generating new customers. And it’s relatively clear that in terms of luxury brands collaborating with more mass brands, the goal is to connect with the aspirational customer.
Dig below the surface, and the efficacy of these collaborations, and their ability to truly capture new customers and increase sales, is dubious at best, especially for the luxury brand. It’s not like the typical Target customer all of the sudden shopped at the McQueen boutique, paying $1000s more for an item that was under $100 at Target. In fact, for many brands, these high-profile collaborations often raise a bar that cannot be easily or consistently recreated—forcing luxury brands to chase after their business, which is hardly the modus operandi of luxury brands and their quest for exclusivity. In fact, often these collaborations are a signal that all is not well with a brand—and that without relying on the affinity or success of another more accessible brand—they are not meeting their numbers. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>On the surface, fashion collaborations might seem like an exciting way to generate new business and overall sales performance. Whether the collaboration is relatively obvious, such as Gucci and Adidas, or more surprising, such as Crocs and Balenciaga or Alexander McQueen and Target, they certainly create interest and engagement, typically in terms of generating new customers. And it’s relatively clear that in terms of luxury brands collaborating with more mass brands, the goal is to connect with the aspirational customer.</p><p>Dig below the surface, and the efficacy of these collaborations, and their ability to truly capture new customers and increase sales, is dubious at best, especially for the luxury brand. It’s not like the typical Target customer all of the sudden shopped at the McQueen boutique, paying $1000s more for an item that was under $100 at Target. In fact, for many brands, these high-profile collaborations often raise a bar that cannot be easily or consistently recreated—forcing luxury brands to chase after their business, which is hardly the modus operandi of luxury brands and their quest for exclusivity. In fact, often these collaborations are a signal that all is not well with a brand—and that without relying on the affinity or success of another more accessible brand—they are not meeting their numbers. </p><p><br></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>341</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0c100b7a-967a-11ec-b741-abe77bea1ff5]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV2154136195.mp3?updated=1645821448" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Conversation with Schanel Bakkouche: Content Marketing for Luxury Fashion</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/Conversation-with-Schanel-Bakkouche-Content-Marketing-for-Luxury-Fashion</link>
      <description>Hello, Schanel. It's so wonderful to have you. 
We're talking about content marketing and how it shifted over the past few years, specifically in the luxury space. Content marketing is a buzz word in the marketing world, but what does it actually mean? 
Schanel Bakkouche: First, thank you for having me.
Content marketing or brand related content, is which consumers in all case or luxury consumers, actually choose to engage. So it has a value for the audience first, whether entertainment, information, or other value; and the brands second. Content can live in marketing and media channels; [00:01:00]it's not a channel itself, I would say. Content can be a spoke or a hub. It can be distributed through media or part of a destination. Importantly content is a means of engagement with current and prospective customer and give the luxury brands it's own voice. 
Joshua Williams: Very interesting. So, what is the role then of content marketing for luxury brands specifically?
Schanel Bakkouche: For luxury brands, the chief value of content marketing lies in its ability to reel in, persuade and evangelize the most discerning audience in the language and elevated aesthetic that is particular to luxury. 
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Conversation with Schanel Bakkouche: Content Marketing for Luxury Fashion</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1d4be01c-9413-11ec-90d7-db591256d66d/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_16f.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, “The Role of Content Marketing in Luxury Fashion,” part one of a three part series featuring Schanel Bakkouche, editor and stylist at Vogue International Publications and founder and creative director at the advertising agency, SFB Creative, we discuss the strategies luxury fashion brands employ to engage current customers and to attract a new clientele.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Hello, Schanel. It's so wonderful to have you. 
We're talking about content marketing and how it shifted over the past few years, specifically in the luxury space. Content marketing is a buzz word in the marketing world, but what does it actually mean? 
Schanel Bakkouche: First, thank you for having me.
Content marketing or brand related content, is which consumers in all case or luxury consumers, actually choose to engage. So it has a value for the audience first, whether entertainment, information, or other value; and the brands second. Content can live in marketing and media channels; [00:01:00]it's not a channel itself, I would say. Content can be a spoke or a hub. It can be distributed through media or part of a destination. Importantly content is a means of engagement with current and prospective customer and give the luxury brands it's own voice. 
Joshua Williams: Very interesting. So, what is the role then of content marketing for luxury brands specifically?
Schanel Bakkouche: For luxury brands, the chief value of content marketing lies in its ability to reel in, persuade and evangelize the most discerning audience in the language and elevated aesthetic that is particular to luxury. 
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Hello, Schanel. It's so wonderful to have you. </p><p>We're talking about content marketing and how it shifted over the past few years, specifically in the luxury space. Content marketing is a buzz word in the marketing world, but what does it actually mean? </p><p><strong>Schanel Bakkouche:</strong> First, thank you for having me.</p><p>Content marketing or brand related content, is which consumers in all case or luxury consumers, actually choose to engage. So it has a value for the audience first, whether entertainment, information, or other value; and the brands second. Content can live in marketing and media channels; [00:01:00]it's not a channel itself, I would say. Content can be a spoke or a hub. It can be distributed through media or part of a destination. Importantly content is a means of engagement with current and prospective customer and give the luxury brands it's own voice. </p><p><strong>Joshua Williams:</strong> Very interesting. So, what is the role then of content marketing for luxury brands specifically?</p><p><strong>Schanel Bakkouche:</strong> For luxury brands, the chief value of content marketing lies in its ability to reel in, persuade and evangelize the most discerning audience in the language and elevated aesthetic that is particular to luxury. </p><p>For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>696</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1d4be01c-9413-11ec-90d7-db591256d66d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV6800340328.mp3?updated=1645557336" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Feature with Sass Brown: The IOU Project</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/feature-with-sass-brown-the-iou-project/</link>
      <description>Joshua Williams: Hello, Sass, welcome back. And who are we going to feature this month? 
Sass Brown: The IOU Project. 
Joshua Williams: Ah, the IOU Project. I know they're based in Madrid. Spain. Can you tell us a little bit about them and their founder? 
Sass Brown: Absolutely. The founder is Kevita Parmar. She works predominantly with hand loomed madras cotton out of India. If you're familiar with the madras cotton, it's quite distinct, they're often candy colored checks and they're quite different from weaver to weaver. Each one is quite unique. And so what she does, she works with locally grown cotton from that region that is then hand-woven. So we're talking about a fabric that has literally no carbon footprint to begin with. But moreover, he really honors the makers, whether it's the maker of the garment or the weaver of the fabric as a truly vital component of her value chain of the garment. And as equal in terms of standing as the designer or the customer.
So it's a very flat, democratic program or company, if you like. It's not hierarchical, where the designers at the top and the makers at the bottom. And so the website is fabulous. First of all, it's beautiful. It's very visually presented. And it features each of the garments, the makers of the garment. So you can dig into each garment and see who the weaver was. You can read a little bit about them. You can see who the maker was, the producer of the garment, the garment manufacturer, maybe watch a video. She specializes in small, little workshops in Portugal and Spain. And the fabric, as I said in India.
So it's very much about authorship and provenance and respect for all of the components that go into making the garment and giving a face and a voice to each of those people, who are normally so hidden from the customer. 
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Feature with Sass Brown: The IOU Project</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/899b5984-8926-11ec-be6d-d3c4068372ef/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_15.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, part of our monthly brand feature series, we learn about The IOU Project, founded by Kevita Parmar, whose focus is on craft and heritage, finding ways to stay true to the past but scale for the future.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Joshua Williams: Hello, Sass, welcome back. And who are we going to feature this month? 
Sass Brown: The IOU Project. 
Joshua Williams: Ah, the IOU Project. I know they're based in Madrid. Spain. Can you tell us a little bit about them and their founder? 
Sass Brown: Absolutely. The founder is Kevita Parmar. She works predominantly with hand loomed madras cotton out of India. If you're familiar with the madras cotton, it's quite distinct, they're often candy colored checks and they're quite different from weaver to weaver. Each one is quite unique. And so what she does, she works with locally grown cotton from that region that is then hand-woven. So we're talking about a fabric that has literally no carbon footprint to begin with. But moreover, he really honors the makers, whether it's the maker of the garment or the weaver of the fabric as a truly vital component of her value chain of the garment. And as equal in terms of standing as the designer or the customer.
So it's a very flat, democratic program or company, if you like. It's not hierarchical, where the designers at the top and the makers at the bottom. And so the website is fabulous. First of all, it's beautiful. It's very visually presented. And it features each of the garments, the makers of the garment. So you can dig into each garment and see who the weaver was. You can read a little bit about them. You can see who the maker was, the producer of the garment, the garment manufacturer, maybe watch a video. She specializes in small, little workshops in Portugal and Spain. And the fabric, as I said in India.
So it's very much about authorship and provenance and respect for all of the components that go into making the garment and giving a face and a voice to each of those people, who are normally so hidden from the customer. 
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Joshua Williams:</strong> Hello, Sass, welcome back. And who are we going to feature this month? </p><p><strong>Sass Brown:</strong> The IOU Project. </p><p><strong>Joshua Williams:</strong> Ah, the IOU Project. I know they're based in Madrid. Spain. Can you tell us a little bit about them and their founder? </p><p><strong>Sass Brown:</strong> Absolutely. The founder is Kevita Parmar. She works predominantly with hand loomed madras cotton out of India. If you're familiar with the madras cotton, it's quite distinct, they're often candy colored checks and they're quite different from weaver to weaver. Each one is quite unique. And so what she does, she works with locally grown cotton from that region that is then hand-woven. So we're talking about a fabric that has literally no carbon footprint to begin with. But moreover, he really honors the makers, whether it's the maker of the garment or the weaver of the fabric as a truly vital component of her value chain of the garment. And as equal in terms of standing as the designer or the customer.</p><p>So it's a very flat, democratic program or company, if you like. It's not hierarchical, where the designers at the top and the makers at the bottom. And so the website is fabulous. First of all, it's beautiful. It's very visually presented. And it features each of the garments, the makers of the garment. So you can dig into each garment and see who the weaver was. You can read a little bit about them. You can see who the maker was, the producer of the garment, the garment manufacturer, maybe watch a video. She specializes in small, little workshops in Portugal and Spain. And the fabric, as I said in India.</p><p>So it's very much about authorship and provenance and respect for all of the components that go into making the garment and giving a face and a voice to each of those people, who are normally so hidden from the customer. </p><p>For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>543</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[899b5984-8926-11ec-be6d-d3c4068372ef]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV5672570429.mp3?updated=1644356633" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Defining Luxury in Fashion</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/defining-fashion-luxury/</link>
      <description>Ask an average consumer what luxury fashion is, and they’ll likely respond with well-known brand names such as Gucci, Yves St. Laurent and Louis Vuitton. But what makes these brands luxury? Well, that question is a bit harder to answer and elicits a wider range of responses: quality, craftsmanship, high price, exclusive, made in France, made in Italy, heritage…and the list goes on. In fact, fashion luxury isn’t any one thing, and often lives more as a fluid concept in the abstract, than something that can be quantified or formalized. 

However, if we shift the context from adjective to noun, we find some additional clarity. A luxury is something that a customer doesn’t need, but chooses to buy nonetheless, to enjoy and find pleasure in. And while that may no longer be purchasing fine silver that requires polishing, or cashmere that necessitates brushing (especially when we don’t have a wait staff to do these things for us anymore), it certainly can be applied to purchasing clothing that we don’t need, but want. This might be purchasing a $20 black tee at Zara to add to an overflowing closet, or buying a $750 black Balenciaga logo tee-shirt simply because we can afford it. The latter is certainly not defined by its quality, craftsmanship, exclusivity, etc.—rather it’s brand name and high price. And thus, it stands out as something a bit different than our traditional understanding of luxury fashion. Perhaps a more apt term for it is mass luxury, or even fast luxury, more connected to its fast fashion counterpart in terms of mass production and marketing, than not. And it’s an approach that is gaining traction, the more digitized and globalized we’ve become, and the more growth traditional luxury brands seek, especially in Asia. 
﻿For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Defining Luxury in Fashion</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/77d61ad8-891a-11ec-87de-c31fb5a72da5/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_14.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, Defining Luxury in Fashion, we delve into the shifting strategies of luxury fashion brands as they balance growth and exclusivity.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Ask an average consumer what luxury fashion is, and they’ll likely respond with well-known brand names such as Gucci, Yves St. Laurent and Louis Vuitton. But what makes these brands luxury? Well, that question is a bit harder to answer and elicits a wider range of responses: quality, craftsmanship, high price, exclusive, made in France, made in Italy, heritage…and the list goes on. In fact, fashion luxury isn’t any one thing, and often lives more as a fluid concept in the abstract, than something that can be quantified or formalized. 

However, if we shift the context from adjective to noun, we find some additional clarity. A luxury is something that a customer doesn’t need, but chooses to buy nonetheless, to enjoy and find pleasure in. And while that may no longer be purchasing fine silver that requires polishing, or cashmere that necessitates brushing (especially when we don’t have a wait staff to do these things for us anymore), it certainly can be applied to purchasing clothing that we don’t need, but want. This might be purchasing a $20 black tee at Zara to add to an overflowing closet, or buying a $750 black Balenciaga logo tee-shirt simply because we can afford it. The latter is certainly not defined by its quality, craftsmanship, exclusivity, etc.—rather it’s brand name and high price. And thus, it stands out as something a bit different than our traditional understanding of luxury fashion. Perhaps a more apt term for it is mass luxury, or even fast luxury, more connected to its fast fashion counterpart in terms of mass production and marketing, than not. And it’s an approach that is gaining traction, the more digitized and globalized we’ve become, and the more growth traditional luxury brands seek, especially in Asia. 
﻿For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Ask an average consumer what luxury fashion is, and they’ll likely respond with well-known brand names such as Gucci, Yves St. Laurent and Louis Vuitton. But what makes these brands luxury? Well, that question is a bit harder to answer and elicits a wider range of responses: quality, craftsmanship, high price, exclusive, made in France, made in Italy, heritage…and the list goes on. In fact, fashion luxury isn’t any one thing, and often lives more as a fluid concept in the abstract, than something that can be quantified or formalized. </p><p><br></p><p>However, if we shift the context from adjective to noun, we find some additional clarity. A luxury is something that a customer doesn’t need, but chooses to buy nonetheless, to enjoy and find pleasure in. And while that may no longer be purchasing fine silver that requires polishing, or cashmere that necessitates brushing (especially when we don’t have a wait staff to do these things for us anymore), it certainly can be applied to purchasing clothing that we don’t need, but want. This might be purchasing a $20 black tee at Zara to add to an overflowing closet, or buying a $750 black Balenciaga logo tee-shirt simply because we can afford it. The latter is certainly not defined by its quality, craftsmanship, exclusivity, etc.—rather it’s brand name and high price. And thus, it stands out as something a bit different than our traditional understanding of luxury fashion. Perhaps a more apt term for it is mass luxury, or even fast luxury, more connected to its <em>fast fashion</em> counterpart in terms of mass production and marketing, than not. And it’s an approach that is gaining traction, the more digitized and globalized we’ve become, and the more growth traditional luxury brands seek, especially in Asia. </p><p>﻿For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>414</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[77d61ad8-891a-11ec-87de-c31fb5a72da5]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV8998277094.mp3?updated=1644351031" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Three Levers of Creating Brand Exclusivity</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/The-Three-Levers-of-Creating-Brand-Exclusivity</link>
      <description>Chanel’s recent announcement to precipitously inflate prices on their bags, and limit quantities customers can purchase, has hit the headlines, with some questions about how the luxury fashion industry continues to grow despite overall economic inflation. And in this case, considering the level of the price change, Chanel is not raising its prices to combat higher costs, but rather to become more exclusive, to break away from other luxury brands. 
Luxury brands have always had three clear levers in which to build exclusivity. 
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Three Levers of Creating Brand Exclusivity</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/87fbc148-836f-11ec-a413-0f17c1da25ae/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_The_Three_Levers_of_Creating_Brand_Exclusivity_4_13.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, “The Three Levers of Creating Brand Exclusivity,” we focus on tools brands have to facilitate exclusivity with a focus on Chanel’s recent announcement to raise the price of their bags. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Chanel’s recent announcement to precipitously inflate prices on their bags, and limit quantities customers can purchase, has hit the headlines, with some questions about how the luxury fashion industry continues to grow despite overall economic inflation. And in this case, considering the level of the price change, Chanel is not raising its prices to combat higher costs, but rather to become more exclusive, to break away from other luxury brands. 
Luxury brands have always had three clear levers in which to build exclusivity. 
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Chanel’s recent announcement to precipitously inflate prices on their bags, and limit quantities customers can purchase, has hit the headlines, with some questions about how the luxury fashion industry continues to grow despite overall economic inflation. And in this case, considering the level of the price change, Chanel is not raising its prices to combat higher costs, but rather to become more exclusive, to break away from other luxury brands. </p><p>Luxury brands have always had three clear levers in which to build exclusivity. </p><p>For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>366</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[87fbc148-836f-11ec-a413-0f17c1da25ae]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV3278256305.mp3?updated=1643727859" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Feature with Sass Brown: Elvis and Kresse</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/feature-with-sass-brown-elvis-and-kresse/</link>
      <description>Joshua Williams: Hello, Sass. Welcome back. Who are we featuring this month? 
Sass Brown: We're featuring Elvis and Kresse. 
Joshua Williams: Ah, the duo out of the UK who started with a very specific fabrication. Can you tell us a little bit about that? 
Sass Brown: They did indeed. They started with decommissioned fire hoses, so very particular resource that of course, much like military equipment gets decommissioned quite quickly, because you're talking about health and safety here. So you don't want to a fire hose with a hole in it or a worn patch, so they get decommissioned quite quickly and there's very hard-wearing resource material. They make a whole line of accessories; bags, everything from little small wallets, all the way up to a great big weekend bags and totes out of these seamed together, decommissioned fire hoses. 
And they have this fantastic sort of patina and wear on them from use. Of course, the whole story of where they came from and their function prior to being a bag. But they're really slick, beautiful bags and purses and wallets and totes that they make out of this material. They're really lovely. 
﻿For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>From Firehouse to Farmhouse</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/2690ce2c-7248-11ec-99cc-8f588aee241d/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_12.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, part of our monthly brand feature series, we learn about Elvis and Kresse, a UK-based company that began by reusing firehoses to create amazing accessories to now owning and managing a permaculture farm in Kent and rethinking circularity.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Joshua Williams: Hello, Sass. Welcome back. Who are we featuring this month? 
Sass Brown: We're featuring Elvis and Kresse. 
Joshua Williams: Ah, the duo out of the UK who started with a very specific fabrication. Can you tell us a little bit about that? 
Sass Brown: They did indeed. They started with decommissioned fire hoses, so very particular resource that of course, much like military equipment gets decommissioned quite quickly, because you're talking about health and safety here. So you don't want to a fire hose with a hole in it or a worn patch, so they get decommissioned quite quickly and there's very hard-wearing resource material. They make a whole line of accessories; bags, everything from little small wallets, all the way up to a great big weekend bags and totes out of these seamed together, decommissioned fire hoses. 
And they have this fantastic sort of patina and wear on them from use. Of course, the whole story of where they came from and their function prior to being a bag. But they're really slick, beautiful bags and purses and wallets and totes that they make out of this material. They're really lovely. 
﻿For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Joshua Williams:</strong> Hello, Sass. Welcome back. Who are we featuring this month? </p><p><strong>Sass Brown:</strong> We're featuring Elvis and Kresse. </p><p><strong>Joshua Williams:</strong> Ah, the duo out of the UK who started with a very specific fabrication. Can you tell us a little bit about that? </p><p><strong>Sass Brown:</strong> They did indeed. They started with decommissioned fire hoses, so very particular resource that of course, much like military equipment gets decommissioned quite quickly, because you're talking about health and safety here. So you don't want to a fire hose with a hole in it or a worn patch, so they get decommissioned quite quickly and there's very hard-wearing resource material. They make a whole line of accessories; bags, everything from little small wallets, all the way up to a great big weekend bags and totes out of these seamed together, decommissioned fire hoses. </p><p>And they have this fantastic sort of patina and wear on them from use. Of course, the whole story of where they came from and their function prior to being a bag. But they're really slick, beautiful bags and purses and wallets and totes that they make out of this material. They're really lovely. </p><p>﻿For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p><br></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>538</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2690ce2c-7248-11ec-99cc-8f588aee241d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV7920288729.mp3?updated=1641841775" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Need for Change</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/the-need-for-change</link>
      <description>Fashion education is ripe for change. As we emerge from the Covid-19 pandemic, it will require a much more flexible, multi-disciplinary, omni-channel approach, that is more in line with the shifts happening in the industry, especially in terms of digital tools and access. Institutions will need to rethink educational content and delivery to rebalance a liberal arts approach with more interdisciplinary vocational skills that are moored in a digital economy. And student tuition will need to be recalibrated to be more in line with post graduation expectations and salaries. 
Universities will need to continue to build their faculty base, bridging the gap between industry and the academy and facilitating more crossover between both. This will require higher paying jobs that are more in consort with industry pay in order to attract top talent. 
Businesses will need to incorporate more nuanced learning opportunities into their own employee offerings, rather than relying on external degree programs. This might include offering “bridge curricula” for post-graduates, partnering with universities to build curriculum and programming, rethinking internship programs and even offering paid apprenticeship programs. In turn, these efforts will help provide more opportunities for a company to teach hyper-focused skills as well as innovate. Studies also show that employees that have access to learning through their employers are most likely to stay at a company. 
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Need for Change</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0f0cdae2-7235-11ec-9127-7b083717f44a/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_11f.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, “The Need for Change” part of “The Future of Fashion Education” series, we summarize the key issues at play between the fashion industry and fashion education. And we highlight opportunities for change that can help to support employees in a fast-changing industry. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Fashion education is ripe for change. As we emerge from the Covid-19 pandemic, it will require a much more flexible, multi-disciplinary, omni-channel approach, that is more in line with the shifts happening in the industry, especially in terms of digital tools and access. Institutions will need to rethink educational content and delivery to rebalance a liberal arts approach with more interdisciplinary vocational skills that are moored in a digital economy. And student tuition will need to be recalibrated to be more in line with post graduation expectations and salaries. 
Universities will need to continue to build their faculty base, bridging the gap between industry and the academy and facilitating more crossover between both. This will require higher paying jobs that are more in consort with industry pay in order to attract top talent. 
Businesses will need to incorporate more nuanced learning opportunities into their own employee offerings, rather than relying on external degree programs. This might include offering “bridge curricula” for post-graduates, partnering with universities to build curriculum and programming, rethinking internship programs and even offering paid apprenticeship programs. In turn, these efforts will help provide more opportunities for a company to teach hyper-focused skills as well as innovate. Studies also show that employees that have access to learning through their employers are most likely to stay at a company. 
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Fashion education is ripe for change. As we emerge from the Covid-19 pandemic, it will require a much more flexible, multi-disciplinary, omni-channel approach, that is more in line with the shifts happening in the industry, especially in terms of digital tools and access. Institutions will need to rethink educational content and delivery to rebalance a liberal arts approach with more interdisciplinary vocational skills that are moored in a digital economy. And student tuition will need to be recalibrated to be more in line with post graduation expectations and salaries. </p><p>Universities will need to continue to build their faculty base, bridging the gap between industry and the academy and facilitating more crossover between both. This will require higher paying jobs that are more in consort with industry pay in order to attract top talent. </p><p>Businesses will need to incorporate more nuanced learning opportunities into their own employee offerings, rather than relying on external degree programs. This might include offering “bridge curricula” for post-graduates, partnering with universities to build curriculum and programming, rethinking internship programs and even offering paid apprenticeship programs. In turn, these efforts will help provide more opportunities for a company to teach hyper-focused skills as well as innovate. Studies also show that employees that have access to learning through their employers are most likely to stay at a company. </p><p>For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>414</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0f0cdae2-7235-11ec-9127-7b083717f44a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV2573707086.mp3?updated=1641833720" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Omni-Channel Learning</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/omni-channel-learning/</link>
      <description>Much like retail has had to evolve to meet the demands of shopping across physical and digital channels, education is also being forced to evolve. Contemporary students require new ways of learning, both in terms of content structure and delivery, that build more on the shifts in media than traditional education--leaving academic institutions largely unable to meet demands without reliance on external partnerships with ed-tech companies. 
The current university model is heavily reliant on an in-person, on campus experience. Not only is this how it’s “been done” for more than a century, it also provides institutions with multiplicitous profit centers from cafeterias, dorms, sports events and more. When the Covid-19 pandemic hit, universities weren’t able to bring students on campus, meaning profit was no longer coming from these sources--and in fact, had become a liability in the form of empty classrooms and dorms. It is no wonder that these institution’s first priority then was to get students back in person. These preparations began in earnest once a shift to online learning was facilitated in spring 2020. By fall 2021, most universities were back open for business despite the Delta variant. 
In all of this, the stark contrast was that university development over the past 50 years was largely focused on building new buildings and expanding the campus footprint, while the rest of the world was turning more digital. Universities were putting very little thought (and budgets) into the development of new digital learning technologies, modalities and support systems, including the purchase of video equipment, recording studios and even digital pedagogy.
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 05:01:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Omni-Channel Learning</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/6c1793bc-7230-11ec-9f90-277e8930134e/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_10f.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, “Omni-Channel Learning” part of “The Future of Fashion Education” series, we consider how education must engage multiple modalities as part of a larger strategy that puts the student at the center of the learning process.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Much like retail has had to evolve to meet the demands of shopping across physical and digital channels, education is also being forced to evolve. Contemporary students require new ways of learning, both in terms of content structure and delivery, that build more on the shifts in media than traditional education--leaving academic institutions largely unable to meet demands without reliance on external partnerships with ed-tech companies. 
The current university model is heavily reliant on an in-person, on campus experience. Not only is this how it’s “been done” for more than a century, it also provides institutions with multiplicitous profit centers from cafeterias, dorms, sports events and more. When the Covid-19 pandemic hit, universities weren’t able to bring students on campus, meaning profit was no longer coming from these sources--and in fact, had become a liability in the form of empty classrooms and dorms. It is no wonder that these institution’s first priority then was to get students back in person. These preparations began in earnest once a shift to online learning was facilitated in spring 2020. By fall 2021, most universities were back open for business despite the Delta variant. 
In all of this, the stark contrast was that university development over the past 50 years was largely focused on building new buildings and expanding the campus footprint, while the rest of the world was turning more digital. Universities were putting very little thought (and budgets) into the development of new digital learning technologies, modalities and support systems, including the purchase of video equipment, recording studios and even digital pedagogy.
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Much like retail has had to evolve to meet the demands of shopping across physical and digital channels, education is also being forced to evolve. Contemporary students require new ways of learning, both in terms of content structure and delivery, that build more on the shifts in media than traditional education--leaving academic institutions largely unable to meet demands without reliance on external partnerships with ed-tech companies. </p><p>The current university model is heavily reliant on an in-person, on campus experience. Not only is this how it’s “been done” for more than a century, it also provides institutions with multiplicitous profit centers from cafeterias, dorms, sports events and more. When the Covid-19 pandemic hit, universities weren’t able to bring students on campus, meaning profit was no longer coming from these sources--and in fact, had become a liability in the form of empty classrooms and dorms. It is no wonder that these institution’s first priority then was to get students back in person. These preparations began in earnest once a shift to online learning was facilitated in spring 2020. By fall 2021, most universities were back open for business despite the Delta variant. </p><p>In all of this, the stark contrast was that university development over the past 50 years was largely focused on building new buildings and expanding the campus footprint, while the rest of the world was turning more digital. Universities were putting very little thought (and budgets) into the development of new digital learning technologies, modalities and support systems, including the purchase of video equipment, recording studios and even digital pedagogy.</p><p>For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>444</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6c1793bc-7230-11ec-9f90-277e8930134e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV6874476189.mp3?updated=1641833606" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Rush to Offer Graduate Programs</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/the-rush-to-offer-graduate-programs/</link>
      <description>In a recent New York Magazine article, author William Deresiewicz stated, “For educational institutions, master’s programs are cash cows since their students get far less financial aid than undergraduates. For students, the master’s program responds to a specific need: American workers are competing more and more with those around the world, and the more college graduates there are, the more you need to find a way to distinguish yourself from the mass.”
This is particularly true when it comes to vocational studies, such as fashion, where master’s programs have proliferated from a handful across the U.S., to a handful of offerings from hundreds of universities. For example, Parsons School of Design in New York City now offers twenty master’s programs, including MFAs, MAs, MSs and MPSs. The MPS, or Masters of Professional Studies, is a relatively new moniker that is given to vocation-specific education, such as Fashion Management. It isn’t an MBA, in that it lacks the focus on finances and statistics, and it’s focus is on one industry only--fashion. 
The cost of these programs, especially by high-profile universities from Columbia to RISD, are very high, often over $50,000 per year. And that adds up in a 2 or 3 year program. And while data suggests that students who graduate with a masters do make more than their counterparts, these high costs make a graduate program very risky, saddling students with debt that may take years to pay off. 
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 05:01:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Rush to Offer Graduate Programs</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c2a96824-6d6f-11ec-a41c-9726632e0051/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_9f.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, “The Rush to Offer Graduate Programs” part of “The Future of Fashion Education” series, we discuss how many universities have rushed to leverage their “brand names” to offer new graduate programs, but often without proper planning or integration with industry needs. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In a recent New York Magazine article, author William Deresiewicz stated, “For educational institutions, master’s programs are cash cows since their students get far less financial aid than undergraduates. For students, the master’s program responds to a specific need: American workers are competing more and more with those around the world, and the more college graduates there are, the more you need to find a way to distinguish yourself from the mass.”
This is particularly true when it comes to vocational studies, such as fashion, where master’s programs have proliferated from a handful across the U.S., to a handful of offerings from hundreds of universities. For example, Parsons School of Design in New York City now offers twenty master’s programs, including MFAs, MAs, MSs and MPSs. The MPS, or Masters of Professional Studies, is a relatively new moniker that is given to vocation-specific education, such as Fashion Management. It isn’t an MBA, in that it lacks the focus on finances and statistics, and it’s focus is on one industry only--fashion. 
The cost of these programs, especially by high-profile universities from Columbia to RISD, are very high, often over $50,000 per year. And that adds up in a 2 or 3 year program. And while data suggests that students who graduate with a masters do make more than their counterparts, these high costs make a graduate program very risky, saddling students with debt that may take years to pay off. 
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In a recent <em>New York Magazine</em> article, author William Deresiewicz stated, “For educational institutions, master’s programs are cash cows since their students get far less financial aid than undergraduates. For students, the master’s program responds to a specific need: American workers are competing more and more with those around the world, and the more college graduates there are, the more you need to find a way to distinguish yourself from the mass.”</p><p>This is particularly true when it comes to vocational studies, such as fashion, where master’s programs have proliferated from a handful across the U.S., to a handful of offerings from hundreds of universities. For example, Parsons School of Design in New York City now offers twenty master’s programs, including MFAs, MAs, MSs and MPSs. The MPS, or Masters of Professional Studies, is a relatively new moniker that is given to vocation-specific education, such as Fashion Management. It isn’t an MBA, in that it lacks the focus on finances and statistics, and it’s focus is on one industry only--fashion. </p><p>The cost of these programs, especially by high-profile universities from Columbia to RISD, are very high, often over $50,000 per year. And that adds up in a 2 or 3 year program. And while data suggests that students who graduate with a masters do make more than their counterparts, these high costs make a graduate program very risky, saddling students with debt that may take years to pay off. </p><p>For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>480</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c2a96824-6d6f-11ec-a41c-9726632e0051]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV7844383055.mp3?updated=1641309032" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Feature with Sass Brown: Re;Code</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/feature-with-sass-recode/</link>
      <description>Joshua Williams: Each month on NewsBytes, we feature a fashion brand that approaches business differently and innovatively or operates outside of the main fashion systems and capitals. I'm with Sass Brown, an expert in ethical fashion, sustainability and craftsmanship. She is the former Dean of Art and Design at the Fashion Institute of Technology and the founding Dean at Dubai Institute of Design and Innovation.
Joshua Williams: Hello, Sass. Who are we featuring this month? 
Ah, Re;code, based in Korea. Can you tell us a little bit about them and what makes them unique. 
Sass Brown: Yeah, they are a really fabulous company. And they work effectively with upcycled materials, revalued, discarded, and unused materials. 
They're part of a larger conglomerate called Kolon Industries. They're a small subsidiary of it. And so they utilize the dead stock and the wasted materials from the other labels that are produced under the same umbrella company. So they use dead stock from their own warehouse. They use military waste. They use industrial waste, things like car seat covers and car airbags and seat belts and things like that. So, they do have some quite unique sources for their materials. 
And they do use also post-consumer, or finished garments anyway. So they dismantle them and reconstruct and redesign them. You can see it quite clearly when you look at their designs. You'll often see half a jacket front, which is inside out, or, you see the pocket details or a sweater that's been applicated on top of a sweater up front that's been appliqued on top of a shirt, for example. So you can see the reconstruction quite clearly in their aesthetic. 
Joshua Williams: How driven are they by a particular visual aesthetic or do they let the waste, the consumer waste that you're talking about sort of drive what that vision becomes? 
Sass Brown: I think it's a bit of both.
They have a very distinct aesthetic. You can pretty much tell a Re;code piece. They have a way of deconstructing and reconstructing their garments that's quite specific and quite unique and various aesthetically pleasing.
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 05:01:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Feature with Sass Brown: Re;Code</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/a8650290-56e8-11ec-ac41-ff8def689a06/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_8f.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, part of our monthly brand feature series, we learn about Re;code, a Seoul, Korea based company redefining the fashion design process by reusing a vast array of materials. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Joshua Williams: Each month on NewsBytes, we feature a fashion brand that approaches business differently and innovatively or operates outside of the main fashion systems and capitals. I'm with Sass Brown, an expert in ethical fashion, sustainability and craftsmanship. She is the former Dean of Art and Design at the Fashion Institute of Technology and the founding Dean at Dubai Institute of Design and Innovation.
Joshua Williams: Hello, Sass. Who are we featuring this month? 
Ah, Re;code, based in Korea. Can you tell us a little bit about them and what makes them unique. 
Sass Brown: Yeah, they are a really fabulous company. And they work effectively with upcycled materials, revalued, discarded, and unused materials. 
They're part of a larger conglomerate called Kolon Industries. They're a small subsidiary of it. And so they utilize the dead stock and the wasted materials from the other labels that are produced under the same umbrella company. So they use dead stock from their own warehouse. They use military waste. They use industrial waste, things like car seat covers and car airbags and seat belts and things like that. So, they do have some quite unique sources for their materials. 
And they do use also post-consumer, or finished garments anyway. So they dismantle them and reconstruct and redesign them. You can see it quite clearly when you look at their designs. You'll often see half a jacket front, which is inside out, or, you see the pocket details or a sweater that's been applicated on top of a sweater up front that's been appliqued on top of a shirt, for example. So you can see the reconstruction quite clearly in their aesthetic. 
Joshua Williams: How driven are they by a particular visual aesthetic or do they let the waste, the consumer waste that you're talking about sort of drive what that vision becomes? 
Sass Brown: I think it's a bit of both.
They have a very distinct aesthetic. You can pretty much tell a Re;code piece. They have a way of deconstructing and reconstructing their garments that's quite specific and quite unique and various aesthetically pleasing.
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Joshua Williams: </strong>Each month on NewsBytes, we feature a fashion brand that approaches business differently and innovatively or operates outside of the main fashion systems and capitals. I'm with Sass Brown, an expert in ethical fashion, sustainability and craftsmanship. She is the former Dean of Art and Design at the Fashion Institute of Technology and the founding Dean at Dubai Institute of Design and Innovation.</p><p><strong>Joshua Williams:</strong> Hello, Sass. Who are we featuring this month? </p><p>Ah, Re;code, based in Korea. Can you tell us a little bit about them and what makes them unique. </p><p><strong>Sass Brown:</strong> Yeah, they are a really fabulous company. And they work effectively with upcycled materials, revalued, discarded, and unused materials. </p><p>They're part of a larger conglomerate called Kolon Industries. They're a small subsidiary of it. And so they utilize the dead stock and the wasted materials from the other labels that are produced under the same umbrella company. So they use dead stock from their own warehouse. They use military waste. They use industrial waste, things like car seat covers and car airbags and seat belts and things like that. So, they do have some quite unique sources for their materials. </p><p>And they do use also post-consumer, or finished garments anyway. So they dismantle them and reconstruct and redesign them. You can see it quite clearly when you look at their designs. You'll often see half a jacket front, which is inside out, or, you see the pocket details or a sweater that's been applicated on top of a sweater up front that's been appliqued on top of a shirt, for example. So you can see the reconstruction quite clearly in their aesthetic. </p><p><strong>Joshua Williams:</strong> How driven are they by a particular visual aesthetic or do they let the waste, the consumer waste that you're talking about sort of drive what that vision becomes? </p><p><strong>Sass Brown:</strong> I think it's a bit of both.</p><p>They have a very distinct aesthetic. You can pretty much tell a Re;code piece. They have a way of deconstructing and reconstructing their garments that's quite specific and quite unique and various aesthetically pleasing.</p><p>For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>571</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a8650290-56e8-11ec-ac41-ff8def689a06]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV4320784202.mp3?updated=1638832838" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Higher Ed Relies on Asia</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/higher-ed-relies-on-asia/</link>
      <description>In the US, the GI Bill was passed to help World War II veterans acclimate back into civilian life. One of the key components of this bill was to provide servicemen with access to an affordable college education. This had the effect of greatly increasing the amount of people with a college degree from the 1950s on, ultimately shifting education from a privilege of the rich, to a rite of passage for most Americans. And this access to education had the effect of increasing the middle class, while also shifting the economy from blue collar to white collar jobs. 
However, as the economy shifted away from the factory to the office in the 1970s and 80s, blue collar jobs also became less desirable. This required companies to offshore their factories--and had the added benefit of cheaper labor, with less governmental regulation. By the 1990s, this meant that most fashion related production--textiles and apparel--no longer happened in the U.S. or in Europe; it had shifted primarily to China and India and then further into southeast Asia. This shift in production brought a wave of money to these countries, effectively shifting their economies and facilitating the birth of their own middle classes, as well as the fortunes of many. 
In time, the new business owners of China and India and their children and grandchildren became the fastest growing consumer segment in the world. Not only were they buying more things, they were also going to college in higher numbers. For those that could afford it, attending top schools in London, Paris and New York--especially to study fashion--was the primary objective. These schools were seen as the penultimate in design and business education--and offered well-known brand names on resumes. 
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2021 05:01:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Higher Ed Relies on Asia</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/274f05fa-51ef-11ec-9666-132cdc4aa1d3/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_7f.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, “Higher Ed Relies on Asia” part of “The Future of Fashion Education” series, we investigate the relationship and reliance between American and European academic institutions and Asian students, as Western countries see declines in domestic student populations. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the US, the GI Bill was passed to help World War II veterans acclimate back into civilian life. One of the key components of this bill was to provide servicemen with access to an affordable college education. This had the effect of greatly increasing the amount of people with a college degree from the 1950s on, ultimately shifting education from a privilege of the rich, to a rite of passage for most Americans. And this access to education had the effect of increasing the middle class, while also shifting the economy from blue collar to white collar jobs. 
However, as the economy shifted away from the factory to the office in the 1970s and 80s, blue collar jobs also became less desirable. This required companies to offshore their factories--and had the added benefit of cheaper labor, with less governmental regulation. By the 1990s, this meant that most fashion related production--textiles and apparel--no longer happened in the U.S. or in Europe; it had shifted primarily to China and India and then further into southeast Asia. This shift in production brought a wave of money to these countries, effectively shifting their economies and facilitating the birth of their own middle classes, as well as the fortunes of many. 
In time, the new business owners of China and India and their children and grandchildren became the fastest growing consumer segment in the world. Not only were they buying more things, they were also going to college in higher numbers. For those that could afford it, attending top schools in London, Paris and New York--especially to study fashion--was the primary objective. These schools were seen as the penultimate in design and business education--and offered well-known brand names on resumes. 
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the US, the GI Bill was passed to help World War II veterans acclimate back into civilian life. One of the key components of this bill was to provide servicemen with access to an affordable college education. This had the effect of greatly increasing the amount of people with a college degree from the 1950s on, ultimately shifting education from a privilege of the rich, to a rite of passage for most Americans. And this access to education had the effect of increasing the middle class, while also shifting the economy from blue collar to white collar jobs. </p><p>However, as the economy shifted away from the factory to the office in the 1970s and 80s, blue collar jobs also became less desirable. This required companies to offshore their factories--and had the added benefit of cheaper labor, with less governmental regulation. By the 1990s, this meant that most fashion related production--textiles and apparel--no longer happened in the U.S. or in Europe; it had shifted primarily to China and India and then further into southeast Asia. This shift in production brought a wave of money to these countries, effectively shifting their economies and facilitating the birth of their own middle classes, as well as the fortunes of many. </p><p>In time, the new business owners of China and India and their children and grandchildren became the fastest growing consumer segment in the world. Not only were they buying more things, they were also going to college in higher numbers. For those that could afford it, attending top schools in London, Paris and New York--especially to study fashion--was the primary objective. These schools were seen as the penultimate in design and business education--and offered well-known brand names on resumes. </p><p>For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>461</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[274f05fa-51ef-11ec-9666-132cdc4aa1d3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV1672612011.mp3?updated=1638832132" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Shadow Industry of Internships</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/the-shadow-industry-of-interships/</link>
      <description>Due to the specialized nature of retail and fashion, training “on the job” has always been an integral part of the industry. In some cases, this learning was informal, particularly in family run businesses, but it was also formal through apprenticeships, where young people were hired to learn a trade at an atelier with the goal for them to become full-time employees. These individual apprenticeships also led to internal certification programs--especially at larger retailers--wherein this learning could be provided at scale, albeit still at a local level. For example, Neiman Marcus’ training program in Dallas or Macy’s training program in New York City. However, as fashion became more corporatized and globalized, these informal and formal types of learning largely disappeared, or shifted to an HR function, leaving a gap in the employee training process.
Concurrent with the shift of fashion education into degree-focused programs was the growth of internships, wherein companies would collaborate with academic institutions to hire non-paid workers to do low level jobs--with the promise that students would get real-world experience and training, and possibly a job at the end of their internship. In theory, this system seemed to benefit all students, especially if an internship was built into a program. But in practice, internships have largely favored the economically advantaged, has normalized unpaid work, and often doesn’t lead to a full time job.  
First, internships have largely favored the economically advantaged for a few reasons. One, students who have more economic means have a stronger network--often through their parents--to access internships in general, and better internships more specifically. Two, because internships are tied to credits (as a way to legalize unpaid work), students are essentially paying for their own internship. So students must make a decision between paying for an internship, or paying for another elective, not to increase their base tuition. Those with economic means can more easily do both. And three, students often must work in order to pay for their college experience. Doing an internship on top of school and a paying job is almost impossible. And it’s rare that schools will allow a paid job to count as an internship--and if they do, then students are essentially paying to work their own job and not benefitting from additional courses in their major. On top of this, many students will choose schools in areas such as New York City or London to study, in order to access internships. The cost of living and studying in these areas is substantially more than at local universities. The net outcome is that students with means have more opportunities for internships and then jobs upon graduation. And this means that the funnel of incoming employees doesn’t match the diversity of the student population, thus perpetuating systemic racism within the retail and fashion industries. 
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2021 05:01:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Shadow Industry of Internships</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e16760ae-51ef-11ec-a87a-a35f7173e083/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_6f.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, “The Shadow Industry of Internships” part of “The Future of Fashion Education” series, we investigate the complexity of internships and how they tend to favor the economically advantaged and facilitate an unpaid, or low paid, work culture in fashion.  </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Due to the specialized nature of retail and fashion, training “on the job” has always been an integral part of the industry. In some cases, this learning was informal, particularly in family run businesses, but it was also formal through apprenticeships, where young people were hired to learn a trade at an atelier with the goal for them to become full-time employees. These individual apprenticeships also led to internal certification programs--especially at larger retailers--wherein this learning could be provided at scale, albeit still at a local level. For example, Neiman Marcus’ training program in Dallas or Macy’s training program in New York City. However, as fashion became more corporatized and globalized, these informal and formal types of learning largely disappeared, or shifted to an HR function, leaving a gap in the employee training process.
Concurrent with the shift of fashion education into degree-focused programs was the growth of internships, wherein companies would collaborate with academic institutions to hire non-paid workers to do low level jobs--with the promise that students would get real-world experience and training, and possibly a job at the end of their internship. In theory, this system seemed to benefit all students, especially if an internship was built into a program. But in practice, internships have largely favored the economically advantaged, has normalized unpaid work, and often doesn’t lead to a full time job.  
First, internships have largely favored the economically advantaged for a few reasons. One, students who have more economic means have a stronger network--often through their parents--to access internships in general, and better internships more specifically. Two, because internships are tied to credits (as a way to legalize unpaid work), students are essentially paying for their own internship. So students must make a decision between paying for an internship, or paying for another elective, not to increase their base tuition. Those with economic means can more easily do both. And three, students often must work in order to pay for their college experience. Doing an internship on top of school and a paying job is almost impossible. And it’s rare that schools will allow a paid job to count as an internship--and if they do, then students are essentially paying to work their own job and not benefitting from additional courses in their major. On top of this, many students will choose schools in areas such as New York City or London to study, in order to access internships. The cost of living and studying in these areas is substantially more than at local universities. The net outcome is that students with means have more opportunities for internships and then jobs upon graduation. And this means that the funnel of incoming employees doesn’t match the diversity of the student population, thus perpetuating systemic racism within the retail and fashion industries. 
