<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.megaphone.fm/LAW7750316807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <title>Law360 Explores </title>
    <link>https://www.law360.com/explores</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright © 2021 Portfolio Media, Inc.</copyright>
    <description>Law360 Explores is a podcast aimed at investigating some of the biggest legal topics happening today. Whether it’s the new landscape of marijuana legalization, or the battle lines being drawn over law school admissions exams, Law360 Explores is an engaging series of narrative stories told by the experts on the front lines of a shifting legal industry.</description>
    
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Law360 Explores is a podcast aimed at investigating some of the biggest legal topics happening today. Whether it’s the new landscape of marijuana legalization, or the battle lines being drawn over law school admissions exams, Law360 Explores is an engaging series of narrative stories told by the experts on the front lines of a shifting legal industry.</itunes:summary>
    <content:encoded>
      <![CDATA[<p>Law360 Explores is a podcast aimed at investigating some of the biggest legal topics happening today. Whether it’s the new landscape of marijuana legalization, or the battle lines being drawn over law school admissions exams, Law360 Explores is an engaging series of narrative stories told by the experts on the front lines of a shifting legal industry.</p>]]>
    </content:encoded>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Law360 Explores</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>editor@law360.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/446df7f0-31af-11ec-a4a9-9f7340f21068/image/2023__04-10_-_EXPLORES_44B_-_01_MAIN.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
    <itunes:category text="News">
    </itunes:category>
    <item>
      <title>DA In Gilgo Beach Killings Case Talks Advances In DNA Use</title>
      <description>The case regarding multiple killings along Gilgo Beach has captivated the New York tristate area ever since women's mutilated bodies were found in 2010 on the stretch of Long Island.In addition to being gruesome, the case has charted new legal waters, as it has seen evidence from a newer form of DNA testing for the first time pass stringent court admissibility standards, setting an example in New York that could come into play in other jurisdictions.Law360 sat down with Suffolk County District Attorney Ray Tierney, who began prosecuting architect Rex Heuermann in 2023 on what now are charges that he murdered seven women, to discuss the case. Heuermann maintains his innocence, has pled not guilty and is in custody awaiting trial.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The case regarding multiple killings along Gilgo Beach has captivated the New York tristate area ever since women's mutilated bodies were found in 2010 on the stretch of Long Island.In addition to being gruesome, the case has charted new legal waters, as it has seen evidence from a newer form of DNA testing for the first time pass stringent court admissibility standards, setting an example in New York that could come into play in other jurisdictions.Law360 sat down with Suffolk County District Attorney Ray Tierney, who began prosecuting architect Rex Heuermann in 2023 on what now are charges that he murdered seven women, to discuss the case. Heuermann maintains his innocence, has pled not guilty and is in custody awaiting trial.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The case regarding multiple killings along Gilgo Beach<strong> </strong>has captivated the New York tristate area ever since women's mutilated bodies were found in 2010 on the stretch of Long Island.<br>In addition to being gruesome, the case has charted new legal waters, as it has seen evidence from a newer form of DNA testing for the first time pass stringent court admissibility standards, setting an example in New York that could come into play in other jurisdictions.<br>Law360 sat down with Suffolk County District Attorney Ray Tierney, who began prosecuting architect Rex Heuermann in 2023 on what now are charges that he murdered seven women, to discuss the case. Heuermann maintains his innocence, has pled not guilty and is in custody awaiting trial.

</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2395</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f8f6955e-9599-11f0-a74e-7bcbec9f35cc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW1530378018.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Law360 Explores: Subminimum Wage, Part 2</title>
      <description>The debate regarding whether incarcerated people who perform work are employees and thus entitled to federal wage and hour protections is set to continue to develop.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2025 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The debate regarding whether incarcerated people who perform work are employees and thus entitled to federal wage and hour protections is set to continue to develop.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The debate regarding whether incarcerated people who perform work are employees and thus entitled to federal wage and hour protections is set to continue to develop.

