<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.megaphone.fm/1999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <title>1999: The Podcast</title>
    <link>https://www.cageclub.me/1999</link>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>℗ &amp; © 2022 The CageClub Podcast Network</copyright>
    <description>Was 1999 the best year in movie history? We think it might be!
John Brooks, Julia Sirmons, and special guests work their way through all the year has to offer, one movie at a time, and we’ll ask special guests to share their memories of this amazing year and the movies that made it unforgettable. Unfortunately, nobody can be told what 1999: The Podcast is… you have to hear it for yourself!</description>
    
    <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>Was 1999 the best year in movie history? We think it might be!</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Was 1999 the best year in movie history? We think it might be!
John Brooks, Julia Sirmons, and special guests work their way through all the year has to offer, one movie at a time, and we’ll ask special guests to share their memories of this amazing year and the movies that made it unforgettable. Unfortunately, nobody can be told what 1999: The Podcast is… you have to hear it for yourself!</itunes:summary>
    <content:encoded>
      <![CDATA[<p>Was 1999 the best year in movie history? We think it might be!</p><p>John Brooks, Julia Sirmons, and special guests work their way through all the year has to offer, one movie at a time, and we’ll ask special guests to share their memories of this amazing year and the movies that made it unforgettable. Unfortunately, nobody can be told what 1999: The Podcast is… you have to hear it for yourself!</p>]]>
    </content:encoded>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>1999@cageclub.me</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d0064978-a2db-11ec-a3d7-ff9be675552e/image/87ed8bb1b40c97b52fb71552c29afb28.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
    <itunes:category text="TV &amp; Film">
      <itunes:category text="Film History"/>
      <itunes:category text="Film Reviews"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <item>
      <title>EDtv - with Will Weldon</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/edtv-1999/</link>
      <description>EDtv opened in third place on March 26th right behind our last movie, Analyze This in 2nd and Forces of Nature in 1st, going on to gross $35 million worldwide on a budget of $80 million.

Directed by Ron Howard, it is a remake of the 1994 Quebecois film Louis 19, King of the Airwaves, with a script adapted by Lowell Ganz and Babaloo Mandel, it stars Matthew McConaughey, Jenna Elfman, Woody Harrelson, Ellen DeGeneres, Sally Kirkland, a frankly Oscar-worthy Martin Landau, Rob Reiner, Dennis Hopper, Elizabeth Hurley, Harry Shearer, Ian Gomez, Rupaul, Michael Moore, Jay Leno, George Plimpton, and Bill Maher.

EDtv tells the story of a regular guy whose life becomes a 24-hour reality show. It did modestly well with critics, but it was drowned out by 1998's similarly-premised (but in no way similar) The Truman Show.

Anyway, since it's the only 1999 movie to feature Bill Maher, we invited the host of the I Hate Bill Maher Podcast, comedian Will Weldon, to talk about this incredibly confused, frustrating movie, which remains notable for being the start of the McConaughey-Harrelson (possibly literal) Bromance!

Will's on Bluesky and other social media @oldmanweldon</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 07:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/d22138be-3204-11f1-aa41-33b881f7c1ed/image/895e80a74f1611f7ba4e6a23aa173a71.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>"I Hate Bill Maher" creator and host Will Weldon joins us to talk about Ron Howard's deeply frustrating but notable comedy "EDtv" (which Bill Maher is in!)</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>EDtv opened in third place on March 26th right behind our last movie, Analyze This in 2nd and Forces of Nature in 1st, going on to gross $35 million worldwide on a budget of $80 million.

Directed by Ron Howard, it is a remake of the 1994 Quebecois film Louis 19, King of the Airwaves, with a script adapted by Lowell Ganz and Babaloo Mandel, it stars Matthew McConaughey, Jenna Elfman, Woody Harrelson, Ellen DeGeneres, Sally Kirkland, a frankly Oscar-worthy Martin Landau, Rob Reiner, Dennis Hopper, Elizabeth Hurley, Harry Shearer, Ian Gomez, Rupaul, Michael Moore, Jay Leno, George Plimpton, and Bill Maher.

EDtv tells the story of a regular guy whose life becomes a 24-hour reality show. It did modestly well with critics, but it was drowned out by 1998's similarly-premised (but in no way similar) The Truman Show.

Anyway, since it's the only 1999 movie to feature Bill Maher, we invited the host of the I Hate Bill Maher Podcast, comedian Will Weldon, to talk about this incredibly confused, frustrating movie, which remains notable for being the start of the McConaughey-Harrelson (possibly literal) Bromance!

Will's on Bluesky and other social media @oldmanweldon</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>
<em>EDtv o</em>pened in third place on March 26th right behind our last movie, <em>Analyze This</em> in 2nd and <em>Forces of Nature </em>in 1st, going on to gross $35 million worldwide on a budget of $80 million.</p>
<p>Directed by Ron Howard, it is a remake of the 1994 Quebecois film <em>Louis 19, King of the Airwaves, </em>with a script adapted by Lowell Ganz and Babaloo Mandel, it stars Matthew McConaughey, Jenna Elfman, Woody Harrelson, Ellen DeGeneres, Sally Kirkland, a frankly Oscar-worthy Martin Landau, Rob Reiner, Dennis Hopper, Elizabeth Hurley, Harry Shearer, Ian Gomez, Rupaul, Michael Moore, Jay Leno, George Plimpton, and Bill Maher.</p>
<p><em>EDtv </em>tells the story of a regular guy whose life becomes a 24-hour reality show. It did modestly well with critics, but it was drowned out by 1998's similarly-premised (but in no way similar) <em>The Truman Show</em>.</p>
<p>Anyway, since it's the only 1999 movie to feature Bill Maher, we invited the host of the <a href="https://www.oldmanweldon.com/ihatebillmaher"><em>I Hate Bill Maher Podcast</em></a>, comedian <a href="https://www.oldmanweldon.com/">Will Weldon</a>, to talk about this incredibly confused, frustrating movie, which remains notable for being the start of the McConaughey-Harrelson (possibly literal) Bromance!</p>
<p>Will's on Bluesky and other social media <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/oldmanweldon.bsky.social">@oldmanweldon</a></p>
<p>

</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6542</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[d22138be-3204-11f1-aa41-33b881f7c1ed]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN6308756594.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[RERELEASE]: FOR LOVE OF THE GAME:  - with Jacki Krestel</title>
      <description>57th on the 1999 box office chart, For Love of the Game marked director Raimi’s first foray into big-budget, mass-market filmmaking (which would ultimately pave the way for being handed the enormous task of finally bringing Spiderman to the screen in 2002)

But love and baseball was very different territory for Raimi, and his inexperience in the realm of pop movie making (as well as in directing romance) proved to be a hindrance.

For Love of the Game is, unofficially, the third and final entry in Kevin Costner's baseball trilogy, following 1989's Field of Dreams and 1988's Bull Durham.

The film tries to balance its dual nature as a romance and a straight sports movie, and while it occasionally hits the mark, most critics agreed: For Love of the Game is pretty great when it's about the game, and not so great when it's about the love.

But it's baseball season, and this was by far 1999's biggest baseball-themed movie, so we asked friend of the show - and White Sox diehard - Jacki Krestel to help us call some balls and strikes on this one!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 12:22:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1b84a786-277c-11f1-8947-bf3ef200e1ee/image/f9fd4da752a27b1d9df67eea88153812.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>57th on the 1999 box office chart, For Love of the Game marked director Raimi’s first foray into big-budget, mass-market filmmaking (which would ultimately pave the way for being handed the enormous task of finally bringing Spiderman to the screen in 2002)

But love and baseball was very different territory for Raimi, and his inexperience in the realm of pop movie making (as well as in directing romance) proved to be a hindrance.

For Love of the Game is, unofficially, the third and final entry in Kevin Costner's baseball trilogy, following 1989's Field of Dreams and 1988's Bull Durham.

The film tries to balance its dual nature as a romance and a straight sports movie, and while it occasionally hits the mark, most critics agreed: For Love of the Game is pretty great when it's about the game, and not so great when it's about the love.

But it's baseball season, and this was by far 1999's biggest baseball-themed movie, so we asked friend of the show - and White Sox diehard - Jacki Krestel to help us call some balls and strikes on this one!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>57th on the 1999 box office chart, <em>For Love of the Game </em>marked director Raimi’s first foray into big-budget, mass-market filmmaking (which would ultimately pave the way for being handed the enormous task of finally bringing <em>Spiderman</em> to the screen in 2002)</p>
<p>But love and baseball was very different territory for Raimi, and his inexperience in the realm of pop movie making (as well as in directing romance) proved to be a hindrance.</p>
<p><em>For Love of the Game </em>is, unofficially, the third and final entry in Kevin Costner's baseball trilogy, following 1989's <em>Field of Dreams</em> and 1988's <em>Bull Durham</em>.</p>
<p>The film tries to balance its dual nature as a romance and a straight sports movie, and while it occasionally hits the mark, most critics agreed: <em>For Love of the Game </em>is pretty great when it's about the game, and not so great when it's about the love.</p>
<p>But it's baseball season, and this was by far 1999's biggest baseball-themed movie, so we asked friend of the show - and White Sox diehard - Jacki Krestel to help us call some balls and strikes on this one!</p>
<p>

</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4472</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1b84a786-277c-11f1-8947-bf3ef200e1ee]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN5363529420.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OSCARS SPECIAL 2026</title>
      <description>It's Oscars Weekend!

1999 was a weird year in Oscar history, as the awards held that year saw one of the most controversial Best Picture wins ever (SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE) and the awards held the following year honoring the awards of 1999 gave the Best Picture Oscar to a film that, well, has not aged well at all (AMERICAN BEAUTY)

So to mark the weekend, we took some time to discuss those two films and their legacies and discussed our picks for some of the worst Best Picture wins in recent history. We talk FORREST GUMP, BRAVEHEART, ANORA, CRASH, and more!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/689dd716-1f2c-11f1-be4f-e77b9235de57/image/89f8c0819742aca1d7e3cce4004d96de.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It's Oscars Weekend!

1999 was a weird year in Oscar history, as the awards held that year saw one of the most controversial Best Picture wins ever (SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE) and the awards held the following year honoring the awards of 1999 gave the Best Picture Oscar to a film that, well, has not aged well at all (AMERICAN BEAUTY)

So to mark the weekend, we took some time to discuss those two films and their legacies and discussed our picks for some of the worst Best Picture wins in recent history. We talk FORREST GUMP, BRAVEHEART, ANORA, CRASH, and more!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>It's Oscars Weekend!</p>
<p>1999 was a weird year in Oscar history, as the awards held that year saw one of the most controversial Best Picture wins ever (SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE) and the awards held the following year honoring the awards of 1999 gave the Best Picture Oscar to a film that, well, has not aged well at all (AMERICAN BEAUTY)</p>
<p>So to mark the weekend, we took some time to discuss those two films and their legacies and discussed our picks for some of the worst Best Picture wins in recent history. We talk FORREST GUMP, BRAVEHEART, ANORA, CRASH, and more!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3360</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[689dd716-1f2c-11f1-be4f-e77b9235de57]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN4370089557.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ANALYZE THIS - with Chase Mitchell</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/analyze-this-1999</link>
      <description>Analyze This was the 18th-highest grossing movie of 1999, opening on at #1 March 5th – the same day as Cruel Intentions, which opened number 2 - and taking in $177 million worldwide on an $80 million budget.

Analyze This gave us the unlikely comedy duo of Billy Crystal and (a then new to comedy) Robert DeNiro, alongside Lisa Kudrow, Chazz Palminteri, and Joe Viterelli

Directed by the late great Harold Ramis and written by Ramis, Peter Tolan, and, somewhat shockingly, Kenneth Lonergan, Analyze This made a lot of its then very novel premise of a gangster getting therapy...but also happened to be released a few months after the premiere of the The Sopranos.

This week, we're rejoined by our friend, comedy writer Chase Mitchell.

Chase is on the socials at @ChaseMit</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/58df0b8e-111b-11f1-8c16-ff3589c84bd7/image/2ea57b100c2269549eee3e1b51300091.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>We're rejoined by comedy writer Chase Mitchell to talk about one of the biggest comedies of 1999, "Analyze This"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Analyze This was the 18th-highest grossing movie of 1999, opening on at #1 March 5th – the same day as Cruel Intentions, which opened number 2 - and taking in $177 million worldwide on an $80 million budget.

Analyze This gave us the unlikely comedy duo of Billy Crystal and (a then new to comedy) Robert DeNiro, alongside Lisa Kudrow, Chazz Palminteri, and Joe Viterelli

Directed by the late great Harold Ramis and written by Ramis, Peter Tolan, and, somewhat shockingly, Kenneth Lonergan, Analyze This made a lot of its then very novel premise of a gangster getting therapy...but also happened to be released a few months after the premiere of the The Sopranos.

This week, we're rejoined by our friend, comedy writer Chase Mitchell.

Chase is on the socials at @ChaseMit</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Analyze This</em> was the 18th-highest grossing movie of 1999, opening on at #1 March 5th – the same day as <em>Cruel Intentions</em>, which opened number 2 - and taking in $177 million worldwide on an $80 million budget.</p>
<p><em>Analyze This </em>gave us the unlikely comedy duo of Billy Crystal and (a then new to comedy) Robert DeNiro, alongside Lisa Kudrow, Chazz Palminteri, and Joe Viterelli</p>
<p>Directed by the late great Harold Ramis and written by Ramis, Peter Tolan, and, somewhat shockingly, Kenneth Lonergan, <em>Analyze This </em>made a lot of its then very novel premise of a gangster getting therapy...but also happened to be released a few months after the premiere of the <em>The Sopranos</em>.</p>
<p>This week, we're rejoined by our friend, comedy writer Chase Mitchell.</p>
<p>Chase is on the socials at <a href="https://x.com/ChaseMit">@ChaseMit</a></p>
<p>

</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4955</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[58df0b8e-111b-11f1-8c16-ff3589c84bd7]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN9268534996.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>See Also: WHEN HARRY MET SALLY (1989) - with Dan Colón</title>
      <description>It's Valentine's Day, so we're taking one last look at the non-1999 landscape before we return to 1999 next week with the movie that reset the standard for romantic comedies, Rob Reiner's When Harry Met Sally.

Joining us is returning friend of the pod Dan Colón, co-host of our podcast network's very own The Monsters that Made Us.

We talk Crystal, Ryan, Carrie Fisher, Barry Sonnenfeld, and if we've really seen a romantic comedy since (not called Notting Hill) that has come close to reaching its considerable romcom heights.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 09:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/26d24cb2-087b-11f1-90cf-fb46ea6a4db7/image/7f5f74bfa424d0789038ee3718594722.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It's Valentine's Day, so we're taking one last look at the non-1999 landscape before we return to 1999 next week with the movie that reset the standard for romantic comedies, Rob Reiner's When Harry Met Sally.

Joining us is returning friend of the pod Dan Colón, co-host of our podcast network's very own The Monsters that Made Us.

We talk Crystal, Ryan, Carrie Fisher, Barry Sonnenfeld, and if we've really seen a romantic comedy since (not called Notting Hill) that has come close to reaching its considerable romcom heights.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>It's Valentine's Day, so we're taking one last look at the non-1999 landscape before we return to 1999 next week with the movie that reset the standard for romantic comedies, Rob Reiner's <em>When Harry Met Sally.</em></p>
<p>Joining us is returning friend of the pod Dan Colón, co-host of our podcast network's very own The Monsters that Made Us.</p>
<p>We talk Crystal, Ryan, Carrie Fisher, Barry Sonnenfeld, and if we've really seen a romantic comedy since (not called <em>Notting Hill</em>) that has come close to reaching its considerable romcom heights.</p>
<p>

</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5066</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[26d24cb2-087b-11f1-90cf-fb46ea6a4db7]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN8635439743.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>See Also: FATHER MOTHER SISTER BROTHER (2025)</title>
      <description>This week, Julia reports back from the screening she attended of "Father Mother Sister Brother", the latest from "Ghost Dog" writer/director Jim Jarmusch.

"Father Mother Sister Brother" is an anthology dramedy starring Tom Waits, Adam Driver, Mayim Bialik, Charlotte Rampling, Cate Blanchett, Vicky Krieps, Sarah Greene, Indya Moore, and Luka Sabbat.


Julia and John discuss the film and take another stab at what makes a Jarmusch film a Jarmusch film, the career of Tom Waits, great casting, and some of their favorite anthology films.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5282f360-f026-11f0-a961-378ef89295a6/image/77e1d9dd43fc77054da417ab2d54f771.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week, Julia reports back from the screening she attended of "Father Mother Sister Brother", the latest from "Ghost Dog" writer/director Jim Jarmusch.

"Father Mother Sister Brother" is an anthology dramedy starring Tom Waits, Adam Driver, Mayim Bialik, Charlotte Rampling, Cate Blanchett, Vicky Krieps, Sarah Greene, Indya Moore, and Luka Sabbat.


Julia and John discuss the film and take another stab at what makes a Jarmusch film a Jarmusch film, the career of Tom Waits, great casting, and some of their favorite anthology films.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week, Julia reports back from the screening she attended of "Father Mother Sister Brother", the latest from "Ghost Dog" writer/director Jim Jarmusch.</p>
<p>"Father Mother Sister Brother" is an anthology dramedy starring Tom Waits, Adam Driver, Mayim Bialik, Charlotte Rampling, Cate Blanchett, Vicky Krieps, Sarah Greene, Indya Moore, and Luka Sabbat.
</p>
<p>Julia and John discuss the film and take another stab at what makes a Jarmusch film a Jarmusch film, the career of Tom Waits, great casting, and some of their favorite anthology films. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3467</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5282f360-f026-11f0-a961-378ef89295a6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN3010009684.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE STORY OF US/In Memory of Rob Reiner (1947-2025) - with Nitish Pahwa</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/story-of-us-1999/</link>
      <description>In honor of the late Rob Reiner we are looking at The Story of Us, the 74th highest-grossing movie of the year, finishing just ahead of earlier entry Blast from the Past. Opening #2 behind Fight Club on October 15th and going on to gross $59 million worldwide on a $50 million dollar budget.

Starring Bruce Willis, Michelle Pfeiffer, Reiner himself, Rita Wilson, Julie Hagerty, Paul Reiser, and Tim Matheson, The Story of Us is one of Reiner’s worst-reviewed movies, who, after an unbelievable run of movies in the late 80s and early 90s started running into trouble in the late 90s and early 2000s with the likes of this, Rumor Has It, and the aggressively sentimental and fluffy The Bucket List.

Is The Story of Us as bad as critics said? Or does it belong alongside When Harry Met Sally, Reiner's romcom masterpiece that it goes so far out its way to evoke?

We welcome Slate's Nitish Pahwa to discuss marriage, casting, bad writing, unnecessary monologues, and the greatness of Rob Reiner.

Nitish is on Bluesky @nitishpahwa.com</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/bce36fb8-e4ec-11f0-a569-af28ecd0d88d/image/e6ef2e5d0443b7b99c05540f385e21a6.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Slate's Nitish Pahwa joins us to discuss marriage, casting, bad writing, unnecessary monologues, and the greatness of Rob Reiner in "The Story of Us"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In honor of the late Rob Reiner we are looking at The Story of Us, the 74th highest-grossing movie of the year, finishing just ahead of earlier entry Blast from the Past. Opening #2 behind Fight Club on October 15th and going on to gross $59 million worldwide on a $50 million dollar budget.

Starring Bruce Willis, Michelle Pfeiffer, Reiner himself, Rita Wilson, Julie Hagerty, Paul Reiser, and Tim Matheson, The Story of Us is one of Reiner’s worst-reviewed movies, who, after an unbelievable run of movies in the late 80s and early 90s started running into trouble in the late 90s and early 2000s with the likes of this, Rumor Has It, and the aggressively sentimental and fluffy The Bucket List.

Is The Story of Us as bad as critics said? Or does it belong alongside When Harry Met Sally, Reiner's romcom masterpiece that it goes so far out its way to evoke?

We welcome Slate's Nitish Pahwa to discuss marriage, casting, bad writing, unnecessary monologues, and the greatness of Rob Reiner.

Nitish is on Bluesky @nitishpahwa.com</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>
</p>
<p>In honor of the late Rob Reiner we are looking at <em>The Story of Us</em>, the 74th highest-grossing movie of the year, finishing just ahead of earlier entry <em>Blast from the Past</em>. Opening #2 behind <em>Fight Club </em>on October 15th and going on to gross $59 million worldwide on a $50 million dollar budget.</p>
<p>Starring Bruce Willis, Michelle Pfeiffer, Reiner himself, Rita Wilson, Julie Hagerty, Paul Reiser, and Tim Matheson, <em>The Story of Us </em>is one of Reiner’s worst-reviewed movies, who, after an unbelievable run of movies in the late 80s and early 90s started running into trouble in the late 90s and early 2000s with the likes of this, <em>Rumor Has It, </em>and the aggressively sentimental and fluffy <em>The Bucket List.</em></p>
<p>Is <em>The Story of Us </em>as bad as critics said? Or does it belong alongside <em>When Harry Met Sally, </em>Reiner's romcom masterpiece that it goes so far out its way to evoke?</p>
<p>We welcome Slate's Nitish Pahwa to discuss marriage, casting, bad writing, unnecessary monologues, and the greatness of Rob Reiner.</p>
<p>Nitish is on Bluesky <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:vcykurfvhhpynm4cwhsnnu4d">@nitishpahwa.com</a></p>
<p>

</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5335</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[bce36fb8-e4ec-11f0-a569-af28ecd0d88d]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN2650644557.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>See Also: A VERY ALTERNATIVE CHRISTMAS</title>
      <description>Merry Christmas and happy every other holiday!

In this episode, John and Julia each recommend five of their favorite "alternative" Christmas movies. The like of It's a Wonderful Life, Home Alone, Love Actually, Miracle on 34th Street, and, yes, even Die Hard are off-limits.

Instead, we present 10 movies that are maybe not in your annual Christmas rotation but ought to be! Enjoy!



Julia's picks:

The Ref  (1994)

Carol  (2015)

The Man Who Came to Dinner  (1941)

A Christmas Tale (2008)

The Shop Around the Corner  (1940)



John's picks:

Rare Exports  (2010)

A Midwinter's Tale  (1995)

8-Bit Christmas  (2021)

About A Boy  (2002)

Little Women  (1994)</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1d033f34-e058-11f0-be6c-3be2b5a45e99/image/b2478560f9388f5bf83430dcb93e335a.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Merry Christmas and happy every other holiday!

In this episode, John and Julia each recommend five of their favorite "alternative" Christmas movies. The like of It's a Wonderful Life, Home Alone, Love Actually, Miracle on 34th Street, and, yes, even Die Hard are off-limits.

Instead, we present 10 movies that are maybe not in your annual Christmas rotation but ought to be! Enjoy!



Julia's picks:

The Ref  (1994)

Carol  (2015)

The Man Who Came to Dinner  (1941)

A Christmas Tale (2008)

The Shop Around the Corner  (1940)



John's picks:

Rare Exports  (2010)

A Midwinter's Tale  (1995)

8-Bit Christmas  (2021)

About A Boy  (2002)

Little Women  (1994)</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Merry Christmas and happy every other holiday!</p>
<p>In this episode, John and Julia each recommend five of their favorite "alternative" Christmas movies. The like of <em>It's a Wonderful Life, Home Alone, Love Actually, Miracle on 34th Street, </em>and, yes, even <em>Die Hard</em> are off-limits.</p>
<p>Instead, we present 10 movies that are maybe not in your annual Christmas rotation but ought to be! Enjoy!</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Julia's picks:</p>
<p><em>The Ref </em> (1994)</p>
<p><em>Carol </em> (2015)</p>
<p><em>The Man Who Came to Dinner </em> (1941)</p>
<p><em>A Christmas Tale (2008)</em></p>
<p><em>The Shop Around the Corner  </em>(1940)

</p>
<p>John's picks:</p>
<p><em>Rare Exports </em> (2010)</p>
<p><em>A Midwinter's Tale </em> (1995)</p>
<p><em>8-Bit Christmas  </em>(2021)</p>
<p><em>About A Boy  </em>(2002)</p>
<p><em>Little Women  </em>(1994)</p>
<p>



</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5170</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1d033f34-e058-11f0-be6c-3be2b5a45e99]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN9644256222.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHOST DOG: THE WAY OF THE SAMURAI - with Sean Malin</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/ghost-dog/</link>
      <description>It's Christmas time, so we're looking at a movie that tells the story of a mysterious man who spends a lot of time on the roof with his animal friends and has the ability to sneak into your house undetected as if by magic: Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai!

Ghost Dog appears nowhere on the 1999 box office charts because it technically didn’t have a major theatrical release in the US until March of 2000 (it did begin its festival run in 1999, starting in May at the Cannes Film Festival where it was nominated for the Palme D’or)

Starring Forest Whitaker and written and directed by Jim Jarmusch with a score by Wu-Tang Clan’s RZA, Ghost Dog is a movie unlike any other, aggressively defying genre and staying laser-focused on its bizarre but endearing vision.

This week, John and Julia are joined by returning guest Sean Malin, author of the just-released book The Podcast Pantheon to talk Whitaker, Jarmusch, podcasts, Jon Hamm, and Christmas movies!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/9634e7ca-da24-11f0-8a9f-e7a8553dd241/image/58e5235842abd52c49f089887494302d.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Returning guest Sean Malin, author of the just-released book The Podcast Pantheon, talks Whitaker, Jarmusch, podcasts, and Jon Hamm!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It's Christmas time, so we're looking at a movie that tells the story of a mysterious man who spends a lot of time on the roof with his animal friends and has the ability to sneak into your house undetected as if by magic: Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai!

Ghost Dog appears nowhere on the 1999 box office charts because it technically didn’t have a major theatrical release in the US until March of 2000 (it did begin its festival run in 1999, starting in May at the Cannes Film Festival where it was nominated for the Palme D’or)

Starring Forest Whitaker and written and directed by Jim Jarmusch with a score by Wu-Tang Clan’s RZA, Ghost Dog is a movie unlike any other, aggressively defying genre and staying laser-focused on its bizarre but endearing vision.

This week, John and Julia are joined by returning guest Sean Malin, author of the just-released book The Podcast Pantheon to talk Whitaker, Jarmusch, podcasts, Jon Hamm, and Christmas movies!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>It's Christmas time, so we're looking at a movie that tells the story of a mysterious man who spends a lot of time on the roof with his animal friends and has the ability to sneak into your house undetected as if by magic: <em>Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai</em>!</p>
<p><em>Ghost Dog </em>appears nowhere on the 1999 box office charts because it technically didn’t have a major theatrical release in the US until March of 2000 (it did begin its festival run in 1999, starting in May at the Cannes Film Festival where it was nominated for the Palme D’or)</p>
<p>Starring Forest Whitaker and written and directed by Jim Jarmusch with a score by Wu-Tang Clan’s RZA, <em>Ghost Dog </em>is a movie unlike any other, aggressively defying genre and staying laser-focused on its bizarre but endearing vision.</p>
<p>This week, John and Julia are joined by returning guest Sean Malin, author of the just-released book <em>The Podcast Pantheon</em> to talk Whitaker, Jarmusch, podcasts, Jon Hamm, and Christmas movies!</p>
<p>

</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5889</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9634e7ca-da24-11f0-8a9f-e7a8553dd241]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN2964881649.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>See Also: SHATTERED GLASS (2003)</title>
      <description>The first of what will be a series of smaller episodes where we take a look at a movie that is somehow related to our most recent subject.



This time, our See Also recommendation for The Insider is Billy Ray's superb 2003 docudrama/thriller Shattered Glass. 

Featuring incredible performances from a uniformly excellent cast, especially Hayden Christensen as the title character and Peter Sarsgaard as New Republic editor Chuck Lane, Shattered Glass deserves it place among the best movies about journalism and the best movies of 2003. 

It's also newly relevant in the midst of the Olivia Nuzzi of it all, and we talk about how the cult of personality around "The Writer" has impacted journalism for the worse.



You can watch Shattered Glass right now for free on Tubi.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 14:29:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5cb026a4-cad4-11f0-a151-8bf9891364b1/image/71789e05c28b1f3f9eb1d355fcbe4920.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The first of what will be a series of smaller episodes where we take a look at a movie that is somehow related to our most recent subject.



This time, our See Also recommendation for The Insider is Billy Ray's superb 2003 docudrama/thriller Shattered Glass. 

Featuring incredible performances from a uniformly excellent cast, especially Hayden Christensen as the title character and Peter Sarsgaard as New Republic editor Chuck Lane, Shattered Glass deserves it place among the best movies about journalism and the best movies of 2003. 

It's also newly relevant in the midst of the Olivia Nuzzi of it all, and we talk about how the cult of personality around "The Writer" has impacted journalism for the worse.



You can watch Shattered Glass right now for free on Tubi.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The first of what will be a series of smaller episodes where we take a look at a movie that is somehow related to our most recent subject.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>This time, our See Also recommendation for <em>The Insider</em> is Billy Ray's superb 2003 docudrama/thriller <em>Shattered Glass</em>. </p>
<p>Featuring incredible performances from a uniformly excellent cast, especially Hayden Christensen as the title character and Peter Sarsgaard as New Republic editor Chuck Lane, <em>Shattered Glass </em>deserves it place among the best movies about journalism and the best movies of 2003. </p>
<p>It's also newly relevant in the midst of the Olivia Nuzzi of it all, and we talk about how the cult of personality around "The Writer" has impacted journalism for the worse.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>You can watch <em>Shattered Glass </em>right now for free on Tubi.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3501</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5cb026a4-cad4-11f0-a151-8bf9891364b1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN6564231081.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE INSIDER - with Lindsay Beyerstein</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/the-insider-1999/</link>
      <description>Michael Mann's The Insider is easily the most glaring omission from the our initial 18, universally regarded as one of the best – if not THE best – movie of 1999.

Finishing in 69th place, sandwiched between two previous entries, Girl Interrupted at 70th and Mystery Men at 68th, The Insider stars Russell Crowe, in an Oscar-nominated performance, and Al Pacino alongside an incredibly deep supporting class (including the greatest character actor alive, Stephen Tobolowsky)

Directed by Michael Mann and adapted from the 1996 Vanity Fair article "The Man Who Knew Too Much" by Marie Brenner, The Insider received rave reviews, wound up on countless year-end top 10 lists, and was nominated for a slew of Oscars, including Mann for directing and screenwriting, but was shut out by the juggernaut that was American Beauty.

Since it's widely regarded as one of Mann's best films and one the best films ever made about journalism, we invited investigative journalist Lindsay Beyerstein to tell us how well the movie mirrors real life and to dig into what it's like to watch a movie about CBS News struggling to maintain its integrity as a journalistic entity in the bleak future of 26 years later.

Lindsay is on Bluesky @beyerstein</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/82dc6e7c-c409-11f0-9fe3-7b438d94d345/image/98739143f37f85259aee8815d7eea75e.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Investigative journalist Lindsay Beyerstein join us to talk about journalism, Russell Crowe, and CBS News in "The Insider"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Michael Mann's The Insider is easily the most glaring omission from the our initial 18, universally regarded as one of the best – if not THE best – movie of 1999.

Finishing in 69th place, sandwiched between two previous entries, Girl Interrupted at 70th and Mystery Men at 68th, The Insider stars Russell Crowe, in an Oscar-nominated performance, and Al Pacino alongside an incredibly deep supporting class (including the greatest character actor alive, Stephen Tobolowsky)

Directed by Michael Mann and adapted from the 1996 Vanity Fair article "The Man Who Knew Too Much" by Marie Brenner, The Insider received rave reviews, wound up on countless year-end top 10 lists, and was nominated for a slew of Oscars, including Mann for directing and screenwriting, but was shut out by the juggernaut that was American Beauty.

Since it's widely regarded as one of Mann's best films and one the best films ever made about journalism, we invited investigative journalist Lindsay Beyerstein to tell us how well the movie mirrors real life and to dig into what it's like to watch a movie about CBS News struggling to maintain its integrity as a journalistic entity in the bleak future of 26 years later.

Lindsay is on Bluesky @beyerstein</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Michael Mann's <em>The Insider </em>is easily the most glaring omission from the our initial 18, universally regarded as one of the best – if not THE best – movie of 1999.</p>
<p>Finishing in 69th place, sandwiched between two previous entries, <em>Girl Interrupted</em> at 70th and <em>Mystery Men</em> at 68th, <em>The Insider </em>stars Russell Crowe, in an Oscar-nominated performance, and Al Pacino alongside an incredibly deep supporting class (including the greatest character actor alive, Stephen Tobolowsky)</p>
<p>Directed by Michael Mann and adapted from the 1996 Vanity Fair article "The Man Who Knew Too Much" by Marie Brenner, <em>The Insider </em>received rave reviews, wound up on countless year-end top 10 lists, and was nominated for a slew of Oscars, including Mann for directing and screenwriting, but was shut out by the juggernaut that was <em>American Beauty.</em></p>
<p>Since it's widely regarded as one of Mann's best films and one the best films ever made about journalism, we invited investigative journalist Lindsay Beyerstein to tell us how well the movie mirrors real life and to dig into what it's like to watch a movie about CBS News struggling to maintain its integrity as a journalistic entity in the bleak future of 26 years later.</p>
<p>Lindsay is on Bluesky <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/beyerstein.bsky.social">@beyerstein</a></p>
<p>

</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4429</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[82dc6e7c-c409-11f0-9fe3-7b438d94d345]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN1722589400.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TRUE CRIME (1999) and JUROR #2 (2024) - with Aaron from HIT FACTORY</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/true-crime-1999/</link>
      <description>True Crime was the 94th-highest grossing movie of 1999, grossing just $17 million on a $50 million budget with a fairly limited release.

Starring and directed by Clint Eastwood, True Crime was largely forgotten and remains overlooked most likely due to its release at what can be described as Eastwood’s most prolonged artistic lull in the mid 1990s, starting with 1997’s Absolute Power and Midnight in the Garden of Eden, 2000’s Space Cowboys, and 2002’s Blood Work. That lull would end with 2003’s acclaimed Mystic River, which earned Oscars for both Sean Penn and Tim Robbins as well as Best Director and Best Picture nominations for Eastwood.

But True Crime is still an interesting entry on Eastwood's resume, exploring many of the themes of injustice and moral ambiguity that he frequently explores in his work. So does the similarly-themed 2024 film Juror #2, which Eastwood directed in his mid-90s.

So this week we're talking about them both, and joining is us is Aaron from the podcast Hit Factory.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1cab2dda-b916-11f0-bf2d-abc4491516bb/image/c407447ab4f798f581a15ede3583636b.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Hit Factory co-host Aaron joins John and Julia to discuss "True Crime", "Juror #2", and Clint Eastwood's complex politics and sense of justice.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>True Crime was the 94th-highest grossing movie of 1999, grossing just $17 million on a $50 million budget with a fairly limited release.

Starring and directed by Clint Eastwood, True Crime was largely forgotten and remains overlooked most likely due to its release at what can be described as Eastwood’s most prolonged artistic lull in the mid 1990s, starting with 1997’s Absolute Power and Midnight in the Garden of Eden, 2000’s Space Cowboys, and 2002’s Blood Work. That lull would end with 2003’s acclaimed Mystic River, which earned Oscars for both Sean Penn and Tim Robbins as well as Best Director and Best Picture nominations for Eastwood.

But True Crime is still an interesting entry on Eastwood's resume, exploring many of the themes of injustice and moral ambiguity that he frequently explores in his work. So does the similarly-themed 2024 film Juror #2, which Eastwood directed in his mid-90s.

So this week we're talking about them both, and joining is us is Aaron from the podcast Hit Factory.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>True Crime </em>was the 94th-highest grossing movie of 1999, grossing just $17 million on a $50 million budget with a fairly limited release.</p>
<p>Starring and directed by Clint Eastwood, <em>True Crime</em> was largely forgotten and remains overlooked most likely due to its release at what can be described as Eastwood’s most prolonged artistic lull in the mid 1990s, starting with 1997’s <em>Absolute Power</em> and <em>Midnight in the Garden of Eden</em>, 2000’s <em>Space Cowboys</em>, and 2002’s <em>Blood Work</em>. That lull would end with 2003’s acclaimed <em>Mystic River</em>, which earned Oscars for both Sean Penn and Tim Robbins as well as Best Director and Best Picture nominations for Eastwood.</p>
<p>But <em>True Crime </em>is still an interesting entry on Eastwood's resume, exploring many of the themes of injustice and moral ambiguity that he frequently explores in his work. So does the similarly-themed 2024 film <em>Juror #2</em>, which Eastwood directed in his mid-90s.</p>
<p>So this week we're talking about them both, and joining is us is Aaron from the podcast Hit Factory.</p>
<p>

</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6620</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1cab2dda-b916-11f0-bf2d-abc4491516bb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN5174861240.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE SIXTH SENSE (Julia's Version) - with Sooz Kempner</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/the-sixth-sense-1999/</link>
      <description>The Sixth Sense was one of the biggest movies of the year, second only to The Phantom Menace. And since it's Halloween and Julia had never seen it before, we thought it was time to take a second look.

A movie best remembered for its plot twist (and the meticulous build up to it), The Sixth Sense is nonetheless at its core a drama about grief. Once you know the ending, the experience of the movie changes. But is it still good? Does M. Night Shyamalan's breakthrough film deserve its status on the 1999 Mount Rushmore?

For our second go-round on The Sixth Sense, John and Julia invited comedian, actor, and singer Sooz Kempner - who didn't understand the ending to The Sixth Sense when she saw it at the age of 14 - to talk plot twists, child actors, Bruce Willis, and jump scares.

You can find Sooz on Bluesky @soozuk

Her website is https://www.soozkempner.co.uk/</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 07:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/a7dac16a-ae10-11f0-b5d0-f3ec4957dc6c/image/efd3f29f5c078d00dd575a827e61e771.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Actor, comedian, singer, and Sonic and Knuckles expert Sooz Kemper joins us for some spooky fun with "The Sixth Sense"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Sixth Sense was one of the biggest movies of the year, second only to The Phantom Menace. And since it's Halloween and Julia had never seen it before, we thought it was time to take a second look.

A movie best remembered for its plot twist (and the meticulous build up to it), The Sixth Sense is nonetheless at its core a drama about grief. Once you know the ending, the experience of the movie changes. But is it still good? Does M. Night Shyamalan's breakthrough film deserve its status on the 1999 Mount Rushmore?

For our second go-round on The Sixth Sense, John and Julia invited comedian, actor, and singer Sooz Kempner - who didn't understand the ending to The Sixth Sense when she saw it at the age of 14 - to talk plot twists, child actors, Bruce Willis, and jump scares.

You can find Sooz on Bluesky @soozuk

Her website is https://www.soozkempner.co.uk/</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>
</p>
<p><em>The Sixth Sense </em>was one of <em>the </em>biggest movies of the year, second only to <em>The Phantom Menace</em>. And since it's Halloween and Julia had never seen it before, we thought it was time to take a second look.</p>
<p>A movie best remembered for its plot twist (and the meticulous build up to it), <em>The Sixth Sense </em>is nonetheless at its core a drama about grief. Once you know the ending, the experience of the movie changes. But is it still good? Does M. Night Shyamalan's breakthrough film deserve its status on the 1999 Mount Rushmore?</p>
<p>For our second go-round on <em>The Sixth Sense</em>, John and Julia invited comedian, actor, and singer Sooz Kempner - who didn't understand the ending to <em>The Sixth Sense </em>when she saw it at the age of 14 - to talk plot twists, child actors, Bruce Willis, and jump scares.</p>
<p>You can find Sooz on Bluesky <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/soozuk.bsky.social">@soozuk</a></p>
<p>Her website is <a href="https://www.soozkempner.co.uk/">https://www.soozkempner.co.uk/</a></p>
<p>

</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4228</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a7dac16a-ae10-11f0-b5d0-f3ec4957dc6c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN9192485340.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OCTOBER SKY - with Amanda Jane Stern</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/october-sky-1999/</link>
      <description>October Sky was the 63rd-highest grossing movie of the year, just behind The 13th Warrior.

Opening on February 19th with just shy of $6 million, it went on to gross $34.7 million worldwide on a $25 million budget.

October Sky was adapted from the memoir Rocket Boys (an anagram of "October Sky") by NASA engineer Homer Hickman and directed by Joe Johnston, beautifully shot by journeyman cinematographer Fred Murphy with a score by Mark Isham it starred newcomer Jake Gyllenhaal, Chris Cooper, Lauren Dern, William Lee Scott, Chad Lindberg, Natalie Canderday, Chris Ellis, and in a really wonderful performance, American Pie’s Sherminator himself, Chris Owen.

A critical hit and modest commercial success, October Sky was largely forgotten by the time award season rolled around, and it is now a fondly if faintly remembered gem (as well as the breakout film for its young star!)

This week, Julia and John welcome actor/writer Amanda Jane Stern from the podcast Don't Be Crazy to talk about her new film, Joe Johnston's aggressively earnest style, and boys and their rockets.

Amanda is on Bluesky @amandajanestern.com</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 07:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5ab82f54-a31a-11f0-b0ed-0f4367d27e5c/image/d9cae4f10841a9a038b81b385deae4d1.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Actor and writer Amanda Jane Stern joins us to talk about bad dads, Bechtel Test failures, and boys with rockets in "October Sky"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>October Sky was the 63rd-highest grossing movie of the year, just behind The 13th Warrior.

Opening on February 19th with just shy of $6 million, it went on to gross $34.7 million worldwide on a $25 million budget.

October Sky was adapted from the memoir Rocket Boys (an anagram of "October Sky") by NASA engineer Homer Hickman and directed by Joe Johnston, beautifully shot by journeyman cinematographer Fred Murphy with a score by Mark Isham it starred newcomer Jake Gyllenhaal, Chris Cooper, Lauren Dern, William Lee Scott, Chad Lindberg, Natalie Canderday, Chris Ellis, and in a really wonderful performance, American Pie’s Sherminator himself, Chris Owen.

A critical hit and modest commercial success, October Sky was largely forgotten by the time award season rolled around, and it is now a fondly if faintly remembered gem (as well as the breakout film for its young star!)

This week, Julia and John welcome actor/writer Amanda Jane Stern from the podcast Don't Be Crazy to talk about her new film, Joe Johnston's aggressively earnest style, and boys and their rockets.

Amanda is on Bluesky @amandajanestern.com</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>October Sky </em>was the 63rd-highest grossing movie of the year, just behind <em>The 13th Warrior</em>.</p>
<p>Opening on February 19th with just shy of $6 million, it went on to gross $34.7 million worldwide on a $25 million budget.</p>
<p><em>October Sky </em>was adapted from the memoir <em>Rocket Boys </em>(an anagram of "October Sky") by NASA engineer Homer Hickman and directed by Joe Johnston, beautifully shot by journeyman cinematographer Fred Murphy with a score by Mark Isham it starred newcomer Jake Gyllenhaal, Chris Cooper, Lauren Dern, William Lee Scott, Chad Lindberg, Natalie Canderday, Chris Ellis, and in a really wonderful performance, <em>American Pie</em>’s Sherminator himself, Chris Owen.</p>
<p>A critical hit and modest commercial success, <em>October Sky </em>was largely forgotten by the time award season rolled around, and it is now a fondly if faintly remembered gem (as well as the breakout film for its young star!)</p>
<p>This week, Julia and John welcome actor/writer Amanda Jane Stern from the podcast <a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/39u4rxNvSxwASkwRXnYjQD">Don't Be Crazy</a> to talk about her new film, Joe Johnston's aggressively earnest style, and boys and their rockets.</p>
<p>Amanda is on Bluesky <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/amandajanestern.com">@amandajanestern.com</a></p>
<p>

</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5304</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5ab82f54-a31a-11f0-b0ed-0f4367d27e5c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN8628524024.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ENTRAPMENT - with Jason Christian</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/entrapment-1999/</link>
      <description>Despite its reputation as giant bomb, Entrapment was the 24th-highest grossing movie of 1999, coming in just behind another movie starring Catherine Zeta-Jones, The Haunting.