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Due to the specialized nature of retail and fashion, training “on the job” has always been an integral part of the industry. In some cases, this learning was informal, particularly in family run businesses, but it was also formal through apprenticeships, where young people were hired to learn a trade at an atelier with the goal for them to become full-time employees. These individual apprenticeships also led to internal certification programs--especially at larger retailers--wherein this learning could be provided at scale, albeit still at a local level. For example, Neiman Marcus’ training program in Dallas or Macy’s training program in New York City. However, as fashion became more corporatized and globalized, these informal and formal types of learning largely disappeared, or shifted to an HR function, leaving a gap in the employee training process.</p><p>Concurrent with the shift of fashion education into degree-focused programs was the growth of internships, wherein companies would collaborate with academic institutions to hire non-paid workers to do low level jobs--with the promise that students would get real-world experience and training, and possibly a job at the end of their internship. In theory, this system seemed to benefit all students, especially if an internship was built into a program. But in practice, internships have largely favored the economically advantaged, has normalized unpaid work, and often doesn’t lead to a full time job.  </p><p>First, internships have largely favored the economically advantaged for a few reasons. One, students who have more economic means have a stronger network--often through their parents--to access internships in general, and better internships more specifically. Two, because internships are tied to credits (as a way to legalize unpaid work), students are essentially paying for their own internship. So students must make a decision between paying for an internship, or paying for another elective, not to increase their base tuition. Those with economic means can more easily do both. And three, students often must work in order to pay for their college experience. Doing an internship on top of school and a paying job is almost impossible. And it’s rare that schools will allow a paid job to count as an internship--and if they do, then students are essentially paying to work their own job and not benefitting from additional courses in their major. On top of this, many students will choose schools in areas such as New York City or London to study, in order to access internships. The cost of living and studying in these areas is substantially more than at local universities. The net outcome is that students with means have more opportunities for internships and then jobs upon graduation. And this means that the funnel of incoming employees doesn’t match the diversity of the student population, thus perpetuating systemic racism within the retail and fashion industries. </p><p>For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>477</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e16760ae-51ef-11ec-a87a-a35f7173e083]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV7871140771.mp3?updated=1638285426" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bridging the Knowledge Gap</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/bridging-the-knowledge-gap/</link>
      <description>Fashion as an academic discipline is relatively new. It’s not to say that people haven’t been researching the intersection of clothing and economics, clothing and psychology, or clothing and culture--to name a few--for quite some time, rather that it hasn't been taken seriously as its own discipline. However, with formalization of fashion as a discipline within the academy, and the growth in graduate level programs, there has been a surge of fashion-specific research both by faculty and students. 
And because this research isn’t necessarily tied to a company’s success--meaning that it’s not research being done as part of one’s job, or in service of a client--this has provided more opportunity to research without a required or expected outcome. In short, it has allowed for more direct critique of the fashion system. It’s no surprise then, that a correlation can be drawn between the growth of fashion research and a growth of interest in subjects such as sustainability, human rights and EISJ. These topics are consistently in the top five when it comes to student research. 
Over time, these areas of academic focus have shifted from the institution to the industry, for two reasons: 1) students are graduating with these topics being front and center in their learning and 2) the more educated people become, the more they demand change from companies. However, this process has been slow and highlights the lack of direct collaboration between academia and industry. 
﻿For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 05:01:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Bridging the Knowledge Gap</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ad3d5692-465c-11ec-9683-0b4218d17556/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_5f.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, “Bridging the Knowledge Gap,” part of “The Future of Fashion Education” series, we discuss ways that researchers and companies may better collaborate to the deeper benefit of both.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Fashion as an academic discipline is relatively new. It’s not to say that people haven’t been researching the intersection of clothing and economics, clothing and psychology, or clothing and culture--to name a few--for quite some time, rather that it hasn't been taken seriously as its own discipline. However, with formalization of fashion as a discipline within the academy, and the growth in graduate level programs, there has been a surge of fashion-specific research both by faculty and students. 
And because this research isn’t necessarily tied to a company’s success--meaning that it’s not research being done as part of one’s job, or in service of a client--this has provided more opportunity to research without a required or expected outcome. In short, it has allowed for more direct critique of the fashion system. It’s no surprise then, that a correlation can be drawn between the growth of fashion research and a growth of interest in subjects such as sustainability, human rights and EISJ. These topics are consistently in the top five when it comes to student research. 
Over time, these areas of academic focus have shifted from the institution to the industry, for two reasons: 1) students are graduating with these topics being front and center in their learning and 2) the more educated people become, the more they demand change from companies. However, this process has been slow and highlights the lack of direct collaboration between academia and industry. 
﻿For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Fashion as an academic discipline is relatively new. It’s not to say that people haven’t been researching the intersection of clothing and economics, clothing and psychology, or clothing and culture--to name a few--for quite some time, rather that it hasn't been taken seriously as its own discipline. However, with formalization of fashion as a discipline within the academy, and the growth in graduate level programs, there has been a surge of fashion-specific research both by faculty and students. </p><p>And because this research isn’t necessarily tied to a company’s success--meaning that it’s not research being done as part of one’s job, or in service of a client--this has provided more opportunity to research without a required or expected outcome. In short, it has allowed for more direct critique of the fashion system. It’s no surprise then, that a correlation can be drawn between the growth of fashion research and a growth of interest in subjects such as sustainability, human rights and EISJ. These topics are consistently in the top five when it comes to student research. </p><p>Over time, these areas of academic focus have shifted from the institution to the industry, for two reasons: 1) students are graduating with these topics being front and center in their learning and 2) the more educated people become, the more they demand change from companies. However, this process has been slow and highlights the lack of direct collaboration between academia and industry. </p><p>﻿For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p><br></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>444</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ad3d5692-465c-11ec-9683-0b4218d17556]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV9056882555.mp3?updated=1637012741" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Feature with Sass Brown: Christopher Raeburn</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/feature-with-sass-brown-christopher-raeburn</link>
      <description>Each month Sass Brown, an expert in ethical fashion, sustainability and craftsmanship, shares a fashion brand that approaches business differently and innovatively or operates outside of the main fashion systems and capitals. Sass is the former Dean of Art and Design at the Fashion Institute of Technology and the founding Dean at Dubai Institute of Design and Innovation.
Christopher Raeburn is a design-led, London-based womenswear, menswear and accessories fashion brand. Christopher works with certified organic materials, recycled polyester, and a lot of surplus materials, particularly military surplus. According to Sass Brown, Christopher’s aesthetic comes from, “a fascination with military materials and something that he's quoted as saying ‘archeological discoveries.’” 
The brand dates back to about 2009 and Christopher’s first collection, which was fall winter 2010, was made from decommissioned military wool field jackets and nylon parachutes. Sass points out, “that's an aesthetic that has continued throughout the collection, since that day. It's very technically savvy; it's full of utilitarian details.”But it also includes some whimsy, she says.” This combination of whimsy and the utilitarian makes his designs very recognizable on the streets.
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 05:01:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Feature with Sass Brown: Christopher Raeburn</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/8f08ae32-465d-11ec-ab72-df790611727a/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_4f.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Each month Sass Brown, an expert in ethical fashion, sustainability and craftsmanship, shares a fashion brand that approaches business differently and innovatively or operates outside of the main fashion systems and capitals. Sass is the former Dean of Art and Design at the Fashion Institute of Technology and the founding Dean at Dubai Institute of Design and Innovation.
Christopher Raeburn is a design-led, London-based womenswear, menswear and accessories fashion brand. Christopher works with certified organic materials, recycled polyester, and a lot of surplus materials, particularly military surplus. According to Sass Brown, Christopher’s aesthetic comes from, “a fascination with military materials and something that he's quoted as saying ‘archeological discoveries.’” 
The brand dates back to about 2009 and Christopher’s first collection, which was fall winter 2010, was made from decommissioned military wool field jackets and nylon parachutes. Sass points out, “that's an aesthetic that has continued throughout the collection, since that day. It's very technically savvy; it's full of utilitarian details.”But it also includes some whimsy, she says.” This combination of whimsy and the utilitarian makes his designs very recognizable on the streets.
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Each month Sass Brown, an expert in ethical fashion, sustainability and craftsmanship, shares a fashion brand that approaches business differently and innovatively or operates outside of the main fashion systems and capitals. Sass is the former Dean of Art and Design at the Fashion Institute of Technology and the founding Dean at Dubai Institute of Design and Innovation.</em></p><p>Christopher Raeburn is a design-led, London-based womenswear, menswear and accessories fashion brand. Christopher works with certified organic materials, recycled polyester, and a lot of surplus materials, particularly military surplus. According to Sass Brown, Christopher’s aesthetic comes from, “a fascination with military materials and something that he's quoted as saying ‘archeological discoveries.’” </p><p>The brand dates back to about 2009 and Christopher’s first collection, which was fall winter 2010, was made from decommissioned military wool field jackets and nylon parachutes. Sass points out, “that's an aesthetic that has continued throughout the collection, since that day. It's very technically savvy; it's full of utilitarian details.”But it also includes some whimsy, she says.” This combination of whimsy and the utilitarian makes his designs very recognizable on the streets.</p><p>For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>554</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8f08ae32-465d-11ec-ab72-df790611727a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV4072620050.mp3?updated=1637241118" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Relying on the Institution and the Degree</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/relying-on-the-institution-and-the-degree/</link>
      <description>For many years, the onus of educating employees in the fashion industry was primarily that of the employer. Firstly, the industry relied heavily on women and because higher education was not generally available to them, companies had to train them with the skills they needed to do their jobs. Secondly, most fashion companies were family run businesses and relied on local workers, so the training happened naturally on the job. Thirdly, fashion required specialized skills related to merchandising, buying, production and retailing. And because each company had their own approach or style, companies benefited from training employees according to their particular needs. As companies grew, these programs expanded to be more formal, with the likes of Macy’s offering full training programs and certifications. In fact, early fashion schools such as the Fashion Institute of Technology built their two-year certifications on matriculating students into these types of programs. 
While some of these corporate programs persist, their fundamental approach (and need) shifted once fashion education became fully integrated into undergraduate degree programs at universities. The onus for training employees shifted from the employer to the university. To a degree, this helped to provide a more consistent foundation in terms of knowledge and skills. And it provided students with a more 360 degree view of the industry beyond a specific job they were training for, along with better soft skills, such as collaboration and communication. But, it also meant that students were learning less hard skills, creating a chasm between what was learned in college versus what was needed on the job. 
﻿For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 05:01:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Relying on the Institution and the Degree</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/34991dba-3d70-11ec-ac6d-0b2c23605be1/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_3f.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, “Relying on the Institution and the Degree,” part of “The Future of Fashion Education” series, we discuss how a shift needs to happen that puts employers more in control of training their employees, rather than relying on the degree system.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For many years, the onus of educating employees in the fashion industry was primarily that of the employer. Firstly, the industry relied heavily on women and because higher education was not generally available to them, companies had to train them with the skills they needed to do their jobs. Secondly, most fashion companies were family run businesses and relied on local workers, so the training happened naturally on the job. Thirdly, fashion required specialized skills related to merchandising, buying, production and retailing. And because each company had their own approach or style, companies benefited from training employees according to their particular needs. As companies grew, these programs expanded to be more formal, with the likes of Macy’s offering full training programs and certifications. In fact, early fashion schools such as the Fashion Institute of Technology built their two-year certifications on matriculating students into these types of programs. 
While some of these corporate programs persist, their fundamental approach (and need) shifted once fashion education became fully integrated into undergraduate degree programs at universities. The onus for training employees shifted from the employer to the university. To a degree, this helped to provide a more consistent foundation in terms of knowledge and skills. And it provided students with a more 360 degree view of the industry beyond a specific job they were training for, along with better soft skills, such as collaboration and communication. But, it also meant that students were learning less hard skills, creating a chasm between what was learned in college versus what was needed on the job. 
﻿For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For many years, the onus of educating employees in the fashion industry was primarily that of the employer. Firstly, the industry relied heavily on women and because higher education was not generally available to them, companies had to train them with the skills they needed to do their jobs. Secondly, most fashion companies were family run businesses and relied on local workers, so the training happened naturally on the job. Thirdly, fashion required specialized skills related to merchandising, buying, production and retailing. And because each company had their own approach or style, companies benefited from training employees according to their particular needs. As companies grew, these programs expanded to be more formal, with the likes of Macy’s offering full training programs and certifications. In fact, early fashion schools such as the Fashion Institute of Technology built their two-year certifications on matriculating students into these types of programs. </p><p>While some of these corporate programs persist, their fundamental approach (and need) shifted once fashion education became fully integrated into undergraduate degree programs at universities. The onus for training employees shifted from the employer to the university. To a degree, this helped to provide a more consistent foundation in terms of knowledge and skills. And it provided students with a more 360 degree view of the industry beyond a specific job they were training for, along with better soft skills, such as collaboration and communication. But, it also meant that students were learning less hard skills, creating a chasm between what was learned in college versus what was needed on the job. </p><p>﻿For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p><br></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>431</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34991dba-3d70-11ec-ac6d-0b2c23605be1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV5737984381.mp3?updated=1636031568" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Part Time Instructors Carry the Weight of Fashion Education</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/part-time-instructors-carry-the-weight-of-fashion-education</link>
      <description>In the mid-1990s, fashion education became more fully integrated into the academy, allowing students of fashion to receive more than vocational training. Their studies in fashion design or fashion merchandising were now combined with a traditional liberal arts or business education, leading to a bachelor’s or baccalaureate degree. This had the effect of formalizing, even legitimizing, fashion as an academic pursuit and a desired career. And with the burgeoning proliferation of fashion content in the media, especially with Project Runway and blogging, followed by smartphones and social media, colleges and universities were quick to realize the profit potential of offering fashion degree programs.
Shifting a fashion education into a more liberal arts setting requires students to take non-fashion courses such as sciences, mathematics, history and so forth, in order to meet accreditation standards. While this ensures a more well-rounded education, it also means less time to focus on fashion related subjects and skills training. For bachelor-level students, this means taking a series of foundational courses, and perhaps an elective or two, without ever having the chance to deep dive, or gain expertise in any one particular area. The goal then becomes on providing a foundation of knowledge and the ability to think critically--the hallmarks of a liberal arts education-- on which students can build, once they enter the industry. While there is certainly value in this approach, it has also led to a wide chasm between what knowledge and actual skills students graduate with, versus what employers expect of them, or need.
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2021 04:01:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Part Time Instructors Carry the Weight of Fashion Education</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/473e9a88-3b1a-11ec-8a04-578bf0fd27ca/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_2f.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, “Fashion Education Meets the Academy,” part of “The Future of Fashion Education” series, we explore the shift from vocational learning to academic degree, which has led to less specificity in skills learning and comes with a more expensive price tag.  </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the mid-1990s, fashion education became more fully integrated into the academy, allowing students of fashion to receive more than vocational training. Their studies in fashion design or fashion merchandising were now combined with a traditional liberal arts or business education, leading to a bachelor’s or baccalaureate degree. This had the effect of formalizing, even legitimizing, fashion as an academic pursuit and a desired career. And with the burgeoning proliferation of fashion content in the media, especially with Project Runway and blogging, followed by smartphones and social media, colleges and universities were quick to realize the profit potential of offering fashion degree programs.
Shifting a fashion education into a more liberal arts setting requires students to take non-fashion courses such as sciences, mathematics, history and so forth, in order to meet accreditation standards. While this ensures a more well-rounded education, it also means less time to focus on fashion related subjects and skills training. For bachelor-level students, this means taking a series of foundational courses, and perhaps an elective or two, without ever having the chance to deep dive, or gain expertise in any one particular area. The goal then becomes on providing a foundation of knowledge and the ability to think critically--the hallmarks of a liberal arts education-- on which students can build, once they enter the industry. While there is certainly value in this approach, it has also led to a wide chasm between what knowledge and actual skills students graduate with, versus what employers expect of them, or need.
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the mid-1990s, fashion education became more fully integrated into the academy, allowing students of fashion to receive more than vocational training. Their studies in fashion design or fashion merchandising were now combined with a traditional liberal arts or business education, leading to a bachelor’s or baccalaureate degree. This had the effect of formalizing, even legitimizing, fashion as an academic pursuit and a desired career. And with the burgeoning proliferation of fashion content in the media, especially with <em>Project Runway</em> and blogging, followed by smartphones and social media, colleges and universities were quick to realize the profit potential of offering fashion degree programs.</p><p>Shifting a fashion education into a more liberal arts setting requires students to take non-fashion courses such as sciences, mathematics, history and so forth, in order to meet accreditation standards. While this ensures a more well-rounded education, it also means less time to focus on fashion related subjects and skills training. For bachelor-level students, this means taking a series of foundational courses, and perhaps an elective or two, without ever having the chance to deep dive, or gain expertise in any one particular area. The goal then becomes on providing a foundation of knowledge and the ability to think critically--the hallmarks of a liberal arts education-- on which students can build, once they enter the industry. While there is certainly value in this approach, it has also led to a wide chasm between what knowledge and actual skills students graduate with, versus what employers expect of them, or need.</p><p>For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>383</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[473e9a88-3b1a-11ec-8a04-578bf0fd27ca]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV3072714288.mp3?updated=1635774808" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fashion Education Meets the Academy</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/fashion-education-meets-the-academy/</link>
      <description>In the mid-1990s, fashion education became more fully integrated into the academy, allowing students of fashion to receive more than vocational training. Their studies in fashion design or fashion merchandising were now combined with a traditional liberal arts or business education, leading to a bachelor’s or baccalaureate degree. This had the effect of formalizing, even legitimizing, fashion as an academic pursuit and a desired career. And with the burgeoning proliferation of fashion content in the media, especially with Project Runway and blogging, followed by smartphones and social media, colleges and universities were quick to realize the profit potential of offering fashion degree programs.
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:36:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fashion Education Meets the Academy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/237e38ca-3731-11ec-9399-d7c2cd0c2caa/image/NewsBytes_Episode_Art_4_1f.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, “Fashion Education Meets the Academy,” part of “The Future of Fashion Education” series, we explore the shift from vocational learning to academic degree, which has led to less specificity in skills learning and comes with a more expensive price tag.  </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In the mid-1990s, fashion education became more fully integrated into the academy, allowing students of fashion to receive more than vocational training. Their studies in fashion design or fashion merchandising were now combined with a traditional liberal arts or business education, leading to a bachelor’s or baccalaureate degree. This had the effect of formalizing, even legitimizing, fashion as an academic pursuit and a desired career. And with the burgeoning proliferation of fashion content in the media, especially with Project Runway and blogging, followed by smartphones and social media, colleges and universities were quick to realize the profit potential of offering fashion degree programs.
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the mid-1990s, fashion education became more fully integrated into the academy, allowing students of fashion to receive more than vocational training. Their studies in fashion design or fashion merchandising were now combined with a traditional liberal arts or business education, leading to a bachelor’s or baccalaureate degree. This had the effect of formalizing, even legitimizing, fashion as an academic pursuit and a desired career. And with the burgeoning proliferation of fashion content in the media, especially with <em>Project Runway</em> and blogging, followed by smartphones and social media, colleges and universities were quick to realize the profit potential of offering fashion degree programs.</p><p>For the full transcript, visit: <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>458</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[237e38ca-3731-11ec-9399-d7c2cd0c2caa]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV3259432752.mp3?updated=1635344932" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When the Past May Drive the Future</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/when-the-past-may-drive-the-future/</link>
      <description>As companies like the Real Real, 1st Dibs and DePop continue to make market share inroads when it comes to overall apparel and accessory sales, two key areas of conversation have emerged. 
One focuses on who has the right in a secondary market to sell certain brands. Most notably, Chanel has filed three lawsuits against The RealReal and 15 cease and desist orders. Their core contentions are that they should have complete control over who sells their product; they should always benefit from the sell of their product; and finally, that they are the only ones able to ensure authenticity. While Chanel, and other luxury brands, have long been sold at secondhand stores throughout the world, the difference here is The RealReal’s scale and control. 
The other conversation focuses on that of fashion sustainability and the shift of consumer behavior towards buying something used, rather than something new. In fact, this has been a marketing strategy that The RealReal has been using in its television ads. And while there are clear benefits to selling and buying secondhand products, for many this claim seems to be more greenwashing than true. After all, The RealReal relies on a heavy back and forth shipping scheme to receive and sell product. What’s more, the pay out for customers is fairly low, as the company sets the sell price—and therefore potentially undermines the customer’s reason to be part of this transaction 
What’s largely missing in these conversations, is a discussion about the long view of brand engagement, especially post-purchase. Typically, marketing strategy is focused on getting a customer back in the door to buy new product, not sell or purchase used product. And yet, by embracing secondhand sales, there is real potential for fashion brands, luxury specifically, to rethink and reengage customers in a more lifelong experience—that recognizes the twists and turns of trends and social behaviors.
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>When the Past May Drive the Future</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268/image/3_23_NewsBytes_When_the_Past_May_Drive_the_Future.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, “When the Past May Drive the Future” we explore how brands might expand lifetime customer engagement through the buying and selling of secondhand goods.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As companies like the Real Real, 1st Dibs and DePop continue to make market share inroads when it comes to overall apparel and accessory sales, two key areas of conversation have emerged. 
One focuses on who has the right in a secondary market to sell certain brands. Most notably, Chanel has filed three lawsuits against The RealReal and 15 cease and desist orders. Their core contentions are that they should have complete control over who sells their product; they should always benefit from the sell of their product; and finally, that they are the only ones able to ensure authenticity. While Chanel, and other luxury brands, have long been sold at secondhand stores throughout the world, the difference here is The RealReal’s scale and control. 
The other conversation focuses on that of fashion sustainability and the shift of consumer behavior towards buying something used, rather than something new. In fact, this has been a marketing strategy that The RealReal has been using in its television ads. And while there are clear benefits to selling and buying secondhand products, for many this claim seems to be more greenwashing than true. After all, The RealReal relies on a heavy back and forth shipping scheme to receive and sell product. What’s more, the pay out for customers is fairly low, as the company sets the sell price—and therefore potentially undermines the customer’s reason to be part of this transaction 
What’s largely missing in these conversations, is a discussion about the long view of brand engagement, especially post-purchase. Typically, marketing strategy is focused on getting a customer back in the door to buy new product, not sell or purchase used product. And yet, by embracing secondhand sales, there is real potential for fashion brands, luxury specifically, to rethink and reengage customers in a more lifelong experience—that recognizes the twists and turns of trends and social behaviors.
For the full transcript, visit: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>As companies like the Real Real, 1st Dibs and DePop continue to make market share inroads when it comes to overall apparel and accessory sales, two key areas of conversation have emerged. </p><p>One focuses on who has the right in a secondary market to sell certain brands. Most notably, Chanel has filed three lawsuits against The RealReal and 15 cease and desist orders. Their core contentions are that they should have complete control over who sells their product; they should always benefit from the sell of their product; and finally, that they are the only ones able to ensure authenticity. While Chanel, and other luxury brands, have long been sold at secondhand stores throughout the world, the difference here is The RealReal’s scale and control. </p><p>The other conversation focuses on that of fashion sustainability and the shift of consumer behavior towards buying something used, rather than something new. In fact, this has been a marketing strategy that The RealReal has been using in its television ads. And while there are clear benefits to selling and buying secondhand products, for many this claim seems to be more greenwashing than true. After all, The RealReal relies on a heavy back and forth shipping scheme to receive and sell product. What’s more, the pay out for customers is fairly low, as the company sets the sell price—and therefore potentially undermines the customer’s reason to be part of this transaction </p><p>What’s largely missing in these conversations, is a discussion about the long view of brand engagement, especially post-purchase. Typically, marketing strategy is focused on getting a customer back in the door to buy new product, not sell or purchase used product. And yet, by embracing secondhand sales, there is real potential for fashion brands, luxury specifically, to rethink and reengage customers in a more lifelong experience—that recognizes the twists and turns of trends and social behaviors.</p><p>For the full transcript, visit: <a href="www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>416</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[29485f7e-a208-11eb-904f-27948dda4268]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV5559851696.mp3?updated=1618944565" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VOZ, A Celebration of Indigenous Culture</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/voz-a-celebration-of-indigenous-cultures</link>
      <description>Joshua Williams: Hello Sass, who are we featuring this month? 
Sass Brown: We're talking about VOZ. 
Joshua Williams:Ah, VOZ. They're based in New York City, but do a lot of their work in Chile. Can you tell us a little bit about them? 
Sass Brown: Absolutely. They're an amazing brand. They were founded back in 2012 by Jasmine Aarons. And their mission is really to honor and empower artisans, to support them economically and culturally by showcasing their traditions of hand weaving and hand dying. So the collection is built around core items that are handwoven by the Mapuche and hand-dyed; vegetable-dyed through the long tradition of hand weaving and artisanship with cotton and with alpaca from the region.
Joshua Williams: And can you tell us a little about the Mapuche people because that's quite unique, their story, and why she's chosen to work with this particular group? 
Sass Brown: For sure. Well then the Mapuche are actually the largest indigenous group in South America. And we never call them cooked by the Spanish. And they have a very long heritage of working with natural fibers, local materials, both animal and vegetable and hand weaving, hand spinning the product. So, they have a very long tradition of it. Like many indigenous groups, there's stories and meanings behind the patterns and the symbolism that's embedded within the things that they weave. It's very graphic visually. Often, it's black on a off-white or a beige base, but it can be and other colors. And if you look at Jasmine's work, she often incorporates all sorts of different shapes. But usually very graphic patterning on a hand-woven base.
Read the full transcript at FCNewsBytes.com.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>VOZ, A Celebration of Indigenous Culture</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/261587c4-9974-11eb-b7b1-e74d3d89f53a/image/3_22_NewsBytes_VOZ__A_Celebration_of_Indigenous_Culture_SQ.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, part of our monthly brand feature series, we learn about VOZ, a New York City based brand that collaborates with and celebrates the Mapuche tribe, based in Chile.   </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Joshua Williams: Hello Sass, who are we featuring this month? 
Sass Brown: We're talking about VOZ. 
Joshua Williams:Ah, VOZ. They're based in New York City, but do a lot of their work in Chile. Can you tell us a little bit about them? 
Sass Brown: Absolutely. They're an amazing brand. They were founded back in 2012 by Jasmine Aarons. And their mission is really to honor and empower artisans, to support them economically and culturally by showcasing their traditions of hand weaving and hand dying. So the collection is built around core items that are handwoven by the Mapuche and hand-dyed; vegetable-dyed through the long tradition of hand weaving and artisanship with cotton and with alpaca from the region.
Joshua Williams: And can you tell us a little about the Mapuche people because that's quite unique, their story, and why she's chosen to work with this particular group? 
Sass Brown: For sure. Well then the Mapuche are actually the largest indigenous group in South America. And we never call them cooked by the Spanish. And they have a very long heritage of working with natural fibers, local materials, both animal and vegetable and hand weaving, hand spinning the product. So, they have a very long tradition of it. Like many indigenous groups, there's stories and meanings behind the patterns and the symbolism that's embedded within the things that they weave. It's very graphic visually. Often, it's black on a off-white or a beige base, but it can be and other colors. And if you look at Jasmine's work, she often incorporates all sorts of different shapes. But usually very graphic patterning on a hand-woven base.
Read the full transcript at FCNewsBytes.com.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Joshua Williams: </strong>Hello Sass, who are we featuring this month? </p><p><strong>Sass Brown: </strong>We're talking about VOZ. </p><p><strong>Joshua Williams:</strong>Ah, VOZ. They're based in New York City, but do a lot of their work in Chile. Can you tell us a little bit about them? </p><p><strong>Sass Brown: </strong>Absolutely. They're an amazing brand. They were founded back in 2012 by Jasmine Aarons. And their mission is really to honor and empower artisans, to support them economically and culturally by showcasing their traditions of hand weaving and hand dying. So the collection is built around core items that are handwoven by the Mapuche and hand-dyed; vegetable-dyed through the long tradition of hand weaving and artisanship with cotton and with alpaca from the region.</p><p><strong>Joshua Williams: </strong>And can you tell us a little about the Mapuche people because that's quite unique, their story, and why she's chosen to work with this particular group? </p><p><strong>Sass Brown: </strong>For sure. Well then the Mapuche are actually the largest indigenous group in South America. And we never call them cooked by the Spanish. And they have a very long heritage of working with natural fibers, local materials, both animal and vegetable and hand weaving, hand spinning the product. So, they have a very long tradition of it. Like many indigenous groups, there's stories and meanings behind the patterns and the symbolism that's embedded within the things that they weave. It's very graphic visually. Often, it's black on a off-white or a beige base, but it can be and other colors. And if you look at Jasmine's work, she often incorporates all sorts of different shapes. But usually very graphic patterning on a hand-woven base.</p><p>Read the full transcript at <a href="www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a>.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>541</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[261587c4-9974-11eb-b7b1-e74d3d89f53a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV5998640746.mp3?updated=1618001510" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shifting the Sustainability Mindset</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/shifting-the-sustainability-mindset</link>
      <description>Sustainability in the fashion industry is the topic du jour, and rightfully so. The adverse effects of fashion on our environment and on humans themselves cannot be overstated. Over the past ten years, this topic has shifted from the world of academia and NGOs to business and consumers. In fact, consumers now identify sustainability as one of the key criteria for determining which brands they shop, forcing brands to adapt. And yet, the reality is far more complex. Just because consumers say sustainability is important pertaining to their shopping habits, doesn’t mean that it truly makes a difference at point of sale. And just because brands say they are sustainable, doesn’t mean they are in practice. 
Values are often separate from action--because values can be hard to pin down or define quantitatively, and because they are contextual. But rather than giving up, it’s a reminder that more education is needed, and that knowledge will empower brands and consumers to make more informed and sustainable choices and demand ongoing change. 
Maria Soubbotina, a graduate student and research assistant at Parsons School of Design, focuses her time on parsing how people use language as it pertains to fashion and retail. And for the past year, she has been deciphering the conversations happening at our sister podcast, “Retail Revolution.” 
“Over the past year, I’ve noticed a shift in how retail issues, including sustainability, are discussed. Sustainability, in general, was primarily a catch-all conversation for anything wrong with the fashion industry, or it was specifically referring to the effects of fashion production on the environment. And rightfully so, since that is a large part of it. For example, water pollution is just one part of the environmental aspect and 20% of industrial water pollution comes from textile manufacturing.” 
But now, she says, the pandemic has begun to shift the language around sustainability towards the effects on the individual. For example, the extent of the impact that chemicals and dyes used to create clothing have on our skin. “Around 8,000 chemicals are used to turn raw materials into clothing, but the average consumer wouldn’t be able to name even one chemical that’s used in the production process, because it’s not something that’s discussed as frequently.” 
Read the full transcript at FCNewsBytes.com.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Shifting the Sustainability Mindset</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d1cec04c-9732-11eb-953a-2b194d720aa1/image/3_21_NewsBytes_Shifting_the_Sustainability_Mindset.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, with Maria Soubbotina, we discuss the change in how sustainability is being approached from both a collective and individual issue.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Sustainability in the fashion industry is the topic du jour, and rightfully so. The adverse effects of fashion on our environment and on humans themselves cannot be overstated. Over the past ten years, this topic has shifted from the world of academia and NGOs to business and consumers. In fact, consumers now identify sustainability as one of the key criteria for determining which brands they shop, forcing brands to adapt. And yet, the reality is far more complex. Just because consumers say sustainability is important pertaining to their shopping habits, doesn’t mean that it truly makes a difference at point of sale. And just because brands say they are sustainable, doesn’t mean they are in practice. 
Values are often separate from action--because values can be hard to pin down or define quantitatively, and because they are contextual. But rather than giving up, it’s a reminder that more education is needed, and that knowledge will empower brands and consumers to make more informed and sustainable choices and demand ongoing change. 
Maria Soubbotina, a graduate student and research assistant at Parsons School of Design, focuses her time on parsing how people use language as it pertains to fashion and retail. And for the past year, she has been deciphering the conversations happening at our sister podcast, “Retail Revolution.” 
“Over the past year, I’ve noticed a shift in how retail issues, including sustainability, are discussed. Sustainability, in general, was primarily a catch-all conversation for anything wrong with the fashion industry, or it was specifically referring to the effects of fashion production on the environment. And rightfully so, since that is a large part of it. For example, water pollution is just one part of the environmental aspect and 20% of industrial water pollution comes from textile manufacturing.” 
But now, she says, the pandemic has begun to shift the language around sustainability towards the effects on the individual. For example, the extent of the impact that chemicals and dyes used to create clothing have on our skin. “Around 8,000 chemicals are used to turn raw materials into clothing, but the average consumer wouldn’t be able to name even one chemical that’s used in the production process, because it’s not something that’s discussed as frequently.” 
Read the full transcript at FCNewsBytes.com.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Sustainability in the fashion industry is the topic <em>du jour</em>, and rightfully so. The adverse effects of fashion on our environment and on humans themselves cannot be overstated. Over the past ten years, this topic has shifted from the world of academia and NGOs to business and consumers. In fact, consumers now identify sustainability as one of the key criteria for determining which brands they shop, forcing brands to adapt. And yet, the reality is far more complex. Just because consumers say sustainability is important pertaining to their shopping habits, doesn’t mean that it truly makes a difference at point of sale. And just because brands say they are sustainable, doesn’t mean they are in practice. </p><p>Values are often separate from action--because values can be hard to pin down or define quantitatively, and because they are contextual. But rather than giving up, it’s a reminder that more education is needed, and that knowledge will empower brands and consumers to make more informed and sustainable choices and demand ongoing change. </p><p>Maria Soubbotina, a graduate student and research assistant at Parsons School of Design, focuses her time on parsing how people use language as it pertains to fashion and retail. And for the past year, she has been deciphering the conversations happening at our sister podcast, “Retail Revolution.” </p><p>“Over the past year, I’ve noticed a shift in how retail issues, including sustainability, are discussed. Sustainability, in general, was primarily a catch-all conversation for anything wrong with the fashion industry, or it was specifically referring to the effects of fashion production on the environment. And rightfully so, since that is a large part of it. For example, water pollution is just one part of the environmental aspect and 20% of industrial water pollution comes from textile manufacturing.” </p><p>But now, she says, the pandemic has begun to shift the language around sustainability towards the effects on the individual. For example, the extent of the impact that chemicals and dyes used to create clothing have on our skin. “Around 8,000 chemicals are used to turn raw materials into clothing, but the average consumer wouldn’t be able to name even one chemical that’s used in the production process, because it’s not something that’s discussed as frequently.” </p><p>Read the full transcript at <a href="www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a>.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>451</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d1cec04c-9732-11eb-953a-2b194d720aa1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV2324662309.mp3?updated=1617753500" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Driven by Digital</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/driven-by-digital</link>
      <description>The pandemic accelerated e-commerce sales in 2020. Pre-Covid, e-commerce sales accounted from between 10 to 20% for fashion retailers, depending on the sophistication and reach of their online platforms. At the height of Covid, these numbers doubled to 40% and beyond, and have now averaged out around 26% with the roll-out of vaccines and the ability for people to move around in public more freely. These numbers are indeed impressive and underscore a true customer shift towards buying a wide range of products online—from groceries to furniture to clothing. And companies like Amazon, Target and Walmart, that offer a wide range of products all in one place, have led the pack. 
However, what’s particularly fascinating about these numbers is that even at the height of the pandemic, 60% or more of sales were still transacted in a brick and mortar store. And instead of online sales holding at 40%, they have decreased, suggesting that in-person shopping still holds sway among customers. While customers appreciate the utility and perceived ease of shopping online, shopping is not just about the purchase itself, especially when it comes to buying fashion—which is often less about the piece we’re buying and more about the experience of finding something, trying it on and buying it. 
However, this is not to suggest that in-store versus online is an even comparison. The reality is much more complex and harder to truly track. Many experts estimate that 65% or more of in-store purchases involve a digital component—meaning customers are engaging online first, whether it’s searching for the perfect dress or trousers, finding a store location, or even purchasing online—before, they head to the store to pick up an item. Or, the customer is online while shopping in a store; they might be listening to music, getting style advice from a friend via FaceTime, or even shopping a competitor. 
What’s more, the primary way in which customers interact with brands now—on a daily basis—is online. This interaction starts first thing in the morning, when a customer picks up their phone, checks their emails, and scrolls through Instagram. This mostly 2D brand experience, often on a small screen, is the most common way customers interact with a brand. And they are doing so from their personal space, rather than in a fully branded space like a store, where the brand is in control. In other words, while customers might still prefer shopping and engaging with brands in a physical store, digital is defining and driving the overall experience. 
This reality requires a major shift from retailer leaders, where most decisions about online shopping have been based on traditional, brick and mortar store models; where online was seen more as an “add-on” than the driving force behind customer purchase behaviors. And it necessitates a realization that the interaction between the brand and the customer is fundamentally different and difficult to maintain. After all, the start of a customer journey probably begins with a Google search or a request to Alexa. Ultimately, this shift to a digitally-led business also requires a new type of employee skillset, that merges technology and data know-how with traditional roles in merchandising, buying, planning, logistics and management. And it requires agility and flexibility in order to stay competitive, beyond seasonal trends. 
Read the full transcript at FCNewsBytes.com.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Driven by Digital</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/01f07530-90d1-11eb-a9d5-a36ab5780a3b/image/3_20+NewsBytes+Driven+by+Digital.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we explore the ways in which online shopping has changed how we shop in person.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The pandemic accelerated e-commerce sales in 2020. Pre-Covid, e-commerce sales accounted from between 10 to 20% for fashion retailers, depending on the sophistication and reach of their online platforms. At the height of Covid, these numbers doubled to 40% and beyond, and have now averaged out around 26% with the roll-out of vaccines and the ability for people to move around in public more freely. These numbers are indeed impressive and underscore a true customer shift towards buying a wide range of products online—from groceries to furniture to clothing. And companies like Amazon, Target and Walmart, that offer a wide range of products all in one place, have led the pack. 
However, what’s particularly fascinating about these numbers is that even at the height of the pandemic, 60% or more of sales were still transacted in a brick and mortar store. And instead of online sales holding at 40%, they have decreased, suggesting that in-person shopping still holds sway among customers. While customers appreciate the utility and perceived ease of shopping online, shopping is not just about the purchase itself, especially when it comes to buying fashion—which is often less about the piece we’re buying and more about the experience of finding something, trying it on and buying it. 
However, this is not to suggest that in-store versus online is an even comparison. The reality is much more complex and harder to truly track. Many experts estimate that 65% or more of in-store purchases involve a digital component—meaning customers are engaging online first, whether it’s searching for the perfect dress or trousers, finding a store location, or even purchasing online—before, they head to the store to pick up an item. Or, the customer is online while shopping in a store; they might be listening to music, getting style advice from a friend via FaceTime, or even shopping a competitor. 
What’s more, the primary way in which customers interact with brands now—on a daily basis—is online. This interaction starts first thing in the morning, when a customer picks up their phone, checks their emails, and scrolls through Instagram. This mostly 2D brand experience, often on a small screen, is the most common way customers interact with a brand. And they are doing so from their personal space, rather than in a fully branded space like a store, where the brand is in control. In other words, while customers might still prefer shopping and engaging with brands in a physical store, digital is defining and driving the overall experience. 
This reality requires a major shift from retailer leaders, where most decisions about online shopping have been based on traditional, brick and mortar store models; where online was seen more as an “add-on” than the driving force behind customer purchase behaviors. And it necessitates a realization that the interaction between the brand and the customer is fundamentally different and difficult to maintain. After all, the start of a customer journey probably begins with a Google search or a request to Alexa. Ultimately, this shift to a digitally-led business also requires a new type of employee skillset, that merges technology and data know-how with traditional roles in merchandising, buying, planning, logistics and management. And it requires agility and flexibility in order to stay competitive, beyond seasonal trends. 
Read the full transcript at FCNewsBytes.com.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The pandemic accelerated e-commerce sales in 2020. Pre-Covid, e-commerce sales accounted from between 10 to 20% for fashion retailers, depending on the sophistication and reach of their online platforms. At the height of Covid, these numbers doubled to 40% and beyond, and have now averaged out around 26% with the roll-out of vaccines and the ability for people to move around in public more freely. These numbers are indeed impressive and underscore a true customer shift towards buying a wide range of products online—from groceries to furniture to clothing. And companies like Amazon, Target and Walmart, that offer a wide range of products all in one place, have led the pack. </p><p>However, what’s particularly fascinating about these numbers is that even at the height of the pandemic, 60% or more of sales were still transacted in a brick and mortar store. And instead of online sales holding at 40%, they have decreased, suggesting that in-person shopping still holds sway among customers. While customers appreciate the utility and perceived ease of shopping online, shopping is not just about the purchase itself, especially when it comes to buying fashion—which is often less about the piece we’re buying and more about the experience of finding something, trying it on and buying it. </p><p>However, this is not to suggest that in-store versus online is an even comparison. The reality is much more complex and harder to truly track. Many experts estimate that 65% or more of in-store purchases involve a digital component—meaning customers are engaging online first, whether it’s searching for the perfect dress or trousers, finding a store location, or even purchasing online—before, they head to the store to pick up an item. Or, the customer is online <em>while </em>shopping in a store; they might be listening to music, getting style advice from a friend via FaceTime, or even shopping a competitor. </p><p>What’s more, the primary way in which customers interact with brands now—on a daily basis—is online. This interaction starts first thing in the morning, when a customer picks up their phone, checks their emails, and scrolls through Instagram. This mostly 2D brand experience, often on a small screen, is the most common way customers interact with a brand. And they are doing so from their personal space, rather than in a fully branded space like a store, where the brand is in control. In other words, while customers might still prefer shopping and engaging with brands in a physical store, digital is defining and driving the overall experience. </p><p>This reality requires a major shift from retailer leaders, where most decisions about online shopping have been based on traditional, brick and mortar store models; where online was seen more as an “add-on” than the driving force behind customer purchase behaviors. And it necessitates a realization that the interaction between the brand and the customer is fundamentally different and difficult to maintain. After all, the start of a customer journey probably begins with a Google search or a request to Alexa. Ultimately, this shift to a digitally-led business also requires a new type of employee skillset, that merges technology and data know-how with traditional roles in merchandising, buying, planning, logistics and management. And it requires agility and flexibility in order to stay competitive, beyond seasonal trends. </p><p>Read the full transcript at <a href="https://cms.megaphone.fm/organizations/eca2bba6-5eac-11e8-b750-a344e2023286/podcasts/7e074ab2-153a-11eb-99af-6f76ea3f1576/episodes/7ff3e278-875d-11eb-8a81-83efa0d4963e/www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a>.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>430</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[01f07530-90d1-11eb-a9d5-a36ab5780a3b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV5689763362.mp3?updated=1617051684" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tonlé, Contemporary Design and Activism</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/tonle-contemporary-design-and-activism</link>
      <description>Joshua Williams: Welcome back Sass. Who are we featuring this month? 
Sass Brown: We're talking about Tonlé. They're a Cambodian brand that does a contemporary collection, 
Joshua Williams: This is such an interesting brand, because they really are involved in so many different things. But at the core, they are a womenswear brand led by founders who are very activistic in terms of how to approach design and how to be part of the world as global citizens.
Sass Brown: Absolutely.  Rachel Faller, who's the founder, she's based in California. The brand itself is produced and operated out of Cambodia, which is where she splits her time with. And she is very impressive in terms of, she really understands the place that the fashion system has played in neo-liberalism, colonialism, the whole sort of white savior type mentality. And she really is extremely conscious of that and sees her role as developing a brand and a company out of Cambodia as an honor; that she is able to give back, that she is able to enable the population, to show their capabilities instead of continuing a  rather long and messy past between the U.S. and Cambodia. So, she's very much aware of the role that she plays. 
Joshua Williams: Can you talk a little bit about her design aesthetic, how she approaches her work? 
Sass Brown: It's a very contemporary, wearable, easy wear collection. They're very relatable clothes. They are at a median price point, so they're quite accessible.
A lot of the collection is made out of jersey, although they utilize a number of different techniques. One of the things that is really quite special about them is their focus on worker training. First of all, all their workers are full-time employees. They don't do piece work. They don't subcontract. They encourage their employees to train, to upskill, to learn, which is quite the reverse of your usual sort of workshops, factory setting, particularly in a place like Cambodia that does significant fast fashion production, where it's all about the de-skilling of workers and the underpaying of workers. She does the complete  reverse. She operates in a lean manufacturing model, which means workers work in a circle. They don't work in straight lines, looking at the back of the person in front of them. They're encouraged to learn new techniques, to try new machines. They are paid to up-skill They're encouraged to progress employment-wise towards managerial positions and so on. So it's much more of a humane model, or an ethical model of production, if you will. And in a country that's renowned for fast fashion and the reverse of that. 
Read the full transcript at FCNewsBytes.com.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Tonlé, Contemporary Design and Activism</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/7ff3e278-875d-11eb-8a81-83efa0d4963e/image/3_19+NewsBytes+Tonle_+Contemporary+Design+and+Activism+LG.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, part of our monthly brand feature series, we learn about Tonlé, a zero waste brand co-created by Rachel Faller and produced by a community of artisans in Cambodia.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Joshua Williams: Welcome back Sass. Who are we featuring this month? 
Sass Brown: We're talking about Tonlé. They're a Cambodian brand that does a contemporary collection, 
Joshua Williams: This is such an interesting brand, because they really are involved in so many different things. But at the core, they are a womenswear brand led by founders who are very activistic in terms of how to approach design and how to be part of the world as global citizens.