</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1036</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6c14525e-2c60-11f0-a5ec-778caf31effd]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW4643161219.mp3?updated=1746745610" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Law360 Explores: Subminimum Wage</title>
      <description>The U.S. Department of Labor's proposed rule to end employers' ability to pay workers with disabilities less than the federal minimum wage comes as time is running out to end the long-standing but controversial program before Republicans take back the White House and Congress. Here, Law360 explores the debate over the program and what ending it would mean for both employers and workers.  </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Law360 Explores: Subminimum Wage</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The U.S. Department of Labor's proposed rule to end employers' ability to pay workers with disabilities less than the federal minimum wage comes as time is running out to end the long-standing but controversial program before Republicans take back the White House and Congress. Here, Law360 explores the debate over the program and what ending it would mean for both employers and workers.  </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Department of Labor's proposed rule to end employers' ability to pay workers with disabilities less than the federal minimum wage comes as time is running out to end the long-standing but controversial program before Republicans take back the White House and Congress. Here, Law360 explores the debate over the program and what ending it would mean for both employers and workers.  </p><p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2143</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0846c178-b800-11ef-ae5f-176b43acddd8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW9206895483.mp3?updated=1734709003" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Don't Fear AI Hallucinations, Embrace Them, Scholar Says</title>
      <link>https://www.law360.com/podcast</link>
      <description>When it comes to artificial intelligence, most early adopters fear the so-called hallucinations that the systems can produce. But one scholar says the creativity those hallucinations represent is actually a valuable feature lawyers should embrace. At the 25th annual Burton Awards, Law360 caught up with Megan Ma, a research fellow and the associate director of the Stanford Program in Law, Science, and Technology and the Stanford Center for Legal Informatics, also known as CodeX. Ma talks about just why hallucinations aren't all bad, the guardrails needed to stay on the right side of legal ethics, and the power academia has to help shape the future uses of AI in the legal profession.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Don't Fear AI Hallucinations, Embrace Them, Scholar Says</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>When it comes to artificial intelligence, most early adopters fear the so-called hallucinations that the systems can produce. But one scholar says the creativity those hallucinations represent is actually a valuable feature lawyers should embrace. At the 25th annual Burton Awards, Law360 caught up with Megan Ma, a research fellow and the associate director of the Stanford Program in Law, Science, and Technology and the Stanford Center for Legal Informatics, also known as CodeX. Ma talks about just why hallucinations aren't all bad, the guardrails needed to stay on the right side of legal ethics, and the power academia has to help shape the future uses of AI in the legal profession.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>When it comes to artificial intelligence, most early adopters fear the so-called hallucinations that the systems can produce. But one scholar says the creativity those hallucinations represent is actually a valuable feature lawyers should embrace. At the 25th annual Burton Awards, Law360 caught up with Megan Ma, a research fellow and the associate director of the Stanford Program in Law, Science, and Technology and the Stanford Center for Legal Informatics, also known as CodeX. Ma talks about just why hallucinations aren't all bad, the guardrails needed to stay on the right side of legal ethics, and the power academia has to help shape the future uses of AI in the legal profession.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1083</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[56e64706-1f7e-11ef-b98d-a7635379f332]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW6925201167.mp3?updated=1717181596" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Patent Attorney Who Shook Up Professional Poker</title>
      <description>Twenty years ago, patent attorney Greg Raymer made poker history by toppling the largest tournament field ever to secure a record $5 million prize at the World Series of Poker’s main event, further fueling the so-called poker boom that pushed the game’s popularity to new heights. 
Raymer joins Law360 for a conversation about the path to his momentous achievement – from a private practice and corporate counsel attorney with a serious poker habit on the side to eventual champion – and what he’s been up to for the last two decades since his win.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 10:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Patent Attorney Who Shook Up Professional Poker</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c3c90432-18f6-11ef-b2f8-577daeccbbee/image/5560a39ed1f6ae606ddedbdcb40c99eb.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Twenty years ago, patent attorney Greg Raymer made poker history by toppling the largest tournament field ever to secure a record $5 million prize at the World Series of Poker’s main event, further fueling the so-called poker boom that pushed the game’s popularity to new heights. 