Entrapment opened on April 30th at number 1 with an impressive $20 million debut, dethroning The Matrix at the top box office spot, going on to gross $212 million worldwide.

It has since gone on to be synonymous with "high profile dud from 1999", but does it really deserve that reputation?

Its relative success at the box office aside, Entrapment is unpretentious, silly, and a lot of fun, even if it never lands every shot it makes. And it's hard not to stack it up against the other big budget art heist movie starring a famous James Bond actor from the same year (a thing we do plenty of this episode).

Joining John and Julia to talk about it is Jason Christian, a writer and co-host of the podcast Cold War Cinema.

Jason is on all the social medias and can be found on Bluesky @jasonachristian.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 09:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/905e4d0c-9814-11f0-ade4-affca7c2082e/image/0c4f81612f28d3cf3017f7b9c7865e29.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Writer and co-host of the podcast Cold War Cinema joins to talk about 1999's OTHER art heist movie starring a former Bond actor, "Entrapment"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Despite its reputation as giant bomb, Entrapment was the 24th-highest grossing movie of 1999, coming in just behind another movie starring Catherine Zeta-Jones, The Haunting.

Entrapment opened on April 30th at number 1 with an impressive $20 million debut, dethroning The Matrix at the top box office spot, going on to gross $212 million worldwide.

It has since gone on to be synonymous with "high profile dud from 1999", but does it really deserve that reputation?

Its relative success at the box office aside, Entrapment is unpretentious, silly, and a lot of fun, even if it never lands every shot it makes. And it's hard not to stack it up against the other big budget art heist movie starring a famous James Bond actor from the same year (a thing we do plenty of this episode).

Joining John and Julia to talk about it is Jason Christian, a writer and co-host of the podcast Cold War Cinema.

Jason is on all the social medias and can be found on Bluesky @jasonachristian.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>
</p>
<p>Despite its reputation as giant bomb, <em>Entrapment </em>was the 24th-highest grossing movie of 1999, coming in just behind another movie starring Catherine Zeta-Jones, <em>The Haunting.</em></p>
<p><em>Entrapment </em>opened on April 30th at number 1 with an impressive $20 million debut, dethroning <em>The Matrix</em> at the top box office spot, going on to gross $212 million worldwide.</p>
<p>It has since gone on to be synonymous with "high profile dud from 1999", but does it really deserve that reputation?</p>
<p>Its relative success at the box office aside, <em>Entrapment</em> is unpretentious, silly, and a lot of fun, even if it never lands every shot it makes. And it's hard not to stack it up against the <em>other</em> big budget art heist movie starring a famous James Bond actor from the same year (a thing we do plenty of this episode).</p>
<p>Joining John and Julia to talk about it is Jason Christian, a writer and co-host of the podcast Cold War Cinema.</p>
<p>Jason is on all the social medias and can be found on Bluesky <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jasonachristian.bsky.social">@jasonachristian</a>.</p>
<p>

</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5433</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[905e4d0c-9814-11f0-ade4-affca7c2082e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN3193636044.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE THOMAS CROWN AFFAIR - with Sarah D. Bunting</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/thomas-crown-affair-1999</link>
      <description>The Thomas Crown Affair was the 31st-highest grossing movie of 1999, coming in one slot below another entry, Galaxy Quest, opening August 6th at number 3 at the box office behind the debut of the juggernaut The Sixth Sense at number one and Runaway Bride at number 2.

The first of two 1999 film besides (besides The 13th Warrior, which we also recently discussed) from Die Hard director John McTiernan, The Thomas Crown Affair is a remake of the 1968 Steve McQueen-Faye Dunaway caper of the same name.

Starring Pierce Brosnan in the title role - at the height of his Bond tenure -  alongside Rene Russo, the film was praised for featuring two (very attractive) actors who were north of 40 and portraying them in an overtly sexy light, with particular ink spilled on how refreshing it was to see the then 45-year-old Russo presented as a femme fatale.

The Thomas Crown Affair was pretty well received at the time, which is interesting because it has not, on a number of fronts, aged very well. What did people see in it at the time? And does it hold up at all today?

John and Julia invited critic/writer/internet pioneer Sarah Bunting, the co-creator of Television Without Pity (among many other things) to take a trip down memory lane with us as we talk sex scenes in the 1990s, the importance of getting the right director, and what separates a "heist" from a "caper".

Sarah is on Bluesky @sarahdbunting</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e5dc3d74-8d07-11f0-8bee-7b3e34da89e9/image/e43cce437024baffc3fe77658390b251.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sarah D. Bunting joins us to talk about making sexy people stealing art be somehow kinda boring in "The Thomas Crown Affair"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Thomas Crown Affair was the 31st-highest grossing movie of 1999, coming in one slot below another entry, Galaxy Quest, opening August 6th at number 3 at the box office behind the debut of the juggernaut The Sixth Sense at number one and Runaway Bride at number 2.

The first of two 1999 film besides (besides The 13th Warrior, which we also recently discussed) from Die Hard director John McTiernan, The Thomas Crown Affair is a remake of the 1968 Steve McQueen-Faye Dunaway caper of the same name.

Starring Pierce Brosnan in the title role - at the height of his Bond tenure -  alongside Rene Russo, the film was praised for featuring two (very attractive) actors who were north of 40 and portraying them in an overtly sexy light, with particular ink spilled on how refreshing it was to see the then 45-year-old Russo presented as a femme fatale.

The Thomas Crown Affair was pretty well received at the time, which is interesting because it has not, on a number of fronts, aged very well. What did people see in it at the time? And does it hold up at all today?

John and Julia invited critic/writer/internet pioneer Sarah Bunting, the co-creator of Television Without Pity (among many other things) to take a trip down memory lane with us as we talk sex scenes in the 1990s, the importance of getting the right director, and what separates a "heist" from a "caper".

Sarah is on Bluesky @sarahdbunting</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>The Thomas Crown Affair </em>was the 31st-highest grossing movie of 1999, coming in one slot below another entry, <em>Galaxy Quest</em>, opening August 6th at number 3 at the box office behind the debut of the juggernaut <em>The Sixth Sense</em> at number one and <em>Runaway Bride </em>at number 2.</p>
<p>The first of two 1999 film besides (besides <em>The 13th Warrior, </em>which we also recently discussed) from <em>Die Hard</em> director John McTiernan, <em>The Thomas Crown Affair </em>is a remake of the 1968 Steve McQueen-Faye Dunaway caper of the same name.</p>
<p>Starring Pierce Brosnan in the title role - at the height of his Bond tenure -  alongside Rene Russo, the film was praised for featuring two (very attractive) actors who were north of 40 and portraying them in an overtly sexy light, with particular ink spilled on how refreshing it was to see the then 45-year-old Russo presented as a femme fatale.</p>
<p><em>The Thomas Crown Affair </em>was pretty well received at the time, which is interesting because it has not, on a number of fronts, aged very well. What did people see in it at the time? And does it hold up at all today?</p>
<p>John and Julia invited critic/writer/internet pioneer Sarah Bunting, the co-creator of <em>Television Without Pity </em>(among many other things) to take a trip down memory lane with us as we talk sex scenes in the 1990s, the importance of getting the right director, and what separates a "heist" from a "caper".</p>
<p>Sarah is on Bluesky <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/sarahdbunting.bsky.social">@sarahdbunting</a></p>
<p>

</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5581</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e5dc3d74-8d07-11f0-8bee-7b3e34da89e9]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN3240629682.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>1999 REWIND - Woodstock 99</title>
      <description>ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED 7/24/24:

Today marks the 26th anniversary of one of the true low points of 1999 and pop culture in general - the human rights disaster that was Woodstock 99.

Dan Colón, of CageClub's very own The Monsters That Made Us podcast, joined John to talk about the greed, mayhem, and madness that defined Woodstock 99.

The Woodstock that was just so great that it convinced everybody to never Woodstock again, 1999's 30th anniversary festival (inspired by the relative success of the 25th anniversary Woodstock 94) was...a lot of things. But mostly it was an epic disaster that somehow managed to take bad situations and terrible ideas and make them much worse.

What went wrong?? Well, aside from everything, John and Dan explore some of the specific problems that sent Woodstock 99 into a fiery tailspin, and discuss why this is such and important milestone in how our culture got to where it is today.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/88ec3348-61a3-11ef-9f92-c7b49f4df5e1/image/c2551a62d160dcfbd38d3758803144af.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dan Colón, of CageClub's very own The Monsters That Made Us podcast joins John to talk about the greed, mayhem, and madness that defined Woodstock 99</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED 7/24/24:

Today marks the 26th anniversary of one of the true low points of 1999 and pop culture in general - the human rights disaster that was Woodstock 99.

Dan Colón, of CageClub's very own The Monsters That Made Us podcast, joined John to talk about the greed, mayhem, and madness that defined Woodstock 99.

The Woodstock that was just so great that it convinced everybody to never Woodstock again, 1999's 30th anniversary festival (inspired by the relative success of the 25th anniversary Woodstock 94) was...a lot of things. But mostly it was an epic disaster that somehow managed to take bad situations and terrible ideas and make them much worse.

What went wrong?? Well, aside from everything, John and Dan explore some of the specific problems that sent Woodstock 99 into a fiery tailspin, and discuss why this is such and important milestone in how our culture got to where it is today.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED 7/24/24:</p>
<p>Today marks the 26th anniversary of one of the true low points of 1999 and pop culture in general - the human rights disaster that was Woodstock 99.</p>
<p>Dan Colón, of CageClub's very own The Monsters That Made Us podcast, joined John to talk about the greed, mayhem, and madness that defined Woodstock 99.</p>
<p>The Woodstock that was just so great that it convinced everybody to never Woodstock again, 1999's 30th anniversary festival (inspired by the relative success of the 25th anniversary Woodstock 94) was...a lot of things. But mostly it was an epic disaster that somehow managed to take bad situations and terrible ideas and make them much worse.</p>
<p>What went wrong?? Well, aside from everything, John and Dan explore some of the specific problems that sent Woodstock 99 into a fiery tailspin, and discuss why this is such and important milestone in how our culture got to where it is today.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3939</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[88ec3348-61a3-11ef-9f92-c7b49f4df5e1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN4450667589.mp3?updated=1753271766" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MUPPETS FROM SPACE - with Ethan Warren</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/muppets-from-space/</link>
      <description>Muppets From Space was the 95th-highest grossing movie of 1999, opening in 4th place behind juggernauts American Pie, Wild Wild West, and The Phantom Menace.

Directed by Tim Hill, the co-developer and longtime director of Spongebob Squarepants (which debuted 3 days later!) and written by longtime Muppet writer Jerry Juhl alongside Joey Mazzarino and Ken Kaufman, Muppets From Space was the third of the 1990s cinematic Muppet revival (following Christmas Carol and Treasure Island)

Unlike the two other films released that year, Muppets From Space was an attempt to get back to basics - less music and more mayhem, and not an adaptation of a classic literary work.

The results, however, fell flat, and the Muppets would not get another theatrical release for more than a decade.

This week, John and Julia talk to author and Muppet fan Ethan Warren about what went wrong and what the future of the Muppets might be.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5820c328-6116-11f0-868c-7fb22ff49494/image/91d6fae07038f041983a960741ae1ea8.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Author and Muppet fan Ethan Warren joins us to talk about the last, and probably least, of the three 1990s Muppet movies</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Muppets From Space was the 95th-highest grossing movie of 1999, opening in 4th place behind juggernauts American Pie, Wild Wild West, and The Phantom Menace.

Directed by Tim Hill, the co-developer and longtime director of Spongebob Squarepants (which debuted 3 days later!) and written by longtime Muppet writer Jerry Juhl alongside Joey Mazzarino and Ken Kaufman, Muppets From Space was the third of the 1990s cinematic Muppet revival (following Christmas Carol and Treasure Island)

Unlike the two other films released that year, Muppets From Space was an attempt to get back to basics - less music and more mayhem, and not an adaptation of a classic literary work.

The results, however, fell flat, and the Muppets would not get another theatrical release for more than a decade.

This week, John and Julia talk to author and Muppet fan Ethan Warren about what went wrong and what the future of the Muppets might be.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>
</p>
<p><em>Muppets From Space </em>was the 95th-highest grossing movie of 1999, opening in 4th place behind juggernauts <em>American Pie, Wild Wild West</em>, and <em>The Phantom Menace.</em></p>
<p>Directed by Tim Hill, the co-developer and longtime director of <em>Spongebob Squarepants</em> (which debuted 3 days later!) and written by longtime Muppet writer Jerry Juhl alongside Joey Mazzarino and Ken Kaufman, <em>Muppets From Space </em>was the third of the 1990s cinematic Muppet revival (following <em>Christmas Carol </em>and <em>Treasure Island</em>)</p>
<p>Unlike the two other films released that year, <em>Muppets From Space </em>was an attempt to get back to basics - less music and more mayhem, and not an adaptation of a classic literary work.</p>
<p>The results, however, fell flat, and the Muppets would not get another theatrical release for more than a decade.</p>
<p>This week, John and Julia talk to author and Muppet fan Ethan Warren about what went wrong and what the future of the Muppets might be.</p>
<p>

</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5247</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5820c328-6116-11f0-868c-7fb22ff49494]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN7060312382.mp3?updated=1752541215" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GALAXY QUEST - with Annie Berke</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/galaxy-quest/</link>
      <description>Galaxy Quest was one of the great summer movies of 1999. Except it was released, for some reason, at Christmas.

Lovingly sending up television sci-fi of a certain era - and heavily grounded in Star Trek - Galaxy Quest was a modest success as 30th highest grossing movie of 1999

The second feature film, both overall and in as many years following the Vince Gilligan-penned Home Fries with Drew Barrymore and Luke Wilson in 1998, from accomplished television director Dean Parisot, and witten by David Howard and Rob Gordon, Galaxy Quest stars Tim Allen, Sigourney Weaver, Alan Rickman, Enrico Colantoni, Tony Shaloub, Sam Rockwell, Darryl Chill Mitchell, Robin Sachs, Patrick Breen, Missy Pyle, Jeb Rees, and Rain Wilson and Justin Long in their film debuts.

Galaxy Quest has gone on to become one of the great cult films (and most enduring comedies) ever. So we invited culture writer Annie Berke to see how it holds up a quarter century later.

Oh, and we basically write the sequel!

Annie is on Bluesky @sayanniething

 </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1fc3f5c0-55e7-11f0-a989-63af058a3c99/image/eb8d025a150581472b63b84ddd544af5.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Culture writer Annie Berke joins us to talk about the OTHER 1999 movie starring Tim Allen as a fake spaceman</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Galaxy Quest was one of the great summer movies of 1999. Except it was released, for some reason, at Christmas.

Lovingly sending up television sci-fi of a certain era - and heavily grounded in Star Trek - Galaxy Quest was a modest success as 30th highest grossing movie of 1999

The second feature film, both overall and in as many years following the Vince Gilligan-penned Home Fries with Drew Barrymore and Luke Wilson in 1998, from accomplished television director Dean Parisot, and witten by David Howard and Rob Gordon, Galaxy Quest stars Tim Allen, Sigourney Weaver, Alan Rickman, Enrico Colantoni, Tony Shaloub, Sam Rockwell, Darryl Chill Mitchell, Robin Sachs, Patrick Breen, Missy Pyle, Jeb Rees, and Rain Wilson and Justin Long in their film debuts.

Galaxy Quest has gone on to become one of the great cult films (and most enduring comedies) ever. So we invited culture writer Annie Berke to see how it holds up a quarter century later.

Oh, and we basically write the sequel!

Annie is on Bluesky @sayanniething

 </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>
</p>
<p><em>Galaxy Quest </em>was one of the great summer movies of 1999. Except it was released, for some reason, at Christmas.</p>
<p>Lovingly sending up television sci-fi of a certain era - and heavily grounded in <em>Star Trek</em> - <em>Galaxy Quest </em>was a modest success as 30th highest grossing movie of 1999</p>
<p>The second feature film, both overall and in as many years following the Vince Gilligan-penned <em>Home Fries</em> with Drew Barrymore and Luke Wilson in 1998, from accomplished television director Dean Parisot, and witten by David Howard and Rob Gordon, <em>Galaxy Quest </em>stars Tim Allen, Sigourney Weaver, Alan Rickman, Enrico Colantoni, Tony Shaloub, Sam Rockwell, Darryl Chill Mitchell, Robin Sachs, Patrick Breen, Missy Pyle, Jeb Rees, and Rain Wilson and Justin Long in their film debuts.</p>
<p><em>Galaxy Quest </em>has gone on to become one of the great cult films (and most enduring comedies) <em>ever</em>. So we invited culture writer Annie Berke to see how it holds up a quarter century later.</p>
<p>Oh, and we basically write the sequel!</p>
<p>Annie is on Bluesky <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/sayanniething.bsky.social">@sayanniething</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>

</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6144</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1fc3f5c0-55e7-11f0-a989-63af058a3c99]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN9349253516.mp3?updated=1751311683" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE 13th WARRIOR - with Peter Raleigh</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/the-13th-warrior-1999/</link>
      <description>August 1999's The 13th Warrior was (mostly) directed by legendary Predator and Die Hard director – and occasional felon – John McTiernan, and released just three weeks after his other (far more successful) 1999 film The Thomas Crown Affair.

Based on the 1976 novel "Eaters of the Dead" by Michael Crichton (who also took over to direct several scenes), The 13th Warrior stars Antonio Banderas, Vladimir Kulich, Dennis Storhoi, Diane Venora, Richard Bremmer, Tony Curran, and Omar Sharif

It took two decades to finally get Crichton’s reimagining of "Beowulf" to the screen, and the film is best remembered as a fascinating failure – a $160 million epic that earned about $100 million shy of that globally, making it the biggest flop of the year.

But over the years The 13th Warrior has achieved cult status, with many defenders arguing that, while imperfect, what actually winds up on the screen is still very worthwhile.

We took that theory to task with writer/critic Peter Raleigh, who you can find on Bluesky at @petreraleigh

You can also listen to Graeme Revell's vastly superior original score to The 13th Warrior here, thanks to YouTube user deavonw: The 13th Warrior (Rejected Score)</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Writer Peter Raleigh joins John and Julia to discuss (and defend) 1999's most high-profile failure, "The13th Warrior"</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ee159002-4af0-11f0-ac59-4b9692c799fe/image/c2a47ea3aa3c60d08f5b9ac00f9f33cf.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>August 1999's The 13th Warrior was (mostly) directed by legendary Predator and Die Hard director – and occasional felon – John McTiernan, and released just three weeks after his other (far more successful) 1999 film The Thomas Crown Affair.

Based on the 1976 novel "Eaters of the Dead" by Michael Crichton (who also took over to direct several scenes), The 13th Warrior stars Antonio Banderas, Vladimir Kulich, Dennis Storhoi, Diane Venora, Richard Bremmer, Tony Curran, and Omar Sharif

It took two decades to finally get Crichton’s reimagining of "Beowulf" to the screen, and the film is best remembered as a fascinating failure – a $160 million epic that earned about $100 million shy of that globally, making it the biggest flop of the year.

But over the years The 13th Warrior has achieved cult status, with many defenders arguing that, while imperfect, what actually winds up on the screen is still very worthwhile.

We took that theory to task with writer/critic Peter Raleigh, who you can find on Bluesky at @petreraleigh

You can also listen to Graeme Revell's vastly superior original score to The 13th Warrior here, thanks to YouTube user deavonw: The 13th Warrior (Rejected Score)</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>August 1999's <em>The 13th Warrior </em>was (mostly) directed by legendary <em>Predator</em> and <em>Die Hard</em> director – and occasional felon – John McTiernan, and released just three weeks after his <em>other</em> (far more successful) 1999 film <em>The Thomas Crown Affair.</em></p>
<p>Based on the 1976 novel "Eaters of the Dead" by Michael Crichton (who also took over to direct several scenes), <em>The 13th Warrior </em>stars Antonio Banderas, Vladimir Kulich, Dennis Storhoi, Diane Venora, Richard Bremmer, Tony Curran, and Omar Sharif</p>
<p>It took two decades to finally get Crichton’s reimagining of "Beowulf" to the screen, and the film is best remembered as a fascinating failure – a $160 million epic that earned about $100 million shy of that globally, making it the biggest flop of the year.</p>
<p>But over the years <em>The 13th Warrior </em>has achieved cult status, with many defenders arguing that, while imperfect, what actually winds up on the screen is still very worthwhile.</p>
<p>We took that theory to task with writer/critic Peter Raleigh, who you can find on Bluesky at <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/petreraleigh.bsky.social">@petreraleigh</a></p>
<p>You can also listen to Graeme Revell's vastly superior original score to <em>The 13th Warrior </em>here, thanks to YouTube user deavonw: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03mkmNhIVlc&amp;list=PLmB3BEM23z0Ki7bsteD-p_dj9_4_b1DOC">The 13th Warrior (Rejected Score)</a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5969</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ee159002-4af0-11f0-ac59-4b9692c799fe]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN2390162537.mp3?updated=1750106210" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AUSTIN POWERS: THE SPY WHO SHAGGED ME - with Siri Dahl</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/austin-powers-siri-dahl/</link>
      <description>We are kicking off the summer by returning to the box office top 10 for the first time since Runaway Bride with one of the 1999’s big summer blockbusters, Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me!

Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me was the 4th-highest grossing movie of 1999, behind Toy Story 2, The Sixth Sense, and The Phantom Menace, opening on June 11 and taking in $55 million that weekend, going on to make $206 million at the domestic box office on a $33 million budget.

Directed by Jay Roach and written by Mike Myers and Michael McCullers, The Spy Who Shagged Me saw Heather Graham stepping in to the Powers Girl role, replacing Elizabeth Hurley. The hugely anticipated and hyped sequel to the 1997 original, the movie came in with sky high expectations.

The results were, well...mixed.

But there's no question that Austin Powers was a huge cultural milestone, so we wanted to see how it held up.

Helping us get the summer off to the most shagadelic start possible is actor, writer, podcaster, and activist Siri Dahl!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/96ad492a-4007-11f0-a729-db88ef12a036/image/cc4daa5b3ce7506df11b32c7c425eb5b.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The amazing, charming, and hilarious Siri Dahl joins John and Julia to talk all things shagadelic in "Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me"!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>We are kicking off the summer by returning to the box office top 10 for the first time since Runaway Bride with one of the 1999’s big summer blockbusters, Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me!

Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me was the 4th-highest grossing movie of 1999, behind Toy Story 2, The Sixth Sense, and The Phantom Menace, opening on June 11 and taking in $55 million that weekend, going on to make $206 million at the domestic box office on a $33 million budget.

Directed by Jay Roach and written by Mike Myers and Michael McCullers, The Spy Who Shagged Me saw Heather Graham stepping in to the Powers Girl role, replacing Elizabeth Hurley. The hugely anticipated and hyped sequel to the 1997 original, the movie came in with sky high expectations.

The results were, well...mixed.

But there's no question that Austin Powers was a huge cultural milestone, so we wanted to see how it held up.

Helping us get the summer off to the most shagadelic start possible is actor, writer, podcaster, and activist Siri Dahl!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>
</p>
<p>We are kicking off the summer by returning to the box office top 10 for the first time since <em>Runaway Bride</em> with one of the 1999’s big summer blockbusters, <em>Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me!</em></p>
<p><em>Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me </em>was the 4th-highest grossing movie of 1999, behind <em>Toy Story 2, The Sixth Sense,</em> and <em>The Phantom Menace</em>, opening on June 11 and taking in $55 million that weekend, going on to make $206 million at the domestic box office on a $33 million budget.</p>
<p>Directed by Jay Roach and written by Mike Myers and Michael McCullers, <em>The Spy Who Shagged Me</em> saw Heather Graham stepping in to the Powers Girl role, replacing Elizabeth Hurley. The hugely anticipated and hyped sequel to the 1997 original, the movie came in with sky high expectations.</p>
<p>The results were, well...mixed.</p>
<p>But there's no question that <em>Austin Powers </em>was a <em>huge</em> cultural milestone, so we wanted to see how it held up.</p>
<p>Helping us get the summer off to the most shagadelic start possible is actor, writer, podcaster, and activist <a href="https://siridahl.com/">Siri Dahl!</a></p>
<p>

</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5732</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[96ad492a-4007-11f0-a729-db88ef12a036]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN6962697438.mp3?updated=1748906480" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>JOE THE KING - with Zaki Hasan</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/joe-the-king-1999</link>
      <description>Joe the King was the directorial debut of long-time career supporting actor and occasional indie leading man Frank Whaley, who also wrote the script based partly on his own life.

It stars Noah Fleiss in the title role, Karen Young, John Leguizamo, Whaley’s friend and frequent collaborator Ethan Hawke, Camryn Manheim, Max Ligosh, a very young Kate Mara, and Whaley’s The Doors co-star, the late Val Kilmer. as Joe’s abusive alcoholic father.

Critics were kind of all over the place about Joe the King, a film very much of its time, although the performances, especially those of Fleiss and Kilmer, were widely praised.

Joe the King was given a very limited release on October 15, going on to gross just $60,000, but a few those dollars once belonged to our guest for this episode, Zaki Hasan, who actually saw it in a movie theater 26 years ago.

Zaki is is a professor, award-winning writer, and film critic for, among other things, the San Francisco Chronicle.

You can find him on Bluesky @zakiscorner</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/b7b62f96-35e0-11f0-a8ec-331b0215dc41/image/788638abcdf11f1173c90ef1cd33da22.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Film critic Zaki Hasan joins John and Julia to talk about Frank Whaley's 1999 writing/directing debut, "Joe the King"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Joe the King was the directorial debut of long-time career supporting actor and occasional indie leading man Frank Whaley, who also wrote the script based partly on his own life.

It stars Noah Fleiss in the title role, Karen Young, John Leguizamo, Whaley’s friend and frequent collaborator Ethan Hawke, Camryn Manheim, Max Ligosh, a very young Kate Mara, and Whaley’s The Doors co-star, the late Val Kilmer. as Joe’s abusive alcoholic father.

Critics were kind of all over the place about Joe the King, a film very much of its time, although the performances, especially those of Fleiss and Kilmer, were widely praised.

Joe the King was given a very limited release on October 15, going on to gross just $60,000, but a few those dollars once belonged to our guest for this episode, Zaki Hasan, who actually saw it in a movie theater 26 years ago.

Zaki is is a professor, award-winning writer, and film critic for, among other things, the San Francisco Chronicle.

You can find him on Bluesky @zakiscorner</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Joe the King </em>was the directorial debut of long-time career supporting actor and occasional indie leading man Frank Whaley, who also wrote the script based partly on his own life.</p>
<p>It stars Noah Fleiss in the title role, Karen Young, John Leguizamo, Whaley’s friend and frequent collaborator Ethan Hawke, Camryn Manheim, Max Ligosh, a very young Kate Mara, and Whaley’s <em>The Doors</em> co-star, the late Val Kilmer. as Joe’s abusive alcoholic father.</p>
<p>Critics were kind of all over the place about <em>Joe the King</em>, a film <em>very </em>much of its time, although the performances, especially those of Fleiss and Kilmer, were widely praised.</p>
<p><em>Joe the King </em>was given a <em>very </em>limited release on October 15, going on to gross just $60,000, but a few those dollars once belonged to our guest for this episode, Zaki Hasan, who actually saw it in a movie theater 26 years ago.</p>
<p>Zaki is is a professor, award-winning writer, and film critic for, among other things, the San Francisco Chronicle.</p>
<p>You can find him on Bluesky <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/zakiscorner.bsky.social">@zakiscorner</a></p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4455</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b7b62f96-35e0-11f0-a8ec-331b0215dc41]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN9955566430.mp3?updated=1747790293" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE LIMEY: "Bang" - with Devan Scott</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/the-limey-1999/</link>
      <description>The Limey was 170th highest grossing movie of 1999, finishing just one spot ahead of cult favorite Jawbreaker

Released October 8th in just 17 theaters and going on to make $3.2 million on a $10 million budget, The Limey was directed by Steven Soderbergh, just on the verge of his first major commercial successes (Erin Brokovich and Traffic, both released on opposite ends of 2000) and following another acclaimed crime caper, 1998’s Elmore Leonard adaptation Out of Sight.

Featuring a tour-de-force performance from Terrence Stamp,  The Limey crosses genre boundaries, it also straddles the line between Soderbergh's smaller, more risk-taking films (like sex, lies, and videotape and Schizopolis) and his bigger, more ambitious ones (like Traffic and Ocean's 11).

In this episode, John and Julia are joined by filmmaker, podcaster, and Steven Soderbergh fan Devan Scott joins John and Julia to discuss 1999's best crime thriller/comedy/tone poem.

Devan is on Bluesky @dagscott.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c3c4b6e0-2a14-11f0-a9bc-732d6f8ef744/image/2233126af1407483de8aea8a0b143b99.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Filmmaker, podcaster, and Steven Soderbergh fan Devan Scott joins John and Julia to discuss the crime thriller/comedy/tone poem "The Limey"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Limey was 170th highest grossing movie of 1999, finishing just one spot ahead of cult favorite Jawbreaker

Released October 8th in just 17 theaters and going on to make $3.2 million on a $10 million budget, The Limey was directed by Steven Soderbergh, just on the verge of his first major commercial successes (Erin Brokovich and Traffic, both released on opposite ends of 2000) and following another acclaimed crime caper, 1998’s Elmore Leonard adaptation Out of Sight.

Featuring a tour-de-force performance from Terrence Stamp,  The Limey crosses genre boundaries, it also straddles the line between Soderbergh's smaller, more risk-taking films (like sex, lies, and videotape and Schizopolis) and his bigger, more ambitious ones (like Traffic and Ocean's 11).

In this episode, John and Julia are joined by filmmaker, podcaster, and Steven Soderbergh fan Devan Scott joins John and Julia to discuss 1999's best crime thriller/comedy/tone poem.

Devan is on Bluesky @dagscott.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>The Limey </em>was 170th highest grossing movie of 1999, finishing just one spot ahead of cult favorite <em>Jawbreaker</em></p>
<p>Released October 8th in just 17 theaters and going on to make $3.2 million on a $10 million budget, <em>The Limey </em>was directed by Steven Soderbergh, just on the verge of his first major commercial successes (<em>Erin Brokovich</em> and <em>Traffic</em>, both released on opposite ends of 2000) and following another acclaimed crime caper, 1998’s Elmore Leonard adaptation <em>Out of Sight.</em></p>
<p>Featuring a tour-de-force performance from Terrence Stamp, <em> The Limey</em> crosses genre boundaries, it also straddles the line between Soderbergh's smaller, more risk-taking films (like <em>sex, lies, and videotape</em> and <em>Schizopolis</em>) and his bigger, more ambitious ones (like <em>Traffic </em>and <em>Ocean's 11).</em></p>
<p>In this episode, John and Julia are joined by filmmaker, podcaster, and Steven Soderbergh fan Devan Scott joins John and Julia to discuss 1999's best crime thriller/comedy/tone poem.</p>
<p>Devan is on Bluesky <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/dagscott.bsky.social">@dagscott</a>.</p>
<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5073</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c3c4b6e0-2a14-11f0-a9bc-732d6f8ef744]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN2707048622.mp3?updated=1746493275" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VAL KILMER: 1959-2025</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/val-kilmer/</link>
      <description>Actor Val Kilmer died on April 1st of this year, after a long battle with throat cancer. He was 65.
Kilmer's film career began in the 1980s with iconic turns in the likes of Top Gun and Real Genius, but it was in the 1990s where be became an icon in a decade known primarily one dominated by iconoclasts, starting with his portrayal of Jim Morrison in Oliver Stone's The Doors, and including memorable bit roles in movies like True Romance, replacing Michael Keaton as Batman in Batman Forever, and what man consider his greatest role as Doc Holiday opposite Kurt Russell's Wyatt Earp in Tombstone.
Kilmer was an avid documentarian of his own life and was rarely without his camcorder. His own video tapes were repurposed to tell the story of his life and career in the moving and insightful documentary Val, directed by Ting Poo and Leo Scott, which captures a man who seems to know his time is almost up reflecting on the lessons of a life extraordinarily lived.
That film formed the basis of this conversation between John and Julia discussing the strange life and career of this remarkable actor.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 17:35:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/333951fe-1fa0-11f0-a104-5be87301acec/image/4f401cf1b3948c78ca764853c3318176.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>John and Julia discuss the life and career of actor and 90s icon Val Kilmer, who died earlier this month at the age of 65.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Actor Val Kilmer died on April 1st of this year, after a long battle with throat cancer. He was 65.
Kilmer's film career began in the 1980s with iconic turns in the likes of Top Gun and Real Genius, but it was in the 1990s where be became an icon in a decade known primarily one dominated by iconoclasts, starting with his portrayal of Jim Morrison in Oliver Stone's The Doors, and including memorable bit roles in movies like True Romance, replacing Michael Keaton as Batman in Batman Forever, and what man consider his greatest role as Doc Holiday opposite Kurt Russell's Wyatt Earp in Tombstone.
Kilmer was an avid documentarian of his own life and was rarely without his camcorder. His own video tapes were repurposed to tell the story of his life and career in the moving and insightful documentary Val, directed by Ting Poo and Leo Scott, which captures a man who seems to know his time is almost up reflecting on the lessons of a life extraordinarily lived.
That film formed the basis of this conversation between John and Julia discussing the strange life and career of this remarkable actor.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Actor Val Kilmer died on April 1st of this year, after a long battle with throat cancer. He was 65.</p><p>Kilmer's film career began in the 1980s with iconic turns in the likes of <em>Top Gun</em> and <em>Real Genius, </em>but it was in the 1990s where be became an icon in a decade known primarily one dominated by iconoclasts, starting with his portrayal of Jim Morrison in Oliver Stone's <em>The Doors</em>, and including memorable bit roles in movies like <em>True Romance</em>, replacing Michael Keaton as Batman in <em>Batman Forever</em>, and what man consider his greatest role as Doc Holiday opposite Kurt Russell's Wyatt Earp in <em>Tombstone</em>.</p><p>Kilmer was an avid documentarian of his own life and was rarely without his camcorder. His own video tapes were repurposed to tell the story of his life and career in the moving and insightful documentary <em>Val</em>, directed by Ting Poo and Leo Scott, which captures a man who seems to know his time is almost up reflecting on the lessons of a life extraordinarily lived.</p><p>That film formed the basis of this conversation between John and Julia discussing the strange life and career of this remarkable actor.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4440</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[333951fe-1fa0-11f0-a104-5be87301acec]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN3250419188.mp3?updated=1745343637" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SWEET AND LOWDOWN: "All That Jazz" - with Liz Whitmere</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/sweet-and-lowdown/</link>
      <description>Sweet and Lowdown opened on December 3rd in just 3 theaters and taking in an impressive 31,562 dollar per screen average
Written and directed by Woody Allen, it stars Sean Penn as fictional jazz guitar legend Emmet Ray alongside Samantha Morton and Uma Thurman, Brad Garrett, John Waters, Anthony LaPaglia, and Brian Markinson, among others.
Sweet and Lowdown was a welcome end to what many saw as a mid-90s slump for Allen, who had released a string of movies who that had been received with mixed or sometimes scathing reviews, like 1995’s Mighty Aphrodite, 1996’s Everyone Says I Love You, 1997’s Deconstructing Harry, and 1998’s Celebrity.
It's also difficult to not see in light of revelations of Allen's darker behaviors throughout his career, to say nothing of Penn.
But it can also sweet and charming, and its jazz-age nostalgia is as hard to resist as Morton's acclaimed, Oscar-nominated silent performance.
Joining John and Julia to talk through Sweet and Lowdown's ups and downs is actor, writer, and director Liz Whitmere, who has some thoughts on toxic behavior in the entertainment industry.
Liz is on Bluesky @lizwhitmere</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/44335372-13db-11f0-81cf-d7c7a06d3c11/image/176a6c80b0f33897a76724bb11cc8d5a.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Actor/writer/director Liz Whitmere joins John and Julia to talk the good and very bad of Woody Allen with "Sweet and Lowdown"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Sweet and Lowdown opened on December 3rd in just 3 theaters and taking in an impressive 31,562 dollar per screen average
Written and directed by Woody Allen, it stars Sean Penn as fictional jazz guitar legend Emmet Ray alongside Samantha Morton and Uma Thurman, Brad Garrett, John Waters, Anthony LaPaglia, and Brian Markinson, among others.
Sweet and Lowdown was a welcome end to what many saw as a mid-90s slump for Allen, who had released a string of movies who that had been received with mixed or sometimes scathing reviews, like 1995’s Mighty Aphrodite, 1996’s Everyone Says I Love You, 1997’s Deconstructing Harry, and 1998’s Celebrity.
It's also difficult to not see in light of revelations of Allen's darker behaviors throughout his career, to say nothing of Penn.
But it can also sweet and charming, and its jazz-age nostalgia is as hard to resist as Morton's acclaimed, Oscar-nominated silent performance.
Joining John and Julia to talk through Sweet and Lowdown's ups and downs is actor, writer, and director Liz Whitmere, who has some thoughts on toxic behavior in the entertainment industry.
Liz is on Bluesky @lizwhitmere</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Sweet and Lowdown </em>opened on December 3rd in just 3 theaters and taking in an impressive 31,562 dollar per screen average</p><p>Written and directed by Woody Allen, it stars Sean Penn as fictional jazz guitar legend Emmet Ray alongside Samantha Morton and Uma Thurman, Brad Garrett, John Waters, Anthony LaPaglia, and Brian Markinson, among others.</p><p><em>Sweet and Lowdown </em>was a welcome end to what many saw as a mid-90s slump for Allen, who had released a string of movies who that had been received with mixed or sometimes scathing reviews, like 1995’s <em>Mighty Aphrodite</em>, 1996’s <em>Everyone Says I Love You</em>, 1997’s <em>Deconstructing Harry</em>, and 1998’s <em>Celebrity.</em></p><p>It's also difficult to <em>not</em> see in light of revelations of Allen's darker behaviors throughout his career, to say nothing of Penn.</p><p>But it can also sweet and charming, and its jazz-age nostalgia is as hard to resist as Morton's acclaimed, Oscar-nominated silent performance.</p><p>Joining John and Julia to talk through <em>Sweet and Lowdown'</em>s ups and downs is actor, writer, and director Liz Whitmere, who has some thoughts on toxic behavior in the entertainment industry.</p><p>Liz is on Bluesky <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/lizwhitmere.bsky.social">@lizwhitmere</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5558</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[44335372-13db-11f0-81cf-d7c7a06d3c11]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN6493288729.mp3?updated=1744049592" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FOR LOVE OF THE GAME: "Baseball" - with Jacki Krestel</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/for-love-of-the-game/</link>
      <description>57th on the 1999 box office chart, For Love of the Game marked director Raimi’s first foray into big-budget, mass-market filmmaking (which would ultimately pave the way for being handed the enormous task of finally bringing Spiderman to the screen in 2002)
But love and baseball was very different territory for Raimi, and his inexperience in the realm of pop movie making (as well as in directing romance) proved to be a hindrance.
For Love of the Game is, unofficially, the third and final entry in Kevin Costner's baseball trilogy, following 1989's Field of Dreams and 1988's Bull Durham.
The film tries to balance its dual nature as a romance and a straight sports movie, and while it occasionally hits the mark, most critics agreed: For Love of the Game is pretty great when it's about the game, and not so great when it's about the love.
But it's baseball season, and this was by far 1999's biggest baseball-themed movie, so we asked friend of the show - and White Sox diehard - Jacki Krestel to help us call some balls and strikes on this one!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/881990c4-0909-11f0-9cd5-db69d998bf76/image/f9fd4da752a27b1d9df67eea88153812.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>White Sox superfan Jacki Krestel joins John and Julia to talk about part three of the Costner Baseball Trilogy, "For Love of the Game"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>57th on the 1999 box office chart, For Love of the Game marked director Raimi’s first foray into big-budget, mass-market filmmaking (which would ultimately pave the way for being handed the enormous task of finally bringing Spiderman to the screen in 2002)
But love and baseball was very different territory for Raimi, and his inexperience in the realm of pop movie making (as well as in directing romance) proved to be a hindrance.
For Love of the Game is, unofficially, the third and final entry in Kevin Costner's baseball trilogy, following 1989's Field of Dreams and 1988's Bull Durham.
The film tries to balance its dual nature as a romance and a straight sports movie, and while it occasionally hits the mark, most critics agreed: For Love of the Game is pretty great when it's about the game, and not so great when it's about the love.
But it's baseball season, and this was by far 1999's biggest baseball-themed movie, so we asked friend of the show - and White Sox diehard - Jacki Krestel to help us call some balls and strikes on this one!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>57th on the 1999 box office chart, <em>For Love of the Game </em>marked director Raimi’s first foray into big-budget, mass-market filmmaking (which would ultimately pave the way for being handed the enormous task of finally bringing <em>Spiderman</em> to the screen in 2002)</p><p>But love and baseball was very different territory for Raimi, and his inexperience in the realm of pop movie making (as well as in directing romance) proved to be a hindrance.</p><p><em>For Love of the Game </em>is, unofficially, the third and final entry in Kevin Costner's baseball trilogy, following 1989's <em>Field of Dreams</em> and 1988's <em>Bull Durham</em>.</p><p>The film tries to balance its dual nature as a romance and a straight sports movie, and while it occasionally hits the mark, most critics agreed: <em>For Love of the Game </em>is pretty great when it's about the game, and not so great when it's about the love.</p><p>But it's baseball season, and this was by far 1999's biggest baseball-themed movie, so we asked friend of the show - and White Sox diehard - Jacki Krestel to help us call some balls and strikes on this one!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4472</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[881990c4-0909-11f0-9cd5-db69d998bf76]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN4966642882.mp3?updated=1742860000" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TWILIGHT (1998) - Gene Hackman Special</title>
      <description>There were no movies starring the late Gene Hackman that were released in the US in 1999, but two of his films released in the US in 1998 – Tony Scott’s Enemy of the State and Robert Benton’s Twilight – were released in Europe in 1999.
So because plenty has been said about the former, we are taking a look today at the latter.
Directed by Kramer and Kramer writer and director Robert Benton and written by Benton and novelist Richard Russo, who also teamed up with star Paul Newman on 1994’s adaptation of Russo's Nobody's Fool, Twilight stars Newman with a supporting cast of Gene Hackman, Susan Sarandon, James Garner, Stockard Channing, Reese Witherspoon, Margo Martindale, John Spencer, Live Shrieber, the dying body of M. Emmet Walsh, and Giancarlo Esposito.
Twilight was a box office failure and was met with a lukewarm reception by critics, but it is a very good case study in the question as to whether or not some actors - like Hackman - could be good in absolutely anything.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:13:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fab03106-fe82-11ef-a880-971133c31c79/image/c94c1a9d624a3c3af92e14f14136ddbf.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>John and Julia look at 1998's "Twilight", the neo-noir that arrived at the tail end of the careers of stars Paul Newman and the late Gene Hackman</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>There were no movies starring the late Gene Hackman that were released in the US in 1999, but two of his films released in the US in 1998 – Tony Scott’s Enemy of the State and Robert Benton’s Twilight – were released in Europe in 1999.
So because plenty has been said about the former, we are taking a look today at the latter.
Directed by Kramer and Kramer writer and director Robert Benton and written by Benton and novelist Richard Russo, who also teamed up with star Paul Newman on 1994’s adaptation of Russo's Nobody's Fool, Twilight stars Newman with a supporting cast of Gene Hackman, Susan Sarandon, James Garner, Stockard Channing, Reese Witherspoon, Margo Martindale, John Spencer, Live Shrieber, the dying body of M. Emmet Walsh, and Giancarlo Esposito.
Twilight was a box office failure and was met with a lukewarm reception by critics, but it is a very good case study in the question as to whether or not some actors - like Hackman - could be good in absolutely anything.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>There were no movies starring the late Gene Hackman that were released in the US in 1999, but two of his films released in the US in 1998 – Tony Scott’s <em>Enemy of the State </em>and Robert Benton’s <em>Twilight</em> – were released in Europe in 1999.</p><p>So because plenty has been said about the former, we are taking a look today at the latter.</p><p>Directed by <em>Kramer and Kramer </em>writer and director Robert Benton and written by Benton and novelist Richard Russo, who also teamed up with star Paul Newman on 1994’s adaptation of Russo's <em>Nobody's Fool</em>, <em>Twilight </em>stars Newman with a supporting cast of Gene Hackman, Susan Sarandon, James Garner, Stockard Channing, Reese Witherspoon, Margo Martindale, John Spencer, Live Shrieber, the dying body of M. Emmet Walsh, and Giancarlo Esposito.</p><p><em>Twilight </em>was a box office failure and was met with a lukewarm reception by critics, but it is a very good case study in the question as to whether or not some actors - like Hackman - could be good in absolutely <em>anything</em>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4150</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[fab03106-fe82-11ef-a880-971133c31c79]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN3999680386.mp3?updated=1741702699" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE END OF THE AFFAIR: "Lots of Rain" - with Kristin Battestella</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/end-of-the-affair/</link>
      <description>The End of the Affair was released on Dec 3, 1999 in just 7 theaters so that it could bait some Oscars and then going wide on January 21. It would ultimately bring in just shy of 11 million dollars on 23 million dollar budget, though it did open with an astonishing $28,000 per screen average, so maybe a wider initial release would have been wise.
The End of the Affair was the second 1999 film in 11 months (after January’s psychological thriller In Dream) from auteur Neil Jordan, best known for 1992’s Oscar winning film The Crying Game as well as 1994’s Interview with the Vampire.
It was also the second sweeping period romance in just a couple years for star Ralph Fiennes after The English Patient, leading to many critics and audiences drawing comparisons between the two films. It was also the one film for which 1999's busiest woman, Julianne Moore, was nominated for an Oscar, despite her equal performances in A Map of the World, An Ideal Husband, and Magnolia.
Joining John and Julia to talk about this second (incredibly horny) adaptation of Graham Greene's The End of the Affair is film critic, writer, and podcaster Kristin Battestella (I Think Therefore I Review)
Kristin is on Bluesky @thereforereview</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3dd5fa1a-f389-11ef-a75b-43e11c5c3996/image/42c9710bb051c51278d655c4fbe11975.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Writer, critic, and podcaster Kristin Battestella joins us to talk about the very rainy and very horny "The End of the Affair"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The End of the Affair was released on Dec 3, 1999 in just 7 theaters so that it could bait some Oscars and then going wide on January 21. It would ultimately bring in just shy of 11 million dollars on 23 million dollar budget, though it did open with an astonishing $28,000 per screen average, so maybe a wider initial release would have been wise.
The End of the Affair was the second 1999 film in 11 months (after January’s psychological thriller In Dream) from auteur Neil Jordan, best known for 1992’s Oscar winning film The Crying Game as well as 1994’s Interview with the Vampire.
It was also the second sweeping period romance in just a couple years for star Ralph Fiennes after The English Patient, leading to many critics and audiences drawing comparisons between the two films. It was also the one film for which 1999's busiest woman, Julianne Moore, was nominated for an Oscar, despite her equal performances in A Map of the World, An Ideal Husband, and Magnolia.
Joining John and Julia to talk about this second (incredibly horny) adaptation of Graham Greene's The End of the Affair is film critic, writer, and podcaster Kristin Battestella (I Think Therefore I Review)
Kristin is on Bluesky @thereforereview</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>The End of the Affair </em>was released on Dec 3, 1999 in just 7 theaters so that it could bait some Oscars and then going wide on January 21. It would ultimately bring in just shy of 11 million dollars on 23 million dollar budget, though it did open with an astonishing $28,000 per screen average, so maybe a wider initial release would have been wise.</p><p><em>The End of the Affair</em> was the second 1999 film in 11 months (after January’s psychological thriller <em>In Dream</em>) from auteur Neil Jordan, best known for 1992’s Oscar winning film <em>The Crying Game</em> as well as 1994’s <em>Interview with the Vampire.</em></p><p>It was also the second sweeping period romance in just a couple years for star Ralph Fiennes after <em>The English Patient</em>, leading to many critics and audiences drawing comparisons between the two films. It was also the one film for which 1999's busiest woman, Julianne Moore, was nominated for an Oscar, despite her equal performances in <em>A Map of the World, An Ideal Husband, </em>and <em>Magnolia</em>.</p><p>Joining John and Julia to talk about this second (incredibly horny) adaptation of Graham Greene's <em>The End of the Affair </em>is film critic, writer, and podcaster Kristin Battestella (<a href="https://ithinkthereforeireview.blogspot.com/"><em>I Think Therefore I Review</em></a><em>)</em></p><p>Kristin is on Bluesky <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/thereforereview.bsky.social">@thereforereview</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5407</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3dd5fa1a-f389-11ef-a75b-43e11c5c3996]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN3196028245.mp3?updated=1740495946" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BEYOND THE MAT: "The Wrestlers" - with Ross Benes</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/beyond-the-mat/</link>
      <description>Beyond the Mat is a movie that appears NOWHERE in the 1999 box office charts, mainly because it only screened once in 1999 in Los Angeles on October 22, thanks in no small part to Vince McMahon fuckery (though it did get a limited release in March of 2000).
Beyond the Mat was directed by Barry Blaustein, an accomplished comedy screenwriter, and it features the real-life stories of wrestling legends Terry Funk, Mick Foley, and Jake the Snake Roberts,
Though it wasn't a commercial hit, it received a mostly favorable critical response, and has gone on to become a beloved documentary, especially among wrestling fans.
Joining John and Julia to discuss it is Ross Benes, author of the upcoming book 1999: The Year Low Culture Conquered America and Kickstarted our Bizarre Times. His book will be available everywhere in April.
You can learn more about Ross and his work on his website: www.rossbenes.com</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 09:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c2d4366a-e73f-11ef-bc2b-afad31d2ab3b/image/90d5faa3352f27c6e6b0a16dbbee3889.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Author Ross Benes joins John and Julia to talk about the beloved wrestling documentary "Beyond the Mat"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Beyond the Mat is a movie that appears NOWHERE in the 1999 box office charts, mainly because it only screened once in 1999 in Los Angeles on October 22, thanks in no small part to Vince McMahon fuckery (though it did get a limited release in March of 2000).
Beyond the Mat was directed by Barry Blaustein, an accomplished comedy screenwriter, and it features the real-life stories of wrestling legends Terry Funk, Mick Foley, and Jake the Snake Roberts,
Though it wasn't a commercial hit, it received a mostly favorable critical response, and has gone on to become a beloved documentary, especially among wrestling fans.
Joining John and Julia to discuss it is Ross Benes, author of the upcoming book 1999: The Year Low Culture Conquered America and Kickstarted our Bizarre Times. His book will be available everywhere in April.
You can learn more about Ross and his work on his website: www.rossbenes.com</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Beyond the Mat</em> is a movie that appears NOWHERE in the 1999 box office charts, mainly because it only screened once in 1999 in Los Angeles on October 22, thanks in no small part to Vince McMahon fuckery (though it did get a limited release in March of 2000).</p><p><em>Beyond the Mat </em>was directed by Barry Blaustein, an accomplished comedy screenwriter, and it features the real-life stories of wrestling legends Terry Funk, Mick Foley, and Jake the Snake Roberts,</p><p>Though it wasn't a commercial hit, it received a mostly favorable critical response, and has gone on to become a beloved documentary, especially among wrestling fans.</p><p>Joining John and Julia to discuss it is Ross Benes, author of the upcoming book <em>1999: The Year Low Culture Conquered America and Kickstarted our Bizarre Times</em>. His book will be available everywhere in April.</p><p>You can learn more about Ross and his work on his website: <a href="https://www.rossbenes.com/">www.rossbenes.com</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4656</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c2d4366a-e73f-11ef-bc2b-afad31d2ab3b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN8528821141.mp3?updated=1739144952" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DICK: "Tricky" - with Alex Steed</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/dick-1999/</link>
      <description>The 145th highest-grossing movie of the year, Dick was released on August 3rd and going on take 12th place at the box office. Through no fault of its own, it was thrown into a death slot, as the films that outgrossed it included juggernauts like The Phantom Menace, American Pie, Runaway Bride, The Blair Witch Project, and a little movie that opened at the same time and took #1, The Sixth Sense,
Despite a generally warm and positive critical reception Dick would go on to make just 6.3 million dollars on a 13 million dollar budget.
Which is a shame, because as part commentary on the Lewinski scandal and part parody of All The President's Men, Dick has more to say than your typical teen comedy. With two very talented stars at its core - Kirsten Dunst and Michelle Williams - It's more Election than American Pie, and portraying the Watergate conspirators as an insane, bumbling mess actually feels relevant.
You know who loves Dick? Our guest, Alex Steed, who appeared on our episode for the 1999 movie that starred that other girl from Dawson's Creek, Go.
Alex is on Bluesky @alexsteed</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/96d0acce-dddf-11ef-8506-c3642b198060/image/f02ebbc2232add5deaff7971c03c734b.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Old friend Alex Steed returns to the show to talk all about 1999's Watergate comedy/satire/teen romp "Dick"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The 145th highest-grossing movie of the year, Dick was released on August 3rd and going on take 12th place at the box office. Through no fault of its own, it was thrown into a death slot, as the films that outgrossed it included juggernauts like The Phantom Menace, American Pie, Runaway Bride, The Blair Witch Project, and a little movie that opened at the same time and took #1, The Sixth Sense,
Despite a generally warm and positive critical reception Dick would go on to make just 6.3 million dollars on a 13 million dollar budget.
Which is a shame, because as part commentary on the Lewinski scandal and part parody of All The President's Men, Dick has more to say than your typical teen comedy. With two very talented stars at its core - Kirsten Dunst and Michelle Williams - It's more Election than American Pie, and portraying the Watergate conspirators as an insane, bumbling mess actually feels relevant.
You know who loves Dick? Our guest, Alex Steed, who appeared on our episode for the 1999 movie that starred that other girl from Dawson's Creek, Go.
Alex is on Bluesky @alexsteed</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The 145th highest-grossing movie of the year, <em>Dick </em>was released on August 3rd and going on take 12th place at the box office. Through no fault of its own, it was thrown into a death slot, as the films that outgrossed it included juggernauts like <em>The Phantom Menace</em>, <em>American Pie, Runaway Bride, The Blair Witch Project</em>, and a little movie that opened at the same time and took #1, <em>The Sixth Sense</em>,</p><p>Despite a generally warm and positive critical reception <em>Dick</em> would go on to make just 6.3 million dollars on a 13 million dollar budget.</p><p>Which is a shame, because as part commentary on the Lewinski scandal and part parody of <em>All The President's Men</em>, <em>Dick </em>has more to say than your typical teen comedy. With two very talented stars at its core - Kirsten Dunst and Michelle Williams - It's more <em>Election </em>than <em>American Pie</em>, and portraying the Watergate conspirators as an insane, bumbling mess actually feels relevant.</p><p>You know who loves <em>Dick</em>? Our guest, Alex Steed, who appeared on our episode for the 1999 movie that starred that <em>other </em>girl from <em>Dawson's Creek, Go.</em></p><p>Alex is on Bluesky <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/alexsteed.bsky.social">@alexsteed</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5256</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[96d0acce-dddf-11ef-8506-c3642b198060]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN5140854377.mp3?updated=1738114086" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bonus Features - WATERGATE MEDIA</title>
      <description>We present to you our very first Bonus Features episode, where we do a little contextual research for an upcoming episode.