Sass Brown: Absolutely.  Rachel Faller, who's the founder, she's based in California. The brand itself is produced and operated out of Cambodia, which is where she splits her time with. And she is very impressive in terms of, she really understands the place that the fashion system has played in neo-liberalism, colonialism, the whole sort of white savior type mentality. And she really is extremely conscious of that and sees her role as developing a brand and a company out of Cambodia as an honor; that she is able to give back, that she is able to enable the population, to show their capabilities instead of continuing a  rather long and messy past between the U.S. and Cambodia. So, she's very much aware of the role that she plays. 
Joshua Williams: Can you talk a little bit about her design aesthetic, how she approaches her work? 
Sass Brown: It's a very contemporary, wearable, easy wear collection. They're very relatable clothes. They are at a median price point, so they're quite accessible.
A lot of the collection is made out of jersey, although they utilize a number of different techniques. One of the things that is really quite special about them is their focus on worker training. First of all, all their workers are full-time employees. They don't do piece work. They don't subcontract. They encourage their employees to train, to upskill, to learn, which is quite the reverse of your usual sort of workshops, factory setting, particularly in a place like Cambodia that does significant fast fashion production, where it's all about the de-skilling of workers and the underpaying of workers. She does the complete  reverse. She operates in a lean manufacturing model, which means workers work in a circle. They don't work in straight lines, looking at the back of the person in front of them. They're encouraged to learn new techniques, to try new machines. They are paid to up-skill They're encouraged to progress employment-wise towards managerial positions and so on. So it's much more of a humane model, or an ethical model of production, if you will. And in a country that's renowned for fast fashion and the reverse of that. 
Read the full transcript at FCNewsBytes.com.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Joshua Williams: </strong>Welcome back Sass. Who are we featuring this month? </p><p><strong>Sass Brown: </strong>We're talking about Tonlé. They're a Cambodian brand that does a contemporary collection, </p><p><strong>Joshua Williams: </strong>This is such an interesting brand, because they really are involved in so many different things. But at the core, they are a womenswear brand led by founders who are very activistic in terms of how to approach design and how to be part of the world as global citizens.</p><p><strong>Sass Brown: </strong>Absolutely.  Rachel Faller, who's the founder, she's based in California. The brand itself is produced and operated out of Cambodia, which is where she splits her time with. And she is very impressive in terms of, she really understands the place that the fashion system has played in neo-liberalism, colonialism, the whole sort of white savior type mentality. And she really is extremely conscious of that and sees her role as developing a brand and a company out of Cambodia as an honor; that she is able to give back, that she is able to enable the population, to show their capabilities instead of continuing a  rather long and messy past between the U.S. and Cambodia. So, she's very much aware of the role that she plays. </p><p><strong>Joshua Williams: </strong>Can you talk a little bit about her design aesthetic, how she approaches her work? </p><p><strong>Sass Brown: </strong>It's a very contemporary, wearable, easy wear collection. They're very relatable clothes. They are at a median price point, so they're quite accessible.</p><p>A lot of the collection is made out of jersey, although they utilize a number of different techniques. One of the things that is really quite special about them is their focus on worker training. First of all, all their workers are full-time employees. They don't do piece work. They don't subcontract. They encourage their employees to train, to upskill, to learn, which is quite the reverse of your usual sort of workshops, factory setting, particularly in a place like Cambodia that does significant fast fashion production, where it's all about the de-skilling of workers and the underpaying of workers. She does the complete  reverse. She operates in a lean manufacturing model, which means workers work in a circle. They don't work in straight lines, looking at the back of the person in front of them. They're encouraged to learn new techniques, to try new machines. They are paid to up-skill They're encouraged to progress employment-wise towards managerial positions and so on. So it's much more of a humane model, or an ethical model of production, if you will. And in a country that's renowned for fast fashion and the reverse of that. </p><p>Read the full transcript at <a href="www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a>.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>536</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7ff3e278-875d-11eb-8a81-83efa0d4963e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV1598146899.mp3?updated=1616012507" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Creativity, Meet Data</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/creativity-meet-data/</link>
      <description>Fashion has always existed at the nexus of art and commerce. It is an endeavor that strives to balance emotional connection and profitability. And it requires a left and right brain approach to be successful. 
For years, capturing and analyzing data has supported fashion companies in their efforts to better understand, target and engage their customers. This data mining operation--driven by complex algorithms and information engineers--has largely been under the auspices of financial and marketing departments. But over the years, the world of big data has creeped into the creative process.  
Schanel Bakkouche, founder and creative director at SFB Creative, as well as editor and stylist for Vogue International Publications, says that this shift to data provides fashion brands with a competitive advantage. “Data can provide access to key market insights that allows a creative director to focus on what’s important to the customer, thus increasing speed to market, efficiencies and overall engagement.” She emphasizes that fashion can be very subjective, but data can help point creative teams in the right direction. “Data can help eliminate confusion internally and create consistency and transparency across all channels. It can also help to set manageable expectations, even optimize what works best.”
Read the full transcript: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Creativity, Meet Data</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4f09c2dc-8667-11eb-8c0c-7745e923c642/image/3_18_NewsBytes+Creativity_+Meet+Data+LG.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we explore the intersection between data analytics and the creative process, and how it can maximize customer engagement.   </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Fashion has always existed at the nexus of art and commerce. It is an endeavor that strives to balance emotional connection and profitability. And it requires a left and right brain approach to be successful. 
For years, capturing and analyzing data has supported fashion companies in their efforts to better understand, target and engage their customers. This data mining operation--driven by complex algorithms and information engineers--has largely been under the auspices of financial and marketing departments. But over the years, the world of big data has creeped into the creative process.  
Schanel Bakkouche, founder and creative director at SFB Creative, as well as editor and stylist for Vogue International Publications, says that this shift to data provides fashion brands with a competitive advantage. “Data can provide access to key market insights that allows a creative director to focus on what’s important to the customer, thus increasing speed to market, efficiencies and overall engagement.” She emphasizes that fashion can be very subjective, but data can help point creative teams in the right direction. “Data can help eliminate confusion internally and create consistency and transparency across all channels. It can also help to set manageable expectations, even optimize what works best.”
Read the full transcript: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Fashion has always existed at the nexus of art and commerce. It is an endeavor that strives to balance emotional connection and profitability. And it requires a left and right brain approach to be successful. </p><p>For years, capturing and analyzing data has supported fashion companies in their efforts to better understand, target and engage their customers. This data mining operation--driven by complex algorithms and information engineers--has largely been under the auspices of financial and marketing departments. But over the years, the world of big data has creeped into the creative process.  </p><p>Schanel Bakkouche, founder and creative director at SFB Creative, as well as editor and stylist for<em> </em>Vogue International Publications<em>,</em> says that this shift to data provides fashion brands with a competitive advantage. “Data can provide access to key market insights that allows a creative director to focus on what’s important to the customer, thus increasing speed to market, efficiencies and overall engagement.” She emphasizes that fashion can be very subjective, but data can help point creative teams in the right direction. “Data can help eliminate confusion internally and create consistency and transparency across all channels. It can also help to set manageable expectations, even optimize what works best.”</p><p>Read the full transcript: <a href="www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>451</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4f09c2dc-8667-11eb-8c0c-7745e923c642]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV2508520544.mp3?updated=1615906766" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Leading by Example</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/leading-by-example</link>
      <description>In today’s world, leading a fashion company is a complex undertaking, involving a vast global supply chain, a highly competitive landscape and an ever evolving consumer with access to more options than ever. And the skills needed to operate such a company must also be balanced with vision, creativity, transparency and authenticity.  
It’s a tall order, agrees Renee Cooper, a professor at the Fashion Institute of Technology, who focuses on management and leadership development. “These days, I think the qualities that set a fashion leader apart from execs in other industries is a bit unique.” When asked if there are any particular fashion leaders that she believes set the right example, she quips, “I suppose I should mention John Donahue or Mark Parker of Nike, but I have to go with a leader who has built a fashion brand that is becoming more and more formidable every day. And that brand is Harlem's Fashion Row, built by owner and founder, Brandice Henderson.”
Read the full transcript at FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 09:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Leading by Example</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/37feaf02-6a39-11eb-b8eb-e7d4c8d6788f/image/uploads_2F1612807931456-0p1xfjjcein-258e23011d237703bd6b31c79de9bc83_2F3_17+NewsBytes+Leading+by+Example.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, featuring Renee Cooper, the second in a two-part series on fashion leadership, we are acquainted with executives, past and present, who have set the example for what’s possible in a fast-evolving industry.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s world, leading a fashion company is a complex undertaking, involving a vast global supply chain, a highly competitive landscape and an ever evolving consumer with access to more options than ever. And the skills needed to operate such a company must also be balanced with vision, creativity, transparency and authenticity.  
It’s a tall order, agrees Renee Cooper, a professor at the Fashion Institute of Technology, who focuses on management and leadership development. “These days, I think the qualities that set a fashion leader apart from execs in other industries is a bit unique.” When asked if there are any particular fashion leaders that she believes set the right example, she quips, “I suppose I should mention John Donahue or Mark Parker of Nike, but I have to go with a leader who has built a fashion brand that is becoming more and more formidable every day. And that brand is Harlem's Fashion Row, built by owner and founder, Brandice Henderson.”
Read the full transcript at FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In today’s world, leading a fashion company is a complex undertaking, involving a vast global supply chain, a highly competitive landscape and an ever evolving consumer with access to more options than ever. And the skills needed to operate such a company must also be balanced with vision, creativity, transparency and authenticity.  </p><p>It’s a tall order, agrees Renee Cooper, a professor at the Fashion Institute of Technology, who focuses on management and leadership development. “These days, I think the qualities that set a fashion leader apart from execs in other industries is a bit unique.” When asked if there are any particular fashion leaders that she believes set the right example, she quips, “I suppose I should mention John Donahue or Mark Parker of Nike, but I have to go with a leader who has built a fashion brand that is becoming more and more formidable every day. And that brand is Harlem's Fashion Row, built by owner and founder, Brandice Henderson.”</p><p>Read the full transcript at <a href="www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>402</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[37feaf02-6a39-11eb-b8eb-e7d4c8d6788f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV4276771066.mp3?updated=1612808442" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Visionary Leadership in a Complex Industry</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/visionary-leadership-in-a-complex-industry</link>
      <description>As the fashion industry continues to corporatize and globalize, it requires executive leadership that understands the complexity of turning design into product; that understands the emotional and functional needs of the consumer and balances that with the financial objectives of the shareholder. It requires someone with creativity, vision, practical skills and flexibility. And now more than ever, it requires an understanding of an omni-channel framework driven by digital engagement and cutting-edge technology. 
And while in the past, it was typical for a merchant or buyer to move up through the ranks into management roles and then the executive offices of a fashion brand, it’s now just as likely to see MBA graduates in the C-Suite, often without any fashion experience at all. Both scenarios come with their own pluses and minuses. However, according to Renee Cooper, a professor in the School of Business at the Fashion Institute of Technology, the ability to lead is fundamental. She states, “After all, a leader influences people to follow, whereas a manager gets people to work for them, thereby executing the leader's mission.”
Renee believes that in today’s evolving fashion industry the key challenge for any business leader is building a sustainable, competitive advantage beyond products and services. “It's not just about members sitting at the board table or majority stockholders. Today, the C-suite must ensure the demands of the customers, employees, and the communities in which they operate.” And they must do with this more transparency, authenticity and empathy. For example, she says, “Fashion business leaders should recognize the benefits of diversity and inclusion and put initiatives into action. Not only talk the talk, but walk the walk.” She emphasizes: “Look at your executive team leaders. Look at your candidate pool. Look at the current committed members of the organization who have never been given the recognition, title and salary for their contributions over the years.”
Read the Full Transcript at FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Visionary Leadership in a Complex Industry</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d9d74cc2-6a38-11eb-8d3a-47a296a232d1/image/uploads_2F1612807703475-suoqilysaw-bdd079a3ac2a2a94fdd1519dacd454db_2F3_16+Visionary+Leadership+in+a+Complex+Industry.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, featuring Renee Cooper, the first in a two-part series on fashion leadership, we consider the corporatization and globalization of fashion and the qualities needed to lead these complex organizations. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As the fashion industry continues to corporatize and globalize, it requires executive leadership that understands the complexity of turning design into product; that understands the emotional and functional needs of the consumer and balances that with the financial objectives of the shareholder. It requires someone with creativity, vision, practical skills and flexibility. And now more than ever, it requires an understanding of an omni-channel framework driven by digital engagement and cutting-edge technology. 
And while in the past, it was typical for a merchant or buyer to move up through the ranks into management roles and then the executive offices of a fashion brand, it’s now just as likely to see MBA graduates in the C-Suite, often without any fashion experience at all. Both scenarios come with their own pluses and minuses. However, according to Renee Cooper, a professor in the School of Business at the Fashion Institute of Technology, the ability to lead is fundamental. She states, “After all, a leader influences people to follow, whereas a manager gets people to work for them, thereby executing the leader's mission.”
Renee believes that in today’s evolving fashion industry the key challenge for any business leader is building a sustainable, competitive advantage beyond products and services. “It's not just about members sitting at the board table or majority stockholders. Today, the C-suite must ensure the demands of the customers, employees, and the communities in which they operate.” And they must do with this more transparency, authenticity and empathy. For example, she says, “Fashion business leaders should recognize the benefits of diversity and inclusion and put initiatives into action. Not only talk the talk, but walk the walk.” She emphasizes: “Look at your executive team leaders. Look at your candidate pool. Look at the current committed members of the organization who have never been given the recognition, title and salary for their contributions over the years.”
Read the Full Transcript at FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>As the fashion industry continues to corporatize and globalize, it requires executive leadership that understands the complexity of turning design into product; that understands the emotional and functional needs of the consumer and balances that with the financial objectives of the shareholder. It requires someone with creativity, vision, practical skills and flexibility. And now more than ever, it requires an understanding of an omni-channel framework driven by digital engagement and cutting-edge technology. </p><p>And while in the past, it was typical for a merchant or buyer to move up through the ranks into management roles and then the executive offices of a fashion brand, it’s now just as likely to see MBA graduates in the C-Suite, often without any fashion experience at all. Both scenarios come with their own pluses and minuses. However, according to Renee Cooper, a professor in the School of Business at the Fashion Institute of Technology, the ability to lead is fundamental. She states, “After all, a leader influences people to follow, whereas a manager gets people to work for them, thereby executing the leader's mission.”</p><p>Renee believes that in today’s evolving fashion industry the key challenge for any business leader is building a sustainable, competitive advantage beyond products and services. “It's not just about members sitting at the board table or majority stockholders. Today, the C-suite must ensure the demands of the customers, employees, and the communities in which they operate.” And they must do with this more transparency, authenticity and empathy. For example, she says, “Fashion business leaders should recognize the benefits of diversity and inclusion and put initiatives into action. Not only talk the talk, but walk the walk.” She emphasizes: “Look at your executive team leaders. Look at your candidate pool. Look at the current committed members of the organization who have never been given the recognition, title and salary for their contributions over the years.”</p><p>Read the Full Transcript at <a href="www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>410</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d9d74cc2-6a38-11eb-8d3a-47a296a232d1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV8046391787.mp3?updated=1612808374" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>KUR Collection: Craft That Has Come Full Circle</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/kur-collection-craft-that-has-come-full-circle</link>
      <description>Joshua Williams: Hello, Sass! And welcome back. Who are we featuring this month? 
Sass Brown: We're talking about Kur Collection.
Joshua Williams: Based in New York city. Can you tell us a little bit about them? 
Sass Brown: Sure. The founder is based in New York, but the production is done out of Sri Lanka. And they're a young contemporary women's wear, mostly dress collection, dresses and separates. Really pretty. That incorporates handmade Portuguese lace or Dutch handmade lace, but from Sri Lanka. It's called Biralu lace there. And it's really beautiful. 
Joshua Williams: It's very interesting because as you said, they're producing out of Sri Lanka, but they're also using Portuguese techniques. How did this sort of interesting combination come about?
Sass Brown: Well, traditional material culture is often just like culture itself, a response to immigration, to colonialism, all of those things. So Portuguese handmade lace was adopted in Sri Lanka through Portuguese colonialism and then Dutch colonialism, both of which countries ladies of leisure, used to do handmade lace in their own time. And so that was transmitted to the local population and taken up by them. And now it's part of their culture and part of their history.
Read the full transcript at FCNewsBytes.com.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 09:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>KUR Collection: Craft That Has Come Full Circle</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d7bd11c0-6d89-11eb-bd64-afe2ebdd0611/image/uploads_2F1613172430650-10w1nqy5ml7-7bd28ae59ab238af25a3c5a52b78c746_2F3_15+NewsBytes+KUR+Collection-+Craft+That+Has+Come+Full+Circle.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, part of our monthly brand feature series, we learn about Kur Collection, a New York City based company created and led by Sri Lankan designer Kasuni Rathnasuriya.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Joshua Williams: Hello, Sass! And welcome back. Who are we featuring this month? 
Sass Brown: We're talking about Kur Collection.
Joshua Williams: Based in New York city. Can you tell us a little bit about them? 
Sass Brown: Sure. The founder is based in New York, but the production is done out of Sri Lanka. And they're a young contemporary women's wear, mostly dress collection, dresses and separates. Really pretty. That incorporates handmade Portuguese lace or Dutch handmade lace, but from Sri Lanka. It's called Biralu lace there. And it's really beautiful. 
Joshua Williams: It's very interesting because as you said, they're producing out of Sri Lanka, but they're also using Portuguese techniques. How did this sort of interesting combination come about?
Sass Brown: Well, traditional material culture is often just like culture itself, a response to immigration, to colonialism, all of those things. So Portuguese handmade lace was adopted in Sri Lanka through Portuguese colonialism and then Dutch colonialism, both of which countries ladies of leisure, used to do handmade lace in their own time. And so that was transmitted to the local population and taken up by them. And now it's part of their culture and part of their history.
Read the full transcript at FCNewsBytes.com.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Joshua Williams: </strong>Hello, Sass! And welcome back. Who are we featuring this month? </p><p><strong>Sass Brown: </strong>We're talking about Kur Collection.</p><p><strong>Joshua Williams: </strong>Based in New York city. Can you tell us a little bit about them? </p><p><strong>Sass Brown: </strong>Sure. The founder is based in New York, but the production is done out of Sri Lanka. And they're a young contemporary women's wear, mostly dress collection, dresses and separates. Really pretty. That incorporates handmade Portuguese lace or Dutch handmade lace, but from Sri Lanka. It's called Biralu lace there. And it's really beautiful. </p><p><strong>Joshua Williams: </strong>It's very interesting because as you said, they're producing out of Sri Lanka, but they're also using Portuguese techniques. How did this sort of interesting combination come about?</p><p><strong>Sass Brown: </strong>Well, traditional material culture is often just like culture itself, a response to immigration, to colonialism, all of those things. So Portuguese handmade lace was adopted in Sri Lanka through Portuguese colonialism and then Dutch colonialism, both of which countries ladies of leisure, used to do handmade lace in their own time. And so that was transmitted to the local population and taken up by them. And now it's part of their culture and part of their history.</p><p>Read the full transcript at <a href="www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a>.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>506</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d7bd11c0-6d89-11eb-bd64-afe2ebdd0611]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV9137032395.mp3?updated=1613173717" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Creating Circular Fashion Economies</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/creating-circular-fashion-economies</link>
      <description>Sustainable fashion is now front and center in customer’s minds and purchase behaviors, as well as business logistics and planning. It’s been a precipitous philosophical shift over the past 20 years, as the impact of the industry on the environment and the people it employs has become more visible to the public. Talk has turned to practice, as both a means to ensure long-term viability and meet customer demand. And yet this shift can be daunting to companies--as sustainability encompasses so many different moving parts in a complex supply chain.   
According to sustainability expert and founder of The Knew Purpose, Sydney Price recommends that companies adopt a circular economy model. This model is quite literally a supply chain that operates like a circle and is based on three core principles. 
The first principle Sydney says is designing out waste and pollution points. 
The focus here is on transitioning to more effective and efficient waste elimination processes that require fewer resource inputs such as fossil fuels, chemicals and even water. It also seeks to adopt more energy efficient resources such as renewable energy.
The second principle is keeping products and materials in use. 
The idea here is to transform the way clothes are designed, sold and used to break free from their disposable nature. Companies can start by creating more durable clothes. They can also change their business models to short-term rental subscriptions, resale and on-demand purchasing. Brands can also offer repair services.
Sydney points out that focusing on this principle can add to overall brand / consumer engagement, and augment the perceived quality of product, experience and convenience, or what creative strategist AJ Lacouette refers to as the new trinity. 
The third and final principle is regenerating natural systems.
A circular economy avoids the use of non-renewable resources and preserves or enhances renewable ones, for instance by returning valuable nutrients to the soil to support regeneration, or using renewable energy as opposed to relying on fossil fuels.
Read the full transcript: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Creating Circular Fashion Economies</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/424967e8-6635-11eb-ba81-6fa32b01495b/image/uploads_2F1612366420011-kh0tt5jtgu-ccc93fb50a64b65c242b1223337fd224_2F3_14+Creativing+Circular+Fashion+Economies.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, featuring Sydney Price, we discuss how companies can approach their supply chain in an incremental way to increase their sustainability efforts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Sustainable fashion is now front and center in customer’s minds and purchase behaviors, as well as business logistics and planning. It’s been a precipitous philosophical shift over the past 20 years, as the impact of the industry on the environment and the people it employs has become more visible to the public. Talk has turned to practice, as both a means to ensure long-term viability and meet customer demand. And yet this shift can be daunting to companies--as sustainability encompasses so many different moving parts in a complex supply chain.   
According to sustainability expert and founder of The Knew Purpose, Sydney Price recommends that companies adopt a circular economy model. This model is quite literally a supply chain that operates like a circle and is based on three core principles. 
The first principle Sydney says is designing out waste and pollution points. 
The focus here is on transitioning to more effective and efficient waste elimination processes that require fewer resource inputs such as fossil fuels, chemicals and even water. It also seeks to adopt more energy efficient resources such as renewable energy.
The second principle is keeping products and materials in use. 
The idea here is to transform the way clothes are designed, sold and used to break free from their disposable nature. Companies can start by creating more durable clothes. They can also change their business models to short-term rental subscriptions, resale and on-demand purchasing. Brands can also offer repair services.
Sydney points out that focusing on this principle can add to overall brand / consumer engagement, and augment the perceived quality of product, experience and convenience, or what creative strategist AJ Lacouette refers to as the new trinity. 
The third and final principle is regenerating natural systems.
A circular economy avoids the use of non-renewable resources and preserves or enhances renewable ones, for instance by returning valuable nutrients to the soil to support regeneration, or using renewable energy as opposed to relying on fossil fuels.
Read the full transcript: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Sustainable fashion is now front and center in customer’s minds and purchase behaviors, as well as business logistics and planning. It’s been a precipitous philosophical shift over the past 20 years, as the impact of the industry on the environment and the people it employs has become more visible to the public. Talk has turned to practice, as both a means to ensure long-term viability and meet customer demand. And yet this shift can be daunting to companies--as sustainability encompasses so many different moving parts in a complex supply chain.   </p><p>According to sustainability expert and founder of The Knew Purpose, Sydney Price recommends that companies adopt a circular economy model. This model is quite literally a supply chain that operates like a circle and is based on three core principles. </p><p>The first principle Sydney says is <strong>designing out waste and pollution points. </strong></p><p>The focus here is on transitioning to more effective and efficient waste elimination processes that require fewer resource inputs such as fossil fuels, chemicals and even water. It also seeks to adopt more energy efficient resources such as renewable energy.</p><p>The second principle is keeping <strong>products and materials in use.</strong> </p><p>The idea here is to transform the way clothes are designed, sold and used to break free from their disposable nature. Companies can start by creating more durable clothes. They can also change their business models to short-term rental subscriptions, resale and on-demand purchasing. Brands can also offer repair services.</p><p>Sydney points out that focusing on this principle can add to overall brand / consumer engagement, and augment the perceived quality of product, experience and convenience, or what creative strategist AJ Lacouette refers to as the new trinity. </p><p>The third and final principle is <strong>regenerating natural systems.</strong></p><p>A circular economy avoids the use of non-renewable resources and preserves or enhances renewable ones, for instance by returning valuable nutrients to the soil to support <strong>regeneration</strong>, or using renewable energy as opposed to relying on fossil fuels.</p><p>Read the full transcript: <a href="www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>532</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[424967e8-6635-11eb-ba81-6fa32b01495b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV3204399670.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Collaborations Create Community</title>
      <description>Since early 2020, customers have been forced to rethink how they engage and buy from brands. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, not only has shopping shifted to online, but customers needs and wants have changed. 
This shift has meant that fashion brands have also had to rethink how they engage and sell to consumers. Dealing with a global pandemic, put fashion consumption in stark reality to more important issues. What’s more, customers were now working from home and were focused less on new trends and more on comfort. But they also desired relief from the constant stream of pandemic news and the monotony of being cooped up at home. This made the marketplace ripe for fashion brands to try new ways to engage their customers--outside of their normal, “tried and true” marketing strategies. And for many, this meant seeking partnerships and collaborations with other brands to create new narratives, and an element of surprise. 
Caryn Pang, an adjunct professor at Parsons School of Design, and retail technology consultant, also believes that collaboration provided an opportunity for brands to energize their employees, especially when racial issues added another layer to pandemic anxiety. She explains:
“At the core of collaboration is teamwork, which is an important part of the inclusivity and accessibility conversation that began in earnest in the spring of 2020.” And she adds that a sense of inclusivity and accessibility that can be engendered through teamwork can also lead to a much-needed sense of community. “In turn, community creates a sense of belonging and optimism. This real need for belonging, coupled with a sense of shared hope, can be attributed to the pandemic and being home for so long, disconnected from others. It’s human nature for people to want to come together and collaborate--to create a future together.”
Read the full transcript: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Collaborations Create Community</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/9da985cc-5ab0-11eb-93a0-8b8d9710ad7f/image/uploads_2F1611099985397-ebne534ojn-3e4ece7918aa70b6dbb3519ef8a690be_2F3_13+NewsBytes+Collaborations+Create+Community+LG.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, with Caryn Pang, we examine how unique collaborations have infused hope and energy into a marketplace dominated by pandemic fears, and in turn have helped to build more meaningful brand communities. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Since early 2020, customers have been forced to rethink how they engage and buy from brands. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, not only has shopping shifted to online, but customers needs and wants have changed. 
This shift has meant that fashion brands have also had to rethink how they engage and sell to consumers. Dealing with a global pandemic, put fashion consumption in stark reality to more important issues. What’s more, customers were now working from home and were focused less on new trends and more on comfort. But they also desired relief from the constant stream of pandemic news and the monotony of being cooped up at home. This made the marketplace ripe for fashion brands to try new ways to engage their customers--outside of their normal, “tried and true” marketing strategies. And for many, this meant seeking partnerships and collaborations with other brands to create new narratives, and an element of surprise. 
Caryn Pang, an adjunct professor at Parsons School of Design, and retail technology consultant, also believes that collaboration provided an opportunity for brands to energize their employees, especially when racial issues added another layer to pandemic anxiety. She explains:
“At the core of collaboration is teamwork, which is an important part of the inclusivity and accessibility conversation that began in earnest in the spring of 2020.” And she adds that a sense of inclusivity and accessibility that can be engendered through teamwork can also lead to a much-needed sense of community. “In turn, community creates a sense of belonging and optimism. This real need for belonging, coupled with a sense of shared hope, can be attributed to the pandemic and being home for so long, disconnected from others. It’s human nature for people to want to come together and collaborate--to create a future together.”
Read the full transcript: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Since early 2020, customers have been forced to rethink how they engage and buy from brands. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, not only has shopping shifted to online, but customers needs and wants have changed. </p><p>This shift has meant that fashion brands have also had to rethink how they engage and sell to consumers. Dealing with a global pandemic, put fashion consumption in stark reality to more important issues. What’s more, customers were now working from home and were focused less on new trends and more on comfort. But they also desired relief from the constant stream of pandemic news and the monotony of being cooped up at home. This made the marketplace ripe for fashion brands to try new ways to engage their customers--outside of their normal, “tried and true” marketing strategies. And for many, this meant seeking partnerships and collaborations with other brands to create new narratives, and an element of surprise. </p><p>Caryn Pang, an adjunct professor at Parsons School of Design, and retail technology consultant, also believes that collaboration provided an opportunity for brands to energize their employees, especially when racial issues added another layer to pandemic anxiety. She explains:</p><p>“At the core of collaboration is teamwork, which is an important part of the inclusivity and accessibility conversation that began in earnest in the spring of 2020.” And she adds that a sense of inclusivity and accessibility that can be engendered through teamwork can also lead to a much-needed sense of community. “In turn, community creates a sense of belonging and optimism. This real need for belonging, coupled with a sense of shared hope, can be attributed to the pandemic and being home for so long, disconnected from others. It’s human nature for people to want to come together and collaborate--to create a future together.”</p><p>Read the full transcript: <a href="www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>437</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9da985cc-5ab0-11eb-93a0-8b8d9710ad7f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV5773771172.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Social Justice Strategies for Fashion Brands</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/social-justice-strategies-for-fashion-brands</link>
      <description>If the events at the U.S. Capitol early this year are any indication of what’s to come, 2021 is surely going to be a year about deep reflection and change.
Over the past year, it’s become clearer that shared ideals that create unity in society are delicate, that racial, ethnic and gender disparities are front and center in the US, China and Europe. And fashion brands are being required more and more to take a public stand in addressing issues of social justice.
Sabrina Lynch, Senior Vice President of Culture and Marketing Communications at Taylor Strategy, and a TEDx speaker, offers companies three clear strategies to mitigate and correct issues of social justice internally. First, she says:
“To understand social issues, you really need to appreciate the tapestry of culture and complex of issues facing so many communities. And you'll never be in a position to do so when you've consciously, or unconsciously sometimes, recruited a talent who only offer one singular perspective.”
Read the full transcript: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Social Justice Strategies for Fashion Brands</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, featuring Sabrina Lynch, we explore how companies can actively approach issues of social justice for the benefit of employees and customers.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>If the events at the U.S. Capitol early this year are any indication of what’s to come, 2021 is surely going to be a year about deep reflection and change.
Over the past year, it’s become clearer that shared ideals that create unity in society are delicate, that racial, ethnic and gender disparities are front and center in the US, China and Europe. And fashion brands are being required more and more to take a public stand in addressing issues of social justice.
Sabrina Lynch, Senior Vice President of Culture and Marketing Communications at Taylor Strategy, and a TEDx speaker, offers companies three clear strategies to mitigate and correct issues of social justice internally. First, she says:
“To understand social issues, you really need to appreciate the tapestry of culture and complex of issues facing so many communities. And you'll never be in a position to do so when you've consciously, or unconsciously sometimes, recruited a talent who only offer one singular perspective.”
Read the full transcript: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>If the events at the U.S. Capitol early this year are any indication of what’s to come, 2021 is surely going to be a year about deep reflection and change.</p><p>Over the past year, it’s become clearer that shared ideals that create unity in society are delicate, that racial, ethnic and gender disparities are front and center in the US, China and Europe. And fashion brands are being required more and more to take a public stand in addressing issues of social justice.</p><p>Sabrina Lynch, Senior Vice President of Culture and Marketing Communications at Taylor Strategy, and a TEDx speaker, offers companies three clear strategies to mitigate and correct issues of social justice internally. First, she says:</p><p>“To understand social issues, you really need to appreciate the tapestry of culture and complex of issues facing so many communities. And you'll never be in a position to do so when you've consciously, or unconsciously sometimes, recruited a talent who only offer one singular perspective.”</p><p>Read the full transcript: <a href="www.FCnewsbytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>472</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[197d55a8-5a9c-11eb-99b4-ff79431d83f0]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV5695709415.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Swati Kalsi: High Art Fashion</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/swati-kalsi-high-art-fashion</link>
      <description>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Swati Kalsi: High Art Fashion</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/68d507c6-59a3-11eb-96ff-0f17f39e038d/image/uploads_2F1610984382036-b3afytk6mk-5de217044f05143a0b7330883819bf07_2F3_11+NewsBytes+Swati+Kalsi+High+Art+Fashion+LG.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, part of our monthly brand feature series, we learn about Swati Kalsi, an artist and designer that creates luxury fashion and museum art pieces, in collaboration with Sujani master embroiders.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><br></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>576</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[68d507c6-59a3-11eb-96ff-0f17f39e038d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV3579458154.mp3?updated=1610993285" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fashion Design Goes Virtual</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/fashion-design-goes-virtual/</link>
      <description>Almost overnight, fashion design companies and fashion design students were forced to move to a mostly remote work environment and away from the studio and tools of their trade. For many designers, this meant shifting their practice into a more virtual space, using emergent technologies such as Clo3D.
It’s an expensive process and takes expertise that is largely non-existent in the current workforce. However, for companies and schools that were already implementing 3D design into their workflow, the switch came more easily according to Soojin Kang, a fashion designer and faculty member at Parsons School of Design. 
[Soojin] I had the privilege to teach the first Clo3d trial class at Parsons, and so when the pandemic hit we did not have any significant difficulties switching from offline to online. 
She describes the remote teaching and learning process:
[Soojin] I was able to do live demonstrations via Clo3d software by sharing my screen on Zoom. I could then remote control a student’s screen and give them technical support right away. Even remotely, my students were still able to make 3D garments in the digital space, expressing their designs and outcomes beautifully; and with very few problems. 
When Parsons decided to go fully online for the fall, Clo3D was adopted into all third level courses, with the support and enthusiasm of students, who recognized this skill as an important one in their toolkit. 
[Soojin] I am very excited for our current Parsons students who will obtain 3D design knowledge and experiences before they graduate. 
Soojin notes that the industry has reached a tipping point. The need for 3D design experience and skills will not just be helpful on a resume, it will become a mandatory skillset, especially as businesses understand its benefits.
See the full transcript:
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fashion Design Goes Virtual</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d012de54-5048-11eb-ac67-f3dace4142b3/image/uploads_2F1609955902331-bdodw94a11j-55a5ff4f0f26c4a0686c8ac0fe4ddfe8_2F3_10+NewsBytes+Fashion+Design+Goes+Virtual+SM.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, featuring Soojin Kang, we discuss the acceleration towards virtual 3D design in the fashion industry, driven by the pandemic, but providing long term benefits. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Almost overnight, fashion design companies and fashion design students were forced to move to a mostly remote work environment and away from the studio and tools of their trade. For many designers, this meant shifting their practice into a more virtual space, using emergent technologies such as Clo3D.
It’s an expensive process and takes expertise that is largely non-existent in the current workforce. However, for companies and schools that were already implementing 3D design into their workflow, the switch came more easily according to Soojin Kang, a fashion designer and faculty member at Parsons School of Design. 
[Soojin] I had the privilege to teach the first Clo3d trial class at Parsons, and so when the pandemic hit we did not have any significant difficulties switching from offline to online. 
She describes the remote teaching and learning process:
[Soojin] I was able to do live demonstrations via Clo3d software by sharing my screen on Zoom. I could then remote control a student’s screen and give them technical support right away. Even remotely, my students were still able to make 3D garments in the digital space, expressing their designs and outcomes beautifully; and with very few problems. 
When Parsons decided to go fully online for the fall, Clo3D was adopted into all third level courses, with the support and enthusiasm of students, who recognized this skill as an important one in their toolkit. 
[Soojin] I am very excited for our current Parsons students who will obtain 3D design knowledge and experiences before they graduate. 
Soojin notes that the industry has reached a tipping point. The need for 3D design experience and skills will not just be helpful on a resume, it will become a mandatory skillset, especially as businesses understand its benefits.
See the full transcript:
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Almost overnight, fashion design companies and fashion design students were forced to move to a mostly remote work environment and away from the studio and tools of their trade. For many designers, this meant shifting their practice into a more virtual space, using emergent technologies such as Clo3D.</p><p>It’s an expensive process and takes expertise that is largely non-existent in the current workforce. However, for companies and schools that were already implementing 3D design into their workflow, the switch came more easily according to Soojin Kang, a fashion designer and faculty member at Parsons School of Design. </p><p>[Soojin] I had the privilege to teach the first Clo3d trial class at Parsons, and so when the pandemic hit we did not have any significant difficulties switching from offline to online. </p><p>She describes the remote teaching and learning process:</p><p>[Soojin] I was able to do live demonstrations via Clo3d software by sharing my screen on Zoom. I could then remote control a student’s screen and give them technical support right away. Even remotely, my students were still able to make 3D garments in the digital space, expressing their designs and outcomes beautifully; and with very few problems. </p><p>When Parsons decided to go fully online for the fall, Clo3D was adopted into all third level courses, with the support and enthusiasm of students, who recognized this skill as an important one in their toolkit. </p><p>[Soojin] I am very excited for our current Parsons students who will obtain 3D design knowledge and experiences before they graduate. </p><p>Soojin notes that the industry has reached a tipping point. The need for 3D design experience and skills will not just be helpful on a resume, it will become a mandatory skillset, especially as businesses understand its benefits.</p><p>See the full transcript:</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>439</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d012de54-5048-11eb-ac67-f3dace4142b3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV7163009664.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Retailers Hold Their Breath as Q4 Sales Emerge</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/retailers-hold-their-breath-as-q4-sales-emerge</link>
      <description>2020 has been a year like no other. Fashion retailers were hit especially hard early on by the Covid-19 pandemic. Since then, they have been racing, fighting even, to adapt, evolve and innovate fast enough to save their businesses. Changes that were once part of a long-term strategic plan had to be implemented immediately, often remotely and with less staff. In some cases, this acceleration of change helped to stave overall losses. For some, it even provided an opportunity for brand growth and scaling. But for many it was an acceleration towards insolvency and bankruptcy.
For those who made it pass these initial hurdles, the focus turned to the fourth quarter, the most important season for fashion retailers in terms of overall sales. For most retailers, this meant putting more emphasis on e-commerce, restructuring promotional timelines and realigning direct-to-consumer distribution strategies. For others, this included more drastic measures, such as reconfiguring physical stores to be pick-up only locations, or even “dark stores” or warehouses. 
Now, as we near the end of the fourth quarter, retail executives are hoping to see that their efforts have paid off and will provide a foundation with which to rebuild their businesses in the short term, post-pandemic.
Full transcript available at FCNewsBytes.com.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2020 13:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Retailers Hold Their Breath as Q4 Sales Emerge</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/507471da-40c1-11eb-a2e7-6f3ef4c5077c/image/uploads_2F1608248440284-3ifyj9qh2wv-5b4cb7cd940caa8d91e6599d57b1a88a_2F3_9+NewsBytes+Retailers+Hold+Their+Breath+as+Q4+Sales+Emerge+LG.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, featuring Massimo Volpe, we discuss the importance of strong sales numbers needed to overcome a turbulent year, and the innovations that will likely carry over into 2021 as retailers rebuild. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>2020 has been a year like no other. Fashion retailers were hit especially hard early on by the Covid-19 pandemic. Since then, they have been racing, fighting even, to adapt, evolve and innovate fast enough to save their businesses. Changes that were once part of a long-term strategic plan had to be implemented immediately, often remotely and with less staff. In some cases, this acceleration of change helped to stave overall losses. For some, it even provided an opportunity for brand growth and scaling. But for many it was an acceleration towards insolvency and bankruptcy.
For those who made it pass these initial hurdles, the focus turned to the fourth quarter, the most important season for fashion retailers in terms of overall sales. For most retailers, this meant putting more emphasis on e-commerce, restructuring promotional timelines and realigning direct-to-consumer distribution strategies. For others, this included more drastic measures, such as reconfiguring physical stores to be pick-up only locations, or even “dark stores” or warehouses. 
Now, as we near the end of the fourth quarter, retail executives are hoping to see that their efforts have paid off and will provide a foundation with which to rebuild their businesses in the short term, post-pandemic.
Full transcript available at FCNewsBytes.com.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>2020 has been a year like no other. Fashion retailers were hit especially hard early on by the Covid-19 pandemic. Since then, they have been racing, fighting even, to adapt, evolve and innovate fast enough to save their businesses. Changes that were once part of a long-term strategic plan had to be implemented immediately, often remotely and with less staff. In some cases, this acceleration of change helped to stave overall losses. For some, it even provided an opportunity for brand growth and scaling. But for many it was an acceleration towards insolvency and bankruptcy.</p><p>For those who made it pass these initial hurdles, the focus turned to the fourth quarter, the most important season for fashion retailers in terms of overall sales. For most retailers, this meant putting more emphasis on e-commerce, restructuring promotional timelines and realigning direct-to-consumer distribution strategies. For others, this included more drastic measures, such as reconfiguring physical stores to be pick-up <em>only</em> locations, or even “dark stores” or warehouses. </p><p>Now, as we near the end of the fourth quarter, retail executives are hoping to see that their efforts have paid off and will provide a foundation with which to rebuild their businesses in the short term, post-pandemic.</p><p>Full transcript available at <a href="www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a>.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>552</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[507471da-40c1-11eb-a2e7-6f3ef4c5077c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV2640669567.mp3?updated=1608251989" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Carla Fernandez, Ethically Engaging Indigenous Peoples</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/feature-carla-fernandez-ethically-engaging-indigenous-peoples</link>
      <description>Each month Sass Brown, an expert in ethical fashion, sustainability and craftsmanship, shares a fashion brand that approaches business differently and innovatively or operates outside of the main fashion systems and capitals. Sass is the former Dean of Art and Design at the Fashion Institute of Technology and the founding Dean at Dubai Institute of Design and Innovation.
Carla Fernandez is a Mexico City-based designer and brand, well known for supporting and promoting indigenous traditional craft from across Mexico and famous for saying that the haute couture of Mexico is located in the indigenous villages.” 
According to Sass, “one of the beauties of Mexico, and one of the things that Carla feels so strongly about, is the fact that there is such a diversity of material traditions across Mexico, across crafts, across communities that are all unique and special.” And she explains that Carla sees it as an honor to be able to work with, and in partnership with, those communities and those people. “She has a long history of working with indigenous communities by going and spending significant time with them, listening and learning from them about what their traditions are, what the meanings and the codes embedded in those traditions and processes are, and what their actual needs are.”
As an extension to her work with indigenous craftspeople, Carla designs a fashion collection, which she sells in her stores and online. Managing the supply side as well as customer demand for fashion products can be difficult, so she has divided her business into two entities: for-profit and not-for-profit. Sass explains that this is not unusual for a socially motivated brand to do, especially when they realize the limitations of a for-profit only business. She adds, “To a degree, the for-profit arm of the business offsets the costs of the not-for-profit work which focuses on engaging with artisans to develop their traditions and crafts into marketable products.” 
For the full transcript, visit FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 13:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Carla Fernandez, Ethically Engaging Indigenous Peoples</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c0864ff6-3ef6-11eb-a2ab-2f761ff4daa2/image/uploads_2F1608051885787-y8cjp6ftlp-9179f2a631e9bf2e23896fa0e26bdd59_2F3_8+NewsBytes+Feature-+Carla+Fernandez_2C+Ethically+Engaging+Indigenous+Peoples+LG.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, part of our monthly brand feature series, we learn about Carla Fernandez, a fashion designer based in Mexico City that ethically engages indigenous populations to create avant-garde masterpieces.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Each month Sass Brown, an expert in ethical fashion, sustainability and craftsmanship, shares a fashion brand that approaches business differently and innovatively or operates outside of the main fashion systems and capitals. Sass is the former Dean of Art and Design at the Fashion Institute of Technology and the founding Dean at Dubai Institute of Design and Innovation.
Carla Fernandez is a Mexico City-based designer and brand, well known for supporting and promoting indigenous traditional craft from across Mexico and famous for saying that the haute couture of Mexico is located in the indigenous villages.” 
According to Sass, “one of the beauties of Mexico, and one of the things that Carla feels so strongly about, is the fact that there is such a diversity of material traditions across Mexico, across crafts, across communities that are all unique and special.” And she explains that Carla sees it as an honor to be able to work with, and in partnership with, those communities and those people. “She has a long history of working with indigenous communities by going and spending significant time with them, listening and learning from them about what their traditions are, what the meanings and the codes embedded in those traditions and processes are, and what their actual needs are.”
As an extension to her work with indigenous craftspeople, Carla designs a fashion collection, which she sells in her stores and online. Managing the supply side as well as customer demand for fashion products can be difficult, so she has divided her business into two entities: for-profit and not-for-profit. Sass explains that this is not unusual for a socially motivated brand to do, especially when they realize the limitations of a for-profit only business. She adds, “To a degree, the for-profit arm of the business offsets the costs of the not-for-profit work which focuses on engaging with artisans to develop their traditions and crafts into marketable products.” 
For the full transcript, visit FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Each month Sass Brown, an expert in ethical fashion, sustainability and craftsmanship, shares a fashion brand that approaches business differently and innovatively or operates outside of the main fashion systems and capitals. Sass is the former Dean of Art and Design at the Fashion Institute of Technology and the founding Dean at Dubai Institute of Design and Innovation.</em></p><p>Carla Fernandez is a Mexico City-based designer and brand, well known for supporting and promoting indigenous traditional craft from across Mexico and famous for saying that the haute couture of Mexico is located in the indigenous villages.” </p><p>According to Sass, “one of the beauties of Mexico, and one of the things that Carla feels so strongly about, is the fact that there is such a diversity of material traditions across Mexico, across crafts, across communities that are all unique and special.” And she explains that Carla sees it as an honor to be able to work with, and in partnership with, those communities and those people. “She has a long history of working with indigenous communities by going and spending significant time with them, listening and learning from them about what their traditions are, what the meanings and the codes embedded in those traditions and processes are, and what their actual needs are.”</p><p>As an extension to her work with indigenous craftspeople, Carla designs a fashion collection, which she sells in her stores and online. Managing the supply side as well as customer demand for fashion products can be difficult, so she has divided her business into two entities: for-profit and not-for-profit. Sass explains that this is not unusual for a socially motivated brand to do, especially when they realize the limitations of a for-profit only business. She adds, “To a degree, the for-profit arm of the business offsets the costs of the not-for-profit work which focuses on engaging with artisans to develop their traditions and crafts into marketable products.” </p><p>For the full transcript, visit <a href="www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>563</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c0864ff6-3ef6-11eb-a2ab-2f761ff4daa2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV2691363402.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Luxury Challenged by Generational Demands</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/luxury-challenged-by-generational-demands-luca-marchetti</link>
      <description>Generation Z is having a profound effect on how fashion brands engage with their customers. They prefer shopping brands that share common values. And they are demanding more transparency from brands regarding material sourcing, pricing, environmental impact and labor practices, in order to make purchase decisions. 