Raymer joins Law360 for a conversation about the path to his momentous achievement – from a private practice and corporate counsel attorney with a serious poker habit on the side to eventual champion – and what he’s been up to for the last two decades since his win.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Twenty years ago, patent attorney Greg Raymer made poker history by toppling the largest tournament field ever to secure a record $5 million prize at the World Series of Poker’s main event, further fueling the so-called poker boom that pushed the game’s popularity to new heights. </p><p>Raymer joins Law360 for a conversation about the path to his momentous achievement – from a private practice and corporate counsel attorney with a serious poker habit on the side to eventual champion – and what he’s been up to for the last two decades since his win.</p><p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1778</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c3c90432-18f6-11ef-b2f8-577daeccbbee]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW3751216541.mp3?updated=1716564299" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>And The Oscars' Legal Questions Go To…John Quinn</title>
      <description>The 96th annual Academy Awards is set to air on Sunday night. And behind the scenes of the bright lights, golden statues and celebrities in couture fashion walking the red carpet, there is, of course, a lawyer making sure it all goes to plan. 
For 33 years, that job belonged to Quinn Emanuel founding partner John Quinn, who served as general counsel to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, and whose firm still serves as the organization’s primary outside counsel. In this special Law360 interview he joins Law360 editor-at-large Alex Lawson to talk about all that the job entails and what it’s like being the top legal adviser behind Hollywood’s biggest night.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2024 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>And The Oscars' Legal Questions Go To…John Quinn</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/48f4e79c-dbea-11ee-953f-1fded9e8be90/image/6eb915e0086edbee6e1932d21f011f71.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The 96th annual Academy Awards is set to air on Sunday night. And behind the scenes of the bright lights, golden statues and celebrities in couture fashion walking the red carpet, there is, of course, a lawyer making sure it all goes to plan. 
For 33 years, that job belonged to Quinn Emanuel founding partner John Quinn, who served as general counsel to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, and whose firm still serves as the organization’s primary outside counsel. In this special Law360 interview he joins Law360 editor-at-large Alex Lawson to talk about all that the job entails and what it’s like being the top legal adviser behind Hollywood’s biggest night.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The 96th annual Academy Awards is set to air on Sunday night. And behind the scenes of the bright lights, golden statues and celebrities in couture fashion walking the red carpet, there is, of course, a lawyer making sure it all goes to plan. </p><p>For 33 years, that job belonged to Quinn Emanuel founding partner John Quinn, who served as general counsel to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, and whose firm still serves as the organization’s primary outside counsel. In this special Law360 interview he joins Law360 editor-at-large Alex Lawson to talk about all that the job entails and what it’s like being the top legal adviser behind Hollywood’s biggest night.</p><p><br></p><p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1882</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[48f4e79c-dbea-11ee-953f-1fded9e8be90]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW3506537845.mp3?updated=1709832496" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Law360 Explores: Psychedelics</title>
      <link>https://www.law360.com/explores</link>
      <description>Psychedelics, a class of hallucinogenic drugs with powerful mind-altering capabilities, are having a moment. While some have been used by traditional healers for thousands of years, as a matter of law today they are federally illegal substances considered to have no medical value. But the field is at an inflection point. As clinical research grows, and state and local laws change, the future of psychedelics policy is being shaped by a wide range of interests, including healthcare workers, government regulators, pharmaceutical startups and traditional use advocates. On this episode of Law360 Explores: Psychedelics, we investigate the emerging medical promise, the grassroots decriminalization movement and the activists focused on fair access and equity, all of which will determine where the industry goes from here.  </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 23:02:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Law360 Explores: Psychedelics</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5dc3d4be-f340-11ed-9bc4-7bc5efe2f2d7/image/558c64.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Psychedelics, a class of hallucinogenic drugs with powerful mind-altering capabilities, are having a moment. While some have been used by traditional healers for thousands of years, as a matter of law today they are federally illegal substances considered to have no medical value. But the field is at an inflection point. As clinical research grows, and state and local laws change, the future of psychedelics policy is being shaped by a wide range of interests, including healthcare workers, government regulators, pharmaceutical startups and traditional use advocates. On this episode of Law360 Explores: Psychedelics, we investigate the emerging medical promise, the grassroots decriminalization movement and the activists focused on fair access and equity, all of which will determine where the industry goes from here.  </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Psychedelics, a class of hallucinogenic drugs with powerful mind-altering capabilities, are having a moment. While some have been used by traditional healers for thousands of years, as a matter of law today they are federally illegal substances considered to have no medical value. But the field is at an inflection point. As clinical research grows, and state and local laws change, the future of psychedelics policy is being shaped by a wide range of interests, including healthcare workers, government regulators, pharmaceutical startups and traditional use advocates. On this episode of <em>Law360 Explores: Psychedelics</em>, we investigate the emerging medical promise, the grassroots decriminalization movement and the activists focused on fair access and equity, all of which will determine where the industry goes from here.  </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2059</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5dc3d4be-f340-11ed-9bc4-7bc5efe2f2d7]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW2210919038.mp3?updated=1684192008" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Law360 Explores: From Wolf Of Wall Street To First Street</title>
      <link>https://www.law360.com/explores</link>
      <description>How did some of the world's biggest tech companies come to benefit from a legal supershield making it almost impossible to sue them? The strange saga of Section 230 began 30 years ago with a notorious penny stock firm later made famous by Hollywood, and has now wound its way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

This week, in a special partnership episode between our Supreme Court podcast The Term and our investigative podcast series Law360 Explores, we track down the story of how a law passed with little fanfare decades ago became an aegis for a fledgling internet industry, and why many critics now want to pierce its armor.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2023 18:28:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Law360 Explores: From Wolf Of Wall Street To First Street</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5121dd0c-da20-11ed-bc8c-c3a0b2081f8c/image/381ffb.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>How did some of the world's biggest tech companies come to benefit from a legal supershield making it almost impossible to sue them? The strange saga of Section 230 began 30 years ago with a notorious penny stock firm later made famous by Hollywood, and has now wound its way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

This week, in a special partnership episode between our Supreme Court podcast The Term and our investigative podcast series Law360 Explores, we track down the story of how a law passed with little fanfare decades ago became an aegis for a fledgling internet industry, and why many critics now want to pierce its armor.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>How did some of the world's biggest tech companies come to benefit from a legal supershield making it almost impossible to sue them? The strange saga of Section 230 began 30 years ago with a notorious penny stock firm later made famous by Hollywood, and has now wound its way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p><p><br></p><p>This week, in a special partnership episode between our Supreme Court podcast The Term and our investigative podcast series Law360 Explores, we track down the story of how a law passed with little fanfare decades ago became an aegis for a fledgling internet industry, and why many critics now want to pierce its armor.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1986</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5121dd0c-da20-11ed-bc8c-c3a0b2081f8c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW5608799531.mp3?updated=1681492009" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S3, Ep. 2: Does Law School Deliver?</title>
      <link>https://www.law360.com/explores</link>
      <description>It’s time to take your seat inside the prestigious legal classroom, where law professors teaching a century-old curriculum engage in Socratic dialogue to shape you into thinking like a lawyer. But is that the most effective way of teaching, for all students? On this episode of Law360 Explores: The Law School Promise, we investigate how outdated methods like one final exam and cold calling can negatively impact students, and some of the ways that legal education reforms could change the curriculum for the better.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Does Law School Deliver?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/002d1632-742c-11ed-89b5-c77eba5517fc/image/a4fde5.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It’s time to take your seat inside the prestigious legal classroom, where law professors teaching a century-old curriculum engage in Socratic dialogue to shape you into thinking like a lawyer. But is that the most effective way of teaching, for all students? On this episode of Law360 Explores: The Law School Promise, we investigate how outdated methods like one final exam and cold calling can negatively impact students, and some of the ways that legal education reforms could change the curriculum for the better.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>It’s time to take your seat inside the prestigious legal classroom, where law professors teaching a century-old curriculum engage in Socratic dialogue to shape you into thinking like a lawyer. But is that the most effective way of teaching, for all students? On this episode of Law360 Explores: The Law School Promise, we investigate how outdated methods like one final exam and cold calling can negatively impact students, and some of the ways that legal education reforms could change the curriculum for the better.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2371</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[002d1632-742c-11ed-89b5-c77eba5517fc]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW5836973806.mp3?updated=1671558159" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S3, Ep. 1: The Pipeline To The Legal Profession</title>