To start - for absolutely no reason at all, what are you even talking about? - we take a look at some of the more interesting media concerning the former Worst President of the Last 100 Years and the famous thing he did that used to pass for a scandal until *waves hands around wildly*.

Julia had to endure a lot of Nixon stuff for this one, so the least you can do is make it worth her time by listening.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2025 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/b57121c4-d540-11ef-8713-9b19c5af7d48/image/94537fbc7d413f2815e420b9292ef287.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>We present to you our very first Bonus Features episode, where we do a little contextual research for an upcoming episode.

To start - for absolutely no reason at all, what are you even talking about? - we take a look at some of the more interesting media concerning the former Worst President of the Last 100 Years and the famous thing he did that used to pass for a scandal until *waves hands around wildly*.

Julia had to endure a lot of Nixon stuff for this one, so the least you can do is make it worth her time by listening.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We present to you our very first Bonus Features episode, where we do a little contextual research for an upcoming episode.</p><p><br></p><p>To start - for absolutely no reason at all, what are you even talking about? - we take a look at some of the more interesting media concerning the former Worst President of the Last 100 Years and the famous thing he did that used to pass for a scandal until *waves hands around wildly*.</p><p><br></p><p>Julia had to endure a lot of Nixon stuff for this one, so the least you can do is make it worth her time by listening.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4415</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b57121c4-d540-11ef-8713-9b19c5af7d48]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN5604382446.mp3?updated=1737166259" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Year's Eve Special - 200 CIGARETTES </title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/200-cigarettes/0</link>
      <description>Opening CONFUSINGLY on February 26th on less than a thousand screens, 200 Cigarettes was the 143rd-highest grossing movie of the year, going on to make just shy of 7 million dollars on a 6 million dollar budget.
Directed by first-time director and accomplished casting director Risa Bramon Garcia, written by first-and-only time screenwriter Shana Larsen, and produced by first-time producer Betsy Beers, 200 Cigarettes was panned by critics shrugged off by audiences.
But over time, due in part to its compelling cast and 80s nostalgia, it developed a cult status of sorts.
And, well, it's one of only a handful of New Year's Eve films that exist, and since this is something of a bummer New Year's, we thought, well, just as the characters bury their emotions in 200 cigarettes in the film, we'd do the same with 200 Cigarettes.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e48e5f48-c727-11ef-8923-d7d92cdb3231/image/6ea08746a05a54b44a58122e8caa8b4a.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>We spend New Year's Eve talking about "200 Cigarettes", for better or worse one of the only New Year's Eve movies ever made.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Opening CONFUSINGLY on February 26th on less than a thousand screens, 200 Cigarettes was the 143rd-highest grossing movie of the year, going on to make just shy of 7 million dollars on a 6 million dollar budget.
Directed by first-time director and accomplished casting director Risa Bramon Garcia, written by first-and-only time screenwriter Shana Larsen, and produced by first-time producer Betsy Beers, 200 Cigarettes was panned by critics shrugged off by audiences.
But over time, due in part to its compelling cast and 80s nostalgia, it developed a cult status of sorts.
And, well, it's one of only a handful of New Year's Eve films that exist, and since this is something of a bummer New Year's, we thought, well, just as the characters bury their emotions in 200 cigarettes in the film, we'd do the same with 200 Cigarettes.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Opening CONFUSINGLY on February 26th on less than a thousand screens, <em>200 Cigarettes </em>was the 143rd-highest grossing movie of the year, going on to make just shy of 7 million dollars on a 6 million dollar budget.</p><p>Directed by first-time director and accomplished casting director Risa Bramon Garcia, written by first-and-only time screenwriter Shana Larsen, and produced by first-time producer Betsy Beers, <em>200 Cigarettes </em>was panned by critics shrugged off by audiences.</p><p>But over time, due in part to its compelling cast and 80s nostalgia, it developed a cult status of sorts.</p><p>And, well, it's one of only a handful of New Year's Eve films that exist, and since this is something of a bummer New Year's, we thought, well, just as the characters bury their emotions in 200 cigarettes in the film, we'd do the same with <em>200 Cigarettes.</em></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4532</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e48e5f48-c727-11ef-8923-d7d92cdb3231]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN3650958431.mp3?updated=1735616264" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Christmas Special - ONE SPECIAL NIGHT:  "Happy Hallmarky" with Audrey Fox</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/one-special-night-1999/</link>
      <description>﻿It's our third Christmas special, and once again we turn to the small screen for Christmas with Hallmark Hallo of Fame's One Special Night.
Airing Sunday, November 28th, 1999 on CBS, One Special Night stars James Garner and Julie Andrews, alongside Patricia Charbonneau, Stewart Bick ,Stacy Grant, and Danniel Magder.
Written by the highly prolific Christmas TV movie scribe Nancey Silvers and directed by accomplished TV director and Emmy winner Roger Young, One Special Night was generally praised by critics and probably beloved by our nation's grandparents at the time. It was then, however, entirely forgotten until John accidentally stumbled upon it on the internet a couple weeks ago!
So Julia and John invited film critic Audrey Fox, who recently wrote about the 25 best Hallmark Christmas movies ever, to chime in with her expert opinion!
Audrey is on Twitter @theaudreyfox and Bluesky @audreyfox
 </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 09:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4445cc98-bb55-11ef-94bc-d3f68cdfebb3/image/2c2b80909981ebeaceb590e2e925c8e1.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Film critic Audrey Fox, who recently wrote about the 25 best Hallmark Christmas movies ever, joins to talk about "One Special Night".</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>﻿It's our third Christmas special, and once again we turn to the small screen for Christmas with Hallmark Hallo of Fame's One Special Night.
Airing Sunday, November 28th, 1999 on CBS, One Special Night stars James Garner and Julie Andrews, alongside Patricia Charbonneau, Stewart Bick ,Stacy Grant, and Danniel Magder.
Written by the highly prolific Christmas TV movie scribe Nancey Silvers and directed by accomplished TV director and Emmy winner Roger Young, One Special Night was generally praised by critics and probably beloved by our nation's grandparents at the time. It was then, however, entirely forgotten until John accidentally stumbled upon it on the internet a couple weeks ago!
So Julia and John invited film critic Audrey Fox, who recently wrote about the 25 best Hallmark Christmas movies ever, to chime in with her expert opinion!
Audrey is on Twitter @theaudreyfox and Bluesky @audreyfox
 </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>﻿It's our third Christmas special, and once again we turn to the small screen for Christmas with Hallmark Hallo of Fame's <em>One Special Night.</em></p><p>Airing Sunday, November 28th, 1999 on CBS, <em>One Special Night </em>stars James Garner and Julie Andrews, alongside Patricia Charbonneau, Stewart Bick ,Stacy Grant, and Danniel Magder.</p><p>Written by the highly prolific Christmas TV movie scribe Nancey Silvers and directed by accomplished TV director and Emmy winner Roger Young, <em>One Special Night </em>was generally praised by critics and probably beloved by our nation's grandparents at the time. It was then, however, entirely forgotten until John accidentally stumbled upon it on the internet a couple weeks ago!</p><p>So Julia and John invited film critic Audrey Fox, who recently wrote about the <a href="https://www.slashfilm.com/1725024/best-hallmark-christmas-movies-ranked/">25 best Hallmark Christma</a>s movies ever, to chime in with her expert opinion!</p><p>Audrey is on Twitter <a href="https://x.com/theaudreyfox/">@theaudreyfox</a> and Bluesky <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/audreyfox.bsky.social">@audreyfox</a></p><p> </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5817</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4445cc98-bb55-11ef-94bc-d3f68cdfebb3]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN5813467232.mp3?updated=1734316338" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TITUS: "There Shalt Be Blood"  - with Carmen Paddock</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/titus-1999/</link>
      <description>Released December 25th, Christmas Day, Julie Taymor's debut feature Titus was 187th-highest grossing movie of the year, going on to gross just about three million dollars worldwide on an 18 million dollar budget.
Titus, adapted from the Shakespeare (or possibly not Shakespeare) play came on the heels of Taymor hitting the cultural spotlight with her enormous Broadway success The Lion King. Titus makes great use of her maxilamist sensibilities, given that it is Shakespeare's most violent, sensationalist play - which also explains why it is among his least-popular, and generally considered one of the worst not titled Henry VIII.
With an incredible cast and eye-catching style, and with Shakespeare adaptations as popular as ever, many assumed Titus would ride a wave of critical success and award accolades to boost its box office, but it was not meant to be.
Beautiful, violent, over-long, absurd, inspired, and tonally inconsistent, Titus is more a curiosity now than a classic.
This week, we talked about it with film critic Carmen Paddock, who, in her own words, "specializes in changing distribution methods and cross-media adaptations, where the limitations of film, literature, music, and time are explored and exploited to reveal new sides to old narratives."
Find Carmen on Bluesky @carmenchloieReleased December 25th, Christmas Day, Julie Taymor's debut feature Titus was 187th-highest grossing movie of the year, going on to gross just about three million dollars worldwide on an 18 million dollar budget.
Titus, adapted from the Shakespeare (or possibly not Shakespeare) play came on the heels of Taymor hitting the cultural spotlight with her enormous Broadway success The Lion King. Titus makes great use of her maxilamist sensibilities, given that it is Shakespeare's most violent, sensationalist play - which also explains why it is among his least-popular, and generally considered one of the worst not titled Henry VIII.
With an incredible cast and eye-catching style, and with Shakespeare adaptations as popular as ever, many assumed Titus would ride a wave of critical success and award accolades to boost its box office, but it was not meant to be.
Beautiful, violent, over-long, absurd, inspired, and tonally inconsistent, Titus is more a curiosity now than a classic.
This week, we talked about it with film critic Carmen Paddock, who, in her own words, "specializes in changing distribution methods and cross-media adaptations, where the limitations of film, literature, music, and time are explored and exploited to reveal new sides to old narratives."
Find Carmen on Bluesky @carmenchloie</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/92fc7dce-a600-11ef-a735-1b82822a428a/image/333e3e993c43b709591e9319c598a7db.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Film critic and Shakespeare fan Carman Paddock helps us pick through the bloody carcass of Julie Taymor's "Titus".</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Released December 25th, Christmas Day, Julie Taymor's debut feature Titus was 187th-highest grossing movie of the year, going on to gross just about three million dollars worldwide on an 18 million dollar budget.
Titus, adapted from the Shakespeare (or possibly not Shakespeare) play came on the heels of Taymor hitting the cultural spotlight with her enormous Broadway success The Lion King. Titus makes great use of her maxilamist sensibilities, given that it is Shakespeare's most violent, sensationalist play - which also explains why it is among his least-popular, and generally considered one of the worst not titled Henry VIII.
With an incredible cast and eye-catching style, and with Shakespeare adaptations as popular as ever, many assumed Titus would ride a wave of critical success and award accolades to boost its box office, but it was not meant to be.
Beautiful, violent, over-long, absurd, inspired, and tonally inconsistent, Titus is more a curiosity now than a classic.
This week, we talked about it with film critic Carmen Paddock, who, in her own words, "specializes in changing distribution methods and cross-media adaptations, where the limitations of film, literature, music, and time are explored and exploited to reveal new sides to old narratives."
Find Carmen on Bluesky @carmenchloieReleased December 25th, Christmas Day, Julie Taymor's debut feature Titus was 187th-highest grossing movie of the year, going on to gross just about three million dollars worldwide on an 18 million dollar budget.
Titus, adapted from the Shakespeare (or possibly not Shakespeare) play came on the heels of Taymor hitting the cultural spotlight with her enormous Broadway success The Lion King. Titus makes great use of her maxilamist sensibilities, given that it is Shakespeare's most violent, sensationalist play - which also explains why it is among his least-popular, and generally considered one of the worst not titled Henry VIII.
With an incredible cast and eye-catching style, and with Shakespeare adaptations as popular as ever, many assumed Titus would ride a wave of critical success and award accolades to boost its box office, but it was not meant to be.
Beautiful, violent, over-long, absurd, inspired, and tonally inconsistent, Titus is more a curiosity now than a classic.
This week, we talked about it with film critic Carmen Paddock, who, in her own words, "specializes in changing distribution methods and cross-media adaptations, where the limitations of film, literature, music, and time are explored and exploited to reveal new sides to old narratives."
Find Carmen on Bluesky @carmenchloie</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Released December 25th, Christmas Day, Julie Taymor's debut feature <em>Titus </em>was 187th-highest grossing movie of the year, going on to gross just about three million dollars worldwide on an 18 million dollar budget.</p><p><em>Titus</em>, adapted from the Shakespeare (or possibly not Shakespeare) play came on the heels of Taymor hitting the cultural spotlight with her enormous Broadway success <em>The Lion King. Titus</em> makes great use of her maxilamist sensibilities, given that it is Shakespeare's most violent, sensationalist play - which also explains why it is among his least-popular, and generally considered one of the worst not titled <em>Henry VIII.</em></p><p>With an incredible cast and eye-catching style, and with Shakespeare adaptations as popular as ever, many assumed <em>Titus </em>would ride a wave of critical success and award accolades to boost its box office, but it was not meant to be.</p><p>Beautiful, violent, over-long, absurd, inspired, and tonally inconsistent, <em>Titus </em>is more a curiosity now than a classic.</p><p>This week, we talked about it with film critic Carmen Paddock, who, in her own words, "specializes in changing distribution methods and cross-media adaptations, where the limitations of film, literature, music, and time are explored and exploited to reveal new sides to old narratives."</p><p>Find Carmen on Bluesky <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/carmenchloie.bsky.social">@carmenchloie</a>Released December 25th, Christmas Day, Julie Taymor's debut feature <em>Titus </em>was 187th-highest grossing movie of the year, going on to gross just about three million dollars worldwide on an 18 million dollar budget.</p><p><em>Titus</em>, adapted from the Shakespeare (or possibly not Shakespeare) play came on the heels of Taymor hitting the cultural spotlight with her enormous Broadway success <em>The Lion King. Titus</em> makes great use of her maxilamist sensibilities, given that it is Shakespeare's most violent, sensationalist play - which also explains why it is among his least-popular, and generally considered one of the worst not titled <em>Henry VIII.</em></p><p>With an incredible cast and eye-catching style, and with Shakespeare adaptations as popular as ever, many assumed <em>Titus </em>would ride a wave of critical success and award accolades to boost its box office, but it was not meant to be.</p><p>Beautiful, violent, over-long, absurd, inspired, and tonally inconsistent, <em>Titus </em>is more a curiosity now than a classic.</p><p>This week, we talked about it with film critic Carmen Paddock, who, in her own words, "specializes in changing distribution methods and cross-media adaptations, where the limitations of film, literature, music, and time are explored and exploited to reveal new sides to old narratives."</p><p>Find Carmen on Bluesky <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/carmenchloie.bsky.social">@carmenchloie</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5301</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[92fc7dce-a600-11ef-a735-1b82822a428a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN5185414052.mp3?updated=1731970987" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GIRL, INTERRUPTED: "Interrupted" with Jane Altoids</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/girl-interrupted-1999/</link>
      <description>Girl, Interrupted was the 70th-highest grossing movie of 1999, released in a very limited run just before Christmas to make it eligible for awards season. It would ultimately go on to earn $48 million worldwide on a $40 million budget.
Directed and co-written by Copland director James Mangold from the memoir "Girl, Interrupted" by Susanna Kaysen, the film was a longtime dream project for star Winona Ryder, who fought hard for years to get it made. It was presented as obvious Oscar bait, but the film had a mixed response from audiences and critics, who found it uneven and lacking a narrative core.
Still, Girl, Interrupted earned universal praise for its performances, including the breakthrough one from Angeline Jolie, who won the Best Supporting Actress Oscar for her performance as the sociopathic Lisa.
It was also praised for what at the time was an unusually nuanced and sensitive portrayal of mental health disorders. But how has Girl, Interrupted aged? Was it too ahead of its time, or is it too of its time to stand on its own today?
John and Julia welcomed Film Twitter superstar Jane Altoids for her take.
Jane is on Twitter @staticbluebat</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 09:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fa23722e-9a29-11ef-8967-4ff814acf1a4/image/fc13a28e960a9a9d6175df8073d49042.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Film Twitter superstar and mint dynasty scion Jane Altoids joins John and Julia to talk about the Winona Ryder passion project, "Girl, Interrupted"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Girl, Interrupted was the 70th-highest grossing movie of 1999, released in a very limited run just before Christmas to make it eligible for awards season. It would ultimately go on to earn $48 million worldwide on a $40 million budget.
Directed and co-written by Copland director James Mangold from the memoir "Girl, Interrupted" by Susanna Kaysen, the film was a longtime dream project for star Winona Ryder, who fought hard for years to get it made. It was presented as obvious Oscar bait, but the film had a mixed response from audiences and critics, who found it uneven and lacking a narrative core.
Still, Girl, Interrupted earned universal praise for its performances, including the breakthrough one from Angeline Jolie, who won the Best Supporting Actress Oscar for her performance as the sociopathic Lisa.
It was also praised for what at the time was an unusually nuanced and sensitive portrayal of mental health disorders. But how has Girl, Interrupted aged? Was it too ahead of its time, or is it too of its time to stand on its own today?
John and Julia welcomed Film Twitter superstar Jane Altoids for her take.
Jane is on Twitter @staticbluebat</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Girl, Interrupted </em>was the 70th-highest grossing movie of 1999, released in a very limited run just before Christmas to make it eligible for awards season. It would ultimately go on to earn $48 million worldwide on a $40 million budget.</p><p>Directed and co-written by <em>Copland</em> director James Mangold from the memoir "Girl, Interrupted" by Susanna Kaysen, the film was a longtime dream project for star Winona Ryder, who fought hard for years to get it made. It was presented as obvious Oscar bait, but the film had a mixed response from audiences and critics, who found it uneven and lacking a narrative core.</p><p>Still, <em>Girl, Interrupted</em> earned universal praise for its performances, including the breakthrough one from Angeline Jolie, who won the Best Supporting Actress Oscar for her performance as the sociopathic Lisa.</p><p>It was also praised for what at the time was an unusually nuanced and sensitive portrayal of mental health disorders. But how has <em>Girl, Interrupted </em>aged? Was it too ahead of its time, or is it too of its time to stand on its own today?</p><p>John and Julia welcomed Film Twitter superstar Jane Altoids for her take.</p><p>Jane is on Twitter <a href="https://x.com/cinemalins">@staticbluebat</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5501</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[fa23722e-9a29-11ef-8967-4ff814acf1a4]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN9946642708.mp3?updated=1730669356" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MAN ON THE MOON : "Andy" with Sean Malin</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/man-on-the-moon-1999/</link>
      <description>If there was a surprise critical and commercial failure for the year, it was Forman’s highly anticipated, Oscar-baiting Andy Kauffman biopic, Man on the Moon.

Among other things, Man on the Moon was touted as a second chance for Carrey to nab a best actor Oscar, following what had roundly been seen as an epic snub for his denial of the award for The Truman Show. 

It had a lot going for it - an exploration of the tragic and mysterious life of an obscure but beloved cultural figure, directed by the Oscar-winning director of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest and Amadeus. Forman had just come off the critical and commercial success of The People Vs. Larry Flynt, written as well by Alexander and Karaszewski, who, with that film and 1994’s Ed Wood had developed a reputation as having cracked the elusive biopic formula, which they described as the “anti-biopic".

Unfortunately, while it did earn his his second consecutive Golden Globe, Man on the Moon was shut out from the Oscars, and the film seemed to find some way to disappoint basically everyone, even those who loved it.

This week, we invited cultural critic and giant Man on the Moon fan Sean Malin to talk about Carrey, Kaufman, and that most uneven of genres, the biopic.

Sean is on Twitter @cinemalins</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ab05542e-8f47-11ef-b149-ff93b2edfc2e/image/0f77782fa936323847c03d122121eac2.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Writer/critic Sean Malin joins John and Julia to talk Kaufman, Carey, and the biopic genre as they look at Milos Forman's "Man on the Moon"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>If there was a surprise critical and commercial failure for the year, it was Forman’s highly anticipated, Oscar-baiting Andy Kauffman biopic, Man on the Moon.

Among other things, Man on the Moon was touted as a second chance for Carrey to nab a best actor Oscar, following what had roundly been seen as an epic snub for his denial of the award for The Truman Show. 

It had a lot going for it - an exploration of the tragic and mysterious life of an obscure but beloved cultural figure, directed by the Oscar-winning director of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest and Amadeus. Forman had just come off the critical and commercial success of The People Vs. Larry Flynt, written as well by Alexander and Karaszewski, who, with that film and 1994’s Ed Wood had developed a reputation as having cracked the elusive biopic formula, which they described as the “anti-biopic".

Unfortunately, while it did earn his his second consecutive Golden Globe, Man on the Moon was shut out from the Oscars, and the film seemed to find some way to disappoint basically everyone, even those who loved it.

This week, we invited cultural critic and giant Man on the Moon fan Sean Malin to talk about Carrey, Kaufman, and that most uneven of genres, the biopic.

Sean is on Twitter @cinemalins</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>If there was a surprise critical <em>and </em>commercial failure for the year, it was Forman’s highly anticipated, Oscar-baiting Andy Kauffman biopic, <em>Man on the Moon.</em></p><p><br></p><p>Among other things, <em>Man on the Moon</em> was touted as a second chance for Carrey to nab a best actor Oscar, following what had roundly been seen as an epic snub for his denial of the award for <em>The Truman Show. </em></p><p><br></p><p>It had a lot going for it - an exploration of the tragic and mysterious life of an obscure but beloved cultural figure, directed by the Oscar-winning director of <em>One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest</em> and <em>Amadeus.</em> Forman had just come off the critical and commercial success of <em>The People Vs. Larry Flynt</em>, written as well by Alexander and Karaszewski, who, with that film and 1994’s <em>Ed Wood</em> had developed a reputation as having cracked the elusive biopic formula, which they described as the “anti-biopic".</p><p><br></p><p>Unfortunately, while it did earn his his second consecutive Golden Globe, <em>Man on the Moon</em> was shut out from the Oscars, and the film seemed to find some way to disappoint basically everyone, even those who loved it.</p><p><br></p><p>This week, we invited cultural critic and giant <em>Man on the Moon </em>fan Sean Malin to talk about Carrey, Kaufman, and that most uneven of genres, the biopic.</p><p><br></p><p>Sean is on Twitter <a href="https://x.com/cinemalins">@cinemalins</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5567</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ab05542e-8f47-11ef-b149-ff93b2edfc2e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN5163789689.mp3?updated=1729472645" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PAYBACK: "Mel"  - with Jim Woods</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/payback-1999/</link>
      <description>Payback was something of a surprise - and largely forgotten - minor hit, riding mostly on the coattails of Mel Gibson at the height of his popularity and box office appeal, having come off a string of hits, including 1994’s Maverick, 1995’s Oscar-winning Braveheart, 1996’s Ransom, and 1997’s Conspiracy Theory, as well as the prestige of Brian Helgeland, who had just won an avalanche awards, including the Oscar, for writing LA Confidential as well as the aforementioned Conspiracy Theory.

But the production of Payback also opened a window to some of the personal and professional issues surrounding Gibson that would become increasingly apparent in the years leading up to his career crash in the mid-2000s. 

Unhappy with the direction of the film Helgeland wrote and director, Gibson had Helgeland fired and reworked and reshot much of the movie, adding Kristofferson's character to the story and changing much of the tone and arc of the main character Porter.

As a result, Payback is actually two movies - the theatrically-released Gibson vision released in 1999 and the Helgeland cut, released on Blu-ray 7 years later, officially titled Payback: Straight Up.

We had writer and Payback superfan Jim Woods on to talk about both!

You can find out everything you need to know about Jim on his website: Jim Woods Writes</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 23:27:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ae621f1a-8503-11ef-aa3d-7b9a824b7172/image/ffe938e6155731a153c8614ea4af814b.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Writer Jim Woods, the world's biggest fan of "Payback", joins John and Julia to talk about "Payback".</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Payback was something of a surprise - and largely forgotten - minor hit, riding mostly on the coattails of Mel Gibson at the height of his popularity and box office appeal, having come off a string of hits, including 1994’s Maverick, 1995’s Oscar-winning Braveheart, 1996’s Ransom, and 1997’s Conspiracy Theory, as well as the prestige of Brian Helgeland, who had just won an avalanche awards, including the Oscar, for writing LA Confidential as well as the aforementioned Conspiracy Theory.

But the production of Payback also opened a window to some of the personal and professional issues surrounding Gibson that would become increasingly apparent in the years leading up to his career crash in the mid-2000s. 

Unhappy with the direction of the film Helgeland wrote and director, Gibson had Helgeland fired and reworked and reshot much of the movie, adding Kristofferson's character to the story and changing much of the tone and arc of the main character Porter.

As a result, Payback is actually two movies - the theatrically-released Gibson vision released in 1999 and the Helgeland cut, released on Blu-ray 7 years later, officially titled Payback: Straight Up.

We had writer and Payback superfan Jim Woods on to talk about both!

You can find out everything you need to know about Jim on his website: Jim Woods Writes</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Payback</em> was something of a surprise - and largely forgotten - minor hit, riding mostly on the coattails of Mel Gibson at the height of his popularity and box office appeal, having come off a string of hits, including 1994’s <em>Maverick</em>, 1995’s Oscar-winning <em>Braveheart</em>, 1996’s <em>Ransom</em>, and 1997’s <em>Conspiracy Theory</em>, as well as the prestige of Brian Helgeland, who had just won an avalanche awards, including the Oscar, for writing <em>LA Confidential</em> as well as the aforementioned <em>Conspiracy Theory.</em></p><p><br></p><p>But the production of <em>Payback</em> also opened a window to some of the personal and professional issues surrounding Gibson that would become increasingly apparent in the years leading up to his career crash in the mid-2000s. </p><p><br></p><p>Unhappy with the direction of the film Helgeland wrote and director, Gibson had Helgeland fired and reworked and reshot much of the movie, adding Kristofferson's character to the story and changing much of the tone and arc of the main character Porter.</p><p><br></p><p>As a result, <em>Payback </em>is actually two movies - the theatrically-released Gibson vision released in 1999 and the Helgeland cut, released on Blu-ray 7 years later, officially titled <em>Payback: Straight Up.</em></p><p><br></p><p>We had writer and <em>Payback </em>superfan Jim Woods on to talk about both!</p><p><br></p><p>You can find out everything you need to know about Jim on his website: <a href="https://jimwoodswrites.com/">Jim Woods Writes</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5581</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ae621f1a-8503-11ef-aa3d-7b9a824b7172]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN6738176827.mp3?updated=1728343934" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUMMER OF SAM: "S.O.S." - with Julia Sirmons</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/summer-of-sam/</link>
      <description>Spike Lee's Summer of Sam should have been the perfect 1999 movie.

After Lee’s breakthrough 1989 film Do the Right Thing, he was on a roll in the 90s, giving us 1990s’ Mo Better Blues, 1991’s Jungle Fever, 1992’s Malcolm X, 1994’s Crooklyn, 1995’s Clockers, 1996’s Get on the Bus, and 1998’s He Got Game.

And so a gritty, Scorsese-esque New York crime like Summer of Sam headlined by the rising star Brody and Leguizamo at his most popular seemed like a no-brainer. And maybe because its nearly two and a half hour run time just didn’t appeal to audiences in the middle of summer, for some reason SoS (which served as a near-perfect metaphor for the anxiety of pre-Y2K America) just never caught on with critics or at the box office.

But has our equally volatile (and true crime obsessed) 2024 America made the film newly relevant? And where does it stand in Spike Lee's oeuvre?

To discuss, John welcomed back film and culture writer and frequent guest Julia Sirmons to the show.
 </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/a31da5ee-7936-11ef-b02d-933d1e170b89/image/a5bca7fac8f351b0c14482d4dc703f95.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Julia Sirmons returns to talk about Spike Lee's gritty, ambitious dud, "Summer of Sam"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Spike Lee's Summer of Sam should have been the perfect 1999 movie.

After Lee’s breakthrough 1989 film Do the Right Thing, he was on a roll in the 90s, giving us 1990s’ Mo Better Blues, 1991’s Jungle Fever, 1992’s Malcolm X, 1994’s Crooklyn, 1995’s Clockers, 1996’s Get on the Bus, and 1998’s He Got Game.

And so a gritty, Scorsese-esque New York crime like Summer of Sam headlined by the rising star Brody and Leguizamo at his most popular seemed like a no-brainer. And maybe because its nearly two and a half hour run time just didn’t appeal to audiences in the middle of summer, for some reason SoS (which served as a near-perfect metaphor for the anxiety of pre-Y2K America) just never caught on with critics or at the box office.

But has our equally volatile (and true crime obsessed) 2024 America made the film newly relevant? And where does it stand in Spike Lee's oeuvre?

To discuss, John welcomed back film and culture writer and frequent guest Julia Sirmons to the show.
 </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Spike Lee's Summer<em> of Sam</em> should have been the perfect 1999 movie.</p><p><br></p><p>After Lee’s breakthrough 1989 film <em>Do the Right Thing</em>, he was on a roll in the 90s, giving us 1990s’ <em>Mo Better Blues</em>, 1991’s <em>Jungle Fever</em>, 1992’s <em>Malcolm X</em>, 1994’s <em>Crooklyn</em>, 1995’s <em>Clockers</em>, 1996’s <em>Get on the Bus</em>, and 1998’s <em>He Got Game</em>.</p><p><br></p><p>And so a gritty, Scorsese-esque New York crime like <em>Summer of Sam </em>headlined by the rising star Brody and Leguizamo at his most popular seemed like a no-brainer. And maybe because its nearly two and a half hour run time just didn’t appeal to audiences in the middle of summer, for some reason <em>SoS </em>(which served as a near-perfect metaphor for the anxiety of pre-Y2K America) just never caught on with critics or at the box office.</p><p><br></p><p>But has our equally volatile (and true crime obsessed) 2024 America made the film newly relevant? And where does it stand in Spike Lee's oeuvre?</p><p><br></p><p>To discuss, John welcomed back film and culture writer and frequent guest Julia Sirmons to the show.</p><p> </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5341</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a31da5ee-7936-11ef-b02d-933d1e170b89]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN5396657285.mp3?updated=1727046405" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE EMPTY CINEMA - A Special Summer Episode</title>
      <description>John and Jenn take a crack at explaining the baffling summer 2024 box office. Why did PLANER OF THE APES and FURIOSA fail where INSIDE OUT 2 succeeded? Is the summer movie season a thing of the past? And why do people seem less inclined to go to the movie theater for just ANYTHING?

Covid? Prices? Capitalism? All of the above?

Find out what we have to say in this special summer episode about America's increasingly, depressingly empty cinemas.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 07:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e7a28c1e-4d50-11ef-a9dd-938a997945f2/image/01a0e1fb3ac17f0d06ec9125c8bd7a1e.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>John and Jenn take a crack at explaining the baffling summer 2024 box office. Why did PLANER OF THE APES and FURIOSA fail where INSIDE OUT 2 succeeded? Is the summer movie season a thing of the past? And why do people seem less inclined to go to the movie theater for just ANYTHING?

Covid? Prices? Capitalism? All of the above?