More and more, Gen Z customers also prefer brands that take a stand on social justice and political issues; topics which brands have typically avoided. After all, one misstep may lead to being cancelled--leading to unwanted press, boycotts and impacting sales.      
However, because of its higher price point and its focus on a more mature customer demographic, luxury fashion has not had to deal with this issue as directly as more accessible brands. Sure, there have been plenty of mishaps that have led to negative press, such as the recent Dior, Gucci and Marni fiascos, but these largely blew over.
What’s more, luxury brands have always been in the business of creating an escape from the real world, creating products that are more about desire than need. Brands such as Chanel and Hermes have been carefully crafting their images for decades, carefully cultivating an aura of mystery and authenticity--myth-making at its best--and certainly the opposite of transparency and true authenticity. 
Here’s Luca Marchetti, cultural analyst, semiotician and co-founder of The Prospectivists in Paris: 
[Luca] On a general level, yes, these concepts are in some ways contradictory with the traditional vision of luxury, in Europe at least. Even if, historically, this field was built on the highest quality and excellence, and its desirability is culturally rooted in opacity and the aura projected around products. Transparency was not an option.
[Luca] Real change will come, when it will be an obligation. It will just be harsher and even more expensive.
Full transcript available at FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 13:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Luxury Challenged by Generational Demands</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/85b7da12-38c9-11eb-8452-3397ca46f2b4/image/uploads_2F1607372308291-8tssubrb5vt-37dc6fe1809736846d5a0078799d8969_2F3_7+NewsBytes+Luxury+Challenged+by+Generational+Demands+LG.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, featuring Luca Marchetti, we explore how Generation Z is forcing brands overall to be more transparent and value driven, and what this means for luxury brands that thrive on escapism and mystery.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Generation Z is having a profound effect on how fashion brands engage with their customers. They prefer shopping brands that share common values. And they are demanding more transparency from brands regarding material sourcing, pricing, environmental impact and labor practices, in order to make purchase decisions. 
More and more, Gen Z customers also prefer brands that take a stand on social justice and political issues; topics which brands have typically avoided. After all, one misstep may lead to being cancelled--leading to unwanted press, boycotts and impacting sales.      
However, because of its higher price point and its focus on a more mature customer demographic, luxury fashion has not had to deal with this issue as directly as more accessible brands. Sure, there have been plenty of mishaps that have led to negative press, such as the recent Dior, Gucci and Marni fiascos, but these largely blew over.
What’s more, luxury brands have always been in the business of creating an escape from the real world, creating products that are more about desire than need. Brands such as Chanel and Hermes have been carefully crafting their images for decades, carefully cultivating an aura of mystery and authenticity--myth-making at its best--and certainly the opposite of transparency and true authenticity. 
Here’s Luca Marchetti, cultural analyst, semiotician and co-founder of The Prospectivists in Paris: 
[Luca] On a general level, yes, these concepts are in some ways contradictory with the traditional vision of luxury, in Europe at least. Even if, historically, this field was built on the highest quality and excellence, and its desirability is culturally rooted in opacity and the aura projected around products. Transparency was not an option.
[Luca] Real change will come, when it will be an obligation. It will just be harsher and even more expensive.
Full transcript available at FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Generation Z is having a profound effect on how fashion brands engage with their customers. They prefer shopping brands that share common values. And they are demanding more transparency from brands regarding material sourcing, pricing, environmental impact and labor practices, in order to make purchase decisions. </p><p>More and more, Gen Z customers also prefer brands that take a stand on social justice and political issues; topics which brands have typically avoided. After all, one misstep may lead to being cancelled--leading to unwanted press, boycotts and impacting sales.      </p><p>However, because of its higher price point and its focus on a more mature customer demographic,<strong> luxury fashion</strong> has not had to deal with this issue as directly as more accessible brands. Sure, there have been plenty of mishaps that have led to negative press, such as the recent Dior, Gucci and Marni fiascos, but these largely blew over.</p><p>What’s more, luxury brands have always been in the business of creating an escape from the real world, creating products that are more about desire than need. Brands such as Chanel and Hermes have been carefully crafting their images for decades, carefully cultivating an aura of mystery and authenticity--myth-making at its best--and certainly the opposite of transparency and true authenticity. </p><p>Here’s Luca Marchetti, cultural analyst, semiotician and co-founder of The Prospectivists in Paris: </p><p>[Luca] On a general level, yes, these concepts are in some ways contradictory with the traditional vision of luxury, in Europe at least. Even if, historically, this field was built on the highest quality and excellence, and its desirability is culturally rooted in opacity and the aura projected around products. Transparency was not an option.</p><p>[Luca] Real change will come, when it will be an obligation. It will just be harsher and even more expensive.</p><p>Full transcript available at <a href="www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>481</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[85b7da12-38c9-11eb-8452-3397ca46f2b4]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV7156858020.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The ABCs of Fashion Marketing During a Pandemic</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/abcs-of-fashion-marketing-during-a-pandemic</link>
      <description>When the Covid-19 pandemic hit this spring, many fashion companies had to put their advertising campaigns on hold. It was no longer possible to gather creative teams—directors, photographers, models and crew--together in person, in studio or on site. And so, companies had to get creative quickly. 
Some brands chose to send new styles from their collection to models and influencers, asking them to be creative and to use what they had at their disposal, hoping for the best. For many brands, this was the first time they had ceded creative control to the model or influencer. 
In the end, some of these campaigns, although home-spun, went viral and were very successful. Others didn’t quite hit the mark. Which begs the question, have brands hit on an all-together new marketing strategy? And is this model worth including in future marketing strategies? 
[Laura] No. As a matter of fact, I think this strategy will be short lived and produce results only in terms of metrics, data and social media engagement.
That’s Laura Lanteri, creative director and consultant at LLNYC Worldwide, a Global Advertising and Marketing firm based in New York City. She continues:
[Laura] In my opinion, a campaign is really successful when it becomes part of the day-to-day conversation, when it becomes part of our cultural landscape. Influencer marketing doesn’t have the power to do that. It all depends on what we decide to focus on: cultural relevance or Instagram likes.
And yet, with the growth of social media such as Instagram, and the ability and access for just about anyone to create content, a real shift in consumer demand has occurred over the past decade. A shift that places more value on realistic imagery and narrative as opposed to perfection, or at least the illusion of perfection, that the fashion industry has peddled over the past century. It’s an illusion that is very one-sided, stresses Laura.
Full transcript available at FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The ABCs of Fashion Marketing During a Pandemic</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/47322182-33e5-11eb-91e2-b3c3b4502395/image/uploads_2F1606834397241-tca1uo7qqy-127cc652e5c057513f745adc235fbcff_2F3_6+NewsBytes+The+ABCs+of+Fashion+Marketing+During+a+Pandemic+LG.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we explore how creative directors are developing campaigns remotely, and how they must balance between customer realities and brand integrity. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>When the Covid-19 pandemic hit this spring, many fashion companies had to put their advertising campaigns on hold. It was no longer possible to gather creative teams—directors, photographers, models and crew--together in person, in studio or on site. And so, companies had to get creative quickly. 
Some brands chose to send new styles from their collection to models and influencers, asking them to be creative and to use what they had at their disposal, hoping for the best. For many brands, this was the first time they had ceded creative control to the model or influencer. 
In the end, some of these campaigns, although home-spun, went viral and were very successful. Others didn’t quite hit the mark. Which begs the question, have brands hit on an all-together new marketing strategy? And is this model worth including in future marketing strategies? 
[Laura] No. As a matter of fact, I think this strategy will be short lived and produce results only in terms of metrics, data and social media engagement.
That’s Laura Lanteri, creative director and consultant at LLNYC Worldwide, a Global Advertising and Marketing firm based in New York City. She continues:
[Laura] In my opinion, a campaign is really successful when it becomes part of the day-to-day conversation, when it becomes part of our cultural landscape. Influencer marketing doesn’t have the power to do that. It all depends on what we decide to focus on: cultural relevance or Instagram likes.
And yet, with the growth of social media such as Instagram, and the ability and access for just about anyone to create content, a real shift in consumer demand has occurred over the past decade. A shift that places more value on realistic imagery and narrative as opposed to perfection, or at least the illusion of perfection, that the fashion industry has peddled over the past century. It’s an illusion that is very one-sided, stresses Laura.
Full transcript available at FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>When the Covid-19 pandemic hit this spring, many fashion companies had to put their advertising campaigns on hold. It was no longer possible to gather creative teams—directors, photographers, models and crew--together in person, in studio or on site. And so, companies had to get creative quickly. </p><p>Some brands chose to send new styles from their collection to models and influencers, asking them to be creative and to use what they had at their disposal, hoping for the best. For many brands, this was the first time they had ceded creative control to the model or influencer. </p><p>In the end, some of these campaigns, although home-spun, went viral and were very successful. Others didn’t quite hit the mark. Which begs the question, have brands hit on an all-together new marketing strategy? And is this model worth including in future marketing strategies? </p><p>[Laura] No. As a matter of fact, I think this strategy will be short lived and produce results only in terms of metrics, data and social media engagement.</p><p>That’s Laura Lanteri, creative director and consultant at LLNYC Worldwide, a Global Advertising and Marketing firm based in New York City. She continues:</p><p>[Laura] In my opinion, a campaign is really successful when it becomes part of the day-to-day conversation, when it becomes part of our cultural landscape. Influencer marketing doesn’t have the power to do that. It all depends on what we decide to focus on: cultural relevance or Instagram likes.</p><p>And yet, with the growth of social media such as Instagram, and the ability and access for just about anyone to create content, a real shift in consumer demand has occurred over the past decade. A shift that places more value on realistic imagery and narrative as opposed to perfection, or at least the illusion of perfection, that the fashion industry has peddled over the past century. It’s an illusion that is very one-sided, stresses Laura.</p><p>Full transcript available at <a href="www.FCNewsBytes.com">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>464</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[47322182-33e5-11eb-91e2-b3c3b4502395]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV8667552915.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Creating a Covid-Proof Design Portfolio</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/creating-a-covid-proof-design-portfolio</link>
      <description>Over the past year, fashion design schools have been forced to rethink how they educate students and prepare them for jobs. It’s a monumental task, when so much about Covid-19 is still unknown, making planning for future academic years difficult at best. What’s more, with a shift to online learning and a focus on systemic racism within fashion curriculum, educators are having to shift the very models of education that have been in place for decades, especially when it comes to studio-based and Western-centric learning. 
And while institutions grapple with these changes, potential fashion design students wonder how or if these issues may change the application process. Here’s Susanna Moyer, a part time professor in the BFA Fashion Design program at Parsons School of Design and an educational consultant in New York City.
[Susanna] Some schools and universities will be looking for students that are able to connect with global issues, with inclusivity being one of them. Students who bring innovation and critical thinking to these issues through the creative process will be the most attractive candidates for these institutions.
And more specifically, fashion schools are increasingly looking for students who show an aptitude and knowledge of emerging technologies. 
[Susanna] Technology, as well, is becoming more and more important for the student to understand. It is being used in the school environment and the professional arena.So, it's really important for students to understand 3D technology, including Clo3D. 
While it’s not expected that an incoming student learn a complex software platform like Clo3D, having an awareness of how it works, or how it changes the design process is very helpful. This is especially true when so much of learning is online right now. 
At the same time, Susanna points out that the core of what makes a successful portfolio hasn’t really changed. It’s still important for students to present “a clear, focused direction, and diversity in presentation.” 
[Susanna] All elements, including moodboard designs and technical flats need to be well thought out and executed so the storytelling of the collection is understandable to the viewer. Along with the portfolio, the student needs to create a design journal to process concepts and research for the portfolio. Some of this content can be used in the portfolio submission. The last thing is to remember, in most cases, the student cannot be there to present their work. They need to ask themselves if the presentation is clear for the viewer. 
And Susanna points out that students who understand their potential role as a designer within the bigger picture can also help them to stand out, as long as it is authentic. 
[Susanna] It is very, very important that the students ‘do’ themselves. As Oscar Wilde said, ‘be yourself, everyone else has taken.’ Be original and believe in something. And also look at what you need to learn before you get into school.
Part of the equation for any incoming student is whether fashion design school is right for them, or if there is even any future in fashion. After all, the world is changing precipitously, and the effect on fashion is obvious. 
[Susanna] The new opportunities for students include the broadening markets and the specializations that are emerging with the changing social rules that are being broken every day. Genderless clothing is one example along with sustainable and ethical practices that are becoming stronger trends with the consumer.
With any change comes opportunity. And an education is meant to prepare students to be ready for new opportunities--to be ready to ideate, innovate and implement. Susanna sums it up, “Choose a school or program that aligns with your values and goals, and gives you a safe space to learn through process and even failure.”
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 17:24:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Creating a Covid-Proof Design Portfolio</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e7bc60ba-2f42-11eb-a3ce-234e5f8a17db/image/uploads_2F1606324974113-f93833c171b-598d192e911dc51fb77a715d4fd7c5d0_2F3_5+NewBytes+Creating+a+Covid-Proof+Design+Portfolio+v2.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we examine the ways in which fashion design schools may shift their application processes and how incoming students can create a standout portfolio. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Over the past year, fashion design schools have been forced to rethink how they educate students and prepare them for jobs. It’s a monumental task, when so much about Covid-19 is still unknown, making planning for future academic years difficult at best. What’s more, with a shift to online learning and a focus on systemic racism within fashion curriculum, educators are having to shift the very models of education that have been in place for decades, especially when it comes to studio-based and Western-centric learning. 
And while institutions grapple with these changes, potential fashion design students wonder how or if these issues may change the application process. Here’s Susanna Moyer, a part time professor in the BFA Fashion Design program at Parsons School of Design and an educational consultant in New York City.
[Susanna] Some schools and universities will be looking for students that are able to connect with global issues, with inclusivity being one of them. Students who bring innovation and critical thinking to these issues through the creative process will be the most attractive candidates for these institutions.
And more specifically, fashion schools are increasingly looking for students who show an aptitude and knowledge of emerging technologies. 
[Susanna] Technology, as well, is becoming more and more important for the student to understand. It is being used in the school environment and the professional arena.So, it's really important for students to understand 3D technology, including Clo3D. 
While it’s not expected that an incoming student learn a complex software platform like Clo3D, having an awareness of how it works, or how it changes the design process is very helpful. This is especially true when so much of learning is online right now. 
At the same time, Susanna points out that the core of what makes a successful portfolio hasn’t really changed. It’s still important for students to present “a clear, focused direction, and diversity in presentation.” 
[Susanna] All elements, including moodboard designs and technical flats need to be well thought out and executed so the storytelling of the collection is understandable to the viewer. Along with the portfolio, the student needs to create a design journal to process concepts and research for the portfolio. Some of this content can be used in the portfolio submission. The last thing is to remember, in most cases, the student cannot be there to present their work. They need to ask themselves if the presentation is clear for the viewer. 
And Susanna points out that students who understand their potential role as a designer within the bigger picture can also help them to stand out, as long as it is authentic. 
[Susanna] It is very, very important that the students ‘do’ themselves. As Oscar Wilde said, ‘be yourself, everyone else has taken.’ Be original and believe in something. And also look at what you need to learn before you get into school.
Part of the equation for any incoming student is whether fashion design school is right for them, or if there is even any future in fashion. After all, the world is changing precipitously, and the effect on fashion is obvious. 
[Susanna] The new opportunities for students include the broadening markets and the specializations that are emerging with the changing social rules that are being broken every day. Genderless clothing is one example along with sustainable and ethical practices that are becoming stronger trends with the consumer.
With any change comes opportunity. And an education is meant to prepare students to be ready for new opportunities--to be ready to ideate, innovate and implement. Susanna sums it up, “Choose a school or program that aligns with your values and goals, and gives you a safe space to learn through process and even failure.”
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Over the past year, fashion design schools have been forced to rethink how they educate students and prepare them for jobs. It’s a monumental task, when so much about Covid-19 is still unknown, making planning for future academic years difficult at best. What’s more, with a shift to online learning and a focus on systemic racism within fashion curriculum, educators are having to shift the very models of education that have been in place for decades, especially when it comes to studio-based and Western-centric learning. </p><p>And while institutions grapple with these changes, potential fashion design students wonder how or if these issues may change the application process. Here’s Susanna Moyer, a part time professor in the BFA Fashion Design program at Parsons School of Design and an educational consultant in New York City.</p><p>[Susanna] Some schools and universities will be looking for students that are able to connect with global issues, with inclusivity being one of them. Students who bring innovation and critical thinking to these issues through the creative process will be the most attractive candidates for these institutions.</p><p>And more specifically, fashion schools are increasingly looking for students who show an aptitude and knowledge of emerging technologies. </p><p>[Susanna] Technology, as well, is becoming more and more important for the student to understand. It is being used in the school environment and the professional arena.So, it's really important for students to understand 3D technology, including Clo3D. </p><p>While it’s not expected that an incoming student learn a complex software platform like Clo3D, having an awareness of how it works, or how it changes the design process is very helpful. This is especially true when so much of learning is online right now. </p><p>At the same time, Susanna points out that the core of what makes a successful portfolio hasn’t really changed. It’s still important for students to present “a clear, focused direction, and diversity in presentation.” </p><p>[Susanna] All elements, including moodboard designs and technical flats need to be well thought out and executed so the storytelling of the collection is understandable to the viewer. Along with the portfolio, the student needs to create a design journal to process concepts and research for the portfolio. Some of this content can be used in the portfolio submission. The last thing is to remember, in most cases, the student cannot be there to present their work. They need to ask themselves if the presentation is clear for the viewer. </p><p>And Susanna points out that students who understand their potential role as a designer within the bigger picture can also help them to stand out, as long as it is authentic. </p><p>[Susanna] It is very, very important that the students ‘do’ themselves. As Oscar Wilde said, ‘be yourself, everyone else has taken.’ Be original and believe in something. And also look at what you need to learn before you get into school.</p><p>Part of the equation for any incoming student is whether fashion design school is right for them, or if there is even any future in fashion. After all, the world is changing precipitously, and the effect on fashion is obvious. </p><p>[Susanna] The new opportunities for students include the broadening markets and the specializations that are emerging with the changing social rules that are being broken every day. Genderless clothing is one example along with sustainable and ethical practices that are becoming stronger trends with the consumer.</p><p>With any change comes opportunity. And an education is meant to prepare students to be ready for new opportunities--to be ready to ideate, innovate and implement. Susanna sums it up, “Choose a school or program that aligns with your values and goals, and gives you a safe space to learn through process and even failure.”</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>429</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e7bc60ba-2f42-11eb-a3ce-234e5f8a17db]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV4038010873.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zazi Vintage: Led by Ethics</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/zazi-vintage-led-by-ethics</link>
      <description>Joshua Williams: Each month on News Bytes, we feature a fashion brand that approaches business differently and innovatively or operates outside of the main fashion systems and capitals. I'm with Sass Brown, an expert in ethical fashion, sustainability and craftsmanship. She is the former Dean of Art and Design at the Fashion Institute of Technology and the founding Dean at Dubai Institute of Design and Innovation.
Sass, thank you so much for being with us today. 
Sass Brown: Happy to be here. 
Joshua Williams: And so, who are you featuring this month? 
Sass Brown: Zazi Vintage, founded by Jeanne de Kroon in Amsterdam and they work across Uzbekistan, India, and Afghanistan. 
Joshua Williams: Tell us a little bit about what makes Zazi Vintage so unique. 
Sass Brown: They work with heritage textiles and artisan-based textiles that have been produced along the traditional Silk Route. So, they work with Uzbekistan ikat. They work with Kashmiri embroidery and with Suzani embroideries. 
Joshua Williams: Wow. So, are they fully customizing each piece or do they have a line that they sell direct to the consumer? 
Sass Brown: They have the small ready-to-wear line of contemporary fashion pieces, separates and predominantly dresses. But then they have a line of Suzani coats, which are those fabulous fur-trimmed, Afghan coats. If you think of Sergeant Peppers from the Beatles; that sort of iconic embroidered uor trimmed coat. And so, those are all covered in Suzani, vintage Suzani embroideries. Those are made to order. And you're able to customize them a little bit, in terms of choice of fur, color, type of embroidery, et cetera.
Joshua Williams: Sass, what do you think that other more mainstream brands can learn from Zazi Vintage? 
Sass Brown: I think there's an awful lot to do with intention and motivation. Honestly, Jeanne is the founder of the brand, is one of the most committed people I've ever met in terms of ethics and how she works. And it's all to do with her passion for textiles, and fo storytelling, and the people whose story she tells through the weaving, through the story threads of embroidery. And so, I think her values and our motivation are incredible. 
I think an example of that is when Covid hit, she reached out to her artissans and asked them what they needed to survive during this difficult time during lockdown, when people were canceling orders. She's not the only person that works with them. So, she went back to the other brands that were working with her artisans, and said, look, this is what they need to survive, to keep a roof over their head, to keep food on the table. How do we collectively work out a plan to ensure that they can survive through this? 
Joshua Williams: Such a human-centric touch. 
How can listeners learn more about Zazi Vintage?
Sass Brown:  Well, they sell direct to consumer only. So, you have to access them through their website, which is zazivintage.com. So, it's pretty straightforward. They also have a really lovely Instagram feed, which is also @ZaziVintage. So, it's very easy to find them. 
Joshua Williams: All right, Sass. Thank you so much. We'll see you in a month for your next feature.
Sass Brown: Look forward to it.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Zazi Vintage: Led by Ethics</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/67247930-25ea-11eb-a234-972a14b89d6e/image/uploads_2F1605297046279-leapfpcbe5i-305c99c62ef55bce5dd4abb22a097b52_2F3_4+NewsBytes+Zazi+Vintage+Led+by+Ethics+LG+MD.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, part of our monthly brand feature series, we learn about Zazi Vintage, an ethically based fashion company with headquarters in Amsterdam.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Joshua Williams: Each month on News Bytes, we feature a fashion brand that approaches business differently and innovatively or operates outside of the main fashion systems and capitals. I'm with Sass Brown, an expert in ethical fashion, sustainability and craftsmanship. She is the former Dean of Art and Design at the Fashion Institute of Technology and the founding Dean at Dubai Institute of Design and Innovation.
Sass, thank you so much for being with us today. 
Sass Brown: Happy to be here. 
Joshua Williams: And so, who are you featuring this month? 
Sass Brown: Zazi Vintage, founded by Jeanne de Kroon in Amsterdam and they work across Uzbekistan, India, and Afghanistan. 
Joshua Williams: Tell us a little bit about what makes Zazi Vintage so unique. 
Sass Brown: They work with heritage textiles and artisan-based textiles that have been produced along the traditional Silk Route. So, they work with Uzbekistan ikat. They work with Kashmiri embroidery and with Suzani embroideries. 
Joshua Williams: Wow. So, are they fully customizing each piece or do they have a line that they sell direct to the consumer? 
Sass Brown: They have the small ready-to-wear line of contemporary fashion pieces, separates and predominantly dresses. But then they have a line of Suzani coats, which are those fabulous fur-trimmed, Afghan coats. If you think of Sergeant Peppers from the Beatles; that sort of iconic embroidered uor trimmed coat. And so, those are all covered in Suzani, vintage Suzani embroideries. Those are made to order. And you're able to customize them a little bit, in terms of choice of fur, color, type of embroidery, et cetera.
Joshua Williams: Sass, what do you think that other more mainstream brands can learn from Zazi Vintage? 
Sass Brown: I think there's an awful lot to do with intention and motivation. Honestly, Jeanne is the founder of the brand, is one of the most committed people I've ever met in terms of ethics and how she works. And it's all to do with her passion for textiles, and fo storytelling, and the people whose story she tells through the weaving, through the story threads of embroidery. And so, I think her values and our motivation are incredible. 
I think an example of that is when Covid hit, she reached out to her artissans and asked them what they needed to survive during this difficult time during lockdown, when people were canceling orders. She's not the only person that works with them. So, she went back to the other brands that were working with her artisans, and said, look, this is what they need to survive, to keep a roof over their head, to keep food on the table. How do we collectively work out a plan to ensure that they can survive through this? 
Joshua Williams: Such a human-centric touch. 
How can listeners learn more about Zazi Vintage?
Sass Brown:  Well, they sell direct to consumer only. So, you have to access them through their website, which is zazivintage.com. So, it's pretty straightforward. They also have a really lovely Instagram feed, which is also @ZaziVintage. So, it's very easy to find them. 
Joshua Williams: All right, Sass. Thank you so much. We'll see you in a month for your next feature.
Sass Brown: Look forward to it.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Joshua Williams: </strong>Each month on News Bytes, we feature a fashion brand that approaches business differently and innovatively or operates outside of the main fashion systems and capitals. I'm with Sass Brown, an expert in ethical fashion, sustainability and craftsmanship. She is the former Dean of Art and Design at the Fashion Institute of Technology and the founding Dean at Dubai Institute of Design and Innovation.</p><p>Sass, thank you so much for being with us today. </p><p><strong>Sass Brown: </strong>Happy to be here. </p><p><strong>Joshua Williams: </strong>And so, who are you featuring this month? </p><p><strong>Sass Brown: </strong>Zazi Vintage, founded by Jeanne de Kroon in Amsterdam and they work across Uzbekistan, India, and Afghanistan. </p><p><strong>Joshua Williams: </strong>Tell us a little bit about what makes Zazi Vintage so unique. </p><p><strong>Sass Brown: </strong>They work with heritage textiles and artisan-based textiles that have been produced along the traditional Silk Route. So, they work with Uzbekistan ikat. They work with Kashmiri embroidery and with Suzani embroideries. </p><p><strong>Joshua Williams: </strong>Wow. So, are they fully customizing each piece or do they have a line that they sell direct to the consumer? </p><p><strong>Sass Brown: </strong>They have the small ready-to-wear line of contemporary fashion pieces, separates and predominantly dresses. But then they have a line of Suzani coats, which are those fabulous fur-trimmed, Afghan coats. If you think of Sergeant Peppers from the Beatles; that sort of iconic embroidered uor trimmed coat. And so, those are all covered in Suzani, vintage Suzani embroideries. Those are made to order. And you're able to customize them a little bit, in terms of choice of fur, color, type of embroidery, et cetera.</p><p><strong>Joshua Williams: </strong>Sass, what do you think that other more mainstream brands can learn from Zazi Vintage? </p><p><strong>Sass Brown: </strong>I think there's an awful lot to do with intention and motivation. Honestly, Jeanne is the founder of the brand, is one of the most committed people I've ever met in terms of ethics and how she works. And it's all to do with her passion for textiles, and fo storytelling, and the people whose story she tells through the weaving, through the story threads of embroidery. And so, I think her values and our motivation are incredible. </p><p>I think an example of that is when Covid hit, she reached out to her artissans and asked them what they needed to survive during this difficult time during lockdown, when people were canceling orders. She's not the only person that works with them. So, she went back to the other brands that were working with her artisans, and said, look, this is what they need to survive, to keep a roof over their head, to keep food on the table. How do we collectively work out a plan to ensure that they can survive through this? </p><p><strong>Joshua Williams: </strong>Such a human-centric touch. </p><p>How can listeners learn more about Zazi Vintage?</p><p><strong>Sass Brown: </strong> Well, they sell direct to consumer only. So, you have to access them through their website, which is zazivintage.com. So, it's pretty straightforward. They also have a really lovely Instagram feed, which is also @ZaziVintage. So, it's very easy to find them. </p><p><strong>Joshua Williams: </strong>All right, Sass. Thank you so much. We'll see you in a month for your next feature.</p><p><strong>Sass Brown: </strong>Look forward to it.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>391</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[67247930-25ea-11eb-a234-972a14b89d6e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV1161610492.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Search of Fashion Leadership</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/in-search-of-fashion-leadership/</link>
      <description>In this episode, “In Search of Fashion Leadership,” we consider the ways in which executive leadership must adapt to crises, and how this changes the way fashion companies hire.
The Covid-19 pandemic has tested the mettle of fashion executives worldwide. They have had to adapt quickly, shifting retail operations primarily online, reimagining their distribution and production, and moving their workforce to remote offices. In more dire cases, they have furloughed or fired employees, cancelled orders and closed stores.
The ripple effect across the supply chain is visible. According to the U.S. Fashion Industry Association, confidence in the fashion business has dropped more than 8% since 2019 and 95% of brands expect sales revenue decreases for the 2020 fiscal year.  
On top of this, civil unrest in the US and worldwide, has laid bare issues of systemic racism and gender pay inequality. And younger customers are quick to “cancel” brands that are not responding transparently with actionable change. 
In short, fashion executives have had to be more visible as consumers demand more transparency, in many ways changing the role of brand leadership and shifting how companies hire. According to Meghan Houle, a Senior Executive Recruiter at The Bowerman Group, fashion companies are taking this moment to be very picky in hiring new executives. 
[Meghan] It really is all about reputation. As the saying goes, ‘Your past can come back to haunt you.’ It is all about reputation.  
When it comes to leadership qualities needed during a crisis such as this, it’s all about “honesty, empathy and approachability.” she says. 
[Meghan] Honest with your communication strategies, empathetic to all situations. Everyone's going through a lot. And empathy, maybe compassion; we'll add that in there. I think it's just really important to teams overall. And to be approachable, really in creating environments where people feel seen and heard and valued. 
As fashion companies head into the fourth quarter and plan their budgets for 2021, they will be prioritizing key roles to ensure ongoing agility and the ability to pivot. So what does this mean for job seekers?
[Meghan] I would expect a slow, but steady, hiring pace, prioritizing key roles. So, I do believe interviews will continue. Offers may not come through until late end of 2020, rolling into the budgets of 2021, maybe early January 2021, unless it really is a critical position needed for the business to sustain and get through the season. Certainly, we're seeing brick and mortar store leadership openings that have been taking priority. There are a lot of companies out there that are just taking the approach of doing more with less for the time being. And you will certainly see a lot of department leaders internally stepping up, taking on new assignments to cover any potential openings that are out there until the right hire is made. And take a lot of vetting; I would very much be prepared, for anyone going through the interview process at any level, for a very strategic, precise hiring process that can maybe feel a little intense. And really as a candidate to make yourself visible, you have to be authentic, know your why, know your value, know what you can bring to an organization; a confident, but not cocky approach.
Learn more: FashionConsort.com / FashionUnited.Com / @FashionConsortAgency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>In Search of Fashion Leadership</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/b2af7ea4-2379-11eb-8eee-3b31478f9aac/image/uploads_2F1605028952336-eh4eyt4ha59-bbd9461f93489cbb4a792085c4324155_2F3_3+NewsBytes+In+Search+of+Fashion+Leadership+LG.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, fashion career specialist Meghan Houle considers the ways in which executive leadership must adapt to crises, and how this changes the way fashion companies hire.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, “In Search of Fashion Leadership,” we consider the ways in which executive leadership must adapt to crises, and how this changes the way fashion companies hire.
The Covid-19 pandemic has tested the mettle of fashion executives worldwide. They have had to adapt quickly, shifting retail operations primarily online, reimagining their distribution and production, and moving their workforce to remote offices. In more dire cases, they have furloughed or fired employees, cancelled orders and closed stores.
The ripple effect across the supply chain is visible. According to the U.S. Fashion Industry Association, confidence in the fashion business has dropped more than 8% since 2019 and 95% of brands expect sales revenue decreases for the 2020 fiscal year.  
On top of this, civil unrest in the US and worldwide, has laid bare issues of systemic racism and gender pay inequality. And younger customers are quick to “cancel” brands that are not responding transparently with actionable change. 
In short, fashion executives have had to be more visible as consumers demand more transparency, in many ways changing the role of brand leadership and shifting how companies hire. According to Meghan Houle, a Senior Executive Recruiter at The Bowerman Group, fashion companies are taking this moment to be very picky in hiring new executives. 
[Meghan] It really is all about reputation. As the saying goes, ‘Your past can come back to haunt you.’ It is all about reputation.  
When it comes to leadership qualities needed during a crisis such as this, it’s all about “honesty, empathy and approachability.” she says. 
[Meghan] Honest with your communication strategies, empathetic to all situations. Everyone's going through a lot. And empathy, maybe compassion; we'll add that in there. I think it's just really important to teams overall. And to be approachable, really in creating environments where people feel seen and heard and valued. 
As fashion companies head into the fourth quarter and plan their budgets for 2021, they will be prioritizing key roles to ensure ongoing agility and the ability to pivot. So what does this mean for job seekers?
[Meghan] I would expect a slow, but steady, hiring pace, prioritizing key roles. So, I do believe interviews will continue. Offers may not come through until late end of 2020, rolling into the budgets of 2021, maybe early January 2021, unless it really is a critical position needed for the business to sustain and get through the season. Certainly, we're seeing brick and mortar store leadership openings that have been taking priority. There are a lot of companies out there that are just taking the approach of doing more with less for the time being. And you will certainly see a lot of department leaders internally stepping up, taking on new assignments to cover any potential openings that are out there until the right hire is made. And take a lot of vetting; I would very much be prepared, for anyone going through the interview process at any level, for a very strategic, precise hiring process that can maybe feel a little intense. And really as a candidate to make yourself visible, you have to be authentic, know your why, know your value, know what you can bring to an organization; a confident, but not cocky approach.
Learn more: FashionConsort.com / FashionUnited.Com / @FashionConsortAgency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, “In Search of Fashion Leadership,” we consider the ways in which executive leadership must adapt to crises, and how this changes the way fashion companies hire.</p><p>The Covid-19 pandemic has tested the mettle of fashion executives worldwide. They have had to adapt quickly, shifting retail operations primarily online, reimagining their distribution and production, and moving their workforce to remote offices. In more dire cases, they have furloughed or fired employees, cancelled orders and closed stores.</p><p>The ripple effect across the supply chain is visible. According to the U.S. Fashion Industry Association, confidence in the fashion business has dropped more than 8% since 2019 and 95% of brands expect sales revenue decreases for the 2020 fiscal year.  </p><p>On top of this, civil unrest in the US and worldwide, has laid bare issues of systemic racism and gender pay inequality. And younger customers are quick to “cancel” brands that are not responding transparently with actionable change. </p><p>In short, fashion executives have had to be more visible as consumers demand more transparency, in many ways changing the role of brand leadership and shifting how companies hire. According to Meghan Houle, a Senior Executive Recruiter at The Bowerman Group, fashion companies are taking this moment to be very picky in hiring new executives. </p><p>[Meghan] It really is all about reputation. As the saying goes, ‘Your past can come back to haunt you.’ It is all about reputation.  </p><p>When it comes to leadership qualities needed during a crisis such as this, it’s all about “honesty, empathy and approachability.” she says. </p><p>[Meghan] Honest with your communication strategies, empathetic to all situations. Everyone's going through a lot. And empathy, maybe compassion; we'll add that in there. I think it's just really important to teams overall. And to be approachable, really in creating environments where people feel seen and heard and valued. </p><p>As fashion companies head into the fourth quarter and plan their budgets for 2021, they will be prioritizing key roles to ensure ongoing agility and the ability to pivot. So what does this mean for job seekers?</p><p>[Meghan] I would expect a slow, but steady, hiring pace, prioritizing key roles. So, I do believe interviews will continue. Offers may not come through until late end of 2020, rolling into the budgets of 2021, maybe early January 2021, unless it really is a critical position needed for the business to sustain and get through the season. Certainly, we're seeing brick and mortar store leadership openings that have been taking priority. There are a lot of companies out there that are just taking the approach of doing more with less for the time being. And you will certainly see a lot of department leaders internally stepping up, taking on new assignments to cover any potential openings that are out there until the right hire is made. And take a lot of vetting; I would very much be prepared, for anyone going through the interview process at any level, for a very strategic, precise hiring process that can maybe feel a little intense. And really as a candidate to make yourself visible, you have to be authentic, know your why, know your value, know what you can bring to an organization; a confident, but not cocky approach.</p><p>Learn more: <a href="www.fashionconsort.com">FashionConsort.com</a> / <a href="www.fashionunited.com">FashionUnited.Com</a> / <a href="www.instagram.com/fashionconsortagency">@FashionConsortAgency</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>482</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b2af7ea4-2379-11eb-8eee-3b31478f9aac]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV9211349833.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Store Employees are on the Frontline</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/store-employees-are-on-the-frontline/</link>
      <description>When it comes to fashion retail during the Covid-19 pandemic, the conversation has centered mostly on the overall viability of a retailer and their strategies to overcome the decrease in brick and mortar shopping. And this makes sense, considering the onslaught of bankruptcies that were unleashed in the spring and the real concern these closings would have on employment and the overall economy. 
However, for those companies that were in a strong enough position to avoid bankruptcy, their focus became two-fold: energize their online sales and re-open brick and mortar. And while the latter was welcomed in theory, in practice it meant store line employees at fashion retailers were put at the forefront of a health crisis, making them more vulnerable to Covid-19 itself, as well as front and center in the mask debate.
Christopher Lacy, former Director of Customer Experience, Learning and Development at Barneys New York and now an Assistant Professor at Parsons School of Design points out that “Crises inform you the old system can no longer be maintained and that there is a need to change.” While the pandemic has certainly had an outsized negative effect on the retail industry, it could also serve as an opportunity for retailers to reset and refocus, beyond sales numbers. It’s a chance for them to rebuild trust between all constituents, the customers, the home office, and most specifically the store line employees who are central to the success of any retail business. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 13:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Store Line Employees are on the Frontline</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/667fc5f0-1944-11eb-9cc5-c780a203244a/image/uploads_2F1603906578863-ast9kwdamd-d2e376a42a1372189b868077125b88f8_2F3_2+NewsBytes+Store+Employees+are+on+the+Frontline+SM.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we discuss the issues and opportunities that exist when engaging more thoughtfully with store line employees during a health crisis.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>When it comes to fashion retail during the Covid-19 pandemic, the conversation has centered mostly on the overall viability of a retailer and their strategies to overcome the decrease in brick and mortar shopping. And this makes sense, considering the onslaught of bankruptcies that were unleashed in the spring and the real concern these closings would have on employment and the overall economy. 
However, for those companies that were in a strong enough position to avoid bankruptcy, their focus became two-fold: energize their online sales and re-open brick and mortar. And while the latter was welcomed in theory, in practice it meant store line employees at fashion retailers were put at the forefront of a health crisis, making them more vulnerable to Covid-19 itself, as well as front and center in the mask debate.
Christopher Lacy, former Director of Customer Experience, Learning and Development at Barneys New York and now an Assistant Professor at Parsons School of Design points out that “Crises inform you the old system can no longer be maintained and that there is a need to change.” While the pandemic has certainly had an outsized negative effect on the retail industry, it could also serve as an opportunity for retailers to reset and refocus, beyond sales numbers. It’s a chance for them to rebuild trust between all constituents, the customers, the home office, and most specifically the store line employees who are central to the success of any retail business. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>When it comes to fashion retail during the Covid-19 pandemic, the conversation has centered mostly on the overall viability of a retailer and their strategies to overcome the decrease in brick and mortar shopping. And this makes sense, considering the onslaught of bankruptcies that were unleashed in the spring and the real concern these closings would have on employment and the overall economy. </p><p>However, for those companies that were in a strong enough position to avoid bankruptcy, their focus became two-fold: energize their online sales and re-open brick and mortar. And while the latter was welcomed in theory, in practice it meant store line employees at fashion retailers were put at the forefront of a health crisis, making them more vulnerable to Covid-19 itself, as well as front and center in the mask debate.</p><p>Christopher Lacy, former Director of Customer Experience, Learning and Development at Barneys New York and now an Assistant Professor at Parsons School of Design points out that “Crises inform you the old system can no longer be maintained and that there is a need to change.” While the pandemic has certainly had an outsized negative effect on the retail industry, it could also serve as an opportunity for retailers to reset and refocus, beyond sales numbers. It’s a chance for them to rebuild trust between all constituents, the customers, the home office, and most specifically the store line employees who are central to the success of any retail business. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>554</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[667fc5f0-1944-11eb-9cc5-c780a203244a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV5700740093.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Face Masks are the New IT Bag</title>
      <link>https://www.faashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/face-masks-are-the-new-it-bag</link>
      <description>Understanding larger social and economic trends is an important part of the design process in fashion. These larger trends have a downstream effect on color, silhouette and texture from season to season. And so, fashion designers and merchandisers work with their teams, and with external agencies, often a full year out, to determine how these trends might integrate best with their brand vision. Because these teams are working so far in advance, planning for trends is an inexact science at best, albeit easier today with the help of algorithmic data. 
However, even this data couldn’t have predicted Covid-19 and it’s immediate effect on fashion trends, leaving brands to rethink their plans mid-stream for fall 2020 and spring 2021. In many cases, companies had to stop their processes altogether as studios and offices closed. And those that could, pivoted to making personal protective equipment, such as masks and shields, to take advantage of government contracts, thus keeping their employees at work, and supporting the needs of their communities. 
As the pandemic wore on, and masks were required in many places, demand rose for more PPE--no longer as simple protective gear, but as a fashion statement. Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the House in the United States Congress became an overnight sensation with her coordinated suits and masks. Masks also made their way to the runway in the spring 2021 shows and are predicted to make an appearance in future collections according to Keanan Duffty, fashion designer and director of the Fashion Management graduate program at Parsons School of Design:
[Keanan] During flu season, face masks were the polite society norm in Asia. Now, most of the rest of the world has accepted face masks and therefore they will become a seasonal fashion trend in order to combat flu and seasonal allergies. 
As with many fashion trends, what once served a utility, such as a jacket lapel, a riveted pocket or an upturned shirt collar, is now simply a preferred style without connection to function. And customers certainly don’t require brands to educate them on these histories . However, it’s an altogether different thing when PPE is serving a real health service in addition to being stylish, which becomes a unique balancing act for a brand. Here’s Keanan again: 
[Keanan] Subjectively, brands look like they are cashing in. For example, Spandau Ballet ‘True’ facemask. Perhaps facemasks are becoming the new slogan tee-shirt?
A tee-shirt with a real purpose beyond the logo or slogan itself, at least for now.  
And so, the question then becomes whether or not there is a place for luxury brands to provide customers with pandemic-related accessories, such as Louis Vuitton’s almost $1,000 face shield and Burberry’s $100+ face masks. 
[Keanan] The luxury sector has begun to appropriate streetwear ideas including sneakers and tracksuits, so luxury versions of pandemic-related accessories were the obvious next step. They provide ‘Status based protection” for the luxury consumer and are the new “it” bag.
After all, it wasn’t more than 25 years ago that fashion apparel companies began including handbags as part of their collections, and leather goods companies became purveyors of ready-to-wear. Perhaps in 25 years time, when the pandemic is a historical footnote, customers will still be wearing masks and shields without any real connection to how they saved lives in 2020. And brands will consider PPE accessories as an essential part of their offering.
Visit: FashionUnited.com
Learn More: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Face Masks are the New IT Bag</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/9d6ad7a6-17e3-11eb-b7c2-a3abd76af018/image/uploads_2F1603755105126-8l6zua7fm8-85ba21171fa490d140ef396c1a22a7f6_2F3_1+NewsBytes+Faces+Masks+are+the+New+It+Bag+SM.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we explore how Covid-19 has affected fashion trends, turning something required into something desired.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Understanding larger social and economic trends is an important part of the design process in fashion. These larger trends have a downstream effect on color, silhouette and texture from season to season. And so, fashion designers and merchandisers work with their teams, and with external agencies, often a full year out, to determine how these trends might integrate best with their brand vision. Because these teams are working so far in advance, planning for trends is an inexact science at best, albeit easier today with the help of algorithmic data. 
However, even this data couldn’t have predicted Covid-19 and it’s immediate effect on fashion trends, leaving brands to rethink their plans mid-stream for fall 2020 and spring 2021. In many cases, companies had to stop their processes altogether as studios and offices closed. And those that could, pivoted to making personal protective equipment, such as masks and shields, to take advantage of government contracts, thus keeping their employees at work, and supporting the needs of their communities. 
As the pandemic wore on, and masks were required in many places, demand rose for more PPE--no longer as simple protective gear, but as a fashion statement. Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the House in the United States Congress became an overnight sensation with her coordinated suits and masks. Masks also made their way to the runway in the spring 2021 shows and are predicted to make an appearance in future collections according to Keanan Duffty, fashion designer and director of the Fashion Management graduate program at Parsons School of Design:
[Keanan] During flu season, face masks were the polite society norm in Asia. Now, most of the rest of the world has accepted face masks and therefore they will become a seasonal fashion trend in order to combat flu and seasonal allergies. 