      <link>https://www.law360.com/explores</link>
      <description>Before the law school journey even begins, you must first wind your way through a rigorous admissions process that includes not just letters of recommendation and statements of purpose, but the notoriously arduous LSAT exam. An exceptional score can open doors at the nation’s most prestigious universities, but is it the fairest way to measure candidates’ potential? On this episode of Law360 Explores: The Law School Promise, we investigate whether the law school admissions process makes sense, and whether a system that emphasizes a test score so heavily is leaving qualified law school applicants behind.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Pipeline To The Legal Profession</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/6d1f26b0-6787-11ed-be5d-8f286adb5266/image/99d7b2.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Before the law school journey even begins, you must first wind your way through a rigorous admissions process that includes not just letters of recommendation and statements of purpose, but the notoriously arduous LSAT exam. An exceptional score can open doors at the nation’s most prestigious universities, but is it the fairest way to measure candidates’ potential? On this episode of Law360 Explores: The Law School Promise, we investigate whether the law school admissions process makes sense, and whether a system that emphasizes a test score so heavily is leaving qualified law school applicants behind.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Before the law school journey even begins, you must first wind your way through a rigorous admissions process that includes not just letters of recommendation and statements of purpose, but the notoriously arduous LSAT exam. An exceptional score can open doors at the nation’s most prestigious universities, but is it the fairest way to measure candidates’ potential? On this episode of <em>Law360 Explores: The Law School Promise</em>, we investigate whether the law school admissions process makes sense, and whether a system that emphasizes a test score so heavily is leaving qualified law school applicants behind.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2048</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6d1f26b0-6787-11ed-be5d-8f286adb5266]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW7682994648.mp3?updated=1671558143" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S2, Ep. 2: A Low Bar In California</title>
      <link>https://www.law360.com/explores</link>
      <description>Tom Girardi allegedly grifted clients for years and got away with it. But how? In this episode of our podcast exploring the fall of Girardi, Law360 reporter Brandon Lowrey shares the findings of his extensive investigation into the flaws in the system meant to hold attorneys accountable. What he found were legal, structural and cultural flaws - particularly at the State Bar of California - that allowed Girardi to escape public punishment for decades.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2021 18:11:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>A Low Bar In California</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ec3198fe-539a-11ec-ac74-cf90f347e6fd/image/7e1f65.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Tom Girardi allegedly grifted clients for years and got away with it. But how? In this episode of our podcast exploring the fall of Girardi, Law360 reporter Brandon Lowrey shares the findings of his extensive investigation into the flaws in the system meant to hold attorneys accountable. What he found were legal, structural and cultural flaws - particularly at the State Bar of California - that allowed Girardi to escape public punishment for decades.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Tom Girardi allegedly grifted clients for years and got away with it. But how? In this episode of our podcast exploring the fall of Girardi, Law360 reporter Brandon Lowrey shares the findings of his extensive investigation into the flaws in the system meant to hold attorneys accountable. What he found were legal, structural and cultural flaws - particularly at the State Bar of California - that allowed Girardi to escape public punishment for decades.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1179</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ec3198fe-539a-11ec-ac74-cf90f347e6fd]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW8735411823.mp3?updated=1645124282" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S2, Ep. 1: The Thief In Shining Armor</title>
      <link>https://www.law360.com/explores</link>