Find out what we have to say in this special summer episode about America's increasingly, depressingly empty cinemas.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>John and Jenn take a crack at explaining the baffling summer 2024 box office. Why did PLANER OF THE APES and FURIOSA fail where INSIDE OUT 2 succeeded? Is the summer movie season a thing of the past? And why do people seem less inclined to go to the movie theater for just ANYTHING?</p><p><br></p><p>Covid? Prices? Capitalism? All of the above?</p><p><br></p><p>Find out what we have to say in this special summer episode about America's increasingly, depressingly empty cinemas.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3117</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e7a28c1e-4d50-11ef-a9dd-938a997945f2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN9987676894.mp3?updated=1722219836" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ARLINGTON ROAD: "Boom" - with Matt Belenky</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/arlington-road-1999/</link>
      <description>Arlington Road was 77th highest grossing movie of 1999, released 25 years ago last week on July 9th, unfortunately crowded out by some other big releases, namely American Pie, released the same day, as well as Wild Wild West, Tarzan, and The General's Daughter, all in their second weeks.
Directed by acclaimed music video director Mark Pellington (Pearl Jam's "Jeremy"), with a script from future Oscar nominee Ehren Kruger. a score by David Lynch’s personal composer Angelo Badalamenti, and starring two of the finest actors of their generation, Jeff Bridges and Tim Robbins, Arlington Road has a lot going for it.
25 years later, it's also turned out to be one of the most prescient and relevant movies of the year. At times unbearably tense, deadly serious, and eye-rollingly goofy, it's ambitious, uneven, and incredibly entertaining.
Lawyer, occasional movie producer, and writer Matt Belenky is probably the world's most biggest Arlington Road fan (prove us wrong!), so John and Jenn invited him on to look back on this very 1990s genre film.
Find Matt on Twitter @JagrWatch68</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f9fdfbd8-424b-11ef-b8c4-cf81475de283/image/da15778f76ff7d06c35571f43fd23cfe.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Matt Belenky joins us to talk about one of 1999's most overlooked gems, the paranoid thriller "Arlington Road"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Arlington Road was 77th highest grossing movie of 1999, released 25 years ago last week on July 9th, unfortunately crowded out by some other big releases, namely American Pie, released the same day, as well as Wild Wild West, Tarzan, and The General's Daughter, all in their second weeks.
Directed by acclaimed music video director Mark Pellington (Pearl Jam's "Jeremy"), with a script from future Oscar nominee Ehren Kruger. a score by David Lynch’s personal composer Angelo Badalamenti, and starring two of the finest actors of their generation, Jeff Bridges and Tim Robbins, Arlington Road has a lot going for it.
25 years later, it's also turned out to be one of the most prescient and relevant movies of the year. At times unbearably tense, deadly serious, and eye-rollingly goofy, it's ambitious, uneven, and incredibly entertaining.
Lawyer, occasional movie producer, and writer Matt Belenky is probably the world's most biggest Arlington Road fan (prove us wrong!), so John and Jenn invited him on to look back on this very 1990s genre film.
Find Matt on Twitter @JagrWatch68</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Arlington Road was </em>77th highest grossing movie of 1999, released 25 years ago last week on July 9th, unfortunately crowded out by some other big releases, namely <em>American Pie</em>, released the same day, as well as <em>Wild Wild West, Tarzan</em>, and <em>The General's Daughter</em>, all in their second weeks.</p><p>Directed by acclaimed music video director Mark Pellington (Pearl Jam's "Jeremy"), with a script from future Oscar nominee Ehren Kruger. a score by David Lynch’s personal composer Angelo Badalamenti, and starring two of the finest actors of their generation, Jeff Bridges and Tim Robbins, <em>Arlington Road</em> has <em>a lot</em> going for it.</p><p>25 years later, it's also turned out to be one of the most prescient and relevant movies of the year. At times unbearably tense, deadly serious, and eye-rollingly goofy, it's ambitious, uneven, and incredibly entertaining.</p><p>Lawyer, occasional movie producer, and writer Matt Belenky is probably the world's most biggest <em>Arlington Road</em> fan (prove us wrong!), so John and Jenn invited him on to look back on this very 1990s genre film.</p><p>Find Matt on Twitter <a href="https://x.com/JagrWatch68">@JagrWatch68</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6807</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f9fdfbd8-424b-11ef-b8c4-cf81475de283]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN4767139922.mp3?updated=1721008256" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOUTH PARK - Summer Rerelease! - with George Freitag</title>
      <description>South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut is...very funny.
It's also absurd, obscene, and one of the best movie musicals not called Moulin Rouge of the last few decades.
The humor of the show and the movie, though, has always been too things - edgy (bordering on shocking) and timely. South Park the series has produced some of the smartest, most incisive satire anywhere in its 25 years of existence, but that kind of humor doesn't always age well?
So how does this movie hold up in that regard? We asked someone who loved it at the time - John's friend George Freitag - if he would still rave to strangers about it at Denny's like he did 23 years ago.
Blame Canada, join La Resistance, and save Terrence and Phillip as we talk about South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut, a title that refers solely to the the fact that the movie is bigger and longer than an episode of the show and did not have to be edited for television!
Find George on Twitter if it still exists @georgefreitag</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 18:18:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/444358f8-37d6-11ef-87d0-07b8708b7172/image/966036231f27e890328d932d71c1e94a.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>A special 25th anniversary rerelease!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut is...very funny.
It's also absurd, obscene, and one of the best movie musicals not called Moulin Rouge of the last few decades.
The humor of the show and the movie, though, has always been too things - edgy (bordering on shocking) and timely. South Park the series has produced some of the smartest, most incisive satire anywhere in its 25 years of existence, but that kind of humor doesn't always age well?
So how does this movie hold up in that regard? We asked someone who loved it at the time - John's friend George Freitag - if he would still rave to strangers about it at Denny's like he did 23 years ago.
Blame Canada, join La Resistance, and save Terrence and Phillip as we talk about South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut, a title that refers solely to the the fact that the movie is bigger and longer than an episode of the show and did not have to be edited for television!
Find George on Twitter if it still exists @georgefreitag</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut </em>is...very funny.</p><p>It's also absurd, obscene, and one of the best movie musicals not called <em>Moulin Rouge </em>of the last few decades.</p><p>The humor of the show and the movie, though, has always been too things - edgy (bordering on shocking) and timely. <em>South Park</em> the series has produced some of the smartest, most incisive satire anywhere in its 25 years of existence, but that kind of humor doesn't always age well?</p><p>So how does this movie hold up in that regard? We asked someone who loved it at the time - John's friend George Freitag - if he would still rave to strangers about it at Denny's like he did 23 years ago.</p><p>Blame Canada, join La Resistance, and save Terrence and Phillip as we talk about <em>South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut</em>, a title that refers solely to the the fact that the movie is bigger and longer than an episode of the show and did not have to be edited for television!</p><p>Find George on Twitter if it still exists <a href="https://twitter.com/georgefreitag">@georgefreitag</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5052</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[444358f8-37d6-11ef-87d0-07b8708b7172]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN4616099011.mp3?updated=1719858189" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TARZAN - Summer Rerelease! - with Heather Antos</title>
      <description>Disney’s Tarzan was, as the 6th-highest grossing movie of the year, a big hit. But it also had a giant budget. Made for $130 million, it grossed $171 million domestically and $448 million worldwide. 
Tarzan did well with critics, as well. It was nominated for more than 2 dozen different awards, and won the Oscar and Golden Globe for best original song, Phil Collins’ “You’ll Be in My Heart”. 
It holds a an 89 percent Rotten Tomatoes score with more than 100 reviews, and 79 Metacritic score with 27 reviews, putting it right in the middle of the pack of the so-called Disney Renaissance films.
But, oddly, this de facto grand finale of the Disney hand-drawn era just doesn't loom as large as the like of The Lion King, Aladdin, Beauty and the Beast, or even Hercules.
It will, however, always be in the heart (get it?) of our guest, artist and senior editor at IDW, Heather Antos. She joins John and Joey to talk about why Tarzan is great and deserves its seat in the Disney pantheon.
Heather is on Twitter @HeatherAntos</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:51:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/35d6ca90-3239-11ef-a544-1b4ea43aa90a/image/3741a9946da94ea48d09470f47a86872.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Artist and IDW's senior editor Heather Antos talks to John and Joey about her love of Disney's adaptation of the beloved Edgar Rice Burroughs character. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Disney’s Tarzan was, as the 6th-highest grossing movie of the year, a big hit. But it also had a giant budget. Made for $130 million, it grossed $171 million domestically and $448 million worldwide. 
Tarzan did well with critics, as well. It was nominated for more than 2 dozen different awards, and won the Oscar and Golden Globe for best original song, Phil Collins’ “You’ll Be in My Heart”. 
It holds a an 89 percent Rotten Tomatoes score with more than 100 reviews, and 79 Metacritic score with 27 reviews, putting it right in the middle of the pack of the so-called Disney Renaissance films.
But, oddly, this de facto grand finale of the Disney hand-drawn era just doesn't loom as large as the like of The Lion King, Aladdin, Beauty and the Beast, or even Hercules.
It will, however, always be in the heart (get it?) of our guest, artist and senior editor at IDW, Heather Antos. She joins John and Joey to talk about why Tarzan is great and deserves its seat in the Disney pantheon.
Heather is on Twitter @HeatherAntos</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Disney’s <em>Tarzan</em> was, as the 6th-highest grossing movie of the year, a big hit. But it also had a giant budget. Made for $130 million, it grossed $171 million domestically and $448 million worldwide. </p><p><em>Tarzan</em> did well with critics, as well. It was nominated for more than 2 dozen different awards, and won the Oscar and Golden Globe for best original song, Phil Collins’ “You’ll Be in My Heart”. </p><p>It holds a an 89 percent Rotten Tomatoes score with more than 100 reviews, and 79 Metacritic score with 27 reviews, putting it right in the middle of the pack of the so-called Disney Renaissance films.</p><p>But, oddly, this de facto grand finale of the Disney hand-drawn era just doesn't loom as large as the like of <em>The Lion King, Aladdin, Beauty and the Beast, </em>or even <em>Hercules</em>.</p><p>It <em>will</em>, however, always <em>be in the heart </em>(get it?) of our guest, artist and senior editor at IDW, Heather Antos. She joins John and Joey to talk about why <em>Tarzan </em>is great and deserves its seat in the Disney pantheon.</p><p>Heather is on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/HeatherAntos">@HeatherAntos</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4852</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[35d6ca90-3239-11ef-a544-1b4ea43aa90a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN7330675466.mp3?updated=1719240977" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THREE TO TANGO: "No La Tango" - with R. Lee Fleming Jr.</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/three-to-tango-1999/ </link>
      <description>Three to Tango was the 126th-highest grossing movie of 1999, sandwiched between two movies we have covered already, Drop Dead Gorgeous at 125, and Bats at 127. 
It opened in 8th place (behind Bats, which it would ultimately outgross) on the very not rom-com season of October the 22nd, going on to gross 10 and a half million dollars worldwide on a 20 million dollar budget.
Three to Tango - which, we can't stress enough, features no tango or dancing of any kind - was written by Aline Brosch McKenna, who would go on to write romcoms like 27 Dresses and Laws of Attraction in addition to the likes of Morning Glory, Cruella, The Devil Wears Prada, and We Bought a Zoo, along with Rodney Patrick Vaccaro, who did not go on to write those things
Starring Matthew Perry, Neve Campbell, Dylan McDermott, Oliver Platt, John C. McGinley, Bob Balaban, Deborah Rush, Kelly Rowan, and (appropriately) Sue for Swingers Patrick van Horn, Three to Tango has a stellar cast, but it was not one of the highest grossing romcoms of the year.
She's All That, however, was. So we invited the writer of that movie, R. Lee Fleming Jr., to talk to us about Three to Tango.
Lee is on twitter @QualityShorts</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/8950d4f2-26ba-11ef-bcb8-77bcd3058f94/image/e5cfd5e67b5241ffc80d52737fa0c284.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>"She's All That" writer R. Lee Fleming Jr. joins John and Jenn to talk about the tango-free romcom, "Three to Tango"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Three to Tango was the 126th-highest grossing movie of 1999, sandwiched between two movies we have covered already, Drop Dead Gorgeous at 125, and Bats at 127. 
It opened in 8th place (behind Bats, which it would ultimately outgross) on the very not rom-com season of October the 22nd, going on to gross 10 and a half million dollars worldwide on a 20 million dollar budget.
Three to Tango - which, we can't stress enough, features no tango or dancing of any kind - was written by Aline Brosch McKenna, who would go on to write romcoms like 27 Dresses and Laws of Attraction in addition to the likes of Morning Glory, Cruella, The Devil Wears Prada, and We Bought a Zoo, along with Rodney Patrick Vaccaro, who did not go on to write those things
Starring Matthew Perry, Neve Campbell, Dylan McDermott, Oliver Platt, John C. McGinley, Bob Balaban, Deborah Rush, Kelly Rowan, and (appropriately) Sue for Swingers Patrick van Horn, Three to Tango has a stellar cast, but it was not one of the highest grossing romcoms of the year.
She's All That, however, was. So we invited the writer of that movie, R. Lee Fleming Jr., to talk to us about Three to Tango.
Lee is on twitter @QualityShorts</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Three to Tango was</em> the 126th-highest grossing movie of 1999, sandwiched between two movies we have covered already, <em>Drop Dead Gorgeous</em> at 125, and <em>Bats</em> at 127. </p><p>It opened in 8th place (behind <em>Bats</em>, which it would ultimately outgross) on the very not rom-com season of October the 22nd, going on to gross 10 and a half million dollars worldwide on a 20 million dollar budget.</p><p><em>Three to Tango - </em>which, we can't stress enough, features no tango or dancing of any kind - was written by Aline Brosch McKenna, who would go on to write romcoms like <em>27 Dresses</em> and <em>Laws of Attraction</em> in addition to the likes of <em>Morning Glory</em>, <em>Cruella, The Devil Wears Prada</em>, and <em>We Bought a Zoo</em>, along with Rodney Patrick Vaccaro, who did not go on to write those things</p><p>Starring Matthew Perry, Neve Campbell, Dylan McDermott, Oliver Platt, John C. McGinley, Bob Balaban, Deborah Rush, Kelly Rowan, and (appropriately) Sue for <em>Swingers</em> Patrick van Horn, <em>Three to Tango </em>has a stellar cast, but it was not one of the highest grossing romcoms of the year.</p><p><em>She's All That</em>, however, was. So we invited the writer of <em>that</em> movie, R. Lee Fleming Jr., to talk to us about <em>Three to Tango</em>.</p><p>Lee is on twitter <a href="https://x.com/QualityShorts">@QualityShorts</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6499</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8950d4f2-26ba-11ef-bcb8-77bcd3058f94]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN4225276850.mp3?updated=1717977109" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NEVER BEEN KISSED: "Grosie" - with Trae Crowder and Corey Ryan Forrester</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/never-been-kissed-trae-crowder-corey-ryan-forrester/</link>
      <description>Never Been Kissed was the 43-rd highest grossing movie of the year, just edging out last week's Forces of Nature (though proving far more profitable) at the box office.
Never Been Kissed opened April 9th, pitting it against The Matrix in its second week, but still managed to post an impressive second place finish for the week, taking in 14 million dollars. This is largely thanks to the overwhelming popularity of star Drew Barrymore, coming off consecutive romantic hits in 1998 with Ever After and The Wedding Singer.
It's a strange movie with an, um, uncomfortable premise. It's part farce, part tragedy, part love story (all of which tends to be true of Shakespeare's plays, from which it draws its narrative template). Never Been Kissed also became a huge home video hit, watched a rewatched by its target demo for years after, as Barrymore's "Josie Grosie" became an Elder Gen-X/Millennial folk hero.
This week, John and Jenn welcome comedians, podcasters, and, as of recently, authors Trae Crowder and Corey Ryan Forrester to talk about high school trauma, inappropriate relationships, the ethics of the 1990s, and Drew.
Trae is on Twitter @traecrowder
Corey is on Twitter @coreyrforrester</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/57db3016-1b7a-11ef-bbe9-d358168d87b9/image/f4a06b340cc96a7e059ff5572505cfed.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Trae Crowder and Corey Ryan Forrester join to talk about high school trauma, inappropriate relationships, the ethics of the 1990s, and Drew Barrymore in "Never Been Kissed"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Never Been Kissed was the 43-rd highest grossing movie of the year, just edging out last week's Forces of Nature (though proving far more profitable) at the box office.
Never Been Kissed opened April 9th, pitting it against The Matrix in its second week, but still managed to post an impressive second place finish for the week, taking in 14 million dollars. This is largely thanks to the overwhelming popularity of star Drew Barrymore, coming off consecutive romantic hits in 1998 with Ever After and The Wedding Singer.
It's a strange movie with an, um, uncomfortable premise. It's part farce, part tragedy, part love story (all of which tends to be true of Shakespeare's plays, from which it draws its narrative template). Never Been Kissed also became a huge home video hit, watched a rewatched by its target demo for years after, as Barrymore's "Josie Grosie" became an Elder Gen-X/Millennial folk hero.
This week, John and Jenn welcome comedians, podcasters, and, as of recently, authors Trae Crowder and Corey Ryan Forrester to talk about high school trauma, inappropriate relationships, the ethics of the 1990s, and Drew.
Trae is on Twitter @traecrowder
Corey is on Twitter @coreyrforrester</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Never Been Kissed </em>was the 43-rd highest grossing movie of the year, just edging out last week's <em>Forces of Nature </em>(though proving far more profitable) at the box office.</p><p><em>Never Been Kissed </em>opened April 9th, pitting it against <em>The Matrix </em>in its second week, but still managed to post an impressive second place finish for the week, taking in 14 million dollars. This is largely thanks to the overwhelming popularity of star Drew Barrymore, coming off consecutive romantic hits in 1998 with <em>Ever After </em>and <em>The Wedding Singer</em>.</p><p>It's a strange movie with an, um, uncomfortable premise. It's part farce, part tragedy, part love story (all of which tends to be true of Shakespeare's plays, from which it draws its narrative template). <em>Never Been Kissed </em>also became a huge home video hit, watched a rewatched by its target demo for years after, as Barrymore's "Josie Grosie" became an Elder Gen-X/Millennial folk hero.</p><p>This week, John and Jenn welcome comedians, podcasters, and, as of recently, authors Trae Crowder and Corey Ryan Forrester to talk about high school trauma, inappropriate relationships, the ethics of the 1990s, and Drew.</p><p>Trae is on Twitter <a href="https://x.com/traecrowder">@traecrowder</a></p><p>Corey is on Twitter <a href="https://x.com/CoreyRForrester">@coreyrforrester</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>7599</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[57db3016-1b7a-11ef-bbe9-d358168d87b9]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN8810869996.mp3?updated=1716740075" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FORCES OF NATURE: "Planes, Trains, and Geo Metros" - with Julia Sirmons</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/forces-of-nature-1999/</link>
      <description>Forces of Nature was the 44th highest-grossing movie of 1999, opening at #1 at the box office on March 19th and taking in 17 million dollars in its first week, going on to make 94 million worldwide on a budget of (somehow) 75 million dollars.
Starring Sandra Bullock and Ben Affleck at a time when both actors' stars were at a high point and one of just a few features directed by accomplished television director Bronwen Hughes, Forces of Nature was the follow-up to her 1996 adaptation of Harriet the Spy, and written by Family Ties writing alum Marc Lawrence, who also wrote 1999’s The Out-of-Towners and would go on to reteam with star Sandra Bullock for Miss Congeniality 1 and 2 as well as Two Weeks Notice with Hugh Grant.
Forces of Nature has a weird and very 1999 visual aesthetic that flies in the face of rom-com tradition, and it dares to at least try something unique and different instead of adhering to genre conventions. It's a stranger, surprising movie. But is it a good one?
You can find Julia and her work on her website, juliasirmons.com</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 21:17:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/568e7cb2-1644-11ef-a646-53db4284bdd5/image/dc14282d02658ed95416b8e2c4f6aff9.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Julia Sirmons makes her record third appearance to talk about the strange and surprising Bullock/Affleck vehicle "Forces of Nature"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Forces of Nature was the 44th highest-grossing movie of 1999, opening at #1 at the box office on March 19th and taking in 17 million dollars in its first week, going on to make 94 million worldwide on a budget of (somehow) 75 million dollars.
Starring Sandra Bullock and Ben Affleck at a time when both actors' stars were at a high point and one of just a few features directed by accomplished television director Bronwen Hughes, Forces of Nature was the follow-up to her 1996 adaptation of Harriet the Spy, and written by Family Ties writing alum Marc Lawrence, who also wrote 1999’s The Out-of-Towners and would go on to reteam with star Sandra Bullock for Miss Congeniality 1 and 2 as well as Two Weeks Notice with Hugh Grant.
Forces of Nature has a weird and very 1999 visual aesthetic that flies in the face of rom-com tradition, and it dares to at least try something unique and different instead of adhering to genre conventions. It's a stranger, surprising movie. But is it a good one?
You can find Julia and her work on her website, juliasirmons.com</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Forces of Nature </em>was the 44th highest-grossing movie of 1999, opening at #1 at the box office on March 19th and taking in 17 million dollars in its first week, going on to make 94 million worldwide on a budget of (somehow) 75 million dollars.</p><p>Starring Sandra Bullock and Ben Affleck at a time when both actors' stars were at a high point and one of just a few features directed by accomplished television director Bronwen Hughes, <em>Forces of Nature </em>was the follow-up to her 1996 adaptation of <em>Harriet the Spy,</em> and written by <em>Family Ties</em> writing alum Marc Lawrence, who also wrote 1999’s <em>The Out-of-Towners </em>and would go on to reteam with star Sandra Bullock for <em>Miss Congeniality</em> 1 and 2 as well as <em>Two Weeks Notice</em> with Hugh Grant.</p><p><em>Forces of Nature</em> has a weird and very 1999 visual aesthetic that flies in the face of rom-com tradition, and it dares to at least try something unique and different instead of adhering to genre conventions. It's a stranger, surprising movie. But is it a good one?</p><p>You can find Julia and her work on her website, <a href="https://www.juliasirmons.com/">juliasirmons.com</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6581</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[568e7cb2-1644-11ef-a646-53db4284bdd5]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN5125553314.mp3?updated=1716240258" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PHANTOM MENACE @ 25 - A Special Anniversary Release</title>
      <description>Four special guests share their fond memories of the movie that (re)started it all: Star Wars: Episode One - The Phantom Menace.
This is followed by a rerelease of our Phantom Menace episode, the second in the podcast's history, with Brian Silliman and Matt Romano from the podcast RETURN OF THE POD: A Star Wars Podcast.
Enjoy. And may the Force be with you, always.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2024 19:26:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4364f614-160f-11ef-9cc5-cb90acc1f29f/image/72f04c0300066871f7023bad18c029fa.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Four special guests share their fond memories of the movie that (re)started it all: Star Wars: Episode One - The Phantom Menace.
This is followed by a rerelease of our Phantom Menace episode, the second in the podcast's history, with Brian Silliman and Matt Romano from the podcast RETURN OF THE POD: A Star Wars Podcast.
Enjoy. And may the Force be with you, always.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Four special guests share their fond memories of the movie that (re)started it all: Star Wars: Episode One - The Phantom Menace.</p><p>This is followed by a rerelease of our Phantom Menace episode, the second in the podcast's history, with Brian Silliman and Matt Romano from the podcast RETURN OF THE POD: A Star Wars Podcast.</p><p>Enjoy. And may the Force be with you, always.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>7558</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4364f614-160f-11ef-9cc5-cb90acc1f29f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN3762868433.mp3?updated=1716144330" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BLAST FROM THE PAST: "Adam &amp; Eve" - with Samm Levine</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/blast-from-the-past-1999/</link>
      <description>Blast from the Past was 75th highest-grossing movie of 1999, opening at #4 at the box office on Valentine’s Day weekend and going on to take in $40 million worldwide on a $35 million budget.
The first of two 1999 collaborations between director Hugh Wilson and star Brendan Fraser, Blast from the Past included a stellar supporting cast, including Alicia Silverstone, Christopher Walken, Sissy Spacek, Dave Foley, Nathan Fillion, Joey Slotnick, and the legendary Jennifer Lewis.
Critics were pretty even split on it - partly because it was inevitably compared to 1998's Pleasantville - and none were especially effusive in their praise, but it went on to find a charmed audience on home video and has emerged as the quintessential "hidden gem" in the years since.
One if its fans is actor Samm Levine, who graced the small screen in 1999 in the beloved (and prematurely canceled) television series Freaks and Geeks. He joined John and Jenn to talk Walken, swing dance, and his most famous creation, the beloved character Zoot Suit Ryan.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/aa3467e8-05c1-11ef-be94-c3af515f088e/image/2c687a121ff173a1322287e3b3344a8d.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>"Freaks and Geeks" star Samm Levine joins the John and Jenn to talk about Brendan Fraser's 2nd-best 1999 movie, "Blast from the Past"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Blast from the Past was 75th highest-grossing movie of 1999, opening at #4 at the box office on Valentine’s Day weekend and going on to take in $40 million worldwide on a $35 million budget.
The first of two 1999 collaborations between director Hugh Wilson and star Brendan Fraser, Blast from the Past included a stellar supporting cast, including Alicia Silverstone, Christopher Walken, Sissy Spacek, Dave Foley, Nathan Fillion, Joey Slotnick, and the legendary Jennifer Lewis.
Critics were pretty even split on it - partly because it was inevitably compared to 1998's Pleasantville - and none were especially effusive in their praise, but it went on to find a charmed audience on home video and has emerged as the quintessential "hidden gem" in the years since.
One if its fans is actor Samm Levine, who graced the small screen in 1999 in the beloved (and prematurely canceled) television series Freaks and Geeks. He joined John and Jenn to talk Walken, swing dance, and his most famous creation, the beloved character Zoot Suit Ryan.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Blast from the Past</em> was 75th highest-grossing movie of 1999, opening at #4 at the box office on Valentine’s Day weekend and going on to take in $40 million worldwide on a $35 million budget.</p><p>The first of <em>two</em> 1999 collaborations between director Hugh Wilson and star Brendan Fraser, <em>Blast from the Past </em>included a stellar supporting cast, including Alicia Silverstone, Christopher Walken, Sissy Spacek, Dave Foley, Nathan Fillion, Joey Slotnick, and the legendary Jennifer Lewis.</p><p>Critics were pretty even split on it - partly because it was inevitably compared to 1998's <em>Pleasantville</em> - and none were especially effusive in their praise, but it went on to find a charmed audience on home video and has emerged as the quintessential "hidden gem" in the years since.</p><p>One if its fans is actor Samm Levine, who graced the small screen in 1999 in the beloved (and prematurely canceled) television series <em>Freaks and Geeks</em>. He joined John and Jenn to talk Walken, swing dance, and his most famous creation, the beloved character Zoot Suit Ryan.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>8136</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[aa3467e8-05c1-11ef-be94-c3af515f088e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN5567566872.mp3?updated=1714351782" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PUSHING TIN: "Control" - with Joe Kwaczala</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/pushing-tin-1999/</link>
      <description>Pushing Tin was the 135th-highest grossing film of the year, grossing 8.4 million dollars on a 33 million dollar budget, opening April the 23rd, 1999 as the #4 movie at the Box Office behind The Matrix, Life, and Never Been Kissed.
Directed by Four Weddings and a Funeral and Donnie Brasco director Mike Newell and written by Cheers co-creators Les and Glen Charles, Pushing Tin felt like a sure thing, especially given its very of-the-moment core cast of John Cusack, Cate Blanchett, Billy Bob Thornton, and Angelina Jolie.
But it never left the runway (get it) with audiences or critics.
What went wrong? And is Pushing Tin a forgotten gem, or was everyone right about it 25 years ago?
This week, John and Jenn are joined by comedian Joe Kwaczala to talk about this weird, uneven, confused, and very pre-9/11 romcom-dramedy thing!
You can find Joe on most of the socials @joekjoek</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/f88c0862-fabb-11ee-af4e-4f329edece7c/image/f9b57b07e9851bed1d108f976e56c86d.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Comedian Joe Kwaczala joins the show to discuss the very original and absurdly misguided rom-comish drama thing, "Pushing Tin"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Pushing Tin was the 135th-highest grossing film of the year, grossing 8.4 million dollars on a 33 million dollar budget, opening April the 23rd, 1999 as the #4 movie at the Box Office behind The Matrix, Life, and Never Been Kissed.
Directed by Four Weddings and a Funeral and Donnie Brasco director Mike Newell and written by Cheers co-creators Les and Glen Charles, Pushing Tin felt like a sure thing, especially given its very of-the-moment core cast of John Cusack, Cate Blanchett, Billy Bob Thornton, and Angelina Jolie.
But it never left the runway (get it) with audiences or critics.
What went wrong? And is Pushing Tin a forgotten gem, or was everyone right about it 25 years ago?
This week, John and Jenn are joined by comedian Joe Kwaczala to talk about this weird, uneven, confused, and very pre-9/11 romcom-dramedy thing!
You can find Joe on most of the socials @joekjoek</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Pushing Tin </em>was the 135th-highest grossing film of the year, grossing 8.4 million dollars on a 33 million dollar budget, opening April the 23rd, 1999 as the #4 movie at the Box Office behind <em>The Matrix, Life</em>, and <em>Never Been Kissed.</em></p><p>Directed by <em>Four Weddings and a Funeral </em>and <em>Donnie Brasco</em> director Mike Newell and written by <em>Cheers</em> co-creators Les and Glen Charles, <em>Pushing Tin </em>felt like a sure thing, especially given its very of-the-moment core cast of John Cusack, Cate Blanchett, Billy Bob Thornton, and Angelina Jolie.</p><p>But it never left the runway (get it) with audiences or critics.</p><p>What went wrong? And is <em>Pushing Tin </em>a forgotten gem, or was everyone right about it 25 years ago?</p><p>This week, John and Jenn are joined by comedian Joe Kwaczala to talk about this weird, uneven, confused, and <em>very</em> pre-9/11 romcom-dramedy thing!</p><p>You can find Joe on most of the socials <a href="https://twitter.com/joekjoek">@joekjoek</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6138</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[f88c0862-fabb-11ee-af4e-4f329edece7c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN9513051182.mp3?updated=1714351482" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>QUIET ON SET - A Very Special Episode</title>
      <description>We take a quick detour to discuss the 1999-adjacent Investigation Discovery series QUIET ON THE SET, which looks into the toxic, harmful atmosphere at Nickelodeon in the 90s and 2000s under showrunner Dan Schneider, as well as the subsequent instances of child sex abuse as detailed by DRAKE AND JOSH star Drake Bell.
You can find Jenn's coverage of the documentary and some of its fallout on Distractify, including this breakdown of what's been going on with Dan Schneider of late: https://www.distractify.com/p/where-is-dan-schneider-now</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:04:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/8f7872c2-eab0-11ee-9ad3-b3bffaa23b47/image/1359824ddc487b5046ed3f2170204fc0.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>We take a quick detour to discuss the 1999-adjacent Investigation Discovery series QUIET ON THE SET, which looks into the toxic, harmful atmosphere at Nickelodeon in the 90s and 2000s under showrunner Dan Schneider, as well as the subsequent instances of child sex abuse as detailed by DRAKE AND JOSH star Drake Bell.
You can find Jenn's coverage of the documentary and some of its fallout on Distractify, including this breakdown of what's been going on with Dan Schneider of late: https://www.distractify.com/p/where-is-dan-schneider-now</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We take a quick detour to discuss the 1999-adjacent Investigation Discovery series QUIET ON THE SET, which looks into the toxic, harmful atmosphere at Nickelodeon in the 90s and 2000s under showrunner Dan Schneider, as well as the subsequent instances of child sex abuse as detailed by DRAKE AND JOSH star Drake Bell.</p><p>You can find Jenn's coverage of the documentary and some of its fallout on Distractify, including this breakdown of what's been going on with Dan Schneider of late: <a href="https://www.distractify.com/p/where-is-dan-schneider-now">https://www.distractify.com/p/where-is-dan-schneider-now</a></p><p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4168</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8f7872c2-eab0-11ee-9ad3-b3bffaa23b47]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN3870323575.mp3?updated=1711375755" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SHE'S ALL THAT: "Kiss Me" - with Chase Mitchell</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/shes-all-that/ </link>
      <description>This week, we take a look at one of 1999’s biggest surprise hits, the 38th-highest grossing movie, which took in a very impressive $103 million on a budget of just $10 million, She's All That.
She's All That opened at #1 on January 29, boosted by being nicely timed around Valentine’s Day and by coming out in one of the least-competitive box office periods of the year. Directed by Robert Iscove and written by friend of the show R. Lee Fleming Jr, She's All That boasts one of the most incredibly deep casts of 1990s icons, as well as launching the career of the titular "she" Rachael Leigh Cook.
It is the very definition of the nostalgic favorite, and it finds charm and humor in places not typical of the teen rom-com genre. So this week, we invited comedy writer Chase Mitchell to join us down by the broken treehouse to talk all about it, so bring your flowered hat as we see if, all these years later, this ugly duckling is still a swan.
You can find Chase on Twitter @ChaseMit
 </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/427d215e-e47d-11ee-b329-3f89b7351c31/image/88407228e74a43afae547fc6a489104f.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Writer and all-around good guy Chase Mitchell joins John and Jenn beneath the milky twilight to talk "She's All That".</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This week, we take a look at one of 1999’s biggest surprise hits, the 38th-highest grossing movie, which took in a very impressive $103 million on a budget of just $10 million, She's All That.
She's All That opened at #1 on January 29, boosted by being nicely timed around Valentine’s Day and by coming out in one of the least-competitive box office periods of the year. Directed by Robert Iscove and written by friend of the show R. Lee Fleming Jr, She's All That boasts one of the most incredibly deep casts of 1990s icons, as well as launching the career of the titular "she" Rachael Leigh Cook.
It is the very definition of the nostalgic favorite, and it finds charm and humor in places not typical of the teen rom-com genre. So this week, we invited comedy writer Chase Mitchell to join us down by the broken treehouse to talk all about it, so bring your flowered hat as we see if, all these years later, this ugly duckling is still a swan.
You can find Chase on Twitter @ChaseMit
 </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week, we take a look at one of 1999’s biggest surprise hits, the 38th-highest grossing movie, which took in a very impressive $103 million on a budget of just $10 million, <em>She's All That.</em></p><p><em>She's All That o</em>pened at #1 on January 29, boosted by being nicely timed around Valentine’s Day and by coming out in one of the least-competitive box office periods of the year. Directed by Robert Iscove and written by friend of the show R. Lee Fleming Jr, <em>She's All That </em>boasts one of the most incredibly deep casts of 1990s icons, as well as launching the career of the titular "she" Rachael Leigh Cook.</p><p>It is the very definition of the nostalgic favorite, and it finds charm and humor in places not typical of the teen rom-com genre. So this week, we invited comedy writer Chase Mitchell to join us down by the broken treehouse to talk all about it, so bring your flowered hat as we see if, all these years later, this ugly duckling is still a swan.</p><p>You can find Chase on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/ChaseMit">@ChaseMit</a></p><p> </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6642</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[427d215e-e47d-11ee-b329-3f89b7351c31]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN6363913338.mp3?updated=1710694014" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RUNAWAY BRIDE: "Eggs &amp; Lamps" - with Greg Pilgrim</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/runaway-bride-1999/</link>
      <description>Runaway Bride, the other 1999 Julia Roberts rom-com, was the 9th-highes grossing movie of the year, sandwiched between The Mummy at 8th and The Blair Witch Project at 10th.
And while Runaway Bride did far worse with the critics to the vastly superior Notting Hill, its box office performance was likely boosted by two factors: unlike Notting Hill, it didn't open against Star Wars, and - more importantly - it was billed as a spiritual sequel to the movie that put Julia Roberts on the map, 1990's smash hit Pretty Woman, reuniting stars Roberts and Richard Gere and director Gary Marshall.
Runaway Bride is a written-by-committee tonal, structural, and thematic mess. But it has its charms, and it boasts an insanely talented supporting cast (and a picturesque Maryland town) that keep the comedy and appeal afloat.
Jenn's person Greg Pilgrim joins the show to talk about eggs, lamps, and the scientific term for a group of orioles.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 16:37:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/7c00ab4a-da45-11ee-bb56-972643495459/image/0dc24c45fcb33c052225301ad4d7f59c.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Jenn's person Greg joins the show to discuss a movie about eggs, lamps, and the ethics of being a USA Today columnist, "Pretty Woman 2: Runaway Bride".</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Runaway Bride, the other 1999 Julia Roberts rom-com, was the 9th-highes grossing movie of the year, sandwiched between The Mummy at 8th and The Blair Witch Project at 10th.
And while Runaway Bride did far worse with the critics to the vastly superior Notting Hill, its box office performance was likely boosted by two factors: unlike Notting Hill, it didn't open against Star Wars, and - more importantly - it was billed as a spiritual sequel to the movie that put Julia Roberts on the map, 1990's smash hit Pretty Woman, reuniting stars Roberts and Richard Gere and director Gary Marshall.
Runaway Bride is a written-by-committee tonal, structural, and thematic mess. But it has its charms, and it boasts an insanely talented supporting cast (and a picturesque Maryland town) that keep the comedy and appeal afloat.
Jenn's person Greg Pilgrim joins the show to talk about eggs, lamps, and the scientific term for a group of orioles.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Runaway Bride, </em>the <em>other</em> 1999 Julia Roberts rom-com, was the 9th-highes grossing movie of the year, sandwiched between <em>The Mummy </em>at 8th and <em>The Blair Witch Project</em> at 10th.</p><p>And while <em>Runaway Bride</em> did <em>far</em> worse with the critics to the vastly superior <em>Notting Hill</em>, its box office performance was likely boosted by two factors: unlike <em>Notting Hill</em>, it didn't open against <em>Star Wars</em>, and - more importantly - it was billed as a spiritual sequel to the movie that put Julia Roberts on the map, 1990's smash hit <em>Pretty Woman</em>, reuniting stars Roberts and Richard Gere and director Gary Marshall.</p><p><em>Runaway Bride </em>is a written-by-committee tonal, structural, and thematic mess. But it has its charms, and it boasts an insanely talented supporting cast (and a picturesque Maryland town) that keep the comedy and appeal afloat.</p><p>Jenn's person Greg Pilgrim joins the show to talk about eggs, lamps, and the scientific term for a group of orioles.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6152</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7c00ab4a-da45-11ee-bb56-972643495459]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN8193902570.mp3?updated=1709570548" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NOTTING HILL: "Just A Girl" - with Courtney Brooks</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/notting-hill-1999/</link>
      <description>Notting Hill was the 16th-highest grossing movie of 1999, opening Memorial Day Weekend, May 28th, and in 2nd place earning $27.7 million (behind #1, The Phantom Menace, which, then in its second weekend, earned $67 million).
It would go on to make $116 million domestically and $364 million worldwide on a $42 million budget.
Notting Hill was the second of several successful ventures between Grant and writer (and Mr. Bean creator) Richard Curtis, following 1994’s Four Weddings and a Funeral and predating 2001’s Bridget Jones's Diary (which Curtis adapted from Helen Fielding's enormously popular novel) and 2003’s Love Actually.
It has gone on to be one of the most revered and beloved romantic comedies of all time, so to kick off our round on 1999 RomComs, we give you our longest episode ever: A love letter to great comedy, peak Hugh Grant, and the joy of close friendships.
John's wife Courtney joins the show for the first time, and John and Jenn also talk to a very special guest - the iconic extra who Hugh Grant refers to affectionately as Cookie Monster in the opening voiceover.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/b4256d08-cf96-11ee-a773-93b28eb50410/image/50sq.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>John's wife Courtney joins the show for the first time (and we welcome a special guest!) in an episode that is a love letter to a love story: Notting Hill.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Notting Hill was the 16th-highest grossing movie of 1999, opening Memorial Day Weekend, May 28th, and in 2nd place earning $27.7 million (behind #1, The Phantom Menace, which, then in its second weekend, earned $67 million).
It would go on to make $116 million domestically and $364 million worldwide on a $42 million budget.
Notting Hill was the second of several successful ventures between Grant and writer (and Mr. Bean creator) Richard Curtis, following 1994’s Four Weddings and a Funeral and predating 2001’s Bridget Jones's Diary (which Curtis adapted from Helen Fielding's enormously popular novel) and 2003’s Love Actually.
It has gone on to be one of the most revered and beloved romantic comedies of all time, so to kick off our round on 1999 RomComs, we give you our longest episode ever: A love letter to great comedy, peak Hugh Grant, and the joy of close friendships.
John's wife Courtney joins the show for the first time, and John and Jenn also talk to a very special guest - the iconic extra who Hugh Grant refers to affectionately as Cookie Monster in the opening voiceover.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Notting Hill </em>was the 16th-highest grossing movie of 1999, opening Memorial Day Weekend, May 28th, and in 2nd place earning $27.7 million (behind #1, <em>The Phantom Menace</em>, which, then in its second weekend, earned $67 million).</p><p>It would go on to make $116 million domestically and $364 million worldwide on a $42 million budget.</p><p><em>Notting Hill</em> was the second of several successful ventures between Grant and writer (and <em>Mr. Bean</em> creator) Richard Curtis, following 1994’s <em>Four Weddings and a Funeral</em> and predating 2001’s <em>Bridget Jones's Diary</em> (which Curtis adapted from Helen Fielding's enormously popular novel) and 2003’s <em>Love Actually.</em></p><p>It has gone on to be one of the most revered and beloved romantic comedies of all time, so to kick off our round on 1999 RomComs, we give you our longest episode ever: A love letter to great comedy, peak Hugh Grant, and the joy of close friendships.</p><p>John's wife Courtney joins the show for the first time, and John and Jenn also talk to a very special guest - the iconic extra who Hugh Grant refers to affectionately as Cookie Monster in the opening voiceover.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>8016</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b4256d08-cf96-11ee-a773-93b28eb50410]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN3186986946.mp3?updated=1708395968" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AUDITION and WE SOLD OUR SOULS FOR ROCK 'N ROLL - "Ozzdition"</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/audition-1999/</link>
      <description>Audition does not rank anywhere in the 1999 box office. This is largely because it had no theatrical release in 1999.
Rather, Audition played a single screening at the Toronto International Film Festival that year, and would only go on to make a few hundred thousand dollars worldwide during its run.
But it developed an enormous cult following since, and has become one of the most revered horror films of its time. And it's easy to see why - Audition is gruesome, inventive, and stunningly unique.
And, also, due to circumstances beyond her control, Jenn couldn't watch it. So John did, shares his thoughts, and then they both discuss Penelope Spheeris's unreleased OZZFEST 99 documentary We Sold Our Souls For Rock 'N Roll, which might finally be released at some point in the near future, but, if not, is available in a fairly grainy Vimeo upload.
It's great. So is Audition. Watch them both, if you can stomach the latter!
If not, just listen to us talk about them!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/18c52298-c395-11ee-9093-4388a1f3d238/image/E49_sq.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>It's a two-for-one horror finale as we talk about BOTH "Audition" and the Ozzfest 99 documentary "We Sold Our Souls For Rock 'N Roll"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Audition does not rank anywhere in the 1999 box office. This is largely because it had no theatrical release in 1999.
Rather, Audition played a single screening at the Toronto International Film Festival that year, and would only go on to make a few hundred thousand dollars worldwide during its run.
But it developed an enormous cult following since, and has become one of the most revered horror films of its time. And it's easy to see why - Audition is gruesome, inventive, and stunningly unique.
And, also, due to circumstances beyond her control, Jenn couldn't watch it. So John did, shares his thoughts, and then they both discuss Penelope Spheeris's unreleased OZZFEST 99 documentary We Sold Our Souls For Rock 'N Roll, which might finally be released at some point in the near future, but, if not, is available in a fairly grainy Vimeo upload.
It's great. So is Audition. Watch them both, if you can stomach the latter!
If not, just listen to us talk about them!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Audition </em>does not rank anywhere in the 1999 box office. This is largely because it had no theatrical release in 1999.</p><p>Rather, <em>Audition </em>played a single screening at the Toronto International Film Festival that year, and would only go on to make a few hundred thousand dollars worldwide during its run.</p><p>But it developed an enormous cult following since, and has become one of the most revered horror films of its time. And it's easy to see why - <em>Audition </em>is gruesome, inventive, and stunningly unique.</p><p>And, also, due to circumstances beyond her control, Jenn couldn't watch it. So John did, shares his thoughts, and then they both discuss Penelope Spheeris's unreleased OZZFEST 99 documentary <em>We Sold Our Souls For Rock 'N Roll</em>, which <em>might </em>finally be released at some point in the near future, but, if not, is available in a fairly grainy Vimeo upload.</p><p>It's great. So is <em>Audition</em>. Watch them both, if you can stomach the latter!</p><p>If not, just listen to us talk about them!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3855</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[18c52298-c395-11ee-9093-4388a1f3d238]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN4330311111.mp3?updated=1707075864" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IDLE HANDS: "American Idle" - with John-Michael Bond</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/idle-hands-1999/</link>
      <description>A dismal critical and commercial failure that has gone on to be a genuine cult classic, Idle Hands came in at 162nd at the box office, earning less than $2 million on a $25 million budget.
It probably didn't help that it was released 10 days after Columbine, and audiences maybe weren't in the mood for a high school-set slasher film.
Or maybe it's that Idle Hands is a bafflingly, deliriously confused movies, with tones shifting wildly, sometimes within the same scene.
But either way, it can't be accused of being lazy, and everything that makes its way to the screen is endlessly interesting (if for not always the best reasons).
And it also includes some great performances, including a lot of improvised banter between Seth Green and Elden Hensen, and a tirelessly committed performance (along with some excellent physical comedy) from Devon Sawa. Plus a pre-Dark Angel Jessica Alba slinking all over the place.
Joining John and Jenn this week is comedian, photographer, writer, and Idle Hands evangelist John-Michael Bond, who you can find on Twitter @BondJohnBond</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c27cfae2-b85d-11ee-ad2d-bfe789296e07/image/E48_Sq.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Comedian John-Michael Bond joins John and Jenn to talk about the horror-comedy-drama(?) "Idle Hands"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A dismal critical and commercial failure that has gone on to be a genuine cult classic, Idle Hands came in at 162nd at the box office, earning less than $2 million on a $25 million budget.
It probably didn't help that it was released 10 days after Columbine, and audiences maybe weren't in the mood for a high school-set slasher film.
Or maybe it's that Idle Hands is a bafflingly, deliriously confused movies, with tones shifting wildly, sometimes within the same scene.
But either way, it can't be accused of being lazy, and everything that makes its way to the screen is endlessly interesting (if for not always the best reasons).
And it also includes some great performances, including a lot of improvised banter between Seth Green and Elden Hensen, and a tirelessly committed performance (along with some excellent physical comedy) from Devon Sawa. Plus a pre-Dark Angel Jessica Alba slinking all over the place.
Joining John and Jenn this week is comedian, photographer, writer, and Idle Hands evangelist John-Michael Bond, who you can find on Twitter @BondJohnBond</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A dismal critical and commercial failure that has gone on to be a genuine cult classic, <em>Idle Hands </em>came in at 162nd at the box office, earning less than $2 million on a $25 million budget.</p><p>It probably didn't help that it was released 10 days after Columbine, and audiences maybe weren't in the mood for a high school-set slasher film.</p><p>Or maybe it's that <em>Idle Hands </em>is a bafflingly, deliriously confused movies, with tones shifting wildly, sometimes within the same scene.</p><p>But either way, it can't be accused of being lazy, and everything that makes its way to the screen is endlessly interesting (if for not always the best reasons).</p><p>And it also includes some great performances, including a lot of improvised banter between Seth Green and Elden Hensen, and a tirelessly committed performance (along with some excellent physical comedy) from Devon Sawa. Plus a pre-<em>Dark Angel</em> Jessica Alba slinking all over the place.</p><p>Joining John and Jenn this week is comedian, photographer, writer, and <em>Idle Hands </em>evangelist John-Michael Bond, who you can find on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/BondJohnBond">@BondJohnBond</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5988</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c27cfae2-b85d-11ee-ad2d-bfe789296e07]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN3719960771.mp3?updated=1705842634" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>HOUSE ON HAUNTED HILL: "The (Other) Haunting" - with Stephanie Gagnon</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/house-on-haunted-hill-1999/</link>
      <description>House on Haunted Hill was a huge failure with critics, but at 50th in the 1999 box office, and having made back its budget, it was a reasonable commercial success. It opened number one during Halloween weekend, likely finding an audience in moviegoers eager for anything spooky (and it is pretty spooky...)
A remake of William Castle’s 1959 film starring Vincent Price, this House on Haunted Hill was directed by William Malone with a written by Dick Beebe, who also penned Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2) with effects by the legendary Greg Nicotero and Robert Kurtzmann.
With a delightfully loopy, hammy performance from Geoffrey Rush and pretty great supporting cast who all understood the assignment, House on Haunted Hill is an imperfect but genuinely enjoyable horror thrill ride.
It's also a favorite of our guest Stephanie Gagnon, host of the horror book podcast Books in the Freezer, who joined us way back in Round 1 for The 6th Sense and rejoins us to talk mustaches, Chris Kattan, bad endings, and which is the best Scream movie.
Check out Books in the Freezer here: https://booksinthefreezer.com/</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2024 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0f11fe80-adcc-11ee-bb34-afc7221945aa/image/e47_sq.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>We try to win a million dollars with Stephanie Gagnon as we accept Geoffrey Rush's invitation to enter 1999's "House on Haunted Hill"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>House on Haunted Hill was a huge failure with critics, but at 50th in the 1999 box office, and having made back its budget, it was a reasonable commercial success. It opened number one during Halloween weekend, likely finding an audience in moviegoers eager for anything spooky (and it is pretty spooky...)
A remake of William Castle’s 1959 film starring Vincent Price, this House on Haunted Hill was directed by William Malone with a written by Dick Beebe, who also penned Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2) with effects by the legendary Greg Nicotero and Robert Kurtzmann.
With a delightfully loopy, hammy performance from Geoffrey Rush and pretty great supporting cast who all understood the assignment, House on Haunted Hill is an imperfect but genuinely enjoyable horror thrill ride.
It's also a favorite of our guest Stephanie Gagnon, host of the horror book podcast Books in the Freezer, who joined us way back in Round 1 for The 6th Sense and rejoins us to talk mustaches, Chris Kattan, bad endings, and which is the best Scream movie.
Check out Books in the Freezer here: https://booksinthefreezer.com/</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>House on Haunted Hill </em>was a huge failure with critics, but at 50th in the 1999 box office, and having made back its budget, it was a reasonable commercial success. It opened number one during Halloween weekend, likely finding an audience in moviegoers eager for anything spooky (and it is pretty spooky...)</p><p>A remake of William Castle’s 1959 film starring Vincent Price, this <em>House on Haunted Hill</em> was directed by William Malone with a written by Dick Beebe, who also penned <em>Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2</em>) with effects by the legendary Greg Nicotero and Robert Kurtzmann.</p><p>With a delightfully loopy, hammy performance from Geoffrey Rush and pretty great supporting cast who all understood the assignment, <em>House on Haunted Hill </em>is an imperfect but genuinely enjoyable horror thrill ride.</p><p>It's also a favorite of our guest Stephanie Gagnon, host of the horror book podcast Books in the Freezer, who joined us way back in Round 1 for <em>The 6th Sense</em> and rejoins us to talk mustaches, Chris Kattan, bad endings, and which is the best <em>Scream </em>movie.</p><p>Check out Books in the Freezer here: <a href="https://booksinthefreezer.com/">https://booksinthefreezer.com/</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6121</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0f11fe80-adcc-11ee-bb34-afc7221945aa]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN6685929330.mp3?updated=1705842673" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A CHRISTMAS CAROL: "You Will Be Visited By Three Hosts - A Very Special 1999: The Podcast Christmas" with Alex Steed</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/christmas-carol-1999/</link>
      <description>Charles Dickens' 1846 A Christmas Carol is one of the most adapted works of all time. And his protagonist, Ebenezer Scrooge, has been portrayed by the likes of Jim Carrey to Bill Murray, George C. Scott to Mr. Magoo, Alastair Sim to Scrooge McDuck, and Michael Caine to Will Ferrell.
And spins on A Christmas Carol have appeared in everything from Beavis and Butthead to Doctor Who.
But rarely have they been as faithful as the version from 1999 starring Patrick Stewart as the miserly businessman whose life changes one fateful night after a visit from three ghosts.
Starring an incredible cast including Stewart, Richard E. Grant, Dominic West, Ian McNiece, Breaking Bad's Laura Fraser, and Ted Lasso's Jeremy Swift, the TNT original movie is a jewel in the vast sea of Christmas Carol adaptations.
So this Christmas, we invited our friend Alex Steed back to share in the Christmas spirit...er...ghost?...as we dig in to this wonderful version of a classic story.
Merry Christmas! And, as Tiny Tim observed, God bless Us, Every One!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2023 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5bbedcd2-a2a8-11ee-a0e7-5f6de9759afb/image/e46_sq.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Alex Steed haunts the show to remind us of the joy of Patrick Stewart as we look at the delightful 1999 version of "A Christmas Carol".</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Charles Dickens' 1846 A Christmas Carol is one of the most adapted works of all time. And his protagonist, Ebenezer Scrooge, has been portrayed by the likes of Jim Carrey to Bill Murray, George C. Scott to Mr. Magoo, Alastair Sim to Scrooge McDuck, and Michael Caine to Will Ferrell.
And spins on A Christmas Carol have appeared in everything from Beavis and Butthead to Doctor Who.
But rarely have they been as faithful as the version from 1999 starring Patrick Stewart as the miserly businessman whose life changes one fateful night after a visit from three ghosts.
Starring an incredible cast including Stewart, Richard E. Grant, Dominic West, Ian McNiece, Breaking Bad's Laura Fraser, and Ted Lasso's Jeremy Swift, the TNT original movie is a jewel in the vast sea of Christmas Carol adaptations.
So this Christmas, we invited our friend Alex Steed back to share in the Christmas spirit...er...ghost?...as we dig in to this wonderful version of a classic story.
Merry Christmas! And, as Tiny Tim observed, God bless Us, Every One!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Charles Dickens' 1846 <em>A Christmas Carol</em> is one of the most adapted works of all time. And his protagonist, Ebenezer Scrooge, has been portrayed by the likes of Jim Carrey to Bill Murray, George C. Scott to Mr. Magoo, Alastair Sim to Scrooge McDuck, and Michael Caine to Will Ferrell.</p><p>And spins on <em>A Christmas Carol</em> have appeared in everything from <em>Beavis and Butthead </em>to <em>Doctor Who</em>.</p><p>But rarely have they been as faithful as the version from 1999 starring Patrick Stewart as the miserly businessman whose life changes one fateful night after a visit from three ghosts.</p><p>Starring an incredible cast including Stewart, Richard E. Grant, Dominic West, Ian McNiece, <em>Breaking Bad's </em>Laura Fraser, and <em>Ted Lasso'</em>s Jeremy Swift, the TNT original movie is a jewel in the vast sea of <em>Christmas Carol </em>adaptations.</p><p>So this Christmas, we invited our friend Alex Steed back to share in the Christmas spirit...er...ghost?...as we dig in to this wonderful version of a classic story.</p><p>Merry Christmas! And, as Tiny Tim observed, God bless Us, Every One!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5038</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5bbedcd2-a2a8-11ee-a0e7-5f6de9759afb]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN4367227024.mp3?updated=1705842699" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SLEEPY HOLLOW: "Hollow" - with Dan Colón and guest go-host Becky Ellis</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/sleepy-hollow-1999/</link>
      <description>Sleepy Hollow qualifies as one of the biggest movies of the year, and it was certainly one of the most anticipated - an expected return to form from a slumping Tim Burton.
But it didn't quite work out that way.
Released on November the 19th of 1999, Sleepy Hollow was one of the most expensive movies ever made at the time, with a budget of $100 million, and while it wasn't a flop, it only barely broke even.
While Burton reteamed with some of his most reliable collaborators - star Johnny Depp, composer Danny Elfman, and production designer Rick Heinrichs - and while what appears onscreen is unquestionably beautiful to look at, critics and audiences found Sleepy Hollow...well, hollow.
This week, Dan Colón, of CageClub's very own The Monsters That Made Us podcast guests as our old friend Becky Ellis subs in the co-host seat as we wrestle with our feelings for Tim Burton's most beautiful gorefest.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e21e98a6-97c4-11ee-9d79-7f0e06a743ed/image/e45_sq.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dan Colón, of CageClub's very own The Monsters That Made Us podcast guests as our old friend Becky Ellis subs in the co-host seat as we wrestle with our feelings for Tim Burton's most beautiful gorefest, "Sleepy Hollow"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Sleepy Hollow qualifies as one of the biggest movies of the year, and it was certainly one of the most anticipated - an expected return to form from a slumping Tim Burton.
But it didn't quite work out that way.
Released on November the 19th of 1999, Sleepy Hollow was one of the most expensive movies ever made at the time, with a budget of $100 million, and while it wasn't a flop, it only barely broke even.
While Burton reteamed with some of his most reliable collaborators - star Johnny Depp, composer Danny Elfman, and production designer Rick Heinrichs - and while what appears onscreen is unquestionably beautiful to look at, critics and audiences found Sleepy Hollow...well, hollow.
This week, Dan Colón, of CageClub's very own The Monsters That Made Us podcast guests as our old friend Becky Ellis subs in the co-host seat as we wrestle with our feelings for Tim Burton's most beautiful gorefest.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Sleepy Hollow</em> qualifies as one of the biggest movies of the year, and it was certainly one of the most anticipated - an expected return to form from a slumping Tim Burton.</p><p>But it didn't quite work out that way.</p><p>Released on November the 19th of 1999, <em>Sleepy Hollow </em>was one of the most expensive movies ever made at the time, with a budget of $100 million<em>, </em>and while it wasn't a flop, it only barely broke even.</p><p>While Burton reteamed with some of his most reliable collaborators - star Johnny Depp, composer Danny Elfman, and production designer Rick Heinrichs - and while what appears onscreen is unquestionably beautiful to look at, critics and audiences found <em>Sleepy Hollow...</em>well, hollow.</p><p>This week, Dan Colón, of CageClub's very own <em>The Monsters That Made Us </em>podcast guests as our old friend Becky Ellis subs in the co-host seat as we wrestle with our feelings for Tim Burton's most beautiful gorefest.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4927</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e21e98a6-97c4-11ee-9d79-7f0e06a743ed]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN9442307846.mp3?updated=1702258536" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE RAGE: CARRIE 2: "All The Rage" - with Paul Haynes</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/the-rage-carrie-2/</link>
      <description>The Rage: Carrie 2 was not a box office success, but it wasn't the disaster a lot of people remember either. Finishing at #91 for the year, just ahead of Go and (somehow) just behind the Melissa Joan Hart/Adrian Grenier vehicle Drive Me Crazy, The Rage: Carrie 2 opened in late March at an impressive #2 behind the 1999 comedy hit Analyze This.
But it didn't quite make back its budget, and it as since largely been forgotten about.
Which is a shame, because it has a lot to offer. While the film was initially called The Curse and had nothing to do with 1976's Carrie, the similarities led the studio to call for a retooling that set the production back a couple years. And actor Amy Irving, who played Sue Snell in the original, was called in to reprise the role. A last-minute change of director (Poison Ivy director Katt Shea) further impacted the production.
But both the fact that The Rage: Carrie 2 finally hit cinemas just a few weeks before Columbine, and its use of a real-life true crime story (the notorious Spur Posse) has led to a lot of revision of its legacy in the quarter century since. As such, we invited horror fan and true crime guy Paul Haynes (collaborator on Michell McNamara's 2018 book I'll Be Gone In The Dark) to talk it out with us.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5164daf8-8c6d-11ee-b232-a369dd99d61e/image/E44-Sq.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Horror fan and true crime guy Paul Haynes joins John and Jenn and talk about the true crime-inspired "The Rage: Carrie 2".</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Rage: Carrie 2 was not a box office success, but it wasn't the disaster a lot of people remember either. Finishing at #91 for the year, just ahead of Go and (somehow) just behind the Melissa Joan Hart/Adrian Grenier vehicle Drive Me Crazy, The Rage: Carrie 2 opened in late March at an impressive #2 behind the 1999 comedy hit Analyze This.
But it didn't quite make back its budget, and it as since largely been forgotten about.
Which is a shame, because it has a lot to offer. While the film was initially called The Curse and had nothing to do with 1976's Carrie, the similarities led the studio to call for a retooling that set the production back a couple years. And actor Amy Irving, who played Sue Snell in the original, was called in to reprise the role. A last-minute change of director (Poison Ivy director Katt Shea) further impacted the production.
But both the fact that The Rage: Carrie 2 finally hit cinemas just a few weeks before Columbine, and its use of a real-life true crime story (the notorious Spur Posse) has led to a lot of revision of its legacy in the quarter century since. As such, we invited horror fan and true crime guy Paul Haynes (collaborator on Michell McNamara's 2018 book I'll Be Gone In The Dark) to talk it out with us.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>The Rage: Carrie 2 </em>was not a box office success, but it wasn't the disaster a lot of people remember either. Finishing at #91 for the year, just ahead of <em>Go </em>and (somehow) just behind the Melissa Joan Hart/Adrian Grenier vehicle <em>Drive Me Crazy</em>, <em>The Rage: Carrie 2</em> opened in late March at an impressive #2 behind the 1999 comedy hit <em>Analyze This</em>.</p><p>But it didn't quite make back its budget, and it as since largely been forgotten about.</p><p>Which is a shame, because it has a lot to offer. While the film was initially called <em>The Curse</em> and had nothing to do with 1976's <em>Carrie</em>, the similarities led the studio to call for a retooling that set the production back a couple years. And actor Amy Irving, who played Sue Snell in the original, was called in to reprise the role. A last-minute change of director (<em>Poison Ivy </em>director Katt Shea)<em> </em>further impacted the production.</p><p>But both the fact that <em>The Rage: Carrie 2</em> finally hit cinemas just a few weeks before Columbine, and its use of a real-life true crime story (the notorious Spur Posse) has led to a lot of revision of its legacy in the quarter century since. As such, we invited horror fan and true crime guy Paul Haynes (collaborator on Michell McNamara's 2018 book <em>I'll Be Gone In The Dark</em>) to talk it out with us.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5460</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5164daf8-8c6d-11ee-b232-a369dd99d61e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN9930677920.mp3?updated=1701011465" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>STIGMATA: "St. Frankie" - with Kelly Baker</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/stigmata-1999/</link>
      <description>Stigmata was, impressively, the 49th-highest grossing movie of 1999, finishing just ahead of House on Haunted Hill at 50th (which is upcoming in this round!)
It made $50 million domestically and just shy of $90 million worldwide on a $29 million budget.
Opening at #1 on September the 10th at over $18 million on a spooky box office weekend that saw The Sixth Sense take second with $16 million and ALSO opening, Stir of Echoes, debuting at $5.8 million in 3rd, the music video of a movie was directed by, appropriately, a music video director named Rupert Wainwright and cowritten by Tom Lazarus and Rick Ramage, all three of whom having very limited experience in feature films prior to Stigmata.
While Stigmata was a modest box office success, it was critically derided and has been largely reduced to a memory of the late 90s. It may well be the 1999est movie we've ever covered, and it does, at the very least, attempt to say something interesting.
This week, John and Jenn are joined by John's OTHER co-host at Pod Only Knows, Kelly Baker, to talk about this interesting little relic.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/340b1e86-816e-11ee-a594-67b3e9e5614a/image/Stigmata_sq.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Worlds collide as John's other co-host, Kelly Baker, joins the show to talk about the weird religious horror film "Stigmata"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Stigmata was, impressively, the 49th-highest grossing movie of 1999, finishing just ahead of House on Haunted Hill at 50th (which is upcoming in this round!)
It made $50 million domestically and just shy of $90 million worldwide on a $29 million budget.
Opening at #1 on September the 10th at over $18 million on a spooky box office weekend that saw The Sixth Sense take second with $16 million and ALSO opening, Stir of Echoes, debuting at $5.8 million in 3rd, the music video of a movie was directed by, appropriately, a music video director named Rupert Wainwright and cowritten by Tom Lazarus and Rick Ramage, all three of whom having very limited experience in feature films prior to Stigmata.
While Stigmata was a modest box office success, it was critically derided and has been largely reduced to a memory of the late 90s. It may well be the 1999est movie we've ever covered, and it does, at the very least, attempt to say something interesting.
This week, John and Jenn are joined by John's OTHER co-host at Pod Only Knows, Kelly Baker, to talk about this interesting little relic.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Stigmata </em>was, impressively, the 49th-highest grossing movie of 1999, finishing just ahead of <em>House on Haunted Hill</em> at 50th (which is upcoming in this round!)</p><p>It made $50 million domestically and just shy of $90 million worldwide on a $29 million budget.</p><p>Opening at #1 on September the 10th at over $18 million on a spooky box office weekend that saw <em>The Sixth Sense</em> take second with $16 million and ALSO opening, <em>Stir of Echoes</em>, debuting at $5.8 million in 3rd, the music video of a movie was directed by, appropriately, a music video director named Rupert Wainwright and cowritten by Tom Lazarus and Rick Ramage, all three of whom having <em>very </em>limited experience in feature films prior to <em>Stigmata.</em></p><p>While <em>Stigmata </em>was a modest box office success, it was critically derided and has been largely reduced to a memory of the late 90s. It may well be the 1999est movie we've ever covered, and it does, at the very least, attempt to say something interesting.</p><p>This week, John and Jenn are joined by John's OTHER co-host at Pod Only Knows, Kelly Baker, to talk about this interesting little relic.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6550</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[340b1e86-816e-11ee-a594-67b3e9e5614a]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN2933254968.mp3?updated=1699802382" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EXISTENZ: "Pod People" - with Julia Sirmons and  Jess Collins</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/existenz-1999/</link>
      <description>At 174th place at the box office, eXistenZ was not one of the big hits of 1999, though the it has some proud company in the 170s, including The Limey, Cradle Will Rock, Princess Mononoke, and Jawbreaker
It’s not clear that it ever had the makings of a runaway hit, but it can’t have helped that another heady sci-fi thriller about people who aren’t sure if the reality they exist in is real (and it isn’t) was released three weeks earlier in the form of The Matrix. 
Cronenberg was hardly a bankable commercial director, either, and the gooey, heady, psychosexual horror-scifi mashup struggled to find an audience.
But critics liked eXistenz. It has a 74 percent Rotten Tomatoes score and 68 Metacritic score with fairly comparable audience scores on both sites. 
And, as we discover in this episode, it was oddly prescient on so many levels and way, way ahead of its time. 
This week, John and Jenn welcome back Julia Sirmons, a fan of both weird Davids (Lynch and Cronenberg), as we learned in our The Straight Story episode, and friend of the network Jess Collins, who loves eXistenZ and is apparently really into movies that Sarah Polley made in 1999. </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>EXISTENZ: "Pod People" - with Julia Sirmons and  Jess Collins</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/4f5996cc-76ba-11ee-a036-c70180cec3e1/image/517ff5.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Julia Sirmons and Jess Collins both return to talk about David Cronenberg's gooey brainbender "eXistenZ" </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>At 174th place at the box office, eXistenZ was not one of the big hits of 1999, though the it has some proud company in the 170s, including The Limey, Cradle Will Rock, Princess Mononoke, and Jawbreaker
It’s not clear that it ever had the makings of a runaway hit, but it can’t have helped that another heady sci-fi thriller about people who aren’t sure if the reality they exist in is real (and it isn’t) was released three weeks earlier in the form of The Matrix. 
Cronenberg was hardly a bankable commercial director, either, and the gooey, heady, psychosexual horror-scifi mashup struggled to find an audience.
But critics liked eXistenz. It has a 74 percent Rotten Tomatoes score and 68 Metacritic score with fairly comparable audience scores on both sites. 
And, as we discover in this episode, it was oddly prescient on so many levels and way, way ahead of its time. 
This week, John and Jenn welcome back Julia Sirmons, a fan of both weird Davids (Lynch and Cronenberg), as we learned in our The Straight Story episode, and friend of the network Jess Collins, who loves eXistenZ and is apparently really into movies that Sarah Polley made in 1999. </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>At 174th place at the box office, <em>eXistenZ</em> was not one of the big hits of 1999, though the it has some proud company in the 170s, including <em>The Limey, Cradle Will Rock, Princess Mononoke, </em>and <em>Jawbreaker</em></p><p>It’s not clear that it ever had the makings of a runaway hit, but it can’t have helped that another heady sci-fi thriller about people who aren’t sure if the reality they exist in is real (and it isn’t) was released three weeks earlier in the form of<em> The Matrix.</em> </p><p>Cronenberg was hardly a bankable commercial director, either, and the gooey, heady, psychosexual horror-scifi mashup struggled to find an audience.</p><p>But critics liked <em>eXistenz</em>. It has a 74 percent Rotten Tomatoes score and 68 Metacritic score with fairly comparable audience scores on both sites. </p><p>And, as we discover in this episode, it was oddly prescient on so many levels and way, way ahead of its time. </p><p>This week, John and Jenn welcome back Julia Sirmons, a fan of both weird Davids (Lynch and Cronenberg), as we learned in our <em>The Straight Story </em>episode, and friend of the network Jess Collins, who loves <em>eXistenZ </em>and is apparently really into movies that Sarah Polley made in 1999. </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5614</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4f5996cc-76ba-11ee-a036-c70180cec3e1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN6033589034.mp3?updated=1698625607" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>STIR OF ECHOES: "Paint it Black" - with Mary Beth McAndrews</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/stir-of-echoes-1999/</link>
      <description>Stir of Echoes was David Koepp's second directorial venture following the success of his 1996 thriller The Trigger Effect. Adapted from a lesser-known work by genre legend Richard Matheson, the film hit at a weird and perhaps unfortunate time.
Just 6 years off his massive breakthrough penning Steven Spielberg's Jurassic Park (a film he wrote when he was not yet 30 years old), Koepp was riding high in the industry.
But Stir of Echoes was a low-key ghost story thriller involving a boy who can see and talk to dead people, and, suffice to say, a lot of that oxygen had been sucked up when it arrived more than a month after the runaway hit The Sixth Sense.
Still, it was a modest, fairly low-budget success that enjoyed critical admiration for the most part, especially in the form of Kevin Bacon's well-tuned performance - one that could have easily gone off the rails in the hands of a different actor.
But is Stir of Echoes actually good? Is it scary?? We invited horror journalist Mary Beth McAndrews to talk to us about her experiences with the film and ask those very questions.
You can learn more about her here: https://www.mbmcandrews.com/</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>STIR OF ECHOES: "Paint it Black" - with Mary Beth McAndrews</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/9b49cd7e-6ad3-11ee-a9e2-b793b11cb523/image/2e4467.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Horror journalist/podcaster/filmmaker Mary Beth McAndrews joins us to kick off spooky season and Jenn's first co-hosting episode with "Stir of Echoes"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Stir of Echoes was David Koepp's second directorial venture following the success of his 1996 thriller The Trigger Effect. Adapted from a lesser-known work by genre legend Richard Matheson, the film hit at a weird and perhaps unfortunate time.
Just 6 years off his massive breakthrough penning Steven Spielberg's Jurassic Park (a film he wrote when he was not yet 30 years old), Koepp was riding high in the industry.
But Stir of Echoes was a low-key ghost story thriller involving a boy who can see and talk to dead people, and, suffice to say, a lot of that oxygen had been sucked up when it arrived more than a month after the runaway hit The Sixth Sense.
Still, it was a modest, fairly low-budget success that enjoyed critical admiration for the most part, especially in the form of Kevin Bacon's well-tuned performance - one that could have easily gone off the rails in the hands of a different actor.
But is Stir of Echoes actually good? Is it scary?? We invited horror journalist Mary Beth McAndrews to talk to us about her experiences with the film and ask those very questions.
You can learn more about her here: https://www.mbmcandrews.com/</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Stir of Echoes </em>was David Koepp's second directorial venture following the success of his 1996 thriller <em>The Trigger Effect. </em>Adapted from a lesser-known work by genre legend Richard Matheson, the film hit at a weird and perhaps unfortunate time.</p><p>Just 6 years off his massive breakthrough penning Steven Spielberg's <em>Jurassic Park</em> (a film he wrote when he was not yet 30 years old), Koepp was riding high in the industry.</p><p>But <em>Stir of Echoes </em>was a low-key ghost story thriller involving a boy who can see and talk to dead people, and, suffice to say, a lot of that oxygen had been sucked up when it arrived more than a month after the runaway hit <em>The Sixth Sense</em>.</p><p>Still, it was a modest, fairly low-budget success that enjoyed critical admiration for the most part, especially in the form of Kevin Bacon's well-tuned performance - one that could have easily gone off the rails in the hands of a different actor.</p><p>But is <em>Stir of Echoes</em> actually <em>good? </em>Is it scary?? We invited horror journalist Mary Beth McAndrews to talk to us about her experiences with the film and ask those very questions.</p><p>You can learn more about her here: <a href="https://www.mbmcandrews.com/">https://www.mbmcandrews.com/</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6664</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9b49cd7e-6ad3-11ee-a9e2-b793b11cb523]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN8212598921.mp3?updated=1697546437" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A VERY SPECIAL ROUND FOUR RECAP EPISODE - With A Very Special Guest</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/round-four-recap/</link>
      <description>It's time for our Round Four recap and it's a very special one!
After 40 episodes and 36 movies, and two specials...big changes are coming to 1999: The Podcast. Is it our very own Y2K?? Are we pivoting to video??? Will we both be replaced by cheaper AI alternatives?????
No.
But find out what IS coming following a look back a the nine movies from the round. We'll recap our favorites, our biggest surprises, our least favorites, and how Wild Wild West artificially inflates the round's total box office and lowers its overall Rotten Tomatoes score!
Plus, we'll preview what's ahead for Round 5 (and, yes, there is going to be a round 5!)</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2023 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>A VERY SPECIAL ROUND FOUR RECAP EPISODE - With A Very Special Guest</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle>A very special look back at Round Four with a very special announcement and a very special guest.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It's time for our Round Four recap and it's a very special one!
After 40 episodes and 36 movies, and two specials...big changes are coming to 1999: The Podcast. Is it our very own Y2K?? Are we pivoting to video??? Will we both be replaced by cheaper AI alternatives?????
No.
But find out what IS coming following a look back a the nine movies from the round. We'll recap our favorites, our biggest surprises, our least favorites, and how Wild Wild West artificially inflates the round's total box office and lowers its overall Rotten Tomatoes score!
Plus, we'll preview what's ahead for Round 5 (and, yes, there is going to be a round 5!)</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>It's time for our Round Four recap and it's a very special one!</p><p>After 40 episodes and 36 movies, and two specials...big changes are coming to 1999: The Podcast. Is it our very own Y2K?? Are we pivoting to video??? Will we both be replaced by cheaper AI alternatives?????</p><p>No.</p><p>But find out what IS coming following a look back a the nine movies from the round. We'll recap our favorites, our biggest surprises, our least favorites, and how <em>Wild Wild West </em>artificially inflates the round's total box office <em>and</em> lowers its overall Rotten Tomatoes score!</p><p>Plus, we'll preview what's ahead for Round 5 (and, yes, there is going to be a round 5!)</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2256</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[9af0066c-6070-11ee-a8ef-7ffca6d1ec11]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN6785356064.mp3?updated=1696175026" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TOPSY-TURVY: "Stan Leigh" - with Shreds</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/topsy-turvy-1999/</link>
      <description>Topsy-Turvy, writer-director Mike Leigh's ambitious period musical about the creation of Gilbert and Sullivan's "The Mikado", was not a commercial hit, losing about $14 million of its $20 million budget.
But like almost all of Leigh's work, it was a critical smash, remaining one of his best-reviewed movies and the recipient of a number of awards, including two Oscars, and landing on a number of year-end best-of lists in 1999.
Topsy-Turvy never really had "commercial hit" written all over it, though. It offers a uniformly spectacular cast including Jim Broadbent, Timothy Spall, Kevin McKidd, Lesley Manville, and Andy Serkis, and absolutely none of them were at the time (or really are today) bankable stars. And much of its appeal depends on how you feel about (or even if you know the first thing about) the work of Gilbert and Sullivan, hardly tapping into the zeitgeist of mainstream 1999 popular culture.
And Leigh's most commercially successful film had been 1994's Secrets and Lies, a runaway, word-of-mouth indy hit and critical and awards season darling. But Leigh is one of the most consistent directors alive, both in terms of the quality and very nature of his films.
So in our final "hosts choice" round selection, we invited Joey's co-host on How to Win the Lottery, "Shreds", himself a giant Leigh stan, to discuss Leigh's first real dip into the waters of grand period drama.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>TOPSY-TURVY: "Stan Leigh" - with Shreds</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/73e9e9ca-5585-11ee-bd22-0b546abfcaab/image/42fe14.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>We invited Shreds from "How To Win The Lottery" to talk about Mike Leigh, Gilbert and Sullivan, and 1999's "Topsy-Turvy".</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Topsy-Turvy, writer-director Mike Leigh's ambitious period musical about the creation of Gilbert and Sullivan's "The Mikado", was not a commercial hit, losing about $14 million of its $20 million budget.
But like almost all of Leigh's work, it was a critical smash, remaining one of his best-reviewed movies and the recipient of a number of awards, including two Oscars, and landing on a number of year-end best-of lists in 1999.
Topsy-Turvy never really had "commercial hit" written all over it, though. It offers a uniformly spectacular cast including Jim Broadbent, Timothy Spall, Kevin McKidd, Lesley Manville, and Andy Serkis, and absolutely none of them were at the time (or really are today) bankable stars. And much of its appeal depends on how you feel about (or even if you know the first thing about) the work of Gilbert and Sullivan, hardly tapping into the zeitgeist of mainstream 1999 popular culture.
And Leigh's most commercially successful film had been 1994's Secrets and Lies, a runaway, word-of-mouth indy hit and critical and awards season darling. But Leigh is one of the most consistent directors alive, both in terms of the quality and very nature of his films.