As with many fashion trends, what once served a utility, such as a jacket lapel, a riveted pocket or an upturned shirt collar, is now simply a preferred style without connection to function. And customers certainly don’t require brands to educate them on these histories . However, it’s an altogether different thing when PPE is serving a real health service in addition to being stylish, which becomes a unique balancing act for a brand. Here’s Keanan again: 
[Keanan] Subjectively, brands look like they are cashing in. For example, Spandau Ballet ‘True’ facemask. Perhaps facemasks are becoming the new slogan tee-shirt?
A tee-shirt with a real purpose beyond the logo or slogan itself, at least for now.  
And so, the question then becomes whether or not there is a place for luxury brands to provide customers with pandemic-related accessories, such as Louis Vuitton’s almost $1,000 face shield and Burberry’s $100+ face masks. 
[Keanan] The luxury sector has begun to appropriate streetwear ideas including sneakers and tracksuits, so luxury versions of pandemic-related accessories were the obvious next step. They provide ‘Status based protection” for the luxury consumer and are the new “it” bag.
After all, it wasn’t more than 25 years ago that fashion apparel companies began including handbags as part of their collections, and leather goods companies became purveyors of ready-to-wear. Perhaps in 25 years time, when the pandemic is a historical footnote, customers will still be wearing masks and shields without any real connection to how they saved lives in 2020. And brands will consider PPE accessories as an essential part of their offering.
Visit: FashionUnited.com
Learn More: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Understanding larger social and economic trends is an important part of the design process in fashion. These larger trends have a downstream effect on color, silhouette and texture from season to season. And so, fashion designers and merchandisers work with their teams, and with external agencies, often a full year out, to determine how these trends might integrate best with their brand vision. Because these teams are working so far in advance, planning for trends is an inexact science at best, albeit easier today with the help of algorithmic data. </p><p>However, even this data couldn’t have predicted Covid-19 and it’s immediate effect on fashion trends, leaving brands to rethink their plans mid-stream for fall 2020 and spring 2021. In many cases, companies had to stop their processes altogether as studios and offices closed. And those that could, pivoted to making personal protective equipment, such as masks and shields, to take advantage of government contracts, thus keeping their employees at work, and supporting the needs of their communities. </p><p>As the pandemic wore on, and masks were required in many places, demand rose for more PPE--no longer as simple protective gear, but as a fashion statement. Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the House in the United States Congress became an overnight sensation with her coordinated suits and masks. Masks also made their way to the runway in the spring 2021 shows and are predicted to make an appearance in future collections according to Keanan Duffty, fashion designer and director of the Fashion Management graduate program at Parsons School of Design:</p><p>[Keanan] During flu season, face masks were the polite society norm in Asia. Now, most of the rest of the world has accepted face masks and therefore they will become a seasonal fashion trend in order to combat flu and seasonal allergies. </p><p>As with many fashion trends, what once served a utility, such as a jacket lapel, a riveted pocket or an upturned shirt collar, is now simply a preferred style without connection to function. And customers certainly don’t require brands to educate them on these histories . However, it’s an altogether different thing when PPE is serving a real health service in addition to being stylish, which becomes a unique balancing act for a brand. Here’s Keanan again: </p><p>[Keanan] Subjectively, brands look like they are cashing in. For example, Spandau Ballet ‘True’ facemask. Perhaps facemasks are becoming the new slogan tee-shirt?</p><p>A tee-shirt with a real purpose beyond the logo or slogan itself, at least for now.  </p><p>And so, the question then becomes whether or not there is a place for luxury brands to provide customers with pandemic-related accessories, such as Louis Vuitton’s almost $1,000 face shield and Burberry’s $100+ face masks. </p><p>[Keanan] The luxury sector has begun to appropriate streetwear ideas including sneakers and tracksuits, so luxury versions of pandemic-related accessories were the obvious next step. They provide ‘Status based protection” for the luxury consumer and are the new “it” bag.</p><p>After all, it wasn’t more than 25 years ago that fashion apparel companies began including handbags as part of their collections, and leather goods companies became purveyors of ready-to-wear. Perhaps in 25 years time, when the pandemic is a historical footnote, customers will still be wearing masks and shields without any real connection to how they saved lives in 2020. And brands will consider PPE accessories as an essential part of their offering.</p><p>Visit: <a href="https://www.fashionunited.com/">FashionUnited.com</a></p><p>Learn More: <a href="https://www.fcnewsbytes.com/">FCNewsBytes.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>410</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9d6ad7a6-17e3-11eb-b7c2-a3abd76af018]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV7872297472.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Announcement: Partnership with FashionUnited</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.comfc-podcasts-news-network/announcement-partnership-with-fashion-united</link>
      <description>Hello, I’m Joshua Williams, host of Fashion Consort NewsBytes. As a professor and consultant, I am often asked to speak at events worldwide as well as appear on news broadcasts to share my expertise on current issues in the fashion industry and fashion higher education.  I began this unique, short-format podcast in early 2020, as a way to extend my voice and share it with a wider audience interested in the inner workings of fashion. And I chose the modality of podcasting, not only because it’s highly shareable, but because it offers a more personal and intimate way to connect with an audience, more so than a written article.  The choice to focus on an audio format felt especially prescient only a month later, as the world began to shut down due to the Covid-19 pandemic, and our interactions became largely digital. For many, podcasting became a new and exciting way to connect with the news, beyond staring at a computer screen. And now, less than a year later, I am excited to announce that News Bytes is being distributed in partnership with FashionUnited, your trusted global network for fashion news, business intelligence and jobs. This partnership truly expands our international reach, and we can’t wait to interact with you, our listener, in a more expansive way. We have so many exciting plans in the pipeline! So thank you, to those of you have joined us along the way, and to those of you will come. We hope you’ll show your support by subscribing to the podcast wherever you are listening. We are now available directly at FashionUnited.com, as well as Apple Podcasts, Spotify, TuneIn, Stitcher, Google Play, Amazon Music, iHeart Radio and much more. And be sure to rate us and share your comments; it helps make the podcast more visible to others searching for fashion industry news. Finally, visit FCPNewsBytes.com, that’s Bytes with a “Y” for more information, including full transcripts.  Until our next episode, be well! Visit: FashionUnited.com Learn More: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:19:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Announcement: Partnership with FashionUnited</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>trailer</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/7e664c24-153a-11eb-87a7-277e49abd9b7/image/uploads_2F1604013979436-lmc3f1rgpp8-e71f126487174e155082d0eef5c88cd5_2F3_0+NewsBytes+Announcement+Fashion+United+LG.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>News Bytes is now being distributed in partnership with FashionUnited, your trusted global network for fashion news, business intelligence and jobs. This partnership truly expands our international reach, and we can’t wait to interact with you, our listener, in a more expansive way.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Hello, I’m Joshua Williams, host of Fashion Consort NewsBytes. As a professor and consultant, I am often asked to speak at events worldwide as well as appear on news broadcasts to share my expertise on current issues in the fashion industry and fashion higher education.  I began this unique, short-format podcast in early 2020, as a way to extend my voice and share it with a wider audience interested in the inner workings of fashion. And I chose the modality of podcasting, not only because it’s highly shareable, but because it offers a more personal and intimate way to connect with an audience, more so than a written article.  The choice to focus on an audio format felt especially prescient only a month later, as the world began to shut down due to the Covid-19 pandemic, and our interactions became largely digital. For many, podcasting became a new and exciting way to connect with the news, beyond staring at a computer screen. And now, less than a year later, I am excited to announce that News Bytes is being distributed in partnership with FashionUnited, your trusted global network for fashion news, business intelligence and jobs. This partnership truly expands our international reach, and we can’t wait to interact with you, our listener, in a more expansive way. We have so many exciting plans in the pipeline! So thank you, to those of you have joined us along the way, and to those of you will come. We hope you’ll show your support by subscribing to the podcast wherever you are listening. We are now available directly at FashionUnited.com, as well as Apple Podcasts, Spotify, TuneIn, Stitcher, Google Play, Amazon Music, iHeart Radio and much more. And be sure to rate us and share your comments; it helps make the podcast more visible to others searching for fashion industry news. Finally, visit FCPNewsBytes.com, that’s Bytes with a “Y” for more information, including full transcripts.  Until our next episode, be well! Visit: FashionUnited.com Learn More: FCNewsBytes.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Hello, I’m Joshua Williams, host of Fashion Consort NewsBytes. As a professor and consultant, I am often asked to speak at events worldwide as well as appear on news broadcasts to share my expertise on current issues in the fashion industry and fashion higher education.  I began this unique, short-format podcast in early 2020, as a way to extend my voice and share it with a wider audience interested in the inner workings of fashion. And I chose the modality of podcasting, not only because it’s highly shareable, but because it offers a more personal and intimate way to connect with an audience, more so than a written article.  The choice to focus on an audio format felt especially prescient only a month later, as the world began to shut down due to the Covid-19 pandemic, and our interactions became largely digital. For many, podcasting became a new and exciting way to connect with the news, beyond staring at a computer screen. And now, less than a year later, I am excited to announce that News Bytes is being distributed in partnership with FashionUnited, your trusted global network for fashion news, business intelligence and jobs. This partnership truly expands our international reach, and we can’t wait to interact with you, our listener, in a more expansive way. We have so many exciting plans in the pipeline! So thank you, to those of you have joined us along the way, and to those of you will come. We hope you’ll show your support by subscribing to the podcast wherever you are listening. We are now available directly at FashionUnited.com, as well as Apple Podcasts, Spotify, TuneIn, Stitcher, Google Play, Amazon Music, iHeart Radio and much more. And be sure to rate us and share your comments; it helps make the podcast more visible to others searching for fashion industry news. Finally, visit FCPNewsBytes.com, that’s Bytes with a “Y” for more information, including full transcripts.  Until our next episode, be well! Visit: FashionUnited.com Learn More: FCNewsBytes.com</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>245</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5f91a0cd8d533711dd55b4e4]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV4911461256.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fashion Essentials</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/fashion-essentials</link>
      <description>By its very nature, modern fashion is not essential. It’s built on a model of planned obsolescence, wherein customers are expected to buy and replace as often as possible. And yet, this hasn’t stopped the fashion industry from marketing goods as essential, whether it’s the proclamation: “must have warm coat for the winter” or “the only shoes that give you the support you need while running.” Whole categories of clothes, including activewear, are built on this mostly false premise. It’s not to say that these products don’t have utility, but rather, that they will be replaced within a few short months with newer, cooler models. This is especially true with swimwear, a category of clothing that has no utility at all, beyond social constructs around modesty, unless you’re in a search of a garment that makes you feel clammy and ensures beach sand comes home with you. So, it should come as no surprise that fashion is completely enamored with an all-together new essential product category, personal protective equipment, or PPE for short. And while it’s true that masks and perhaps shields, to a lesser degree, are essential during the Covid-19 pandemic, fashion will certainly find a way to ensure we buy more than we need, so that we don’t get caught wearing the same mask twice! Already, luxury brands such as Burberry and Louis Vuitton have gotten in on the game, with hyper-expensive masks and shields, a new entry-level price point that puts their logo front and center—right on the customer’s face. But irony aside, behind all of this, is a very real business decision that brands are making. Because, if a brand makes and sells PPE in their stores, they can be classified by many local governments as essential retailers. Said differently, this means that with new lockdowns now happening due to the second wave, these retailers will not have to close down a second time, because they are selling PPE. It’s a workaround that alleviates the need for mass furloughs of store line employees and mitigates issues around store leases. In reality, fashion brands see PPE whether its face masks, shields, gloves, or even scrubs, as essential to the viability of their business. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 21:20:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fashion Essentials</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/7e881ae8-153a-11eb-87a7-e324b17c9081/image/uploads_2F1604013953012-2oqoriqpumq-3deb82768d1b10cf7be68b31dc29b91c_2FFC+Fashion+Essentials.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Offering PPE  is a very real business decision that brands are making. Because, if a brand makes and sells PPE in their stores, they can be classified by many local governments as essential retailers.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>By its very nature, modern fashion is not essential. It’s built on a model of planned obsolescence, wherein customers are expected to buy and replace as often as possible. And yet, this hasn’t stopped the fashion industry from marketing goods as essential, whether it’s the proclamation: “must have warm coat for the winter” or “the only shoes that give you the support you need while running.” Whole categories of clothes, including activewear, are built on this mostly false premise. It’s not to say that these products don’t have utility, but rather, that they will be replaced within a few short months with newer, cooler models. This is especially true with swimwear, a category of clothing that has no utility at all, beyond social constructs around modesty, unless you’re in a search of a garment that makes you feel clammy and ensures beach sand comes home with you. So, it should come as no surprise that fashion is completely enamored with an all-together new essential product category, personal protective equipment, or PPE for short. And while it’s true that masks and perhaps shields, to a lesser degree, are essential during the Covid-19 pandemic, fashion will certainly find a way to ensure we buy more than we need, so that we don’t get caught wearing the same mask twice! Already, luxury brands such as Burberry and Louis Vuitton have gotten in on the game, with hyper-expensive masks and shields, a new entry-level price point that puts their logo front and center—right on the customer’s face. But irony aside, behind all of this, is a very real business decision that brands are making. Because, if a brand makes and sells PPE in their stores, they can be classified by many local governments as essential retailers. Said differently, this means that with new lockdowns now happening due to the second wave, these retailers will not have to close down a second time, because they are selling PPE. It’s a workaround that alleviates the need for mass furloughs of store line employees and mitigates issues around store leases. In reality, fashion brands see PPE whether its face masks, shields, gloves, or even scrubs, as essential to the viability of their business. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>By its very nature, modern fashion is not essential. It’s built on a model of planned obsolescence, wherein customers are expected to buy and replace as often as possible. And yet, this hasn’t stopped the fashion industry from marketing goods as essential, whether it’s the proclamation: “must have warm coat for the winter” or “the only shoes that give you the support you need while running.” Whole categories of clothes, including activewear, are built on this mostly false premise. It’s not to say that these products don’t have utility, but rather, that they will be replaced within a few short months with newer, cooler models. This is especially true with swimwear, a category of clothing that has no utility at all, beyond social constructs around modesty, unless you’re in a search of a garment that makes you feel clammy and ensures beach sand comes home with you. So, it should come as no surprise that fashion is completely enamored with an all-together new essential product category, personal protective equipment, or PPE for short. And while it’s true that masks and perhaps shields, to a lesser degree, are essential during the Covid-19 pandemic, fashion will certainly find a way to ensure we buy more than we need, so that we don’t get caught wearing the same mask twice! Already, luxury brands such as Burberry and Louis Vuitton have gotten in on the game, with hyper-expensive masks and shields, a new entry-level price point that puts their logo front and center—right on the customer’s face. But irony aside, behind all of this, is a very real business decision that brands are making. Because, if a brand makes and sells PPE in their stores, they can be classified by many local governments as essential retailers. Said differently, this means that with new lockdowns now happening due to the second wave, these retailers will not have to close down a second time, because they are selling PPE. It’s a workaround that alleviates the need for mass furloughs of store line employees and mitigates issues around store leases. In reality, fashion brands see PPE whether its face masks, shields, gloves, or even scrubs, as essential to the viability of their business. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>220</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5f88bbd4587fae67d96f2575]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV4521864093.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Vicious Fashion Circle</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/a-vicious-fashion-circle</link>
      <description>In 2015, as part of Li Edelkoort’s Anti-Fashion Manifesto, she called out fashion schools to rethink how they were educating students to be part of fashion’s future. She provided many suggestions including a return to materiality and craft, as well as a shift away from the smoke and mirrors of marketing. It was a wake-up call for many schools that had, for many years, relied on the coattail effect of Project Runway, influencer culture and fast fashion. Since then, many fashion schools have grappled with their role in the fashion system and have tried to update their application processes and curriculum. However, with the onset of Covid-19 and the political and social unrest that followed, many of these schools found themselves still woefully behind, not fully up to speed on new technologies, and still very much based in a Western approach to history and design, despite a more diverse student body. And while institutions must take responsibility for this, they are very much a reflection of the fashion industry itself. For example, even though schools can’t guarantee a job post-graduation--that isn’t their purview--they certainly highlight graduates who obtain high-profile positions, because potential students judge schools on their successful alumni. And leadership positions in fashion are still primarily held by white men, so they get most of the focus. The numbers are even lower when accounting for Bipoc or LGBTQ+ representation. According to Mckinsey, over 50% of fashion employees don’t feel their leadership is diverse or represents them. And yet, according to a 2019 Fashion United article, author Marjorie van Elven points out that 80% of fashion students are women, and 75% of the fashion workforce is women. It could be construed that over time, because women represent the majority of fashion graduates, executive jobs will increasingly be filled by women. But this has been the case for quite some time and hasn’t produced immediate results without any real policy change. Nor does it account for other diversity issues. There are deep rooted systemic issues at work, where the interplay between school and company is very real. But the cycle needs to be stopped. Fashion schools must do more to promote their graduates, building on a more inclusive curriculum and a diversity of ideas and lived experiences, perhaps even more aggressively and against the fashion industry status quo. This may mean eschewing financial partnerships with brands that aren’t willing to change or who haven’t taken meaningful action. And students must demand change from fashion institutions, to be more inclusive in their application processes, to offer more opportunities and scholarships for less-represented groups of people and then better represent the diverse student body they graduate. What’s more, students are also consumers--both of the schools they pay for their education and of the brands they want to work for. Demanding change “with your wallet” can be an effective change agent in both cases. Finally, fashion companies need to be ready and willing to learn from graduates, their new employees, to provide space where they can innovate and bring to bear the concepts they studied in school. Too often companies quash new employee ideas and force them into old ways of doing things; it’s easier that way. It’s no wonder that many fashion students choose to create their own businesses where they feel they can effectuate change more immediately.  fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 21:07:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>A Vicious Fashion Circle</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/7eaf1670-153a-11eb-87a7-6fcbf67c2e47/image/uploads_2F1604013937324-ow8h9pnztj-664b5a3d29e9ae5c727de8c80eeae5c3_2FFC+A+Vicious+Fashion+Circle.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Many fashion schools have grappled with their role in the fashion system and have tried to update their application processes and curriculum. With the onset of Covid-19 and the political and social unrest that followed, many of these schools found themselves still woefully behind..</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In 2015, as part of Li Edelkoort’s Anti-Fashion Manifesto, she called out fashion schools to rethink how they were educating students to be part of fashion’s future. She provided many suggestions including a return to materiality and craft, as well as a shift away from the smoke and mirrors of marketing. It was a wake-up call for many schools that had, for many years, relied on the coattail effect of Project Runway, influencer culture and fast fashion. Since then, many fashion schools have grappled with their role in the fashion system and have tried to update their application processes and curriculum. However, with the onset of Covid-19 and the political and social unrest that followed, many of these schools found themselves still woefully behind, not fully up to speed on new technologies, and still very much based in a Western approach to history and design, despite a more diverse student body. And while institutions must take responsibility for this, they are very much a reflection of the fashion industry itself. For example, even though schools can’t guarantee a job post-graduation--that isn’t their purview--they certainly highlight graduates who obtain high-profile positions, because potential students judge schools on their successful alumni. And leadership positions in fashion are still primarily held by white men, so they get most of the focus. The numbers are even lower when accounting for Bipoc or LGBTQ+ representation. According to Mckinsey, over 50% of fashion employees don’t feel their leadership is diverse or represents them. And yet, according to a 2019 Fashion United article, author Marjorie van Elven points out that 80% of fashion students are women, and 75% of the fashion workforce is women. It could be construed that over time, because women represent the majority of fashion graduates, executive jobs will increasingly be filled by women. But this has been the case for quite some time and hasn’t produced immediate results without any real policy change. Nor does it account for other diversity issues. There are deep rooted systemic issues at work, where the interplay between school and company is very real. But the cycle needs to be stopped. Fashion schools must do more to promote their graduates, building on a more inclusive curriculum and a diversity of ideas and lived experiences, perhaps even more aggressively and against the fashion industry status quo. This may mean eschewing financial partnerships with brands that aren’t willing to change or who haven’t taken meaningful action. And students must demand change from fashion institutions, to be more inclusive in their application processes, to offer more opportunities and scholarships for less-represented groups of people and then better represent the diverse student body they graduate. What’s more, students are also consumers--both of the schools they pay for their education and of the brands they want to work for. Demanding change “with your wallet” can be an effective change agent in both cases. Finally, fashion companies need to be ready and willing to learn from graduates, their new employees, to provide space where they can innovate and bring to bear the concepts they studied in school. Too often companies quash new employee ideas and force them into old ways of doing things; it’s easier that way. It’s no wonder that many fashion students choose to create their own businesses where they feel they can effectuate change more immediately.  fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In 2015, as part of Li Edelkoort’s Anti-Fashion Manifesto, she called out fashion schools to rethink how they were educating students to be part of fashion’s future. She provided many suggestions including a return to materiality and craft, as well as a shift away from the smoke and mirrors of marketing. It was a wake-up call for many schools that had, for many years, relied on the coattail effect of Project Runway, influencer culture and fast fashion. Since then, many fashion schools have grappled with their role in the fashion system and have tried to update their application processes and curriculum. However, with the onset of Covid-19 and the political and social unrest that followed, many of these schools found themselves still woefully behind, not fully up to speed on new technologies, and still very much based in a Western approach to history and design, despite a more diverse student body. And while institutions must take responsibility for this, they are very much a reflection of the fashion industry itself. For example, even though schools can’t guarantee a job post-graduation--that isn’t their purview--they certainly highlight graduates who obtain high-profile positions, because potential students judge schools on their successful alumni. And leadership positions in fashion are still primarily held by white men, so they get most of the focus. The numbers are even lower when accounting for Bipoc or LGBTQ+ representation. According to Mckinsey, over 50% of fashion employees don’t feel their leadership is diverse or represents them. And yet, according to a 2019 Fashion United article, author Marjorie van Elven points out that 80% of fashion students are women, and 75% of the fashion workforce is women. It could be construed that over time, because women represent the majority of fashion graduates, executive jobs will increasingly be filled by women. But this has been the case for quite some time and hasn’t produced immediate results without any real policy change. Nor does it account for other diversity issues. There are deep rooted systemic issues at work, where the interplay between school and company is very real. But the cycle needs to be stopped. Fashion schools must do more to promote their graduates, building on a more inclusive curriculum and a diversity of ideas and lived experiences, perhaps even more aggressively and against the fashion industry status quo. This may mean eschewing financial partnerships with brands that aren’t willing to change or who haven’t taken meaningful action. And students must demand change from fashion institutions, to be more inclusive in their application processes, to offer more opportunities and scholarships for less-represented groups of people and then better represent the diverse student body they graduate. What’s more, students are also consumers--both of the schools they pay for their education and of the brands they want to work for. Demanding change “with your wallet” can be an effective change agent in both cases. Finally, fashion companies need to be ready and willing to learn from graduates, their new employees, to provide space where they can innovate and bring to bear the concepts they studied in school. Too often companies quash new employee ideas and force them into old ways of doing things; it’s easier that way. It’s no wonder that many fashion students choose to create their own businesses where they feel they can effectuate change more immediately.  fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>415</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5f7f7e1708d9a65ca34b49af]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV6239763629.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Something New from Something Old</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/podcast-news-bytes/something-new-from-something-old</link>
      <description>It’s no secret that the fashion system thrives on creating and selling new products—constantly. In fact, the fashion industry is very adept at built-in obsolescence, with an especially short lifecycle, wherein the very item that was heralded as the “must have” in September is no longer even desirable or cool in February. Because the fashion system is built on seasons—fashion brands must deliver something completely new at least every six months—spring and fall—to replace the old. And in some cases, brands are delivering specialty seasons such as holiday and resort on top of that, or simply forgoing seasons altogether and dropping new styles on a weekly or monthly basis. While tech companies are often “called out” and even sued for supposedly building in obsolescence, consumers rarely make the connection to the same techniques fashion companies have been engaged in for decades.
So, it’s time to start really asking why we, as customers, continue to support brands that have no real impetus to change, no matter their storied histories. It’s time to start putting our money where our mouth is. If we want change, then things must actually change and that may mean letting go of nostalgia, so that fashion brands will be forced to adapt, or make way for more innovative brands that don’t trade on built-in obsolescence.  
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 16:07:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Something New from Something Old</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/7ed0f6fa-153a-11eb-87a7-573cf6355839/image/uploads_2F1604013915275-1wqbjfhmeqs-bf6b9ad66ed69072cd9517131d97180f_2FFC+Something+New+from+Something+Old.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>It’s no secret that the fashion system thrives on creating and selling new products—constantly. In fact, the fashion industry is very adept at built-in obsolescence, with an especially short lifecycle.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It’s no secret that the fashion system thrives on creating and selling new products—constantly. In fact, the fashion industry is very adept at built-in obsolescence, with an especially short lifecycle, wherein the very item that was heralded as the “must have” in September is no longer even desirable or cool in February. Because the fashion system is built on seasons—fashion brands must deliver something completely new at least every six months—spring and fall—to replace the old. And in some cases, brands are delivering specialty seasons such as holiday and resort on top of that, or simply forgoing seasons altogether and dropping new styles on a weekly or monthly basis. While tech companies are often “called out” and even sued for supposedly building in obsolescence, consumers rarely make the connection to the same techniques fashion companies have been engaged in for decades.
So, it’s time to start really asking why we, as customers, continue to support brands that have no real impetus to change, no matter their storied histories. It’s time to start putting our money where our mouth is. If we want change, then things must actually change and that may mean letting go of nostalgia, so that fashion brands will be forced to adapt, or make way for more innovative brands that don’t trade on built-in obsolescence.  
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>It’s no secret that the fashion system thrives on creating and selling new products—constantly. In fact, the fashion industry is very adept at built-in obsolescence, with an especially short lifecycle, wherein the very item that was heralded as the “must have” in September is no longer even desirable or cool in February. Because the fashion system is built on seasons—fashion brands must deliver something completely new at least every six months—spring and fall—to replace the old. And in some cases, brands are delivering specialty seasons such as holiday and resort on top of that, or simply forgoing seasons altogether and dropping new styles on a weekly or monthly basis. While tech companies are often “called out” and even sued for supposedly building in obsolescence, consumers rarely make the connection to the same techniques fashion companies have been engaged in for decades.</p><p>So, it’s time to start really asking why we, as customers, continue to support brands that have no real impetus to change, no matter their storied histories. It’s time to start putting our money where our mouth is. If we want change, then things must actually change and that may mean letting go of nostalgia, so that fashion brands will be forced to adapt, or make way for more innovative brands that don’t trade on built-in obsolescence.  </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>345</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5f75fd0b8036587780b8e438]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV1552640456.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Miniature Magic on the Runway</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/jeffrey-scott-moschino-miniature-magic-runway</link>
      <description>Fashion week and all of its attendant traditions have been largely upended due to the Covid-19 pandemic. While some designers have chosen to show in person, with limited attendance, much of the focus has been on digital variations of the fashion show. So far, these have included everything from artistic, pre-recorded videos, to livestreams on Twitch, and even augmented reality. Technology, in many ways, has made it possible for fashion week to go on—and precipitate a shift towards more synchronous, inclusive events. However, one particular designer chose a very different path, a nod to fashion’s past with an emphasis on handicraft. American designer, Jeffrey Scott, is known for his kitschy, pop-culture inspired designs both for his eponymous line and for the Italian house, Moschino. In the past, his shows have been exuberant, colorful celebrations of the excesses of fashion, as much attended by “club kids” as the fashion intelligentsia. And yet, for Spring 2020, Scott went decidedly lo-fi. He enlisted the Jim Henson Creature Shop to create one-of-a-kind marionettes to display the latest Moschino collection. Each piece was created “in miniature” of the full sample size—and featured highly tailored pieces with decadent trims and visible corsetry. According to Scott, the looks were inspired by the Théâtre de la Mode, miniature “fashion dolls” that traveled the globe post-World War II in an effort to reinvigorate a decimated fashion industry. But Scott went one step further, creating puppet versions of the fashion regulars who weren’t able to attend this season’s show in person. He included Vogue editors, Anna Wintour and Edward Enningful, among others, in their own custom Moschino looks. During the show, as Duran Duran’s “Girls on Film” played as the soundtrack, the VIP guests even reacted and spoke one with another! Scott’s magical production immediately went viral on social media; the irony of this not lost on anyone! And that was most certainly the goal. But Scott had an opportunity to share a piece of history that goes beyond the Théâtre de la Mode, all the way back to the 16th century, when European royal families would commission “fashion dolls” as a way to see, then copy, the dresses being worn in the French court. They were known as Pandora dolls beginning in the mid-1600s. In the 1700s, they became common to seamstresses, milliners and all kinds of fashion merchants, including Rose Bertin, seamstress to Marie Antoinette. They largely fell out of favor in the late 1800s when the first illustrated fashion magazines such as Cabinet des Modes, took their place. And now in 2020, Scott’s Moschino collection is a reminder of fashion’s storied past; it’s a chance to focus again on the handcrafted details, the minutiae of design so easily overlooked or forgotten, as our attention moves so quickly from one show to another. It manages to capture—and hold—our attention. . fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2020 19:35:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Miniature Magic on the Runway</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/7eef7526-153a-11eb-87a7-87bbd9c8eb38/image/uploads_2F1604013894742-p1a62hkqhy-1678e6a48d044bea3efcf12843b11e3a_2FFC+Miniature+Magic+on+the+Runway.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Fashion week and all of its attendant traditions have been largely upended due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Much of the focus has been on digital variations of the fashion show.  However, Jeffrey Scott chose a very different path, a nod to fashion’s past with an emphasis on handicraft.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Fashion week and all of its attendant traditions have been largely upended due to the Covid-19 pandemic. While some designers have chosen to show in person, with limited attendance, much of the focus has been on digital variations of the fashion show. So far, these have included everything from artistic, pre-recorded videos, to livestreams on Twitch, and even augmented reality. Technology, in many ways, has made it possible for fashion week to go on—and precipitate a shift towards more synchronous, inclusive events. However, one particular designer chose a very different path, a nod to fashion’s past with an emphasis on handicraft. American designer, Jeffrey Scott, is known for his kitschy, pop-culture inspired designs both for his eponymous line and for the Italian house, Moschino. In the past, his shows have been exuberant, colorful celebrations of the excesses of fashion, as much attended by “club kids” as the fashion intelligentsia. And yet, for Spring 2020, Scott went decidedly lo-fi. He enlisted the Jim Henson Creature Shop to create one-of-a-kind marionettes to display the latest Moschino collection. Each piece was created “in miniature” of the full sample size—and featured highly tailored pieces with decadent trims and visible corsetry. According to Scott, the looks were inspired by the Théâtre de la Mode, miniature “fashion dolls” that traveled the globe post-World War II in an effort to reinvigorate a decimated fashion industry. But Scott went one step further, creating puppet versions of the fashion regulars who weren’t able to attend this season’s show in person. He included Vogue editors, Anna Wintour and Edward Enningful, among others, in their own custom Moschino looks. During the show, as Duran Duran’s “Girls on Film” played as the soundtrack, the VIP guests even reacted and spoke one with another! Scott’s magical production immediately went viral on social media; the irony of this not lost on anyone! And that was most certainly the goal. But Scott had an opportunity to share a piece of history that goes beyond the Théâtre de la Mode, all the way back to the 16th century, when European royal families would commission “fashion dolls” as a way to see, then copy, the dresses being worn in the French court. They were known as Pandora dolls beginning in the mid-1600s. In the 1700s, they became common to seamstresses, milliners and all kinds of fashion merchants, including Rose Bertin, seamstress to Marie Antoinette. They largely fell out of favor in the late 1800s when the first illustrated fashion magazines such as Cabinet des Modes, took their place. And now in 2020, Scott’s Moschino collection is a reminder of fashion’s storied past; it’s a chance to focus again on the handcrafted details, the minutiae of design so easily overlooked or forgotten, as our attention moves so quickly from one show to another. It manages to capture—and hold—our attention. . fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Fashion week and all of its attendant traditions have been largely upended due to the Covid-19 pandemic. While some designers have chosen to show in person, with limited attendance, much of the focus has been on digital variations of the fashion show. So far, these have included everything from artistic, pre-recorded videos, to livestreams on Twitch, and even augmented reality. Technology, in many ways, has made it possible for fashion week to go on—and precipitate a shift towards more synchronous, inclusive events. However, one particular designer chose a very different path, a nod to fashion’s past with an emphasis on handicraft. American designer, Jeffrey Scott, is known for his kitschy, pop-culture inspired designs both for his eponymous line and for the Italian house, Moschino. In the past, his shows have been exuberant, colorful celebrations of the excesses of fashion, as much attended by “club kids” as the fashion intelligentsia. And yet, for Spring 2020, Scott went decidedly lo-fi. He enlisted the Jim Henson Creature Shop to create one-of-a-kind marionettes to display the latest Moschino collection. Each piece was created “in miniature” of the full sample size—and featured highly tailored pieces with decadent trims and visible corsetry. According to Scott, the looks were inspired by the Théâtre de la Mode, miniature “fashion dolls” that traveled the globe post-World War II in an effort to reinvigorate a decimated fashion industry. But Scott went one step further, creating puppet versions of the fashion regulars who weren’t able to attend this season’s show in person. He included Vogue editors, Anna Wintour and Edward Enningful, among others, in their own custom Moschino looks. During the show, as Duran Duran’s “Girls on Film” played as the soundtrack, the VIP guests even reacted and spoke one with another! Scott’s magical production immediately went viral on social media; the irony of this not lost on anyone! And that was most certainly the goal. But Scott had an opportunity to share a piece of history that goes beyond the Théâtre de la Mode, all the way back to the 16th century, when European royal families would commission “fashion dolls” as a way to see, then copy, the dresses being worn in the French court. They were known as Pandora dolls beginning in the mid-1600s. In the 1700s, they became common to seamstresses, milliners and all kinds of fashion merchants, including Rose Bertin, seamstress to Marie Antoinette. They largely fell out of favor in the late 1800s when the first illustrated fashion magazines such as Cabinet des Modes, took their place. And now in 2020, Scott’s Moschino collection is a reminder of fashion’s storied past; it’s a chance to focus again on the handcrafted details, the minutiae of design so easily overlooked or forgotten, as our attention moves so quickly from one show to another. It manages to capture—and hold—our attention. . fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>268</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5f70e785f414a7531ed76a28]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV9151277126.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fashion Week Rebalance</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/fashion-week-rebalance</link>
      <description>New York Fashion Week has ended, and the baton has been passed to Milan, London and Paris. With a shortened schedule, and a move largely to digital platforms, New York Fashion Week hardly resembles fashion weeks of the past. And like everything else in the industry, change already happening around fashion show presentations was precipitated by the pandemic. Ever since the birth of haute couture, developed and codified by Charles Frederick Worth in the late 1800s, VIP customers would be invited to see next season’s collection and place their orders. Select press attaches were also invited, as a way to garner interest in the collection once it became more widely available to the public. This worked well in a small centralized country like France but became unwieldy for couturiers in the United States. Thus, Fashion Week was devised by Eleanor Lambert as a weeklong event in New York City, that customers and press could all participate in twice a year. This concentrated event was such a success that it was soon copied in France, as the perfect way to extend their reach to customers and press in other countries. Soon, the tradition spread to Italy, England and beyond. Fashion weeks also correlated with buying seasons, providing the perfect opportunity for store buyers to choose the looks that would end up in their stores six months later. This also provided a safeguard to designers, as it gave them a chance to test their styles in the market before going into full production. Fast forward to today, and fashion week is now primarily a consumer-focused event, largely due to social media and the ability to share information instantaneously, direct to the general public, an audience that is not even invited to attend the physical shows!  This means that the press can no longer time their coverage to the season, which essentially puts the system completely out of balance. What’s more, buyers are much more likely to be working one-on-one with brands to develop exclusive styles for their stores, long before fashion week, which means that buyers are primarily showing up to support what they’ve already bought. On top of this, as customers become more value-based in how they shop, brands have to contend with issues of sustainability and transparency. Holding big expensive shows with celebrities feels out of touch. Many brands have been toying with solutions to these problems in an effort to rebalance the system, including “see now, buy now” collections to combat fast fashion copies, livestream shows on Pinterest and Twitch to alleviate travel, and augmented reality shows with avatar models to alleviate costs. But these solutions have never really fully taken root or upended the system. But now that has all changed, in a time where physical gatherings are difficult at best, and digital is leading the way. And so, the Spring 2021 shows held this September have largely been used as tests by brands searching for the best way to engage buyers, press and customers. It’s forcing them to think much more individually, while still considering the benefit of scale that a bi-annual fashion event provides. When the fall shows come around in February, we’re likely to see a much more hybrid approach to fashion week with brands approaching their presentations more personally and confidently...no matter if the pandemic persists. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:11:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fashion Week Rebalance</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/7f24596c-153a-11eb-87a7-035de950bc00/image/uploads_2F1604013873485-16okp24nw8gh-6509ccc2a3df5d3b78ee6274561d283e_2FFC+Fashion+Week+Rebalance.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>With a shortened schedule, and a move largely to digital platforms, New York Fashion Week hardly resembles fashion weeks of the past. And like everything else in the industry, change already happening around fashion show presentations was precipitated by the pandemic.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>New York Fashion Week has ended, and the baton has been passed to Milan, London and Paris. With a shortened schedule, and a move largely to digital platforms, New York Fashion Week hardly resembles fashion weeks of the past. And like everything else in the industry, change already happening around fashion show presentations was precipitated by the pandemic. Ever since the birth of haute couture, developed and codified by Charles Frederick Worth in the late 1800s, VIP customers would be invited to see next season’s collection and place their orders. Select press attaches were also invited, as a way to garner interest in the collection once it became more widely available to the public. This worked well in a small centralized country like France but became unwieldy for couturiers in the United States. Thus, Fashion Week was devised by Eleanor Lambert as a weeklong event in New York City, that customers and press could all participate in twice a year. This concentrated event was such a success that it was soon copied in France, as the perfect way to extend their reach to customers and press in other countries. Soon, the tradition spread to Italy, England and beyond. Fashion weeks also correlated with buying seasons, providing the perfect opportunity for store buyers to choose the looks that would end up in their stores six months later. This also provided a safeguard to designers, as it gave them a chance to test their styles in the market before going into full production. Fast forward to today, and fashion week is now primarily a consumer-focused event, largely due to social media and the ability to share information instantaneously, direct to the general public, an audience that is not even invited to attend the physical shows!  This means that the press can no longer time their coverage to the season, which essentially puts the system completely out of balance. What’s more, buyers are much more likely to be working one-on-one with brands to develop exclusive styles for their stores, long before fashion week, which means that buyers are primarily showing up to support what they’ve already bought. On top of this, as customers become more value-based in how they shop, brands have to contend with issues of sustainability and transparency. Holding big expensive shows with celebrities feels out of touch. Many brands have been toying with solutions to these problems in an effort to rebalance the system, including “see now, buy now” collections to combat fast fashion copies, livestream shows on Pinterest and Twitch to alleviate travel, and augmented reality shows with avatar models to alleviate costs. But these solutions have never really fully taken root or upended the system. But now that has all changed, in a time where physical gatherings are difficult at best, and digital is leading the way. And so, the Spring 2021 shows held this September have largely been used as tests by brands searching for the best way to engage buyers, press and customers. It’s forcing them to think much more individually, while still considering the benefit of scale that a bi-annual fashion event provides. When the fall shows come around in February, we’re likely to see a much more hybrid approach to fashion week with brands approaching their presentations more personally and confidently...no matter if the pandemic persists. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>New York Fashion Week has ended, and the baton has been passed to Milan, London and Paris. With a shortened schedule, and a move largely to digital platforms, New York Fashion Week hardly resembles fashion weeks of the past. And like everything else in the industry, change already happening around fashion show presentations was precipitated by the pandemic. Ever since the birth of haute couture, developed and codified by Charles Frederick Worth in the late 1800s, VIP customers would be invited to see next season’s collection and place their orders. Select press attaches were also invited, as a way to garner interest in the collection once it became more widely available to the public. This worked well in a small centralized country like France but became unwieldy for couturiers in the United States. Thus, Fashion Week was devised by Eleanor Lambert as a weeklong event in New York City, that customers and press could all participate in twice a year. This concentrated event was such a success that it was soon copied in France, as the perfect way to extend their reach to customers and press in other countries. Soon, the tradition spread to Italy, England and beyond. Fashion weeks also correlated with buying seasons, providing the perfect opportunity for store buyers to choose the looks that would end up in their stores six months later. This also provided a safeguard to designers, as it gave them a chance to test their styles in the market before going into full production. Fast forward to today, and fashion week is now primarily a consumer-focused event, largely due to social media and the ability to share information instantaneously, direct to the general public, an audience that is not even invited to attend the physical shows!  This means that the press can no longer time their coverage to the season, which essentially puts the system completely out of balance. What’s more, buyers are much more likely to be working one-on-one with brands to develop exclusive styles for their stores, long before fashion week, which means that buyers are primarily showing up to support what they’ve already bought. On top of this, as customers become more value-based in how they shop, brands have to contend with issues of sustainability and transparency. Holding big expensive shows with celebrities feels out of touch. Many brands have been toying with solutions to these problems in an effort to rebalance the system, including “see now, buy now” collections to combat fast fashion copies, livestream shows on Pinterest and Twitch to alleviate travel, and augmented reality shows with avatar models to alleviate costs. But these solutions have never really fully taken root or upended the system. But now that has all changed, in a time where physical gatherings are difficult at best, and digital is leading the way. And so, the Spring 2021 shows held this September have largely been used as tests by brands searching for the best way to engage buyers, press and customers. It’s forcing them to think much more individually, while still considering the benefit of scale that a bi-annual fashion event provides. When the fall shows come around in February, we’re likely to see a much more hybrid approach to fashion week with brands approaching their presentations more personally and confidently...no matter if the pandemic persists. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>284</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5f64e856fdb4cb79bf7ee0af]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV8810931525.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tiffany &amp; Co.: A Case Study for the Future</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/tiffany-a-case-study-for-the-future</link>
      <description>LVMH announced this week that their plan to buy Tiffany &amp; Co for $16.2 billion dollars is now off. Tiffany’s responded with a lawsuit. Stocks fell for both companies in the aftermath, with Tiffany’s bearing the brunt of an 11% decrease.  While there are many different ways to break down this news, as it would’ve been the biggest takeover in fashion history, the fact that LVMH is blaming this both on Tiffany’s handling of Covid-19, as well as political instability between France and the US, is an important perspective to consider. First, Covid-19. America still struggles to get a handle on the pandemic. And without a national-level plan, the virus is moving from one location to another. This has made it very difficult for national retailers to develop a comprehensive plan. Instead, companies like Tiffany’s, are left to deal with issues on a geographic level. With states and even cities having their own laws and ordinances around containing the virus, retailers are forced to create more localized plans which draw attention away from more top down leadership and strategy. The impact on the bottom line is real—29% decrease in net profit in the case of Tiffany &amp; Co. But this is not fully the responsibility of Tiffany’s. To blame them is to create a straw man. Second, political instability. Donald Trump announced 25% tariffs on French luxury goods in the spring, a tit for tat political maneuver for greater political purposes. In fact, the tariffs are a direct retaliation against French President, Emmanuel Macron’s taxes on Silicon Valley tech companies. While this is nothing new in politics, targeting luxury goods, and the luxury consumer, is rare, especially during a pandemic. But, from a less nuanced perspective, it’s striking against France’s largest international conglomerates, LVMH and The Kering Group. And these tariffs are completely out of Tiffany’s control. Now, that doesn’t mean that Bernard Arnault, president of LVMH, doesn’t have two very legitimate reasons to pull out of the deal. In fact, it is important for him to protect his shareholders, and the companies under the LVMH umbrella. However, it is interesting that Arnault is putting the blame on issues largely outside of Tiffany’s control. And what’s more, he is using the French government as the scapegoat. This isn’t helped by Arnault’s insider connections in the French government, which suggests something more insidious. This example of Tiffany’s is playing out in myriad ways across all levels of fashion retail as well as in other sectors. It’s a game of shifting blame and uncertainty—and underlies the need to establish a new balance between government, society and business, on a global level—all accelerated by the pandemic. How the Tiffany &amp; Co. drama plays out, could define what this balance looks like in the near future. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:58:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Tiffany &amp; Co.: A Case Study for the Future</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/7f3f5370-153a-11eb-87a7-8760f841be36/image/uploads_2F1604013849298-9yzxmr0wctk-3cb6a2799e795f8e4f9ad6242a155fb5_2FFC+Tiffany+_26+Co.+A+Case+Study+for+the+Future.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>LVMH announced this week that their plan to buy Tiffany &amp; Co for $16.2 billion dollars is now off. Tiffany’s responded with a lawsuit. Stocks fell for both companies in the aftermath, with Tiffany’s bearing the brunt of an 11% decrease.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>LVMH announced this week that their plan to buy Tiffany &amp; Co for $16.2 billion dollars is now off. Tiffany’s responded with a lawsuit. Stocks fell for both companies in the aftermath, with Tiffany’s bearing the brunt of an 11% decrease.  While there are many different ways to break down this news, as it would’ve been the biggest takeover in fashion history, the fact that LVMH is blaming this both on Tiffany’s handling of Covid-19, as well as political instability between France and the US, is an important perspective to consider. First, Covid-19. America still struggles to get a handle on the pandemic. And without a national-level plan, the virus is moving from one location to another. This has made it very difficult for national retailers to develop a comprehensive plan. Instead, companies like Tiffany’s, are left to deal with issues on a geographic level. With states and even cities having their own laws and ordinances around containing the virus, retailers are forced to create more localized plans which draw attention away from more top down leadership and strategy. The impact on the bottom line is real—29% decrease in net profit in the case of Tiffany &amp; Co. But this is not fully the responsibility of Tiffany’s. To blame them is to create a straw man. Second, political instability. Donald Trump announced 25% tariffs on French luxury goods in the spring, a tit for tat political maneuver for greater political purposes. In fact, the tariffs are a direct retaliation against French President, Emmanuel Macron’s taxes on Silicon Valley tech companies. While this is nothing new in politics, targeting luxury goods, and the luxury consumer, is rare, especially during a pandemic. But, from a less nuanced perspective, it’s striking against France’s largest international conglomerates, LVMH and The Kering Group. And these tariffs are completely out of Tiffany’s control. Now, that doesn’t mean that Bernard Arnault, president of LVMH, doesn’t have two very legitimate reasons to pull out of the deal. In fact, it is important for him to protect his shareholders, and the companies under the LVMH umbrella. However, it is interesting that Arnault is putting the blame on issues largely outside of Tiffany’s control. And what’s more, he is using the French government as the scapegoat. This isn’t helped by Arnault’s insider connections in the French government, which suggests something more insidious. This example of Tiffany’s is playing out in myriad ways across all levels of fashion retail as well as in other sectors. It’s a game of shifting blame and uncertainty—and underlies the need to establish a new balance between government, society and business, on a global level—all accelerated by the pandemic. How the Tiffany &amp; Co. drama plays out, could define what this balance looks like in the near future. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>LVMH announced this week that their plan to buy Tiffany &amp; Co for $16.2 billion dollars is now off. Tiffany’s responded with a lawsuit. Stocks fell for both companies in the aftermath, with Tiffany’s bearing the brunt of an 11% decrease.  While there are many different ways to break down this news, as it would’ve been the biggest takeover in fashion history, the fact that LVMH is blaming this both on Tiffany’s handling of Covid-19, as well as political instability between France and the US, is an important perspective to consider. First, Covid-19. America still struggles to get a handle on the pandemic. And without a national-level plan, the virus is moving from one location to another. This has made it very difficult for national retailers to develop a comprehensive plan. Instead, companies like Tiffany’s, are left to deal with issues on a geographic level. With states and even cities having their own laws and ordinances around containing the virus, retailers are forced to create more localized plans which draw attention away from more top down leadership and strategy. The impact on the bottom line is real—29% decrease in net profit in the case of Tiffany &amp; Co. But this is not fully the responsibility of Tiffany’s. To blame them is to create a straw man. Second, political instability. Donald Trump announced 25% tariffs on French luxury goods in the spring, a tit for tat political maneuver for greater political purposes. In fact, the tariffs are a direct retaliation against French President, Emmanuel Macron’s taxes on Silicon Valley tech companies. While this is nothing new in politics, targeting luxury goods, and the luxury consumer, is rare, especially during a pandemic. But, from a less nuanced perspective, it’s striking against France’s largest international conglomerates, LVMH and The Kering Group. And these tariffs are completely out of Tiffany’s control. Now, that doesn’t mean that Bernard Arnault, president of LVMH, doesn’t have two very legitimate reasons to pull out of the deal. In fact, it is important for him to protect his shareholders, and the companies under the LVMH umbrella. However, it is interesting that Arnault is putting the blame on issues largely outside of Tiffany’s control. And what’s more, he is using the French government as the scapegoat. This isn’t helped by Arnault’s insider connections in the French government, which suggests something more insidious. This example of Tiffany’s is playing out in myriad ways across all levels of fashion retail as well as in other sectors. It’s a game of shifting blame and uncertainty—and underlies the need to establish a new balance between government, society and business, on a global level—all accelerated by the pandemic. How the Tiffany &amp; Co. drama plays out, could define what this balance looks like in the near future. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>257</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5f5aa0766e598e462310b825]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV5528664452.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Student Experience</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.cofc-podcasts-news-network/the-student-experience</link>
      <description>Over the past twenty years, consumer-based businesses have had to contend with a major push towards digitization, and to find the balance between in-person and online transactions and experiences, with customers driving the overall experience. Omni-channel, UX (user experience) and CX (customer experience) have emerged as guiding principles for businesses, in order to stay competitive in a fast-changing marketplace. 