      <description>Tom Girardi spent decades as one of the most successful plaintiff's attorneys in America, but in 2020, it all fell apart when he was accused of stealing settlement money from his clients. Girardi seemingly had it all — he was a celebrated plaintiffs attorney with a winning record and a famous wife who was a rising star of reality TV. But attorneys who knew him and clients who trusted him say that shiny exterior hid a darker truth.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:45:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Thief In Shining Armor</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/69ae884a-52c5-11ec-8c84-8ff6e8ddf3ef/image/ca7978.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Tom Girardi spent decades as one of the most successful plaintiff's attorneys in America, but in 2020, it all fell apart when he was accused of stealing settlement money from his clients. Girardi seemingly had it all — he was a celebrated plaintiffs attorney with a winning record and a famous wife who was a rising star of reality TV. But attorneys who knew him and clients who trusted him say that shiny exterior hid a darker truth.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Tom Girardi spent decades as one of the most successful plaintiff's attorneys in America, but in 2020, it all fell apart when he was accused of stealing settlement money from his clients. Girardi seemingly had it all — he was a celebrated plaintiffs attorney with a winning record and a famous wife who was a rising star of reality TV. But attorneys who knew him and clients who trusted him say that shiny exterior hid a darker truth.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1797</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[69ae884a-52c5-11ec-8c84-8ff6e8ddf3ef]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW4412240909.mp3?updated=1645124259" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S1, Ep. 5: Big Risks For Attorneys</title>
      <link>https://podcasts.law360.com/episodes/0c694589-7a2b-46f4-aabc-cfb67bcf5537/0c694589-7a2b-46f4-aabc-cfb67bcf5537.mp3</link>
      <description>More and more law firms are jumping into the cannabis world — but do they know the risks they’re facing? Lawyers who have been working with cannabis for a while say they have faced death threats, struggled with ethical questions and worried about criminal charges — but they can’t imagine doing anything else.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2019 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Big Risks For Attorneys</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/44df17d2-31af-11ec-b3f2-77962b875179/image/e45156.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>More and more law firms are jumping into the cannabis world — but do they know the risks they’re facing? Lawyers who have been working with cannabis for a while say they have faced death threats, struggled with ethical questions and worried about criminal charges — but they can’t imagine doing anything else.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>More and more law firms are jumping into the cannabis world — but do they know the risks they’re facing? Lawyers who have been working with cannabis for a while say they have faced death threats, struggled with ethical questions and worried about criminal charges — but they can’t imagine doing anything else.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1380</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0c694589-7a2b-46f4-aabc-cfb67bcf5537]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW2133329852.mp3?updated=1645124239" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S1, Ep. 4: Don’t Steal My Brand</title>
      <link>https://podcasts.law360.com/episodes/2b2bfa52-47bf-40c1-945c-8f12f0eeaf44/2b2bfa52-47bf-40c1-945c-8f12f0eeaf44.mp3</link>
      <description>Cannabis companies realize federal legalization could change everything about the industry they know. To prepare, many of the savviest are looking for ways to protect their brands so they won’t be drowned out. But for this industry, it takes some real ingenuity to build that fence.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Don’t Steal My Brand</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/450406c8-31af-11ec-b3f2-53cd6f42474f/image/f6970e.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Cannabis companies realize federal legalization could change everything about the industry they know. To prepare, many of the savviest are looking for ways to protect their brands so they won’t be drowned out. But for this industry, it takes some real ingenuity to build that fence.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Cannabis companies realize federal legalization could change everything about the industry they know. To prepare, many of the savviest are looking for ways to protect their brands so they won’t be drowned out. But for this industry, it takes some real ingenuity to build that fence.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1398</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2b2bfa52-47bf-40c1-945c-8f12f0eeaf44]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW7733847443.mp3?updated=1645124211" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S1, Ep. 3: The Red Tape Problem</title>
      <link>https://podcasts.law360.com/episodes/276b0d8e-fbdd-477a-bbb2-71d6d015fa0b/276b0d8e-fbdd-477a-bbb2-71d6d015fa0b.mp3</link>