So in our final "hosts choice" round selection, we invited Joey's co-host on How to Win the Lottery, "Shreds", himself a giant Leigh stan, to discuss Leigh's first real dip into the waters of grand period drama.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Topsy-Turvy</em>, writer-director Mike Leigh's ambitious period musical about the creation of Gilbert and Sullivan's "The Mikado", was not a commercial hit, losing about $14 million of its $20 million budget.</p><p>But like almost all of Leigh's work, it was a critical smash, remaining one of his best-reviewed movies and the recipient of a number of awards, including two Oscars, and landing on a number of year-end best-of lists in 1999.</p><p><em>Topsy-Turvy</em> never really had "commercial hit" written all over it, though. It offers a uniformly spectacular cast including Jim Broadbent, Timothy Spall, Kevin McKidd, Lesley Manville, and Andy Serkis, and absolutely none of them were at the time (or really are today) bankable stars. And much of its appeal depends on how you feel about (or even if you know the first thing about) the work of Gilbert and Sullivan, hardly tapping into the zeitgeist of mainstream 1999 popular culture.</p><p>And Leigh's most commercially successful film had been 1994's <em>Secrets and Lies</em>, a runaway, word-of-mouth indy hit and critical and awards season darling. But Leigh is one of the most consistent directors alive, both in terms of the quality and very nature of his films.</p><p>So in our final "hosts choice" round selection, we invited Joey's co-host on <em>How to Win the Lottery</em>, "Shreds", himself a giant Leigh stan, to discuss Leigh's first real dip into the waters of grand period drama.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5141</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[73e9e9ca-5585-11ee-bd22-0b546abfcaab]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN6509521714.mp3?updated=1694974517" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MYSTERY MEN: "The Spleen" - with Becky Ellis</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/mystery-men-1999/</link>
      <description>Mystery Men was 1999's 68th-highest grossing movie, and an overall money loser.
It arrived at a strange but opportune time, as it both lampooned and heralded the rebirth of the superhero genre. The early stages of its production date to the mid 1990s, when movies like 1998’s Blade, often cited as the birthplace of the modern superhero film, began preproduction.
Based on the comic book series by Bob Burden, Kinka Usher's Mystery Men was first offered to Danny DeVito and Stiller, who both turned it down for personal reasons. Usher landed the movie thanks to his reputation as a great director of commercials.
But the movie's massive cast of established talent and big ambitions proved too much drama for Usher, who, according to Hank Azaria, said "I'm going back to commercials when this is done. I've had enough. I'd much rather do my cool little one-minute shorts that I make than deal with all this nonsense."
Mystery Men is very much a product of its time, and is now considered a cult classic. It also stars the late Paul Reubens, so we decided now was the time to talk about it, and we invited filmmaker, pop culture junky, and die-hard Mystery Men evangelist Becky Ellis to join us.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>MYSTERY MEN: "The Spleen" - with Becky Ellis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/62fc812c-4abd-11ee-b8eb-9b0993a120dd/image/ccde0b.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Becky Ellis joins to talk about the only film of 1999 to star the late Paul Reubens, the cult classic "Mystery Men"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Mystery Men was 1999's 68th-highest grossing movie, and an overall money loser.
It arrived at a strange but opportune time, as it both lampooned and heralded the rebirth of the superhero genre. The early stages of its production date to the mid 1990s, when movies like 1998’s Blade, often cited as the birthplace of the modern superhero film, began preproduction.
Based on the comic book series by Bob Burden, Kinka Usher's Mystery Men was first offered to Danny DeVito and Stiller, who both turned it down for personal reasons. Usher landed the movie thanks to his reputation as a great director of commercials.
But the movie's massive cast of established talent and big ambitions proved too much drama for Usher, who, according to Hank Azaria, said "I'm going back to commercials when this is done. I've had enough. I'd much rather do my cool little one-minute shorts that I make than deal with all this nonsense."
Mystery Men is very much a product of its time, and is now considered a cult classic. It also stars the late Paul Reubens, so we decided now was the time to talk about it, and we invited filmmaker, pop culture junky, and die-hard Mystery Men evangelist Becky Ellis to join us.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Mystery Men</em> was 1999's 68th-highest grossing movie, and an overall money loser.</p><p>It arrived at a strange but opportune time, as it both lampooned <em>and</em> heralded the rebirth of the superhero genre. The early stages of its production date to the mid 1990s, when movies like 1998’s <em>Blade</em>, often cited as <em>the </em>birthplace of the modern superhero film, began preproduction.</p><p>Based on the comic book series by Bob Burden, Kinka Usher's <em>Mystery Men </em>was first offered to Danny DeVito and Stiller, who both turned it down for personal reasons. Usher landed the movie thanks to his reputation as a great director of commercials.</p><p>But the movie's massive cast of established talent and big ambitions proved too much drama for Usher, who, according to Hank Azaria, said "I'm going back to commercials when this is done. I've had enough. I'd much rather do my cool little one-minute shorts that I make than deal with all this nonsense."</p><p><em>Mystery Men </em>is very much a product of its time, and is now considered a cult classic. It also stars the late Paul Reubens, so we decided now was the time to talk about it, and we invited filmmaker, pop culture junky, and die-hard <em>Mystery Men </em>evangelist Becky Ellis to join us.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5545</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[62fc812c-4abd-11ee-b8eb-9b0993a120dd]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN4577510054.mp3?updated=1693789077" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE STRAIGHT STORY: "Mt. Zion" - with Julia Sirmons</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/straight-story-1999/</link>
      <description>The Straight Story was that other 1999 movie about someone trying to get to a place called Zion.
In all seriousness, the beloved film about a man at the end of his life driving his lawnmower across the Midwest to visit his estranged brother is notable for a number of reasons.
It's a rare G-rated non-aminated movie (though the rating itself is a source of some controversy). It comes from legendary weirdo auteur David Lynch, most famous for films like Blue Velvet, Eraserhead, and the TV series Twin Peaks, and yet it is astoundingly, aggressively naturalistic and warm.
And it's the final film for stuntman-turned-actor Richard Farnsworth, whose performance carried the movie and whose health deteriorated as the film's shoot went on. He would die shortly after its release.
And while the awards behemoth American Beauty has aged like fine milk, The Straight Story, which also featured on a ton of critics' best-of lists from 1999, has only earned more and more admirers along the way.
Among them our guest today - Lynch fan and film writer Julia Sirmons, who you can learn more about here: juliasirmons.com</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>THE STRAIGHT STORY: "Mt. Zion" - with Julia Sirmons</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c910be4c-3f7d-11ee-a584-1f4a0ee2bbbf/image/082130.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Julia Sirmons joins the show to talk about David Lynch's least-weird (and, some would argue, best) film, The Straight Story.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Straight Story was that other 1999 movie about someone trying to get to a place called Zion.
In all seriousness, the beloved film about a man at the end of his life driving his lawnmower across the Midwest to visit his estranged brother is notable for a number of reasons.
It's a rare G-rated non-aminated movie (though the rating itself is a source of some controversy). It comes from legendary weirdo auteur David Lynch, most famous for films like Blue Velvet, Eraserhead, and the TV series Twin Peaks, and yet it is astoundingly, aggressively naturalistic and warm.
And it's the final film for stuntman-turned-actor Richard Farnsworth, whose performance carried the movie and whose health deteriorated as the film's shoot went on. He would die shortly after its release.
And while the awards behemoth American Beauty has aged like fine milk, The Straight Story, which also featured on a ton of critics' best-of lists from 1999, has only earned more and more admirers along the way.
Among them our guest today - Lynch fan and film writer Julia Sirmons, who you can learn more about here: juliasirmons.com</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>The Straight Story </em>was that <em>other </em>1999 movie about someone trying to get to a place called Zion.</p><p>In all seriousness, the beloved film about a man at the end of his life driving his lawnmower across the Midwest to visit his estranged brother is notable for a number of reasons.</p><p>It's a rare G-rated non-aminated movie (though the rating itself is a source of some controversy). It comes from legendary weirdo auteur David Lynch, most famous for films like <em>Blue Velvet, Eraserhead, </em>and the TV series <em>Twin Peaks</em>, and yet it is astoundingly, aggressively naturalistic and warm.</p><p>And it's the final film for stuntman-turned-actor Richard Farnsworth, whose performance carried the movie and whose health deteriorated as the film's shoot went on. He would die shortly after its release.</p><p>And while the awards behemoth <em>American Beauty </em>has aged like fine milk, <em>The Straight Story</em>, which also featured on a ton of critics' best-of lists from 1999, has only earned more and more admirers along the way.</p><p>Among them our guest today - Lynch fan and film writer Julia Sirmons, who you can learn more about here: <a href="https://www.juliasirmons.com/">juliasirmons.com</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4368</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c910be4c-3f7d-11ee-a584-1f4a0ee2bbbf]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN9787633546.mp3?updated=1692552298" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SIMON SEZ: "The Worm" - with Matt Stuertz</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/simon-sez-1999/</link>
      <description>At the 1999 box office, the Dennis Rodman action vehicle Simon Sez came in at...
Well, actually, we don't know, because Box Office Mojo's rankings end at #200, which was American Movie, which made $1,165,795.
Simon Sez made $292,152 (somehow) on a budget of...well, quite a bit more than that, probably.
You've probably never heard of Simon Sez, and we hadn't either, until Joey came upon it accidentally and it was just a movie we couldn't pass up.
Simon Sez is a very strange relic of its time, a Eurotrash martial arts action movie, directed by the guy who wrote the Iron Eagle trilogy, that keeps switching genres, featuring an unbearable performance by an unbearable human being (Dane Cook) that was meant for Robert Downey Jr.
It is, to use a variation of a phrase we often use on the show, a movie that could only be made at the time.
But it's so bizarre and bad that it's impossible to not be fascinated by. We watched it so you don't have to, but we had a great time talking about it with filmmaker Matt Stuertz.
You can find Matt on Twitter @MattStuertz</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>SIMON SEZ: "The Worm" - with Matt Stuertz</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ee83ff94-297b-11ee-8702-cf8351f41caf/image/f31bdf.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Filmmaker Matt Stuertz joins us to talk about the bizarre, virtually unknown Dennis Rodman vehicle "Simon Sez".</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>At the 1999 box office, the Dennis Rodman action vehicle Simon Sez came in at...
Well, actually, we don't know, because Box Office Mojo's rankings end at #200, which was American Movie, which made $1,165,795.
Simon Sez made $292,152 (somehow) on a budget of...well, quite a bit more than that, probably.
You've probably never heard of Simon Sez, and we hadn't either, until Joey came upon it accidentally and it was just a movie we couldn't pass up.
Simon Sez is a very strange relic of its time, a Eurotrash martial arts action movie, directed by the guy who wrote the Iron Eagle trilogy, that keeps switching genres, featuring an unbearable performance by an unbearable human being (Dane Cook) that was meant for Robert Downey Jr.
It is, to use a variation of a phrase we often use on the show, a movie that could only be made at the time.
But it's so bizarre and bad that it's impossible to not be fascinated by. We watched it so you don't have to, but we had a great time talking about it with filmmaker Matt Stuertz.
You can find Matt on Twitter @MattStuertz</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>At the 1999 box office, the Dennis Rodman action vehicle <em>Simon Sez</em> came in at...</p><p>Well, actually, we don't know, because Box Office Mojo's rankings end at #200, which was <em>American Movie</em>, which made $1,165,795.</p><p><em>Simon Sez </em>made $292,152 (somehow) on a budget of...well, quite a bit more than that, probably.</p><p>You've probably never heard of <em>Simon Sez</em>, and we hadn't either, until Joey came upon it accidentally and it was just a movie we couldn't pass up.</p><p><em>Simon Sez </em>is a very strange relic of its time, a Eurotrash martial arts action movie, directed by the guy who wrote the <em>Iron Eagle </em>trilogy, that keeps switching genres, featuring an unbearable performance by an unbearable human being (Dane Cook) that was <em>meant</em> for Robert Downey Jr.</p><p>It is, to use a variation of a phrase we often use on the show, a movie that could only be made at the time.</p><p>But it's so bizarre and bad that it's impossible to not be fascinated by. We watched it so you don't have to, but we had a great time talking about it with filmmaker Matt Stuertz.</p><p>You can find Matt on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/MattStuertz">@MattStuertz</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4888</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ee83ff94-297b-11ee-8702-cf8351f41caf]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN6956447897.mp3?updated=1690195807" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S DREAM: "Ye Woodes" - with Steven Sabel</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/midsummer-nights-dream/</link>
      <description>Michael Hoffman's adaptation of A Midsummer Night's Dream came at the end of a big decade for Shakespeare adaptations in general.
Franco Zeffirelli's Hamlet starring Mel Gibson was released in 1990, and other hit adaptations would follow - notably Kenneth Branagh’s celebrated Much Ado About Nothing in 1993, Oliver Parker’s Othello, starring Branagh and Laurence Fishburne, in 1995, and Baz Luhrman’s huge hit Romeo + Juliet with Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes in 1996, a movie that made ten times its 14 million dollar budget.
So when A Midsummer Night's Dream, often cited as the most popular Shakespeare play ever, hit early in summer movie season of 1999, it was basically a sure thing, especially given its stellar cast.
However, grossing just 16 million dollars, it barely made money on its 11 million dollar budget. Compare that to Romeo + Juliet or even Much Ado, which made 43 million on a less than 6 million dollar budget, and A Midsummer Night’s Dream has to be seen as a dud.
It was met with a very mixed (but largely approving) critical response, but what did we think of it?
This week, John and Joey welcome accomplished Shakespearean actor, director, and producer Steven Sabel to talk about it. Steven is also the host of Don't Quill the Messenger, a podcast exploring the Shakespeare authorship question.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>A MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S DREAM: "Ye Woodes" - with Steven Sabel</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/199b2666-1e79-11ee-8b7c-034ffa0f4d62/image/ea97f6.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Shakespearean actor, director, and podcast host (Don't Quill the Messenger) joins to discuss Michael Hoffman's "A Midsummer Night's Dream" adaptation.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Michael Hoffman's adaptation of A Midsummer Night's Dream came at the end of a big decade for Shakespeare adaptations in general.
Franco Zeffirelli's Hamlet starring Mel Gibson was released in 1990, and other hit adaptations would follow - notably Kenneth Branagh’s celebrated Much Ado About Nothing in 1993, Oliver Parker’s Othello, starring Branagh and Laurence Fishburne, in 1995, and Baz Luhrman’s huge hit Romeo + Juliet with Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes in 1996, a movie that made ten times its 14 million dollar budget.
So when A Midsummer Night's Dream, often cited as the most popular Shakespeare play ever, hit early in summer movie season of 1999, it was basically a sure thing, especially given its stellar cast.
However, grossing just 16 million dollars, it barely made money on its 11 million dollar budget. Compare that to Romeo + Juliet or even Much Ado, which made 43 million on a less than 6 million dollar budget, and A Midsummer Night’s Dream has to be seen as a dud.
It was met with a very mixed (but largely approving) critical response, but what did we think of it?
This week, John and Joey welcome accomplished Shakespearean actor, director, and producer Steven Sabel to talk about it. Steven is also the host of Don't Quill the Messenger, a podcast exploring the Shakespeare authorship question.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Michael Hoffman's adaptation of <em>A Midsummer Night's Dream </em>came at the end of a big decade for Shakespeare adaptations in general.</p><p>Franco Zeffirelli's <em>Hamlet</em> starring Mel Gibson was released in 1990, and other hit adaptations would follow - notably Kenneth Branagh’s celebrated <em>Much Ado About Nothing</em> in 1993, Oliver Parker’s <em>Othello</em>, starring Branagh and Laurence Fishburne, in 1995, and Baz Luhrman’s huge hit <em>Romeo + Juliet</em> with Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes in 1996, a movie that made ten times its 14 million dollar budget.</p><p>So when <em>A Midsummer Night's Dream</em>, often cited as the most popular Shakespeare play ever, hit early in summer movie season of 1999, it was basically a sure thing, especially given its stellar cast.</p><p>However, grossing just 16 million dollars, it barely made money on its 11 million dollar budget. Compare that to <em>Romeo + Juliet</em> or even <em>Much Ado</em>, which made 43 million on a less than 6 million dollar budget, and <em>A Midsummer Night’s Dream</em> has to be seen as a dud.</p><p>It was met with a very mixed (but largely approving) critical response, but what did we think of it?</p><p>This week, John and Joey welcome accomplished Shakespearean actor, director, and producer Steven Sabel to talk about it. Steven is also the host of <a href="https://www.dragonwagonradio.com/dontquillthemessenger"><em>Don't Quill the Messenger</em></a>, a podcast exploring the Shakespeare authorship question.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5067</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[199b2666-1e79-11ee-8b7c-034ffa0f4d62]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN2373665340.mp3?updated=1689195568" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WILD WILD WEST: "Wicky Wicky" - with Mike Manzi and Dan Cólon</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/wild-wild-west/</link>
      <description>It is late 1998, Wild Wild West is well into its production, and things are not going well. The film has gone through a stunning roster of would-be stars - Tom Cruise, George Clooney, and Mel Gibson among them - before landing on Will Smith, who turned down the lead role in an obscure sci-fi picture called The Matrix from a couple of fringe indy filmmakers named the Wachowski siblings in order to sign on to director Barry Sonnenfeld's sci-fi/Western mashup adventure.
The stars have little chemistry. None of them are happy with the material. Wild Wild West has burned through six writers and several reimaginings. Sonnenfeld - coming off a string of hits in The Addams Family, Get Shorty, and his previous team-up with Smith, Men in Black - sits at a table opposite producer Jon Peters.
"I've lost control of the film," he tells Peters. "It has no story, no core, no charm - the jokes don't work and the tone is all over the place."
Peters takes a deep breath. He looks down at the table and then up at Sonnenfeld. Suddenly, he slams his fist on the table, shoots up from his chair, and screams at his director. "DAMN IT! I don't care if it has no plot! I don't care if the actors hate it!! I don't care if it's miscast!!! I. ONLY. CARE. ABOUT. GIANT. METAL. SPIDERS. Get that spider onto the big screen. Nothing else matters!!"
Peters takes another breath. He sits back down. He looks a startled Sonnenfeld right in the eye. "Nothing. Else. Matters."
Wicky wicky wah wah.
We're joined this week by Dan Cólon (@DanColon) and Mike Manzi (@the_mikestir), hosts of The Monsters That Made Us.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>WILD WILD WEST: "Wicky Wicky" - with Mike Manzi and Dan Cólon</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/5721d202-1396-11ee-9aad-b7bb4405b9f8/image/6f8f35.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>We're heading straight to the wild, wild west with Dan Cólon and Mike Manzi of "The Monsters That Made Us"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It is late 1998, Wild Wild West is well into its production, and things are not going well. The film has gone through a stunning roster of would-be stars - Tom Cruise, George Clooney, and Mel Gibson among them - before landing on Will Smith, who turned down the lead role in an obscure sci-fi picture called The Matrix from a couple of fringe indy filmmakers named the Wachowski siblings in order to sign on to director Barry Sonnenfeld's sci-fi/Western mashup adventure.
The stars have little chemistry. None of them are happy with the material. Wild Wild West has burned through six writers and several reimaginings. Sonnenfeld - coming off a string of hits in The Addams Family, Get Shorty, and his previous team-up with Smith, Men in Black - sits at a table opposite producer Jon Peters.
"I've lost control of the film," he tells Peters. "It has no story, no core, no charm - the jokes don't work and the tone is all over the place."
Peters takes a deep breath. He looks down at the table and then up at Sonnenfeld. Suddenly, he slams his fist on the table, shoots up from his chair, and screams at his director. "DAMN IT! I don't care if it has no plot! I don't care if the actors hate it!! I don't care if it's miscast!!! I. ONLY. CARE. ABOUT. GIANT. METAL. SPIDERS. Get that spider onto the big screen. Nothing else matters!!"
Peters takes another breath. He sits back down. He looks a startled Sonnenfeld right in the eye. "Nothing. Else. Matters."
Wicky wicky wah wah.
We're joined this week by Dan Cólon (@DanColon) and Mike Manzi (@the_mikestir), hosts of The Monsters That Made Us.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>It is late 1998, <em>Wild Wild West</em> is well into its production, and things are not going well. The film has gone through a stunning roster of would-be stars - Tom Cruise, George Clooney, and Mel Gibson among them - before landing on Will Smith, who turned down the lead role in an obscure sci-fi picture called <em>The Matrix</em> from a couple of fringe indy filmmakers named the Wachowski siblings in order to sign on to director Barry Sonnenfeld's sci-fi/Western mashup adventure.</p><p>The stars have little chemistry. None of them are happy with the material. <em>Wild Wild West</em> has burned through six writers and several reimaginings. Sonnenfeld - coming off a string of hits in <em>The Addams Family, Get Shorty, </em>and his previous team-up with Smith, <em>Men in Black - </em>sits at a table opposite producer Jon Peters.</p><p>"I've lost control of the film," he tells Peters. "It has no story, no core, no charm - the jokes don't work and the tone is all over the place."</p><p>Peters takes a deep breath. He looks down at the table and then up at Sonnenfeld. Suddenly, he slams his fist on the table, shoots up from his chair, and screams at his director. "DAMN IT! I don't care if it has no plot! I don't care if the actors hate it!! I don't care if it's miscast!!! I. ONLY. CARE. ABOUT. GIANT. METAL. SPIDERS. Get that spider onto the big screen. Nothing else matters!!"</p><p>Peters takes another breath. He sits back down. He looks a startled Sonnenfeld right in the eye. "Nothing. Else. Matters."</p><p>Wicky wicky wah wah.</p><p>We're joined this week by Dan Cólon (<a href="https://twitter.com/DanColon">@DanColon</a>) and Mike Manzi (<a href="https://twitter.com/the_mikestir">@the_mikestir</a>), hosts of <a href="https://www.cageclub.me/monsters/"><em>The Monsters That Made Us</em></a><em>.</em></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6341</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[5721d202-1396-11ee-9aad-b7bb4405b9f8]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN4291040790.mp3?updated=1689195541" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GO: "Mary Xmas" - with Alex Steed and Jess Collins</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/go-1999-alex-steed/</link>
      <description>The shortest-titled movie of 1999 (and among the shortest ever), Go was Doug Liman's follow-up to his 1996 debut, a collaboration with writer John Favreau, Swingers.
There is some shared DNA between the two movies - both explore a very specific subculture in LA at a very specific time in the 90s, both drip with cool, and both borrow heavily from other films while creating something all their own.
But they're also very different. And Go was often labeled by critics - who overwhelmingly praised the movie - as "Tarantinoesque".
Of all the movies we've covered, this one is perhaps the most of its time (by design) and, weirdly, among the least aged, as Go's emphasis on clever dialogue, fast-paced storytelling, and characters that feel like real people make it a movie that is every bit as enjoyable, frantic, surprising, and oddly sweet as it was 24 years ago.
John and Joey invited two giant Go fans to discuss all of this - friend of the network Jess Collins, and the co-host of the podcast You Are Good, Alex Steed.
Jess is on Twitter @jayarekay_
Alex is on Twitter @alexsteed
 </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2023 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>GO: "Mary Xmas" - with Alex Steed and Jess Collins</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/b2789aea-08b6-11ee-90bb-43371145955b/image/a3c417.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Alex Steed and Jess Collins join the show to talk about 1999's best not-Christmas-movie Christmas movie, Doug Liman's "Go".</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The shortest-titled movie of 1999 (and among the shortest ever), Go was Doug Liman's follow-up to his 1996 debut, a collaboration with writer John Favreau, Swingers.
There is some shared DNA between the two movies - both explore a very specific subculture in LA at a very specific time in the 90s, both drip with cool, and both borrow heavily from other films while creating something all their own.
But they're also very different. And Go was often labeled by critics - who overwhelmingly praised the movie - as "Tarantinoesque".
Of all the movies we've covered, this one is perhaps the most of its time (by design) and, weirdly, among the least aged, as Go's emphasis on clever dialogue, fast-paced storytelling, and characters that feel like real people make it a movie that is every bit as enjoyable, frantic, surprising, and oddly sweet as it was 24 years ago.
John and Joey invited two giant Go fans to discuss all of this - friend of the network Jess Collins, and the co-host of the podcast You Are Good, Alex Steed.
Jess is on Twitter @jayarekay_
Alex is on Twitter @alexsteed
 </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The shortest-titled movie of 1999 (and among the shortest ever), <em>Go </em>was Doug Liman's follow-up to his 1996 debut, a collaboration with writer John Favreau, <em>Swingers.</em></p><p>There is some shared DNA between the two movies - both explore a very specific subculture in LA at a very specific time in the 90s, both drip with cool, and both borrow heavily from other films while creating something all their own.</p><p>But they're also very different. And <em>Go</em> was often labeled by critics - who overwhelmingly praised the movie - as "Tarantinoesque".</p><p>Of all the movies we've covered, this one is perhaps the most of its time (by design) and, weirdly, among the least aged, as <em>Go</em>'s emphasis on clever dialogue, fast-paced storytelling, and characters that feel like real people make it a movie that is every bit as enjoyable, frantic, surprising, and oddly sweet as it was 24 years ago.</p><p>John and Joey invited two giant <em>Go</em> fans to discuss all of this - friend of the network Jess Collins, and the co-host of the podcast You Are Good, Alex Steed.</p><p>Jess is on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/jayarekay_">@jayarekay_</a></p><p>Alex is on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/alexsteed">@alexsteed</a></p><p> </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5461</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b2789aea-08b6-11ee-90bb-43371145955b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN7041440165.mp3?updated=1689195515" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AMERICAN MOVIE: "Coven" - with BJ and Harmony Colangelo</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/american-movie-1999/ </link>
      <description>Chris Smith and Sarah Price's heartfelt, quirky, and utterly original documentary American Movie was not one of 1999's major blockbuster hits. And of the 200 movies listed in Box Office Mojo's list of film grosses from that year, American Movie comes in at number 200.
But it has gone on to become of the most critically successful and beloved documentaries ever made. The story of filmmaker Mark Borchardt's attempt to make his dream movie on a microbudget in his quiet midwestern town. The film ends up as something of a meditation on artistry, the American Dream, family, and the true costs of the relentless will to create.
And it is now considered by many to be one of the greatest documentaries ever made, and in some way helped usher in a new era of documentaries as a commercially viable, culturally relevant genre of film.
BJ Colangelo, who established herself as the expert on midwest quirkiness in our Drop Dead Gorgeous episode. rejoins us. And this time, so does Harmony Colangelo (who happen to be married and are also the co-hosts of the podcast This Ends at Prom) as we take a loving look at American Movie.
Check out This Ends at Prom on Patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/thisendsatprom</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2023 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>AMERICAN MOVIE: "Coven" - with BJ and Harmony Colangelo</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3699706a-fdbd-11ed-bea9-6fa1bfc7a085/image/974301.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Colangelo Wives of "This Ends at Prom" join John and Joey to talk about Chris Smith and Sarah Price's "American Movie"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Chris Smith and Sarah Price's heartfelt, quirky, and utterly original documentary American Movie was not one of 1999's major blockbuster hits. And of the 200 movies listed in Box Office Mojo's list of film grosses from that year, American Movie comes in at number 200.
But it has gone on to become of the most critically successful and beloved documentaries ever made. The story of filmmaker Mark Borchardt's attempt to make his dream movie on a microbudget in his quiet midwestern town. The film ends up as something of a meditation on artistry, the American Dream, family, and the true costs of the relentless will to create.
And it is now considered by many to be one of the greatest documentaries ever made, and in some way helped usher in a new era of documentaries as a commercially viable, culturally relevant genre of film.
BJ Colangelo, who established herself as the expert on midwest quirkiness in our Drop Dead Gorgeous episode. rejoins us. And this time, so does Harmony Colangelo (who happen to be married and are also the co-hosts of the podcast This Ends at Prom) as we take a loving look at American Movie.
Check out This Ends at Prom on Patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/thisendsatprom</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Chris Smith and Sarah Price's heartfelt, quirky, and utterly original documentary <em>American Movie</em> was not one of 1999's major blockbuster hits. And of the 200 movies listed in Box Office Mojo's list of film grosses from that year, <em>American Movie </em>comes in at number 200.</p><p>But it has gone on to become of the most critically successful and beloved documentaries ever made. The story of filmmaker Mark Borchardt's attempt to make his dream movie on a microbudget in his quiet midwestern town. The film ends up as something of a meditation on artistry, the American Dream, family, and the true costs of the relentless will to create.</p><p>And it is now considered by many to be one of the greatest documentaries ever made, and in some way helped usher in a new era of documentaries as a commercially viable, culturally relevant genre of film.</p><p>BJ Colangelo, who established herself as the expert on midwest quirkiness in our <em>Drop Dead Gorgeous </em>episode. rejoins us. And this time, so does Harmony Colangelo (who happen to be married and are also the co-hosts of the podcast This Ends at Prom) as we take a loving look at <em>American Movie</em>.</p><p>Check out This Ends at Prom on Patreon here: <a href="https://www.patreon.com/thisendsatprom">https://www.patreon.com/thisendsatprom</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5493</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3699706a-fdbd-11ed-bea9-6fa1bfc7a085]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN8658945828.mp3?updated=1689195489" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Sarah Rose Cosmetics Mount Rose American Teen Princess Round 3 Review Show</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/round-3-review/ </link>
      <description>It's the Sarah Rose Cosmetics Mount Rose American Teen Princess Round 3 Review Show.
One year and 27 movies later, we're wrapping up round 3 and previewing our fourth round - this time, it's hosts' choice, as John and Joey each pick 4 movies and one they decided on together. But before that, they are joined by their friend and #1 fan Tyler Birth to take a look back at the highs and lows of our request round.
Thanks to all our guest from this round:
Bridget Todd (The Talented Mr. Ripley)
Jenn Tisdale (Jawbreaker)
Cody and Garth from Least Haunted (Ravenous)
BJ Colangelo, Chelsey Weber-Smith, and Miranda Zickler (Drop Dead Gorgeous)
Mark Hofmeyer (Deep Blue Sea)
Heather Antos (Tarzan)
Dahlia Balcazar (The Haunting)
Sebastian Major (The Messenger)
and
Austin Wolf-Sothern (Bats)
You can find Tyler on Twitter @OhThatTyler</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>The Sarah Rose Cosmetics Mount Rose American Teen Princess Round 3 Review Show</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/bb25599a-f2bc-11ed-b334-679111178c63/image/0f8ae3.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Sarah Rose Cosmetics Mount Rose American Teen Princess Round 3 Review Show</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It's the Sarah Rose Cosmetics Mount Rose American Teen Princess Round 3 Review Show.
One year and 27 movies later, we're wrapping up round 3 and previewing our fourth round - this time, it's hosts' choice, as John and Joey each pick 4 movies and one they decided on together. But before that, they are joined by their friend and #1 fan Tyler Birth to take a look back at the highs and lows of our request round.
Thanks to all our guest from this round:
Bridget Todd (The Talented Mr. Ripley)
Jenn Tisdale (Jawbreaker)
Cody and Garth from Least Haunted (Ravenous)
BJ Colangelo, Chelsey Weber-Smith, and Miranda Zickler (Drop Dead Gorgeous)
Mark Hofmeyer (Deep Blue Sea)
Heather Antos (Tarzan)
Dahlia Balcazar (The Haunting)
Sebastian Major (The Messenger)
and
Austin Wolf-Sothern (Bats)
You can find Tyler on Twitter @OhThatTyler</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>It's the Sarah Rose Cosmetics Mount Rose American Teen Princess Round 3 Review Show.</p><p>One year and 27 movies later, we're wrapping up round 3 and previewing our fourth round - this time, it's hosts' choice, as John and Joey each pick 4 movies and one they decided on together. But before that, they are joined by their friend and #1 fan Tyler Birth to take a look back at the highs and lows of our request round.</p><p>Thanks to all our guest from this round:</p><p>Bridget Todd (The Talented Mr. Ripley)</p><p>Jenn Tisdale (Jawbreaker)</p><p>Cody and Garth from Least Haunted (Ravenous)</p><p>BJ Colangelo, Chelsey Weber-Smith, and Miranda Zickler (Drop Dead Gorgeous)</p><p>Mark Hofmeyer (Deep Blue Sea)</p><p>Heather Antos (Tarzan)</p><p>Dahlia Balcazar (The Haunting)</p><p>Sebastian Major (The Messenger)</p><p>and</p><p>Austin Wolf-Sothern (Bats)</p><p>You can find Tyler on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/OhThatTyler">@OhThatTyler</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3101</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[bb25599a-f2bc-11ed-b334-679111178c63]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN5471808673.mp3?updated=1684113092" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BATS: "Bats, Man" - with Austin Wolf-Sothern</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/bats-1999/</link>
      <description>"Dusk! With a creepy, tingling sensation, you hear the fluttering of leathery wing! BATS!"
Bats.
So, not every 1999 movie was a paradigm-shifting landmark. Some of them were unabashedly absurd b-movie creature features about bats. Like Bats.
1999’s 127th-highest grossing movie, Bats opened at #9 just in time for Halloween, on the weekend of October 29th.
But it nearly earned back its budget in its opening week, taking in 4.7 million dollars, and going on to earn more than 10 million dollars on a US-only release.
Bats is also the worst-reviewed film we’ve covered. But is the Lou Diamond Philips-led horror romp a hidden gem?
Maybe!
So we asked the world's #1 fan of the movie Bratz, Austin Wolf-Sothern, to go to bat for Bats, a movie Joey ended up loving and John ended up rooting for in spite of all its frustrating shortcomings.
You can check out Austin's Patreon site here: The Truth About Cats and Bratz</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>BATS: "Bats, Man" - with Austin Wolf-Sothern</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/399afdcc-e6b8-11ed-b266-b335fd2d62aa/image/2b3533.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Austin Wolf-Sothern joins the show to discuss the charms of 1999's best genetically-engineered killer bats movie.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>"Dusk! With a creepy, tingling sensation, you hear the fluttering of leathery wing! BATS!"
Bats.
So, not every 1999 movie was a paradigm-shifting landmark. Some of them were unabashedly absurd b-movie creature features about bats. Like Bats.
1999’s 127th-highest grossing movie, Bats opened at #9 just in time for Halloween, on the weekend of October 29th.
But it nearly earned back its budget in its opening week, taking in 4.7 million dollars, and going on to earn more than 10 million dollars on a US-only release.
Bats is also the worst-reviewed film we’ve covered. But is the Lou Diamond Philips-led horror romp a hidden gem?
Maybe!
So we asked the world's #1 fan of the movie Bratz, Austin Wolf-Sothern, to go to bat for Bats, a movie Joey ended up loving and John ended up rooting for in spite of all its frustrating shortcomings.
You can check out Austin's Patreon site here: The Truth About Cats and Bratz</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>"Dusk! With a creepy, tingling sensation, you hear the fluttering of leathery wing! <strong>BATS!</strong>"</p><p><em>Bats.</em></p><p>So, not every 1999 movie was a paradigm-shifting landmark. Some of them were unabashedly absurd b-movie creature features about bats. Like <em>Bats.</em></p><p>1999’s 127th-highest grossing movie, <em>Bats </em>opened at #9 just in time for Halloween, on the weekend of October 29th.</p><p>But it nearly earned back its budget in its opening week, taking in 4.7 million dollars, and going on to earn more than 10 million dollars on a US-only release.</p><p><em>Bats </em>is also the worst-reviewed film we’ve covered. But is the Lou Diamond Philips-led horror romp a hidden gem?</p><p>Maybe!</p><p>So we asked the world's #1 fan of the movie <em>Bratz, </em>Austin Wolf-Sothern, to go to bat for <em>Bats</em>, a movie Joey ended up loving and John ended up rooting for in spite of all its frustrating shortcomings.</p><p>You can check out Austin's Patreon site here: <a href="https://www.patreon.com/wolfsothern">The Truth About Cats and Bratz</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4398</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[399afdcc-e6b8-11ed-b266-b335fd2d62aa]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN2623965343.mp3?updated=1689195441" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE MESSENGER - THE STORY OF JOAN OF ARC: "The Voices" - with Sebastian Major</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/messenger-joan-of-arc/</link>
      <description>The Messenger: The Story of Joan of Arc was...big in France?
Actually, The Messenger was indeed touted as "Oscar bait" prior to its release in November of 1999. Luc Besson was fresh off of his most commercially successful hit The Fifth Element, and so reteaming with Fifth Element star Milla Jovovich (who at the time was married to Besson) for a big, epic, gritty retelling of the Joan of Arc story seemed like a sure thing.
Add in star power from John Malkovich, Dustin Hoffman, and how could you go wrong?
Well, The Messenger goes wrong a lot of ways. But it's also not the abysmal disaster some people seem to remember.
The Messenger, for all its faults, tries to do something different with the well-worn Joan of Arc story, and it has a lot to recommend it (just maybe not its run-time).
This week, Our Fake History host Sebastian Major, who covered Joan in his podcast's first season, joins John and Joey to share his thoughts on the award-winning epic that wasn't.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>THE MESSENGER - THE STORY OF JOAN OF ARC: "The Voices" - with Sebastian Major</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ca097040-dcb4-11ed-b56e-bb71f615a136/image/7b583f.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Our Fake History host Sebastian Major talks to John and Joey about what he makes of Luc Besson's 1999 take on Joan of Arc. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Messenger: The Story of Joan of Arc was...big in France?
Actually, The Messenger was indeed touted as "Oscar bait" prior to its release in November of 1999. Luc Besson was fresh off of his most commercially successful hit The Fifth Element, and so reteaming with Fifth Element star Milla Jovovich (who at the time was married to Besson) for a big, epic, gritty retelling of the Joan of Arc story seemed like a sure thing.
Add in star power from John Malkovich, Dustin Hoffman, and how could you go wrong?
Well, The Messenger goes wrong a lot of ways. But it's also not the abysmal disaster some people seem to remember.
The Messenger, for all its faults, tries to do something different with the well-worn Joan of Arc story, and it has a lot to recommend it (just maybe not its run-time).
This week, Our Fake History host Sebastian Major, who covered Joan in his podcast's first season, joins John and Joey to share his thoughts on the award-winning epic that wasn't.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>The Messenger: The Story of Joan of Arc </em>was...big in France?</p><p>Actually, <em>The Messenger </em>was indeed touted as "Oscar bait" prior to its release in November of 1999. Luc Besson was fresh off of his most commercially successful hit <em>The Fifth Element</em>, and so reteaming with <em>Fifth Element </em>star Milla Jovovich (who at the time was married to Besson) for a big, epic, gritty retelling of the Joan of Arc story seemed like a sure thing.</p><p>Add in star power from John Malkovich, Dustin Hoffman, and how could you go wrong?</p><p>Well, <em>The Messenger </em>goes wrong a lot of ways. But it's also not the abysmal disaster some people seem to remember.</p><p><em>The Messenger</em>, for all its faults, tries to do something different with the well-worn Joan of Arc story, and it has a lot to recommend it (just maybe not its run-time).</p><p>This week, <em>Our Fake History </em>host Sebastian Major, who covered Joan in his podcast's first season, joins John and Joey to share his thoughts on the award-winning epic that wasn't.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5733</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ca097040-dcb4-11ed-b56e-bb71f615a136]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN7169769759.mp3?updated=1689195419" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE HAUNTING: First Anniversary Episode - with Dahlia Balcazar (1999 FOREVER)</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/1999-forever-the-haunting/ </link>
      <description>It's our first anniversary, and so we invited fellow 1999-podcaster Dahlia Balcazar to talk about her podcast, 1999 FOREVER, and her hand-picked 1999 movie: The Haunting!
Dahlia tells us why she decided to make an audio essay about the year of all years, and we touch on what was going on in other areas of culture outside of the movie theater, like Y2K and The Sopranos.
Dahlia's requested movie was Jan Debont's follow-up to Speed and Twister, the 2nd major...um...adaptation of Shirley Jackson's novel The Haunting of Hill House. Originally planned to be release with the novel's title intact, it was shortened to The Haunting to avoid confusion with another 1999 movie, The House on Haunted Hill.
Starring Lily Taylor, Liam Neeson, Catherine Zeta-Jones, and Owen Wilson, The Haunting was not a disaster at the box office, cracking the top 25 for the year. But it is, nonetheless, a disaster...and not in the way it's supposed to be, like Twister.
Is there any reason to watch this movie? Find out!
But there are definitely reasons to listen to 1999: Forever, which you can find here!
https://www.salvadordahlia.com/1999-forever</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>THE HAUNTING: First Anniversary Episode - with Dahlia Balcazar (1999 FOREVER)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/7388432a-d18f-11ed-a899-b7f102c5e95b/image/0a9842.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dahlia Balcazar joins John and Joey for their one-year anniversary to talk about her podcast, 1999 FOREVER, and her hand-selected 1999 movie, "The Haunting".</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>It's our first anniversary, and so we invited fellow 1999-podcaster Dahlia Balcazar to talk about her podcast, 1999 FOREVER, and her hand-picked 1999 movie: The Haunting!
Dahlia tells us why she decided to make an audio essay about the year of all years, and we touch on what was going on in other areas of culture outside of the movie theater, like Y2K and The Sopranos.
Dahlia's requested movie was Jan Debont's follow-up to Speed and Twister, the 2nd major...um...adaptation of Shirley Jackson's novel The Haunting of Hill House. Originally planned to be release with the novel's title intact, it was shortened to The Haunting to avoid confusion with another 1999 movie, The House on Haunted Hill.
Starring Lily Taylor, Liam Neeson, Catherine Zeta-Jones, and Owen Wilson, The Haunting was not a disaster at the box office, cracking the top 25 for the year. But it is, nonetheless, a disaster...and not in the way it's supposed to be, like Twister.
Is there any reason to watch this movie? Find out!
But there are definitely reasons to listen to 1999: Forever, which you can find here!
https://www.salvadordahlia.com/1999-forever</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>It's our first anniversary, and so we invited fellow 1999-podcaster Dahlia Balcazar to talk about her podcast, <em>1999</em> <em>FOREVER</em>, and her hand-picked 1999 movie: <em>The Haunting</em>!</p><p>Dahlia tells us why she decided to make an audio essay about the year of all years, and we touch on what was going on in other areas of culture outside of the movie theater, like Y2K and <em>The Sopranos</em>.</p><p>Dahlia's requested movie was Jan Debont's follow-up to <em>Speed </em>and <em>Twister</em>, the 2nd major...um...adaptation of Shirley Jackson's novel <em>The Haunting of Hill House</em>. Originally planned to be release with the novel's title intact, it was shortened to <em>The Haunting</em> to avoid confusion with another 1999 movie, <em>The House on Haunted Hill</em>.</p><p>Starring Lily Taylor, Liam Neeson, Catherine Zeta-Jones, and Owen Wilson, <em>The Haunting </em>was not a disaster at the box office, cracking the top 25 for the year. But it is, nonetheless, a disaster...and not in the way it's supposed to be, like <em>Twister</em>.</p><p>Is there any reason to watch this movie? Find out!</p><p>But there are definitely reasons to listen to 1999: Forever, which you can find here!</p><p><a href="https://www.salvadordahlia.com/1999-forever">https://www.salvadordahlia.com/1999-forever</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5686</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7388432a-d18f-11ed-a899-b7f102c5e95b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN8256113198.mp3?updated=1689195364" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TARZAN: "Apes!" - with Heather Antos</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/disneys-tarzan/</link>
      <description>Disney’s Tarzan was, as the 6th-highest grossing movie of the year, a big hit. But it also had a giant budget. Made for $130 million, it grossed $171 million domestically and $448 million worldwide. 
Tarzan did well with critics, as well. It was nominated for more than 2 dozen different awards, and won the Oscar and Golden Globe for best original song, Phil Collins’ “You’ll Be in My Heart”. 
It holds a an 89 percent Rotten Tomatoes score with more than 100 reviews, and 79 Metacritic score with 27 reviews, putting it right in the middle of the pack of the so-called Disney Renaissance films.
But, oddly, this de facto grand finale of the Disney hand-drawn era just doesn't loom as large as the like of The Lion King, Aladdin, Beauty and the Beast, or even Hercules.
It will, however, always be in the heart (get it?) of our guest, artist and senior editor at IDW, Heather Antos. She joins John and Joey to talk about why Tarzan is great and deserves its seat in the Disney pantheon.
Heather is on Twitter @HeatherAntos</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>TARZAN: "Apes!" - with Heather Antos</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fa95accc-c5c3-11ed-b216-971eb415d6b5/image/10fa80.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Artist and IDW's senior editor Heather Antos talks to John and Joey about her love of Disney's adaptation of the beloved Edgar Rice Burroughs character. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Disney’s Tarzan was, as the 6th-highest grossing movie of the year, a big hit. But it also had a giant budget. Made for $130 million, it grossed $171 million domestically and $448 million worldwide. 
Tarzan did well with critics, as well. It was nominated for more than 2 dozen different awards, and won the Oscar and Golden Globe for best original song, Phil Collins’ “You’ll Be in My Heart”. 
It holds a an 89 percent Rotten Tomatoes score with more than 100 reviews, and 79 Metacritic score with 27 reviews, putting it right in the middle of the pack of the so-called Disney Renaissance films.
But, oddly, this de facto grand finale of the Disney hand-drawn era just doesn't loom as large as the like of The Lion King, Aladdin, Beauty and the Beast, or even Hercules.
It will, however, always be in the heart (get it?) of our guest, artist and senior editor at IDW, Heather Antos. She joins John and Joey to talk about why Tarzan is great and deserves its seat in the Disney pantheon.
Heather is on Twitter @HeatherAntos</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Disney’s <em>Tarzan</em> was, as the 6th-highest grossing movie of the year, a big hit. But it also had a giant budget. Made for $130 million, it grossed $171 million domestically and $448 million worldwide. </p><p><em>Tarzan</em> did well with critics, as well. It was nominated for more than 2 dozen different awards, and won the Oscar and Golden Globe for best original song, Phil Collins’ “You’ll Be in My Heart”. </p><p>It holds a an 89 percent Rotten Tomatoes score with more than 100 reviews, and 79 Metacritic score with 27 reviews, putting it right in the middle of the pack of the so-called Disney Renaissance films.</p><p>But, oddly, this de facto grand finale of the Disney hand-drawn era just doesn't loom as large as the like of <em>The Lion King, Aladdin, Beauty and the Beast, </em>or even <em>Hercules</em>.</p><p>It <em>will</em>, however, always <em>be in the heart </em>(get it?) of our guest, artist and senior editor at IDW, Heather Antos. She joins John and Joey to talk about why <em>Tarzan </em>is great and deserves its seat in the Disney pantheon.</p><p>Heather is on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/HeatherAntos">@HeatherAntos</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4856</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[fa95accc-c5c3-11ed-b216-971eb415d6b5]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN7117540750.mp3?updated=1689195299" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DEEP BLUE SEA: "Sharks!" - with Mark Hofmeyer</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/deep-blue-sea/ </link>
      <description>A modest success, Deep Blue Sea was the 29th-highest grossing movie of the year, putting it close the likes of Any Given Sunday, Galaxy Quest, and The Thomas Crown Affair, earning $74 million at the domestic box office on an $80ish million budget but going on to take in $165 million worldwide.
Opening on July 30, Deep Blue Sea debuted in 3rd place behind the #1 opening of Runaway Bride and a still-strong Blair Witch Project coming in #2 in its third week.
It would continue to stay in the top 10 for a respectable three further weeks.
Writing in Wired in 2016, friend of the show and giant Deep Blue Sea fan Brian Raftery noted that it was one of the last movies of its kind, one ubiquitous in the mid-90s, “A]n R-rated B-movie, full of gore and chaos and smart-stupidness.”
It felt old-fashioned and anachronistic by the eve of the 21st century, but has gone on to be celebrated as, at once, a shameless facsimile, delightful celebration, and singular exemplar of its specific subgenre.
To discuss its legacy and surprising effectiveness, John and Joey invited Deep Blue Sea's most notable fan, Mark Hofmeyer, to explain why it's so great, and to settle which of the film's many doors are best.
You can find Mark, and link to his many ventures, on Twitter @Mhofmeyer</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>DEEP BLUE SEA: "Sharks!" - with Mark Hofmeyer</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/2e2d560c-bb9c-11ed-b245-3ff1b8b099d5/image/ab797f.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Writer, podcaster, and "Deep Blue Sea" superfan Mark Hofmeyer joins John and Joey to talk about his favorite shark-infested 1999 movie!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A modest success, Deep Blue Sea was the 29th-highest grossing movie of the year, putting it close the likes of Any Given Sunday, Galaxy Quest, and The Thomas Crown Affair, earning $74 million at the domestic box office on an $80ish million budget but going on to take in $165 million worldwide.
Opening on July 30, Deep Blue Sea debuted in 3rd place behind the #1 opening of Runaway Bride and a still-strong Blair Witch Project coming in #2 in its third week.
It would continue to stay in the top 10 for a respectable three further weeks.
Writing in Wired in 2016, friend of the show and giant Deep Blue Sea fan Brian Raftery noted that it was one of the last movies of its kind, one ubiquitous in the mid-90s, “A]n R-rated B-movie, full of gore and chaos and smart-stupidness.”
It felt old-fashioned and anachronistic by the eve of the 21st century, but has gone on to be celebrated as, at once, a shameless facsimile, delightful celebration, and singular exemplar of its specific subgenre.
To discuss its legacy and surprising effectiveness, John and Joey invited Deep Blue Sea's most notable fan, Mark Hofmeyer, to explain why it's so great, and to settle which of the film's many doors are best.
You can find Mark, and link to his many ventures, on Twitter @Mhofmeyer</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A modest success, <em>Deep Blue Sea</em> was the 29th-highest grossing movie of the year, putting it close the likes of<em> Any Given Sunday</em>, <em>Galaxy Quest</em>, and <em>The Thomas Crown Affair</em>, earning $74 million at the domestic box office on an $80ish million budget but going on to take in $165 million worldwide.</p><p>Opening on July 30, <em>Deep Blue Sea</em> debuted in 3rd place behind the #1 opening of <em>Runaway Bride</em> and a still-strong <em>Blair Witch Project</em> coming in #2 in its third week.</p><p>It would continue to stay in the top 10 for a respectable three further weeks.</p><p>Writing in Wired in 2016, friend of the show and giant <em>Deep Blue Sea</em> fan Brian Raftery noted that it was one of the last movies of its kind, one ubiquitous in the mid-90s, “A]n R-rated B-movie, full of gore and chaos and smart-stupidness.”</p><p>It felt old-fashioned and anachronistic by the eve of the 21st century, but has gone on to be celebrated as, at once, a shameless facsimile, delightful celebration, and singular exemplar of its specific subgenre.</p><p>To discuss its legacy and surprising effectiveness, John and Joey invited <em>Deep Blue Sea</em>'s most notable fan, Mark Hofmeyer, to explain why it's so great, and to settle which of the film's many doors are best.</p><p>You can find Mark, and link to his many ventures, on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/Mhofmeyer">@Mhofmeyer</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5821</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2e2d560c-bb9c-11ed-b245-3ff1b8b099d5]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN3046012333.mp3?updated=1689195273" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>1999 Extra Super Special Surprise Bonus: The Episode - "Drop Dead Gorgeous" Director Michael Patrick Jann</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/michael-patrick-jann/</link>
      <description>John and Joey talk to "Drop Dead Gorgeous" director and founding member of "The State" Michael Patrick Jann.
Jann shares his thoughts on the film's journey from critical and commercial dud to beloved cult classic, and shares what he's been up to lately (spoiler, his second feature film is due out this year!)</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2023 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>"Drop Dead Gorgeous" Director Michael Patrick Jann</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/bfadf9e8-ba2e-11ed-a258-ff2cf80c40c0/image/958105.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>John and Joey talk to "Drop Dead Gorgeous" director and founding member of "The State" Michael Patrick Jann</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>John and Joey talk to "Drop Dead Gorgeous" director and founding member of "The State" Michael Patrick Jann.
Jann shares his thoughts on the film's journey from critical and commercial dud to beloved cult classic, and shares what he's been up to lately (spoiler, his second feature film is due out this year!)</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>John and Joey talk to "Drop Dead Gorgeous" director and founding member of "The State" Michael Patrick Jann.</p><p>Jann shares his thoughts on the film's journey from critical and commercial dud to beloved cult classic, and shares what he's been up to lately (spoiler, his second feature film is due out this year!)</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2067</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[bfadf9e8-ba2e-11ed-a258-ff2cf80c40c0]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN2713671572.mp3?updated=1677895759" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DROP DEAD GORGEOUS: "Amer-I-Can!" - with BJ Colangelo, Chelsey Weber-Smith, and Miranda Zickler</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/drop-dead-gorgeous-1999/</link>
      <description>A critical and commercial failure upon its release, Drop Dead Gorgeous was the 125th-highest grossing movie of 1999.
Filmed in the then still novel mockumentary style, the movie about a beauty pageant in Mount Rose, Minnesota was written by a former beauty pageant contestant from Rosemount, Minnesota, Lona Williams (also known as 1985’s Minnesota Junior Miss) and directed by former member of The State and accomplished TV director Michael Patrick Jann.
And it boasts a jam-packed cast, including Kirsten Dunst, Allison Janney, Ellen Barkin, Denise Richards, and the film debut of Amy Adams.
But in the years since its release, it has become an enormously popular cult favorite, with appreciative audiences finding themselves baffled over its initial critical panning.
Drop Dead Gorgeous was requested by return guest Chelsey Weber-Smith, who appeared on our Blair Witch Project episode, this time joined by American Hysteria producer Miranda Zickler and This Ends at Prom co-host BJ Colangelo.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>DROP DEAD GORGEOUS: "Amer-I-Can!" - with BJ Colangelo, Chelsey Weber-Smith, and Miranda Zickler</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/279d0174-b09e-11ed-a2be-7b734eddb834/image/4533e8.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The host and producer of American Hysteria and the co-host of This Ends at Prom join to talk about the beloved cult gem, Drop Dead Gorgeous. You betcha!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>A critical and commercial failure upon its release, Drop Dead Gorgeous was the 125th-highest grossing movie of 1999.
Filmed in the then still novel mockumentary style, the movie about a beauty pageant in Mount Rose, Minnesota was written by a former beauty pageant contestant from Rosemount, Minnesota, Lona Williams (also known as 1985’s Minnesota Junior Miss) and directed by former member of The State and accomplished TV director Michael Patrick Jann.
And it boasts a jam-packed cast, including Kirsten Dunst, Allison Janney, Ellen Barkin, Denise Richards, and the film debut of Amy Adams.
But in the years since its release, it has become an enormously popular cult favorite, with appreciative audiences finding themselves baffled over its initial critical panning.
Drop Dead Gorgeous was requested by return guest Chelsey Weber-Smith, who appeared on our Blair Witch Project episode, this time joined by American Hysteria producer Miranda Zickler and This Ends at Prom co-host BJ Colangelo.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>A critical and commercial failure upon its release, <em>Drop Dead Gorgeous </em>was the 125th-highest grossing movie of 1999.</p><p>Filmed in the then still novel mockumentary style, the movie about a beauty pageant in Mount Rose, Minnesota was written by a former beauty pageant contestant from Rosemount, Minnesota, Lona Williams (also known as 1985’s Minnesota Junior Miss) and directed by former member of The State and accomplished TV director Michael Patrick Jann.</p><p>And it boasts a jam-packed cast, including Kirsten Dunst, Allison Janney, Ellen Barkin, Denise Richards, and the film debut of Amy Adams.</p><p>But in the years since its release, it has become an enormously popular cult favorite, with appreciative audiences finding themselves baffled over its initial critical panning.</p><p><em>Drop Dead Gorgeous</em> was requested by return guest Chelsey Weber-Smith, who appeared on our <em>Blair Witch Project </em>episode, this time joined by <em>American Hysteria </em>producer Miranda Zickler and <em>This Ends at Prom</em> co-host BJ Colangelo.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6536</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[279d0174-b09e-11ed-a2be-7b734eddb834]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN8478601367.mp3?updated=1689195243" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RAVENOUS: "Wendigo" - with Least Haunted hosts Cody and Garth</title>
      <description>1999's 180th-highest grossing film, Antonia Bird's Ravenous never finished higher than 18th at the domestic box office, earning just over 2 millions dollars on a 12 million dollar budget. And it was never released theatrically outside North America.
Ravenous was also the recipient of decidedly (often wildly) mixed critics' reviews, all of whom seem to agree that the movie shifts tones so often and dramatically that it’s hard to actually pin it to any one genre.
But like our previous movie, Jawbreaker, it has since developed a loving cult following. So this week Joey and John invited back Logan Ashley-Kisner, who considers Ravenous one of his favorite movies, to help them with the intro, and then speaks to the hosts of the podcast Least Haunted, Cody and Garth, about the history and folklore that serves as the movie's inspiration, as well as a healthy debate about whether Guy Pearce is actually attractive.
Logan is on Twitter @transhorrors
and his Linktree is available here
Check out Least Haunted at their website:
https://www.leasthaunted.com/</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>RAVENOUS: "Wendigo" - with Least Haunted hosts Cody and Garth</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/fe18458e-a57b-11ed-8698-e3e9a463b409/image/2fe1b5.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The hosts of the podcast Least Haunted discuss Antonia Bird's genre-breaking cannibalism cult classic "Ravenous".</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>1999's 180th-highest grossing film, Antonia Bird's Ravenous never finished higher than 18th at the domestic box office, earning just over 2 millions dollars on a 12 million dollar budget. And it was never released theatrically outside North America.
Ravenous was also the recipient of decidedly (often wildly) mixed critics' reviews, all of whom seem to agree that the movie shifts tones so often and dramatically that it’s hard to actually pin it to any one genre.
But like our previous movie, Jawbreaker, it has since developed a loving cult following. So this week Joey and John invited back Logan Ashley-Kisner, who considers Ravenous one of his favorite movies, to help them with the intro, and then speaks to the hosts of the podcast Least Haunted, Cody and Garth, about the history and folklore that serves as the movie's inspiration, as well as a healthy debate about whether Guy Pearce is actually attractive.
Logan is on Twitter @transhorrors
and his Linktree is available here
Check out Least Haunted at their website:
https://www.leasthaunted.com/</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>1999's 180th-highest grossing film, Antonia Bird's <em>Ravenous</em> never finished higher than 18th at the domestic box office, earning just over 2 millions dollars on a 12 million dollar budget. And it was never released theatrically outside North America.</p><p><em>Ravenous</em> was also the recipient of decidedly (often wildly) mixed critics' reviews, all of whom seem to agree that the movie shifts tones so often and dramatically that it’s hard to actually pin it to any one genre.</p><p>But like our previous movie, <em>Jawbreaker</em>, it has since developed a loving cult following. So this week Joey and John invited back Logan Ashley-Kisner, who considers <em>Ravenous</em> one of his favorite movies, to help them with the intro, and then speaks to the hosts of the podcast Least Haunted, Cody and Garth, about the history and folklore that serves as the movie's inspiration, as well as a healthy debate about whether Guy Pearce is actually attractive.</p><p>Logan is on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/transhorrors">@transhorrors</a></p><p>and his Linktree is available <a href="http://linktr.ee/transhorror">here</a></p><p>Check out Least Haunted at their website:</p><p><a href="https://www.leasthaunted.com/">https://www.leasthaunted.com/</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5545</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[fe18458e-a57b-11ed-8698-e3e9a463b409]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN3207483993.mp3?updated=1689195220" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>JAWBREAKER: "Teen Dream" - with Jenn Tisdale</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/jawbreaker-movie/</link>
      <description>Our second Round 3 film, Jawbreaker, was requested by our friend and Office Space guest Jenn Tisdale.
Jawbreaker was released in theatres on February 19th, making it one of the earliest 1999 films we’ve covered to date.
The sophomore feature from writer Darren Stein, Jawbreaker is a John Waters-esque psychedelic high school satire. The 171st-highest grossing movie of the year, it earned 3.1 million on a 3.5 million dollar budget and was a complete failure with critics, holding just a 14% Rotten Tomatoes score and a 22 Metacritic score.
The film was really intended for home video consumption, however, and it quickly became a cult classic in that form. Additionally, several critics gave the film a second look much later and came to a much different conclusion.
How does it hold up? And does Jenn still love it? And what about that Marilyn Manson cameo? Find out this week!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 05:05:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>JAWBREAKER: "Teen Dream" - with Jenn Tisdale</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ab13f64c-9a6f-11ed-b506-6b6b5645e34b/image/ee3f83.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Jenn Tisdale returns to discuss the film she requested, the cult classic "Jawbreaker".</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Our second Round 3 film, Jawbreaker, was requested by our friend and Office Space guest Jenn Tisdale.
Jawbreaker was released in theatres on February 19th, making it one of the earliest 1999 films we’ve covered to date.
The sophomore feature from writer Darren Stein, Jawbreaker is a John Waters-esque psychedelic high school satire. The 171st-highest grossing movie of the year, it earned 3.1 million on a 3.5 million dollar budget and was a complete failure with critics, holding just a 14% Rotten Tomatoes score and a 22 Metacritic score.
The film was really intended for home video consumption, however, and it quickly became a cult classic in that form. Additionally, several critics gave the film a second look much later and came to a much different conclusion.
How does it hold up? And does Jenn still love it? And what about that Marilyn Manson cameo? Find out this week!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Our second Round 3 film, <em>Jawbreaker, </em>was requested by our friend and <em>Office Space </em>guest Jenn Tisdale.</p><p><em>Jawbreaker </em>was released in theatres on February 19th, making it one of the earliest 1999 films we’ve covered to date.</p><p>The sophomore feature from writer Darren Stein, <em>Jawbreaker </em>is a John Waters-esque psychedelic high school satire. The 171st-highest grossing movie of the year, it earned 3.1 million on a 3.5 million dollar budget and was a complete failure with critics, holding just a 14% Rotten Tomatoes score and a 22 Metacritic score.</p><p>The film was really intended for home video consumption, however, and it quickly became a cult classic in that form. Additionally, several critics gave the film a second look much later and came to a much different conclusion.</p><p>How does it hold up? And does Jenn still love it? And what about that Marilyn Manson cameo? Find out this week!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5629</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ab13f64c-9a6f-11ed-b506-6b6b5645e34b]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN9593888622.mp3?updated=1689195195" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE TALENTED MR. RIPLEY: "Peepin'" - with Bridget Todd</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/talented-mr-ripley-bridget-todd/</link>
      <description>The Talented Mr. Ripley is one of a few movies that just barely didn't make our first 18, so we were delighted to learn the talented Bridget Todd wanted to give it a shout-out.
The second motion picture adaptation of the novel by Patricia Highsmith, Ripley was released just under the wire on December 25th, going on to earn $127 million on a $40 million budget. The film stars Matt Damon, a pre-Goop Gwyneth Paltrow, Jude Law, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Cate Blanchett, Jack Davenport, and James Rebhorn, with music by Gabriel Yared and adapted and directed by Anthony Minghella, just a couple years of his big Oscar haul for The English Patient.
Bridget joins John and Joey to argue that, far from being merely an incredible period-specific psychodrama, Ripley has a lot to say about the ways the world was changing in 1999, and is just as relevant as it was 23 years ago...and 70 some-odd years since Tom Ripley first graced the page.
Find Bridget on Twitter (where you can link to the rest of her work) @BridgetMarie</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>THE TALENTED MR. RIPLEY: "Peepin'" - with Bridget Todd</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/b39f1dac-8f8c-11ed-acb2-838cd6724c2f/image/95161c.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>John and Joey welcome Bridget Todd (host of There Are No Girls On The Internet) to discuss Anthony Minghella's "The Talented Mr. Ripley"</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Talented Mr. Ripley is one of a few movies that just barely didn't make our first 18, so we were delighted to learn the talented Bridget Todd wanted to give it a shout-out.
The second motion picture adaptation of the novel by Patricia Highsmith, Ripley was released just under the wire on December 25th, going on to earn $127 million on a $40 million budget. The film stars Matt Damon, a pre-Goop Gwyneth Paltrow, Jude Law, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Cate Blanchett, Jack Davenport, and James Rebhorn, with music by Gabriel Yared and adapted and directed by Anthony Minghella, just a couple years of his big Oscar haul for The English Patient.
Bridget joins John and Joey to argue that, far from being merely an incredible period-specific psychodrama, Ripley has a lot to say about the ways the world was changing in 1999, and is just as relevant as it was 23 years ago...and 70 some-odd years since Tom Ripley first graced the page.
Find Bridget on Twitter (where you can link to the rest of her work) @BridgetMarie</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>The Talented Mr. Ripley</em> is one of a few movies that just barely didn't make our first 18, so we were delighted to learn the talented Bridget Todd wanted to give it a shout-out.</p><p>The second motion picture adaptation of the novel by Patricia Highsmith, <em>Ripley </em>was released just under the wire on December 25th, going on to earn $127 million on a $40 million budget. The film stars Matt Damon, a pre-Goop Gwyneth Paltrow, Jude Law, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Cate Blanchett, Jack Davenport, and James Rebhorn, with music by Gabriel Yared and adapted and directed by Anthony Minghella, just a couple years of his big Oscar haul for <em>The English Patient</em>.</p><p>Bridget joins John and Joey to argue that, far from being merely an incredible period-specific psychodrama, <em>Ripley </em>has a lot to say about the ways the world was changing in 1999, and is just as relevant as it was 23 years ago...and 70 some-odd years since Tom Ripley first graced the page.</p><p>Find Bridget on Twitter (where you can link to the rest of her work) <a href="https://twitter.com/BridgetMarie">@BridgetMarie</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5210</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b39f1dac-8f8c-11ed-acb2-838cd6724c2f]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN2465415683.mp3?updated=1689195172" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OLIVE THE OTHER REINDEER - A Very Special 1999 Christmas! - with Juhi Khemani</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/olive-the-other-reindeer/ ‎</link>
      <description>Merry Christmas! In the spirit of the season, John and Joey asked their friend (and friend of the network) Juhi Khemani to spend 45 minutes watching the 1999 animated Christmas TV special Olive the Other Reindeer.
Olive the Other Reindeer is based on the children's book of the same name by artist J. Otto Seibold and Vivian Walsh.
With its unique style, an all-star voice cast, and Michael Stipe, Olive is something of a forgotten gem. And we're here to unforget it! (Except Joey and Juhi, who had never seen it at all...)
Enjoy our laid-back Christmas chat and get the fireplace going as you enjoy Juhi's incredible recapping skills and sit in amazement as John regales the listeners with his incredibly random Drew Barrymore story.
We hope you and yours are happy and well. Look out for frogs, and see you in 2023!</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2022 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>OLIVE THE OTHER REINDEER - A Very Special 1999 Christmas! - with Juhi Khemani</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/1f803fdc-8390-11ed-8ad7-778b4f80dc78/image/4ee91e.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Juhi Khemani joins the show for our Christmas special in which we discuss Fox's 1999 TV special "Olive the Other Reindeer".</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Merry Christmas! In the spirit of the season, John and Joey asked their friend (and friend of the network) Juhi Khemani to spend 45 minutes watching the 1999 animated Christmas TV special Olive the Other Reindeer.
Olive the Other Reindeer is based on the children's book of the same name by artist J. Otto Seibold and Vivian Walsh.
With its unique style, an all-star voice cast, and Michael Stipe, Olive is something of a forgotten gem. And we're here to unforget it! (Except Joey and Juhi, who had never seen it at all...)
Enjoy our laid-back Christmas chat and get the fireplace going as you enjoy Juhi's incredible recapping skills and sit in amazement as John regales the listeners with his incredibly random Drew Barrymore story.
We hope you and yours are happy and well. Look out for frogs, and see you in 2023!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Merry Christmas! In the spirit of the season, John and Joey asked their friend (and friend of the network) Juhi Khemani to spend 45 minutes watching the 1999 animated Christmas TV special <em>Olive the Other Reindeer</em>.</p><p><em>Olive the Other Reindeer </em>is based on the children's book of the same name by artist J. Otto Seibold and Vivian Walsh.</p><p>With its unique style, an all-star voice cast, and Michael Stipe, <em>Olive </em>is something of a forgotten gem. And we're here to unforget it! (Except Joey and Juhi, who had never seen it at all...)</p><p>Enjoy our laid-back Christmas chat and get the fireplace going as you enjoy Juhi's incredible recapping skills and sit in amazement as John regales the listeners with his incredibly random Drew Barrymore story.</p><p>We hope you and yours are happy and well. Look out for frogs, and see you in 2023!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4627</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[1f803fdc-8390-11ed-8ad7-778b4f80dc78]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN9681540902.mp3?updated=1689195140" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Roundup! - Round 2 Recap</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/roundup-round-2-recap/</link>
      <description>We have reached the end of Round 2, completed our list of the 18 essential movies of 1999, and it's time for a (Woody's) Roundup last nine episodes. This round saw a lot more comedies, a lot more animation, and some pretty stellar guests.
We take a moment to look back at it all, discuss some of what surprised us both, offer ideas on which movies might be ready for a sequel or two, and take preview what's to come (hint: it's a lot!)
The show will be back with a new round with a new theme and brand new episodes on January 9th, but in the meantime keep an eye out on your feed for a potential Christmas surprise!
 </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2022 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Roundup! - Round 2 Recap</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/242e990c-7f3f-11ed-a4a4-03e1cf9d2e28/image/3d3cc4.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Joey and John recap round 2 with a roundup of the last nine episodes, and give a preview of what's ahead!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>We have reached the end of Round 2, completed our list of the 18 essential movies of 1999, and it's time for a (Woody's) Roundup last nine episodes. This round saw a lot more comedies, a lot more animation, and some pretty stellar guests.
We take a moment to look back at it all, discuss some of what surprised us both, offer ideas on which movies might be ready for a sequel or two, and take preview what's to come (hint: it's a lot!)
The show will be back with a new round with a new theme and brand new episodes on January 9th, but in the meantime keep an eye out on your feed for a potential Christmas surprise!
 </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We have reached the end of Round 2, completed our list of the 18 essential movies of 1999, and it's time for a (Woody's) Roundup last nine episodes. This round saw a lot more comedies, a lot more animation, and some pretty stellar guests.</p><p>We take a moment to look back at it all, discuss some of what surprised us both, offer ideas on which movies might be ready for a sequel or two, and take preview what's to come (hint: it's a lot!)</p><p>The show will be back with a new round with a new theme and brand new episodes on January 9th, but in the meantime keep an eye out on your feed for a potential Christmas surprise!</p><p> </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>2157</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[242e990c-7f3f-11ed-a4a4-03e1cf9d2e28]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN5616709307.mp3?updated=1671414768" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TOY STORY 2: "LZTYBRN" - with Aaron Neuwirth</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/toy-story-2-lztybrn/</link>
      <description>Toy Story 2 is our final film of round 2 and our final pick for the 18 essential movies of 1999.
Originally conceived as a direct-to-video sequel, much in line with Disney's strategy of releasing its other sequels to blockbuster animated films like The Return of Jafar and The Lion King 2, it soon became clear that Pixar's vision for Toy Story 2 was far too big and too bold not to grace the big screen.
So instead of relegating it to video, Disney triples the budget of the original Toy Story and wound up with a mammoth holiday season hit.
The film went on to win a number of awards and wind up on several critics' year-end Best Of lists, and it, along with its predecessor, holds the rare honor of a 100% Rotten Tomatoes rating.
For this episode, film critic and Pixar enthusiast Aaron Neuwirth joined the show to talk about Toy Story 2's place in the series, where it ranks among the best of Pixar's work, and that damn Sarah McLachlan scene.
Aaron is on Twitter @AaronsPS4
You can check out his website here.
 </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>TOY STORY 2: "LZTYBRN" - with Aaron Neuwirth</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e273b712-79b8-11ed-a974-673ad7df7079/image/9a3650.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Joey and John welcome Aaron Neuwirth to discuss the final film of Round 2, Pixar's masterful, timeless "Toy Story 2".</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Toy Story 2 is our final film of round 2 and our final pick for the 18 essential movies of 1999.
Originally conceived as a direct-to-video sequel, much in line with Disney's strategy of releasing its other sequels to blockbuster animated films like The Return of Jafar and The Lion King 2, it soon became clear that Pixar's vision for Toy Story 2 was far too big and too bold not to grace the big screen.
So instead of relegating it to video, Disney triples the budget of the original Toy Story and wound up with a mammoth holiday season hit.
The film went on to win a number of awards and wind up on several critics' year-end Best Of lists, and it, along with its predecessor, holds the rare honor of a 100% Rotten Tomatoes rating.
For this episode, film critic and Pixar enthusiast Aaron Neuwirth joined the show to talk about Toy Story 2's place in the series, where it ranks among the best of Pixar's work, and that damn Sarah McLachlan scene.
Aaron is on Twitter @AaronsPS4
You can check out his website here.
 </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Toy Story 2 </em>is our final film of round 2 and our final pick for the 18 essential movies of 1999.</p><p>Originally conceived as a direct-to-video sequel, much in line with Disney's strategy of releasing its other sequels to blockbuster animated films like <em>The Return of Jafar </em>and <em>The Lion King 2</em>, it soon became clear that<em> </em>Pixar's vision for <em>Toy Story 2 </em>was far too big and too bold not to grace the big screen.</p><p>So instead of relegating it to video, Disney triples the budget of the original <em>Toy Story </em>and wound up with a mammoth holiday season hit.</p><p>The film went on to win a number of awards and wind up on several critics' year-end Best Of lists, and it, along with its predecessor, holds the rare honor of a 100% Rotten Tomatoes rating.</p><p>For this episode, film critic and Pixar enthusiast Aaron Neuwirth joined the show to talk about <em>Toy Story 2'</em>s place in the series, where it ranks among the best of Pixar's work, and that damn Sarah McLachlan scene.</p><p>Aaron is on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/AaronsPS4">@AaronsPS4</a></p><p>You can check out his website <a href="https://www.thecodeiszeek.com/">here</a>.</p><p> </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6480</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e273b712-79b8-11ed-a974-673ad7df7079]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN3744828871.mp3?updated=1689195120" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOUTH PARK: BIGGER, LONGER, AND UNCUT: "La Resistance" - with George Freitag</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/south-park-bigger-longer-uncut/</link>
      <description>South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut is...very funny.
It's also absurd, obscene, and one of the best movie musicals not called Moulin Rouge of the last few decades.
The humor of the show and the movie, though, has always been too things - edgy (bordering on shocking) and timely. South Park the series has produced some of the smartest, most incisive satire anywhere in its 25 years of existence, but that kind of humor doesn't always age well?
So how does this movie hold up in that regard? We asked someone who loved it at the time - John's friend George Freitag - if he would still rave to strangers about it at Denny's like he did 23 years ago.
Blame Canada, join La Resistance, and save Terrence and Phillip as we talk about South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut, a title that refers solely to the the fact that the movie is bigger and longer than an episode of the show and did not have to be edited for television!
Find George on Twitter if it still exists @georgefreitag</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2022 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>SOUTH PARK: BIGGER, LONGER, AND UNCUT: "La Resistance" - with George Freitag</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/3f80750e-6ea0-11ed-bcf5-57f84e7efe26/image/b227348141b940ce123c1af98be6489b.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Joey and John welcome John's friend George to talk about moral panics, musicals, and fart jokes in "South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut."</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut is...very funny.
It's also absurd, obscene, and one of the best movie musicals not called Moulin Rouge of the last few decades.
The humor of the show and the movie, though, has always been too things - edgy (bordering on shocking) and timely. South Park the series has produced some of the smartest, most incisive satire anywhere in its 25 years of existence, but that kind of humor doesn't always age well?
So how does this movie hold up in that regard? We asked someone who loved it at the time - John's friend George Freitag - if he would still rave to strangers about it at Denny's like he did 23 years ago.
Blame Canada, join La Resistance, and save Terrence and Phillip as we talk about South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut, a title that refers solely to the the fact that the movie is bigger and longer than an episode of the show and did not have to be edited for television!
Find George on Twitter if it still exists @georgefreitag</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut </em>is...very funny.</p><p>It's also absurd, obscene, and one of the best movie musicals not called <em>Moulin Rouge </em>of the last few decades.</p><p>The humor of the show and the movie, though, has always been too things - edgy (bordering on shocking) and timely. <em>South Park</em> the series has produced some of the smartest, most incisive satire anywhere in its 25 years of existence, but that kind of humor doesn't always age well?</p><p>So how does this movie hold up in that regard? We asked someone who loved it at the time - John's friend George Freitag - if he would still rave to strangers about it at Denny's like he did 23 years ago.</p><p>Blame Canada, join La Resistance, and save Terrence and Phillip as we talk about <em>South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut</em>, a title that refers solely to the the fact that the movie is bigger and longer than an episode of the show and did not have to be edited for television!</p><p>Find George on Twitter if it still exists <a href="https://twitter.com/georgefreitag">@georgefreitag</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5067</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3f80750e-6ea0-11ed-bcf5-57f84e7efe26]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN2214925700.mp3?updated=1689195092" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RUN LOLA RUN: "die Tasche" - with Jacob Meirovich</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/run-lola-run/ </link>
      <description>Run Lola Run only technically meets the criteria of our podcast, but no discussion of the revolutionary, groundbreaking films of 1999 could really be complete without it. Because while it was released in 1998 in its native Germany, its US theatrical release came in June 18, 1999.
Starring Franke Potente and Moritz Bleibtreu, Run Lola Run was the breakout feature from writer-director-composer Tom Tykwer.
The style and themes of the film share a lot in common with the first film we covered on the podcast and one of your favorites, The Matrix. Beyond just the superficial, like a telephone serving as the catalyst for the plot, both films borrow as much from the kinetic pace and jump-cut editing of music videos of the era as they do from the styles and techniques of traditional filmmaking.
Not surprisingly, then, Tykwer, used Run Lola Run as a springboard for much more mainstream (if still pretty avant-garde) success with his collaborations with Wachowskis in films like Cloud Atlas and the Netflix Series Sense8, as well as serving, again with Klimek, as composer for Lana Wachowski’s The Matrix Resurrections.
Is the film as vital today as it was two decades ago? To find out, we asked someone who wasn't born when it was released. Jacob Meirovich is one of the editors responsible for the Run Lola Run remix Run Lola Run the Jewels Run, and he joined John and Joey to explain why this movie is one of his favorites.
Find Jacob on Twitter @nerdyton