And yet, this shift has gone largely unnoticed by higher education institutions where a physical, in-person experience reigns supreme, and a thoughtful online experience is still an afterthought to administrators, or at best, a potential new profit generator on the side. 
To be fair, there was very little reason for administrators to take notice—nor professors—because an in-person education was still what students wanted and fought for. And limited physical space, meant universities could turn away students and hike up prices. 
However, in the past few years, US demographics have shifted, creating too much supply of universities in the market and not enough demand. For schools not in the higher echelons, such as Harvard and Stanford, conversations began to shift to reaching new students. For many, this meant a focus on international students from emerging economies such as Korea, then China. These students largely pay cash for their educations—as federal financial aid is not available to them—and were a big boon to schools. They also served to obfuscate the massive shifts happening domestically, leaving schools woefully unprepared for a crisis.  
Covid-19 struck in March and changed the equation immediately, forcing schools to digitize with no long-term plan in place, no real strategy. The issue accelerated when schools realized that fall was going to stay online. And beyond simply shifting content and learning to online, there was a realization that a whole new Student Experience (SX) had to be considered. For example, how do students engage in learning at home with other family members around? How do we ensure that all students have a personal computer and WiFi connection? What about time zones? How do we facilitate internships on a global scale, with disparity in which companies that are open to business, or closed? How do we create a school community? 
During this period of profound change, academic institutions that take the time to truly understand the needs of their students, and faculty, whether they are working or learning from home or on campus, will be in a better position post-pandemic. These institutions have much to learn from consumer-based businesses—their trials and tribulations—when it comes to a more omni-channel, personalized approach.
fashionconsort.com
@fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 20:52:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Student Experience</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/7f5eef3c-153a-11eb-87a7-c7eec5b536a2/image/uploads_2F1604013789367-7ox5uw1a4cm-86a190e29dda567d034f8703292b1f54_2FFC+The+Student+Experience.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>During this period of profound change, academic institutions must take the time to truly understand the needs of their students, and faculty, whether they are working or learning from home or on campus, will be in a better position post-pandemic. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Over the past twenty years, consumer-based businesses have had to contend with a major push towards digitization, and to find the balance between in-person and online transactions and experiences, with customers driving the overall experience. Omni-channel, UX (user experience) and CX (customer experience) have emerged as guiding principles for businesses, in order to stay competitive in a fast-changing marketplace. 
And yet, this shift has gone largely unnoticed by higher education institutions where a physical, in-person experience reigns supreme, and a thoughtful online experience is still an afterthought to administrators, or at best, a potential new profit generator on the side. 
To be fair, there was very little reason for administrators to take notice—nor professors—because an in-person education was still what students wanted and fought for. And limited physical space, meant universities could turn away students and hike up prices. 
However, in the past few years, US demographics have shifted, creating too much supply of universities in the market and not enough demand. For schools not in the higher echelons, such as Harvard and Stanford, conversations began to shift to reaching new students. For many, this meant a focus on international students from emerging economies such as Korea, then China. These students largely pay cash for their educations—as federal financial aid is not available to them—and were a big boon to schools. They also served to obfuscate the massive shifts happening domestically, leaving schools woefully unprepared for a crisis.  
Covid-19 struck in March and changed the equation immediately, forcing schools to digitize with no long-term plan in place, no real strategy. The issue accelerated when schools realized that fall was going to stay online. And beyond simply shifting content and learning to online, there was a realization that a whole new Student Experience (SX) had to be considered. For example, how do students engage in learning at home with other family members around? How do we ensure that all students have a personal computer and WiFi connection? What about time zones? How do we facilitate internships on a global scale, with disparity in which companies that are open to business, or closed? How do we create a school community? 
During this period of profound change, academic institutions that take the time to truly understand the needs of their students, and faculty, whether they are working or learning from home or on campus, will be in a better position post-pandemic. These institutions have much to learn from consumer-based businesses—their trials and tribulations—when it comes to a more omni-channel, personalized approach.
fashionconsort.com
@fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Over the past twenty years, consumer-based businesses have had to contend with a major push towards digitization, and to find the balance between in-person and online transactions and experiences, with customers driving the overall experience. Omni-channel, UX (user experience) and CX (customer experience) have emerged as guiding principles for businesses, in order to stay competitive in a fast-changing marketplace. </p><p>And yet, this shift has gone largely unnoticed by higher education institutions where a physical, in-person experience reigns supreme, and a thoughtful online experience is still an afterthought to administrators, or at best, a potential new profit generator on the side. </p><p>To be fair, there was very little reason for administrators to take notice—nor professors—because an in-person education was still what students wanted and fought for. And limited physical space, meant universities could turn away students and hike up prices. </p><p>However, in the past few years, US demographics have shifted, creating too much supply of universities in the market and not enough demand. For schools not in the higher echelons, such as Harvard and Stanford, conversations began to shift to reaching new students. For many, this meant a focus on international students from emerging economies such as Korea, then China. These students largely pay cash for their educations—as federal financial aid is not available to them—and were a big boon to schools. They also served to obfuscate the massive shifts happening domestically, leaving schools woefully unprepared for a crisis.  </p><p>Covid-19 struck in March and changed the equation immediately, forcing schools to digitize with no long-term plan in place, no real strategy. The issue accelerated when schools realized that fall was going to stay online. And beyond simply shifting content and learning to online, there was a realization that a whole new Student Experience (SX) had to be considered. For example, how do students engage in learning at home with other family members around? How do we ensure that all students have a personal computer and WiFi connection? What about time zones? How do we facilitate internships on a global scale, with disparity in which companies that are open to business, or closed? How do we create a school community? </p><p>During this period of profound change, academic institutions that take the time to truly understand the needs of their students, and faculty, whether they are working or learning from home or on campus, will be in a better position post-pandemic. These institutions have much to learn from consumer-based businesses—their trials and tribulations—when it comes to a more omni-channel, personalized approach.</p><p><a href="https://www.fashionconsort.com/">fashionconsort.com</a></p><p><a href="https://www.instagram.com/fashionconsortagency">@fashionconsortagency</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>247</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5f5156738de00c68238af84f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV6313962235.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Remote vs. Immersive Online Learning</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network//remote-vs-immersive-online-learning</link>
      <description>Over 50% of American universities are not opening their physical campuses this fall due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Over the summer, college administrators and faculty have been working hard to move their classes online. It’s a monumental and expensive task to digitize content that has always been part of a live classroom setting, whether it be lectures or studios, especially in such a short amount of time and with very little overall precedent or strategy. After all, what works in a live classroom doesn’t necessarily work online. For example, in a physical classroom a professor is able to “read the room” and adapt a lecture to keep students engaged over the course of 1-2 hours, with questions and break-out sessions. Most teaching is done in the classroom, and students are then expected to synthesize information outside of the classroom. Online, classes are mostly pre-produced in modules that consider every aspect of the “student experience.” For example, a lecture online should be developed more like a short 8 to 10-minute films, with a strong narrative arc, supporting images and thoughtful editing. These lectures are then punctuated by self-paced quizzes, assignments or readings, each building on one another. Inherently, successful online learning relies on what’s called a “flipped classroom” model wherein students engage asynchronously with content, whether it be lectures, readings, podcasts, or videos on their time, and then come together with the instructor and classmates in synchronous sessions to discuss and synthesize information. So, universities that are simply “cutting and pasting” the physical experience to online are really just teaching remotely. And while this still takes time and money, it’s completely understandable why students, and their parents, are not willing to pay the same tuition for this experience as opposed to the full, physical experience. It’s second-rate    at best and puts the onus of the experience on the instructor, many of whom have no experience teaching online. For universities that are developing and offering true, immersive online courses, the equation is much different, and will take time, expertise and financial investment. In fact, these types of courses will potentially provide more consistent, high quality learning to students, allowing instructors to focus less on delivering content and more on mentoring and engaging one-on-one with students.  And truly forward-thinking institutions, will begin to think less in terms of online and offline, and more in terms of a hybrid—or omni-channel learning experience—to provide students with much more thoughtful learning touch points across all modalities that can ensure a more flexible and personalized educational experience.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:37:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Remote vs. Immersive Online Learning</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/7f8c30fa-153a-11eb-87a7-5faa0e655530/image/uploads_2F1604013769062-b4abnojhwsm-9a4ed055f929db6baf59f729af053c46_2FFC+Remote+vs+Immersive+Online+Learning.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over 50% of American universities are not opening their physical campuses this fall due to the Covid-19 pandemic. truly forward-thinking institutions, will begin to think less in terms of online and offline, and more in terms of a hybrid—or omni-channel learning experience.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Over 50% of American universities are not opening their physical campuses this fall due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Over the summer, college administrators and faculty have been working hard to move their classes online. It’s a monumental and expensive task to digitize content that has always been part of a live classroom setting, whether it be lectures or studios, especially in such a short amount of time and with very little overall precedent or strategy. After all, what works in a live classroom doesn’t necessarily work online. For example, in a physical classroom a professor is able to “read the room” and adapt a lecture to keep students engaged over the course of 1-2 hours, with questions and break-out sessions. Most teaching is done in the classroom, and students are then expected to synthesize information outside of the classroom. Online, classes are mostly pre-produced in modules that consider every aspect of the “student experience.” For example, a lecture online should be developed more like a short 8 to 10-minute films, with a strong narrative arc, supporting images and thoughtful editing. These lectures are then punctuated by self-paced quizzes, assignments or readings, each building on one another. Inherently, successful online learning relies on what’s called a “flipped classroom” model wherein students engage asynchronously with content, whether it be lectures, readings, podcasts, or videos on their time, and then come together with the instructor and classmates in synchronous sessions to discuss and synthesize information. So, universities that are simply “cutting and pasting” the physical experience to online are really just teaching remotely. And while this still takes time and money, it’s completely understandable why students, and their parents, are not willing to pay the same tuition for this experience as opposed to the full, physical experience. It’s second-rate    at best and puts the onus of the experience on the instructor, many of whom have no experience teaching online. For universities that are developing and offering true, immersive online courses, the equation is much different, and will take time, expertise and financial investment. In fact, these types of courses will potentially provide more consistent, high quality learning to students, allowing instructors to focus less on delivering content and more on mentoring and engaging one-on-one with students.  And truly forward-thinking institutions, will begin to think less in terms of online and offline, and more in terms of a hybrid—or omni-channel learning experience—to provide students with much more thoughtful learning touch points across all modalities that can ensure a more flexible and personalized educational experience.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Over 50% of American universities are not opening their physical campuses this fall due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Over the summer, college administrators and faculty have been working hard to move their classes online. It’s a monumental and expensive task to digitize content that has always been part of a live classroom setting, whether it be lectures or studios, especially in such a short amount of time and with very little overall precedent or strategy. After all, what works in a live classroom doesn’t necessarily work online. For example, in a physical classroom a professor is able to “read the room” and adapt a lecture to keep students engaged over the course of 1-2 hours, with questions and break-out sessions. Most teaching is done in the classroom, and students are then expected to synthesize information outside of the classroom. Online, classes are mostly pre-produced in modules that consider every aspect of the “student experience.” For example, a lecture online should be developed more like a short 8 to 10-minute films, with a strong narrative arc, supporting images and thoughtful editing. These lectures are then punctuated by self-paced quizzes, assignments or readings, each building on one another. Inherently, successful online learning relies on what’s called a “flipped classroom” model wherein students engage asynchronously with content, whether it be lectures, readings, podcasts, or videos on their time, and then come together with the instructor and classmates in synchronous sessions to discuss and synthesize information. So, universities that are simply “cutting and pasting” the physical experience to online are really just teaching remotely. And while this still takes time and money, it’s completely understandable why students, and their parents, are not willing to pay the same tuition for this experience as opposed to the full, physical experience. It’s second-rate    at best and puts the onus of the experience on the instructor, many of whom have no experience teaching online. For universities that are developing and offering true, immersive online courses, the equation is much different, and will take time, expertise and financial investment. In fact, these types of courses will potentially provide more consistent, high quality learning to students, allowing instructors to focus less on delivering content and more on mentoring and engaging one-on-one with students.  And truly forward-thinking institutions, will begin to think less in terms of online and offline, and more in terms of a hybrid—or omni-channel learning experience—to provide students with much more thoughtful learning touch points across all modalities that can ensure a more flexible and personalized educational experience.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>253</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5f4406fb44a77734ab1c0e41]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV8254855115.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Higher Learning from Retail</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/higher-learning-from-retail</link>
      <description>Over the past 3-5 years, fashion retail has been going through what’s been coined “The Retail Apocalypse.” Long-held truths and traditions that had served retailers for over a hundred years no longer made sense, or needed to be tweaked, to integrate with online shopping, and overall digital technologies that have led to greater access to brands globally. In short, technology was facilitating supply in a world where demand hasn’t shifted—at least demographically speaking. Yes, fast fashion retailers, were able to convince shoppers to buy more, but even that has its limits. And now, with the Covid-19 pandemic, the apocalypse is no longer metaphorical. It is real, and the consequences of not fully shifting to a digital-focused retail operation is forcing companies to shift focus immediately or go out of business. Those companies that have the funds and expertise to make this shift will make it to the other side of the pandemic intact.  There are many lessons to be learned from retail in other industries. In particular, higher education. In many ways, fashion retail and higher education are quite alike. They rely heavily on physical service, experience and community. The sum of these three elements is a brand name—that carries social currency, and allows fashion brands and schools, in equal measure, to increase their prices, far beyond cost.  Both industries have engaged in building digital platforms, catering to a new generation of customers and expanding their reach and profits. But in both cases, the shift to online was largely for “looks” —to be seen as technologically progressive. Behind-the-scenes was something altogether different. Online shopping and online learning are largely misunderstood and therefore underfunded and understaffed. And the actual technologies driving their online activities are outdated. In both cases, the physical and online experience have been kept separate. Fashion companies hired “online staff” and universities hired “online instructors” —often second-class citizens. And yes, while there are some positive examples of collaboration and integration between the two, these are not the norm. In large part, this is due to executive leadership, that doesn’t fully understand online modalities, especially in terms of how it is now driving the physical experience. full integration with a physical experience. What’s more, they are not part of the generation of customers or students, who grew up in a digital world and who expect a fully connected, integrated, hybrid experience. Higher education is now forced to face head-on the online revolution that is completely re-shaping all learning modalities. And just like fashion retail, this is going to require a shift in hiring and staffing, building new expertise, a updated operational strategies. Except for the special few boutique schools—that are more in line with Hermes than Zara, higher education is now poised for a revolution, not an evolution. There is no simply no time for the latter. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Higher Learning from Retail</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/7fbda888-153a-11eb-87a7-cbac22701838/image/uploads_2F1604013727622-1s9zc1ta3ah-bdd3127d41b780bb197587e874e6f5e6_2FFC+Higher+Learning+from+Retail.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>There are many lessons to be learned from retail in other industries. In particular, higher education. In many ways, fashion retail and higher education are quite alike. They rely heavily on physical service, experience and community.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Over the past 3-5 years, fashion retail has been going through what’s been coined “The Retail Apocalypse.” Long-held truths and traditions that had served retailers for over a hundred years no longer made sense, or needed to be tweaked, to integrate with online shopping, and overall digital technologies that have led to greater access to brands globally. In short, technology was facilitating supply in a world where demand hasn’t shifted—at least demographically speaking. Yes, fast fashion retailers, were able to convince shoppers to buy more, but even that has its limits. And now, with the Covid-19 pandemic, the apocalypse is no longer metaphorical. It is real, and the consequences of not fully shifting to a digital-focused retail operation is forcing companies to shift focus immediately or go out of business. Those companies that have the funds and expertise to make this shift will make it to the other side of the pandemic intact.  There are many lessons to be learned from retail in other industries. In particular, higher education. In many ways, fashion retail and higher education are quite alike. They rely heavily on physical service, experience and community. The sum of these three elements is a brand name—that carries social currency, and allows fashion brands and schools, in equal measure, to increase their prices, far beyond cost.  Both industries have engaged in building digital platforms, catering to a new generation of customers and expanding their reach and profits. But in both cases, the shift to online was largely for “looks” —to be seen as technologically progressive. Behind-the-scenes was something altogether different. Online shopping and online learning are largely misunderstood and therefore underfunded and understaffed. And the actual technologies driving their online activities are outdated. In both cases, the physical and online experience have been kept separate. Fashion companies hired “online staff” and universities hired “online instructors” —often second-class citizens. And yes, while there are some positive examples of collaboration and integration between the two, these are not the norm. In large part, this is due to executive leadership, that doesn’t fully understand online modalities, especially in terms of how it is now driving the physical experience. full integration with a physical experience. What’s more, they are not part of the generation of customers or students, who grew up in a digital world and who expect a fully connected, integrated, hybrid experience. Higher education is now forced to face head-on the online revolution that is completely re-shaping all learning modalities. And just like fashion retail, this is going to require a shift in hiring and staffing, building new expertise, a updated operational strategies. Except for the special few boutique schools—that are more in line with Hermes than Zara, higher education is now poised for a revolution, not an evolution. There is no simply no time for the latter. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Over the past 3-5 years, fashion retail has been going through what’s been coined “The Retail Apocalypse.” Long-held truths and traditions that had served retailers for over a hundred years no longer made sense, or needed to be tweaked, to integrate with online shopping, and overall digital technologies that have led to greater access to brands globally. In short, technology was facilitating supply in a world where demand hasn’t shifted—at least demographically speaking. Yes, fast fashion retailers, were able to convince shoppers to buy more, but even that has its limits. And now, with the Covid-19 pandemic, the apocalypse is no longer metaphorical. It is real, and the consequences of not fully shifting to a digital-focused retail operation is forcing companies to shift focus immediately or go out of business. Those companies that have the funds and expertise to make this shift will make it to the other side of the pandemic intact.  There are many lessons to be learned from retail in other industries. In particular, higher education. In many ways, fashion retail and higher education are quite alike. They rely heavily on physical service, experience and community. The sum of these three elements is a brand name—that carries social currency, and allows fashion brands and schools, in equal measure, to increase their prices, far beyond cost.  Both industries have engaged in building digital platforms, catering to a new generation of customers and expanding their reach and profits. But in both cases, the shift to online was largely for “looks” —to be seen as technologically progressive. Behind-the-scenes was something altogether different. Online shopping and online learning are largely misunderstood and therefore underfunded and understaffed. And the actual technologies driving their online activities are outdated. In both cases, the physical and online experience have been kept separate. Fashion companies hired “online staff” and universities hired “online instructors” —often second-class citizens. And yes, while there are some positive examples of collaboration and integration between the two, these are not the norm. In large part, this is due to executive leadership, that doesn’t fully understand online modalities, especially in terms of how it is now driving the physical experience. full integration with a physical experience. What’s more, they are not part of the generation of customers or students, who grew up in a digital world and who expect a fully connected, integrated, hybrid experience. Higher education is now forced to face head-on the online revolution that is completely re-shaping all learning modalities. And just like fashion retail, this is going to require a shift in hiring and staffing, building new expertise, a updated operational strategies. Except for the special few boutique schools—that are more in line with Hermes than Zara, higher education is now poised for a revolution, not an evolution. There is no simply no time for the latter. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>260</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5f29ad404d4d8e40f3c6c3c7]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV3340048354.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>First Evolution, Now Revolution</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/first-evolution-now-revolution</link>
      <description>The Covid-19 pandemic has had an outsized effect on fashion retail. Almost overnight, retailers were forced to re-focus most of their business online. Up until that point, total online sales only accounted for approximately 10-20% of most retailers’ overall sales.  This doesn’t mean that the remaining 80-90% of business was done in brick &amp; mortar—it was likely a conglomeration of many channels or layers of channels. And this omni-channel approach mitigated risk in any one channel, especially e-commerce. But, all of the sudden, online was the only way customers could shop, and had to be everything to everyone. And while e-commerce, and digital engagement overall, has largely driven retail innovation in the past 20 years, not all multi-channel organizations had taken the time, or invested the money needed to fully optimize or take advantage of online as a sales channel. They didn’t fully understand that digital shopping, in effect, changes how we shop in general, or even how we engage with brands. In today’s world, there are myriad customer/brand touch points—and each channel has strengths and weaknesses to consider when considering the customer journey. Those brands that weren’t prepared to move expressly online, or brands who hadn’t considered this more complex approach to the client experience, were left exposed to the pandemic. A slew of bankruptcies have already riddled the marketplace, and will continue to do so, as the pandemic persists. With sales at an all-time low, there isn’t much time or cash to turn a business around. In many cases, this an accelerated “right sizing” of the market—something that would’ve happened over a longer period of time anyway. Neiman Marcus, Lord &amp; Taylor, The Men’s Warehouse, J.Crew—they were all struggling long before March 2020.  But this is also starting to have an effect on brands who are in a stronger position. In the short-term future, these fashion retailers must focus on digital retailing as the key entry point for all omni-channel retailing operations, and then innovate how other channels—especially brick and mortar—support online. Re-thinking what stores are—whether it’s their footprint, or their service offering—will need to be multi-dimensional, localized and thoughtful. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>First Evolution, Now Revolution</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/7ff102dc-153a-11eb-87a7-57006b0f80c4/image/uploads_2F1604013690162-4jicils6nk-8f4b5b7c87e0ae9835b6ab27635fff43_2FFC+First+Evolution_2C+Now+Revolution.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Covid-19 pandemic has had an outsized effect on fashion retail. Almost overnight, retailers were forced to re-focus most of their business online.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Covid-19 pandemic has had an outsized effect on fashion retail. Almost overnight, retailers were forced to re-focus most of their business online. Up until that point, total online sales only accounted for approximately 10-20% of most retailers’ overall sales.  This doesn’t mean that the remaining 80-90% of business was done in brick &amp; mortar—it was likely a conglomeration of many channels or layers of channels. And this omni-channel approach mitigated risk in any one channel, especially e-commerce. But, all of the sudden, online was the only way customers could shop, and had to be everything to everyone. And while e-commerce, and digital engagement overall, has largely driven retail innovation in the past 20 years, not all multi-channel organizations had taken the time, or invested the money needed to fully optimize or take advantage of online as a sales channel. They didn’t fully understand that digital shopping, in effect, changes how we shop in general, or even how we engage with brands. In today’s world, there are myriad customer/brand touch points—and each channel has strengths and weaknesses to consider when considering the customer journey. Those brands that weren’t prepared to move expressly online, or brands who hadn’t considered this more complex approach to the client experience, were left exposed to the pandemic. A slew of bankruptcies have already riddled the marketplace, and will continue to do so, as the pandemic persists. With sales at an all-time low, there isn’t much time or cash to turn a business around. In many cases, this an accelerated “right sizing” of the market—something that would’ve happened over a longer period of time anyway. Neiman Marcus, Lord &amp; Taylor, The Men’s Warehouse, J.Crew—they were all struggling long before March 2020.  But this is also starting to have an effect on brands who are in a stronger position. In the short-term future, these fashion retailers must focus on digital retailing as the key entry point for all omni-channel retailing operations, and then innovate how other channels—especially brick and mortar—support online. Re-thinking what stores are—whether it’s their footprint, or their service offering—will need to be multi-dimensional, localized and thoughtful. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The Covid-19 pandemic has had an outsized effect on fashion retail. Almost overnight, retailers were forced to re-focus most of their business online. Up until that point, total online sales only accounted for approximately 10-20% of most retailers’ overall sales.  This doesn’t mean that the remaining 80-90% of business was done in brick &amp; mortar—it was likely a conglomeration of many channels or layers of channels. And this omni-channel approach mitigated risk in any one channel, especially e-commerce. But, all of the sudden, online was the only way customers could shop, and had to be everything to everyone. And while e-commerce, and digital engagement overall, has largely driven retail innovation in the past 20 years, not all multi-channel organizations had taken the time, or invested the money needed to fully optimize or take advantage of online as a sales channel. They didn’t fully understand that digital shopping, in effect, changes how we shop in general, or even how we engage with brands. In today’s world, there are myriad customer/brand touch points—and each channel has strengths and weaknesses to consider when considering the customer journey. Those brands that weren’t prepared to move expressly online, or brands who hadn’t considered this more complex approach to the client experience, were left exposed to the pandemic. A slew of bankruptcies have already riddled the marketplace, and will continue to do so, as the pandemic persists. With sales at an all-time low, there isn’t much time or cash to turn a business around. In many cases, this an accelerated “right sizing” of the market—something that would’ve happened over a longer period of time anyway. Neiman Marcus, Lord &amp; Taylor, The Men’s Warehouse, J.Crew—they were all struggling long before March 2020.  But this is also starting to have an effect on brands who are in a stronger position. In the short-term future, these fashion retailers must focus on digital retailing as the key entry point for all omni-channel retailing operations, and then innovate how other channels—especially brick and mortar—support online. Re-thinking what stores are—whether it’s their footprint, or their service offering—will need to be multi-dimensional, localized and thoughtful. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>226</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5f29ab4be290a7477fcb9c15]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV1881942172.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fashion Luxury is a Luxury</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/fashion-luxury-is-a-luxury</link>
      <description>Luxury fashion retailers have long relied on their storied histories to buoy themselves through times of trouble. In a sense, they have become too big, or at least too important to fail. And, we as customers, given their “importance to our social identities” are willing to give these luxury brands much more room to fail and recover. It’s something that the likes of Bernard Arnault or Francois Pinault, the CEOs of LVMH and The Kering Group respectively, understand unequivocally. In fact, it’s what drives their “portfolio” approach to the luxury business. When Gucci is “in” then it doesn’t matter so much if YSL is “out.” And in some cases, there have been brands such as Alexander McQueen that at one point was bleeding money, but was kept in the portfolio for prestige. McQueen’s extraordinary and extravagant runway shows served as a counterweight to more wearable, sellable labels. This portfolio approach has also meant that luxury brands have always had some wiggle room to be more creative, and not so tied to retail sales, or shareholder demands. This is indeed a positive, in a fashion economy that requires year-to-year sales growth. However, from a more negative point of view, it has hidden some of the problems that some luxury labels have contended with—from high turnover of creative directors, to low sales, and even the ramifications of major public communication fiascos. In the context of today’s culture wars, fashion luxury brands, have managed to put “foot in mouth” an astounding amount of times, and still manage to come through largely unscathed. There are many examples: Prada and Gucci’s blackface representations Dolce &amp; Gabbana’s outright racist and anti-LGBTQ statements, Marni’s tone-deaf and culturally appropriated ad campaign, Jacquemus’ performative use of black models notwithstanding a mostly white organization, or Burberry’s noose on the runway… Customers will complain on social media, even like Diet Prada’s scathing posts…but then they continue to share that same content and shop these luxury brands notwithstanding. As Dior’s president Pietro Beccari stated, no matter the culture conversation, or the pandemic, “we have 20 million followers to feed on Instagram".” And why not, the repercussions are not there. And again, largely hidden within the portfolio system. But in an age where the rising consumer is demanding more authenticity and transparency, will luxury brands still get a way with this? Will they eventually meet the wrath of “cancel culture?” Will they be able to claim authenticity while continue to still build their brands on appropriated culture? On the backs of those who cannot even afford their products? After all, luxury fashion is a luxury—that can be satiated elsewhere. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2020 21:41:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fashion Luxury is a Luxury</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/802355b6-153a-11eb-87a7-8789d66d380a/image/uploads_2F1604013665234-f4fqtwc5sb8-a43bfe72887e823deda49e69f9b4b12c_2FFC+Fashion+Luxury+is+a+Luxury.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>in an age where the rising consumer is demanding more authenticity and transparency, will luxury brands still get a way with this? Will they eventually meet the wrath of “cancel culture?” Will they be able to claim authenticity while continue to still build their brands on appropriated culture?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Luxury fashion retailers have long relied on their storied histories to buoy themselves through times of trouble. In a sense, they have become too big, or at least too important to fail. And, we as customers, given their “importance to our social identities” are willing to give these luxury brands much more room to fail and recover. It’s something that the likes of Bernard Arnault or Francois Pinault, the CEOs of LVMH and The Kering Group respectively, understand unequivocally. In fact, it’s what drives their “portfolio” approach to the luxury business. When Gucci is “in” then it doesn’t matter so much if YSL is “out.” And in some cases, there have been brands such as Alexander McQueen that at one point was bleeding money, but was kept in the portfolio for prestige. McQueen’s extraordinary and extravagant runway shows served as a counterweight to more wearable, sellable labels. This portfolio approach has also meant that luxury brands have always had some wiggle room to be more creative, and not so tied to retail sales, or shareholder demands. This is indeed a positive, in a fashion economy that requires year-to-year sales growth. However, from a more negative point of view, it has hidden some of the problems that some luxury labels have contended with—from high turnover of creative directors, to low sales, and even the ramifications of major public communication fiascos. In the context of today’s culture wars, fashion luxury brands, have managed to put “foot in mouth” an astounding amount of times, and still manage to come through largely unscathed. There are many examples: Prada and Gucci’s blackface representations Dolce &amp; Gabbana’s outright racist and anti-LGBTQ statements, Marni’s tone-deaf and culturally appropriated ad campaign, Jacquemus’ performative use of black models notwithstanding a mostly white organization, or Burberry’s noose on the runway… Customers will complain on social media, even like Diet Prada’s scathing posts…but then they continue to share that same content and shop these luxury brands notwithstanding. As Dior’s president Pietro Beccari stated, no matter the culture conversation, or the pandemic, “we have 20 million followers to feed on Instagram".” And why not, the repercussions are not there. And again, largely hidden within the portfolio system. But in an age where the rising consumer is demanding more authenticity and transparency, will luxury brands still get a way with this? Will they eventually meet the wrath of “cancel culture?” Will they be able to claim authenticity while continue to still build their brands on appropriated culture? On the backs of those who cannot even afford their products? After all, luxury fashion is a luxury—that can be satiated elsewhere. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Luxury fashion retailers have long relied on their storied histories to buoy themselves through times of trouble. In a sense, they have become too big, or at least too important to fail. And, we as customers, given their “importance to our social identities” are willing to give these luxury brands much more room to fail and recover. It’s something that the likes of Bernard Arnault or Francois Pinault, the CEOs of LVMH and The Kering Group respectively, understand unequivocally. In fact, it’s what drives their “portfolio” approach to the luxury business. When Gucci is “in” then it doesn’t matter so much if YSL is “out.” And in some cases, there have been brands such as Alexander McQueen that at one point was bleeding money, but was kept in the portfolio for prestige. McQueen’s extraordinary and extravagant runway shows served as a counterweight to more wearable, sellable labels. This portfolio approach has also meant that luxury brands have always had some wiggle room to be more creative, and not so tied to retail sales, or shareholder demands. This is indeed a positive, in a fashion economy that requires year-to-year sales growth. However, from a more negative point of view, it has hidden some of the problems that some luxury labels have contended with—from high turnover of creative directors, to low sales, and even the ramifications of major public communication fiascos. In the context of today’s culture wars, fashion luxury brands, have managed to put “foot in mouth” an astounding amount of times, and still manage to come through largely unscathed. There are many examples: Prada and Gucci’s blackface representations Dolce &amp; Gabbana’s outright racist and anti-LGBTQ statements, Marni’s tone-deaf and culturally appropriated ad campaign, Jacquemus’ performative use of black models notwithstanding a mostly white organization, or Burberry’s noose on the runway… Customers will complain on social media, even like Diet Prada’s scathing posts…but then they continue to share that same content and shop these luxury brands notwithstanding. As Dior’s president Pietro Beccari stated, no matter the culture conversation, or the pandemic, “we have 20 million followers to feed on Instagram".” And why not, the repercussions are not there. And again, largely hidden within the portfolio system. But in an age where the rising consumer is demanding more authenticity and transparency, will luxury brands still get a way with this? Will they eventually meet the wrath of “cancel culture?” Will they be able to claim authenticity while continue to still build their brands on appropriated culture? On the backs of those who cannot even afford their products? After all, luxury fashion is a luxury—that can be satiated elsewhere. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>254</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5f288474ce5aa52565243a8c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV2931599687.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Podcasts, More Authentic Communication</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/podcast-news-bytes/podcasts-more-authentic-communication</link>
      <description>[Joshua] Organizations are struggling to find ways to engage in authentic conversations with their employees and their customers. Often, they resort to long-winded emails, or written public statements, that are meant to “cover all angles” in one fell swoop. At best, these attempts go unread; at worst, they are too simplistic, or too full of legalese, and show a lack of authenticity. In an age where employees and customers expect transparency, especially around shared mission and values, these forms of communication are not optimal. The most effective way to communicate is in person, face to face, eye to eye, where intent and action are more nuanced and more empathic. This has always been a struggle for companies with far-flung reach, and this issue has only amplified during the Covid-19 pandemic, where employees are less likely to be together. And this is likely to be our new collective reality, far beyond the current crisis. So, what should organizations do? There is no one clear approach, however brands should be looking for platforms that provide more intimacy. Already, Zoom has replaced the traditional phone call, because it is a visual medium. Another emerging modality is podcasts—whether they’re specifically for employees, customers, or both. Because they are typically listened to while driving, cleaning, working out or even relaxing, they create a more intimate space to share ideas and personal experiences, discuss complex concepts and disseminate information, all while building community. Here’s Phil, a Fashion Consort associate, and podcast development expert: [Phil] I spent a lot of my career working in IT and Technology. And while I knew I was building systems that were supporting important work at the companies I worked for, I had very little connection to that work, and the people that were using the tools I was creating. Without connecting to the larger organizational community, I felt left out, and ultimately, I burned out. [Joshua] Podcasts are typically delivered by subscription, via smart phone, completely disconnected from emails, and other forms of communication that are characteristically more work and task related. And, because they are so focused on the human voice—they can be a much less stressful way to communicate. Here’s Phil again: [Phil] I left the tech world, and then soon thereafter started a podcast that focused on the intersection of the fashion and LGBTQ communities. For me, it was a passion project, a disconnect from corporate life. But it has since made clear to me how powerful the podcast medium is! I am now working with clients, small and large, to connect employees and customers in more meaningful and human-centric ways, in support of their values, all through podcasting! [Joshua] For more information on how to incorporate podcasts in your organization, I recommend reading Phil’s article, “Podcasts, A Corporate Opportunity” which can be found on the Fashion Consort website. Just click on News. Also, be sure to listen to Phil’s podcast, “Transition of Style,” available wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Podcasts, More Authentic Communication</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/80514566-153a-11eb-87a7-efd1b943bc68/image/uploads_2F1604013638158-xchz36c2mua-fb6d1fd3016f7623227a0fdf460236db_2FFC+Podcasts+More+Authentic+Communication.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Organizations are struggling to find ways to engage in authentic conversations with their employees and their customers.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>[Joshua] Organizations are struggling to find ways to engage in authentic conversations with their employees and their customers. Often, they resort to long-winded emails, or written public statements, that are meant to “cover all angles” in one fell swoop. At best, these attempts go unread; at worst, they are too simplistic, or too full of legalese, and show a lack of authenticity. In an age where employees and customers expect transparency, especially around shared mission and values, these forms of communication are not optimal. The most effective way to communicate is in person, face to face, eye to eye, where intent and action are more nuanced and more empathic. This has always been a struggle for companies with far-flung reach, and this issue has only amplified during the Covid-19 pandemic, where employees are less likely to be together. And this is likely to be our new collective reality, far beyond the current crisis. So, what should organizations do? There is no one clear approach, however brands should be looking for platforms that provide more intimacy. Already, Zoom has replaced the traditional phone call, because it is a visual medium. Another emerging modality is podcasts—whether they’re specifically for employees, customers, or both. Because they are typically listened to while driving, cleaning, working out or even relaxing, they create a more intimate space to share ideas and personal experiences, discuss complex concepts and disseminate information, all while building community. Here’s Phil, a Fashion Consort associate, and podcast development expert: [Phil] I spent a lot of my career working in IT and Technology. And while I knew I was building systems that were supporting important work at the companies I worked for, I had very little connection to that work, and the people that were using the tools I was creating. Without connecting to the larger organizational community, I felt left out, and ultimately, I burned out. [Joshua] Podcasts are typically delivered by subscription, via smart phone, completely disconnected from emails, and other forms of communication that are characteristically more work and task related. And, because they are so focused on the human voice—they can be a much less stressful way to communicate. Here’s Phil again: [Phil] I left the tech world, and then soon thereafter started a podcast that focused on the intersection of the fashion and LGBTQ communities. For me, it was a passion project, a disconnect from corporate life. But it has since made clear to me how powerful the podcast medium is! I am now working with clients, small and large, to connect employees and customers in more meaningful and human-centric ways, in support of their values, all through podcasting! [Joshua] For more information on how to incorporate podcasts in your organization, I recommend reading Phil’s article, “Podcasts, A Corporate Opportunity” which can be found on the Fashion Consort website. Just click on News. Also, be sure to listen to Phil’s podcast, “Transition of Style,” available wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>[Joshua] Organizations are struggling to find ways to engage in authentic conversations with their employees and their customers. Often, they resort to long-winded emails, or written public statements, that are meant to “cover all angles” in one fell swoop. At best, these attempts go unread; at worst, they are too simplistic, or too full of legalese, and show a lack of authenticity. In an age where employees and customers expect transparency, especially around shared mission and values, these forms of communication are not optimal. The most effective way to communicate is in person, face to face, eye to eye, where intent and action are more nuanced and more empathic. This has always been a struggle for companies with far-flung reach, and this issue has only amplified during the Covid-19 pandemic, where employees are less likely to be together. And this is likely to be our new collective reality, far beyond the current crisis. So, what should organizations do? There is no one clear approach, however brands should be looking for platforms that provide more intimacy. Already, Zoom has replaced the traditional phone call, because it is a visual medium. Another emerging modality is podcasts—whether they’re specifically for employees, customers, or both. Because they are typically listened to while driving, cleaning, working out or even relaxing, they create a more intimate space to share ideas and personal experiences, discuss complex concepts and disseminate information, all while building community. Here’s Phil, a Fashion Consort associate, and podcast development expert: [Phil] I spent a lot of my career working in IT and Technology. And while I knew I was building systems that were supporting important work at the companies I worked for, I had very little connection to that work, and the people that were using the tools I was creating. Without connecting to the larger organizational community, I felt left out, and ultimately, I burned out. [Joshua] Podcasts are typically delivered by subscription, via smart phone, completely disconnected from emails, and other forms of communication that are characteristically more work and task related. And, because they are so focused on the human voice—they can be a much less stressful way to communicate. Here’s Phil again: [Phil] I left the tech world, and then soon thereafter started a podcast that focused on the intersection of the fashion and LGBTQ communities. For me, it was a passion project, a disconnect from corporate life. But it has since made clear to me how powerful the podcast medium is! I am now working with clients, small and large, to connect employees and customers in more meaningful and human-centric ways, in support of their values, all through podcasting! [Joshua] For more information on how to incorporate podcasts in your organization, I recommend reading Phil’s article, “Podcasts, A Corporate Opportunity” which can be found on the Fashion Consort website. Just click on News. Also, be sure to listen to Phil’s podcast, “Transition of Style,” available wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>274</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5ee904df58926a2d5ba72012]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV8394117729.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fashion, Fully Exposed</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/podcast-news-bytes/fashion-fully-exposed</link>
      <description>Fashion brands are struggling to engage in meaningful and authentic conversations around the Covid-19 pandemic, the environment and the Black Lives Matter movement. Even with the best of intentions, written statements in the form of press releases and social media posts, lack authenticity. In many cases, their words and images are performative, void of any true action. In other cases, they expose white, patriarchal privilege, inherent bias and a past full of mismanagement, inequity and even racism. Fashion brands find themselves in a particularly precarious position as an industry that is both an artistic expression and a consumer product. It is both form and function. This tension has always existed, but not so tenuously as in this moment; ironically, fashion is now fully exposed. Luxury fashion brands are especially fraught, their refined designs, and the rarefied worlds created around them, are meant only for an exclusive few. It’s this exclusivity that drives up prices, exponentially over the years. And as consumers are demanding more transparency from fashion brands, they are also realizing the extent to which they are paying to create this world of exclusivity. Quality, being as subjective as it is, is particularly out-of-balance when it comes to luxury products, as the cost of goods is so drastically different than the retail price. With this in mind then, what genuine bonafides do these brands even have to speak about social issues at all? Wobbly at best. And yet, this shouldn’t, nor can it be, an excuse. Fashion after all is not inherently evil, it is merely a manifestation of our social values at any given time; the zeitgeist. And since these values are changing, right now in cataclysmic ways, so must fashion. This means seismic shifts in how fashion does business—a categorical house cleaning from the cotton fields to stores and to the landfills, that rethinks sustainability from an environmental and human perspective. This will take an immense amount of time and effort. So, instead of spending energy on empty promises, crying in guilt, or being defensive…look inward and start systematically rebuilding a new fashion industry. There is a whole generation that is ready to embrace a more diverse, more just, more inclusive fashion industry. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:37:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fashion, Fully Exposed</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/80948592-153a-11eb-87a7-43b489827d01/image/uploads_2F1604013616068-nvm0jeh0f8-fa8d2e4c13dd88b47caea5cff2b6467d_2FFC+Fashion+Fully+Exposed.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Fashion brands are struggling to engage in meaningful and authentic conversations around the Covid-19 pandemic, the environment and the Black Lives Matter movement. Even with the best of intentions, written statements in the form of press releases and social media posts, lack authenticity.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Fashion brands are struggling to engage in meaningful and authentic conversations around the Covid-19 pandemic, the environment and the Black Lives Matter movement. Even with the best of intentions, written statements in the form of press releases and social media posts, lack authenticity. In many cases, their words and images are performative, void of any true action. In other cases, they expose white, patriarchal privilege, inherent bias and a past full of mismanagement, inequity and even racism. Fashion brands find themselves in a particularly precarious position as an industry that is both an artistic expression and a consumer product. It is both form and function. This tension has always existed, but not so tenuously as in this moment; ironically, fashion is now fully exposed. Luxury fashion brands are especially fraught, their refined designs, and the rarefied worlds created around them, are meant only for an exclusive few. It’s this exclusivity that drives up prices, exponentially over the years. And as consumers are demanding more transparency from fashion brands, they are also realizing the extent to which they are paying to create this world of exclusivity. Quality, being as subjective as it is, is particularly out-of-balance when it comes to luxury products, as the cost of goods is so drastically different than the retail price. With this in mind then, what genuine bonafides do these brands even have to speak about social issues at all? Wobbly at best. And yet, this shouldn’t, nor can it be, an excuse. Fashion after all is not inherently evil, it is merely a manifestation of our social values at any given time; the zeitgeist. And since these values are changing, right now in cataclysmic ways, so must fashion. This means seismic shifts in how fashion does business—a categorical house cleaning from the cotton fields to stores and to the landfills, that rethinks sustainability from an environmental and human perspective. This will take an immense amount of time and effort. So, instead of spending energy on empty promises, crying in guilt, or being defensive…look inward and start systematically rebuilding a new fashion industry. There is a whole generation that is ready to embrace a more diverse, more just, more inclusive fashion industry. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Fashion brands are struggling to engage in meaningful and authentic conversations around the Covid-19 pandemic, the environment and the Black Lives Matter movement. Even with the best of intentions, written statements in the form of press releases and social media posts, lack authenticity. In many cases, their words and images are performative, void of any true action. In other cases, they expose white, patriarchal privilege, inherent bias and a past full of mismanagement, inequity and even racism. Fashion brands find themselves in a particularly precarious position as an industry that is both an artistic expression and a consumer product. It is both form and function. This tension has always existed, but not so tenuously as in this moment; ironically, fashion is now fully exposed. Luxury fashion brands are especially fraught, their refined designs, and the rarefied worlds created around them, are meant only for an exclusive few. It’s this exclusivity that drives up prices, exponentially over the years. And as consumers are demanding more transparency from fashion brands, they are also realizing the extent to which they are paying to create this world of exclusivity. Quality, being as subjective as it is, is particularly out-of-balance when it comes to luxury products, as the cost of goods is so drastically different than the retail price. With this in mind then, what genuine bonafides do these brands even have to speak about social issues at all? Wobbly at best. And yet, this shouldn’t, nor can it be, an excuse. Fashion after all is not inherently evil, it is merely a manifestation of our social values at any given time; the zeitgeist. And since these values are changing, right now in cataclysmic ways, so must fashion. This means seismic shifts in how fashion does business—a categorical house cleaning from the cotton fields to stores and to the landfills, that rethinks sustainability from an environmental and human perspective. This will take an immense amount of time and effort. So, instead of spending energy on empty promises, crying in guilt, or being defensive…look inward and start systematically rebuilding a new fashion industry. There is a whole generation that is ready to embrace a more diverse, more just, more inclusive fashion industry. fashionconsort.com @fashionconsortagency</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>230</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5ee9037cefe5d10cb66a2fe8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV5950658783.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fashion &amp; Racism + Special Episode of "Retail Revolution"</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/podcast-news-bytes/fashion-amp-racism-special-episode-of-retail-revolution</link>