      <description>As states open their doors to marijuana, they have to figure out the rules to govern it. On this episode we take a trip to California to explore that state’s efforts to control a booming industry — and why some business owners say it is pushing them to stay illegal.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Red Tape Problem</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4528eb50-31af-11ec-b3f2-07ce82e8e8ad/image/993b97.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>As states open their doors to marijuana, they have to figure out the rules to govern it. On this episode we take a trip to California to explore that state’s efforts to control a booming industry — and why some business owners say it is pushing them to stay illegal.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>As states open their doors to marijuana, they have to figure out the rules to govern it. On this episode we take a trip to California to explore that state’s efforts to control a booming industry — and why some business owners say it is pushing them to stay illegal.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1461</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[276b0d8e-fbdd-477a-bbb2-71d6d015fa0b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW6130547846.mp3?updated=1645124167" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S1, Ep. 2: Dangerous Cash</title>
      <link>https://podcasts.law360.com/episodes/81e68835-dcdb-42a2-878f-008e0a956a69/81e68835-dcdb-42a2-878f-008e0a956a69.mp3</link>
      <description>It’s no secret that many cannabis companies have had trouble getting a bank account. On this episode of Legalization we explain just why that is -- and the lengths some businesses are going to get away from cash.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Dangerous Cash</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/454dc592-31af-11ec-b3f2-8fb1f7504ac1/image/4712f5.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It’s no secret that many cannabis companies have had trouble getting a bank account. On this episode of Legalization we explain just why that is -- and the lengths some businesses are going to get away from cash.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>It’s no secret that many cannabis companies have had trouble getting a bank account. On this episode of Legalization we explain just why that is -- and the lengths some businesses are going to get away from cash.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1452</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[81e68835-dcdb-42a2-878f-008e0a956a69]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW5293282840.mp3?updated=1645124183" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S1, Ep. 1: The Boogeyman In The Tax Code</title>
      <link>https://podcasts.law360.com/episodes/aa309511-8a5c-47a8-ab8b-83d3a4ab9a24/aa309511-8a5c-47a8-ab8b-83d3a4ab9a24.mp3</link>
      <description>A single sentence in the U.S. tax code targets marijuana businesses and saddles them with a crushing tax burden. Here's how a relic of the War on Drugs is making it really hard for cannabis entrepreneurs to get off the ground.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2019 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Boogeyman In The Tax Code</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/45725740-31af-11ec-b3f2-832405fb3506/image/bd15d7.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A single sentence in the U.S. tax code targets marijuana businesses and saddles them with a crushing tax burden. Here's how a relic of the War on Drugs is making it really hard for cannabis entrepreneurs to get off the ground.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A single sentence in the U.S. tax code targets marijuana businesses and saddles them with a crushing tax burden. Here's how a relic of the War on Drugs is making it really hard for cannabis entrepreneurs to get off the ground.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1738</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[aa309511-8a5c-47a8-ab8b-83d3a4ab9a24]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW2032013957.mp3?updated=1645124047" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Welcome To Law360 Explores: Legalization</title>
      <link>https://podcasts.law360.com/episodes/de6ae82b-c081-4bf9-a3c5-56eb0b0d1999/de6ae82b-c081-4bf9-a3c5-56eb0b0d1999.mp3</link>
      <description>More than 40 states have some form of legal marijuana, but the drug is still federally illegal. That tension can impact everything marijuana businesses do, from how much they pay in taxes to whether they can protect their brands in court. Here's a sample of what you'll hear as host Diana Novak Jones takes you on a five-part journey into the murky legal world surrounding these companies.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Law360 - Legal News &amp; Analysis</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4596cc1a-31af-11ec-b3f2-836ffd251bc1/image/b0fe1c.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>More than 40 states have some form of legal marijuana, but the drug is still federally illegal. That tension can impact everything marijuana businesses do, from how much they pay in taxes to whether they can protect their brands in court. Here's a sample of what you'll hear as host Diana Novak Jones takes you on a five-part journey into the murky legal world surrounding these companies.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>More than 40 states have some form of legal marijuana, but the drug is still federally illegal. That tension can impact everything marijuana businesses do, from how much they pay in taxes to whether they can protect their brands in court. Here's a sample of what you'll hear as host Diana Novak Jones takes you on a five-part journey into the murky legal world surrounding these companies.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>170</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[de6ae82b-c081-4bf9-a3c5-56eb0b0d1999]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LAW3621498377.mp3?updated=1638375313" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