Other links!
https://twitter.com/exportz_
https://twitter.com/MonMovMad
https://twitter.com/dvdivision
https://twitter.com/MagnoliaRMSTRD
https://twitter.com/SegFest
https://www.twitch.tv/exportz
https://www.twitch.tv/beesonehundred
https://www.twitch.tv/caymanislandspublicaccess
https://www.twitch.tv/mondaymoviemadness
https://www.twitch.tv/dreamvideodivision
https://www.twitch.tv/segfest</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>RUN LOLA RUN: "die Tasche" - with Jacob Meirovich</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/437a704a-6399-11ed-a82f-9f6a700ab74e/image/050c3f.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>We hit the streets of Berlin and didn't even die once as we discussed "Run Lola Run" with film student and editor Jacob Meirovich.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Run Lola Run only technically meets the criteria of our podcast, but no discussion of the revolutionary, groundbreaking films of 1999 could really be complete without it. Because while it was released in 1998 in its native Germany, its US theatrical release came in June 18, 1999.
Starring Franke Potente and Moritz Bleibtreu, Run Lola Run was the breakout feature from writer-director-composer Tom Tykwer.
The style and themes of the film share a lot in common with the first film we covered on the podcast and one of your favorites, The Matrix. Beyond just the superficial, like a telephone serving as the catalyst for the plot, both films borrow as much from the kinetic pace and jump-cut editing of music videos of the era as they do from the styles and techniques of traditional filmmaking.
Not surprisingly, then, Tykwer, used Run Lola Run as a springboard for much more mainstream (if still pretty avant-garde) success with his collaborations with Wachowskis in films like Cloud Atlas and the Netflix Series Sense8, as well as serving, again with Klimek, as composer for Lana Wachowski’s The Matrix Resurrections.
Is the film as vital today as it was two decades ago? To find out, we asked someone who wasn't born when it was released. Jacob Meirovich is one of the editors responsible for the Run Lola Run remix Run Lola Run the Jewels Run, and he joined John and Joey to explain why this movie is one of his favorites.
Find Jacob on Twitter @nerdyton