      <description>We are at a tipping point in our nation. More than ever, it is clear that our systems are inherently racist, built by, built for and fully empowering white people to the disadvantage of people of color, most specifically black Americans. This systemic racism, often invisible, has ensured consistent lack of access to equal education, jobs, equal pay, homes and business capital for black people. It has led to higher rates of police brutality, incarceration and even death. George Floyd is just one of many in these past few months alone that has been brutally murdered for simply being black. We must now look inward, in our communities and our businesses, in our institutions of learning and governance to change the system, to right those wrongs. It will be a painful process, and one that will require a great amount of self reflection and vulnerability. But we must rise to the occasion, especially if we are in roles of leadership. For white people this absolutely means using our white privilege to provide that same privilege to everyone, no matter the color of their skin. For me, this means rethinking how and what I teach—to go beyond our euro-centric fashion system. It means advocating for more parity in the fashion system, an industry that is primarily led by white males, by facilitating training and challenging broken systems—systems that favor white hires, white promotion and therefore white leadership; systems that commodify black culture, but but don’t profit black people. It also means putting my money where my mouth is when it comes to my buying power, beyond simply calling companies out and then moving on once they’ve posted a press release and apology. That’s not good enough and won’t lead to real change. These issues are difficult, but must be addressed now. In March 2020, Fashion Consort began production of “Retail Revolution” a podcast that engages experts in discussions about fashion retail. Our focus was on the fast changing world of fashion retail, especially during the pandemic. Our goal was to provide a space to consider a new way forward for retail, that values authenticity and innovation. And now, this conversation extends far beyond the pandemic, to the revolution that must take place in the fashion industry around issues of racial justice, equity, diversity and inclusion. Today, as part of News Bytes, we are sharing a special episode of “Retail Revolution” that begins to tackle these issues. We hope you’ll join us for this 40-minute conversation, and then share your own voice. Learn more: www.fashionconsort.com Follow us: @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2020 17:43:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fashion &amp; Racism + a special episode of "Retail Revolution"</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/80bfbb04-153a-11eb-87a7-dffe3d280cc8/image/uploads_2F1604013589932-xwlnoavnxk-041ae324ccbd55c3451d4ec0117d938f_2FFC+Fashion+and+Racism.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>We are at a tipping point in our nation. More than ever, it is clear that our systems are inherently racist, built by, built for and fully empowering white people to the disadvantage of people of color, most specifically black Americans. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>We are at a tipping point in our nation. More than ever, it is clear that our systems are inherently racist, built by, built for and fully empowering white people to the disadvantage of people of color, most specifically black Americans. This systemic racism, often invisible, has ensured consistent lack of access to equal education, jobs, equal pay, homes and business capital for black people. It has led to higher rates of police brutality, incarceration and even death. George Floyd is just one of many in these past few months alone that has been brutally murdered for simply being black. We must now look inward, in our communities and our businesses, in our institutions of learning and governance to change the system, to right those wrongs. It will be a painful process, and one that will require a great amount of self reflection and vulnerability. But we must rise to the occasion, especially if we are in roles of leadership. For white people this absolutely means using our white privilege to provide that same privilege to everyone, no matter the color of their skin. For me, this means rethinking how and what I teach—to go beyond our euro-centric fashion system. It means advocating for more parity in the fashion system, an industry that is primarily led by white males, by facilitating training and challenging broken systems—systems that favor white hires, white promotion and therefore white leadership; systems that commodify black culture, but but don’t profit black people. It also means putting my money where my mouth is when it comes to my buying power, beyond simply calling companies out and then moving on once they’ve posted a press release and apology. That’s not good enough and won’t lead to real change. These issues are difficult, but must be addressed now. In March 2020, Fashion Consort began production of “Retail Revolution” a podcast that engages experts in discussions about fashion retail. Our focus was on the fast changing world of fashion retail, especially during the pandemic. Our goal was to provide a space to consider a new way forward for retail, that values authenticity and innovation. And now, this conversation extends far beyond the pandemic, to the revolution that must take place in the fashion industry around issues of racial justice, equity, diversity and inclusion. Today, as part of News Bytes, we are sharing a special episode of “Retail Revolution” that begins to tackle these issues. We hope you’ll join us for this 40-minute conversation, and then share your own voice. Learn more: www.fashionconsort.com Follow us: @fashionconsortagency
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We are at a tipping point in our nation. More than ever, it is clear that our systems are inherently racist, built by, built for and fully empowering white people to the disadvantage of people of color, most specifically black Americans. This systemic racism, often invisible, has ensured consistent lack of access to equal education, jobs, equal pay, homes and business capital for black people. It has led to higher rates of police brutality, incarceration and even death. George Floyd is just one of many in these past few months alone that has been brutally murdered for simply being black. We must now look inward, in our communities and our businesses, in our institutions of learning and governance to change the system, to right those wrongs. It will be a painful process, and one that will require a great amount of self reflection and vulnerability. But we must rise to the occasion, especially if we are in roles of leadership. For white people this absolutely means using our white privilege to provide that same privilege to everyone, no matter the color of their skin. For me, this means rethinking how and what I teach—to go beyond our euro-centric fashion system. It means advocating for more parity in the fashion system, an industry that is primarily led by white males, by facilitating training and challenging broken systems—systems that favor white hires, white promotion and therefore white leadership; systems that commodify black culture, but but don’t profit black people. It also means putting my money where my mouth is when it comes to my buying power, beyond simply calling companies out and then moving on once they’ve posted a press release and apology. That’s not good enough and won’t lead to real change. These issues are difficult, but must be addressed now. In March 2020, Fashion Consort began production of “Retail Revolution” a podcast that engages experts in discussions about fashion retail. Our focus was on the fast changing world of fashion retail, especially during the pandemic. Our goal was to provide a space to consider a new way forward for retail, that values authenticity and innovation. And now, this conversation extends far beyond the pandemic, to the revolution that must take place in the fashion industry around issues of racial justice, equity, diversity and inclusion. Today, as part of News Bytes, we are sharing a special episode of “Retail Revolution” that begins to tackle these issues. We hope you’ll join us for this 40-minute conversation, and then share your own voice. Learn more: www.fashionconsort.com Follow us: @fashionconsortagency</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2735</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5ed7df1e8b9f0329367fa323]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV2844946420.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Setting Expectations: Work from Home</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/setting-expectations-work-from-home</link>
      <description>The Covid-19 pandemic has forced much of the world’s white-collar workforce to work from home. Early on, companies scrambled to find ways to support remote employees and to develop new workflows that incorporated everything from Zoom meeting protocol to digital office hours. For many employees and employers, this shift to “work from home” has been an ongoing learning process, full of trial and error; a re-evaluation of long-held traditions around efficiency and productivity, and the thin line between home life and the office. While companies and employees continue to evaluate best practices, it seems that Americans are generally positive about working from home. According to Zapier: 65% feel their productivity has increased, 80% say they can better manage interruptions from co-workers, 77% say they’re finding new times to be productive outside of the normal 9-5 hour work day, and 80% enjoy being able to see their family during the workday. So, considering these statistics, what will work look like as stay-at-home orders are lifted? Will Americans be ready to return to the office? It’s likely a yes and no situation, largely dependent on how a company approaches the situation. Organizations that rely heavily on in-person work environments will need to communicate these needs and expectations clearly, and then provide proof that they are doing everything within their power to ensure the safety and wellbeing of their employees. This also puts the onus on the organization to prove that working in-person is necessary and not due to intransigent thinking. After all, employees are now more aware than ever that working remotely is possible. Organizations that are unclear in their communications, even if they are generally open to remote working arrangements, will likely see employees err on the side of returning to the office notwithstanding health concerns. This lack of communication leads to inconsistencies from one manager to the next and creates fear and mistrust among employees. What’s more, so much of American office culture centers around “being seen” as proof of value to the company, whether that’s working long hours or skipping vacations, that unless companies change this intrinsic culture, employees will certainly fall back into old habits, regardless of inefficiencies. Finally, organizations that are supportive of a more remote or hybrid work arrangement, and communicate expectations to employees clearly and concisely, will likely see employees take advantage of the opportunity, without fear of discrimination. This approach will need to consider each role and department individually, recognizing that there is probably not a one-size-fits-all solution. This transparency ensures employees will have room to make decisions about their health and comfort without recrimination, while still allowing them to be successful in their jobs. In conclusion, it’s in a company’s best interest to develop a clear plan now to address employee expectations as the economy reopens. And if this plan includes a flexible or hybrid approach between the office and home, it should include assurances that there will be no discrimination between those who work at the office versus those who work from home, if employees are meeting their goals and objectives. This might also be the opportune time for companies to tackle some of the bigger issues that have plagued them, including gender and race inequities, increasing commute times, lack of sufficient and affordable office space and overall work/life balance. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 22:02:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Setting Expectations: Work From Home</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/8101a668-153a-11eb-87a7-b728fd7bbd44/image/uploads_2F1604013558447-lua1de5we8i-059261a7be15436043e7c152f0e0dcb6_2FFC+Setting+Expecations+Work+From+Home.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>It’s in a company’s best interest to develop a clear plan now to address employee expectations as the economy reopens. And if this plan includes a flexible or hybrid approach between the office and home, it should include assurances that there will be no discrimination.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Covid-19 pandemic has forced much of the world’s white-collar workforce to work from home. Early on, companies scrambled to find ways to support remote employees and to develop new workflows that incorporated everything from Zoom meeting protocol to digital office hours. For many employees and employers, this shift to “work from home” has been an ongoing learning process, full of trial and error; a re-evaluation of long-held traditions around efficiency and productivity, and the thin line between home life and the office. While companies and employees continue to evaluate best practices, it seems that Americans are generally positive about working from home. According to Zapier: 65% feel their productivity has increased, 80% say they can better manage interruptions from co-workers, 77% say they’re finding new times to be productive outside of the normal 9-5 hour work day, and 80% enjoy being able to see their family during the workday. So, considering these statistics, what will work look like as stay-at-home orders are lifted? Will Americans be ready to return to the office? It’s likely a yes and no situation, largely dependent on how a company approaches the situation. Organizations that rely heavily on in-person work environments will need to communicate these needs and expectations clearly, and then provide proof that they are doing everything within their power to ensure the safety and wellbeing of their employees. This also puts the onus on the organization to prove that working in-person is necessary and not due to intransigent thinking. After all, employees are now more aware than ever that working remotely is possible. Organizations that are unclear in their communications, even if they are generally open to remote working arrangements, will likely see employees err on the side of returning to the office notwithstanding health concerns. This lack of communication leads to inconsistencies from one manager to the next and creates fear and mistrust among employees. What’s more, so much of American office culture centers around “being seen” as proof of value to the company, whether that’s working long hours or skipping vacations, that unless companies change this intrinsic culture, employees will certainly fall back into old habits, regardless of inefficiencies. Finally, organizations that are supportive of a more remote or hybrid work arrangement, and communicate expectations to employees clearly and concisely, will likely see employees take advantage of the opportunity, without fear of discrimination. This approach will need to consider each role and department individually, recognizing that there is probably not a one-size-fits-all solution. This transparency ensures employees will have room to make decisions about their health and comfort without recrimination, while still allowing them to be successful in their jobs. In conclusion, it’s in a company’s best interest to develop a clear plan now to address employee expectations as the economy reopens. And if this plan includes a flexible or hybrid approach between the office and home, it should include assurances that there will be no discrimination between those who work at the office versus those who work from home, if employees are meeting their goals and objectives. This might also be the opportune time for companies to tackle some of the bigger issues that have plagued them, including gender and race inequities, increasing commute times, lack of sufficient and affordable office space and overall work/life balance. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The Covid-19 pandemic has forced much of the world’s white-collar workforce to work from home. Early on, companies scrambled to find ways to support remote employees and to develop new workflows that incorporated everything from Zoom meeting protocol to digital office hours. For many employees and employers, this shift to “work from home” has been an ongoing learning process, full of trial and error; a re-evaluation of long-held traditions around efficiency and productivity, and the thin line between home life and the office. While companies and employees continue to evaluate best practices, it seems that Americans are generally positive about working from home. According to Zapier: 65% feel their productivity has increased, 80% say they can better manage interruptions from co-workers, 77% say they’re finding new times to be productive outside of the normal 9-5 hour work day, and 80% enjoy being able to see their family during the workday. So, considering these statistics, what will work look like as stay-at-home orders are lifted? Will Americans be ready to return to the office? It’s likely a yes and no situation, largely dependent on how a company approaches the situation. Organizations that rely heavily on in-person work environments will need to communicate these needs and expectations clearly, and then provide proof that they are doing everything within their power to ensure the safety and wellbeing of their employees. This also puts the onus on the organization to prove that working in-person is necessary and not due to intransigent thinking. After all, employees are now more aware than ever that working remotely is possible. Organizations that are unclear in their communications, even if they are generally open to remote working arrangements, will likely see employees err on the side of returning to the office notwithstanding health concerns. This lack of communication leads to inconsistencies from one manager to the next and creates fear and mistrust among employees. What’s more, so much of American office culture centers around “being seen” as proof of value to the company, whether that’s working long hours or skipping vacations, that unless companies change this intrinsic culture, employees will certainly fall back into old habits, regardless of inefficiencies. Finally, organizations that are supportive of a more remote or hybrid work arrangement, and communicate expectations to employees clearly and concisely, will likely see employees take advantage of the opportunity, without fear of discrimination. This approach will need to consider each role and department individually, recognizing that there is probably not a one-size-fits-all solution. This transparency ensures employees will have room to make decisions about their health and comfort without recrimination, while still allowing them to be successful in their jobs. In conclusion, it’s in a company’s best interest to develop a clear plan now to address employee expectations as the economy reopens. And if this plan includes a flexible or hybrid approach between the office and home, it should include assurances that there will be no discrimination between those who work at the office versus those who work from home, if employees are meeting their goals and objectives. This might also be the opportune time for companies to tackle some of the bigger issues that have plagued them, including gender and race inequities, increasing commute times, lack of sufficient and affordable office space and overall work/life balance. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>298</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5ec4561d01955f7ab6b7c246]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV1519931944.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Post Pandemic Retail Strategies</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/podcast-news-bytes/post-pandemic-retail-strategies</link>
      <description>As businesses across the United States begin to reopen, questions remain about the best way for retailers to open their doors, with consumer desires and fears both in mind.  Let’s consider five key questions related to fashion retail experience, post-pandemic. 1.) What will the reopening of retail look like? Slow and cautious. While retailers are anxious to open their doors sooner than later, they also want to assuage customer fears, and ensure they are not opening themselves to liability. This is an opportunity for retailers to really rethink the customer experience in brick and mortar, including store flow and customer services. Retailers will need to thoughtfully connect touch points between their online and brick &amp; mortar stores, an opportunity to put omni-channel retail principles to practice. 2.) What should retailers be doing now to prepare for the reopening? Retailers should be thinking very much about their core customers and the key products and services customers expect from them. Even before the pandemic, retailers were beginning to realize that customers want more focused merchandise offerings and more authentic brand experiences, tying back to customer lifestyle. Additionally, retailers should really be looking at their total operation, and determine exactly how to optimize digital technologies to decrease “high touch” areas of business. For example, an integrative Buy Online, Pick Up In Store, or BOPIS, will likely be a crucial offering post-pandemic. Additionally, in reverse, retailers will need to have a  very transparent returns process and policy in place, that carefully considers the safety concerns around Covid-19. 3.) How will COVID-19 impact consumer behavior over the long term? Consumers will become more aware of what they are buying, particularly from a supply chain perspective, including materials, manufacturing and distribution. They will demand full transparency from brands, as a way to ensure their own individual safety. Ultimately, consumers will rely heavily on brands they feel they can trust on all levels. Retailers are going to have to work very hard to build that trust considering their mission, vision and values. 4.) What will be the lasting effects of COVID-19 on brick and mortar retail? The long-lasting effects of Covid-19 on brick and mortar will primarily focus on in-store experience and service. Consumers will be much more aware of how stores are designed to increase personal space while shopping. Clean bathrooms, hand sanitizer and masks will likely be demanded, as well as clear messaging around products and services across all channels. Brick and Mortar retailers will also need to be much more strategic in where they operate stores and will be required to provide more localized experiences that engage the communities they do business in. This is especially true now, in an environment where regions are affected differently by the coronavirus. customers will expect more localized  approaches.  5.) What retail technologies will see adoption accelerated due to COVID-19? Already there is a major shift towards digital showrooms, 3D shopping environments and even digital fashion, meaning digital clothes that can be worn in digital spaces whether it’s Instagram or Fortnight. Great examples of companies working in this space, in the fashion sector, include ByondXR and Fabrikant. Additionally, it’s likely that fashion weeks across the world will move more fundamentally online. For more in-depth conversations about retailing post-pandemic, tune into the “Retail Revolution” podcast now streaming on your favorite podcast platforms. Learn more at www.RetailRevolutionPodcast.com. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2020 17:10:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Post Pandemic Retail Strategies</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/81257700-153a-11eb-87a7-e7cdcf9c8ade/image/uploads_2F1604013524955-ak05vlxhbah-737483045845c8d18145e03d79b1ce0b_2FFC+Post+Pandemic+Retail+Strategies.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>As businesses across the United States begin to reopen, questions remain about the best way for retailers to open their doors, with consumer desires and fears both in mind. We'll consider five key questions related to fashion retail experience, post-pandemic.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As businesses across the United States begin to reopen, questions remain about the best way for retailers to open their doors, with consumer desires and fears both in mind.  Let’s consider five key questions related to fashion retail experience, post-pandemic. 1.) What will the reopening of retail look like? Slow and cautious. While retailers are anxious to open their doors sooner than later, they also want to assuage customer fears, and ensure they are not opening themselves to liability. This is an opportunity for retailers to really rethink the customer experience in brick and mortar, including store flow and customer services. Retailers will need to thoughtfully connect touch points between their online and brick &amp; mortar stores, an opportunity to put omni-channel retail principles to practice. 2.) What should retailers be doing now to prepare for the reopening? Retailers should be thinking very much about their core customers and the key products and services customers expect from them. Even before the pandemic, retailers were beginning to realize that customers want more focused merchandise offerings and more authentic brand experiences, tying back to customer lifestyle. Additionally, retailers should really be looking at their total operation, and determine exactly how to optimize digital technologies to decrease “high touch” areas of business. For example, an integrative Buy Online, Pick Up In Store, or BOPIS, will likely be a crucial offering post-pandemic. Additionally, in reverse, retailers will need to have a  very transparent returns process and policy in place, that carefully considers the safety concerns around Covid-19. 3.) How will COVID-19 impact consumer behavior over the long term? Consumers will become more aware of what they are buying, particularly from a supply chain perspective, including materials, manufacturing and distribution. They will demand full transparency from brands, as a way to ensure their own individual safety. Ultimately, consumers will rely heavily on brands they feel they can trust on all levels. Retailers are going to have to work very hard to build that trust considering their mission, vision and values. 4.) What will be the lasting effects of COVID-19 on brick and mortar retail? The long-lasting effects of Covid-19 on brick and mortar will primarily focus on in-store experience and service. Consumers will be much more aware of how stores are designed to increase personal space while shopping. Clean bathrooms, hand sanitizer and masks will likely be demanded, as well as clear messaging around products and services across all channels. Brick and Mortar retailers will also need to be much more strategic in where they operate stores and will be required to provide more localized experiences that engage the communities they do business in. This is especially true now, in an environment where regions are affected differently by the coronavirus. customers will expect more localized  approaches.  5.) What retail technologies will see adoption accelerated due to COVID-19? Already there is a major shift towards digital showrooms, 3D shopping environments and even digital fashion, meaning digital clothes that can be worn in digital spaces whether it’s Instagram or Fortnight. Great examples of companies working in this space, in the fashion sector, include ByondXR and Fabrikant. Additionally, it’s likely that fashion weeks across the world will move more fundamentally online. For more in-depth conversations about retailing post-pandemic, tune into the “Retail Revolution” podcast now streaming on your favorite podcast platforms. Learn more at www.RetailRevolutionPodcast.com. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>As businesses across the United States begin to reopen, questions remain about the best way for retailers to open their doors, with consumer desires and fears both in mind.  Let’s consider five key questions related to fashion retail experience, post-pandemic. 1.) What will the reopening of retail look like? Slow and cautious. While retailers are anxious to open their doors sooner than later, they also want to assuage customer fears, and ensure they are not opening themselves to liability. This is an opportunity for retailers to really rethink the customer experience in brick and mortar, including store flow and customer services. Retailers will need to thoughtfully connect touch points between their online and brick &amp; mortar stores, an opportunity to put omni-channel retail principles to practice. 2.) What should retailers be doing now to prepare for the reopening? Retailers should be thinking very much about their core customers and the key products and services customers expect from them. Even before the pandemic, retailers were beginning to realize that customers want more focused merchandise offerings and more authentic brand experiences, tying back to customer lifestyle. Additionally, retailers should really be looking at their total operation, and determine exactly how to optimize digital technologies to decrease “high touch” areas of business. For example, an integrative Buy Online, Pick Up In Store, or BOPIS, will likely be a crucial offering post-pandemic. Additionally, in reverse, retailers will need to have a  very transparent returns process and policy in place, that carefully considers the safety concerns around Covid-19. 3.) How will COVID-19 impact consumer behavior over the long term? Consumers will become more aware of what they are buying, particularly from a supply chain perspective, including materials, manufacturing and distribution. They will demand full transparency from brands, as a way to ensure their own individual safety. Ultimately, consumers will rely heavily on brands they feel they can trust on all levels. Retailers are going to have to work very hard to build that trust considering their mission, vision and values. 4.) What will be the lasting effects of COVID-19 on brick and mortar retail? The long-lasting effects of Covid-19 on brick and mortar will primarily focus on in-store experience and service. Consumers will be much more aware of how stores are designed to increase personal space while shopping. Clean bathrooms, hand sanitizer and masks will likely be demanded, as well as clear messaging around products and services across all channels. Brick and Mortar retailers will also need to be much more strategic in where they operate stores and will be required to provide more localized experiences that engage the communities they do business in. This is especially true now, in an environment where regions are affected differently by the coronavirus. customers will expect more localized  approaches.  5.) What retail technologies will see adoption accelerated due to COVID-19? Already there is a major shift towards digital showrooms, 3D shopping environments and even digital fashion, meaning digital clothes that can be worn in digital spaces whether it’s Instagram or Fortnight. Great examples of companies working in this space, in the fashion sector, include ByondXR and Fabrikant. Additionally, it’s likely that fashion weeks across the world will move more fundamentally online. For more in-depth conversations about retailing post-pandemic, tune into the “Retail Revolution” podcast now streaming on your favorite podcast platforms. Learn more at www.RetailRevolutionPodcast.com. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>315</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5ebc28feb61fbc6eec73a2cd]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV5021560271.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mission, Vision and Values</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/mission-vision-and-values</link>
      <description>As the world becomes more connected, consumers have more options than ever. In fact, they are saturated with products and services. According to retail expert Robin Lewis, there is 46 square feet of dedicated retail space for every American. And with constant deliveries of new merchandise to stores, sometimes every day, this adds up to a lot of products that will never be sold or worn, often ending up in landfill. So how do fashion brands capture a customer’s attention in all of the clutter? It starts quite simply with a having a focused brand mission, vision and value statement, providing a brand with a strong foundation from which to make business decisions, develop employee talent and engage customers. Done correctly, these relatively simple statements can galvanize a company around a unique selling proposition and provide crucial market differentiation in a sea of competitors. Most importantly, a mission statement defines a company’s core service and product offering, including points of differentiation and/or expertise. Additionally, it defines a brand’s core customer, particularly from a psychographic or lifestyle perspective. A vision statement builds on the mission and is more forward thinking. It provides a brand an opportunity to consider short- and long-term objectives, especially as they relate to planned growth and scalability. It’s also an opportunity for brands to consider how they want to be perceived by customers. Finally, a value statement highlights the key principles and standards by which an organization should operate. These values should provide organizations perspective on leadership style, hiring practices and employee relations, as well as collaborations and partnerships. Each of these statements will likely overlap in content, ultimately leading to a succinct and cohesive brand identity. If brands can truly align to this core identity, a sense of authenticity will emerge. And authenticity leads to trust and loyalty. Organizations should evaluate their mission, vision and value statements annually, as an opportunity to reassess the marketplace, and to address new internal and external challenges and opportunities. After all, the market is continually shifting, and brands cannot remain stagnant or rest on their laurels. Otherwise, they become the very clutter they are trying to avoid. www.fashionconsort.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 16:56:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Mission, Vision and Values</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/814ef198-153a-11eb-87a7-e7a8e260b571/image/uploads_2F1604013495272-vl4yenz54ee-d66af4b357be625e16b94ea32f41c295_2FFC+Mission_2C+Vision+and+Values.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>How do fashion brands capture a customer’s attention in all of the clutter?   It starts quite simply with a having a focused brand mission, vision and value statement, providing a brand with a strong foundation from which to make business decisions, develop employee talent and engage customers.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As the world becomes more connected, consumers have more options than ever. In fact, they are saturated with products and services. According to retail expert Robin Lewis, there is 46 square feet of dedicated retail space for every American. And with constant deliveries of new merchandise to stores, sometimes every day, this adds up to a lot of products that will never be sold or worn, often ending up in landfill. So how do fashion brands capture a customer’s attention in all of the clutter? It starts quite simply with a having a focused brand mission, vision and value statement, providing a brand with a strong foundation from which to make business decisions, develop employee talent and engage customers. Done correctly, these relatively simple statements can galvanize a company around a unique selling proposition and provide crucial market differentiation in a sea of competitors. Most importantly, a mission statement defines a company’s core service and product offering, including points of differentiation and/or expertise. Additionally, it defines a brand’s core customer, particularly from a psychographic or lifestyle perspective. A vision statement builds on the mission and is more forward thinking. It provides a brand an opportunity to consider short- and long-term objectives, especially as they relate to planned growth and scalability. It’s also an opportunity for brands to consider how they want to be perceived by customers. Finally, a value statement highlights the key principles and standards by which an organization should operate. These values should provide organizations perspective on leadership style, hiring practices and employee relations, as well as collaborations and partnerships. Each of these statements will likely overlap in content, ultimately leading to a succinct and cohesive brand identity. If brands can truly align to this core identity, a sense of authenticity will emerge. And authenticity leads to trust and loyalty. Organizations should evaluate their mission, vision and value statements annually, as an opportunity to reassess the marketplace, and to address new internal and external challenges and opportunities. After all, the market is continually shifting, and brands cannot remain stagnant or rest on their laurels. Otherwise, they become the very clutter they are trying to avoid. www.fashionconsort.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>As the world becomes more connected, consumers have more options than ever. In fact, they are saturated with products and services. According to retail expert Robin Lewis, there is 46 square feet of dedicated retail space for every American. And with constant deliveries of new merchandise to stores, sometimes every day, this adds up to a lot of products that will never be sold or worn, often ending up in landfill. So how do fashion brands capture a customer’s attention in all of the clutter? It starts quite simply with a having a focused brand mission, vision and value statement, providing a brand with a strong foundation from which to make business decisions, develop employee talent and engage customers. Done correctly, these relatively simple statements can galvanize a company around a unique selling proposition and provide crucial market differentiation in a sea of competitors. Most importantly, a mission statement defines a company’s core service and product offering, including points of differentiation and/or expertise. Additionally, it defines a brand’s core customer, particularly from a psychographic or lifestyle perspective. A vision statement builds on the mission and is more forward thinking. It provides a brand an opportunity to consider short- and long-term objectives, especially as they relate to planned growth and scalability. It’s also an opportunity for brands to consider how they want to be perceived by customers. Finally, a value statement highlights the key principles and standards by which an organization should operate. These values should provide organizations perspective on leadership style, hiring practices and employee relations, as well as collaborations and partnerships. Each of these statements will likely overlap in content, ultimately leading to a succinct and cohesive brand identity. If brands can truly align to this core identity, a sense of authenticity will emerge. And authenticity leads to trust and loyalty. Organizations should evaluate their mission, vision and value statements annually, as an opportunity to reassess the marketplace, and to address new internal and external challenges and opportunities. After all, the market is continually shifting, and brands cannot remain stagnant or rest on their laurels. Otherwise, they become the very clutter they are trying to avoid. www.fashionconsort.com</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>235</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5eb19ac1fca301714e496e93]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV5849905596.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Getting to Know Your Colleagues, A Conversation</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/getting-to-know-your-colleagues-a-conversation</link>
      <description>In a recent Financial Times article with psychotherapist Esther Perel, she recommended that workplace colleagues ask the following open-ended questions: What have you been thinking about lately? What's on your mind? Tell me about a time when you changed your mind. What's the best piece of advice you ever received? What would you say to your 18-year-old self if you had a chat with them today? Have you ever lost a friend? Have you ever rejected a friend? Do you work in a language that is not your mother tongue? What is it like to live in translation? If there is a choice between remembering and forgetting, do you lean towards the side of forgetting, or the side of the one who remembers it all? Were you raised for autonomy, or were you raised for loyalty? Was there a moment where you thought, I'm giving up” and tell us whether you did or you didn't? What part of your identity was given to you, or what part of your identity was chosen? In this unique episode, we ask these questions among our agency, with some surprisingly honest answers and insights.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2020 20:38:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Getting to Know Your Colleagues, a conversation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/8179c616-153a-11eb-87a7-db12970e4c7e/image/uploads_2F1604013469831-tve2fd0uodp-a9864edc3f91021380e4ca2a6d8bd410_2FFC+Getting+to+Know+Your+Colleagues.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Fashion Agency consultants get to know each other using psychotherapist, Esther Perel's recommended questions.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In a recent Financial Times article with psychotherapist Esther Perel, she recommended that workplace colleagues ask the following open-ended questions: What have you been thinking about lately? What's on your mind? Tell me about a time when you changed your mind. What's the best piece of advice you ever received? What would you say to your 18-year-old self if you had a chat with them today? Have you ever lost a friend? Have you ever rejected a friend? Do you work in a language that is not your mother tongue? What is it like to live in translation? If there is a choice between remembering and forgetting, do you lean towards the side of forgetting, or the side of the one who remembers it all? Were you raised for autonomy, or were you raised for loyalty? Was there a moment where you thought, I'm giving up” and tell us whether you did or you didn't? What part of your identity was given to you, or what part of your identity was chosen? In this unique episode, we ask these questions among our agency, with some surprisingly honest answers and insights.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In a recent Financial Times article with psychotherapist Esther Perel, she recommended that workplace colleagues ask the following open-ended questions: What have you been thinking about lately? What's on your mind? Tell me about a time when you changed your mind. What's the best piece of advice you ever received? What would you say to your 18-year-old self if you had a chat with them today? Have you ever lost a friend? Have you ever rejected a friend? Do you work in a language that is not your mother tongue? What is it like to live in translation? If there is a choice between remembering and forgetting, do you lean towards the side of forgetting, or the side of the one who remembers it all? Were you raised for autonomy, or were you raised for loyalty? Was there a moment where you thought, I'm giving up” and tell us whether you did or you didn't? What part of your identity was given to you, or what part of your identity was chosen? In this unique episode, we ask these questions among our agency, with some surprisingly honest answers and insights.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2054</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5ea5f1617b37694a318e57b7]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV3943543832.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Perspective in a Time of Crisis</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/perspective-in-a-time-of-crisis</link>
      <description>In a conversation hosted by founder and President Joshua Williams, Fashion Consort consultants share the ideas and perspectives about the Covid-19 pandemic. They provide insights on how companies, especially fashion brands, might find a way forward, when business resumes. Topics include technology, preparing new workforce, issues of public safety and formats that organizations can use to share values with employees and customers.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2020 21:29:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Perspective in a Time of Crisis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/819eadb4-153a-11eb-87a7-375cdd50ee8e/image/uploads_2F1604013444311-b3lz8pkdjld-74c4808d6db0d9ffefaf6857c66aa6e8_2FFC+Pespective+in+a+Time+of+Crisis.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Host Joshua Williams leads a conversation around the current Covid-19 crisis, discussing how this will effect business-as-usual.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In a conversation hosted by founder and President Joshua Williams, Fashion Consort consultants share the ideas and perspectives about the Covid-19 pandemic. They provide insights on how companies, especially fashion brands, might find a way forward, when business resumes. Topics include technology, preparing new workforce, issues of public safety and formats that organizations can use to share values with employees and customers.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In a conversation hosted by founder and President Joshua Williams, Fashion Consort consultants share the ideas and perspectives about the Covid-19 pandemic. They provide insights on how companies, especially fashion brands, might find a way forward, when business resumes. Topics include technology, preparing new workforce, issues of public safety and formats that organizations can use to share values with employees and customers.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2702</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5e9a1dc1c0e58808d5259362]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV5726248052.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Balance in Retail Post-Pandemic</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/balance-in-retail-post-pandemic</link>
      <description>During the Covid-19 crisis, finding the balance between the health and safety of citizens, versus protecting people’s livelihoods and the overall economy, is difficult at best. In most cases, leaders have understandably focused on slowing the spread of the virus, but the vast impact of these decisions on the economy are requiring government and business leaders to grapple now with how and when to reopen businesses, in a completely new context. Fashion retailers have been particularly hard hit by the pandemic. In addition to contingency plans that include filing for bankruptcy, retail executives are challenged with determining how best to serve customers when business resumes. Much has been discussed about the need to hyper focus on core values and service—the real human element of the retail business—and yet, there is an awareness that social distancing and the real fear of congregating in public, may necessitate a more transactional approach to retail in the short term. Said differently, there’s a sense that people will want to re-engage and re-connect post pandemic, but that may not be possible in the same context as before the pandemic. Retailers are going to need to strike a balance between these two contrasting expectations with flexibility and the willingness to change as needed, especially on a local and personalized level. This is especially difficult for a business that looks for best practices that can be established and scaled nationally or even   globally. In many cases, the intransigence of heritage retailers has precipitated the so-called retail apocalypse, leaving room for up-start business that are more reactive to the market and more operationally adaptable. The major retailers that made it through the apocalypse into 2020, were largely relying on “too big to fail” mentalities, providing them a false sense of time and space to rethink their futures. The Covid-19 pandemic has all but eliminated this mindset, forcing major retailers to innovate quickly or close their doors. On the other hand, while start-ups are certainly more agile than their counterparts, they were heavily reliant on a booming economy coming into 2020 and a high marketing spend mentality. Now with businesses closed, this spend is not converting into the same dollars, also putting them at risk of closing. For those retailers who make it intact to the other side, business will not be, cannot be, “as usual.” It will require a company with the financial resources, technological know-how and progressive leadership needed to adapt quickly and often to the unknown. www.fashionconsort.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:30:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Balance in Retail, Post-Pandemic</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/81bd3f18-153a-11eb-87a7-df230a2c814c/image/uploads_2F1604013405237-8xiu69dniok-df364bb3608c76ff3e70c84ada3139ad_2FFC+Balance+in+Retail.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>During the Covid-19 crisis, finding the balance between the health and safety of citizens, versus protecting people’s livelihoods and the overall economy, is difficult at best.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>During the Covid-19 crisis, finding the balance between the health and safety of citizens, versus protecting people’s livelihoods and the overall economy, is difficult at best. In most cases, leaders have understandably focused on slowing the spread of the virus, but the vast impact of these decisions on the economy are requiring government and business leaders to grapple now with how and when to reopen businesses, in a completely new context. Fashion retailers have been particularly hard hit by the pandemic. In addition to contingency plans that include filing for bankruptcy, retail executives are challenged with determining how best to serve customers when business resumes. Much has been discussed about the need to hyper focus on core values and service—the real human element of the retail business—and yet, there is an awareness that social distancing and the real fear of congregating in public, may necessitate a more transactional approach to retail in the short term. Said differently, there’s a sense that people will want to re-engage and re-connect post pandemic, but that may not be possible in the same context as before the pandemic. Retailers are going to need to strike a balance between these two contrasting expectations with flexibility and the willingness to change as needed, especially on a local and personalized level. This is especially difficult for a business that looks for best practices that can be established and scaled nationally or even   globally. In many cases, the intransigence of heritage retailers has precipitated the so-called retail apocalypse, leaving room for up-start business that are more reactive to the market and more operationally adaptable. The major retailers that made it through the apocalypse into 2020, were largely relying on “too big to fail” mentalities, providing them a false sense of time and space to rethink their futures. The Covid-19 pandemic has all but eliminated this mindset, forcing major retailers to innovate quickly or close their doors. On the other hand, while start-ups are certainly more agile than their counterparts, they were heavily reliant on a booming economy coming into 2020 and a high marketing spend mentality. Now with businesses closed, this spend is not converting into the same dollars, also putting them at risk of closing. For those retailers who make it intact to the other side, business will not be, cannot be, “as usual.” It will require a company with the financial resources, technological know-how and progressive leadership needed to adapt quickly and often to the unknown. www.fashionconsort.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>During the Covid-19 crisis, finding the balance between the health and safety of citizens, versus protecting people’s livelihoods and the overall economy, is difficult at best. In most cases, leaders have understandably focused on slowing the spread of the virus, but the vast impact of these decisions on the economy are requiring government and business leaders to grapple now with how and when to reopen businesses, in a completely new context. Fashion retailers have been particularly hard hit by the pandemic. In addition to contingency plans that include filing for bankruptcy, retail executives are challenged with determining how best to serve customers when business resumes. Much has been discussed about the need to hyper focus on core values and service—the real human element of the retail business—and yet, there is an awareness that social distancing and the real fear of congregating in public, may necessitate a more transactional approach to retail in the short term. Said differently, there’s a sense that people will want to re-engage and re-connect post pandemic, but that may not be possible in the same context as before the pandemic. Retailers are going to need to strike a balance between these two contrasting expectations with flexibility and the willingness to change as needed, especially on a local and personalized level. This is especially difficult for a business that looks for best practices that can be established and scaled nationally or even   globally. In many cases, the intransigence of heritage retailers has precipitated the so-called retail apocalypse, leaving room for up-start business that are more reactive to the market and more operationally adaptable. The major retailers that made it through the apocalypse into 2020, were largely relying on “too big to fail” mentalities, providing them a false sense of time and space to rethink their futures. The Covid-19 pandemic has all but eliminated this mindset, forcing major retailers to innovate quickly or close their doors. On the other hand, while start-ups are certainly more agile than their counterparts, they were heavily reliant on a booming economy coming into 2020 and a high marketing spend mentality. Now with businesses closed, this spend is not converting into the same dollars, also putting them at risk of closing. For those retailers who make it intact to the other side, business will not be, cannot be, “as usual.” It will require a company with the financial resources, technological know-how and progressive leadership needed to adapt quickly and often to the unknown. www.fashionconsort.com</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>248</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5e976000f1ed54708b8b119f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV5193873863.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Women's Leadership in Fashion</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/womens-leadership-in-fashion</link>
      <description>Thank you for joining us on Fashion Consort News Bytes. Typically, we post short 1-2 minute episodes covering key news events during the week. Today, we’re doing something quite different--a long format episode that deep dives into the topic of women and leadership in the fashion industry. It’s one component of a much larger “diversity and inclusion” conversation that needs to be front and center in an industry primarily led by older white men. As an agency, it’s an area that we dedicate a lot of our time and efforts, in hopes of facilitating education and training for business leaders who want to benefit from more diverse voices in their organizations. I’m joined today by four members of the Fashion Consort team, all based in New York City. I want to welcome Isabella Dawn Notaro, Susanna Moyer, Caryn Pang and Phil, aka Corrinne Phillips. Learn More: FashionConsort.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2020 00:27:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Women's Leadership in Fashion, A Conversation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/81dd3bba-153a-11eb-87a7-8bd0dd42773a/image/uploads_2F1604013375362-q8detyz1uk-a790ce2ccdf7a14115c62edd5f37b35c_2FFC+Women_27s+Leadership+in+Fashion.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>A discussion that focuses on women's leadership challenges and opportunities in the fashion industry.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Thank you for joining us on Fashion Consort News Bytes. Typically, we post short 1-2 minute episodes covering key news events during the week. Today, we’re doing something quite different--a long format episode that deep dives into the topic of women and leadership in the fashion industry. It’s one component of a much larger “diversity and inclusion” conversation that needs to be front and center in an industry primarily led by older white men. As an agency, it’s an area that we dedicate a lot of our time and efforts, in hopes of facilitating education and training for business leaders who want to benefit from more diverse voices in their organizations. I’m joined today by four members of the Fashion Consort team, all based in New York City. I want to welcome Isabella Dawn Notaro, Susanna Moyer, Caryn Pang and Phil, aka Corrinne Phillips. Learn More: FashionConsort.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Thank you for joining us on Fashion Consort News Bytes. Typically, we post short 1-2 minute episodes covering key news events during the week. Today, we’re doing something quite different--a long format episode that deep dives into the topic of women and leadership in the fashion industry. It’s one component of a much larger “diversity and inclusion” conversation that needs to be front and center in an industry primarily led by older white men. As an agency, it’s an area that we dedicate a lot of our time and efforts, in hopes of facilitating education and training for business leaders who want to benefit from more diverse voices in their organizations. I’m joined today by four members of the Fashion Consort team, all based in New York City. I want to welcome Isabella Dawn Notaro, Susanna Moyer, Caryn Pang and Phil, aka Corrinne Phillips. Learn More: FashionConsort.com</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3142</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5e910db43438ed160e73ac5f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV2475638286.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fashion Retail in Crisis</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/fashion-retail-in-crisis</link>
      <description>While some sectors of the retail business have been able to continue due to their essential nature, fashion retailers have been especially hard hit by the Covid-19 pandemic. Most major fashion brands ceased brick and mortar retail operations in mid-March right at the height of the spring selling season, focusing their efforts on e-commerce. However, the global supply chain that powers the fashion industry has been very compromised, hampering overall distribution of products from manufacturers to retailers, and then on to consumers. And because the virus is affecting different parts of the world at different times, normal supply and demand has been thrown off balance. For example, while the US was still “business as normal” during the early part of the year, China was all but shut down. Now the reverse is true. On top of that, as more and more Americans are unemployed due to the crisis, retailers can expect to see sales drop. Customers will be focusing less on fashion and more on essentials. In short, retailers are grappling with how to cover expenses with severely limited cash flow. This has led many companies to make the hard decision of letting employees go or putting them on furlough, which is unpaid leave. The hope for retailers, is that if they can withstand the crisis, keeping their workforce will help them to get back to business quickly. However, this decision has forced employees into a very difficult position—whether to withgo their paycheck in hopes of returning to work, or whether to start searching for a new job.  The longer the crisis continues, the more this issue is exacerbated for the company and the employee.  The reality is that retailers don’t have a lot of choice at the moment. And the hard truth is, that most retail executives are likely using this time of crisis to rethink “business as usual”—to really consider what their core value is to consumers and how to re-focus and reset. The implications of these decisions will be dramatic.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 20:44:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Fashion Retail in Crisis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/81fe7802-153a-11eb-87a7-ab61c354f3ac/image/uploads_2F1604013351020-nexd31hqw3g-a38a81a3b3ad07528f59a57afa9f95cb_2FFC+Fashion+Retail+in+Crisis.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Covid-19 pandemic will have far reaching implications on the short and long term viability of US retailers.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>While some sectors of the retail business have been able to continue due to their essential nature, fashion retailers have been especially hard hit by the Covid-19 pandemic. Most major fashion brands ceased brick and mortar retail operations in mid-March right at the height of the spring selling season, focusing their efforts on e-commerce. However, the global supply chain that powers the fashion industry has been very compromised, hampering overall distribution of products from manufacturers to retailers, and then on to consumers. And because the virus is affecting different parts of the world at different times, normal supply and demand has been thrown off balance. For example, while the US was still “business as normal” during the early part of the year, China was all but shut down. Now the reverse is true. On top of that, as more and more Americans are unemployed due to the crisis, retailers can expect to see sales drop. Customers will be focusing less on fashion and more on essentials. In short, retailers are grappling with how to cover expenses with severely limited cash flow. This has led many companies to make the hard decision of letting employees go or putting them on furlough, which is unpaid leave. The hope for retailers, is that if they can withstand the crisis, keeping their workforce will help them to get back to business quickly. However, this decision has forced employees into a very difficult position—whether to withgo their paycheck in hopes of returning to work, or whether to start searching for a new job.  The longer the crisis continues, the more this issue is exacerbated for the company and the employee.  The reality is that retailers don’t have a lot of choice at the moment. And the hard truth is, that most retail executives are likely using this time of crisis to rethink “business as usual”—to really consider what their core value is to consumers and how to re-focus and reset. The implications of these decisions will be dramatic.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>While some sectors of the retail business have been able to continue due to their essential nature, fashion retailers have been especially hard hit by the Covid-19 pandemic. Most major fashion brands ceased brick and mortar retail operations in mid-March right at the height of the spring selling season, focusing their efforts on e-commerce. However, the global supply chain that powers the fashion industry has been very compromised, hampering overall distribution of products from manufacturers to retailers, and then on to consumers. And because the virus is affecting different parts of the world at different times, normal supply and demand has been thrown off balance. For example, while the US was still “business as normal” during the early part of the year, China was all but shut down. Now the reverse is true. On top of that, as more and more Americans are unemployed due to the crisis, retailers can expect to see sales drop. Customers will be focusing less on fashion and more on essentials. In short, retailers are grappling with how to cover expenses with severely limited cash flow. This has led many companies to make the hard decision of letting employees go or putting them on furlough, which is unpaid leave. The hope for retailers, is that if they can withstand the crisis, keeping their workforce will help them to get back to business quickly. However, this decision has forced employees into a very difficult position—whether to withgo their paycheck in hopes of returning to work, or whether to start searching for a new job.  The longer the crisis continues, the more this issue is exacerbated for the company and the employee.  The reality is that retailers don’t have a lot of choice at the moment. And the hard truth is, that most retail executives are likely using this time of crisis to rethink “business as usual”—to really consider what their core value is to consumers and how to re-focus and reset. The implications of these decisions will be dramatic.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>193</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5e8f88e3db73e2531316737d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV7775802087.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gaslighting on a National Scale</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/gaslighting-on-a-national-scale</link>
      <description>Gaslighting is a term that originated from the 1938 play Gas Light, and two subsequent film adaptations in 1940 and 1944. It depicts a husband that psychologically abuses his young wife, by denying and contradicting their shared experience and truth to gain power. Ultimately her beliefs are destabilized, delegitimized and denied. Gaslighting is now recognized as form of relationship abuse. It is a tactic used by narcissists to gain leverage and power in a relationship or prove their own fragile self-worth. Just recently, the Dixie Chicks released a song called Gaslighter, singing: Gaslighter, denierDoin' anything to get your ass fartherGaslighter, big timerRepeating all of the mistakes of your fatherGaslighter, you broke meYou're sorry, but where's my apology?Gaslighter, you liar Gaslighting is not only a form of relationship abuse; this behavior also extends into the workplace as well into the political realm. It too has a destabilizing effect on overall morale and leads to collective confusion. This behavior often trickles down from top leadership, amplified by social media, permeating organizational structure and undermining shared values. Unfortunately, this behavior is currently on display by our national leaders in a time of crisis. Misinformation and lack of coordinated communication is undermining the need to slow the spread of coronavirus across the United States. And the implications of this behavior leads to life and death situations. Gaslighting is an insidious form of abuse with real consequences. We must call it what it is and demand more from our leaders. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:11:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Gaslighting on a National Scale</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/82277e5a-153a-11eb-87a7-8b7666b9f233/image/uploads_2F1604013318853-69lkw07fph-006183d136212a607bbaefad57fac6ae_2FFC+Gasligthing+on+a+National+Scale.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Gaslighting is an insidious form of abuse, and a tool being used by our national leaders, with real consequences. We must call it what it is and demand more from our leaders. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Gaslighting is a term that originated from the 1938 play Gas Light, and two subsequent film adaptations in 1940 and 1944. It depicts a husband that psychologically abuses his young wife, by denying and contradicting their shared experience and truth to gain power. Ultimately her beliefs are destabilized, delegitimized and denied. Gaslighting is now recognized as form of relationship abuse. It is a tactic used by narcissists to gain leverage and power in a relationship or prove their own fragile self-worth. Just recently, the Dixie Chicks released a song called Gaslighter, singing: Gaslighter, denierDoin' anything to get your ass fartherGaslighter, big timerRepeating all of the mistakes of your fatherGaslighter, you broke meYou're sorry, but where's my apology?Gaslighter, you liar Gaslighting is not only a form of relationship abuse; this behavior also extends into the workplace as well into the political realm. It too has a destabilizing effect on overall morale and leads to collective confusion. This behavior often trickles down from top leadership, amplified by social media, permeating organizational structure and undermining shared values. Unfortunately, this behavior is currently on display by our national leaders in a time of crisis. Misinformation and lack of coordinated communication is undermining the need to slow the spread of coronavirus across the United States. And the implications of this behavior leads to life and death situations. Gaslighting is an insidious form of abuse with real consequences. We must call it what it is and demand more from our leaders. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Gaslighting is a term that originated from the 1938 play Gas Light, and two subsequent film adaptations in 1940 and 1944. It depicts a husband that psychologically abuses his young wife, by denying and contradicting their shared experience and truth to gain power. Ultimately her beliefs are destabilized, delegitimized and denied. Gaslighting is now recognized as form of relationship abuse. It is a tactic used by narcissists to gain leverage and power in a relationship or prove their own fragile self-worth. Just recently, the Dixie Chicks released a song called Gaslighter, singing: Gaslighter, denierDoin' anything to get your ass fartherGaslighter, big timerRepeating all of the mistakes of your fatherGaslighter, you broke meYou're sorry, but where's my apology?Gaslighter, you liar Gaslighting is not only a form of relationship abuse; this behavior also extends into the workplace as well into the political realm. It too has a destabilizing effect on overall morale and leads to collective confusion. This behavior often trickles down from top leadership, amplified by social media, permeating organizational structure and undermining shared values. Unfortunately, this behavior is currently on display by our national leaders in a time of crisis. Misinformation and lack of coordinated communication is undermining the need to slow the spread of coronavirus across the United States. And the implications of this behavior leads to life and death situations. Gaslighting is an insidious form of abuse with real consequences. We must call it what it is and demand more from our leaders. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>183</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5e7f73f9971cba01a8621b7f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV7817791528.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vulnerable Communication in a Time of Crisis</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/vulnerable-communication-in-a-time-of-crisis</link>
      <description>As much of the world settles into the reality of living and working during the unprecedented Covid-19 pandemic, business leaders must strike a balance between being optimistic and encouraging to employees and customers, while also managing a crisis in action and actively preparing for worst case scenarios. And, of course, they must do this all remotely without the benefit of having their team by their side. In some cases, they are also learning on the go—using and adapting to new technologies and dealing with issues outside of their expertise. Constant updates and changes are a reality in a health crisis of this magnitude, which means business leaders must also deal with shifting narratives in communication. In some cases, prior public statements may be void or proven wrong from week to week, or even day to day. With this in mind, it’s imperative that leaders do not make overstatements or make promises they can’t keep. It’s also imperative that leaders are transparent and honest about these shifts, developing a sense of trust with their employees and customers, no matter how difficult the situation. This is a moment in time when we all feel vulnerable and when, in fact, vulnerability most matters. As educator and researcher Brene Brown states: “Vulnerability is not winning or losing; it's having the courage to show up and be seen when we have no control over the outcome. Vulnerability is not weakness; it's our greatest measure of courage.” Leaders must have the courage to rely on the people and teams they have hired, wherein everyone in the organization are empowered to share information, concerns and ideas freely, no matter their role or title. In this great moment of crisis, there is the potential for positive change and innovation to emerge.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2020 19:41:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Vulnerable Communication in a Time of Crisis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/8244f214-153a-11eb-87a7-8b22288b045c/image/uploads_2F1604013296078-4k45memlww5-0e94442705a7633854ef48cd07dbd6d7_2FFC+Vulnerable+Communication.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Being a leader in a time of crisis requires vulnerability, honesty and transparency, even with constant change.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As much of the world settles into the reality of living and working during the unprecedented Covid-19 pandemic, business leaders must strike a balance between being optimistic and encouraging to employees and customers, while also managing a crisis in action and actively preparing for worst case scenarios. And, of course, they must do this all remotely without the benefit of having their team by their side. In some cases, they are also learning on the go—using and adapting to new technologies and dealing with issues outside of their expertise. Constant updates and changes are a reality in a health crisis of this magnitude, which means business leaders must also deal with shifting narratives in communication. In some cases, prior public statements may be void or proven wrong from week to week, or even day to day. With this in mind, it’s imperative that leaders do not make overstatements or make promises they can’t keep. It’s also imperative that leaders are transparent and honest about these shifts, developing a sense of trust with their employees and customers, no matter how difficult the situation. This is a moment in time when we all feel vulnerable and when, in fact, vulnerability most matters. As educator and researcher Brene Brown states: “Vulnerability is not winning or losing; it's having the courage to show up and be seen when we have no control over the outcome. Vulnerability is not weakness; it's our greatest measure of courage.” Leaders must have the courage to rely on the people and teams they have hired, wherein everyone in the organization are empowered to share information, concerns and ideas freely, no matter their role or title. In this great moment of crisis, there is the potential for positive change and innovation to emerge.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>As much of the world settles into the reality of living and working during the unprecedented Covid-19 pandemic, business leaders must strike a balance between being optimistic and encouraging to employees and customers, while also managing a crisis in action and actively preparing for worst case scenarios. And, of course, they must do this all remotely without the benefit of having their team by their side. In some cases, they are also learning on the go—using and adapting to new technologies and dealing with issues outside of their expertise. Constant updates and changes are a reality in a health crisis of this magnitude, which means business leaders must also deal with shifting narratives in communication. In some cases, prior public statements may be void or proven wrong from week to week, or even day to day. With this in mind, it’s imperative that leaders do not make overstatements or make promises they can’t keep. It’s also imperative that leaders are transparent and honest about these shifts, developing a sense of trust with their employees and customers, no matter how difficult the situation. This is a moment in time when we all feel vulnerable and when, in fact, vulnerability most matters. As educator and researcher Brene Brown states: “Vulnerability is not winning or losing; it's having the courage to show up and be seen when we have no control over the outcome. Vulnerability is not weakness; it's our greatest measure of courage.” Leaders must have the courage to rely on the people and teams they have hired, wherein everyone in the organization are empowered to share information, concerns and ideas freely, no matter their role or title. In this great moment of crisis, there is the potential for positive change and innovation to emerge.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>186</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5e7bb10bac58303d0f11e467]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV2842140281.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Digital Content in the Age of Coronavirus</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/digital-content-in-the-age-of-coronavirus</link>
      <description>The coronavirus has had an enormous ripple effect beyond the core concerns around the virus itself. Conferences, events and festivals have largely been cancelled, including South by Southwest, Coachella and now the NBA. Academic institutions have closed their campuses to varying degrees leaving teachers and staff to rethink on the fly how to teach the rest of the semester online. Imagine shifting a fashion design class from the studio to online in a week?! And while over the past decade businesses have been shifting their workflow and technology support to include more “work at home” options, and while schools now have fully functioning remote learning platforms and trained online faculty, very few of these organizations have any experience in going completely digital. It’s becoming clear for many institutions that managing wide scale operations online without any previous experience doing so, and without any “best practices” in place, is challenging on many fronts—training, implementation, software bandwidth, finances and disparity in access to technology. What’s more, many organizations are rushing to digitize content, which simply takes time, whether it’s capturing images and uploading them into online systems or recording lectures and training modules for online delivery. In short, the coronavirus is forcing change in the most immediate way possible. And while most experts are focused on today or the very short term, decisions and changes made now will dramatically shift how we as a society work, learn and socialize forever.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:19:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Digital Content in the Age of Coronavirus</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/826edb60-153a-11eb-87a7-fb9308c3aead/image/uploads_2F1604013272796-ubgmt2h9ak-804fccbebcdbbb116e1bc5e64f3d0fc8_2FFC+Digital+Content.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Organizations of all types are dealing with a sudden shift to doing business and communicating remotely. Digital tools are more important than ever.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The coronavirus has had an enormous ripple effect beyond the core concerns around the virus itself. Conferences, events and festivals have largely been cancelled, including South by Southwest, Coachella and now the NBA. Academic institutions have closed their campuses to varying degrees leaving teachers and staff to rethink on the fly how to teach the rest of the semester online. Imagine shifting a fashion design class from the studio to online in a week?! And while over the past decade businesses have been shifting their workflow and technology support to include more “work at home” options, and while schools now have fully functioning remote learning platforms and trained online faculty, very few of these organizations have any experience in going completely digital. It’s becoming clear for many institutions that managing wide scale operations online without any previous experience doing so, and without any “best practices” in place, is challenging on many fronts—training, implementation, software bandwidth, finances and disparity in access to technology. What’s more, many organizations are rushing to digitize content, which simply takes time, whether it’s capturing images and uploading them into online systems or recording lectures and training modules for online delivery. In short, the coronavirus is forcing change in the most immediate way possible. And while most experts are focused on today or the very short term, decisions and changes made now will dramatically shift how we as a society work, learn and socialize forever.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The coronavirus has had an enormous ripple effect beyond the core concerns around the virus itself. Conferences, events and festivals have largely been cancelled, including South by Southwest, Coachella and now the NBA. Academic institutions have closed their campuses to varying degrees leaving teachers and staff to rethink on the fly how to teach the rest of the semester online. Imagine shifting a fashion design class from the studio to online in a week?! And while over the past decade businesses have been shifting their workflow and technology support to include more “work at home” options, and while schools now have fully functioning remote learning platforms and trained online faculty, very few of these organizations have any experience in going completely digital. It’s becoming clear for many institutions that managing wide scale operations online without any previous experience doing so, and without any “best practices” in place, is challenging on many fronts—training, implementation, software bandwidth, finances and disparity in access to technology. What’s more, many organizations are rushing to digitize content, which simply takes time, whether it’s capturing images and uploading them into online systems or recording lectures and training modules for online delivery. In short, the coronavirus is forcing change in the most immediate way possible. And while most experts are focused on today or the very short term, decisions and changes made now will dramatically shift how we as a society work, learn and socialize forever.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>180</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5e7a78a74f074574bc63aa77]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV4016697536.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gaultier: Luxury Fashion Collaboration</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/gaultier-luxury-fashion-collaboration</link>
      <description>Fashion brands spend a lot of time, money and resources in protecting their brand, especially in the luxury sector. The goal is to build a clear and concise brand identity, which allows companies to sell their products at higher prices and with bigger profit margins. Essentially, customers are willing to pay more for luxury products—and the marketing that goes with it--because they represent something more than the product itself. It’s no surprise then, that brands are very meticulous in who they affiliate with, whether it’s the retailer they partner with, or the celebrity they engage for their ad campaigns. The goal is to align with like-minded businesses and people to further reinforce brand values. This model has shifted dramatically since the 80s and 90s, as fast fashion brands began to knock-off luxury brands, eating into their profits and brand positions. In an effort to control the situation, luxury brands began to collaborate with retailers such as H&amp;M and Target, bringing in a new era of collaboration between diametrically opposed partners. This trend precipitated as streetwear emerged as the defining trend of the decade, forcing luxury brands to get even more creative in their affiliations—from hiring VIrgil Abloh at Louis Vuitton to partnerships with brands like Supreme. Today, a new model is emerging. Jean Paul Gaultier just announced that his couture house would continue, but would feature new designers each season, providing the Gaultier house with constant aesthetic change. While other brands have played around with this concept, Gaultier is the first to adopt this as an overall business model. This dramatic shift has the potential to further disrupt the luxury market as we know it, infusing it with fresh talent and ideas.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:16:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Gaultier: Luxury Fashion Collaboration</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/82887444-153a-11eb-87a7-43e4f43af6fb/image/uploads_2F1604013246573-5an6piuzg87-310068f0f22fa88e5372410733561967_2FFC+Luxury+Fashion+Collaboration.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Gaultier will invite guest designers to create each new collection for the storied Parisian brand.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Fashion brands spend a lot of time, money and resources in protecting their brand, especially in the luxury sector. The goal is to build a clear and concise brand identity, which allows companies to sell their products at higher prices and with bigger profit margins. Essentially, customers are willing to pay more for luxury products—and the marketing that goes with it--because they represent something more than the product itself. It’s no surprise then, that brands are very meticulous in who they affiliate with, whether it’s the retailer they partner with, or the celebrity they engage for their ad campaigns. The goal is to align with like-minded businesses and people to further reinforce brand values. This model has shifted dramatically since the 80s and 90s, as fast fashion brands began to knock-off luxury brands, eating into their profits and brand positions. In an effort to control the situation, luxury brands began to collaborate with retailers such as H&amp;M and Target, bringing in a new era of collaboration between diametrically opposed partners. This trend precipitated as streetwear emerged as the defining trend of the decade, forcing luxury brands to get even more creative in their affiliations—from hiring VIrgil Abloh at Louis Vuitton to partnerships with brands like Supreme. Today, a new model is emerging. Jean Paul Gaultier just announced that his couture house would continue, but would feature new designers each season, providing the Gaultier house with constant aesthetic change. While other brands have played around with this concept, Gaultier is the first to adopt this as an overall business model. This dramatic shift has the potential to further disrupt the luxury market as we know it, infusing it with fresh talent and ideas.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Fashion brands spend a lot of time, money and resources in protecting their brand, especially in the luxury sector. The goal is to build a clear and concise brand identity, which allows companies to sell their products at higher prices and with bigger profit margins. Essentially, customers are willing to pay more for luxury products—and the marketing that goes with it--because they represent something more than the product itself. It’s no surprise then, that brands are very meticulous in who they affiliate with, whether it’s the retailer they partner with, or the celebrity they engage for their ad campaigns. The goal is to align with like-minded businesses and people to further reinforce brand values. This model has shifted dramatically since the 80s and 90s, as fast fashion brands began to knock-off luxury brands, eating into their profits and brand positions. In an effort to control the situation, luxury brands began to collaborate with retailers such as H&amp;M and Target, bringing in a new era of collaboration between diametrically opposed partners. This trend precipitated as streetwear emerged as the defining trend of the decade, forcing luxury brands to get even more creative in their affiliations—from hiring VIrgil Abloh at Louis Vuitton to partnerships with brands like Supreme. Today, a new model is emerging. Jean Paul Gaultier just announced that his couture house would continue, but would feature new designers each season, providing the Gaultier house with constant aesthetic change. While other brands have played around with this concept, Gaultier is the first to adopt this as an overall business model. This dramatic shift has the potential to further disrupt the luxury market as we know it, infusing it with fresh talent and ideas.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>183</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5e7a777b6298be0e5acc901d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV3748786620.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Finding Retail Success</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/finding-retail-success</link>
      <description>Fashion retailers continue to experience major disruptions in their business. Not only is the retail marketplace over-saturated and highly competitive, consumer preferences are changing, largely driven by online access and innovative technologies. Key considerations for operating a successful retail business, in today’s market, are: Only 10-20% of sales are completed online, but close to 65% of in-person sales are influenced by digital channels. Retailers must have a comprehensive, coordinated omni-channel strategy that takes advantage of each channel’s strengths. Consumers expect that brand’s offer a full lifestyle experience across all channels. This branded experience needs to be authentic to a brand’s core values, with the goal of encouraging an engaged community. Retailers must be highly focused in their product and service offering. Customers highly value ease of shopping, which includes smaller store footprints, “hidden technologies” that facilitate the shopping experience and pay attention to an overall customer user experience—how they move through a store, online and onsite. Retailers must recognize that consumers expect more one-on-one engagement that takes into consideration more diverse consumer needs and wants. Key opportunities include being more actively involved in engaging customers authentically around race, language, sizing, politics, and sustainable practices. And more and more, consumers are demanding spaces and experiences that aren’t based on a gender binary (ie. women’s and men’s departments). It’s impossible for retail brands to be perfect, but customers expect retailers to try their best, apologize for missteps, and be transparent along the way.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:10:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Finding Retail Success</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/82aa9272-153a-11eb-87a7-ab3dadfb7af2/image/uploads_2F1604013161119-3yizmomtrhj-c45c00c8f9e89da063586460dc79fc56_2FFC+Retail+Success.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Fashion retailers are continuing to experience changing consumer demands. How can they best adapt for the future?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Fashion retailers continue to experience major disruptions in their business. Not only is the retail marketplace over-saturated and highly competitive, consumer preferences are changing, largely driven by online access and innovative technologies. Key considerations for operating a successful retail business, in today’s market, are: Only 10-20% of sales are completed online, but close to 65% of in-person sales are influenced by digital channels. Retailers must have a comprehensive, coordinated omni-channel strategy that takes advantage of each channel’s strengths. Consumers expect that brand’s offer a full lifestyle experience across all channels. This branded experience needs to be authentic to a brand’s core values, with the goal of encouraging an engaged community. Retailers must be highly focused in their product and service offering. Customers highly value ease of shopping, which includes smaller store footprints, “hidden technologies” that facilitate the shopping experience and pay attention to an overall customer user experience—how they move through a store, online and onsite. Retailers must recognize that consumers expect more one-on-one engagement that takes into consideration more diverse consumer needs and wants. Key opportunities include being more actively involved in engaging customers authentically around race, language, sizing, politics, and sustainable practices. And more and more, consumers are demanding spaces and experiences that aren’t based on a gender binary (ie. women’s and men’s departments). It’s impossible for retail brands to be perfect, but customers expect retailers to try their best, apologize for missteps, and be transparent along the way.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Fashion retailers continue to experience major disruptions in their business. Not only is the retail marketplace over-saturated and highly competitive, consumer preferences are changing, largely driven by online access and innovative technologies. Key considerations for operating a successful retail business, in today’s market, are: Only 10-20% of sales are completed online, but close to 65% of in-person sales are influenced by digital channels. Retailers must have a comprehensive, coordinated omni-channel strategy that takes advantage of each channel’s strengths. Consumers expect that brand’s offer a full lifestyle experience across all channels. This branded experience needs to be authentic to a brand’s core values, with the goal of encouraging an engaged community. Retailers must be highly focused in their product and service offering. Customers highly value ease of shopping, which includes smaller store footprints, “hidden technologies” that facilitate the shopping experience and pay attention to an overall customer user experience—how they move through a store, online and onsite. Retailers must recognize that consumers expect more one-on-one engagement that takes into consideration more diverse consumer needs and wants. Key opportunities include being more actively involved in engaging customers authentically around race, language, sizing, politics, and sustainable practices. And more and more, consumers are demanding spaces and experiences that aren’t based on a gender binary (ie. women’s and men’s departments). It’s impossible for retail brands to be perfect, but customers expect retailers to try their best, apologize for missteps, and be transparent along the way.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>202</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5e7a7665b8ae72565ee492c3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV9357322992.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Transparency in Fashion Branding</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/transparency-in-fashion-branding</link>
      <description>With the birth of haute couture in the late 1800s, Paris quickly became the epicenter of fashion creativity, setting the standard for style throughout the world. This coalesced with a burgeoning nouveau riche class and the introduction of new forms of transportation that connected the world. Designers such as Paul Poiret set their sites on creating more than just clothing, offering products such as perfumes and home furnishings to support his client’s modern lifestyle. It was the birth of lifestyle branding, and it hits jet speed in the 1920s. Subsequent fashion houses, became adept at curating and telling their brand story, mixing fact and fiction to add to their label’s mystique and create an overall DNA. The tight control of the brand narrative ensured exclusivity as these brands began to spread throughout the world. Fast forward to today, the very myths that ensure these brands still exist, is now a potential liability. Customers now have access to the internet, where controlling brand narrative is much more difficult. And information is much easier to get online, leading customers to find new information that runs counter to a brand’s purported history. Customers are demanding transparency, and prefer authenticity to a “pitch perfect” story. This is forcing luxury brands into a corner. Is it good business to be more forthcoming around their history? For example, does being truthful about Chanel’s role in World War II and subsequent banishment from France, potentially hurt or help the brand in the 21st century? How does that counterbalance with the Dior/Galliano fiasco, if at all? What seems to be clear is that if brands are still struggling to determine how best to grapple with their complex histories more truthfully, is it any wonder that these brands will also continue to struggle with current issues around diversity, cultural appropriation, production processes and more? Perhaps a reckoning with the past is what’s needed to best approach the future. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:06:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Transparency in Fashion Branding</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/82caada0-153a-11eb-87a7-af3f21c0edc5/image/uploads_2F1604013082833-e2dppdu02o6-22f08e2756282a1c6c04f1619d012144_2FFC+Transparecy+in+Fashion+Branding.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Luxury brands create exclusivity by protecting their brand narrative. This is increasingly difficult in the age of the internet.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>With the birth of haute couture in the late 1800s, Paris quickly became the epicenter of fashion creativity, setting the standard for style throughout the world. This coalesced with a burgeoning nouveau riche class and the introduction of new forms of transportation that connected the world. Designers such as Paul Poiret set their sites on creating more than just clothing, offering products such as perfumes and home furnishings to support his client’s modern lifestyle. It was the birth of lifestyle branding, and it hits jet speed in the 1920s. Subsequent fashion houses, became adept at curating and telling their brand story, mixing fact and fiction to add to their label’s mystique and create an overall DNA. The tight control of the brand narrative ensured exclusivity as these brands began to spread throughout the world. Fast forward to today, the very myths that ensure these brands still exist, is now a potential liability. Customers now have access to the internet, where controlling brand narrative is much more difficult. And information is much easier to get online, leading customers to find new information that runs counter to a brand’s purported history. Customers are demanding transparency, and prefer authenticity to a “pitch perfect” story. This is forcing luxury brands into a corner. Is it good business to be more forthcoming around their history? For example, does being truthful about Chanel’s role in World War II and subsequent banishment from France, potentially hurt or help the brand in the 21st century? How does that counterbalance with the Dior/Galliano fiasco, if at all? What seems to be clear is that if brands are still struggling to determine how best to grapple with their complex histories more truthfully, is it any wonder that these brands will also continue to struggle with current issues around diversity, cultural appropriation, production processes and more? Perhaps a reckoning with the past is what’s needed to best approach the future. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>With the birth of haute couture in the late 1800s, Paris quickly became the epicenter of fashion creativity, setting the standard for style throughout the world. This coalesced with a burgeoning nouveau riche class and the introduction of new forms of transportation that connected the world. Designers such as Paul Poiret set their sites on creating more than just clothing, offering products such as perfumes and home furnishings to support his client’s modern lifestyle. It was the birth of lifestyle branding, and it hits jet speed in the 1920s. Subsequent fashion houses, became adept at curating and telling their brand story, mixing fact and fiction to add to their label’s mystique and create an overall DNA. The tight control of the brand narrative ensured exclusivity as these brands began to spread throughout the world. Fast forward to today, the very myths that ensure these brands still exist, is now a potential liability. Customers now have access to the internet, where controlling brand narrative is much more difficult. And information is much easier to get online, leading customers to find new information that runs counter to a brand’s purported history. Customers are demanding transparency, and prefer authenticity to a “pitch perfect” story. This is forcing luxury brands into a corner. Is it good business to be more forthcoming around their history? For example, does being truthful about Chanel’s role in World War II and subsequent banishment from France, potentially hurt or help the brand in the 21st century? How does that counterbalance with the Dior/Galliano fiasco, if at all? What seems to be clear is that if brands are still struggling to determine how best to grapple with their complex histories more truthfully, is it any wonder that these brands will also continue to struggle with current issues around diversity, cultural appropriation, production processes and more? Perhaps a reckoning with the past is what’s needed to best approach the future. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>211</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5e7a75a0a7fbd757165b6a36]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV7847354544.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Black Face" Controversy at FIT</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/podcast-news-bytes/black-face-controversy-at-fit</link>
      <description>In light of the recent “black face” fashion show controversy involving the MFA fashion design program at the Fashion Institute of Technology, it’s important to highlight three things: 1)    The Asian population, specifically Chinese students, represent a large part of enrollment at FIT and other fashion universities…sometimes over 50% of a program cohort. 2)    These programs rarely include American cultural and historical training as part of their curriculum, let alone a comprehensive education in understanding cultures beyond the U.S. 3)    American educators are not well trained to understand the needs of a more diverse student body. And yet, increasingly upon graduation, fashion students are likely to work as part of a global fashion system, where they are required to understand the needs of customers on a vast, international scale. It’s an almost impossible task, but if the many corporate mishaps are any sign—from Prada to Burberry, it’s a reality of training future fashion leaders. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:02:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>"Black Face" Controversy at FIT</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/82e530da-153a-11eb-87a7-5ff081eddf19/image/uploads_2F1604013055745-6dhha1lykq-39503daa29020ad5a0643c065d7bc239_2FFC+Black+Face.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>A graduate fashion design student at FIT gets caught up in black face controversy.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In light of the recent “black face” fashion show controversy involving the MFA fashion design program at the Fashion Institute of Technology, it’s important to highlight three things: 1)    The Asian population, specifically Chinese students, represent a large part of enrollment at FIT and other fashion universities…sometimes over 50% of a program cohort. 2)    These programs rarely include American cultural and historical training as part of their curriculum, let alone a comprehensive education in understanding cultures beyond the U.S. 3)    American educators are not well trained to understand the needs of a more diverse student body. And yet, increasingly upon graduation, fashion students are likely to work as part of a global fashion system, where they are required to understand the needs of customers on a vast, international scale. It’s an almost impossible task, but if the many corporate mishaps are any sign—from Prada to Burberry, it’s a reality of training future fashion leaders. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In light of the recent “black face” fashion show controversy involving the MFA fashion design program at the Fashion Institute of Technology, it’s important to highlight three things: 1)    The Asian population, specifically Chinese students, represent a large part of enrollment at FIT and other fashion universities…sometimes over 50% of a program cohort. 2)    These programs rarely include American cultural and historical training as part of their curriculum, let alone a comprehensive education in understanding cultures beyond the U.S. 3)    American educators are not well trained to understand the needs of a more diverse student body. And yet, increasingly upon graduation, fashion students are likely to work as part of a global fashion system, where they are required to understand the needs of customers on a vast, international scale. It’s an almost impossible task, but if the many corporate mishaps are any sign—from Prada to Burberry, it’s a reality of training future fashion leaders. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>146</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5e7a748d7130e17f1b29816d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV9958662735.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Prada x Simons</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/prada-x-simons</link>
      <description>There is a lot of excitement and buzz surrounding the news that Raf Simons will join Italian luxury brand Prada as an equal co-creator with Miuccia Prada. The talented Belgian designer has moved from one creative director position to another over the past several years, including Jil Sander, Dior and most recently Calvin Klein. The big question on the tip of everyone’s tongue…will it work? Tom Ford’s turn as the Creative Director at Gucci for ten years from 1994 to 2004, is largely credited with the introduction of the fashion designer as uber creative director. This role was now responsible for more than just designing six collections a year, but for creating marketing campaigns, store designs, and on top of that curating their own image and fame. This complete control worked so well for Gucci, that other brands followed suit. While there have been some examples of success employing this autocratic model, the end result was mostly designer burnout. It was proving an impossible task to do everything…something that Simons understands all too well. So…the announcement this week is especially interesting because the creative duties will be shared. And perhaps these two singular artists will be afforded the real luxury of more time to create ideas, share ideas, and find new inspiration in a fashion system that is ever more demanding and mass driven. Time will tell.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:57:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Prada x Simons</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/83039232-153a-11eb-87a7-d7ddaaf460be/image/uploads_2F1604013030520-qauuy2pau1k-0aff44c58b41b64ff1935b2f792cd73b_2FPrada+x+Simons.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Prada announces an equal collaboration with design Raf Simons.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>There is a lot of excitement and buzz surrounding the news that Raf Simons will join Italian luxury brand Prada as an equal co-creator with Miuccia Prada. The talented Belgian designer has moved from one creative director position to another over the past several years, including Jil Sander, Dior and most recently Calvin Klein. The big question on the tip of everyone’s tongue…will it work? Tom Ford’s turn as the Creative Director at Gucci for ten years from 1994 to 2004, is largely credited with the introduction of the fashion designer as uber creative director. This role was now responsible for more than just designing six collections a year, but for creating marketing campaigns, store designs, and on top of that curating their own image and fame. This complete control worked so well for Gucci, that other brands followed suit. While there have been some examples of success employing this autocratic model, the end result was mostly designer burnout. It was proving an impossible task to do everything…something that Simons understands all too well. So…the announcement this week is especially interesting because the creative duties will be shared. And perhaps these two singular artists will be afforded the real luxury of more time to create ideas, share ideas, and find new inspiration in a fashion system that is ever more demanding and mass driven. Time will tell.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>There is a lot of excitement and buzz surrounding the news that Raf Simons will join Italian luxury brand Prada as an equal co-creator with Miuccia Prada. The talented Belgian designer has moved from one creative director position to another over the past several years, including Jil Sander, Dior and most recently Calvin Klein. The big question on the tip of everyone’s tongue…will it work? Tom Ford’s turn as the Creative Director at Gucci for ten years from 1994 to 2004, is largely credited with the introduction of the fashion designer as uber creative director. This role was now responsible for more than just designing six collections a year, but for creating marketing campaigns, store designs, and on top of that curating their own image and fame. This complete control worked so well for Gucci, that other brands followed suit. While there have been some examples of success employing this autocratic model, the end result was mostly designer burnout. It was proving an impossible task to do everything…something that Simons understands all too well. So…the announcement this week is especially interesting because the creative duties will be shared. And perhaps these two singular artists will be afforded the real luxury of more time to create ideas, share ideas, and find new inspiration in a fashion system that is ever more demanding and mass driven. Time will tell.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>167</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5e7a7381e5c39b733fdd7d06]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV5090931297.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coronavirus and Fashion Students</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/coronavirus-and-fashion-students</link>
      <description>For the last several years, China has emerged as a great exporter of students to the U.S. Nowhere is this more evident than at fashion schools, where Chinese students often make up 50% of a student cohort. Luckily, most Chinese students arrived in the U.S. for the spring semester before travel sanctions were put in place, due to the coronavirus, but are now facing uncertainty about their ability to return home. For seniors, this is especially acute, as families cannot plan to attend graduation ceremonies, typically held in May. Additionally, many fashion schools offer spring learning sessions and study abroad opportunities in China during the spring. These have all been cancelled, leaving students and schools in a lurch. For American students, studying in China is a chance to see the heart of the manufacturing industry firsthand. Finally, there has been an uptick in violence against Chinese students that school administrators must grapple with. Recently, a student at The New School was hit over the head at a local restaurant in New York City. The assailant shouted an epitaph about the coronavirus and China. While these attacks are largely due to fear and misinformation, the coronavirus can add another level of stress on Chinese students studying in the US.  UPDATE: Universities are now largely closed in the US, including The New School. Most students have returned home. Classes will be finished online and plans are underway for summer and fall terms.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:52:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Coronavirus and Fashion Students</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/831cd526-153a-11eb-87a7-e7939502959e/image/uploads_2F1604012992323-hj4841k4hwg-f3d77cccd0cf7c09a4a15dde850c2286_2FFC+Coronavirus.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Emerging health crisis effects universities as they determine best way to complete spring 2020 term.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>For the last several years, China has emerged as a great exporter of students to the U.S. Nowhere is this more evident than at fashion schools, where Chinese students often make up 50% of a student cohort. Luckily, most Chinese students arrived in the U.S. for the spring semester before travel sanctions were put in place, due to the coronavirus, but are now facing uncertainty about their ability to return home. For seniors, this is especially acute, as families cannot plan to attend graduation ceremonies, typically held in May. Additionally, many fashion schools offer spring learning sessions and study abroad opportunities in China during the spring. These have all been cancelled, leaving students and schools in a lurch. For American students, studying in China is a chance to see the heart of the manufacturing industry firsthand. Finally, there has been an uptick in violence against Chinese students that school administrators must grapple with. Recently, a student at The New School was hit over the head at a local restaurant in New York City. The assailant shouted an epitaph about the coronavirus and China. While these attacks are largely due to fear and misinformation, the coronavirus can add another level of stress on Chinese students studying in the US.  UPDATE: Universities are now largely closed in the US, including The New School. Most students have returned home. Classes will be finished online and plans are underway for summer and fall terms.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>For the last several years, China has emerged as a great exporter of students to the U.S. Nowhere is this more evident than at fashion schools, where Chinese students often make up 50% of a student cohort. Luckily, most Chinese students arrived in the U.S. for the spring semester before travel sanctions were put in place, due to the coronavirus, but are now facing uncertainty about their ability to return home. For seniors, this is especially acute, as families cannot plan to attend graduation ceremonies, typically held in May. Additionally, many fashion schools offer spring learning sessions and study abroad opportunities in China during the spring. These have all been cancelled, leaving students and schools in a lurch. For American students, studying in China is a chance to see the heart of the manufacturing industry firsthand. Finally, there has been an uptick in violence against Chinese students that school administrators must grapple with. Recently, a student at The New School was hit over the head at a local restaurant in New York City. The assailant shouted an epitaph about the coronavirus and China. While these attacks are largely due to fear and misinformation, the coronavirus can add another level of stress on Chinese students studying in the US.  UPDATE: Universities are now largely closed in the US, including The New School. Most students have returned home. Classes will be finished online and plans are underway for summer and fall terms.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>156</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5e7a7144e1294b32cd6c2a04]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV3587740335.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Diversity &amp; Inclusion in Fashion Retail</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/diversity-inclusion-in-fashion-retail</link>
      <description>More and more, fashion retailers are grappling with the concept of diversity and inclusion, especially in an increasingly transparent world. Largely due to social media, customers are more vocal than ever about their expectations and needs. And because there are so many options to choose from—especially online—customers increasingly prefer to spend their money on a brand that shares their personal values. They won’t hesitate to leave a retailer they’ve spent their life shopping at, if they don’t feel heard. At the forefront of this shift are conversations about standardized sizes that all but dismiss a large part of the US population and are still firmly rooted in the gender binary. Companies that fail to offer services in more than English are simply not able to communicate effectively to a large swath of their customer base who speak Spanish and other languages. And brands that assume their customer is largely white, are increasingly missing out on offering products that customers are in need of from bras to make-up. Brands like “Victoria’s Secret” have experienced major push-back for their lack of diversity, ultimately leading to the cancellation of their annual fashion show, major organizational reshuffling, and then most recently to a private buy-out. By not paying attention or tackling issues of diversity and inclusion head-on, the future of that brand is now in the balance.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:44:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Diversity &amp; Inclusion in Retail</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/833b12e8-153a-11eb-87a7-276c6fc1456c/image/uploads_2F1604012971073-vfkwejncxc-52278c158da70f38ba1568a205c4bfd6_2FFC+Diversity_Inclusion.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Retailers must approach diversity and inclusion internally and externally if they expect to engage customers authentically.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>More and more, fashion retailers are grappling with the concept of diversity and inclusion, especially in an increasingly transparent world. Largely due to social media, customers are more vocal than ever about their expectations and needs. And because there are so many options to choose from—especially online—customers increasingly prefer to spend their money on a brand that shares their personal values. They won’t hesitate to leave a retailer they’ve spent their life shopping at, if they don’t feel heard. At the forefront of this shift are conversations about standardized sizes that all but dismiss a large part of the US population and are still firmly rooted in the gender binary. Companies that fail to offer services in more than English are simply not able to communicate effectively to a large swath of their customer base who speak Spanish and other languages. And brands that assume their customer is largely white, are increasingly missing out on offering products that customers are in need of from bras to make-up. Brands like “Victoria’s Secret” have experienced major push-back for their lack of diversity, ultimately leading to the cancellation of their annual fashion show, major organizational reshuffling, and then most recently to a private buy-out. By not paying attention or tackling issues of diversity and inclusion head-on, the future of that brand is now in the balance.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>More and more, fashion retailers are grappling with the concept of diversity and inclusion, especially in an increasingly transparent world. Largely due to social media, customers are more vocal than ever about their expectations and needs. And because there are so many options to choose from—especially online—customers increasingly prefer to spend their money on a brand that shares their personal values. They won’t hesitate to leave a retailer they’ve spent their life shopping at, if they don’t feel heard. At the forefront of this shift are conversations about standardized sizes that all but dismiss a large part of the US population and are still firmly rooted in the gender binary. Companies that fail to offer services in more than English are simply not able to communicate effectively to a large swath of their customer base who speak Spanish and other languages. And brands that assume their customer is largely white, are increasingly missing out on offering products that customers are in need of from bras to make-up. Brands like “Victoria’s Secret” have experienced major push-back for their lack of diversity, ultimately leading to the cancellation of their annual fashion show, major organizational reshuffling, and then most recently to a private buy-out. By not paying attention or tackling issues of diversity and inclusion head-on, the future of that brand is now in the balance.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>168</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5e7a6ef06c11a91a7b770cc7]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV7428061066.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More than an Experience</title>
      <link>https://www.fashionconsort.com/fc-podcasts-news-network/more-than-an-experience</link>
      <description>There are more signs of retail disruption in 2020 as evidenced by the recent layoffs at Macy’s. Clearly, retail executives continue to struggle to find the best way to meet the needs of Millennial and Gen Z customers. It’s no surprise then that a mantra for retailers has emerged from this chaos…EXPERIENCE, EXPERIENCE, EXPERIENCE. And brands have begun to do just that, investing millions of dollars in creating all sorts of experiences from live DJs to arctic dressing rooms to try on winter coats. And yet many of these experiences are not paying off. Why? Sure, a unique experience can get the attention of the press and draw traffic, but the return on investment in such a saturated marketplace is typically short lived. What customers are really searching for is an authentic community and ease of shopping. When these two elements are combined consistently, and within a branded context, retailers begin to understand that experience is not about being flashy and doing something unique, but about being authentic to their customer’s needs. Building loyalty, after all, still takes hard work and time. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 18:35:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>More than an Experience</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Fashion Consort / Joshua Williams</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/837bc8ce-153a-11eb-87a7-3377b7c4c5ae/image/uploads_2F1604012931586-iyxvzaknjx-34ceefb20dfb60bda01e7b46c2fb3d6f_2FFC+Experience.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Insight on building more than a retail experience, but an authentic community based on brand values.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>There are more signs of retail disruption in 2020 as evidenced by the recent layoffs at Macy’s. Clearly, retail executives continue to struggle to find the best way to meet the needs of Millennial and Gen Z customers. It’s no surprise then that a mantra for retailers has emerged from this chaos…EXPERIENCE, EXPERIENCE, EXPERIENCE. And brands have begun to do just that, investing millions of dollars in creating all sorts of experiences from live DJs to arctic dressing rooms to try on winter coats. And yet many of these experiences are not paying off. Why? Sure, a unique experience can get the attention of the press and draw traffic, but the return on investment in such a saturated marketplace is typically short lived. What customers are really searching for is an authentic community and ease of shopping. When these two elements are combined consistently, and within a branded context, retailers begin to understand that experience is not about being flashy and doing something unique, but about being authentic to their customer’s needs. Building loyalty, after all, still takes hard work and time. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>There are more signs of retail disruption in 2020 as evidenced by the recent layoffs at Macy’s. Clearly, retail executives continue to struggle to find the best way to meet the needs of Millennial and Gen Z customers. It’s no surprise then that a mantra for retailers has emerged from this chaos…EXPERIENCE, EXPERIENCE, EXPERIENCE. And brands have begun to do just that, investing millions of dollars in creating all sorts of experiences from live DJs to arctic dressing rooms to try on winter coats. And yet many of these experiences are not paying off. Why? Sure, a unique experience can get the attention of the press and draw traffic, but the return on investment in such a saturated marketplace is typically short lived. What customers are really searching for is an authentic community and ease of shopping. When these two elements are combined consistently, and within a branded context, retailers begin to understand that experience is not about being flashy and doing something unique, but about being authentic to their customer’s needs. Building loyalty, after all, still takes hard work and time. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>155</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ce07b95cd731b0001ff4198:5e7a4d7d75a3117231603bb4:5e7a4dbe7fff240f38e76ce7]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/chtbl.com/track/1CFDC7/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV6667672530.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