Other links!
https://twitter.com/exportz_
https://twitter.com/MonMovMad
https://twitter.com/dvdivision
https://twitter.com/MagnoliaRMSTRD
https://twitter.com/SegFest
https://www.twitch.tv/exportz
https://www.twitch.tv/beesonehundred
https://www.twitch.tv/caymanislandspublicaccess
https://www.twitch.tv/mondaymoviemadness
https://www.twitch.tv/dreamvideodivision
https://www.twitch.tv/segfest</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Run Lola Run</em> only technically meets the criteria of our podcast, but no discussion of the revolutionary, groundbreaking films of 1999 could really be complete without it. Because while it was released in 1998 in its native Germany, its US theatrical release came in June 18, 1999.</p><p>Starring Franke Potente and Moritz Bleibtreu, <em>Run Lola Run </em>was the breakout feature from writer-director-composer Tom Tykwer.</p><p>The style and themes of the film share a lot in common with the first film we covered on the podcast and one of your favorites, <em>The Matrix</em>. Beyond just the superficial, like a telephone serving as the catalyst for the plot, both films borrow as much from the kinetic pace and jump-cut editing of music videos of the era as they do from the styles and techniques of traditional filmmaking.</p><p>Not surprisingly, then, Tykwer, used <em>Run Lola Run</em> as a springboard for much more mainstream (if still pretty avant-garde) success with his collaborations with Wachowskis in films like <em>Cloud Atlas</em> and the Netflix <em>Series Sense8</em>, as well as serving, again with Klimek, as composer for Lana Wachowski’s <em>The Matrix Resurrections.</em></p><p>Is the film as vital today as it was two decades ago? To find out, we asked someone who wasn't born when it was released. Jacob Meirovich is one of the editors responsible for the <em>Run Lola Run </em>remix <em>Run Lola Run the Jewels Run</em>, and he joined John and Joey to explain why this movie is one of his favorites.</p><p>Find Jacob on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/nerdyton">@nerdyton</a></p><p><br></p><p>Other links!</p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/exportz_">https://twitter.com/exportz_</a></p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/MonMovMad">https://twitter.com/MonMovMad</a></p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/dvdivision">https://twitter.com/dvdivision</a></p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/MagnoliaRMSTRD">https://twitter.com/MagnoliaRMSTRD</a></p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/SegFest">https://twitter.com/SegFest</a></p><p><a href="https://www.twitch.tv/exportz">https://www.twitch.tv/exportz</a></p><p><a href="https://www.twitch.tv/beesonehundred">https://www.twitch.tv/beesonehundred</a></p><p><a href="https://www.twitch.tv/caymanislandspublicaccess">https://www.twitch.tv/caymanislandspublicaccess</a></p><p><a href="https://www.twitch.tv/mondaymoviemadness">https://www.twitch.tv/mondaymoviemadness</a></p><p><a href="https://www.twitch.tv/dreamvideodivision">https://www.twitch.tv/dreamvideodivision</a></p><p><a href="https://www.twitch.tv/segfest">https://www.twitch.tv/segfest</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6167</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[437a704a-6399-11ed-a82f-9f6a700ab74e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN2624675203.mp3?updated=1689195048" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OFFICE SPACE: "Nothing" - with Jenn Tisdale</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/office-space-1999</link>
      <description>Of the 18 movies that made our first two rounds, Office Space was far and away the most abject failure.
Released in the frigid box office month of February and featuring an advertising and marketing campaign that was so bad classes should be taught about it, Office Space went on to become the year's 134th-highest grossing movie, falling short of the box office hauls for beloved, critically-acclaimed classics like Chill Factor and Wing Commander. 
The live-action feature debut of Beavis and Butt-Head creator Mike Judge deserved so much better, and it would soon get it. Office Space caught on when Comedy Central began airing it (on heavy rotation) shortly after its release on home video, in August of 1999, and the movie began to develop the audience it always deserved.
It was very funny then. But does it still work now? Or is its satirizing of late-90s office life lost on the audiences of 2022. We pose this question to podcaster, comedian, writer, and all-around spooktacular person Jenn Tisdale, cohost of Too Many Jennifers.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>OFFICE SPACE: "Nothing" - with Jenn Tisdale</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/a4b8f23c-58ae-11ed-ac9e-dff501316c44/image/f66d1e.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Grab a few pieces of flair and hear us discuss the comedy cult classic, "Office Space"!</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Of the 18 movies that made our first two rounds, Office Space was far and away the most abject failure.
Released in the frigid box office month of February and featuring an advertising and marketing campaign that was so bad classes should be taught about it, Office Space went on to become the year's 134th-highest grossing movie, falling short of the box office hauls for beloved, critically-acclaimed classics like Chill Factor and Wing Commander. 
The live-action feature debut of Beavis and Butt-Head creator Mike Judge deserved so much better, and it would soon get it. Office Space caught on when Comedy Central began airing it (on heavy rotation) shortly after its release on home video, in August of 1999, and the movie began to develop the audience it always deserved.
It was very funny then. But does it still work now? Or is its satirizing of late-90s office life lost on the audiences of 2022. We pose this question to podcaster, comedian, writer, and all-around spooktacular person Jenn Tisdale, cohost of Too Many Jennifers.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Of the 18 movies that made our first two rounds, <em>Office Space</em> was far and away the most abject failure.</p><p>Released in the frigid box office month of February and featuring an advertising and marketing campaign that was so bad classes should be taught about it, <em>Office Space </em>went on to become the year's 134th-highest grossing movie, falling short of the box office hauls for beloved, critically-acclaimed classics like <em>Chill Factor </em>and <em>Wing Commander</em>. </p><p>The live-action feature debut of <em>Beavis and Butt-Head </em>creator Mike Judge deserved so much better, and it would soon get it. <em>Office Space</em> caught on when Comedy Central began airing it (on heavy rotation) shortly after its release on home video, in August of 1999, and the movie began to develop the audience it always deserved.</p><p>It was very funny then. But does it still work now? Or is its satirizing of late-90s office life lost on the audiences of 2022. We pose this question to podcaster, comedian, writer, and all-around spooktacular person Jenn Tisdale, cohost of <a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/0yvoawgUSCMp7DgkPW0lNC">Too Many Jennifers</a>.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>7038</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a4b8f23c-58ae-11ed-ac9e-dff501316c44]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN7044998685.mp3?updated=1689195024" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE MUMMY: "Bugs!" - with Chris Kluwe</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/the-mummy-1999/</link>
      <description>What better time than this, the intersection of Spooky Season and our cultural Brenaissance, to talk about the beloved Brendan Fraser vehicle, The Mummy?!
The 8th-highest grossing movie of 1999, The Mummy is - there's no other way to say it - weird on a lot of levels. It feels completely out of place among its peers, embracing both state-of-the-art digital effects and very old school practical effects, it pays homage to the adventure films of the golden age of Hollywood while also somehow functioning as modern blockbuster.
It's not for everyone (including, at is turns out, Joey), but it was so earnest and unexpected at the time that it still has some pretty rabid fans, including our guest for out The Matrix episode, the first movie we covered on this podcast, Chris Kluwe, who returns to talk about bugs that crawl under your skin, whether this should be compared to Indiana Jones, and whether anybody should bother with the sequels (or the Tom Cruise version!)</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>THE MUMMY: "Bugs!" - with Chris Kluwe</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/94b1dd18-4d82-11ed-aa34-37407d6a3a08/image/f3509e.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>We celebrate Spooky Season with the beloved remake of the Universal Horror classic "The Mummy", starring Brendan Fraser.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What better time than this, the intersection of Spooky Season and our cultural Brenaissance, to talk about the beloved Brendan Fraser vehicle, The Mummy?!
The 8th-highest grossing movie of 1999, The Mummy is - there's no other way to say it - weird on a lot of levels. It feels completely out of place among its peers, embracing both state-of-the-art digital effects and very old school practical effects, it pays homage to the adventure films of the golden age of Hollywood while also somehow functioning as modern blockbuster.
It's not for everyone (including, at is turns out, Joey), but it was so earnest and unexpected at the time that it still has some pretty rabid fans, including our guest for out The Matrix episode, the first movie we covered on this podcast, Chris Kluwe, who returns to talk about bugs that crawl under your skin, whether this should be compared to Indiana Jones, and whether anybody should bother with the sequels (or the Tom Cruise version!)</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>What better time than this, the intersection of Spooky Season and our cultural Brenaissance, to talk about the beloved Brendan Fraser vehicle, <em>The Mummy</em>?!</p><p>The 8th-highest grossing movie of 1999, <em>The Mummy </em>is - there's no other way to say it - weird on a lot of levels. It feels completely out of place among its peers, embracing both state-of-the-art digital effects and <em>very </em>old school practical effects, it pays homage to the adventure films of the golden age of Hollywood while also somehow functioning as modern blockbuster.</p><p>It's not for everyone (including, at is turns out, Joey), but it was so earnest and unexpected at the time that it still has some pretty rabid fans, including our guest for out <em>The Matrix </em>episode, the first movie we covered on this podcast, Chris Kluwe, who returns to talk about bugs that crawl under your skin, whether this should be compared to <em>Indiana Jones</em>, and whether anybody should bother with the sequels (or the Tom Cruise version!)</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5091</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[94b1dd18-4d82-11ed-aa34-37407d6a3a08]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN7874088344.mp3?updated=1689194990" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ELECTION: "Pick Flick" - with Brian Rodriguez</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/election-1999/</link>
      <description>When Election premiered on April 23rd, audiences, it is safe to say, did not Pick Flick.
Election was a pretty giant dud. With a reported $25 million price tag, the film earned just $15 million at the box office, making it the 98th-highest grossing movie of the year. And that's despite near universal critical acclaim and a number of major awards nominations.
What went wrong? A lot, including a very limited release right after Columbine and sandwiched between The Matrix and The Mummy. But Election also defies genre, and having the MTV Productions label attached to it made the movie seem like something it...wasn't.
But the growing acclaim for its writer-director Alexander Payne in the years that followed made audience give it a second look, and today Election is something of a cult favorite, as well as powerful time capsule for a lot of the pre-9/11, pre-millennium, post-Clinton angst that made 1999 so unique.
John and Joey invited High School Slumber Party host Brian Rodriguez on to chat about this very not-a-teen-movie high school comedy.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>ELECTION: "Pick Flick" - with Brian Rodriguez</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0c934a82-40c3-11ed-940d-4f50cb0e2bf6/image/E14Square.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>High School Slumber Party host Brian Rodriguez joins John and Joey to chat about the high school *political* party (get it?), "Election". </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>When Election premiered on April 23rd, audiences, it is safe to say, did not Pick Flick.
Election was a pretty giant dud. With a reported $25 million price tag, the film earned just $15 million at the box office, making it the 98th-highest grossing movie of the year. And that's despite near universal critical acclaim and a number of major awards nominations.
What went wrong? A lot, including a very limited release right after Columbine and sandwiched between The Matrix and The Mummy. But Election also defies genre, and having the MTV Productions label attached to it made the movie seem like something it...wasn't.
But the growing acclaim for its writer-director Alexander Payne in the years that followed made audience give it a second look, and today Election is something of a cult favorite, as well as powerful time capsule for a lot of the pre-9/11, pre-millennium, post-Clinton angst that made 1999 so unique.
John and Joey invited High School Slumber Party host Brian Rodriguez on to chat about this very not-a-teen-movie high school comedy.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>When <em>Election</em> premiered on April 23rd, audiences, it is safe to say, did not Pick Flick.</p><p><em>Election </em>was a pretty giant dud. With a reported $25 million price tag, the film earned just $15 million at the box office, making it the 98th-highest grossing movie of the year. And that's despite near universal critical acclaim and a number of major awards nominations.</p><p>What went wrong? A lot, including a very limited release right after Columbine and sandwiched between <em>The Matrix </em>and <em>The Mummy</em>. But <em>Election </em>also defies genre, and having the MTV Productions label attached to it made the movie seem like something it...wasn't.</p><p>But the growing acclaim for its writer-director Alexander Payne in the years that followed made audience give it a second look, and today <em>Election </em>is something of a cult favorite, as well as powerful time capsule for a lot of the pre-9/11, pre-millennium, post-Clinton angst that made 1999 so unique.</p><p>John and Joey invited <a href="https://www.cageclub.me/high-school-slumber-party/"><em>High School Slumber Party</em></a><em> </em>host <a href="https://www.cageclub.me/brian/">Brian Rodriguez</a> on to chat about this very not-a-teen-movie high school comedy.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5370</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0c934a82-40c3-11ed-940d-4f50cb0e2bf6]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN2195013769.mp3?updated=1689194959" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BEING JOHN MALKOVICH: "Malkovich" - with Brian Silliman</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/being-john-malkovich/</link>
      <description>Being John Malkovich may well be the 1999est movie we have yet covered on the show. And the only reason it didn’t make it into the first nine (and just barely) is that 1) it really took some time to fully sink in to the culture, sort of like Fight Club, and 2) unlike Fight Club, it has largely been marginalized in recent years, due in no small part to the successive work of both Jonze and Kaufman, who produced films that would go on to greater critical and commercial success than this one did.
But it explores many of the same issues that films like The Matrix and Fight Club explore, though with a much more insane glee than those films. And it comes across as the kind of movie that could only hit theaters during the year of Y2K end-times paranoia, when the whole culture sort of shared and “I dunno, fuck it!” kind of attitude.
It also happens to be previous guest Brian Silliman's favorite 1999 movie, so John and Joey asked him back to take a little trip through the tunnel on floor seven-and-a-half to get inside the mind Malkovich and talk about this brilliant, groundbreaking classic.
Find Brian on Twitter @BrianSilliman</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>BEING JOHN MALKOVICH: "Malkovich" - with Brian Silliman</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/43ea51ea-3783-11ed-8ba3-4f2b739244ff/image/malkovichsquare.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Brian Silliman, of Return of the Pod, returns to OUR pod (get it?) to talk "Being John Malkovich".</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Being John Malkovich may well be the 1999est movie we have yet covered on the show. And the only reason it didn’t make it into the first nine (and just barely) is that 1) it really took some time to fully sink in to the culture, sort of like Fight Club, and 2) unlike Fight Club, it has largely been marginalized in recent years, due in no small part to the successive work of both Jonze and Kaufman, who produced films that would go on to greater critical and commercial success than this one did.
But it explores many of the same issues that films like The Matrix and Fight Club explore, though with a much more insane glee than those films. And it comes across as the kind of movie that could only hit theaters during the year of Y2K end-times paranoia, when the whole culture sort of shared and “I dunno, fuck it!” kind of attitude.
It also happens to be previous guest Brian Silliman's favorite 1999 movie, so John and Joey asked him back to take a little trip through the tunnel on floor seven-and-a-half to get inside the mind Malkovich and talk about this brilliant, groundbreaking classic.
Find Brian on Twitter @BrianSilliman</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Being John Malkovich</em> may well be the 1999est movie we have yet covered on the show. And the only reason it didn’t make it into the first nine (and just barely) is that 1) it really took some time to fully sink in to the culture, sort of like <em>Fight Club</em>, and 2) unlike <em>Fight Club</em>, it has largely been marginalized in recent years, due in no small part to the successive work of both Jonze and Kaufman, who produced films that would go on to greater critical and commercial success than this one did.</p><p>But it explores many of the same issues that films like <em>The Matrix</em> and <em>Fight Club</em> explore, though with a much more insane glee than those films. And it comes across as the kind of movie that could only hit theaters during the year of Y2K end-times paranoia, when the whole culture sort of shared and “I dunno, fuck it!” kind of attitude.</p><p>It also happens to be previous guest Brian Silliman's favorite 1999 movie, so John and Joey asked him back to take a little trip through the tunnel on floor seven-and-a-half to get inside the mind Malkovich and talk about this brilliant, groundbreaking classic.</p><p>Find Brian on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/BrianSilliman">@BrianSilliman</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6167</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[43ea51ea-3783-11ed-8ba3-4f2b739244ff]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN2598243177.mp3?updated=1689194935" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AMERICAN PIE: "Band Camp" - with Tessa and Nicole of the Doom Generation podcast</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/american-pie-doom-generation/</link>
      <description>The fact that American Pie was the twentieth-highest-grossing movie of 1999 wouldn't suggest that film was a mammoth hit, but it was.
American Pie made back its tiny 11 million dollar budget and then some in its opening weekend. And it went on to gross more than 100 million domestically and 235 million worldwide, making it one of the most profitable movies of the year (an honor obviously belonging to the freakishly budget-to-gross ratio obliteration machine that was The Blair Witch Project).
But like 10 Things, it had almost no star power whatsoever. While much of the cast would go on to various levels of fame, the most famous cast member at the time was Alyson Hannigan, who had spent three seasons playing Willow Rosenberg on Buffy the Vampire Slayer, followed by Thomas Ian Nicholas, who had starred in a couple of popular family movies in the 1990s.
American Pie was also buoyed by some surprisingly warm critical praise. But do the movie's gross-out humor and depictions of sexual angst still hold up? Find out in this episode, where John and Joey invited Tessa and Nicole from the Doom Generation podcast to talk about what happened that one time in band camp.
Everything you need to know about Doom Generation you can find out here!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>AMERICAN PIE: "Band Camp" - with Tessa and Nicole of the Doom Generation podcast</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/e36006ac-2c7f-11ed-8efd-5b3278438b4c/image/band_camp.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The hosts of the Doom Generation podcast join John and Joey to talk about American Pie and everything that happened that one time at band camp.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The fact that American Pie was the twentieth-highest-grossing movie of 1999 wouldn't suggest that film was a mammoth hit, but it was.
American Pie made back its tiny 11 million dollar budget and then some in its opening weekend. And it went on to gross more than 100 million domestically and 235 million worldwide, making it one of the most profitable movies of the year (an honor obviously belonging to the freakishly budget-to-gross ratio obliteration machine that was The Blair Witch Project).
But like 10 Things, it had almost no star power whatsoever. While much of the cast would go on to various levels of fame, the most famous cast member at the time was Alyson Hannigan, who had spent three seasons playing Willow Rosenberg on Buffy the Vampire Slayer, followed by Thomas Ian Nicholas, who had starred in a couple of popular family movies in the 1990s.
American Pie was also buoyed by some surprisingly warm critical praise. But do the movie's gross-out humor and depictions of sexual angst still hold up? Find out in this episode, where John and Joey invited Tessa and Nicole from the Doom Generation podcast to talk about what happened that one time in band camp.
Everything you need to know about Doom Generation you can find out here!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>The fact that <em>American Pie </em>was the twentieth-highest-grossing movie of 1999 wouldn't suggest that film was a mammoth hit, but it was.</p><p><em>American Pie</em> made back its tiny 11 million dollar budget and then some in its opening weekend. And it went on to gross more than 100 million domestically and 235 million worldwide, making it one of the most profitable movies of the year (an honor obviously belonging to the freakishly budget-to-gross ratio obliteration machine that was <em>The Blair Witch Project).</em></p><p>But like <em>10 Things</em>, it had almost no star power whatsoever. While much of the cast would go on to various levels of fame, the most famous cast member at the time was Alyson Hannigan, who had spent three seasons playing Willow Rosenberg on <em>Buffy the Vampire Slayer</em>, followed by Thomas Ian Nicholas, who had starred in a couple of popular family movies in the 1990s.</p><p>American<em> Pie </em>was also buoyed by some surprisingly warm critical praise. But do the movie's gross-out humor and depictions of sexual angst still hold up? Find out in this episode, where John and Joey invited Tessa and Nicole from the Doom Generation podcast to talk about what happened that one time in band camp.</p><p>Everything you need to know about Doom Generation <a href="https://www.doomgenerationpod.com/">you can find out here!</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6308</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e36006ac-2c7f-11ed-8efd-5b3278438b4c]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN1148879346.mp3?updated=1689194902" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10 THINGS I HATE ABOUT YOU: "Sonnet" - with Kelly J. Baker</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/10-things-i-hate-about-you/</link>
      <description>10 Things I Hate About You has become a generational favorite, joining the ranks of The Breakfast Club and Fast Times at Ridgemont High among the teen movie pantheon. Filmed on a $13 million budget, it made $38 million at the domestic box office, making it the 53rd top grossing movie of the year (one ahead of Fight Club). It would go on to break $60 million worldwide.
But while it boasted a very impressive cast of very good actors, it had virtually no star power, and the central draw was a virtually unknown young actor named Heath Ledger. Neither Joseph Gordon-Levitt nor Julia Stiles were yet household names.
And it was released against another big 1999 movie called The Matrix, and right in the crowded midst of the revival of the teen movie that had begun a year earlier with the release of Can’t Hardly Wait, and had already in 1999, by the time of 10 Things I Hate About You's release, seen the releases of She’s All That, Varsity Blues, Jawbreaker, and Cruel Intentions (to say nothing of the juggernaut that was American Pie, released several months later). 
So why did 10 Things work so well, and find such a devout audience, that it makes it so beloved today? John and Joey invited one such devotee, author Kelly J. Baker, to tell them.
Find Dr. Baker on Twitter @kelly_j_baker</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>10 THINGS I HATE ABOUT YOU: "Sonnet" - with Kelly J. Baker</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c6b5b574-2167-11ed-a4ab-c7c83d0de31e/image/sonnet_450.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dr. Kelly J. Baker joins to discuss what has become one of the most beloved teen movies ever made, 10 Things I Hate About You.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>10 Things I Hate About You has become a generational favorite, joining the ranks of The Breakfast Club and Fast Times at Ridgemont High among the teen movie pantheon. Filmed on a $13 million budget, it made $38 million at the domestic box office, making it the 53rd top grossing movie of the year (one ahead of Fight Club). It would go on to break $60 million worldwide.
But while it boasted a very impressive cast of very good actors, it had virtually no star power, and the central draw was a virtually unknown young actor named Heath Ledger. Neither Joseph Gordon-Levitt nor Julia Stiles were yet household names.
And it was released against another big 1999 movie called The Matrix, and right in the crowded midst of the revival of the teen movie that had begun a year earlier with the release of Can’t Hardly Wait, and had already in 1999, by the time of 10 Things I Hate About You's release, seen the releases of She’s All That, Varsity Blues, Jawbreaker, and Cruel Intentions (to say nothing of the juggernaut that was American Pie, released several months later). 
So why did 10 Things work so well, and find such a devout audience, that it makes it so beloved today? John and Joey invited one such devotee, author Kelly J. Baker, to tell them.
Find Dr. Baker on Twitter @kelly_j_baker</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>10 Things I Hate About You </em>has become a generational favorite, joining the ranks of <em>The Breakfast Club </em>and <em>Fast Times at Ridgemont High </em>among the teen movie pantheon. Filmed on a $13 million budget, it made $38 million at the domestic box office, making it the 53rd top grossing movie of the year (one ahead of <em>Fight Club)</em>. It would go on to break $60 million worldwide.</p><p>But while it boasted a very impressive cast of very good actors, it had virtually no star power, and the central draw was a virtually unknown young actor named Heath Ledger. Neither Joseph Gordon-Levitt nor Julia Stiles were yet household names.</p><p>And it was released against another big 1999 movie called <em>The Matrix, </em>and right in the crowded midst of the revival of the teen movie that had begun a year earlier with the release of<em> Can’t Hardly Wait</em>, and had already in 1999, by the time of <em>10 Things I Hate About You's </em>release, seen the releases of <em>She’s All That, Varsity Blues, Jawbreaker</em>, and <em>Cruel Intentions </em>(to say nothing of the juggernaut that was <em>American Pie, </em>released several months later). </p><p>So why did <em>10 Things </em>work so well, and find such a devout audience, that it makes it so beloved today? John and Joey invited one such devotee, author Kelly J. Baker, to tell them.</p><p>Find Dr. Baker on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/kelly_j_baker">@kelly_j_baker</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5147</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c6b5b574-2167-11ed-a4ab-c7c83d0de31e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN5002961596.mp3?updated=1689194870" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spybreak! - Round One Recap</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/round-one-recap/</link>
      <description>In this end--of-round recap mini episode, Joey and John share their thoughts on the first nine movies, pick a "winner" from round one, and preview what's up ahead in the second round: The Back Nine.
Thanks to Brian Raftery, Chris Kluwe, Brian Silliman, Matt Romano, Lila Shapiro, Chelsey Weber-Smith, Stephanie Gagnon, Aislinn and Tobin Addington, Amanda Moore, Logan Kisner, and Tyler Huckabee for sharing their time and thoughts with us!
We'll be back to on Monday, 8/22 with a new episode!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Spybreak! - Round One Recap</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ee7fc402-1cc9-11ed-83f7-6fce985eaac9/image/e10sq.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Joey and John share their thoughts on the first nine movies and recap what we learned in round one.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this end--of-round recap mini episode, Joey and John share their thoughts on the first nine movies, pick a "winner" from round one, and preview what's up ahead in the second round: The Back Nine.
Thanks to Brian Raftery, Chris Kluwe, Brian Silliman, Matt Romano, Lila Shapiro, Chelsey Weber-Smith, Stephanie Gagnon, Aislinn and Tobin Addington, Amanda Moore, Logan Kisner, and Tyler Huckabee for sharing their time and thoughts with us!
We'll be back to on Monday, 8/22 with a new episode!</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this end--of-round recap mini episode, Joey and John share their thoughts on the first nine movies, pick a "winner" from round one, and preview what's up ahead in the second round: The Back Nine.</p><p>Thanks to Brian Raftery, Chris Kluwe, Brian Silliman, Matt Romano, Lila Shapiro, Chelsey Weber-Smith, Stephanie Gagnon, Aislinn and Tobin Addington, Amanda Moore, Logan Kisner, and Tyler Huckabee for sharing their time and thoughts with us!</p><p>We'll be back to on Monday, 8/22 with a new episode!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>1585</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ee7fc402-1cc9-11ed-83f7-6fce985eaac9]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN4794472135.mp3?updated=1660589213" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MAGNOLIA: "Save Me" - with Tyler Huckabee</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/magnolia-tyler-huckabee/</link>
      <description>Paul Thomas Anderson's Magnolia was just his third feature film. It remains both his most beloved and most divisive.
Released at the very end of 1999, Magnolia was largely lauded by critics, received a number of year-end awards and nominations, and mostly overlooked by audiences.
But like Fight Club before it, it found second life on DVD and quickly found an adoring audience, in addition to the source of a number of ubiquitous pop culture references, largely due to Tom Cruise's outrageous motivational speaker character, Frank T. J. Mackey.
Still, three hours of high drama, weird dramatic flourishes, multiple storylines, falling frogs, and Aimee Mann sing-a-longs doesn't exactly sound like everyone's cup of tea. But it is the cup of tea of Relevant Magazine's senior editor Tyler Huckabee, who joined John and Joey to talk all about this classic in our round one finale!
Find Tyler on Twitter @TylerHuckabee</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>MAGNOLIA: "Save Me" - with Tyler Huckabee</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c695d72c-1690-11ed-ac41-ebe65c05d6da/image/E9SQ.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Relevant Magazine's Tyler Huckabee joins John and Joey to talk about Magnolia in the round one finale.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Paul Thomas Anderson's Magnolia was just his third feature film. It remains both his most beloved and most divisive.
Released at the very end of 1999, Magnolia was largely lauded by critics, received a number of year-end awards and nominations, and mostly overlooked by audiences.
But like Fight Club before it, it found second life on DVD and quickly found an adoring audience, in addition to the source of a number of ubiquitous pop culture references, largely due to Tom Cruise's outrageous motivational speaker character, Frank T. J. Mackey.
Still, three hours of high drama, weird dramatic flourishes, multiple storylines, falling frogs, and Aimee Mann sing-a-longs doesn't exactly sound like everyone's cup of tea. But it is the cup of tea of Relevant Magazine's senior editor Tyler Huckabee, who joined John and Joey to talk all about this classic in our round one finale!
Find Tyler on Twitter @TylerHuckabee</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Paul Thomas Anderson's <em>Magnolia</em> was just his third feature film. It remains both his most beloved and most divisive.</p><p>Released at the very end of 1999, <em>Magnolia</em> was largely lauded by critics, received a number of year-end awards and nominations, and mostly overlooked by audiences.</p><p>But like <em>Fight Club</em> before it, it found second life on DVD and quickly found an adoring audience, in addition to the source of a number of ubiquitous pop culture references, largely due to Tom Cruise's outrageous motivational speaker character, Frank T. J. Mackey.</p><p>Still, three hours of high drama, weird dramatic flourishes, multiple storylines, falling frogs, and Aimee Mann sing-a-longs doesn't exactly sound like everyone's cup of tea. But it is the cup of tea of <a href="https://relevantmagazine.com/">Relevant Magazine</a>'s senior editor Tyler Huckabee, who joined John and Joey to talk all about this classic in our round one finale!</p><p>Find Tyler on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/TylerHuckabee">@TylerHuckabee</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5170</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c695d72c-1690-11ed-ac41-ebe65c05d6da]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN9355194341.mp3?updated=1689194826" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BOYS DON'T CRY: "Brandon" - with Logan Ashley Kisner</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/boys-dont-cry/</link>
      <description>Boys Don’t Cry holds a 90% Rotten Tomatoes critics score and a pretty astonishing 86% Metacritic. And with scores like that, one might get the impression that was and is a universally admired classic.
Billed as a dramatization of the events leading up to the 1993 rape and murder of 21-year-old trans man Brandon Teena, it was nominated for 57 major awards and won 37 of them.
14 of went to star Hilary Swank, 6 to costar Chloe Sevigny, and 8 to writer director Kimberley Peirce.
And Swank of course won the Oscar for Best Actress, while Sevigny was nominated for Best Supporting Actress.
But critics at the time almost always misgendered Brandon in their reviews. And the film effectively erases the trans identity of its protagonist, which some argue is the result of a conscious and unforgiveable narrative and creative decision made my Peirce, who cast a cisgendered woman to play Brandon and who shut out essentially all input and participation from anyone in the trans community. 
In the 23 years since its release, Boys Don't Cry has not aged well. But this week's guest, writer and trans horror historian Logan Ashley Kisner, argues that it's not all about aging - Boys Don't Cry is a fundamentally, irredeemably transphobic film.
Find Logan Ashley on Twitter @transhorrors and find links to his writing at linktr.ee/transhorror
His essay on Boys Don't Cry is available here: “Boys Don’t Cry” Has Always Been Violently Transphobic
Trans Rights Organization Links:

Transgender Map Advocacy Page

National Center for Transgender Equality

Transgender Law Center

Trans Justice Funding Project

The Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund

The Trevor Project

Trans Lifeline

Transgender Media Portal

TransAction Florida

Trans Pride Initative

TransOhio


 </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>BOYS DON'T CRY: "Brandon" - with Logan Ashley Kisner</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/be000c16-0b7f-11ed-99c9-8fe3df5bb6ec/image/e8square.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Logan Ashley Kisner, who writes about trans horror, joins John and Joey to discuss "Boys Don't Cry" and trans representation in film.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Boys Don’t Cry holds a 90% Rotten Tomatoes critics score and a pretty astonishing 86% Metacritic. And with scores like that, one might get the impression that was and is a universally admired classic.
Billed as a dramatization of the events leading up to the 1993 rape and murder of 21-year-old trans man Brandon Teena, it was nominated for 57 major awards and won 37 of them.
14 of went to star Hilary Swank, 6 to costar Chloe Sevigny, and 8 to writer director Kimberley Peirce.
And Swank of course won the Oscar for Best Actress, while Sevigny was nominated for Best Supporting Actress.
But critics at the time almost always misgendered Brandon in their reviews. And the film effectively erases the trans identity of its protagonist, which some argue is the result of a conscious and unforgiveable narrative and creative decision made my Peirce, who cast a cisgendered woman to play Brandon and who shut out essentially all input and participation from anyone in the trans community. 
In the 23 years since its release, Boys Don't Cry has not aged well. But this week's guest, writer and trans horror historian Logan Ashley Kisner, argues that it's not all about aging - Boys Don't Cry is a fundamentally, irredeemably transphobic film.
Find Logan Ashley on Twitter @transhorrors and find links to his writing at linktr.ee/transhorror
His essay on Boys Don't Cry is available here: “Boys Don’t Cry” Has Always Been Violently Transphobic
Trans Rights Organization Links:

Transgender Map Advocacy Page

National Center for Transgender Equality

Transgender Law Center

Trans Justice Funding Project

The Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund

The Trevor Project

Trans Lifeline

Transgender Media Portal

TransAction Florida

Trans Pride Initative

TransOhio


 </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Boys Don’t Cry </em>holds a 90% Rotten Tomatoes critics score and a pretty astonishing 86% Metacritic. And with scores like that, one might get the impression that was and is a universally admired classic.</p><p>Billed as a dramatization of the events leading up to the 1993 rape and murder of 21-year-old trans man Brandon Teena, it was nominated for 57 major awards and won 37 of them.</p><p>14 of went to star Hilary Swank, 6 to costar Chloe Sevigny, and 8 to writer director Kimberley Peirce.</p><p>And Swank of course won the Oscar for Best Actress, while Sevigny was nominated for Best Supporting Actress.</p><p>But critics at the time almost always misgendered Brandon in their reviews. And the film effectively erases the trans identity of its protagonist, which some argue is the result of a conscious and unforgiveable narrative and creative decision made my Peirce, who cast a cisgendered woman to play Brandon and who shut out essentially all input and participation from anyone in the trans community. </p><p>In the 23 years since its release, <em>Boys Don't Cry</em> has not aged well. But this week's guest, writer and trans horror historian Logan Ashley Kisner, argues that it's not all about aging - <em>Boys Don't Cry </em>is a fundamentally, irredeemably transphobic film.</p><p>Find Logan Ashley on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/transhorrors">@transhorrors</a> and find links to his writing at<a href="https://linktr.ee/transhorror"> linktr.ee/transhorror</a></p><p>His essay on Boys Don't Cry is available here: <a href="https://atranslog.medium.com/boys-dont-cry-has-always-been-violently-transphobic-30c885232359">“Boys Don’t Cry” Has Always Been Violently Transphobic</a></p><p>Trans Rights Organization Links:</p><ul>
<li><a href="http://transgendermap.com/resources/advocacy">Transgender Map Advocacy Page</a></li>
<li><a href="https://transequality.org/">National Center for Transgender Equality</a></li>
<li><a href="https://transgenderlawcenter.org/">Transgender Law Center</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.transjusticefundingproject.org/">Trans Justice Funding Project</a></li>
<li><a href="https://transgenderlegal.org/">The Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.thetrevorproject.org/">The Trevor Project</a></li>
<li><a href="https://translifeline.org/">Trans Lifeline</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.transgendermediaportal.org/">Transgender Media Portal</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.eqfl.org/transactionfl">TransAction Florida</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.tpride.org/">Trans Pride Initative</a></li>
<li><a href="https://transohio.org/">TransOhio</a></li>
</ul><p><br></p><p> </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4187</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[be000c16-0b7f-11ed-99c9-8fe3df5bb6ec]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN1315715944.mp3?updated=1689194802" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FIGHT CLUB: "Soap" - with Amanda Moore</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/fight-club-amanda-moore/</link>
      <description>Fight Club may well have been 1999's most important box office bomb. With a budget of $65 million, the film barely made back half that at the domestic box office, and barely cleared $100 million worldwide.
Yet it remains one of the cult classics of the 1990s, and people often remember it being a lot more successful than it was. A lot of that has to do with the format that would define film in the pre-streaming era of the late 90s and early 00s: DVD.
Its themes of toxic masculinity, cultural decay, overbearing capitalism, fascism, and how all those things are expressed in violence seem particularly relevant today.
And so this week, John and Joey invited Amanda Moore (aka Frank) - who spent a year infiltrating the world of the alt-right and neo-Nazis and has spent her time since exposing them and writing about her experience - to talk about her love of the film and how well it reflects what is happening beneath the surface of American culture today.
You can find Amanda on Twitter @noturtlesoup17 and on TikTok at noturtlesoup17</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>FIGHT CLUB: "Soap" - with Amanda Moore</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/8ebccbb0-005d-11ed-a20a-1f426066cb22/image/E7_Square.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Amanda Moore joins John and Joey to talk about fascism, toxic masculinity, and Fight Club.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Fight Club may well have been 1999's most important box office bomb. With a budget of $65 million, the film barely made back half that at the domestic box office, and barely cleared $100 million worldwide.
Yet it remains one of the cult classics of the 1990s, and people often remember it being a lot more successful than it was. A lot of that has to do with the format that would define film in the pre-streaming era of the late 90s and early 00s: DVD.
Its themes of toxic masculinity, cultural decay, overbearing capitalism, fascism, and how all those things are expressed in violence seem particularly relevant today.
And so this week, John and Joey invited Amanda Moore (aka Frank) - who spent a year infiltrating the world of the alt-right and neo-Nazis and has spent her time since exposing them and writing about her experience - to talk about her love of the film and how well it reflects what is happening beneath the surface of American culture today.
You can find Amanda on Twitter @noturtlesoup17 and on TikTok at noturtlesoup17</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Fight Club </em>may well have been 1999's most important box office bomb. With a budget of $65 million, the film barely made back half that at the domestic box office, and barely cleared $100 million worldwide.</p><p>Yet it remains one of <em>the</em> cult classics of the 1990s, and people often remember it being a lot more successful than it was. A lot of that has to do with the format that would define film in the pre-streaming era of the late 90s and early 00s: DVD.</p><p>Its themes of toxic masculinity, cultural decay, overbearing capitalism, fascism, and how all those things are expressed in violence seem particularly relevant today.</p><p>And so this week, John and Joey invited Amanda Moore (aka Frank) - who spent a year infiltrating the world of the alt-right and neo-Nazis and has spent her time since exposing them and writing about her experience - to talk about her love of the film and how well it reflects what is happening beneath the surface of American culture today.</p><p>You can find Amanda on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/noturtlesoup17">@noturtlesoup17</a> and on TikTok at <a href="https://www.tiktok.com/discover/notturtlesoup17?lang=en">noturtlesoup17</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4670</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[8ebccbb0-005d-11ed-a20a-1f426066cb22]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN9922362510.mp3?updated=1689194778" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AMERICAN BEAUTY: "Roses" - with Aislinn and Tobin Addington</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/american-beauty/</link>
      <description>American Beauty was 1999's Best Picture winner at the Academy Awards. And it was an unstoppable behemoth when it came to end of year accolades, cleaning up as well at the Golden Globes, the BAFTAs, SAG, and more. Critics practically tripped over themselves digging deep into their vocabularies to properly articulate the film's genius.
And yet, 23 year later, the consensus seems to be that the film is...bad.
So what happened (beyond the dark revelations of Kevin Spacey's long history of terrible, abusive behavior and sexual assault)? And is there anything left to make American Beauty a film that can still be appreciated? Is anything about American Beauty still beautiful?
This week, John and Joey are joined by the Addington siblings, Aislinn and Tobin, co-hosts of CageClub's very own The Contenders podcast.
They discuss their journeys from loving and then really, really hating Sam Mendes and Alan Ball's strange, misguided, ambitious, and hopelessly outdated failure.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>AMERICAN BEAUTY: "Roses" - with Aislinn and Tobin Addington</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/53e43fd4-f584-11ec-85db-cf67f53a55a2/image/E6_Square.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>John and Joey welcome the Addington siblings to talk about the very large gap between their then-and-now takes on "American Beauty". </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>American Beauty was 1999's Best Picture winner at the Academy Awards. And it was an unstoppable behemoth when it came to end of year accolades, cleaning up as well at the Golden Globes, the BAFTAs, SAG, and more. Critics practically tripped over themselves digging deep into their vocabularies to properly articulate the film's genius.
And yet, 23 year later, the consensus seems to be that the film is...bad.
So what happened (beyond the dark revelations of Kevin Spacey's long history of terrible, abusive behavior and sexual assault)? And is there anything left to make American Beauty a film that can still be appreciated? Is anything about American Beauty still beautiful?
This week, John and Joey are joined by the Addington siblings, Aislinn and Tobin, co-hosts of CageClub's very own The Contenders podcast.
They discuss their journeys from loving and then really, really hating Sam Mendes and Alan Ball's strange, misguided, ambitious, and hopelessly outdated failure.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>American Beauty </em>was 1999's Best Picture winner at the Academy Awards. And it was an unstoppable behemoth when it came to end of year accolades, cleaning up as well at the Golden Globes, the BAFTAs, SAG, and more. Critics practically tripped over themselves digging deep into their vocabularies to properly articulate the film's genius.</p><p>And yet, 23 year later, the consensus seems to be that the film is...bad.</p><p>So what happened (beyond the dark revelations of Kevin Spacey's long history of terrible, abusive behavior and sexual assault)? And is there anything left to make <em>American Beauty</em> a film that can still be appreciated? Is anything about <em>American Beauty </em>still beautiful?</p><p>This week, John and Joey are joined by the Addington siblings, Aislinn and Tobin, co-hosts of CageClub's very own The Contenders podcast.</p><p>They discuss their journeys from loving and then really, really hating Sam Mendes and Alan Ball's strange, misguided, ambitious, and hopelessly outdated failure.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>5310</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[53e43fd4-f584-11ec-85db-cf67f53a55a2]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN7452346052.mp3?updated=1689194752" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE SIXTH SENSE: "Dead People" - with Books in the Freezer host Stephanie Gagnon</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/the-sixth-sense/</link>
      <description>The Sixth Sense was 1999's most unexpected phenomenon. And it really was a phenomenon.
Filmed on a $40 million budget, the film made a respectable $26 million its opening weekend, but great reviews and word of mouth propelled it to a $293.5 million domestic box office gross and a worldwide gross of just shy of $673 million.
It was the only movie to stay #1 for 5 weeks aside from The Phantom Menace, and, most impressively, it made at least $20 million all five weekends it was #1, making more than $29 million its final weekend.
Not bad for a decidedly not-action movie centered around Bruce Willis, a year after Armageddon and then at the early stages of the waning days of his star power, and a relatively obscure child actor named Haley Joel Osment, and written and directed by an almost entirely unknown filmmaker named M. Night Shyamalan.
So much of The Sixth Sense rests on its legendary plot twist, so already knowing how it ends, we invited Stephanie Gagnon, host of the horror book podcast Books in the Freezer, to join us in taking another look at the movie to see if it still holds up as a haunted horror movie.
Check out Books in the Freezer here.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>THE SIXTH SENSE: "Dead People" - with Books in the Freezer host Stephanie Gagnon</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c2e2eb82-ea5e-11ec-b473-9bcb08db0266/image/E5_square.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>John and Joey welcome Books in the Freezer host Stephanie Gagnon to discuss how well "The Sixth Sense" holds up (even knowing the ending)</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Sixth Sense was 1999's most unexpected phenomenon. And it really was a phenomenon.
Filmed on a $40 million budget, the film made a respectable $26 million its opening weekend, but great reviews and word of mouth propelled it to a $293.5 million domestic box office gross and a worldwide gross of just shy of $673 million.
It was the only movie to stay #1 for 5 weeks aside from The Phantom Menace, and, most impressively, it made at least $20 million all five weekends it was #1, making more than $29 million its final weekend.
Not bad for a decidedly not-action movie centered around Bruce Willis, a year after Armageddon and then at the early stages of the waning days of his star power, and a relatively obscure child actor named Haley Joel Osment, and written and directed by an almost entirely unknown filmmaker named M. Night Shyamalan.
So much of The Sixth Sense rests on its legendary plot twist, so already knowing how it ends, we invited Stephanie Gagnon, host of the horror book podcast Books in the Freezer, to join us in taking another look at the movie to see if it still holds up as a haunted horror movie.
Check out Books in the Freezer here.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>The Sixth Sense </em>was 1999's most unexpected phenomenon. And it really was a phenomenon.</p><p>Filmed on a $40 million budget, the film made a respectable $26 million its opening weekend, but great reviews and word of mouth propelled it to a $293.5 million domestic box office gross and a worldwide gross of just shy of $673 million.</p><p>It was the only movie to stay #1 for 5 weeks aside from <em>The Phantom Menace</em>, and, most impressively, it made at least $20 million all five weekends it was #1, making more than $29 million its final weekend.</p><p>Not bad for a decidedly not-action movie centered around Bruce Willis, a year after <em>Armageddon </em>and then at the early stages of the waning days of his star power, and a relatively obscure child actor named Haley Joel Osment, and written and directed by an almost entirely unknown filmmaker named M. Night Shyamalan.</p><p>So much of <em>The Sixth Sense </em>rests on its legendary plot twist, so already knowing how it ends, we invited Stephanie Gagnon, host of the horror book podcast <em>Books in the Freezer</em>, to join us in taking another look at the movie to see if it still holds up as a haunted horror movie.</p><p><a href="https://booksinthefreezer.com/">Check out Books in the Freezer here.</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4504</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c2e2eb82-ea5e-11ec-b473-9bcb08db0266]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN8352050014.mp3?updated=1689194723" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EYES WIDE SHUT: "Fidelio" - with New York Magazine's Lila Shapiro</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/eyes-wide-shut-lila-shapiro/</link>
      <description>Stanley Kubrick’s final film (and perhaps the nail in the coffin for Hollywood's most famous couple), the psychosexual thriller Eyes Wide Shut, was released on July 16th, two days after the limited release of The Blair Witch Project, and on the day that birthed a thousand QAnon conspiracy theories as John F. Kennedy Jr. and Carolyn Bessette Kennedy died in a plane crash while everyone in America kept listening to Destiny’s Child’s Bills Bills Bills.
The film was, at the time, well received if not overwhelmingly praised by critics and audiences.
But it’s worth noting that the critical division is unusually stark, with critics who reviewed it positively giving the film overwhelming praise and vice-versa, with very little in between (Slate’s David Edelstein called it “a somnolent load of wank,” for example).
And, to be fair, many critics have given the film a second look and come to their senses.
But the question now is not whether or not Eyes Wide Shut is a great film (it is) but whether or not it’s Kubrick’s greatest film.
In this episode, John and Joey welcome New York Magazine feature writer Lila Shapiro, who wrote the 2019 essay What I Learned After Watching Eyes Wide Shut 100 Times for Vulture.
Check out more of Lila's work here.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>EYES WIDE SHUT: "Fidelio" - with New York Magazine's Lila Shapiro</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/85b1c7a2-df54-11ec-9d95-0f47443b659e/image/e4square.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>John and Joey welcome New York Magazine feature writer Lila Shapiro to discuss her favorite movie of 1999, Eyes Wide Shut.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Stanley Kubrick’s final film (and perhaps the nail in the coffin for Hollywood's most famous couple), the psychosexual thriller Eyes Wide Shut, was released on July 16th, two days after the limited release of The Blair Witch Project, and on the day that birthed a thousand QAnon conspiracy theories as John F. Kennedy Jr. and Carolyn Bessette Kennedy died in a plane crash while everyone in America kept listening to Destiny’s Child’s Bills Bills Bills.
The film was, at the time, well received if not overwhelmingly praised by critics and audiences.
But it’s worth noting that the critical division is unusually stark, with critics who reviewed it positively giving the film overwhelming praise and vice-versa, with very little in between (Slate’s David Edelstein called it “a somnolent load of wank,” for example).
And, to be fair, many critics have given the film a second look and come to their senses.
But the question now is not whether or not Eyes Wide Shut is a great film (it is) but whether or not it’s Kubrick’s greatest film.
In this episode, John and Joey welcome New York Magazine feature writer Lila Shapiro, who wrote the 2019 essay What I Learned After Watching Eyes Wide Shut 100 Times for Vulture.
Check out more of Lila's work here.</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Stanley Kubrick’s final film (and perhaps the nail in the coffin for Hollywood's most famous couple), the psychosexual thriller <em>Eyes Wide Shut</em>, was released on July 16th, two days after the limited release of The Blair Witch Project, and on the day that birthed a thousand QAnon conspiracy theories as John F. Kennedy Jr. and Carolyn Bessette Kennedy died in a plane crash while everyone in America kept listening to Destiny’s Child’s <em>Bills Bills Bills</em>.</p><p>The film was, at the time, well received if not overwhelmingly praised by critics and audiences.</p><p>But it’s worth noting that the critical division is unusually stark, with critics who reviewed it positively giving the film overwhelming praise and vice-versa, with very little in between (Slate’s David Edelstein called it “a somnolent load of wank,” for example).</p><p>And, to be fair, many critics have given the film a second look and come to their senses.</p><p>But the question now is not whether or not <em>Eyes Wide Shut</em> is a great film (it is) but whether or not it’s Kubrick’s greatest film.</p><p>In this episode, John and Joey welcome New York Magazine feature writer Lila Shapiro, who wrote the 2019 essay <em>What I Learned After Watching Eyes Wide Shut 100 Times</em> for Vulture.</p><p><a href="https://www.vulture.com/author/lila-shapiro/">Check out more of Lila's work here.</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4122</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[85b1c7a2-df54-11ec-9d95-0f47443b659e]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN5345292061.mp3?updated=1689194691" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT: "The Woods" - with American Hysteria's Chelsey Weber-Smith</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/blair-witch-project-chelsey-weber-smith</link>
      <description>Starring Heather Donahue, Michael C. Williams, and Joshua Leonard as themselves – or people who happen to have their exact names – and written and directed by Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sanchez, 1999's 10th-highest grossing film, The Blair Witch Project was produced on a budget of less than a half million dollars and grossed $248.6 million at the box office. 
One of the founding films in the "found footage" genre, the film was perhaps most famous for the unprecedented marketing campaign that led up to its release.
The movie made innovative use of a relatively novel outlet called "the World Wide Web" and deliberately blurred the lines between fact and fiction, giving the film an air of reality that actually fooled some its audience into believing they were watching real documentary footage.
Heralded by critics for its ingenuity as well as its genuine scares, Blair Witch may well have been the buzziest of buzzy movies ever. But its legacy is slightly more complicated. While it was a huge hit with the public at the time, it is less liked by audiences now, who often complain that the movie doesn't hold up on its own, having relied too much on the multimedia "project" of which the film is merely the final ingredient.
This week, we talk to Blair Witch superfan and host of American Hysteria Chelsey Weber-Smith about what made it a great movie then and why we should still love it today.
Chelsey on Twitter: @AmerHysteria
 </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT: "The Woods" - with American Hysteria's Chelsey Weber-Smith</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/91e25690-d47d-11ec-8a17-ebaffde48210/image/e3square.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Blair Witch superfan and host of American Hysteria Chelsey Weber-Smith joins us to talk about what made The Blair Witch Project a great movie then and why we should still love it today.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Starring Heather Donahue, Michael C. Williams, and Joshua Leonard as themselves – or people who happen to have their exact names – and written and directed by Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sanchez, 1999's 10th-highest grossing film, The Blair Witch Project was produced on a budget of less than a half million dollars and grossed $248.6 million at the box office. 
One of the founding films in the "found footage" genre, the film was perhaps most famous for the unprecedented marketing campaign that led up to its release.
The movie made innovative use of a relatively novel outlet called "the World Wide Web" and deliberately blurred the lines between fact and fiction, giving the film an air of reality that actually fooled some its audience into believing they were watching real documentary footage.
Heralded by critics for its ingenuity as well as its genuine scares, Blair Witch may well have been the buzziest of buzzy movies ever. But its legacy is slightly more complicated. While it was a huge hit with the public at the time, it is less liked by audiences now, who often complain that the movie doesn't hold up on its own, having relied too much on the multimedia "project" of which the film is merely the final ingredient.
This week, we talk to Blair Witch superfan and host of American Hysteria Chelsey Weber-Smith about what made it a great movie then and why we should still love it today.
Chelsey on Twitter: @AmerHysteria
 </itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Starring Heather Donahue, Michael C. Williams, and Joshua Leonard as themselves – or people who happen to have their exact names – and written and directed by Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sanchez, 1999's 10th-highest grossing film, <em>The Blair Witch Project</em> was produced on a budget of less than a half million dollars and grossed $248.6 million at the box office. </p><p>One of the founding films in the "found footage" genre, the film was perhaps most famous for the unprecedented marketing campaign that led up to its release.</p><p>The movie made innovative use of a relatively novel outlet called "the World Wide Web" and deliberately blurred the lines between fact and fiction, giving the film an air of reality that actually fooled some its audience into believing they were watching real documentary footage.</p><p>Heralded by critics for its ingenuity as well as its genuine scares, <em>Blair Witch</em> may well have been the buzziest of buzzy movies ever. But its legacy is slightly more complicated. While it was a huge hit with the public at the time, it is less liked by audiences now, who often complain that the movie doesn't hold up on its own, having relied too much on the multimedia "project" of which the film is merely the final ingredient.</p><p>This week, we talk to <em>Blair Witch </em>superfan and host of <a href="https://www.chelseywebersmith.com/americanhysteria"><em>American Hysteria</em></a> Chelsey Weber-Smith about what made it a great movie then and why we should still love it today.</p><p>Chelsey on Twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/AmerHysteria">@AmerHysteria</a></p><p> </p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>4740</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[91e25690-d47d-11ec-8a17-ebaffde48210]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN9416945566.mp3?updated=1689194657" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>STAR WARS EPISODE ONE - THE PHANTOM MENACE: "Wizard" with Brian Silliman and Matt Romano, hosts of Return of the Pod</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/phantom-menace/</link>
      <description>The Phantom Menace was, at the time, universally referred to as "the most anticipated movie of all time", and it's unlikely that any movie will ever again carry that distinction.
But with anticipation like that, how could it not disappoint? The movie has gone on quite a journey in the last 23 years, from "the first Star Wars movie in 22 years", to "the biggest disappointment of the summer", to "the worst Star Wars movie", to now, where it finds itself beloved by a generation of fans who grew up on it and admired by older fans who have come to overlook its obvious flaws in favor of its considerable (and many) charms.
Just in time for Star Wars Day, May the Fourth, Star Wars fans (and prequel lovers) Brian Silliman and Matt Romano, the hosts of the Star Wars podcast Return of the Pod, join us to talk about all the ups and downs of The Phantom Menace, and how the film has become a nostalgic favorite and continued to find new fans two decades later.
(NOTE: John keeps referring to the span between RotJ and TPM as 17 years. It was 16. John is old and time is an illusion. 1999: The Podcast regrets the error.)
Check out Return of the Pod on the web.
Return of the Pod on Twitter: @ReturnOfThePod
Brian on Twitter: @BrianSilliman
Matt on Twitter: @mattromano</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>STAR WARS EPISODE ONE - THE PHANTOM MENACE: "Wizard" with Brian Silliman and Matt Romano, hosts of Return of the Pod</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ff9d676e-c948-11ec-894e-5795b4f3d328/image/E2Square.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>The hosts of Star Wars podcast Return of the Pod join us to talk about the 23-year legacy of Star Wars: Episode One - The Phantom Menace.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Phantom Menace was, at the time, universally referred to as "the most anticipated movie of all time", and it's unlikely that any movie will ever again carry that distinction.
But with anticipation like that, how could it not disappoint? The movie has gone on quite a journey in the last 23 years, from "the first Star Wars movie in 22 years", to "the biggest disappointment of the summer", to "the worst Star Wars movie", to now, where it finds itself beloved by a generation of fans who grew up on it and admired by older fans who have come to overlook its obvious flaws in favor of its considerable (and many) charms.
Just in time for Star Wars Day, May the Fourth, Star Wars fans (and prequel lovers) Brian Silliman and Matt Romano, the hosts of the Star Wars podcast Return of the Pod, join us to talk about all the ups and downs of The Phantom Menace, and how the film has become a nostalgic favorite and continued to find new fans two decades later.
(NOTE: John keeps referring to the span between RotJ and TPM as 17 years. It was 16. John is old and time is an illusion. 1999: The Podcast regrets the error.)
Check out Return of the Pod on the web.
Return of the Pod on Twitter: @ReturnOfThePod
Brian on Twitter: @BrianSilliman
Matt on Twitter: @mattromano</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>The Phantom Menace </em>was, at the time, universally referred to as "the most anticipated movie of all time", and it's unlikely that any movie will ever again carry that distinction.</p><p>But with anticipation like that, how could it <em>not </em>disappoint? The movie has gone on quite a journey in the last 23 years, from "the first Star Wars movie in 22 years", to "the biggest disappointment of the summer", to "the worst Star Wars movie", to now, where it finds itself beloved by a generation of fans who grew up on it and admired by older fans who have come to overlook its obvious flaws in favor of its considerable (and many) charms.</p><p>Just in time for Star Wars Day, May the Fourth, <em>Star Wars</em> fans (and prequel lovers) Brian Silliman and Matt Romano, the hosts of the <em>Star Wars </em>podcast Return of the Pod, join us to talk about all the<em> </em>ups and downs of <em>The Phantom Menace, </em>and how the film has become a nostalgic favorite and continued to find new fans two decades later.</p><p>(NOTE: John keeps referring to the span between RotJ and TPM as 17 years. It was 16. John is old and time is an illusion. 1999: The Podcast regrets the error.)</p><p><a href="https://www.returnofthepod.net/">Check out Return of the Pod on the web.</a></p><p>Return of the Pod on Twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/ReturnOfThePod">@ReturnOfThePod</a></p><p>Brian on Twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/briansilliman">@BrianSilliman</a></p><p>Matt on Twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/mattromano">@mattromano</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>6519</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ff9d676e-c948-11ec-894e-5795b4f3d328]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN6876073474.mp3?updated=1689194603" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE MATRIX: "Whoa" with Chris Kluwe</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/whoa-the-matrix-chris-kluwe/</link>
      <description>Former Minnesota Vikings punter and current science fiction author ("Otaku") Chris Kluwe joins us to discuss our first movie from our Essentials series - The Matrix.
Released on March 31, 1999, written and directed by the Wachowskis and starring Keanu Reeves, Carrie-Anne Moss, Laurence Fishburne, Hugo Weaving, and Joe Pantoliano, The Matrix was something of an unexpected hit that would go on to become a cultural phenomenon.
To this day, we use terms like "glitch in the Matrix" and "red pill" in memes and casual conversation because the things the reference are nearly universally recognizable.
Kluwe joined John and Joey to talk about their memories of seeing it for the first time, how well it has aged, and how it has influenced his own writing.
Find John on Twitter @ProbablyRealJB
Find Joey on Twitter @soulpopped
Find Chris on Twitter @ChrisWarcraft
For more on Chris's book Otaku: https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250203939/otaku</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>THE MATRIX: "Whoa" with Chris Kluwe</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/0de5c900-bc16-11ec-9c1d-d7e7732ad4d1/image/E1Square.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Former Minnesota Vikings punter and current science fiction author ("Otaku") Chris Kluwe joins us to discuss our first movie from our Essentials series - The Matrix.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Former Minnesota Vikings punter and current science fiction author ("Otaku") Chris Kluwe joins us to discuss our first movie from our Essentials series - The Matrix.
Released on March 31, 1999, written and directed by the Wachowskis and starring Keanu Reeves, Carrie-Anne Moss, Laurence Fishburne, Hugo Weaving, and Joe Pantoliano, The Matrix was something of an unexpected hit that would go on to become a cultural phenomenon.
To this day, we use terms like "glitch in the Matrix" and "red pill" in memes and casual conversation because the things the reference are nearly universally recognizable.
Kluwe joined John and Joey to talk about their memories of seeing it for the first time, how well it has aged, and how it has influenced his own writing.
Find John on Twitter @ProbablyRealJB
Find Joey on Twitter @soulpopped
Find Chris on Twitter @ChrisWarcraft
For more on Chris's book Otaku: https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250203939/otaku</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Former Minnesota Vikings punter and current science fiction author ("Otaku") Chris Kluwe joins us to discuss our first movie from our Essentials series - <em>The Matrix</em>.</p><p>Released on March 31, 1999, written and directed by the Wachowskis and starring Keanu Reeves, Carrie-Anne Moss, Laurence Fishburne, Hugo Weaving, and Joe Pantoliano, <em>The Matrix </em>was something of an unexpected hit that would go on to become a cultural phenomenon.</p><p>To this day, we use terms like "glitch in the Matrix" and "red pill" in memes and casual conversation because the things the reference are nearly universally recognizable.</p><p>Kluwe joined John and Joey to talk about their memories of seeing it for the first time, how well it has aged, and how it has influenced his own writing.</p><p>Find John on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/ProbablyRealJB">@ProbablyRealJB</a></p><p>Find Joey on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/soulpopped">@soulpopped</a></p><p>Find Chris on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/ChrisWarcraft">@ChrisWarcraft</a></p><p>For more on Chris's book <em>Otaku: </em>https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250203939/otaku</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3388</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0de5c900-bc16-11ec-9c1d-d7e7732ad4d1]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN7761000100.mp3?updated=1689194557" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Best. Movie. Year. Ever? - with Brian Raftery</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/1999-best-movie-year-ever-brian-raftery/</link>
      <description>Was 1999 the best movie year ever? We think it might be, and in this podcast we’ll be exploring the movies that made that year so memorable. Before we start, we invited journalist and author Brian Raftery, who quite literally wrote the book on the movies of 1999 — Best. Movie. Year. Ever.: How 1999 Blew Up the Big Screen — to share his thoughts on why it was such an important year for movies and for our culture.
Find John on Twitter @ProbablyRealJB
Find Joey on Twitter @soulpopped
Find Brian on Twitter @BrianRaftery
For more on the book, Brian's website is https://www.brianraftery.com/</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 04:00:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Best. Movie. Year. Ever? - with Brian Raftery</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/db72aca2-b06e-11ec-80ff-5f7ef87304de/image/E0Square.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&amp;max-w=3000&amp;max-h=3000&amp;fit=crop&amp;auto=format,compress"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>Journalist and author Brian Raftery joins us to talk about his book on the movies of 1999,  "Best. Movie. Year. Ever."</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Was 1999 the best movie year ever? We think it might be, and in this podcast we’ll be exploring the movies that made that year so memorable. Before we start, we invited journalist and author Brian Raftery, who quite literally wrote the book on the movies of 1999 — Best. Movie. Year. Ever.: How 1999 Blew Up the Big Screen — to share his thoughts on why it was such an important year for movies and for our culture.
Find John on Twitter @ProbablyRealJB
Find Joey on Twitter @soulpopped
Find Brian on Twitter @BrianRaftery
For more on the book, Brian's website is https://www.brianraftery.com/</itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Was 1999 the best movie year ever? We think it might be, and in this podcast we’ll be exploring the movies that made that year so memorable. Before we start, we invited journalist and author Brian Raftery, who quite literally wrote the book on the movies of 1999 — <em>Best. Movie. Year. Ever.: How 1999 Blew Up the Big Screen</em> — to share his thoughts on why it was such an important year for movies and for our culture.</p><p>Find John on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/ProbablyRealJB">@ProbablyRealJB</a></p><p>Find Joey on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/soulpopped">@soulpopped</a></p><p>Find Brian on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/brianraftery">@BrianRaftery</a></p><p>For more on the book, Brian's website is <a href="https://www.brianraftery.com/">https://www.brianraftery.com/</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>3200</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[db72aca2-b06e-11ec-80ff-5f7ef87304de]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN3743010804.mp3?updated=1648921513" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Introducing 1999: The Podcast</title>
      <link>https://www.cageclub.me/introducing-1999-the-podcast/</link>
      <description></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2022 14:43:00 -0000</pubDate>
      <itunes:title>Introducing 1999: The Podcast</itunes:title>
      <itunes:episodeType>trailer</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>John Brooks and Julia Sirmons</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary></itunes:summary>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p><br></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:duration>29</itunes:duration>
      <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[209a2f80-a2dc-11ec-aed0-8fd3d22e6eb9]]></guid>
      <enclosure url="https://traffic.megaphone.fm/CCPN7462297843.mp3?updated=1649081527" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
